Next Article in Journal
Oxidation of Toluene by Ozone over Surface-Modified γ-Al2O3: Effect of Ag Addition
Next Article in Special Issue
The Preparation of g-C3N4/CoAl-LDH Nanocomposites and Their Depollution Performances in Cement Mortars under UV-Visible Light
Previous Article in Journal
Emissions Merit Function for Evaluating Multifunctional Catalyst Beds
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preparation and Properties of Magnesium Cement-Based Photocatalytic Materials

1
State Key Laboratory of Silicate Materials for Architectures, Wuhan University of Technology, 122# Luoshi Road, Wuhan 430070, China
2
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
3
China Construction Sixth Engineering Bureau Corp., Ltd., Tianjin 300170, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2022, 12(4), 420; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12040420
Submission received: 1 March 2022 / Revised: 28 March 2022 / Accepted: 29 March 2022 / Published: 8 April 2022

Abstract

:
Photocatalytic oxidation is a technology developed in recent years for the degradation of indoor air pollutants. In this study, magnesium cement-based photocatalytic material (MPM) was prepared by loading TiO2 photocatalysts onto a SiO2-modified basic magnesium chloride whisker (BMCW) surface, and was subsequently sprayed evenly on the surface of putty powder to form a photocatalytic functional wall coating (PFWC) material. Then, by introducing Ag, visible light photocatalytic functional wall coating (VPFWC) materials were also prepared. The results show that TiO2 and SiO2 form Ti–O–Si bonds on the BMCW surface, and the PFWC presents a promising degradation effect, with a photocatalytic removal rate of 46% for gaseous toluene, under ultraviolet light for 3 h, and an MPM coating concentration of 439 g/m2. This is related to the surface structure of the functional coating, which is formed using putty powder and MPM. The visible light photocatalytic efficiency of the VPFWC increased as the spraying amount of the AgNO3 solution increased, up to 16.62 g/m2, and then decreased with further increasing. The gaseous toluene was degraded by 28% and 73% in 3 h, by the VPFWC, under visible light and ultraviolet light irradiation, respectively. In addition, the photocatalytic performance of the PFWC/VPFWC also showed excellent durability after being reused five times.

1. Introduction

It is reported that the average time spent indoors during working is about 80~90% [1,2]. There are many volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in indoor furniture and decorations, which seriously affect people’s health and work efficiency. As a consequence, improving indoor air quality and providing a healthy indoor environment have become the focus of attention.
At present, the main removal methods of indoor air pollutants are adsorption [3,4,5,6], biodegradation [7,8], photodegradation [9,10], and so on. Although adsorption agents can absorb pollutants, they can only transfer pollutants and, ultimately, cannot eliminate them. There are also some difficulties to be overcome in microbial degradation, such as the complex culture process and long cycle. A microbe needs a suitable environment to survive, which is difficult to apply to indoor environments. Photocatalytic oxidation (PCO), as a promising technology for the degradation of air pollutants, has received extensive attention in past decades [10,11,12,13,14]. As a kind of material with high chemical stability, a low price and high catalytic activity, TiO2 photocatalysts have been widely used in building materials. Combining TiO2 photocatalysts with building materials not only endows the building materials with functionalization, but also provides a new method to solve indoor air pollution [15,16,17]. A pure TiO2 photocatalyst is difficult to disperse, which easily causes catalyst waste, and the complex environment (containing free ions and a high pH value) of ordinary Portland cement systems and the encapsulation of hydration products have adverse effects on the catalytic performance of TiO2 [18,19,20]. In addition, TiO2 can only be excited by ultraviolet light, whose wavelength is less than 387 nm, while sunlight, whose wavelength is less than 387 nm, only accounts for about 4%, which also limits its application [21,22].
As the main component of magnesium oxychloride cement, the basic magnesium chloride whisker (BMCW) has a simple and stable structure, avoiding the complex environment that affects the photocatalysis of TiO2. In addition, the BMCW is crisscrossed to form a special pore structure, which is an excellent catalytic carrier. According to the characteristics of the building materials of indoor decorations, TiO2 sol was loaded onto the SiO2/BMCW surface to prepare the magnesium cement-based photocatalytic material (MPM), by using the BMCW as the loading matrix and SiO2 as the matrix modifier [23]. Then, the MPM was compounded with cement-based putty powder to prepare the photocatalytic functional wall coating (PFWC), which can degrade indoor pollutants. The effects of spraying different amounts of the coating onto the surface structure, and the photocatalytic performance of the materials, were studied. In addition, in order to further expand the application range of the material, a functional wall coating with visible light catalytic activity (VPFWC) was prepared, using Ag as the deposition modification material [24,25,26]. The effects of the deposition amount of Ag on the photocatalytic performance of the material were studied.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Material Characterization

