Next Article in Journal
A Novel Self-Temperature Compensation Method for Mode-Localized Accelerometers
Next Article in Special Issue
Module-Fluidics: Building Blocks for Spatio-Temporal Microenvironment Control
Previous Article in Journal
Robust Optimal Control Design for Performance Enhancement of PWM Voltage Source Inverter
Previous Article in Special Issue
Study of the Fabrication Technology of Hybrid Microfluidic Biochips for Label-Free Detection of Proteins
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Micromachines
Volume 13
Issue 3
10.3390/mi13030436
micromachines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Multivalent Aptamer Approach: Designs, Strategies, and Applications

by
Zhong Wang
1,
Xiuying Yang
2,
Nicholas Zhou Lee
3 and
Xudong Cao
1,4,*
1
Ottawa-Carleton Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
2
Hainan Institute of Science and Technology, Haikou 571125, China
3
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada
4
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2022, 13(3), 436; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13030436
Submission received: 29 January 2022 / Revised: 26 February 2022 / Accepted: 10 March 2022 / Published: 12 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lab-on-a-Chip and Organ-on-a-Chip: Fabrications and Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Aptamers are short and single-stranded DNA or RNA molecules with highly programmable structures that give them the ability to interact specifically with a large variety of targets, including proteins, cells, and small molecules. Multivalent aptamers refer to molecular constructs that combine two or more identical or different types of aptamers. Multivalency increases the avidity of aptamers, a particularly advantageous feature that allows for significantly increased binding affinities in comparison with aptamer monomers. Another advantage of multivalency is increased aptamer stabilities that confer improved performances under physiological conditions for various applications in clinical settings. The current study aims to review the most recent developments in multivalent aptamer research. The review will first discuss structures of multivalent aptamers. This is followed by detailed discussions on design strategies of multivalent aptamer approaches. Finally, recent developments of the multivalent aptamer approach in biosensing and biomedical applications are highlighted.

1. Introduction

The concept of multivalency is intrinsic to nature. For instance, marine mussels use multiple byssal threads to ensure attachment to rock surfaces, and octopus appendages make use of numerous suckers to efficiently capture preys. Likewise, multivalent interactions play a vital role in biological systems, down to the cellular level. Examples of biological processes utilizing multivalence include viral entry, cell–cell interaction, host–pathogen interaction, and immune synapse formation [1]. In each of these processes, multiple functional units work synergistically to improve overall performance. By taking advantage of the working principle of multivalency, researchers have applied this strategy in many molecular-recognition-based applications, such as targeted drug delivery [2,3], pathogen inhibition [4,5], cell capture and downstream analysis [6,7], detection [8,9], and in vivo imaging [10,11]. To this end, multimeric nucleic acids [12], antibodies [13,14,15], and aptamers have all been used to enhance functional performance in comparison to their monomeric counterparts.
Among the multivalency-based strategies mentioned above, the multivalent aptamer approach has attracted the most attention in recent years. Aptamers are short single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) or RNA molecules that bind to targets via specific structures [16] and possess advantages over other binding mechanisms, such as antibody-antigen binding. These short aptamer oligonucleotides are artificially selected from a process called Systematic Evolution of Ligands by EXponential Enrichment (SELEX) [17]. Aptamers can be selected to target ligands that are extremely small, highly toxic, or non-immunogenic, characteristics that are not readily achievable with conventional antibodies. In addition, thanks to large-scale oligonucleotide synthesis, the production of aptamers is significantly more cost-effective and accessible than that of antibodies.
In general, multivalent aptamer approaches aim to achieve enhanced binding avidities toward their target ligands. The avidity of an aptamer describes the overall affinity of the interactions between an aptamer and its target; by linking two or more aptamer units, multivalent aptamers have been shown to work cooperatively to increase the avidity of interactions [18,19]. Higher local aptamer concentration leads to a higher chance of interaction between aptamers and cell-surface ligands. In addition, after the initial binding of an aptamer with its ligand, nearby aptamers can be readily recruited to facilitate additional binding, thereby leading to a higher avidity. Physiological conditions present another challenge for aptamers; in their monomeric form, aptamers have been shown to be rapidly degraded by nuclease, a major drawback limiting their in vivo applications [20]. However, studies have demonstrated that conjugating multiple aptamers onto nanoparticles can successfully provide resistance to enzymatic degradation and increase nucleic acid stabilities due to increased local salt concentrations on the surfaces of the nanoparticles [21,22].
The current review focuses on the structures and design principles of multivalent aptamer approaches developed in recent years. To this end, multivalent aptamers are first divided into several categories based on their structures. This will set the stage for detailed discussions on the design principles and strategy highlights of multivalent aptamers. Subsequently, applications based on recently published studies related to multivalent aptamers are reviewed, followed by a brief discussion of current challenges and future research directions.

2. Multivalent Aptamer Structures

Based on their structures, multivalent aptamers can be generally divided into three categories: spherical [23,24], single-layer [25,26], and linear [27,28] (shown in Figure 1); other varieties of structures are also shown in Figure 1, and they are discussed in Section 2.4. In general, aptamers of interest are composed of three parts: a head-group moiety for attachment, a spacer, and an outward-extending capturing unit. While conjugating aptamers, one must tailor the conjugation method to the surface chemistry of each material. For different immobilization strategies, interested readers are encouraged to refer to recent review papers for details [29,30].

2.1. Spherical Multivalent Aptamers

For spherical multivalent aptamers, the aptamers are connected onto a hollow or solid core particle in an organized and radial polyvalent arrangement [31]. The core particles can be gold [32], silver [33], metal oxides [34,35,36], silica [37,38], polymers [39], or DNA self-assemblies [40]. Spherical carriers allow the greatest directional extension of aptamers into sample solutions, resulting in enhanced contact surface areas and thus better aptamer–target interactions. Furthermore, additional plasmonic [41], magnetic [24], or luminescent [42] properties of the particles can also offer added advantages for applications such as imaging and detections.

2.2. Single-Layer Multivalent Aptamers

After the first ground-breaking study on the two-dimensional (2D) material graphene was published in 2004 [43], a new chapter has started in the history of material science. The atomic thickness of 2D materials is the origin of their unique physical and chemical properties, which are considerably different from those of three-dimensional (3D) structures. For example, their unique optical properties make them a promising tool for photothermal therapy [44], detection, and imaging applications [45]. Moreover, the large surface-to-volume ratio of 2D materials also allows for increased loading of therapeutic agents [46,47]. Typical examples of 2D materials are graphene, transition metal dichalcogenides (e.g., molybdenum disulfide, MoS2), and phosphorene.
Besides 2D materials, conjugating aptamers onto DNA origami nanosheets can also achieve monolayer aptamer configuration. This type of aptamer has been used as a delivery vehicle for drugs [48,49], antisense oligonucleotides [48], antimicrobial lysozymes [50], and RNase A [51]. In addition to possessing high loading capacities and programmable structures, DNA origami-conjugated aptamers have also been shown to have good biocompatibilities. Additionally, the angstrom level precision of DNA origami scaffolds and their excellent spatial addressability created the possibility to realize single-molecule-level biosensing [25,52].

2.3. Linear Multivalent Aptamers

Conjugating aptamers onto linear scaffolds—either flexible or rigid—allows aptamers to be arranged into linear configurations. The linear scaffolds can be made of polymers [53] or nucleic acids, such as ssDNA [54,55], double stranded DNA (dsDNA) [56,57,58], and DNA nanotubes [59,60]. The physical properties of each scaffold type confer specific advantages to their resultant linear constructs. For flexible scaffolds such as ssDNA and polymers, the scaffold chains can easily adapt to the surface topography of targets, while the multivalent aptamers work synergistically, thus enhancing binding avidities [53]. Linear multivalent aptamers with flexible scaffolds are commonly used for therapeutic [4,61] or detection purposes [23,53,55]. Because of these long and flexible aptamer chains, the linear multivalent aptamers can reach tens of micrometers into the sample solutions, providing sufficient interactions with targets for more enhanced target capturing [55]. In addition, these flexible multivalent aptamer chains have been shown to wrap around their targets, resulting in even higher target-capturing efficacies [62]. In contrast, rigid scaffolds endow the aptamers with more precise arrangements and orientations. Typical rigid scaffolds include DNA nanowires and nanotubes; these rigid scaffolds are also commonly used as drug-loading sites for therapeutic agents [28,63].

2.4. Other Multivalent Aptamer Structures

Multivalent aptamer strategies can also be found in other configurations. For example, in an attempt to increase the avidity of molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), the multivalent aptamer approach has been used [64,65]. After removal of the template molecules, the polymers are left with binding sites and shapes that are complementary to the original template molecules. This MIP approach will likely find wider applications in molecular-recognition-based sensing and detection, especially if it is combined with multivalent aptamers to further enhance binding avidity [66,67]. In addition, DNA origamis, such as nanoboxes [68,69], nanorobots [60], and tetrahedral [70,71] and triangular origamis [72,73], can also be used to construct nanostructures that feature multivalent aptamers, as summarized in Figure 1.

3. Design Strategies

The design of multivalent aptamer composites combines multiple identical or different aptamers with structural and other additional elements. The structural elements can be either a polymer (e.g., poly(ethylene glycol), PEG) or a non-specific nucleotide sequence (e.g., homo-polymeric oligonucleotides, such as oligo-T, with different lengths [4,54,55,74]). These structural elements are designed to maintain intra- and inter-molecular space that allow for independent activities of functional elements. Additional elements include functional nucleotide sequences, such as DNAzyme, small interfering RNA (siRNA), or signaling probes. In order to achieve optimal performances, other factors are also considered, such as spacers, heterovalent aptamers, and spatial arrangements of the aptamers, as shown in Figure 2. These factors will be discussed individually in the following sections. By applying one or combinations of these strategies, the efficiency of multivalent aptamer composites can be further enhanced. For example, by combining spacer designs with heterovalent aptamers, Lao and coworkers [75] demonstrated a hundred- to a thousand-fold enhancement of microarray sensitivity compared to single-type aptamers without any spacers.

3.1. Spacers

Spacers refer to short-strand polymers or oligonucleotides between the recognition domains of aptamers and the conjugated surface that they are attached to. Although multivalent aptamer strategies can enhance avidities compared to free aptamer monomers even without added structural elements [76], avidities can be further improved by employing properly designed spacers. This is because these spacers can either offer enhanced abilities for surface-tethered aptamers to properly bind to their targets or prevent aptamer units from forming unexpected secondary structures.
In general, surface-tethered aptamers with spacers show better performance when compared with those without. With properly selected lengths and materials, spacers can increase the avidities of multivalent constructs by overcoming steric hindrances due to adjacent aptamers. The most common spacers are PEG [77,78]; alkyl [78,79]; ssDNAs, such as oligo-T and oligo-A [78,80,81]; and dsDNA [82]. Among these different types of spacers, oligo-T spacers are perhaps the most commonly used [75]; therefore, in this section, we focus on oligo-T spacers.
Spacer length is an important consideration in spacer design. A spacer with properly designed length should both support the aptamer sequence and allow the aptamers to stand out from the conjugated surface or backfilling molecules [83]. Surface-immobilized aptamers with no or short spacer lengths experience impairments in freedom motions [84], while long spacer lengths can be too long to ensure correct folding of either the aptamers [81] or the spacers themselves [85] for correct secondary structures. For instance, Qin and coworkers [81] demonstrated the importance of spacer length by conjugating sgc8 aptamers onto poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM) dendrimers via oligo-Ts of lengths from 2 to 20 nucleotides for capturing circulating tumor cells (CTCs). The researchers observed that excessively long spacers resulted in unfavorable alterations in aptamer secondary structures, thereby negatively impacting the capturing performance. In addition, Edwards and coworkers [86] reported that an increase in oligo-T spacer length resulted in decreasing number of aptamers immobilized onto capturing surfaces. Furthermore, the researchers also reported that increasing oligonucleotide spacer lengths also caused increasing electrostatic repulsion, which, in turn, resulted in stronger electric-charge barriers that eventually inhibited additional aptamers to be immobilized onto the capturing surfaces [86].

3.2. Heterovalent Aptamers

Heterovalent aptamer strategies, also known as aptamer cocktails, use two or more types of aptamers that target different moieties of the target. In comparison with single type of aptamer, heterovalent aptamer approaches have been shown to result in the cooperative enhancement of overall aptamer performances. For example, an 18-fold improvement of limit of detection (LOD) was observed using an aptamer cocktail-modified electrode (three different aptamers targeting different moieties on the surface of E. coli cells) compared to an electrode modified with a single-type aptamer [87].
The aptamer-cocktail strategies have shown exciting potentials in CTC detections. Traditionally, CTC detections face issues such as low CTC occurrences in clinical samples and difficulties in targeting appropriate CTC biomarkers, since the presence of these surface markers is known to be non-uniform between individual patients [18]. To overcome these obstacles, one can target different arrays of CTC biomarkers simultaneously to both increase binding avidities and prevent the off-target effects due to the reduced or loss of certain surface biomarker expressions on the CTCs [88]. For example, Lin et al. [18] developed a dual-aptamer-tethered network system that allowed DNA-triggered reversible isolation-and-release of CTCs by tethering Sgc8c and Sgc4f aptamers onto a ssDNA scaffold. This dual-type aptamer network system showed significantly higher capturing efficiency compared to a single-type aptamer network. Similarly, Zhao et al. [89] combined the aptamer-cocktail strategy and poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) microfluidic detection platform to detect CTCs, as shown in Figure 3. The researchers showed that the aptamer cocktail exhibited a synergetic effect in target capturing and that the aptamer-cocktail approach demonstrated a higher overall capturing efficiency when compared with the single-type aptamer approach.
Another way of utilizing heterovalent aptamers is multiplex detection, which allows for the simultaneous detection of more than one target. Multiplex detections significantly reduce sample size and runtime required for detection. For example, by combining aptamer-conjugated gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) with magnetic graphene nanosheets, Dou and coworkers [90] developed a sensitive electrochemical platform for detecting CTCs in blood samples. Both Sgc8 and Td05 aptamers were incorporated to target two types of CTCs: CCRF-CEM cells and Ramos cells, respectively. This platform demonstrated successful detection of rare CTCs in clinical blood samples. In another interesting study, Dai et al. [91] developed an optical multiplex system based on a 3D triangular-shaped DNA nanotube (DNANT), as shown in Figure 4. As a proof-of-the-concept, three different aptamers to individually target thrombin, adenosine triphosphate (ATP), and insulin were conjugated onto three edges of the nanotube. This work demonstrated that the aptamer-conjugated DNA nanotube was able to achieve multiple binding activities that also generated discriminative signals for multiple targets in one detection system. The authors further suggested that by simply altering the design of the scaffold from triangular to square, pentagonal, and hexagonal nanotubes, it would be possible to simultaneously detect four, five, or even six targets.

3.3. Spatial Arrangements

The spatial arrangements of aptamers or their positioning relative to binding motif alignments on the target surfaces have recently become an interesting field in the study of multivalent aptamers. The optimal arrangements of aptamers—characterized by the distance and geometry of surface ligands or binding pockets—is believed to be more important than high local aptamer concentrations [5,61], since placing aptamers at an optimal distance and position can result in increased avidity [92].
Spatial arrangements can be achieved by either altering the distance between two adjacent aptamers [92,93] or positioning aptamers in a desired geometry [5,94]. Distance arrangements can be achieved by positioning aptamers onto rigid scaffolds (i.e., dsDNA, dsRNA [95], or DNA origami [96]). By conjugating two different anti-thrombin aptamers onto multi-helix DNA tiles and DNA origami scaffolds at various distances, Rinker et al. demonstrated that placing two different thrombin binding aptamers at an optimal distance on a rigid DNA tile nanostructure could lead to significant improvements in binding affinity, with results suggesting an estimated 50-fold enhancement in binding strength compared to aptamer monomer approach [97]. Using rigid scaffolds for spatial arrangement is particularly effective when the arrangements of binding moieties on the target surface can be perfectly aligned with those of the aptamers. However, it should be noted that even minor structural mismatches could result in suboptimal binding, due to unfavorable steric interactions in such cases [98]. In an elegant study, Kwon et al. [5] developed a star-shaped multivalent aptamer-conjugated DNA architecture by using tile-based DNA assemblies. In these star-shaped DNA nanoconstructs, each dsDNA intra-molecular spacer between the adjacent aptamers contained a hairpin structure, which could be unzipped and stretched to fine tune in order to fit the distance between adjacent surface ligands. This spatial arrangement of multivalent aptamers enhanced binding to their targets while reducing off-target binding through pattern matching. Significantly, the researchers also showed that aptamers with a mismatched geometric arrangement displayed an unexpected lower affinity to their targets, suggesting that specific bindings between aptamers and their targets are dependent on not only individual aptamer–ligand interactions but also geometry matching and pattern recognition. As shown in Figure 5, a heptagon-shaped complex showed a poor detection performance despite correct spacing and a higher level of valency, thus strongly suggesting the importance of geometric positioning [5].

4. Biosensing and Biomedical Applications

4.1. Biosensors

Aptamer–target interaction is an important recognition mechanism in biosensing applications. In particular, multivalent aptamers allow elevated local concentrations of aptamers and increased binding avidities between the capturing motif and the target. As a result, the multivalent strategy has been widely used in many large-sized target detections, such as human cells [6,18,42,67,99] and bacterial cells [87,100,101,102] in whole-cell assays. In addition, the multivalent strategy has also been used to detect smaller sized targets, such as extracellular vehicles [54,103] and small molecules [104]. In comparison with antibodies, aptamers allow readily and reversible capturing of targets for further analysis and characterizations [105].
Linear aptamers and spherical aptamers (see Figure 1) are the most frequently used aptamer forms in detection applications; to further increase multivalency, the combinations of the two forms have also been reported [24,100]. For instance, Chen et al. [24] proposed a NanoOctopus to capture CTCs in blood samples. To achieve this, the researchers conjugated multivalent aptamer chains onto the surfaces of magnetic nanoparticles (i.e., NanoOctopus), and they showed that the multivalent NanoOctopus significantly increased binding avidity to their targets. Subsequently, the captured cells were released for further analysis. Similarly, DNA nanochains that contain multiple copies of aptamers have also been used [55,62,100]. Inspired by climbing plants, Liu et al. [53] developed a multivalent aptamer nanoclimber (MANC)-functionalized PDMS microfluidic device for minimal residual disease testing. This work demonstrated a 57.5-fold increase in binding affinity in comparison with a mono-aptamer approach when the MANCs was used to capture target cells in human plasma samples, suggesting that the MANCs are clinically applicable to assay minimal residual disease in peripheral blood. The captured cells were then released by using complementary DNA displacement or nuclease digestion for downstream analysis.
Spherical multivalent aptamers have also been used in microfluidic devices [6,19,23,106] to increase detection performances of the microfluidic devices. Inspired by octopus tentacles, Song et al. [23] conjugated SYL3C aptamers onto AuNPs that were subsequently attached to the inner surfaces of a micropillar-decorated microfluidic channel. The researchers showed that approximately 250 SYL3C aptamers were attached onto each AuNP and that the detection platform was able to detect CTCs directly in blood samples without any sample pretreatments. In addition, the authors further demonstrated that the multivalent aptamer approach improved the binding efficiency by 100-fold and that the capturing efficiency was enhanced by more than 300% in blood samples when compared with aptamer-monomer-modified microfluidic devices. The captured target cells were released by using a thiol-exchange reaction that was shown to be of high efficiency and maintained high cell viability. Alternately, polymeric dendrimers, such as PAMAM, have also been used to construct spherical multivalent aptamers structures [101]. Jiang and coworkers [100] developed a fluorescent microfluidic sensing platform for detecting E. coli O157:H7, using rolling circle amplification (RCA) chain-conjugated PAMAM dendrimers as an inner-channel surface modification. In this work, the PDMS microfluidic channel was modified with PAMAM dendrimers that were subsequently conjugated with capturing long ssDNA chains containing hundreds of repeating aptamer units. The resultant channel modified by multivalent aptamer chains captured approximately 5-fold more target cells compared to a channel modified by aptamer monomers. More importantly, this multivalency-driven improvement was observed to be more significant under higher flow rates, suggesting that this multivalent strategy can be a potential solution for achieving higher throughput in microfluidic devices while maintaining sufficient capturing efficiencies.

4.2. Biomedical Applications

Targeted therapeutic-treatment deliveries generally require specific interactions between cell-surface biomarkers and recognition elements [107]. This specific recognition mechanism enables accumulation of therapeutic agents in pathological sites while reducing systemic toxicity [63]. Aptamer-mediated drug-delivery systems take advantage of the enhanced avidities, bio-stability, and intracellular uptake to their targets via multimerization. For instance, Wang et al. [108] used a DNAzyme-driven DNA nanosponge with multivalent aptamers for targeted delivery and controlled release of doxorubicin. In addition, carriers such as aptamer-conjugated DNA self-assemblies can also enable targeted delivery of gene therapies, such as the delivery of siRNA [56,109], DNAzyme [110], and Cas9/sgRNA (small guide RNA) [111,112]. It is conceivable that co-deliveries of more than one type of therapeutic agents are also possible.
Another important area of in vivo multivalent aptamer applications is focused on cancer treatment. Over the past decades, many aptamers that specifically target cancer cells have been successfully selected, including AS1411 (nucleolin-targeted) [113,114], MUC1 (MUC1-targeted) [115], and Sgc8 (protein tyrosine kinase-7-targeted) [38], among others [39,74]. However, aptamers have not yet been widely used in in vivo cancer treatments. This is likely, in part, due to their poor performances under physiological conditions. For example, aptamers are known to be vulnerable to nuclease degradations [116]; in addition, conditions such as temperature [61,117], pH [118], and shear stress [105,119] have also been shown to affect the abilities of aptamers to bind to their targets. As a promising solution to these challenges, multimerizing aptamers have been used to mitigate in vivo instabilities associated with aptamers, since multimerizing aptamers have been shown to increases steric hindrance, thereby concealing specific cleavage sites from nuclease access [120]. For example, Li et al. [28] prepared a self-assembled DNA nanocentipede as a multivalent drug carrier by hybridization chain reaction (HCR). This drug carrier remained stable after treatment with Exonuclease III for 2 h, demonstrating significantly increased resistance to degradation.
In addition, multimerizing aptamers for in vivo applications can enhance the internalization of the delivery vehicle by target cells. Endocytosis is of interest in understanding the mechanisms that guide the entry of nanomaterials into target cells, which is particularly meaningful for in vivo applications [121]. The multivalent effect has been shown to enhance cellular uptake via receptor-mediated endocytosis by improving the local concentration of aptamers [56,63,122]. To demonstrate this concept, Kang et al. [123] immobilized multivalent aptamers onto a DNA or a DNA/RNA hybrid structure to build a targeted drug-delivery system. For comparison, the researchers separately conjugated dual-type aptamers (AS1411 and MUC-1) and single-type aptamers onto multiple scaffolds of different levels of valency (i.e., monomers, pentamers, nonamers, or RCA generated multivalent scaffolds). The RCA-generated multivalent dual-type aptamer system outperformed monomer aptamer systems with a 2.9-fold higher intracellular uptake in serum-free media.

4.3. Summary of Recent Research

In addition to the applications discussed above, recently published studies on multivalent aptamers are summarized Table 1. The table lists applications, aptamers, targets, conjugated materials, structures, and demonstrated advantages of aptamer multivalency; interested readers are encouraged to refer to the original publications for more details.
Table
Table 1. A summary of recently published multivalent-aptamers-related papers.
Table 1. A summary of recently published multivalent-aptamers-related papers.
ApplicationAptamerConjugated MaterialTargetFunctional
Component		SpacerAdvantages of MultivalencyReference
Spherical multivalent aptamer
Drug deliverySZTI01
(DNA)		RCA generated spherical DNA self-assemblyProstate cancer membrane antigen (PCMA)-positive C4-2 cells (PCMA)Drug-loading sites; doxorubicinpH-sensitive oligo-T Very stable in physiological environment; high specificity[74]
Drug delivery5TR1
(DNA)		Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PGLA) dendrimer; chitosanMCF7 cancer cells (MUC1 receptor)Drug-loading sites; epirubicinN/AHigh affinity and specificity; good internalization[39]
Drug deliveryS2.2
(DNA)		Lipid-capped polymer nanoparticleCancer cellDrug-loading sites; vinorelbinePEG2000Significantly higher uptake efficacy; enhanced cell targeting efficiency with increased density of the S2.2 aptamer[124]
Drug deliveryAS1411 (DNA)Chitosan-silica nanoparticleSKOV-3 ovarian cancer cellDrug-loading sites; epigallocatechin gallateN/AHigher internalization efficacy[125]
Imaging/TherapeuticAS1411 (DNA)AuNPs; Silver nanoclusters (AgNCs)Cancer cellDrug-loading sites; doxorubicin; DNA-templated silver nanoclusters (signaling, fluorescent)Adenine-rich sequenceIncreased the stability of DNA probe; better internalization[114]
Detection and isolationMUC1 (DNA)Hybrid membrane; Fe3O4@SiO2 magnetic nanoparticle; Ag2S nanodotsCTCAg2S nanodots (signaling, near-infrared fluorescence signal)DNA scaffoldGreatly enhanced the anti-interference from background; improve binding ability; good specificity[42]
Single-layer multivalent aptamers
ImagingSgc8
(DNA)		Manganese dioxide nanosheetCCRF-CEM cellsMnO2 (signaling, contrast agent); fluorescent-labeled aptamer (signaling, fluorescence) N/ATarget-specific binding and internalization; low background signal; high sensitivity[126]
Chemo-photothermal therapyAS1411 (DNA)Black phosphorus nanosheetPC3 cellsDoxorubicin; black phosphorus nanosheet (photothermal therapy)N/ASpecific and high photothermal cytotoxicity for target cells[26]
Drug delivery systemC2NP (DNA)DNA origamiK299 cells
(CD30 receptors)		DoxorubicinN/AIncreased internalization; significantly increased aptamer bioactivity[49]
Linear multivalent aptamers
DetectionAS1411
(DNA)		RCA generated multivalent chainB16 cellsSignaling molecular beacon (fluorescent)18-bp dsDNAEnhanced sensitivity; enhanced selectivity[27]
TherapeuticLS Aptamer (DNA)RCA generated multivalent chainJurkat cells (L-selectin)Aptamer (L-selectin inhibitor)20 oligo-THigh avidity (103-fold higher affinity than L-selectin aptamer monomers); high specificity[4]
Detection/cell manipulationSplit ZY11 (DNA)RCA generated DNA chainHuman liver cancerSignaling probe (fluorescent)41 oligo-T; also served as signaling compartment by hybridization with signaling probeImproved performance in avidity (a ~2.8-fold increase in signal-to-background-ratio); increased recognition; extended the tolerance range of temperature for target binding[127]
DetectionSYL3C (DNA)RCA generated multivalent aptamer network electrode interfaceCTC
(EpCAMs)		Anti-EpCAM antibody; horseradish peroxidase conjugated gold nanoparticle probe (signaling. electrochemical)20 oligo-TGreatly increased current response; reduced detection time[55]
Drug deliveryAS1411 and MUC-1 (DNA)DNA and DNA-RNA hybrid structuresMCF-7 cellsDrug-loading sitedsDNA or siRNA duplexIncreased intracellular uptake of dual aptamer systems (increase in aptamer valency led to higher intracellular uptake)[123]
DetectionZy1
(DNA)		HCR generated DNA self-assemblyHuman liver cancer SMMC-7721 cellsSignaling branch (fluorescent)10 oligo-T; HCR generated backbone High stability in the presence of nuclease or in human serum; higher signal-to-background ratio compared with aptamer monomers; reduced dissociation constant (1/10) compared with Zy1 monomers[128]
Others
Drug deliverySgc8
(DNA)		DNA origami generated self-assembly (triangular)Cancer cell/HeLa cellDrug-loading sites; doxorubicinN/AEnhanced drug-delivery efficiency and therapeutic efficacy; decrease systemic toxicity; high stability in cell culture medium for 24 h[73]
Targeted gene therapySgc8
(DNA)		AAV2 vectorsCCRF-CEM cells (PTK7)Gene for green fluorescent proteinDNA dendrimer21-fold enhanced binding affinity and enhanced resistance against nuclease degradation[129]
ImmunotherapyKK1B10
(DNA)		HCR generated DNA self-assembly-functionalized natural killer cellsK562 cellsNatural killer cells HCR generated backboneGreatly increased binding avidity compared to the aptamer monomers; good stability under physiological shear stress[119]
Detection and captureZY-sls (DNA)Cell imprinted hydrogelSMC-7721 cellsN/ATrifunctional cleavable crosslinkerEnhanced interaction between enhanced sites and target cells; high capture efficiency and selectivity[67]

5. Challenges and Outlook

Multivalency is a strategy inspired by nature. In the last decade, multivalent aptamers have attracted a significant amount of interest as a promising solution to overcome the intrinsic challenges facing aptamer monomers by significantly improving avidity and stability. The rapid growth of research in material science further accelerates the ongoing development of multivalent aptamer-based devices. Encouraged by the significant advantages held by this approach, recent research is now focusing on developing constructs that excel in performance and possess potentials for use in real-life applications. However, there are many challenges that need to be addressed before the potential of the multivalency strategy can be fully realized.
Although the enhancement of local concentration is one of the advantages of multivalent aptamers, in some cases, it is not optimal to follow the idea of “the more, the better”, but rather, “less is more”. When designing an aptamer device, one must ensure the aptamers are properly positioned to expose their binding pockets to the greatest extent. In order to achieve this, different types of structural elements are often used, and the effects of these structural elements are critically important and warrant further investigations.
Spatial arrangements of aptamers is another important factor to consider in multivalent aptamer design. Proper spatial arrangements, optimal positioning, and correct orientation of aptamers can also significantly enhance overall avidities. As discussed, there has been some work performed to investigate the proper geometries between neighboring aptamers, with significantly higher avidities observed at certain geometric configurations. To properly configure the spatial arrangements of the aptamers in designing multivalent aptamer constructs, a deep understanding of target morphologies, ligand alignments, and aptamer–target interactions is necessary, and more research in this area is needed.

6. Conclusions

Multivalent aptamer-based applications have shown great potentials due to their enhanced performances in comparison with their monomer aptamer counterparts. By combining the design considerations of spacers, spatial arrangements, and the heterovalent effect, multivalent aptamer constructs have great potential for even more efficient functions and improved performance. Furthermore, by incorporating nanotechnologies, signaling molecules, and functional oligonucleotides into multivalent aptamer constructs, multifunctional smart devices that combine properties for applications in imaging, drug delivery, and diagnostics in real-world applications are perceivable in the near future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.W., X.Y. and X.C.; investigation, Z.W. and N.Z.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.W. and N.Z.L.; writing—review and editing, X.Y. and X.C.; supervision, X.Y. and X.C.; funding acquisition, X.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by NSERC Discovery Grants, grant number RGPIN-2018-06370. The APC was funded by NSREC Discovery Grants.

Data Availability Statement

Not Applicable.

Acknowledgments

Z.W. is supported, in part, by a scholarship from the Ontario Graduate Scholarship program.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Kiessling, L.L.; Lamanna, A.C. Multivalency in biological systems. In Chemical Probes in Biology; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hong, S.; Leroueil, P.R.; Majoros, I.J.; Orr, B.G.; Baker, J.R., Jr.; Holl, M.M.B. The binding avidity of a nanoparticle-based multivalent targeted drug delivery platform. Chem. Biol. 2007, 14, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Radford, D.C.; Yang, J.; Doan, M.C.; Li, L.; Dixon, A.S.; Owen, S.C.; Kopeček, J. Multivalent HER2-binding polymer conjugates facilitate rapid endocytosis and enhance intracellular drug delivery. J. Control. Release 2020, 319, 285–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chang, E.K.; Eckert, M.A.; Ali, M.M.; Riazifar, H.; Pone, E.J.; Liu, L.; Zhao, W. Facile supermolecular aptamer inhibitors of L-selectin. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0123034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Kwon, P.S.; Ren, S.; Kwon, S.J.; Kizer, M.E.; Kuo, L.; Xie, M.; Zhu, D.; Zhou, F.; Zhang, F.; Kim, D.; et al. Designer DNA architecture offers precise and multivalent spatial pattern-recognition for viral sensing and inhibition. Nat. Chem. 2020, 12, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wu, L.; Ding, H.; Qu, X.; Shi, X.; Yang, J.; Huang, M.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, H.; Song, J.; Zhu, L.; et al. Fluidic multivalent membrane nanointerface enables synergetic enrichment of circulating tumor cells with high efficiency and viability. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 4800–4806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chen, J.; Yu, L.; Li, Y.; Cuellar-Camacho, J.L.; Chai, Y.; Li, D.; Li, Y.; Liu, H.; Ou, L.; Li, W. Biospecific monolayer coating for multivalent capture of circulating tumor cells with high sensitivity. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1808961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, Y.; Hu, Y.; Deng, S.; Yuan, Z.; Li, C.; Lu, Y.; He, Q.; Zhou, M.; Deng, R. Engineering multivalence aptamer probes for amplified and label-free detection of antibiotics in aquatic products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 2554–2561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Qi, P.; Chen, X.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, D. Multivalent glycosylated Cu:CdS quantum dots as a platform for rapid bacterial discrimination and detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 254, 431–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kwon, Y.-D.; Oh, J.-M.; Chun, S.; Kim, H.K. Synthesis and evaluation of multivalent nitroimidazole-based near-infrared fluorescent agents for neuroblastoma and colon cancer imaging. Bioorg. Chem. 2021, 113, 104990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cho, H.-J.; Huynh, T.T.; Rogers, B.E.; Mirica, L.M. Design of a multivalent bifunctional chelator for diagnostic 64Cu PET imaging in Alzheimer’s disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 30928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tan, X.; Lu, X.; Jia, F.; Liu, X.; Sun, Y.; Logan, J.K.; Zhang, K. Blurring the role of oligonucleotides: Spherical nucleic acids as a drug delivery vehicle. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 10834–10837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, Z.; Qin, W.; Zhuang, J.; Wu, M.; Li, Q.; Fan, C.; Zhang, Y. Virus-mimicking cell capture using heterovalency magnetic DNA nanoclaws. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 12244–12252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yeh, P.-Y.; Chen, Y.-R.; Wang, C.-F.; Chang, Y.-C. Promoting multivalent antibody–antigen interactions by tethering antibody molecules on a PEGylated dendrimer-supported lipid bilayer. Biomacromolecules 2018, 19, 426–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rossi, E.A.; Goldenberg, D.M.; Cardillo, T.M.; Stein, R.; Wang, Y.; Chang, C.-H. Novel designs of multivalent anti-CD20 humanized antibodies as improved lymphoma therapeutics. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 8384–8392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Keefe, A.D.; Pai, S.; Ellington, A. Aptamers as therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2010, 9, 537–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Stoltenburg, R.; Reinemann, C.; Strehlitz, B. SELEX—A (r)evolutionary method to generate high-affinity nucleic acid ligands. Biomol. Eng. 2007, 24, 381–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lin, Y.; Jiang, L.; Huang, Y.; Yang, Y.; He, Y.; Lu, C.; Yang, H. DNA-mediated reversible capture and release of circulating tumor cells with a multivalent dual-specific aptamer coating network. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 5387–5390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sheng, W.; Chen, T.; Tan, W.; Fan, Z.H. Multivalent DNA nanospheres for enhanced capture of cancer cells in microfluidic devices. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 7067–7076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Lakhin, A.; Tarantul, V.; Gening, L. Aptamers: Problems, solutions and prospects. Acta Nat. 2013, 5, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Seferos, D.S.; Prigodich, A.E.; Giljohann, D.A.; Patel, P.C.; Mirkin, C.A. Polyvalent DNA nanoparticle conjugates stabilize nucleic acids. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 308–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cutler, J.I.; Auyeung, E.; Mirkin, C.A. Spherical nucleic acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 1376–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Song, Y.; Shi, Y.; Huang, M.; Wang, W.; Wang, Y.; Cheng, J.; Lei, Z.; Zhu, Z.; Yang, C. Bioinspired engineering of a multivalent aptamer-functionalized nanointerface to enhance the capture and release of circulating tumor cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 2236–2240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chen, Y.; Tyagi, D.; Lyu, M.; Carrier, A.J.; Nganou, C.; Youden, B.; Wang, W.; Cui, S.; Servos, M.; Oakes, K.; et al. Regenerative NanoOctopus based on multivalent-aptamer-functionalized magnetic microparticles for effective cell capture in whole blood. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 4017–4022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Godonoga, M.; Lin, T.Y.; Oshima, A.; Sumitomo, K.; Tang, M.S.L.; Cheung, Y.W.; Kinghorn, A.B.; Dirkzwager, R.M.; Zhou, C.; Kuzuya, A.; et al. A DNA aptamer recognising a malaria protein biomarker can function as part of a DNA origami assembly. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 21266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Gao, L.; Teng, R.; Zhang, S.; Zhou, Y.; Luo, M.; Fang, Y.; Lei, L.; Ge, B. Zinc ion-stabilized aptamer-targeted black phosphorus nanosheets for enhanced photothermal/chemotherapy against prostate cancer. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zhang, Z.; Wang, S.; Ma, J.; Zhou, T.; Wang, F.; Wang, X.; Zhang, G. Rolling circle amplification-based polyvalent molecular beacon probe-assisted signal amplification strategies for sensitive detection of B16 cells. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 6, 3114–3121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Li, W.; Yang, X.; He, L.; Wang, K.; Wang, Q.; Huang, J.; Liu, J.; Wu, B.; Xu, C. Self-assembled DNA nanocentipede as multivalent drug carrier for targeted delivery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 25733–25740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Odeh, F.; Nsairat, H.; Alshaer, W.; Ismail, M.A.; Esawi, E.; Qaqish, B.; Bawab, A.A.; Ismail, S.I. Aptamers chemistry: Chemical modifications and conjugation strategies. Molecules 2020, 25, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Oberhaus, F.V.; Frense, D.; Beckmann, D. Immobilization techniques for aptamers on gold electrodes for the electrochemical detection of proteins: A review. Biosensors 2020, 10, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Kapadia, C.H.; Melamed, J.R.; Day, E.S. Spherical nucleic acid nanoparticles: Therapeutic potential. BioDrugs 2018, 32, 297–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Taghdisi, S.M.; Danesh, N.M.; Lavaee, P.; Emrani, A.S.; Hassanabad, K.Y.; Ramezani, M.; Abnous, K. Double targeting, controlled release and reversible delivery of daunorubicin to cancer cells by polyvalent aptamers-modified gold nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 61, 753–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yazdanparast, S.; Benvidi, A.; Banaei, M.; Nikukar, H.; Tezerjani, M.D.; Azimzadeh, M. Dual-aptamer based electrochemical sandwich biosensor for MCF-7 human breast cancer cells using silver nanoparticle labels and a poly (glutamic acid)/MWNT nanocomposite. Microchim. Acta 2018, 185, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Li, J.; Chang, K.-W.; Wang, C.-H.; Yang, C.-H.; Shiesh, S.-C.; Lee, G.-B. On-chip, aptamer-based sandwich assay for detection of glycated hemoglobins via magnetic beads. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 79, 887–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhu, H.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, K.; Xie, X.; Song, L.; Wang, D.; Han, C.; Chen, Q. Aptamer-PEG-modified Fe3O4@Mn as a novel T1- and T2- dual-model MRI contrast agent targeting hypoxia-induced cancer stem cells. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 39245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Sun, C.; Sun, R.; Chen, Y.; Tong, Y.; Zhu, J.; Bai, H.; Zhang, S.; Zheng, H.; Ye, H. Utilization of aptamer-functionalized magnetic beads for highly accurate fluorescent detection of mercury (II) in environment and food. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 255, 775–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, X.; Song, P.; Peng, L.; Tong, A.; Xiang, Y. Aggregation-induced emission luminogen-embedded silica nanoparticles containing DNA aptamers for targeted cell imaging. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 609–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Yang, Y.; Zhao, W.; Tan, W.; Lai, Z.; Fang, D.; Jiang, L.; Zuo, C.; Yang, N.; Lai, Y. An efficient cell-targeting drug delivery system based on aptamer-modified mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2019, 14, 390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Taghavi, S.; Ramezani, M.; Alibolandi, M.; Abnous, K.; Taghdisi, S.M. Chitosan-modified PLGA nanoparticles tagged with 5TR1 aptamer for in vivo tumor-targeted drug delivery. Cancer Lett. 2017, 400, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Zhang, J.; Wang, Z.; Gao, Y.; Wu, Z.-S. Simply-self-assembled targeting DNA nano-sea-urchin as multivalent drug carrier. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2020, 3, 4514–4521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Ma, Y.; Li, X.; Liu, J.; Li, W.; Liu, Z. Convenient construction of orthogonal dual aptamer-based plasmonic immunosandwich assay for probing protein disease markers in complex samples and living animals. ACS Sens. 2020, 5, 1436–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ding, C.; Zhang, C.; Cheng, S.; Xian, Y. Multivalent aptamer functionalized Ag2S nanodots/hybrid cell membrane-coated magnetic nanobioprobe for the ultrasensitive isolation and detection of circulating tumor cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1909781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.-E.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S.V.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Firsov, A.A. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004, 306, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Yang, L.; Tseng, Y.T.; Suo, G.; Chen, L.; Yu, J.; Chiu, W.J.; Huang, C.C.; Lin, C.H. Photothermal therapeutic response of cancer cells to aptamer-gold nanoparticle-hybridized graphene oxide under NIR illumination. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 5097–5106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhao, L.; Cheng, M.; Liu, G.; Lu, H.; Gao, Y.; Yan, X.; Liu, F.; Sun, P.; Lu, G. A fluorescent biosensor based on molybdenum disulfide nanosheets and protein aptamer for sensitive detection of carcinoembryonic antigen. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 273, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chen, L.; Meng, X.; Liu, M.; Lv, R.; Cai, B.; Wang, Z. Interfaces, Biodegradable mesoporous organosilica nanosheets for chemotherapy/mild thermotherapy of cancer: Fast internalization, high cellular uptake, and high drug loading. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 30234–30246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Peng, L.; Mei, X.; He, J.; Xu, J.; Zhang, W.; Liang, R.; Wei, M.; Evans, D.G.; Duan, X. Monolayer nanosheets with an extremely high drug loading toward controlled delivery and cancer theranostics. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1707389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Pan, Q.; Nie, C.; Hu, Y.; Yi, J.; Liu, C.; Zhang, J.; He, M.; He, M.; Chen, T.; Chu, X. Aptamer-functionalized DNA origami for targeted codelivery of antisense oligonucleotides and doxorubicin to enhance therapy in drug-resistant cancer cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 400–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Sun, P.; Zhang, N.; Tang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, J.; Zhao, Y. Site-specific anchoring aptamer C2NP on DNA origami nanostructures for cancer treatment. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 26300–26308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Mela, I.; Vallejo-Ramirez, P.P.; Makarchuk, S.; Christie, G.; Bailey, D.; Henderson, R.M.; Sugiyama, H.; Endo, M.; Kaminski, C.F. DNA nanostructures for targeted antimicrobial delivery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2020, 59, 12698–12702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Zhao, S.; Duan, F.; Liu, S.; Wu, T.; Shang, Y.; Tian, R.; Liu, J.; Wang, Z.-G.; Jiang, Q.; Ding, B. Efficient intracellular delivery of RNase A using DNA origami carriers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 11112–11118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Tintoré, M.; Gállego, I.; Manning, B.; Eritja, R.; Fàbrega, C. DNA origami as a DNA repair nanosensor at the single-molecule level. Angew. Chem. 2013, 125, 7901–7904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Du, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Zhang, M.; Lv, Z.; Wu, L.; Yang, Y.; Li, A.; Yang, L.; et al. Highly sensitive minimal residual disease detection by biomimetic multivalent aptamer nanoclimber functionalized microfluidic chip. Small 2020, 16, 2000949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Gao, M.-L.; Yin, B.-C.; Ye, B.-C. Construction of a DNA-AuNP-based satellite network for exosome analysis. Analyst 2019, 144, 5996–6003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Yang, J.; Li, X.; Jiang, B.; Yuan, R.; Xiang, Y. In situ-generated multivalent aptamer network for efficient capture and sensitive electrochemical detection of circulating tumor cells in whole blood. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 7893–7899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Jeong, H.; Lee, S.H.; Hwang, Y.; Yoo, H.; Jung, H.; Kim, S.H.; Mok, H. Multivalent aptamer–RNA conjugates for simple and efficient delivery of doxorubicin/siRNA into multidrug-resistant cells. Macromol. Biosci. 2017, 17, 1600343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Yazdian-Robati, R.; Ramezani, M.; Jalalian, S.H.; Abnous, K.; Taghdisi, S.M. Targeted delivery of epirubicin to cancer cells by polyvalent aptamer system in vitro and in vivo. Pharm. Res. 2016, 33, 2289–2297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Xue, C.; Zhang, S.; Yu, X.; Hu, S.; Lu, Y.; Wu, Z.S. Periodically ordered, nuclease-resistant DNA nanowires decorated with cell-specific aptamers as selective theranostic agents. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2020, 132, 17693–17700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rutten, I.; Daems, D.; Lammertyn, J. Boosting biomolecular interactions through DNA origami nano-tailored biosensing interfaces. J. Mater. Chem. B 2020, 8, 3606–3615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Li, S.; Jiang, Q.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Tian, Y.; Song, C.; Wang, J.; Zou, Y.; Anderson, G.J.; Han, J.Y.; et al. A DNA nanorobot functions as a cancer therapeutic in response to a molecular trigger in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 2018, 36, 258–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Mallikaratchy, P.R.; Ruggiero, A.; Gardner, J.R.; Kuryavyi, V.; Maguire, W.F.; Heaney, M.L.; McDevitt, M.R.; Patel, D.J.; Scheinberg, D.A. A multivalent DNA aptamer specific for the B-cell receptor on human lymphoma and leukemia. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, 2458–2469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Zhao, W.; Cui, C.H.; Bose, S.; Guo, D.; Shen, C.; Wong, W.P.; Halvorsen, K.; Farokhzad, O.C.; Teo, G.S.; Phillips, J.A.; et al. Bioinspired multivalent DNA network for capture and release of cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 19626–19631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Zhang, Z.; Ali, M.M.; Eckert, M.A.; Kang, D.-K.; Chen, Y.Y.; Sender, L.S.; Fruman, D.A.; Zhao, W. A polyvalent aptamer system for targeted drug delivery. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 9728–9735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Jolly, P.; Tamboli, V.; Harniman, R.L.; Estrela, P.; Allender, C.J.; Bowen, J.L. Aptamer–MIP hybrid receptor for highly sensitive electrochemical detection of prostate specific antigen. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 75, 188–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Liu, X.; Ren, J.; Su, L.; Gao, X.; Tang, Y.; Ma, T.; Zhu, L.; Li, J. Novel hybrid probe based on double recognition of aptamer-molecularly imprinted polymer grafted on upconversion nanoparticles for enrofloxacin sensing. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 87, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Zhang, Z.; Liu, J. Molecularly imprinted polymers with DNA aptamer fragments as macromonomers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 6371–6378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Liu, L.; Yang, K.; Gao, H.; Li, X.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, L.; Peng, X.; Zhang, Y. Artificial antibody with site-enhanced multivalent aptamers for specific capture of circulating tumor cells. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 2591–2594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Tang, M.S.; Shiu, S.C.-C.; Godonoga, M.; Cheung, Y.-W.; Liang, S.; Dirkzwager, R.M.; Kinghorn, A.B.; Fraser, L.A.; Heddle, J.G.; Tanner, J.A. An aptamer-enabled DNA nanobox for protein sensing. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2018, 14, 1161–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Liu, K.; Xu, C.; Liu, J. Regulation of cell binding and entry by DNA origami mediated spatial distribution of aptamers. J. Mater. Chem. B 2020, 8, 6802–6809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Han, X.; Jiang, Y.; Li, S.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, X.; Wu, Z.; Wu, Z.; Qi, X. Multivalent aptamer-modified tetrahedral DNA nanocage demonstrates high selectivity and safety for anti-tumor therapy. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 339–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, Q.; Zhao, D.; Shao, X.; Lin, S.; Xie, X.; Liu, M.; Ma, W.; Shi, S.; Lin, Y. Aptamer-modified tetrahedral DNA nanostructure for tumor-targeted drug delivery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 36695–36701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Xu, D.; Pang, L. Aptamer-tagged DNA origami for spatially addressable detection of aflatoxin B1. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 941–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Cao, M.; Sun, Y.; Xiao, M.; Li, L.; Liu, X.; Jin, H.; Pei, H. Multivalent aptamer-modified DNA origami as drug delivery system for targeted cancer therapy. Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. 2020, 36, 254–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhang, P.; Ye, J.; Liu, E.; Sun, L.; Zhang, J.; Lee, S.-J.; Gong, J.; He, H.; Yang, V.C. Aptamer-coded DNA nanoparticles for targeted doxorubicin delivery using pH-sensitive spacer. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 2017, 11, 529–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lao, Y.-H.; Peck, K.; Chen, L.-C. Enhancement of aptamer microarray sensitivity through spacer optimization and avidity effect. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 1747–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mahlknecht, G.; Maron, R.; Schechter, B.; Yarden, Y.; Sela, M. Multimerization of ERBB2/HER2 specific aptamer leads to improved receptor binding. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 465, 218–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Hayat, A.; Andreescu, S.; Marty, J.-L. Design of PEG-aptamer two piece macromolecules as convenient and integrated sensing platform: Application to the label free detection of small size molecules. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 45, 168–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Waybrant, B.; Pearce, T.R.; Kokkoli, E. Effect of polyethylene glycol, alkyl, and oligonucleotide spacers on the binding, secondary structure, and self-assembly of fractalkine binding FKN-S2 aptamer-amphiphiles. Langmuir 2014, 30, 7465–7474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Kuang, H.; Schneiderman, Z.; Shabana, A.M.; Russo, G.C.; Guo, J.; Wirtz, D.; Kokkoli, E. Effect of an alkyl spacer on the morphology and internalization of MUC1 aptamer-naphthalimide amphiphiles for targeting and imaging triple negative breast cancer cells. Bioeng. Transl. Med. 2021, 6, e10194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Chen, N.; Zhang, Z.; Soontornworajit, B.; Zhou, J.; Wang, Y. Cell adhesion on an artificial extracellular matrix using aptamer-functionalized PEG hydrogels. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 1353–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Qin, Y.; Yang, X.; Zhang, J.; Cao, X. Target capturing performance of microfluidic channel surface immobilized aptamers: The effects of spacer lengths. Biomed. Microdevices 2019, 21, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Ueno, Y.; Furukawa, K.; Tin, A.; Hibino, H. On-chip FRET graphene oxide aptasensor: Quantitative evaluation of enhanced sensitivity by aptamer with a double-stranded DNA spacer. Anal. Sci. 2015, 31, 875–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Xing, H.; Li, J.; Xu, W.; Hwang, K.; Wu, P.; Yin, Q.; Li, Z.; Cheng, J.; Lu, Y. The effects of spacer length and composition on aptamer-mediated cell-specific targeting with nanoscale PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin. Chembiochem 2016, 17, 1111–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Goda, T.; Higashi, D.; Matsumoto, A.; Hoshi, T.; Sawaguchi, T.; Miyahara, Y. Dual aptamer-immobilized surfaces for improved affinity through multiple target binding in potentiometric thrombin biosensing. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 73, 174–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Zhu, G.; Lübbecke, M.; Walter, J.G.; Stahl, F.; Scheper, T. Characterization of optimal aptamer-microarray binding chemistry and spacer design. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2011, 34, 2022–2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Edwards, K.A.; Baeumner, A.J. Aptamer sandwich assays: Label-free and fluorescence investigations of heterogeneous binding events. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010, 398, 2635–2644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Kim, Y.S.; Chung, J.; Song, M.Y.; Jurng, J.; Kim, B.C. Aptamer cocktails: Enhancement of sensing signals compared to single use of aptamers for detection of bacteria. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014, 54, 195–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Qin, W.; Chen, L.; Wang, Z.; Li, Q.; Fan, C.; Wu, M.; Zhang, Y. Bioinspired DNA nanointerface with anisotropic aptamers for accurate capture of circulating tumor cells. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 2000647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zhao, L.; Tang, C.; Xu, L.; Zhang, Z.; Li, X.; Hu, H.; Cheng, S.; Zhou, W.; Huang, M.; Fong, A.; et al. Enhanced and differential capture of circulating tumor cells from lung cancer patients by microfluidic assays using aptamer cocktail. Small 2016, 12, 1072–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Dou, B.; Xu, L.; Jiang, B.; Yuan, R.; Xiang, Y. Aptamer-functionalized and gold nanoparticle array-decorated magnetic graphene nanosheets enable multiplexed and sensitive electrochemical detection of rare circulating tumor cells in whole blood. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 10792–10799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Dai, Z.; Gao, Q.; Cheung, M.C.; Leung, H.M.; Lau, T.C.; Sleiman, H.F.; Lai, K.W.; Lo, P.K. A highly versatile platform based on geometrically well-defined 3D DNA nanostructures for selective recognition and positioning of multiplex targets. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 18291–18295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zhao, X.; Lis, J.T.; Shi, H. A systematic study of the features critical for designing a high avidity multivalent aptamer. Nucleic Acid Ther. 2013, 23, 238–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Hasegawa, H.; Taira, K.-I.; Sode, K.; Ikebukuro, K. Improvement of aptamer affinity by dimerization. Sensors 2008, 8, 1090–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Aghebat Rafat, A.; Sagredo, S.; Thalhammer, M.; Simmel, F.C. Barcoded DNA origami structures for multiplexed optimization and enrichment of DNA-based protein-binding cavities. Nat. Chem. 2020, 12, 852–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Santulli-Marotto, S.; Nair, S.K.; Rusconi, C.; Sullenger, B.; Gilboa, E. Multivalent RNA aptamers that inhibit CTLA-4 and enhance tumor immunity. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 7483–7489. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  96. Krissanaprasit, A.; Key, C.M.; Froehlich, K.; Pontula, S.; Mihalko, E.; Dupont, D.M.; Andersen, E.S.; Kjems, J.; Brown, A.C.; LaBean, T.H. Multivalent aptamer-functionalized single-strand RNA origami as effective, target-specific anticoagulants with corresponding reversal agents. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2021, 10, 2001826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Rinker, S.; Ke, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chhabra, R.; Yan, H. Self-assembled DNA nanostructures for distance-dependent multivalent ligand–protein binding. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 418–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Bujotzek, A.; Shan, M.; Haag, R.; Weber, M. Towards a rational spacer design for bivalent inhibition of estrogen receptor. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2011, 25, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Chen, Y.; Wang, W.; Tyagi, D.; Carrier, A.J.; Cui, S.; He, S.; Zhang, X. Non-invasive isolation of rare circulating tumor cells with a DNA mimic of double-sided tape using multimeric aptamers. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 5879–5883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Jiang, Y.; Qiu, Z.; Le, T.; Zou, S.; Cao, X. Developing a dual-RCA microfluidic platform for sensitive E. coli O157:H7 whole-cell detections. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, 1127, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Hao, X.; Yeh, P.; Qin, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Qiu, Z.; Li, S.; Le, T.; Cao, X. Aptamer surface functionalization of microfluidic devices using dendrimers as multi-handled templates and its application in sensitive detections of foodborne pathogenic bacteria. Anal. Chim. Acta 2019, 1056, 96–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Jiang, Y.; Zou, S.; Cao, X. A simple dendrimer-aptamer based microfluidic platform for E. coli O157:H7 detection and signal intensification by rolling circle amplification. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 251, 976–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Xue, F.; Chen, Y.; Wen, Y.; Abhange, K.; Zhang, W.; Cheng, G.; Quinn, Z.; Mao, W.; Wan, Y. Isolation of extracellular vesicles with multivalent aptamers. Analyst 2021, 146, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Huang, Y.; Yan, X.; Zhao, L.; Qi, X.; Wang, S.; Liang, X. An aptamer cocktail-based electrochemical aptasensor for direct capture and rapid detection of tetracycline in honey. Microchem. J. 2019, 150, 104179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Zhu, J.; Nguyen, T.; Pei, R.; Stojanovic, M.; Lin, Q. Specific capture and temperature-mediated release of cells in an aptamer-based microfluidic device. Lab Chip 2012, 12, 3504–3513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Chen, J.; Li, H.; Xie, H.; Xu, D. A novel method combining aptamer-Ag10NPs based microfluidic biochip with bright field imaging for detection of KPC-2-expressing bacteria. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, 1132, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Guan, B.; Zhang, X. Aptamers as versatile ligands for biomedical and pharmaceutical applications. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Wang, J.; Wang, H.; Wang, H.; He, S.; Li, R.; Deng, Z.; Liu, X.; Wang, F. Nonviolent self-catabolic DNAzyme nanosponges for smart anticancer drug delivery. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 5852–5863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Yoo, H.; Jung, H.; Kim, S.A.; Mok, H. Multivalent comb-type aptamer–siRNA conjugates for efficient and selective intracellular delivery. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 6765–6767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Jin, Y.; Li, Z.; Liu, H.; Chen, S.; Wang, F.; Wang, L.; Li, N.; Ge, K.; Yang, X.; Liang, X.-J. Biodegradable, multifunctional DNAzyme nanoflowers for enhanced cancer therapy. NPG Asia Mater. 2017, 9, e365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Sun, W.; Ji, W.; Hall, J.M.; Hu, Q.; Wang, C.; Beisel, C.L.; Gu, Z. Self-assembled DNA nanoclews for the efficient delivery of CRISPR–Cas9 for genome editing. Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 12197–12201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Shi, J.; Yang, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, D.; Liu, W.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, J.; Zhang, K. MicroRNA-responsive release of Cas9/sgRNA from DNA nanoflower for cytosolic protein delivery and enhanced genome editing. Biomaterials 2020, 256, 120221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Sathiyaseelan, A.; Saravanakumar, K.; Mariadoss, A.V.A.; Wang, M.-H. pH-controlled nucleolin targeted release of dual drug from chitosan-gold based aptamer functionalized nano drug delivery system for improved glioblastoma treatment. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 262, 117907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Zhu, Y.-J.; Li, W.-J.; Hong, Z.-Y.; Tang, A.-N.; Kong, D.-M. Stable, polyvalent aptamer-conjugated near-infrared fluorescent nanocomposite for high-performance cancer cell-targeted imaging and therapy. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 9229–9237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Pascual, L.; Cerqueira-Coutinho, C.; García-Fernández, A.; de Luis, B.; Bernardes, E.S.; Albernaz, M.S.; Missailidis, S.; Martínez-Máñez, R.; Santos-Oliveira, R.; Orzaez, M. MUC1 aptamer-capped mesoporous silica nanoparticles for controlled drug delivery and radio-imaging applications. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2017, 13, 2495–2505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Kratschmer, C.; Levy, M. Effect of chemical modifications on aptamer stability in serum. Nucleic Acid Ther. 2017, 27, 335–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Han, G.-M.; Jia, Z.-Z.; Zhu, Y.-J.; Jiao, J.-J.; Kong, D.-M.; Feng, X.-Z. Biostable L-DNA-templated aptamer-silver nanoclusters for cell-type-specific imaging at physiological temperature. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 10800–10804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Hianik, T.; Ostatná, V.; Sonlajtnerova, M.; Grman, I. Influence of ionic strength, pH and aptamer configuration for binding affinity to thrombin. Bioelectrochemistry 2007, 70, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Shi, P.; Wang, X.; Davis, B.; Coyne, J.; Dong, C.; Reynolds, J.; Wang, Y. In situ synthesis of an aptamer-based polyvalent antibody mimic on the cell surface for enhanced interactions between immune and cancer cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 11892–11897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Zou, S.; Lei, Y.; Ma, W.; Chen, B.; Cheng, H.; Jia, R.; Li, Z.; He, X.; Wang, K. Extracellular pH-manipulated in situ reconfiguration of aptamer functionalized DNA monomer enables specifically improved affinity, detection and drug delivery. Analyst 2020, 145, 2562–2569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Li, H.; Yang, S.; Yu, G.; Shen, L.; Fan, J.; Xu, L.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, N.; Zeng, Z.; Hu, T.; et al. Aptamer internalization via endocytosis inducing S-phase arrest and priming maver-1 lymphoma cells for cytarabine chemotherapy. Theranostics 2017, 7, 1204–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Zhang, H.; Ma, Y.; Xie, Y.; An, Y.; Huang, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Yang, C.J. A controllable aptamer-based self-assembled DNA dendrimer for high affinity targeting, bioimaging and drug delivery. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 10099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Kang, Y.Y.; Song, J.; Jung, H.S.; Kwak, G.; Yu, G.; Ahn, J.-H.; Kim, S.H.; Mok, H. Implication of multivalent aptamers in DNA and DNA–RNA hybrid structures for efficient drug delivery in vitro and in vivo. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2018, 60, 250–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Liu, Z.; Zhao, H.; He, L.; Yao, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Wu, J.; Liu, J.; Ding, J. Aptamer density dependent cellular uptake of lipid-capped polymer nanoparticles for polyvalent targeted delivery of vinorelbine to cancer cells. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 16931–16939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Alizadeh, L.; Alizadeh, E.; Zarebkohan, A.; Ahmadi, E.; Rahmati-Yamchi, M.; Salehi, R. AS1411 aptamer-functionalized chitosan-silica nanoparticles for targeted delivery of epigallocatechin gallate to the SKOV-3 ovarian cancer cell lines. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2020, 22, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Zhao, Z.; Fan, H.; Zhou, G.; Bai, H.; Liang, H.; Wang, R.; Zhang, X.; Tan, W. Activatable fluorescence/MRI bimodal platform for tumor cell imaging via MnO2 nanosheet–aptamer nanoprobe. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 11220–11223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Tang, J.; Yu, Y.; Shi, H.; He, X.; Lei, Y.; Shangguan, J.; Yang, X.; Qiao, Z.; Wang, K. Polyvalent and thermosensitive DNA nanoensembles for cancer cell detection and manipulation. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 6637–6644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Luo, L.; Li, W.; Xiang, D.; Ma, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Xu, Y.; Chen, N.; Wang, Q.; Huang, J.; Liu, J. Sensitive and specific detection of tumour cells based on a multivalent DNA nanocreeper and a multiplexed fluorescence supersandwich. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 3693–3696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Wu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Cui, C.; Cansiz, S.; Liang, H.; Wu, C.; Teng, I.-T.; Chen, W.; Liu, Y.; Hou, W. Enhanced targeted gene transduction: AAV2 vectors conjugated to multiple aptamers via reducible disulfide linkages. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 2–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Micromachines 13 00436 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic drawing of various structures of multivalent aptamer structures.
Figure 1. Schematic drawing of various structures of multivalent aptamer structures.
Micromachines 13 00436 g001
Micromachines 13 00436 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of designs of multivalent aptamers. The optimization strategies include adding different lengths or types of spacer motifs, using a mixture of two or more different types of aptamers, and applying spatial arrangements of aptamers tailored for the geometries of target ligands and binding pockets.
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of designs of multivalent aptamers. The optimization strategies include adding different lengths or types of spacer motifs, using a mixture of two or more different types of aptamers, and applying spatial arrangements of aptamers tailored for the geometries of target ligands and binding pockets.
Micromachines 13 00436 g002
Micromachines 13 00436 g003 550
Figure 3. Schematic description of aptamer-cocktail-based microfluidic approach for CTC detection. (a) A microfluidic device is composed of an aptamer-conjugated silicon nanowire and a PDMS chaotic mixer. (b) When a single type aptamer is incorporated, the capturing affinity of the device is relatively weak due to the lack of synergistic binding. (c) By using an aptamer cocktail, the synergistic effects among individual aptamers lead to an enhanced capturing affinity. (d) Different aptamer cocktails are expected to have differential capture performance for CTC subpopulation recognition [89].
Figure 3. Schematic description of aptamer-cocktail-based microfluidic approach for CTC detection. (a) A microfluidic device is composed of an aptamer-conjugated silicon nanowire and a PDMS chaotic mixer. (b) When a single type aptamer is incorporated, the capturing affinity of the device is relatively weak due to the lack of synergistic binding. (c) By using an aptamer cocktail, the synergistic effects among individual aptamers lead to an enhanced capturing affinity. (d) Different aptamer cocktails are expected to have differential capture performance for CTC subpopulation recognition [89].
Micromachines 13 00436 g003
Micromachines 13 00436 g004 550
Figure 4. Schematic drawing of constructions of 3 aptamer-DNANTs and schematic representation of thrombin-DNANT, ATP-DNANT, and insulin-DNANT [91].
Figure 4. Schematic drawing of constructions of 3 aptamer-DNANTs and schematic representation of thrombin-DNANT, ATP-DNANT, and insulin-DNANT [91].
Micromachines 13 00436 g004
Micromachines 13 00436 g005 550
Figure 5. A schematic representing the inhibitory nanostructures for dengue virus with their corresponding mean EC50 (half maximal effective concentration) values. The hexagonal spacing resulted in reduced detection compared to the star-shaped spacing, despite its being the correct spacing. The schematic for the star and hexagon shows an unzipped hairpin region because potent pattern matching occurs. Other scaffolds represent the hairpins as stem–loop structures to indicate a lack of potent pattern matching ([5]).
Figure 5. A schematic representing the inhibitory nanostructures for dengue virus with their corresponding mean EC50 (half maximal effective concentration) values. The hexagonal spacing resulted in reduced detection compared to the star-shaped spacing, despite its being the correct spacing. The schematic for the star and hexagon shows an unzipped hairpin region because potent pattern matching occurs. Other scaffolds represent the hairpins as stem–loop structures to indicate a lack of potent pattern matching ([5]).
Micromachines 13 00436 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Z.; Yang, X.; Lee, N.Z.; Cao, X. Multivalent Aptamer Approach: Designs, Strategies, and Applications. Micromachines 2022, 13, 436. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13030436

AMA Style

Wang Z, Yang X, Lee NZ, Cao X. Multivalent Aptamer Approach: Designs, Strategies, and Applications. Micromachines. 2022; 13(3):436. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13030436

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Zhong, Xiuying Yang, Nicholas Zhou Lee, and Xudong Cao. 2022. "Multivalent Aptamer Approach: Designs, Strategies, and Applications" Micromachines 13, no. 3: 436. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13030436

APA Style

Wang, Z., Yang, X., Lee, N. Z., & Cao, X. (2022). Multivalent Aptamer Approach: Designs, Strategies, and Applications. Micromachines, 13(3), 436. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13030436

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop