Next Article in Journal
Gemology, Mineralogy, and Spectroscopy of Gem-Quality Diopside from Pakistan and Russia: New Insights for the Chromogenic Mechanism and Possible Origin
Next Article in Special Issue
Novel Non-Centrosymmetric NdSr4O(BO3)3 Borate and Nd(Ca1−xSrx)4O(BO3)3 Solid Solutions: Preparation, Crystal Structures, Thermal Expansion and Optical Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Review on the Corrosion Behaviour of Nickel-Based Alloys in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide under High Temperature and Pressure
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Electronic Properties, Linear and Nonlinear Performance of KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) Compounds: A First-Principles Study

1
Laboratory of Quantum Physics of Matter and Mathematical Modeling (LPQ3M), Mascara University, Mascara 29000, Algeria
2
Department of Physics, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi 835215, India
3
Laboratoire de Physique de la Matière Condensée, Département de Physique, Faculté des Sciences de Tunis, Université Tunis El Manar, Tunis 2092, Tunisia
4
Department of Physics, Birla Institute of Technology (Mesra), Off-Campus Deoghar, Jasidih, Deoghar 814142, India
5
Electrical Engineering Department, Future University in Egypt, Cairo 11835, Egypt
6
Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11535, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2023, 13(5), 726; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13050726
Submission received: 26 March 2023 / Revised: 12 April 2023 / Accepted: 14 April 2023 / Published: 25 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances of Nonlinear Optical Materials)

Abstract

:
In the current study, the peculiar nonlinear optical (NLO) properties of KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) and their structural, electronic, and thermodynamic properties are computed utilizing the FP-LAPW (full-potential linearized augmented plane wave) approach as embedded in Wein2K code. The Perdew–Burke–Ernzerh of generalized gradient approximation (PBE-GGA) was considered for the structural optimization. The computed bandgaps are found to be 2.57 and 2.39 eV for KAgS and KAgSe, respectively. Besides the structural and electronic properties, we also computed the refractive indices n(ω), surface energy loss function (SELF), and nonlinear optical susceptibilities. The estimated refractive indices, energy band gap, and their frequency dependence for the investigated KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) compounds, along with the NLO coefficients, are found to be in good agreement with the earlier reports. These current findings suggest that KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) can be recommended for nonlinear optical applications in the near-infrared spectrum.

1. Introduction

Extensive research studies have been carried out in the last several years to develop various types of new inorganic and organic nonlinear optical (NLO) compounds. These NLO compounds display promising applications for optical parametric oscillation or amplification via second-harmonic generation, sum and difference frequency mixing, and as efficient photonic devices [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Therefore, exceptionally efficient NLO crystals must be developed for usage in the visible, ultra-violet, and deep ultraviolet range in order to perform laser processing and laser spectroscopy, such as laser tailoring of molecules and optical triggering [7,8,9,10]. Ternary alkali metal chalcogenides with the general formula ABCh, where A represents alkali metals such as Na, K, and Rb; B represents Cu and Ag; and Ch is a chalcogen (S, Se, and Te), have recently attracted the interest of materials researchers [11,12,13,14,15,16]. NaCuCh and KCuCh (Ch = S, Te) were the first alkali metal chalcogenides to be explored that have PbFCl and Ni2 In-type structures [16]. Later on, G. Savelsberg and H. Schäfer [10] explored the new KAgSe compounds, finding that this material adopts a tetragonal PbFCl-type structure with space group P4/nmm (#129). This was followed by a theoretical analysis of its electronic band structure, dynamical behavior, and elastic attributes [8]. Assuming that both KAgS and KAgTe are analogues to KAgSe compound, a theoretical study on structural and thermodynamic stability as well as electronic and elastic properties has been carried out [17,18]. Aside from their properties as 2D materials, KAgCh have a number of notable behaviors, including an ideal direct band gap, impressive optical absorption in the visible light region, significant carrier mobilities, and remarkable performances in the corresponding thermoelectric and photovoltaic nano-devices [9,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. The effect of nonlinearity can also be seen in different types of beam propagation, leading to soliton formation, breather formation, and soliton–breather pair formation [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32].
Despite a few notable experimental contributions, we still know relatively little about the electronic and optical characteristics of these KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) ternary alkali metal chalcogenides, which will be crucial for their use in technological applications. Further theoretical research into such properties is thus desired. Motivated by this purpose, we conducted a comprehensive study on the linear and nonlinear optical performance of KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) compounds, which has not been performed by any research group till now to the best of our knowledge. The structural, electronic optical, and thermodynamic properties of KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) compounds are reported in this paper. The three portions of the manuscript include the introduction, a full description of the computational approach adopted in the study, and the results and conclusions determined to be of major value to the field of current investigations.

2. Computational Method

The quantum mechanically focused calculations in the present work were performed using the Wien2K code [33] implementation of density functional theory (DFT) [20,34,35,36,37] based on the full-potential linearized augmented plane wave (FP-LAPW) strategy [21]. For the structural optimization, the GGA-PBE approach [22] was considered in conjunction with Tran–Blaha modified Becke–Johnson potential (TB-mBJ) [38] to assess the electronic and optical properties of the investigated compounds. A cut-off value for RMTv × KMAX of 9.0 is considered in this study. The term KMAX represents the largest selected value of the reciprocal lattice vectors utilized to extend the plane wave, while RMT stands for the muffin tin (MT) radius of the smallest atomic sphere [39]. The simulations used a self-consistent precision of total energy of 10−4 Ry. The MT atomic spheres RMT have radii of 2.03, 2.31, 2.50, and 2.65 a.u. for K, Ag, S, and Se atoms, respectively. The charge density and potential were extended up to Gmax = 12 a.u.−1. Using the modified tetrahedron approach, a dense mesh of 17 × 17 × 10 uniformly distributed k-points was employed inside the Brillouin zone (BZ) [40,41], where the total energy concentration is set up to 10−6 Ry. We used the Gibbs2 code [42] to solve the Gibbs function within the quasi-harmonic Debye model to obtain the thermodynamic characteristics of KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) compounds. At temperatures between 0 and 1000 K and pressures between 0 and 8GPa, the thermal effects of KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) were examined. Furthermore, utilizing the Vienna Ab-initio Simulation Package (VASP) [43], we performed the phonon dispersion study in order to study the dynamical stability of the investigated KAgCh (Ch = S, Se).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structural Properties

As shown in Figure 1, the investigated KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) exists in the tetragonal crystal structure [10], where the K, Ag, and Ch atoms are located at specific positions at (1/4, 1/4, 0.657), (3/4, 1/4, 0), and (1/4, 1/4, w), respectively. Accordingly, both KAgS and KAgSe compounds are relaxed and optimized to obtain the ground state parameters. Table 1 includes the optimized structural parameters and experimental results for comparison [10,17].
From Table 1, it is remarked that our obtained lattice parameters are in decent agreement with other reported experimental and theoretical works. Besides, it is remarked that the bulk modulus decreases when going from S to Se, which is principally due to the difference in atomic radius. Furthermore, to know the stability of the studied KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) materials, we computed the formation energy (Ef):
E f ( K A g C h ) = ( E T K A g C h E K + E A g + E C h )
where ET (KAgCh) is the total energy and EK, EAg, and ECh are the energies of K, Ag, and Ch (S/Se) atoms, respectively. The computed Ef for KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) is found to be −0.71 eV/atom and−0.67 eV/atom, respectively. This negative value suggests the formability of the researched KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) compounds [45]. The phonon spectra are computed using the finite displacement approach in the Vienna Ab-initio Simulation Package (VASP). The phonon dispersion in the first Brillouin zone was calculated along high symmetry directions (M-K-Γ-A-L) (Figure 2). The real and imaginary frequencies in the phonon plot for positive and negative frequencies are used to signify the balanced and unbalanced phonon structures, respectively. The lack of an imaginary frequency at the Γ-point attests to the examined KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) compounds’ dynamical stability [46,47]. The obtained results agree with other reports.

3.2. Electronic Properties

Calculating the electronic band structure is necessary to comprehend the physical properties of a crystalline solid, which almost entirely describe optical and transport aspects [48,49]. In the k-space, we computed the electronic band structure for KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) compounds for the high symmetry points in the irreducible Brillouin zone, as displayed in Figure 3a–d. The GGA-PBE potential notably underestimates the band gap of a material, while the TB-mBJ approximation [38,50] may forecast band gaps that are comparable to experimental values. In this investigation, two distinct exchange correlation functionals, the GGA-PBE and TB-mBJ functionals, were used to evaluate the electronic band structures of KAgCh (Ch = S, Se). Figure 3a–d shows that the band gaps of the KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) compounds are direct and are located at Γ point. The calculated direct band gaps by GGA-PBE and TB-mBJ functionals are 1.02 eV and 2.57 eV for KAgS and 1.03 eV and 2.39 eV for KAgSe, respectively. The computed bandgaps obtained with GGA-PBE are in accordance with other reported theoretical results; however, the values obtained by TB-mBJ are different to those estimated by M.A. Mahmoud [17], thus more investigation on the band structure calculation is needed. We also calculated the effective mass [40,51] of electrons and holes using the following relationship:
m = 2 2 E 2 k 1
The effective masses of electrons are approximately 0.70 and 0.63, while the effective masses of holes are 0.37 and 0.32 for KAgS and KAgSe, respectively.
The density of states (DOS) computation can be used to better clarify how distinct atomic states contribute to the band structure [41,52]. The amount of accessible electronic states per unit energy per unit volume is generally referred to as the DOS [39]. Figure 4a,b illustrates the total and partial DOS of KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) materials. From this figure, one can notice that the valence band maximum is occupied principally by the Ag-d and Ch-s states, while the lowest conduction band is formed by Ag-s and s,p orbitals for Ch atoms. Additionally, a strong hybridization between Ag-d states and Ch-s states indicates a covalent character of the Ag-Ch bond.

3.3. Thermodynamic Properties

The quasi-harmonic Debye approximation is used in this study to examine the thermodynamic properties of KAgCh (Ch = S, Se). The specific heat at a constant volume and pressure (Cv and Cp), thermal expansion (α), and Debye temperature (θD) were calculated in the pressure range 0–8 GPa. The quasi-harmonic Debye model was demonstrated to perform well for temperatures between 0 K and 1000 K. Figure 5a and Figure 6a display graphically how the temperature and pressure affect the specific heat capacity (CV) for KAgCh (Ch = S, Se). Upon comparing the CV diagrams of the two compounds, it can be seen that CV increases linearly up to 300 K. When temperatures are between 300 K and 700 K, it increases more slowly, and when temperatures are beyond 700 K, CV is almost constant. According to the well-known Debye model, CV is expected to rise at low temperatures. This can be explained by functioning of long-wavelength vibration modes of the lattice and, if the lattice is considered as a continuum, it is possible to approach these modes [53]. However, as suggested by Petit and Dulong’s law [54], at significantly high temperatures, the classical behavior (CV(T) α 3R for mono-atomic materials) is observed. For KAgCh (Ch = S, Se), the computed values of CV at 300 K (0 GPa) were discovered to be 67 J mol−1 K−1 and 68 J mol−1 K−1, respectively.
According to Figure 5b and Figure 6b, it is shown that both pressure and temperature affect the Debye temperature (θD) [55] of KAgCh (Ch = S, Se). It is obvious when comparing the two plots that the value of θD falls very gradually, but achieves a constant value over a range of temperature and pressure. For both substances, it decreases with the increasing temperature at a pressure of 0 GPa. At a particular temperature, it is seen that the value of θD increases with pressure. The computed values of θD for KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) at a pressure of 0 GPa and ambient temperature are 428 and 367 K, respectively.
Further, Figure 5c and Figure 6c display the heat capacity Cp variation with pressure and temperature. As the temperature rises, the variation characteristics of Cp values, which are similar to those of Cv at lower temperatures, become more evident. On the other hand, when the temperature is high, the behavior of Cp is found to be different from Cv. With the increase in pressure, Cp decreases without converging to a single value. There is a noticeable increase in the heat capacity as the temperature rises.
Moreover, Figure 5d and Figure 6d display the variation in the thermal expansion coefficient (α) with changing temperature and pressure. It is relatively simple to demonstrate using these data that the value increases linearly and gradually at high temperatures, but abruptly above 300 K. This can be observed by comparing the two sets of data. The saturation of up to 300 K may be the reason for this trend. KAgS was calculated to have a value of 1.92 × 10−5 per Kelvin, while KAgSe has a value of 1.97 × 10−5 per Kelvin at a pressure of 0 GPa and ambient temperature. Pressure has been discovered to have the potential to lower this value [56]. The influence of pressure on the value, however, becomes more pronounced and diminishes more quickly as the temperature rises. This is because of the fact that the quasi-harmonic model performs poorly in conditions of both high temperature and low pressure.

3.4. Optical Properties

3.4.1. Linear Optical Property

We estimated that the optical characteristics of KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) subject to photon energy are significant for applications in optoelectronic devices. TB-mBJ functional was used to calculate all of the parameters. Because of the functional inaccurate prediction of the energy band gap with the GGA-PBE, it was ignored. Figure 7a,b shows the predicted optical characteristics of KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) for a photon energy up to 12 eV. The hexagonal structure of KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) enables us to determine the associated properties for two polarization directions ( E x   a n d   E z ) . In order to analyze the optical response of a medium and its dispersive behavior at all photon energies, we determined the real ( ε 1 ) and the imaginary ( ε 2 ) parts of the dielectric function of KAgS and KAgSe, which are displayed in Figure 7a,b. The static dielectric constant ε1(0) reflects the dielectric response at the zero-frequency limit [57]. All of the obtained values of the static dielectric constant are listed in Table 2. From Table 2, it can be deduced that the highest static dielectric constant is obtained in the case of the KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) compounds in the direction of polarization E∥z.
A transition between the occupied states at the upper valence band and the unoccupied at the occupied at the conduction band minimum is considered to be the origin of the major absorption peak shown in the ε 2 ( ω ) curve, which is positioned at about 206 nm (6 eV) [48,58,59,60]. It should be remarked from Figure 8 that the extinction coefficient curve k(ω) and the imaginary portion of the dielectric function ε 2 ( ω ) exhibit behavior that is comparable.
Next, Figure 8 shows the spectral dependence of the refractive index on the photon energy. It can be observed that the n(ω) curves have high values at low frequencies, which decrease significantly towards higher frequencies. At low optical frequencies, the Wemple–DiDomenico (WDD) single oscillator model is commonly used to analyze the refractive index. The WDD model is given by the following relation:
( n 2 1 ) 1 = E 0 E d 1 E 0 E d ( h ν ) 2
where E d and E 0 denote the dispersion of the electronic dielectric function and the single oscillator energy, respectively. From the low-frequency region, by fitting the plot ( n 2 1 ) 1 versus ( h ν ) 2 , we can estimate the dispersion parameters and the single oscillator energies for KAgS and KAgSe. Figure 9 illustrates the spectral dependence of the ( n 2 1 ) 1 versus ( h ν ) 2 for both KAgS and KAgSe compounds. A crucial parameter given by the WDD model is the oscillator strength found from F = E 0 E d . The values of E d and E 0 and F are reported in Table 2. Once the values E 0 and E d are calculated, the determination of the static refractive index ( n 0 ) is deduced using the following relation [61]:
n 0 = 1 + E d E 0 1 / 2
All simulated static refractive indexes n ( 0 ) for KAgS and KAgSe compounds are given in Table 2. The obtained values of static refractive index obey the relation n 0 = ε 1 1 2 0 .
The photon-energy-dependent absorption coefficient of KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) is shown in Figure 10. It is important to take note of the several peaks in this absorption spectra caused by the interband transitions from the bonding band to the anti-bonding band [62]. The maximum absorptions are observed in the UV range for the KAgSe compound along the E//z polarization direction. In the visible range, all compounds under study show very low absorption, which indicates high transmittance of light.
By definition, L ( ω ) is the surface energy loss function describing the energy loss of a fast electron crossing a medium and for the determination of plasmon frequency [45,63,64,65]. The calculated surface energy loss function (SELF L ( ω ) ) spectra for K A g S and K A g S e are presented in Figure 11.
In addition, the surface energy loss function (SELF) represents the energy loss of fast electrons crossing the surface of the material and can be evaluated by the following relation [66]:
S E L F = I m 1 ε + 1 = ε 2 ( ε 1 + 1 ) 2 + ε 2 2
The electron energy loss takes on relatively low values for energies below 6 eV. Beyond 3 eV, energy that coincides with the peak of the absorption observed in ε 2 ( ω ) spectrum, the electron energy loss increases. The characteristic behavior of the dielectric depends not only on its constitutive parameters, but also on the energy.
The electron conduction process produced in the material is described by the optical conductivity, which is calculated using the following relation [66]:
σ o p t = α n c 4 π
We notice, according to Figure 12, an increase in conductivity going from the visible to the UV range, with a gradual increase for KAgSe material in the x polarization direction.

3.4.2. Nonlinear Optical Parameters

The nonlinearity in optical material occurs when the medium interacts with an intense electromagnetic field, leading to the second and third harmonic effect. The nonlinear refractive index ( n 2 ) and the third-order nonlinear optical susceptibility ( χ ( 3 ) ) can be estimated using generalized Miller’s rule:
χ 3 = A 4 π 4 E d E 0 4
n 2 = 12 π χ 3 n ( 0 )
where the constant A is equal to 1.7 × 10 10 esu [66] and E 0 and E d are the dispersion parameters presented above in Table 2. The estimated values of n 2 and χ ( 3 ) are summarized in Table 3. All simulated parameters are in the same range as the other materials used in nonlinear optics applications [67,68]. The results presented in Table 3 reveal the highest value of nonlinear optical parameters in KAgSe compounds for the z polarization direction, suggesting that this compound is promising for nonlinear optical devices.

4. Conclusions

Overall, we have determined the structural, linear, and nonlinear optical coefficients, as well as the electronic structure, of KAgCh (Ch = S, Se), by employing density functional theory as embedded in Wein2k code. The estimated lattice parameters are in close agreement with earlier experimental and theoretical reports. The computed bandgap values for KAgS and KAgSe are 2.57 and 2.39 eV, respectively, which are higher than those reported for many other comparable NLO compounds. The phonon dispersion spectrum predicts the dynamical stability of the studied KAgCh (Ch = S, Se). Additionally, the computed refractive indices for KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) are quite similar to their equivalent experimental values. We also determined the nonlinear refractive index ( n 2 ) and the third-order nonlinear optical susceptibility ( χ ( 3 ) ) for KAgCh (Ch = S, Se). The computed parameters agree well with the experimental and theoretical reports. Both KAgS and KAgSe compounds have good second-order NLO coefficients, large bandgap values, and acceptable optical birefringence, making them suitable candidates for NLO applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.B., W.O. and S.K.M.; Methodology, T.S., D.B., H.B.A. and S.K.M.; Software, T.S., D.B., M.B., R.K.S., M.M.S. and A.S.; Validation, T.S., D.B., M.B., W.O., H.B.A., R.K.S. and M.M.S.; Formal analysis, T.S., H.B.A., A.S. and S.K.M.; Investigation, D.B., M.B., R.K.S., M.M.S., A.S. and S.K.M.; Resources, T.S., D.B. and W.O.; Data curation, D.B., M.B., W.O., H.B.A., R.K.S., M.M.S. and S.K.M.; Writing—original draft, D.B. and R.K.S.; Writing—review and editing, D.B. and A.S.; Visualization, D.B.; Project administration, M.M.S.; Funding acquisition, M.M.S. and A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The raw/processed data can be made available with reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

One of the authors (Debidatta Behera) is thankful to Birla Institute of Technology, Ranchi for the award of an institute fellowship.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interest or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Pan, S.; Smit, J.P.; Watkins, B.; Marvel, M.R.; Stern, C.L.; Poeppelmeier, K.R. Synthesis, crystal structure, and nonlinear optical properties of Li6CuB4O10: A congruently melting compound with isolated [CuB4O10] 6-units. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 11631–11634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Choyke, S.J.; Blau, S.M.; Larner, A.A.; Sarjeant, A.N.; Yeon, J.; Halasyamani, P.S.; Norquist, A.J. Noncentrosymmetry in new templated gallium fluorophosphates. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 11277–11282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhang, W.-L.; Cheng, W.-D.; Zhang, H.; Geng, L.; Lin, C.-S.; He, Z.-Z. A strong second-harmonic generation material Cd4BiO (BO3) 3 originating from 3-chromophore asymmetric structures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 1508–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Sun, C.-F.; Hu, C.-L.; Xu, X.; Yang, B.-P.; Mao, J.-G. Explorations of new second-order nonlinear optical materials in the potassium vanadyl iodate system. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 5561–5572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Medhekar, S.; Sarkar, R.K. All-optical passive transistor. Opt. Lett. 2005, 30, 887–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sarkar, R.K.; Medhekar, S. Passive,“self-trapped family” all-optical half adder using all-optical XOR and AND gates. Czechoslov. J. Phys. 2006, 56, 359–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Atuchin, V.V.; Bazarov, B.G.; Gavrilova, T.A.; Grossman, V.G.; Molokeev, M.S.; Bazarova, Z.G. Preparation and structural properties of nonlinear optical borates K2 (1 − x) Rb2xAl2B2O7, 0 < x< 0.75. J. Alloy. Compd. 2012, 515, 119–122. [Google Scholar]
  8. Tran, T.T.; Koocher, N.Z.; Rondinelli, J.M.; Halasyamani, P.S. Beryllium-free β-Rb2Al2B2O7 as a possible deep-ultraviolet nonlinear optical material replacement for KBe2BO3F2. Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 3015–3019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Feng, J.; Hu, C.; Xu, X.; Li, B.; Zhang, M.; Mao, J. AgGa2PS6: A New Mid-Infrared Nonlinear Optical Material with a High Laser Damage Threshold and a Large Second Harmonic Generation Response. Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 10978–10982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Behera, D.; Sharma, R.; Ullah, H.; Waheed, H.S.; Mukherjee, S.K. Electronic, optical, and thermoelectric investigations of Zintl phase AAg2Se2 (A = Sr, Ba) compounds: A first first-principles approach. J. Solid State Chem. 2022, 312, 123259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jain, A.; Ong, S.P.; Hautier, G.; Chen, W.; Richards, W.D.; Dacek, S.; Cholia, S.; Gunter, D.; Skinner, D.; Ceder, G. Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 2013, 1, 11002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, Q.; Li, J.; Liang, Y.; Nie, Y.; Wang, B. KAgSe: A new two-dimensional efficient photovoltaic material with layer-independent behaviors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 41670–41677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Savelsberg, G.; Schäfer, H. Beiträge zu den Stabilitätskriterien des PbFCl-typs: Darstellung und Struktur von KAgSe. J. Less Common Met. 1981, 80, P59–P69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ding, L.-J.; Li, G.-G.; Zhang, C.-W.; Li, P.; Wang, P.-J. Novel two-dimensional KAB (A = Cu, Au, B = S, Se) photoelectric materials with Prominent carrier mobility and optical properties. Superlattices Microstruct. 2021, 149, 106773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Boualleg, M.; Bennecer, B.; Kalarasse, F. Ab initio predictions of structures and physical properties of the KCuX (X = Se and Te) phases under pressure. Comput. Condens. Matter 2022, 30, e00616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Savelsberg, G. Ternäre pnictide und chalkogenide von alkalimetallen und IB-bzw. IIB-elementen/On ternary pnictides and chalkogenides of alkaline metals and IB-resp. II B-elements. Z. Naturforsch. B 1978, 33, 370–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mahmoud, M.; Rugut, E.K.; Molepo, M.P.; Joubert, D.P. First-principles study of structural stability, electronic properties and lattice thermal conductivity of KAgX (X = S, Se, Te). Eur. Phys. J. B 2019, 92, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Basri, S.; Zulkifli, M.E.; Hazri, N.S.; Kamarudin, S.K. Quantum Behaviour of Mg and Mg-Al-Zn Microstructure. Crystals 2023, 13, 501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mounet, N.; Gibertini, M.; Schwaller, P.; Campi, D.; Merkys, A.; Marrazzo, A.; Sohier, T.; Castelli, I.E.; Cepellotti, A.; Pizzi, G. Two-dimensional materials from high-throughput computational exfoliation of experimentally known compounds. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018, 13, 246–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xu, W.; Wang, R.; Zheng, B.; Wu, X.; Xu, H. New family of two-dimensional ternary photoelectric materials. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 14457–14462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhu, X.-L.; Yang, H.; Zhou, W.-X.; Wang, B.; Xu, N.; Xie, G. KAgX (X = S, Se): High-performance layered thermoelectric materials for medium-temperature applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 36102–36109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wang, Q.; Liang, Y.; Yao, H.; Li, J.; Wang, B.; Wang, J. Emerging negative differential resistance effects and novel tunable electronic behaviors of the broken-gap KAgSe/SiC 2 van der Waals heterojunction. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 8107–8119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Konar, S.; Biswas, A. Soliton-soliton interaction with Kerr law nonlinearity. J. Electromagn. Waves Appl. 2005, 19, 1443–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Medhekar, S.; Sarkar, R.K.; Paltani, P.P. Coupled spatial-soliton pairs in saturable nonlinear media. Opt. Lett. 2006, 31, 77–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Khalique, C.M.; Biswas, A. Optical solitons with parabolic and dual-power law nonlinearity via Lie symmetry analysis. J. Electromagn. Waves Appl. 2009, 23, 963–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sarkar, R.K.; Medhekar, S. Spatial soliton pairing of two cylindrical beams in saturable nonlinear media. Prog. Electromagn. Res. M 2009, 9, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Biswas, A.; Yıldırım, Y.; Yaşar, E.; Zhou, Q.; Alshomrani, A.S.; Belic, M. Optical soliton perturbation in parabolic law medium having weak non-local nonlinearity by a couple of strategic integration architectures. Results Phys. 2019, 13, 102334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Medhekar, S.; Sarkar, R.K.; Paltani, P.P. Soliton pairing of two coaxially co-propagating mutually incoherent 1-D beams in Kerr type media. Opt. Appl. 2007, 37, 243. [Google Scholar]
  29. Biswas, A.; Kara, A.H.; Khan, S.; Yildirim, Y.; Mahmood, M.F.; Alshehri, H.M.; Belic, M.R. Conservation laws for cubic–quartic optical solitons with complex Ginzburg–Landau equation having five nonlinear refractive index structures. Adv. Mater. Rapid Commun. 2022, 16, 137–141. [Google Scholar]
  30. Shwetanshumala, S.; Konar, S. Bright optical spatial solitons in a photorefractive waveguide. Phys. Scr. 2010, 82, 45404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Biswas, A.; Sonmezoglu, A.; Ekici, M.; Alzahrani, A.K.; Belic, M.R. Cubic–quartic optical solitons with differential group delay for Kudryashov’s model by extended trial function. J. Commun. Technol. Electron. 2020, 65, 1384–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sarkar, R.K.; Medhekar, S. Mutual-focusing of two co-propagating beams and formation of trapped spatial breather pair in saturable nonlinear media. Optik 2010, 121, 339–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Blaha, P.; Schwarz, K.; Madsen, G.; Kvasnicka, D.; Luitz, J. Inst. F. Mater. Chem. TU Vienna. Available online: http://susi.theochem.tuwien.ac.at (accessed on 19 April 2023).
  34. Hafner, J. Ab-initio simulations of materials using VASP: Density-functional theory and beyond. J. Comput. Chem. 2008, 29, 2044–2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hohenberg, P.; Kohn, W. Density functional theory (DFT). Phys. Rev 1964, 136, B864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Blaha, P.; Schwarz, K.; Sorantin, P.; Trickey, S.B. Full-potential, linearized augmented plane wave programs for crystalline systems. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1990, 59, 399–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Perdew, J.P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Koller, D.; Tran, F.; Blaha, P. Improving the modified Becke-Johnson exchange potential. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 85, 155109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Behera, D.; Manzoor, M.; Iqbal, M.W.; Lakra, S.; Mukherjee, S.K. Revealing Excellent Electronic, Optical, and Thermoelectric Behavior of EU Based Euag2y2 (Y = S/Se): For Solar Cell Applications. Comput. Condens. Matter 2022, 32, e00723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Behera, D.; Mukherjee, S.K. Optoelectronics and Transport Phenomena in Rb2InBiX6 (X = Cl, Br) Compounds for Renewable Energy Applications: A DFT Insight. Chemistry 2022, 4, 1044–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Behera, D.; Mukherjee, S.K. Theoretical Investigation of the Lead-free K2InBiX6 (X = Cl, Br) Double Perovskite Compounds Using First Principle Calculation. JETP Lett. 2022, 116, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Otero-de-la-Roza, A.; Luaña, V. Gibbs2: A new version of the quasi-harmonic model code. I. Robust treatment of the static data. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2011, 182, 1708–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hafner, J.; Kresse, G. The vienna ab-initio simulation program VASP: An efficient and versatile tool for studying the structural, dynamic, and electronic properties of materials. In Properties of Complex Inorganic Solids; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1997; pp. 69–82. [Google Scholar]
  44. Saal, J.E.; Kirklin, S.; Aykol, M.; Meredig, B.; Wolverton, C. Materials design and discovery with high-throughput density functional theory: The open quantum materials database (OQMD). JOM 2013, 65, 1501–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Manzoor, M.; Behera, D.; Sharma, R.; Iqbal, M.W.; Mukherjee, S.K.; Khenata, R.; Alarfaji, S.S.; Alzahrani, H.A. Investigation of the structural, mechanical, optoelectronic and, thermoelectric characteristics of cubic GeTiO3: An ab initio study. Mater. Today Commun. 2023, 34, 105053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Behera, D.; Manzoor, M.; Maharana, M.; Iqbal, M.W.; Zahid, T.; Lakra, S.; Mukherjee, S.K.; Alarfaji, S.S. Structural, electronic, optical, and thermoelectric response of zintl phase AAg2S2 (A= Sr/Ba) compounds for renewable energy applications. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2023, 649, 414446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Manzoor, M.; Chowdhury, S.; Sharma, R.; Iqbal, M.W.; Mukherjee, S.K.; Alarfaji, S.S.; Alzahrani, H.A. Insight on the lattice dynamics, thermodynamic and thermoelectric properties of CdYF3 perovskite: A DFT study. Comput. Theor. Chem. 2022, 113928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Abraham, J.A.; Behera, D.; Kumari, K.; Srivastava, A.; Sharma, R.; Mukherjee, S.K. A comprehensive DFT analysis on structural, electronic, optical, thermoelectric, SLME properties of new Double Perovskite Oxide Pb2ScBiO6. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2022, 806, 139987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Behera, D.; Mukherjee, S.K. Structural, elastic, electronic and thermoelectric properties of K2GeBr6: A first principle approach. Mater. Today Proc. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Koller, D.; Tran, F.; Blaha, P. Merits and limits of the modified Becke-Johnson exchange potential. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 83, 195134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rubel, O.; Tran, F.; Rocquefelte, X.; Blaha, P. Perturbation approach to ab initio effective mass calculations. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2021, 261, 107648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Behera, D.; Abraham, J.A.; Sharma, R.; Mukerjee, S.K.; Jain, E. First Principles Study of New d0 Half-Metallic Ferromagnetism in CsBaC Ternary Half-Heusler Alloy. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 2022, 35, 3431–3437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Behera, D.; Dixit, A.; Nahak, B.; Srivastava, A.; Dubey, S.; Sharma, R.; Mishra, A.K.; Mukherjee, S.K. Structural, electronic, elastic, vibrational and thermodynamic properties of antiperovskites Mg3NX (X = Ge, Sn): A DFT study. Phys. Lett. A 2022, 453, 128478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Fitzgerel, R.K.; Verhoek, F.H. The law of Dulong and Petit 1960. J. Chem. Educ. 1960, 37, 545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Inaba, H.; Yamamoto, T. Debye temperature of materials. Netsu Sokutei 1983, 10, 132–145. [Google Scholar]
  56. Behera, D.; Dixit, A.; Kumari, K.; Srivastava, A.; Sharma, R.; Mukherjee, S.K.; Khenata, R.; Boumaza, A.; Bin-Omran, S. Structural, elastic, mechanical, and thermodynamic characteristic of NaReO3 and KReO3 perovskite oxides from first principles study. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 2022, 137, 1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Behera, D.; Manzoor, M.; Sharma, R.; Iqbal, M.W.; Mukherjee, S.K. First principle insight on structural, opto-electronic and transport properties of novel zintl-phase AMg2Bi2 (A = Sr, Ba). J. Solid State Chem. 2023, 320, 123860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ouerghui, W.; Alkhalifah, M.S. Density functional investigation of structural, electronic, optical and thermodynamic properties of Zn1− xBexO semiconductor. Appl. Phys. A 2019, 125, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ben Abdallah, H.; Ouerghui, W. Hybrid functional calculations of electro-optical properties of novel Ga1−xInxTe ternary chalcogenides. Appl. Phys. A 2020, 126, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Behera, D.; Manzoor, M.; Mukherjee, S.K. Incorporation of Te in enhancing thermoelectric response of AeAg2SeTe (Ae = Sr, Ba) compounds: A DFT insight. Comput. Condens. Matter 2022, 33, e00757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Joshi, H.; Rai, D.P.; Hnamte, L.; Laref, A.; Thapa, R.K. A theoretical analysis of elastic and optical properties of half Heusler MCoSb (M = Ti, Zr and Hf). Heliyon 2019, 5, e01155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Manzoor, M.; Bahera, D.; Sharma, R.; Tufail, F.; Iqbal, M.W.; Mukerjee, S.K. Investigated the structural, optoelectronic, mechanical, and thermoelectric properties of Sr2BTaO6 (B = Sb, Bi) for solar cell applications. Int. J. Energy Res. 2022, 46, 23698–23714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ouerghui, W.; Alkhalifah, M.S.; Abdallah, H. Ben DFT calculations on ZnO1− x compounds for optoelectronic applications. J. Comput. Electron. 2021, 20, 467–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Alkhalifah, M.S.; Ouerghui, W. DFT calculations of optoelectronic properties of cubic $$\left ({{\text {In}}_{1-x}{\text {Al}}_{x}}\right)_{2}{\text {O}}_{3} $$ In 1-x Al x 2 O 3 alloys. J. Comput. Electron. 2021, 20, 1234–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Babushkina, E.A.; Belokopytova, L.V.; Grachev, A.M.; Meko, D.M.; Vaganov, E.A. Variation of the hydrological regime of Bele-Shira closed basin in Southern Siberia and its reflection in the radial growth of Larix sibirica. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2017, 17, 1725–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ouerghui, W.; Gassoumi, M.; Beji, L.; Maaref, M.A. Optical properties of quaternary GaMnAsP thin layer grown by molecular beam epitaxy. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostructures 2021, 131, 114733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Msalmi, R.; Elleuch, S.; Hamdi, B.; Zouari, R.; Naïli, H. Synthesis, DFT calculations, intermolecular interactions and third order nonlinear optical properties of new organoammonium tetrabromocadmate (II):(C5H6N2Cl) 2 [CdBr4]·H2O. J. Mol. Struct. 2020, 1222, 128853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sharda, S.; Sharma, N.; Sharma, P.; Sharma, V. New quaternary Sb-Se-Ge-In chalcogenide glasses: Linear and nonlinear optical properties. J. Electron. Mater. 2013, 42, 3367–3372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Crystal structure of KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) using VESTA [26].
Figure 1. Crystal structure of KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) using VESTA [26].
Crystals 13 00726 g001
Figure 2. Phonon dispersion spectrum for (a) KAgS and (b) KAgSe.
Figure 2. Phonon dispersion spectrum for (a) KAgS and (b) KAgSe.
Crystals 13 00726 g002
Figure 3. (ad) Computed band structure for KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) employing different exchange correlation functionals.
Figure 3. (ad) Computed band structure for KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) employing different exchange correlation functionals.
Crystals 13 00726 g003
Figure 4. (a,b) Computed density of states for KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) employing TB-mBJ exchange correlation functionals.
Figure 4. (a,b) Computed density of states for KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) employing TB-mBJ exchange correlation functionals.
Crystals 13 00726 g004
Figure 5. (ad) Variation indifferent thermodynamic parameters with temperature (0–1000 K) and pressure (0–8 GPa) for KAgS.
Figure 5. (ad) Variation indifferent thermodynamic parameters with temperature (0–1000 K) and pressure (0–8 GPa) for KAgS.
Crystals 13 00726 g005
Figure 6. (ad) Variation indifferent thermodynamic parameters with temperature (0–1000 K) and pressure (0–8 GPa) for KAgSe.
Figure 6. (ad) Variation indifferent thermodynamic parameters with temperature (0–1000 K) and pressure (0–8 GPa) for KAgSe.
Crystals 13 00726 g006
Figure 7. Calculated real and imaginary parts of the dielectric function of (a) KAgS and (b) KAgSe.
Figure 7. Calculated real and imaginary parts of the dielectric function of (a) KAgS and (b) KAgSe.
Crystals 13 00726 g007
Figure 8. Computed complex refractive index n ( ω ) and extinction coefficient k ( ω ) of (a) KAgS and (b) KAgSe.
Figure 8. Computed complex refractive index n ( ω ) and extinction coefficient k ( ω ) of (a) KAgS and (b) KAgSe.
Crystals 13 00726 g008
Figure 9. ( n 2 1 ) 1 versus ( h ν ) 2 for σ(ω) of K A g S and K A g S e .
Figure 9. ( n 2 1 ) 1 versus ( h ν ) 2 for σ(ω) of K A g S and K A g S e .
Crystals 13 00726 g009
Figure 10. Calculated absorption coefficient α ( ω ) of KAgCh (Ch = S, Se).
Figure 10. Calculated absorption coefficient α ( ω ) of KAgCh (Ch = S, Se).
Crystals 13 00726 g010
Figure 11. Simulated surface energy loss function L(ω) of K A g S and K A g S e .
Figure 11. Simulated surface energy loss function L(ω) of K A g S and K A g S e .
Crystals 13 00726 g011
Figure 12. Simulated optical conductivity σ(ω) of K A g S and K A g S e .
Figure 12. Simulated optical conductivity σ(ω) of K A g S and K A g S e .
Crystals 13 00726 g012
Table 1. Lattice parameters (Å), c/a ratio, bulk modulus B (GPa), its derivative B’, and formation energy Ef (eV) for KAgCh (Ch = S, Se).
Table 1. Lattice parameters (Å), c/a ratio, bulk modulus B (GPa), its derivative B’, and formation energy Ef (eV) for KAgCh (Ch = S, Se).
a = bcc/aBB’zKwChEf
KAgSThis work4.397.561.7239.144.410.6570.216−0.71
Expt.
Other works4.391 [44]7.556 [44]
4.42 [17]7.53 [17]1.70 [17]29.96 [17]6.61 [17]
4.32 [17]7.36 [17] 34.79 [17]7.18 [17]
KAgSeThis work4.517.721.7135.375.000.6540.231−0.61
Expt. [10]4.527.591.68 0.65790.2156
Other works4.29 [44]7.275 [44]
4.56 [11]7.77 [11]1.70 [11]25.87 [17]6.47 [17]
4.57 [17]7.79 [17] 30.03 [17]6.99 [17]
4.47 [17]7.61 [17]
Table 2. Calculated optical constants for KAgS and KAgSe: static dielectric constant ϵ 1 0 , static refractive index n 0 , oscillator energy E 0 , dispersion energy E d , and oscillator strength F .
Table 2. Calculated optical constants for KAgS and KAgSe: static dielectric constant ϵ 1 0 , static refractive index n 0 , oscillator energy E 0 , dispersion energy E d , and oscillator strength F .
Compound ϵ 1 0 n 0 E 0 ( e V ) E d ( e V ) F ( e V 2 )
(E//x)(E//z)(E//x)(E//z)(E//x)(E//z)(E//x)(E//z)(E//x)(E//z)
KAgS4.244.252.052.066.286.4020.3620.82128.02133.32
KAgSe4.935.062.222.245.755.9822.6424.03130.36143.72
Table 3. Nonlinear optical parameters: nonlinear refractive index n 2 and third-order nonlinear optical susceptibility χ 3 for KAgS and KAgSe.
Table 3. Nonlinear optical parameters: nonlinear refractive index n 2 and third-order nonlinear optical susceptibility χ 3 for KAgS and KAgSe.
Compound n 2 10 11 e s u χ 3 10 13 e s u
(E//x)(E//z)(E//x)(E//z)
KAgS1.371.397.517.62
KAgSe2.753.0916.218.5
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Seddik, T.; Behera, D.; Batouche, M.; Ouerghui, W.; Abdallah, H.B.; Sarkar, R.K.; Salah, M.M.; Shaker, A.; Mukherjee, S.K. Electronic Properties, Linear and Nonlinear Performance of KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) Compounds: A First-Principles Study. Crystals 2023, 13, 726. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13050726

AMA Style

Seddik T, Behera D, Batouche M, Ouerghui W, Abdallah HB, Sarkar RK, Salah MM, Shaker A, Mukherjee SK. Electronic Properties, Linear and Nonlinear Performance of KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) Compounds: A First-Principles Study. Crystals. 2023; 13(5):726. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13050726

Chicago/Turabian Style

Seddik, Taieb, Debidatta Behera, Mohammed Batouche, Walid Ouerghui, Houda Ben Abdallah, Ram Krishna Sarkar, Mostafa M. Salah, Ahmed Shaker, and Sanat Kumar Mukherjee. 2023. "Electronic Properties, Linear and Nonlinear Performance of KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) Compounds: A First-Principles Study" Crystals 13, no. 5: 726. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13050726

APA Style

Seddik, T., Behera, D., Batouche, M., Ouerghui, W., Abdallah, H. B., Sarkar, R. K., Salah, M. M., Shaker, A., & Mukherjee, S. K. (2023). Electronic Properties, Linear and Nonlinear Performance of KAgCh (Ch = S, Se) Compounds: A First-Principles Study. Crystals, 13(5), 726. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13050726

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop