Next Article in Journal
Integrated Analysis of RNA-Binding Proteins in Glioma
Next Article in Special Issue
The Interplay of Dysregulated pH and Electrolyte Imbalance in Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
A Fluorescence-Based Wireless Capsule Endoscopy System for Detecting Colorectal Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Andrographolide on Intracellular pH Regulation, Cellular Migration, and Apoptosis in Human Cervical Cancer Cells (Running Tittle: Effects of Andrographolide on pH Regulators and Apoptosis in Cervical Cancer)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 12
Issue 4
10.3390/cancers12040891
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Targeting the Acidic Tumor Microenvironment: Unexpected Pro-Neoplastic Effects of Oral NaHCO3 Therapy in Murine Breast Tissue

by
Ninna C. S. Voss
1,2,
Thomas Dreyer
1,
Mikkel B. Henningsen
1,
Pernille Vahl
3,
Bent Honoré
1 and
Ebbe Boedtkjer
1,*
1
Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
2
Department of Surgery, Regionshospitalet Randers, DK-8930 Randers, Denmark
3
Department of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2020, 12(4), 891; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12040891
Submission received: 20 February 2020 / Revised: 31 March 2020 / Accepted: 31 March 2020 / Published: 6 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Tumour pH Regulation)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The acidic tumor microenvironment modifies malignant cell behavior. Here, we study consequences of the microenvironment in breast carcinomas. Beginning at carcinogen-based breast cancer induction, we supply either regular or NaHCO3-containing drinking water to female C57BL/6j mice. We evaluate urine and blood acid-base status, tumor metabolism (microdialysis sampling), and tumor pH (pH-sensitive microelectrodes) in vivo. Based on freshly isolated epithelial organoids from breast carcinomas and normal breast tissue, we assess protein expression (immunoblotting, mass spectrometry), intracellular pH (fluorescence microscopy), and cell proliferation (bromodeoxyuridine incorporation). Oral NaHCO3 therapy increases breast tumor pH in vivo from 6.68 ± 0.04 to 7.04 ± 0.09 and intracellular pH in breast epithelial organoids by ~0.15. Breast tumors develop with median latency of 85.5 ± 8.2 days in NaHCO3-treated mice vs. 82 ± 7.5 days in control mice. Oral NaHCO3 therapy does not affect tumor growth, histopathology or glycolytic metabolism. The capacity for cellular net acid extrusion is increased in NaHCO3-treated mice and correlates negatively with breast tumor latency. Oral NaHCO3 therapy elevates proliferative activity in organoids from breast carcinomas. Changes in protein expression patterns—observed by high-throughput proteomics analyses—between cancer and normal breast tissue and in response to oral NaHCO3 therapy reveal complex influences on metabolism, cytoskeleton, cell-cell and cell-matrix interaction, and cell signaling pathways. We conclude that oral NaHCO3 therapy neutralizes the microenvironment of breast carcinomas, elevates the cellular net acid extrusion capacity, and accelerates proliferation without net effect on breast cancer development or tumor growth. We demonstrate unexpected pro-neoplastic consequences of oral NaHCO3 therapy that in breast tissue cancel out previously reported anti-neoplastic effects.

1. Introduction

The acidic tumor microenvironment is a hallmark of solid cancer tissue with multifaceted consequences for cancer cells, adjacent normal cells, and their interactions [1,2]. Enhanced metabolic acid production in cancer tissue is a consequence of accelerated glycolysis and/or oxidative phosphorylation that provide energy and chemical intermediates for cancer cell proliferation [3]. Cancer cells export the increased acid load to the extracellular space via acid-base transporters in their cell membranes [4,5,6]. Inadequate perfusion further amplifies local interstitial accumulation of acid [7]. The electroneutral Na+, HCO3–-cotransporter NBCn1 (Slc4a7) is upregulated in human and murine breast cancer tissue compared to normal breast tissue; and acting in parallel with the Na+/H+-exchanger isoform 1 (NHE1, Slc9a1), NBCn1 is the predominant path for net acid extrusion from breast cancer cells [8,9,10,11]. Cellular elimination of lactate and H+ from glycolytic metabolism can also occur via monocarboxylate transporters [12,13]. Acid-base transport processes across membranes, within the cytoplasm, and through the tortuous extracellular space can be accelerated by carbonic anhydrases that catalyze the reaction CO2 + OH− ⇄ HCO3− [14,15,16]. The functional consequences of carbonic anhydrases have hitherto been studied mostly in model systems and need to be confirmed in breast cancer tissue. Despite the high metabolic rate and low extracellular pH (pHo), efficient net acid extrusion maintains the cytoplasm of breast cancer cells more alkaline than normal breast epithelial cells under the same conditions [8,9]. The characteristic compartmentalization of acidity in solid cancer tissue—with very low pHo and relatively high intracellular pH (pHi)—is an early event in carcinogenesis and a promising therapeutic target [4,17,18].
Local extracellular acidity is believed to promote cancer development and progression but it is a point of contention whether pHo within tumors can reach levels so low that it restricts functions of acid-adapted cancer cells [17]. Advancement through specific cell cycle checkpoints depends on transient increases in pHi [19,20], and acidosis typically inhibits cell cycle progression and hence proliferation of cultured cancer cells [21]. However, opposing facilitatory roles of acidosis on proliferation are possible as extracellular H+ acting directly on H+-sensing receptors or H+-activated ion channels may elicit signals that favor proliferation [17]. Despite these uncertainties, it is well-accepted that cancer cells show improved resistance to acidosis compared to normal cells [8] and that the evolutionary selection pressure of the acidic microenvironment can favor more malignant phenotypes [22]. The overall consequences of the tumor microenvironment depend on the degree of acidification; and adaptive processes initiated by tumor acidosis likely enhance cancer cell function particularly if they later encounter less acidic environments, for instance, during invasion [17].
Acidosis can influence cellular functions by modulation of enzymatic activities, and particularly the acid-sensitivity of enzymes in the glycolytic pathway has attracted attention [23]. Cancer cells respond to sustained acidosis by reshaping their metabolic phenotype and over time shift towards glutamine metabolism and fatty acid oxidation [24,25,26]. Acidosis also has cancer type-dependent effects on autophagy as illustrated by the stimulatory effect of low pHo in melanoma cell lines yet inhibitory effect in breast cancer cells [27,28]. Cancer-promoting effects of low pHo include degradation of extracellular matrix—through acid-mediated activation of matrix metalloproteinases, cathepsins, lysosomal proteases, and hyaluronidase [29,30,31,32]—and induction of cell death in surrounding normal cells [33]. The low pHo of the tumor microenvironment also purportedly inhibits immune cell functions [17,34]. Together, these processes facilitate tumor expansion and metastasis and are essential for the prognosis of cancer patients.
Ingestion of base, through dietary intake or buffer therapy, has been proposed to reduce the risk of cancer development and metastasis [35,36]. Although oral administration of NaHCO3—in order to neutralize the tumor microenvironment—does not affect primary breast tumor growth in murine xenograft models [32], it lowers the number of metastases and prevents recurrence [32,37]. As xenograft models involve in vivo implantation of already transformed malignant cells, they are not well suited for studying processes whereby normal cells transform into cancer cells. Supporting a role of pH during carcinogenesis, oral NaHCO3 therapy impairs primary tumor growth in the transgenic adenocarcinoma of the mouse prostate (TRAMP) model [38], and knockout of NBCn1 delays carcinogen- and ErbB2-induced breast cancer development and decelerates tumor growth [9,10]. Evidence from human intervention and observational studies is still insufficient to support or exclude that an alkaline diet can be used for prevention or treatment of cancer [39]. Initial studies, showing promising effects of alkaline therapy on renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease, suggest that alkaline supplements can be administered to humans without unacceptable adverse effects [40].
In the current study, we explore consequences of oral NaHCO3 therapy during breast carcinogenesis. Contrary to our expectation, the elevated pHo of the tumor microenvironment in response to oral NaHCO3 therapy shows no overall net effect on breast tumor-free survival or primary tumor growth. We reveal unexpected pro-neoplastic effects of oral NaHCO3 therapy in breast tissue—including increased capacity for cellular net acid extrusion and accelerated in vitro proliferation—that likely cancel out previously reported benefits of oral buffer therapy. Consistent with this model of mixed pro- and anti-neoplastic consequences of tumor acidosis, we show—based on high-throughput proteomics analyses—that oral NaHCO3 therapy differentially influences protein expression patterns related to cell signaling, metabolism, cytoskeleton, and cell-cell and cell-matrix interaction during breast carcinogenesis.

2. Results

2.1. Oral NaHCO3 Therapy Alkalinizes Tumors, Urine, and Arterial Blood

The microenvironment of breast cancer tissue in vivo is highly acidic reaching an average pH of 6.68 ± 0.04 (Figure 1A), which is consistent with previous reports [41]. Chronic oral administration of NaHCO3 elevates tumor pH by 0.35 ± 0.13 (Figure 1A).
Sustained oral NaHCO3 therapy also elevates pH (Figure 1B) and standard-[HCO3−] (Figure 1C) of arterial blood although the alkalinizing effect is considerably smaller than for tumors. We performed recordings on and collected blood samples from mice mechanically ventilated to normocapnia in order to avoid stress-induced hyperventilation or anesthesia-induced hypoventilation. Accordingly, pCO2 of arterial blood was similar (p = 0.78, unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test) for NaHCO3-treated mice (45.10 ± 2.23 mmHg) and control mice (47.85 ± 2.31 mmHg). At steady-state, intake and output of NaHCO3 must balance, and we indeed document dramatic increases in urinary pH (Figure 1D) and [HCO3–] (Figure 1E) during oral NaHCO3 therapy.

2.2. Oral NaHCO3 Therapy Modifies Protein Expression Related to Cytoskeleton, Cell-Cell and Cell-Matrix Interaction, and Immune Function

We identify marked differences in protein expression patterns related to cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions, cytoskeletal dynamics, and immune-related functions between organoids freshly isolated from breast cancer tissue and matched normal breast tissue (Figure 1F and Figure S1A). These effects are anticipated based on the changes in cytoskeleton, extracellular matrix, and cell-cell interactions that occur during cancer development [17]. Our data suggest that oral NaHCO3 therapy amplifies or perturbs carcinogen-induced protein expression changes in breast cancer tissue (Figure 1G and Figure S1B) and even cause related changes in matched macroscopically normal breast tissue (Figure 1H and Figure S1C). These data imply that acidosis of the breast cancer microenvironment in some respects limits the cellular alterations taking place during carcinogenesis.
Acidosis of the tumor microenvironment purportedly attenuates immune-mediated anti-neoplastic responses in cancer tissue [42]. In congruence, we find that signaling pathways of particular relevance for macrophage and neutrophil function are perturbed in the breast tissue of NaHCO3-treated mice, including chemokine signaling downstream of interleukin (IL)-8, N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP), and the C-X-C motif chemokine receptor (CXCR)4, Fcγ-receptor-mediated phagocytosis, and macrophage production of NO and reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Figure 1G,H). The detailed mechanisms of macrophage infiltration and function in solid cancer tissue are not well understood but subtype-dependent differences have been described with M1-like macrophages predominantly suppressing and M2-like macrophages predominantly promoting tumor growth [43]. Variable influences [44,45,46,47,48] of the immune-relevant signaling pathways that we find perturbed by oral NaHCO3 therapy (Figure 1G,H) likely reflect the complexity of the interaction between immune cells, cancer cells, and the tumor microenvironment. Overall, our findings support that interventions, such as oral NaHCO3 therapy, to neutralize the acidity of the tumor microenvironment modify protein expression patterns (Figure 1G,H and Figure S1B,C) that may otherwise contribute to immune evasion in solid cancer tissue.

2.3. Oral NaHCO3 Therapy does not Affect Tumor Burden, Tumor-Free Survival, or Histopathology

After carcinogen-based induction, breast tumors develop with a median latency of 85.5 ± 8.2 days in NaHCO3-treated mice compared to 82.0 ± 7.5 days in control mice (Figure 2A). One of 45 control mice and 3 of 42 NaHCO3-treated mice did not develop breast tumors within the 9-month observation period starting from cancer induction.
We measure the size of all breast tumors with calipers upon excision 2 weeks after first detection and observe no significant difference in breast tumor burden between control mice and NaHCO3-treated mice (Figure 2B). Because oral NaHCO3 therapy is not expected to influence our ability to detect tumors by palpation—which is usually possible when tumors are 3–4 mm in diameter [9,49]—tumor burden after 2 weeks is a measure of the tumor growth rate.
The various breast cancer histopathologies occur with similar frequencies in NaHCO3-treated mice and control mice (Figure 2C): most numerous are squamous carcinomas and Wnt tumors, whereas adenocarcinomas, adenosquamous carcinomas, solid tumors, myoepitheliomas, solid nodular tumors, and metaplastic carcinomas are less common, consistent with earlier reports [9].
Breast tumor-free survival and breast tumor burden depend on histopathology, but we observe no systematic differences between NaHCO3-treated mice and control mice (Figure 2D).

2.4. Metabolic Activity Changes during Carcinogenesis and Oral NaHCO3 Therapy

Dramatic changes in energy fluxes occur during carcinogenesis as supported by the massively perturbed protein expression profile in breast cancer tissue compared to normal breast tissue (Figure 3A). Most notably, enzymes of the glycolytic pathway increase substantially (Figure 3A and Figure S2A) supporting their dominant contribution to supply of energy and chemical components for cell proliferation in cancer tissue [50]. We also see enrichment of the pentose phosphate pathway (Figure 3A and Figure S2A). In sharp contrast, the majority of enzymes in other—particularly oxidative—catabolic pathways show reduced expression levels as demonstrated for acetyl-CoA biosynthesis, the tricarboxylic acid cycle, and oxidative phosphorylation (Figure 3A and Figure S2A). Reduced or perturbed expression levels are also evident for catabolic pathways involving amino acids (valine, leucine, isoleucine, lysine, and tryptophan), fatty acids (L-carnitine shuttle and fatty acid β-oxidation), ketone bodies, and ethanol (Figure 3A and Figure S2A). These protein expression changes support the Warburg effect, favoring energy production through fermentative glycolysis rather than oxidative phosphorylation. Interestingly, we also see disturbances in cholesterol and stearate biosynthesis (Figure 3A and Figure S2A).
Oral NaHCO3 therapy partly reverses the downregulation of oxidative phosphorylation in the breast cancer tissue without influencing the upregulation of glycolysis (Figure 3A,B and Figure S2B), and the intervention to neutralize the acidity of the tumor microenvironment thus potentially improves energy supply to the cancer cells. Surprisingly, despite the marked differences in cancer cell pHi (Figure 4) and pH of the tumor microenvironment (Figure 1A), our proteomics analysis reveals no other significant changes of metabolic pathways in the tumor tissue in response to oral NaHCO3 therapy.
We sampled interstitial solution by microdialysis in order to functionally evaluate glycolytic metabolism in breast cancer tissue and normal breast tissue in vivo. Consistent with the protein expression patterns (Figure 3A,B), we observe (a) decreased [glucose] (Figure 3C) and increased [lactate] (Figure 3D) in the tumor interstitium as signs of elevated glycolytic activity compared to normal breast tissue and (b) no difference in [lactate]/[glucose]-ratio—which is a measure of glycolytic metabolism—between NaHCO3-treated mice and control mice (Figure 3E).

2.5. Oral NaHCO3 Therapy Increases the Capacity for Net Acid Extrusion in Breast Tissue

Earlier reports demonstrate that Na+, HCO3–-cotransport and Na+/H+-exchange constitute the major components of net acid extrusion from breast tissue [8,9,10,11]. In accordance, pHi recovery after NH4+-prepulse-induced acidification is largely Na+-dependent in organoids from normal breast tissue and breast cancer tissue irrespective of whether they are isolated from control mice or NaHCO3-treated mice (Figure 4A,B).
As expected, the intracellular buffering power of the breast tissue varies as function of pHi (Figure 4C); and consistent with a previous report [9], we find a tendency towards higher intracellular buffering capacity in the breast cancer tissue compared to normal breast tissue although this does not reach statistical significance (Figure 4C). Otherwise, the intracellular buffering capacity is unaffected by oral NaHCO3 therapy.
The capacity for net acid extrusion is strongly increased in breast carcinomas compared to normal breast tissue particularly when experiments are performed in presence of CO2/HCO3– (Figure 4D,E). This finding is consistent with the previously reported key role of NBCn1 for net acid extrusion from breast cancer tissue [9,10] and the upregulated NBCn1 protein expression in breast cancer tissue compared to normal breast tissue (Figure 5A,B). We also observe upregulation of NHE1 protein expression during breast carcinogenesis (Figure 5A,C). Supporting the pathophysiological relevance of local acid-base dynamics for malignancy, we show that the capacity for net acid extrusion correlates negatively with breast tumor-free survival as tumors developing with the shortest latencies show the highest acid extrusion capacities (Figure 4F).
To our surprise, oral NaHCO3 therapy increases the capacity for net acid extrusion in breast cancer tissue and normal breast tissue (Figure 4A,B,D,E). The elevated net acid extrusion is evident from the ability of the breast tissue from NaHCO3-treated mice to extrude intracellular acid at more alkaline pHi [8,9,10] and is apparent whether organoids are investigated in physiological buffer or are acutely deprived of CO2/HCO3− (Figure 4D,E). Thus, the data demonstrate that oral NaHCO3 therapy increases Na+/H+-exchange activity and maybe has additional effects on Na+, HCO3−-cotransport. Oral NaHCO3 therapy has no additional effect on the upregulation of NBCn1 or NHE1 protein expression during breast carcinogenesis (Figure 5A-C) suggesting that the acid-base transport activity is post-translationally regulated by oral NaHCO3 therapy.

2.6. Oral NaHCO3 Therapy Increases Steady-State pHᵢ in Breast Tissue

Consistent with the increased net acid extrusion capacity, steady-state pHᵢ is significantly elevated in organoids isolated from normal breast tissue (Figure 4G) and breast cancer tissue (Figure 4H) of NaHCO3-treated mice compared to control mice irrespective of whether the intracellular acid-base conditions are studied at pHo 7.4 or 6.8.

2.7. Oral NaHCO3 Therapy Increases ex vivo Proliferation in Organoids

Proliferative activity is elevated in breast cancer tissue compared to normal breast tissue [9] and accompanied by increased expression of pathways for nucleotide and protein synthesis (Figure 6A). As shown in Figure 6B,C, we observe mixed consequences of oral NaHCO3 therapy, which for some signaling pathways (phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT), Rho family guanosine triphosphatases (GTPases), and 5’ adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK)) amplify or resemble the protein expression changes seen during breast carcinogenesis (Figure 6A). Other signaling pathways (eukaryotic initiation factor 2, protein kinase A (PKA), phospholispase C (PLC), and Sirtuin) are oppositely affected by oral NaHCO3 therapy (Figure 6B,C) and carcinogenesis (Figure 6A).
Cell proliferation is significantly increased in breast cancer organoids isolated from NaHCO3-treated mice compared to control mice, and this effect is observed at both pHo 7.4 (Figure 6E) and 6.8 (Figure 6F) but only when experiments are performed in the presence of CO2/HCO3–. These findings show that oral NaHCO3 therapy fundamentally influences cancer cell functions and support that the effect of oral NaHCO3 therapy depends on local acid-base conditions.

3. Discussion

Oral NaHCO3 therapy elevates pH of the tumor microenvironment (Figure 1A) but—contrary to our expectation—has no net beneficial effect on breast cancer development or tumor growth (Figure 2). This finding is unlike previous studies showing delayed and reduced onset of prostate cancer development in mice treated with NaHCO3 [38]. Consistent with the absence of a net beneficial treatment effect on breast carcinogenesis and early tumor progression, we observe that oral NaHCO3 therapy upregulates the cellular capacity for net acid extrusion (Figure 4A–E), which correlates with earlier tumor development (Figure 4F), enhances proliferative activity in breast cancer tissue (Figure 6D–F), and maintains expression of enzymes involved in oxidative phosphorylation (Figure 3A,B). The effects of carcinogenesis and NaHCO3 therapy on protein expression are widespread and—in addition to intermediary metabolism (Figure 3)—encompass signaling pathways related to cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions, cytoskeletal dynamics, and immune functions (Figure 1F–H) as well as growth factor signaling, cell proliferation, and apoptosis (Figure 6A–C). The perturbation of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in breast cancer tissue (Figure 1F and Figure S1A) is particularly interesting as GM-CSF secretion from orthotopic primary breast tumor models was previously found to depend on carbonic anhydrase activity and lead to recruitment of granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells to pre-metastatic niches in the lung [51]. Based on the consequences of oral NaHCO3 therapy, our data suggest that the acidic tumor microenvironment keeps in check some elements of cancer cell function—that are enhanced or reduced compared to normal cells—whereas others are exacerbated.
Upregulation of net acid extrusion is crucial for tumor progression [5,52,53] and associated with poor prognosis [6,54]. The current study demonstrates that elevated net acid extrusion capacity is associated with accelerated breast cancer development (Figure 4F). The enhanced Na+/H+-exchange activity takes place despite unchanged overall NHE1 protein expression levels as was previously reported in MCF7 breast cancer cells with overexpression of an NH2-truncated ErbB2 receptor [55] and in smooth muscle cells with disrupted expression of NBCn1 [56]. Elevated pHi has also been linked to increased protein and DNA synthesis leading to accelerated cell proliferation [57]; and indeed, we observe increased proliferation rates in vitro in breast cancer organoids from NaHCO3-treated mice (Figure 6). This could, in part, relate to elevated pHi and NaHCO3 therapy (Figure 3, 4) facilitating intermediary metabolism [4]. In human breast cancer tissue, NBCn1 and NHE1 are predominantly co-expressed in cytokeratin-19-positive epithelial cells [11] although limited stromal expression of NBCn1 and NHE1 is consistent with the important function of these transporters in resistance arteries [56,58,59].
Immune cell infiltration and function are among previously reported targets of acidic pHo [17,42]. In congruence, oral administration of NaHCO3 has been found to increase T cell infiltration in tumors and potentiate anti-cancer responses during immunotherapy [34]. These effects are consistent with the observed proteomics signs of enhanced chemokine signaling and macrophage activation in the current study (Figure 1G,H). Because we used a model of carcinogen-induced breast cancer in immunocompetent mice, it is surprising that the more neutral tumor pH as result of the oral NaHCO3 therapy (Figure 1A) did not cause prominent anti-cancer effects. Differences in the magnitude of the pHo-increase attained by oral NaHCO3 therapy may determine whether beneficial or detrimental effects dominate the overall treatment outcome. We observe that tumor pH in response to oral NaHCO3 therapy increases to around 7.0 in breast carcinomas (Figure 1A) whereas other studies have reported pHo values anywhere between 7.0 and 7.8 [32,34,60].
We previously found that inhibition of net acid extrusion from breast cancer cells by genetic disruption of Na+, HCO3–-cotransporter NBCn1 results in tumors of less malignant phenotype [9,10]. The microenvironmental alkalinisation observed in response to oral NaHCO3 therapy does not have a similar effect (Figure 2C). This difference is likely explained by contrasting effects on pHi, which is lowered in cancer cells from NBCn1 knockout mice [9,10] but elevated during NaHCO3 therapy (Figure 4G,H). The substantial sensitivity of pHi to extracellular acidification also in breast cancer cells (Figure 4G,H) is consistent with previous findings from human and murine breast cancer tissue [8,9,10] and is likely explained by the prominent inhibition of NBCn1 (~60%) and NHE1 (~85%) activity when pHo is lowered to 6.8 [61]. These findings reinforce the suggestion [17] that upregulated net acid extrusion capacity favors malignant functions particularly when cancer cells, for instance during invasion, encounter environments of more neutral pH.
Increased systemic pH could be of concern when orally supplying NaHCO3 for cancer therapy [62]. Urinary alkalinization has been observed during increased NaHCO3 intake [37] but without significant changes in blood pH [32,37]. Differing from prior studies, we find that oral NaHCO3 therapy increases arterial blood pH although the effect is of modest magnitude (~0.04 pH-units, Figure 1B). We collected arterial blood from anesthetized, endotracheally intubated mice that were mechanically ventilated to a fixed expiratory end-tidal CO2 fraction whereas other investigators have drawn blood from euthanized mice [37] or used tail bleeds [32]. Although intubating and ventilating mice might eliminate a respiratory compensation of the metabolic alkalosis, it is extremely difficult to obtain reliable blood samples from awake mice without causing stress-induced hyperventilation [63]. With our approach, we sample blood under tightly controlled conditions, which allows us to identify even small changes in acid-base conditions brought about by a metabolic disturbance.
In conclusion, the current study of murine breast carcinogenesis reveals that oral NaHCO3 therapy is a double-edged sword that can have both pro- and anti-neoplastic effects. The precise mechanisms modifying cancer development and progression are multifaceted, likely cancer type-dependent, and still not comprehensively understood. Oral NaHCO3 therapy increases the capacity for net acid extrusion in breast tissue, which is associated with poor prognosis. We also observe increased proliferation in breast cancer organoids from NaHCO3-treated mice and complex changes in protein expression patterns that can facilitate cancer development and progression. Rather than using buffer therapy—with the risk of elevating pHi and promoting cancer development and progression—we propose that the acidic microenvironment of breast cancer tissue can be targeted more successfully based on inhibitors of acid-base transport.

4. Materials and Methods

Mice from Janvier Labs (France) were housed in the animal facility at Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, under a 12-h light/12-h dark cycle with constant room temperature and humidity. The Danish Animal Experiments Inspectorate approved the animal procedures (2014-15-0201-00330).

4.1. Tumor Induction and Oral NaHCO3 Therapy

Medroxyprogesterone acetate pellets (50 mg, 90 day release; Innovative Research of America, Sarasota, FL, USA) were implanted subcutaneously in 6 weeks old female C57BL/6j mice that were subsequently treated at 9, 10, 12, and 13 weeks of age with dimethylbenz(α)anthracene through oral gavage [64].
At beginning of tumor induction, mice were randomly assigned to receive either water containing 200 mM NaHCO3 (treated) or regular water (control) [32,38]. From completion of breast cancer induction, we palpated the mice twice weekly for early tumor detection. Fourteen days after first tumor detection, the mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of ketamine (80 mg/kg Ketaminol® vet; Intervet International, Boxmeer, Netherlands) and xylazine (8 mg/kg Narcoxyl® vet; Intervet International, Boxmeer, Netherlands) and subjected to microdialysis sampling or tumor pH measurements.

4.2. Microdialysis

We measured [glucose] and [lactate] in microdialysates using a CMA 600 Microdialysis Analyzer (CMA Microdialysis AB, Kista, Sweden) [8,9]. Samples were collected by inserting microdialysis probes (CMA 20 Elite, 4 mm membrane length; CMA Microdialysis AB, Kista, Sweden) into breast tumors and matched normal breast tissue guided by needles and split tubing. Dual syringe pumps (Pump 33; Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA, USA) perfused the probes at 0.5 µL/min; and after a 60-minute washout period, 6 µL sample was collected for analysis.

4.3. Tumor pH

Anaesthetized mice were endotracheally intubated and kept on a ventilator (Minivent type 845, Hugo Sachs Electronic, March, Germany). The expiratory end-tidal CO2 fraction was measured by capnography (Capnograph type 340; Hugo Sachs Electronic, March, Germany) and maintained at ~3.8% throughout the experiments. Glass pH microelectrodes (pH 500; Unisense, Aarhus, Denmark) were advanced stepwise into the tumors 2 mm at a time, and the reference electrode placed in the intraperitoneal space. We observed pH decreases as the electrode tip advanced deeper into the tumor and pH increases when the electrode moved towards more superficial tumor regions. Figure 1A displays the lowest pH for each tumor. We measured intraperitoneal pH at the end of each experiment and included mice where intraperitoneal pH was between 7.1 and 7.7.

4.4. Tumor Size and Histopathology

Tumors were removed postmortem and measured in 3 perpendicular dimensions (s, m, l) with calipers. Tumors were considered ellipsoid, and their volume (V) calculated as V=s·m·l·π/6.
Tissue samples fixed in formalin for 30 min (normal tissue) or 1 h (cancer tissue) were stored in phosphate-buffered saline, paraffin-embedded, cut to 3-µm sections, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. An experienced breast pathologist evaluated histopathology according to previous studies [9].

4.5. Organoid Isolation

Finely chopped excised breast cancer tissue and matched normal breast tissue incubated for 4 hours on a shaking table (set at 60 rpm) at 37 °C in advanced DMEM/F12 culture medium (Life Technologies, Nærum, Denmark) aerated with 5% CO2/balance air and supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Biochrom, Cambridge, UK), 1% Glutamax (Gibco, Invitrogen, Roskilde, Denmark), and 450 IU/mL collagenase type 3 (Worthington Biochemical Corporation, Lakewood, NJ, USA). Organoids are 100–150 µm in diameter and consist primarily of cytokeratin-19-positive cancer cells with smaller numbers of other cell types (e.g., myofibroblasts and tumor-associated macrophages) [8,9]. From the partially digested breast tissue, organoids were isolated by sedimentation for 20 min and used directly for experiments without culture in order to avoid changes in expression profile or phenotype.

4.6. Intracellular pH

We performed fluorescence-based pHi measurements on freshly isolated breast epithelial organoids using a Diaphot 200 wide-field microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an R1 or SRV CCD Retiga fluorescence camera (QImaging, Surrey, Canada) controlled through VisiView software (Visitron Systems, Puchheim, Germany). Organoids maintained at 37 °C were loaded with 3 µM BCECF-AM (Invitrogen, Roskilde, Denmark) in 0.1% DMSO for 20 min. During experiments performed with CO2/HCO3– present, the bath solution was continuously bubbled with 5% CO2/balance air. Organoids were excited alternatingly at 495 and 440 nm and emission light collected at 510 nm. Fluorescence ratios were calibrated to pH based on the high [K+]-nigericin technique [65]. Net acid-base transport activity was determined from the pHi recovery rate after NH4+-prepulse-induced intracellular acidification [8,9,66]. Intrinsic buffering capacity calculated from NH4Cl-induced changes in pHi under CO2/HCO3–-free conditions did not significantly differ between NaHCO3-treated mice and control mice or between organoids from breast cancer tissue and normal breast tissue (Figure 4C). We quantified the intracellular acid load using the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, assuming equilibrium of NH3 across cell membranes. Contribution of CO2/HCO3– to intracellular buffering capacity was calculated from β = 2.3·[HCO3–]i [58,67].
Physiological saline solutions for functional experiments consisted of (in mM): 4 K+, 140 Na+, 1.6 Ca2+, 1.2 Mg2+, 122 Cl–, 1.18 H2PO4–, 22 HCO3−, 10 HEPES, 5.5 glucose, 0.03 EDTA, 1.2 SO42–, aerated with 5% CO2/balance air, adjusted to pH 7.4 at 37 °C. In experiments performed at pHo 6.8, the concentration of HCO3– was reduced to 5.5 mM through substitution with Cl–. In Na+-free solutions, N-methyl-D-glucammonium replaced Na+, except for NaHCO3 that was replaced with choline-HCO3. All solutions contained 5 mM probenecid in order to inhibit BCECF extrusion by the organic anion transporters [8,9].

4.7. Cell Proliferation

Freshly isolated organoids from breast cancer tissue incubated 6 hours with 0.1% bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU, Invitrogen, Roskilde, Denmark) at 37 °C. We performed experiments with CO2/HCO3– under control circumstances (pH 7.4, 5% CO2, 22 mM HCO3–), respiratory acidosis (pH 6.8, 20% CO2, 22 mM HCO3–), and metabolic acidosis (pH 6.8, 5% CO2, 5.5 mM HCO3–). Experiments without CO2/HCO3– were performed at pH 7.4 and 6.8. All solutions contained 10 mM HEPES. After incubation, organoids were fixed in 75% ethanol for 2 min and then denatured in 1 M HCl. We identified dividing cells by immunofluorescence imaging using anti-BrdU mouse monoclonal primary antibody (#5292, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), Alexa488-labelled donkey anti-mouse secondary antibody (#A21202, Invitrogen, Roskilde, Denmark), and a LSM510META confocal laser scanning microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) [68]. Nuclei were co-stained with SYTO16 (Life Technologies, Nærum, Denmark). We manually calculated proliferation indices (BrdU-positive cells/SYTO16-positive nuclei) for 3 different focal planes in each organoid using ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).

4.8. Immunoblotting

Organoids were homogenized in a lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EGTA (pH 7.5), 10 mM NaF, 20 mM sodium β-glycerophosphate, and HALT protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA)) using pellet pestles (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), sonicated for 45 s, and centrifuged at ~16,000 g for 10 min at 4 °C. We measured total protein concentrations in the supernatants based on a bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). 10 µg total protein diluted in Laemmlie sample buffer was loaded in each lane of a sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), separated by gel electrophoresis, and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes blocked with 0.3% i-block (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Although boiling can limit protein aggregation and improve solubility—that may otherwise lead to smears—we did not heat the lysates as we find that this markedly reduces the ability of the antibodies to recognize their specific epitopes. Membranes were probed with rabbit anti-NBCn1 (1:200; kind gift from Dr. Jeppe Praetorius, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark) [69] or mouse monoclonal anti-NHE1 (1:500; #sc-136239, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) [9] primary antibody, and then with species-matched goat anti-rabbit (1:2,000; #7074, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) or horse anti-mouse (1:2,000; #7076, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) secondary antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase. Bound antibody was detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL Plus; GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) and quantified using Image Studio Lite version 5.2 (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA). NBCn1 and NHE1 expression was normalized to pan-actin expression.

4.9. Label-Free Quantitative Nano Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LFQ nLC-MS/MS)

Organoids from Wnt type breast cancer tissue and matched normal breast tissue were snap frozen in liquid N2, stored at –80 °C, homogenized in lysis buffer (5% sodium deoxycholate, 20 mM triethylammonium bicarbonate), and sonicated on ice [70]. Protein concentrations were measured by IR spectrometry (Direct Detect Spectrometer, Merck, Kenilworth, NJ, USA). Up to 100-µg protein was reduced, alkylated, and digested using filter-aided preparation (Microcon 30K centrifugal filter device, Merck, Kenilworth, NJ, USA). Peptide concentrations were measured by tryptophan fluorescence [70], and 1 µg peptide injected from each sample. Two of 28 samples from 7 NaHCO3-treated mice and 7 control mice could not be run due to irregularities with chromatographic peptide separation.
Peptide mixtures were separated by nano Liquid-Chromatography (Ultimate 3000; Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) coupled to an Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid mass spectrometer through an EASY-Spray nano-electrospray ion source (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). A µ-Precolumn (300 µm × 5 mm, C18 PepMap100, 5 µm, 100 Å; Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and analytical column (EASY-Spray Column, 750 mm × 75 µm, PepMap RSCL, C18, 2 mm, 100 Å; Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) trapped and separated peptides, respectively. Peptides were eluted with a flow of 300 nL/min. The elution gradient was made by mixing a buffer containing 99.9% water and 0.1% formic acid with a buffer containing 80% acetonitrile, 20% water, and 0.1% formic acid. The universal method setting was used for mass spectrometry detection with full Orbitrap scans (m/z 400–1500) at a resolution of 120,000, an automatic gain control (AGC) target of 4·105, a maximum injection time of 50 ms, and a cycle time of 3 s. The most intense precursors were selected with an intensity threshold of 5·103. Charge states 2–7 were included. MS2 scans were performed in the linear ion trap at rapid scan rate with collision-induced dissociation energy at 35%, an AGC target of 2·103, and a maximum injection time of 300 ms. The precursor ions were isolated using the quadrupole set with an isolation window of 1.6 m/z. Dynamic exclusion was set to 60 s. Internal mass calibration was used by activating the Easy-IC using fluoranthene.
The 26 raw data files were used to search the Mus musculus database from Uniprot downloaded on 21 March 2018 using MaxQuant (version 1.5.5.1) for LFQ analysis [71]. Carbamidomethyl (C) was used as fixed modification. The false discovery rate for PSM, protein identification hits, and proteins identified by site were each set at 1%. The LFQ minimum ratio count was set to 1. MS/MS was required for LFQ comparisons. Unique and razor peptides, unmodified and modified with oxidation (M) or acetyl (protein N-terminal), were used for protein quantification with a minimum ratio count of 2. The match between runs function was used. Revert sequences were used for decoy search. Contaminant sequences were included in the search. The generated results file was then entered into Perseus (version 1.6.1.1) [72] where data were log2 transformed and filtered (at least 2 unique peptides for identification in at least 70% of samples in each group). This approach identified ~2500 proteins (Table S1) that we analyzed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software (version 49932394, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).

4.10. Blood and Urine

We treated C57BL/6j mice with oral NaHCO3 for 151 days (average treatment duration for mice undergoing cancer induction) and collected spontaneously released urine on Parafilm®. We then anaesthetized and mechanically ventilated mice to normocapnia (expiratory end-tidal CO2 fraction of ~3.8%), as described above, for 10 min prior to blood sampling by carotid artery puncture. We analyzed urine and blood immediately after collection with an ABL80 FLEX (Radiometer, Brønshøj, Denmark). We excluded a few blood samples due to signs of hemolysis ([K⁺] > 6 mM) or inadequate ventilation (pO2 ˂ 80 mmHg and/or pCO2 > 60 mmHg).

4.11. Statistics

Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. p ˂ 0.05 is considered statistically significant; n equals number of mice, except in proliferation experiments where n equals number of organoids. We compared one variable between two normally distributed groups of equal variance using two-tailed Student’s t-tests (paired or unpaired, as appropriate). For 2 groups of unequal variance, we used t-tests with Welch’s correction; and for data that are not normally distributed, we used non-parametric Mann-Whitney tests. We compared one variable between more than 2 groups using repeated measures one-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s post-tests. We tested effects of 2 variables on a third variable using repeated measures two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-tests and effects of 3 variables on a fourth variable using three-way ANOVA. We compared Kaplan-Maier curves by Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test. We assessed linear relationships based on least-squares regression analyses. Right-skewed data were log-transformed before analyses to obtain normal distribution. Analyses were performed using Prism 7.03 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA) except for mass spectrometry data analyzed by Fisher’s right-tailed exact test in Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).

5. Conclusions

Oral NaHCO3 therapy neutralizes the microenvironment of breast carcinomas, elevates the capacity for cellular net acid extrusion, and accelerates proliferation without net effect on breast cancer development or tumor growth. These unexpected pro-neoplastic consequences of oral NaHCO3 therapy in breast tissue cancel out previously reported anti-neoplastic effects.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/4/891/s1, Figure S1–S3: Illustrated results of Ingenuity Pathway Analyses, Figure S4: Full uncropped images of immunoblots from Figure 5, Table S1: Mass spectrometry data.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.B.; methodology, N.C.S.V., P.V., B.H. and E.B.; formal analysis, N.C.S.V., B.H. and E.B.; investigation, N.C.S.V., T.D., M.B.H., P.V. and B.H.; writing—original draft preparation, E.B.; writing—review and editing, all authors; visualization, N.C.S.V. and E.B.; supervision, E.B.; project administration, E.B.; funding acquisition, B.H. and E.B.; all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Independent Research Fund Denmark (grant number 7025-00050B to E.B.), the Novo Nordisk Foundation (grant numbers NNF15OC0017344 and NNF18OC0053037 to E.B.), and the Danish Cancer Society (grant numbers R72-A4273 and R146-A9461 to E.B.). The mass spectrometry platform was kindly donated by A.P. Møller og Hustru Chastine McKinney Møllers Fond til Almeene Formaal.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Vladimir V. Matchkov for assistance with proteomics analyses and Jane Rønn and Mona Britt Hansen for expert technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

Ebbe Boedtkjer is inventor on patent applications addressing new tools for targeting acid-base transporters in breast cancer.

References

  1. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 2011, 144, 646–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Corbet, C.; Feron, O. Tumour acidosis: from the passenger to the driver’s seat. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2017, 17, 577–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Boedtkjer, E.; Bunch, L.; Pedersen, S.F. Physiology, pharmacology and pathophysiology of the pH regulatory transport proteins NHE1 and NBCn1: Similarities, differences and implications for cancer therapy. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2012, 18, 1345–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Parks, S.K.; Chiche, J.; Pouyssegur, J. Disrupting proton dynamics and energy metabolism for cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2013, 13, 611–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Andersen, A.P.; Flinck, M.; Oernbo, E.K.; Pedersen, N.B.; Viuff, B.M.; Pedersen, S.F. Roles of acid-extruding ion transporters in regulation of breast cancer cell growth in a 3-dimensional microenvironment. Mol. Cancer 2016, 15, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Gorbatenko, A.; Olesen, C.W.; Boedtkjer, E.; Pedersen, S.F. Regulation and roles of bicarbonate transporters in cancer. Front. Physiol. 2014, 5, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Dass, C.R.; Choong, P.F. Cancer angiogenesis: targeting the heel of Achilles. J. Drug Target 2008, 16, 449–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lee, S.; Mele, M.; Vahl, P.; Christiansen, P.M.; Jensen, V.E.D.; Boedtkjer, E. Na+,HCO3–-cotransport is functionally upregulated during human breast carcinogenesis and required for the inverted pH gradient across the plasma membrane. Pflugers Arch. 2015, 467, 367–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lee, S.; Axelsen, T.V.; Andersen, A.P.; Vahl, P.; Pedersen, S.F.; Boedtkjer, E. Disrupting Na+,HCO3–-cotransporter NBCn1 (Slc4a7) delays murine breast cancer development. Oncogene 2016, 35, 2112–2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lee, S.; Axelsen, T.V.; Jessen, N.; Pedersen, S.F.; Vahl, P.; Boedtkjer, E. Na+,HCO3–-cotransporter NBCn1 (Slc4a7) accelerates ErbB2-induced breast cancer development and tumor growth in mice. Oncogene 2018, 37, 5569–5584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Boedtkjer, E.; Moreira, J.M.; Mele, M.; Vahl, P.; Wielenga, V.T.; Christiansen, P.M.; Jensen, V.E.; Pedersen, S.F.; Aalkjaer, C. Contribution of Na+,HCO3--cotransport to cellular pH control in human breast cancer: a role for the breast cancer susceptibility locus NBCn1 (SLC4A7). Int. J. Cancer 2013, 132, 1288–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Counillon, L.; Bouret, Y.; Marchiq, I.; Pouysségur, J. Na+/H+ antiporter (NHE1) and lactate/H+ symporters (MCTs) in pH homeostasis and cancer metabolism. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2016, 1863, 2465–2480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Morais-Santos, F.; Granja, S.; Miranda-Goncalves, V.; Moreira, A.H.J.; Queiros, S.; Vilaca, J.L.; Schmitt, F.C.; Longatto-Filho, A.; Paredes, J.; Baltazar, F.; et al. Targeting lactate transport suppresses in vivo breast tumour growth. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 19177–19189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Swietach, P.; Patiar, S.; Supuran, C.T.; Harris, A.L.; Vaughan-Jones, R.D. The role of carbonic anhydrase 9 in regulating extracellular and intracellular pH in three-dimensional tumor cell growths. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 20299–20310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Noor, S.I.; Jamali, S.; Ames, S.; Langer, S.; Deitmer, J.W.; Becker, H.M. A surface proton antenna in carbonic anhydrase II supports lactate transport in cancer cells. Elife 2018, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Boedtkjer, E.; Bentzon, J.F.; Dam, V.S.; Aalkjaer, C. Na+,HCO3–-cotransporter NBCn1 increases pHi gradients, filopodia and migration of smooth muscle cells and promotes arterial remodeling. Cardiovasc. Res. 2016, 111, 227–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Boedtkjer, E.; Pedersen, S.F. The acidic tumor microenvironment as a driver of cancer. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2019, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Vander Linden, C.; Corbet, C. Therapeutic targeting of cancer stem cells: Integrating and exploiting the acidic niche. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Putney, L.K.; Barber, D.L. Na-H exchange-dependent increase in intracellular pH times G2/M entry and transition. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 44645–44649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Flinck, M.; Kramer, S.H.; Schnipper, J.; Andersen, A.P.; Pedersen, S.F. The acid-base transport proteins NHE1 and NBCn1 regulate cell cycle progression in human breast cancer cells. Cell Cycle 2018, 17, 1056–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Flinck, M.; Kramer, S.H.; Pedersen, S.F. Roles of pH in control of cell proliferation. Acta Physiol. (Oxf) 2018, 223, e13068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Moellering, R.E.; Black, K.C.; Krishnamurty, C.; Baggett, B.K.; Stafford, P.; Rain, M.; Gatenby, R.A.; Gillies, R.J. Acid treatment of melanoma cells selects for invasive phenotypes. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2008, 25, 411–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Trivedi, B.; Danforth, W.H. Effect of pH on the kinetics of frog muscle phosphofructokinase. J. Biol. Chem. 1966, 241, 4110–4112. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Corbet, C.; Draoui, N.; Polet, F.; Pinto, A.; Drozak, X.; Riant, O.; Feron, O. The SIRT1/HIF2α axis drives reductive glutamine metabolism under chronic acidosis and alters tumor response to therapy. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 5507–5519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Corbet, C.; Pinto, A.; Martherus, R.; de Jesus, J.P.S.; Polet, F.; Feron, O. Acidosis drives the reprogramming of fatty acid metabolism in cancer cells through changes in mitochondrial and histone acetylation. Cell Metab. 2018, 24, 311–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. LaMonte, G.; Tang, X.; Chen, J.L.; Wu, J.; Ding, C.K.; Keenan, M.M.; Sangokoya, C.; Kung, H.N.; Ilkayeva, O.; Boros, L.G.; et al. Acidosis induces reprogramming of cellular metabolism to mitigate oxidative stress. Cancer Metab. 2013, 1, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Marino, M.L.; Pellegrini, P.; Di, L.G.; Djavaheri-Mergny, M.; Brnjic, S.; Zhang, X.; Hagg, M.; Linder, S.; Fais, S.; Codogno, P.; et al. Autophagy is a protective mechanism for human melanoma cells under acidic stress. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 30664–30676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Xu, T.; Su, H.; Ganapathy, S.; Yuan, Z.-M. Modulation of autophagic activity by extracellular pH. Autophagy 2011, 7, 1316–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Rozhin, J.; Sameni, M.; Ziegler, G.; Sloane, B.F. Pericellular pH affects distribution and secretion of cathepsin B in malignant cells. Cancer Res. 1994, 54, 6517. [Google Scholar]
  30. Bourguignon, L.Y.; Singleton, P.A.; Diedrich, F.; Stern, R.; Gilad, E. CD44 interaction with Na+-H+ exchanger (NHE1) creates acidic microenvironments leading to hyaluronidase-2 and cathepsin B activation and breast tumor cell invasion. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 26991–27007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rofstad, E.K.; Mathiesen, B.; Kindem, K.; Galappathi, K. Acidic extracellular pH promotes experimental metastasis of human melanoma cells in athymic nude mice. Cancer Res. 2006, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Robey, I.F.; Baggett, B.K.; Kirkpatrick, N.D.; Roe, D.J.; Dosescu, J.; Sloane, B.F.; Hashim, A.I.; Morse, D.L.; Raghunand, N.; Gatenby, R.A.; et al. Bicarbonate increases tumor pH and inhibits spontaneous metastases. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 2260–2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Park, H.J.; Lyons, J.C.; Ohtsubo, T.; Song, C.W. Acidic environment causes apoptosis by increasing caspase activity. Br. J. Cancer 1999, 80, 1892–1897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Pilon-Thomas, S.; Kodumudi, K.N.; El-Kenawi, A.E.; Russell, S.; Weber, A.M.; Luddy, K.; Damaghi, M.; Wojtkowiak, J.W.; Mulé, J.J.; Ibrahim-Hashim, A.; et al. Neutralization of tumor acidity improves antitumor responses to immunotherapy. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 1381–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Zick, S.M.; Snyder, D.; Abrams, D.I. Pros and cons of dietary strategies popular among cancer patients. Oncology (Williston Park) 2018, 32, 542–547. [Google Scholar]
  36. Pillai, S.R.; Damaghi, M.; Marunaka, Y.; Spugnini, E.P.; Fais, S.; Gillies, R.J. Causes, consequences, and therapy of tumors acidosis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2019, 38, 205–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Robey, I.F.; Martin, N.K. Bicarbonate and dichloroacetate: Evaluating pH altering therapies in a mouse model for metastatic breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2011, 11, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Ibrahim-Hashim, A.; Cornnell, H.H.; Abrahams, D.; Lloyd, M.; Bui, M.; Gillies, R.J.; Gatenby, R.A. Systemic buffers inhibit carcinogenesis in TRAMP mice. J. Urol. 2012, 188, 624–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Fenton, T.R.; Huang, T. Systematic review of the association between dietary acid load, alkaline water and cancer. BMJ Open 2016, 6, e010438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dobre, M.; Rahman, M.; Hostetter, T.H. Current status of bicarbonate in CKD. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2015, 26, 515–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Vaupel, P.; Kallinowski, F.; Okunieff, P. Blood flow, oxygen and nutrient supply, and metabolic microenvironment of human tumors: A review. Cancer Res. 1989, 49, 6449–6465. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Huber, V.; Camisaschi, C.; Berzi, A.; Ferro, S.; Lugini, L.; Triulzi, T.; Tuccitto, A.; Tagliabue, E.; Castelli, C.; Rivoltini, L. Cancer acidity: An ultimate frontier of tumor immune escape and a novel target of immunomodulation. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2017, 43, 74–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Brown, J.M.; Recht, L.; Strober, S. The promise of targeting macrophages in cancer therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 3241–3250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Xu, C.; Zhao, H.; Chen, H.; Yao, Q. CXCR4 in breast cancer: oncogenic role and therapeutic targeting. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2015, 9, 4953–4964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Todorović-Raković, N.; Milovanović, J. Interleukin-8 in breast cancer progression. J. Interferon. Cytokine Res. 2013, 33, 563–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Akewanlop, C.; Watanabe, M.; Singh, B.; Walker, M.; Kufe, D.W.; Hayes, D.F. Phagocytosis of breast cancer cells mediated by anti-MUC-1 monoclonal antibody, DF3, and its bispecific antibody. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 4061–4065. [Google Scholar]
  47. Liou, G.-Y.; Storz, P. Reactive oxygen species in cancer. Free Radic. Res. 2010, 44, 479–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Choudhari, S.K.; Chaudhary, M.; Bagde, S.; Gadbail, A.R.; Joshi, V. Nitric oxide and cancer: A review. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2013, 11, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Landis, M.D.; Seachrist, D.D.; Abdul-Karim, F.W.; Keri, R.A. Sustained trophism of the mammary gland is sufficient to accelerate and synchronize development of ErbB2/Neu-induced tumors. Oncogene 2006, 25, 3325–3334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Jin, L.; Zhou, Y. Crucial role of the pentose phosphate pathway in malignant tumors. Oncol. lett. 2019, 17, 4213–4221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Chafe, S.C.; Lou, Y.; Sceneay, J.; Vallejo, M.; Hamilton, M.J.; McDonald, P.C.; Bennewith, K.L.; Möller, A.; Dedhar, S. Carbonic anhydrase IX promotes myeloid-derived suppressor cell mobilization and establishment of a metastatic niche by stimulating G-CSF production. Cancer Res. 2015, 75, 996–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Gottlieb, R.A.; Nordberg, J.; Skowronski, E.; Babior, B.M. Apoptosis induced in Jurkat cells by several agents is preceded by intracellular acidification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 654–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Granja, S.; Tavares-Valente, D.; Queirós, O.; Baltazar, F. Value of pH regulators in the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2017, 43, 17–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Andrew, A.S.; Gui, J.; Sanderson, A.C.; Mason, R.A.; Morlock, E.V.; Schned, A.R.; Kelsey, K.T.; Marsit, C.J.; Moore, J.H.; Karagas, M.R. Bladder cancer SNP panel predicts susceptibility and survival. Hum. Genet. 2009, 125, 527–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Lauritzen, G.; Jensen, M.B.; Boedtkjer, E.; Dybboe, R.; Aalkjaer, C.; Nylandsted, J.; Pedersen, S.F. NBCn1 and NHE1 expression and activity in ΔNErbB2 receptor-expressing MCF-7 breast cancer cells: Contributions to pHi regulation and chemotherapy resistance. Exp. Cell Res. 2010, 316, 2538–2553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Boedtkjer, E.; Praetorius, J.; Matchkov, V.V.; Stankevicius, E.; Mogensen, S.; Füchtbauer, A.C.; Simonsen, U.; Fuchtbauer, E.M.; Aalkjaer, C. Disruption of Na+,HCO3–-cotransporter NBCn1 (slc4a7) inhibits NO-mediated vasorelaxation, smooth muscle Ca2+-sensitivity and hypertension development in mice. Circulation 2011, 124, 1819–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Pedersen, S.F. The Na+/H+ exchanger NHE1 in stress-induced signal transduction: implications for cell proliferation and cell death. Pflugers Arch. 2006, 452, 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Boedtkjer, E.; Praetorius, J.; Aalkjaer, C. NBCn1 (slc4a7) mediates the Na+-dependent bicarbonate transport important for regulation of intracellular pH in mouse vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ. Res. 2006, 98, 515–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Boedtkjer, E.; Damkier, H.H.; Aalkjaer, C. NHE1 knockout reduces blood pressure and arterial media/lumen ratio with no effect on resting pHi in the vascular wall. J. Physiol. 2012, 590, 1895–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Raghunand, N.; He, X.; Van Sluis, R.; Mahoney, B.; Baggett, B.; Taylor, C.W.; Paine-Murrieta, G.; Roe, D.; Bhujwalla, Z.M.; Gillies, R.J. Enhancement of chemotherapy by manipulation of tumour pH. Br. J. Cancer 1999, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Bonde, L.; Boedtkjer, E. Extracellular acidosis and very low [Na+] inhibit NBCn1- and NHE1-mediated net acid extrusion from mouse vascular smooth muscle cells. Acta Physiol. (Oxf) 2017, 219, 227–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Martin, N.K.; Gaffney, E.A.; Gatenby, R.A.; Gillies, R.J.; Robey, I.F.; Maini, P.K. A mathematical model of tumour and blood pHe regulation: The HCO3–/CO2 buffering system. Math. Biosci. 2011, 230, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Iversen, N.K.; Malte, H.; Baatrup, E.; Wang, T. The normal acid–base status of mice. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2012, 180, 252–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Aldaz, C.M.; Liao, Q.Y.; LaBate, M.; Johnston, D.A. Medroxyprogesterone acetate accelerates the development and increases the incidence of mouse mammary tumors induced by dimethylbenzanthracene. Carcinogenesis 1996, 17, 2069–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Aalkjaer, C.; Cragoe, E.J., Jr. Intracellular pH regulation in resting and contracting segments of rat mesenteric resistance vessels. J. Physiol. 1988, 402, 391–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Boron, W.F.; De Weer, P. Intracellular pH transients in squid giant axons caused by CO2, NH3, and metabolic inhibitors. J. Gen. Physiol. 1976, 67, 91–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Roos, A.; Boron, W.F. Intracellular pH. Physiol. Rev. 1981, 61, 296–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gratzner, H.G. Monoclonal antibody to 5-bromo- and 5-iododeoxyuridine: A new reagent for detection of DNA replication. Science 1982, 218, 474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Damkier, H.H.; Nielsen, S.; Praetorius, J. An anti-NH2-terminal antibody localizes NBCn1 to heart endothelia and skeletal and vascular smooth muscle cells. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2006, 290, H172–H180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Honoré, B. Proteomic protocols for differential protein expression analyses. In Xenotransplantation: Methods and Protocols; Costa, C., Ed.; Springer US: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Tyanova, S.; Temu, T.; Cox, J. The MaxQuant computational platform for mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics. Nat. Protoc. 2016, 11, 2301–2319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Tyanova, S.; Temu, T.; Sinitcyn, P.; Carlson, A.; Hein, M.Y.; Geiger, T.; Mann, M.; Cox, J. The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 731–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cancers 12 00891 g001 550
Figure 1. Oral NaHCO3 therapy alkalinizes breast tumors and increases [HCO3–] and pH of arterial blood and urine. It also leads to marked protein expression changes related to immune function, cytoskeleton, and cell-cell and cell-matrix interaction. (A–C). Tumor pH (A) along with pH (B) and standard-[HCO3–] (C) of arterial blood from NaHCO3-treated mice and control mice (n = 6–11) mechanically ventilated to normocapnia (expiratory end-tidal CO2 fraction of 3.8%). (D,E). Urine pH (D) and [HCO3–] (E) of NaHCO3-treated mice and control mice (n = 9–10). (F–H). Protein expression changes related to immune function, cytoskeleton, and cell-cell and cell-matrix interaction. We compare breast cancer tissue vs. normal breast tissue from control mice (F), breast cancer tissue from NaHCO3-treated mice vs. control mice (G), and normal breast tissue from NaHCO3-treated mice vs. control mice (H). Data in panel C were log-transformed in order to improve normal distribution. Data in panel A were compared by unpaired two-tailed t-test with Welch’s correction for unequal variance, data in panel B through D were compared by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests, and data in panel E were compared by the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test. p-values in panel F through H were calculated based on Fisher’s right-tailed exact test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. Control.
Figure 1. Oral NaHCO3 therapy alkalinizes breast tumors and increases [HCO3–] and pH of arterial blood and urine. It also leads to marked protein expression changes related to immune function, cytoskeleton, and cell-cell and cell-matrix interaction. (A–C). Tumor pH (A) along with pH (B) and standard-[HCO3–] (C) of arterial blood from NaHCO3-treated mice and control mice (n = 6–11) mechanically ventilated to normocapnia (expiratory end-tidal CO2 fraction of 3.8%). (D,E). Urine pH (D) and [HCO3–] (E) of NaHCO3-treated mice and control mice (n = 9–10). (F–H). Protein expression changes related to immune function, cytoskeleton, and cell-cell and cell-matrix interaction. We compare breast cancer tissue vs. normal breast tissue from control mice (F), breast cancer tissue from NaHCO3-treated mice vs. control mice (G), and normal breast tissue from NaHCO3-treated mice vs. control mice (H). Data in panel C were log-transformed in order to improve normal distribution. Data in panel A were compared by unpaired two-tailed t-test with Welch’s correction for unequal variance, data in panel B through D were compared by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests, and data in panel E were compared by the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test. p-values in panel F through H were calculated based on Fisher’s right-tailed exact test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. Control.
Cancers 12 00891 g001
Cancers 12 00891 g002 550
Figure 2. Tumor-free survival, tumor burden, and breast tumor histopathology are similar in NaHCO3-treated mice and control mice. (A). Tumor-free survival of NaHCO3-treated mice and control mice after carcinogen-based breast cancer induction. Median tumor-free survival of NaHCO3-treated mice was 85.5 ± 8.2 days (n = 42) compared to 82.0 ± 7.5 days for control mice (n = 45). Data were compared by Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test. (B). Tumor burden was similar in NaHCO3-treated mice and control mice (n = 37–41) two weeks after first tumor detection. Tumors were typically 3–4 mm at first detection consistent with previous reports [49]. Data were log-transformed in order to improve normal distribution and then compared by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. (C). Distribution of breast tumors from NaHCO3-treated mice and control mice (n = 37–41) between histopathological subtypes. (D). Plot of matched data for histopathology, tumor burden, and tumor latency of breast tumors from NaHCO3-treated mice and control mice (n = 37–41). NS: Not significantly different vs. Control.
Figure 2. Tumor-free survival, tumor burden, and breast tumor histopathology are similar in NaHCO3-treated mice and control mice. (A). Tumor-free survival of NaHCO3-treated mice and control mice after carcinogen-based breast cancer induction. Median tumor-free survival of NaHCO3-treated mice was 85.5 ± 8.2 days (n = 42) compared to 82.0 ± 7.5 days for control mice (n = 45). Data were compared by Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test. (B). Tumor burden was similar in NaHCO3-treated mice and control mice (n = 37–41) two weeks after first tumor detection. Tumors were typically 3–4 mm at first detection consistent with previous reports [49]. Data were log-transformed in order to improve normal distribution and then compared by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. (C). Distribution of breast tumors from NaHCO3-treated mice and control mice (n = 37–41) between histopathological subtypes. (D). Plot of matched data for histopathology, tumor burden, and tumor latency of breast tumors from NaHCO3-treated mice and control mice (n = 37–41). NS: Not significantly different vs. Control.
Cancers 12 00891 g002
Cancers 12 00891 g003 550
Figure 3. Metabolic pathways are dramatically perturbed during breast carcinogenesis but glycolytic metabolism in breast cancer tissue and normal breast tissue in vivo is unaffected by oral NaHCO3 therapy. (A, B). Protein expression changes for metabolic pathways. We compare breast cancer tissue vs. normal breast tissue from control mice (A) and breast cancer tissue from NaHCO3-treated mice vs. control mice (B). p-values were calculated based on Fisher’s right-tailed exact test. (C–E). Interstitial concentrations of glucose (C) and lactate (D) and corresponding [glucose]/[lactate]-ratios (E) measured in microdialysis samples from breast cancer tissue and matched normal breast tissue of NaHCO3-treated mice and control mice (n = 8–9). Data were compared by repeated measures to-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s post-tests. NS: not significantly different vs. Control. ***p < 0.001.
Figure 3. Metabolic pathways are dramatically perturbed during breast carcinogenesis but glycolytic metabolism in breast cancer tissue and normal breast tissue in vivo is unaffected by oral NaHCO3 therapy. (A, B). Protein expression changes for metabolic pathways. We compare breast cancer tissue vs. normal breast tissue from control mice (A) and breast cancer tissue from NaHCO3-treated mice vs. control mice (B). p-values were calculated based on Fisher’s right-tailed exact test. (C–E). Interstitial concentrations of glucose (C) and lactate (D) and corresponding [glucose]/[lactate]-ratios (E) measured in microdialysis samples from breast cancer tissue and matched normal breast tissue of NaHCO3-treated mice and control mice (n = 8–9). Data were compared by repeated measures to-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s post-tests. NS: not significantly different vs. Control. ***p < 0.001.
Cancers 12 00891 g003
Cancers 12 00891 g004 550
Figure 4. The capacity for net acid extrusion is increased in both normal breast tissue and breast cancer tissue from NaHCO3-treated mice compared to control mice. (A, B). Average traces of pHi-dynamics during NH4+-prepulse experiments performed on normal breast tissue (A) and breast cancer tissue (B) from NaHCO3-treated mice and control mice (n = 7). Experiments were conducted in both the presence and absence of CO2/HCO3–. (C). Intracellular intrinsic buffering capacity of organoids of both cancer and normal tissue from NaHCO3-treated and untreated mice (n = 7). Linear regression showed no significant difference in buffering capacity between NaHCO3-treated and control mice. (D,E). Cellular net acid extrusion in epithelial organoids isolated from normal breast tissue (D) and breast cancer tissue (E) displayed as a function of pHi. Experiments were based on tissue from NaHCO3-treated mice and control mice (n = 7) and performed in both the presence and absence of CO2/HCO3–. Data were compared by least-squares linear regression analyses. (F). Breast tumor-free survival plotted as function of net acid extrusion capacity displayed as the pHi value corresponding to net acid extrusion of 14 mM/min. The higher the pHi value, the greater the capacity for net acid extrusion. (G,H). Steady-state pHi values measured from normal breast tissue (G) and breast cancer tissue (H) isolated from NaHCO3-treated mice and control mice (n = 7) and investigated at pHo 7.4 (closed symbols) and 6.8 (open symbols). Data were compared by three-way ANOVA. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs. Control under similar conditions or as indicated.
Figure 4. The capacity for net acid extrusion is increased in both normal breast tissue and breast cancer tissue from NaHCO3-treated mice compared to control mice. (A, B). Average traces of pHi-dynamics during NH4+-prepulse experiments performed on normal breast tissue (A) and breast cancer tissue (B) from NaHCO3-treated mice and control mice (n = 7). Experiments were conducted in both the presence and absence of CO2/HCO3–. (C). Intracellular intrinsic buffering capacity of organoids of both cancer and normal tissue from NaHCO3-treated and untreated mice (n = 7). Linear regression showed no significant difference in buffering capacity between NaHCO3-treated and control mice. (D,E). Cellular net acid extrusion in epithelial organoids isolated from normal breast tissue (D) and breast cancer tissue (E) displayed as a function of pHi. Experiments were based on tissue from NaHCO3-treated mice and control mice (n = 7) and performed in both the presence and absence of CO2/HCO3–. Data were compared by least-squares linear regression analyses. (F). Breast tumor-free survival plotted as function of net acid extrusion capacity displayed as the pHi value corresponding to net acid extrusion of 14 mM/min. The higher the pHi value, the greater the capacity for net acid extrusion. (G,H). Steady-state pHi values measured from normal breast tissue (G) and breast cancer tissue (H) isolated from NaHCO3-treated mice and control mice (n = 7) and investigated at pHo 7.4 (closed symbols) and 6.8 (open symbols). Data were compared by three-way ANOVA. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs. Control under similar conditions or as indicated.
Cancers 12 00891 g004
Cancers 12 00891 g005 550
Figure 5. NBCn1 and NHE1 protein expression is increased in organoids from breast cancer tissue compared to normal breast tissue, but unaffected by oral NaHCO3 therapy. (A–C). Representative immunoblots (A) and quantified protein expression levels for NBCn1 (B) and NHE1 (C) in breast cancer tissue and normal breast tissue from NaHCO3-treated mice and control mice (n = 11–12). Equal amounts of total protein were loaded in each lane of the gels. The band densities for NBCn1 and NHE1 are normalized to that of pan-actin. Data were compared by repeated measures two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-tests. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. NS: not significantly different vs. Control. The Full uncropped images of immunoblots please find in Figure S4.
Figure 5. NBCn1 and NHE1 protein expression is increased in organoids from breast cancer tissue compared to normal breast tissue, but unaffected by oral NaHCO3 therapy. (A–C). Representative immunoblots (A) and quantified protein expression levels for NBCn1 (B) and NHE1 (C) in breast cancer tissue and normal breast tissue from NaHCO3-treated mice and control mice (n = 11–12). Equal amounts of total protein were loaded in each lane of the gels. The band densities for NBCn1 and NHE1 are normalized to that of pan-actin. Data were compared by repeated measures two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-tests. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. NS: not significantly different vs. Control. The Full uncropped images of immunoblots please find in Figure S4.
Cancers 12 00891 g005
Cancers 12 00891 g006 550
Figure 6. Breast cancer organoids from mice undergoing oral NaHCO3 therapy show increased proliferative activity in vitro at both pHo 6.8 and 7.4 but only when investigated in the presence of CO2/HCO3– buffer. (A–C). Protein expression changes for cellular signaling cascades. p-values were calculated based on Fisher’s right-tailed exact test. We compare breast cancer tissue vs. normal breast tissue from control mice (A), breast cancer tissue from NaHCO3-treated mice vs. control mice (B), and normal breast tissue from NaHCO3-treated mice vs. control mice (C). (D). Original image of breast cancer organoid fluorescently labeled using an anti-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) antibody (red). Nuclei are stained with SYTO16 (green). (E, F). BrdU proliferative index in breast cancer organoids from NaHCO3-treated mice and control mice (n = 7–21) investigated at pHo 7.4 (E) and 6.8 (F). The BrdU proliferation index is the fraction of cells positive for BrdU after 6 h incubation and represents the rate of cell division during this period. Data were compared by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-tests. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, NS: not significantly different vs. Control under similar conditions.
Figure 6. Breast cancer organoids from mice undergoing oral NaHCO3 therapy show increased proliferative activity in vitro at both pHo 6.8 and 7.4 but only when investigated in the presence of CO2/HCO3– buffer. (A–C). Protein expression changes for cellular signaling cascades. p-values were calculated based on Fisher’s right-tailed exact test. We compare breast cancer tissue vs. normal breast tissue from control mice (A), breast cancer tissue from NaHCO3-treated mice vs. control mice (B), and normal breast tissue from NaHCO3-treated mice vs. control mice (C). (D). Original image of breast cancer organoid fluorescently labeled using an anti-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) antibody (red). Nuclei are stained with SYTO16 (green). (E, F). BrdU proliferative index in breast cancer organoids from NaHCO3-treated mice and control mice (n = 7–21) investigated at pHo 7.4 (E) and 6.8 (F). The BrdU proliferation index is the fraction of cells positive for BrdU after 6 h incubation and represents the rate of cell division during this period. Data were compared by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-tests. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, NS: not significantly different vs. Control under similar conditions.
Cancers 12 00891 g006

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Voss, N.C.S.; Dreyer, T.; Henningsen, M.B.; Vahl, P.; Honoré, B.; Boedtkjer, E. Targeting the Acidic Tumor Microenvironment: Unexpected Pro-Neoplastic Effects of Oral NaHCO3 Therapy in Murine Breast Tissue. Cancers 2020, 12, 891. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12040891

AMA Style

Voss NCS, Dreyer T, Henningsen MB, Vahl P, Honoré B, Boedtkjer E. Targeting the Acidic Tumor Microenvironment: Unexpected Pro-Neoplastic Effects of Oral NaHCO3 Therapy in Murine Breast Tissue. Cancers. 2020; 12(4):891. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12040891

Chicago/Turabian Style

Voss, Ninna C. S., Thomas Dreyer, Mikkel B. Henningsen, Pernille Vahl, Bent Honoré, and Ebbe Boedtkjer. 2020. "Targeting the Acidic Tumor Microenvironment: Unexpected Pro-Neoplastic Effects of Oral NaHCO3 Therapy in Murine Breast Tissue" Cancers 12, no. 4: 891. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12040891

APA Style

Voss, N. C. S., Dreyer, T., Henningsen, M. B., Vahl, P., Honoré, B., & Boedtkjer, E. (2020). Targeting the Acidic Tumor Microenvironment: Unexpected Pro-Neoplastic Effects of Oral NaHCO3 Therapy in Murine Breast Tissue. Cancers, 12(4), 891. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12040891

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop