Next Article in Journal
Discovery, Characterization, and Pharmaceutical Applications of Two Loratadine–Oxalic Acid Cocrystals
Previous Article in Journal
Sonic and Photonic Crystals
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Cavity Structure on Acoustic Characteristics of Phononic Crystals Based on Double-Layer Plates

1
Hebei Key Lab of Power Plant Flue Gas Multi-Pollutants Control, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China
2
MOE Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Systems Optimization, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2020, 10(11), 995; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10110995
Submission received: 23 September 2020 / Revised: 29 October 2020 / Accepted: 31 October 2020 / Published: 3 November 2020

Abstract

:
Localized resonance phononic crystals (LRPCs) are increasingly attracting scientists’ attention in the field of low-frequency noise reduction because of the excellent subwavelength band gap characteristics in the low-frequency band. However, the LRPCs have always had the disadvantage that the noise reduction band is too narrow. In this paper, in order to solve this problem, LRPCs based on double-layer plates with cavity structures are designed. First, the energy bands of phononic crystals plate with different thicknesses were calculated by the finite element method (FEM). At the same time, the mechanism of band gap generation was analyzed in combination with the modalities. Additionally, the influence of structure on the sound transmission loss (STL) of the phononic crystals plate and the phononic crystals cavity plates were analyzed, which indicates that the phononic crystals cavity plates have notable characteristics and advantages. Moreover, this study reveals a unique ”cavity cave” pattern in the STL diagram for the phononic crystals cavity plates, and it was analyzed. Finally, the influence of structural factors on the band structure and STL of phononic crystals cavity plates are summarized, and the theoretical basis and method guidance for the study of phononic crystals cavity plates are provided. New ideas are also provided for the future design and research of phononic crystals plate along with potential applications in low-frequency noise reduction.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Reducing low-frequency noise has always been problematic. The primary reason for this is that the low-frequency sound waves penetrate the structure more easily than the high-frequency sound waves. The development of local resonance phononic crystals has resulted in the possibility of efficient low-frequency noise reduction [1,2,3]. The theoretical basis of phononic crystals was proposed by Sigalas and Economou [4] in 1992, which proved for the first time in theory that a solid spherical scattered projectile is embedded in a certain matrix material to form a three-dimensional periodic lattice structure with forbidden band elastic properties. In 1993, Kushwaha et al. [5] clearly proposed the concept of phononic crystals for the first time, and the composite medium formed by the nickel column in the aluminum alloy matrix is calculated by the plane wave method to obtain the elastic wave gap in the direction of shear polarization. A periodic material with an elastic-wave band gap is called a phononic crystals [6,7,8,9]. In 1995, when Martinez-Sala et al. [10] studied the acoustic characteristics of the sculpture “Flowing Melody” made more than 200 years ago in Madrid, Spain, they first determined the existence of elastic wave band gap from an experimental perspective. Liu introduced aluminum spheres into epoxy resin in 2000 and was the first to propose local-resonance-type phononic crystals of hetero-Bragg-scattering phononic crystals [11].
Local resonance phononic crystals have been increasingly researched in the field of noise reduction because they can suppress large-wavelength low-frequency sound waves through their small unit structure [12,13,14]. Research on phononic crystals has mainly focused on the effects of various materials and structures on the band gap of two-dimensional phononic crystals [15,16,17,18,19,20]; however, no structure with infinite z-axis size exists in the real world. Research on three-dimensional phononic crystals has gradually advanced to research on three-dimensional phononic crystals plate [3,21,22,23]. Many studies have examined the band gap of phononic crystals plate. However, for local resonance phonon crystals, except for the high sound transmission loss near the beginning of the band gap, the sound transmission loss (STL) in other frequency domains is very low. In order to widen the noise reduction band, scientists have made many efforts [24,25,26,27,28,29]. Dong et al. [25] investigated hybrid phononic crystals; the characteristic frequency of the xy mode, transmission loss, and displacement vector were calculated using the finite element method. A Bragg-scattering band gap and local resonance band gap were discovered to exist in the band structures. The band gap covers a large range at low frequencies. Below 3000 Hz, the band gaps cover more than 95% of the spectrum. Zhou et al. [26] found that the band gaps of locally resonant phononic crystals can be extended to several frequency ranges through periodic embedding of multilayered coaxial inclusions. The frequency response of multilayered periodic structures with various numbers of cells was simulated. However, the problem of too low STL outside the band gap starting point cannot be solved.
In order to solve this problem, we referenced the method of improving the noise reduction ability of traditional materials and applied it to the phononic crystals plate. The previous research indicates that a cavity structure significantly improves the sound insulation of ordinary single layer plate and makes a noise reduction material more lightweight [30,31,32,33,34]. Sarıgül et al. [35] calculated and presented a modal structural–acoustic coupling for plates with different composite parameters. The effects of material, ply angle, and number of layers on the coupled vibroacoustic characteristics of composite plate-cavity systems have been examined and compared with the behavior of isotropic plate systems. Xin et al. [36] investigated the vibroacoustic performance of a rectangular double-panel partition with an enclosed air cavity and simply mounted on an infinite acoustic rigid baffle. The simply supported boundary condition is accounted for by using the method of modal function, and the double Fourier series solutions are obtained to characterize the vibroacoustic behaviors of the structure. The results for sound transmission loss, panel vibration level, and sound pressure level are presented to explore the physical mechanisms of sound energy penetration across the finite double-panel partition. This paper proposes phononic crystals based on double-layer plates with a cavity structure. The noise reduction mechanism of phononic crystals cavity plate and the effect of the cavity structure on the STL of the phononic crystals based on double-layer plates are investigated by referring to previous research on cavity plate, and exploiting the unique band gap characteristics of phononic crystals. The present study of phononic crystals cavity plates provides a theoretical basis and methodological guidance. It also provides new ideas regarding the future design and research of phononic crystals plate and indicates potential applications in low-frequency noise reduction.

2. Principle and Method of Band Structure

To investigate the band structure characteristics of the proposed phononic crystals plate, band structures are calculated using the finite element method (FEM), proven in other work [37,38] to constitute an efficient method.
The phononic crystal is first transformed from the real lattice vector space into the reciprocal lattice vector space by using the following equations:
b 1 = 2 π a 2 × a 3 a 1 · a 2 × a 3
b 2 = 2 π a 1 × a 3 a 1 · a 2 × a 3
b 3 = 2 π a 1 × a 2 a 1 · a 2 × a 3
where a i and b i are the axis vectors of the positive and reciprocal lattice vector spaces, respectively. By definition, the two axes of each inverted lattice and normal lattice are orthogonal, satisfying Equation (4):
b i · a j = 2 π δ i j , δ i j = { 1 , i = j 0 , i j
Because of the periodicity of the phononic crystals, the physical quantities in the real lattice and the changed inverted lattice meet the translation periodicity requirement, satisfying the following Equation:
n ( r ) = G n ( G ) e i G · r
where G is a reciprocal lattice vector space, which is a discretized vector space that satisfies the periodicity requirement in the Fourier expansion of the physical quantity n ( r ) ; r is the position vector equal to x y z T . The inverted lattice is clearly the lattice of the true regular lattice vector space in its Fourier space. The wave vector k is then used to scan the irreducible Brillouin zone of the cell, and the Bloch periodicity is added to the cell boundary for calculation. A schematic of the cell and irreducible Brillouin zone is displayed in Figure 1.
When a longitudinal acoustic wave is injected into the elastic body, it is transformed into an elastic wave that has both longitudinal and transverse components. For isotropic materials, the elastic wave equation can be expressed using the displacement components in three directions as follows:
{ ρ 2 u x t 2 = ( λ + μ ) θ t x + μ 2 u x + ρ f x ρ 2 u x t 2 = ( λ + μ ) θ t y + μ 2 u y + ρ f y ρ 2 u y t 2 = ( λ + μ ) θ t y + μ 2 u z + ρ f z
λ = E v ( 1 2 v ) ( 1 + v )
μ = E 2 ( 1 + v )
where u x , u y , u z are the displacement components in the x, y, and z directions, respectively; θ t is the total line-strain ( θ t = ε x + ε y + ε z ); f x , f y , f z are the external force components of the unit mass in the x, y, and z directions (unit: N / kg ); λ and μ are the Lamé elastic constants, and the unit is Pa; ρ is the density; E is Young’s modulus; ν is Poisson’s ratio; and 2 is the Laplace operator:
2 = 2 x 2 + 2 y 2 + 2 z 2
Using the finite element software to mesh the cells, the characteristic equations in the primitive cells are:
( K ω 2 M ) U = 0
where K is the stiffness matrix of the nodes in the primitive cell, M is the mass matrix of the nodes in the primitive cell, U is the displacement matrix of the nodes in the primitive cell, and ω is the characteristic frequency.
COMSOL Multiphysics 5.4 was employed to directly solve the eigenvalue equation subject to the complex boundary conditions. The wave vector is then used to sweep the edges of the irreducible Brillouin zone. We thereby obtain the eigenvalue problem representing the relationship between the wave frequency and wave vector, that is, the dispersion relationship, also known as the band structure.

3. Material and Method of STL

The phononic crystals cavity plates comprise two phononic crystals plates separated by a cavity. Three-dimensional three-component local resonance phononic crystals were selected as the phononic crystals plate. A schematic of the phononic crystals plates cell is displayed in Figure 2. The cell size (a) is 100 mm, the thickness of plates (t_p) is 10 mm, the thickness of cavity (H) is 10 mm; epoxy resin is used as the matrix, and tungsten with a radius (r) of 46 mm is used as the scatterer. A silicone rubber layer with a thickness of 2 mm is placed between the matrix and the scatterer. The material density, Young modulus, and Poisson’s ratio in the models are given in Table 1.
STL simulation calculations for the phononic crystals plate and phononic crystals cavity plates are performed according to the structure of a standing wave tube. However, the standing wave tube method is only suitable for measuring soft materials such as porous materials. Because the acoustic properties of hard materials are greatly affected by the boundary conditions, when the standing wave tube tests fixed-supported hard materials, the sound insulation will produce false high values in the low-frequency domain [39]. Therefore, this article is based on the principle of the standing wave tube method, and continuity Floquet–Bloch periodic boundary conditions are added in the x and y directions to reflect the periodicity of the phononic crystals. The schematic diagram of the cycle model is shown in Figure 3, and one of the cycles is taken as the functional area explanation. The upper boundary (blue surface) of the emission zone is defined as the boundary condition of plane wave radiation, and an incident wave with a value of 1 Pa is defined. The lowermost region is the perfectly matched layers (PML). The incident wave is first transmitted to the upper plate of the phononic crystals cavity plates, then the acoustic radiation through the plate is transmitted to the cavity between plates, and then transmitted to the lower plate of the phononic crystals cavity plates, and finally dissipated by the PML layer. The STL formula is defined as
STL = 20 l o g 10 ( P 1 P 2 )
P1 is the incentive pressure, which is 1 Pa in this model, and P2 is the pressure in the integral P2 area.
When the phononic crystals cavity plates are simulated, the acoustic physical field and solid mechanical physics field should be coupled and simulated. The coupling method involves the addition of multiphysics coupling equations at the acoustic–solid boundary. The following three sets of acoustic vibration characteristic equations, which are the cavity sound pressure wave equations, are used for the coupling calculations:
2 P = 1 c 2 2 P t 2
where P is the sound pressure, c is the speed of sound, and t is time;
P n = ρ 0 w ¨
where n is the direction normal to the plate surface, ρ 0 is the air density, and w is the surface vibration displacement of the plate structure;
D 4 w + ρ s t p 2 t 2 = F m F p
where D is the bending stiffness of the plate, 4 is the reharmonic operator, ρ s is the plate density, t p is the plate thickness, F m is the source excitation, and F p is the acoustic excitation in the cavity.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Band Structure Analysis

To fully capture the effect of the cavity structure on the STL of the phononic crystals plate, for a constant total thickness of the phononic crystals cavity plates, this study compares the STL obtained for three types of phononic crystals plate: (i) thickness equal to that of a single layer of the phononic crystals cavity plates, (ii) thickness equal to that of a double layer of the phononic crystals cavity plates, and (iii) equal to the total thickness of the phononic crystals cavity plates. In this paper, the structure of the main phononic crystals cavity plates is a 10 mm phononic crystals plate + 10 mm air layer + 10 mm phononic crystals plate. Therefore, the band structures of phononic crystals plate with thicknesses 10, 20, and 30 mm are calculated first. The results are presented in Figure 4 and Table 2. Through analysis, the band structure found to determine the main band gap is the sixth- and seventh-order bands. To make the comparison more intuitive, comparison of the bands is attempted. The sixth- to seventh-order bands of phononic crystals plate with different thicknesses are analyzed. The comparison analysis results are shown in Figure 4d. Figure 5 displays the modal for analysis of the band gap mechanism and the cause of the band gap difference.
According to Figure 4 and Figure 5 and Table 2, changing the thickness exerts little effect on the upper edge of the complete band gap of the phononic crystals plate, and the lower edge is stable in the range 208.59–208.93 Hz. However, a certain effect is exerted on the lower edge. From 87.04 Hz at 10 mm to 96.78 Hz at 20 mm, and 98.57 Hz at 30 mm, nonlinear growth with a decreasing slope occurs, fluctuating by approximately 10 Hz. In terms of the directional band gap, the first band gap of the X–M direction is not significantly different in various plate thicknesses. The modes are the vibration of the scatterer along the z-axis and the rotation of the scatterer about the z-axis. This is explained by noting that the physical quantity that determines the first band gap of the X–M direction is mainly the volume physical quantity. The second band gap change is more obvious in the X–M direction at the 2–3 band position. The difference obtained between 10 and 20 mm is too small at this band position, only approximately 1 Hz, so a band gap is not formed, whereas the 30 mm-thick plate has a band gap with a width close to 7 Hz. The calculation of the modalities is such that the scatterer rotates around the z-axis and vibrates along the x-axis, indicating that the physical quantities determining the second band gap in the X–M direction are mainly surface physical quantities. The third band gap in the X–M direction is at the 4–5 band position. The modes are such that the scatterer both rotates around and vibrates along the y-axis. The band gap width is mostly stable at approximately 35–40 Hz. The band gap change is similar to the band gap in the first direction. The largest change is the fourth band gap in the complete direction at the 6–7 band position, and the modes are the scatterer vibrating along the x-axis and the matrix vibrating along the z-axis. The lower edge of the band gap is the same, but the upper edge of the band gap changes from 610.87 Hz at 10 mm to 939.03 Hz at 20 mm to 953.38 Hz at 30 mm. A nonlinear growth characteristic is exhibited with a decreasing slope that is consistent with the lower edge of the full band gap, which changes by approximately 343 Hz. Because the band that determines the main band gap is the sixth- to seventh-order band, the band diagrams of the sixth to seventh bands of the phononic crystals plate for various thicknesses are compared and analyzed, so the color of the band gap from 10 to 30 mm changes gradually. To facilitate observation, the full band gap is scaled to various degrees in the horizontal direction according to proportions in the vertical direction. Following this operation, the various differences and changes in the previous analysis can be observed intuitively in Figure 4d.

4.2. Influence of Phononic Crystals Plate Structure on the STL of the Plate and the Phononic Crystals Cavity Plates

Based on the band structure and modal analysis, the STL of the phononic crystals plate under various conditions is calculated. First, the STLs of phononic crystals plate and phononic crystals cavity plates with various thicknesses were calculated. Comparison analysis of the phononic crystals plate and phononic crystals cavity plates is then performed, and the effect of scatterer radius r on phononic crystals plate and phononic crystals cavity plates of various thicknesses is determined.
Figure 6 illustrates that increasing the thickness of the phononic crystals plate from 10 to 20 or 30 mm results in an increase in the average STL by approximately 5 dB; the peak STL increases from 63 to 66 to 69 dB, respectively—by 3 dB for each 10 mm in thickness. However, the average STL for the phononic crystals cavity plates with h = 10 + 10 + 10 mm is considerably higher, with its peak value being 100 dB, more than 30 dB greater than that of the phononic crystals plate with different thicknesses. The homogeneous cavity plates case was calculated as a comparison, and the result showed that although its STL has a certain increase at 140 Hz, it is only 25 dB, which is much smaller than the phononic crystal cavity plates. Notably, the STL curve has an inverted U shape for the phononic crystals cavity plates at frequencies lower than 60 Hz and higher than 200 Hz, and this is not observed for the phononic crystals plate. Calculating the mode of the phononic crystals demonstrates that the scatterer vibrates along the z-axis and the matrix vibrates along the z-axis within these two ranges. Therefore, the inverted U shapes are STL-inverted U-shaped attenuation caused by resonance resulting from the coupling of the phononic crystals plate and air acoustic vibration. Because the shape of the curve resembles a cave, it may be referred to as a ”cavity cave”.
These characteristics are unaffected when the scatterer r is changed. As indicated in Figure 7, the peak and average STLs of the phononic crystals cavity plates considerably exceed those of the single plate structure of thickness 10 mm and the phononic crystals plate with the same total mass (20 mm thickness) and total volume (30 mm thickness) as the cavity plate. As the scatterer radius r is decreased from 46 mm in 2 mm increments to 36 mm, the frequencies corresponding to the first few peaks decrease accordingly for both the phononic crystals plate and phononic crystals cavity plate. The difference between the two plates is that the size of the peak of the phononic crystals plate increases first and then decreases, whereas the peak for the phononic crystals cavity plates gradually decreases. The reason for consideration is that when the phononic crystals plate is too thin, the kinetic energy of the scatterer cannot be fully excited. The phononic crystals cavity plate can more easily excite the kinetic energy of the scatterer due to the existence of the cavity. At the same time, the STL peaks and dips denser as the radius of the scatterer decreases, owing to the band gap decreases. The area near the first peak corresponds to the first complete band gap of the phononic crystals, so the STL in this band gap range is more worthy of study.
First, according to presented results, when r is 46 mm, the band gap of a 10 mm-thick phononic crystals plate is 87.04–208.59 Hz. An STL greater than 20 dB is defined as effective noise reduction. The possibility of distortion of the standing wave tube when testing low frequencies should be considered. The peak is taken as the effective noise reduction starting point. To illustrate the problem more clearly, the STL is localized in the 10–200 Hz range and plotted in Figure 8. As r is changed from 46 to 36 mm in increments of 2 mm for the 10 mm-thick phononic crystals plate, the effective noise reduction range is 100–190, 70–120, 50–90, 40–70, 40–60, and 30–50 Hz, with respective range widths of 90, 50, 40, 30, 20, and 20 Hz, showing a nonlinear decrease with a decreasing slope; the extreme value is 65 dB at 70 Hz. For r changed from 46 to 36 mm for the 20 mm-thick phononic crystals plate, the effective noise reduction range is 100–200, 70–130, 50–100, 40–80, 30–60, and 30–50 Hz; these ranges have respective widths of 100, 60, 50, 40, 30, and 20 Hz. As for the 10 mm-thick plate, the range exhibits a nonlinear decrease with a gradually decreasing slope. The difference with the 100 mm-thick plate is that the lower edge of the effective noise reduction section is approximately 10 Hz higher, and the width is approximately 10 Hz greater. The extreme value is 78 dB at 70 Hz, which is an increase of 13 dB compared with that of the 10 mm-thick plate. For the 30 mm-thick phononic crystals plate, the effective noise reduction range as r is changed from 46 to 36 mm in increments of 2 mm is 100–200, 70–130, 50–100, 50–80, 40–70, and 30–60 Hz, with respective range widths of 100, 60, 50, 40, 30, and 30 Hz. As for the other two plates, the range exhibits a nonlinear decrease with a decreasing slope. The difference with the 20 mm-thick plate is that when r is less than or equal to 40 mm, the upper and lower edges of the effective noise reduction section are enlarged to a certain extent; the width is increased by an average of approximately 5 Hz. The extreme value is 91 dB at 70 Hz, which is 13 dB higher than for the 20 mm-thick plate, thus showing a clear linear correlation with the changes of 20 mm and 10 mm.
As r is altered from 46 to 36 mm in increments of 2 mm, the effective noise reduction range of the phononic crystals cavity plates is 100–200, 70–130, 50–100, 50–80, 40–60, and 30–50 Hz, with respective range widths of 100, 60, 50, 30, 20, and 20 Hz; as for the phononic crystals plate, the ranges exhibit a nonlinear decrease with decreasing slope. The effective noise reduction width and position are maintained near the average of the three-thickness phononic crystals plate. The difference is that at the extreme value, the transmission loss is 100 dB at 100 Hz, whereas at the second extreme, the transmission loss is still high at 99 dB at 70 Hz. The overall trend is such that the STL for the phononic crystals cavity plates is significantly better than that of the ordinary phononic crystals plate. Through analysis of the aforementioned data, the noise reduction performance of the phononic crystals cavity plates introduced into the cavity structure has a qualitative improvement. When the board structure is consistent, compared with that for the 10 mm-thick phononic crystals plate, the average effective noise reduction frequency range is improved by approximately 15 Hz, and the extreme value is improved by 35 dB. When the total mass is the same as that of a 20 mm-thick phononic crystals plate, the average effective noise reduction frequency domain is improved by approximately 5 Hz, and the extreme value is improved by 22 dB. When the total volume is the same as that of the 30 mm-thick phononic crystals plate, although the average effective noise reduction frequency domain is not considerably different, the extreme value is increased by 9 dB and the quality is reduced by one-third. Overall comparison reveals that in the frequency range 0–1500 Hz, the average STL of the phononic crystals cavity plates is much larger than that of the phononic crystals plate with various thicknesses, providing a clear advantage.

4.3. Effect of Cavity Thickness on STL of Phononic Crystals Cavity Plates

The aforementioned research clarifies the effect of cavity thickness and plate thickness on the STL of the phononic crystals cavity plates. Various cavity thicknesses are used: 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 15, and 20 mm. (When the cavity thickness is larger, the plate–cavity coupling effect gradually disappears and the experimental results are like two separate plates. Since a too large cavity does not reflect better acoustic performance, and the increased floor space is not conducive to later experiments and engineering applications, the effect of thicker cavities was not analyzed). To clarify the STL comparison, the STL is taken at 10–200 Hz when the cavity thickness is 1, 10, or 20 mm. To ensure the rigor of the research conclusions, after analyzing the effect of cavity thickness on the STL when the longitudinal influence of the phononic crystals plate thickness of 10 mm is analyzed, the STL values for phononic crystals plate of thickness 1 and 20 mm are calculated on the basis of the phononic crystals plate with 10 mm thickness. For the thickness of 1 and 20 mm lateral analysis, a phononic plate thickness of 10 mm is used.
As demonstrated by Figure 9, cavity thickness does not affect the location of STL peaks; only the STL values and deformation of the “cavity cave” change. As the cavity thickness is increased, the average STL gradually increases, and the extreme value increases nonlinearly with a decreasing slope, from 78 dB at a cavity thickness of 1 mm to 100 dB at a cavity thickness of 10 mm, and then to 104 dB at 20 mm cavity thickness. The width of the “cavity cave” also gradually decreases, which means that the average STL increases. Therefore, the larger the cavity, the better the sound insulation effect of the phononic crystals cavity plates. Figure 10 and Figure 11 indicate that the aforementioned rules are mostly constant whether the plate thickness is 10 or 20 mm. As the cavity thickness is increased, the average STL increases. The difference is that when the thickness of the plate is 1 mm, the extreme value and width of the first STL peak are unaffected by the thickness of the cavity. However, when the cavity thickness is 3 mm, a large change occurs, and this change is beneficial, which can be further investigated in the future.

4.4. Effect of Plate Thickness on STL of Phononic Crystals Cavity Plates

The effects on the phononic crystals cavity plates’ STL for plate thicknesses 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 15, and 20 mm are examined. (The reason for the effect of the thicker plates was not analyzed but is similar to the thicker cavities.) According to other research, and combining the effect of plate thickness on the STL of the phononic crystals cavity plates, the STL is measured at 0–200 Hz for plate thicknesses of 1, 2, 3, 5, or 20 mm, taking the complete ”cavity cave“ graphics for each plate thickness as a partial map. For a cavity thickness of 10 mm in the phononic crystals cavity plates, lateral comparison analysis is performed.
Figure 12 illustrate that plate thickness not only affects the location and size of STL peaks but also causes deformation of the ”cavity cave.” When the plate thickness is 1 mm, the peak is 43 dB at 60 Hz; when the plate thickness is 2 mm, the peak is 62 dB at 80 Hz; when the plate thickness is 3 mm, the peak is 76 dB at 90 Hz; when the plate thickness is 5 mm, the peak is 98 dB at 100 Hz; and when the plate thickness is 20 mm, the peak value of 104 dB appears at 60 Hz. This shows that as the thickness of the plate is increased, the average STL gradually increases, the position at which the STL peak appears gradually moves in the direction of higher frequencies, and the peak value increases nonlinearly as the slope decreases.
According to Figure 13, when the thickness of the plate is 1 mm, the “cavity cave” starts at 100 Hz and ends at 340 Hz, and the hole width is 240 Hz; when the plate thickness is 2 mm, the “cavity cave” spans 160–330 Hz, and the hole width is 170 Hz; when the plate thickness is 3 mm, the “cavity cave” spans 180–310 Hz, and the hole width is 130 Hz; when the plate thickness is 5 mm, the “cavity cave” spans 200–280 Hz, and the hole width is 80 Hz; when the plate thickness is 10 mm, the “cavity cave” spans 210–240 Hz, and the hole width is 30 Hz; and when the plate thickness is 15 or 20 mm, the “cavity cave” spans 210–230 Hz, and the hole width is 20 Hz. The width of the “cavity cave” thus gradually decreases as the plate thickness is increased, such that the starting frequency increases and the end frequency decreases; the rate of decrease becomes lower and lower, causing the average STL to increase. Therefore, the thicker the plate, the better the sound insulation effect of the phononic crystals cavity plates.
Figure 14 and Figure 15 illustrate that the aforementioned rules are mostly the same when the plate thickness is 1 or 20 mm. As the plate thickness is increased, the average STL gradually increases, the position of the STL peak gradually moves toward higher frequencies, and the peak gradually decreases by an increasing slope. Notably, the change in the ”cavity cave” is greatest when the cavity thickness is 1 mm; the change is centered when the cavity thickness is 10 mm, and the change is minimal when the cavity thickness is 20 mm. This shows that although the existence of the “cavity cave” is caused by the appearance of the cavity structure, it is a consequence of the acoustic–vibration coupling between the cavity and phononic crystals plate. Analyzing the vibration displacement diagram at the end of the “cavity cave” enables clear understanding of the mechanism. In Figure 16, the left image represents the first “cavity cave” and the right image represents the second “cavity cave.” The mechanism is such that the phononic crystals plate is located at the beginning of the corresponding band gap because phononic crystals are located in the cavity. The scatterer or matrix of the upper and lower sides of the cavity in the opposite phase increases the sound transmission efficiency. Therefore, changes to the “cavity cave” are inseparably related to plate thickness and cavity thickness.

5. Conclusions and Prospect

The phononic crystals plate thickness exerts only a weak effect on the upper edge of the complete band gap, but it has a strong effect on the lower edge. As the thickness of the plate is increased, a nonlinear increase is observed with a gradually decreasing slope, and the increase in amplitude is not large—it increases by only approximately 10 Hz as the plate thickness is increased from 10 to 30 mm. In terms of the directional band gap, the largest change is the fourth directional band gap at the 6–7 band position, and the modes are the scatterer vibrating along the x-axis and the matrix vibrating along the z-axis. The lower edge of the band gap is the same, but the upper edge of the band gap and lower edge of the full band gap exhibit consistent nonlinear growth with a gradually decreasing slope, although the growth amplitude is large, increasing by approximately 343 Hz as the plate thickness is increased from 10 to 30 mm. These changes and characteristics can be observed intuitively in the comparison analysis band diagram.
Phononic crystals cavity plates greatly improves STL in the frequency domain beyond the start of the band gap. The average STL of the phononic crystals cavity plates is greatly superior to that of the phononic crystals plate, and the peak value is 100 dB, which represents an increase of more than 30 dB over the corresponding values for the phononic crystals plate of various thicknesses. Furthermore, a cavity-like ”cavity cave” appears near the first attenuation peak in the STL diagram. Because ”cavity cave” is accompanied by the appearance of the cavity and its changes do not depend only on changes in the cavity, the formation mechanism of the ”cavity cave” is determined from the difference between the phononic crystals plate and gas–acoustic coupling in the cavity.
Reducing the scatterer radius r causes the phononic crystals plate and phononic crystals cavity plates to exhibit a nonlinear decrease at the same slope with a gradually decreasing slope, which is near the average of the three phononic crystals plates with different thicknesses. The difference is that the extreme value for the phononic crystals cavity plates is greatly improved compared to that for the phononic crystals plate of all thicknesses, and subject to all values of r. The overall trend in the STL image compared with that for the ordinary phononic crystals plate exhibits a significant upward phenomenon, indicating that the cavity structure of the phononic crystals cavity plates results in considerably improved noise reduction performance.
With an increase in cavity thickness, the position of the STL peak of the phononic crystals cavity plates is unchanged. However, both the extreme and average STL values increase nonlinearly with a decreasing slope. The width of the ”cavity cave” gradually decreases, and its decrease means an increase in the average STL. Therefore, the larger the cavity within a certain limit, the better the sound insulation effect of the phononic crystals cavity plates. After a certain limit is exceeded, the benefits clearly disappear.
As the thickness of the plate is increased, the average STL gradually increases, and the position of the STL peak gradually moves toward higher frequencies whereas the extreme value increases nonlinearly with a decreasing slope. The width of the ”cavity cave” gradually decreases as the thickness of the plate is increased, and it decreases as the starting and end frequencies of the “cavity cave” closer, with the rate of decrease becoming lower. This decrease in the “cavity cave” width means that the average STL increases. Therefore, the larger the plate thickness, within a certain limit, the better the sound insulation effect of the phononic crystals cavity plates.
Although the existence of “cavity cave” seems to be due to the appearance of cavity structure, it is actually caused by the coupling of the cavity and phononic crystals plate. The mechanism is such that at the starting point of the corresponding band gap, the phononic crystals plate increases the transmission efficiency of sound because of the opposite phase vibration of the scatterer or matrix located on the two sides of the cavity. Therefore, changes to the “cavity cave” are inseparably related to plate thickness and cavity thickness. Further research can be done in the future. It can be foreseen that mastering the mechanism and law in the “cavity cave” could be essential for enabling the application and development of phononic crystals cavity plates in the field of noise reduction.

Author Contributions

C.C. provided ideas and solutions, Z.G. established a simulation model and wrote an article, S.L., H.F. and C.Q. participated in the simulation experiment and wrote an article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by “the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities“, grant number 2018QN087” and “Study on main equipment sound source model and plant boundary noise prediction technology for UHV substations“, grant number GYW17201900046.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Goffaux, C.; Vigneron, J.P. Theoretical study of a tunable phononic band gap system. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 64, 075118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wen, J.; Zhao, H.; Lv, L.; Yuan, B.; Wang, G.; Wen, X. Effects of locally resonant modes on underwater sound absorption in viscoelastic materials. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2011, 130, 1201–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gao, J.; Zou, X.-Y.; Cheng, J.-C.; Li, B. Band gaps of lower-order Lamb wave in thin plate with one-dimensional phononic crystal layer: Effect of substrate. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, 023510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sigalas, M.; Economou, E. Elastic and acoustic wave band structure. J. Sound Vib. 1992, 158, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kushwaha, M.S.; Halevi, P.; Dobrzynski, L.; Djafari-Rouhani, B. Acoustic band structure of periodic elastic composites. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1993, 71, 2022–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kushwaha, M.S.; Halevi, P.; Martínez, G.; Dobrzynski, L.; Djafari-Rouhani, B. Theory of acoustic band structure of periodic elastic composites. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 49, 2313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wang, X.P.; Jiang, P.; Chen, T.N.; Yu, K.P. Frequency characteristics of defect states in a two-dimensional phononic crystal with slit structure. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 2016, 30, 1650025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shi, X.; Shu, H.; Zhu, J.; Wang, X.; Dong, L.; Zhao, L.; Liang, S.; Liu, R. Research on wave bandgaps inacircular plate of radial phononic crystal. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 2016, 30, 1650162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gao, N.; Wu, J.H.; Yu, L. Large band gaps in two-dimensional phononic crystals with self-similarity structure. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 2015, 29, 1550017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Martínez-Sala, R.; Sancho, J.; Sánchez, J.V.; Gómez, V.; Llinares, J.; Meseguer, F. Sound attenuation by sculpture. Nature 1995, 378, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Mao, Y.; Zhu, Y.Y.; Yang, Z.; Chan, C.T.; Sheng, P. Locally resonant sonic materials. Science 2000, 289, 1734–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, Z.; Chan, C.T.; Sheng, P. Analytic model of phononic crystals with local resonances. Phys. Rev. B 2005, 71, 014103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Goffaux, C.; Sánchez-Dehesa, J. Two-dimensional phononic crystals studied using a variational method: Application to lattices of locally resonant materials. Phys. Rev. B 2003, 67, 144–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Steurer, W.; Sutter-Widmer, D. Photonic and phononic quasicrystals. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2007, 40, R229–R247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vasseur, J.O.; Deymier, P.A.; Chenni, B.; Djafari-Rouhani, B.; Dobrzynski, L.; Prevost, D. Experimental and theoretical evidence for the existence of absolute acoustic band gaps in two-dimensional solid phononic crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 86, 3012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Jensen, J. Phononic band gaps and vibrations in one- and two-dimensional mass–spring structures. J. Sound Vib. 2003, 266, 1053–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sigmund, O.; Jensen, J.S. Systematic design of phononic band–gap materials and structures by topology optimization. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2003, 361, 1001–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Yu, J.-K.; Mitrovic, S.; Tham, D.; Varghese, J.; Heath, J.R. Reduction of thermal conductivity in phononic nanomesh structures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010, 5, 718–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Alegre, T.P.M.; Safavi-Naeini, A.H.; Winger, M.; Painter, O. Full phononic bandgap in 2D-optomechanical crystals. In CLEO: Science and Innovations; Optical Society of America: Washington, DC, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  20. Graczykowski, B.; Vogel, N.; Bley, K.; Butt, H.-J.; Fytas, G. Multiband Hypersound Filtering in Two-Dimensional Colloidal Crystals: Adhesion, Resonances, and Periodicity. Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 1883–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, S.; Page, J.H.; Liu, Z.; Cowan, M.L.; Chan, C.T.; Sheng, P. Focusing of Sound in a 3D Phononic Crystal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 024301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Alonso-Redondo, E.; Schmitt, M.; Urbach, Z.; Hui, C.M.; Sainidou, R.; Rembert, P.; Matyjaszewski, K.; Bockstaller, M.R.; Fytas, G. A new class of tunable hypersonic phononic crystals based on polymer-tethered colloids. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Lin, J.; Lin, S. Study on a Large-Scale Three-Dimensional Ultrasonic Plastic Welding Vibration System Based on a Quasi-Periodic Phononic Crystal Structure. Crystals 2020, 10, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Hussein, M.I.; Frazier, M.J. Damped phononic crystals and acoustic metamaterials. In Acoustic Metamaterials and Phononic Crystals; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 201–215. [Google Scholar]
  25. Dong, Y.; Yao, H.; Du, J.; Zhao, J.; Chao, D.; Wang, B. Research on low-frequency band gap property of a hybrid phononic crystal. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 2018, 32, 1850165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhou, X.; Xu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Lv, L.; Peng, F.; Wang, L. Extending and lowering band gaps by multilayered locally resonant phononic crystals. Appl. Acoust. 2018, 133, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, Y.F.; Meng, F.; Li, S.; Jia, B.; Zhou, S.; Huang, X. Designing broad phononic band gaps for in-plane modes. Phys. Lett. A 2018, 382, 679–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zuo, S.; Huang, H.; Wu, X.; Zhang, M.; Ni, T. Low-frequency band gap of locally resonant phononic crystals with a dual-base plate. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2018, 143, 1326–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jia, Z.; Chen, Y.; Yang, H.; Wang, L. Designing Phononic Crystals with Wide and Robust Band Gaps. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2018, 9, 044021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Anvariyeh, F.S.; Jalili, M.; Fotuhi, A.R. Nonlinear vibration analysis of a circular plate–cavity system. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 2019, 41, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dowell, E.H. Transmission of Noise from a Turbulent Boundary Layer through a Flexible Plate into a Closed Cavity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1969, 46, 238–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Qaisi, M.I. Free vibrations of a rectangular plate-cavity system. Appl. Acoust. 1988, 24, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Frampton, K.D.; Clark, R.L. Sound transmission through an aeroelastic plate into a cavity. AIAA J. 1997, 35, 1113–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, H.; Shi, D.; Zha, S.; Wang, Q. Vibro-acoustic analysis of the thin laminated rectangular plate-cavity coupling system. Compos. Struct. 2018, 189, 570–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sarıgül, A.S.; Karagözlü, E. Vibro-acoustic coupling in composite plate-cavity systems. J. Vib. Control. 2018, 11, 2274–2283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xin, F.X.; Lu, T.J.; Chen, C. Sound Transmission Through Simply Supported Finite Double-Panel Partitions With Enclosed Air Cavity. J. Vib. Acoust. 2010, 132, 011008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Muzar, E.; Aval, G.A.; Stotz, J.A.H. Wet-etched phononic crystal waveguiding on GaAs. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2018, 51, 044001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, Y.-F.; Wang, Y.-S.; Wang, L. Two-dimensional ternary locally resonant phononic crystals with a comblike coating. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2013, 47, 015502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Peiffer, A.; Grunewald, M.; Lempereur, P. Comment on “A lightweight yet sound-proof honeycomb acoustic metamaterial” [Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 171905 (2015)]. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 107, 216101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Cells and irreducible Brillouin zone: (a) is the 3D model of the single-layer phononic crystal plate cell and (b) is the top view of the cell. The yellow triangle in (c) is the irreducible Brillouin zone.
Figure 1. Cells and irreducible Brillouin zone: (a) is the 3D model of the single-layer phononic crystal plate cell and (b) is the top view of the cell. The yellow triangle in (c) is the irreducible Brillouin zone.
Crystals 10 00995 g001
Figure 2. Phononic crystals cavity plates cell.
Figure 2. Phononic crystals cavity plates cell.
Crystals 10 00995 g002
Figure 3. Sound transmission loss (STL) simulation model: (a) is the STL model of the finite structure and (b) is the partition description of the STL model.
Figure 3. Sound transmission loss (STL) simulation model: (a) is the STL model of the finite structure and (b) is the partition description of the STL model.
Crystals 10 00995 g003
Figure 4. Band structure. The red area in the figure is the complete band gap, and the yellow area is the band gap in the X–M direction. Among them, the yellow and blue lines in (ac) correspond to the sixth-order band and seventh-order band, respectively. The two-order bands are extracted and placed in (d) for comparison. (a) Band structure of 10 mm-thick phononic crystals plate. (b) Band structure of 20 mm-thick phononic crystals plate. (c) Band structure of 30 mm-thick phononic crystals plate. (d) Comparison analysis band diagram (sixth- to seventh-order band structure of phononic crystals plate with various thicknesses).
Figure 4. Band structure. The red area in the figure is the complete band gap, and the yellow area is the band gap in the X–M direction. Among them, the yellow and blue lines in (ac) correspond to the sixth-order band and seventh-order band, respectively. The two-order bands are extracted and placed in (d) for comparison. (a) Band structure of 10 mm-thick phononic crystals plate. (b) Band structure of 20 mm-thick phononic crystals plate. (c) Band structure of 30 mm-thick phononic crystals plate. (d) Comparison analysis band diagram (sixth- to seventh-order band structure of phononic crystals plate with various thicknesses).
Crystals 10 00995 g004
Figure 5. Modal diagram: (a) first band, (b) second band (c) third band (d) fourth band, (e) fifth band, (f) sixth band, (g) lower edge of seventh band, (h) lower edge of seventh band in the X–M direction.
Figure 5. Modal diagram: (a) first band, (b) second band (c) third band (d) fourth band, (e) fifth band, (f) sixth band, (g) lower edge of seventh band, (h) lower edge of seventh band in the X–M direction.
Crystals 10 00995 g005
Figure 6. STL of phononic crystals cavity plates (h = 10 mm + 10 mm + 10 mm), homogeneous cavity plates, and phononic crystals plate with various thicknesses: h = 10 mm, h = 20 mm (the same mass with phononic crystals cavity plates), and h = 30 mm (the same volume with phononic crystals cavity plates). The peak and bottom values of all types of STL are the same, 100 and 210 Hz, respectively. This is highly consistent with the calculation result of the energy band, which proves the correctness of both.
Figure 6. STL of phononic crystals cavity plates (h = 10 mm + 10 mm + 10 mm), homogeneous cavity plates, and phononic crystals plate with various thicknesses: h = 10 mm, h = 20 mm (the same mass with phononic crystals cavity plates), and h = 30 mm (the same volume with phononic crystals cavity plates). The peak and bottom values of all types of STL are the same, 100 and 210 Hz, respectively. This is highly consistent with the calculation result of the energy band, which proves the correctness of both.
Crystals 10 00995 g006
Figure 7. Effect of r on the STL: (a) effect of r on the STL for a 10 mm-thick phononic crystals plate, (b) effect of r on the STL for a 20 mm-thick phononic crystals plate, (c) effect of r on the STL for a 30 mm-thick phononic crystals plate, and (d) effect of r on the STL of the phononic crystals cavity plates.
Figure 7. Effect of r on the STL: (a) effect of r on the STL for a 10 mm-thick phononic crystals plate, (b) effect of r on the STL for a 20 mm-thick phononic crystals plate, (c) effect of r on the STL for a 30 mm-thick phononic crystals plate, and (d) effect of r on the STL of the phononic crystals cavity plates.
Crystals 10 00995 g007
Figure 8. Effect of r on the local STL: (a) local STL of a 10 mm-thick phononic crystals plate, (b) local STL of a 20 mm-thick phononic crystals plate, (c) local STL of a 30 mm-thick phononic crystals plate, and (d) local STL of the phononic crystals cavity plates.
Figure 8. Effect of r on the local STL: (a) local STL of a 10 mm-thick phononic crystals plate, (b) local STL of a 20 mm-thick phononic crystals plate, (c) local STL of a 30 mm-thick phononic crystals plate, and (d) local STL of the phononic crystals cavity plates.
Crystals 10 00995 g008
Figure 9. Effect of cavity thickness on STL for phononic crystals plate thickness of 10 mm: (a) 0–1500 Hz and (b) 0–200 Hz.
Figure 9. Effect of cavity thickness on STL for phononic crystals plate thickness of 10 mm: (a) 0–1500 Hz and (b) 0–200 Hz.
Crystals 10 00995 g009
Figure 10. Effect of cavity thickness on STL for phononic crystals plate thickness of 1 mm: (a) 0–1500 Hz and (b) 0–200 Hz.
Figure 10. Effect of cavity thickness on STL for phononic crystals plate thickness of 1 mm: (a) 0–1500 Hz and (b) 0–200 Hz.
Crystals 10 00995 g010
Figure 11. Effect of cavity thickness on STL for phononic crystals plate thickness of 20 mm: (a) 0–1500 Hz and (b) 0–200 Hz.
Figure 11. Effect of cavity thickness on STL for phononic crystals plate thickness of 20 mm: (a) 0–1500 Hz and (b) 0–200 Hz.
Crystals 10 00995 g011
Figure 12. Effect of plate thickness on STL for a cavity thickness of 10 mm: (a) 0–1500 Hz and (b) 0–200 Hz.
Figure 12. Effect of plate thickness on STL for a cavity thickness of 10 mm: (a) 0–1500 Hz and (b) 0–200 Hz.
Crystals 10 00995 g012
Figure 13. Effect of plate thickness on the cavity cave for cavity thickness of 10 mm.
Figure 13. Effect of plate thickness on the cavity cave for cavity thickness of 10 mm.
Crystals 10 00995 g013
Figure 14. Effect of plate thickness on STL for cavity thickness of 1 mm: (a) 0–1500 Hz and (b) 0–200 Hz.
Figure 14. Effect of plate thickness on STL for cavity thickness of 1 mm: (a) 0–1500 Hz and (b) 0–200 Hz.
Crystals 10 00995 g014
Figure 15. Effect of plate thickness on STL for cavity thickness of 20 mm: (a) 0–1500 Hz and (b) 0–200 Hz.
Figure 15. Effect of plate thickness on STL for cavity thickness of 20 mm: (a) 0–1500 Hz and (b) 0–200 Hz.
Crystals 10 00995 g015
Figure 16. Vibration displacement diagram of “cavity cave” end point.
Figure 16. Vibration displacement diagram of “cavity cave” end point.
Crystals 10 00995 g016
Table 1. Material parameters.
Table 1. Material parameters.
Material ρ (kg/m3) E (Pa)ν
Resin11804.35 × 1090.3679
Rubber13001.175 × 1050.46875
Tungsten193503.54 × 10110.35
Table 2. Band gaps for 10, 20, and 30 mm-thick phononic crystals plate.
Table 2. Band gaps for 10, 20, and 30 mm-thick phononic crystals plate.
Band Position10 mm Start and Stop Frequency (Hz)20 mm Start and Stop Frequency (Hz)30 mm Start and Stop Frequency (Hz)Band Gap Direction
1–233.98–47.6934.04–48.7634.05–48.77XM
2–3--49.15–56.1XM
4–550–84.0952.26–92.5156.16–94.45XM
6–787.04–208.5996.78–208.8898.57–208.93complete
6–7208.59–610.87208.88–939.03208.93–953.38XM
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, C.; Guo, Z.; Liu, S.; Feng, H.; Qiao, C. Effect of Cavity Structure on Acoustic Characteristics of Phononic Crystals Based on Double-Layer Plates. Crystals 2020, 10, 995. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10110995

AMA Style

Chen C, Guo Z, Liu S, Feng H, Qiao C. Effect of Cavity Structure on Acoustic Characteristics of Phononic Crystals Based on Double-Layer Plates. Crystals. 2020; 10(11):995. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10110995

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Chuanmin, Zhaofeng Guo, Songtao Liu, Hongda Feng, and Chuanxi Qiao. 2020. "Effect of Cavity Structure on Acoustic Characteristics of Phononic Crystals Based on Double-Layer Plates" Crystals 10, no. 11: 995. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10110995

APA Style

Chen, C., Guo, Z., Liu, S., Feng, H., & Qiao, C. (2020). Effect of Cavity Structure on Acoustic Characteristics of Phononic Crystals Based on Double-Layer Plates. Crystals, 10(11), 995. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10110995

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop