Next Article in Journal
A 1,6-Diphenylpyrene-Based, Photoluminescent Cyclophane Showing a Nematic Liquid-Crystalline Phase at Room Temperature
Next Article in Special Issue
Ceramic Conductors
Previous Article in Journal
Very Low Nucleation Rates of Glucose Isomerase Crystals under Microgravity in the International Space Station
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of the Initial Powder’s Specific Surface Area on the Properties of Sm-Doped Ceria Thin Films
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Terbium Substituted Lanthanum Orthoniobate: Electrical and Structural Properties

by
Kacper Dzierzgowski
,
Sebastian Wachowski
,
Maria Gazda
and
Aleksandra Mielewczyk-Gryń
*
Department of Solid State Physics, Faculty of Applied Physics and Mathematics, Gdańsk University of Technology, Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2019, 9(2), 91; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst9020091
Submission received: 2 January 2019 / Revised: 5 February 2019 / Accepted: 6 February 2019 / Published: 11 February 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ceramic Conductors)

Abstract

:
The results of electrical conductivity studies, structural measurements and thermogravimetric analysis of La1−xTbxNbO4+δ (x = 0.00, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.3) are presented and discussed. The phase transition temperatures, measured by high-temperature x-ray diffraction, were 480 °C, 500 °C, and 530 °C for La0.9Tb0.1NbO4+δ, La0.8Tb0.2NbO4+δ, and La0.7Tb0.3NbO4+δ, respectively. The impedance spectroscopy results suggest mixed conductivity of oxygen ions and electron holes in dry conditions and protons in wet. The water uptake has been analyzed by the means of thermogravimetry revealing a small mass increase in the order of 0.002% upon hydration, which is similar to the one achieved for undoped lanthanum orthoniobate.

1. Introduction

Proton conducting ceramics have attracted much interest due to their possible applications in energy conversion, as protonic ceramic fuel cells (PCFC), proton ceramic electrolyzer cells (PCEC), hydrogen sensors, and chemical synthesis [1]. Among them, several distinctive groups can be listed: materials based on barium cerate–zirconate solid solutions [2], rare earth niobates [3,4], as well as other materials, e.g., calcium zirconate, rare earth tungstates, and lanthanum ytterbium oxide [5,6,7,8].
For the last decade, multiple rare earth orthoniobates systems have been investigated, with the interest being put on their electronic [9,10,11] along with ionic conduction with oxygen ions [9,10] and protons [3] as mobile charge carriers. Also, other interesting properties were observed in these materials, e.g., paramagnetism, ferroelectricity, and luminescent emission [1,12].
Lanthanum orthoniobate as a proton conductor has been widely investigated since 2006, when Hausgrud and Norby introduced 1 mol% calcium into the lanthanum sublattice as a way of enhancing protonic conductivity [13]. In the following years, multiple dopants have been introduced both into the lanthanum (e.g., by calcium [14], magnesium [15], or strontium [16,17,18,19]) and niobium (e.g., by vanadium [20,21,22], antimony [23,24,25], arsenic [26], or cobalt [27]) sublattices. Recently, we also reported the influence of co-doping, using praseodymium as a rare earth dopant and calcium as an acceptor dopant in the lanthanum sublattice, on these system properties [28]. The presence of a mixed 3+/4+ cation in the lanthanum sublattice leads to enhanced electronic conductivity and yielding a mixed proton-electron conductor. From the other point of view, such a substitution can affect not only conductivity but also the structure of the material. For example, as it has been reported for Ce1−xLaxNbO4+δ, the increase of lanthanum content in the cerium sublattice caused a decrease in the phase transition temperature [29]. Following the cerium and praseodymium substitutions, a natural next step was to introduce the third lanthanide with mixed valence—terbium. In this work, we present the structural and transport properties of terbium doped lanthanum orthoniobates. The influence of a dopant on the conductivity of the system has been determined by the means of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and thermogravimetric analysis.

2. Experimental

Powders of La1−xTbxNbO4+δ (x = 0.00, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.3) were prepared via the solid-state reaction route. La2O3 (99.99% Aldrich, preheated at 900 °C for 4 h), Tb4O7 (99.99% Aldrich), and Nb2O5 (99.99% Alfa Aesar, Haverhill, MA, USA) were used as starting materials. The stoichiometric amounts of the reagents were milled in an agate mortar in isopropanol. The obtained powders were uniaxially pressed at 400 MPa into 12 mm diameter pellets. The green bodies were calcined at 1000 °C for 12 h. After the first step of the synthesis, the specimens were ground into powders. In the second step, the powders were pressed again at 400 MPa and resintered at 1400 °C for 12 h.
The Powder X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) patterns were collected using Philips X’Pert Pro MPD with Cu Kα radiation. High-temperature XRD (HTXRD) analyses were carried out with an Anton Paar HTK-1200 high-temperature unit. XRD data were analyzed with the FullProf suite [30]. The density of the samples was determined by a vacuum-assisted Archimedes method. The liquid medium used for the measurements was kerosene. The samples were dried, soaked, and suspended in the medium prior to weighing. To enhance soaking, the samples were immersed in kerosene and placed under a vacuum in order to remove air from open pores.
The microstructure was characterized using FEI (Waltham, MA, USA) Quanta FEG 250 scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with EDAX Apollo-SD energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) detector. The microstructure imaging was performed in High Vacuum mode with Everhart-Thornley detector working either in Secondary Electrons (SE) or Back-scattered Electrons (BSE) mode.
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed using a Netzsch (Burlington, MA, USA) Jupiter® 449 F1. The as-prepared powders were heated to 1000 °C and held at this temperature for 0.5 h under dry air to remove water and possible surface carbon dioxide. The samples after dehydration were cooled to 300 °C in dry gas. After 2 h of stabilization, the dry purge gas was switched to the humidified gas (PH2O = 0.023 atm), then after an additional 2 h, the purge gas was switched back to the dry gas.
Impedance spectroscopy measurements were performed to determine the electrical properties of the investigated materials. Impedance spectroscopy measurements were performed in the frequency range 1 Hz–1 MHz and 1 V amplitude on samples with ink painted platinum electrodes (ESL 5542). The measurements were performed in wet (2.4% H2O) and dry technical air (20% O2, 80% N2) using Gamry Reference 3000 at the temperature range from 350 °C to 750 °C with 50 °C steps. Obtained data were analyzed with ZView software. Studies of conductivity as a function of pO2 were performed within the range of 2 × 10−6 to 1 atm at 700 °C. Different values of pressure were obtained through mixing nitrogen (<2 ppm O2) with oxygen (purity 99.999%) gas. Both dry and wet gases (2.4% H2O) were used in the pO2 -dependency study.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the X-ray diffractograms of the synthesized sample powders. All observed reflections were indexed within the monoclinic LaNbO4 (ICSD 01-071-1405), therefore the samples may be regarded as single-phase orthoniobates. The Rietveld profile of the pattern and the difference plots for La0.85Tb0.15NbO4+δ is presented in Figure 2b. The unit cell parameters of the compounds, refined with the Rietveld method, are listed in Table 1. Terbium substituting lanthanum (La3+ ionic radius for CN = 8 is 1.16 Å) can be present in the lattice as Tb3+ or Tb4+. Ionic radii of Tb3+ or Tb4+ for CN = 8 are 1.04 Å and 0.88 Å, respectively [31]. The general trend of a decrease of the unit cell volume with increasing terbium content (Figure 2a) can be attributed to the lower ionic radius of terbium.
The XRD patterns of La0.9Tb0.1NbO4+δ obtained between 460 °C and 490 °C are presented in Figure 3. It can be seen that the reflections corresponding to the ( 1 ¯ 21 ) and ( 121 ) planes of the monoclinic structure shift towards one another with increasing temperature and at 480 °C, they merge into one. This indicates the transition into the tetragonal phase. Similar behavior was observed in all studied samples. The phase transition temperatures were approximately 480 °C, 500 °C, and 530 °C for La0.9Tb0.1NbO4+δ, La0.8Tb0.2NbO4+δ, and La0.7Tb0.3NbO4+δ, respectively. Taking into consideration that terbium has a lower ionic radius than lanthanum, an increase of the transition temperature in La1−xTbxNbO4+δ with increasing terbium content is consistent with the other experimental results. For RENbO4 with a decrease of rare earth metal ionic radius, an increase of phase transition temperature was observed [32].
Figure 4 shows exemplary SEM images taken of the sintered La0.95Tb0.05NbO4+δ, La0.9Tb0.1NbO4+δ, La0.85Tb0.15NbO4+δ, La0.7Tb0.3NbO4+δ samples. In all samples, the observed fractures were apparently dense, without visible grain boundaries and with closed pores. Observed differences in porosity of the samples are consistent with the results of density measurements presented in Table 1. The relative densities vary from 87.5 ± 0.5 % (La0.95Tb0.05NbO4+δ) to 99.9 ± 0.3 % (LaNbO4−δ). The analysis performed with EDS and BSE detectors did not reveal secondary phases or impurities, which confirms the XRD results showing no phase separation.
Thermogravimetric analysis was performed in order to determine the water uptake of the investigated samples. The results obtained for La0.9Tb0.1NbO4+δ, La0.8Tb0.2NbO4+δ, and La0.7Tb0.3NbO4+δ are presented in Figure 5. One can see that the weight change during gas switch is of the order of 0.002%. This is much lower than the results reported by Yamazaki et al. for barium zirconate system, who at 300 °C obtained 0.5% [33]. However, this is in accordance with the results achieved for undoped lanthanum niobate [34]. The relatively small water uptake suggests a rather small concentration of the protons within the samples structures. In the view of a small proton concentration in lanthanum orthoniobates, it may be considered strange why the conductivity differences between wet and dry air reach 50–400% at 700 °C (Table 2). The most probable reason for that is relatively high mobility of protons as well as the absence of defect association phenomena. The proton mobility and trapping effects were discussed extensively by Huse et al. showing their importance in the process of conductivity in this system [35].
Figure 6 presents an example of the acquired Nyquist plot for La0.9Tb0.1NbO4+δ. The clear curve separation into two semicircles can be seen. The brick layer model was used in the analysis of the impedance data [36]. The highest frequency semicircle is usually attributed to grain interior and the next semicircle is attributed to grain boundary conductivity [37]. Electrode responses, observed in the form of a low-frequency semicircle, as not in the scope of this study, were not analyzed. All impedance spectra were fitted with an equivalent circuit: ( C P E g R g ) ( C P E g b R g b ) , where R is resistance and C P E is a constant phase element. For each semicircle, capacitances were calculated using the Formula (1).
C = Q 0 1 n R 1 n 1
where Q 0 , the admittance and n , the angle of misalignment were calculated for each CPE. Typical values of capacitance obtained for high- and mid-frequency were 1 × 10−11 F/cm and 4 × 10−10 F/cm, respectively. The values are close to the ones typically observed in the literature [38] and confirm the semicircles were correctly attributed to grain, grain boundaries, and electrode processes. The conductivities of grain interior σ g , specific grain boundary σ g b , and total conductivity σ t o t were calculated with the use of Equations (2)–(4).
σ g = S 1 R g
σ g b = S 1 R g b C g C g b
σ t o t = S 1 R g + R g b
The S coefficient is a geometrical factor including sample porosity, thickness, and electrode area. Activation energies of total conductivity were calculated by fitting obtained values to the Equation (5), where σ is the conductivity, T is temperature, σ 0 is a pre-exponential factor, E a is the activation energy, and k is the Boltzmann constant. Calculated values of activation energies are presented in Table 2.
Total conductivities of obtained samples in dry and wet air as a function of reciprocal temperature are presented in Figure 7. For all of the samples, the conductivity in wet air was higher than in dry air. The conductivity at 700 ˚C both in dry and wet air in the La0.9Tb0.1NbO4+δ and La0.85Tb0.15NbO4+δ samples reached 10−4 S/cm. Maximum conductivity at 700 °C was observed for the samples doped with 15% of terbium, while a further increase of Tb content led to the decline of total conductivity (Figure 8).
σ T = σ 0 e E a k T
The change of slope of the plots observed at temperatures about 500 °C is related to the phase transition between the scheelite and fergusonite structures. Such behavior was observed before in many LaNbO4−δ-based materials [13,15,28,35]. The influence of the terbium content on the apparent activation energies of total conductivities (Table 2) is complex. In the low-temperature range, the values of activation energy in dry air decreases with the increase of Tb content. In the higher temperature range, the apparent activation energies are lower than these below 500 °C, however, no clear tendency of EA dependence on Tb content can be observed. It should be noted that the La0.8Tb0.15NbO4+δ sample, with the highest conductivities at 700 °C, shows also the lowest activation energies of conductivity in wet air, both for tetragonal (0.53 ± 0.02 eV) and monoclinic structure (1.16 ± 0.02 eV). Moreover, the strongest influence of humid atmosphere on the conductivity of this sample may be observed. The relative change of conductivity at 700 °C of La0.8Tb0.15NbO4+δ reaches 107%, whereas in other doped materials, it is between 50 and 92%.
Figure 9 presents conductivity measured as a function of pO2 in dry and wet atmospheres for LaNbO4−δ, La0.05Tb0.05NbO4+δ, and La0.15Tb0.85NbO4+δ. Under wet conditions, conductivity does not depend on oxygen partial pressure. Similarly, under dry conditions, the conductivity is almost independent for pO2 below 10−4 atm, whilst above 10−3 atm it increases with increasing oxygen partial pressure. In terbium doped samples a stronger change of conductivity is observed, whereas in the LaNbO4, change of conductivity is much smaller than in samples containing terbium. The observed slope of the conductivity at high pO2 is close to ¼. Obtained results indicate that in wet conditions, materials are protonic conductors. In dry gases, the results show that at lower pO2, the materials are oxygen ion conductors, whilst at high pO2, the material is a mixed oxygen ion and electron holes conductor. The slope of the dependence observed in Figure 9 is characteristic of the situation where ionic charge carriers have dominating concentration, whereas holes are a minority defect, but due to much higher mobility, contribute to total conductivity.
The influence of Tb on the electrical properties of the material should be analyzed in view of two possible terbium oxidation states—terbium can be either isovalent (Tb3+) with lanthanum (La3+) or have higher oxidation state (Tb4+) and serve as a donor. The source of terbium during the synthesis was Tb4O7, which contains a mixture of Tb3+ and Tb4+. For simplicity in defect chemistry analysis, we will treat that oxide as a mixture of Tb2O3 and TbO2. In the case of Tb2O3, in which terbium is isovalent with lanthanum, the incorporation of Tb follows the reaction (6).
T b 2 O 3 + N b 2 O 5     2 T b L a x + 2 N b N b x + 8 O O x
In the case of TbO2, the excess positive charge of Tb4+ can be compensated by the formation of either electron or oxygen interstitials, which is described by reactions (7) and (8).
2 T b O 2 + N b 2 O 5     2 T b L a + 2 N b N b x + 8 O O x + 2 e + O 2 ( g )
2 T b O 2 + N b 2 O 5     2 T b L a + 2 N b N b x + 8 O O x + 2 O i
Another point to analyze is the preferred oxidation state of terbium in the crystal lattice of lanthanum orthoniobate. One can assume that the more preferred oxidation state of terbium is 3+, since the ionic radii difference between Tb3+ and La3+ is much smaller (0.12 Å) than that between Tb4+ and La3+ (0.28 Å). The structure with Tb3+ would be much less strained than with Tb4+. Therefore, it may be expected that Tb4+ will be at least partially reduced into Tb3+, which is accompanied by the generation of holes:
T b L a T b L a x + h
Further analysis of the possible scenarios must be performed in relation to the knowledge of properties of undoped lanthanum orthoniobate. First of all, the most energetically favourable intrinsic defect in LaNbO4-δ is an anion Frenkel pair, which is a pair of oxygen vacancy and oxygen interstitial [39]:
O O X   O i +   V O
This indicates that the formation of interstitial oxygen ions’ defects could be energetically preferred in the case of doped lanthanum niobate. Secondly, studies of LaNbO4−δ [13] showed that in oxidizing conditions at 1200 °C, the material is a mixed electron hole and oxygen ion conductor. The electron holes are a minority defect (concentration-wise), however, due to the higher mobility of holes in the valence band in comparison to the mobility of ionic defects in the lattice, the overall effect is a mixed type of conductivity. The results for lower temperatures are not presented in the study by Haugsrud et al. [13], however by the studies of similar systems [38] it can be expected that with lowering temperature the contribution from holes diminishes and for temperatures of interest in our study, doped lanthanum orthoniobate should be an oxygen ion conductor in dry conditions. Indeed, our measurement of conductivity of lanthanum orthoniobate as a function of oxygen partial pressure shows that at 700 °C at lower pO2 it is an ion conductor, with increasing hole contribution at higher pO2. The situation is the same for Tb doped lanthanum orthoniobates. This shows similarity of properties of Tb doped samples to the pure LaNbO4.
The effect of Tb substitution given by reactions (7–9) could be twofold. In the first scenario it can be either that the incorporation of Tb4+ produces electrons (7), and then latter partial reduction to Tb3+ reduces that effect by either producing holes in the reaction (9), which can further recombine with electrons. The second scenario would be the creation of oxygen interstitials (8) accompanied by the formation of holes during a partial reduction of Tb to fit into the LaNbO4−δ lattice (9). The latter hypothesis of the preferred formation of oxygen interstitials instead of electrons is supported by the results of the measurement of conductivity as a function of oxygen partial pressure in dry conditions. Moreover, a similar compound, CeNbO4+δ, is an oxygen ion conductor, in which oxygen interstitials dominate [40]. CeNbO4+δ is a compound similar to LaNbO4−δ. It is isostructural with LaNbO4−δ, but cerium occupying the A-site may be present either as Ce3+ or Ce4+. Therefore, CeNbO4+δ is expected to be somewhat similar to terbium-doped lanthanum orthoniobate because terbium doping also induces a mixed 3+/4+ oxidation state in the A-site.
All considered, an overall effect with dominating reactions (8) and (9) should be that the oxygen ionic conductivity should increase due to the formation of ionic defects and the hole contribution to total conductivity should also increase with an increase of Tb content. Indeed, the conductivity of samples with x < 0.2 increases with increasing Tb content, which means that increasing Tb content leads to the increase of the concentration of mobile charged species. This is observed both in the wet and dry atmospheres, which supports the hypothesis of dominating ionic conductivity. Moreover, conductivity measured as a function of oxygen partial pressure in wet atmospheres shows a typical feature of a proton conductor, i.e., the conductivity does not depend on the pressure. Lower conductivity observed in samples with high Tb content (x ≥ 0.2) (Figure 8) can be explained by potential trapping of ionic charged species around the dopants. This is a common feature observed in heavily doped ionic conductors [41,42,43].
The observed increase of the conductivity in wet air compared to dry one may be considered as a typical feature of a high-temperature proton conductor related to the hydration reaction of an oxide. Typically, the hydration reaction is given by the following:
H 2 O + V O + O O x 2 O H O
In La1−xTbxNbO4+δ, however, not many vacancies are expected to be present in the system, therefore a possible alternative reaction could be given:
H 2 O + 2 O O X     2 O H O + O i
This reaction was previously proposed by Norby and discussed later by Islam for brownmillerite oxides [44,45]. Moreover, recent calculations showed oxygen ionic conductivity at high temperatures in undoped LaNbO4, which may occur via oxygen interstitial positions [46]. Hydration of the doped materials may lead to the formation of both proton defects and interstitial oxygen ions. Thermogravimetric analysis showed that the mass change caused by the water uptake is rather small. The TGA results did not allow us to determine whether this depends on the terbium content. On the other hand, the analysis of the influence of the atmosphere on electrical properties shows that the relative increase of conductivity in wet atmospheres depends on the terbium content, in a similar way as the conductivity values (Table 2, Figure 7). It reaches the maximum in the La0.85Tb15NbO4+δ sample, however, it is much lower than that in the undoped lanthanum orthoniobate—the relative change of conductivity for LaNbO4−δ is 4 times higher than that for La0.85Tb15NbO4+δ. The proposed hypothesis, in which Tb presence increases the concentrations of oxygen interstitials and electron holes, could explain this observation. The hole conductivity occurs as a result of the partial reduction of Tb4+ in the lattice (reaction (9)), and this should not be affected by the hydration reactions (11) and (12). Therefore, with increasing terbium content, the hole conductivity also increases and the relative contribution of protons into the total conductivity should decrease.
Figure 10 presents the temperature dependence of the two components of the total conductivity, specific grain boundary, and grain interior (bulk) conductivities for La0.9Tb0.1NbO4+δ sample, which is representative of the whole system. In the temperature range above 500 °C, the specific grain boundary conductivity is higher by over an order of magnitude than the bulk one. This is not typical behavior of solid electrolytes, however, similar phenomena were observed for LaNbO4−δ co-doped with 10% praseodymium and 2% calcium [28].

4. Conclusions

Single-phase samples of terbium doped lanthanum orthoniobates were prepared and studied. Unit cell parameters at room temperature of the studied compounds were determined. A decrease of the unit cell volume with increasing terbium content was observed. The results of high-temperature XRD showed that increasing terbium content in the lanthanum sublattice causes an increase of the phase transition temperature. The phase transition temperatures were approximately 480 °C, 500 °C, and 530 °C for La0.9Tb0.1NbO4+δ, La0.8Tb0.2NbO4+δ, and La0.7Tb0.3NbO4+δ, respectively. This behavior, as well as the observed decrease of the unit cell volume with increasing terbium content, was interpreted as related to the lower ionic radius of terbium.
Temperature dependence of electrical conductivity in different atmospheres was investigated and discussed. Both terbium content and the atmosphere influence the total conductivity of La1−xTbxNbO4+δ. The highest conductivity was observed for the La0.85Tb0.15NbO4+δ sample both in dry and wet atmospheres. For all samples, the total conductivity in the wet was higher than that in the dry air. On the basis of defect formation analysis supported by the comparison with the La1−xCexNbO4+δ, the hypothesis explaining the electrical properties of La1−xTbxNbO4+δ was proposed. In particular, it was proposed that Tb presence increases the concentrations of oxygen interstitials and electron holes, whereas the hydration of the doped materials leads to the formation of both proton defects and interstitial oxygen ions, which has been confirmed by pO2 dependency measurements. This means that Tb increasing content and humid atmosphere lead to an increase of the concentrations of three types of charge carriers. The non-monotonic dependence of the total conductivity on terbium content was interpreted as a result of a possible defect association phenomena for high Tb contents (above 0.15).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.D., M.G. and A.M.-G.; methodology, A.M.-G., K.D.,S.W., M.G.; formal analysis, M.G.; investigation, K.D., M.G.,A.M.-G.; resources, A.M.-G.; data curation, K.D., S.W., A.M.-G.; writing—original draft preparation, K.D.; writing—review and editing, M.G., S.W., A.M-G.; supervision, M.G., A.M.-G.; project administration, A.M.-G.; funding acquisition, A.M.-G.

Funding

The research was financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Poland by Iuventus Scheme Grant No IP2015 051374.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Molenda, J.; Kupecki, J.; Baron, R.; Blesznowski, M.; Brus, G.; Brylewski, T.; Bucko, M.; Chmielowiec, J.; Cwieka, K.; Gazda, M.; et al. Status report on high temperature fuel cells in Poland—Recent advances and achievements. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 4366–4403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gdula-Kasica, K.; Mielewczyk-Gryn, A.; Molin, S.; Jasinski, P.; Krupa, A.; Kusz, B.; Gazda, M. Optimization of microstructure and properties of acceptor-doped barium cerate. Solid State Ionics 2012, 225, 245–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Haugsrud, R.; Norby, T. Proton conduction in rare-earth ortho-niobates and ortho-tantalates. Nat. Mater. 2006, 5, 193–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Animitsa, I.; Iakovleva, A.; Belova, K. Electrical properties and water incorporation in A-site deficient perovskite La1-xBaxNb3O9-0.5x. J. Solid State Chem. 2016, 238, 156–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hibino, T.; Mizutani, K.; Yajima, T.; Iwahara, H. Evaluation of proton conductivity in SrCeO3, BaCeO3, CaZrO3 and SrZrO3 by temperature programmed desorption method. Solid State Ionics 1992, 57, 303–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Escolástico, S.; Vert, V.B.; Serra, J.M. Preparation and characterization of nanocrystalline mixed proton-electronic conducting materials based on the system Ln6WO12. Chem. Mater. 2009, 21, 3079–3089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yajima, T.; Kazeoka, H.; Yogo, T.; Iwahara, H. Proton conduction in sintered oxides based on CaZrO3. Solid State Ionics 1991, 47, 271–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sakai, T.; Isa, K.; Matsuka, M.; Kozai, T.; Okuyama, Y.; Ishihara, T.; Matsumoto, H. Electrochemical hydrogen pumps using Ba doped LaYbO3 type proton conducting electrolyte. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38, 6842–6847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Haugsrud, R.; Ballesteros, B.; Lira-Cantu, M.; Norby, T. Ionic and electronic conductivity of 5% Ca-doped GdNbO4. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2006, 153, J87–J90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bayliss, R.D.; Pramana, S.S.; An, T.; Wei, F.; Kloc, C.L.; White, A.J.P.; Skinner, S.J.; White, T.J.; Baikie, T. Fergusonite-type CeNbO4+δ: Single crystal growth, symmetry revision and conductivity. J. Solid State Chem. 2013, 204, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, C.; Bayliss, R.D.; Skinner, S.J. Crystal structure and potential interstitial oxide ion conductivity of LnNbO4 and LnNb0.92W0.08O4.04 (Ln = La, Pr, Nd). Solid State Ionics 2014, 262, 530–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Huang, H.; Wang, T.; Zhou, H.; Huang, D.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, G.; Hu, J.; Zhan, J. Luminescence, energy transfer, and up-conversion mechanisms of Yb3+and Tb3+co-doped LaNbO4. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 702, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Haugsrud, R.; Norby, T. High-temperature proton conductivity in acceptor-doped LaNbO4. Solid State Ionics 2006, 177, 1129–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hakimova, L.; Kasyanova, A.; Farlenkov, A.; Lyagaeva, J.; Medvedev, D.; Demin, A.; Tsiakaras, P. Effect of isovalent substitution of La3+ in Ca-doped LaNbO4 on the thermal and electrical properties. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mielewczyk-Gryn, A.; Wachowski, S.; Zagórski, K.; Jasiński, P.; Gazda, M. Characterization of magnesium doped lanthanum orthoniobate synthesized by molten salt route. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 7847–7852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mielewczyk-Gryn, A.; Gdula, K.; Lendze, T.; Kusz, B.; Gazda, M. Nano- and microcrystals of doped niobates. Cryst. Res. Technol. 2010, 45, 1225–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fjeld, H.; Kepaptsoglou, D.M.; Haugsrud, R.; Norby, T. Charge carriers in grain boundaries of 0.5% Sr-doped LaNbO4. Solid State Ionics 2010, 181, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mokkelbost, T.; Lein, H.L.; Vullum, P.E.; Holmestad, R.; Grande, T.; Einarsrud, M.-A. Thermal and mechanical properties of LaNbO4-based ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2009, 35, 2877–2883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nguyen, D.; Kim, Y.H.; Lee, J.S.; Fisher, J.G. Structure, morphology, and electrical properties of proton conducting La0.99Sr0.01NbO4-δ synthesized by a modified solid state reaction method. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2017, 202, 320–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Brandão, A.D.; Antunes, I.; Frade, J.R.; Torre, J.; Kharton, V.V.; Fagg, D.P. Enhanced Low-Temperature Proton Conduction in Sr0.02La0.98NbO4−δ by Scheelite Phase Retention. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 6673–6683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wachowski, S.; Mielewczyk-Gryn, A.; Gazda, M. Effect of isovalent substitution on microstructure and phase transition of LaNb1−xMxO4 (M = Sb, V or ta; x = 0.05 to 0.3). J. Solid State Chem. 2014, 219, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Brandão, A.D.; Nasani, N.; Yaremchenko, A.A.; Kovalevsky, A.V.; Fagg, D.P. Solid solution limits and electrical properties of scheelite SryLa1-yNb1-xVxO4-δ materials for x = 0.25 and 0.30 as potential proton conducting ceramic electrolytes. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 18682–18690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wachowski, S.; Mielewczyk-Gryn, A.; Zagorski, K.; Li, C.; Jasinski, P.; Skinner, S.J.; Haugsrud, R.; Gazda, M. Influence of Sb-substitution on ionic transport in lanthanum orthoniobates. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 11696–11707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mielewczyk-Gryn, A.; Wachowski, S.; Strychalska, J.; Zagórski, K.; Klimczuk, T.; Navrotsky, A.; Gazda, M. Heat capacities and thermodynamic properties of antimony substituted lanthanum orthoniobates. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 7054–7059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mielewczyk-Gryn, A.; Wachowski, S.; Lilova, K.I.; Guo, X.; Gazda, M.; Navrotsky, A. Influence of antimony substitution on spontaneous strain and thermodynamic stability of lanthanum orthoniobate. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 2128–2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wachowski, S.; Kamecki, B.; Winiarz, P.; Dzierzgowski, K.; Mielewczyk-Gryń, A.; Gazda, M. Tailoring structural properties of lanthanum orthoniobates through an isovalent substitution on the Nb-site. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2018, 5, 2157–2166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, M.; Wu, R.; Zhu, L.; Cheng, J.; Hong, T.; Xu, C. Enhanced sinterability and conductivity of cobalt doped lanthanum niobate as electrolyte for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cell. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 573–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dzierzgowski, K.; Wachowski, S.; Gojtowska, W.; Lewandowska, I.; Jasiński, P.; Gazda, M.; Mielewczyk-Gryń, A. Praseodymium substituted lanthanum orthoniobate: Electrical and structural properties. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 8210–8215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Packer, R.J.; Skinner, S.J.; Yaremchenko, A.A.; Tsipis, E.V.; Kharton, V.V.; Patrakeev, M.V.; Bakhteeva, Y.A. Lanthanum substituted CeNbO4+δ scheelites: Mixed conductivity and structure at elevated temperatures. J. Mater. Chem. 2006, 16, 3503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rodríguez-Carvajal, J. Recent Developments for the Program FULLPROF; Commission on Powder Diffraction: Perth, Australia, 2001; Volume 26, ISBN 4971168915. [Google Scholar]
  31. Shannon, R.D. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 1976, 32, 751–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Stubičan, V.S. High-Temperature Transitions in Rare Earth Niobates and TantaIates. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1964, 47, 55–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yamazaki, Y.; Babilo, P.; Haile, S.M. Defect chemistry of yttrium-doped barium zirconate: A thermodynamic analysis of water uptake. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 6352–6357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mielewczyk-Gryń, A. Water uptake analysis of the acceptor-doped lanthanum orthoniobates. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2019. submitted. [Google Scholar]
  35. Huse, M.; Norby, T.; Haugsrud, R. Effects of A and B site acceptor doping on hydration and proton mobility of LaNbO4. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 8004–8016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Abrantes, J.C.C.; Labrincha, J.A.; Frade, J.R. Applicability of the brick layer model to describe the grain boundary properties of strontium titanate ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2000, 20, 1603–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Haile, S.M.; West, D.L.; Campbell, J. The role of microstructure and processing on the proton conducting properties of gadolinium-doped barium cerate. J. Mater. Res. 1998, 13, 1576–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Berger, P.; Mauvy, F.; Grenier, J.-C.; Sata, N.; Magrasó, A.; Haugsrud, R.; Slater, P.R. Proton-Conducting Ceramics: From Fundamentals to Applied Research; Marrony, M., Ed.; Pan Stanford Publishing: Singapore, 2016; Chapter 1; pp. 1–72. [Google Scholar]
  39. Mather, G.C.; Fisher, C.A.J.; Islam, M.S. Defects, dopants, and protons in LaNbO4. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 5912–5917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Packer, R.J.; Tsipis, E.V.; Munnings, C.N.; Kharton, V.V.; Skinner, S.J.; Frade, J.R. Diffusion and conductivity properties of cerium niobate. Solid State Ionics 2006, 177, 2059–2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, D.Y.; Park, D.S.; Griffith, J.; Nowick, A.S. Oxygen-ion conductivity and defect interactions in yttria-doped ceria. Solid State Ionics 1981, 2, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Guo, X.; Waser, R. Electrical properties of the grain boundaries of oxygen ion conductors: Acceptor-doped zirconia and ceria. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2006, 51, 151–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kilner, J.A.; Brook, R.J. A study of oxygen ion conductivity in doped non-stoichiometric oxides. Solid State Ionics 1982, 6, 237–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Norby, T.; Larring, Y. Concentration and transport of protons in oxides. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 1997, 2, 593–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Islam, M.S.; Davies, R.A.; Fisher, C.A.J.; Chadwick, A.V. Defects and protons in the CaZrO3 perovskite and Ba2In2O5 brownmillerite: Computer modelling and EXAFS studies. Solid State Ionics 2001, 145, 333–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Toyoura, K.; Sakakibara, Y.; Yokoi, T.; Nakamura, A.; Matsunaga, K. Oxide-ion conduction: Via interstitials in scheelite-type LaNbO4: A first-principles study. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 12004–12011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. X-ray diffractograms of La1−xTbxNbO4+δ (x = 0.00, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.3).
Figure 1. X-ray diffractograms of La1−xTbxNbO4+δ (x = 0.00, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.3).
Crystals 09 00091 g001
Figure 2. (a) Unit cell volume as a function of Tb content in La1−xTbxNbO4+δ. (b) The Rietveld profile of the pattern and the difference plots for La0.85Tb0.15NbO4+δ.
Figure 2. (a) Unit cell volume as a function of Tb content in La1−xTbxNbO4+δ. (b) The Rietveld profile of the pattern and the difference plots for La0.85Tb0.15NbO4+δ.
Crystals 09 00091 g002
Figure 3. HTXRD patterns of La0.9Tb0.1NbO4+δ. Reflections of monoclinic and tetragonal phases were indexed with “M” and “T” letters, respectively.
Figure 3. HTXRD patterns of La0.9Tb0.1NbO4+δ. Reflections of monoclinic and tetragonal phases were indexed with “M” and “T” letters, respectively.
Crystals 09 00091 g003
Figure 4. SEM image of polished fractures of La0.95Tb0.05NbO4+δ, La0.9Tb0.1NbO4+δ, La0.85Tb0.15NbO4+δ, La0.7Tb0.3NbO4+δ taken in SE and BSE mode.
Figure 4. SEM image of polished fractures of La0.95Tb0.05NbO4+δ, La0.9Tb0.1NbO4+δ, La0.85Tb0.15NbO4+δ, La0.7Tb0.3NbO4+δ taken in SE and BSE mode.
Crystals 09 00091 g004
Figure 5. Results of TGA measurements performed for La0.9Tb0.1NbO4+δ, La0.8Tb0.2NbO4+δ, La0.7Tb0.3NbO4+δ.
Figure 5. Results of TGA measurements performed for La0.9Tb0.1NbO4+δ, La0.8Tb0.2NbO4+δ, La0.7Tb0.3NbO4+δ.
Crystals 09 00091 g005
Figure 6. Nyquist plot of La0.9Tb0.1NbO4+δ measured in wet air at 500 °C.
Figure 6. Nyquist plot of La0.9Tb0.1NbO4+δ measured in wet air at 500 °C.
Crystals 09 00091 g006
Figure 7. Total conductivity as a function of the reciprocal temperature of La1−xTbxNbO4+δ in (a) dry air and (b) wet air.
Figure 7. Total conductivity as a function of the reciprocal temperature of La1−xTbxNbO4+δ in (a) dry air and (b) wet air.
Crystals 09 00091 g007
Figure 8. Total conductivities at 700 °C of La1−xTbxNbO4+δ.
Figure 8. Total conductivities at 700 °C of La1−xTbxNbO4+δ.
Crystals 09 00091 g008
Figure 9. Total conductivity plotted as a function of pO2 at 700 °C of LaNbO4−δ, La0.05Tb0.05NbO4+δ, and La0.15Tb0.85NbO4+δ under (a) wet and (b) dry conditions.
Figure 9. Total conductivity plotted as a function of pO2 at 700 °C of LaNbO4−δ, La0.05Tb0.05NbO4+δ, and La0.15Tb0.85NbO4+δ under (a) wet and (b) dry conditions.
Crystals 09 00091 g009
Figure 10. Temperature dependence of total conductivity, grain conductivity, and specific grain boundary conductivity of La0.9Tb0.1NbO4+δ measured in wet air.
Figure 10. Temperature dependence of total conductivity, grain conductivity, and specific grain boundary conductivity of La0.9Tb0.1NbO4+δ measured in wet air.
Crystals 09 00091 g010
Table 1. Unit cell parameters and densities of La1−xTbxNbO4+δ (x = 0.00, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.3); ρt, ρm, and ρrel signify density calculated on the basis of unit cell parameters, density determined on the basis of Archimedes method, and relative density, respectively.
Table 1. Unit cell parameters and densities of La1−xTbxNbO4+δ (x = 0.00, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.3); ρt, ρm, and ρrel signify density calculated on the basis of unit cell parameters, density determined on the basis of Archimedes method, and relative density, respectively.
Sample a   ( ) b   ( ) c   ( ) β (°) V   ( 3 ) ρt (g/cm3)ρm (g/cm3)ρrel (%)
LaNbO4−δ 5.565911.52455.203194.082332.905.9065.90399.9
La0.95Tb0.05NbO4+δ5.550911.49025.195494.091330.525.9635.21487.5
La0.9Tb0.1NbO4+δ5.549911.49345.196194.087330.615.9815.95999.6
La0.85Tb0.15NbO4+δ5.553211.49795.196994.092330.975.9955.25987.7
La0.8Tb0.2NbO4+δ5.536711.46485.190594.103328.636.0585.53691.4
La0.7Tb0.3NbO4+δ5.520211.43115.181294.103326.116.1455.52589.9
Table 2. Summary of electrical properties of La1−xTbxNbO4+δ: total conductivities at 700 °C, a relative difference of total conductivities in wet and dry atmospheres at 700 °C, and apparent activation energies of conductivity in temperature ranges below and above 500 °C.
Table 2. Summary of electrical properties of La1−xTbxNbO4+δ: total conductivities at 700 °C, a relative difference of total conductivities in wet and dry atmospheres at 700 °C, and apparent activation energies of conductivity in temperature ranges below and above 500 °C.
σ t o t ( 700   ° C ) σ t o t w e t σ t o t d r y σ t o t d r y EA Below 500 °CEA Above 500 °C
(10−5 S/cm)(%)(eV)(eV)
Wet AirDry Air at   700   ° C Wet AirDry AirWet AirDry Air
LaNbO4−δ0.680.13419n/dn/dn/dn/d
La0.95Tb0.05NbO4+δ3.682.46491.02 ± 0.021.29 ± 0.020.56 ± 0.020.68 ± 0.02
La0.9Tb0.1NbO4+δ9.515.04891.25 ± 0.021.25 ± 0.020.55 ± 0.020.68 ± 0.02
La0.85Tb0.15NbO4+δ11.35.451071.16 ± 0.021.24 ± 0.020.53 ± 0.020.86 ± 0.02
La0.8Tb0.2NbO4+δ3.952.05931.26 ± 0.021.11 ± 0.020.59 ± 0.020.74 ± 0.02
La0.7Tb0.3NbO4+δ3.111.83701.07 ± 0.031.15 ± 0.020.69 ± 0.050.85 ± 0.02

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dzierzgowski, K.; Wachowski, S.; Gazda, M.; Mielewczyk-Gryń, A. Terbium Substituted Lanthanum Orthoniobate: Electrical and Structural Properties. Crystals 2019, 9, 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst9020091

AMA Style

Dzierzgowski K, Wachowski S, Gazda M, Mielewczyk-Gryń A. Terbium Substituted Lanthanum Orthoniobate: Electrical and Structural Properties. Crystals. 2019; 9(2):91. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst9020091

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dzierzgowski, Kacper, Sebastian Wachowski, Maria Gazda, and Aleksandra Mielewczyk-Gryń. 2019. "Terbium Substituted Lanthanum Orthoniobate: Electrical and Structural Properties" Crystals 9, no. 2: 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst9020091

APA Style

Dzierzgowski, K., Wachowski, S., Gazda, M., & Mielewczyk-Gryń, A. (2019). Terbium Substituted Lanthanum Orthoniobate: Electrical and Structural Properties. Crystals, 9(2), 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst9020091

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop