Next Article in Journal
Combined Biological and Photocatalytic Degradation of Dibutyl Phthalate in a Simulated Wastewater Treatment Plant
Next Article in Special Issue
Iridium(triNHC)-Catalyzed Transfer Hydrogenation of Glycerol Carbonate without Exogenous Reductants
Previous Article in Journal
High-Performance Ligand-Protected Metal Nanocluster Catalysts for CO2 Conversion through the Exposure of Undercoordinated Sites
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dimethyl Ether Hydrolysis over WO3/γ-Al2O3 Supported Catalysts
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Catalysts
Volume 12
Issue 5
10.3390/catal12050506
catalysts-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Partial Hydrogenation of Soybean and Waste Cooking Oil Biodiesel over Recyclable-Polymer-Supported Pd and Ni Nanoparticles

by
Ambra Maria Fiore
1,
Giuseppe Romanazzi
1,
Cristina Leonelli
2,
Piero Mastrorilli
1 and
Maria Michela Dell’Anna
1,*
1
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Ambientale, del Territorio, Edile e di Chimica (DICATECh) Politecnico di Bari, Via Edoardo Orabona 4, 70126 Bari, Italy
2
Dipartimento di Ingegneria “Enzo Ferrari”, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Via Pietro Vivarelli 10, 41125 Modena, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2022, 12(5), 506; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12050506
Submission received: 1 April 2022 / Revised: 23 April 2022 / Accepted: 28 April 2022 / Published: 30 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Exclusive Papers of the Editorial Board Members (EBMs) of Catalysts)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Biodiesel obtained through the transesterification in methanol of vegetable oils, such as soybean oil (SO) and waste cooking oil (WCO), cannot be used as a biofuel for automotive applications due to the presence of polyunsaturated fatty esters, which have a detrimental effect on oxidation stability (OS). A method of upgrading this material is the catalytic partial hydrogenation of the fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) mixture. The target molecule of the partial hydrogenation reaction is monounsaturated methyl oleate (C18:1), which represents a good compromise between OS and the cold filter plugging point (CFPP) value, which becomes too high if the biodiesel consists of unsaturated fatty esters only. In the present work, polymer-supported palladium (Pd-pol) and nickel (Ni-pol) nanoparticles were separately tested as catalysts for upgrading SO and WCO biodiesels under mild conditions (room temperature for Pd-pol and T = 100 °C for Ni-pol) using dihydrogen (p = 10 bar) as the reductant. Both catalysts were obtained through co-polymerization of the metal containing monomer M(AAEMA)2 (M = Pd, Ni; AEEMA− = deprotonated form of 2-(acetoacetoxy)ethyl methacrylate)) with co-monomers (ethyl methacrylate for Pd and N,N-dimethylacrilamide for Ni) and cross-linkers (ethylene glycol dimethacrylate for Pd and N,N’-methylene bis-acrylamide for Ni), followed by reduction. The Pd-pol system became very active in the hydrogenation of C=C double bonds, but poorly selective towards the desirable C18:1 product. The Ni-pol catalyst was less active than Pd-pol, but very selective towards the mono-unsaturated product. Recyclability tests demonstrated that the Ni-based system retained its activity and selectivity with both the SO and WCO substrates for at least five subsequent runs, thus representing an opportunity for waste biomass valorization.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Using biomass instead of fossil sources for producing fuel for automotive applications is essential for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and for overcoming the increasing depletion of petrol supplies [1], which has become significant for the European Union due to recent geopolitical events. In the framework of employing renewable supplies, many fuel companies have so far used fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) derived from natural feedstock, such as edible oils, especially palm oil, as a biodiesel for transport purposes [2]. After the ban on palm oil imposed by the European Union until 2030, manufacturing companies have been looking for sustainable alternatives for producing biodiesel. An appealing substitute for palm oil as a feedstock for generating biodiesel is waste cooking oil (WCO) [3,4]. For example, every year, in Italy, about 280,000 tons of waste vegetable oils from alimentary industries are produced and converting them into valuable sources of energy could eliminate the cost of their disposal [5]. FAMEs obtained through the transesterification of methanol from WCO [6] or any vegetable oil [7] cannot be utilized as a fuel for automotive applications due to the presence of many polyunsaturated compounds, such as linolenic and linoleic methyl esters [8]. A method for making the obtained FAME mixture suitable for use as a biofuel is catalytic partial hydrogenation [9,10], i.e., the conversion of poly-unsaturated fatty esters into mono-unsaturated ones (Scheme 1). In fact, mono-unsaturated fatty esters represent the best compromise between oxidation stability and the fluidity parameters that a high-quality biofuel should possess [10]. The total hydrogenation of C18 esters into methyl stearate should be avoided, as it yields an ester that is solid at room temperature; cis to trans isomerization of the unsaturated fatty esters should also be prevented, because it adversely affects the pour point of the fuel mixture (Scheme 1).
In recent years, many studies on upgrading FAMEs have been reported [11,12], most of them being catalytic hydrogenation [13,14] or transfer hydrogenation systems [15,16], based on metals such as Ni [17,18,19], Pd [20,21,22], Pt [23], or Ir [24]. However, it should be underlined that WCO feedstocks contain several unwanted species, such as free fatty acids (FFAs) and water (not present in fresh vegetable oils), posing serious concerns for the stability of the catalytic systems used for upgrading biofuels [3]. For this reason, developing convenient and effective procedures for converting WCO into a valuable biofuel is still a challenging goal. Recently, we scrutinized new catalytic systems based on polymer-supported palladium (Pd-pol) and nickel (Ni-pol) nanoparticles in the hydrogenation [25,26] and catalytic transfer hydrogenation [27,28] of several substrates under sustainable conditions, even in aqueous media [29]. Both catalysts were obtained through the co-polymerization of the metal containing monomer M(AAEMA)2 (M = Pd, Ni; AEEMA− = deprotonated form of 2-(acetoacetoxy)ethyl methacrylate)) with co-monomers (ethyl methacrylate for Pd and N,N-dimethylacrilamide for Ni) and cross-linkers (ethylene glycol dimethacrylate for Pd and N,N’-methylene bis-acrylamide for Ni), followed by reduction. The amphiphilic nature of the supported catalysts and the stability of the latter in the presence of water, air, and free fatty acids (FFAs) prompted us to test the activity of Pd-pol and Ni-pol as catalysts for the partial hydrogenation of WCO biodiesel, as well as of soybean oil (SO) FAMEs. The main aim of the present work is to highlight the differences between palladium and nickel nanoparticles supported on similar organic matrices in the partial hydrogenation of FAMEs, with the goal of proposing a new catalytic system for upgrading the biodiesel. The results showed that the palladium catalyst appeared to be more active than the nickel counterpart in the hydrogenation reaction, but less selective towards the C18:1 desirable product. Thus, the biodiesel obtained with Ni-pol upgrading displayed better fuel parameters with respect to the one achieved with the Pd-pol treatment. Both catalytic systems were recyclable and performed in the same way with either the SO or WCO feedstock.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Catalysts

As mentioned in the previous paragraph, both Pd- and Ni-based catalysts were prepared by co-polymerizing the metal containing monomers M(AAEMA)2 (AAEMA− = deprotonated form of 2-(acetoacetoxy)ethyl methacrylate; M = Pd, Ni) with suitable co-monomers (ethyl methacrylate (EMA) for Pd and N,N-dimethylacrilamide (DMA) for Ni) and cross-linkers (ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA) for Pd and N,N’-methylene bis-acrylamide (MBAA) for Ni; Scheme 2), thus obtaining porous amphiphilic resins supporting homogeneously dispersed M(II) centers (Pd(II)-pol and Ni(II)-pol) [30].
Both Pd(II)-pol and Ni(II)-pol needed to be reduced to afford polymer-supported metal(0) nanoparticles, which constitute the catalytically active species for hydrogenation reactions. As the reduction of Pd centers from the +2 to 0 oxidation state is very easy, the transformation of Pd(II)-pol into polymer-supported Pd(0) nanoparticles (referred to as Pd-pol) occurred smoothly during the first cycle of FAMEs hydrogenation. In the case of Ni(II)-pol, no reduction from Ni(II) to Ni(0) could be achieved under the reaction conditions used in the FAMEs hydrogenation; therefore, the polymer-supported Ni(0) nanoparticles (referred to as Ni-pol) were obtained through the calcination of Ni(II)-pol at 300 °C under nitrogen flow. The full characterization of Pd(II)-pol, Pd-pol, Ni(II)-pol, and Ni-pol has been reported in the literature [31,32]. Figure 1 summarizes the structure of Pd(II)-pol, Ni(II)-pol, and Ni-pol [31,32], showing the following: (i) Pd(II)-pol is a resin containing mainly Pd(II) species and few Pd nanoparticles (mean size diameter of 9 nm) formed during thermal polymerization (Figure S5); (ii) Ni(II)-pol does not bear any metal nanoparticles; and (iii) Ni-pol is composed of acrylamide-based polymer-supported Ni nanoparticles with a diameter ranging from 10 to 37 nm, except for Ni nanocubes and ellypsoids (Figure S3). As we previously observed that Pd(II)-pol quickly transformed into Pd-pol under reductive reaction conditions [29], in the following, Pd-pol will be referred to as both Pd(II)-pol and Pd-pol, without distinctions.
The reason for the choice of methacrylic and acrylamide supports for Pd and Ni catalysts, respectively, stemmed from the necessity to enhance the catalytic activity of Ni and to “moderate” the catalytic activity of Pd towards C=C hydrogenation. In fact, as a noble metal, Pd is very active in hydrogenation reactions of carbon−carbon double bonds, and therefore needs a support able to stabilize itself in the form of nanoparticles, preventing aggregations and avoiding the formation of unactive Pd black. At the same time, given that the goal of the present work is the partial hydrogenation of FAMEs, Pd did not require a matrix that enhanced its activity. In fact, a too high activity in the catalytic hydrogenation could be detrimental for selectivity towards the formation of mono-alkene products. On the contrary, as Ni is much less active than Pd in hydrogenations, it needs a support suitable to improve its catalytic activity. Many studies have been reported on the importance of N-doping earth abundant metal-based catalysts for increasing their catalytic activity [33,34]. In fact, N impurities dispersed onto the support can achieve the following: (a) promote electron transfer towards the metal centers; (b) co-adjuvate the solvent assisted heterolytic splitting of dihydrogen, due to Brønsted basic properties of the nitrogen sites; and (c) facilitate the formation of metal−hydride intermediates in the catalytic pathway. The acrylamide matrix of Ni-pol contains several nitrogen centers, even after calcination, and for this reason, acrylamide Ni-pol has been found much more active than its methacrylic analogous in the hydrogenation of nitroarenes [35]. On the basis of all of the reported considerations, no partial hydrogenation tests were performed by cross-switching the organic supports between Ni- and Pd-based catalysts.

2.2. Fatty Acid Methyl Esters (FAMEs)

Commercial soybean oil (SO) and waste cooking oil (WCO) were analyzed after transesterification in methanol, and the resulting FAMEs compositions are reported in Figure 2.
SO and WCO have a similar FAMEs composition (Figure 2), being rich in polyunsaturated methyl esters, such as C18:2 (methyl linoleate, 48.2–46.9%) and C18:3 (methyl linolenate, 4.8–5.8%), which should be converted into the more valuable monounsaturated C18:1 product, avoiding the further formation of C18:0 methyl stearate, which is present in raw SO and WCO FAMEs in a low amount (5.8–6.8%), except for methyl palmitate (C16:0, 9.8–10.9%) and a negligible quantity of methyl arachidate (C20:0, 0.3%). The biodiesel upgrading aims at converting C18:3 and C18:2 starting esters into C18:1 methyl oleate (cis configuration), trying to prevent the formation of methyl elaidate (C18:1, trans configuration), which has a melting point higher than its cis isomer, with detrimental effects on the cold flow properties of the whole mixture. However, it has been demonstrated that biodiesel enriched with the trans-C18:1 isomer has better lubricity features than FAMEs mixture containing C18:1 species in only a cis configuration [36].

2.3. Catalytic Tests

2.3.1. Pd Catalyst

Based on the catalytic activity of Pd-pol in C=C double bond hydrogenation reactions [25], preliminary experiments were carried out using a metal/biodiesel molar ratio equal to 0.028, under 10 bar of dihydrogen in methanol at room temperature (RT). Figure 3 shows the composition of the SO and WCO FAMEs mixtures at different reaction times.
A close inspection of Figure 3 reveals that the Pd-pol catalytic system was able to convert almost quantitatively polyunsaturated fatty acid methyl esters (PFAMEs) into mono-unsaturated and even totally hydrogenated FAMEs after a 5-min reaction. In fact, at t = 5 min the most abundant compound in the biodiesels was C18:1 ester (51.7% and 54.1% for SO and WCO mixtures, respectively), and the quantity of methyl stearate was not negligible (33.6% of SO and 28.7% of WCO) in both biooils. Notably, at t = 5 min, the C18:1 cis/trans molar ratio was equal to 0.83, suggesting that Pd-pol was able to simultaneously catalyze hydrogenation and alkene isomerization from a cis to trans configuration, considering that C18:3, C18:2, and C18:1 FAMEs in the starting SO and WCO biodiesels had only cis geometry for all C=C double bonds. After a 10-min reaction (Figure 3), the amounts of methyl stearate were 60.3% and 55.6% in SO and WCO, respectively, and both C18:3 and C18:2 compounds disappeared, while the C18:1 compound accounted for approximately one third of the biodiesel amount. At t = 10 min, the SO and WCO FAMEs compositions were too rich in saturated esters for use as an automotive biofuel because of the high value of the methyl stearate melting point (37 °C), which is detrimental for cold flow properties. As expected, the amounts of saturated products increased after a 15 min reaction, and both SO and WCO mixtures were totally hydrogenated after a 30 min reaction (Figure 3). These catalytic tests prompted us to consider 5 min as the best reaction time for obtaining the highest amount of desired C18:1 product, even if cis to trans isomerization could not be avoided. Remarkably, the Pd-pol performance was similar with both SO and WCO FAMEs, and no metal deactivation was observed when using waste oil as a starting material.
Recyclability tests were carried out on Pd-pol recovered after a 5 min reaction, which were re-used for further subsequent runs. Figure 4 shows the recyclability of Pd-pol catalytic system in the SO and WCO biodiesel partial hydrogenation.
The Pd-pol catalyst was recyclable for at least five subsequent runs for both SO and WCO substrates, as unwanted C18:3 and C18:2 methyl esters were almost quantitively converted in a 5 min reaction, even in the fifth cycle with the same catalyst (Figure 4). Indeed, the catalytic activity of Pd-pol seemed to increase after recycling, enhancing the amount of undesirable totally hydrogenate methyl stearate product. In fact, the quantity of the latter passed from one third of the upgraded biodiesel obtained after the first run to half of the hydrogenated FAMEs mixtures recovered after the fifth cycle (Figure 4). Conversely, the selectivity towards the C18:1 product decreased with the increase in cycles, rendering the partially hydrogenated blends obtained after the second run not suitable as automotive fuels, as the amounts of totally hydrogenated esters were too high for acceptable viscosity and cold flow features. In addition, the undesirable cis/trans isomerization was not negligible and the C18:1 methyl ester was mainly in the thermodynamically more stable trans configuration. Elemental analyses carried out on the recovered resin after five subsequent runs revealed that Pd leaching from the supported catalyst was negligible.

2.3.2. Ni Catalyst

The initial experiments of the hydrogenation of SO and WCO blends with Ni-pol were carried out using the same reaction conditions adopted for the Pd-pol partial hydrogenation system, but no C18:3, C18:2, and C18:1 conversion was observed after either the overnight reaction or after increasing the metal amount employed. Only by using a Ni/biodiesel molar ratio equal to 0.12 and by increasing the reaction temperature up to 100 °C (although the dihydrogen solubility in methanol is lower at higher temperature), was a high concentration of C18:1 methyl ester obtained after a 10 h reaction (68.7%wt for SO blend, Figure 5). Figure 5 shows the composition of SO mixtures analyzed at different reaction times under the above-mentioned conditions, revealing that the undesirable formation of a high amount of C18:0 methyl ester did not occur during the reaction (methyl stearate %wt passed from 5.8 in the pristine feedstock to 15.9 after 10 h reaction).
Once optimized for the reaction time of 10 h, recyclability tests were performed for both SO and WCO FAME feedstocks (Figure 6). The weight percent of C18:1 FAMEs was 68.7 in the SO blend and 68.1 in the WCO mixture (first cycle of Figure 6), with both values being higher than the ones obtained with the Pd-pol system. Clearly, Pd-pol was too active for the purposes of the present work, as it was poorly selective towards the mono hydrogenated product. On the contrary, Ni-pol was less active in the hydrogenation reaction than Pd-pol, thus requiring a longer reaction time and higher reaction temperature, but it turned out to have a higher selectivity towards the desirable C18:1 product. Recyclability tests performed on Ni-pol revealed that the catalyst could be re-used at least five times without losing its activity and selectivity towards the C18:1 product. Figure 6 shows the weight percent composition of the partially hydrogenated SO and WCO biodiesel after each of the five subsequent runs performed after recycling the Ni supported catalyst.
The compositions of partially hydrogenated blends were very similar for both SO and WCO starting materials in all of the cycles. The main compound present in the blends was always C18:1 methyl ester, the amount of which ranged from 68.0%wt to 70.3%wt (Figure 6). In addition, C18:3 methyl esters disappeared in the blends after partial hydrogenation, and small amounts (about 5%wt) of the C18:2 compound was always detectable in all runs (Figure 6). The Ni-pol system appeared to retain its activity and selectivity over several recycles for both SO and WCO starting materials, although with some differences as discussed in the following. Elemental analyses carried out on the recovered resin after five subsequent runs revealed that Ni leaching from the supported catalyst was negligible.

2.3.3. Partially Hydrogenated Biodiesel Features

The main physical−chemical characteristics of the partially hydrogenated blends derived the quantity of the poly-unsaturated compounds and the value of the C18:1 cis/trans molar ratio from their composition. Unfortunately, during partial hydrogenation reactions, cis to trans isomerization occurred in both Pd-pol and Ni-pol catalytic systems, and a mixture of cis and trans C18:1 methyl isomer was invariably obtained in all blends. However, the Ni-pol catalytic system was less active towards cis to trans isomerization with respect to the Pd-pol catalyst. In fact, after the first run with Ni-pol, the cis/trans C18:1 molar ratio was 1.30 and 1.37 for the SO and WCO partially hydrogenated blends, respectively, indicating that the relative amount of methyl oleate was higher than that of methyl elaidate (first cycle in Figure 7). On the contrary, with Pd-pol catalytic system after the first run, the amount of cis-C18:1 was lower than the quantity of trans-C18:1, with a cis/trans molar ratio of 0.83 for both the SO and WCO partially hydrogenated FAMEs (1st cycle in Figure 7). However, the cis/trans molar ratio increased with the subsequent cycles for Pd-pol and decreased for Ni-pol. Figure 6 shows the C18:1 cis/trans molar ratio over five cycles for both Pd-pol and Ni-pol catalysts in SO and WCO biodiesels, indicating that for Pd-pol hydrogenated blends, the C18:1 methyl ester was mostly in the thermodynamically favoured trans configuration, while for the Ni-pol partially hydrogenated FAMEs, the cis configuration was prevalent over the trans one. Considering that the melting point of cis-C18:1 (−19.9 °C) was much lower than that of trans-C18:1 (10 °C), the isomerization of cis-C18:1 to trans-C18:1 should be avoided if the final mixture is addressed to cold regions. However, FAMEs enriched by trans-C18:1 could be used as an automotive biofuel in warm countries [37], as they are characterized by excellent lubricating features [36].
Based on the FAMEs profiles of the upgraded mixture, some key parameters for defining biodiesel quality and properties, such as cold filter plugging point (CFPP), iodine value (IV), and oxidation stability (OS), could be predicted using the Biodiesel Analyzer© Software [38]. CFPP represents the lowest temperature at which fuel still flows through a specific filter, while IV is a measure of the unsaturation of biodiesel and is correlated to its stability, because the presence of many unsaturated features renders the material sensible to oxidation. Namely, IV indicates the mass in grams of iodine to be reacted with 100 g of a given oil by stoichiometric addition to double bonds. OS parameters depend on IV values, but there are many other factors not included in the iodine value affecting the stability of the bio-oil (such as the presence of saturated free fatty acids, length of the carbon chains, location of the double bonds, cis or trans configuration, and allylic double bonds that are more oxidable than not allylic ones). However, IV could give an idea about the stability of the biodiesel, and according to European laws, it should not be higher than 120 [39], while OS should exceed 8 h [40]. The best value for CFPP depends on the considered country and climate, and it always goes in the opposite direction with respect to the OS index. In fact, the CFPP value improves with increasing the number of double bonds in the FAMEs chain, whereas OS rises when the unsaturation number decreases.
Table 1 reports the CFPP, IV, and OS for SO and WCO diesel samples before the reaction and after each cycle of the partial hydrogenation test with Pd-pol and Ni-pol.
Before upgrading, SO and WCO FAMEs had good CFPP values (–3.3 °C and –1.4 °C, respectively, Table 1) and very bad IV and OS parameters, due to the high number of unsaturations in the material. By using Pd-pol as the upgrading catalyst, the IV and OS values improved, making the SO and WCO biodiesels very stable, but unfortunately the CFPP temperature increased significantly (ranging from 32.8 °C to 67.1 °C), rendering the partially hydrogenated mixtures unsuitable as a fuel for automotive applications (Table 1). Finally, SO and WCO Ni-pol partially hydrogenated FAMEs were stable enough (OS >> 8 h and IV << 120 g/100 g in all cases), but their CFPP values still exceeded the European limit (10 °C), ranging from 10.6 °C to 14.6 °C (Table 1). Thus, SO and WCO mixtures upgraded with the Ni-pol system could be useful as a biodiesel only in warm countries or by adding substances that could improve their fluidity [40].

2.4. Possible Explanation of the Different Performances of Pd-pol and Ni-pol Systems

By analyzing the data reported in previous paragraphs, it appears that Pd-pol is unsuitable for upgrading as a biodiesel, because it is too active in hydrogenation reactions and has detrimental effects on both selectivity towards C18:1 fatty acid esters as well as cis to trans isomerization. This high activity is not unexpected, as noble metals are very susceptible to form metal hydride intermediates, which in turn coordinate C=C double bonds to give additional hydrogen. Indeed, in some cases, palladium catalysts have been poisoned with sulfur or lead, aiming at lowering their activity in hydrogenation reactions, and thus improving their selectivity [13]. On the contrary, the increase of Pd-pol catalytic activity with the subsequent cycles seems to be quite uncommon, because, generally, a catalyst deactivates or at least retains its catalytic activity with reuse. As the increasing activation of Pd-pol with reuse is an occurrence never observed before in other Pd-pol catalyzed reactions taking few hours [25,27], we argue that in the present work, during the first run under dihydrogen, Pd-pol did not have enough time to transform the whole amount of palladium(II) species into Pd nanoparticles (NPs), because of the short reaction time (5 min). In fact, as the active species in these kinds of reactions are metal nanoparticles, an increased catalytic activity with the subsequent reuse might be associated with an increased density of Pd nanoparticles on the catalyst support. Indeed, Pd-pol was mainly constituted by Pd(II) centers prior to their use in catalysis, which were reduced to Pd NPs during hydrogenation under reaction conditions [25,26]. Given that the time of permanence of Pd-pol under dihydrogen became longer with reuse, more Pd(II) sites had the possibility to transform into Pd NPs, increasing the amount of catalytically active sites. To confirm this hypothesis, we employed Pd-pol recovered after five subsequent runs for an extra cycle of partial hydrogenation, observing that the catalytic activity of the supported catalyst did not increase further (Figure 8). In fact, the quantity of C18:1 FAMEs was half of the hydrogenated mixtures recovered after both the fifth and sixth cycles, becoming most (70%wt ca.) of the blend after 10-min hydrogenation with the same catalyst when used six times (Figure 7), suggesting that after five runs (25 min under dihydrogen in total) Pd-pol was composed only of Pd NPs supported onto an organic matrix.
Ni-pol did not show the same high activity of Pd-pol, but it was more selective towards the formation of the desirable cis-C18:1 FAME than its palladium analogue (Figure 4, Figure 6 and Figure 7), because nickel nanoparticles have a lesser tendency to form metal hydrides. In addition, as expected, for the Ni-pol system, an increase in its catalytic activity with the subsequent re-use was not observed.
Regarding the cis to trans isomerization and the different performances of Pd-pol and Ni-pol catalytic systems towards it, it could be useful to recall the mechanism of the heterogeneous hydrogenation reaction. In fact, the catalytic cycle started with the interaction between the unsaturated C=C bond and the catalyst, followed by homolytic dihydrogen splitting into the atomic hydrogen bound to the catalyst (Figure 9). Then, a hydrogen attached to the substrate in a reversible step (a) (Figure 9), followed by the addition of a second hydrogen atom (step b), rendering the hydrogenation process irreversible (Figure 9). During the reversible step (a) (Figure 9), isomerization could occur, forming the thermodynamically more favourable trans isomer, which is less prone to be hydrogenated with respect to the cis geometric isomer, because the interaction between the double bond and the metal catalyst is sensitive to steric hindrance [10].
As Pd-pol was more active than Ni-pol in the hydrogenation, it also hydrogenated the less sterically hampered C18:1 cis isomer faster than the trans one, leading to a cis-C18:1/trans-C18:1 molar ratio of less than 1 in the final mixture.
In addition, as conjugate dienes are easier to be hydrogenated than monoenes [41], the less active Ni-pol system was able to more rapidly hydrogenate methyl linoleate and methyl linolenate than methyl oleate, thus resulting in being selective towards the formation of C18:1 methyl ester.
Notably, both Pd and Ni systems performed in the same way for upgrading FAMEs from SO and WCO feedstocks, because they were stable to impurities (water, FAAs, oxidized functionalities, etc.) usually found in vegetable oils recovered from fried-food industries.
Finally, Pd-pol and Ni-pol were more active than conventional activated carbon supported Pd and Ni catalysts in the partial hydrogenation of FAMEs, using dihydrogen as the reductant. In fact, Pd/C 5% has been reported to hydrogenate SO FAMEs under H2 (p = 75 atm) at 85 °C for 4 h, resulting in a mixture containing 23% of C18:2, 24% of C18:1, and 40% of C18:0, with a cis-C18:1/trans-C18:1 molar ratio of 0.5, thus using harsher conditions with respect to the ones employed in the present work, except for the metal/substrate molar ratio [42]. Ni/C did not show an impressive catalytic activity in the hydrogenation of FAMEs derived from palm oil under 6 bar dihydrogen, at 120 °C for 2.5 h, as C18:3 and C18:2 amounts passed from 0.23% and 0.28%, respectively, in the pristine blend to 0.14% and 0.10% in the hydrogenated one, while C18:1 increased from 38.63%.to 39.81% after the reaction [43]. However, Ni-based nanomaterials are promising catalysts for the catalytic transfer hydrogenation of FAMEs using isopropanol, glycerol, and so on, as hydrogen donors [15,19].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Considerations

All of the chemicals were purchased from commercial sources and were used as received. Soybean oil and WCO were obtained from food market and domestic waste, respectively. Tap water was de-ionized by ionic exchange resins (Millipore) before use. Pd-pol [31] and Ni-pol [32] were synthesized according to the procedures described in the literature. The metal content in the catalysts (before and after their use) was assessed with an atomic absorption spectrometer (AAS; Perkin–Elmer 3110) after sample mineralization. The experimental error on the assessed value was ±0.3%. Mineralization of the catalysts was performed in the microwave ETHOS E-TOUCH Milestone applicator in an HCl/HNO3 (3:1 v/v) solution (12 mL). Gas chromatography−mass spectrometry (GC-MS) data (EI, 70 eV) were acquired on a HP 6890 instrument using an HP-5MS cross-linked 5% phenyl methyl siloxane (30.0 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm) capillary column coupled with a HP 5973 mass spectrometer. The products were identified by comparing their GC-MS characteristics with those of the pure samples. Gas chromatography analyses were carried out using an HP 6890 instrument equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) and an HP-1 (Cross linked Methyl Siloxane) capillary column (60.0 m × 0.25 mm × 1.0 μm).

3.2. Synthesis of FAMEs

FAMEs were prepared from SO and WCO through a transesterification reaction according to the procedure reported in [22]. First, 50 g of vegetable oil was heated at 60 °C. Then, a solution of methanol (16.9 g) and potassium hydroxide (0.5 g) in a MeOH/oil molar ratio equal to 9:1 was added to the heated oil and left under stirring at 600 rpm for 2 h under refluxing conditions. Afterwards, the mixture was poured into a separating funnel, and was left standing overnight to separate the FAMEs from the glycerol. Once separated, the FAMEs phase was washed several times with distilled water at 60 °C and dried over Na2SO4. The average molar weights of the SO and WCO FAMEs mixtures were calculated on the base of their composition.

3.3. Catalytic Tests

3.3.1. Upgrading with Pd-pol

Biodiesel (125 mg) and Pd-pol (60.3 mg, Pd%wt = 2.50) were mixed in CH3OH (5.0 mL) in a 50 mL stainless-steel reactor under dihydrogen (10 bar) at room temperature. The whole mixture was left under stirring for the appropriate amount of time. The progress of the reaction was monitored by GLC and GC-MS.
At the end of the reaction, the catalyst was filtered off and washed with methanol (3 × 5 mL) and n-hexane (3 × 5 mL). Then, it was dried under vacuum, weighed, and employed for subsequent catalytic runs, by using a proper amount of fresh reagent, in order to keep the metal/substrate molar ratio steady over subsequent cycles.

3.3.2. Upgrading with Ni-pol

Biodiesel (125 mg) and Ni-pol (64.5 mg, Ni%wt = 5.35) were mixed in CH3OH (5.0 mL) in a 50 mL stainless-steel reactor under dihydrogen (10 bar) at 100 °C. The whole mixture was left under stirring for the appropriate amount of time. The progress of the reaction was monitored by GLC and GC-MS.
At the end of the reaction, the catalyst was filtered off, and washed with methanol (3 × 5 mL) and n-hexane (3 × 5 mL). Then, it was dried under vacuum, weighed, and employed for subsequent catalytic runs by using a proper amount of fresh reagent in order to keep the metal/substrate molar ratio steady over subsequent cycles.

4. Conclusions

Polymer-supported palladium (Pd-pol) and nickel (Ni-pol) nanoparticles were employed as catalysts for the partial hydrogenation of FAMEs obtained from soybean and waste cooking oils. Pd-pol was very active under mild conditions (10 bar dihydrogen, room temperature, 5 min reaction time), but unfortunately it was poorly selective towards the formation of a desirable C18:1 product, which guaranteed good cold flow and oxidative stability parameters for the upgraded biodiesel. In fact, the main product of the Pd-pol catalytic system was methyl stearate, resulting from total hydrogenation. On the contrary, the Ni-pol catalyst was less active than Pd-pol, requiring longer reaction times (10 h) and higher temperatures (100 °C) under 10 bar dihydrogen, but still not severe conditions. However, the Ni-pol system showed good selectivity towards the formation of C18:1 methyl ester, although the unwanted cis to trans isomerization could not be avoided. Both catalysts were recyclable for at least five subsequent runs and retained the metal charge over the cycles. By comparing the Pd and Ni polymer-supported catalysts reported here, the best performances were achieved with the nickel material. Considering the high cost of palladium, the present work demonstrates that nickel catalysts could represent a compelling alternative to noble metals for the synthesis of renewable biofuels.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/catal12050506/s1. Figure S1. Chromatogram of FAMEs obtained from waste cooking oil using GC-MS instrument. Figure S2. Chromatogram of FAMEs obtained from soybean oil using GC-MS instrument Figure S3. STEM image of Ni-pol before use in catalysis. Figure S4a,b. STEM images of Ni-pol recovered after five cycles. Figure S5. TEM image of Pd-pol before use in catalysis. Figure S6. TEM image of Pd-pol recovered after five cycles.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M.D.; methodology, A.M.F.; software, M.M.D.; validation, M.M.D., G.R. and P.M.; formal analysis, A.M.F. and C.L.; investigation, A.M.F.; resources, P.M.; data curation, G.R.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M.D.; writing—review and editing, M.M.D. and P.M.; editing, G.R.; visualization, M.M.D.; supervision, M.M.D.; project administration, P.M.; funding acquisition, P.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Operational Programme 2014–2020, Italian Ministerial Decree No. 1061 (10 August 2021), PhD Programmes for Sustainability and Innovation-Related Subjects.

Acknowledgments

Daniele Carrasso is acknowledged for support in some of the experiments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jeyaseean, T.; Ekambaram, P.; Subramanian, J.; Shamim, A. A comprehensive review on the current trends, challenges and future prospects for sustainable mobility. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 2022, 157, 112073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Munyentwali, A.; Li, H. Review of advances in bifunctional solid acid/base catalysts for sustainable biodiesel production. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2022, 633, 118525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Singh, D.; Sharma, D.; Soni, S.L.; Inda, C.S.; Sharma, S.; Sharma, P.K.; Jhalani, A. A comprehensive review of biodiesel production from waste cooking oil and its use as fuel in compression ignition engines: 3rd generation cleaner feedstock. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 307, 127299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lucas Nascimento, L.; Ribeiro, A.; Ferreira, A.; Valério, N.; Pinheiro, V.; Araújo, J.; Vilarinho, C.; Carvalho, J. Turning waste cooking oils into biofuels—Valorization Technologies: A review. Energies 2022, 15, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H.; Li, C.; Chen, X.; Peng, W.; Aghbashlo, M.; Lam, S.S.; Tabatabaei, M. Managing the hazardous waste cooking oil by conversion into bioenergy through the application of waste-derived green catalysts: A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 424, 127636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tayari, S.; Abedi, R.; Rahi, A. Comparative assessment of engine performance and emissions fueled with three different biodiesel generations. Renew. Energy 2020, 147, 1058–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Casiello, M.; Catucci, L.; Fracassi, F.; Fusco, C.; Laurenza, G.; di Bitonto, L.; Pastore, C.; D’Accolti, L.; Nacci, A. ZnO/Ionic liquid catalyzed biodiesel production from renewable and waste lipids as feedstocks. Catalysts 2019, 9, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. McCormick, R.L.; Ratcliff, M.; Moens, L.; Lawrence, R. Several factors affecting the stability of biodiesel in standard accelerated tests. Fuel Process. Technol. 2007, 88, 651–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Weidong, Z.; Jiangwei, Y.; Xiaoyin, Z.; Xiaolong, Q. Review on the progress of the first-generation biodiesel hydrogenation and upgrading. Energy Sources A Recovery Util. Environ. Eff. 2020, 42, 2704–2714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Adu-Mensah, D.; Mei, D.; Zuo, L.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, J. A review on partial hydrogenation of biodiesel and its influence on fuel properties. Fuel 2019, 251, 660–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wongjaikham, W.; Kongprawes, G.; Wongsawaeng, D.; Ngaosuwan, R.; Kiatkittipong, W.; Hosemann, P.; Assabumrungrat, S. Highly effective microwave plasma application for catalyst-free and low temperature hydrogenation of biodiesel. Fuel 2021, 305, 121524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kongprawes, G.; Wongsawaeng, D.; Hosemann, P.; Ngaosuwan, K.; Kiatkittipong, W.; Assabumrungrat, S. Improvement of oxidation stability of fatty acid methyl esters derived from soybean oil via partial hydrogenation using dielectric barrier discharge plasma. Int. J. Energy Res 2021, 45, 4519–4533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Laverdura, U.P.; Rossi, L.; Ferella, F.; Courson, C.; Zarli, A.; Alhajyoussef, R.; Gallucci, K. Selective catalytic hydrogenation of vegetable oils on lindlar catalyst. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 22901–22913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, S.-Y.; Attanatho, L.; Chang, A.; Laosombut, T.; Nishi, M.; Mochizuki, T.; Takagi, H.; Yang, C.-M.; Abe, H.; Toba, M.; et al. Profiling and catalytic upgrading of commercial palm oil-derived biodiesel fuels for high-blend fuels. Catal. Today 2019, 332, 122–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gao, L.; Liu, K.; Zhang, L.; Xin, Z.; Yang, Y.; Wei, G.; Yuan, T. Microwave-assisted catalytic transfer hydrogenation of fatty acid methyl esters using metal-doped nickelboride-cetyltrimethylammonium bromide amorphous alloy catalyst. Int. J. Energy Res. 2021, 45, 13098–13116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lee, H.-S.; Lee, J.; Seo, H.; Kang, H.; Kim, D.-H.; Lee, Y.-W. Evaluation of Pd/ZSM-5 catalyst for simultaneous reaction of transesterification and partial catalytic transfer hydrogenation of soybean oil under supercritical methanol. Fuel Process. Technol. 2021, 218, 106870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xin, Z.; Wei, G.; Zhang, L.; Gao, L.; Li, G.; Zhao, W. Partial hydrogenation of fatty acid methyl esters under mild conditions using sodium borohydride as hydrogen donor. Fuel 2021, 299, 120877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhu, T.; Zhang, L.; Li, Z.; Wei, G.; Xin, Z.; Xiong, D.; Ou, Z. Partial Hydrogenation of Jatropha Oil Biodiesel Catalyzed by Nickel/Bentonite Catalyst. Waste Biomass Valorization 2021, 12, 465–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wei, G.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, L.; Li, Z. Catalytic upgrading of Jatropha oil biodiesel by partial hydrogenation using Raney-Ni as catalyst under microwave heating. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 163, 208–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, S.-Y.; Attanatho, L.; Mochizuki, T.; Abe, Y.; Toba, M.; Yoshimura, Y.; Kumpidet, C.; Somwonhsa, P.; Laoubol, S. Upgrading of palm biodiesel fuel over supported palladium catalysts. Comptes Rendus Chim. 2016, 19, 1166–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Numwong, N.; Prabnasak, P.; Prayoonpunratn, P.; Triphatthanaphong, P.; Thunyaratchatanon, C.; Mochizuki, T.; Chen, S.-Y.; Luengnaruemitchai, A.; Sookno, T. Effect of Pd particle size on activity and cis-trans selectivity in partial hydrogenation of soybean oil-derived FAMEs over Pd/SiO2 catalysts. Fuel Process. Technol. 2020, 203, 106393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Thunyaratchatanon, C.; Luengnaruemitchai, A.; Chollacoop, N.; Yoshimura, Y. Catalytic upgrading of soybean oil methyl esters by partial hydrogenation using Pd catalysts. Fuel 2016, 163, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Troncoso, F.D.; Tonetto, G.M. Highly stable platinum monolith catalyst for the hydrogenation of vegetable oil. Chem. Eng. Process. 2022, 170, 108669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lu, Z.; Cherepakhin, V.; Kapenstein, T.; Williams, T.J. Upgrading Biodiesel from Vegetable Oils by Hydrogen Transfer to Its Fatty Esters. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 5749–5753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dell’Anna, M.M.; Capodiferro, V.F.; Mali, M.; Manno, D.; Cotugno, P.; Monopoli, A.; Mastrorilli, P. Highly selective hydrogenation of quinolines promoted by recyclable polymer supported palladium nanoparticles under mild conditions in aqueous medium. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2014, 481, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dell’Anna, M.M.; Capodiferro, V.F.; Mali, M.; Mastrorilli, P. Esterification, transesterification and hydrogenation reactions of polyunsaturated compounds catalyzed by a recyclable polymer supported palladium catalyst. J. Organomet. Chem. 2016, 818, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dell’Anna, M.M.; Romanazzi, G.; Intini, S.; Rizzuti, A.; Leonelli, C.; Piccinni, A.F.; Mastrorilli, P. A polymer supported palladium (II) b--ketoesterate complex as active and recyclable pre-catalyst for selective reduction of quinolines in water with sodium borohydride. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2015, 402, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Fiore, A.M.; Romanazzi, G.; Dell’Anna, M.M.; Latronico, M.; Leonelli, C.; Mali, M.; Rizzuti, A.; Mastrorilli, P. Mild and efficient synthesis of secondary aromatic amines by one-pot stepwise reductive amination of arylaldehydes with nitroarenes promoted by reusable nickel nanoparticles. Mol. Catal. 2019, 476, 110507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mastrorilli, P.; Dell’Anna, M.M.; Rizzuti, A.; Mali, M.; Zapparoli, M.; Leonelli, C. Resin-immobilized palladium nanoparticle catalysts for organic reactions in aqueous media: Morphological aspects. Molecules 2015, 20, 18661–18684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Dell’Anna, M.M.; Romanazzi, G.; Mastrorilli, P. Polymer Supported Catalysts Obtained from Metal-Containing Monomers. Curr. Org. Chem. 2013, 17, 1236–1273. [Google Scholar]
  31. Dell’Anna, M.M.; Mastrorilli, P.; Nobile, C.F. Solid-Phase Catalytic Activity of a Polymer-Supported Palladium Complex. In Solid-Phase Organic Syntheses; Scott, P.J.H., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012; pp. 79–86. [Google Scholar]
  32. Romanazzi, G.; Fiore, A.M.; Mali, M.; Rizzuti, A.; Leonelli, C.; Nacci, A.; Mastrorilli, P.; Dell’Anna, M.M. Polymer supported Nickel nanoparticles as recyclable catalyst for the reduction of nitroarenes to anilines in aqueous medium. Mol. Catal. 2018, 446, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jagadeesh, R.V.; Surkus, A.-E.; Junge, H.; Pohl, M.-M.; Radnik, J.; Rabeah, J.; Huan, H.; Schünemann, V.; Brückner, A.; Beller, M. Nanoscale Fe2O3-based catalysts for selective hydrogenation of nitroarenes to anilines. Science 2013, 342, 1073–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Murugesan, K.; Senthamarai, T.; Chandrashekhar, V.G.; Natte, K.; Kamer, P.C.J.; Beller, M.; Jagadeesh, R.V. Catalytic reductive aminations using molecular hydrogen for synthesis of different kinds of amines. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 6273–6328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fiore, A.M.; Nefedova, D.; Romanazzi, G.; Petrelli, V.; Mali, M.; Leonelli, C.; Mortalò, C.; Catauro, M.; Mastrorilli, P.; Dell’Anna, M.M. How the Calcination Procedure Affects the Morphology and the Catalytic Activity of Polymer-Supported Nickel Nanoparticles. Macromol. Symp. 2021, 395, 2000195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sukjit, E.; Tongroon, M.; Chollacoop, N.; Yoshimura, Y.; Poapongsakorn, P.; Lapuerta, M.; Dearn, K.D. Improvement of the tribological behaviour of palm biodiesel via partial hydrogenation of unsaturated fatty acid methyl esters. Wear 2019, 426–427, 813–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bateni, H.; Saraeian, A.; Able, C. A comprehensive review on biodiesel purification and upgrading. Biofuel Res. J. 2017, 15, 668–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Talebi, A.F.; Tabatabaei, M.; Chisti, Y. BiodieselAnalyzer@: A user-friendly software for predicting the properties of prospective biodiesel. Biofuel Res. J. 2014, 2, 55–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lapuerta, M.; Fernandez, J.M.; Font de Mora, E. Correlation for the estimation of the cetane number of biodiesel fuels and implications on the iodine number. Energy Policy 2009, 37, 4337–4344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Makareviciene, V.; Kazancev, K.; Kazanceva, I. Possibilities for improving the cold flow properties of biodiesel fuel by blending with butanol. Renew. Energy 2015, 75, 805–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Quaranta, E.; Cornacchia, D. Partial hydrogenation of a C18:3-rich FAME mixture over Pd/C. Renew. Energy 2020, 157, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Souza, B.S.; Pinho, D.M.M.; Leopoldino, E.C.; Suarez, P.A.Z.; Nome, F. Selective partial biodiesel hydrogenation using highly active supported palladium nanoparticles in imidazolium-based ionic liquid. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2012, 433, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ramayeni, E.; Susanto, B.H.; Pratama, D.F. Palm H-FAME Production through Partially Hydrogenation using Nickel/Carbon Catalyst to Increase Oxidation Stability. In MATEC Web of Conferences; RSCE: Entebbe, Uganda, 2018; Volume 156, p. 03004. [Google Scholar]
Catalysts 12 00506 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Hydrogenation of C18 FAMEs.
Scheme 1. Hydrogenation of C18 FAMEs.
Catalysts 12 00506 sch001
Catalysts 12 00506 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Pd(II)-pol and Ni(II)-pol.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Pd(II)-pol and Ni(II)-pol.
Catalysts 12 00506 sch002
Catalysts 12 00506 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematization of Pd(II)-pol, Ni(II)-pol, and Ni-pol structures.
Figure 1. Schematization of Pd(II)-pol, Ni(II)-pol, and Ni-pol structures.
Catalysts 12 00506 g001
Catalysts 12 00506 g002 550
Figure 2. SO and WCO FAMEs composition (%wt).
Figure 2. SO and WCO FAMEs composition (%wt).
Catalysts 12 00506 g002
Catalysts 12 00506 g003 550
Figure 3. SO and WCO FAMEs compositions (%wt) at different reaction times during hydrogenation with Pd-pol (2.8 mol% of Pd with respect to biodiesel (0.5 mmol, 125 mg), CH3OH (5 mL), RT, under H2 (10 bar)).
Figure 3. SO and WCO FAMEs compositions (%wt) at different reaction times during hydrogenation with Pd-pol (2.8 mol% of Pd with respect to biodiesel (0.5 mmol, 125 mg), CH3OH (5 mL), RT, under H2 (10 bar)).
Catalysts 12 00506 g003
Catalysts 12 00506 g004 550
Figure 4. SO and WCO FAME composition (%wt) after each of five subsequent runs with the same Pd-pol catalyst. Reaction conditions: SO or WCO biodiesels (125 mg), Pd-pol (0.014 mmol of Pd), CH3OH (5 mL), RT, H2 (10 bar), t = 5 min. In all histograms, the percent of C20:0 methyl ester is equal to 0.3%.
Figure 4. SO and WCO FAME composition (%wt) after each of five subsequent runs with the same Pd-pol catalyst. Reaction conditions: SO or WCO biodiesels (125 mg), Pd-pol (0.014 mmol of Pd), CH3OH (5 mL), RT, H2 (10 bar), t = 5 min. In all histograms, the percent of C20:0 methyl ester is equal to 0.3%.
Catalysts 12 00506 g004
Catalysts 12 00506 g005 550
Figure 5. SO FAMEs composition (C) at different reaction times during hydrogenation with Ni-pol (0.059 mmol of Ni), biodiesel (0.5 mmol, 125 mg), and CH3OH (5 mL), at 100 °C under H2 (10 bar). In all of the histograms, the percent of C20:0 methyl ester is equal to 0.3%.
Figure 5. SO FAMEs composition (C) at different reaction times during hydrogenation with Ni-pol (0.059 mmol of Ni), biodiesel (0.5 mmol, 125 mg), and CH3OH (5 mL), at 100 °C under H2 (10 bar). In all of the histograms, the percent of C20:0 methyl ester is equal to 0.3%.
Catalysts 12 00506 g005
Catalysts 12 00506 g006 550
Figure 6. SO and WCO FAMEs compositions (%wt) after each of the five subsequent runs with the same Ni-pol catalyst. Reaction conditions: SO or WCO biodiesels (125 mg), Ni-pol (0.059 mmol of Ni), and CH3OH (5 mL), at 100 °C, H2 (10 bar), and t = 10 h. In all of the histograms, the percent of C20:0 methyl ester is equal to 0.3%.
Figure 6. SO and WCO FAMEs compositions (%wt) after each of the five subsequent runs with the same Ni-pol catalyst. Reaction conditions: SO or WCO biodiesels (125 mg), Ni-pol (0.059 mmol of Ni), and CH3OH (5 mL), at 100 °C, H2 (10 bar), and t = 10 h. In all of the histograms, the percent of C20:0 methyl ester is equal to 0.3%.
Catalysts 12 00506 g006
Catalysts 12 00506 g007 550
Figure 7. The cis-C18:1/trans-C18:1 molar ratio in SO and WCO partially hydrogenated biodiesel over five subsequent cycles with Pd-pol and Ni-pol.
Figure 7. The cis-C18:1/trans-C18:1 molar ratio in SO and WCO partially hydrogenated biodiesel over five subsequent cycles with Pd-pol and Ni-pol.
Catalysts 12 00506 g007
Catalysts 12 00506 g008 550
Figure 8. SO and WCO FAMEs compositions (%wt) after the fifth and the sixth runs with the same Pd-pol catalyst. Reaction conditions: SO or WCO biodiesels (125 mg), Pd-pol (0.014 mmol of Pd), and CH3OH (5 mL), at RT, H2 (10 bar), and t = 5 min. The last two histograms refer to the sixth cycle over a 10-min reaction. In all of the histograms, the percent of C20:0 methyl ester is equal to 0.3%.
Figure 8. SO and WCO FAMEs compositions (%wt) after the fifth and the sixth runs with the same Pd-pol catalyst. Reaction conditions: SO or WCO biodiesels (125 mg), Pd-pol (0.014 mmol of Pd), and CH3OH (5 mL), at RT, H2 (10 bar), and t = 5 min. The last two histograms refer to the sixth cycle over a 10-min reaction. In all of the histograms, the percent of C20:0 methyl ester is equal to 0.3%.
Catalysts 12 00506 g008
Catalysts 12 00506 g009 550
Figure 9. Mechanism of the heterogeneously catalysed hydrogenation of C=C bond.
Figure 9. Mechanism of the heterogeneously catalysed hydrogenation of C=C bond.
Catalysts 12 00506 g009
Table
Table 1. CFPP, IV, and OS for SO and WCO diesel samples treated with Pd-pol or Ni-pol catalytic systems.
Table 1. CFPP, IV, and OS for SO and WCO diesel samples treated with Pd-pol or Ni-pol catalytic systems.
BiodieselCatCycleCFPP (°C)IV (g/100 g)OS (h)
SO--–3.31304.7
Pd-pol1st40.355.227.2
Pd-pol2nd47.551.326.2
Pd-pol3rd48.750.626.2
Pd-pol4th54.944.951.7
Pd-pol5th67.136.8109.8
WCO--–1.41264.8
Pd-pol1st32.860.221.0
Pd-pol2nd46.051.926.2
Pd-pol3rd47.751.324.4
Pd-pol4th58.843.435.3
Pd-pol5th67.136.4109.8
SONi-pol1st12.571.724.0
Ni-pol2nd12.872.922.2
Ni-pol3rd12.472.421.9
Ni-pol4th11.073.022.2
Ni-pol5th10.673.322.6
WCONi-pol1st14.069.229.4
Ni-pol2nd14.669.926.1
Ni-pol3rd13.071.224.4
Ni-pol4th12.270.828.2
Ni-pol5th10.672.525.7
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fiore, A.M.; Romanazzi, G.; Leonelli, C.; Mastrorilli, P.; Dell’Anna, M.M. Partial Hydrogenation of Soybean and Waste Cooking Oil Biodiesel over Recyclable-Polymer-Supported Pd and Ni Nanoparticles. Catalysts 2022, 12, 506. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12050506

AMA Style

Fiore AM, Romanazzi G, Leonelli C, Mastrorilli P, Dell’Anna MM. Partial Hydrogenation of Soybean and Waste Cooking Oil Biodiesel over Recyclable-Polymer-Supported Pd and Ni Nanoparticles. Catalysts. 2022; 12(5):506. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12050506

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fiore, Ambra Maria, Giuseppe Romanazzi, Cristina Leonelli, Piero Mastrorilli, and Maria Michela Dell’Anna. 2022. "Partial Hydrogenation of Soybean and Waste Cooking Oil Biodiesel over Recyclable-Polymer-Supported Pd and Ni Nanoparticles" Catalysts 12, no. 5: 506. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12050506

APA Style

Fiore, A. M., Romanazzi, G., Leonelli, C., Mastrorilli, P., & Dell’Anna, M. M. (2022). Partial Hydrogenation of Soybean and Waste Cooking Oil Biodiesel over Recyclable-Polymer-Supported Pd and Ni Nanoparticles. Catalysts, 12(5), 506. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12050506

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop