Proteomic Analysis Identifies NDUFS1 and ATP5O as Novel Markers for Survival Outcome in Prostate Cancer
Abstract
:Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Methods
2.1. Formalin-Fixed Clinical Specimens
2.2. Human Tissue Microarray Generation: Sample Selection and Preparation for Laser Microdissection
2.3. Proteomic Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) Analysis
2.4. Immunohistochemistry
2.5. Oncomine Database Analysis
2.6. TCGA and GTEx Project Analyses
2.7. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Human Proteomics Data Analysis Shows Upregulation of Mitochondrial Processes and OXPHOS in STAT3-Low PCa
3.2. NDUFS1 and ATP5O Protein Expression in PCa
3.3. NDUFS1 and ATP5O Expression Is Associated with Earlier Biochemical Recurrence in PCa
3.4. mRNA Analysis Shows Higher Expression of NDUFS1 and ATP5O in PCa
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
References
- Rawla, P. Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer. World J. Oncol. 2019, 10, 63–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Epstein, J.I.; Zelefsky, M.; Sjoberg, D.D.; Nelson, J.B.; Egevad, L.; Magi-Galluzzi, C.; Vickers, A.J.; Parwani, A.V.; Reuter, V.E.; Fine, S.W.; et al. A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score. Eur. Urol. 2016, 69, 428–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Epstein, J.I.; Egevad, L.; Amin, M.B.; Delahunt, B.; Srigley, J.R.; Humphrey, P.A. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2016, 40, 244–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loeb, S.; Berglund, A.; Stattin, P. Population Based Study of Use and Determinants of Active Surveillance and Watchful Waiting for Low and Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer. J. Urol. 2013, 190, 1742–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sathianathen, N.J.; Konety, B.R.; Crook, J.; Saad, F.; Lawrentschuk, N. Landmarks in prostate cancer. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2018, 15, 627–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taylor, B.S.; Schultz, N.; Hieronymus, H.; Gopalan, A.; Xiao, Y.; Carver, B.S.; Arora, V.K.; Kaushik, P.; Cerami, E.; Reva, B.; et al. Integrative Genomic Profiling of Human Prostate Cancer. Cancer Cell 2010, 18, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Robinson, D.; Van Allen, E.M.; Wu, Y.-M.; Schultz, N.; Lonigro, R.J.; Mosquera, J.-M.; Montgomery, B.; Taplin, M.-E.; Pritchard, C.C.; Attard, G.; et al. Integrative Clinical Genomics of Advanced Prostate Cancer. Cell 2015, 161, 1215–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, Y.; Beyer, A.; Aebersold, R. On the Dependency of Cellular Protein Levels on mRNA Abundance. Cell 2016, 165, 535–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vogel, C.; Marcotte, E.M. Insights into the regulation of protein abundance from proteomic and transcriptomic analyses. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13, 227–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wyatt, A.W.; Mo, F.; Wang, K.; McConeghy, B.; Brahmbhatt, S.; Jong, L.; Mitchell, D.M.; Johnston, R.L.; Haegert, A.; Li, E.; et al. Heterogeneity in the inter-tumor transcriptome of high-risk prostate cancer. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Srihari, S.; Kwong, R.; Tran, K.; Simpson, R.; Tattam, P.; Smith, E. Metabolic deregulation in prostate cancer. Mol. Omics 2018, 14, 320–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, C.; Salzillo, T.C.; Bader, D.A.; Wilkenfeld, S.R.; Awad, D.; Pulliam, T.L.; Dutta, P.; Pudakalakatti, S.; Titus, M.; McGuire, S.E.; et al. Prostate Cancer Energetics and Biosynthesis. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2019, 1210, 185–237. [Google Scholar]
- Eidelman, E.; Twum-Ampofo, J.; Ansari, J.; Siddiqui, M.M. The Metabolic Phenotype of Prostate Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2017, 7, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dang, C.V. Links between metabolism and cancer. Genes Dev. 2012, 26, 877–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Frank, S.; Nelson, P.; Vasioukhin, V. Recent advances in prostate cancer research: Large-scale genomic analyses reveal novel driver mutations and DNA repair defects. F1000Research 2018, 7, 1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pencik, J.; Schlederer, M.; Gruber, W.; Unger, C.; Walker, S.M.; Chalaris, A.; Marié, I.J.; Hassler, M.R.; Javaheri, T.; Aksoy, O.; et al. STAT3 regulated ARF expression suppresses prostate cancer metastasis. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Oberhuber, M.; Pecoraro, M.; Rusz, M.; Oberhuber, G.; Wieselberg, M.; Haslinger, P.; Gurnhofer, E.; Schlederer, M.; Limberger, T.; Lagger, S.; et al. STAT 3 -dependent analysis reveals PDK 4 as independent predictor of recurrence in prostate cancer. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2020, 16, e9247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atas, E.; Oberhuber, M.; Kenner, L. The Implications of PDK1–4 on Tumor Energy Metabolism, Aggressiveness and Therapy Resistance. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 583217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barshad, G.; Zlotnikov-Poznianski, N.; Gal, L.; Schuldiner, M.; Mishmar, D. Disease-causing mutations in subunits of OXPHOS complex I affect certain physical interactions. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Giannoni, E.; Taddei, M.L.; Morandi, A.; Comito, G.; Calvani, M.; Bianchini, F.; Richichi, B.; Raugei, G.; Wong, N.; Tang, D.; et al. Targeting stromal-induced pyruvate kinase M2 nuclear translocation impairs OXPHOS and prostate cancer metastatic spread. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 24061–24074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Philley, J.V.; Kannan, A.; Qin, W.; Sauter, E.R.; Ikebe, M.; Hertweck, K.L.; Troyer, D.A.; Semmes, O.J.; Dasgupta, S. Complex-I Alteration and Enhanced Mitochondrial Fusion Are Associated With Prostate Cancer Progression. J. Cell. Physiol. 2015, 231, 1364–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ippolito, L.; Marini, A.; Cavallini, L.; Morandi, A.; Pietrovito, L.; Pintus, G.; Giannoni, E.; Schrader, T.; Puhr, M.; Chiarugi, P.; et al. Metabolic shift toward oxidative phosphorylation in docetaxel resistant prostate cancer cells. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 61890–61904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tyanova, S.; Temu, T.; Sinitcyn, P.; Carlson, A.; Hein, M.Y.; Geiger, T.; Mann, M.; Cox, J. The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 731–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rhodes, D.R.; Yu, J.; Shanker, K.; Deshpande, N.; Varambally, R.; Ghosh, D.; Barrette, T.; Pander, A.; Chinnaiyan, A.M. ONCOMINE: A Cancer Microarray Database and Integrated Data-Mining Platform. Neoplasia 2004, 6, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Goldman, M.J.; Craft, B.; Hastie, M.; Repečka, K.; McDade, F.; Kamath, A.; Banerjee, A.; Luo, Y.; Rogers, D.; Brooks, A.N.; et al. Visualizing and interpreting cancer genomics data via the Xena platform. Nat. Biotechnol. 2020, 38, 675–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vivian, J.; Rao, A.; Nothaft, F.A.; Ketchum, C.; Armstrong, J.; Novak, A.; Pfeil, J.; Narkizian, J.; DeRan, A.D.; Musselman-Brown, A.; et al. Toil enables reproducible, open source, big biomedical data analyses. Nat. Biotechnol. 2017, 35, 314–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- GTEx Consortium. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 580–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Janssen, R.J.; Nijtmans, L.G.; van den Heuvel, L.P.; Smeitink, J.A.M. Mitochondrial complex I: Structure, function and pathology. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2006, 29, 499–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bezawork-Geleta, A.; Rohlena, J.; Dong, L.; Pacak, K.; Neuzil, J. Mitochondrial Complex II: At the Crossroads. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2017, 42, 312–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sousa, J.S.; D’Imprima, E.; Vonck, J. Mitochondrial Respiratory Chain Complexes. Subcellular Biochemistry; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2018; Volume 87, pp. 167–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Timón-Gómez, A.; Nývltová, E.; Abriata, L.A.; Vila, A.; Hosler, J.; Barrientos, A. Mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase biogenesis: Recent developments. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2018, 76, 163–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neupane, P.; Bhuju, S.; Thapa, N.; Bhattarai, H.K. ATP Synthase: Structure, Function and Inhibition. Biomol. Concepts 2019, 10, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wallace, D.C. Mitochondria and cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2012, 12, 685–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sotgia, F.; Lisanti, M.P. Mitochondrial biomarkers predict tumor progression and poor overall survival in gastric cancers: Companion diagnostics for personalized medicine. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 67117–67128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Iglesias-Gato, D.; Wikström, P.; Tyanova, S.; Lavallee, C.; Thysell, E.; Carlsson, J.; Hägglöf, C.; Cox, J.; Andrén, O.; Stattin, P.; et al. The Proteome of Primary Prostate Cancer. Eur. Urol. 2016, 69, 942–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellinger, J.; Poss, M.; Brüggemann, M.; Gromes, A.; Schmidt, D.; Ellinger, N.; Tolkach, Y.; Dietrich, D.; Kristiansen, G.; Müller, S.C. Systematic Expression Analysis of Mitochondrial Complex I Identifies NDUFS1 as a Biomarker in Clear-Cell Renal-Cell Carcinoma. Clin. Genitourin. Cancer 2017, 15, e551–e562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brüggemann, M.; Gromes, A.; Poss, M.; Schmidt, D.; Klümper, N.; Tolkach, Y.; Dietrich, D.; Kristiansen, G.; Müller, S.C.; Ellinger, J. Systematic Analysis of the Expression of the Mitochondrial ATP Synthase (Complex V) Subunits in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Transl. Oncol. 2017, 10, 661–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, C.-Y.; Chang, Y.-C.; Yang, C.-J.; Huang, M.-S.; Hsiao, M. The opposite prognostic effect of NDUFS1 and NDUFS8 in lung cancer reflects the oncojanus role of mitochondrial complex I. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 31357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Porporato, P.E.; Filigheddu, N.; Pedro, J.M.B.-S.; Kroemer, G.; Galluzzi, L. Mitochondrial metabolism and cancer. Cell Res. 2018, 28, 265–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The Human Protein Atlas. NDUFS1. Breast cancer. Available online: https://www.proteinatlas.org/ENSG00000023228-NDUFS1/pathology/breast+cancer (accessed on 22 November 2021).
- Silberstein, J.L.; Pal, S.K.; Lewis, B.; Sartor, O. Current clinical challenges in prostate cancer. Transl. Androl. Urol. 2013, 2, 122–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Latonen, L.; Afyounian, E.; Jylhä, A.; Nättinen, J.; Aapola, U.; Annala, M.; Kivinummi, K.K.; Tammela, T.T.L.; Beuerman, R.W.; Uusitalo, H.; et al. Integrative proteomics in prostate cancer uncovers robustness against genomic and transcriptomic aberrations during disease progression. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Koochekpour, S. Androgen receptor signaling and mutations in prostate cancer. Asian J. Androl. 2010, 12, 639–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Characteristic | Total Cohort | CI |
---|---|---|
Number of patients | 88 | |
Valid values for NDUFS1 | 74 | |
Valid values for ATP5O | 75 | |
Mean age at surgery | 63.3 | 6.42 |
Gleason score, n (%) | 87 | |
3 | 5 (5.7) | |
4 | 6 (6.9) | |
5 | 10 (11.5) | |
6 | 12 (13.8) | |
7 | 34 (39) | |
8 | 15 (17.2) | |
9 | 5 (5.7) | |
ISUP, n (%) | 87 | |
1 | 33 (37.9) | |
2 | 22 (25.3) | |
3 | 12 (13.8) | |
4 | 15 (17.2) | |
5 | 5 (5.7) | |
Clinical T stage, n (%) | ||
T3a | 84 (95.5) | |
T3b | 4 (4.5) |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wiebringhaus, R.; Pecoraro, M.; Neubauer, H.A.; Trachtová, K.; Trimmel, B.; Wieselberg, M.; Pencik, J.; Egger, G.; Krall, C.; Moriggl, R.; et al. Proteomic Analysis Identifies NDUFS1 and ATP5O as Novel Markers for Survival Outcome in Prostate Cancer. Cancers 2021, 13, 6036. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13236036
Wiebringhaus R, Pecoraro M, Neubauer HA, Trachtová K, Trimmel B, Wieselberg M, Pencik J, Egger G, Krall C, Moriggl R, et al. Proteomic Analysis Identifies NDUFS1 and ATP5O as Novel Markers for Survival Outcome in Prostate Cancer. Cancers. 2021; 13(23):6036. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13236036
Chicago/Turabian StyleWiebringhaus, Robert, Matteo Pecoraro, Heidi A. Neubauer, Karolína Trachtová, Bettina Trimmel, Maritta Wieselberg, Jan Pencik, Gerda Egger, Christoph Krall, Richard Moriggl, and et al. 2021. "Proteomic Analysis Identifies NDUFS1 and ATP5O as Novel Markers for Survival Outcome in Prostate Cancer" Cancers 13, no. 23: 6036. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13236036
APA StyleWiebringhaus, R., Pecoraro, M., Neubauer, H. A., Trachtová, K., Trimmel, B., Wieselberg, M., Pencik, J., Egger, G., Krall, C., Moriggl, R., Mann, M., Hantusch, B., & Kenner, L. (2021). Proteomic Analysis Identifies NDUFS1 and ATP5O as Novel Markers for Survival Outcome in Prostate Cancer. Cancers, 13(23), 6036. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13236036