Next Article in Journal
Studying the Damage Evolution and the Micro-Mechanical Response of X8CrMnNi16-6-6 TRIP Steel Matrix and 10% Zirconia Particle Composite Using a Calibrated Physics and Crystal-Plasticity-Based Numerical Simulation Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Bulk and Single Crystal Growth Progress of Iron-Based Superconductors (FBS): 1111 and 1144
Previous Article in Journal
Determination of New IR and UV/VIS Spectroscopic Parameters of the C84-D2:22 Isomer for Its Quantitative Assessment, Identification and Possible Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Single-Crystal Growth of Sr2RuO4 by the Floating-Zone Method Using an Infrared Image Furnace with Improved Halogen Lamps
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Laser-Assisted Floating Zone Growth of BaFe2S3 Large-Sized Ferromagnetic-Impurity-Free Single Crystals

1
Leibniz IFW Dresden, Helmholtzstr. 20, 01069 Dresden, Germany
2
Max-Planck-Institut für Chemische Physik Fester Stoffe, 01187 Dresden, Germany
3
Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110016, India
4
Institut für Festkörper- und Materialphysik, Technische Universität Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany
5
Würzburg-Dresden Cluster of Excellence ct.qmat, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Current address: Fakultät für Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften, Bergische Universität Wuppertal, 42097 Wuppertal, Germany.
Crystals 2021, 11(7), 758; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11070758
Submission received: 3 June 2021 / Revised: 16 June 2021 / Accepted: 21 June 2021 / Published: 29 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Synthesis and Crystal Growth of Superconductors Materials)

Abstract

:
The quasi-one-dimensional antiferromagnetic insulator BaFe 2 S 3 becomes superconducting under a hydrostatic pressure of ∼10 GPa. Single crystals of this compound are usually obtained by melting and further slow cooling of BaS or Ba, Fe, and S, and are small and needle-shaped (few mm long and 50–200 μm wide). A notable sample dependence on the antiferromagnetic transition temperature, transport behavior, and presence of superconductivity has been reported. In this work, we introduce a novel approach for the growth of high-quality single crystals of BaFe 2 S 3 based on a laser-assisted floating zone method that yields large samples free of ferromagnetic impurities. We present the characterization of these crystals and the comparison with samples obtained using the procedure reported in the literature.

1. Introduction

Since the discovery of superconductivity in LaO 1 x F x FeAs in 2008 [1], a great effort was devoted to the study of iron-based superconductors [2,3,4]. While most of the materials in this class share a layered crystalline structure [5], the finding of superconductivity in the quasi-one-dimensional iron chalcogenides BaFe 2 S 3 [6,7] and BaFe 2 Se 3 [8] represented an interesting surprise. The building blocks of these compounds are two-leg ladders of edge-sharing Fe(S,Se) 4 tetrahedra, as shown in Figure 1 for BaFe 2 S 3 , that contrast with the planes of FeAs 4 or FeSe 4 tetrahedra common to other members of the family. BaFe 2 S 3 and BaFe 2 Se 3 also differ from other iron-based superconductors in that they are antiferromagnetic insulators at ambient pressure and superconductivity only emerges under hydrostatic pressure [6,7,8,9]. These unique characteristics make them intensively studied both theoretically and experimentally [10,11,12,13].
BaFe 2 S 3 presents a stripe-type antiferromagnetic order below T N ∼120 K [6]. Under hydrostatic pressure, T N increases up to 185 K for 7.5 GPa and then undergoes a sudden drop near the insulator-to-metal transition [14]. The superconducting state emerges at P∼10 GPa, reaching a maximum T c ∼24 K [7]. However, the value of the Néel temperature and the presence of superconductivity seem to depend on specific features of the growth procedure [6,15,16,17]. Starting from a stoichiometric ratio of BaS or Ba, Fe, and S does not always lead to samples that present superconductivity under hydrostatic pressure [6,17]. The use of a slight Fe excess in the nominal content was reported to promote the appearance of superconductivity. Moreover, samples that present superconductivity under hydrostatic pressure were reported to have higher values of T N [6]. Another typical problem of the samples described in the literature is the existence of impurity phases that are clearly seen in magnetization loops, obscuring the intrinsic properties of BaFe 2 S 3 [15,18]. The fact that these impurity phases exhibit a rather large magnetic response makes the accurate description of the intrinsic physical properties of BaFe 2 S 3 a real challenge. It is also unclear how the sample purity affects the appearance of superconductivity at high pressure.
Previously, we have reported the growth of BaFe 2 S 3 crystals using a Bridgman-like method based on optical heating [15]. This approach allowed us to obtain samples free of ferromagnetic impurities, although tiny traces of nonmagnetic SiO 2 inclusions have been detected due to the weak reaction between the melt and the quartz crucible. It is worth mentioning that all previously reported BaFe 2 S 3 crystals were prepared using a crucible-based technology. From this point of view, a crucible-free floating zone technique seems to be a promising choice to grow inclusion-free BaFe 2 S 3 crystals.
In this work, we report the floating zone growth of BaFe 2 S 3 crystals using a laser-assisted floating zone furnace. We present a characterization of the composition, the crystal structure, the magnetization, and the resistivity of the as-grown crystals and the comparison with samples grown by the standard procedure previously reported in the literature [6,15]. This characterization confirms the improvement in the quality of the crystals and the suppression of ferromagnetic impurities.

2. Materials and Methods

The precursor material was obtained following a protocol commonly used and well described in the literature [15]. BaS powder, 200 mesh (Alfa Aesar 99.7%), Fe powder, 70 mesh (Acros organics 99%), and S pieces (Alfa Aesar 99.999%) were mixed in a molar ratio 1:2.05:2 using an agate mortar under Ar atmosphere (<0.5 ppm O 2 and H 2 O). The obtained mixture was placed in a glassy carbon crucible and sealed in an evacuated quartz ampule, which was heated up to 1100 °C in a vertical position in a Nabertherm chamber furnace, and slowly cooled down to 750 °C at 10 °C/h. After 2 h at 750 °C, the furnace was switched off. An ingot was formed at the crucible bottom, from which needlelike single crystals of few mm length and 50–200 μm width could be detached.
This precursor material was ground and filled into a rubber tube in a high-purity Ar atmosphere (MB 150B-G glovebox, <0.1 ppm O 2 and H 2 O). The rubber tube was tightly closed to avoid exposure to air and pressurized under a hydrostatic pressure of 2500 bar. The pressed rod with a diameter of ∼0.5 cm was finally sintered at 650 °C for 20 h in a horizontal tube furnace in Ar flow of 0.5 l/min. In order to avoid any contact between the rod and the furnace, a glassy carbon boat was used. Because of the relatively low melting point of BaFe 2 S 3 , approximately 800 °C based on our preliminary DTA measurements, the as-sintered feed rod was quite porous but mechanically stable.
Initially, we tried to grow this material using a conventional four-mirror-type image furnace (CSI, Japan) equipped with 300 W halogen lamps. Prior to the growth run, the growth chamber was evacuated down to a pressure of 10 3 mbar and consequently filled with Ar (5N) gas. This step was repeated three times in order to avoid oxygen contamination. Nevertheless, after 1.5–2.0 h, the molten zone was completely covered by a solid layer due to the oxidation. Additionally, a strong penetration effect was observed due to the feed rod porosity. Both effects terminated the growth run in 3–4 h.
Finally, we successfully grew BaFe 2 S 3 using a recently developed laser-assisted floating zone furnace with a magnetic sealing (CSI, Japan) operated at MPI-CPfS Dresden. The machine was equipped with five semiconductor laser diodes with a total power of 5 × 200 W. The wavelength of the laser light was 976 nm with a rectangular beam profile of 4 × 8 mm 2 . The pinpoint character of laser heating makes the temperature gradient across the solid–liquid interface extremely steep [19] (over 1500 °C/cm), preventing the penetration of liquid from the molten zone into the porous feed rod. This resulted in a stable molten zone during the whole growth run (approximately 12 h). Prior to the growth, we evacuated the chamber and the gas line up to 10 6 mbar and filled with purified Ar gas. Using an in-built Ar purifier (SAES Pure Gas, Inc.), the levels of O 2 and H 2 O in the Ar flow were decreased from ppm to ppb level. The growth was performed at 4 mm/h. The feed and seed rod were counter-rotated at 20 rpm. The applied Ar pressure was 7 bar.
The grain selection through the rod was analyzed with an optical microscope (Carl Zeiss) using polarized light.
The composition and morphology were studied with a Zeiss EVOMA15 scanning electron microscope (SEM) with AzTec software equipped with an electron microprobe analyzer for semiquantitative elemental analysis using the energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) mode. We used BaF 2 and FeS 2 standards and performed around 50 measurements for each sample. We only took the measurements where the total weight percent (wt %) was between 95 and 105 wt % into account.
Powder X-ray diffraction measurements were carried out in briefly crushed single crystals, since prolonged grinding proved detrimental to crystallinity, inducing considerable broadening of Bragg peaks and decreasing intensity. The data were collected at ambient temperature with a STOE STADI P diffractometer equipped with a MYTHEN 2 K detector using Mo-K α 1 radiation. The structure refinement was performed using the FullProf Suite program [20]. Due to the highly textured nature of the powder, atomic positions and displacement parameters were not refined, but initially fixed to the values obtained from the literature [15]. After the single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis, the powder X-ray diffraction refinement was revisited with the values obtained for the crystals grown by the laser-assisted floating zone method. No significant change was found, indicating good convergence of the refinement.
The single crystal X-ray diffraction data were collected at ambient temperature on a Bruker-AXS KAPPA APEX II CCD diffractometer with graphite-monochromated Mo-K α X-ray radiation (50 kV, 30 mA). A single crystal of 50 × 50 × 90 μm 3 in size was isolated from the as-grown ingot obtained from the laser-assisted floating zone growth and glued on top of a glass capillary. The crystal-to-detector distance was 45.1 mm. The detector was positioned at 2 Θ = 30° and 45° using an ω -scan mode strategy at four different ϕ positions (0°, 90°, 180° and 270°). The Bruker APEX3 software suite [21], SAINT [22], and SADABS [23] were used to perform the data processing, the integration of the reflection intensities, and the correction of the multiscan absorption, respectively. The subsequent weighted fullmatrix least-squares refinements on F 2 were performed with SHELX-2012 [24] as implemented in the WinGx 2014.1 program suite [25]. The crystal structure was refined with anisotropic displacement parameters for all atoms and using the lattice constants determined via Rietveld refinement of the powder pattern.
The rocking curves were measured at room temperature using a custom-made high-resolution X-ray diffraction system, providing monochromatic Mo-K β radiation with a divergence of 1 mrad and a beam diameter of 90 μm. The measurements were performed in transmission geometry on a small piece (approximately 200 × 200 μm 2 area and 100 μm thickness) of the ingot obtained from the laser-assisted floating zone growth.
X-ray Laue back-scattering was performed using a Multiwire detector, white radiation from a tungsten X-ray tube, and a collimator of 0.5 mm.
Magnetization measurements were performed in a vibrating sample superconducting quantum interference device magnetometer (SQUID-VSM) from Quantum Design. All measurements were carried out after cooling in zero field. To reduce the remanent field of the superconducting magnet to less than 2 Oe before each measurement, we applied a magnetic field of 5 T at ambient temperature and then removed it in an oscillation mode. The magnetic field was applied parallel to the needle direction of the single crystals that corresponds to the c-axis.
The resistivity measurements were carried out in an OXFORD cryostat using a four-probe configuration. We used gold wires and silver paste for the electric contacts. The current was applied along the c-axis and its value depends on the temperature. At 300 K, we used 0.4 mA decreasing linearly to 0.1 mA at 100 K, 0.01 mA at 70 K, 0.001 mA at 60 K, 0.0001 mA at 50 K, and 0.00005 mA at 40 K. Varying the current by one order of magnitude did not induce any changes in the value of the resistivity. Therefore, we can rule out Joule heating effects. Moreover, no change in the resistivity behavior was observed when using a constant current of 0.00005 mA below 150 K.

3. Results

The stable molten zone during BaFe 2 S 3 growth is shown in Figure 2. Although some level of liquid penetration into the feed could be observed, it was dramatically suppressed compared to that detected in the conventional image furnace.
No S evaporation was observed and the quartz tube was completely clean after the growth run. Since BaFe 2 S 3 melts at a relatively low temperature of about 800 °C in Ar atmosphere, the growth was performed at low laser output power (6.7–7.0%). Nevertheless, the molten zone was extremely stable during the growth and no overspills were noticed compared to the conventional image furnace. The molten zone was not oxidized and had no solid particles on its surface in contrast to the previous experiment in a CSI image furnace. The as-grown ingot is shown in Figure 3a. Sections were cut off from the beginning and the end-portion of the as-grown ingot as indicated in Figure 3, and polished to a mirror finish. The polarized optical microscope study of these slices shows the strong grain selection during the growth. Thus, the end-portion consists only of a few large grains (Figure 3c). In the rest of the work, the crystals obtained from this ingot will be labeled “LFZ” to differentiate them from the precursor crystals obtained by the standard growth procedure [15].
Figure 4 presents backscattered electron (BSE) images of the precursor and of the end-portion of the as-grown ingot (LFZ). While the precursor exhibits a textured surface with striations representative of the needle conglomerate, the end-portion of the ingot shows a smooth surface. The average composition in each region is in good agreement with the expected BaFe 2 S 3 within the accuracy of the method [26,27], as presented in Table 1. However, the statistical dispersion of the measurements of the end-portion of the ingot is reduced by almost an order of magnitude with respect to the precursor. Though inclusions of FeS and Fe have been observed in the precursor, no impurity phases have been identified in the LFZ grown crystals.
All of this indicates an improvement in the quality of the samples grown with the laser-assisted floating zone furnace with respect to the standard growth procedure. This result also represents an improvement with respect to previously reported samples grown by a Bridgman-like method based on optical heating, which did not present ferromagnetic impurities but contained nonmagnetic SiO 2 inclusions stemming from the quartz crucible [15].
Powder X-ray diffraction patterns from crushed single crystals of the precursor and LFZ samples are presented in Figure 5a. The majority of the reflections can be identified with the orthorhombic structure with a space group Cmcm previously reported for BaFe 2 S 3 [6,15,28,29]. The differences in the relative intensity of the reflections between both samples can be associated with the preferred orientation in the powder due to the strong anisotropic morphology of the crystallites. The lattice parameters, obtained from a Rietveld refinement, are a = 8.7799(3) Å, b = 11.2248(4) Å and c = 5.2842(2) Å and a = 8.7757(3) Å, b = 11.2248(4) Å and c = 5.2831(2) Å for the precursor and LFZ, respectively. The reliability indices of the Rietveld analysis are χ 2 = 2.08, Bragg R-factor = 4.48 and RF-factor = 3.28 for the precursor and χ 2 = 2.64, Bragg R-factor = 4.67 and RF-factor=3.08 for LFZ. No significant difference between both kind of samples can be identified. Additionally, the parameters are in good agreement with the literature [6,15].
The analysis of the powder X-ray diffraction patterns indicates the presence of a small quantity of an impurity phase for both samples. Such extra reflections, often accompanying the 123 phase, have been proposed to correspond to Ba 2 Fe 4 S 5 , which could be the average structure of a BaFe 2 S 3 polymorph [30]. From the Rietveld refinement, the fraction of Ba 2 Fe 4 S 5 can be estimated to be ∼2.1 wt % and ∼2.6 wt % for the precursor and LFZ, respectively. The presence of an extra phase could be expected from the incongruent melting of BaFe 2 S 3 as observed from the penetration effect in the feed, which is also compatible with our preliminary DTA measurements.
The crystal structure of the LFZ crystal was also studied using single crystal X-ray diffraction. Experimental details on the data collection and results of the structural refinement are summarized in Table 2; the fractional atomic coordinates, equivalent isotropic displacement parameters, and occupation factors are compiled in Table 3; the anisotropic displacement parameters are listed in Table 4.
In agreement with the results of the powder X-ray diffraction, the analysis of systematic extinctions and the subsequent structure refinement confirm that the LFZ sample crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Cmcm (No. 63). Hirata et al. proposed that the presence of Fe vacancies affects the electronic and magnetic properties in BaFe 2 S 3 [16]. In order to exclude this issue, the Fe-occupancy was allowed to vary freely during the crystal structure refinement. However, in line with the results from the EDX analysis, no compelling factor was found to suggest a Fe off-stoichiometry. The final refinement with the anisotropic atomic displacement parameters and consideration of possible Fe vacancies converged at final R 1 (all data) = 1.86 % and wR 2 (all data) = 3.25 %, showing a good agreement with previous reports [15].
X-ray diffraction experiments on single crystals show a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of ∼0.1° for the rocking curve of the (711) reflection as presented in Figure 5b. A typical Laue backscattering image for a LFZ crystal is shown in Figure 5c. To obtain this image, the crystal was rotated, indicating that the growth direction is ∼10° off the c-axis.
Figure 6a shows the temperature (T) dependence of the magnetization divided by the applied magnetic field ( M / H ) for crystals of the precursor and LFZ. A magnetic field of μ 0 H = 5 T along the c-axis was used. Below room temperature, the magnetization decreases with decreasing temperature opposing the typical Curie–Weiss behavior for three-dimensional localized magnets. This behavior is widely observed in this material [6,15,18,31] and is related to its low dimensional structure. Spin correlations within the ladders are present at temperatures well above T N , the temperature at which long-range antiferromagnetic order sets in [32,33]. The kink in the magnetization at T N indicates the transition to three-dimensional long-range antiferromagnetic order. The Néel temperature, defined as the minimum in the temperature derivative of the magnetization (dM/dT | min ), is T N = 109.5(6) K for the precursor and T N = 119.8(6) K for the LFZ crystal as shown in Figure 6a. The higher T N in the crystal grown by the laser-assisted floating zone method indicates an important improvement given that samples with lower T N were reported to show no superconductivity under hydrostatic pressure [6].
The higher absolute value of M / H ( T ) in the precursor with respect to the LFZ sample in Figure 6a is commonly seen for crystals with ferromagnetic inclusions as presented in Ref. [15]. Further insight is provided by the field dependence of the magnetization shown in Figure 6b. We present data for two independent growths of the precursor and of the LFZ samples. A characteristic jump at low fields is observed for the precursor, which depends on the batch as well as on the sample. No hysteresis is seen for any of the LFZ samples as shown in the inset of Figure 6b. This jump could be related to the saturation of an extrinsic ferromagnetic contribution (less than 2 mol% if we assume it to be Fe). Such a small quantity of an impurity phase can pass unnoticed in a powder X-ray diffraction experiment, but it was occasionally observed in the compositional analysis. On the other hand, the jump is practically absent in crystals from two independent growths with the laser-assisted floating zone method. This reflects two important characteristics of the LFZ crystals: first, that ferromagnetic inclusions are successfully removed, yielding cleaner single crystals, and second, that this occurs in a reproducible way, in contrast to the standard procedure. The higher purity of the LFZ crystals of BaFe 2 S 3 is also reflected in the lower absolute values of M / H , which are closer to the magnetic susceptibility at 25 K and 250 K obtained from the slope of M ( H ) well above the jump (Honda–Owen analysis [34]), as shown in Figure 6a.
The normalized resistivity as a function of the inverse temperature for precursor and LFZ crystals is presented in Figure 7. Both samples exhibit an insulating behavior with two characteristic temperatures, T N and T * , which are indicated with arrows in the logarithmic derivative of the resistivity (dln ρ /d(1/T)). The Néel temperature is T N = 110.1(5) K for the precursor and T N = 121.0(4) K for the LFZ crystal, in good agreement with the values obtained from magnetization measurements. The temperature of the additional high-T anomaly in the resistivity is higher in the case of the precursor ( T * = 198(2) K) than in the case of the LFZ crystal ( T * = 176(2) K). The origin of T * is still under debate, but it has been suggested to be related to orbital order [7,16].
The logarithmic derivative of the resistivity reveals a complex and different behavior for both samples. The LFZ crystal presents a region above ∼60 K and below ∼100 K consistent with a thermally activated behavior ( ρ = ρ 0 e Δ / T ) with a gap of Δ = 54(2) meV. This value is slightly higher than in previous reports [15,16]. On the other hand, in the same temperature region, the precursor presents a behavior compatible with a 1D variable range hopping ( ρ = ρ 0 e ( T 0 / T ) 1 / 2 ) [35], also reported in the literature [15,16,18]. Another important difference is the region near the antiferromagnetic transition: while a sharp peak is observed in dln ρ /d(1/T) for the LFZ crystal, the precursor presents a broad hump with a tiny peak at T N . These features, together with the higher value of T N in the LFZ samples, reflect the improvement in the quality of the samples grown by the laser-assisted floating zone method.

4. Conclusions

We show that the quality of BaFe 2 S 3 crystals can be greatly improved when grown by a laser-assisted floating zone method compared to that of crystals grown using the method widely reported in the literature [6,15,16]. The success of the growth of high-quality BaFe 2 S 3 crystals is due to specific characteristics of the laser-assisted floating zone furnace compared, for example, to a conventional image furnace equipped by halogen lamps. The laser-assisted FZ furnace presents a much steeper temperature gradient that strongly suppresses the penetration effect and allows to maintain a stable molten zone even in case of porous feed rods, which is useful for the growth of incongruently melting compounds.
While ferromagnetic impurity phases in variable amounts are ubiquitous in the precursor crystals and influence the magnetism and transport behavior observed in the samples, such impurity phases are absent in laser-grown crystals. Therefore, the crystals grown by the laser-assisted floating zone method provide a more reliable insight into the intrinsic properties of BaFe 2 S 3 .

Author Contributions

The original idea was proposed by A.M. and S.S. The investigation and the project administration were conducted by M.L.A., A.M. and S.S. The precursor material was grown by M.L.A. The laser-assisted floating zone growth was performed by A.M. and K.M. The structural characterization and the analysis were conducted by M.L.A., Q.S., J.G. and S.S. The magnetization measurements and analysis were conducted by M.L.A. and A.U.B.W. The resistivity measurements and analysis were performed by M.L.A. and C.H., C.F., J.G. and B.B. contributed with resources and funding acquisition. The original draft preparation was completed by M.L.A., A.M. and S.S. All of the authors reviewed and commented on the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

M.L.A. acknowledges support from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation through the Georg Forster program. K.M. and C.F. greatly acknowledge financial support from the European Research Council (ERC) to purchase the Laser OFZ in MPI-CPfS through the advanced Grant No. 742068 “TOPMAT”. K.M. acknowledges the Max Planck Society for the funding support under Max Planck–India partner group project. This research has been supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) through SFB 1143 (Project No. 247310070), the DFG within the Graduate School GRK 1621, and the Würzburg-Dresden Cluster of Excellence on Complexity and Topology in Quantum Matter – ct.qmat (EXC 2147, Project No. 390858490). The publication of this article was funded by the Open Access Fund of the Leibniz Association.

Data Availability Statement

The data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

We thank R. Kluge for the assistance in the EDX measurements and sample preparation, J. Werner for the assistance in the DTA measurements, C.G.F. Blum for the assistance in the powder X-ray measurements, S. Gaß for technical assistance in the SQUID measurements, and F. Caglieris and C. Wuttke for technical assistance in the resistivity measurements.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Kamihara, Y.; Watanabe, T.; Hirano, M.; Hosono, H. Iron-based layered superconductor La[O1-xFx]FeAs (x = 0.05–0.12) with Tc = 26 K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 3296–3297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fernandes, R.; Chubukov, A.; Schmalian, J. What drives nematic order in iron-based superconductors? Nat. Phys. 2014, 10, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Hosono, H.; Kuroki, K. Iron-based superconductors: Current status of materials and pairing mechanism. Phys. C Supercond. Appl. 2015, 514, 399–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Hao, N.; Hu, J. Topological quantum states of matter in iron-based superconductors: from concept to material realization. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2019, 6, 213–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Aswathy, P.; Anooja, J.; Sarun, P.; Syamaprasad, U. An overview on iron based superconductors. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 2010, 23, 073001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Takahashi, H.; Sugimoto, A.; Nambu, Y.; Yamauchi, T.; Hirata, Y.; Kawakami, T.; Avdeev, M.; Matsubayashi, K.; Du, F.; Kawashima, C.; et al. Pressure-induced superconductivity in the iron-based ladder material BaFe2S3. Nat. Mater. 2015, 14, 1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Yamauchi, T.; Hirata, Y.; Ueda, Y.; Ohgushi, K. Pressure-Induced Mott Transition Followed by a 24-K Superconducting Phase in BaFe2S3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 115, 246402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ying, J.; Lei, H.; Petrovic, C.; Xiao, Y.; Struzhkin, V.V. Interplay of magnetism and superconductivity in the compressed Fe-ladder compound BaFe2Se3. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 95, 241109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Svitlyk, V.; Garbarino, G.; Rosa, A.; Pomjakushina, E.; Krzton-Maziopa, A.; Conder, K.; Nunez-Regueiro, M.; Mezouar, M. High-pressure polymorphism of BaFe2Se3. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2019, 31, 085401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Craco, L.; Leoni, S. Microscopic description of localization-delocalization transitions in BaFe2S3. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 98, 195107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Roh, S.; Shin, S.; Jang, J.; Lee, S.; Lee, M.; Seo, Y.S.; Li, W.; Biesner, T.; Dressel, M.; Rhee, J.Y.; et al. Magnetic-order-driven metal-insulator transitions in the quasi-one-dimensional spin-ladder compounds BaFe2S3 and BaFe2Se3. Phys. Rev. B 2020, 101, 115118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pizarro, J.M.; Bascones, E. Strong electronic correlations and Fermi surface reconstruction in the quasi-one-dimensional iron superconductor BaFe2S3. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2019, 3, 014801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Zhang, Y.; Lin, L.; Zhang, J.J.; Dagotto, E.; Dong, S. Pressure-driven phase transition from antiferromagnetic semiconductor to nonmagnetic metal in the two-leg ladders AFe2X3 (A = Ba, K; X = S,Se). Phys. Rev. B 2017, 95, 115154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Materne, P.; Bi, W.; Zhao, J.; Hu, M.Y.; Amigó, M.L.; Seiro, S.; Aswartham, S.; Büchner, B.; Alp, E.E. Bandwidth controlled insulator-metal transition in BaFe2S3: A Mössbauer study under pressure. Phys. Rev. B 2019, 99, 020505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Amigó, M.L.; Stahl, Q.; Maljuk, A.; Wolter, A.U.B.; Hess, C.; Geck, J.; Wurmehl, S.; Seiro, S.; Büchner, B. The role of the nominal iron content in the structural, compositional and physical properties of BaFe2+δS3. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2101.07823. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hirata, Y.; Maki, S.; Yamaura, J.i.; Yamauchi, T.; Ohgushi, K. Effects of stoichiometry and substitution in quasi-one-dimensional iron chalcogenide BaFe2S3. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 92, 205109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Sun, H.; Li, X.; Zhou, Y.; Yu, J.; Frandsen, B.A.; Wu, S.; Xu, Z.; Jiang, S.; Huang, Q.; Bourret-Courchesne, E.; et al. Nonsuperconducting electronic ground state in pressurized BaFe2S3 and BaFe2S2.5Se0.5. Phys. Rev. B 2020, 101, 205129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, X.; Zhang, H.; Ma, Y.; Wang, L.; Chu, J.; Hu, T.; Mu, G.; Lu, Y.; Cai, C.; Huang, F.; et al. In situ annealing effects on magnetic properties and variable-range hopping of iron-based ladder material BaFe2S3. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 2018, 61, 77421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Telang, P.; Maljuk, A.; Rout, D.; Hu, R.; Skoulatos, M.; Karmakar, K.; Seiro, S.; Roessli, B.; Stuhr, U.; Büchner, B.; et al. Laser-diode-heated floating-zone crystal growth of ErVO3. J. Cryst. Growth 2019, 507, 406–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rodríguez-Carvajal, J. Recent advances in magnetic structure determination by neutron powder diffraction. Phys. B Condens. Matter 1993, 192, 55–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bruker, APEX3 v2018.1-0; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2017.
  22. SAINT(V8.30A); Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2017.
  23. Krause, L.; Herbst-Irmer, R.; Sheldrick, G.M.; Stalke, D. Comparison of silver and molybdenum microfocus X-ray sources for single-crystal structure determination. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2015, 48, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Sheldrick, G.M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Crystallogr. 2008, 64, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Farrugia, L.J. WinGX suite for small-molecule single-crystal crystallography. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1999, 32, 837–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Seiro, S.; Deppe, M.; Jeevan, H.; Burkhardt, U.; Geibel, C. Flux crystal growth of CeCu2Si2: Revealing the effect of composition. Phys. Status Solidi 2010, 247, 614–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Goldstein, J.; Newbury, D.E.; Joy, D.C.; Lyman, C.E.; Echlin, P.; Lifshin, E.; Sawyer, L.; Michael, J.R. Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-ray Microanalysis; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hong, H.; Steinfink, H. The crystal chemistry of phases in the Ba-Fe-S and Se systems. J. Solid State Chem. 1972, 5, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Iglesias, J.; Steinfink, H. Triangular prismatic coordination in ternary chalcogenides. Z. Für Krist.-Cryst. Mater. 1975, 142, 398–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Swinnea, J.S.; Eisman, G.; Perng, T.; Kimizuka, N.; Steinfink, H. The crystal structure of “Ba2Fe4S5”: A two-dimensional array of FeS4 tetrahedra. J. Solid State Chem. 1982, 41, 104–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Du, F.; Ueda, Y.; Ohgushi, K. Large Magnon Contributions to Thermal Conductance in Quasi-One-Dimensional Fe-Based Ladder Compounds BaFe2(S1-xSex)3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 123, 086601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Johnston, D. Antiferromagnetic exchange in two-leg spin-1/2 ladders. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 13009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tiwary, S.K.; Vasudevan, S. Single crystal magnetic susceptibility of the quasi-one-dimensional antiferromagnet KFeS2. Solid State Commun. 1997, 101, 449–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bates, L.F. Modern Magnetism; Cambrige at University Press: Cambrige, UK, 1948. [Google Scholar]
  35. Fogler, M.M.; Teber, S.; Shklovskii, B.I. Variable-range hopping in quasi-one-dimensional electron crystals. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 69, 035413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Crystal structure of the quasi-one-dimensional iron chalcogenide BaFe 2 S 3 .
Figure 1. Crystal structure of the quasi-one-dimensional iron chalcogenide BaFe 2 S 3 .
Crystals 11 00758 g001
Figure 2. Crystal growth of BaFe 2 S 3 in the laser floating-zone furnace.
Figure 2. Crystal growth of BaFe 2 S 3 in the laser floating-zone furnace.
Crystals 11 00758 g002
Figure 3. (a) As-grown ingot of BaFe 2 S 3 . The scale is in cm. The dotted lines indicate the cuts corresponding to (b) the longitudinal section of the seeding and (c) the cross-section of the end portion. The images in (b,c) were obtained using polarized light.
Figure 3. (a) As-grown ingot of BaFe 2 S 3 . The scale is in cm. The dotted lines indicate the cuts corresponding to (b) the longitudinal section of the seeding and (c) the cross-section of the end portion. The images in (b,c) were obtained using polarized light.
Crystals 11 00758 g003
Figure 4. SEM images in the BSE-mode for (a) precursor and (b) end-part of the LFZ ingot.
Figure 4. SEM images in the BSE-mode for (a) precursor and (b) end-part of the LFZ ingot.
Crystals 11 00758 g004
Figure 5. (a) Powder X-ray diffraction patterns and Rietveld refinements for precursor and LFZ samples. The data are shifted vertically for clarity. (b) Rocking curve of an LFZ-grown crystal for the (711) reflection. (c) Laue pattern for an LFZ-grown single crystal. The c direction (horizontal in the image) is ∼10° away from the growth direction.
Figure 5. (a) Powder X-ray diffraction patterns and Rietveld refinements for precursor and LFZ samples. The data are shifted vertically for clarity. (b) Rocking curve of an LFZ-grown crystal for the (711) reflection. (c) Laue pattern for an LFZ-grown single crystal. The c direction (horizontal in the image) is ∼10° away from the growth direction.
Crystals 11 00758 g005
Figure 6. (a) Temperature dependence of the magnetization divided by the magnetic field for precursor and LFZ crystals measured with an applied magnetic field of μ 0 H = 5 T parallel to the c-axis. The dots show the slope of M ( H ) for μ 0 H ≥ 3 T, the color and symbol indicate the sample as defined in (b). T N indicates the Néel temperature defined as the minimum in the derivative, d M d T | min . (b) Field dependence of the magnetization for two independent growths of both precursor and LFZ samples for T = 250 K. Inset: Low field region of M vs. H for the same samples of the main panel.
Figure 6. (a) Temperature dependence of the magnetization divided by the magnetic field for precursor and LFZ crystals measured with an applied magnetic field of μ 0 H = 5 T parallel to the c-axis. The dots show the slope of M ( H ) for μ 0 H ≥ 3 T, the color and symbol indicate the sample as defined in (b). T N indicates the Néel temperature defined as the minimum in the derivative, d M d T | min . (b) Field dependence of the magnetization for two independent growths of both precursor and LFZ samples for T = 250 K. Inset: Low field region of M vs. H for the same samples of the main panel.
Crystals 11 00758 g006
Figure 7. Normalized resistivity (left axis) and derivative of the logarithm of the resistivity (right axis) as a function of the inverse temperature for precursor and LFZ crystals. The Néel temperature and T * are indicated with arrows in dln ρ /d(1/T). The fitted thermally activated behavior for the LFZ crystal and the 1D variable range hopping for the precursor are presented as black continuous lines.
Figure 7. Normalized resistivity (left axis) and derivative of the logarithm of the resistivity (right axis) as a function of the inverse temperature for precursor and LFZ crystals. The Néel temperature and T * are indicated with arrows in dln ρ /d(1/T). The fitted thermally activated behavior for the LFZ crystal and the 1D variable range hopping for the precursor are presented as black continuous lines.
Crystals 11 00758 g007
Table 1. Average composition of the precursor and the end-part of the ingot (LFZ) in at%. The standard deviation is indicated in parenthesis.
Table 1. Average composition of the precursor and the end-part of the ingot (LFZ) in at%. The standard deviation is indicated in parenthesis.
BaFeS
Precursor17.2(1)32.9(3)49.9(4)
LFZ17.16(4)32.79(6)50.05(9)
Table 2. Details on data collection and structure refinement of a LFZ crystal as determined from single crystal X-ray diffraction.
Table 2. Details on data collection and structure refinement of a LFZ crystal as determined from single crystal X-ray diffraction.
Crystal Data Data Collection Refinement
Temperature (K)2952 θ m a x (°)62.93N p a r a m e t e r s 21
Space groupCmcmAbsorption correctionMultiscanR 1 > 4 σ (%)1.46
a (Å)8.7757(3)T m i n 0.5834R 1 all (%)1.86
b (Å)11.2248(4)T m a x 0.7462wR 2 > 4 σ (%)3.13
c (Å)5.2831(2)N m e a s u r e d 5807wR 2 all (%)3.25
Z4N i n d e p e n d e n t 499G.O.F1.140
M r 345.17R i n t (%)2.93 Δ ρ m i n (e·A 3 )−0.865
ρ c a l c (g·cm 3 )4.406 Δ ρ m a x (e·A 3 )0.889
μ (mm 1 )14.009 weight w (a,b)0.0160
0.4559
T m i n = minimum transmission, T m a x = maximum transmission, R 1 = F 0 F c / F 0 , w R 2 = { [ w ( F 0 2 F c 2 ) 2 ] / [ w ( F 0 2 ) 2 ] } 1 / 2 , w = 1 / [ ( σ 2 ( F 0 2 ) ) + ( a P ) 2 + b P ] where P = [ 2 F c 2 + m a x ( F 0 2 , 0 ) ] / 3 .
Table 3. Fractional atomic coordinates, equivalent isotropic displacement parameters, and occupation factors of a LFZ single crystal at 295 K.
Table 3. Fractional atomic coordinates, equivalent isotropic displacement parameters, and occupation factors of a LFZ single crystal at 295 K.
AtomSitexyzU e q 2 )Occupancy
Ba4c0.50.18632(2)0.250.01854(8)1
Fe8e0.34635(4)0.500.01115(9)1.000(2)
S 1 4c0.50.61569(8)0.250.0115(2)1
S 2 8g0.20762(8)0.37821(7)0.250.0194(2)1
Table 4. Anisotropic displacement parameters (Å 2 ) of a LFZ crystal at 295 K.
Table 4. Anisotropic displacement parameters (Å 2 ) of a LFZ crystal at 295 K.
AtomU 11 U 22 U 33 U 23 U 13 U 12
Ba0.0187(1)0.0231(1)0.0138(1)000
Fe0.0098(2)0.0162(2)0.0074(2)0.00003(14)00
S 1 0.0118(3)0.0133(4)0.0093(4)000
S 2 0.0188(3)0.0280(3)0.0113(3)00−0.0124(3)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Amigó, M.L.; Maljuk, A.; Manna, K.; Stahl, Q.; Felser, C.; Hess, C.; Wolter, A.U.B.; Geck, J.; Seiro, S.; Büchner, B. Laser-Assisted Floating Zone Growth of BaFe2S3 Large-Sized Ferromagnetic-Impurity-Free Single Crystals. Crystals 2021, 11, 758. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11070758

AMA Style

Amigó ML, Maljuk A, Manna K, Stahl Q, Felser C, Hess C, Wolter AUB, Geck J, Seiro S, Büchner B. Laser-Assisted Floating Zone Growth of BaFe2S3 Large-Sized Ferromagnetic-Impurity-Free Single Crystals. Crystals. 2021; 11(7):758. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11070758

Chicago/Turabian Style

Amigó, Maria Lourdes, Andrey Maljuk, Kaustuv Manna, Quirin Stahl, Claudia Felser, Christian Hess, Anja U.B. Wolter, Jochen Geck, Silvia Seiro, and Bernd Büchner. 2021. "Laser-Assisted Floating Zone Growth of BaFe2S3 Large-Sized Ferromagnetic-Impurity-Free Single Crystals" Crystals 11, no. 7: 758. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11070758

APA Style

Amigó, M. L., Maljuk, A., Manna, K., Stahl, Q., Felser, C., Hess, C., Wolter, A. U. B., Geck, J., Seiro, S., & Büchner, B. (2021). Laser-Assisted Floating Zone Growth of BaFe2S3 Large-Sized Ferromagnetic-Impurity-Free Single Crystals. Crystals, 11(7), 758. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11070758

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop