State-of-the-Art Review of the Applicability and Challenges of Microbial-Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP) and Enzyme-Induced Calcite Precipitation (EICP) Techniques for Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Applications
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Please see the attached file.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
The paper is written nicely. However, the technical and scientific contribution in terms of data analysis is poor and gives the reviewer a lack of the research contribution. The review paper is not only to report what the other scientists have done but to provide new ideas in research after analyzing the mass data. The authors are encouraged to do more work on how to write a scientific review paper based on the published data and papers. More graphical analyses are needed in order to get a quality outcome from the review.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
See attached.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
All the comments have been taken care of. Thanks
Reviewer 2 Report
It looks fine now.
