Next Article in Journal
Catalytic Ozonation by Iron Coated Pumice for the Degradation of Natural Organic Matters
Previous Article in Journal
Deep Eutectic Mixtures as Reaction Media for the Enantioselective Organocatalyzed α-Amination of 1,3-Dicarbonyl Compounds
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Activation of Persulfate Using an Industrial Iron-Rich Sludge as an Efficient Nanocatalyst for Landfill Leachate Treatment

by
Alaa Mohamad Soubh
,
Majid Baghdadi
*,
Mohammad Ali Abdoli
and
Behnoush Aminzadeh
Department of Environmental Engineering, Graduate Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, Tehran 1417853111, Iran
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2018, 8(5), 218; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8050218
Submission received: 3 April 2018 / Revised: 12 May 2018 / Accepted: 16 May 2018 / Published: 20 May 2018

Abstract

:
In this research, the performance of nanomaterials obtained from the converter sludge (CS) of Esfahan Steel Company, Iran was investigated for the activation of persulfate (PS). The experiments were conducted on real and synthetic leachates. CS showed high catalytic activity for removal of chemical oxygen demand COD and NH3 because of its high iron oxide content. The effects of pH, CS dosage, and PS/COD ratio, temperature, and reaction time on the removal of COD and NH3 were evaluated to optimize operational conditions (pH 2, CS dosage: 1.2 g L−1, PS/COD: 4, and reaction time: 60 min). Maximum COD and NH3 removal efficiencies were 73.56 and 63.87%, respectively. Finally, the optimized process was applied for treatment of a real leachate sample. Although the treated leachate was not suitable to discharge into the environment, an increase in the 5-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) and biodegradability (BOD5/COD) of leachate after treatment indicated that the effluent can be biologically treated. As a consequence, it can be combined with sewage or can be returned to the landfill.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Landfill leachate is a highly contaminated fluid formed as a result of rainwater leakage in the landfill. Other processes involved in leachate production are biological decomposition, surface water runoff, and groundwater inflow [1]. The landfill leachates contain a broad spectrum of organic substances, heavy metals, and other toxic materials. Therefore, proper management and safe disposal of leachate are vital issues [2].
Because the leachate composition varies depending on where it is formed, there is no specific method or technique for its treatment [3]. Generally accepted treatments for leachates mainly include: (a) physical methods: air stripping, sedimentation/flotation, coagulation/flocculation, and adsorption (b) chemical methods: chemical precipitation, and chemical oxidation [4], (c) aerobic and anaerobic biological processes, in which the leachate can be mixed with urban sewage and treated in urban wastewater treatment plant [5].
Biological processes are successful in treating leachates with the BOD5/COD ratios larger than 0.5. However, increasing refractory compounds limit the effectiveness of the process [4]. The coagulation and flocculation process has been reported to be effective in treating stabilized landfill leachates. The main disadvantage of this process is producing high volume of sludge. In addition, the concentration of iron or aluminum in the leachate increases [6]. Nonbiodegradable organics may be removed using the adsorption process from biologically treated landfill leachates. However, frequent regeneration of columns is needed, which limits the application of the adsorption process in treating leachate [4].
Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are the most commonly used methods for contaminant removal from effluents. Hydroxyl radical-based advanced oxidation processes (HR-AOPs) attenuate many organic substances through conversion into CO2 and H2O [7]. For example, the heterogeneous photocatalysis (TiO2/UV) technology has been applied to treat landfill leachate, and the results showed that biodegradability (BOD5/COD) of treated wastewater was favorable to be treated biologically [8]. It was also suitable to be recycled in landfills (loop AOP + landfill) [9].
Persulfate (S2O82−) is the most active member of the peroxygen family and has a high standard oxidation potential (E° = 2.01 V) [10,11,12]. Therefore, it has been widely used for the oxidation of organic contaminants in recent years [13]. Sulfate radical-based advanced oxidation processes (SR-AOPs) occur when persulfate ion is activated [7], and the sulfate radical is generated [14]. Transition metals, ozone, heat, or ultraviolet light irradiation are used for persulfate activation [7,15,16]. The O3/persulfate system has been applied for treatment of stabilized landfill leachate. Results have shown that a combination of O3 and persulfate is more effective than using each component alone [11]. In another research, the maximum removal efficiencies of 87 and 85% have been reported for COD and color, respectively, after 210 min of ozonation in the presence of sodium persulfate (4500 mg L−1), at pH 9, and at an ozone mass flow rate of 0.79 g h−1, [10]. The transition metals, including Mn2+ and Fe3+, are the most efficient activators for persulfate ions [17]. However, Fe2+ is preffered for activation of persulfate in environmental applications [18,19]. Furthermore, the waste materials containing a significant amount of iron such as fly ash can be a superior activator for persulfate activation [20].
Many waste materials, such as converter slag, dust, sludge, and oxide shell are produced in the steel industries. Among them, sludge has attracted enormous interest because the amount of its production rate is higher than that of other wastes, and approximately 150 kg of converter sludge is produced per ton of steel product. It has been reported that 250 million kg of sludge is produced per year in Esfahan Steel Company of Iran [21,22]. These waste materials can lead to serious environmental problems. Therefore, they have recently been used in agricultural studies to improve soil fertility [23,24].
Acidified converter sludge alone or along with organic matter has been reported as an advantageous method to supply iron to calcareous soils [25]. Converter sludge and slag are considered as disposable and inexpensive materials. Therefore, the application of these materials in different fields is essential to achieve integrated waste management and has significant environmental benefits. The converter sludge can be considered as the best activator for persulfate because of its ability to provide enough available Fe2+ and Fe3+, which have a significant role in generating sulfate radicals with superior capability to oxidize the pollutants present in leachate.
In this work, the performances of both sludge and slag were evaluated in batch experiments for activation of persulfate to remove COD and NH3 from synthetic leachate. Then, the effects of parameters affecting the sulfate radical oxidation process such as catalyst dosage, PS concentration, pH, contact time, and temperature were examined. Degradation kinetics of COD and NH3 were also studied. The optimal conditions were applied for the treatment of real landfill leachate. Finally, the biodegradability (BOD5/COD) of treated synthetic and real landfill leachates was examined.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Activator Characterization

Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of CS are exhibited in Figure 1a–c. As it is clear, the mean particle size of CS was about 200 nm; as a consequence, it can provide a high surface area for the activation of persulfate. Furthermore, the result of energy dispersivespectroscopy (EDS) analysis (Figure 1d) confirmed the presence of a considerable amount of iron (72.03%) necessary for the activation of persulfate ions. Moreover, small amounts of other elements, such as Si, Ca, and Mg were observed in CS.
The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of CS and SL are shown in Figure 1e,f, respectively. As indicated in Figure 1e, the XRD pattern of CS showed the presence of iron oxide compounds such as Fe3O4 and Fe2O3. On the other hand, according to Figure 1f, the SL sample did not contain iron oxide, whereas the presence of calcium compounds, including CaCO3, Ca(OH)2, Ca2SiO4, and Ca3Mg(SiO4)2 were confirmed.

2.2. The Catalytic and Adsorptive Activity of CS and SL

In order to choose a suitable activator to activate the persulfate, treatment of synthetic leachate was examined in the presence of CS and SL. As indicated in Figure 2a, the removal efficiencies of COD (74.2%) and NH3 (64.9%) in the presence of CS were significantly higher than those of COD (28.9%) and NH3 (23.1%) in the presence of SL, which is due to high iron oxide content in CS. As a consequence, CS has excellent characteristics as an activator of persulfate for treatment of synthetic leachate. Similar experiments were performed in the absence of PS. Removal efficiencies of COD (14.3%) and NH3 (12.9%) in the presence of SL were higher than those of COD (3%) and NH3 (1.9%) in the presence of CS (Figure 2b). It is concluded that SL has a greater potential in the adsorption of organic compounds and ammonia. In the present research, CS was chosen as the activator of PS to perform the next experiments.

2.3. Effective Parameters for the Leachate Treatment

2.3.1. Effect of pH

In sulfate radical advanced oxidation processes (SR-AOPs) like other advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), pH affects the kind and the quantity of radicals [26,27]. The removal efficiencies have been studied at various pH values (Figure 3). The removal efficiencies were improved as pH decreased. At pH 1.0, the maximum removal efficiency of COD (76.32%) and NH3 (65.68%) were achieved. The removal efficiency at pH 2.0 was slightly lower than that at pH 1.0. Many previous studies have confirmed that Fe3O4 and Fe2O3 can activate PS to degrade organic contaminants [20,28,29,30]. This activity is as a result of releasing Fe3+ and Fe2+ ions from Fe3O4 and Fe2O3 at highly acidic conditions, in accordance with Equations (1) and (2) [31]. Fe3+ and Fe2+ ions activate the persulfate ions and subsequently produce a stronger oxidant, i.e., sulfate radical (SO4•−), according to Equations (3) and (4), [19,32,33]. By reducing the pH to 4, the removal efficiency was decreased and reached a minimum level at pH 7.0. This decrease is because of converting iron ions into iron hydroxide, which is not useful for the activation of PS [34]. By increasing the pH to 9, the removal efficiency improved relatively because the alkaline conditions partially activated PS [35,36].
Fe3O4 + 8H+ → 2Fe3+ + Fe2+ + 4H2O
Fe2O3 + 6H+ → 2Fe3+ + 3H2O
S2O82− + Fe3+ → 2SO4•− + Fe3+
S2O82− + Fe2+ → SO4•− + SO42− + Fe3+
It has been reported that an acidic pH was suitable when compounds containing iron were used as activators for activating persulfate [20,37].
In the present research, pH 2 was chosen to perform the next experiments. The mechanism of COD and NH3 degradation by sulfate radical produced through activation of PS using CS is shown in Scheme 1.

2.3.2. Effect of Converter Sludge Dosage and PS/COD Mass Ratio

The effect of CS dosage on the removal of COD and NH3 was studied (Figure 4a). A significant increase in removal efficiencies was achieved as CS dosage increased from 0.0 to 1.2 g L−1, which can be attributed to an increase in the initial Fe3+ and Fe2+ concentrations and subsequent improvement in persulfate activation.
However, by a further increase in the CS dosage, removal efficiency increased slightly because an increase in the concentration of Fe2+ not only increased the production rate of sulfate radical but also increases the rate of its reaction with sulfate radical (Equation (5)) [12,18,38,39].
Fe2+ + SO4•− → SO42− + Fe3+
Therefore, the CS dosage of 1.2 g L−1 was selected as the optimum dosage for the next experiments.
For investigating the influence of the persulfate concentration on the CS/PS oxidation process, PS/COD mass ratio was varied from 1 to 8. As the CS/PS ratio increased from 1 to 4, the removal efficiencies of COD and NH3 increased significantly from 32.43 and 26.45% to 73.38 and 63.1%, respectively (Figure 4b). This increase corresponds to an increase in sulfate radical concentration. However, as the CS/PS ratio was increased to 8, a slight growth in the removal efficiencies of COD and NH3 was achieved, which may be due to the fact that the excessive amount of PS can react with SO4•−, according to Equation (6) and convert it to sulfate ion [40]. Alternatively, sulfate radicals can react with each other; as a consequence, they have a quenching effect on the sulfate radical production at high concentration, according to Equation (7) [41]. Therefore, the PS/COD ratio of 4 was selected to perform the following experiments.
SO4•− + S2O82− → S2O8 + SO42−
SO4•−+ SO4•− → S2O82−
Shiying et al., have adduced that an increase in molar ratio of sodium persulfate/Azo dye acid Orange 7 to 50:1 did not have any meaningful effect on the degradation rate of Azo dye Acid Orange 7 in Microwave/persulfate system [27]. Soubh and Mokhtarani selected PS concentration of 4500 mg L−1 as the optimal concentration for post-treatment of composting leachate using ozone/PS oxidation process [10].

2.3.3. Effect of Reaction Time and Kinetic Study

In order to use the full potential of persulfate to remove COD and NH3, the effect of time was studied in the range of 0–180 min at different CS dosages and PS/COD ratios (Figure 5a,b). By increasing the reaction time up to 60 min, the removal efficiencies of COD and NH3 increased. After that, no significant change in removal efficiencies was observed. Thus, the reaction time of 60 min was selected as the optimum reaction time. It is clear from Figure 5a,b that by increasing the CS dosage and PS/COD ratio, the removal rates increased significantly. The concentration of active sites of activator increases by increasing the activator dosage; as a consequence, the number of collisions between activator and persulfate increases. At a low PS/COD ratio, the produced radicals are not sufficient for complete degradation of organic materials and ammonia. At the activator dosage of 1.2 g L−1 and PS/COD ratio of 4, the removal efficiencies of 73.56 and 63.87% were achieved for COD and NH3, respectively.
The effect of CS and PS/COD ratio on the removal rate of COD and NH3 were also examined using pseudo-first-order kinetic model (Figure 5c). A significant increase in reaction rate constant was observed by increasing CS dosage and PS/COD ratio. By increasing the PS/COD ratio from 1 to 4, the removal rate constants of COD and NH3 increased from 9.0 × 10−3 to 23.5 × 10−3 min−1 and from 9.1 × 10−3 to 17 × 10−3 min−1, respectively. Furthermore, the addition of CS (1.2 g L−1) resulted in a six-times increase in degradation rate constants of COD and NH3. Xu et al. have reported that by increasing the activator concentration (Fe2+) from 1 to 4 mM, the degradation rate constant of Orange G increased from 0.04 to 0.12 min−1 [42].

2.3.4. Effect of Temperature and Activation Energy

The experiments were designed at different temperatures to investigate the impact of temperature on the removal efficiency of COD and NH3. As indicated in Figure 6a, temperature had a significant impact on the removal efficiency. As the temperature increased from 5 to 50 °C, the removal efficiency of COD and NH3 improved from 46.7 to 88.7% and from 41.1 to 70.6%, respectively. The increase in removal efficiency is as a result of supplying the activation energy by heating the solution. In addition, PS ions are converted into sulfate radicals at high temperatures; in fact, the applied heat acts as a persulfate activator [20].
The degradation kinetics of COD and NH3 in heat-activated PS and heat-activated PS/CS systems were investigated at different temperatures (278, 298, and 323 K) and the results are shown in Figure 6b,c. The degradation rate constants of COD and NH3 increased by increasing the temperature. In the absence of CS, as the temperature increased from 5 to 50 °C, the removal rate constants of COD and NH3 increased from 0.9 × 10−3 to 21.5 × 10−3 min−1 and from 0.8 × 10−3 to 18.3 × 10−3 min−1, respectively. Furthermore, the addition of CS (1.2 g L−1) resulted in a 12-times increase in degradation rate constants of COD and NH3 at 5 °C. However, the addition of 3 g L−1 CS led to a 1.5 and 1.1-times increase in removal rate constants of COD and NH3 at 50 °C.
The activation energies of COD removal for heat-activated PS and heat-activated CS/PS systems were 60.08 and 21.56 kJ mol−1, and those of NH3 removal were 59.41 and 13.46 kJ mol−1, respectively. In the presence of the CS, the activation energy of COD and NH3 removal decreased by a factor of 2.8 and 4.4, respectively, which is due to the production of sulfate radical [38]. Two different types of fly ash (FA1 and FA2) have been reported as useful activators for treatment of pharmaceutical effluent, which decreased the activation energy from 122.56 kJ mol−1 to 23.32 and 47.64 kJ mol−1, respectively [20]. In other research, the presence of Fe0 as an activator to degrade acetaminophen resulted in the reduction of the activation energy from 120.4 to 36.1 kJ mol−1 [41].
The ESR at different temperatures ranging from 5 to 50 °C are presented in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, at 5 °C, the ESR for COD and NH3 removal was 90% and at 25 °C, it was 86%. This is one of the advantages of using CS as a catalyst of PS to improve the efficiency of removal at low temperatures. At 50 °C, the ESR of 33.8 and 10.7 was obtained for COD and NH3 removal, respectively, indicating the impact of temperature on the activation of persulfate.

2.3.5. The Metal Release from CS during the CS/PS Process

The concentration of metals was measured at the end of the process performed at pH 2, and the results are shown in Table 2. The results showed a high concentration of Fe, indicating a homogeneous catalytic reaction. By increasing pH, iron ions can be precipitated. The obtained sludge can be used as nutrient for soil. Several previous studies confirmed the possibility of using converter sludge as an amendment for the calcareous soil [25].
As can be seen in Table 2, no toxic metal was detected in the treated solution, confirming no toxic metal release from the catalyst to the solution in acidic medium.

2.3.6. Treatment of Real Landfill Leachate and Biodegradability Investigation

To study the impact of the CS/PS process on the degradation of real landfill leachate, real landfill leachate was diluted so that the samples with COD concentrations of 37,000 and 18,500 mg L−1 were obtained. At the COD concentration of 18,500 mg L−1, COD and NH3 removal in real leachate were 48.38 and 37.98%, respectively (Figure 7a). However, COD and NH3 removal in synthetic leachate with a COD concentration of 18,500 mg L−1 were 73.56 and 63.87%, respectively. The lower removal efficiency in real leachate was due to the presence of refractory organic compounds [43,44]. The mentioned conditions have also been applied for treatment of leachates with concentrations of 37,000 and 121,000 mg L−1. As it is evident from Figure 7a, the COD and NH3 removal were diminished from 36.3 and 27% to 17.2 and 11.8%, respectively. The decrease in removal efficiency was due to insufficient sulfate radical for complete degradation.
The effectiveness of CS/PS and PS processes on the biodegradability (BOD5/COD) of real and synthetic leachates was investigated. The results presented in Figure 7b indicated that the CS/PS oxidation process enhanced the biodegradability of real landfill leachate from 0.25 to 0.66, while the biodegradability did not increase in the absence of CS. However, in the case of synthetic leachate, the CS/PS oxidation process resulted in a growth in BOD5/COD ratio from 0.76 to 1.07, whereas a BOD5/COD ratio of 0.79 was obtained after treatment using PS system. An enhancement in the biodegradability of stabilized composting leachate from 0.13 to 0.61 was reported in the O3/persulfate system [10], while an increase in the biodegradability of landfill leachate from 0.09 to 0.17 was reported when using a persulfate/hydrogen peroxide system [45]. The treated leachate was non-compatible with environmental standards, but an increase in BOD5/COD ratio after the CS/PS process indicated that the treated leachate was suitable for treatment using a biological process or recycling in the landfill (loop SR-AOP + landfill).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

The converter sludge (CS) and slag (SL) were gathered from Esfahan Steel Company, Iran. Then it was ground and sieved through a 60-mesh sieve. Sodium persulfate (SPS, formula: Na2S2O8; molecular weight: 238.09 g mol−1; purity: 99%) was obtained from (Loba–Chemie, Mumbai, India) and employed as the source of persulfate ion (PS, S2O82−).
The pH was adjusted using NaOH and HCl solutions with appropriate concentration purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). All chemicals employed in the preparation of synthetic leachate were also obtained from Merck. The test kits for determination of COD and NH3 were purchased from HACH Company (Loveland, CO, USA). All solutions were prepared using deionized water.

3.2. Synthetic Leachate and Fresh Leachate Characteristics

In this study, the synthetic leachate was prepared using the method reported by researchers (Table 3) [46,47].
Fresh leachate was obtained from Aradkouh’s landfill located in Tehran, Iran. This landfill accommodates 8000 tons solid waste per day [48]. The features of raw leachate are shown in Table 4. The transferred fresh leachate to the laboratory was kept in a refrigerator at 4 °C to diminish changes [10].

3.3. Converter Sludge and Slag Characteristics

SEM and EDS analysis are used to investigate the surface morphology and to examine the surface elemental composition of nanocatalys (VEGA3//TESCAN-Libusina trida, Czech).
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of converter sludge and slag were acquired using an X-ray diffractometer (X’Pert PRO MPD, PANalytical, Almelo, Netherlands) with a CuKa radiation source at 40 kV and 40 mA.

3.4. Analytical Methods

COD and NH3 concentration were determined using a spectrophotometer DR 5000 (HACH, Loveland, CO, USA). To quench the reaction, iron ions were precipitated by increasing the pH to 8.0. Then the solution was filtrated through a 0.2 μm membrane. Furthermore, the measurements were done quickly.
In order to consider the interference of persulfate in the COD measurements, standard solutions of persulfate were prepared, and a calibration curve was constructed by plotting the COD versus persulfate concentration. The remaining persulfate in the solution was determined, and the COD related to the remaining persulfate were calculated using calibration curve. The calculated COD was subtracted from the measured COD. Persulfate concentration was measured by Al-Shamsi and Thomson ‘s method [49].
BOD5 was determined by a BOD measurement system (OxDirect, AQUALYTIC, Dortmund, Germany), and pH was measured by a Metrohm 691 pH meter (Metrohm AG, Herisau, Switzerland). Total dissolved solids (TDS) and electrical conductivity (EC) were determined with a multimeter equipped with a conductivity electrode (WTW COND 7110, inoLab, Weilheim, Germany). An inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometer with axially viewed configuration (ICP OES, Vista-PRO, Varian, Melbourne, Australia) was used to determine the concentration of heavy metals.

3.5. Oxidation Experiments

All experiments were conducted in batch mode. Briefly, 40 mL of leachate was transferred to a 100-mL glass flask to which the certain quantity of sodium persulfate dissolved in 10 mL of the related leachate had been added. Afterward, the mixture was stirred at 150 rpm. The specific amount of activator was then added to the mixture. Finally, the concentrations of COD and NH3 were determined at specified time intervals. Sulfuric acid and sodium hydroxide solutions (2 mol L−1) were used for pH adjustment. The performance of converter sludge (CS) and slag (S) as activators for treatment of leachate were investigated. For this purpose, the experiments were conducted at PS/COD mass ratio of 5, pH 2, activator dosage concentration of 1.5 g L−1, and reaction time of 45 min. The impact of essential parameters on the removal efficiency was examined. The effect of pH was studied in the range of 1–9 in the presence of 1.5 g L−1 of CS and PS/COD ratio of 5. To investigate the impact of other essential factors, the removal experiments were conducted at different levels of factors (Activator dosage: 0–2 g L−1; PS/COD ratio: 1–8; contact time: 0–180 min; temperature: 5–50 °C). The effect of the PS/COD ratio (1 and 4) and activator dosage (0 and 1.2 g L−1) on the degradation kinetics of COD and NH3 were investigated at pH 2. Furthermore, the degradation kinetics of COD and NH3 were evaluated at different temperatures (278, 298, and 323 K), while other parameters were kept constant (reaction time: 60 min, PS/COD ratio: 4, CS dosage: 1.2 g L−1, and pH 2). The slope of the linear form of Arrhenius equation (Equation (8), lnk versus T−1) [50] was applied to calculate the activation energy of the reaction.
lnk = lnAEa/RT
where T is the solution temperature (K), R is the universal gas constant (0.0083 kJ mol−1), Ea is the activation energy (kJ mol−1), A is the pre-exponential factor (min−1), and k is pseudo first-order rate constant (min−1).
The degree of sulfate radical enhancement (ESR) in CS/PS and heat/PS systems can be estimated by Equation (9) [51], where kCS/PS and kPS correspond to kinetic constants (pseudo-first-order kinetic model) of COD and NH3 removal by CS/PS and PS systems, respectively.
E S R = k C S / P S k P S k C S / P S
The experiments were conducted on real leachate at different concentrations obtained by diluting the real leachate with deionized water to examine the performance of the CS/PS system for the treatment of real leachate. Finally, the biodegradability (BOD5/COD) of treated synthetic and real landfill leachate was examined in the presence and absence of the CS.
The removal efficiencies were calculated according to the following equation:
Removel (%) = [(CiCf)/Cf] × 100
where Ci and Cf imply to the initial and final concentrations of COD and NH3, respectively.

4. Conclusions

In this research, the performance of converter sludge (CS), obtained from Esfahan Steel Company, Iran, was investigated for the activation of persulfate to remove COD and NH3 from synthetic and real leachate in batch experiments. The presence of Fe3O4 and Fe2O3 in CS was confirmed using XRD analysis. In addition, a significant amount of iron (72.03%) in CS was detected by EDS analysis. In contrast, the SL sample had no iron oxide compounds. SEM images of CS indicated that the mean particle size of CS was about 200 nm, providing a high surface area for the activation of persulfate. Maximum COD and NH3 removal efficiencies in synthetic leachate at optimum condition (pH 2, CS dosage: 1.2 g L−1, PS/COD: 4, and reaction time: 60 min) were 73.56 and 63.87%, respectively. A noticeable enhancement in the reaction rate constant was observed as the CS dosage, and PS/COD ratio increased. In fact, the addition of CS (1.2 g L−1) led to a 12-times increase in degradation rate constants of both COD and NH3 at 5 °C. The activation energies related to heat-activated PS and heat-activated CS/PS were 60.08 and 21.56 kJ mol−1, respectively, for COD removal and 59.41 and 13.46 kJ mol−1, respectively, for NH3 removal. Finally, the optimum conditions were applied for treatment of real leachate obtained from Aradkouh’s landfill located in Tehran, Iran. The biodegradability of real landfill leachate increased from 0.25 to 0.66 after treatment using the CS/PS oxidation process, while the biodegradability did not change in the absence of the CS. However, an increase in BOD5/COD ratio from 0.76 to 1.07 was achieved as the CS/PS oxidation process was used for the treatment of synthetic leachate. The COD and NH3 removal efficiencies for real leachate were 48.38 and 37.98%, respectively.

Author Contributions

In this paper, A.M.S. and M.B conceived and designed the experiments; A.M.S. performed the experiments; M.A.A. and B.A. analyzed the data; the manuscript was written by A.M.S. and edited by M.B.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Nanotechnology Research Center of Graduate Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran for supporting this project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abbas, A.A.; Jingsong, G.; Ping, L.Z.; Ya, P.Y.; Al-Rekabi, W.S. Review on landfill leachate treatments. Am. J. Appl. Sci. 2009, 6, 672–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wu, L.; Chen, S.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, C.; Liu, J.; Luo, J.; Song, G.; Qian, G.; Song, L.; Xia, M. Simultaneous removal of organic matter and nitrate from bio-treated leachate via iron–carbon internal micro-electrolysis. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 68356–68360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kulikowska, D.; Klimiuk, E. The effect of landfill age on municipal leachate composition. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 5981–5985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Renou, S.; Givaudan, J.G.; Poulain, S.; Dirassouyan, F.; Moulin, P. Landfill leachate treatment: Review and opportunity. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 150, 468–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ahn, W.-Y.; Kang, M.-S.; Yim, S.-K.; Choi, K.-H. Advanced landfill leachate treatment using an integrated membrane process. Desalination 2002, 149, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Silva, A.C.; Dezotti, M.; Sant’Anna, G.L. Treatment and detoxification of a sanitary landfill leachate. Chemosphere 2004, 55, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Deng, Y.; Ezyske, C.M. Sulfate radical-advanced oxidation process (SR-AOP) for simultaneous removal of refractory organic contaminants and ammonia in landfill leachate. Water Res. 2011, 45, 6189–6194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Chemlal, R.; Abdi, N.; Drouiche, N.; Lounici, H.; Pauss, A.; Mameri, N. Rehabilitation of Oued Smar landfill into a recreation park: Treatment of the contaminated waters. Ecol. Eng. 2013, 51, 244–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chemlal, R.; Azzouz, L.; Kernani, R.; Abdi, N.; Lounici, H.; Grib, H.; Mameri, N.; Drouiche, N. Combination of advanced oxidation and biological processes for the landfill leachate treatment. Ecol. Eng. 2014, 73, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Soubh, A.; Mokhtarani, N. The post treatment of composting leachate with a combination of ozone and persulfate oxidation processes. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 76113–76122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Abu Amr, S.S.; Aziz, H.A.; Adlan, M.N.; Bashir, M.J.K. Pretreatment of stabilized leachate using ozone/persulfate oxidation process. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 221, 492–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhen, G.; Lu, X.; Zhao, Y.; Chai, X.; Niu, D. Enhanced dewaterability of sewage sludge in the presence of Fe(II)-activated persulfate oxidation. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 116, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Oh, S.Y.; Kang, S.G.; Kim, D.W.; Chiu, P.C. Degradation of 2,4-dinitrotoluene by persulfate activated with iron sulfides. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 172, 641–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. House, D.A. Kinetics and Mechanism of Oxidations by Peroxydisulfate. Chem. Rev. 1962, 62, 185–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cao, J.; Zhang, W.-X.; Brown, D.G.; Sethi, D. Oxidation of Lindane with Fe(II)-Activated Sodium Persulfate. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2008, 25, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lin, Y.T.; Liang, C.; Chen, J.H. Feasibility study of ultraviolet activated persulfate oxidation of phenol. Chemosphere 2011, 82, 1168–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Anipsitakis, G.P.; Dionysiou, D.D. Radical Generation by the Interaction of Transition Metals with Common Oxidants Radical Generation by the Interaction of Transition Metals with Common Oxidants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 3705–3712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Romero, A.; Santos, A.; Vicente, F.; González, C. Diuron abatement using activated persulphate: Effect of pH, Fe(II) and oxidant dosage. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 162, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Diao, Z.; Xu, X.; Chen, H.; Jiang, D.; Yang, Y.; Kong, L.; Sun, Y.; Hu, Y.; Hao, Q.; Liu, L. Simultaneous removal of Cr (VI) and phenol by persulfate activated with bentonite-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron: Reactivity and mechanism. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 316, 186–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Nachiappan, S.; Gopinath, K.P. Treatment of pharmaceutical effluent using novel heterogeneous fly ash activated persulfate system. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 2229–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Karchegani, S.M.; Hoodaji, M.; Kalbasi, M. The effect of steel converter slag application along with sewage sludge in iron nutrition and corn plant yield. Bull. Environ. Pharmacol. Life Sci. 2014, 3, 96–104. [Google Scholar]
  22. Bozkurt, M.A.; Akdeniz, H.; Keskin, B.; Yilmaz, I.H. Possibilities of using sewage sludge as nitrogen fertilizer for maize. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B Soil Plant Sci. 2006, 56, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Brofas, G.; Michopoulos, P.; Alifragis, D. Sewage Sludge as an Amendment for Calcareous Bauxite Mine Spoils Reclamation. J. Environ. Qual. 2000, 29, 811–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mahmood, T.; Elliott, A. A review of secondary sludge reduction technologies for the pulp and paper industry. Water Res. 2006, 40, 2093–2112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Karimian, N.; Kalbasi, M.; Hajrasuliha, S. Effect of converter sludge, and its mixtures with organic matter, elemental sulfur and sulfuric acid on availability of iron, phosphorus and manganese of 3 calcareous soils from central Iran. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2012, 7, 568–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liang, C.; Wang, Z.S.; Bruell, C.J. Influence of pH on persulfate oxidation of TCE at ambient temperatures. Chemosphere 2007, 66, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Shiying, Y.; Wang, P.; Yang, X.; Wei, G.; Zhang, W.; Shan, L. A novel advanced oxidation process to degrade organic pollutants in wastewater: Microwave-activated persulfate oxidation. J. Environ. Sci. 2009, 21, 1175–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yan, J.; Lei, M.; Zhu, L.; Anjum, M.N.; Zou, J.; Tang, H. Degradation of sulfamonomethoxine with Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles as heterogeneous activator of persulfate. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 186, 1398–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Fang, G.; Dionysiou, D.D.; Al-abed, S.R.; Zhou, D. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental Superoxide radical driving the activation of persulfate by magnetite nanoparticles: Implications for the degradation of PCBs. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2013, 129, 325–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hou, L.; Zhang, H.; Xue, X. Ultrasound enhanced heterogeneous activation of peroxydisulfate by bimetallic Fe-Co/GAC catalyst for the degradation of Acid Orange 7 in water. J. Environ. Sci. 2012, 26, 1267–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Virtanen, S.; Schmuki, P.; Davenport, A.J.; Vitus, C.M. Dissolution of Thin Iron Oxide Films Used as Models for Iron Passive Films Studied by In Situ X-ray Absorption Near-Edge Spectroscopy. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1997, 144, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liang, C.; Bruell, C.J.; Marley, M.C.; Sperry, K.L. Persulfate oxidation for in situ remediation of TCE. I. Activated by ferrous ion with and without a persulfate-thiosulfate redox couple. Chemosphere 2004, 55, 1213–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Liu, D.; Xiu, Z.; Liu, F.; Wu, G.; Adamson, D.; Newell, C.; Vikesland, P.; Tsai, A.L.; Alvarez, P.J. Perfluorooctanoic acid degradation in the presence of Fe(III) under natural sunlight. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 262, 456–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Govindan, K.; Raja, M.; Maheshwari, S.U.; Noel, M. Analysis and understanding of amido black 10B dye degradation in aqueous solution by electrocoagulation with the conventional oxidants peroxomonosulfate, peroxodisulfate and hydrogen peroxide. Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 2014, 1, 108–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liang, C.; Guo, Y.Y. Remediation of diesel-contaminated soils using persulfate under alkaline condition. Water Air. Soil Pollut. 2012, 223, 4605–4614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Furman, O.S.; Teel, A.M.Y.L.; Watts, R.J. Mechanism of Base Activation of Persulfate. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 6423–6428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhao, J.; Zhang, Y.; Quan, X.; Chen, S. Enhanced oxidation of 4-chlorophenol using sulfate radicals generated from zero-valent iron and peroxydisulfate at ambient temperature. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 71, 302–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Oh, S.Y.; Kim, H.W.; Park, J.M.; Park, H.S.; Yoon, C. Oxidation of polyvinyl alcohol by persulfate activated with heat, Fe2+, and zero-valent iron. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 168, 346–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Monteagudo, J.M.; Durán, A.; González, R.; Expósito, A.J. In situ chemical oxidation of carbamazepine solutions using persulfate simultaneously activated by heat energy, UV light, Fe2+ ions, and H2O2. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2015, 176–177, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yang, S.; Yang, X.; Shao, X.; Niu, R.; Wang, L. Activated carbon catalyzed persulfate oxidation of Azo dye acid orange 7 at ambient temperature. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 186, 659–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Deng, J.; Shao, Y.; Gao, N.; Deng, Y.; Tan, C.; Zhou, S. Zero-valent iron/persulfate(Fe0/PS) oxidation acetaminophen in water. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 11, 881–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Xu, X.R.; Li, X.Z. Degradation of azo dye Orange G in aqueous solutions by persulfate with ferrous ion. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 72, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, Z.; Wu, W.; Shi, P.; Guo, J.; Cheng, J. Characterization of dissolved organic matter in landfill leachate during the combined treatment process of air stripping, Fenton, SBR and coagulation. Waste Manag. 2015, 41, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Tran, H.N.; Münnich, K.; Fricke, K.; Harborth, P. Removal of nitrogen from MBT residues by leachate recirculation in combination with intermittent aeration. Waste Manag. Res. 2014, 32, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hilles, A.H.; Abu Amr, S.S.; Hussein, R.A.; El-Sebaie, O.D.; Arafa, A.I. Performance of combined sodium persulfate/H2O2 based advanced oxidation process in stabilized landfill leachate treatment. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 166, 493–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kanmani, S.; Gandhimathi, R.; Muthukkumaran, K. Bioclogging in porous media: Influence in reduction of hydraulic conductivity and organic contaminants during synthetic leachate permeation. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2014, 12, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Hrapovic, L.; Rowe, R.K. Intrinsic degradation of volatile fatty acids in laboratory-compacted clayey soil. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2002, 58, 221–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pazoki, M.; Abdoli, M.A.; Karbassi, A.; Mehrdadi, N.; Yaghmaeian, K. Attenuation of municipal landfill leachate through land treatment. Int. J. Environ. Heal. Sci. Eng. 2014, 1, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Al-Shamsi, M.A.; Thomson, N.R. Treatment of organic compounds by activated persulfate using nanoscale zerovalent iron. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 13564–13571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hasan, M.; Ahmad, A.L.; Hameed, B.H. Adsorption of reactive dye onto cross-linked chitosan/oil palm ash composite beads. Chem. Eng. J. 2008, 136, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Daskalaki, V.M.; Fulgione, I.; Frontistis, Z.; Rizzo, L.; Mantzavinos, D. Solar light-induced photoelectrocatalytic degradation of bisphenol-A on TiO2/ITO film anode and BDD cathode. Catal. Today 2013, 209, 74–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. SEM images of converter sludge at (a) 20 KX, (b) 30 KX, and (c) 50 KX. (d) The corresponding EDS spectrum. Powder XRD pattern of (e) converter sludge (CS) and (f) slag (SL).
Figure 1. SEM images of converter sludge at (a) 20 KX, (b) 30 KX, and (c) 50 KX. (d) The corresponding EDS spectrum. Powder XRD pattern of (e) converter sludge (CS) and (f) slag (SL).
Catalysts 08 00218 g001
Figure 2. (a) Effect of SL/PS and CS/PS systems on the removal of COD and NH3 from synthetic leachate (reaction time: 45 min; PS/COD ratio: 5; pH 2; activator dosage: 1.5 g L−1); (b) Effect of SL and CS on the adsorption of COD and ammonia (reaction time: 45 min; pH 2; activator dosage of 1.5 g L−1).
Figure 2. (a) Effect of SL/PS and CS/PS systems on the removal of COD and NH3 from synthetic leachate (reaction time: 45 min; PS/COD ratio: 5; pH 2; activator dosage: 1.5 g L−1); (b) Effect of SL and CS on the adsorption of COD and ammonia (reaction time: 45 min; pH 2; activator dosage of 1.5 g L−1).
Catalysts 08 00218 g002
Figure 3. Effect of pH on the COD and NH3 removal (PS/COD ratio: 5; CS dosage: 1.5 g L−1; reaction time: 45 min).
Figure 3. Effect of pH on the COD and NH3 removal (PS/COD ratio: 5; CS dosage: 1.5 g L−1; reaction time: 45 min).
Catalysts 08 00218 g003
Scheme 1. The suggested mechanism for COD and NH3 degradation by CS activated persulfate.
Scheme 1. The suggested mechanism for COD and NH3 degradation by CS activated persulfate.
Catalysts 08 00218 sch001
Figure 4. (a) Effect of CS dosage on the COD and NH3 removal efficiency (reaction time: 45 min; PS/COD ratio: 5; pH 2); (b) Effect of PS/COD mass ratio on the COD and NH3 removal efficiencies (CS dosage: 1.2 g L−1; pH 2, and reaction time: 45 min).
Figure 4. (a) Effect of CS dosage on the COD and NH3 removal efficiency (reaction time: 45 min; PS/COD ratio: 5; pH 2); (b) Effect of PS/COD mass ratio on the COD and NH3 removal efficiencies (CS dosage: 1.2 g L−1; pH 2, and reaction time: 45 min).
Catalysts 08 00218 g004
Figure 5. The effect of the reaction time on the (a) COD and (b) NH3 degradation, and (c) related degradation rate constants at different PS/COD ratios and different CS dosages (pH 2; reaction time: 60 min).
Figure 5. The effect of the reaction time on the (a) COD and (b) NH3 degradation, and (c) related degradation rate constants at different PS/COD ratios and different CS dosages (pH 2; reaction time: 60 min).
Catalysts 08 00218 g005
Figure 6. Effect of temperature (a) on the COD and NH3 removal (PS/COD ratio: 4; CS dosage: 1.2 g L−1; pH 2; reaction time: 60 min) and on the degradation rate constants of (b) COD and (c) NH3 in the absence of CS and in the presence of CS dosage of 1.2 g L−1 (PS/COD ratio of 4, pH 2, and reaction time of 60 min).
Figure 6. Effect of temperature (a) on the COD and NH3 removal (PS/COD ratio: 4; CS dosage: 1.2 g L−1; pH 2; reaction time: 60 min) and on the degradation rate constants of (b) COD and (c) NH3 in the absence of CS and in the presence of CS dosage of 1.2 g L−1 (PS/COD ratio of 4, pH 2, and reaction time of 60 min).
Catalysts 08 00218 g006
Figure 7. (a) Effect of CS/PS process on the degradation of raw landfill leachate with different concentrations (PS = 74,000 mg L−1; CS:1.2 g L−1; pH 2; reaction time; 60 min); (b) the biodegradability of real and synthetic leachate after treatment using PS (PS = 74,000 mg L−1; pH 2; reaction time; 60 min) and CS/PS systems (PS = 74,000 mg L−1; CS:1.2 g L−1; pH 2; reaction time; 60 min).
Figure 7. (a) Effect of CS/PS process on the degradation of raw landfill leachate with different concentrations (PS = 74,000 mg L−1; CS:1.2 g L−1; pH 2; reaction time; 60 min); (b) the biodegradability of real and synthetic leachate after treatment using PS (PS = 74,000 mg L−1; pH 2; reaction time; 60 min) and CS/PS systems (PS = 74,000 mg L−1; CS:1.2 g L−1; pH 2; reaction time; 60 min).
Catalysts 08 00218 g007
Table 1. Enhancement degree of CS/PS system.
Table 1. Enhancement degree of CS/PS system.
TemperatureCODNH3
kCS/PS, * 10−3/minkPS, * 10−3/minE%kCS/PS, * 10−3/minkPS, * 10−3/minE%
510.30.991.3100.892
2523.53.186.817288.2
5032.521.533.820.518.310.7
Table 2. Metal release from the catalyst after treatment.
Table 2. Metal release from the catalyst after treatment.
Metal Elementsmg L−1Metal Elementsmg L−1
Al2.34Ag<0.02
Fe91.13As<0.05
Si55.35Cd<0.02
Co<0.05
Cr<0.05
Cu<0.05
Hg<0.05
Pb<0.05
Se<0.05
Ni<0.05
Ti<0.05
Sn<0.05
Table 3. Leachate synthetic composition.
Table 3. Leachate synthetic composition.
QuantityComponents
18,500COD (mg L−1)General indicators
775NH3–N(mg L−1)
14,000BOD5 (mg L−1)
24 ± 2Temperature (°C)
5.8–6.0pH (adjusted using NaOH)
2Butyric (butanoic) acidVolatile fatty acids (VFA)s) (mL L−1)
6Propionic (propanoic) acid
10Acetic (ethanoic) acid
325K2CO3Inorganic nutrients (mg L−1)
3015NaHCO3
312KHCO3
30K2HPO4
50NaNO3
1440NaCl
695CO(NH2)2, urea
1653NH4Cl
2882CaCl2
156MgSO4
1647MgCl2
896Mg(OH)2
Table 4. Characteristics of the real leachate.
Table 4. Characteristics of the real leachate.
ParameterRangeAverage *Unit
COD109,000–133,000121,000mg L−1
BOD527,000–34,20030,600mg L−1
NH3-N6440–71006770mg L−1
TDS44,500–51,50048,000mg L−1
EC79.3–97.188.2mS cm−1
pH6.7–7.97.3-
* Number of replicates: 3.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Soubh, A.M.; Baghdadi, M.; Abdoli, M.A.; Aminzadeh, B. Activation of Persulfate Using an Industrial Iron-Rich Sludge as an Efficient Nanocatalyst for Landfill Leachate Treatment. Catalysts 2018, 8, 218. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8050218

AMA Style

Soubh AM, Baghdadi M, Abdoli MA, Aminzadeh B. Activation of Persulfate Using an Industrial Iron-Rich Sludge as an Efficient Nanocatalyst for Landfill Leachate Treatment. Catalysts. 2018; 8(5):218. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8050218

Chicago/Turabian Style

Soubh, Alaa Mohamad, Majid Baghdadi, Mohammad Ali Abdoli, and Behnoush Aminzadeh. 2018. "Activation of Persulfate Using an Industrial Iron-Rich Sludge as an Efficient Nanocatalyst for Landfill Leachate Treatment" Catalysts 8, no. 5: 218. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8050218

APA Style

Soubh, A. M., Baghdadi, M., Abdoli, M. A., & Aminzadeh, B. (2018). Activation of Persulfate Using an Industrial Iron-Rich Sludge as an Efficient Nanocatalyst for Landfill Leachate Treatment. Catalysts, 8(5), 218. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8050218

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop