Next Article in Journal
Advanced Rhodococcus Biocatalysts for Environmental Biotechnologies
Next Article in Special Issue
Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Obtained by Supercritical Antisolvent Precipitation for the Photocatalytic Degradation of Crystal Violet Dye
Previous Article in Journal
Characterisation of the First Archaeal Mannonate Dehydratase from Thermoplasma acidophilum and Its Potential Role in the Catabolism of D-Mannose
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fluorinated and Platinized Titania as Effective Materials in the Photocatalytic Treatment of Dyestuffs and Stained Wastewater Coming from Handicrafts Factories
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dye-sensitized Photocatalyst of Sepiolite for Organic Dye Degradation

Department of Earth Resources Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishiku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2019, 9(3), 235; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9030235
Submission received: 10 January 2019 / Revised: 25 February 2019 / Accepted: 26 February 2019 / Published: 4 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends in the Photocatalytic Removal of Organic Dyes)

Abstract

:
The photocatalytic activity of sepiolite was examined for degradation of several dye compounds under visible light irradiation. Higher adsorption capacities and greater photocatalytic performance of cationic dyes (rhodamine B and methylene blue) were observed on sepiolite, in comparison with anionic dyes (orange II and trypan blue). Superiority in the photocatalytic activity of cationic dyes is attributed to the strong electrostatic attraction and photosensitization properties of cationic dye molecules. Sepiolite has degraded 45.3% rhodamine B within 120 min, which is the greatest photocatalytic degradation efficiency when compared with other dyes. Subsequently, the reusability of spent sepiolite after adsorption of rhodamine B was evaluated by the degradation of trypan blue under the visible light irradiation. The photocatalytic degradation performance of trypan blue by spent sepiolite after adsorption of rhodamine B increased about twice as much as with pristine sepiolite, indicating that the dye-sensitized photocatalytic process could enhance the photocatalytic degradation ability of sepiolite. Through radical scavenger tests, it was found that a superoxide radical is mainly responsible for rhodamine B degradation. The possible mechanism of rhodamine B degradation under visible light irradiation was proposed. The sepiolite could be a potential catalyst for the degradation of organic pollutants in wastewater under solar light.

1. Introduction

Naturally abundant 2:1 type of clay minerals, representatively smectite, have been extensively used as support materials for semiconductors or other photocatalysts due to its natural abundant availability and characteristics features, such as, fibrous or layered morphology, large specific surface areas, superior cation exchange capacity, negative surface charge, and a hydroxyl group rooted at the bottom in the octahedral sheet [1,2,3,4,5]. Comprehensively, all these natural properties can be utilized for several types of organic and inorganic types of modifications which are benefited to the development of clay-based photocatalyst [6,7]. In recent years, natural sepiolite, belonging to the 2:1 type of clay minerals, has gained great interest in different fields of application, including the development of photocatalyst [8,9,10]. Sepiolite is a hydrous magnesium silicate that is widespread due to its unusual fibrous morphology and intracrystalline tunnels [11,12]. The ideal chemical formula is expressed as Si12Mg8O30(OH)4·12H2O for the half-unit cell. In the structure of sepiolite, there is an alternation of blocks and tunnels around 200 Å in pore size that grows up in the direction of fibers belonging to a chain type of clay mineral [13]. Each structural block is composed of a central octahedral sheet containing magnesium sandwiched by two tetrahedral silicate sheets. The structure of sepiolite results in zeolite-like channels [14]. The peculiar pore structure with interior channels contributes to voluminously adsorb cationic organic molecules and ions. In addition, these channels might contain zeolitic water and exchangeable metal ions. The structural and textural physicochemical properties of sepiolite offer its exclusive role compared to other clay materials.
So far, sepiolite has been considered as an effective hole transporter between known semiconductor materials and degrading targets in the photocatalytic reaction to decompose organic pollutants, including organic dyes and pharmaceutical wastes. Many TiO2-based composites have been developed to improve photodegradation using a sepiolite matrix: ternary heterogeneous BiOCl/TiO2/sepiolite composite for tetracycline degradation [15], sepiolite-TiO2 nanocomposites for the orange G dye degradation [16], TiO2/sepiolite composites for the degradation of acid red G and 4-nitrophenol [17], and TiO2/sepiolite composites to decompose phenol [18]. Composites with other metallic oxides and hydroxides have been also synthesized for photodegradation of organic dye compounds: Sepiolite@LDH composite for simultaneous photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange (MO) and methylene blue (MB) dye [19], ternary ZnO/Fe3O4-sepiolite nanostructured material for MB dye degradation [20,21], and quantum-sized ZnO particles on sepiolite for the degradation of reactive blue 4 [22]. So far, from the above reports, sepiolite has been generally utilized as an efficient supporting material for well-known semiconductors and other types of photocatalytically active species under UV light irradiation.
Fibrous morphologies of sepiolite offer the rigid and active surfaces for the adsorption of cationic dye molecules through electrostatic interaction or complexation. Successful adsorption of dye molecules on clay surfaces is indispensably the first step for photocatalytic reactions [23,24,25]. Siloxane bonds are existing at the edge of the outer surface, and broken and terminated Si–O, and Mg–O bonds are on lateral surfaces of sepiolite. Since these unprotected metallic ions at the edges are electron-deficient, they are expected to act as natural electron acceptors. The adsorbed cationic dye species, which are electro-statistically bound with the broken bond surface, should be responsible for the generation of dye radical species. It is predictable that the formed dye radicals can react with active oxygen species present within the system, which may lead to a disintegration of the dyes [26]. In addition, it is well-known that the highly polar surface of the clay material is advantageous to stabilize the generated radical species, which prolongs lifetime and ultimately causes better photocatalytic performance [6].
As aforementioned, sepiolite was utilized as supporting material for well-known photocatalysts (TiO2, BiOCl, ZnO, etc.). As per our knowledge, there was no report available on the dye-sensitization of natural sepiolite. In this work, we tried to fulfill the understanding of natural sepiolite as a dye-sensitized photocatalyst for dyes degradation. The observed phenomenon was proved by several physiochemical and photocatalytic experimental studies in the presence of different dyes with various size and charges, e.g., anionic or cation colorants organic pollutants. One of the important findings in the present work was that natural sepiolite material without any modification could be utilized for the photocatalytic degradation of organic dye via the dye-sensitization mechanism.
The detail objectives in the present study were to investigate the visible light-driven photocatalytic degradation performance of the natural, pristine sepiolite for cationic (rhodamine B (RhB) and MB and anionic (orange II (OII) and trypan blue (TB)) dyes and to propose the mechanism based on the experimental results.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characterizations

As received, the sepiolite was confirmed by several characterization techniques, including XRD, FTIR, TEM, XRF, specific surface area measurement, and XPS analysis. As shown in Figure 1a, the specimen had an apparently single phase of sepiolite in the XRD pattern (Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS) 13-0595). There were trace amounts of impurities of Ti, Fe, and Al, confirmed by XRF (Table 1). The purity as sepiolite (Si12Mg8O30(OH)4) could be estimated to 89.9%, based on Mg content. The XRD results showed several reflections, such as the strong diffraction peaks, for pure sepiolite observed around d-spacing value 1.2 nm at 2θ = 7.3° (110), which represent the characteristics interlayer distance reflection for sepiolite clay. And another characteristics reflection peaks for the pure phases of sepiolite clay was observed at 0.75 nm.at 2θ 11.83° (130), 0.66 nm at 2θ 13.12°, (040), 0.45 nm.at 2θ 19.71° (060), 0.43 nm.at 2θ 20.66° (031), 0.375 nm.at 2θ 23.74° (221), 0.334 nm.at 2θ 26.71° (400), and 0.25 nm.at 2θ 35.01° (191), which confirmed the presence of pure phases of sepiolite [27].
The FTIR spectrum of the pristine sepiolite clay mineral was observed in Figure 1b similarly to that reported in the literature for 2:1 smectite clay minerals by a slight variation in the frequencies [28,29]. The bands observed in the range of 3000 and 3800 cm−1 were assigned to the stretching vibration mode of the hydroxyl groups in Mg–OH. The peak centered at 3625 cm−1, attributed to OH stretching mode. The absorption bands centered at about 3423 and 3251 cm−1 corresponded to the vibration mode of physisorbed water (surface and zeolitic); a band at 1673 cm−1 due to the bending mode of zeolitic water; bands in the 1200–400 cm−1 range characteristic of silicate; bands centered at 1014 and 462 cm−1 due to stretching in the vibration mode of Si–O–Si groups in the tetrahedral sheet; bands at 1217 and 975 cm−1 due to Si–O bonds; and bands at 690 and 639 cm−1 corresponding to the vibration mode of Mg–OH bond [29].
TEM images for the pristine sepiolite showed straightly fibrous shapes with several hundred nm to 1 µm in length and 50–60 nm in width (Figure 2). It was clear that the crystal was developed in a one-dimensional direction [30]. The nitrogen sorption isotherm plot is presented in Figure 3a. The isotherms represented type IV isotherm nature, with a narrow H3-type of hysteresis loop, according to the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) classification [31,32]. The H3 type of hysteresis loop is characteristic of the pore channels in the layers of smectite clay minerals [29,33,34]. A comparative pressure range from 0.7 to 1.0 would indicate that a crack-type mesoporous structure exists in pristine sepiolite [35]. Additionally, the isotherm was unsaturated near to 1.0 relative pressure (P/P0). The Barrett, Joyner, and Halenda method (BJH) pore size distribution plot is presented in Figure 3b, suggesting that pore structure in the sepiolite was an irregular type. The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) specific surface area of pristine sepiolite was observed around 230 m2/g and the total pore volume of 0.686 cm3/g was determined by BET method.
The XPS measurements were carried out to elucidate the elemental compositions and electronic properties of sepiolite. In Figure 4a, the survey spectrum for the pristine sepiolite shows the predominant peaks assigned to Si 2p, O 1s, and Mg 2p orbitals and a small peak assigned to Al 2p. The valence band (VB) energy can be estimated to around 2.81 eV by drawing the straight tangent line to the VB spectrum of the sepiolite as shown in Figure 4b [36,37].
Figure 5a shows the UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectrum (UV-DRS) of sepiolite. It was observed that the absorption of sepiolite had photo-responses from the UV to the visible light region. In addition, sepiolite has shown a light absorption predominantly around 300–350 nm, indicating that sepiolite can be excited under the ultraviolet light irradiation. The optical band gap energy (Eg) of a semiconductor photocatalyst can be evaluated by using the Kubelka–Munk equation [38]:
α = A (Eg)n/2
where α, h, ν, Eg, and A are the absorption coefficient, Planck constant, light frequency, band gap energy, and the proportionality constant, respectively. In addition, n is dependent on the type of optical transition of semiconductor (n = 1 for direct transition and n = 4 for indirect transition). The band gap energy value was calculated by the linear part of the (α)2 versus energy (Eg) plot. Based on the UV-DRS results, the band gap energy of sepiolite could be estimated to be 3.7 eV through the Tauc plot (Figure 5b). Therefore, the conduction band energy (CB) of sepiolite could be calculated to be −0.89 eV.

2.2. Photocatalytic Activity for Organic Dye Degradation

Organic dyes, MB, RhB, OII, and TB were used as models of organic pollutants to estimate the photocatalytic performance of sepiolite under the visible light irradiation. The adsorption capacity of each organic dye compound on sepiolite was determined under the dark condition without the visible light irradiation. Figure 6a displays the removal efficiency results of organic dyes by sepiolite under the dark (dotted lines) and visible light (solid lines) irradiation. In dark control, the sepiolite showed a higher adsorption capacity of cationic dyes, MB and RhB, than anionic dyes, OII and TB. It could be explained by electrostatic interaction of the cationic dyes with sepiolite, which is negatively charged so that the cationic dye molecules are strongly attracted through ion exchange with mainly K+ [3,4,39]. However, the adsorption density was saturated within 30 min under the dark condition. Prior to photocatalytic reaction under the visible light, the suspension of sepiolite particles was well-dispersed by stirring under dark for 30 min in order to achieve the adsorption–desorption equilibrium. Immediately after the visible light was irradiated, sepiolite particles exhibited the photocatalytic degradation of cationic dyes in contrast to anionic dye molecules.
Figure 6b summarized the final organic dye removal (%) after 120 min of irradiation time under the visible light. The highest removal efficiency of MB was observed with 83.3%, in which 61.5% was from adsorption and 21.7% was from photocatalytic degradation. The reason why RhB was less adsorbed on sepiolite despite the same charge as MB would be the larger molecular size of RhB than MB and the higher electron density localized in S of MB than N of RhB (Figure S1). Regarding of photocatalytic degradation, RhB was the most effectively photocatalytically-degraded, with 45.3%. The lower photocatalytic performance of MB than RhB was caused by the shielding effect from supernumerary adsorbed dye molecules, which may have changed the rate of production of active species (e.g., O2). Negligibly trace degradation was observed with anionic dyes (OII and TB), indicating photodegradation of dyes hardly happens without adsorption.
To evaluate the kinetics of organic dye degradation over sepiolite, the degradation results after the visible light irradiation were fitted to pseudo-first-order equation (Equation (2)):
−ln(C/C0) = kt
where C0 is the initial concentration of organic dye, C is the remaining concentration of organic dye at time t (min), and k is the pseudo-first-order rate constant (min−1) [40,41,42]. The plots of reaction time (t) versus −ln(C/C0) provided a linear line, suggesting that the organic dye degradations were well fitted to the pseudo-first-order kinetic model, as shown in Figure 6c (R2 = 0.9938 and 0.9956 for MB-V and RhB-V). In addition, it could be seen that the degradation rate constants under the visible light irradiation were greater than those under the dark conditions about 45 and 6 times in case of RhB and MB, respectively, indicating a synergetic effect of cationic dye and sepiolite under visible light irradiation. Moreover, the synergistic effect was more excellent for the degradation of RhB than MB over sepiolite.
By focusing on the photocatalytic degradation of RhB on sepiolite, time-dependent UV-Vis absorption spectra were observed (Figure 6d). After photocatalytic degradation of RhB on sepiolite happened, the adsorption intensity clearly decreased around 554 nm, and the absorption peak position of RhB had shifted to the lower wavenumbers, indicating that the degradation of ethyl groups in RhB occurred during the photocatalytic degradation [37,43,44,45]. Moreover, the decomposition of RhB was monitored over time by HPLC, as shown in Figure 7. The peak at 18.5 min of retention time was assigned to RhB, and the peak intensity relatively decreased over time. A distinctive new peak at 14.6 min of retention time was observed within 30 min after photocatalytic degradation, and its intensity increased relatively with time. The other tiny peaks around 8.9 min and 11.8 min of the retention time were gradually observed over time. Appearance of the new peaks in HPLC was in accordance with the degradation of RhB, which could be confirmed by the determination of the remaining RhB by UV-Vis spectrometry (Figure 6a) and the wavenumber-shift of an absorption peak in UV-Vis spectrum (Figure 6d). In the previous reports, N-deethylated byproducts (N,N-diethyl-N’-ethylrhodamine, N,N-diethylrhodamine, and N-ethylrhodamine) were confirmed as byproducts in photocatalytic degradation of RhB using LC–MS [46,47,48], suggesting decomposition of ethyl groups from xanthene rings in the molecular structure of RhB.
After 120 min-photoreaction, XRD patterns and FTIR spectra for the solid resides were collected in the same manner as the pristine sepiolite (Figure 1). XRD patterns were mostly identical with the pristine sepiolite. In FTIR for the solid resides after reaction with MB, there were additional peaks in a region of 1300 to 1600 cm−1, which were assigned to the aromatic ring structure in MB molecule, and the peaks at 1500 cm−1 were attributed to C=N stretching vibration mode (Figure S1). It was consistent with the largest amounts of MB, which were adsorbed on sepiolite (Figure 6b). In other FTIR spectra, there were no significant changes. These results supported that the photocatalytic reaction happened without any degradation of sepiolite.
The previous reports regarding of photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes using composites, including sepiolite, were summarized in Table 2 to compare with the present work. From the comparative results of dye degradation, we could clearly signify our research work from the reported results. In the previous reports, sepiolite was utilized as supporting material for known photocatalysts, such as TiO2, and showed ~80% RhB dye degradation, whereas we observed that pristine sepiolite material could show comparable degradation efficiency under visible light irradiation. We believe that the present finding might be useful for detailed understanding in the upcoming research scope of the sepiolite-based photocatalyst materials for organic dye degradation.

2.3. Radical Scavenger Test

In order to elucidate the role of responsible reactive species for RhB degradation, several scavenger reagents were tested, as shown in Figure 8, where isopropyl alcohol (IPA), benzoquinone (BQ), and potassium iodide (KI) were used as the scavenger reagents for h+, O2, and OH, respectively [54,55,56,57]. The photocatalytic degradation efficiency of RhB significantly decreased after trapping O2 by BQ, but the presence of KI and IPA had shown negligibly small decreases in RhB degradation efficiency, indicating that O2 was dominantly responsible for the photocatalytic degradation of RhB, but the h+ and OH did not play an important role in the degradation of RhB over sepiolite under the visible light irradiation. These results implied that O2 was the main oxidant species in the photocatalytic degradation of RhB.

2.4. Stability Test

One of the important factors of photocatalyst material is stability. The photocatalytic stability of sepiolite for RhB degradation under visible light irradiation was examined by the recycling test three times. From the observed results in Figure 9, it could be seen that the photocatalytic efficiency of sepiolite for RhB degradation still maintained for three cycles, suggesting the sepiolite showed high stability for photocatalytic degradation of organic dye.
Moreover, the reusability of spent sepiolite after adsorption of RhB for 30 min in dark condition without any pretreatment was examined by applying to photocatalytic degradation of an anionic dye, TB, under the visible light irradiation. TB can be utilized for staining of cells in cytotoxicity measurements due to the negative charge of TB. The removal efficiency of TB after 2 h was displayed in Figure 10. Little adsorption capacity (~1%) of TB was observed on sepiolite and spent RhB–sepiolite under the dark condition. However, after the visible light irradiation, the spent RhB–sepiolite shows greater than twice photocatalytic degradation than pristine sepiolite. This suggests that the RhB adsorbed on the surface of sepiolite enhanced the photocatalytic degradation of TB through photosensitization property of RhB–sepiolite. Based on the results, the sequential photodegradation of cationic and anionic dye molecules are possible on sepiolite under the visible light to contribute to green chemistry in dye-contaminated water treatment.

2.5. Mechanism of Organic Dye Degradation over Sepiolite

The photosensitization of organic dye molecules is an important step for starting the photocatalytic reaction because the dye molecule can provide the electron to sepiolite through the photo-irradiation process [58,59,60,61]. In the case of RhB degradation over sepiolite under the visible light irradiation, the electron in the pristine sepiolite could not be excited under the visible light due to the wide energy band gap (Eg = 3.7 eV, Figure 5b). Firstly, cationic organic dye molecules (RhB) were adsorbed on the surface of the sepiolite, and then the electrons of RhB were excited under the visible light to generate the excited electrons. The electrons in the LUMO of RhB (ELUMO = −1.10 eV versus NHE) were transferred to the CB of sepiolite (ECB = −0.89 eV) due to the more positive energy level of the CB of sepiolite, compared with LUMO state of RhB [62]. The photo-excited electron on the CB of sepiolite could reduce the dissolved O2 to O2 because the standard reduction potential of O2 to O2 (E0(O2/O2) = −0.046 eV versus NHE [63,64]) was more positive than the CB potential of sepiolite. Then, the oxidation of RhB by O2 occurred to degrade RhB to smaller molecules. Based on the above results, the mechanism for degradation of RhB over sepiolite under the visible light irradiation could be proposed as follows:
RhB@sepiolite + → RhB* (h+ + e)@sepiolite,
RhB* (h+ + e)@sepiolite → RhB* (h+)@sepiolite (e),
sepiolite (e) + O2O2,
O2 + RhB → degradation products.
Aforesaid in Section 2.2, the obtained degradation results of anionic dyes (OII and TB) showed less degradation efficiency by using sepiolite. This was explained due to the less adsorption behavior of anionic dyes on the negative surface of sepiolite. This reconfirmed the role of adsorbed cationic dye, which is influenced by the dye photosensitized degradation mechanism. For the confirmation of this phenomena, the RhB adsorbed solid residual sepiolite from the dark conditions is further used for the degradation of anionic dye (TB) and showed better photocatalyst efficiency than pristine sepiolite. Here adsorbed RhB residue showed similar dye-sensitized mechanistic approach (as explained in Equations (3)–(5)) providing an electron to sepiolite and generated the O2 species responsible for the degradation of TB as in Equation (7):
O2 + TB → degradation products.
According to the above sequence, photocatalytic degradation mechanisms of organic dye (both cationic and anionic dyes) over sepiolite under the visible light irradiation, as illustrated in Scheme 1. Consequently, the cooperative function through the combination of cationic organic dye molecules with sepiolite through electrostatic interaction resulted in the improved photocatalytic degradation of organic dye molecules. The electrostatic interaction of cationic organic dye (i.e., RhB) with sepiolite was much more favorable than anionic dye (i.e., TB). Although anionic dye was less favorable for adsorption on sepiolite, a small amount of adsorbed anionic dye would still have been involved in photocatalytic degradation by O2 species on the surface of the sepiolite.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials and Reagents

Sepiolite (13% Mg, ≤ 10% loss on drying) was obtained from Sigma Aldrich Japan Co. Ltd (Tokyo, Japan) with the color of grayish white. RhB (C28H31ClN2O3, 97% dye content, RhB) was also obtained from Sigma Aldrich Japan. MB (C16H18N3SCl· 3H2O, MB) was purchased from Waldeck GmbH & Co. KG (Münster, Germany). Orange II (C16H11N2NaO4S, OII) and TB (C34H28N6O14S4, TB) were purchased from Wako Chemicals (Osaka, Japan). The chemicals were directly utilized without further purification. Ultrapure water was used in the preparation of the organic dye solutions and their experiments.

3.2. Characterization

The crystal phases of the original and spent sepiolite after photocatalytic reactions were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) on Ultima IV diffractometer (Rigaku, Akshima, Japan), using Cu Kα radiation with 40 kV acceleration voltage and 40 mA applied current at a 2°/min scanning speed and 0.02° step size. The elemental compositions of sepiolite were determined by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectroscopy Rigaku ZSX Primus II in the wavelength dispersive mode (Akishima, Japan). The functional groups of pristine sepiolite and spent sepiolite after the photocatalytic reaction were characterized by FTIR on Jasco FTIR-670 Plus (Tokyo, Japan). TEM images of the solid products were observed on a transmission electron microscope (JEM-2100HCKM, JEOL (Akishima, Japan). The X-ray photoelectron spectrum (XPS) for the original sepiolite was collected on an ESCA 5800 (ULVAC-PHI, Inc. Kanagawa, Japan) using a monochromated Al Kα X-ray source at 200 W. The data analysis was performed by Casa XPS software (version 2.3.12.8). Binding energy was calibrated using EB(C 1s) = 284.6 eV assigned to the contamination peak derived from vacuum oil in the apparatus. To estimate the band gap energy (Eg) of sepiolite, UV-Vis/DRS was applied using a Shimadzu UV-2450 spectrophotometer equipped with ISR-2200 integrating sphere attachment (Kyoto, Japan). The degradation products were determined on a Jasco LC-netII/ADC HPLC system PU-2089 plus pump, C0-2065 plus column oven, and UV-2075 plus detector equipped with a C18 column (K009450, Shodex, Japan). The mobile phase was prepared by mixing deionized water and methanol with the volumetric ratio of 3:7. The specific surface area (SSA) and pore size distribution of sepiolite were determined by Japan BEL-Max, BEL (Osaka, Japan).

3.3. Photocatalytic Activity

Photocatalytic performances were evaluated toward the photocatalytic degradation of various organic dyes under the visible light (λ > 400 nm) irradiation (Scheme 2). Typically, 50 mg of sepiolite powder was magnetically stirred in 50 mL of 2 × 10−5 M organic dye aqueous solution in the dark condition for 30 min to reach the adsorption-desorption equilibrium. The suspensions were then irradiated using a 500 W Xe lamp with a cut-off filter. During the light illumination, solutions were collected and filtrated by 0.45 µm membrane filters to remove the suspended particles. The concentrations of the remaining organic dyes of MB, RhB, OII, and TB were determined by UV-Vis spectrometry at 665, 554, 483, and 575 nm, respectively. Moreover, photocatalytic stability of sepiolite for RhB degradation under visible light irradiation was examined by the recycling test for three cycles. After every cycle, the spent sepiolite was separated from the suspension by centrifugation, followed by a wash with ethanol and water three times to remove covered, unreacted RhB and degradation products. The spent sepiolite was dried and used in the next cycle under identical photocatalytic experiment.

4. Conclusions

In the present work, we reported the photocatalytic activity of natural sepiolite by the dye-sensitized process to degrade organic dyes under the visible light irradiation. The photocatalytic activity of sepiolite was shown through electrostatistic coverage on the surface of sepiolite by the cationic organic dye compound. The role of covered cationic organic dye molecules on the surface of sepiolite was to produce the excited electrons under the visible light. Then the electrons could be transferred to CB of sepiolite, enhancing the photocatalytic degradation efficiency of organic dyes mainly through oxidation by O2 which was generated by reduction of O2. The function of RhB-adsorbed sepiolite in the system is called as “photosensitizer”. RhB was the most efficiently photo-degraded on the sepiolite compared with MB, TB, and OII. All the kinetic data of removal of RhB, MB, TB, and OII on sepiolite were fitted to the pseudo-first-order reaction model. The greatest kinetic constant was found with RhB. The photocatalytic degradation of RhB on sepiolite under the visible light irradiation could be explained by adsorption and ELUMO and EHOMO in RhB. The spent sepiolite after adsorption of RhB successfully acted to photocatalytically degrade even anionic organic dye (TB) through dye-sensitization of RhB on sepiolite. Especially, we confirmed that the natural sepiolite represents a new class of visible light-responsive photocatalyst from naturally occurring minerals. It is unique as it absorbs visible light without modification. The acceptable performance with regard to photocatalytic activity and its low-cost characteristics make it a suitable candidate for application in environmental treatments.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/9/3/235/s1, Figure S1: Chemical structures of dyes: (a) methylene blue (MB); (b) Rhodamine B (RhB); (c) Orange II (OII); (d) trypan Blue (TB).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.S.; Methodology, C.C. and R.P.; Data curation, C.C. and R.P.; Writing—original draft preparation, C.C. and R.P.; Writing—review and editing, K.S., C.C. and R.P.; Supervision, K.S.; Project administration, K.S., C.C. and R.P.; Funding acquisition, K.S.

Funding

This work was supported to KS by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP16H02435 and JP17F17355.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sun, A.; Delacaillerie, J.B.D.; Fripiat, J.J. A New Microporous Material—Aluminated Sepiolite. Microporous Mater. 1995, 5, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rytwo, G.; Nir, S.; Crespin, M.; Margulies, L. Adsorption and Interactions of Methyl Green with Montmorillonite and Sepiolite. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2000, 222, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jacobo-Azuara, A.; Ramos, R.; Padilla, E.; Aragon-Piña, A.; Maria Guerrero-Coronado, R.; Mendoza-Barron, J. Adsorption of heavy metals on Sepiolite 2011. Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. 2014, 29, 569–584. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ozdemir, Y.; Dogan, M.; Alkan, M. Adsorption of cationic dyes from aqueous solutions by sepiolite. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2006, 96, 419–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bergaya, F.; Lagaly, G. Chapter 1 General Introduction: Clays, Clay Minerals, and Clay Science; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  6. Liu, J.; Zhang, G. Recent advances in synthesis and applications of clay-based photocatalysts: A review. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. PCCP 2014, 16, 8178–8192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Álvarez, A.; Santaren, J.; Esteban, A. Current Industrial Applications of Palygorskite and Sepiolite; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; Volume 3, p. 281. [Google Scholar]
  8. Alvarez, A. Sepiolite: Properties and Uses. In Developments in Sedimentology; Singer, A., Galan, E., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1984; Volume 37, pp. 253–287. [Google Scholar]
  9. Murray, H.H. Overview—Clay mineral applications. Appl. Clay Sci. 1991, 5, 379–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ruiz-Hitzky, E.; Aranda, P.; Álvarez, A.; Santarén, J.; Esteban-Cubillo, A. Chapter 17—Advanced Materials and New Applications of Sepiolite and Palygorskite. In Developments in Clay Science; Galàn, E., Singer, A., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; Volume 3, pp. 393–452. [Google Scholar]
  11. Guggenheim, S.; Krekeler, M.P.S. Chapter 1—The Structures and Microtextures of the Palygorskite–Sepiolite Group Minerals. In Developments in Clay Science; Galàn, E., Singer, A., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; Volume 3, pp. 3–32. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cecilia, J.A.; Vilarrasa-Garcia, E.; Cavalcante, C.L.; Azevedo, D.C.S.; Franco, F.; Rodriguez-Castellon, E. Evaluation of two fibrous clay minerals (sepiolite and palygorskite) for CO2 Capture. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 4573–4587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Brigatti, M.F.; Galan, E.; Theng, B.K.G. Chapter 2 Structures and Mineralogy of Clay Minerals. In Developments in Clay Science; Bergaya, F., Theng, B.K.G., Lagaly, G., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006; Volume 1, pp. 19–86. [Google Scholar]
  14. Brigatti, M.; Malferrari, D.; Laurora, A.; Elmi, C. Structure and Mineralogy of Layer Silicates: Recent Perspectives and New Trends; Mineralogical Society of Great Britain: London, UK, 2011; Volume 12, pp. 1–71. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hu, X.; Sun, Z.; Song, J.; Zhang, G.; Li, C.; Zheng, S. Synthesis of novel ternary heterogeneous BiOCl/TiO2/sepiolite composite with enhanced visible-light-induced photocatalytic activity towards tetracycline. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 533, 238–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kaur, S.; Singh, V. Visible light induced sonophotocatalytic degradation of Reactive Red dye 198 using dye sensitized TiO2. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2007, 14, 531–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhang, Y.L.; Wang, D.J.; Zhang, G.K. Photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants by TiO2/sepiolite composites prepared at low temperature. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 173, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ugurlu, M.; Karaoglu, M.H. TiO2 supported on sepiolite: Preparation, structural and thermal characterization and catalytic behaviour in photocatalytic treatment of phenol and lignin from olive mill wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 166, 859–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jin, L.; Zeng, H.Y.; Xu, S.; Chen, C.R.; Duan, H.Z.; Du, J.Z.; Hu, G.; Sun, Y.X. Facile preparation of sepiolite@LDH composites for the visible-light degradation of organic dyes. Chin. J. Catal. 2018, 39, 1832–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Akkari, M.; Aranda, P.; Belver, C.; Bedia, J.; Ben Haj Amara, A.; Ruiz-Hitzky, E. ZnO/sepiolite heterostructured materials for solar photocatalytic degradation of pharmaceuticals in wastewater. Appl. Clay Sci. 2018, 156, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Akkari, M.; Aranda, P.; Mayoral, A.; Garcia-Hernandez, M.; Ben Haj Amara, A.; Ruiz-Hitzky, E. Sepiolite nanoplatform for the simultaneous assembly of magnetite and zinc oxide nanoparticles as photocatalyst for improving removal of organic pollutants. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 340, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Xu, W.G.; Liu, S.F.; Lu, S.X.; Kang, S.Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, H.F. Photocatalytic degradation in aqueous solution using quantum-sized ZnO particles supported on sepiolite. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 351, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Giustetto, R.; Seenivasan, K.; Bonino, F.; Ricchiardi, G.; Bordiga, S.; Chierotti, M.R.; Gobetto, R. Host/Guest Interactions in a Sepiolite-Based Maya Blue Pigment: A Spectroscopic Study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 16764–16776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bhatt, A.S.; Sakaria, P.L.; Vasudevan, M.; Pawar, R.R.; Sudheesh, N.; Bajaj, H.C.; Mody, H.M. Adsorption of an anionic dye from aqueous medium by organoclays: Equilibrium modeling, kinetic and thermodynamic exploration. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 8663–8671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rodriguez, A.; Ovejero, G.; Mestanza, M.; Garcia, J. Removal of Dyes from Wastewaters by Adsorption on Sepiolite and Pansil. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49, 3207–3216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, P.; Cheng, M.M.; Zhang, Z.H. On different photodecomposition behaviors of rhodamine B on laponite and montmorillonite clay under visible light irradiation. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2014, 18, 308–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Hassan, M.; Afify, A.S.; Tulliani, J.M. Synthesis of ZnO Nanoparticles onto Sepiolite Needles and Determination of Their Sensitivity toward Humidity, NO2 and H2. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2016, 32, 573–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pawar, R.R.; Lalhmunsiama; Bajaj, H.C.; Lee, S.-M. Activated bentonite as a low-cost adsorbent for the removal of Cu(II) and Pb(II) from aqueous solutions: Batch and column studies. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2016, 34, 213–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Pawar, R.R.; Gupta, P.; Lalhmunsiama; Bajaj, H.C.; Lee, S.-M. Al-intercalated acid activated bentonite beads for the removal of aqueous phosphate. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 572, 1222–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Krekeler, M.P.S.; Guggenheim, S. Defects in microstructure in palygorskite–sepiolite minerals: A transmission electron microscopy (TEM) study. Appl. Clay Sci. 2008, 39, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sing, K.S.W.; Williams, R.T. Physisorption Hysteresis Loops and the Characterization of Nanoporous Materials. Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. 2004, 22, 773–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Sing, K.S.W.; Everett, D.H.; Haul, R.A.W.; Moscou, L.; Pierotti, R.A.; Rouquérol, J.; Siemieniewska, T. Reporting Physisorption Data for Gas/Solid Systems with Special Reference to the Determination of Surface Area and Porosity. Pure Appl. Chem. 1985, 57, 603–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pawar, R.R.; Kevadiya, B.D.; Brahmbhatt, H.; Bajaj, H.C. Template free synthesis of mesoporous hectorites: Efficient host for pH responsive drug delivery. Int. J. Pharm. 2013, 446, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Pawar, R.R.; Patel, H.A.; Sethia, G.; Bajaj, H.C. Selective adsorption of carbon dioxide over nitrogen on calcined synthetic hectorites with tailor-made porosity. Appl. Clay Sci. 2009, 46, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hubbard, B.; Kuang, W.; Moser, A.; Facey, G.A.; Detellier, C. Structural study of maya blue: Textural, thermal and solid-state multinuclear magnetic resonance characterization of the palygorskite-indigo and sepiolite-indigo adducts. Clays Clay Miner. 2003, 51, 318–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dong, F.; Zhao, Z.; Xiong, T.; Ni, Z.; Zhang, W.; Sun, Y.; Ho, W.K. In situ construction of g-C3N4/g-C3N4 metal-free heterojunction for enhanced visible-light photocatalysis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 11392–11401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Su, X.D.; Yang, J.J.; Yu, X.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, Y.M. In situ grown hierarchical 50%BiOCl/BiOI hollow flowerlike microspheres on reduced graphene oxide nanosheets for enhanced visible-light photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 433, 502–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, Z.; Chen, M.; Ai, Z.Q.; Wu, L.; Zhang, Q.W. Mechanochemical synthesis of CdS/MgAl LDH-precursor as improved visible-light driven photocatalyst for organic dye. Appl. Clay Sci. 2018, 163, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wan, C.; Chen, B. Synthesis and characterization of biomimetic hydroxyapatite/sepiolite nanocomposites. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 693–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Feng, Q.; Li, S.Y.; Ma, W.H.; Fan, H.J.; Wan, X.H.; Lei, Y.; Chen, Z.J.; Yang, J.; Qin, B. Synthesis and characterization of Fe3O4/ZnO-GO nanocomposites with improved photocatalytic degradation methyl orange under visible light irradiation. J. Alloy. Compd. 2018, 737, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wei, Z.; Benlin, D.; Fengxia, Z.; Xinyue, T.; Jiming, X.; Lili, Z.; Shiyin, L.; Leung, D.Y.C.; Sun, C. A novel 3D plasmonic p-n heterojunction photocatalyst: Ag nanoparticles on flower-like p-Ag2S/n-BiVO4 and its excellent photocatalytic reduction and oxidation activities. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 229, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Xu, F.; Chen, H.; Xu, C.; Wu, D.; Gao, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Jiang, K. Ultra-thin Bi2WO6 porous nanosheets with high lattice coherence for enhanced performance for photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI). J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 525, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhang, D. Effectiveness of photodecomposition of rhodamine B and malachite green upon coupled tricomponent TiO2(Anatase-Rutile)/ZnO nanocomposite. Acta Chim. Slovaca 2013, 6, 245–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Halterman, R.L.; Moore, J.L.; Mannel, L.M. Disrupting aggregation of tethered rhodamine B dyads through inclusion in cucurbit [7] uril. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 3266–3269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Pica, M.; Calzuola, S.; Donnadio, A.; Gentili, P.; Nocchetti, M.; Casciola, M. De-Ethylation and Cleavage of Rhodamine B by a Zirconium Phosphate/Silver Bromide Composite Photocatalyst. Catalysts 2018, 9, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, W.; Xing, J.; Yang, Z.; Kong, M.; Yao, H. A chemical etching route to controllable fabrication of TiO2 hollow nanospheres for enhancing their photocatalytic activity. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 2013, 7, 192–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yu, K.; Yang, S.; He, H.; Sun, C.; Gu, C.; Ju, Y. Visible light-driven photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B over NaBiO3: Pathways and mechanism. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 10024–10032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Hu, X.; Mohamood, T.; Ma, W.; Chen, C.; Zhao, J. Oxidative decomposition of rhodamine B dye in the presence of VO2+ and/or Pt(IV) under visible light irradiation: N-deethylation, chromophore cleavage, and mineralization. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 26012–26018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Guishui, L.; Lijun, C.; Bing, Z.; Yi, L. Novel Bi2O3 loaded sepiolite photocatalyst: Preparation and characterization. Mater. Lett. 2016, 168, 143–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhou, F.; Yan, C.; Liang, T.; Sun, Q.; Wang, H. Photocatalytic degradation of Orange G using sepiolite-TiO2 nanocomposites: Optimization of physicochemical parameters and kinetics studies. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2018, 183, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, P.; Qi, C.; Hao, L.; Wen, P.; Xu, X. Sepiolite/Cu2O/Cu photocatalyst: Preparation and high performance for degradation of organic dye. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2019, 35, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhou, F.; Yan, C.; Sun, Q.; Komarneni, S. TiO2/Sepiolite nanocomposites doped with rare earth ions: Preparation, characterization and visible light photocatalytic activity. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2019, 274, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Papoulis, D.; Panagiotaras, D.; Tsigrou, P.; Christoforidis, K.C.; Petit, C.; Apostolopoulou, A.; Stathatos, E.; Komarneni, S.; Koukouvelas, I. Halloysite and sepiolite –TiO2 nanocomposites: Synthesis characterization and photocatalytic activity in three aquatic wastes. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2018, 85, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hernández-Uresti, D.B.; Vázquez, A.; Sanchez-Martinez, D.; Obregón, S. Performance of the polymeric g-C3N4 photocatalyst through the degradation of pharmaceutical pollutants under UV–vis irradiation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2016, 324, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Luo, B.; Chen, M.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, J.; Li, D.; Xu, D.; Shi, W. Highly efficient visible-light-driven photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline by a Z-scheme g-C3N4/Bi3TaO7 nanocomposite photocatalyst. Dalton Trans 2017, 46, 8431–8438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Hou, C.; Hu, B.; Zhu, J. Photocatalytic Degradation of Methylene Blue over TiO2 Pretreated with Varying Concentrations of NaOH. Catalysts 2018, 8, 575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, L.; Zhang, C.; Cheng, R.; Ali, J.; Wang, Z.; Mailhot, G.; Pan, G. Microcystis aeruginosa Synergistically Facilitate the Photocatalytic Degradation of Tetracycline Hydrochloride and Cr(VI) on PAN/TiO2/Ag Nanofiber Mats. Catalysts 2018, 8, 628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bai, Z.Q.; Liu, Z.W. A broadband photodetector based on Rhodamine B-sensitized ZnO nanowires film. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Le, T.T.; Akhtar, M.S.; Park, D.M.; Lee, J.C.; Yang, O.B. Water splitting on Rhodamine-B dye sensitized Co-doped TiO2 catalyst under visible light. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2012, 111, 397–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhao, H.P.; Zhang, Y.F.; Li, G.F.; Tian, F.; Tang, H.; Chen, R. Rhodamine B-sensitized BiOCl hierarchical nanostructure for methyl orange photodegradation. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 7772–7779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Molla, M.A.I.; Tateishi, I.; Furukawa, M.; Katsumata, H.; Suzuki, T.; Kaneco, S. Photocatalytic Decolorization of Dye with Self-Dye-Sensitization under Fluorescent Light Irradiation. ChemEngineering 2017, 1, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ruankham, P.; Sae-Kung, C.; Mangkorntong, N.; Mangkorntong, P.; Choopun, S. Photoelectrochemical Characteristic of ZnO Dye-sensitized Solar Cell with Platinum Nanoparticle as a Counterelectrode. CMU J. Nat. Sci. 2008, 7, 177. [Google Scholar]
  63. Huang, S.; Chen, J.; Zhong, J.; Li, J.; Hu, W.; Li, M.; Huang, K.; Duan, R. Enhanced photocatalytic performance of Ag/AgCl/SnO2 originating from efficient formation of ·O2. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2017, 201, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Watanabe, M. Dye-sensitized photocatalyst for effective water splitting catalyst. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2017, 18, 705–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) PXRD patterns and (b) FTIR spectra of sepiolite and the spent sepiolite after photocatalytic degradation in various organic dye compounds.
Figure 1. (a) PXRD patterns and (b) FTIR spectra of sepiolite and the spent sepiolite after photocatalytic degradation in various organic dye compounds.
Catalysts 09 00235 g001
Figure 2. TEM images of sepiolite. (a) Bright-field and (b) dark-field; scale bars indicate 500 nm.
Figure 2. TEM images of sepiolite. (a) Bright-field and (b) dark-field; scale bars indicate 500 nm.
Catalysts 09 00235 g002
Figure 3. (a) Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm and (b) BJH pore size distribution for sepiolite.
Figure 3. (a) Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm and (b) BJH pore size distribution for sepiolite.
Catalysts 09 00235 g003
Figure 4. XPS spectrum of sepiolite. (a) Survey scan and (b) valence band (VB) energy region.
Figure 4. XPS spectrum of sepiolite. (a) Survey scan and (b) valence band (VB) energy region.
Catalysts 09 00235 g004
Figure 5. UV-Vis spectrum of sepiolite. (a) Diffuse reflectance spectrum (DRS) spectrum and (b) Tauc plot.
Figure 5. UV-Vis spectrum of sepiolite. (a) Diffuse reflectance spectrum (DRS) spectrum and (b) Tauc plot.
Catalysts 09 00235 g005
Figure 6. (a) Adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of various organic dyes over sepiolite as a function of time; (b) removal efficiency of various organic dyes over sepiolite after 120 min; (c) pseudo-first-order kinetic plot of various organic dyes over sepiolite; and (d) time-dependent changes in UV-Vis spectra of rhodamine B (RhB) in suspension of sepiolite under the visible light irradiation.
Figure 6. (a) Adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of various organic dyes over sepiolite as a function of time; (b) removal efficiency of various organic dyes over sepiolite after 120 min; (c) pseudo-first-order kinetic plot of various organic dyes over sepiolite; and (d) time-dependent changes in UV-Vis spectra of rhodamine B (RhB) in suspension of sepiolite under the visible light irradiation.
Catalysts 09 00235 g006
Figure 7. Time-dependent changes in HPLC spectra of RhB and degradation products on sepiolite under the visible light irradiation.
Figure 7. Time-dependent changes in HPLC spectra of RhB and degradation products on sepiolite under the visible light irradiation.
Catalysts 09 00235 g007
Figure 8. Photocatalytic degradation of RhB over sepiolite in the presence of different radical scavengers. IPA: isopropyl alcohol; BQ: benzoquinone; and KI: potassium iodide.
Figure 8. Photocatalytic degradation of RhB over sepiolite in the presence of different radical scavengers. IPA: isopropyl alcohol; BQ: benzoquinone; and KI: potassium iodide.
Catalysts 09 00235 g008
Figure 9. Recycling test in the photocatalytic degradation of 2 × 10−5 M RhB over sepiolite (catalyst loading = 0.25 g/L) under visible light irradiation.
Figure 9. Recycling test in the photocatalytic degradation of 2 × 10−5 M RhB over sepiolite (catalyst loading = 0.25 g/L) under visible light irradiation.
Catalysts 09 00235 g009
Figure 10. Removal efficiency of TB by sepiolite and spent RhB-sepiolite after adsorption of RhB under the visible light irradiation. The initial concentrations of RhB and TB were 2 × 10−5 M.
Figure 10. Removal efficiency of TB by sepiolite and spent RhB-sepiolite after adsorption of RhB under the visible light irradiation. The initial concentrations of RhB and TB were 2 × 10−5 M.
Catalysts 09 00235 g010
Scheme 1. Proposed mechanism of photocatalytic degradation RhB over sepiolite and TB over spent sepiolite after adsorption of RhB under the visible light irradiation.
Scheme 1. Proposed mechanism of photocatalytic degradation RhB over sepiolite and TB over spent sepiolite after adsorption of RhB under the visible light irradiation.
Catalysts 09 00235 sch001
Scheme 2. Schematic of the photocatalytic experimental setup.
Scheme 2. Schematic of the photocatalytic experimental setup.
Catalysts 09 00235 sch002
Table 1. The elemental compositions of sepiolite in wt.%.
Table 1. The elemental compositions of sepiolite in wt.%.
ComponentC NOFNaMgAlSiPS
wt.%6.8170.33953.4590.8640.04713.1821.08723.2350.0070.011
ComponentClKCaTiMnFeCuZnZrBa
wt.%0.0170.4350.1350.0540.0110.2650.0020.0090.0010.019
Table 2. Comparison of photocatalytic efficiency of sepiolite composites with other reported photocatalysts for organic dye degradation.
Table 2. Comparison of photocatalytic efficiency of sepiolite composites with other reported photocatalysts for organic dye degradation.
CatalystActive CompoundTargetC0 (mol/L)Loading (g/L)Efficacy (%)Time (min)Ref.
Bi2O3/sepioliteBi2O3Malachite green14 × 10−50.598.2180[49]
Sepiolite-TiO2TiO2Orange G2.2 × 10−50.897.8150[50]
Sepiolite/Cu2O/CuCu2O/CuCongo red1.4 × 10−50.2 95.150[51]
Eu-TiO2/sepioliteEu-TiO2Orange G2.2 × 10−50.8~70600[52]
ZnCr LDH/SepioliteZnCr LDHMB3.1 × 10−51.2593.1120[19]
Sepiolite –TiO2TiO2RhB8.3 × 10−50.85~80120[53]
SepioliteAdsorbed MB on sepioliteMB2.0 × 10−50.2583.3120This work
SepioliteAdsorbed RhB on sepioliteRhB2.0 × 10−50.2565.5120This work

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chuaicham, C.; Pawar, R.; Sasaki, K. Dye-sensitized Photocatalyst of Sepiolite for Organic Dye Degradation. Catalysts 2019, 9, 235. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9030235

AMA Style

Chuaicham C, Pawar R, Sasaki K. Dye-sensitized Photocatalyst of Sepiolite for Organic Dye Degradation. Catalysts. 2019; 9(3):235. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9030235

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chuaicham, Chitiphon, Radheshyam Pawar, and Keiko Sasaki. 2019. "Dye-sensitized Photocatalyst of Sepiolite for Organic Dye Degradation" Catalysts 9, no. 3: 235. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9030235

APA Style

Chuaicham, C., Pawar, R., & Sasaki, K. (2019). Dye-sensitized Photocatalyst of Sepiolite for Organic Dye Degradation. Catalysts, 9(3), 235. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9030235

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop