Next Article in Journal
An Image Processing Approach to Quality Control of Drop-on-Demand Electrohydrodynamic (EHD) Printing
Previous Article in Journal
Open-End Control of Neurite Outgrowth Lengths with Steep Bending Confinement Microchannel Patterns for Miswiring-Free Neuronal Network Formation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Indirect Enhancement of ALD Thin-Film Properties Induced by the ECAP Modification of an As-Extruded Mg-Ca Alloy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Hot Junction Size on the Temperature Measurement of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells Using NiCr/NiSi Thin-Film Thermocouple Sensors

by
Huijin Guo
1,†,
Zhihui Liu
2,†,
Tengda Guo
2,
Yi Sun
2,3,
Kai Shen
4,
Bi Wang
5,
Yongjun Cheng
6,
Yuming Wang
2,
Tiancai Ma
1,
Zixi Wang
2,* and
Wanyu Ding
7,*
1
School of Automotive Studies, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Tribology in Advanced Equipment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
3
College of Mechanical Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian 116028, China
4
Engineering Research Center of Continuous Extrusion, Ministry of Education, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian 116028, China
5
State Key Laboratory of High-End Compressor and System Technology, Hefei 230031, China
6
Laboratory of Low Frequency Electromagnetic Communication Technology with the WMCRT CSSC, Wuhan 430200, China
7
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian 116028, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Micromachines 2024, 15(11), 1375; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15111375
Submission received: 10 October 2024 / Revised: 5 November 2024 / Accepted: 11 November 2024 / Published: 14 November 2024

Abstract

:
In the process of using thin-film thermocouples for contact measurement of the reaction temperature in proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFC), the impact of thin-film thermocouple volume on the system’s reaction temperature field variation, reaction efficiency, and the lifespan of thermocouples under these conditions is not thoroughly studied. Using magnetron sputtering technology, NiCr/NiSi thin-film thermocouples (NiCr/NiSi TFTCs) with different junction sizes were fabricated on the proton exchange membrane (PEM). These NiCr/NiSi TFTCs exhibit excellent compactness, with thickness and planar dimensions in the micrometer range. When PEMFCs are equipped with built-in NiCr/NiSi TFTCs of different hot junction sizes, the time required for the system to reach a steady state varies with the size of the hot junction, with smaller hot junction sizes reaching a steady state more quickly. In a 500-h continuous operation test, the failure rates of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs also vary based on the hot junction size. Both smaller and larger hot junction sizes have relatively higher failure rates, whereas medium-sized junctions have a lower failure rate. These extensive and repetitive comparative experiments provide significant reference value for the size design of TFTCs operating inside PEMFCs, promoting both industrial production and scientific research.

1. Introduction

Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) are widely regarded as a promising carbon-neutral energy source due to their high energy conversion efficiency and zero harmful gas emissions [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. They have broad application prospects in public transportation, portable emergency power supplies, and combined heat and power solutions. However, like other fuel cell technologies, PEMFCs face a series of challenges related to insufficient durability before they can be deployed on a large scale commercially. These challenges increase costs and pose safety risks, and one of the main reasons for insufficient durability in PEMFCs is thermal management issues.
Effective thermal management is crucial for the optimal performance and longevity of PEMFCs. One major obstacle to achieving effective thermal management is the difficulty in accurately measuring the internal temperature of PEMFCs. Many researchers have attempted to measure the internal temperature fields of PEMFCs using various methods. For example, Chong Fang Ma et al. [9]. Used infrared imaging technology to measure the temperature field on the anode side surface of a membrane electrode assembly (MEA) under a serpentine flow field in a self-designed PEMFC without humidification, with measured temperatures ranging from 25.6 °C to 27.3 °C. Brian Sangeorzan et al. [10]. Demonstrated preliminary progress in creating a non-invasive temperature measurement system based on fluorescence thermometry, which can also optically detect the formation and movement of liquid water in PEMFC gas channels. Experimental data indicated a relationship between temperature variations in PEMFC gas channels and water droplet movement. Akira Nishimura et al. [11]. Studied the impact of the thickness of the gas diffusion layer (GDL) on heat and mass transfer characteristics and power generation performance of PEMFCs at an operating temperature of 90 °C, using a thermal imager to measure the in-plane temperature distribution of the anode and cathode separators. Ping Wen Ming et al. [12]. Manufactured a robust gold thin-film resistance temperature detector (RTD) based on micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) for internal temperature monitoring in PEMFCs.
Thin-film thermocouples (TFTCs) have emerged as a promising solution for real-time temperature sensing within PEMFCs due to their small size, fast response time, and ability to operate under harsh conditions. TFTCs serve as vital temperature sensors that can provide precise temperature measurements without significantly disturbing fuel cell operation. Various materials have been employed as TFTCs in the literature to enhance their performance and durability. Common material combinations include noble metals like platinum and gold, as well as metal pairs such as nickel–chromium (Ni-Cr) and nickel-silicon (Ni-Si) [13,14,15,16,17,18].
When using metal films for temperature measurement, the lifespan of the film and the response speed are two important indicators for evaluating the performance of a film-based temperature measurement system. Factors affecting the lifespan of the film mainly stem from high-temperature failure. Yang L. and others developed and tested an environmental simulator with high-speed rotation and gas thermal shock characteristics to evaluate the lifespan of thermal barrier coatings under high-temperature conditions [19]. As for the temperature measurement method using TFTCs, many teams have tested and improved the lifespan of TFTCs made of different materials [13,14,15,16,17,18]. Some teams have extended the lifespan of TFTCs by improving their protective layers [20]. Regarding response time, David Kokalj and others designed different protective layers to explore their relationship with TFTC response time [21]. Despite these advancements, the effect of different thermojunction sizes on the response time of TFTCs made from the same material has not been thoroughly studied. Understanding this relationship is crucial for optimizing the design of TFTCs to achieve faster response times without compromising durability. Therefore, the goal of this work is to investigate how various thermojunction sizes affect the response time of TFTCs composed of the same material. By systematically studying the influence of thermojunction size on response time, this research aims to provide valuable insights for the design of more efficient temperature sensors in PEMFCs, contributing to better thermal management and enhanced durability of fuel cells.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Working Principle of Thermocouple

The effect connecting thermal and electrical phenomena is known as the thermoelectric effect, also referred to as the Seebeck effect. The working principle of a thermocouple relies on this Seebeck effect. It involves creating a closed circuit with two conductors of different compositions or crystal structures. When one end is heated, an electromotive force (thermoelectric voltage) is generated between the hot and cold ends, causing current to flow in the circuit. By measuring this voltage, the temperature difference between the hot and cold ends can be determined. The calculation methods are provided by Equations (1)–(3).
E A B T , T 0 = K e t T 0 T ln N A t N B t d t
E A B = T 0 T S B t S A t d t = T 0 T S A B t d t
In the equations:
EA(t)—Absolute thermopotential rate of electrode A;
EB(t)—Absolute thermopotential rate of electrode B;
SAB(t)—Seebeck coefficient for thermocouples.
When the thermal electrode material is determined, SA(t) and SB(t) are constant values, so Equation (2) can be reduced to:
E A B t = S A B t T T 0
According to Equation (3), the thermoelectric voltage EAB is linearly related to the hot end temperature T. Therefore, by using this linear relationship and assuming the cold end temperature is known and constant, the temperature at the hot end of the thermocouple can be calculated simply by measuring the output voltage of the thermocouple.

2.2. Temperature Measurement Structure of PEM

NiCr/NiSi TFTCs were fabricated on the surface of the PEM of a commercial PEMFC. The PEM channels are made of stainless steel with a width of 2 mm and a depth of 1 mm. The overall dimensions are 396 × 153 mm2. The positions of the NiCr/NiSi TFTCs on the PEM are shown in Figure 1, with two pairs of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs placed in the middle of the PEM and another two pairs placed at the edges of the PEM. Four NiCr/NiSi TFTCs are arranged in a centrosymmetric pattern on the PEM.

2.3. Preparation and Calibration of NiCr/NiSi Thin Films

NiCr films, NiSi films, and their SiO2 protective layers were fabricated using magnetron sputtering. The NiCr and NiSi films had a thickness of 800 ± 50 nm, while the SiO2 layer had a thickness of 1000 ± 50 nm. The deposition was carried out in a vacuum chamber using NiCr and NiSi targets with 99.99% purity and a Si target for the SiO2 layer. Prior to deposition, the bipolar plates were cleaned with acetone, ethanol, and ultrapure water, followed by drying in a drying chamber to ensure surface cleanliness. Mechanical masks were cleaned using the same procedure. NiCr films were deposited first, followed by a mechanical mask change for NiSi film deposition and another mask change for the deposition of the SiO2 layer. Detailed parameters for the preparation of NiCr, NiSi, and SiO2 films are provided in Table 1.
First, a layer of SiO2 insulating film is deposited on the PEM to obtain a smooth and well-adhered functional film preparation substrate. The size of this insulating substrate is 30 × 70 mm2. Then, a layer of NiCr film is deposited on the SiO2 insulating film, followed by a layer of NiSi film deposition on this structure, completing the preparation of the functional films. Finally, a layer of SiO2 protective film is deposited on the surface of the functional films to encapsulate the entire temperature measurement system, isolating it from external factors such as corrosion and oxidation. The completed NiCr/NiSi TFTC prepared on the surface of the PEM is also shown in Figure 1.
From the same batch of prepared PEM, select one PEM and cut out two areas containing thin-film thermocouples. One area is used for static calibration and the other for dynamic calibration. In this experiment, NiCr and NiSi films are connected and fixed to copper wires using DB5015 conductive silver paste (DBC, Taian, China). DB5015 is chosen for its excellent heat resistance (up to 1200 °C), water resistance, acid resistance, resistance to organic corrosion, and superior conductivity with low impedance. However, it requires preparation before use as follows: At room temperature, measure components A and B in a mass ratio of 2.5:1 and mix them into a flowable paste for use. After cleaning the copper wires and the surfaces of the NiCr and NiSi films, fix the copper wires at the ends of the NiCr and NiSi films using PI tape, ensuring good adhesion. Cover the adhered areas with the prepared paste and let it sit at room temperature for 12–24 h. Then, slowly heat it in a 202-00B electric thermostat drying oven to 80 °C, maintain this temperature for 2 h, and finally allow it to cool slowly back to room temperature before removing it for use.
The static calibration system is shown in Figure 2. The bipolar plate samples with thin-film thermocouples are placed in a Fluke 9144 calibration furnace (Fluke, Everett, WA, USA) with asbestos insulation at the furnace mouth. The thermocouple leads are exposed outside the furnace, with one end of the connected copper wire placed in a Fluke 9170 ice point instrument (Fluke, Everett, WA, USA). The ice point instrument is set to zero degrees, and the other end of the copper wire is connected to a DMM 7510 digital multimeter (Keysight Technologies, Santa Rosa, CA, USA). The electromotive force readings on the multimeter are recorded to calculate the Seebeck coefficient. In this study, the set temperature range is 50~505 °C, with eight evenly spaced temperature points, each maintained for five minutes.
Dynamic calibration is performed using a custom dynamic calibration system, as shown in Figure 2. This system uses a Quantel ultra-50 short-pulse infrared laser system, with the laser directed perpendicularly to the thermocouple plane and irradiating the center of the NiCr/NiSi TFTC hot junction. The laser has a wavelength of 1064 nm, a pulse width of 7.6 ns, and a spot diameter of 2.56 mm. Similar to the static calibration system, a Fluke 9170 ice point instrument is used to maintain the cold end temperature around zero degrees. An MR6000 data logger system is connected to the copper wires linked to the NiCr/NiSi thin-film thermocouple to record the thermoelectric voltage signal, with a time resolution of 5 ns and a voltage resolution of 65 μV.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. The Temperature Measurement Results of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs with Different Hot Junction Sizes

First, it should be noted that the rate of heat conduction is constant between materials of the same kind, and the heat absorbed by the material (Q) is determined by Equation (4) [22].
Q = m c Δ T
For the same material, its specific heat capacity (c) is identical, meaning that the heat required for a change in temperature depends only on its mass. According to Equation (5), it is evident that for the same material, the density (ρ) is also identical, which implies that the required heat depends solely on the geometric dimensions of the material.
m = ρ V
As the hot junction size of the NiCr/NiSi TFTCs increases, the time for the system to transition from startup to a stable operating state also increases, as shown in Figure 3. When the hot junction size is 0.1 × 0.1 mm2, the time taken for the system to stabilize is t1 = 3200 s, with the specific temperature curve shown as the black line in Figure 3. Through repeated experiments, it was found that the stable operating temperature of this self-built system is T = 83.2 °C. Therefore, it can be considered that the system has reached a stable operating temperature once the temperature reaches 83.2 °C. In Figure 3, similar to the representation for the 0.1 × 0.1 mm2 size, the stabilization time for the 0.5 × 0.5 mm2 size is t2 = 4900 s, shown as the red line in the figure. For the 1 × 1 mm2 size, the stabilization time is t3 = 6500 s, indicated by the blue line in Figure 3.
After the system has been operating for ttotal-operation = 10,700 s and is then shut down, it can be observed that the temperature of the NiCr/NiSi TFTCs drops rapidly after the reaction stops. However, due to the different thermal melting effects of the various hot junction volumes, the black line, which represents the smallest area, drops the fastest. The red line, representing the medium area, and the blue line, representing the largest area, have relatively similar descent rates, with the red line being slightly faster. Similarly, during the heating process, the different stabilization times of the three NiCr/NiSi TFTCs with different hot junction sizes are primarily due to the differences in their heating rates, which are caused by their varying thermal melting properties.
As for the temperature fluctuations within the red rectangle in Figure 3, these are due to the sudden shutdown of the PEMFC, causing dramatic changes in the PEM surface environment and resulting in a rapid temperature drop. For NiCr/NiSi TFTCs, this places them in an unstable temperature field with a significant temperature difference between the upper and lower surfaces. In recent studies, Sun et al. [23] have consistently observed significant signal fluctuations of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs in unstable temperature fields and have thus developed a dynamic heat transfer mathematical model for NiCr/NiSi TFTCs. The temperature fluctuations observed here can be fully explained by the internal heat transfer and reflection within NiCr/NiSi TFTCs under unstable temperature fields, leading to localized temperature increases. This is a very normal and interesting phenomenon.

3.2. The Effect of Hot Junction Size on the Lifespan of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs

The experiment on the effect of hot junction size on the lifespan of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs is shown in Figure 4. In this experiment, 50 PMCs were used to test the lifespan of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs. Each thermocouple operated in the PEMFC for 500 h, and the relevant data were recorded. The damage condition of two pairs of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs located in the middle of the PMC, as shown in statistical Figure 1, was assessed. These two pairs are in the same position within the PMC, providing a strong basis for comparison. The failure of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs is evaluated based on the following three tests, where failure in any one of these tests indicates that the NiCr/NiSi TFTCs are damaged and cannot continue to operate normally: (1) The structure of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs shows visible cracks and peeling of the thin film, as shown in Figure 4b. (2) The electrical resistance between the functional film (NiCr or NiSi) leads and the PMC surface is less than 1 × 105 Ω. (3) Damage at the connection between NiCr/NiSi TFTCs and the leads.
From Figure 4a, it can be seen that when the hot junction size is 0.1 × 0.1 mm2, 50% of 100 pairs of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs are judged to be damaged. When the hot junction size is 0.5 × 0.5 mm2, 24% of 100 pairs of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs are judged to be damaged. Similarly, when the hot junction size is 1 × 1 mm2, 44% of 100 pairs of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs are judged to be damaged. It can be seen that the damage rate of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs with sizes in the range of 0.1 × 0.1 mm2 to 1 × 1 mm2 is generally below 50%. There are two main influencing factors. First, as the size decreases, the mechanical strength of the NiCr/NiSi TFTCs reduces, and crystal defects within the thin film are magnified, leading to overall failure. Second, as the size increases, the effect of differing thermal expansion coefficients between the layers of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs becomes more pronounced. In NiCr/NiSi TFTCs, the thermal expansion coefficients of the NiCr and NiSi films are almost identical, but the thermal expansion coefficient of SiO2 is significantly different from that of the NiCr/NiSi films. This difference causes slippage between the NiCr/NiSi layer and the SiO2 layer under mechanical stress. On a macroscopic level, this can be observed as film fracture due to compressive deformation, as shown in Figure 4b.

3.3. Performance Characterization of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs

To explain and investigate the phenomena mentioned in Section 3.1 and Section 3.2, it is necessary to characterize the NiCr film, NiSi film, and SiO2 film. This will involve examining the microstructure and performance of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs to elucidate these two phenomena.
Figure 5a displays the XRD patterns of the NiCr and NiSi thin films. To verify the compactness of the NiCr and NiSi thin films, EDS measurements were performed, as shown in Figure 5b,c. Only C and O elements were detected as impurities, which is attributed to contamination from organic substances in the environment during sample transfer since EDS measurements are not conducted in situ. The EDS results reveal that the NiCr thin film is composed of Ni and Cr elements with an atomic ratio of Ni/Cr = 89.84/10.16, and the NiSi thin film is composed of Ni and Si elements with an atomic ratio of Ni/Si = 94.05/5.95. These results are consistent with the composition of the target material and the standard K-type thermocouple thermoelectric electrodes [24,25]. This indicates that the films are dense, and there are no macroscopic defects caused by the preparation process. However, it does not prevent macroscopic film damage caused by lattice defects, which remains a challenging issue to address [26,27].
The static and dynamic calibration results of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs with different hot junction sizes are shown in Table 2. It can be seen from Table 2 that the change in hot junction size does not affect the Seebeck coefficient of the NiCr/NiSi TFTCs, which is completely consistent with the definition of the Seebeck coefficient. However, the dynamic calibration results show a strong correlation with the hot junction size, which is also understandable. In dynamic calibration, the hot junction is in an unstable temperature field, and the dynamic calibration results are greatly influenced by the thermal melting of the metal at the hot junction. In other words, under the same conditions, the response time depends on the size of the thermal melting at the hot junction of the NiCr/NiSi TFTCs.

3.4. The Effect of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs Hot Junction Size on the Operating State of PEMFCs

Figure 6 presents the I-V and I-P polarization curves of PEMFCs under specific conditions, comparing three different hot junction sizes of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs and a PEMFC without the NiCr/NiSi functional film, all using the same size of the SiO2 insulation layer. The conditions include an H2/air input pressure of 0.4 MPa, a flow rate of 500 mL/min, an inlet relative humidity of 40%RH, an ambient temperature of 25 °C, and a stable operating temperature of the PEMFC at 83.2 °C. Figure 6 demonstrates that coating the PEM surface with NiCr/NiSi TFTC measurement devices has a minimal impact on the I-V polarization curves. As the hot junction area of the NiCr/NiSi TFTCs increases, there is a slight voltage drop at the same current density. When the current density exceeds 0.1 A/cm2, the output voltage of PEMFCs with NiCr/NiSi TFTCs decreases with increasing hot junction volume, but the differences remain within 5%, which is acceptable. Similarly, comparing the effects of different NiCr/NiSi TFTCs hot junction sizes on the I-P curves further demonstrates that changes in the hot junction size of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs have no significant impact on power output. The difference in power output between the group without NiCr/NiSi thin-film thermocouples and the group with NiCr/NiSi TFTCs having a hot junction area of 1 × 1 mm2 at a current density of 1.1 A/cm2 is only ΔP = 0.05 W/cm2. It can be observed that, although the NiCr/NiSi TFTCs coating on the PEM surface slightly hinders proton exchange and heat transfer processes in the coated area, this effect is negligible.

3.5. Optimal Design of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs Hot Junction Size

To better explore the optimal balance between the lifespan and performance of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs with different junction sizes, a benefit evaluation criterion was designed and constructed to provide a quantitative assessment standard. The calculation method is as follows:
R i = P i 1 F i
where Ri represents the benefit of the i-th junction area of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs, Pi represents the performance index of the i-th junction area of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs, and Fi represents the failure rate of the i-th junction area of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs. Where the performance index Pi is obtained by the following formula:
P i = 1000 t i 100
Equation (6) can be arranged as follows:
R i = 1000 t i 100 1 F i
Using a quadratic polynomial, fit the failure rate data from Figure 4a and the stabilization time data from Figure 3. Supplement the complete data for the junction area of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs within the range of 0.1 × 0.1 mm2 to 1 × 1 mm2 with a step size of 0.01 mm2 for both t and F. A total of 91 junction sizes were calculated, and the results are shown in Figure 7. When the junction area S = 0.22 mm2, the benefit coefficient reaches its maximum value. This indicates that the optimal junction size for NiCr/NiSi TFTCs is 0.47 × 0.47 mm2.

4. Conclusions

Designed experiments and discussed the impact of the hot junction size of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs on the performance of the temperature measurement system in PEMFCs and the working efficiency of PEMFCs. By designing three different hot junction sizes—0.1 × 0.1 mm2, 0.5 × 0.5 mm2, and 1 × 1 mm2—the comprehensive performance of different hot junction sizes is evaluated using two parameters: the time required for system stabilization and the damage rate of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs after 500 h of operation. The experiment revealed that as the hot junction size increases, the stabilization time also increases. Furthermore, as the hot junction size increases from 0.1 × 0.1 mm2 to 1 × 1 mm2, the damage rate of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs initially decreases and then increases. This is consistent with the amplification rule of lattice defect effects at the microscale and the positive correlation between thermal expansion and object volume. The benefit evaluation algorithm determined that the optimal hot junction size for NiCr/NiSi TFTCs is 0.47 × 0.47 mm2. This has significant reference value and serves as a driving force for establishing standards for the size of thin-film thermocouples (TFTCs) used in measuring PEMFCs. It also provides a basis for studying the damage mechanisms of TFTCs under extreme conditions. In the future, we will continue to optimize the algorithm and conduct supplementary tests to determine the optimal size of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs. Additionally, we will extend the conclusions to TFTCs made from different material compositions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.G., Z.L., Y.S., Y.W., T.M., Z.W. and W.D.; Methodology, H.G., Z.L., T.G. and Z.W.; Software, H.G., T.G., B.W. and T.M.; Validation, H.G. and Y.C.; Formal analysis, K.S. and Y.C.; Investigation, K.S.; Resources, Z.L. and W.D.; Data curation, T.G. and B.W.; Writing—original draft, Z.L. and Y.S.; Writing—review & editing, T.M., Z.W. and W.D.; Supervision, Y.W. and Z.W.; Project administration, Z.W.; Funding acquisition, Z.L. and Z.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2021YFB4001501), the State Sponsored Postdoctoral Fellowship Programme under Grant (No. GZC20231280), Open Foundation of Laboratory of Low frequency Electromagnetic Communication Technology with the WMCRT CSSC, (No. DPJJ-2022-03), Open Foundation of State Key Laboratory of High-end Compressor and System Technology, (No. SKL-YSJ202201).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yalcinoz, T.; Alam, M.S. Dynamic modeling and simulation of air-breathing proton exchange membrane fuel cell. J. Power Sources 2008, 182, 168–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Budak, Y.; Devrim, Y. Investigation of micro-combined heat and power application of PEM fuel cell systems. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 160, 486–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. He, K.; Mao, L.; Yu, J.; Huang, W.; He, Q. Long-Term Performance Prediction of PEMFC Based on LASSO-ESN. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2021, 70, 3511611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Budak, Y.; Devrim, Y. Micro-cogeneration application of a high-temperature PEM fuel cell stack operated with polybenzimidazole based membranes. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 35198–35207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Benouioua, D.; Candusso, D.; Harel, F.; Picard, P.; François, X. On the issue of the PEMFC operating fault identification: Generic analysis tool based on voltage pointwise singularity strengths. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 11606–11613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fan, L.; Tu, Z.; Chan, S.H. Recent development in design a state-of-art proton exchange membrane fuel cell from stack to system: Theory, integration and prospective. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 7828–7865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nguyen, H.Q.; Aris, A.M.; Shabani, B. PEM fuel cell heat recovery for preheating inlet air in standalone solar-hydrogen systems for telecommunication applications: An exergy analysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 2987–3003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. O’Connell, A.; Kelly, A.L.; Tobin, J.; Ruegg, P.L.; Gleeson, D. The effect of storage conditions on the composition and functional properties of blended bulk tank milk. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 991–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Guo, H.; Wang, M.H.; Liu, J.X.; Nie, Z.H.; Ye, F.; Ma, C.F. Temperature distribution on anodic surface of membrane electrode assembly in proton exchange membrane fuel cell with interdigitated flow bed. J. Power Sources 2015, 273, 775–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Inman, K.; Wang, X.; Sangerozan, B. Development of an Optical Sensor for Temperature Measurement and Water Droplet Detection in PEMFC Gas Channels. In Proceedings of the ASME 2011 9th International Conference on Fuel Cell Science, Engineering and Technology, Washington, DC, USA, 7–10 August 2011; ASMEDC: Washington, DC, USA, 2011; pp. 103–109. [Google Scholar]
  11. Nishimura, A.; Kamiya, S.; Okado, T.; Sato, Y.; Hirota, M.; Kolhe, M.L. Heat and mass transfer analysis in single cell of PEFC using different PEM and GDL at higher temperature. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 29631–29640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yuan, L.; Wang, Q.; Tang, F.; Li, B.; Ming, P.; Zhang, C. An enhanced thin-film resistance temperature detector and its application for catalyst layer surface temperature measurement inside PEMFC. eTransportation 2022, 13, 100178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ruan, Y.; Li, J.; Xiao, Q.; Wu, Y.; Shi, M. High-Temperature Failure Evolution Analysis of K-Type Film Thermocouples. Micromachines 2023, 14, 2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, Z.; Tian, B.; Li, L.; Lei, J.; Liu, Z.; Liu, J.; Cheng, G.; Zhao, N.; Fang, X.; Zhao, L. Thermoelectricity and antivibration properties of screen-printed nanodoped In1.35ZnO2.11/In2O3 thin-film thermocouples on alumina substrates. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 25747–25755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, Z.; Sun, Y.; Xue, Y. Reliability Analysis For Thin Film Thermocouple Thermal Oxidation Failure Based On Interlayer Diffusion. In Proceedings of the 2023 10th International Conference on Dependable Systems and Their Applications (DSA), Tokyo, Japan, 10–11 August 2023; IEEE: Tokyo, Japan, 2023; pp. 565–574. [Google Scholar]
  16. Guk, E.; Ranaweera, M.; Venkatesan, V.; Kim, J.-S. Performance and Durability of Thin Film Thermocouple Array on a Porous Electrode. Sensors 2016, 16, 1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Choi, H.; Datta, A.; Cheng, X.; Li, X. Microfabrication and Characterization of Metal-Embedded Thin-Film Thermomechanical Microsensors for Applications in Hostile Manufacturing Environments. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 2006, 15, 322–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, Z.; Tian, B.; Yu, Q.; Shi, P.; Lin, Q.; Zhao, N.; Jing, W.; Jiang, Z. Range Analysis of Thermal Stress and Optimal Design for Tungsten-Rhenium Thin Film Thermocouples Based on Ceramic Substrates. Sensors 2017, 17, 857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yan, J.J.; Yan, G.; Chen, H.Y.; Liu, Z.Y.; Yang, L.; Zhou, Y.C. Real-time detection of damage evolution and failure of EB-PVD thermal barrier coatings using an environmental simulator with high-temperature and high-speed rotation. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2022, 439, 128416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, Y.; Liu, D.; Ren, W.; Shi, P.; Liu, M.; Ye, Z.; Tian, B.; Jiang, Z. Enhanced stability of ITO/In2O3 thin film thermocouples by coating Al2O3 layer. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE SENSORS, Glasgow, UK, 29 October–1 November 2017; IEEE: Glasgow, UK, 2017; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  21. Tillmann, W.; Kokalj, D.; Stangier, D.; Schöppner, V.; Malatyali, H. Effects of AlN and BCN Thin Film Multilayer Design on the Reaction Time of Ni/Ni-20Cr Thin Film Thermocouples on Thermally Sprayed Al2O3. Sensors 2019, 19, 3414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kaviany, M. Heat Transfer Physics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  23. Sun, Y.; Liu, Z.; Hao, Y.; Liu, J.; Wang, Q.; Wang, H.; Li, Z.; Yin, J.; Wang, H.; Jiang, W.; et al. Preliminary Investigation of Thermoelectric Electromotive Force Oscillation of NiCr/NiSi Thin Film Thermocouple in Dynamic Calibration. Small 2023, 20, 2308002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fraden, J. Handbook of Modern Sensors; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010; ISBN 978-1-4419-6465-6. [Google Scholar]
  25. Fraden, J. Handbook of Modern Sensors: Physics, Designs, and Applications; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; ISBN 978-3-319-19302-1. [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu, Z.; Wang, Q.; Guo, S.; Wang, H.; Jiang, W.; Liu, S.; Liu, C.; Wang, N.; Cui, Y.; Ding, W. The preliminary exploration on change mechanism of Seebeck coefficient for NiCr/NiSi thin film thermocouple with different thickness. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 931, 167573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Porter, A. Basic Principles of Automatic Control Systems. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 1948, 159, 25–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the NiCr/NiSi thin-film thermocouple position on the PEM.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the NiCr/NiSi thin-film thermocouple position on the PEM.
Micromachines 15 01375 g001
Figure 2. Static and dynamic calibration system structure diagram.
Figure 2. Static and dynamic calibration system structure diagram.
Micromachines 15 01375 g002
Figure 3. The effect of different hot point two-dimensional sizes on the response time and temperature measurement accuracy of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs temperature measurement systems.
Figure 3. The effect of different hot point two-dimensional sizes on the response time and temperature measurement accuracy of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs temperature measurement systems.
Micromachines 15 01375 g003
Figure 4. (a) The ratio of failed NiCr/NiSi TFTCs to the total number for each hot junction size. (b) The damage location diagram of failed NiCr/NiSi TFTCs.
Figure 4. (a) The ratio of failed NiCr/NiSi TFTCs to the total number for each hot junction size. (b) The damage location diagram of failed NiCr/NiSi TFTCs.
Micromachines 15 01375 g004
Figure 5. Basic characteristics of NiCr and NiSi thin films: (a) XRD patterns of NiCr thin films, NiCr target material, and the standard XRD pattern of Ni91Cr9 (wt.%); XRD patterns of NiSi thermoelectric electrodes, NiSi target material, and the standard XRD pattern of Ni94Si6 (wt.%). (b) EDS spectrum of the NiCr thin film. (c) EDS spectrum of the NiSi thin film.
Figure 5. Basic characteristics of NiCr and NiSi thin films: (a) XRD patterns of NiCr thin films, NiCr target material, and the standard XRD pattern of Ni91Cr9 (wt.%); XRD patterns of NiSi thermoelectric electrodes, NiSi target material, and the standard XRD pattern of Ni94Si6 (wt.%). (b) EDS spectrum of the NiCr thin film. (c) EDS spectrum of the NiSi thin film.
Micromachines 15 01375 g005
Figure 6. The effect of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs with different hot spot sizes on the I-V and I-P polarization curves of PEMFC.
Figure 6. The effect of NiCr/NiSi TFTCs with different hot spot sizes on the I-V and I-P polarization curves of PEMFC.
Micromachines 15 01375 g006
Figure 7. The calculation results of the benefit coefficient for different junction sizes.
Figure 7. The calculation results of the benefit coefficient for different junction sizes.
Micromachines 15 01375 g007
Table 1. The deposition parameters for NiCr, NiSi, and SiO2 films.
Table 1. The deposition parameters for NiCr, NiSi, and SiO2 films.
Experimental ParametersNiCr FilmNiSi FilmSio2 Film
Target (wt.%)Ni90Cr10Ni97Si3Si
Target purity99.9%99.9%99.99%
Target base distance (mm)120120120
Working gasArArAr/O2
Working pressure (Pa)0.70.70.6
Flow rate (sccm)202020/10
Inversion time (μs)111
Pulse frequency (kHz)100100100
Sputtering power density (W/cm2)1.901.903.33
Film thickness (nm)800 ± 50800 ± 501000 ± 50
Sputtering time (min)404590
Table 2. Static and dynamic calibration results for different thermocouple junction sizes.
Table 2. Static and dynamic calibration results for different thermocouple junction sizes.
Hot Point SizeStatic Calibration (μV/°C)Dynamic Calibration (μs)
0.1 × 0.1 mm210.40.53
0.5 × 0.5 mm210.21.05
1 × 1 mm210.32.33
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guo, H.; Liu, Z.; Guo, T.; Sun, Y.; Shen, K.; Wang, B.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ma, T.; Wang, Z.; et al. Effect of Hot Junction Size on the Temperature Measurement of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells Using NiCr/NiSi Thin-Film Thermocouple Sensors. Micromachines 2024, 15, 1375. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15111375

AMA Style

Guo H, Liu Z, Guo T, Sun Y, Shen K, Wang B, Cheng Y, Wang Y, Ma T, Wang Z, et al. Effect of Hot Junction Size on the Temperature Measurement of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells Using NiCr/NiSi Thin-Film Thermocouple Sensors. Micromachines. 2024; 15(11):1375. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15111375

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guo, Huijin, Zhihui Liu, Tengda Guo, Yi Sun, Kai Shen, Bi Wang, Yongjun Cheng, Yuming Wang, Tiancai Ma, Zixi Wang, and et al. 2024. "Effect of Hot Junction Size on the Temperature Measurement of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells Using NiCr/NiSi Thin-Film Thermocouple Sensors" Micromachines 15, no. 11: 1375. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15111375

APA Style

Guo, H., Liu, Z., Guo, T., Sun, Y., Shen, K., Wang, B., Cheng, Y., Wang, Y., Ma, T., Wang, Z., & Ding, W. (2024). Effect of Hot Junction Size on the Temperature Measurement of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells Using NiCr/NiSi Thin-Film Thermocouple Sensors. Micromachines, 15(11), 1375. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15111375

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop