Next Article in Journal
Organocatalysis for the Asymmetric Michael Addition of Aldehydes and α,β-Unsaturated Nitroalkenes
Next Article in Special Issue
One-Pot Synthesis of TiO2/Hectorite Composite and Its Photocatalytic Degradation of Methylene Blue
Previous Article in Journal
Cr(III) Complexes Bearing a β-Ketoimine Ligand for Olefin Polymerization: Are There Differences between Coordinative and Covalent Bonding?
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Review: Photocatalysts Based on BiOCl and g-C3N4 for Water Purification
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification of Active Species in Photodegradation of Aqueous Imidacloprid over g-C3N4/TiO2 Nanocomposites

by
Thawanrat Kobkeatthawin
1,
Jirawat Trakulmututa
1,
Taweechai Amornsakchai
1,
Puangrat Kajitvichyanukul
2,* and
Siwaporn Meejoo Smith
1,*
1
Center of Sustainable Energy and Green Materials and Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, 999 Phuttamonthon Sai 4 Rd, Salaya 73170, Thailand
2
Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University 239, Huay Kaew Road, Muang District, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2022, 12(2), 120; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12020120
Submission received: 23 December 2021 / Revised: 13 January 2022 / Accepted: 16 January 2022 / Published: 19 January 2022

Abstract

:
In this work, g-C3N4/TiO2 composites were fabricated through a hydrothermal method for the efficient photocatalytic degradation of imidacloprid (IMI) pesticide. The composites were fabricated at varying loading of sonochemically exfoliated g-C3N4 (denoted as CNS). Complementary characterization results indicate that the heterojunction between the CNS and TiO2 formed. Among the composites, the 0.5CNS/TiO2 material gave the highest photocatalytic activity (93% IMI removal efficiency) under UV-Vis light irradiation, which was 2.2 times over the pristine g-C3N4. The high photocatalytic activity of the g-C3N4/TiO2 composites could be ascribed to the band gap energy reduction and suppression of photo-induced charge carrier recombination on both TiO2 and CNS surfaces. In addition, it was found that the active species involved in the photodegradation process are OH• and holes, and a possible mechanism was proposed. The g-C3N4/TiO2 photocatalysts exhibited stable photocatalytic performance after regeneration, which shows that g-C3N4/TiO2 is a promising material for the photodegradation of imidacloprid pesticide in wastewater.

1. Introduction

Imidacloprid (IMI), which is the most widely used pesticide in the group of neonicotinoids, is a pesticide that is used in agriculture such as in crop protection against aphids, leafhoppers, psyllids beetles, etc. [1], and parasite management [2]. The use of neonicotinoids has been registered in approximately 120 countries worldwide [3], and IMI is one of the top ten global agrochemicals used as a pesticide worldwide [4]. It acts as a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) agonist that interferes with the transmission in the central nervous system of insects and results in paralysis and death [5]. With their widespread use, persistent nature, and high solubility (610 mg/L in 20 °C H2O; log Kow = 0.57), IMI can cause damage to the environment via transportation in water, soil, and air [6]. Furthermore, the use of IMI can affect human health which includes neurological effects [7,8], in addition to gastrointestinal symptoms, lethargy [9], emaciation thyroid lesions, and cardiorespiratory failure [10]. Thus, the removal of these pollutants from water is essential due to their harmful influence on human health and aquatic ecosystems. Various methods can be applied for the degradation of IMI from aqueous solutions such as microfiltration membrane [11], biological degradation [12], adsorption [13,14], and advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) [15,16]. Among the AOP methods, photocatalytic activity has been used effectively in wastewater treatment for the removal of organic pollutants due to its simplicity, high activity, low cost, and ability to reduce CO2 [17,18].
Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) has attracted significant attention as a visible photocatalyst for water purification due to its stability, high surface area, eco-friendliness, and facile synthesis [19,20]. However, the disadvantage of pure g-C3N4 is the fast recombination of photogenerated electron–hole pairs which lead to low photocatalytic efficiency [21]. Many strategies have been tried to improve the photocatalytic performance such as nanostructure design [22,23], metal and non-metal doping [24], and composite photocatalysts [25,26,27,28]. Among the various strategies, photocatalysis by coupling with other semiconductor materials is a beneficial method to improve the electron recombination process and extend the visible light absorption, which can enhance the photocatalytic performance. TiO2 is an n-type semiconductor that has been widely used owing to the high efficiency, low cost, non-toxicity, and long-term stability of this compound. However, because of the large band gap energy of 3.2 eV of TiO2, this results in the ineffective utilization of visible light, low quantum efficiency, and fast recombination [29]. It is expected that coupling TiO2 with g-C3N4 can improve electron–hole pair recombination, broaden the photo-response range, and promote oxidation and reduction processes.
Herein, g-C3N4/TiO2 photocatalysts were synthesized by a simple hydrothermal method. The phase structure, chemical composition, morphology, and scavenger trapping were investigated in detail. The g-C3N4/TiO2 photocatalysts were used to degrade imidacloprid pesticide in wastewater under UV-Vis light irradiation. The recyclability of the composite was studied. In addition, the possible photodegradation mechanism was also proposed in this study.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characterization

The XRD patterns of bulk-CN, CNS, TiO2, and 0.5TiO2/g-C3N4 are shown in Figure 1a. The g-C3N4 has two main diffraction peaks at 13.1° and 27.5°, which corresponds to the (001) plane caused by the arrangement of the tri-s-triazine units and the (002) plane caused by the interlayer stacking of the conjugated aromatic ring (JCPDS 87-1526) [29]. After the exfoliation of the bulk-CN, the decrease of CNS intensity (002) peak indicated that the interlayer structure was partially destroyed [30,31], and the slight shift of the (002) peak is attributed to the decreased distance of the basic sheets in the nanosheets [32]. The peaks of pure TiO2 at 25.3, 37.8, 48.0, 53.9, 62.7, 68.8, 70.3, 75.0, and 82.6° correspond to the (101), (004), (200), (211), (204), (116), (220), (215), and (224) crystal planes of anatase TiO2 (JCPDS 21-1272) [33]. Hydrothermally synthesized g-C3N4/TiO2 photocatalysts showed the patterns related to both pure g-C3N4 and TiO2. In addition, there is no obvious change in the peaks of TiO2 in the composites, indicating that coupling with g-C3N4 did not influence the phase structure of TiO2.
The Raman spectra of g-C3N4, TiO2, and g-C3N4/TiO2 composites are shown in Figure 1b. The characteristic peaks of g-C3N4 appeared at 707 cm−1 and 1230 cm−1 which were assigned to the breathing modes of the tri-s-triazine ring and C-N heterocycles, respectively [34]. Moreover, all the Raman bands observed for bulk-CN can be found in the CNS. The Raman spectrum of pure TiO2 exhibited peaks at 148, 395, 510, and 640 cm−1 corresponding to anatase-phase TiO2 [35]. 15CNS/TiO2 showed a combination peak of g-C3N4 and TiO2 which confirms the formation of composites. No peak shifts were observed, which means no structural changes occurred during the preparation of the composites with pure TiO2 and g-C3N4.
The chemical binding states of g-C3N4, TiO2, and composites were studied through XPS analysis. Figure 2a displays the survey scan of bulk-CN, CNS, TiO2, and g-C3N4/TiO2 in various weight ratios which confirmed the presence of C, N, Ti, and O atoms in the composites. Figure 2b shows three high-resolution C 1s spectrums at binding energies of 285.0, 288.3, and 289.2 eV, assigned as C-C, N–C=N, and sp2 hybridized carbon in the tri-s-triazine ring (N2-C=N) for g-C3N4.
Four binding energies in N 1s spectra (Figure 2c) can be observed, which can be classified into to sp2 hybridized nitrogen C-N=C (398.8 eV), tertiary nitrogen N-(C)3 (399.2 eV), amino functional groups N–H (400.3 eV), and π-excitation (401.2 eV), respectively [36,37,38]. The C 1s and N 1s spectra are slightly shifted from primitive g-C3N4 which suggests that there is a chemical bond connection between g-C3N4 and TiO2 [39]. The C/N ratio of g-C3N4 is 0.90, indicating the presence of nitrogen vacancies that probably occurred during the thermal reduction process [40]. EPR spectra can provide evidence for probing the surface vacancies in photocatalysts. As shown in Figure 2f, the EPR intensity signal of CNS is significantly enhanced, revealing the increase of nitrogen vacancies generated in gC3N4 [41]. Figure 2d shows the high-resolution Ti 2p spectrum. The binding energy peaks of Ti 2p3/2 and Ti 2p1/2 appeared at 459.3 and 465.0 eV, which represent Ti4+ species in the form of TiO2 clusters [42]. In addition, there might be another Ti species in the material due to the poor XPS peak fitting for the Ti4+ alone. A better XPS profile fitting was later obtained by including a peak at 460.2 eV, being assigned as the Ti3+ defects on the composite surface [43,44]. The O 1s spectrum in Figure 2e can be devised into three peaks in TiO2 with the binding energy of 530.5, 531.9, and 533.2 eV which can be assigned to (Ti-O), oxygen vacancy (Vo), and water molecules adsorbed on the surface of TiO2, respectively [45]. Figure 2f shows the result of the solid ESR measurement which was used to confirm the presence of Ti3+. A strong EPR signal of TiO2 and the composites was observed with g of 1.997, which corresponds with Ti3+ defect (3d1, S = 1/2) and oxygen vacancy (Vo) [46]. It is possible that Ti4+ was reduced to Ti3+ by the loss of oxygen from the surface of TiO2 because of the hydrothermal treatment at a high temperature [47].

2.2. Morphology Study

The morphologies of bulk-CN, CNS, TiO2, and 0.5CNS/TiO2 composites were examined by SEM as shown in Figure 3. We can see that bulk-CN presents in the form of bulk morphology with a layered structure (Figure 3a) [48]. CNS revealed smaller particles like the nanosheet structure after thermal exfoliation with HNO3 (Figure 3b). The BET surface area of bulk-CN and CNS were calculated to be 68.26 and 91.61 m2g−1, respectively. It is possible that the van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonds of g-C3N4 might be destroyed with thermal treatment which results in the separation of g-C3N4 into small layers [49,50]. In addition, nitric acid might be intercalated into interlayers of bulk-CN which caused the expansion of their interlayer space and reduction of the layer thickness and hence increased its surface area [51,52]. The obtained TiO2 showed spherical-like morphology with a particle size around 10 nm. From Figure 3d, it can be seen that the CNS particles having thin-layered structures are well distributed on the surface of TiO2 particles, which is consistent with the presence of the peaks of g-C3N4 in XRD, XPS, and Raman spectra.

2.3. Optical Study

Figure 4a shows the UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectra of g-C3N4, TiO2, and g-C3N4/TiO2 composites. The exfoliated g-C3N4 nanosheets show an absorption edge at 470 nm with a band gap of 2.93 eV, which was in agreement with previous reports [53]. The absorption spectra of the TiO2 shows an absorption edge at around 400 nm with a band gap of 3.20 eV. The presence of g-C3N4 resulted in the red shift of the absorption edge in all composites, revealing that the composites can be applied to visible-light photocatalysis. In addition, the presence of Ti3+-TiO2 can narrow the wide band gap of TiO2 for harvesting visible light and can provide an increase in electronic conductivity [54].
The band gap energy was calculated using the Tauc plot in Equation (1) and is shown in Figure 4b [55].
αhν = A(hν − Eg)1/2
where α is the optical absorption coefficient, h is Planck’s constant, ν is photon frequency, A is constant, and Eg is band gap.
The band gaps of pure g-C3N4, TiO2, and 0.5CNS/TiO2 were calculated to be 2.93, 3.20, and 3.17 eV, respectively.
Photoluminescence analysis was performed in order to determine the electron–hole recombination which is shown in Figure 4c. Under excitation at 320 nm, the emission peak of g-C3N4 appears at around 457 nm. The bulk-CN and CNS showed high PL intensity because of the fast recombination of electron–hole pairs, whereas TiO2 showed a broad emission peak at 410 nm and a lower maximum peak than that of the g-C3N4 system. After the hybridization of g-C3N4 and TiO2, the composite showed a much weaker emission peak, implying that the recombination of charge carriers may be effectively inhibited.

2.4. Photocatalytic Study

The photocatalytic performance of g-C3N4, TiO2, and composites was evaluated for IMI degradation under UV-Vis light irradiation in Figure 5. Photolysis of IMI degradation was carried out under the same conditions, as can be seen from Figure S2. It was found that the photolysis is not the main cause of effective degradation of IMI. On the other hand, the treatments of IMI with catalysts are less effective in dark conditions. From this result, the g-C3N4 system exhibited low photocatalytic efficiency in the degradation of IMI. This could be because of the fast recombination of electron–hole pairs, as evidenced by PL spectra (Figure 4c). However, it was found that exfoliated g-C3N4 showed higher photocatalytic activity than bulk-g-C3N4. It could be explained as the effects of a larger specific surface area, narrow band gap, and nitrogen defects which improved photogenerated charge separation and transfer [56]. In addition, the incorporation of TiO2 clearly enhances the photocatalytic activity of g-C3N4. Specifically, 0.5CNS/TiO2 and 1CNS/TiO2 exhibited excellent photocatalytic activity, and photocatalysts were able to degrade 93.1% and 88.3% of IMI within 150 min, while pure TiO2 and g-C3N4 only degraded IMI by 79.7% and 51.8%, respectively. It is reasonable that there might have been a synergetic effect between TiO2 and g-C3N4. g-C3N4 can narrow the band gap energy and increase solar absorption efficiency. In addition, Ti3+ and oxygen vacancies (Ov) in TiO2 can suppress the recombination of photogenerated electron–hole pairs and promote charge separation [57] which led to high photocatalytic degradation of IMI. As seen in Figure 4c, CNS gave a very broad PL spectrum having a very high intensity. In addition, the PL intensity from 0.5CNS/TiO2 was found just slightly higher than that from the TiO2 material (much weaker than that of CNS). Several works [58,59] related the intensity of PL spectra to the oxidation–reduction potential between the conduction band and the valence band. PL spectra with lower intensity described a low probability of photogenerated electron–hole recombination. Although PL results suggest a slightly faster recombination rate on the 0.5CNS/TiO2, its relatively narrow band gap (compared with TiO2) promoted superior IMI removal efficiencies (Figure 5). It should be noted that the loading level of g-C3N4 played an important role in improving the IMI photodegradation. It was found that the photocatalytic rate of activity slightly decreased after 90 min irradiation time when the loading of g-C3N4 was increased from 4% to 15%. This might be due to the fast recombination of the electron–hole pair in g-C3N4. Furthermore, from Figure 5, 0.5CNS/TiO2 gave a higher IMI degradation rate than that of 1CNS/TiO2, as seen from the slope. However, the IMI removal efficiencies obtained from the 4CNS/TiO2 treatment were higher during 0–120 min. Effective photodegradation of organic compounds requires a suitable amount of stable radical species in the aqueous media. Too-high concentrations of radical species may cause termination of the radical reaction pathway, while insufficient radical concentrations resulted in slow degradation rates and low removal efficiencies. We could explain the removal efficiencies by the varied concentrations of radicals over time. Hence, after 150 min, three samples (i.e., 0.5CNS/TiO2, 1CNS/TiO2, and TiO2) gave % IMI removal efficiencies of 80% and above, likely due to the suitable amount of stable radical species in the aqueous media through the prolonged degradation process.
The initial rate constants, derived from the first-order kinetic fitting curve (Figure 5b), for the photodegradation of IMI from the highest to the lowest, are given in the order of 4CN/TiO2 (1.50 × 10−2 min−1), 10CNS/TiO2 (9.96 × 10−3 min−1), 0.5CNS/TiO2 (9.70 × 10−3 min−1), 15CNS/TiO2 (8.26 × 103), CNS (8.00 × 10−3 min−1), TiO2 (7.60 × 10−3 min−1), bulk-CN (6.13 × 10−3 min−1), and 1CNS/TiO2 (1.88 × 10−3 min−1) catalysts. As a result, the initial rate constants are poorly correlated with the IMP removal efficiencies after 180 min of irradiation time, possibly due to the stability of radical species as a function of time discussed earlier.

2.5. Reusability and Regeneration

The stability of the photocatalysts was evaluated over multiple cycles of IMI degradation. As shown in Figure 6a, the IMI removal efficiency of 0.5CN/TiO2 decreased significantly in the fourth cycle. The SEM image (Figure 6b,c) shows that the sheet-like morphology of the photocatalyst remained. However, the surface of the catalysts could be covered either by reactants or products that hindered photocatalytic performance. A regeneration experiment was carried out. After the photocatalysis experiment, the catalyst was separated from the reaction mixture by centrifugation. The used photocatalyst was regenerated by stirring in water (dark) for 1 h and irradiated for 2.5 h before using it in the next cycle. It was found that the 0.5CN/TiO2 composite still kept ~91% regeneration efficiency at the end of the fourth cycle, indicating a relatively high regeneration potential of the nanocomposite.
From this work, the bulk carbon nitride is less suitable than the exfoliated material to be incorporated with TiO2 for photocatalytic applications. The IMI removal efficiencies obtained from the 4CNS/TiO2 treatment are significantly higher (ca. 30%) than those obtained from 4CN/TiO2 (Figure S1, Supplementary Data). The photocatalytic performance of several carbon nitride based composites in the degradation of imidacloprid is given in Table 1.
As seen in Table 1, a quite prolonged reaction time (5 h) was required in order to achieve high IMI removal efficiencies in the photocatalytic treatments of IMI (aq) over the g-C3N4 materials, and the photocatalytic performance of g-C3N4 is precursor-dependent. Direct comparison of the catalytic performance of the reported photocatalysts and those developed in this work could not be entirely appropriate as each report utilized specific performance testing setups and conditions (initial concentration, catalyst loading, and reaction time). Nevertheless, a greater number of steps and expensive chemicals would be required to prepare several functional photocatalysts (0.04C60/PCN, Ag-Bi2O3/g-C3N4, Bi2WO6: NH2-MOF, Ag4V2O7/g-C3N4), compared to this work.

2.6. Photocatalytic Mechanism

To find out the major active species for the photocatalytic oxidation, several scavengers were added to the photocatalytic system individually to trap and remove active species (Figure 7). Ammonium oxalate (AO), isopropanol (IPA), and benzoquinone (BQ) act as scavengers to holes (h+), hydroxyl radical (•OH), and superoxide radical (•O2), respectively. The addition of p-benzoquinone had a little effect on the photocatalytic degradation of IMI, implying that •O2 has a minor role in the reaction as an oxidative species. In contrast, the photodegradation activity of the 0.5CNS/TiO2 had a dramatic decrease with the addition of IPA and AO, suggesting that both OH and holes are the main oxidative species in this system.
In order to describe the photocatalytic mechanism of 0.5CNS/TiO2 for the degradation of IMI, the CB and VB edge potentials of g-C3N4 and TiO2 were calculated from Equations (2) and (3) [66].
ECB = X Ec − 1/2Eg
EVB = ECB + Eg
where X is the absolute electronegativity of the atom semiconductor, and the X values of TiO2 and g-C3N4 are 5.8 eV and 4.73 eV, respectively [66]. Ec is the energy of free electrons of the hydrogen scale (4.5 Ev). Eg is the band gap of the semiconductor which is 2.93 and 3.20 eV for g-C3N4 and TiO2, respectively. Therefore, the reductive potentials of the conduction band (CB) are −0.30 and −1.23 V for TiO2 and g-C3N4, and the oxidizing potentials of the valence band (VB) of TiO2 and g-C3N4 are +2.90 and +1.70 V, respectively.
Based on the above results, the possible Z-scheme photocatalytic mechanism of g-C3N4/TiO2 was proposed as shown in Figure 8. Under UV-Vis irradiation, TiO2 absorbed photon energy, and then electrons were excited from the VB to the CB. The photogenerated holes tended to stay in the VB of TiO2, whereas photogenerated electrons on the CB of TiO2 can be directly transferred into the VB of g-C3N4 due to their proximity to each other. Then, the electrons in the VB of g-C3N4 are further excited into the CB. This resulted in an efficient charge separation of the photo-induced electron–hole pair and an enhancement in their oxidation–reduction ability. Specifically, the presence of Ti3+ and oxygen vacancy could be an important reason for the hindrance of the electron–hole recombination. It was found that the photogenerated holes (h+) in the VB of TiO2 (EVB = 2.90 V vs. NHE) have the ability to oxidize H2O or hydroxyl ions (OH) to hydroxyl radicals (•OH), while the photogenerated h+ in the VB of g-C3N4 (EVB = 1.70 V vs. NHE) is not sufficient for the oxidation of H2O to hydroxyl radicals. In addition, the photogenerated electron in the CB of g-C3N4 was trapped on the surface to form reactive superoxide radical ions (•O2). The photocatalytic mechanism was consistent with the scavenger experiments in which the hydroxyl radical and holes were the principal reactive species for the IMI degradation, whereas the superoxide radical had a minor role. The Z-scheme photocatalyst was suggested since the photogenerated h+ on the TiO2/g-C3N4 composite has a sufficient oxidation potential for producing •OH radicals [67]. Evaluated by using Equations (2) and (3), the reduction potential of g-C3N4 (+1.70 V) is less positive to oxidize H2O to •OH (+1.99 V). Thus, the holes in the VB of g-C3N4 cannot adsorb water molecules near the surface of g-C3N4 to generate hydroxyl radicals (•OH). Note that •OH radicals can be produced on semiconductors with an oxidation potential of 2.4 V (and above) versus NHE. The scavenging testing indicated that •OH radicals are the key radicals promoting effective IMI degradation. The Z-scheme g-C3N4/TiO2 composites showed better photocatalytic performance than TiO2 or g-C3N4 alone. However, with the content of g-C3N4 in g-C3N4/TiO2 being in excess, numerous photo-induced electrons and holes would recombine easily. Therefore, the 0.5CNS/TiO2 sample displayed the best photocatalytic performance among these different g-C3N4/TiO2 photocatalysts.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemicals

Urea (CH4N2O) was obtained from Kemaus, Australia. Ammonium oxalate (NH4)2C2O4, nitric acid (HNO3), and methanol (CH3OH) were purchased from Merck, Darmstadt, Germany. Benzoquinone, isopropyl alcohol, titanium (IV) oxysulfate (TiOSO4) and imidacloprid were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, USA. All reagents were of analytical grade and were used without further purification. Deionized water was used in preparing all aqueous solutions.

3.2. Characterization

The sample was determined using powder X-ray diffraction (Bruker AXS, D8 advance, Germany) with CuKα radiation (λ = 1.54 Å) and was collected in 2θ range from 10° to 90°. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was carried out to determine the surface electronic state of the samples with a monochromatized Al Kα radiation source (AXIS Ultra DLD, Japan). The Raman spectra were recorded using Raman microscope at laser wavelength of 785 nm (Horiba, XploRA Plus, France). The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) signals of free radicals were recorded at ambient temperature (Bruker; Elexsys 500, Germany). The morphologies and elemental composites of the samples were examined by a scanning electron microscope (JEOL, JSM-IT500, Japan) and Field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, JEOL, JSM-7610FPlus, Japan). Photoluminescence (PL) spectrum was performed with excitation at 320 nm (Horiba, FluoroMax, France). The band gap energy of the prepared samples was carried out by UV-Vis NIR spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, UV3600 plus, Tokyo, Japan). The degradation of IMI was monitored by measuring the absorbance at 268 nm with a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer, Lambda 800, MA, USA).

3.3. Synthesis of g-C3N4

Bulk-g-C3N4 was prepared by direct pyrolysis of urea according to a reported procedure with modification [68]. In detail, 125 g of urea was put into an alumina crucible with a cover and heated with a heating rate of 10 °C/min to 600 °C for 4 h. After being cooled to room temperature, the pale yellow of bulk-g-C3N4 (CN) was obtained. The bulk-CN was exfoliated into a nanosheet structure by thermal exfoliation in the presence of acid, and 2.5 g of bulk-CN was stirred in 65 % of HNO3 solution (100 mL) for 12 h. The dispersion was filtrated and washed several times with D.I. water, followed by annealing at 500 °C for 4 h to obtain g-C3N4 nanosheet (CNS).

3.4. Synthesis of g-C3N4/TiO2 Composites

g-C3N4/TiO2 composites were prepared by a hydrothermal method. Firstly, TiOSO4 suspensions were obtained by sonication for 35 min in D.I. water. After dispersing, CNS was added into the solution and was sonicated continuously for 30 min. The solution was transferred to a Teflon-lined autoclave which was then further heated at 180 °C for 4 h. The obtained solution was centrifuged, washed with D.I. water, and dried at 65 °C for 24 h. According to the above method, different weight ratios of g-C3N4 to TiO2 at 0.5%, 1%, 4%, 10%, and 15% were synthesized and labeled as 0.5CNS/TiO2, 1CNS/TiO2, 4CNS/TiO2, 10CNS/TiO2, and 15CNS/TiO2, respectively. TiO2 was also prepared by the same procedure without adding g-C3N4.

3.5. Photocatalytic Activity

The photocatalytic behavior of the catalyst was evaluated by the photodegradation of imidacloprid in an aqueous solution with an initial concentration of 10 mg/L under 300 watts of W lamp. First, 10 mg of photocatalyst was added to 10 mL of IMI solution. The suspension was stirred using a magnetic stirrer in the dark at room temperature for 1 h before irradiation. The solution was collected every 30 min to 150 min using a syringe with a microspore filter (0.45 µm). The concentration of IMI was analyzed by UV-Vis spectrophotometry at 268 nm, and the removal efficiency was calculated via Equation (4) [69].
Where C0 is the initial concentration of IMI, and Ct is the concentration of IMI after t minutes.
To study the reaction kinetic, the obtained data were fitted by a first-order kinetic model which is shown in Equation (2).
ln(C0/C) = kt
where k is the pseudo-first-order rate constant, C0 is the initial IMI concentration, and C is imidacloprid equilibrium concentration in aqueous solution at time t.

3.6. Scavenger Activity

Active species capture experiments were used to study the photocatalysis mechanism. First, isopropyl alcohol (IPA; 0.5 mM) was used as the hydroxyl scavenger (•OH˙), benzoquinone (BQ; 0.5 mM) was employed as the superoxide scavenger (•O2), and ammonium oxalate (AO; 0.5 mM) was used as the hole scavenger (h+) [70]. Different scavengers were used in the trapping experiments to check the inhibitory effect of scavengers during the photocatalytic reaction under analogous irradiation experimental conditions.

4. Conclusions

In this work, g-C3N4 nanosheets were exfoliated from bulk-g-C3N4 by thermal exfoliation in the presence of HNO3. The exfoliated g-C3N4 resulted in nanosheets with a large specific surface area and N vacancy defects, which can be prepared and further used in the fabrication of TiO2 base composites having superior photocatalytic activity, under UV-Vis light irradiation, to bulk the g-C3N4 and g-C3N4/TiO2 composites. Results show that the g-C3N4/TiO2 photocatalyst exhibited higher removal efficiency for IMI than g-C3N4 and TiO2, indicating that a synergistic effect exists between Ti3+-TiO2 and g-C3N4. With the increase of g-C3N4 loading, the photocatalytic activity of g-C3N4/TiO2 composites may also decrease the photocatalytic activity of g-C3N4. The sample of 0.5CNS/TiO2 showed the highest photocatalytic activity with 93% removal efficiency within 150 min. The enhanced photocatalytic performance of the g-C3N4/TiO2 composites could be due to the generation of reactive oxidation species induced by photogenerated electrons and the effective suppression of the recombination of the charge carriers. In addition, the g-C3N4/TiO2 photocatalyst showed good stability for multiple recycling. Thus, the g-C3N4/TiO2 could be effectively used as material for the photodegradation of imidacloprid pesticide in wastewater. Comprehensive photoelectrochemical analysis of the g-C3N4/TiO2 materials should be further studied to obtain the photogenerated charge recombination rates in detail.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/catal12020120/s1, Figure S1: Powder XRD patterns of 1CNS/TiO2, 4CNS/TiO2, 10CNS/TiO2, and 15CNS/TiO2, Figure S2: Photolysis of imidacloprid.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, visualization, T.K. and S.M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, T.K. and J.T.; writing— review and editing, S.M.S.; supervision, T.A. and S.M.S.; writing—review and editing, S.M.S.; resources, P.K. and S.M.S.; funding acquisition, P.K. and S.M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

National Research Council of Thailand (Grant No. IRN62W0005).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available in Mendeley repository at doi:10.17632/3v2mgmgzpz.1.

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the National Research Council Thailand (Grant No. IRN62W0005). We thank Mahidol University Frontier Research Facility (MU-FRF) for instrument support and the MU-FRF scientists, Nawapol Udpuay and Suwilai Chaveanghong, for their kind assistance in Raman and FE-SEM analyses.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wumuerhan, P.; Yuntao, J.; Deying, M. Effects of exposure to imidacloprid direct and poisoned cotton aphids Aphis gossypii on ladybird Hippodamia variegata feeding behavior. J. Pestic. Sci. 2020, 45, 24–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Stanneck, D.; Ebbinghaus-Kintscher, U.; Schoenhense, E.; Kruedewagen, E.M.; Turberg, A.; Leisewitz, A.; Jiritschka, W.; Krieger, K.J. The synergistic action of imidacloprid and flumethrin and their release kinetics from collars applied for ectoparasite control in dogs and cats. Parasites Vectors 2012, 5, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Borsuah, J.F.; Messer, T.L.; Snow, D.D.; Comfort, S.D.; Mittelstet, A.R. Literature review: Global neonicotinoid insecticide occurrence in aquatic environments. Water 2020, 12, 3388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Berheim, E.H.; Jenk, J.A.; Lundgren, J.G.; Michel, E.S.; Grove, D.; Jensen, W.F. Effects of neonicotinoid insecticides on physiology and reproductive characteristics of captive female and fawn white-tailed deer. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 4534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Yang, E.C.; Chuang, Y.C.; Chen, Y.L.; Chang, L.H. Abnormal foraging behavior induced by sublethal dosage of imidacloprid in the honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2008, 101, 1743–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nyman, A.-M.; Hintermeister, A.; Schirmer, K.; Ashauer, R. The insecticide imidacloprid causes mortality of the freshwater amphipod gammarus pulex by interfering with feeding behavior. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e62472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Sriapha, C.; Trakulsrichai, S.; Tongpool, A.; Pradoo, A.; Rittilert, P.; Wananukul, W. Acute imidacloprid poisoning in Thailand. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2020, 16, 1081–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mundhe, S.A.; Birajdar, S.V.; Chavan, S.S.; Pawar, N.R. Imidacloprid poisoning: An emerging cause of potentially fatal poisoning. Indian J. Crit Care Med. 2017, 21, 786–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Crall, J.D.; Switzer, C.M.; Oppenheime, R.L.; Versypt, A.N.F.; Dey, B.; Brown, A.; Eyster, M.; Guérin, C.; Pierce, N.E.; Combes, S.A.; et al. Neonicotinoid exposure disrupts bumblebee nest behavior, social networks, and thermoregulation. Science 2018, 362, 683–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Patil, A.L.; Patil, P.N.; Gogate, P.R. Degradation of imidacloprid containing wastewaters using ultrasound-based treatment strategies. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2014, 21, 1778–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, Y.; Lu, H.; Wang, B.; Zhang, Z.; Lin, X.; Chen, Z.; Li, B. Removal of imidacloprid and acetamiprid from tea infusions by microfiltration membrane. Int. J. Food Sci. 2015, 50, 1397–1404. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sabourmoghaddam, N.; Zakaria, M.P.; Omar, D. Evidence for the microbial degradation of imidacloprid in soils of Cameron Highlands. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 2015, 14, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Urbain, K.Y.; Fodjo, E.K.; Ardjouma, D.; Serge, B.Y.; Aimé, E.S.; Marc, G.B.I.; Albert, T. Removal of imidacloprid using activated carbon produced from ricinodendron heudelotii shells. Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiop. 2017, 31, 397–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Mohammad, S.G.; El-Sayed, M.M.H. Removal of imidacloprid pesticide using nanoporous activated carbons produced via pyrolysis of peach stone agricultural wastes. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2020, 208, 1069–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Soltani-nezhad, F.; Saljooqi, A.; Shamspur, T.; Mostafavi, A. Photocatalytic degradation of imidacloprid using GO/Fe3O4/TiO2-NiO under visible radiation: Optimization by response level method. Polyhedron 2019, 165, 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lacson, C.F.Z.; de Luna, M.D.G.; Dong, C.; Garcia-Segura, S.; Lu, M.-C. Fluidized-bed fenton treatment of imidacloprid: Optimization and degradation pathway. Sustain. Environ. Res. 2018, 28, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lee, Y.-J.; Ka, J.-K.; Park, S.-J.; Lee, C.-G.; Moon, J.-K.; Alvarez, P.J.J. Photocatalytic degradation of neonicotinoid insecticides using sulfate-doped Ag3PO4 with enhanced visible light activity. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2020, 402, 126183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kumar, A.; Pandey, G. A review on the factors affecting the photocatalytic degradation of hazardous materials. Mater. Sci. Eng. Int. 2017, 1, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Wen, J.; Xie, J.; Chen, X.; Li, X. A review on g-C3N4-based photocatalysts. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 391, 72–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, R.; Chen, Z.; Yao, Y.; Li, Y.; Cheema, W.A.; Wang, D.; Zhu, S. Recent advancements in g-C3N4-based photocatalysts for photocatalytic CO2 reduction: A mini review. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 29408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zou, L.R.; Huang, G.-F.; Li, D.-F.; Liu, J.-H.; Pan, A.-L.; Huang, W.-Q. A facile and rapid route for synthesis of g-C3N4 nanosheets with high adsorption capacity and photocatalytic activity. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 86688–86694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yang, Y.; Chen, J.; Mao, Z.; An, N.; Wang, D.; Fahkman, B.D. Ultrathin g-C3N4 nanosheets with an extended visible-light-responsive range for significant enhancement of photocatalysis. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Wang, P.; Yang, M.; Tang, S.; Chen, F.; Li, Y. Preparation of cellular C3N4/CoSe2/GA composite photocatalyst and its CO2 reduction activity. Chem. J. Chin. Univ. 2021, 42, 6. [Google Scholar]
  24. Jiang, L.; Yuan, X.; Pan, Y.; Liang, J.; Zeng, G.; Wu, Z.; Wang, H. Doping of graphitic carbon nitride for photocatalysis: A review. Appl. Catal. B 2017, 217, 388–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, H.; Liu, F.; Wu, H.; CaO, X.; Sun, J.; Lei, W. In situ synthesis of g-C3N4/TiO2 heterostructures with enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution under visible light. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 40327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Kanwal, M.; Tariq, S.R.; Chotana, G.A. Photocatalytic degradation of imidacloprid by Ag-ZnO composite. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 27307–27320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lin, X.; Du, S.; Li, C.; Li, G.; Li, Y.; Chen, F.; Fang, P. Consciously Constructing the Robust NiS/g-C3N4 Hybrids for Enhanced Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. Catal. Lett. 2020, 150, 1898–1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, P.; Liu, F.; Ding, H.; Chen, S.; Chen, L.; Li, Y.-J.; Au, C.-T.; Yin, S.-F. Porous double-shell CdS@C3N4 octahedron derived by in situ supramolecular self-assembly for enhanced photocatalytic activity. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 252, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Schneider, J.; Matsuoka, M.; Takeuchi, M.; Zhang, J.; Horiuchi, Y.; Anpo, M.; Bahnemann, D.W. Understanding TiO2 photocatalysis: Mechanisms and materials. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 9919–9986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ma, Y.; Liu, E.; Hu, X.; Tang, C.; Wan, J.; Li, J.; Fan, J. A simple process to prepare few-layer g-C3N4 nanosheets with enhanced photocatalytic activities. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 358, 246–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Niu, P.; Zhang, L.; Liu, G.; Cheng, H.-M. Graphene-like carbon nitride nanosheets for improved photocatalytic activities. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 4763–4770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, Y.; Yang, M.; Xing, Y.; Liu, X.; Yang, Y.; Wang, X.; Song, S. Preparation of carbon-rich g-C3N4 nanosheets with enhanced visible light utilization for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production. Small 2017, 13, 1701552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Robotti, M.; Dosta, S.; Cana, I.G.; Concustell, A.; Cinca, N.; Guilemany, J.M. Attrition and cryogenic milling powder production for low pressure cold gas spray and composite coatings characterization. Adv. Powder Technol. 2016, 27, 1257–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, M.; Ma, F.; Wang, Z.; Hu, D.; Xu, X.; HaO, X. Graphitic carbon nitride, a saturable absorber material for the visible waveband. Photonics Res. 2018, 6, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. El-Deen, S.S.; Hashem, A.M.; Abdel Ghany, A.E.; Indris, S.; Ehrenberg, H.; Mauger, A.; Julien, C.M. Anatase TiO2 nanoparticles for lithium-ion batteries. Ionics 2018, 24, 2925–2934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, J.-R.; Ma, Y.; Wang, S.-Y.; Ding, J.; Gao, B.; Kan, E.; Hua, W. Accurate K-edge X-ray photoelectron and absorption spectra of g-C3N4 nanosheets by first-principles simulations and reinterpretations. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 22819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Che, W.; Cheng, W.; Yao, T.; Tang, F.; Liu, W.; Su, H.; Huang, Y.; Liu, O.; Hu, F.; Pan, Z.; et al. Fast photoelectron transfer in (C ring)-C3N4 plane heterostructural nanosheets for overall water splitting. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 3021–3026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Bi, G.; Wen, J.; Li, X.; Liu, W.; Xie, J.; Fang, Y.; Zhang, W. Efficient visible-light photocatalytic H2 evolution over metal-free g-C3N4 co-modified with robust acetylene black and Ni(OH)2 as dual co-catalysts. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 31497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Du, X.; Bai, X.; Xu, L.; Yang, L.; Jin, P. Visible-light activation of persulfate by TiO2/g-C3N4 photocatalyst toward efficient degradation of micropollutants. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2020, 384, 123245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cao, J.; Pan, C.; Ding, Y.; Li, W.; Lv, K.; Tang, H. Constructing nitrogen vacancy introduced g-C3N4 p-n homojunction for enhanced photocatalytic activity. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 102984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, J.; Gao, B.; Dou, M.; Huang, X.; Ma, Z. A porous g-C3N4 nanosheets containing nitrogen defects for enhanced photocatalytic removal meropenem: Mechanism, degradation pathway and DFT calculation. Environ. Res. 2020, 184, 109339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Xi, J.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, X.; Hu, Y. A simple sol-gel hydrothermal method for the synthesis of defective TiO2 nanocrystals with excellent visible-light photocatalytic activity. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2020, 46, 2205–2214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bharti, B.; Kumar, S.; Lee, H.-N.; Kumar, R. Formation of oxygen vacancies and Ti3+ state in TiO2 thin film and enhanced optical properties by air plasma treatment. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 32355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. HaO, J.; Hu, Y.; Jiang, H.; Li, C. In situ surface hydrogenation synthesis of Ti3+self-doped TiO2 with enhanced visible light photoactivity. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 9078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Cheng, D.; Li, Y.; Yang, L.; Luo, S.; Yang, L.; Luo, X.; Luo, Y.; Li, T.; Gao, J.; Dionysiou, D.D. One step reductive synthesis of Ti3+ self–doped elongated anatase TiO2 nanowires combined with reduced graphene oxide for adsorbing and degrading waste engine oil. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 378, 120752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Swaminathan, J.; Ravichandran, S. Insights into the defect-centered electrocatalytic behavior of reduced titania (TiO1.23). J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 1670–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mohajernia, S.; Andryskova, P.; Zoppellaro, G.; Hejazi, S.; Kment, S.; Zboril, R.; Schmidt, J.; Schmuki, P. Influence of Ti3+ defect-type on heterogeneous photocatalytic H2 evolution activity of TiO2. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 1432–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, H.; Bu, Y.; Wu, G.; Zouc, X. The promotion of the photocatalytic nitrogen fixation ability of nitrogen vacancy-embedded graphitic carbon nitride by replacing the corner-site carbon atom with phosphorus. Dalton Tran. 2019, 48, 11724–11731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yang, L.; Liu, X.; Liu, Z.; Wang, C.; Liu, G.; Li, Q.; Feng, X. Enhanced photocatalytic activity of g-C3N4 2D nanosheets through thermal exfoliation using dicyandiamide as precursor. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 20613–20619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Che, H.; Liu, L.; Che, G.; Dong, H.; Liu, C.; Li, C. Control of energy band, layer structure and vacancy defect of graphitic carbon nitride by intercalated hydrogen bond effect of NO3 toward improving photocatalytic performance. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 357, 209–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dong, F.; Li, Y.H.; Wang, Z.Y. Enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity and oxidation ability of porous graphene-like g-C3N4 nanosheets via thermal exfoliation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 358, 393–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wu, X.; Gao, D.; Yua, H.; Yu, J. High-yield lactic acid-mediated route for g-C3N4 nanosheet photocatalyst with enhanced H2-evolution performance. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 9608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ye, C.; Li, J.-X.; Li, Z.-J.; Li, X.-B.; Fan, X.-B.; Zhang, L.-P.; Chen, B.; Tung, C.-H.; Wu, L.-Z. Enhanced driving force and charge separation efficiency of protonated g-C3N4 for photocatalytic O2 evolution. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 6973–6979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, K.; Huang, Z.; Zeng, X.; Huang, B.; Gao, S.; Lu, J. Synergetic effect of Ti3+ and oxygen doping on enhancing photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic properties of TiO2/g-C3N4 heterojunctions. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 11577–11586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Gao, L.; Gan, W.; Qiu, Z.; Zhan, X.; Qiang, T.; Li, J. Preparation of heterostructured WO3/TiO2 catalysts from wood fibers and its versatile photodegradation abilities. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Xu, J.; Zhang, L.; Shi, R.; Zhu, Y. Chemical exfoliation of graphitic carbon nitride for efficient heterogeneous photocatalysis. J. Mater. Chem. 2013, 1, 14766–14772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Na, S.; Sao, S.; Lee, H. Recent Developments of advanced Ti3+-self-doped TiO2 for efficient visible-light-driven photocatalysis. Catalysts 2020, 10, 679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lu, D.; Zhang, G.; Wan, Z. Visible-light-driven g-C3N4/Ti3+-TiO2 photocatalyst co-exposed {0 0 1} and {1 0 1} facets and its enhanced photocatalytic activities for organic pollutant degradation and Cr(VI) reduction. Appl Surf. Sci. 2015, 358, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lin, H.; Zhao, L. Novel g-C3N4/TiO2 nanorods with enhanced photocatalytic activity for water treatment and H2 production. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 18191–18199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Liu, X.; Wu, X.; Long, Z.; Zhang, C.; Ma, Y.; Hao, X.; Zhang, H.; Pan, C. Photodegradation of Imidacloprid in Aqueous Solution by Metal Free Catalyst Graphitic Carbon Nitride using An Energy-Saving Lamp. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 4754–4760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Liang, S.; Zhang, D.; Pu, X.; Yao, X.; Han, R.; Yin, J.; Ren, Z. A novel Ag2O/g-C3N4 p-n heterojunction photocatalysts with enhanced visible and near-infrared light activity. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 210, 786–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sudhaik, A.; Raizada, P.; Singh, P.; Hosseini-Bandegharaei, A.; Thakur, V.K.; Nguyen, V.-H. Highly effective degradation of imidacloprid by H2O2/ fullerene decorated P-doped g-C3N4 photocatalyst. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 104483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Raizada, P.; Sudhaik, A.; Singha, P.; Hosseini-Bandegharaei, A.; Gupta, V.K.; Agarwal, S. Silver-mediated Bi2O3 and graphitic carbon nitride nanocomposite as all solid-state Z scheme photocatalyst for imidacloprid pesticide abatement from water. Desalin. Water Treat. 2019, 171, 344–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Chen, M.L.; Lu, T.H.; Li, S.S. Photocatalytic degradation of imidacloprid by optimized Bi2WO6/NH2-MIL-88B(Fe) composite under visible light. Environ. Sci Pollut Res. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhang, T.; Zhao, D.; Wang, Y.; Chang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Tang, Y.; Pu, X.; Shao, X. Facial synthesis of a novel Ag4V2O7/g-C3N4 heterostructure with highly efficient photoactivity. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2019, 102, 3897–3907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bi, X.; Yu, S.; Liu, E.; Liu, L.; Zhang, K.; Zang, J.; Zhao, Y. Construction of g-C3N4/TiO2 nanotube arrays Z-scheme heterojunction to improve visible light catalytic activity. Colloids Surf. A 2020, 603, 125193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Liao, G.; Li, C.; Li, X.; Fang, B. Emerging polymeric carbon nitride Z-scheme system for photocatalysis. Cell Rep. 2021, 2, 100355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Fang, H.-B.; Luo, Y.; Zheng, Y.-Z.; Ma, W.; TaO, X. Facile large-scale synthesis of urea-derived porous graphitic carbon nitride with extraordinary visible-light spectrum Photodegradation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2016, 55, 4506–4514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Rana, A.G.; Minceva, M. Analysis of photocatalytic degradation of phenol with exfoliated graphitic carbon nitride and light-emitting diodes using response surface methodology. Catalysts 2021, 11, 898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wang, B.; Li, L.; Chen, J.; Duan, C.; Song, J.; Wang, R.; Zhang, B. Synthesis of BiOCl0.5I0.5/TiO2 heterojunctions with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic properties. J. Nanopart. Res. 2018, 20, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Powder XRD patterns of bulk-CN, CNS, TiO2, and 0.5CNS/TiO2. (b) Raman spectra of bulk-CN, CNS, TiO2, and 15CNS/TiO2. Figure S1 shows the PXRD of the rest of nanocomposites.
Figure 1. (a) Powder XRD patterns of bulk-CN, CNS, TiO2, and 0.5CNS/TiO2. (b) Raman spectra of bulk-CN, CNS, TiO2, and 15CNS/TiO2. Figure S1 shows the PXRD of the rest of nanocomposites.
Catalysts 12 00120 g001
Figure 2. (a) The survey scan of all samples. (b) The C1s spectra. (c) The N1s spectra. (d) The Ti 2p spectra. (e) The O1s spectra. (f) Solid EPR spectra of g-C3N4, TiO2, and g-C3N4/TiO2.
Figure 2. (a) The survey scan of all samples. (b) The C1s spectra. (c) The N1s spectra. (d) The Ti 2p spectra. (e) The O1s spectra. (f) Solid EPR spectra of g-C3N4, TiO2, and g-C3N4/TiO2.
Catalysts 12 00120 g002
Figure 3. (a) SEM images of (a) bulk-CN, (b) CNS, (c) TiO2, and (d) 0.5CNS/TiO2.
Figure 3. (a) SEM images of (a) bulk-CN, (b) CNS, (c) TiO2, and (d) 0.5CNS/TiO2.
Catalysts 12 00120 g003
Figure 4. (a,b) UV-Vis DRS spectra and Tauc plot of g-C3N4, TiO2, and g-C3N4/TiO2 photocatalysts, (c) photoluminescence spectra of the as-synthesized g-C3N4, TiO2, and g-C3N4/TiO2.
Figure 4. (a,b) UV-Vis DRS spectra and Tauc plot of g-C3N4, TiO2, and g-C3N4/TiO2 photocatalysts, (c) photoluminescence spectra of the as-synthesized g-C3N4, TiO2, and g-C3N4/TiO2.
Catalysts 12 00120 g004
Figure 5. (a) Photocatalytic degradation of imidacloprid when treated with g-C3N4, TiO2, and g-C3N4/TiO2 composites under UV-Vis light irradiation (10 ppm of pesticide and 1g/L of catalyst loading), and (b) the first-order kinetic fitting curve of the photocatalytic IMI degradation during 30 min irradiation time.
Figure 5. (a) Photocatalytic degradation of imidacloprid when treated with g-C3N4, TiO2, and g-C3N4/TiO2 composites under UV-Vis light irradiation (10 ppm of pesticide and 1g/L of catalyst loading), and (b) the first-order kinetic fitting curve of the photocatalytic IMI degradation during 30 min irradiation time.
Catalysts 12 00120 g005
Figure 6. (a) Reusability and regeneration performance test of 0.5CN/TiO2 for imidacloprid degradation, SEM images of (b) fresh and (c) spent 0.5CN/TiO2 photocatalyst
Figure 6. (a) Reusability and regeneration performance test of 0.5CN/TiO2 for imidacloprid degradation, SEM images of (b) fresh and (c) spent 0.5CN/TiO2 photocatalyst
Catalysts 12 00120 g006
Figure 7. Effects of different scavengers on the photocatalytic degradation of IMI.
Figure 7. Effects of different scavengers on the photocatalytic degradation of IMI.
Catalysts 12 00120 g007
Figure 8. Photocatalytic mechanism of 0.5CNS/TiO2 for degradation of imidacloprid.
Figure 8. Photocatalytic mechanism of 0.5CNS/TiO2 for degradation of imidacloprid.
Catalysts 12 00120 g008
Table 1. Comparative photocatalytic degradation of imidacloprid pesticide at varying conditions, over various carbon nitride based materials.
Table 1. Comparative photocatalytic degradation of imidacloprid pesticide at varying conditions, over various carbon nitride based materials.
PhotocatalystLight SourceCat. Loading (g/L)Initial (IMI) (ppm)Irradiation Time (h)Best Removal Eff. (%)Ref.
g-C3N4 (urea)
g-C3N4 (melamine)
λ > 400 nm (8 W)0.5
1.0
205.090
43
[60]
Ag2O/g-C3N4Infrared lamp
(250 W)
1.0102.080[61]
g-C3N4LED lamp (35 W)0.6269.060[62]
P doped g-C3N4 (PCN)72
0.04C60/PCN95
g-C3N4LED lamp
(35 W)
0.5268.065[63]
Ag-Bi2O3/g-C3N498
Bi2WO6: NH2-MOFXe lamp0.4103.084[64]
Ag4V2O7/g-C3N4Xe lamp (300 W)1.0104.038[65]
g-C3N4 (urea)W lamp (300 W)1.0102.542This work
CNS51
0.5CNS/TiO293
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kobkeatthawin, T.; Trakulmututa, J.; Amornsakchai, T.; Kajitvichyanukul, P.; Smith, S.M. Identification of Active Species in Photodegradation of Aqueous Imidacloprid over g-C3N4/TiO2 Nanocomposites. Catalysts 2022, 12, 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12020120

AMA Style

Kobkeatthawin T, Trakulmututa J, Amornsakchai T, Kajitvichyanukul P, Smith SM. Identification of Active Species in Photodegradation of Aqueous Imidacloprid over g-C3N4/TiO2 Nanocomposites. Catalysts. 2022; 12(2):120. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12020120

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kobkeatthawin, Thawanrat, Jirawat Trakulmututa, Taweechai Amornsakchai, Puangrat Kajitvichyanukul, and Siwaporn Meejoo Smith. 2022. "Identification of Active Species in Photodegradation of Aqueous Imidacloprid over g-C3N4/TiO2 Nanocomposites" Catalysts 12, no. 2: 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12020120

APA Style

Kobkeatthawin, T., Trakulmututa, J., Amornsakchai, T., Kajitvichyanukul, P., & Smith, S. M. (2022). Identification of Active Species in Photodegradation of Aqueous Imidacloprid over g-C3N4/TiO2 Nanocomposites. Catalysts, 12(2), 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12020120

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop