2.1. Fabrication of Ultrathin and Thick NMC111 Slurry-Cast Electrodes
To refine the NMC111 powder (TOB, Xiamen, China), dry ball milling was performed for 6 h at a rotational speed of 400 rpm. For the slurry deposition process, a mixture was prepared using NMC111 as the active material, Carbon Black (CB), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), and N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) in a mass ratio of 8:1:1:30. Initially, PVDF and NMP were stirred at room temperature for 1 h to achieve homogeneity, after which the NMC111 and CB powders were introduced and thoroughly ground to ensure uniform dispersion.
The resulting slurry was carefully applied onto a 10 μm thick stainless steel (SS) foil with a 15 mm diameter using a precision applicator. This process ensured a consistent, uniform coating across the substrate. The coated foil was then dried overnight at 80 °C under vacuum conditions to remove any residual solvent and ensure complete adhesion of the electrode materials.
For the thin NMC111 electrode, the loading amount of the active material was controlled at 0.6 mg, corresponding to an approximate film thickness of ~100 nm. In contrast, the thick electrode configuration involved a loading of 3.0 mg, yielding a film thickness of ~5 μm. These specific loading conditions were tailored to optimize electrochemical performance and ensure consistency across different electrode thicknesses, providing a systematic comparison of their impact on battery behavior and performance metrics.
2.2. Electrochemical and Structural Characterizations
The slurry-deposited NMC111 electrodes were assembled into half-cells to evaluate their electrochemical performance. CR2032 coin cells were fabricated, utilizing Li metal as both the reference and counter electrodes, with the NMC111-coated electrode serving as the working electrode. The electrolyte employed was 1 M LiPF6 (Sigma Aldrich), dissolved in a 1:1 volume ratio mixture of ethylene carbonate (EC) and diethyl carbonate (DEC), chosen for its favorable ionic conductivity and stability. Following assembly, the coin cells were allowed to equilibrate in an argon-filled glove box for 24 h to ensure proper electrolyte infiltration and electrode stabilization.
Electrochemical performance was rigorously tested, beginning with galvanostatic charge/discharge cycling. Specific capacity measurements were performed using a battery testing system (BTS, Neware) over a potential range of 3.0–4.3 V versus Li/Li+. Charge and discharge cycles were conducted at current rates ranging from 1 C to 10 C, followed by a return to 1 C to evaluate the rate capability and long-term cycling stability of the electrodes. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) was carried out to further probe the redox behavior of the electrodes at scan rates of 0.1 mV/s, 0.3 mV/s, 0.5 mV/s, 0.8 mV/s, and 1.0 mV/s, within the same voltage window. For performance benchmarking, the theoretical capacity of NMC111 was assumed to be 145 mAh/g.
To complement the electrochemical measurements, structural characterization of the NMC111-deposited electrodes was performed. X-ray diffraction (XRD) was conducted on freshly fabricated electrodes to confirm phase purity and crystallographic alignment. Additionally, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to capture high-resolution images of the electrode surface, providing insights into the microscopic morphology and the uniformity of the deposited layer.
2.3. Results and Discussion
Figure 1a shows the XRD pattern of the NMC111 electrode material. The distinct peaks in the diffraction pattern indicate the crystalline structure of the NMC111 material. These sharp peaks correspond to the specific lattice planes of the NMC111 crystal structure, confirming the formation of a well-ordered phase. The crystallite size of NMC111, determined using the Debye–Scherrer method, was measured to be 20 nm.
The SEM image in
Figure 1b illustrates the surface morphology of an ultrathin NMC111 electrode with a thickness of approximately 100 nm. The image reveals a highly porous, nano-structured surface with a rough texture. The increased surface area due to the porous nature of the ultrathin film enhances electrochemical performance, as the surface interfaces play a significant role in pseudocapacitive charge storage and rapid ion transport. The scale bar indicates that the structural features are within the micrometer range, while the overall film thickness remains nanometric. The SEM image in
Figure 1c shows the surface morphology of a thicker NMC111 electrode, approximately 5 µm in thickness. Compared to the ultrathin electrode, the thick electrode appears denser and less porous, with fewer surface features that can facilitate rapid ion diffusion. The compact structure of the thick electrode increases the diffusion path length for Li ions, leading to slower electrochemical reactions and reduced overall performance. The image scale bar is again 10 µm, providing a sense of the surface structure and differences in porosity compared to the ultrathin sample.
The electrochemical performance of the NMC111 electrode was evaluated in coin cells using Li metal as both the counter and reference electrodes. CV was conducted at a scan rate of 0.1 mV/s over a potential window of 3.0 to 4.3 V versus Li/Li
+.
Figure 2a shows the CV profiles, which exhibit a single pair of sharp anodic and cathodic peaks, corresponding to Li-ion de-intercalation and re-intercalation in the NMC111 structure. The redox peaks, observed at 3.8 V (oxidation) and 3.7 V (reduction), are attributed to the Ni
2+/Ni
4+ redox couple, indicating stable Li cycling within the NMC lattice. The gradual stabilization of the peaks from the 1st to the 4th cycle suggests that the electrode material undergoes activation during the initial cycles and becomes more stable with further cycling. The overlapping curves in later cycles indicate good reversibility and stable electrochemical behavior, which are essential for long-term cycling performance in batteries.
Figure 2b exhibits high rate capability of NMC11 with blue representing charge and red representing discharge. The figure clearly demonstrates the rate-dependent capacity of the ultrathin NMC111 electrode. At lower rates (1 C and 2 C), the electrode delivers higher capacity, whereas at higher rates (5 C and 10 C), the capacity declines due to limited time for Li-ion diffusion. The electrode shows the ability to recover capacity when cycled at a slower rate (1 C) after experiencing high-rate cycling, indicating good structural resilience and reversibility of the material, despite the initial capacity fade. The closeness between the charge (blue) and discharge (red) curves at high C-rates suggests good coulombic efficiency, meaning that the electrode retains a significant portion of the stored charge during discharge, even though the overall capacity declines at higher rates.
The distinct plateaus, characteristic of phase transitions during the intercalation/deintercalation of Li ions, were not observed in the potential profile of
Figure 2c. In many intercalation materials like NMC111, the distinct voltage plateaus are often a result of a two-phase coexistence during the insertion or removal of Li ions. In ultrathin electrodes, this two-phase behavior may be less pronounced because of the small volume of the active material, leading to a more continuous change in voltage rather than the abrupt shifts seen in thicker electrodes where the two-phase coexistence can dominate.
Figure 2d shows the differential capacity versus voltage plot over multiple cycles (from 1 cycle to 10 cycles). The peaks in this plot correspond to the voltage at which phase transitions and redox reactions occur during Li-ion insertion and extraction. The relatively stable peak positions and intensities over several cycles reflect the good reversibility and consistency of the redox reactions in the ultrathin NMC electrode. The close alignment of the curves from cycle 1 to cycle 10 indicates excellent cycling stability and retention of electrochemical activity over time.
Rate-dependent CV measurements were performed to distinguish between diffusion-controlled and capacitive charge storage mechanisms. The cycling performance and rate capability of the NMC111 electrode are influenced by the balance between diffusion-controlled and surface capacitive behaviors. Diffusion-controlled storage, governed by the Li-ion diffusion within the electrode, is typically the rate-limiting step, whereas surface capacitive contributions, including both faradaic (surface redox reactions) and non-faradaic (electric double-layer formation) processes, are faster and enhance charge capacity at higher rates.
To quantify the contributions of these mechanisms, CV data (
Figure 3a) were analyzed at different sweep rates using the power law equation
i =
aνb, where
i is the current,
ν is the sweep rate, and
a and
b are adjustable parameters. This approach allowed us to differentiate the roles of diffusion-controlled, pseudocapacitive faradaic, and non-faradaic charge storage, providing insights into the overall charge storage behavior at varying rates. The
b-values derived from the log
i versus log
ν plot in
Figure 3b indicate the dominant charge storage mechanism. A
b-value of 0.5 suggests diffusion-controlled processes, while a
b-value of 1.0 corresponds to surface capacitive behavior. For the NMC111 electrode,
b-values of 0.70 (oxidation) and 0.77 (reduction) confirm that pseudocapacitive contributions dominate the charge storage process.
The diffusion coefficient of Li ions was estimated using CV data at various scan rates, analyzed through the Randles–Sevcik equation:
where
Ip is the peak current,
n the number of electrons transferred,
F the Faraday constant (96,485 C∙mol
−1),
CLi the initial concentration of Li
+ ions, A the electrode surface area,
DLi the diffusion coefficient,
R the gas constant, and
T the temperature. By plotting
Ip against
ν1/2, the diffusion coefficient was calculated as 1.6 × 10
−8 cm
2·s
−1 indicating efficient Li-ion transport in the NMC111 electrode. This high diffusion coefficient underscores the superior electrochemical performance, particularly under high charge/discharge rates.
The pseudocapacitive charge storage behavior of the ultrathin NMC111 electrode was compared with the diffusion-dominated behavior of the thick slurry-cast NMC111 electrode. As shown in
Figure 4a–c, the slurry-cast thick electrode exhibited a predominant diffusive component, with a
b-value of 0.58 (oxidation), closely aligning with the theoretical value of 0.5, indicative of diffusion-controlled charge storage. In contrast, the ultrathin NMC111 electrode exhibited a
b-value of 0.70 (oxidation), reflecting a significant contribution from surface-driven pseudocapacitive processes. Additionally, the Li-ion diffusion coefficient in the thick electrode was significantly lower, at 4.4 × 10
−10 cm
2·s
−1, compared to the much higher value of 1.6 × 10
−8 cm
2·s
−1 in the ultrathin electrode. This highlights the superior ionic mobility within the ultrathin electrode, which enhances its capacity to sustain rapid charge/discharge cycles, essential for high-rate applications.
The fundamental distinction between these two electrodes lies in their charge storage mechanisms. Pseudocapacitive materials, like the ultrathin NMC111 electrode, promote rapid surface redox reactions, leveraging a large accessible surface area, resulting in efficient but shallower ion interactions. This allows for faster kinetics, making such materials suitable for high-power applications. In contrast, diffusion-controlled materials, like the thick NMC111 electrode, support deeper ion penetration into the bulk of the material, which favors greater energy storage but at the cost of slower charge/discharge rates due to more limited ion diffusion. These findings demonstrate that optimizing electrode morphology and thickness is crucial for balancing pseudocapacitive and diffusion-controlled mechanisms, allowing tailored performance based on specific application requirements. While ultrathin electrodes are advantageous for fast-charging scenarios due to enhanced surface reactions, thicker electrodes provide greater energy density but are constrained by slower ionic diffusion.
Despite the ultrathin NMC111 electrode’s superior Li-ion diffusivity and dominant pseudocapacitive behavior, its specific charge capacity was significantly lower than that of the thick NMC111 electrode, as observed in
Figure 2b and
Figure 4d. This might seem counterintuitive, given the enhanced kinetic parameters, such as faster Li-ion diffusion and a higher
b-value, reflecting substantial pseudocapacitive contributions. While the ultrathin electrode demonstrates excellent rate capability due to rapid charge/discharge kinetics, its overall capacity is limited by surface-confined reactions, even at high C-rates, which restrict the full utilization of active material. In contrast, the thick NMC electrode, although characterized by slower kinetics, achieves greater specific capacity through deeper bulk intercalation of Li ions. The higher capacity at elevated C-rates in the thick electrode also suggests that the ultrathin electrode’s increased surface area may facilitate more side reactions at the electrode–electrolyte interface, leading to capacity degradation that offsets its kinetic benefits.
The impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data for the thin and thick NMC111 electrodes exhibit distinct differences, as shown in
Figure 5, which can be explained by the variation in charge transfer resistance (
Rct). The high-frequency semicircle represents the cathode electrolyte interphase (CEI) resistance (
RCEI) and contact resistances. The mid-to-low frequency semicircle corresponds to the charge transfer resistance related to the electrochemical reaction occurring at the electrode–electrolyte interface. In the thin NMC111 electrode of
Figure 5a, the EIS spectra show lower overall resistance (smaller semicircles), indicating that both the CEI and charge transfer resistances are minimized. This can be attributed to the thinner nature of the electrode, which results in shorter ion diffusion paths and more efficient electron transfer, thereby reducing the resistance to charge transfer. The reduced thickness also ensures that the entire electrode surface is more accessible to the electrolyte, leading to a more uniform and stable SEI layer, which further minimizes the CEI resistance. For the thicker NMC111 electrode of
Figure 5b, the EIS spectra show larger semicircles, indicating increased charge transfer resistance and possibly higher CEI resistance. The increased charge transfer resistance can be attributed to the thicker electrode, which leads to longer diffusion paths for Li ions and electrons, resulting in slower kinetics for charge transfer across the electrode–electrolyte interface. Additionally, the thicker electrode may result in a more uneven or thicker CEI layer, which increases
RCEI. This happens due to the difficulty in uniformly wetting and penetrating the electrolyte through the entire electrode thickness, especially during initial cycling.