Next Article in Journal
The Influence of Obesity on Melanoma and Sentinel Lymph Node Diagnosis: A Retrospective Monocentric Study in 1001 Patients
Next Article in Special Issue
A Comprehensive Narrative Review on the History, Current Landscape, and Future Directions of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Systemic Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
Vulvar Paget’s Disease: A Systematic Review of the MITO Rare Cancer Group
Previous Article in Special Issue
Real World Data for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma from a Population-Based Study in France
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 15
Issue 6
10.3390/cancers15061808
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Commentary

Adoptive Cell Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review of Clinical Trials

by
Muhammet Ozer
1,
Suleyman Yasin Goksu
2,
Baran Akagunduz
3,
Andrew George
4,5,6 and
Ilyas Sahin
7,8,*
1
Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
2
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
3
Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Erzincan 24100, Turkey
4
Laboratory of Translational Oncology and Experimental Cancer Therapeutics, The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI 02915, USA
5
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI 02915, USA
6
Legorreta Cancer Center, The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI 02915, USA
7
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
8
University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2023, 15(6), 1808; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15061808
Submission received: 21 February 2023 / Revised: 10 March 2023 / Accepted: 15 March 2023 / Published: 16 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Hepatobiliary Cancers: From Diagnosis to Treatment)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Immunotherapy has become the standard frontline treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, drug resistance is a major limitation and novel strategies are needed for better clinical outcomes. In this review, we discuss adoptive cell therapy (ACT) as an emerging cancer therapy in the treatment of HCC and provide a summary of ongoing clinical trials.

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of primary liver cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the new reference standard in first-line HCC treatment, replacing tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as sorafenib. Many clinical trials with different combinations are already in development to validate novel immunotherapies for the treatment of patients with HCC. Adoptive cell therapy (ACT), also known as cellular immunotherapy, with chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) or gene-modified T cells expressing novel T cell receptors (TCR) may represent a promising alternative approach to modify the immune system to recognize tumor cells with better clinical outcomes. In this review, we briefly discuss the overview of ACT as a promising treatment modality in HCC, along with recent updates of ongoing clinical trials.

1. Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), an inflammation-driven primary malignant cancer, is the seventh most common malignancy and the second most frequent cancer-related death worldwide [1]. Common risk factors include fatty liver disease (both alcoholic and non-alcoholic), alcohol consumption, chronic Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C, and toxins causing chronic inflammation [2]. While endemic viral hepatitis is the leading cause in African and Asian countries, chronic alcohol consumption and obesity-related non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are the primary etiologies in Western countries [3]. The incidence of HCC is rapidly increasing, with an expected rate of increase of 2.8% annually through to 2030 [4]. Current standard treatment for HCC, categorized based on the stage of HCC, ranges from curative intent surgery and locoregional treatments to palliative systemic therapies. Unfortunately, most HCC patients are diagnosed with advanced disease and have dismal outcomes [5]. Based on American Cancer Society reports, the 5-year survival rate for patients with advanced HCC is less than 5% (last accessed 20 December 2022). Thus, novel therapeutic approaches for advanced disease are urgently needed.
HCC is a chemo-resistant malignancy with minimal clinical benefits when treated with various cytotoxic chemotherapies, interferon-alpha, and hormone therapies [6]. The protein tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were the next treatment options that gained popularity after sorafenib received approval for advanced HCC in 2008 [7]. However, sorafenib and the next-generation TKIs, including lenvatinib, regorafenib, and cabozantinib have demonstrated only modest improvements in prognosis and have caused various toxicities [8,9,10].
As the liver has a diverse and complex immune microenvironment, HCC is considered an immunogenic tumor [11]. Along with cytotoxic T cells, the liver has various CD4+ T cells, regulatory T cells (Tregs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), dendritic cells, and NK cells, which regulate responses to immunomodulatory therapies [12,13,14]. Studies showed an association between low recurrence rates and low CD4:CD8 ratios [15]. Therefore, immunotherapy is a promising modality for advanced HCC that could obtain durable and non-toxic anti-cancer activity. Over the past decade, development in immunotherapy has changed the landscape of advanced HCC treatment [16]. In 2020, FDA approved atezolizumab (anti-PDL1) combined with bevacizumab (VEGF inhibitor) for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic HCC based on IMbrave150 trial data, showing better overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with sorafenib, and this regimen became a new first-line treatment for advanced HCC [17]. More recently, tremelimumab (anti-CTLA4) plus durvalumab (anti-PD-L1) demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in OS compared with sorafenib [18] and received FDA approval in October 2022. However, immune evasion and dysregulated immunity due to anti-inflammatory cytokines are major resistance mechanisms limiting current immunotherapy options’ effectiveness [2]. Therefore, novel immunotherapeutic strategies and the identification of therapy resistance are urgently needed. Current research focuses on the treatment of advanced HCC, mainly consisting of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), adoptive cell therapies, and tumor vaccines.
To date, with advancements in biotechnology, adoptive cellular therapy (ACT) is gaining attention as a novel treatment option in HCC. After the success in hematology, multiple clinical trials of chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) and T-cell-receptor-modified T cells (TCR-T) therapies were conducted in patients with HCC. Studies suggest redirected cytotoxic cells can recognize HCC-tumor-associated antigens by inducing the programmed expression of synthetic T cell surface receptors [19]. Scientists aimed to increase the cytotoxic properties of the cells by engineering cytotoxic cells targeting HCC. The liver tumor microenvironment has an exceptional specificity to tumor-associated antigens, which makes HCC one of the most promising solid tumors for ACT [20]. In the context of TCR-T cell therapies, the recognition of MHC-restricted peptides is projected to be more adapted to solid-tumor management. Researchers hypothesized that replacing endogenous TCR with transgenic TCR will likely improve biological activity and increase clinical efficacy.
In this review, we discussed the overview of ACT in HCC along with the recent updates from ongoing clinical trials of ACT in HCC patients. HCC vaccination strategies are beyond the scope of this paper, and the reader is referred to the literature for further details [21].

2. Background of Adoptive Cell Therapy in HCC

The liver possesses a distinct immune system that makes it conducive to the development of immunogenic tumors, such as HCC [11]. This is attributed to its location, which facilitates pathogen detection via the gut and processing by various phagocytic cells, including Kupffer cells, as well as innate immune cells, such as NKT and iNKT cells. Additionally, the liver contains multiple subtypes of CD4+ T cells with immunomodulatory roles and cytotoxic CD8+ T cells. Despite these immune cells, they often experience T cell exhaustion and are unable to effectively control advanced HCC by themselves [22,23]. For an effective anti-tumor immune response, there should be a balance between tumor cells’ ability to present tumor-associated antigens (TAA) to antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and immunosuppressive activity from the tumor microenvironment. Naturally, the immune system tends to enhance self-tolerance, including malignant cells. Thus, the effective endogenous anti-tumor response depends on the increased infiltration of T cells, which promotes the expression of TAAs and tumor-specific antigens (TSAs) [24]. Previous studies with HCC patients undergoing hepatic resection reported that prominent lymphocyte infiltration is associated with better OS and decreased recurrence [15,25]. However, the relationship between activated lymphocyte infiltration and survival rates needs further investigation. The non-gene-modified ACT includes cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). CIKs are CD3 + CD56 + natural killer (NK)-like T cells with non-MHC-restricted cytotoxic and proliferative activity [26,27]. On the other hand, TILs are polyclonal tumor-targeting T cells expanded to use as autologous therapy.
Recently, gene engineering technology has allowed modifying immune cells with synthetic receptors, such as CAR-T and TCR-T, to enhance the visibility of TAA and TSA. These tumor antigens are the primary targets used in ACT for HCC and mainly fall into one of the three categories, including tumor-associated antigens (e.g., AFP, GPC-3), viral-derived cancer antigens (VHB, VHC), and cancer–testis antigens (e.g., NY-ESO-1, MAGE). A schematic overview of major steps within the CAR-T and TCR-T adoptive cell therapy process is summarized in Figure 1.
To date, many ongoing early phase clinical trials of ACT dedicated to HCC are under evaluation.

3. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells (CAR-T)

Chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) are synthetic cell surface receptors composed of an extracellular single-chain variable fragment, intracellular domain with a hinge region, a transmembrane region, and several domains from costimulatory molecules [28,29]. The extracellular domain recognizes membrane antigens expressed at the target cells. The hinge region provides flexibility and binds the related ligand precipitate T cell activation through the TCR domain. The intracellular signaling domain is modifiable for functional improvement. CAR-T cell therapy consists of engineered autologous T cells to recognize and eliminate malignant cells [30,31]. ACT aims to generate tumor-specific CAR-T cells, which are not restricted by the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and could overcome immune escape [32,33]. Currently, three autologous CAR-T cell therapies have FDA approval for relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma, multiple myeloma (MM), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) [34,35,36].
As CAR-T cell therapy greatly impacted hematological malignancies, many studies were conducted to target solid tumors by CAR-T. After promising results from preclinical models, CAR-T cells targeting various TAAs have been developed and become one of the most encouraging immunotherapy options for HCC. Several promising CAR-T cell tumor targets were identified, including Glypican-3 (GPC3), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), NK group 2 member D ligand (NKG2DL), Mucin 1 glycoprotein 1 (MUC1), Epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), Claudin18.2 (CLD18), CD147, CD133, HBV surface protein, and c-MET [37,38,39]. Currently, 24 phase I/II CAR-T cell clinical trials for HCC are ongoing. While some clinical trials have incorporated lymphodepletion prior to adoptive cell therapy using mostly a combination of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, others have not mentioned any lymphodepleting chemotherapy in their protocols. Most trials are at the early phase and evaluate safety as a primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints include overall response, response duration, and T cell persistence in peripheral blood. The ongoing clinical trials for CAR-T cell therapies have been summarized in Table 1.
Of the limited completed studies available, a phase 2 study evaluated CD133-directed CAR T cells in adults with advanced HCC that was refractory to treatment to investigate their safety and efficacy. Of the 21 patients, 1 had a partial response, 14 had stable disease, and 6 progressed after T cell infusion. The median OS was 12 months, and the median PFS was 6.8 months, with the most common high-grade adverse event being hyperbilirubinemia. The results suggest promising anti-tumor activity and a manageable safety profile for CART-133 cell therapy in previously treated advanced HCC [38].
Currently, most CAR-T cell therapies target glypican-3 (GPC3) as a treatment option for HCC [40,41,42]. There are 11 ongoing phase I/II clinical trials targeting GPC3, and one targeting GPC3/TGFβ (NCT03198546). GPC3 is overexpressed in HCC but has very limited to no expression in normal tissues, making it a great target for CAR-T cell therapies [43]. Multiple pre-clinical studies suggest GPC3 targeting with ACT [44,45]. One study explored the efficacy of human CAR-T cells engineered to secrete IL-7 and CCL19 (7 × 19) in the treatment of solid tumors, including HCC. The 7 × 19 CAR-T cells demonstrated superior expansion, migration, and tumor suppression capabilities in vitro and in xenograft models of HCC. A complete tumor disappearance was observed 30 days after an intratumor injection of anti-GPC3-7 × 19 CAR-T treatment in a patient with advanced HCC enrolled in an ongoing phase 1 clinical trial (NCT03198546) [46].
In their two sequential phase 1 clinical trials (NCT02395250; NCT03146234), Shi et al. reported the safety and anti-tumor activity of GPC3 CAR-T cells in GPC3+ HCC patients [47]. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was observed in nine patients, with one case being fatal grade 5 CRS. Although the rapid expansion of CAR-T cells in vivo after infusion has been linked to cytokine release syndrome and correlates with anti-tumor responses in hematological malignancies, solid-tumor CAR-T cell trials have not reported outcomes with the significant release of proinflammatory cytokines prior to tumor regression, which suggests that the unsatisfactory response rates observed in patients with solid tumors are likely due to the insufficient expansion and persistence of CAR T cells [48].
As another CAR-T target, AFP is a well-described biomarker for HCC, expressed in 60–80% of patients and related to poor prognosis [49]. After pre-clinical studies reported AFP as a potential target for the ACT, a phase I clinical trial was conducted in HCC patients (NCT03349255); however, the trial was terminated. Currently, a new T cell construct for the same indication is pending. NKG2DL is overexpressed in HCC and mainly absent in normal cells, highlighting its potential as a good target for CAR-T cell therapy [50]. In November 2021, a phase I NKG2D-based CAR-T cells clinical trial started recruiting patients (NCT05131763). The EpCAM has oncogenic potential and is over-expressed in various carcinomas, including HCC, colon cancer, prostate cancer, pancreas cancer, and esophageal cancer [51,52]. A CARTEPC trial (NCT03013712) was conducted to evaluate CAR-T cell therapy targeting EpCAM-positive cancers; outcomes have not yet been reported. Another undergoing basket study is targeting CLD18 (NCT03302403). MUC1 is overexpressed in HCC and correlated with prognosis in patients with HCC [53]. Pre-clinical studies validated MUC1 as a promising target for CAR-T therapy [54,55]. A phase I\II basket trial of MUC1-CAR-T cell therapy (NCT02587689) is underway in patients with HCC, breast, lung, and pancreatic cancer.

4. T-Cell-Receptor-Transduced T Cells (TCR-T)

As part of the adoptive cell therapy strategies, multiple studies focused on TCR-engineered T cells specifically designed to recognize targeted tumor cells via TAA/TSA and MHC-restricted peptides. This concept gives TCR-T the advantage of targeting intracellular antigens expressed on HLA [56,57,58]. On the other hand, it limits the therapy to the most frequently shared HLA types [59]. To date, TCR -T cell therapies mainly focus on viral-associated peptides and AFP as the optimal targets. To date, 11 phase I/II TCR-T HCC clinical trials are ongoing. These are early phase studies mainly looking at safety data, tolerability, and partial or complete response. The ongoing clinical trials for TCR-T cell therapies are summarized in Table 2.
An early phase trial that published preliminary results examined the effectiveness and safety of HBV-specific TCR-expressing autologous T cells with a short life span in patients with advanced HBV-related HCC who were not suitable for liver transplantation. The study enrolled eight patients, of whom two experienced adverse events; however, the treatment was generally safe and well tolerated. One patient achieved a partial response lasting for 27.7 months, and most of the patients exhibited a reduction or stabilization of circulating HBsAg and HBV DNA levels after this therapy. The results of this early study support the application of this treatment strategy in advanced HBV-related HCC patients [60].
High-affinity TCR-T cells can be induced with HBV infection and potentially be a good target for engineered TCRs. Integrated HBV-DNA in HCC cells include short segments that encode epitopes capable of activating T cells. By utilizing the HBV transcriptomes from these cells, they could be used to engineer T cells for personalized immunotherapy; therefore, this approach has the potential to treat a broader population of patients with HBV-associated HCC [61]. This phenomenon was initially shown in patients with HCC recurrence after liver transplantation. Overall, integrating HBV-DNA into the genome of HCC tumor cells enables the production of HBV antigens that TCR-T cells can recognize. The main concern is liver damage considering HBV-infected non-malign liver cells could obtain lyses. Earlier this year, Tan et al. reported a favorable safety profile and long-term clinical benefit of short-lived mRNA HBV-TCR-T cell therapy in primary diffused non-operable HBV-HCC [62]. Additionally, another study published in 2019 suggested HBV transcriptomes from HBV-HCC patients could be used to engineer T cells for personalized immunotherapy. They showed a good safety profile without adverse events occurring. To date, there are five phase I and two phase I/II clinical trials targeting HBV TCR-T cells.
As presented on HLA, AFP is also a good target for TCR-T cell therapies. Initial data from the genetically engineered autologous SPEAR T cells (AFPc332 T cells) show promising response rates [63]. The complete results of the study have yet to be published (NCT03132792). An additional two phase I AFP TCR-T cell clinical trials have been conducted since 2019, with no reported results (NCT04368182, NCT03971747). Another trial is currently active, evaluating the melanoma-associated antigen 1 (MAGEA1) as a TCR-T target (NCT03441100).

5. Conclusions and Future Expectations

Since the discovery of immunotherapies in HCC treatment, the landscape of the treatment has changed remarkably. ACT has emerged as a novel therapeutic approach as part of cellular immunotherapy strategies. Compared with immune checkpoint inhibitors, the ACT is still in the early development stages for HCC treatment. ACT is a new and evolving modality for HCC; therefore, many clinical trials are in phase I/II settings and focused on adverse events, dose-limiting toxicities, maximum tolerated doses, safety, and tolerability. To date, various clinical trials for the ACT are at an early stage and face multiple limitations. First, the complex tumor microenvironment causes biological and physical barriers for ACT to reach its targets [64,65]. For ACT to be effective, its target should be highly expressed on the tumoral cell surface, with very limited to no expression on healthy tissues. Studies showed that normal cells have the ability to express some of the solid-tumor targets, which brings the risk of on-target and off-tumor toxicity. The major safety challenges of ACT in HCC, especially for targeted T cell therapies, include the heterogeneity of TSAs, and TAAs across the tumors [66,67]. Future studies should focus on searching for HCC-specific antigens that could be excellent targets for the ACT. Down-regulation of MHC molecules and the short viability of the ACT cells are also limiting factors. Toxicities from the off-tumor effects of CAR-T and TCR-T cells are another significant concern in managing HCC [68,69,70,71]. Most adoptive cell therapy clinical trials were conducted in Child–Pugh class A patients, so shared safety data might not be definitive for sicker patients. To overcome unexpected toxicities from ACT, further research should evaluate genetic engineering interventions to optimize ACT affinity to target cells. In CAR-T cell therapy, having multiple HCC antigen targets potentially enhances specificity and improves safety.
More efforts are needed to focus on the improvement of the efficacy and safety of CAR-T and TCR-T cell therapies before confirmation in a phase 3 setting. Ultimately, we believe that treatments that combine different immunotherapy modalities are anticipated to improve clinical outcomes in patients with HCC.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.O., S.Y.G., I.S. and B.A.; methodology, M.O. and S.Y.G.; software, S.Y.G. and A.G.; validation, M.O., A.G. and I.S.; formal analysis, M.O., S.Y.G. and I.S.; investigation, M.O., S.Y.G., I.S. and B.A.; resources, M.O., A.G., and I.S.; data curation, M.O., S.Y.G., I.S. and B.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.O., S.Y.G., B.A., A.G. and I.S.; writing—review and editing, M.O., S.Y.G., B.A., A.G. and I.S.; visualization, M.O., A.G. and I.S.; supervision, B.A. and I.S.; project administration, M.O.; funding acquisition, M.O. and I.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA. Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ringelhan, M.; Pfister, D.; O’Connor, T.; Pikarsky, E.; Heikenwalder, M. The immunology of hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat. Immunol. 2018, 19, 222–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Maucort-Boulch, D.; de Martel, C.; Franceschi, S.; Plummer, M. Fraction and incidence of liver cancer attributable to hepatitis B and C viruses worldwide. Int. J. Cancer 2018, 142, 2471–2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Petrick, J.L.; Kelly, S.P.; Altekruse, S.F.; McGlynn, K.A.; Rosenberg, P.S. Future of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Incidence in the United States Forecast Through 2030. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 34, 1787–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. European Association for the Study of the Liver; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. EASL–EORTC Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 2012, 56, 908–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Burroughs, A.; Hochhauser, D.; Meyer, T. Systemic treatment and liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Two ends of the therapeutic spectrum. Lancet Oncol. 2004, 5, 409–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Llovet, J.M.; Ricci, S.; Mazzaferro, V.; Hilgard, P.; Gane, E.; Blanc, J.-F.; de Oliveira, A.C.; Santoro, A.; Raoul, J.-L.; Forner, A.; et al. Sorafenib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 359, 378–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Kudo, M.; Finn, R.S.; Qin, S.; Han, K.-H.; Ikeda, K.; Piscaglia, F.; Baron, A.; Park, J.-W.; Han, G.; Jassem, J.; et al. Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2018, 391, 1163–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Abou-Alfa, G.K.; Meyer, T.; Cheng, A.-L.; El-Khoueiry, A.B.; Rimassa, L.; Ryoo, B.-Y.; Cicin, I.; Merle, P.; Chen, Y.; Park, J.-W.; et al. Cabozantinib in Patients with Advanced and Progressing Hepatocellular Carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bruix, J.; Qin, S.; Merle, P.; Granito, A.; Huang, Y.-H.; Bodoky, G.; Pracht, M.; Yokosuka, O.; Rosmorduc, O.; Breder, V.; et al. Regorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib treatment (RESORCE): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2017, 389, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Kubes, P.; Jenne, C. Immune Responses in the Liver. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2018, 36, 247–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. George, A.; Sahin, I.; Carneiro, B.A.; Dizon, D.S.; Safran, H.P.; El-Deiry, W.S. Strategies to sensitize cancer cells to immunotherapy. Hum. Vacci. Immunother. 2021, 17, 2595–2601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Han, Y.; Chen, Z.; Yang, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Gu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Lin, C.; Pan, Z.; Yu, Y.; Jiang, M.; et al. Human CD14+CTLA-4+ regulatory dendritic cells suppress T-cell response by cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4-dependent IL-10 and indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase production in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2014, 59, 567–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sun, J.C.; Lanier, L.L. NK cell development, homeostasis and function: Parallels with CD8+ T cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 11, 645–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Unitt, E.; Marshall, A.; Gelson, W.; Rushbrook, S.M.; Davies, S.; Vowler, S.L.; Morris, L.S.; Coleman, N.; Alexander, G.J.M. Tumour lymphocytic infiltrate and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma following liver transplantation. J. Hepatol. 2006, 45, 246–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ozer, M.; George, A.; Goksu, S.Y.; George, T.J.; Sahin, I. The Role of Immune Checkpoint Blockade in the Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review of Clinical Trials. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 5259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Finn, R.S.; Qin, S.; Ikeda, M.; Galle, P.R.; Ducreux, M.; Kim, T.-Y.; Kudo, M.; Breder, V.; Merle, P.; Kaseb, A.O.; et al. Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1894–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Abou-Alfa, G.K.; Lau, G.; Kudo, M.; Chan, S.L.; Kelley, R.K.; Furuse, J.; Sukeepaisarnjaroen, W.; Kang, Y.K.; Van Dao, T.; De Toni, E.N.; et al. Tremelimumab plus Durvalumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma. NEJM Evid. 2022, 1, EVIDoa2100070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Calmels, B.; Mfarrej, B.; Chabannon, C. From clinical proof-of-concept to commercialization of CAR T cells. Drug Discov. Today 2018, 23, 758–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Comoli, P.; Chabannon, C.; Koehl, U.; Lanza, F.; Urbano-Ispizua, A.; Hudecek, M.; Ruggeri, A.; Secondino, S.; Bonini, C.; Pedrazzoli, P. Development of adaptive immune effector therapies in solid tumors. Ann. Oncol. 2019, 30, 1740–1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Repáraz, D.; Aparicio, B.; Llopiz, D.; Hervás-Stubbs, S.; Sarobe, P. Therapeutic Vaccines against Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Era: Time for Neoantigens? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Rochigneux, P.; Nault, J.-C.; Mallet, F.; Chretien, A.-S.; Barget, N.; Garcia, A.J.; Del Pozo, L.; Bourcier, V.; Blaise, L.; Grando-Lemaire, V.; et al. Dynamic of systemic immunity and its impact on tumor recurrence after radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncoimmunology 2019, 8, 1615818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Gehring, A.J.; Ho, Z.Z.; Tan, A.T.; Aung, M.O.; Lee, K.H.; Tan, K.C.; Lim, S.G.; Bertoletti, A. Profile of Tumor Antigen-Specific CD8 T Cells in Patients With Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2009, 137, 682–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Buonaguro, L.; Mauriello, A.; Cavalluzzo, B.; Petrizzo, A.; Tagliamonte, M. Immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann. Hepatol. 2019, 18, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wada, Y.; Nakashima, O.; Kutami, R.; Yamamoto, O.; Kojiro, M. Clinicopathological study on hepatocellular carcinoma with lymphocytic infiltration. Hepatology 1998, 27, 407–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nishimura, R.; Baker, J.; Beilhack, A.; Zeiser, R.; Olson, J.A.; Sega, E.I.; Karimi, M.; Negrin, R.S. In vivo trafficking and survival of cytokine-induced killer cells resulting in minimal GVHD with retention of antitumor activity. Blood 2008, 112, 2563–2574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Schmidt-Wolf, I.G.H.; Finke, S.; Trojaneck, B.; Denkena, A.; Lefterova, P.; Schwella, N.; Heuft, H.-G.; Prange, G.; Korte, M.; Takeya, M.; et al. Phase I clinical study applying autologous immunological effector cells transfected with the interleukin-2 gene in patients with metastatic renal cancer, colorectal cancer and lymphoma. Br. J. Cancer 1999, 81, 1009–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lindner, S.E.; Johnson, S.M.; Brown, C.E.; Wang, L.D. Chimeric antigen receptor signaling: Functional consequences and design implications. Sci. Adv. 2022, 6, eaaz3223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Hong, M.; Clubb, J.D.; Chen, Y.Y. Engineering CAR-T Cells for Next-Generation Cancer Therapy. Cancer Cell 2020, 38, 473–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kingwell, K. CAR T therapies drive into new terrain. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2017, 16, 301–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wolf, P.; Alzubi, J.; Gratzke, C.; Cathomen, T. The potential of CAR T cell therapy for prostate cancer. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2021, 18, 556–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sadelain, M.; Brentjens, R.; Rivière, I. The promise and potential pitfalls of chimeric antigen receptors. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2009, 21, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Davenport, A.J.; Jenkins, M.R.; Cross, R.S.; Yong, C.S.; Prince, H.M.; Ritchie, D.S.; Trapani, J.A.; Kershaw, M.H.; Darcy, P.K.; Neeson, P.J. CAR-T Cells Inflict Sequential Killing of Multiple Tumor Target Cells. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2015, 3, 483–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Mullard, A. FDA approves first CAR T therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2017, 16, 669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Braendstrup, P.; Levine, B.L.; Ruella, M. The long road to the first FDA-approved gene therapy: Chimeric antigen receptor T cells targeting CD19. Cytotherapy 2020, 22, 57–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Anderson, L.D., Jr. Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) CAR T-cell therapy for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Futur. Oncol. 2021, 18, 277–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tseng, H.; Xiong, W.; Badeti, S.; Yang, Y.; Ma, M.; Liu, T.; Ramos, C.A.; Dotti, G.; Fritzky, L.; Jiang, J.; et al. Efficacy of anti-CD147 chimeric antigen receptors targeting hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dai, H.; Tong, C.; Shi, D.; Chen, M.; Guo, Y.; Chen, D.; Han, X.; Wang, H.; Wang, Y.; Shen, P. Efficacy and biomarker analysis of CD133-directed CAR T cells in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A single-arm, open-label, phase II trial. Oncoimmunology 2020, 9, 1846926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zou, F.; Tan, J.; Liu, T.; Liu, B.; Tang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, J. The CD39+ HBV surface protein-targeted CAR-T and personalized tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells exhibit potent anti-HCC activity. Mol. Ther. 2021, 29, 1794–1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhu, A.X.; Gold, P.J.; El-Khoueiry, A.B.; Abrams, T.A.; Morikawa, H.; Ohishi, N.; Ohtomo, T.; Philip, P.A. First-in-Man Phase I Study of GC33, a Novel Recombinant Humanized Antibody Against Glypican-3, in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 920–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Hanaoka, H.; Nagaya, T.; Sato, K.; Nakamura, Y.; Watanabe, R.; Harada, T.; Gao, W.; Feng, M.; Phung, Y.; Kim, I.; et al. Glypican-3 Targeted Human Heavy Chain Antibody as a Drug Carrier for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Therapy. Mol. Pharm. 2015, 12, 2151–2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shimizu, Y.; Suzuki, T.; Yoshikawa, T.; Endo, I.; Nakatsura, T. Next-Generation Cancer Immunotherapy Targeting Glypican-3. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zheng, X.; Liu, X.; Lei, Y.; Wang, G.; Liu, M. Glypican-3: A Novel and Promising Target for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 824208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jiang, Z.; Jiang, X.; Chen, S.; Lai, Y.; Wei, X.; Li, B.; Lin, S.; Wang, S.; Wu, Q.; Liang, Q.; et al. Anti-GPC3-CAR T Cells Suppress the Growth of Tumor Cells in Patient-Derived Xenografts of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Front. Immunol. 2017, 7, 690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Li, W.; Guo, L.; Rathi, P.; Marinova, E.; Gao, X.; Wu, M.-F.; Liu, H.; Dotti, G.; Gottschalk, S.; Metelitsa, L.S.; et al. Redirecting T Cells to Glypican-3 with 4-1BB Zeta Chimeric Antigen Receptors Results in Th1 Polarization and Potent Antitumor Activity. Hum. Gene Ther. 2016, 28, 437–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Pang, N.; Shi, J.; Qin, L.; Chen, A.; Tang, Y.; Yang, H.; Huang, Y.; Wu, Q.; Li, X.; He, B.; et al. IL-7 and CCL19-secreting CAR-T cell therapy for tumors with positive glypican-3 or mesothelin. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2021, 14, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Shi, D.; Shi, Y.; Kaseb, A.O.; Qi, X.; Zhang, Y.; Chi, J.; Lu, Q.; Gao, H.; Jiang, H.; Wang, H.; et al. Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Glypican-3 T-Cell Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results of Phase I Trials. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 26, 3979–3989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Schmidts, A.; Maus, M.V. Making CAR T Cells a Solid Option for Solid Tumors. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Xue, J.; Cao, Z.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, J.; Liu, Y.; Yang, R.; Li, H.; Jiang, W.; Li, G.; Zhao, W.; et al. Acetylation of alpha-fetoprotein promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Cancer Lett. 2020, 471, 12–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Hüe, S.; Mention, J.-J.; Monteiro, R.C.; Zhang, S.; Cellier, C.; Schmitz, J.; Verkarre, V.; Fodil, N.; Bahram, S.; Cerf-Bensussan, N.; et al. A Direct Role for NKG2D/MICA Interaction in Villous Atrophy during Celiac Disease. Immunity 2004, 21, 367–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Yamashita, T.; Forgues, M.; Wang, W.; Kim, J.W.; Ye, Q.; Jia, H.; Budhu, A.; Zanetti, K.A.; Chen, Y.; Qin, L.-X.; et al. EpCAM and α-Fetoprotein Expression Defines Novel Prognostic Subtypes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 1451–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Yang, Y.; McCloskey, J.E.; Yang, H.; Puc, J.; Gallegos, A.A.G.; Vedvyas, Y.; Min, I.M.; von Hofe, E.; Jin, M.M. Abstract 6598: Eradication of EpCAM expressing solid tumors by low-affinity CAR T cells. Cancer Res. 2020, 80 (Suppl. S16), 6598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lan, Y.; Ni, W.; Tai, G. Expression of MUC1 in different tumours and its clinical significance (Review). Mol. Clin. Oncol. 2022, 17, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zhou, R.; Yazdanifar, M.; Roy, L.D.; Whilding, L.M.; Gavrill, A.; Maher, J.; Mukherjee, P. CAR T Cells Targeting the Tumor MUC1 Glycoprotein Reduce Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Growth. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Mei, Z.; Zhang, K.; Lam, A.K.-Y.; Huang, J.; Qiu, F.; Qiao, B.; Zhang, Y. MUC1 as a target for CAR-T therapy in head and neck squamous cell carinoma. Cancer Med. 2020, 9, 640–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Huang, J.; Brameshuber, M.; Zeng, X.; Xie, J.; Li, Q.; Chien, Y.; Valitutti, S.; Davis, M.M. A Single Peptide-Major Histocompatibility Complex Ligand Triggers Digital Cytokine Secretion in CD4+ T Cells. Immunity 2013, 39, 846–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Brossard, E.; Corcelli, S.A. Simulating the binding of a T cell receptor to a peptide-bound major histocompatibility complex. Biophys. J. 2022, 121, 334a. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Groth, E.; Ayres, C.M.; Baker, B.M.; Corcelli, S.A. Modeling the Binding Mechanism of a T Cell Receptor and Major Histocompatibility Complex. Biophys. J. 2020, 118, 245a. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. González-Galarza, F.F.; Takeshita, L.Y.; Santos, E.J.; Kempson, F.; Maia, M.H.; Silva, A.L.; Silva, A.L.; Ghattaoraya, G.S.; Alfirevic, A.; Jones, A.R.; et al. Allele frequency net 2015 update: New features for HLA epitopes, KIR and disease and HLA adverse drug reaction associations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, D784–D788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Meng, F.; Zhao, J.; Tan, A.T.; Hu, W.; Wang, S.-Y.; Jin, J.; Wu, J.; Li, Y.; Shi, L.; Fu, J.-L.; et al. Immunotherapy of HBV-related advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with short-term HBV-specific TCR expressed T cells: Results of dose escalation, phase I trial. Hepatol. Int. 2021, 15, 1402–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tan, A.T.; Yang, N.; Lee Krishnamoorthy, T.; Oei, V.; Chua, A.; Zhao, X.; Tan, H.S.; Chia, A.; Le Bert, N.; Low, D.; et al. Use of Expression Profiles of HBV-DNA Integrated Into Genomes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells to Select T Cells for Immunotherapy. Gastroenterology 2019, 156, 1862–1876.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tan, A.T.; Meng, F.; Jin, J.; Zhang, J.-Y.; Wang, S.-Y.; Shi, L.; Shi, M.; Li, Y.; Xie, Y.; Liu, L.-M.; et al. Immunological alterations after immunotherapy with short lived HBV-TCR T cells associates with long-term treatment response in HBV-HCC. Hepatol. Commun. 2022, 6, 841–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Goyal, L.; Frigault, M.; Meyer, T.; Feun, L.G.; Bruix, J.; El-Khoueiry, A.; Hausner, P.; Sangro, B.; Pierce, T.T.; Norry, E.; et al. Abstract 3183: Initial safety of AFP SPEAR T-cells in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2019, 79 (Suppl. S13), 3183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. D’Aloia, M.M.; Zizzari, I.G.; Sacchetti, B.; Pierelli, L.; Alimandi, M. CAR-T cells: The long and winding road to solid tumors. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Leen, A.M.; Sukumaran, S.; Watanabe, N.; Mohammed, S.; Keirnan, J.; Yanagisawa, R.; Anurathapan, U.; Rendon, D.; Heslop, H.E.; Rooney, C.M.; et al. Reversal of Tumor Immune Inhibition Using a Chimeric Cytokine Receptor. Mol. Ther. 2014, 22, 1211–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Gerlinger, M.; Rowan, A.J.; Horswell, S.; Larkin, J.; Endesfelder, D.; Gronroos, E.; Martinez, P.; Matthews, N.; Stewart, A.; Tarpey, P.; et al. Intratumor Heterogeneity and Branched Evolution Revealed by Multiregion Sequencing. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 366, 883–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Longo, D.L. Tumor Heterogeneity and Personalized Medicine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 366, 956–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Sun, B.; Yang, D.; Dai, H.; Liu, X.; Jia, R.; Cui, X.; Li, W.; Cai, C.; Xu, J.; Zhao, X. Eradication of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by NKG2D-Based CAR-T Cells. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2019, 7, 1813–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Neelapu, S.S. Managing the toxicities of CAR T-cell therapy. Hematol. Oncol. 2019, 37, 48–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Brudno, J.N.; Kochenderfer, J.N. Recent advances in CAR T-cell toxicity: Mechanisms, manifestations and management. Blood Rev. 2019, 34, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Sterner, R.C.; Sterner, R.M. CAR-T cell therapy: Current limitations and potential strategies. Blood Cancer J. 2021, 11, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cancers 15 01808 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic overview of major steps within CAR-T and TCR-T adoptive cell therapy process. T cells are isolated autologously from patient blood or from a healthy allogeneic source. Leukocyte separation is accomplished through leukocyte apheresis, allowing isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). T cells are selectively stimulated prior to viral transduction of engineered CAR or TCR gene(s), or via alternate genetic editing tools. Successfully transfected clones are expanded for therapeutic use. Note: costimulatory domains on the CAR vary based on CAR generation.
Figure 1. Schematic overview of major steps within CAR-T and TCR-T adoptive cell therapy process. T cells are isolated autologously from patient blood or from a healthy allogeneic source. Leukocyte separation is accomplished through leukocyte apheresis, allowing isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). T cells are selectively stimulated prior to viral transduction of engineered CAR or TCR gene(s), or via alternate genetic editing tools. Successfully transfected clones are expanded for therapeutic use. Note: costimulatory domains on the CAR vary based on CAR generation.
Cancers 15 01808 g001
Table
Table 1. Ongoing clinical trials of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Table 1. Ongoing clinical trials of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
AgentStatusPhaseClinicaltrial.gov (accessed on 10 March 2023)Sample SizePatient CharacteristicsPrimary Outcome
GPC3 CAR-TActivePhase 1NCT029051889HCCDLT, CR/PR
GPC3 CAR-TRecruitingPhase 1NCT0412127320HCCDLT
GPC3 CAR-TRecruitingPhase 1NCT050701563HCCSafety and tolerability
GPC3 CAR-TRecruitingN/ANCT0562070620HCCAEs, ORR
GPC3 CAR-TUnknownPhase 1 and 2NCT0313071210HCCSafety and tolerability
GPC3 CAR-TRecruitingPhase 1NCT0500389538HCCSafety and feasibility
GPC3 CAR-TRecruitingPhase 1NCT0495114110HCC, cholangiocarcinomaAEs, ORR
GPC3 CAR-TUnknownPhase 1 and 2NCT0308438020HCCAEs, efficacy
GPC3 CAR-TRecruitingPhase 1NCT0510363127HCCDLT, CR/PR
GPC3 CAR-TNot yet recruitingPhase 1NCT0534466412HCCAEs
GPC3 CAR-TUnknownPhase 1 and 2NCT0271536230HCCSafety
GPC3 and/or TGFβ targeting CAR-TRecruitingPhase 1NCT0319854630HCC
SCLC		DLT
CR/PR
EpCAM CAR-TRecruitingPhase 1NCT0502893348HCC, CRC, pancreatic and gastric cancersDLT, MTD, AEs
EpCAM CAR-TUnknownPhase 1 and 2NCT0301371260HCC, colon, esophageal, prostate, pancreatic, and gastric cancers Toxicity profile, survival time, and efficacy
CLD18 CAR-TActiveN/ANCT0330240318HCC, pancreatic cancer, esophageal cancer, MM, B-cell lymphoma, and B-cell leukemia AEs, engraftment
MUC1 CAR-TUnknownPhase 1 and 2NCT0258768920HCC, NSCLC, pancreatic carcinoma and triple-negative breast cancerAEs
CD147 CAR-TUnknownPhase 1NCT0399374334HCCAEs, DLT, MTD
CAR-T/TCR-TRecruitingPhase 1 and 2NCT0363820673HCC, renal, ovarian, esophagus, colorectal, lung, pancreatic, gastric cancersAEs, clinical response
Bold is not necCAR-T/TCR-TRecruitingPhase 1 and 2NCT0394162650HCC, glioma, gastric cancer, esophageal cancerAEs, clinical response
NKG2D CAR-TRecruitingPhase 1NCT051317633HCC, glioma, medulloblastoma, colon cancerAEs
NKG2D CAR-TNot yet recruitingPhase 1NCT0455066310HCC, colorectal cancer, gliomaMTD, AEs
B7H3 CAR-TRecruitingPhase 1 and 2NCT0532320115HCCSafety, ORR
Armored CAR-TRecruitingPhase 1NCT0515518920HCCAEs
c-Met/PD-L1 CAR-TUnknownPhase 1NCT0367230550HCCEfficacy, AEs
DLTs: dose-limiting toxicities, CR: complete response, PR: partial response, AEs: adverse events, ORR: overall response rate, MTD: maximum tolerated dose.
Table
Table 2. Ongoing clinical trials of T-cell-receptor-transduced T cell therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Table 2. Ongoing clinical trials of T-cell-receptor-transduced T cell therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
AgentStatusPhaseClinicaltrial.gov (accessed on 10 March 2023)Sample SizePatient CharacteristicsOutcome
AFP T cellsUnknownPhase 1NCT043681823HCCORR, DCR, DOR
AFP T cellsUnknownPhase 1NCT039717479HCCAEs, ORR, DOR
AFP T cellsActive, not recruitingPhase 1NCT0313279245HCCDLT, AEs, CR/PR
HBV-TCR T cellsActive, not recruitingPhase 1NCT046770887HCCAEs, ORR
HBV-TCR T cellsRecruitingPhase 1 and 2NCT0541793247HCCAEs, tumor response
HBV-TCR T cellsUnknownPhase 1NCT0271978210HCCSafety, efficacy
HBV-TCR T cellsRecruitingPhase 1NCT0474540310HCCAEs, ORR
HBV-TCR T cellsRecruitingPhase 1NCT0389941510HCCAEs, ORR
HBV-TCR T cellsRecruitingPhase 1NCT0533932136HCCAEs, efficacy
HBV-TCR T cellsNot yet recruitingPhase 1 and 2NCT0519529455HCCAEs, ORR
MAGEA1Active, not recruitingPhase 1NCT0344110015HCC and multiple solid tumorsAEs, tumor response
ORR: overall response rate, DCR: disease control rate, DOR: duration of response, DLT: dose-limiting toxicities, AEs: adverse events.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ozer, M.; Goksu, S.Y.; Akagunduz, B.; George, A.; Sahin, I. Adoptive Cell Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review of Clinical Trials. Cancers 2023, 15, 1808. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15061808

AMA Style

Ozer M, Goksu SY, Akagunduz B, George A, Sahin I. Adoptive Cell Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review of Clinical Trials. Cancers. 2023; 15(6):1808. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15061808

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ozer, Muhammet, Suleyman Yasin Goksu, Baran Akagunduz, Andrew George, and Ilyas Sahin. 2023. "Adoptive Cell Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review of Clinical Trials" Cancers 15, no. 6: 1808. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15061808

APA Style

Ozer, M., Goksu, S. Y., Akagunduz, B., George, A., & Sahin, I. (2023). Adoptive Cell Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review of Clinical Trials. Cancers, 15(6), 1808. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15061808

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop