Next Article in Journal
Source/Drain Trimming Process to Improve Gate-All-Around Nanosheet Transistors Switching Performance and Enable More Stacks of Nanosheets
Next Article in Special Issue
Current Trends in Micro and Nano Manufacturing
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis and Characterization of Optimized Dual-Frequency Vibration Energy Harvesters for Low-Power Industrial Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Quantitative Characterization of the Affected Zones in a Single Crystal Fe-6Si Steel Sheet by Fine Piercing
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Micromachines
Volume 13
Issue 7
10.3390/mi13071079
Review Report
micromachines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Study of the Influence of Cutting Edge on Micro Cutting of Hardened Steel Using FE and SPH Modeling

Micromachines 2022, 13(7), 1079; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13071079
by Lobna Chaabani 1,*, Romain Piquard 2, Radouane Abnay 1, Michaël Fontaine 1, Alexandre Gilbin 1, Philippe Picart 1, Sébastien Thibaud 1, Alain D’Acunto 2 and Daniel Dudzinski 2
Reviewer 1:
Kurmendra Kurmendra
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Micromachines 2022, 13(7), 1079; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13071079
Submission received: 1 March 2022 / Revised: 3 June 2022 / Accepted: 28 June 2022 / Published: 7 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Micro and Nano Manufacturing (WCMNM 2021))

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The article has issues for which I request authors to look at following points: 1. The introduction is not clear and does not provide exact information that what is trying to be said. 2. After looking at the 12 references only, I observed that these are very less for a good paper and none of the journal belongs to 2020 or 2021 and so on... due to this, I doubt author has gone through latest work in the field which gives possibility of better work than their own work in literature. 3. The explanations consider many assumptions or hypothesis which means there is no guarantee that work that authors have presented is actually correct. In the light of above points, I do not feel that this article is novel and can add significant knowledge to particular field.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

See annex for details

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment. 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

The manuscript entitled "Study of the influence of cutting edge on micro cutting of hardened steel using Fe and Sph modelling" discussed the influence of cutting edge in micro-cutting under size effect. The topic is interesting. The comments are presented as below:

  1. For the title, the "Fe" and "Sph" should be replaced by the "FE" and "SPH". What ARE the "Fe" and "Sph"?
  2. The paper seems confused, which should be re-written.
  3. In the ABSTRACT, WHAT are the four models?
  4. In the INTRODUCTION, more papers should be cited.
  5. The Section 2 should not only include finite element and SPH models but also ALE and CEL methods.
  6. In the RESULTS, the Section 3.1 should be a new section "Experiment Setup".
  7. Check Figure 13 and Figure 14, and more information has been lost.
  8. The paper should include the section "Discussion".
  9. The "Conclusions and prospects" is too long.
  10. What is the contribution and significance?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The revisions are not acceptable as the responses are not sufficient and look more like excuses.

In my opinion, article is not as per standard of this journal of repute.

Back to TopTop