Next Article in Journal
Is Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Predictive of Surgical Complications in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Ovarian Cancer?
Previous Article in Journal
Characterisation of Aberrant Metabolic Pathways in Hepatoblastoma Using Liquid Chromatography and Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)
Previous Article in Special Issue
T2-Weighted MRI Radiomic Features Predict Prostate Cancer Presence and Eventual Biochemical Recurrence
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 15
Issue 21
10.3390/cancers15215183
Review Report
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Quantitative Evaluation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values, ISUP Grades and Prostate-Specific Antigen Density Values of Potentially Malignant PI-RADS Lesions

Cancers 2023, 15(21), 5183; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15215183
by Nadine Spadarotto 1, Anja Sauck 2, Nicolin Hainc 3, Isabelle Keller 2, Hubert John 2,4 and Joachim Hohmann 1,5,*
Reviewer 1:
Stephen Strum
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Cancers 2023, 15(21), 5183; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15215183
Submission received: 17 September 2023 / Revised: 8 October 2023 / Accepted: 24 October 2023 / Published: 28 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Non-invasive Methods for Screening, Prognosis, and Prediction in Prostate Cancers)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I think this is an excellent contribution and highly important to all physicians involved with PCa patients.  I converted the manuscript from PDF to Word so I could more easily use the Review tool in Word to offer my recommendations to you.  Your grammar is overall excellent and I only found a few areas where I think the content could be presented more simply and clearly to the reader. 

I also feel that you could add text to some of your figures so that they could stand alone as teaching vehicles.  

This was the most enjoyable review I have done in the last two years. I hope the other reviewers concur with my assessment. 

Congrats to all of you involved. 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

See above. I found the manuscript to be very well written.  There are only a few sentences that could be restructured for clarity.  

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Please see attached.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Thanks for addressing my comments. 

Back to TopTop