1. Introduction
TGF-β is a multimodal factor that participates in many biological and physiological processes. The variability of TGF-β functions is attributable to differences in cellular type and context [
1]. TGF-β signaling pathways are triggered by its interaction to the TGF-β type II receptor (TGFβRII) that, in turn, interacts with the TGF-β type I receptor (TGFβRI or ALK5). TβRII phosphorylates TGFβRI and activates downstream effectors that transduce TGF-β signaling. The canonical TβRs signaling is conducted by the SMAD transcription factor family [
2,
3,
4]. Engagement of TβR leads to the phosphorylation of the receptor-associated SMADs (R-SMADs), SMAD2 and SMAD3. Once phosphorylated SMAD2 and/or SMAD3 interact with the common SMAD (Co-SMAD) SMAD4, assembling dimers or trimers translocate to the nucleus. In the nucleus, SMAD4-R-SMAD bind other transcription factors that act as co-activators or co-repressors of transcription. A third group of SMADs are the inhibitory SMADs (I-SMADs) that compete with R-SMADs for receptor binding and by targeting activated receptor complex to proteasome degradation [
5]. In addition to canonical SMAD signaling, TGF-β triggers other signaling pathways frequently referred as “non-SMAD” branch of TGF-β signaling [
6,
7]. These non-canonical TGF-β pathways include Rho-like GTPase signaling pathway, MAP kinase pathway and the Phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase/AKT (PI3K/AKT) signaling pathway.
In cancer development and progression, TGF-β has a dichotomous function, being a suppressor for premalignant or normal cells but a tumor promoter for transformed cells [
8,
9,
10]. As a tumor suppressor, TGF-β elicits cell cycle inhibition and apoptosis, and loss of those responses are critical for cancer progression [
9,
11]. However, the mechanisms by which TGF-β switches its functions are not fully ascertained. An increasing amount of evidence demonstrates that tumor-suppressive signaling induced by TGF-β is impaired by oncogenic mutations, leading to survival and proliferation of initiated cells. Among such perturbations, those that activate the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway antagonize the cytostatic or pro-apoptotic effects of TGF-β [
12].
The PI3K/AKT pathway regulates cell survival and proliferation and is frequently dysregulated in human cancers. PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10) is a phosphatase that opposes PI3K activity by dephosphorylating phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate (PIP3) to phosphatidylinositol-4,5-trisphosphate (PIP2) [
13]. Loss of PTEN activity is a frequent alteration in cancer, with special high incidence in endometrial cancer [
14,
15,
16]. Alterations of PTEN increase the amount of PIP3 in the membrane, resulting in the activation of 3-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase (PDK) and AKT, which in turn stimulates cell proliferation and survival. The importance of PTEN deficiency in endometrial tumorigenesis has been evidenced by different knock-out mouse models, in which genetic deletion of PTEN results in the development of endometrial carcinogenesis [
17,
18,
19].
The TGF-β/SMAD signaling pathway has an important role in the uterine function and physiology of the female uterine tract [
20]. Genetically modified mouse models have uncovered the importance of TGF-β as a tumor suppressor in the female reproductive tract. Conditional TβRI knock-out in the female reproductive system shows profound defects in myometrium structure and function [
21], and ablation of TβRI in the uterus leads to increased endometrial cell proliferation resulting in the development of endometrial hyperplasia and the development of endometrial cancers [
22]. Moreover, uterine conditional deletion of TβRI [
23], conditional double deletion of SMAD2 and SMAD3 [
24] or conditional deletion of TβRI in combination in PTEN-inactivated endometrium [
25] results in metastatic endometrial carcinoma mice.
The PI3K/AKT and TGF-β/SMAD signaling pathways are involved in the regulation of cellular processes such as cell proliferation or apoptosis. Therefore, these two signaling pathways are coordinated to integrate cellular outcomes [
12]. However, the crosstalk between these two pathways is still under active investigation, and several cell type-specific mechanisms have been reported [
12]. The first mechanism involves an interaction of AKT with SMAD3 in the cytoplasm, preventing its nuclear translocation and the transcriptional activation of SMAD3 target genes [
26,
27]. In the second proposed mechanism, AKT phosphorylates the forkhead transcription factor (FOXO) which causes its nuclear export and interferes with the formation of a transcriptionally active FOXO/SMAD transcriptional complex [
28]. The third mechanism describes a collaborative effect of TGF-β/SMAD signaling loss and PI3K/AKT activation in tumor development. In this mechanism, PTEN loss and SMAD4 inactivation or inhibition through either genetic deletion of SMAD4 [
29,
30] leads to tumor progression in a mouse model of prostatic cancer.
Here, we provide in vivo and in vitro evidence for a regulation of SMAD2/3 by the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. We demonstrate that SMAD2/3 is constitutively located in the nucleus of PTEN-inactivated endometrium. In the nucleus, SMAD2/3 acts as a tumor suppressor, restraining the increase of cell proliferation caused by PTEN deficiency. Moreover, we demonstrate that nuclear localization of SMAD2/3 is AKT-dependent, as its inhibition restores cytosolic localization of SMAD2/3.
2. Methods
2.1. Reagents and Antibodies
Epidermal growth factor (EGF) and LY294002 were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), and Matrigel® (rBM) was purchased from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA, USA). Recombinant TGF-β and Insulin−Transferrin−Sodium Selenite (ITS) supplements were from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). (Z)-4-Hydroxytamoxifen (TAM), BisBenzimide H 33,342 trihydrochloride (Hoechst), rhodamine conjugated-phalloidin and the TGF-β superfamily type I receptor inhibitor SB431542 were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Rapamycin and Everolimus were from Selleckchem. Antibodies against TGFβRI (#sc:398), TGFβRII (#sc:220 and #sc:400), Cyclin D1 (#sc:20044), Histone H1 (#sc:8030), Pan-AKT (#sc:1618) and SMAD4 (#sc:7966) were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Antibody to α-Tubulin (#T9026) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA); anti-antibodies to cleaved-caspase 3 (#9961), PTEN (#9188), p-AKT (ser473) (#4060) and p-SMAD2 (Ser465/467)/SMAD3 (Ser423/425) (#8828) were from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA). LDH (Lactate Dehydrogenase) (#100-1173) was from Rockland Immunochemicals INC. (Limerick, PA, USA); anti-total SMAD2/3 (#610051) was purchased from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA, USA).
PTEN cDNA from PKR5-PTEN plasmid (obtained from Rafa Pulido’s laboratory) was subcloned in the PTEN-encoding lentiviral vector. CA-AKT was a gift from Elisabeth Krizman and Michael Robinson’s laboratory.
2.2. Genetically Modified Mouse Models
PTEN and SMAD2 conditional knock-out mice and mice expressing Cre:ER
T were housed, bred and genotyped as previously described [
31]. Floxed homozygous PTEN (C;129S4-
Ptentm1Hwu/J, hereafter called PTEN
fl/fl) Cre:ER (B6.Cg-Tg(CAG-CRE/Esr1* 5Amc/J) mice were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). Cre:ER
+/− PTEN
fl/fl mice were bred in a mixed background (C57BL6; 129S4) by crossing PTEN
fl/fl and Cre:ER
+/− mice. To obtain mice carrying both PTEN floxed alleles (PTENfl/fl) and a single Cre:ER (Cre:ER
+/−), Cre:ER
+/− PTEN
fl/+ were backcrossed with PTEN
fl/fl mice. SMAD
fl/fl mice were provided by Dr. Martin M Matzuk (Department of Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, USA). SMAD3
fl/fl mice genotyping PCR was carried out with the following primer: forward primer 5′-CTC CAG ATC GTG GGC ATA CAG C-3′; SMADd3
fl/fl reverse primer 5′-GGT CAC AGG GTC CTC TGT GCC-3′.
To induce deletion of floxed alleles, Tamoxifen (Sigma-Aldrich T5648, St. Louis, MO, USA) was dissolved in 100% ethanol at 100 mg/mL. Tamoxifen solution was emulsified in corn oil (Sigma-Aldrich C8267) at 10 mg/mL by vortexing. To induce PTEN deletion, adult mice (4–5 weeks old) were given a single intraperitoneal injection of 0.5 mg of tamoxifen emulsion (30–35 μg per mg body weight).
2.3. Isolation of Endometrial Epithelial Cells and Organoid Culture
Cell culture experiments were performed in the Cell Culture Scientific and Technical Service from Universitat de Lleida, Lleida, Catalonia, Spain. Isolation and culture of endometrial organoids was performed as previously described with minor modifications [
31,
32]. Mice were killed by cervical dislocation and uterine horns were dissected, washed with HBSS and chopped in 3–4 mm length fragments. Uterine fragments were digested with 1% trypsin (Invitrogen) in HBSS (Invitrogen) for 1 h at 4 °C and 45 min at room temperature and epithelial sheets were squeezed-out of the uterine pieces. Epithelial sheets were washed twice with PBS and resuspended in 1 mL of DMEM/F12 (Invitrogen) supplemented with 1 mM HEPES (Sigma), 1% of penicillin/streptomycin (Sigma) and fungizone (Invitrogen) (basal medium). Epithelial sheets were disrupted mechanically in basal medium, and cells were diluted in basal medium containing 2% of dextran-coated charcoal-stripped serum (Invitrogen) and plated into culture dishes (BD Falcon). Cells were cultured for 24 h in an incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO
2 and saturating humidity. Twenty-four hours later, cells were washed with HBSS and incubated with trypsin/EDTA solution (Sigma) for 5 min at 37 °C. Cells were collected resuspended in HBSS, and mechanically disrupted cells were centrifuged and plated in matrigrel-coated tissue culture plates in basal medium containing 3% of matrigel. Twenty-four hours after plating, the medium was replaced by basal medium supplemented with 5 ng/mL EGF and 1/100 dilution of Insulin−Transferrin−Sodium Selenite (ITS) Supplement (Invitrogen) and 3% of fresh matrigel. Medium was replaced every 2–3 days.
2.4. Viral Production, Infection and In Vitro Transfection Conditions
Production of lentiviruses carrying PTEN cDNA (FCIV-PTEN) or constructively active AKT (CA-AKT) was achieved by transfecting HEK293T packaging cells with linear PEI (40 µM) in combination with lentiviral plasmids and [psPAX2 packaging and pMD2G envelope] helper plasmids at 1:1:1 ratio, respectively. Viral production was performed in HEK293T cells as previously described [
31].
2.5. Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP)
ChIP analysis was performed as previously described [
31]. Endometrial organoids were crosslinked at room temperature for 15 min by adding 1/10 volumes of 11% formaldehyde solution and quenched with glycine for 15 min. Organoids were washed in ice-cold PBS and lysed. Lysate was sonicated ten times with the following protocol: 4 cycles of 30″ sonication and 20″ pause at 20% amplitude. Ten µL were separated as a whole cell extract input. Anti-SMAD2/3 conjugated beads were collected and washed with blocking buffer. 100 µL of nuclear extracts were added to the bead solution and incubated overnight at 4 °C. The next day, beads were consecutively washed with low and high salt buffer, LiCl wash buffer and with TE buffer and resuspended with elution buffer for 15 min at 65 °C. Elution buffer was added to input. Input and pellet were incubated in the oven overnight at 65 °C. Lysates were centrifuged and supernatants were digested and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h in TE buffer containing RNaseA and proteinase K and incubated for 2 h at 55 °C. DNA was extracted by phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol method and precipitated. Samples were incubated at −20 °C for 4 h, and then the samples were centrifuged at top speed. The pellets were washed with 80% EtOH. Samples were spun again, and the pellet was resuspended in TE buffer and incubated at 65 °C on a heating block for 15 min. Primers used for PCR were: PTEN PROMOTER −1/−500 (F TCGGAAAGCCGGAGGGGAG, R GTGTCTCCCGCGTGGGTCA); PTEN PROMOTER −501/−986 (F TGACCCACGCGGGAGACAC, R GGCCTGGGAGGGCTCAAAG); PTEN PROMOTER −987/−1459 (F CTTTGAGCCCTCCCAGGCC, R CAACCGTGGGAGAAGAGGC).
2.6. Western Blotting
Western blotting was performed as previously described [
31]. Organoids were washed with PBS and lysed with lysis buffer containing 2% SDS, 125 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 6.8. Protein was quantified by loading on a 10% acrylamide gel, transferring to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore Corporation, Kenilworth, NJ, USA) and blotting with anti-tubulin antibody. Band density was determined by using Image Lab 4.0.1 software (Bio-Rad laboratories, Richmond, CA, USA). Equal amounts of proteins were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. Nonspecific binding was blocked by incubation with TBST (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 150 mM NaCl and 0.1% Tween 20) plus 5% of nonfat milk. Membranes were incubated with the primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C and for 1 h room temperature with secondary horseradish peroxidase (1:10,000 in TBST). Signal was detected with ECL Advance (Amersham-Pharmacia, Little Chalfont, Buskinghamshire, UK) and SuperSignal West Femto Trial Kit (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA).
2.7. Human Tissue Samples Selection and Tissue Micro Arrays (TMAs) Construction
Three TMAs were constructed using the manual arrays from Beecher InstrumentsTM. The TMAs contained formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue from 79 primary Endometrioid Endometrial Carcinomas (EEC). The tumors were classified following the most recent WHO criteria. They were surgically staged and graded according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grading systems. They included 19 grade 1 EECs, 23 grade 2 EECs and 37 grade 3 EECs. Samples were obtained from the surgical pathology specimens. The study complied with Law 14/2007 and RD 1716/2011 of the Autonomous Community (Generalitat of Catalonia), Spanish Government and EU Directives and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hospital Arnau de Vilanova de Lleida (CEIC). Informed consent was obtained from each patient. All tissue samples were histologically reviewed by two members of the team, and representative tumor or non-tumor areas were marked in the corresponding paraffin blocks. Tissue cylinders with a diameter of 0.6-mm were punched from two different tumor areas of each “donor” tissue block and brought into a recipient paraffin block.
2.8. Total RNA Extraction, Reverse Transcriptase−Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) and Quantitative Real-Time PCR RT-qPCR
Total RNA was extracted from the uterine endometrium using the RNeasy Total RNA kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). For RT-qPCR assays, cDNA was amplified by heating at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 PCR cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min using the ABI Prism 7900 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems) and Promega GoTaq® qPCR Master Mix (Madison, WI, USA). Relative mRNA expression levels were calculated by using the 2ΔΔCt method and are presented as ratios to the housekeeping gene glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Taqman® technology from Applied Biosystems was used for RT-qPCR analyses. The probes were: GAPDH, Mm99999915_g1; SMAD2, Mm00487530_m1; SMAD3, Mm01170760_m1. The number of cycles required to reach the crossing point for each sample was used to calculate the amount of each product using the 2-CP method. Each sample pool was amplified in triplicate using GAPDH for normalization.
2.9. Immunohistochemistry
Mice uteri were dissected, washed with PBS, fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin and sectioned (4–5 μm). Mice uteri and TMA blocks from human tissue samples were sectioned at a thickness of 3 μm, dried, rehydrated and submitted to antigen retrieval for 20 min in 50× Tris/EDTA buffer, pH 9 in the Pre-Treatment Module, PT-LINK (DAKO) at 95 °C. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked. The antibodies used were against TGFβ1, TGFβRII, SMAD 2/3, SMAD4 and PTEN (6H2.1). The reaction was visualized with the EnVisionTM FLEX Detection Kit (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) for SMAD 2/3, SMAD 4 and PTEN and EnVisionTM FLEX+ rabbit (LINKER) Detection Kit (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) using diaminobenzidine chromogen as a substrate. Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. Appropriate negative controls including no primary antibody were also tested.
Immunohistochemical results shown in
Supplementary Figure S1 were evaluated by following uniform pre-established criteria. Immunostaining was graded semi-quantitatively by considering the percentage and intensity of the staining. A histological score was obtained from each sample and values ranged from 0 (no immunoreaction) to 300 (maximum immunoreactivity). The score was obtained by applying the following formula: Histoscore = 1 × (% light staining) + 2 × (% moderate staining) + 3 × (% strong staining). The histological score was also used for evaluation of cytosolic and nuclear staining intensity.
In the case of TMA evaluation, immunohistochemical evaluation was done after examining the two different tumor cylinders from each case. PTEN immunoreactivity was scored as follows: 2 for highly expressing cylinders, 1 for moderately expressing cylinders and 0 for cylinders completely lacking PTEN expression. For evaluation of SMAD2/3 for cytosolic and nuclear staining intensity, cylinders were scored as follows:
n > c for cylinders showing only nuclear expression;
n < c for cylinders showing only cytoplasmic expression;
n = c for cylinders showing both nuclear and cytosolic expression. The reliability of such scores for interpretation of immunohistochemical staining in EC TMAs has been shown previously [
33,
34].
To support the scoring of immunohistochemistry, an automated imaging system, the ACIS® III Instrument (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark), was also used. An intensity score, which ranged from 60 to 255, was obtained from 4 different areas of each sample.
2.10. Immunofluorescence Study
Immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence experiments were performed as previously described [
31]. Organoids were fixed for 5 min at room temperature with formalin and washed with PBS. Depending on primary antibody, cells were permeabilized with 0.2% Triton (T) X-100 in PBS for 10 min or with 100% methanol (Me) for 2 min. Organoids were incubated overnight at 4 °C with the indicated dilutions of antibodies: SMAD2/3 (T), TGFβRI (T), TGFβRII (T), α-Tubulin (T) and anti-SMAD4 (Me), washed with PBS and incubated with Alexa Fluor secondary anti-mouse or anti-rabbit antibodies (1:500) containing 5 μg/mL of Hoechst 33,342 in PBS at room temperature for 4 h. For double-immunofluorescence, organoids were incubated with the second round of primary and secondary antibodies. For all double-immunofluorescence stains, first and second primary antibodies were from a different isotype. Immunofluorescence staining was visualized and analyzed using confocal microscopy (model FV1000; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) with the 10× and the oil-immersion 60× magnification objectives. Analysis of images was obtained with Fluoview FV100 software (Olympus, Shinjuku City, Tokyo, Japan).
2.11. Confocal Imaging and Evaluation of SMAD2/3 Positive Nuclei and Glandular Perimeter Measurement
Images of endometrial epithelial spheroids were captured and digitized with a confocal microscope (Fluoview FV1000-Olympus). Epithelial perimeter analysis was processed by image analysis software (ImageJ version 1.46r; NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA), generating binary images of the spheroids as previously described. For each experiment, at least 150 spheroids were quantified. SMAD2/3 nuclei were scored and divided by the total number of cells (visualized by Hoechst staining). The results are expressed as a percentage of SMAD2/3-positive nuclei cells. The investigators were not blinded to allocation during experiments or outcome assessment.
2.12. Statistical Analysis
TMA statistical analyses were performed using linear mixed models to assess the effects of any experimental factor on PTEN staining. For each experimental design, SEs were used to statistically assess the main effect of each variable but also their paired interactions. Chi-squared test was conducted to assess the reduction in the levels of PTEN expression (considered categorically as 0, 1 or 2) in relation to SMAD2/3 expression and whether the expression was higher in the nucleus versus the cytoplasm. This analysis was performed globally for all EEC cases and separately for grades I, II or III. Values are presented in the graphs as the mean ± standard errors of the mean (SEM) of n cells cultures experiments or n biopsies where each value is the average of responses in triplicate, at least.
The normality of the distribution of experiments was assessed by Kolmogorov−Smirnov test. No statistical method was used to predetermine sample size. Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism 8.0. Differences between two groups were assessed by Student’s t test (unpaired or paired as needed depending on the study design). Differences between more than two groups were assessed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test or two-way ANOVA, followed by the Bonferroni post hoc comparison test. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All data examined are expressed as mean ± SEM.
4. Discussion
TGF-β is a cytokine that regulates a myriad of cellular functions depending on cell type and context [
1]. During cancer development, TGF-β is a tumor suppressor on normal or pre-malignant cells, but it is a potent tumor promoter in malignant stages. However, the molecular mechanisms of such opposing effects are not fully understood. It is widely accepted that in epithelial tissues, TGF-β tumor-suppressive action depends on its ability to induce cell growth arrest or apoptosis [
9]. In the uterus, TGF-β plays an important role in endometrial development and physiology [
20] and also in endometrial carcinogenesis. TGF-β signaling is impaired during endometrial carcinogenesis [
40], and TGF-β signaling downregulation has been associated with poor prognosis [
41]. In addition, during early stages of endometrial carcinogenesis, impaired TGF-β signaling correlates with loss of growth inhibition [
42]. On the contrary, TGF-β promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and increases invasiveness of endometrial cancer cell lines [
43]. In recent years, the role of TGF-β/SMAD in endometrial carcinogenesis signaling has been uncovered by conditional deletion of TGF-β receptors and SMADs: uterine conditional deletion of TβRI [
23], conditional double deletion of SMAD2 and SMAD3 [
24] or conditional deletion of TβRI in combination in PTEN-inactivated endometrium [
25] results in metastatic endometrial carcinoma mice.
Here, we have demonstrated that lack of PTEN results in an increase in PI3K/AKT signaling which leads to constitutive nuclear translocation of SMAD2/3. The PI3K/AKT signaling pathway plays a pivotal role in the regulation of endometrial homeostasis. Perturbations of this signaling pathway are the most frequent molecular alterations found in endometrial cancers [
14,
15,
16]. Activation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway leads to survival and proliferation, and therefore, it can abrogate pro-apoptotic or cytostatic effects of TGF-β. Mechanistically, the regulation of SMADs activation and their nuclear translocation by the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway is still controversial, and opposing effects of PI3K/AKT activation on SMAD activity and localization have been observed. On the one hand, it has been reported that AKT can directly interact with SMAD3 inhibiting its nuclear translocation and activation [
26,
27]. Moreover, activation of PI3K/AKT signaling by IGF-1 suppresses SMAD3 activation in prostate cells [
44]. On the other hand, it has been also demonstrated that enhanced PI3K/AKT signaling triggers SMAD activation in several cell types with different cellular outcomes. In keratinocytes, loss of PTEN increases TGFβ-mediated invasion with enhanced SMAD3 transcriptional activity [
45]. In the kidney, PTEN loss initiates tubular dysfunction via SMAD3-dependent fibrotic responses [
46]. Prostates from PTEN-deficient mice display increased phosphorylation and activation of SMAD3 and SMAD4 [
29]. We have also addressed the molecular mechanism by which loss of PTEN causes nuclear translocation of SMAD2/3. It has been reported that PI3K/AKT activation increases TGF-β receptors in the cell surface, resulting in an enhanced autocrine TGF-β signaling that causes SMAD3 activation [
36]. SMAD2/3 activation downstream PTEN deletion is dependent of PI3K/AKT signaling but independent of TGF-β receptors. In contrast, we have unveiled the PI3K/AKT/mTORC1 signaling pathway as the major one responsible for SMAD2/3 nuclear translocation in PTEN knock-out cells. It is worth highlighting that SMAD2/3 translocation can be blocked by mTORC1 inhibitors such as Everolimus, which is a therapeutic agent for PTEN-deficient cancers [
47]. At the functional level, mTORC1 inhibition restores TGF-β-induced apoptosis downstream of PTEN loss or constitutive AKT activation. Therefore, apart from new mechanistic insight on the regulation of SMAD2/3 by PTEN, or findings could have a therapeutic value. Finally, we would like to highlight that the mechanistic differences between our model and others can be explained by the well-known cell type or cell context specificity of TGF-β signaling [
1].
Another observation that deserves discussion is the role of SMAD4 to drive TGF-β-induced cellular responses. Most of the cell responses activated by TGF-β require association of R-SMADs (SMAD2/3) with SMAD4. However, an increasing number of evidences demonstrate that SMAD2 and SMAD3 may have different functions in TGF-β signaling [
48], independently of SMAD4. To this end, our results demonstrate PTEN deficiency caused constitutive nuclear translocation of SMAD2/3, while SMAD4 was still retained in the cytoplasm.
Besides the results derived from organoid cultures, one of the strengths of our findings is the nuclear localization of SMAD2/3 in both mouse and human PTEN-deficient endometrial samples in vivo. Our mouse model of tamoxifen-induced PTEN deletion is a mosaic where cells lacking PTEN that develop endometrial tumors are nearby cells keeping PTEN expression that show normal phenotype. It is noteworthy that all PTEN-deficient cells display nuclear translocation of SMAD2/3, whereas in the same sample, cells retaining PTEN expression do not have nuclear staining for SMAD2/3. More importantly, nuclear SMAD2/3 in PTEN-deficient mouse endometrial cancer is extensible to human endometrium. The analysis of human endometrial carcinomas revealed a significant inverse correlation between PTEN expression and SMAD2/3 nuclear staining in Grade III EC. It is worth mentioning this and considering it as high-risk EC that often spreads to other parts of the body. This result opens the door for a further investigation of SMAD2/3 as a biomarker of PTEN deficiency in Grade III EC.
Finally, we intended to evaluate the function of SMAD2/3 in PTEN-deficient cells. It is widely accepted that in normal epithelial cells, TGF-β-induced SMAD activation is a tumor suppressor pathway, but oncogenic mutations can switch the tumor-suppressive functions of TGF-β/SMAD signaling to tumor-promoting ones. We have previously described that SMAD2/3 nuclear translocation triggered by TGF-β induces apoptosis of normal endometrial organoid cultures, and its deletion leads to increased cell proliferation and inhibition of apoptosis. Therefore, it is intriguing that PTEN deficiency, which inhibits TGF-β-induced apoptosis and leads to increased proliferation, also triggers SMAD2/3 nuclear translocation. This observation raises the question: is the nuclear translocation of SMAD2/3 downstream of PTEN deletion, a tumor suppressor or tumor-promoting mechanism? By concomitant deletion of PTEN and SMAD2/3, we have demonstrated that SMAD2/3 restrains tumor proliferation of PTEN-deficient organoids. PTEN loss leads to an increase of organoid size and triggers SMAD2/3 nuclear translocation. When PTEN and SMAD2/3 and organoid size are further increased, this indicates that SMAD2/3 nuclear translocation constrains tumorigenesis triggered by PTEN loss. These results strongly suggest that SMAD2/3 has tumor-suppressive functions when it is translocated to the nucleus by PTEN deficiency.
It is well known that SMAD signaling is capable of triggering EMT in initiated or malignant cells. However, neither SMAD2/3-deficiency nor SMAD2/3-PTEN triple deficiency caused any sign of morphological changes compatible with EMT. Therefore, the tumor-suppressive function of SMADs is restricted to the control of glandular proliferation and the regulation of apoptosis triggered by TGF-β.