3.2. Pyruvate and Alanine Transaminase
To determine whether pyruvate–alanine transamination provides glutamine carbons to sustain the TCA cycle during S phase, we sorted cells based on their cell cycle phase and performed isotope enrichment analysis using
13C
1,2-Glucose and
13C
5,15N
2-Glutamine, as illustrated in
Figure 2a. The glycolytic metabolism of glucose with
13C
1,2 yielded two molecules of pyruvate, with one molecule enriched with
13C
1,2 and the other remaining unlabeled. Alanine and lactate retained the same isotopic enrichments since there was no carbon loss during the metabolic conversion from pyruvate, as shown in
Figure 2a. Upon entering the TCA cycle, and accruing loss of one carbon as CO
2, α-ketoglutarate was enriched with
13C
1, and this enrichment could then transfer to glutamate by pyruvate-dependent alanine transaminase. However, oxaloacetate remained unlabeled due to the loss of another carbon through the further metabolism of α-ketoglutarate to yield oxaloacetate in the TCA cycle, as summarized in
Figure 2a.
In parallel labeling experiments with
13C
5,
15N
2-Glutamine, loss of one nitrogen yielded
13C
5,
15N
1-glutamate (through glutaminase), which would then transfer
15N
1 enriching alanine (C
015N
1 or C
315N
1) or aspartate (C
015N
1 or C
415N
1) from glucose- or glutamine-derived carbon backbones by participating in transaminase reactions (
Figure 2a). Additionally,
13C
5 α-ketoglutarate (derived from glutamate) participating in the TCA cycle and incurring carbon loss converted into
13C
4 oxaloacetate (
Figure 2a). Furthermore, this
13C
4 labeled oxaloacetate could produce pyruvate through malic enzyme, which could result in enriching both lactate and alanine with
13C
3 (
Figure 2a).
Following 2 h of culture in
13C
1,2 Glucose medium without pyruvate, the cell cycle sorted CA46 cells showed a significant increase in pyruvate, lactate, alanine, and α-ketoglutarate pool sizes from G1 to S (
p < 0.05), and then decreased by G2 (
Figure 2a). Under these conditions, glutamate and aspartate pool sizes showed modest changes. Pyruvate, lactate, and alanine were all enriched with
13C labels from glucose-derived carbons (
Figure 2a). However, aspartate and α-ketoglutarate did not contain these
13C labels, and prior studies have demonstrated that the labeling of aspartate occurs at slower kinetics [
35]. Cell cycle sorted CA46 cells labeled with
13C
5,
15N
2-Glutamine showed significant increases in glutamate and α-ketoglutarate levels during the S phase compared with the G1 phase (
p < 0.05) (
Figure 2a). Interestingly, we observed that only one-third of glutamate carbons were enriched with
15N, represented as
13C
5N
1, while the remaining two-thirds contained
13C
5N
0, indicating that glutamate carbons undergo rapid turnover, incurring
15N loss (
Figure 2a). Moreover, 78% of α-ketoglutarate was enriched with
13C
5, derived from glutamine, whereas glucose-derived
13C carbons remained undetected, suggesting glutamine is the main carbon source for α-ketoglutarate in TCA during the S phase of the cell cycle (
Figure 2a).
Next, we observed that with increases in both alanine and aspartate levels, an increase in transamination activity resulted in a 1.5-fold increase in enrichment with
15N to C
0 alanine (from glucose-derived) in the S phase compared to G1 (
p < 0.05) (
Figure 2a). In contrast, by averaging all three phases of the cell cycle, aspartate contained 20–30% carbon obtained from glutamine, of which only 10% were labeled with
15N, without any increases at the S phase compared to G1 (
Figure 2a). Overall, since
13C enrichments from glucose were absent in α-ketoglutarate, and a significant 3-fold increase in α-ketoglutarate consisting of carbon enriched from glutamine were observed in the S phase, along with
15N enrichment increases detected in alanine, we conclude glucose-dependent alanine transaminase facilitates participation of glutamine carbon into the TCA cycle, through the S phase transition during cell cycle. Considering that
13C labeling from glucose was not detected in α-ketoglutarate, oxaloacetate, and aspartate, and
13C carbons derived from glutamine were not detected in pyruvate, lactate, and oxaloacetate from 2 h labeling experiments, we performed our next labeling experiments with
13C
1,2-Glucose or
13C
5,
15N
2-Glutamine for 12 h (with unsorted CA46 cells) to gain a better clarity of the carbon exchanges occurring in these reactions. In CA46 cells using
13C
1,2-Glucose, we observed 50% of pyruvate (representing half of a molecule of glucose) was
13C-labeled, and nearly equal percentages of lactate and 45% of alanine (transaminase-derived) were also
13C-labeled (
Figure 2b). Altogether we observed proportionally similar
13C labeling patterns in pyruvate, lactate, and alanine, at both 2 and 12 h labeling experiments. However, we were then able to detect 25% of α-ketoglutarate as
13C labeled (TCA cycle-derived) and 20% of glutamate with
13C label (transaminase-derived) (
Figure 2b). Despite extending the duration for labeling, oxaloacetate did not show any evidence of
13C labeling, while aspartate showed <5% of glucose-derived
13C labels (
Figure 2b). These results suggest that glucose carbons entering glycolysis are predominantly converted to lactate or undergo transamination into alanine (
Figure 2b). The slower kinetics of
13C labeling in α-ketoglutarate suggests that only a small fraction of pyruvate enters the TCA cycle (
Figure 2b).
With
13C
5,
15N
2-Glutamine-labeled CA46 cells, we observed high amounts of glutamate consisting of either (40%)
13C
5,
15N
1, (45%)
13C
5, N
0, and (<5%) C
015N
1, indicating that glutamine-derived carbon is being directly deaminated (40%) and returned from the TCA cycle (50%) (
Figure 2b). Furthermore, since glutamate and α-ketoglutarate contain 90% of the carbons labeled with
13C
5, glutamine appears to be the major source of carbons for TCA. Interestingly, by comparing nitrogen transfers to alanine based on the carbons derived from glucose (C
0, 60%) or glutamine (
13C
5, 40%), we observed that
15N was present only in 10% of carbon derived from glucose (C
0) and completely absent in the alanine derived from
13C glutamine. This indicates that cytosolic glycolytic pyruvate was likely the source of carbon (through glutaminolysis, the TCA cycle, and transamination) (
Figure 2b). The absence of
15N in the 40% fraction of
13C-derived alanine suggests that alanine transaminase activity involving glutamate-derived N
0 could have occurred in a different subcellular compartment, possibly in the mitochondria. Of note, in comparing the 2 h with the 12 h labeling, we found a substantial reduction in
15N labeling in C
0, which suggests alanine derived from glycolytic is consumed or lost. Although aspartate, pyruvate, and lactate showed trace amounts of glutamine-derived
13C (
Figure 2b), the slower labeling kinetics at 12 h indicate that glutamine is not the major carbon source for these metabolites.
In summary, these results (from the 2 and 12 h labeling experiments) show that the carbon from glucose that ends in pyruvate is preferentially converted into lactate and alanine instead of directly being oxidized through the TCA. Thus, our next objective is to determine whether the pyruvate to alanine transamination that occurs during the S phase is related to differential glucose and glutamine utilization in normal and malignant cells. Therefore, we compared the metabolic profiles using LCL (lymphoblastoid, transformed non-malignant normal human B lymphocyte) and DLBCL cell lines (CA46 and SUDHL4).
We observed that in comparison with LCL, lymphoma cells (CA46 or SUDHL4) have significantly higher amounts of glucose-6-phosphate and glutamate (
Figure 3a), which are the first metabolic intermediates of glucose and glutamine metabolism. Lymphoma cells had a one-fold higher pyruvate pool than LCL cells, while lactate and alanine pools were 2–4 times and 4-fold higher, respectively (
Figure 3a). Although pyruvate is more readily available, our results indicate that malignant cells do not prefer to oxidize pyruvate by TCA, despite the higher availability. Therefore, the transamination of pyruvate to alanine represents a highly relevant aspect of Warburg’s paradox, which considers glucose as necessary for maintaining oxidative metabolism.
Based on these results, we concluded that by sparing glucose from oxidation, the transamination of pyruvate to alanine becomes crucial for sustaining the TCA cycle. This metabolic reprogramming likely provides a proliferative advantage to malignant cells. Therefore, our next goal is to investigate the overall metabolic implications of the differential utilization of glucose and glutamine between DLBCLs and LCL cells. By using
13C
1,2-Glucose as tracer and performing 12 h labeling, we observed marked labeling of all intermediates in glycolysis, TCA cycle, transaminase, and nucleotide metabolism in all cell lines (
Figure 3). We observed, however, that the proportion of labeling patterns varied between metabolic pathways and cell types (
Figure 3). In non-malignant LCL cells, the average carbon labeling index (from
13C
1,2-Glucose) for glycolytic intermediates beyond glucose-6-phosphate were 50% (representing half of a molecule of glucose), followed by 40% from citrate through isocitrate and 25% from α-ketoglutarate through the rest of the TCA cycle (
Figure 3a). Additionally, fractional labeling with
13C derived from glucose was significantly higher for metabolic end-products representing nucleotides (60%) or coenzymes (NAD
+ and NADP
+) (80%) than for intermediates representing glycolysis or the citric acid cycle in LCL (
Figure 3a). When comparing LCL with lymphoma cell lines CA46 and SUDHL4, the average percentage of
13C labeling with glycolytic intermediates was the same, but the labeling index for citric acid cycle intermediates, alanine, and nucleotides was 20% higher in lymphoma cell lines, CA46 and SUDHL4 (
Figure 3a).
In parallel experiments using
13C
5,
15N
2-Glutamine, we observed
13C labeling of all citric acid cycle intermediates, alanine from transaminase but not detected in the glycolytic intermediates, aspartate, and nucleotides in all three cell lines (
Figure 3b). In comparison with LCL, the lymphoma cells, CA46 and SUDHL4, showed an average of 20% higher
13C labeling, with citric acid cycle intermediates and NAD
+ and NADP
+ (
Figure 3b). Interestingly, when comparing LCL with lymphoma cells (CA46 and SUDHL4), we observed a net 20% increase in
13C incorporation from both glucose- and glutamine-derived carbons in α-ketoglutarate (
Figure 3a,b). This suggests that glucose metabolism, while facilitating increased participation of glutamine, also increases. Consequently, glucose and oxidative metabolism are synergistically enhanced in lymphoma. Comparing these results with the similar 20% increases in glucose-derived nucleotide metabolism (
Figure 3a), it becomes clear that the biological advantage of glucose-mediated (net gain of 40%) increases in oxidative metabolism could be significant for lymphoma. This helps meet the simultaneous demand for energy and glucose-derived nucleotides.
3.3. Molecular-Metabolic Circuitry of Lymphoma
Our findings indicate that pyruvate–alanine transamination may play a pivotal role in Warburg’s paradox. Thus, glucose, even when converted to lactate, synergistically favors oxidative metabolism to provide nucleotides and energy for the growth of malignant cells. Typically, during cell division, the process prioritizes acquiring nutrients and accumulating energy in the form of ATP [
36]. This accumulation leads to feedback inhibition of glycolysis, which then permits nucleotide biosynthesis to proceed [
36]. Due to the high energy demand for nucleotide metabolism, normal cells cannot use glucose for both energy and biosynthesis simultaneously [
36]. However, malignant cells undergo metabolic reprogramming to overcome this limitation, resulting in increased glucose uptake but reduced glucose oxidation, without compromising oxidative metabolism, which is crucial for survival [
1,
2,
5,
24,
37]. Therefore, Warburg’s paradoxical metabolism becomes crucial and must be considered a key endpoint in oncogenic paradigms that drive malignant proliferation. Disrupting these mechanisms in malignant cells could revert their metabolic and proliferative functions of normal cells. Therefore, our next objective is to construct a molecular metabolic circuit aligned with this metabolic paradox and then disrupt metabolic activities using inhibitors appropriate for selectively blocking cell proliferation in lymphoma, while sparing non-malignant LCL cells.
By enumerating the key metabolic genes that included pyruvate metabolizing enzymes and the associated metabolite transporters, defined as core metabolic components (
Figure 4a), and then identifying the corresponding regulatory genes, we constituted a molecular-metabolic network model, as follows. Using GeneHancer, a database that contains genome-wide datasets containing promoter-gene associations, we conducted data mining and identified 2611 potential interactions consisting of 456 transcription regulators associated with 10 metabolic genes and transporters (see
Table S2). We then utilized transcriptomics datasets (see
Table S2), which included lymphoma patients (
n = 481, from the National Cancer Institute) and lymphoma cell lines (
n = 9) collected from our prior studies [
31,
33], to retrospectively analyze the mRNA level expression of metabolic genes, transporters, and transcription factors. The results of this analysis indicated that the medians of log
2 normalized gene expression, for both lymphoma patient and cell line datasets, and were significantly high (log
2 > 10 for metabolic genes and >7.5 for transcriptional regulators (
Figure 4b)).
Among all genes, lactate dehydrogenase genes (LDHA and LDHB) were observed to be the most highly expressed (among the entire transcriptome), followed by transaminase genes (GOT1, GOT2, GPT, and GPT2) with log
2 median expression > 10, both in lymphoma patients and cell lines (
Figure 4b). In both lymphoma patients and cell lines, a median log
2 of >10 and >8 was observed for transcriptional regulatory factors of metabolic genes (
Figure 4b). Our next step was to isolate common sets of transcription factor-metabolic interactions via network analysis by Cytoscape, which identified 103 transcription factors (out of 456) that acted with eight metabolic genes as well as the PCNA associated with proliferation (
Figure 4c). An analysis of pathway enrichment using the 103 transcription factors by the Gprofiler database revealed that these regulatory genes are associated with “Transcriptional misregulation in cancer”, KEGG:05202 pathway with the highest significance (adjusted
p < 0.0001). Accordingly, this finding of a massive number of oncogenic transcription factors exerting redundant control over metabolic genes indicates the sheer complexity of the molecular mechanism employed in the reprogramming of metabolism in cancer. Moreover, such molecular complexity and redundant regulatory influences of metabolic genes present significant difficulties for the appropriate identification of actionable targets for biological investigation.
Nevertheless, we chose to assess these interactions by means of pharmacological inhibitors for a priori determination of the gene regulatory and enzymatic functions in the context of this molecular-metabolic circuitry. For this purpose, through the comparison of transcriptomes of lymphoma patients and cell lines, we identified 10 highly expressed transcription factors (median log
2 > 10) that regulated a minimum of five metabolic genes (
Figure 4c). Of note, despite shortlisting transcriptional factors to a few candidates,
Figure 4c shows that each metabolic enzyme (at mRNA level) is regulated by multiple transcriptional factors and therefore requires additional screening experiments using a panel of pharmacological inhibitors.
3.4. Targeting the Molecular-Metabolic Regulatory Mechanisms in DLBCL
The overall goal of this experiment is to determine whether disrupting key molecular-metabolic circuits, thereby reversing the metabolic features associated with Warburg’s paradox, can limit the proliferative activity of malignant cells. Using the molecular-metabolic circuitry defined in
Figure 4c, we selected the appropriate pharmacological inhibitors to compare cell proliferation assessments with LCL, CA46, and SUDHL4 cells. The inhibitors intended to target metabolic enzymes, such as SLC25A1 (CPT1) [
38], MCT1 (MCT-III) [
39], LDHA (oxamate) [
40], glutamine transporter (MK801) [
41], and PDH/α-ketoglutarate (Demvistat) [
42], without affecting cell viability in the lymphoma cells or LCL (see
Figure S1). While pharmacological inhibitors chosen for targeting transcriptional regulatory factors, besides TARDP1 (XAV939) [
43], targeted HDAC1 (abexinostat) [
44], STAT1 (fludarabine) [
45], NONO (auranofin) [
46], DNMT1 (thioguanine) [
47], and ETS1 (YK-4-279) [
48], all resulted in decreased cell viability in the lymphoma cell lines in a concentration-dependent manner, in both lymphoma and LCL cells (see
Figure S1). Among these inhibitors, fludarabine alone selectively reduced the cell viability in CA46 and SUDHL4 lymphoma cell lines, without affecting LCL cell viability (see
Figure S1). Therefore, for metabolomic profiling experiments, LCL, CA46, and SUDHL4 cells were treated with abexinostat (12.5 μM), fludarabine (2.5 μM), auranofin (0.5 μM), thioguanine (2.5 μM), and YK-4-279 (12.5 μM) for 48 h using the average IC
50 for lymphoma cell lines.
Heatmap analysis of log
2 transformed pool size estimates and hierarchical clustering of 41 significant metabolites (from ANOVA), revealed the following changes in metabolic signatures (
Figure 5a), (Raw profiles and statistical analysis provided in
Table S1). Compared to lymphoma cell lines (CA46 and SUDLH4), LCL had a larger metabolic pool of glycolytic intermediates (glucose-6-phosphate, fructose-6-phosphate, dihydroxyacetone phosphate) and glutamate (
Figure 5a). However, the pool sizes of nucleotides and TCA intermediates were higher in lymphoma cell lines than LCL. Treatment with fludarabine in CA46 and SUDHL4 resulted in reversing these metabolic features and became comparable to LCL. (
Figure 5a). Specifically, fludarabine treatment, while increasing the levels of the glycolytic intermediates, caused significant decreases in metabolic pool sizes of pyruvate, lactate, TCA cycle intermediates, nucleotides, and alanine, selectively in the lymphoma cell lines (CA46 and SUDHL4 (
Figure 5a). Abexinostat exhibited a significant reduction in the pool size of most metabolites in both LCL and DLBCL cells, while thioguanine and YK-4-279 demonstrated significant decreases in the pool sizes of all metabolites in LCL (
Figure 5a). Auranofin did not show any significant difference in the metabolic profiles when compared with untreated cells in all cell lines (
Figure 5a).
Additionally, we performed principal component analysis (PCA) for an unbiased assessment of the overall metabolic characteristics (of pool size changes) from each experiment. Based on the loadings from the PC1 axis (plotted by highest variation 56.7%), we observed that the overall metabolic pools in lymphoma cell lines CA46 and SUDHL4 are similar but differ from those in LCL (
Figure 5b). Further, we observed that the metabolic profiles of fludarabine-treated CA46 and SUDHL4 were aligned together with fludarabine-treated LCL and untreated controls, suggesting that while LCL is unaffected by fludarabine, the metabolic profiles of fludarabine-treated lymphoma cells appear similar to those of LCL cells (
Figure 5b).
A VIP scoring (see Methods), performed to identify the most significant metabolites which demonstrated most variations across all experiments, revealed lactate and TCA cycle intermediates, including α-ketoglutarate and nucleotides, as the most responsive metabolic signatures (
Figure 5c). Since glucose and glutamine are the primary metabolites involved in all these metabolic processes, we also investigated the most significant changes in metabolic features by correlating the metabolic behavior with glucose from fludarabine treatment. The Spearman rank correlation of the significant metabolites showed positive correlations with glucose and glutamine and aspartate, whereas negative correlations were observed for lactate, alanine, TCA cycle intermediates, and nucleotide pool size changes (
Figure 5c). The inverse correlation observed from treatment with fludarabine suggests that metabolic impairment, which decreases the TCA cycle, nucleotides, lactate, and transaminase metabolic intermediates, leads to the impaired utilization of glucose and glutamine, resulting in the corresponding increases. These metabolic changes affected proliferative function only in fludarabine-treated lymphoma cells, but not in the LCL cells (
Figure 6a).
3.5. Fludarabine Interrupts Glucose Carbon Entry into Nucleotide Metabolism
As summarized in
Figure 6b, fludarabine treatment resulted in a significant decrease in the pool sizes of pyruvate, alanine, and lactate (Log 1-fold), as well as TCA cycle intermediates and nucleotide metabolites (Log 2-fold). On the other hand, the pool sizes of most glycolytic intermediates were increased (
Figure 6b). Given that fludarabine treatment significantly reduced the levels of transaminase-associated pyruvate, alanine, and α-ketoglutarate, and meaningful insights from
15N labeling were not possible, we conclude that overall transamination is impaired, as evidenced by the significantly elevated glutamine levels. Based on these observations, our next objective is to identify which metabolic compartments of glucose and glutamine are affected and how they correlate with the decrease in pyruvate to alanine transamination caused by fludarabine. To achieve this, we performed the following isotopic tracer investigations using LCL and lymphoma cells.
Using
13C
1,2-Glucose as a tracer, we examined the effect of fludarabine on the fractional labeling patterns with the metabolic intermediates in lymphoma and LCL cells, following 48 h of treatment with 12 h labeling investigations. With fludarabine treatment, although lymphoma cells showed increases in pool sizes of glycolytic intermediates, no significant changes were observed in the fractional labeling pattern, including lactate and alanine (see
Table S1). However, the most significant impact of reduced metabolic labeling with
13C
1,2-Glucose was observed in the TCA cycle and nucleotide metabolic intermediates in the lymphoma cells treated with fludarabine, but not in the LCL cells (
Figure S2a,b). We further determined that, based on the carbon labeling patterns in the nucleotides, these nucleotides were primarily derived from glucose, through the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) (
Figure S2d). The isotopic tracing of
13C
1 incorporation in nucleotides, illustrated in
Figure 6c and focusing on oxidative PPP, clearly demonstrates that fludarabine causes a significant decrease in
13C fractional labeling in all nucleotides (nucleotide mono- and triphosphates), only in the lymphoma cells (
Figure 6c). Comparing the average
13C fractional labeling in the nucleotides, it is apparent that lymphoma cells incorporate far more
13C
1 from glucose (65–70%) than LCL (40%) (
Figure 6d). Meanwhile, treatment with fludarabine resulted in a significant reduction (from 65–70% to 10–15%) in glucose-derived
13C
1 labeling of nucleotides in the lymphoma cells, compared to LCL (
Figure 6d).
Based on the estimation of relative carbon contribution between oxidative and non-oxidative PPP, we observed that lymphoma cells utilized oxidative PPP (70–80%) and LCL (50%), with fludarabine treatment resulting in the most reduction in oxidative PPP (from 70–80%) to 30% in lymphoma compared (from 50%) to 40% in LCL versus non-oxidative PPP (
Figure S2). These results indicate that the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) is a major source of nucleotides and is elevated in lymphoma. Additionally, fludarabine treatment restores the oxidative PPP to levels comparable with those in LCL. Based on the relative carbon contribution estimation, lymphoma cells utilize more glucose-derived carbons (20–30%) for ribose phosphate synthesis (R5P) than LCL (18%), which decreases to less than 10% in fludarabine-treated lymphoma cells (
Figure 6e). However, the contribution of glucose carbon to alanine and citrate was similar in LCL cells (
Figure 6e), while the contribution to lactate could be different, since both intracellular and secreted lactate assessments are necessary for making meaningful conclusions. Despite pyruvate, lactate, and alanine fractional labeling patterns remaining unchanged, their pool sizes showed significant reductions (
Figure 6f). However, there was also a significant increase in upstream glycolytic metabolites glycerol-3-phosphate and dihydroxy acetone phosphate (DHAP) in fludarabine-treated lymphoma cells (
Figure 6f), indicating that overall glycolytic activity, if not inhibited, is accumulating.
Taken together, fludarabine treatment reduced the metabolic pool sizes of nucleotides, pyruvate, lactate, and alanine in lymphoma cells, with opposite effects on upstream glycolytic intermediates, as summarized in
Figure 6g. This was accompanied by a decrease in the incorporation of glucose-derived carbon into the TCA cycle and nucleotide metabolism. The correlation between lactate and alanine levels with energy metabolism and nucleotide levels is therefore consistent with the fludarabine-mediated suppression of lymphoma specific cellular proliferation.
3.6. Fludarabine Disrupts Glutamine Carbon Entry into the TCA Cycle
Next, we investigated whether reduced pyruvate availability is linked to elevated glutamine levels and the decreased metabolic activity of the TCA cycle (
Figure 6b). This was conducted to establish that glucose, even when converted into lactate, acts synergistically with oxidative energy-yielding metabolism. As illustrated in
Figure 7a, we investigated
13C enrichment patterns of TCA cycle intermediates using glutamine-derived
13C-5 glutamate as a precursor for this investigation. Oxidation of α-ketoglutarate in the conventional direction of the TCA cycle should result in the loss of one carbon as carbon dioxide generating
13C-4 succinate, which in subsequent metabolic stops could yield
13C-4 citrate, through
13C-4 oxaloacetate accepting two carbons from pyruvate. Alternatively, if α-ketoglutarate becomes the direct source of citrate through reductive carboxylation [
12], then all five carbons of citrate will be derived from
13C-5 sourced from α-ketoglutarate, as shown in
Figure 7a.
Using
13C
5,
15N
2-Glutamine as a tracer, we observed that C-5 of α-ketoglutarate, aconitate and citrate were labeled at 80%, 50%, and 40% respectively in the untreated lymphoma cells (
Figure 7b). In LCL cells, that C-5 of α-ketoglutarate, aconitate and citrate was labeled with
13C at 50%, 38%, and 18% respectively from
13C
5,
15N
2-glutamine. Together, these labeling patterns indicate that glutamine significantly contributes to citrate synthesis through reductive carboxylation in lymphoma than LCL cells. Considering the loss of one carbon atom as CO
2 in the conventional TCA cycle, we found that succinate C-4 is 70% labeled, while C-4 of fumarate and malate are labeled at 40% (as shown in
Figure 7b). Unfortunately, due to its low abundance, the labeling in oxaloacetate remained undetermined by mass spectrometry. Taken together, our
13C enrichment results reveal that glutamine carbon undergoes both oxidation (via the conventional TCA cycle) and reductive carboxylation generating citrate (
Figure 7b). This necessity for (glutamine-derived) excess citrate production suggests that citrate is lost from the TCA cycle or is not sufficiently synthesized from pyruvate-derived Acetyl-CoA. Our previous research has shown that citrate exit facilitates nucleotide metabolism (via glucose and the PPP) [
24]. Therefore, it is possible that glutamine-derived citrate could be necessary for compensating for this citrate loss. Taken together, we conclude that citrate exit is another important link between energy metabolism and nucleotide synthesis.
While fludarabine treatment did not alter the proportion of
13C enrichment in C-5 of α-ketoglutarate, citrate, and C-4 of succinate in LCL cells, these
13C enrichments, except for citrate, were significantly reduced in the lymphoma cells (CA46 and SUDHL4) (
Figure 7c). However, we observed a significant decline in the citrate pool size in the fludarabine-treated lymphoma cells (CA46 and SUDHL4), along with α-ketoglutarate and succinate (
Figure 7d). This abrupt decline in citrate occurred despite increases in the pool sizes of glucose-6-phosphate (
Figure 6f) and glutamine (
Figure 7d), indicating that citrate is the end-product of the synergistic glucose/glutamine metabolism in the TCA cycle.
Furthermore, by comparing the relative contribution of carbons
13C-1 from glucose and
13C-5 or
13C-4 from glutamine, we observed that lymphoma cells incorporate 20% more carbon from glutamine into citrate (
Figure 7e). The relative contributions of carbons from glucose and glutamine to α-ketoglutarate, succinate, and malate were similar for both LCL and lymphoma cells (
Figure 7e). However, treatment with fludarabine further reduced glucose carbon contributions to α-ketoglutarate and succinate (from 30–40% to less than 10%) (
Figure 7e), indicating that glutamine entry facilitates the reciprocal participation of glucose carbon in the TCA cycle.
Taken together, results from the fludarabine treatment experiments indicate that decreased pyruvate and alanine availability (
Figure 6f) restrict the participation of both glucose and glutamine carbons in the TCA cycle, resulting in glycolytic and glutamine accumulation and thereby resulting in the reduction in the pool sizes of TCA cycle intermediates (
Figure 7d). Therefore, pyruvate to alanine transamination appears to be essential for the glucose-dependent maintaining of TCA cycle metabolism through glutamine.
3.7. Elevated Levels of Pyruvate, TCA Cycle Intermediates, and Nucleotides Correlate with STAT1 Expression in Tumors
Our experiments with fludarabine have demonstrated that when glucose and glutamine carbons accumulate and fail to enter the energy-yielding TCA cycle, nucleotide biosynthesis becomes compromised. These observations are significant in the context of Warburg’s paradox, where glucose, despite being converted into lactate, acts synergistically with oxygen metabolism to promote tumorigenesis. Therefore, Warburg’s paradox and the Warburg effect represent the endpoints for oncogenic signals to generate energy and nucleotides, driving malignant cell proliferation. Our final goal is to determine whether the metabolic correlations inferred from in vitro experiments using cultured cells are clinically relevant for lymphoma. Our comparison of the metabolic profiles of cultured cells (LCL and lymphoma cell lines, CA46 and SUDHL4) with patient-derived tissues (normal lymph nodes and B cell lymphoma tumors,
n = 10) reveals that the pool sizes of metabolic intermediates from transaminase, the citric acid cycle, and nucleotide metabolism are well correlated and consistently elevated in malignancy (
p < 0.05), with significant metabolites shown as a heatmap in
Figure 8a,b. Raw profiles and detailed statistical analysis are provided in
Table S1.
Additionally, we compared protein lysates from tumor and normal tissues for expression levels of metabolic enzymes and transcription factors associated with our predicted Warburg circuitry (
Figure 4c) for validating the biological appropriateness for using fludarabine in our metabolic studies. The results of the Western blot analysis comparing normal lymph nodes to B cell lymphoma nodes indicated that STAT1 and JUND are significantly overexpressed in lymphomas (
Figure 8c). We also observed that the expression of LDHA and alanine transaminase in lymphoma is sporadically elevated. The significant overexpression of STAT1 (
Figure 8c) indicates that fludarabine’s tumor selectivity is associated with its regulatory influence on inhibiting STAT1 function and malignant metabolic activity, and it is clinically relevant.
In summarizing the results of our experiments, we observed an increase in pyruvate, lactate, and alanine levels during the S phase of the cell cycle, which corresponded to increases in glycolysis, the TCA cycle, and nucleotide metabolism (
Figure 1). Pyruvate plays a key role in supplying glutamine-derived carbons as α-ketoglutarate and contributes to citrate formation in malignant cells (
Figure 2 and
Figure 7). We previously observed that citrate exit facilitates FASN-mediated NADP/NADPH cycling, which is necessary for diverting glucose-derived carbon into nucleotide synthesis via the oxidative PPP [
24]. Therefore, continuous citrate loss should result in a diminished TCA cycle, as shown in step 1 (
Figure 9a). This is evident from the shrinking citrate pools derived from glucose and glutamine with fludarabine treatment (
Figure 9a).
Transamination of glycolytic carbons from pyruvate to alanine serves as an alternate pathway to restore the TCA cycle (and citrate) through glutamine carbon, as indicated in step 2 (
Figure 9a). This is evident from the decreases in α-ketoglutarate levels and label incorporations observed with fludarabine (
Figure 7c,d). As the entry of pyruvate carbon into the TCA cycle is diminished with fludarabine, the malate, aspartate, and oxaloacetate shuttle shunts glutamate carbons through a partially active TCA cycle, as indicated in step 3 (
Figure 9a), potentially sustaining oxidative metabolism. With the accumulation of the metabolic components of mitochondrial shuttle pathways—such as aspartate (
Figure 7d), DHAP, and glycerol-3-phosphate (
Figure 6f)—with fludarabine, we conclude that the overall integrity of the TCA cycle is vulnerable. Therefore, constant availability of pyruvate becomes crucial for TCA cycle to remain operational, and metabolic conversion of pyruvate to lactate ensures this availability, as shown in step 4 (
Figure 9a).
Finally, based on the fact that fludarabine treatment decreases pyruvate and lactate levels while glycolytic intermediates accumulate, the impaired TCA cycle-mediated energy metabolism is accompanied by decreased nucleotide biosynthesis, as indicated in step 5 (
Figure 9a). This conclusion is derived from
Figure 6g and
Figure 7f. We conclude that all these metabolic reprogramming events converge on nucleotide biosynthesis to confer a proliferative advantage in malignant lymphoma cells.
Applying these results in the context of resolving the metabolic reprogramming principles responsible for the Warburg effect and Warburg’s paradox, and their implications in malignancy, our conclusions are as follows:
The physiological regulation of normal cell proliferation is a systematically controlled process facilitated through feedback regulations that follow a sequential metabolic activity [
36]. Newly formed cells prioritize glucose carbon for energy production. The accumulating energy then exerts feedback inhibition over pyruvate synthesis [
49], resulting in the accumulation of glycolytic intermediates. This allows glucose carbons to flow toward nucleotide biosynthesis. Once nucleotide levels reach sufficient levels, mitotic activity is triggered followed by completion of cell proliferation in an orderly fashion [
36] (
Figure 9b).
The hallmark of malignancy, on the other hand, is uncontrolled cell proliferation. The metabolic feedback regulations found in normal cells make it disadvantageous for cells to commit to rapid proliferation. Therefore, the overexpression of LDH pivots glycolysis away from TCA cycle-mediated feedback inhibition, keeping the glucose carbon flow uninterrupted. This is the foremost and most apparent feature noticeable in most malignancies and caught the attention of Warburg, commonly known as the Warburg effect [
2] (
Figure 9b).
With LDH activity keeping pyruvate metabolism open, transamination reactions allow coupling of glucose with glutamine to sustain the TCA cycle and respiratory oxygen-mediated energy metabolism (
Figure 9b). Together these metabolic features constitute the principles behind Warburg’s paradox. As a result, with excess energy constantly available, increased glycolytic and glutamine metabolism via the TCA cycle allows citrate to couple with FASN-mediated Ox-PPP-dependent nucleotide synthesis [
24]. FASN is also the most highly overexpressed protein in almost all malignancies, including in lymphoma [
24] (
Figure 9b). Considering that exogenous lipids are physiologically abundant, de novo lipogenesis in malignancy, which is energetically expensive, is unnecessary but exists [
24]. Additionally, citrate, being the negative feedback regulator of the TCA cycle, is utilized for lipogenesis [
49], providing an opportunity to remove another important feedback regulatory mechanism over energy production. LDH and FASN are crucial metabolic functions that remove feedback restrictions on glycolysis and the TCA cycle, enabling citrate to integrate energy and nucleotide metabolism. Due to the low abundance of oxaloacetate and the contribution of glutamine-derived carbon in the reductive synthesis of citrate, it is clear that the exit of citrate is also a crucial component for integrating glucose and oxidative metabolism. Consequently, all oncogenic signals ultimately converge on upregulating the expression of enzymes involved in these metabolic paradigms to drive abnormal cell proliferation.