Figure 1 shows the FT-IR diagram of the MPM, from which we can observe that the absorption peaks at 3681 cm−1, 3640 cm−1, 3418 cm−1 and 1635 cm−1 are the stretching vibration peaks of –OH in adsorbed water and basic magnesium chloride, respectively, and 1447 cm−1 and 1386 cm−1 are the characteristic peaks of –OH in basic magnesium chloride whiskers. The vibrational absorption peaks of the Si–O–Si bonds are 1043 cm−1 and 857 cm, and 572 cm−1 and 433 cm−1 at low wavenumbers are the overlapping absorption peaks of Si–O–Si, Mg–O, Ti–O–Ti and other bonds. Some studies have shown that [12,27] the peak in the range of 900–1000 cm−1 is the vibration absorption peak of the Ti–O–Si bond. Moreover, the peak at 974 cm−1 indicates that the TiO2 photocatalyst has been successfully supported on the surface of the SiO2/BMCW.
Figure 2 shows the microstructure of the BMCW, SiO2/BMCW and MPM. It can be observed from Figure 2a that the BMCWs are crisscrossed with each other, with a good fibrous morphology, uniform thickness, and no obvious bending phenomenon, indicating that the whisker has good rigidity and uniform distribution. It can be observed from Figure 2b that nano-SiO2 presents the shape of nano-sphericity, without obvious agglomeration, and is evenly distributed along the length and diameter of the whisker, which is conducive to improving the water resistance of the BMCW and increasing the load performance of the TiO2 photocatalytic material [23]. It can also be observed from Figure 2c that nano-TiO2 wraps around the surface of the nano-SiO2/BMCW and forms a close bond, which is consistent with the observation of the Si–O–Ti bond formed in FT-IR spectroscopy (Figure 1). In addition, it can be observed that nano-TiO2 forms a certain agglomeration, which increases the specific surface area of the SiO2/BMCW, enhances the adsorption of pollutants and improves the photocatalytic efficiency of TiO2.
Figure 3 shows the microscopic morphology of the PFWC. The morphology of the putty powder without the MPM (Figure 3a) is irregular, showing large and flocculent hydration products of different sizes. When the MPM was sprayed on the surface of the putty powder, after hydration for 2 h, a small number of MPM nanorods were observed to “extend” from the putty powder hydration product, while the other part was below the putty powder hydration product, and such MPM nanorods are less likely to appear in the figure (Figure 3b). With the increase in the MPM spraying amount, a large number of MPM nanorods were observed on the surface of the putty powder coating, and were interlaced with the large hydration products of the putty powder (Figure 3c). When the spraying amount of the MPM on the surface of the putty powder reached 439 g/m2, the large hydration products on the surface of the putty powder (Figure 3d) decreased significantly. As the putty powder continued to hydrate, it bonded to the cross-linked MPM nanorods, which formed a surface-connected pore structure, conducive to improving the photocatalytic performance of the PFWC.
Figure 4 shows the EDS spectrum of the PFWC-439/putty powder. The EDS analysis results are shown in Table 1. The EDS spots 1 and 3 are the hydration products of the putty powder. Some Ti atoms still exist at the EDS spots 1 and 3, compared with the hydration products of the putty powder, indicating that the MPM nanorods were covered by the hydration products. This also proves that the hydration process of the putty powder remains for a period of time after spraying the MPM on the surface, and covers part of the MPM.
Figure 5 illustrates the BSEM image of the VPFWC with different amounts of Ag/AgCl surface deposition. The bright point in Figure 5 is the aggregation of Ag/AgCl [24]. These bright spots exist in both the hydration products of the MPM and the putty powder, indicating that Ag/AgCl is uniformly deposited on the surface of the VPFWC-439. The unified deposition of Ag/AgCl plays a positive role in improving the light response range of the VPFWC and the photocatalytic reaction efficiency. Due to the self-aggregation effect of the Ag/AgCl particles, the particle diameter on the surface of the VPFWC became larger and the distribution density increased significantly, with the gradual increase in deposition amount. As shown in Figure 5c, the maximum diameter of Ag/AgCl on the surface of the VPFWC-16.62 reached about 1 μm. When the deposition amount of Ag/AgCl reached 32.35 g/m2, its distribution was more dense on the surface of the VPFWC-32.35 (Figure 5d), but the nanorod-like structure could hardly be observed. It could be that the excessive spraying amount of the AgNO3 solution introduced a large amount of water and anhydrous ethanol, which meant that the MPM was encased in a secondary hydrated putty powder. It can also be observed that the surface of the VPFWC-32.35 is less angular and more rounded than that of the PFWC-439 (Figure 3d).

2.2. Photocatalytic Performance

Figure 6 shows the ultraviolet photocatalytic degradation efficiency of the PFWC for gas-phase toluene. Compared with the performance of a blank group without sprayed MPM, the photocatalytic efficiency of the PFWC-63 for toluene degradation is low, and the 3 h catalytic efficiency is only 16%. However, with the increase in the MPM spraying amount, the photocatalytic degradation efficiency of the PFWC for toluene gradually increased, and the 3 h catalytic degradation efficiencies of the PFWC-133 and PFWC-439 for gas toluene were 27% and 46%, respectively. This is mainly due to their low photocatalytic efficiency, which is almost wrapped by the hydration products of the putty powder, when the spraying amount is small at the beginning. With the increase in the content of sprayed MPM, the exposure of the MPM on the surface of the putty powder hydration product becomes higher and higher. When the spraying amount reached 439 g/m2, the MPM bonded with the hydrated flocculent and with some small particles to form a pore structure, which increased the specific surface area and permeability, and significantly improved its photocatalytic performance.
In practical applications, the ultraviolet intensity of sunlight is weaker than that of accelerated catalysis in the laboratory, which is a constraint of photocatalytic function on the wall coating. It is particularly important to improve the catalytic efficiency by introducing Ag, which improves the utilization rate of sunlight. Moreover, the Cl in the BMCW matrix will self-assemble with Ag+ to form AgCl, which will be partially photolyzed to form a composite structure of Ag/AgCl under visible/ultraviolet light [24].
Figure 7 shows the visible/ultraviolet photocatalytic degradation rate of the PFWC-439 and the VPFWC with different amounts of Ag/AgCl deposition for gas-phase toluene. The results show that the photocatalytic degradation rate of the VPFWC, modified by Ag/AgCl, was higher than that of the PFWC-439 under visible and ultraviolet irradiation. The band gap value of TiO2 is 3.2 eV, which means that only ultraviolet light with a wavelength less than 387 nm can excite TiO2 to generate electron-hole pairs (ecb-hvb+, Equation (1)). In addition, the band gap value of TiO2-Ag/AgCl is 2.8 eV [28], which can generate corresponding electron-hole pairs under visible light (e-AgNPs+, Equation (2)). The electron-hole pairs ecb and e migrate to the surface of the material and react with O2 to generate ·O2 (Equation (3)), which degrades the target pollutant. At the same time, hvb+ and AgNPs+ will migrate to the surface and react with AgCl or the adsorbed OH to generate ·Cl0 (Equation (4)) and ·OH (Equation (5)) with strong oxidation ability, and then catalyze the decomposition of the target pollutants. Therefore, VPFWC-modified Ag deposition shows much higher photocatalytic activity than the PFWC-439 under visible/ultraviolet light catalytic conditions.
TiO2 + UV → TiO2 + ecb + hvb+
AgNPs + Vis → AgNPs+ + e
ecb/e + O2·O2
hvb+/AgNPs+AgCl → Ag+ + ·Cl0 + AgNPS
hvb+/AgNPs + OH·OH + AgNPs
When the deposition amount of Ag/AgCl on the VPFWC surface increased from 1.70 g/m2 to 16.62 g/m2, its photocatalytic efficiency gradually increased. The photocatalytic degradation rate of gas-phase toluene for the VPFWC-16.62 reached 28% and 73% under visible and ultraviolet light in 3 h, respectively, which was much higher than the 7.5% and 46%, respectively, for the PFWC-439. However, when the deposition amount reached 32.35 g/m2, the degradation rate of the VPFWC-32.35 to gas-phase toluene decreased under visible and ultraviolet light catalysis. The degradation rate of the VPFWC-32.35 under ultraviolet light catalysis almost matched that of the PFWC-439. This may be caused by the secondary hydration of the putty powder, induced by water and anhydrous ethanol from the excessively sprayed AgNO3 solution, which wrapped the PFWC-439 in the secondary hydration product.

2.3. Photocatalytic Durability

In order to evaluate the long-term catalytic degradation performance of magnesium cement-based photocatalytic materials in practical applications, the VPFWC-16.62 was selected to carry out a cyclic test of photocatalytic durability. As shown in Figure 8, after five photocatalytic cycle tests, the degradation rate of the VPFWC-16.62 for gas-phase toluene, over 3 h, was stable under both ultraviolet and visible light irradiation, indicating that the photocatalytic durability of the VPFWC-16.62 was excellent.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

In this study, magnesium chloride hexahydrate (MgCl2·6H2O, AR), light-burned magnesium oxide (MgO, AR), tetraethyl orthosilicate (C8H20O4Si, AR), ammonium hydroxide (NH3·H2O, AR), titanium sol preparation raw materials of tetra-n-butyl titanate (C16H36O4Ti, AR), nitric acid (HNO3, AR), silver nitrate (AgNO3, AR) and anhydrous ethanol (C2H5OH, AR) were purchased from Sinopharm Group Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. Deionized water was prepared using a laboratory EPED-Z1 deionized pure water machine (Shanghai Tims Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). The putty powder, which implemented standard JG/T3049-1998 (industrial grade), was purchased from Shanghai Duoleshi Chemical Coatings Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.

3.2. Synthesis and Characterization

3.2.1. Preparation of Magnesia Cement-Based Photocatalytic Materials

The basic magnesium chloride whisker (BMCW) was prepared according to the molar ratio of n MgO/n MgCl2 = 0.1 [29]; firstly, 4.8 g of light MgO was added to 300 mL of the 4 mol/L MgCl2 solution, then it was stirred at room temperature for 1 h, aged for 48 h, washed and dried at 60 °C.
The preparation of the SiO2-modified basic magnesium chloride whisker (SiO2/BMCW) included the following steps: 1 g of the basic magnesium chloride whisker was added to 80 mL of anhydrous ethanol, then, according to the mass ratio of SiO2/(BMCW + SiO2) = 0.4, 1 mL of TEOS was added to the alcohol solution of the basic magnesium chloride whisker and stirred for 6 h, and 1.5 mL of ammonia was slowly added at the speed of 1~2 gt/s, and then filtered, washed and dried after continuous stirring for 4 h.
The preparation of the magnesium cement-based photocatalysis material (MPM) included the following steps: 14 mL of TiO2 sol [11,12] and 1 g of the above-mentioned SiO2/BMCW were mixed and stirred in 60 mL of anhydrous ethanol for 12 h, then washed with anhydrous ethanol, centrifuged 3 times, and finally dried at 85 °C.

3.2.2. Preparation of Magnesia Cement-Based Photocatalytic Functional Coating

According to the mass ratio of 2:1, 40 g of putty powder and 20 g of H2O were mixed and stirred evenly, and were placed for 5 min, then the fresh slurry was filled into a mold with a diameter of 10 cm. The demolded samples were cured for 2 h in a YH-40B standard curing box with relative humidity higher than 90% at 25 °C.
After 2 g of MPM and 200 mL of anhydrous ethanol were stirred evenly, according to the concentration of 0.01 g/mL, they were added to the sprayer and uniformly sprayed on the surface of the cured putty powder matrix. According to the actual spraying amount, the spraying amount of the MPM on the surface of the putty powder was 63 g/m2, 133 g/m2 and 439 g/m2, respectively, and was denoted as PFWC-n, n = 63, 133, 439, respectively.
The AgNO3 solution was uniformly sprayed on the optimized photocatalytic coating surface. The proportion of AgNO3:anhydrous ethanol:deionized water was 1:3:1. After curing for 30 min, it was moved to a high-pressure mercury lamp for 10 min to be excited by ultraviolet light. According to the actual spraying amount of AgNO3, the deposition amount of Ag on the coating surface was 1.70 g/m2, 16.62 g/m2, and 32.35 g/m2, respectively, and was denoted as VPFWC-n, n = 1.70, 8.31, 16.62, 32.35, respectively.

3.3. Characterization

Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were obtained using a Nicolet 6700 Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (Thermo Electron Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with 48 scans per sample collected from 400 to 4000 cm−1 at 2 cm−1 resolution. Surface morphology was observed using an FEI Quanta 450 FEG environmental field emission scanning electron microscope (FEI Quanta 450 FEG, FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA) equipped with Genesis EDS spectroscopy for material compositional analysis. Before testing, the samples were dried at the temperature of 40 °C for 24 h and plated with platinum.

3.4. Photocatalytic Performance Test

The characterization of the catalytic performance of the photocatalytic materials was tested using the degradation effect of the simulated pollutant toluene and gas chromatography (GC2020, Wuhan Hengxin Century Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China). The samples with a diameter of 10 cm were put into a 2.35 L stainless steel reactor and 2 μL of toluene was injected into the reactor using a micro syringe. Then, the toluene was volatilized into a gaseous state at 35 °C. We used the gas chromatograph to detect the gas concentration, to ensure that the initial concentration of gaseous toluene in the reactor was about (200 ± 10) ppm. The 300 W high-pressure mercury lamp, with a maximum emission wavelength of 365 nm, was used for ultraviolet light testing, and the 249 W Xenon lamp (CEL-HXF249, Ceaulight Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) was used for visible light testing, by using a 420 nm filter to cut the ultraviolet light. The vertical distance between the lamp and the reactor was adjusted to ensure that the light intensity on the sample surface was 1 mW/cm2. The photocatalytic degradation of toluene can be calculated with Formula (6), as follows:
η = C 0     C C 0   ×   100 %
In the formula, C0 and C are the initial concentrations of gas-phase toluene and the concentration after the photocatalytic reaction, respectively.

4. Conclusions

To solve the problems associated with nano-TiO2 photocatalysts, such as their difficulty dispersing, unsuitability for recycling, and low efficiency of sunlight utilization, the hydration product of the magnesium oxychloride cement (BMCW) was used as the loading matrix to prepare the MPM, which was modified by Ag deposition to expand the material spectral response range and to improve the photocatalytic efficiency. The photocatalytic removal performance of gas-phase toluene and the MPM loaded in putty powder was investigated. The results show that the load performance of TiO2 can be significantly increased by modifying a layer of SiO2 on the surface of the BMCW, resulting in the formation of a Ti–O–Si bond. When the amount of MPM increased to 439 g/m2, MPM nanorods gradually bonded on the surface of the putty powder hydration product, and formed a surface structure containing small holes, which had a good photocatalytic degradation effect on gas-phase toluene. The deposition of Ag can significantly improve the catalytic efficiency of magnesium cement-based photocatalytic materials. With the increase in Ag deposition, the catalytic efficiency of the materials first increased and then decreased. The VPFWC-16.62 showed the best catalytic degradation efficiency on gas-phase toluene. After five cycles of catalytic tests, it still maintained excellent stability.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.F., C.S. and L.Y.; methodology, Y.F., C.S. and L.Y.; software, Y.F.; validation, P.L.; investigation, Y.F. and C.S.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.F., X.X. and L.Y.; supervision, L.Y. and C.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51802238) and the State Key Laboratory of Solid Waste Resource Utilization and Energy Saving Building Materials Open Fund (SWR-2021-008), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from corresponding author (L.Y.).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Klepeis, N.E.; Nelson, W.C.; Ott, W.R.; Robinson, J.P.; Tsang, A.M.; Switzer, P.; Behar, J.V.; Hern, S.C.; Engelmann, W.H. The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): A Resource for Assessing Exposure to Environmental Pollutants. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2001, 11, 231–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Yu, B.F.; Hu, Z.B.; Liu, M.; Yang, H.L.; Kong, Q.X.; Liu, Y.H. Review of Research on Air-Conditioning Systems and Indoor Air Quality Control for Human Health. Int. J. Refrig. 2009, 32, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yin, T.; Meng, X.; Wang, S.; Yao, X.; Liu, N.; Shi, L. Study on the Adsorption of Low-Concentration VOCs on Zeolite Composites Based on Chemisorption of Metal-Oxides under Dry and Wet Conditions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 280, 119634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, Z.; Jin, Y.; Chen, T.; Tang, F.; Cai, J.; Ma, J. Trimethylchlorosilane Modified Activated Carbon for the Adsorption of VOCs at High Humidity. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 272, 118659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhu, L.; Shen, D.; Luo, K.H. A Critical Review on VOCs Adsorption by Different Porous Materials: Species, Mechanisms and Modification Methods. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 389, 122102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, X.; Zhang, L.; Yang, Z.; Wang, P.; Yan, Y.; Ran, J. Adsorption Materials for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and the Key Factors for VOCs Adsorption Process: A Review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 235, 116213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yi, F.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, W.; Yang, C.; Meng, H.; Cui, P.; Zhong, W. Gaseous Formaldehyde Degrading by Methylobacterium Sp. XJLW. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2019, 189, 262–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wantz, E.; Kane, A.; Lhuissier, M.; Amrane, A.; Audic, J.-L.; Couvert, A. A Mathematical Model for VOCs Removal in a Treatment Process Coupling Absorption and Biodegradation. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 423, 130106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abdullah, H.I.; Al-Amiery, A.A.; Al-Baghdadi, S.B. The Using of Nanomaterials as Catalysts for Photodegradations. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1853, 012052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mengjie, W.; Kun, L. Application of and Research on TiO2 Photocatalysis Technology. E3S Web Conf. 2020, 165, 05001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Si, H.; Fang, Y.; Yang, L. Application of Supported TiO2 in Carbonated Binding Material and Its Photocatalytic Performance. Catalysts 2020, 10, 1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yang, L.; Hakki, A.; Wang, F.; Macphee, D.E. Photocatalyst Efficiencies in Concrete Technology: The Effect of Photocatalyst Placement. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 222, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Yang, L.; Hakki, A.; Wang, F.; Macphee, D.E. Different Roles of Water in Photocatalytic DeNOx Mechanisms on TiO2: Basis for Engineering Nitrate Selectivity? ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 17034–17041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Sadeghfar, F.; Zalipour, Z.; Taghizadeh, M.; Taghizadeh, A.; Ghaedi, M. Photodegradation Processes. In Interface Science and Technology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; Volume 32, pp. 55–124. ISBN 978-0-12-818806-4. [Google Scholar]
  15. Guarino, M.; Costa, A.; Porro, M. Photocatalytic TiO2 Coating—To Reduce Ammonia and Greenhouse Gases Concentration and Emission from Animal Husbandries. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 2650–2658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, J.; Poon, C. Photocatalytic Construction and Building Materials: From Fundamentals to Applications. Build. Environ. 2009, 44, 1899–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cassar, L. Photocatalysis of Cementitious Materials: Clean Buildings and Clean Air. MRS Bull. 2004, 29, 328–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Macphee, D.E.; Folli, A. Photocatalytic Concretes—The Interface between Photocatalysis and Cement Chemistry. Cem. Concr. Res. 2016, 85, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bloh, J.Z.; Folli, A.; Macphee, D.E. Photocatalytic NOx Abatement: Why the Selectivity Matters. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 45726–45734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhao, D.; Wang, F.; Liu, P.; Yang, L.; Hu, S.; Zhang, W. Preparation, Physicochemical Properties, and Long-Term Performance of Photocatalytic Ceramsite Sand in Cementitious Materials. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Li, D.; Haneda, H.; Hishita, S.; Ohashi, N. Visible-Light-Driven N–F–Codoped TiO2 Photocatalysts. 1. Synthesis by Spray Pyrolysis and Surface Characterization. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 2588–2595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Barba-Nieto, I.; Caudillo-Flores, U.; Fernández-García, M.; Kubacka, A. Sunlight-Operated TiO2-Based Photocatalysts. Molecules 2020, 25, 4008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Guo, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Soe, K.; Hutchison, W.D.; Timmers, H.; Poblete, M.R. Effect of Fly Ash on Mechanical Properties of Magnesium Oxychloride Cement under Water Attack. Struct. Concr. 2020, 21, 1181–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. McEvoy, J.G.; Cui, W.Q.; Zhang, Z.S. Synthesis and Characterization of Ag/AgCl–Activated Carbon Composites for Enhanced Visible Light Photocatalysis. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 144, 702–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, L.; Wang, F.; Shu, C.; Liu, P.; Zhang, W.; Hu, S. An In-Situ Synthesis of Ag/AgCl/TiO2/Hierarchical Porous Magnesian Material and Its Photocatalytic Performance. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 21617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Yang, L.; Gao, Y.; Wang, F.; Liu, P.; Hu, S. Enhanced Photocatalytic Performance of Cementitious Material with TiO2@Ag Modified Fly Ash Micro-Aggregates. Chin. J. Catal. 2017, 38, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yamashita, H.; Kawasaki, S.; Ichihashi, Y.; Harada, M.; Takeuchi, M.; Anpo, M.; Stewart, G.; Fox, M.A.; Louis, C.; Che, M. Characterization of Titanium–Silicon Binary Oxide Catalysts Prepared by the Sol–Gel Method and Their Photocatalytic Reactivity for the Liquid-Phase Oxidation of 1-Octanol. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 5870–5875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xu, X.; Wu, C.; Guo, A.; Qin, B.; Sun, Y.; Zhao, C.; Zhang, F.; Cai, A. Visible-Light Photocatalysis of Organic Contaminants and Disinfection Using Biomimetic-Synthesized TiO2-Ag-AgCl Composite. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 588, 152886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wu, Z.; Liu, M.; Wang, Y.; Lin, Z. Study of In Situ Formation of Magnesium Hydroxide Whisker via Basic Magnesium Chloride Whisker Regulated by Organic Parcels at Low Temperature. Chin. J. Struct. Chem. 2014, 33, 881–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. FT-IR spectra of magnesium cement-based photocatalytic materials.
Figure 1. FT-IR spectra of magnesium cement-based photocatalytic materials.
Catalysts 12 00420 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) the BMCW, (b) SiO2/BMCW and (c) MPM.
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) the BMCW, (b) SiO2/BMCW and (c) MPM.
Catalysts 12 00420 g002
Figure 3. SEM images of the morphologies of photocatalytic putty powder with different PFWC spray amounts: (a) pure putty powder; (b) PFWC-63/putty powder; (c) PFWC-133/putty powder; (d) PFWC-439/putty powder.
Figure 3. SEM images of the morphologies of photocatalytic putty powder with different PFWC spray amounts: (a) pure putty powder; (b) PFWC-63/putty powder; (c) PFWC-133/putty powder; (d) PFWC-439/putty powder.
Catalysts 12 00420 g003
Figure 4. EDS image of PFWC-439/putty powder: spot 1 and spot 3 are the hydration products of the putty powder; spot 2, spot 4, spot 5 and spot 6 are MPM.
Figure 4. EDS image of PFWC-439/putty powder: spot 1 and spot 3 are the hydration products of the putty powder; spot 2, spot 4, spot 5 and spot 6 are MPM.
Catalysts 12 00420 g004
Figure 5. BSEM images of different Ag/AgCl surface depositions: (a) VPFWC-1.70; (b) VPFWC-8.31; (c) VPFWC-16.62; (d) VPFWC-32.35.
Figure 5. BSEM images of different Ag/AgCl surface depositions: (a) VPFWC-1.70; (b) VPFWC-8.31; (c) VPFWC-16.62; (d) VPFWC-32.35.
Catalysts 12 00420 g005
Figure 6. The photocatalytic degradation rates of gaseous toluene on the PFWC under ultraviolet light.
Figure 6. The photocatalytic degradation rates of gaseous toluene on the PFWC under ultraviolet light.
Catalysts 12 00420 g006
Figure 7. The photocatalytic degradation rates of gaseous toluene on the PFWC-439 and the VPFWC-n, with different Ag surface deposits under visible/ultraviolet light: (a) visible photocatalytic degradation of the PFWC-439 and the VPFWC-n by visible light; (b) photocatalytic degradation of the PFWC-439 and the VPFWC-n by ultraviolet light.
Figure 7. The photocatalytic degradation rates of gaseous toluene on the PFWC-439 and the VPFWC-n, with different Ag surface deposits under visible/ultraviolet light: (a) visible photocatalytic degradation of the PFWC-439 and the VPFWC-n by visible light; (b) photocatalytic degradation of the PFWC-439 and the VPFWC-n by ultraviolet light.
Catalysts 12 00420 g007
Figure 8. Durability test of the VPFWC-16.62 for photocatalytic degradation of gaseous toluene under visible/ultraviolet light: (a) photocatalytic removal performance of the VPFWC-16.62 for gas-phase toluene in 5 visible light cycles; (b) photocatalytic removal performance of the VPFWC-16.62 for gas-phase toluene in 5 ultraviolet light cycles.
Figure 8. Durability test of the VPFWC-16.62 for photocatalytic degradation of gaseous toluene under visible/ultraviolet light: (a) photocatalytic removal performance of the VPFWC-16.62 for gas-phase toluene in 5 visible light cycles; (b) photocatalytic removal performance of the VPFWC-16.62 for gas-phase toluene in 5 ultraviolet light cycles.
Catalysts 12 00420 g008
Table 1. EDS analysis of PFWC-439 (at%).
Table 1. EDS analysis of PFWC-439 (at%).
ElementSpot 1Spot 2Spot 3Spot 4Spot 5Spot 6
O54.7661.7654.0359.5659.2762.53
Mg18.2727.9618.0528.8128.3126.97
Al0.730.640.520.630.500.63
Si18.240.9318.080.880.870.84
Cl5.017.357.918.068.686.84
Ca1.990.520.370.420.610.36
Ti1.001.631.041.681.761.83
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fang, Y.; Shu, C.; Yang, L.; Xue, C.; Luo, P.; Xu, X. Preparation and Properties of Magnesium Cement-Based Photocatalytic Materials. Catalysts 2022, 12, 420. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12040420

AMA Style

Fang Y, Shu C, Yang L, Xue C, Luo P, Xu X. Preparation and Properties of Magnesium Cement-Based Photocatalytic Materials. Catalysts. 2022; 12(4):420. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12040420

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fang, Yongle, Chang Shu, Lu Yang, Cheng Xue, Ping Luo, and Xingang Xu. 2022. "Preparation and Properties of Magnesium Cement-Based Photocatalytic Materials" Catalysts 12, no. 4: 420. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12040420

APA Style

Fang, Y., Shu, C., Yang, L., Xue, C., Luo, P., & Xu, X. (2022). Preparation and Properties of Magnesium Cement-Based Photocatalytic Materials. Catalysts, 12(4), 420. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12040420

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop