Next Article in Journal
Lysine Methyltransferase 9 (KMT9) Is an Actionable Target in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
Canonical and Noncanonical Functions of the BH3 Domain Protein Bid in Apoptosis, Oncogenesis, Cancer Therapeutics, and Aging
Previous Article in Journal
Colorectal Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Prevention
Previous Article in Special Issue
ANLN Promotes the Proliferation and Migration of Gallbladder Cancer Cells via STRA6-Mediated Activation of PI3K/AKT Signaling
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 16
Issue 8
10.3390/cancers16081531
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Role of Ion Channels and Chemokines in Cancer Growth and Metastasis: A Proposed Mode of Action Using Peptides in Cancer Therapy

by
Gerald J. Mizejewski
1,2,3
1
Division of Translational Medicine, Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Albany, NY 12201, USA
2
Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Empire State Plaza, Albany, NY 12201, USA
3
Biggs Laboratory, Empire State Plaza, Albany, NY 12237, USA
Cancers 2024, 16(8), 1531; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16081531
Submission received: 22 January 2024 / Revised: 12 April 2024 / Accepted: 12 April 2024 / Published: 17 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Factors Regulating Cancer Cell Growth, Migration, Invasion, and Apoptosis)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Cancer Metastasis has been mostly misunderstood and underestimated by the general public regarding cancer deaths. The aims and objectives of the present report was to more fully describe the scientific activities and components that are involved in the malignant cell’s fulfillment of the metastatic process and to impress the readership that metastasis is the major cause on all cancer deaths. The paper proceeds to enumerate and describe certain factors that contribute to cancer cell proliferation and subsequent metastasis such as; (a) calcium levels, (b) multiple cell membrane channels, and (c) the chemokine/receptor system. These latter components could serve to provide ideal molecular targets for possible future peptide therapeutic applications in treating cancer patients.

Abstract

Metastasis (Met) largely contributes to the major cause of cancer deaths throughout the world, rather than the growth of the tumor mass itself. The present report brings together several of the pertinent contributors to cancer growth and metastatic processes from an activity standpoint. Such biological activities include the following: (1) cell adherence and detachment; (2) cell-to-cell contact; (3) contact inhibition; (4) the cell interfacing with the extracellular matrix (ECM); (5) tumor cell-to-stroma communication networks; (6) chemotaxis; and (7) cell membrane potential. Moreover, additional biochemical factors that contribute to cancer growth and metastasis have been shown to comprise the following: (a) calcium levels in the extracellular matrix and in intracellular compartments; (b) cation voltage and ATP-regulated potassium channels; (c) selective and non-selective cation channels; and (d) chemokines (cytokines) and their receptors, such as CXCL12 (SDF-1) and its receptor/binding partner, CXCR4. These latter molecular components represent a promising group of an interacting and synchronized set of candidates ideal for peptide therapeutic targeting for cancer growth and metastasis. Such peptides can be obtained from naturally occurring proteins such as alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), an onco-fetal protein and clinical biomarker.

1. Introduction: Cancer Growth and Metastasis

1.1. The Process of Cancer Cell Growth and Proliferation

Cancer is viewed as a condition of the uncontrolled growth of cells/tissues as a result of gene/chromosome instability caused by DNA mutations [1]. One of the most remarkable discoveries in cancer growth research within the past several decades has been the regulation of cell division, growth, and proliferation by means of a biological clock within cells termed the “growth cell cycle” [2]. The activities of this built-in cellular clock take place within five phase periods (namely, G1, S, G2, mitosis, and the resting stage, G0). One phase called mitosis is the period in which cell division occurs. In order to regulate the cell cycle (i.e., cell growth), modulating factors called cyclin-dependent kinase enzymes (CdKs) and their protein inhibitors serve as enhancers, regulators, and checkpoint suppressors, respectively; these factors advance or halt progression at each phase cycle. Certain peptides (see below) can interfere and block cell cycle progression at the G1-to-S-phase transition, a prequel to a DNA synthesis phase. With the S-phase cell cycle arrested, the cell fails to advance to the mitosis stage in which cell division occurs; hence, cell growth and proliferation do not occur. The suppression of the cell growth cycle is an ideal means to prevent cancer growth. It is of further interest that the FDA recently approved cell cycle inhibitors of cell cycle CdKs for human use in cancer therapy [3]. The mechanism of peptide cell cycle cessation involves the presence of CdK cell cycle inhibitors, p27 Kip1 and p21 Cip1, by preventing their degradation, i.e., breakdown. It is also through such inhibitory factors that certain peptides can prevent the attachment of a phosphate group (phosphorylation) to a cell cycle suppressor termed p53 in order to regulate its activity. This latter step prevents subsequent cell cycle progression, hence forthcoming cell growth.
As a final note, peptides can target cancer cells, unlike most, if not all, chemotherapeutic agents in use today. Peptides, due to their amphipathic properties, can seek out and selectively bind to cancer cells versus normal cells due to an aberrant electrical charge difference on the cell surface bilayer of cancer cells [4]. Peptides also do not exhibit off-target homing specificity. Peptides can then bind and penetrate into the interior of the cancer cell to eventually cause cell cycle arrest [5]. As an additional benefit, peptides are ideally suited for use as post-surgical cancer agents in combinations with standard chemotherapy drugs; the ancillary action could prevent the re-growth of recently removed tumor masses from the surgical excision area.

1.2. The Process of Metastasis

The vast majority of cancer deaths can be attributed to breakaway tumor cells (metastasized) which migrate to distant organ sites, rather than demise from the primary tumor mass itself. It has been demonstrated in previous reports that metastasis-related proteins can participate in cell membrane activities such as tumor cell adhesion and contact with the extracellular matrix (ECM) [6,7]. Such associations further indicate that growth factors and their receptors together with various kinases are involved and interact with MET cells in order to achieve the completed process of cancer cell detachment and migration from the main tumor mass [8]. Once tumor cells are separated and disseminated from their tumor mass, detached freed tumor cells begin to migrate and spread. The tumor cells proceed to traverse various ECM layers and basement membranes in order to migrate and traverse nearby blood vessels. Following the involvement of cancer cell adhesion and attachment sites, proteolytic enzymes from the cells are concomitantly released and activated to digest a passageway (path) through a myriad of tissue/cell membrane barriers. The tumor cells must then gain entrance into and traverse the endothelial cells of capillaries and the lumen of blood vessels and/or lymphatic ducts [4]. The tumor cells’ extravasation and subsequent migration to distant tissue sites can only occur after their exit from the blood vessel’s lumen [9].
Once inside the capillary lumen, circulating tumor cells seek to attach themselves to already formed clusters of aggregated platelets that themselves have adhered to the inner wall of blood vessels. This process of platelet attachment is referred to as “tumor cell-induced platelet aggregation [10]”. This endothelial attachment site provides circulating tumor cells with a temporary “shielded haven” while circulating through the blood vessels to distant homing sites. By means of a process called “chemical-induced chemotaxis,” tumor cells are attracted to distal homing sites, usually directed to filtration organs such as the liver, lungs, kidneys, and bone marrow [11]. By means of this chemoattraction, sensitized tumor cells emerge through the blood vessel walls and are drawn to the direction of specific organ/tissue destinations by cytokine agents called “chemokines” and their respective receptors [12,13]. This system of dual attraction chemo-agents (i.e., CXCL12 chemokine and the CXCR4 receptor) is then directed to where the tumor cells are destined to become nested. This is within the stromal tissue of the predestined specific host organ/tissue site [8,14]. Thus, the guidance of metastatic tumor cells to distal organ sites is a complicated multi-step process involving a pair of protein cytokine families comprising (A) chemokines and (B) their matched binding receptors’ partners [14].

2. Alpha-Fetoprotein Contains a Peptide Fragment That Can Suppress Cancer Growth and Metastasis

Human alpha-fetoprotein (HAFP) has a long history of clinical use as a tumor-associated fetal biomarker, utilized to detect both fetal defects during pregnancy and cancers in adults [15]. HAFP is a single-chain polypeptide with an average molecular mass of 69 kDa, depending on its carbohydrate micro-heterogeneity [16]. This fetal protein has been classified as a member of the albuminoid gene family, consisting of AFP, albumin, vitamin D-binding protein, and the AFP-related (ARG) protein [13]. HAFP binds to a vast array of ligands, including various drugs, dyes, steroid hormones, heavy metals, flavonoids, fatty acids, and phytoestrogens [17].
Human AFP has been reported to contain an encrypted “occult” hidden peptide fragment (named Growth Inhibitory Peptide or GIP) concealed within the compacted tertiary folded HAFP polypeptide [18]. This AFP-derived peptide fragment is exposed following a conformational change in the U-shaped full-length native AFP molecule. The GIP fragment of AFP is a 34 amino acid (AA) peptide which was identified and purified as a segment from AAs #445 to 480 of the human AFP polypeptide chain [19,20]. GIP has been synthesized as a free peptide fragment and subsequently isolated, purified, and biochemically characterized; its biological activities were then determined [21]. GIP was found to inhibit and suppress growth in both estrogen (E)-dependent and non-E-dependent (basal) cancer growth and can interact and bind with various transcription factors, dyes, and cell cycle-associated proteins [22,23,24]. The mechanism of action of GIP as a cell cycle suppressor has also been established and reported; GIP has been further associated with cell membrane penetration and disruption and can suppress both cancer cell growth and migration [19,21].
GIP is an amphipathic peptide with an isoelectric point of pH 4.7; it displays a secondary structure consisting of 45% beta sheets and turns, 45% random coil (disordered), and 10% alpha-helix [19,20]. Hence, GIP is largely a beta-sheet peptide and contains a carboxyterminal type-1 reverse beta-turn structure which serves to enhance cell surface membrane binding. The AFP-derived peptide is a cell membrane disrupter which lacks a receptor and bypasses receptor-mediated endocytosis. Nonetheless, GIP undergoes rapid cell internalization via a channel and/or pore forming processes [25,26]. Following transmembrane passage, the peptide becomes diffusely distributed throughout the cytoplasm within 1.0 h and by 2.0 h, is localized in a focused fashion in the perinuclear region of the cell, an area contiguous with the endoplasmic reticulum [21]. The GIP segment is bioactive both as a linear as well as a cyclized (disulfide bridge) peptide [27,28,29].
AFP-derived GIP displays multiple biological activities including estrogen-associated cytoskeletal interactions and the prevention of birth defects in animal models [20,30]. Plasma cell membrane electrical activities in the GIP segment have also been reported by means of electrophysiological procedures such as the following: (a) sharp microelectrodes and (b) patch-clamp whole-cell recordings in cultured MCF-7 cell membranes [31]. In vitro data suggested that GIP at low concentrations could serve as a “cell channel-forming” peptide coincident with a decreased cell membrane electrical resistance ([32,33,34,35,36], and personal communication). At higher peptide concentrations, GIP was capable of cell membrane pore forming activities with a cell membrane potential at −30 to −45 mV ([5,25,26]; see acknowledgement). Thus, GIP could act either as a channel-forming or a pore-forming peptide coincident with an increased cell membrane electrical resistance. Thus, the AFP-derived peptide was found to gain entrance into cells via (a) cell membrane bilayer pore formation and/or (b) a channel formation action both of which were concentration-dependent [5]. In addition, a global RNA microarray analysis of GIP administrated to MCF-7 breast cancer cell cultures for 8 days demonstrated that GIP was capable of the up- and/or down-regulation of the RNA of multiple outward/inward flux cation channel proteins resulting in cation channel regulation and cell cycle arrest in breast cancer cell cultures [5] (Table 1, Part I and Part II).
The cytoplasmic ripple effect of membrane ion channel regulation via GIP has been reported to affect and halt G1-to-S-phase cell cycle progression demonstrated by growth inhibition in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells [32,33,34,37,38] (Table 1 Section 1). An RNA microarray data set (see above) revealed that the treatment of MCF-7 cells with GIP for 8 days resulted in the RNA down-regulation of multiple cell cycle proteins such as Cyclin-E, SKP2, and associated transition checkpoint proteins which prevented Cyclin-E/Cdc2-induced G1-to-S-phase progression [5]. GIP concomitantly blocked the ubiquitin-induced degradation of cyclin inhibitors such as p27 KIP and p21 CIP resulting in cell cycle arrest and subsequent mitotic cell growth inhibition [5]. While the labile linear version of GIP forms timers which are growth-inhibitory at high molar concentrations, the cyclic form (which behaved like a dimer) was inhibitory at lower molar concentrations. Moreover, both forms were cytostatic without any cytotoxic side effects in cell cultures (in vitro) and in xenograft mouse models via in vivo studies [19,20].
Expression of 716 transcripts was significantly altered in MCF-7 cell after 8 days of treatment with GIP as compared to treatment with scrambled peptide. Four hundred and thirty RNAs were down-regulated, while 286 RNAs were up-regulated; ** = real-time PCR. Data provided by Kathleen Arcaro, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
The disruption of cancer cell signaling activities has been shown to disturb, impair, and disable the ability of tumor cells to transduce downstream signals in order to adhere and spread. GIP has been described as a cell surface membrane perturbation agent, capable of disrupting tumor cell adhesion, membrane pseudopodial extensions, cell shape, aggregation, and cell agglutinating activities [19,23,24]. Thus, peptides exemplified by GIP might have the potential to serve as a cancer therapeutic agent alone or as an adjunct chemotherapeutic agent for cancer.

3. Membrane Ion Channels, Growth/Proliferation, and Metastasis: Cell Cycle Involvement

Membrane ion channels are essential for cell proliferation and may have a role in cancer progression and its subsequent metastasis. Microarray data for such roles have been confirmed for potassium voltage-gated channels as well as Ca++ and other cation-regulated channels ([5]; Table 1). Some of these channels include voltage-gated selective potassium-dependent channels in addition to non-selective calcium, magnesium, and sodium (TRP) channels. A cell cycle-dependent linkage has been further demonstrated between ion channels and the cell growth cycle [32,33]. Other membrane channels can also affect the membrane voltage and intracellular Ca2+ signal transduction in cell growth [28]. Homeostatic parameters, such as intracellular ion concentration, cytosolic pH, cell volume, and cell cycle regulatory agents, are governed by the action of cation channels. Furthermore, environmental factors, such as low oxygen pressure, acidosis, and exposure to various serum proteins, can affect physiological processes such as growth, proliferation, and metastasis [34]. The homeostatic ratio of the extra- and intracellular content of Ca2+ levels has further been shown to influence platelet aggregation, a process required for the adhesion of circulating metastatic tumor cells to the interior of blood vascular walls [10,36]. In summary, voltage-gated and non-selective cation channel activity may significantly contribute to both growth/proliferation and metastatic processes. Interestingly, alpha-fetoprotein-derived GIP displays amino acid sequence identities/similarities to a vast array of cation channel-associated and calcium-interacting proteins suggesting a possible mimetic action [36] (see Table 2).
The metastatic ability of cancer cells has been found to involve the expression of various ion channel activities in strongly versus weakly metastatic tumor cell lines [39]. Such differences in cells related to their extracellular versus intracellular Ca2+ levels have especially been denoted in cancer cells. Differences in the voltage-independent non-selective Ca2+ influx channels (transient receptor potential (TRP) channels) and the voltage-dependent K+-regulated channels were further sought out and studied. Both cell-to-cell contact-mediated cancer cell migration and growth are controlled by multiple sensory stimuli of TRP channels from stresses such as the following: pain, heat, cold, peppermint oil (menthol), camphor, capsaicin (hot peppers), mustard, Wasabi, ginger, touch, pressure, vibrations, and mechanical motion [37,40]. Overall, such TRP channels appear to affect cell migration by the regulation and transport of extracellular Ca2+ ions activated by spice and other sensory-activated agents. Ca2+ channels, together with serotonin receptors, are also important for tumor cell lodgment (nesting) into target organ/tissue sites as the endpoint of metastatic nesting. Interestingly, serotonin is one of the more important platelet-released secretions that also influences tumor cell lodgment into tissue distal “nesting” sites [41]. Cell surface membrane negative changes have also been found to be important for the cell migration of the metastatic cell membrane’s electrical potential [42]. It is the cell membrane phospholipid components (phosphodiesterase, phosphatidylcholine, phosphotidylserine) that are also crucial for determining the overall cell surface charge (membrane flip) of a cell membrane bilayer [43].
Potassium (K) channels are known to function in the cell membrane of cells to open and close channels by means of the following: (1) membrane voltage; (2) ligand binding to juxtaposed G-coupled receptors; (3) changes in intra- and extracellular calcium concentrations; (4) the alteration of cell membrane tension; and (5) changes in cell membrane electrical resistance and (6) ATP-sensitive currents [44]. K channels are also known to regulate progression through the cell cycle and to contribute to cell growth, proliferation, cell-produced extensions, motility, invasion, and metastasis [45]. In contributing to the metastatic process, K channels can also modulate cell proliferation and migration, apoptosis, cell adhesion, Ca2+ influx to the cytoplasm, and cytoskeletal alterations in the microtubular system [20].
In a global microarray analysis of GIP’s effect on MCF-7 cultured breast cancer cells [5], it was reported that GIP was able to down-regulate multiple types of potassium- and calcium-associated channels (Table 1). The cation channels affected by GIP regulation consisted of the following types: (1) potassium voltage-gated channels (KCNB2); (2) potassium voltage-gated channel KQT-like (KCNQ3); (3) calcium channel, voltage-dependent-2 (CACNA2D4); (4) calcium channel, voltage-dependent (CACNC6); (5) transient receptor potential (TRP)-V4 (Valanoid family); and (6) transient receptor potential (TRP)-M8 (Melastatin family) [40]. As shown in Table 1, (Section 2), the RNA GIP microarray results showed that the voltage-gated potassium and calcium channels in MCF-7 breast cancer cells were RNA down-regulated from 1.8 to 8.0-fold decreases [5].

4. The Role of Calcium in Cation Channel Regulation

Calcium is a universal cell second messenger, regulating many important processes such as growth, differentiation, and programmed cell death. All cells in the body are bathed in extracellular fluids very rich in Ca2+, while intracellular cytoplasmic Ca2+ concentrations were found to be 3 logs lower in concentration [46,47]. However, normal cell membranes are impermeable to Ca2+ influx and require ion channels to enter cells. Within the cell, calcium ions are stored in the smooth endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and are pumped out of the ER; the disruption of the cell membrane acts to disable cell surface permeability with a consequent influx of Ca2+ ions [48]. Calcium ions are biologically very active, being capable of a considerable disturbance of the metabolic order resulting in a large intracellular toxic accumulation of Ca2+ ions. However, high levels of cytoplasmic ions can result in calcium toxicity to a cell [49,50].
It has been established that Ca2+ ions play a major role in toxic cell injury especially involving cell membrane disruption and leakage. In prior reports, Ca2+ ions have been demonstrated to be the mediators of plasma membrane disruptive damage and their functional consequences thereof [49]. Thus, detrimental alterations in Ca2+ homeostasis have been documented as major factors in mechanisms leading to lethal plasma membrane damage, which transforms a living cell into a necrotic one.
In light of the role that calcium can play in cell death and the composition of the TRP calcium channel signal complex, an examination of the data was elegantly reported by Nilius and Wondergem [34]. Such investigations were eventually applied to studies of GIP action on LNCAP prostate cancer cells (personal communications and see Acknowledgements). These electrophysiological (grant-funded) studies indicated that GIP (A) increased the electrical conductance (inward current due to calcium influx) across the cell membrane and (B) decreased membrane resistance. Such studies and others using menthol spice activation revealed that Ca2+-activated K+ ion (BK) channels were also involved; further studies showed that GIP enhanced the TRP valloniid calcium channel rather than inhibiting it ([40] and personal communication/acknowledgement). Therefore, it may be postulated that GIP may not block calcium entry but actually promote an increased flow (influx) of calcium into cultured MCF-7 cells. TRP channels are transiently open indicating that some of the total TRP channels are open much of the time. However, it can be proposed that GIP could open many of the channels at a given moment and maintain the open state for a period of time, such that high amounts of extracellular calcium might enter into the cancer cell. If GIP were to be administered constantly over several days (i.e., 8 days), it might be assumed that a number of cells would gradually be destroyed from calcium “toxic” overload [40]. Thus, GIP might at first appear to be cytostatic, but over an extended period of time (8 days), GIP treatment might ultimately lead to cell death via Ca2+ toxicity.

5. Properties of Chemokines concerning Metastasis

Chemokines are chemical attractant cytokines that are locally produced in tissues and traffic the emigration of lymphoid cells from the blood stream into sites of inflammation and/or growth/proliferation [51]. Chemokines can direct and influence many physiological processes such as angiogenesis, inflammation, degranulation, cell proliferation, autoimmunity, HIV infection, tumor growth, parasite infections, and leukocyte trafficking [11]. Discovered only decades ago, chemokines are now known to function as “local regulatory” molecules in leukocyte (and other cells) maturation, trafficking, homing, and the progressive development of lymphoid and other tissues. Chemokines are known to comprise a family of 50 ligands and 20 receptors, which, despite their size, are remarkably homogenous with properties similar to Interleukin-8 (IL-8), the first chemokine to be discovered [11]. The effect of chemokines on leukocytes (and other cells) are mediated by hepahelical G-coupled receptors that form a link to GTP-binding proteins. Many chemokines are produced as a result of pathological conditions, some fulfill housekeeping (regulatory) roles, and some can function during histo- and organogenesis [11]. Chemokines attracted world-wide attention when it was discovered that some of their receptors function as binding sites for AIDS viruses (HIV) on macrophages and that AFP binds to those macrophage surface receptors. In fact, AFP was found to bind to the CXCR5 receptor [52]. Although they show receptor binding with HIV agents, chemokines/receptors’ main functions are attracting, homing, regulating, and guiding cells into distal tissues.
Chemokine CXCL12 is the bone marrow stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) which modulates cell migration, proliferation, and regulates growth in stromal tissues [52]. The SDF-1 chemokine binds to the G-coupled receptor CXCR4 and can activate multiple signal transduction pathways such as in the mitogenic kinase system [12,53]. In fact, SDF-1α activates the p44/42 mitogen-activated protein kinases termed ErK-1 and ErK-2 and the mitogen-activated protein kinase-kinases [54]. SDF-1 also activates phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, increases NF-kB activity in cells, and up-regulates the adhesion focal tyrosine in addition to paxillin, a focal adaptor scaffolding protein [55]. Although conceivable, it has not been reported, to date, that GIP could actually bind the CXCR4 receptor (see below).
By means of Genebank sequence matching, it was discovered that GIP appears to resemble a portion of chemokine molecules (see Table 3), especially the SDF-1 stromal cell growth chemokine (Table 3). It could be further proposed from direct and indirect evidence that GIP appears to possess the properties of a chemokine segment or be a chemokine-associated peptide (Table 4) [43]. If such is the case, logic would dictate that GIP could bind to three possible chemokine cell surface receptors, i.e., CCR5, CXCR4, or CCR6. The CCR5 receptor has already been reported to bind the full-length HAFP molecule and, hence, would be a good candidate. CXCR6 is the only receptor found in reproductive tissues as well as lymphoid and bone marrow tissue [13,56]. Thus, CXCR4 is the remaining receptor deemed possible to bind to GIP. CCR6 receptors are also known to bind to antimicrobial cell-penetrating peptides, and GIP possesses properties of an antimicrobial (pore-forming) peptide [57]. Since there is no receptor reported for GIP, it could provide an additional mechanism for GIP’s action of growth suppression since GIP might serve as a decoy ligand to compete for binding to the SDF-1 chemokine or to its receptor, CXCR4 [43,58].
If indeed GIP serves as a decoy ligand (posing as a mimic of SDF-1), GIP could possibly bind to the CXCR4 receptor of the G-coupled family but not activate the receptor to induce cell proliferation (Table 3). For example, full-length HAFP has been reported to bind to the CCR5 receptor [59]. This, in effect, might cause suppression in growth factor-stimulated cells such as prostate and breast cancers, which have actually been reported. Also, it might be possible that GIP could bind to a possible chemokine receptor, induce the cell shape change, induce tubulin (or actin) polymerization, and also inhibit cell migration (spreading), cell adhesion, and cell proliferation as reported for GIP [20]. In other words, GIP may be a partial antagonist or a chemokine mimic depending on its concentration (dose) and length of treatment duration (Table 3 and Table 4). Thus, GIP has an advantage over the other chemokine-related inhibitors which cannot act in a partial antagonist fashion. It can also be proposed that GIP might present as a novel type of chemokine inhibitor or decoy ligand, in that it could still retain the growth suppressive property and anti-angiogenic capability. GIP could still be able to induce some of the early (initial) functions of a true chemokine (such as immunostimulation). Finally, it was reported that GIP was capable of inhibiting metastasis in 60% of tumors and in an in vivo study involving a GI-101 tumor (human breast cancer transplanted into nude mice) [24]. Thus, AFP-derived GIP acting as a chemokine decoy ligand could possibly affect multiple phases of the development, oncogenic growth, and metastasis of tumors.

6. How Could GIP Treatment Impede the Metastatic Spread of Solid Tumors In Vivo? A Proposed Action

The AFP-derived peptide (GIP), when injected into the human/animal body, could follow a three-step course of action as now outlined: First, the in vivo administered (injected) peptide could gain entrance into the blood and/or interstitial fluid and travel toward and approach a cancer cell mass [60]. GIP has been reported to attach and/or adhere to the surface of the cell membrane (plasma membrane) of tumor cells [21]. By means of its pore forming or channel forming process, GIP has been observed to enter into the cell cytoplasmic compartment and distribute in a diffusive pattern [21]. The widely cytoplasmic-distributed GIP molecules then act to decrease the ATP energy reserve of the tumor cell [24]. After several minutes, GIP becomes localized as a thinly perinuclear layer surrounding the entire cell nucleus. In this manner, GIP might be in a position to selectively gate the transpassage traffic of molecules entering into and passing out of the nucleoplasm [21]. Theoretically, this gating might be possible to regulate the traffic flow of signals from cytoplasmic transcription factors to steroid and other receptors already residing in the nuclear compartment [61,62]. This step would also tend to cease the growth activities of the cell. By the same token, GIP might also engage and suppress the growth cycle in the cell cytoplasm by mechanisms already reported in the literature and cited above [5].
Secondly, GIP could make it more difficult for tumor cells to leave the original tumor mass. GIP is able to bind to the cell’s cytoskeletal fiber that furthermore allows the cell to change its shape. This action stiffens the skeletal frame of tumor cells so that detached tumor cells cannot easily traverse the blood vessels for passage (metastasize) to distal sites. Such cytoskeletal, cell shape, and tumor cell migration observations for GIP have been previously reported [20]. After entering into the blood vessels, GIP might block the ability of platelets to shield the circulating tumor cells from immune attacks and clearance from the blood stream as reported in GIP blood cell agglutination data [19,20].
Thirdly, GIP could block the ability of circulating cells to settle into distal homing sites as directed and determined by the homing agents of chemokines and their receptor binding partners. GIP is capable of blocking the signal transduction, attachment, and adherence to proteins of the extracellular matrix (ECM) residing in distal sites of newly metastatic nesting locations in various organs and tissues [19,20,21].

7. Conclusions

It can be gleaned from the studies described in this treatise that a peptide (GIP) derived from the full-length AFP protein molecule contains an occult peptide fragment that can inhibit or suppress cancer metastasis in both cell culture and in xenograft animal models [58]. The present results demonstrated that GIP was capable of suppressing or inhibiting both tumor growth progression and metastasis, via cell cycle arrest [5]. In addition, recent data implied that tumors presenting with transient receptor potential (TRP) calcium-regulated cation channels could potentially lead to cell death from calcium toxicity [40]. Finally, a proposed mechanism of action was presented regarding how GIP might be capable of inhibiting the metastatic spread of solid tumors throughout the body. Such treatment using an AFP-derived peptide (like GIP) might provide a non-toxic therapeutic treatment option which lacks side effects; thus, it could serve as an adjunct treatment modality to aid in chemotherapy and to block metastatic migration itself.

Funding

None: no U.S. federal grants were used in the preparation of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The author extends his thanks and gratitude to Sarah Andres for her commitment and time expenditure in the skilled typing and processing of the manuscript, references, and tables of this report. Gratitude is also expressed to the Serometrix Biotech Company (Syracuse, NY, USA) in providing interim bridge grant funding to Robert Wondergem and William Wonderlin (West Virginia University) for their research, collaboration, and counseling in the electrophysiology and membrane ion channel studies in the present research. The death of Robert Wondergem (East Tennessee University) in 2018 is sadly acknowledged as a memorial to this research article.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares that there are no known conflicts of interest in the preparation of this manuscript.

References

  1. Siegel, R.; Ma, J.; Zou, Z.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2014, 64, 9–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Alberts, B.; Johnson, A.; Lewis, J. Molecular Biology of the Cell: An Overview of the Cell Cycle, 4th ed.; Garland Science Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mizejewski, G.J. Breast cancer and cell cycle inhibitors (CCIs): Potential therapeutic strategies for CCI cell targeting and drug delivery. Curr. Adv. Oncol. Res. 2019, 2019, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mizejewski, G.J.; Mirowski, M.; Garnuszek, P.; Maurin, M.; Cohen, B.D.; Poiesz, B.J.; Posypanova, G.A.; Makarov, V.A.; Severin, E.S.; Severin, S.E. Targeted delivery of anti-cancer growth inhibitory peptides derived from human alpha-fetoprotein: Review of an International Multi-Center Collaborative Study. J. Drug Target. 2010, 18, 575–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mizejewski, G.J. Mechanism of cancer growth suppression of alpha-fetoprotein derived growth inhibitory peptide (GIP) Comparison of GIP-34 versus GIP-8 (AFPep). Updates and Prospects. Cancer 2011, 3, 2709–2733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mizejewski, G.J. Breast cancer, metastasis, and the microenvironment: Disabling the tumor cell-to-stroma communication network. J. Cancer Metastasis Treat. 2019, 5, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gupta, G.P.; Massague, J. Cancer metastasis: Building a framework. Cell 2006, 127, 679–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Peinado, H.; Lavotshkin, S.; Lyden, D. The secreted factors responsible for pre-metastatic niche formation: Old sayings and new thoughts. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2011, 21, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Welch, H.G.; Gorski, D.H.; Albertsen, P.C. Trends in Metastatic breast and prostate cancer- Lessons in Cancer dynamics. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 1685–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Gasic, G.J.; Gasic, T.B.; Galant, N.; Johnson, T.; Murphy, S. Platelet tumor cell interactions in mice, The role of platelets in the spread of malignant disease. Int. J. Cancer 1973, 11, 704–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Stone, M.J.; Hayward, J.A.; Huang, C.Z.E.H.; Sanchez, J. Mechanisms of regulation of the Cheokine-Receptor Network. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Busillo, J.M.; Benovic, J.L. Regulations of CXCR4 signaling. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2007, 1768, 952–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhao, B. CXCR4 over-expression and survival in cancer: A system review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 5022–5040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Scala, S. Molecular Pathways: Targeting the CXCR4-CXCL12 axis- untapped potential in the tumor microenvironment. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015, 21, 4278–4285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mizejewski, G.J. Physiology of alpha-fetoprotein as a biomarker for perinatal distress: Relevance to adverse pregnancy outcome. Exp. Biol. Med. 2007, 232, 993–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mizejewski, G.J. Alpha-fetoprotein structure and function: Relevance to isoforms, epitopes, and conformation variants. Exp. Biol. Med. 2001, 226, 377–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mizejewski, G.J. A Compendium of Lagands reported to bind Alpha-fetoprotein: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Cancer Ther. Oncol. 2022, 20, 556047. [Google Scholar]
  18. Mizejewski, G.J. The different Biologically active forms of alpha-fetoprotein as functional biomarkers in pregnancy, disease, and cancer: A review and update. Adv. Biomark. Sci. Technol. 2023, 2, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mizejewski, G.J.; Butterstein, G. Survey of functional activities for alpha-fetoprotein growth inhibitory peptides: A review and prospects. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2006, 7, 73–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mizejewski, G.J.; Smith, G.; Butterstein, G. Review and Proposed action of alpha fetoprotein growth inhibitory peptides as estrogen and cytoskeleton associated factors. Cell Biol. Int. 2004, 28, 913–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mizejewski, G.J.; MacColl, R. Alpha-fetoprotein growth inhibitory peptides: Potential leads for cancer therapeutics. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2003, 2, 1243–1255. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mizejewski, G.J. The alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) third domain: A search for AFP interaction sites of cell cycle proteins. Tumour Biol. 2016, 37, 12697–12711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Muehlemann, M.; Miller, K.D.; Dauphinee, M.; Mizejewski, G.J. Review of growth inhibitory peptides as biotherapeutic agents for tumor growth, adhesion, and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2005, 24, 441–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mizejewski, G.J.; Muehlemann, M.; Dauphinee, M. Update of alpha-fetoprotein growth inhibitory peptides as biotherapeutic agents for tumor growth and metastasis. Chemotherapy 2006, 52, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Mizejewski, G.J. Antimicrobial peptides and cancer: Potential use of antimicrobial-like peptides in chemotherapy. J. Cancer Biol. Therap. 2019, 5, 233–242. [Google Scholar]
  26. Mizejewski, G.J. Cell-penetrating versus antimicrobial peptides: Comparison of potential use as cancer therapeutics. J. Oncol. Res. Forecast. 2019, 2, 1013–1015. [Google Scholar]
  27. Mizejewski, G.J.; Eisele, L.; MacColl, R. Anticancer versus antigrowth activities of three analogs of the growth-inhibitory peptide: Relevance of physicochemical properties. Anticancer Res. 2006, 26, 3071–3076. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. MacColl, R.; Eisele, L.E.; Stack, R.F.; Hauer, C.; Vakharia, D.D.; Benno, A.; Kelly, W.C.; Mizejewski, G.J. Interrelationships among biological activity, disulfide bonds, secondary structure, and metal ion binding for a chemically synthesized 34-amino acid peptide derived from alpha-fetoprotein. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2001, 1528, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Eisele, L.E.; Mesfin, F.B.; Bennett, J.A.; Andersen, T.T.; Jacobsen, H.I.; Soldwedel, H.; MacColl, R.; Mizejewski, G.J. Studies on a growth-inhibitory peptide derived from alpha-fetoprotein and some analogs. J. Pept. Res. 2001, 57, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Butterstein, G.; Morrison, J.; Mizejewski, G.J. Effect of alpha-fetoprotein and derived peptides on insulin- and estrogen-induced fetotoxicity. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 2003, 18, 360–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mizejewski, G.J. The third domain fragments of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP): Mapping AFP interactions with selective and non-selective cation channels. Curr. Top. Pept. Protein Res. 2016; in press. [Google Scholar]
  32. Wonderlin, W.F.; Strobl, J.S. Potassium channel, proliferation, and G1 progression. J. Membr. Biol. 1996, 154, 91–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wonderlin, W.F.; Eoodfork, K.A.; Strobl, J.S. Changes in membrane potential during the progression of MCF-7 human mammary tumor cells through the cell cycle. J. Cell Physiol. 1995, 165, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Nilius, B.; Droogmans, G.; Wondergem, R. Transient receptor potential channels in endothelium: Solving the calcium entry puzzle? Endothelium 2003, 10, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wondergem, R.; Ecay, T.W.; Mahieu, F.; Owsianik, G.; Nilius, B. HGF/AF and menthol increase in human glioblastoma cell calcium and migration. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 372, 210–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Watanabe, H.; Vriens, J.; Janssens, A.; Wondergem, R.; Droogmans, G.; Milius, B. Modualtion of TRPV4 gating by intra and extracellular Ca2+. Cell Calcium J. 2003, 33, 489–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wondergem, R.; Bartley, J.W. Mentol increases human glioblastoma intracellular Ca2+, BK channel activity and cell migration. J. Biomed. Sci. 2009, 16, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Mizejewski, G.J. The third domain ligand binding fragment of alpha-fetoprotein: Detection of metastasis-associated molecular targets. Cancer Ther. Oncol. 2017, 6, 555700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ding, Y.; Robbins, J.; Fraser, S.P.; Grimes, J.A.; Diamogoz, M.B. Comparative studies of intracellular Ca2+ in strongly and weakly metastatic rate prostate cancer cell lines. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2006, 38, 366–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mizejewski, G.J. Breast cancer and transient receptor potential (TRP) cation channels: Is there a role for non-slective TRP channels as therapeutic cancer targets: A commentary. Int. J. Cancer Res. Dev. 2017, 2, 4–6. [Google Scholar]
  41. Liu, Q.; Xhang, H.; Jiang, X.; Qian, C.; Liu, Z.; Luo, D. Factors involved in cancer metastasis: A better understanding to “seed and soil” hypotheses. Mol. Cancer 2017, 16, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Skolmik, G.; Nage, U.; Blomqvist, G.; Djarv, L.; Ahlman, H. The role of calcium channels and serotonin (5-HT2) receptors for tumour cell lodgment in the liver. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 1989, 7, 169–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mizejewski, G.J. Breast cancer, chemokines, and metastasis: A search for decoy ligands of eh CXCR4 receptor. J. Neoplasmas 2018, 1, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Woodfork, K.A.; Wonderlin, W.F.; Perterson, C.A.; Strobl, J.S. Inhibition of ATP-sensitive potassium channels causes reversible cell-cycle arrest of human breast cancer cells in tissue culture. J. Cell Physiol. 1995, 162, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kllimatcheva, E.; Wonderlin, W.F. An ATP sensitive K(+) current that regulates progression through early G1 phase of the cell cycle in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. J. Membr. Biol. 1999, 171, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Medeja, Z.; Master, A.; Michalik, M.; Sroka, J. Contact-mediated acceleration of migration of melanoma B16 cells depends on extracellular calcium ions. Folia Biol. 2001, 49, 113–124. [Google Scholar]
  47. Wonderlin, W.F. Constitutive, translation-independent opening of the protein-conducting channel in the endoplasmic reticulum. Pflug. Arch. 2009, 457, 917–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Roy, A.; Wonderlin, W.F. The permeability of the endoplasmic reticulum is dynamically coupled to protein synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 4397–4403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Farber, J.L. The role of calcium ions in toxic cell injury. Environ. Health Perspect. 1990, 84, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Endo, M. Calcium ion as a second messenger with special reference to excitation-contraction coupling. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2006, 100, 519–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Moser, B.; Wolf, M.; Walz, A.; Loetscher, P. Chemokines: Multiple levels of leukocyte migration control. Trends Immunol. 2004, 25, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dewan, M.Z.; Ahmed, S.; Iwasaki, Y.; Ohba, K.; Toi, M.; Yamamoto, N. Stromal cell-derived factor-1 and CXCR4 receptor interaction in tumor growth and metastasis of breast cancer. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2006, 60, 273–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pan, J.; Mestas, J.; Burdick, M.D.; Phillips, R.J.; Thomas, G.V.; Reckamp, K.; Belperio, J.A.; Strieter, R.M. Stromal derived factor-1 (SDF-1/CXCL12) and CXCR4 in renal cell carcinoma metastasis. Mol. Cancer 2006, 5, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Guo, F.; Wang, Y.; Liu, J.; Mok, S.C.; Xue, F.; Zhang, W. CXCL12/CXCR4: A symbiotic bridge linking cancer cells and their stromal neighbors in oncogenic communication networks. Oncogene 2016, 35, 816–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Mukherjee, D.; Zhao, J. The role of chemokine receptor CXCr4 in breast cancer metastasis. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2013, 3, 46–57. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Xu, C.; Zhai, H.; Chen, H.; Yai, Q. CXCR4 in breast cancer: Oncogenic role and therapeutic targeting. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2015, 9, 4953–4964. [Google Scholar]
  57. Cavallaro, S. CXCR4/CXCL12 in non-small-cell lung cancer metastasis to the brain. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 1713–1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Mizejewski, G.J. Cancer, circulating tumor cells, and metastasis: Could protein-derived peptide fragments impede brain metastases? J. Cancer Metastasis Treat. 2018, 10, 205–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Atemezem, A.; Mbemba, E.; Marfaing, R.; Vaysse, J.; Pontet, M.; Saffar, L.; Charnaux, N.; Gattegno, L. Human alpha-fetoprotein binds to primary macrophages. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002, 296, 507–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Garniszek, P.; Wiercioch, R.; Sztajer, H.; Karczmarczyk, U.; Mirowski, M. Uptake of radiolabeled modified fragment of human alpha-fetoprotein by experimental mammary adenocarcinoma: In vitro and in vivo studies. Nucl. Med. Rev. Cent. East. Eur. 2005, 8, 6–10. [Google Scholar]
  61. Mizejewski, G.J. An apparent dimerization motif in the third domain of alpha fetoprotein: Molecular mimicry of the steroid/thyroid nuclear receptor superfamily. Bioessays 1993, 15, 427–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mizejewski, G.J. Alpha feto-protein binding proteins: Implications of transmembrane passage and subcellular localization. Life Sci. 1995, 56, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Global RNA microarray data from MCF-1 breast cancer cells treated with GIP. Transcripts displaying 1.0 or larger log-fold (log base 2.0) decrease for genes associated with cell division and proliferation processes, ubiquitination, and cation channels obtained from human MCF-7 breast cancer cell in vitro (see Ref. [18]).
Table 1. Global RNA microarray data from MCF-1 breast cancer cells treated with GIP. Transcripts displaying 1.0 or larger log-fold (log base 2.0) decrease for genes associated with cell division and proliferation processes, ubiquitination, and cation channels obtained from human MCF-7 breast cancer cell in vitro (see Ref. [18]).
Gene TitleFold DecreaseCell Function
I. Cell Cycle Regulation
1. Calpain (LOC 441200)−32.5Cell cycle progression
2. F-Boc/Wd40, Domain-10 (FBXW10)−14.9P27 degradation pathway
3. Serine/Threonine Kinase-33 (STK33)−9.2SH3 protein kinase
4. Establishment of Cohesion-1, Homolog (ESC02)−9.2DNA replication
5. Checkpoint Suppressor-1 (CHES1) (FOXN3)−9.2S-phase checkpoint
6. Cyclin-E−4.6Regulates G-S transition
7. SKP2 **−4.3Mediates p27 degradation
8. Transcription Dp-1 (TFDP1)−4.3Binds E2F-1; G1 to S
9. CDC20 Cell Division Homolog−4.3Activates ubiquitin
10. Triple Function Domain (TRIO)−3.7Actin remodeling
11. Histone-1, H4g (HIST1H4G)−3.2DNA repair/replication
12. Fanconi Anemia-D2 (FRANCD2)−2.0DNA repair/synthesis
II. Channel Associated Proteins
1. Potassium Voltage-gated Channel (KCNB2)−8.0Shab ion channel
2. Transmembrane Channel-Like 5 (TMC5)−5.2Ion transporter
3. Potassium Voltage-gated Channel, KQT-like (KCNQ3)−4.0Cation signaling
4. Calcium Channel, Voltage dependent of 2 (CACNA2D4)−2.0Calcium signaling
5. Calcium/Calmodulin-dependent Kinase
(CAMK2B)		−1.9Calcium regulation
6. Calcineurin A gamma (PPP3CC)−1.8Calcium phosphate 3 protein
7. Calcium Channel, Voltage Dependent
(CACNC6)		−1.8Calcium transport
Table 2. Amino acid sequencing matching of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)-derived Growth Inhibitory Peptide (GIP, P149) with various cation channel-associated and calcium-interacting proteins including ion co-transporters.
Table 2. Amino acid sequencing matching of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)-derived Growth Inhibitory Peptide (GIP, P149) with various cation channel-associated and calcium-interacting proteins including ion co-transporters.
% Identity/Similarity% Total
Hum GIP #445L S E D K L L A C G E G A A D I I I G H L C I R H E M T P V N P G V G N100/100100
Fragment GIP GIPa   GIPb   GIPc
Hum Na, Glu COTR (#163)L S G H V L R S C I H P A G S X G L E H L C L R H42/3880
Xen Na/K ATPase (#252)L S C T R L I A C C Y G N C T G A I X H L C X X T N L S S I 36/2359
Hum Actinin, α (#958)L S E Q R L L P R G E G 62/2385
Na Chanel Protein (#55)Y V Q D Q L Q A C G E G 58/2583
Hum CoFilin (#40)L S E D K K N71/071
Hum Calmodulin (#27)L S E I E L L 71/071
Xen Ache R, δ (#362)L S G D K L L S I 66/3399
Yeast MDRP ($735)L S E N K L L S P S60/3090
Mus Entactin (#1935) K L L S C G E H63/2588
Rab Ca Channel-P (#32) G L L P C A E G63/2588
Hum Nic- AcheR α (#440)  C G E V L R D V V F G L W C I R D K A T G G G S G40/2060
Rat Musc AcheR (#588)  C G N G P S R R I R A L D C L R L G R K S G A S G V G33/4174
Carp Ca Channel-P (#333)  L C G E G A A G L 33/1144
Piso ATP-syn A (31165)     A A N L T A G H L L 45/4590
Hum Calcitonin R (#210)     N S M I I I I H L C50/3080
Pig Calcitonin R (#195)     N S I I I I I H L V50/3080
Rat Calcitonin R (#195)     N S I I I I I H L V50/3070
Hum calreticulin (#3692)     I Q S I I V G H L G50/2070
Yeast Calmodulin (#21635)      N R I G Q L C I R66/1177
Pig Na/Glu COTR (#1150)      I I L S Q L C I R56/3389
Hum Calcitonin (#1550)      L C I R H S F T P A 60/3090
Mus K-Chanel P (#18)      L C I R G T L T P R60/2080
Bov ATP-channel (P) (#385)       C I Q F E L P P V N50/3080
Rat Ca/ATPase (#660)       C I H N Q M Q P V H60/40100
Rat Ca/Calm Kin-α (#118)       C I H Q I L E S V N40/5090
Rat Ca/Calm Kin-D (#118)       C I Q Q I L E S V N40/5090
Rat Na/GLN/ASNtR (#228)      R I R E E M V P V P G S V54/3892
Caeel Mech-Sen (#332)      C I K H E H A A M V L N L W E27/4774
Pig Na/Glu COTR (#510)        T A Y K P S I G N56/2278
Legend: Hum = Human; Xen = Xenopus; Na = Sodium; Mus = Mouse; Carp = Fish; and Caeel = C. elegans.
Table 3. Sequence matching of conserved amino acids of chemokine-associated proteins with alpha-fetoprotein Growth Inhibitory Peptide—P149.
Table 3. Sequence matching of conserved amino acids of chemokine-associated proteins with alpha-fetoprotein Growth Inhibitory Peptide—P149.
% Identity/Similarity% Total
AFP Peptide GIPLSEDKLLACGEGAADIIIGHLCIRHEMTPVNPGV100/0100
Fragments of GIP GIPa GIPb GIPc
Mus IL-1b QEDRLVLCLXGAXDVPVGELCRLK 42/2567
Mus Thy 1.2LSTDKLVKCGGIS 54/1569
RatThy-1L STDKLVKCGGIS 54/1569
Rab CD1-1 KLLPCGLS 63/1376
Mus IL-2 ReceptorLASXGLL IPEGHLCILND 50/1161
Hum IFN α/β IQSIIVGHLG 50/2070
Hum IL-2 IXSIIVGHLLG 50/1060
Hum CD-1 IQSIIVGHLG 50/2070
Mus C5S RVTIGPLCIR 60/2080
Mus pro-C5 RVTIGPLCTR 60/2080
Mus C5D RVTIGPLCTR 60/2080
Hum IFN-γ CISISNQPVNP 56/965
Hum Leuc CD-9 CIQRQVPPVXP 45/2772
Mus t-cell receptor CIRDNKTPST 50/2070
Hum IgG H-chain CIHHSLTPPD 50/3080
SDF-1αVNKLKILNC CIKWEY KLNK 33/5083
Legend: Mus = Mouse; Hum = Human; Rab = rabbit; and H-chain = heavy chain.
Table 4. Comparisons between chemokines versus Growth Inhibitory Peptide (GIP).
Table 4. Comparisons between chemokines versus Growth Inhibitory Peptide (GIP).
List of PropertiesChemokinesGrowth Inhibitory Peptide
(1) Amino acid length60–90 Amino acids34-amino acid (⅓ to ½’ the size)
(2) Molecular weight (Daltons)8 to 10,000 Daltons3573 Daltons
(3) Type of proteinLargely cationic and anionic fragmentAmphipathic
(4) Oligomer formationDimers, tetramers, monomersMonomer, dimer, trimer, hexamers
(5) Effective concentration rangeNanomolar to low micromolarNanomolar to low micromolar
(6) Secondary structureAntiparallel
B strands; α helix at c terminal
Random coil at NH2 COOH terminals		B strands and turns (45%); α helical only 10%, 45% random coil
(7) Receptor bindingMicromolar rangeMicromolar range
(8) HydrophobicitySurface hydrophobicity; central hydrophobicitySurface hydrophobicity (mod piece)
(9) Integrin responseIntegrin activation and signalingIntegrin interaction and signaling
(10) Calcium (Ca2+) responsivenessInduces Ca2+ mobilizationSensitive Ca2+ responsiveness (CD and bioassay)
(11) Microtubule responseInduces actin polymerizationInduces tubulin polymerization
(12) Cancer growthInhibits growth of cancer without toxicityInhibits growth of cancer without toxicity
(13) Mouse model of diabetes (NOD)Induces early onset of diabetes at high dosesInduces early onset of diabetes at high doses
(14) Species specificityPresent and reactive in rabbit, human, mouse, chicken, and frog (xenopus)Present and reactive in human, mouse, chicken, rat, frog, and brine shrimp
(15) Tissue localization (SDF-1 as ligand)Heart, brain, pancreas, placenta, lung, liver, muscle, kidney, spleen, thymus, prostate, testis, ovary, small intestine. ColonActive against colon, ovary, breast, prostate, NSC lung, skin, central nervous system (brain, kidney, leukocytes, lymphocytes, and uterine tissues)
(16) Receptor typeG-coupled receptors CCR5, CXCR4CCR5, CXCR4
(17) Platelet aggregationRegulation of platelet aggregationInhibits platelet aggregation
(18) Cell migrationRegulates and modulates cell migrationInhibits cell migration
(19) Cell adhesionInhibits/enhances cell adhesionInhibits/enhances cell adhesion
(20) Apoptosis, programmed cell deathRegulation of apoptosis (inhibition/enhancement)Inhibits apoptosis; enhances α-irradiated apoptosis
(21) Angiogenesis; neovascularizationRegulation of angiogenesis (inhibition/enhancement)Inhibits angiogenesis
(22) Increased vascular permeability; basement membrane disruptionInduces and modulates vascular permeability; induces ascites formationInhibits vascular permeability in ascites tumors
(23) Cell proliferation, tumor growthRegulates cellular proliferation, cancer (enhancement/inhibition)Inhibits cell proliferation of prostate/breast cancer and 9 tumor types
(24) Cellular differentiationRegulates cellular differentiation, myelogenesis, lymphogenesisInhibits frog metamorphosis and fetal chick development
(25) Estrogen-regulated (induced) moleculesChemokine CXCL12 (SDF-1) is estrogen-sensitive (induced) moleculeGIP-midpiece (p232) binds estradiol
(26) Estrogen (E2)-induced mitogenic activitySDF-1 mediates proliferative action of (E2) estradiolGIP suppresses proliferative action of (E2) estradiol
(27) Estrogen regulation mediated by estrogen receptor (Erα)SDF-1 induction is mediated through ErαGIP binds Erα (receptor)
(28) MAP kinase-mediated pathwaysSDF-1 is upstream effector of MAP kinaseMAP kinase is down-regulated by GIP
(29) Use of chemokine CXCR4 receptorCXCR4 is sole receptor of SDF-1CXCR4 modulates growth in ovary and breast cancer which GIP suppresses
(30) Use of CCR5 chemokine receptor in HIV and use of CCR6HIV binds to CCR5 co-receptor and to CD4 receptor, CCL28 binds CCR6Human AFP (full-length) binds to CCR5 receptor
Legend: CD = circular dichroism; CXCL12 = chemokine ligand (SDF-1); CCR5, CXCR4 = chemokine receptors; and E2 = estradiol.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mizejewski, G.J. The Role of Ion Channels and Chemokines in Cancer Growth and Metastasis: A Proposed Mode of Action Using Peptides in Cancer Therapy. Cancers 2024, 16, 1531. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16081531

AMA Style

Mizejewski GJ. The Role of Ion Channels and Chemokines in Cancer Growth and Metastasis: A Proposed Mode of Action Using Peptides in Cancer Therapy. Cancers. 2024; 16(8):1531. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16081531

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mizejewski, Gerald J. 2024. "The Role of Ion Channels and Chemokines in Cancer Growth and Metastasis: A Proposed Mode of Action Using Peptides in Cancer Therapy" Cancers 16, no. 8: 1531. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16081531

APA Style

Mizejewski, G. J. (2024). The Role of Ion Channels and Chemokines in Cancer Growth and Metastasis: A Proposed Mode of Action Using Peptides in Cancer Therapy. Cancers, 16(8), 1531. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16081531

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop