Next Article in Journal
Strategic Decoy Peptides Interfere with MSI1/AGO2 Interaction to Elicit Tumor Suppression Effects
Previous Article in Journal
Novel Cellular Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Previous Article in Special Issue
Current Aspects and Future Considerations of EGFR Inhibition in Locally Advanced and Recurrent Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 14
Issue 3
10.3390/cancers14030506
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

NSAIDs Overcome PIK3CA Mutation-Mediated Resistance to EGFR Inhibition in Head and Neck Cancer Preclinical Models

by
Hua Li
†,
Noah D. Peyser
†,
Yan Zeng
,
Patrick K. Ha
,
Daniel E. Johnson
and
Jennifer R. Grandis
*
Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Cancers 2022, 14(3), 506; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030506
Submission received: 19 November 2021 / Revised: 20 December 2021 / Accepted: 4 January 2022 / Published: 20 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue EGFR Signaling in Cancer)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of several cancers including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). It has been reported that activating mutations in PIK3CA, which are relatively common, may contribute to EGFR inhibitor resistance while conferring sensitivity to treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). We hypothesized that disruption of PI3K/COX/EGFR crosstalk via COX inhibition would overcome resistance to EGFR inhibition in HNSCC models, particularly in the context of PIK3CA mutation. We found that the combination of NSAIDs and EGFR inhibitors showed additive or synergistic effects in preclinical HNSCC models harboring mutant PIK3CA. Our results suggest that PIK3CA mutation in HNSCC might represent a predictive biomarker for EGFR inhibitors in combination with NSAIDs.

Abstract

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) but remain under active clinical investigation for the treatment of both newly diagnosed and recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Despite EGFR expression in the majority of HNSCC tumors, the levels of total or phosphorylated EGFR have not consistently been correlated with a response to EGFR targeting agents. The lack of predictive biomarkers represents a major obstacle to successful use of these drugs. Activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling by mutation of the PIK3CA oncogene represents a plausible mechanism for EGFR inhibitor drug resistance. We compared the impact of EGFR inhibitors, alone or in combination with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), in preclinical HNSCC models harboring mutant versus wild-type PIK3CA. Our results demonstrate additive or synergistic effects of NSAIDs and EGFR inhibitors in vitro and in vivo in PIK3CA-mutated HNSCC models. These findings suggest that the addition of NSAIDs to EGFR inhibitors for the treatment of HNSCC may represent a promising therapeutic strategy in PIK3CA-mutated cancers.
Keywords:
EGFR; NSAID; PIK3CA

1. Introduction

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a heterogeneous and frequently fatal malignancy of the upper aerodigestive tract epithelium. Despite aggressive treatment, many patients develop therapeutic resistance leading to progressive disease, poor outcomes, and a dismal survival rate which has improved little in recent decades. HNSCC tumors express elevated levels of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), which has prompted the extensive clinical investigation of EGFR inhibitors, primarily monoclonal antibodies and small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the EGFR, for HNSCC patients in 2006, yet the clinical response to EGFR inhibition remains modest, despite the nearly ubiquitous EGFR overexpression in HNSCC tumors. EGFR TKIs are effective in selected patient populations. Clinical responses to EGFR inhibitors will likely be improved by the identification of predictive biomarkers and the development of well-tolerated co-targeting strategies.
The mutation or amplification of PIK3CA, which encodes the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase alpha (PI3Kα) catalytic subunit, are among the most common genomic aberrations in HNSCC, with 37% (103 of 279) of cases exhibiting one or both alterations in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) report [1]. Our group and others have reported that activating mutations in PIK3CA may promote cetuximab resistance in HNSCC models [2,3]. Cetuximab resistance may also arise in HNSCC through alternative mechanisms, including via activation of other signaling pathways, such as the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-mediated autocrine release of EGFR ligands [4,5,6]. Evidence suggests that EGFR activation in turn leads to further activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway and the continued secretion of the GPCR ligands, including prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), thereby promoting positive feedback and downstream oncogenic signaling [7]. PGE2 is the principle mediator of inflammation downstream of cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes, which are markedly upregulated in HNSCC [8]. COX enzymes have been investigated thoroughly as targets for HNSCC prevention and treatment, using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) alone, or in combination with other targeted therapies, including EGFR inhibitors [9,10,11]. The inhibition of EGFR [12] or COX [13] in HNSCC cells leads to increased PI3K pathway signaling via both GPCR-dependent and -independent mechanisms, suggesting PI3K activation may lead to a resistance to these monotherapies. Intriguingly, cumulative evidence has demonstrated a significant survival advantage in patients with PIK3CA-mutant, but not wild-type, colorectal cancer who began regular NSAID use (aspirin) following diagnosis [14]. Together, these data indicate intimate crosstalk between PI3K, COX, and EGFR, leading to robust oncogenic signaling.
We sought to test the hypothesis that the disruption of PI3K/COX/EGFR crosstalk via COX inhibition would overcome resistance to EGFR inhibition in HNSCC models, particularly in the context of PIK3CA mutation. We identified a panel of HNSCC cells with endogenous PIK3CA mutations and an intrinsic resistance to the EGFR TKIs erlotinib and lapatinib. We also engineered cells to overexpress PIK3CA constructs in order to validate our findings in an isogenic model system. Our results demonstrate that NSAID treatment markedly enhances sensitivity to EGFR TKIs in PIK3CA-mutant HNSCC cell line models, including isogenic models. We additionally report that the NSAIDs sulindac or indomethacin overcome EGFR TKI resistance in vivo using well-characterized patient-derived xenografts (PDXs), with more profound effects in PIK3CA-mutant models. Together, these results suggest that HNSCC patients may benefit from regular NSAID in combination with EGFR inhibitors, especially among patients with PIK3CA-mutant disease.

2. Results

2.1. PIK3CA-Mutant HNSCC Cells Are Resistant to EGFR Inhibition

As EGFR is a well-validated molecular target and upstream activator of PI3K in HNSCC, we first sought to test the contribution of PIK3CA mutation to sensitivity/resistance to EGFR TKIs in HNSCC cell line models. Treatment of a panel of PIK3CA wild-type [15] and PIK3CA-mutant (MT) (H1047R hotspot) cell lines with erlotinib (an EGFR-specific TKI; Figure 1a) or lapatinib (a dual EGFR/HER2 TKI; Figure 1b) indicated that PIK3CA-MT cells are resistant to EGFR inhibition, relative to PIK3CA-WT cells. Colony formation assays additionally indicated that PIK3CA-MT cells are resistant to erlotinib (Figure 1c) or lapatinib (Figure 1d), relative to PIK3CA-WT cells. Furthermore, while EGFR TKI treatment leads to only a modest reduction in EGFR/PI3K signaling in PIK3CA-MT HNSCC cells, p-EGFR (Y1068), p-AKT (S473), and p-S6 were markedly reduced in PIK3CA-WT cells following erlotinib or lapatinib treatment (Figure 1e). Together, these results indicate that PIK3CA mutation mediates resistance to EGFR inhibition via the sustained activation of EGFR/PI3K signaling in the presence of TKI in HNSCC cells.

2.2. NSAIDs Overcome PIK3CA Mutation-Mediated Erlotinib Resistance

Since PIK3CA mutation is associated with resistance to EGFR TKIs as well as sensitivity to NSAIDs [16], we next sought to test the hypothesis that NSAIDs would overcome erlotinib resistance in PIK3CA-mutant HNSCC cells. We treated our panel of WT or MT PIK3CA cell lines with vehicle, NSAID (sulindac or indomethacin), erlotinib, or a combination. Consistent with our previous results, PIK3CA-MT cell lines were resistant to erlotinib alone, relative to PIK3CA-WT cells (Figure 2a,b; p < 0.0001 for both drugs, two tailed T-tests). Sulindac or indomethacin alone had modest effects on cell survival at the low concentrations tested, yet still significantly enhanced sensitivity to erlotinib in both PIK3CA-WT and -MT cell lines, as determined by MTT assays (Figure 2a,b). In all cases, PIK3CA-MT cells were more sensitive to NSAID treatment. Notably, while PIK3CA-mutant cells were relatively resistant to erlotinib alone, the combination with NSAID led to similar levels of cell survival in both PIK3CA-MT and -WT cells, indicating that the addition of NSAIDs effectively overcame the PIK3CA-mediated erlotinib resistance in PIK3CA-MT cells.
We also observed NSAID and erlotinib synergy in colony formation assays following 10 days of treatment, where PIK3CA-MT cells were more inhibited by the combination than PIK3CA-WT cells were (Figure 2c). Next, we assessed EGFR/PI3K signaling in our cell line panel following vehicle, erlotinib, NSAID, or combination treatment, and found that erlotinib alone was sufficient to abrogate pathway signaling in PIK3CA-WT, but not -MT, cell lines (Figure 3a,b). The addition of NSAID led to only modest further reduction of EGFR/PI3K signaling in PIK3CA-WT cells. In contrast, the combination led to a robust downregulation of p-EGFR (Y1068), p-AKT (S473), and p-S6 in PIK3CA-MT cells. Together, these results demonstrate that NSAIDs enhance the response to EGFR TKI and abrogate PIK3CA mutation-mediated resistance to EGFR inhibition in HNSCC cells, by the downregulation of EGFR/PI3K signaling.
To further validate these findings, we engineered PCI-52 cells to overexpress WT or MT PIK3CA and treated them with vehicle, erlotinib, NSAID, or a combination. This cell line was selected because it contains wild-type, unamplified PIK3CA. As anticipated, cells overexpressing MT PIK3CA (H1047R) or WT (analogous to gene amplification) were both resistant to erlotinib and sensitive to sulindac or indomethacin, relative to parental cells (Figure 4). Furthermore, while the parental cells did not respond to the combination more robustly than erlotinib alone, cells overexpressing WT or MT PIK3CA were significantly more responsive to the combination of erlotinib with NSAID. Moreover, the combined treatment led to significantly lower cell survival in both WT and MT PIK3CA-overexpressing cells relative to parental cells, although no substantial differences between WT and MT were detected on immunoblots for p-EGFR and pAKT (Figure S1). These findings confirm, in an isogenic model, that PIK3CA mutation (and likely amplification) is associated with erlotinib resistance, NSAID sensitivity, and a reversal of erlotinib resistance upon combination treatment.
Lastly, we sought to test the combination in a more clinically relevant model. We therefore established one PIK3CA-MT (p.E542K) and one PIK3CA-WT PDX in NSG mice and treated with vehicle, sulindac, erlotinib, or the combination as described in the Methods section (Figure 5). We previously reported the lack of response in these PDX models to vehicle control treatment [16]. Similar to our in vitro studies, sulindac led to significant tumor growth inhibition only in the PIK3CA-MT PDX model. Furthermore, the combination of erlotinib and sulindac led to synergistic growth inhibition in PIK3CA-MT, but not PIK3CA-WT, PDX models. Together, these results indicate that PIK3CA mutation may predict exquisite sensitivity to the combination of EGFR inhibition with NSAID in HNSCC.

3. Discussion

EGFR is a proven therapeutic target in HNSCC, due to overexpression in patient tumors and the demonstrated clinical activity of EGFR inhibitors [17]. Agents that target EGFR are generally less toxic compared with conventional chemotherapy and patients who cannot tolerate platinum-based chemotherapy can be treated with the EGFR monoclonal antibody cetuximab. However, the activity of EGFR inhibitors alone is relatively modest and limited to a minority of patients, and in the absence of a reliable predictive biomarker of response, it is unclear how to identify HNSCC patients most likely to benefit from EGFR-targeted agents [18,19].
There is a paucity of clinical trial data to support the routine use of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for the prevention or treatment of HNSCC. In the absence of a validated biomarker of response or resistance to EGFR TKI, all therapeutic studies carried out to date have administered these agents, alone or in combination, to unselected patient populations with no indication of robust activity [20]. We previously reported a patient with an exceptional response to erlotinib monotherapy on a window-of-opportunity trial. Sequencing of the tumor combined with preclinical modeling studies suggested that an uncommon MAPK1 mutation found in 1–2% of HNSCC patients (E322K) mediated this clinical response [21]. In the absence of activity in unselected HNSCC populations, there is little justification to administer EGFR TKI for the treatment of this cancer.
Erlotinib has also been studied in combination with celecoxib and radiation in recurrent HNSCC with demonstration of clinical activity and feasibility [22]. However, in the absence of additional data comparing this regimen with standard of care, the future of the combination is unknown. We previously reported the impact of celecoxib, alone or in combination with sulindac, in a window-of-opportunity trial in HNSCC patients undergoing surgical resection with curative intent [11]. While the brief course of therapy prior to surgery was well tolerated, we saw no impact of the addition of the NSAID to erlotinib therapy on the inhibition of proliferation in the tumor. In the modern era of cancer immunotherapy, the impact of EGFR TKI plus NSAIDs in the setting of anti-PD-1/PDL-1 is likely needed to impact clinical practice.
EGFR TKI have also been investigated in the setting of HNSCC chemoprevention. Saba et al. carried out a phase 1b trial testing the impact of erlotinib and celecoxib in patients with advanced premalignant lesions [10]. Although there were encouraging responses with the combination therapy, erlotinib-associated rash proved to be a dose-limiting toxicity.
Alterations in the PIK3CA pathway are common in HNSCC, and studies have linked PIK3CA mutations to poorer survival in patients with head and neck cancer [23], as well as other solid tumors [24]. Moreover, in HPV-positive patients, those with PIK3CA mutations were recently found to have an increased chance of recurrence, and worse disease-free survival rates [25]. Preclinical studies have indicated that the dual inhibition of the PIK3CA and EGFR pathways demonstrates synergistic cell killing in head, neck [26] and lung cancer models [27].
PIK3CA-activating mutations have also been studied in colorectal cancer (CRC), where they are commonly identified in 20% of patients [28]. In patients with CRC, the use of aspirin has been consistently shown to reduce the risk of cancer development [29], as well as cancer-specific mortality [30]. Further studies determined that this protective effect of NSAID use was closely associated with PIK3CA mutation in patient tumors [14,31].
A similar benefit of NSAID use in HNSCC has been postulated, but the results of observational studies remain somewhat mixed [32,33,34], and findings were not stratified according to mutational profiles. We recently reported a survival benefit in HNSCC patients with PIK3CA alterations who used NSAIDs on a regular basis [16]. On multivariate analysis, the survival benefit of NSAID use was statistically significant, but only in patients whose tumors harbored PIK3CA mutation or amplification. Activation of the PI3K pathway could represent both a therapeutic target, as well as a mechanism of resistance to certain classes of drugs. In HNSCC in vitro and PDX models, mutant PIK3CA led to increased sensitivity to NSAID treatment, mediated at least in part, through prostaglandin E2 production [16].
Additional candidate predictive biomarkers that could be explored include cancer stem cells. One group examined the effects of cetuximab and erlotinib on stem cell sub-populations in HNSCC cell lines, and found that these EGFR inhibitors induced large shifts of cells between the epithelial and mesenchymal cancer stem cell populations [35]. Others have reported that the EGFR/HER2 TKI afatinib sensitizes HNSCC cells to radiation by specifically targeting cancer stem cells [36]. One plausible mechanism for these effects was demonstrated by a study by Seguin et al., showing that a complex containing integrin α(v)β3, KRAS and RalB mediated tumor stemness in conjunction with resistance to EGFR TKI in carcinomas of the breast, lung and pancreas [37]. The impact of EGFR TKI, alone or in combination with NSAIDs in the setting of PIK3CA alterations remains largely unexplored. Finally, platinum remains a standard of care chemotherapeutic agent for HNSCC treatment. Studies to date, combining EGFR TKI and platinum, have shown the benefits to overall survival of patients with HNSCC [38]. The role of NSAIDs in combination with EGFR TKI and platinum remains untested.
In the present study, we demonstrated that endogenous PIK3CA-MT HNSCC cell lines show an enhanced sensitivity to combined EGFR–NSAID treatment relative to PIK3CA-WT cell lines. The combination also led to decreased EGFR/PI3K pathway activation, specifically in PIK3CA-MT cell lines. Engineered isogenic mutant PIK3CA PCI-52 cells also showed the same pattern of sensitivity to combined EGFR–NSAID treatment, compared with wild-type cells. Ultimately, these findings were confirmed in an in vivo PDX model treated with erlotinib and sulindac, where there was increased growth inhibition primarily in the PIK3CA-MT tumors.
EGFR TKI were granted orphan drug status by the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of HNSCC in the setting of Fanconi Anemia based on promising findings in cell line xenograft studies [39]. The vast majority of HNSCCs arise in individuals without Fanconi Anemia, and the role of EGFR and NSAIDs remains unproven. The precision medicine is anchored by the probability that patient and tumor characteristics can be leveraged to guide treatment. Our results suggest that PIK3CA mutation in HNSCC may serve as candidate for predictive biomarkers. A prospective evaluation of HNSCC patients is needed to directly test this possibility.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Cell Lines

HNSCC cell lines harboring endogenous WT or MT PIK3CA were identified using the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia [40]. Cal27, FaDu, and Detroit562 were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA). PE/CA-PJ34.12 (clone 12) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). HSC-2 were obtained from Dr. Hideo Niwa (Nihon University, Tokyo, Japan). Cal33 cells were obtained from Dr. Gerard Milano (Nice Cancer Center, Nice, France). PCI-52 cells were obtained from Dr. Theresa Whiteside at the University of Pittsburgh (Pittsburgh, PA, USA). All cell lines were verified by short tandem repeat profiling performed by Genetica DNA Laboratories (Cincinnati, OH, USA). Cal27, FaDu, Detroit562, HSC-2, Cal33, and PCI-52 cells were maintained in DMEM (Corning, Corning, NY, USA) with 10% FBS (Gemini Bio-Products, West Sacramento, CA, USA). PE/CA-PJ34.12 were maintained in Iscove’s DMEM (Corning, Corning, NY, USA) with 10% FBS and 2 mM L-glutamine (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). All cells were cultured in a humidified incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO2.

4.2. Stable Cell Line Generation

PIK3CA plasmids were obtained from Dr. Gordon Mills (University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA) and were used to subclone PIK3CA into the doxycycline-inducibe pLVX-Puro (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA). Each vector generated was verified by Sanger sequencing (Quintara Biosciences, South San Francisco, CA, USA). The Lenti-X Tet-One Inducible expression system was used to generate lentivirus according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Clontech). After infection with lentivirus, PCI-52 cells were subject to puromycin selection (0.5 µg/mL) for a period of weeks, and PI3K overexpression was verified by immunoblot following 48 h of incubation in doxycycline (1 µg/mL).

4.3. Drug Treatment

Cells were plated at 10,000 cells per well in 24-well plates and allowed to adhere overnight. The following day cells were treated in triplicate with vehicle (DMSO), erlotinib (Tarceva, Astellas Pharm Global Development Inc. Northbrook, IL USA), lapatinib (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), sulindac sulfide (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), or indomethacin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at the indicated concentration of drug for 48 h. Cell growth inhibition was determined by MTT assay and normalized to vehicle-treated wells.

4.4. Apoptosis Assays

Apoptosis was analyzed by counting cells with condensed chromatin and micro-nucleation following nuclear staining with Hoechst 33258 (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). A minimum of 300 cells were analyzed for each sample. Fluorescence images were captured with the EVOS FL microscope (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

4.5. Colony Formation Assays

PIK3CA-MT (Cal33) or -WT (FaDu) cells were plated at 1000 cells per well in 12-well plates. Cells were treated with vehicle control, or the indicated drug or a combination. After 10 days, colonies were visualized by crystal violet staining and counted using ImageJ software (ImageJ1, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).

4.6. Immunoblotting

Primary antibodies targeting p-AKT (S473), AKT, p-EGFR (Y1068), EGFR, p-S6, and S6 were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Boston, MA, USA). β-tubulin primary antibody was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA). Secondary antibodies were purchased from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA, USA).

4.7. Animals

All animal procedures were performed in accordance with protocols approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of California, San Francisco (IACUC protocol: AN187611) or the University of Pittsburgh (IACUC protocol: 13072053). Additionally, 5–6-week-old NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NSG) mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME) or the UCSF Breeding Core Facility. Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) were implanted into one flank of NSG mice under anesthesia and allowed to grow until palpable (~100 mm3). Mice (four mice with four tumors for each treatment group) were treated with vehicle control (saline), sulindac sulfide intraperitoneally (30 mg/kg; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), erlotinib by oral gavage (50 mg/kg), or the combination of both as indicated throughout. Tumors were measured every other day by Vernier caliper in two dimensions and the volume was calculated as (larger measurement) × (smaller measurement)2/2.

4.8. Statistics

Two-tailed T-tests were used for normally distributed data (determined by D’Agostino–Pearson omnibus normality test) with equivalent between-group variances. Welch’s correction was used to correct for unequal between-group variance as appropriate. Two-tailed Mann–Whitney tests were used when data were non-Gaussian.

5. Conclusions

These findings provide further mechanistic evidence that PIK3CA alterations could be used to successfully predict the response to EGFR inhibition in combination with NSAIDs. By effectively using PIK3CA mutation/amplification as a biomarker for EGFR inhibitor response, one could envision using NSAIDs in combination with EGFR inhibitors to provide clinical benefit to a significant portion of patients, while adding little to their side effect burden. The data presented here support the use of NSAIDs in patients receiving EGFR inhibitor therapy in HNSCC, particularly those whose tumors harbor alterations in PIK3CA or the PI3K signaling pathway.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cancers14030506/s1, Figure S1: Treatments of EGFR TKI and NSAIDs changes the pathway signaling in engineered HNSCC PCI-52 cells, Figure S2: The uncropped Western blots.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.L., N.D.P., D.E.J. and J.R.G.; methodology, H.L., N.D.P. and Y.Z.; validation, H.L., N.D.P. and Y.Z.; formal analysis, H.L., N.D.P., D.E.J. and J.R.G.; investigation, H.L., N.D.P., Y.Z., D.E.J. and J.R.G.; resources, D.E.J. and J.R.G.; data curation, H.L. and N.D.P.; writing—original draft preparation, H.L., N.D.P., P.K.H., D.E.J. and J.R.G.; writing—review and editing, P.K.H., D.E.J., and J.R.G.; visualization, H.L. and N.D.P.; supervision, D.E.J. and J.R.G.; project administration, J.R.G.; funding acquisition, D.E.J. and J.R.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Cancer Institute, grant number R35CA231998 to J.R.G.; the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, grant number R01DE023685 to J.R.G. and D.E.J. and the American Cancer Society to J.R.G.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of California, San Francisco (IACUC protocol: AN187611, approval date 7 January 2021) or the University of Pittsburgh (IACUC protocol: 13072053, approval date 23 July 2013).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or supplementary material. The data presented in this study are available in this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Network, C.G.A. Comprehensive genomic characterization of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Nature 2015, 517, 576–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Wang, Z.; Martin, D.; Molinolo, A.A.; Patel, V.; Iglesias-Bartolome, R.; Degese, M.S.; Vitale-Cross, L.; Chen, Q.; Gutkind, J.S. mTOR Co-Targeting in Cetuximab Resistance in Head and Neck Cancers Harboring PIK3CA and RAS Mutations. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2014, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, H.; Wawrose, J.S.; Gooding, W.E.; Garraway, L.A.; Lui, V.W.Y.; Peyser, N.D.; Grandis, J.R. Molecular profiling of HNSCC cells and tumors reveals a rational approach to preclinical model selection. Mol. Cancer Res. 2014, 12, 571–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Thomas, S.; Bhola, N.E.; Zhang, Q.; Contrucci, S.C.; Wentzel, A.L.; Freilino, M.L.; Gooding, W.E.; Siegfried, J.M.; Chan, D.C.; Grandis, J.R. Cross-talk between G Protein–Coupled Receptor and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling Pathways Contributes to Growth and Invasion of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 11831–11839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Lui, V.W.Y.; Thomas, S.M.; Zhang, Q.; Wentzel, A.L.; Siegfried, J.M.; Li, J.Y.; Grandis, J.R. Mitogenic effects of gastrin-releasing peptide in head and neck squamous cancer cells are mediated by activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor. Oncogene 2003, 22, 6183–6193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Zhang, Q.; Thomas, S.M.; Xi, S.; Smithgall, T.E.; Siegfried, J.M.; Kamens, J.; Gooding, W.E.; Grandis, J.R. SRC family kinases medi-ate epidermal growth factor receptor ligand cleavage, proliferation, and invasion of head and neck cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 6166–6173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Zhang, W.; Bhola, N.; Kalyankrishna, S.; Gooding, W.; Hunt, J.; Seethala, R.; Grandis, J.R.; Siegfried, J.M. Kinin b2 receptor medi-ates induction of cyclooxygenase-2 and is overexpressed in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Mol. Cancer Res. 2008, 6, 1946–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Nathan, C.-A.O.; Leskov, I.L.; Lin, M.; Abreo, F.W.; Shi, R.; Hartman, G.H.; Glass, J. COX-2 expression in dysplasia of the head and neck. Cancer 2001, 92, 1888–1895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ahmadi, N.; Goldman, R.; Seillier-Moiseiwitsch, F.; Noone, A.-M.; Kosti, O.; Davidson, B.J. Decreased risk of squamous cell carci-noma of the head and neck in users of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Int. J. Otolaryngol. 2010, 2010, 424161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Saba, N.F.; Hurwitz, S.J.; Kono, S.A.; Yang, C.S.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, Z.; Sica, G.; Müller, S.; Moreno-Williams, R.; Lewis, M. Chemo-prevention of head and neck cancer with celecoxib and erlotinib: Results of a phase ib and pharmacokinetic study. Cancer Prev. Res. 2014, 7, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Gross, N.D.; Bauman, J.E.; Gooding, W.E.; Denq, W.; Thomas, S.; Wang, L.; Chiosea, S.; Hood, B.L.; Flint, M.; Sun, M.; et al. Erlotinib, Erlotinib–Sulindac versus Placebo: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Window Trial in Operable Head and Neck Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 20, 3289–3298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Bhola, N.E.; Thomas, S.; Freilino, M.; Joyce, S.; Sahu, A.; Maxwell, J.; Argiris, A.; Seethala, R.; Grandis, J.R. Targeting GPCR-Mediated p70S6K Activity May Improve Head and Neck Cancer Response to Cetuximab. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 4996–5004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Abrahao, A.C.; Giudice, F.S.; Sperandio, F.F.; Junior, D.D.S.P. Effects of celecoxib treatment over the AKT pathway in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 2013, 42, 793–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liao, X.; Lochhead, P.; Nishihara, R.; Morikawa, T.; Kuchiba, A.; Yamauchi, M.; Imamura, Y.; Qian, Z.R.; Baba, Y.; Shima, K. As-pirin use, tumor PIK3CA mutation, and colorectal-cancer survival. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367, 1596–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Duvvuri, U.; George, J.; Kim, S.; Alvarado, D.; Neumeister, V.M.; Chenna, A.; Gedrich, R.; Hawthorne, T.; Lavallee, T.; Grandis, J.R.; et al. Molecular and Clinical Activity of CDX-3379, an Anti-ErbB3 Monoclonal Antibody, in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 5752–5758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Hedberg, M.L.; Peyser, N.D.; Bauman, J.E.; Gooding, W.E.; Li, H.; Bhola, N.E.; Zhu, T.R.; Zeng, Y.; Brand, T.M.; Kim, M.-O.; et al. Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs predicts improved patient survival for PIK3CA-altered head and neck cancer. J. Exp. Med. 2019, 216, 419–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Bonner, J.A.; Harari, P.M.; Giralt, J.; Azarnia, N.; Shin, D.M.; Cohen, R.B.; Jones, C.U.; Sur, R.; Raben, D.; Jassem, J.; et al. Radiotherapy plus Cetuximab for Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 354, 567–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Chapman, C.H.; Saba, N.F.; Yom, S.S. Targeting epidermal growth factor receptor for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Still lost in translation? Ann. Transl. Med. 2016, 4, 80. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kim, B.J.; Jeong, J.H.; Kim, H.S.; Kim, J.H. The role of anti-EGFR agents in patients with locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 102371–102380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Cohen, E.E.; Davis, D.W.; Karrison, T.G.; Seiwert, T.Y.; Wong, S.J.; Nattam, S.; Kozloff, M.F.; Clark, J.I.; Yan, D.-H.; Liu, W.; et al. Erlotinib and bevacizumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A phase I/II study. Lancet Oncol. 2009, 10, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Van Allen, E.M.; Lui, V.W.; Egloff, A.M.; Goetz, E.M.; Li, H.; Johnson, J.T.; Duvvuri, U.; Bauman, J.E.; Stransky, N.; Zeng, Y. Ge-nomic Correlate of Exceptional Erlotinib Response in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. JAMA Oncol. 2015, 1, 238–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Kao, J.; Genden, E.M.; Chen, C.-T.; Rivera, M.; Tong, C.C.L.; Misiukiewicz, K.; Gupta, V.; Gurudutt, V.; Teng, M.; Packer, S.H. Phase 1 trial of concurrent erlotinib, celecoxib, and reirradiation for recurrent head and neck cancer. Cancer 2011, 117, 3173–3181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Brauswetter, D.; Dános, K.; Gurbi, B.; Félegyházi, É.F.; Birtalan, E.; Meggyesházi, N.; Krenács, T.; Tamás, L.; Peták, I. Copy num-ber gain of PIK3CA and MET is associated with poor prognosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Virchows Arch. 2016, 468, 579–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xu, J.-M.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.-L.; Liu, T.; Ni, M.; Li, M.; Lin, L.; Ge, F.-J.; Gong, C.; Gu, J.-Y.; et al. PIK3CA Mutations Contribute to Acquired Cetuximab Resistance in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 4602–4616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Beaty, B.T.; Moon, D.H.; Shen, C.J.; Amdur, R.J.; Weiss, J.; Grilley-Olson, J.; Patel, S.; Zanation, A.; Hackman, T.G.; Thorp, B.; et al. PIK3CA Mutation in HPV-Associated OPSCC Patients Receiving Deintensified Chemoradiation. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2019, 112, 855–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mazumdar, T.; Byers, L.A.; Ng, P.K.S.; Mills, G.B.; Peng, S.; Diao, L.; Fan, Y.-H.; Stemke-Hale, K.; Heymach, J.V.; Myers, J.N.; et al. A Comprehensive Evaluation of Biomarkers Predictive of Response to PI3K Inhibitors and of Resistance Mechanisms in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2014, 13, 2738–2750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Zhou, X.; Wang, X.; Zhu, H.; Gu, G.; Zhan, Y.; Liu, C.; Sun, G. PI3K inhibition sensitizes EGFR wild-type NSCLC cell lines to erlo-tinib chemotherapy. Exp. Ther. Med. 2021, 21, 9. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Network, C.G.A. Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature 2012, 487, 330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Algra, A.M.; Rothwell, P.M. Effects of regular aspirin on long-term cancer incidence and metastasis: A systematic comparison of evidence from observational studies versus randomised trials. Lancet Oncol. 2012, 13, 518–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rothwell, P.M.; Fowkes, F.G.R.; Belch, J.J.; Ogawa, H.; Warlow, C.P.; Meade, T.W. Effect of daily aspirin on long-term risk of death due to cancer: Analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet 2011, 377, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Paleari, L.; Puntoni, M.; Clavarezza, M.; DeCensi, M.; Cuzick, J. PIK3CA Mutation, Aspirin Use after Diagnosis and Survival of Colorectal Cancer. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Epidemiological Studies. Clin. Oncol. 2015, 28, 317–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bosetti, C.; Talamini, R.; Franceschi, S.; Negri, E.; Garavello, W.; La Vecchia, C. Aspirin use and cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract. Br. J. Cancer 2003, 88, 672–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Macfarlane, T.V.; Macfarlane, G.J.; Thakker, N.S.; Benhamou, S.; Bouchardy, C.; Ahrens, W.; Pohlabeln, H.; Lagiou, P.; Lagiou, A.; Castellsague, X.; et al. Role of medical history and medication use in the aetiology of upper aerodigestive tract cancers in Europe: The ARCAGE study. Ann. Oncol. 2011, 23, 1053–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gillespie, M.B.; Moody, M.W.; Lee, F.-S.; Poole, L.J.; Hornig, J.D.; Lathers, D.; Young, M.R.; Day, T.A. Head and neck cancer re-currence and mortality in nonselective cyclooxygenase inhibitor users. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2007, 133, 28–31. [Google Scholar]
  35. Rodrigues, M.F.; Gammon, L.; Rahman, M.M.; Biddle, A.; Nunes, F.D.; MacKenzie, I.C. Effects of Cetuximab and Erlotinib on the behaviour of cancer stem cells in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 13488–13500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Macha, M.A.; Rachagani, S.; Qazi, A.K.; Jahan, R.; Gupta, S.; Patel, A.; Seshacharyulu, P.; Lin, C.; Li, S.; Wang, S.; et al. Afatinib radiosensitizes head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells by targeting cancer stem cells. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 20961–20973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Seguin, L.; Kato, S.; Franovic, A.; Camargo, M.F.; Lesperance, J.; Elliott, K.C.; Yebra, M.; Mielgo, A.; Lowy, A.M.; Husain, H.; et al. An integrin β3–KRAS–RalB complex drives tumour stemness and resistance to EGFR inhibition. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014, 16, 457–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Vermorken, J.B.; Mesia, R.; Rivera, F.; Remenar, E.; Kawecki, A.; Rottey, S.; Erfan, J.; Zabolotnyy, D.; Kienzer, H.-R.; Cupissol, D.; et al. Platinum-Based Chemotherapy plus Cetuximab in Head and Neck Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 359, 1116–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Montanuy, H.; Martinez-Barriocanal, A.; Casado, J.A.; Rovirosa, L.; Ramirez, M.J.; Nieto, R.; Carrascoso-Rubio, C.; Riera, P.; Gonzalez, A.; Lerma, E.; et al. Gefitinib and Afatinib Show Potential Efficacy for Fanconi Anemia–Related Head and Neck Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 26, 3044–3057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Barretina, J.; Caponigro, G.; Stransky, N.; Venkatesan, K.; Margolin, A.A.; Kim, S.; Wilson, C.J.; Lehár, J.; Kryukov, G.V.; Sonkin, D. The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity. Nature 2012, 483, 603–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cancers 14 00506 g001 550
Figure 1. HNSCC cells with PIK3CA mutation are resistant to EGFR TKIs. HNSCC cell lines with WT PIK3CA (Cal27, FaDu, and PE/CA-PJ34.12) or PIK3CA mutation (p.H1047R; Cal33, Detroit562, and HSC-2) were treated with the indicated concentration of (a) erlotinib, or (b) lapatinib, for 48 h followed by MTT assay. p values were calculated using two-tailed T-tests with Welch’s correction, as appropriate. Bars represent mean + SEM. Cells were alternatively treated with the indicated concentrations of (c) erlotinib or (d) lapatinib for 10 days, followed by crystal violet staining. Percentages indicate the number of colonies relative to vehicle control counted using ImageJ software. (e) HNSCC cells were treated as indicated for 24 h followed by collection of whole cell lysate and immunoblot analysis.
Figure 1. HNSCC cells with PIK3CA mutation are resistant to EGFR TKIs. HNSCC cell lines with WT PIK3CA (Cal27, FaDu, and PE/CA-PJ34.12) or PIK3CA mutation (p.H1047R; Cal33, Detroit562, and HSC-2) were treated with the indicated concentration of (a) erlotinib, or (b) lapatinib, for 48 h followed by MTT assay. p values were calculated using two-tailed T-tests with Welch’s correction, as appropriate. Bars represent mean + SEM. Cells were alternatively treated with the indicated concentrations of (c) erlotinib or (d) lapatinib for 10 days, followed by crystal violet staining. Percentages indicate the number of colonies relative to vehicle control counted using ImageJ software. (e) HNSCC cells were treated as indicated for 24 h followed by collection of whole cell lysate and immunoblot analysis.
Cancers 14 00506 g001
Cancers 14 00506 g002 550
Figure 2. NSAID overcomes resistance to EGFR (erlotinib) inhibition. (a) HNSCC cell lines with WT PIK3CA (Cal27, FaDu, and PE/CA-PJ34.12) or PIK3CA mutation (p.H1047R; Cal33, Detroit562, and HSC-2) were treated with vehicle, sulindac (100 μM), erlotinib (2 μM), or a combination of sulindac and erlotinib for 48 h, followed by MTT assay. (b) Cells were treated as in panel A with substitution of 100 μM indomethacin for sulindac. p values were calculated using a two-tailed T-test with Welch’s correction. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.005; *** p < 0.0005; **** p < 0.0001; NS: not significant. Bars represent mean + SEM. (c) Longer-term survival was assessed by seeding an equal number of cells in 12-well plates followed by treatment, as indicated. After 10 days, cells were visualized by crystal violet staining and counted using ImageJ software. Percentages indicate the number of colonies relative to vehicle control.
Figure 2. NSAID overcomes resistance to EGFR (erlotinib) inhibition. (a) HNSCC cell lines with WT PIK3CA (Cal27, FaDu, and PE/CA-PJ34.12) or PIK3CA mutation (p.H1047R; Cal33, Detroit562, and HSC-2) were treated with vehicle, sulindac (100 μM), erlotinib (2 μM), or a combination of sulindac and erlotinib for 48 h, followed by MTT assay. (b) Cells were treated as in panel A with substitution of 100 μM indomethacin for sulindac. p values were calculated using a two-tailed T-test with Welch’s correction. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.005; *** p < 0.0005; **** p < 0.0001; NS: not significant. Bars represent mean + SEM. (c) Longer-term survival was assessed by seeding an equal number of cells in 12-well plates followed by treatment, as indicated. After 10 days, cells were visualized by crystal violet staining and counted using ImageJ software. Percentages indicate the number of colonies relative to vehicle control.
Cancers 14 00506 g002
Cancers 14 00506 g003 550
Figure 3. Combination of NSAIDs with EGFR TKI abrogates downstream signaling. HNSCC cell lines with WT PIK3CA (Cal27, FaDu, and PE/CA-PJ34.12) or PIK3CA mutation (H1047R; Cal33, Detroit562, and HSC-2) were treated with vehicle, sulindac (100 μM), indomethacin (100 μM), erlotinib (2 μM), or a combination of sulindac and erlotinib (a), or indomethacin and erlotinib (b), for 24 h followed by collection of whole cell lysate and immunoblot analysis. The uncropped Western blots have been shown in Figure S2.
Figure 3. Combination of NSAIDs with EGFR TKI abrogates downstream signaling. HNSCC cell lines with WT PIK3CA (Cal27, FaDu, and PE/CA-PJ34.12) or PIK3CA mutation (H1047R; Cal33, Detroit562, and HSC-2) were treated with vehicle, sulindac (100 μM), indomethacin (100 μM), erlotinib (2 μM), or a combination of sulindac and erlotinib (a), or indomethacin and erlotinib (b), for 24 h followed by collection of whole cell lysate and immunoblot analysis. The uncropped Western blots have been shown in Figure S2.
Cancers 14 00506 g003
Cancers 14 00506 g004 550
Figure 4. Combination of NSAID with erlotinib markedly inhibits cell survival in isogenic HNSCC cells overexpressing mutant PIK3CA. PCI-52 parental cells and isogenic cells overexpressing WT or MT (H1047R) PIK3CA were treated with vehicle, erlotinib (2 μM), sulindac (100 μM), indomethacin (100 μM), or combination of sulindac and erlotinib or indomethacin and erlotinib for 48 h followed by MTT assay. p values were calculated using a two-tailed T-test. Bars represent mean + SEM. ns: not significant.
Figure 4. Combination of NSAID with erlotinib markedly inhibits cell survival in isogenic HNSCC cells overexpressing mutant PIK3CA. PCI-52 parental cells and isogenic cells overexpressing WT or MT (H1047R) PIK3CA were treated with vehicle, erlotinib (2 μM), sulindac (100 μM), indomethacin (100 μM), or combination of sulindac and erlotinib or indomethacin and erlotinib for 48 h followed by MTT assay. p values were calculated using a two-tailed T-test. Bars represent mean + SEM. ns: not significant.
Cancers 14 00506 g004
Cancers 14 00506 g005 550
Figure 5. A combination of sulindac with erlotinib potently inhibits tumor growth in PIK3CA-mutant PDX. PDXs were implanted into the flanks of NSG mice and allowed to grow until palpable (n = 4 tumors per group). Mice were then treated with erlotinib (50 mg/kg by oral gavage every day), or the combination of sulindac (30 mg/kg by IP injection every other day) and erlotinib. (a) A PIK3CA-WT PDX model does not exhibit significant response to the combination relative to erlotinib alone. (b) A PIK3CA-MT PDX model exhibits significant growth inhibition upon the combination of sulindac with erlotinib treatment relative to erlotinib alone. p values were calculated on the last day using two-tailed T-tests with Welch’s correction, as appropriate. Data are displayed as mean ± SEM.
Figure 5. A combination of sulindac with erlotinib potently inhibits tumor growth in PIK3CA-mutant PDX. PDXs were implanted into the flanks of NSG mice and allowed to grow until palpable (n = 4 tumors per group). Mice were then treated with erlotinib (50 mg/kg by oral gavage every day), or the combination of sulindac (30 mg/kg by IP injection every other day) and erlotinib. (a) A PIK3CA-WT PDX model does not exhibit significant response to the combination relative to erlotinib alone. (b) A PIK3CA-MT PDX model exhibits significant growth inhibition upon the combination of sulindac with erlotinib treatment relative to erlotinib alone. p values were calculated on the last day using two-tailed T-tests with Welch’s correction, as appropriate. Data are displayed as mean ± SEM.
Cancers 14 00506 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, H.; Peyser, N.D.; Zeng, Y.; Ha, P.K.; Johnson, D.E.; Grandis, J.R. NSAIDs Overcome PIK3CA Mutation-Mediated Resistance to EGFR Inhibition in Head and Neck Cancer Preclinical Models. Cancers 2022, 14, 506. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030506

AMA Style

Li H, Peyser ND, Zeng Y, Ha PK, Johnson DE, Grandis JR. NSAIDs Overcome PIK3CA Mutation-Mediated Resistance to EGFR Inhibition in Head and Neck Cancer Preclinical Models. Cancers. 2022; 14(3):506. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030506

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Hua, Noah D. Peyser, Yan Zeng, Patrick K. Ha, Daniel E. Johnson, and Jennifer R. Grandis. 2022. "NSAIDs Overcome PIK3CA Mutation-Mediated Resistance to EGFR Inhibition in Head and Neck Cancer Preclinical Models" Cancers 14, no. 3: 506. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030506

APA Style

Li, H., Peyser, N. D., Zeng, Y., Ha, P. K., Johnson, D. E., & Grandis, J. R. (2022). NSAIDs Overcome PIK3CA Mutation-Mediated Resistance to EGFR Inhibition in Head and Neck Cancer Preclinical Models. Cancers, 14(3), 506. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030506

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop