Next Article in Journal
Polysiloxanes in Theranostics and Drug Delivery: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
In Situ Strain and Damage Monitoring of GFRP Laminates Incorporating Carbon Nanofibers under Tension
Previous Article in Journal
Electrohydrodynamic Jet 3D Printed Nerve Guide Conduits (NGCs) for Peripheral Nerve Injury Repair
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Thermoplastic Multilayered Carbon-Fabric/Polycarbonate Laminate Prepared by a Two-Step Hot-Press Technique
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ethylene Polymerization and Copolymerization with Polar Monomers Using Nickel Complexes Bearing Anilinobenzoic Acid Methyl Ester Ligand

1
State Key Laboratory for Modification of Chemical Fibers and Polymer Materials, College of Material Science and Engineering, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China
2
Key Laboratory of Synthetic Rubber, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130022, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2018, 10(7), 754; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10070754
Submission received: 31 May 2018 / Revised: 2 July 2018 / Accepted: 2 July 2018 / Published: 9 July 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multi-functional Polymer Composites and Structures)

Abstract

:
Neutral nickel complexes containing an anilinobenzoic acid methyl ester ligand are prepared and applied for the ethylene polymerization and copolymerization with polar monomers. The complex C2 containing isopropyl substituent on the aniline ligand conducts ethylene polymerization with high activity and good thermal stability. Most importantly, the catalyst promotes the copolymerization of ethylene and polar monomers with high activity (up to 277 kg·mol−1·h−1), affording ester-functionalized semicrystalline polyethylene with reasonable polar monomer content (up to 3.20 mol %).

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Although polyolefins have been extensively used in a wide range of application, the nonpolarity of polyolefins limits their further application [1]. This limitation could be dramatically improved by the introduction of even a small amount of polar functional groups to the polyolefin backbone [2]. A pioneering discovery was reported by Brookhart and co-workers that the α-diimine-nickel/palladium catalysts can initiate direct copolymerization of ethylene with polar monomers in the 1990s [3]. Since then, late-transition-metal catalysts based on palladium complexes have been extensively studied for olefin copolymerization with polar monomers [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Recently, low cost nickel catalysts were also developed extensively for the synthesis of functionalized polyolefins, although their copolymerization activities and resulting copolymer molecular weight are far from those required for industrial application [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20].
The significant interest was attracted in developing the neutral nickel catalysts because they exhibit higher tolerance toward functional polar groups [21]. Early examples of SHOP type neutral nickel catalysts have been commercialized for the synthesis of α-olefins [22,23,24]. A series of neutral nickel catalysts bearing salicylaldimine ligands (Chart 1A) was reported by Grubbs et al., which showed excellent tolerance towards polar monomers to give functionalized polyethylene [25,26,27,28]. The β-ketoiminato neutral nickel complexes with six-membered-ring were synthesized and applied as the olefin (co)polymerization catalyst (Chart 1B) [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. Brookhart et al. successively developed the anilinotropone-based (Chart 1C) and anilinoperinaphtenone-based (Chart 1D) neutral nickel catalysts [38,39,40,41]. These nickel catalysts exhibited higher activity than salicylaldimine neutral nickel catalyst A in ethylene polymerization. Shiono et al. reported that five-membered anilinonaphthoquinone ligated neutral nickel complexes (Chart 1E) exhibited unique performances for the polymerization of ethylene and norbornene and copolymerization of ethylene with polar monomers [16,42,43,44,45]. Recently, we found that a novel six-membered anilinoanthraquinone-based neutral nickel complex promoted random copolymerization of ethylene with norbornene and polar monomers with high activity and good thermal stability (Chart 1F) [46,47]. Here, we report the synthesis, characterization, and application of six-membered neutral nickel complexes bearing anilinobenzoic acid methyl ester ligand for the ethylene polymerization and copolymerization with polar monomers to investigate the electronic effect of the ligand backbone.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

All experiments were performed under dry nitrogen atmosphere using standard Schlenk techniques or in a glovebox. All solvents were dried by the PS-MD-5 (Innovative Technology (China) Ltd., Hong Kong, China) solvent purification system. Ethylene was purified by passage through dehydration column of ZHD-20 and deoxidation column of ZHD-20A before using. Commercial polar monomers were distilled ov`er calcium hydride before using. The other reagents were purchased and used without purification.

2.2. Analytical Procedure

NMR spectra were measured on a Bruker AsendTM 600 spectrometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany). CDCl3 was employed as solvent and the central peak of the solvent was used as an internal reference (CDCl3, 7.26, {77.16} ppm). Differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) analyses were carried out on a TA Q2000 instrument (Waters, New Castle, DE, USA). The DSC curves of the samples were recorded under a nitrogen atmosphere at a heating rate of 10 °C·min−1. The single crystals data was made on a Bruker APEX2 diffractometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) using graphite monochromated with Mo Kα radiation (l = 0.71073 Å), and the measurement were mounted under nitrogen atmosphere at low temperature. Crystallographic data are summarized in Table S1. Molecular weight and molecular weight distribution of polymers obtained were tested by a polymer laboratory PL GPC-22 (Agilen, Santa Clara, CA, USA) at 150 °C using 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene as a solvent.

2.3. General Polymerization Procedure

Atmospheric pressure polymerization was carried out in a 100 mL glass reactor equipped with a magnetic stirrer and the high pressure polymerization was performed in Parr Instrument Company autoclave. At first, the reactor was vacuumized at 110 °C and charged with nitrogen several times before polymerization procedure. Then the prescribed amounts of toluene, monomers and cocatalyst under nitrogen were charged into the reactor and polymerization was initiated by adding the catalyst solution at desired temperature and desired pressure. The polymerization was conducted for a certain time and terminated with acidic methanol. The polymer obtained was stirred overnight, collected by filtration, adequately washed with alcohol and acetone, and dried under vacuum at 80 °C overnight until a constant weight was reached.

2.4. Synthesis of Ligands and Complexes

2.4.1. Synthesis of 2-Anilinobenzoic Acid Methyl Ester Ligand L1

A solution of bis(dibenzylideneacetone) palladium (Pd(dba)2) (0.230 g, 0.4 mmol), 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene (dppf) (0.333 g, 0.6 mmol), Methyl 2-bromobenzoate (1.42 mL, 10 mmol), aniline (1.1 mL, 12 mmol) and CsCO3 (4.89 g, 15 mmol) in toluene (100 mL) was heated to 110 °C and stirred for 24 h to afford a brown solution. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure, and then the residue was dissolved in dichloromethane. The organic phase was washed with water (20 mL × 5) and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. Then the solvents were filtrated and evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue l was extracted with ether and washed three times by 20 mL hexane to yield brown oil. Yield 2.091 g (92%). 1H NMR (CDCl3) (Figure S1): δ = 9.47 (s, 1H, –NH), 7.98–7.96 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H, aryl–H), 7.36–7.30 (m, 3H, aryl–H), 7.26–7.24 (m, 3H, aryl–H), 7.11–7.08 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, aryl–H), 6.75–6.72 (t, J = 7.4, 7.52 Hz, 1H, aryl–H), 3.91 (s, 3H, –OCH3). 13C NMR (CDCl3) (Figure S2): δ 168.90, 147.93, 140.77, 134.10, 131.54, 129.38, 123.54, 122.46, 117.11, 114.00, 111.89, 51.74. Elemental Analysis: C14H13NO2: Calcd. C 73.99, H 5.77, N 6.16; Found: C 73.34, H 5.35, N 6.23. Elemental Analysis: C14H13NO2: Calcd. C 73.99, H 5.77, N 6.16; Found: C 73.34, H 5.35, N 6.23.

2.4.2. Synthesis of 2-(2,6-Diisopropylaniline)-Methyl Benzoate Ligand L2

Ligand L2 was synthesized in a similar way to that for ligand L1. L2 was recrystallized in hexane to yield a reddish crystal. Yield 2.62 g (84%). 1H NMR (CDCl3) (Figure S3): δ 9.03 (s, 1H, –NH), 7.98-7.97 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.5 Hz, 1H, aryl–H), 7.38–7.30 (t, 1H, aryl–H), 7.28–7.23 (m, 2H, aryl–H), 7.20–7.17 (m, 1H, aryl–H), 6.63–6.60 (td, J = 7.6, 0.9 Hz, 1H, aryl–H), 6.22–6.21 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H, aryl–H), 3.95 (s, 3H, –OCH3), 3.17–3,10 (hept, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H, –CH), 1.19–1.12 (dd, J = 34.4, 6.9 Hz, 12H, –CH3). 13C NMR (CDCl3) (Figure S4): 185.61, 183.97, 155.70, 150.10, 135.23, 134.40, 134.33, 134.02, 133.30, 133.13, 127.07, 127.03, 126.84, 121.49, 117.27, 116.53, 114.14, 104.58, 56.08. Elemental Analysis: C20H25NO2: Calcd. C 77.14, H 8.09, N 4.50; Found: C 77.47, H 7.92, N 4.21. 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 169.41, 151.51, 147.80, 134.48, 134.45, 131.49, 127.80, 124.01, 115.39, 113.03, 109.59, 77.37, 77.16, 76.95, 51.72, 28.52, 24.74, 23.14, 0.13.

2.4.3. Synthesis of Nickel Complex C1

A mixture of the ligand L1 (0.227 g, 1 mmol) and KH (0.044 g, 1.1 mmol) in 50 mL of THF was stirred for 3 h to afford potassium salts of L1. The THF solution of potassium salts was slowly dropped into a solution of trans-[Ni(PPh3)2 PhCl] (0.696 g, 1 mmol) in 5 mL of the same solvent. The mixture was stirred over night at 25 °C. The reaction mixture was filtered off under a nitrogen atmosphere (PTFE, 0.45 μm) and evaporated under vacuum. The solid thus obtained was purified by recrystallization with a mixture of toluene/hexane to afford crimson single crystals. Yield 0.305 g (49%). Elemental Analysis: C38H32NNiO2P, Calcd. C 73.10, H 5.17, N 2.24; Found: C 73.48, H 5.20, N 2.34.

2.4.4. Synthesis of Nickel Complex C2

Complex C2 was synthesized in a similar way to that for Complex C1. C2 was purified by recrystallization with a mixture of THF/hexane to afford orange-red single crystals. Yield 0.291 g (41%). Elemental Analysis: C44H44NNiO2P, Calcd. C 74.59, H 6.26, N 1.98; Found:C 74.37, H 6.29, N 2.08.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis and Molecular Structure of Nickel Complexes

The synthesis procedure of the ligands L1L2 and the corresponding nickel complexes C1C2 is shown in Scheme 1. 2-Anilinobenzoic acid methyl ester ligands were easily obtained by the amination of methyl 2-bromobenzoate in the presence Pd(dba)2/dppf and Cs2CO3 [48]. The nickel complexes were prepared from the reaction of corresponding potassium salt of ligand with 1 equiv of trans-[Ni(PPh3)2PhCl] in good yields according to the literature procedure [49].
The molecular structures of nickel complexes were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis (Figure 1). Complexes C1 and C2 showed very similar structure in view of the bond distances and the bond angles and exhibited a six-membered (N, O) nickel chelate ring with a puckered conformation. Each nickel center adopted a square planar coordination geometry, and the phosphine occupied the trans position to the nitrogen.

3.2. Ethylene Polymerization

The nickel complexes C1 and C2 were applied in ethylene polymerization. The results are summarized in Table 1. C1 containing nonsubstituted aniline ligand was inactive regardless of the cocatalyst used. In contrast, C2 containing isopropyl substituent on the aniline ligand in the presence of trialkylaluminum-free dried modified methylaluminoxane (dMMAO) or Ni(COD)2 promoted ethylene polymerizaiton with almost the same activities. The results suggested that the substituent on the aniline ligand and the cocatalyst as a phosphine scavenger are necessary for ethylene homopolymerization. The similar effects of the ligand substituent were observed with both cationic and neutral nickel catalyzed ethylene polymerization [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. The Ni(COD)2 system gave high molecular-weight polyethylene (up to 76.3 kg·mol−1) with narrow molecular weight distribution, while the dMMAO system produced ethylene oligomers along with a small amount of polyethylene (entry 2, Table 1). The improved chain transfer rate in the dMMAO system may be attributed to the efficient dissociation of the phosphine, owing to the stronger Lewis acidity of dMMAO than that of Ni(COD)2. The same phenomenon was also reported by Kim et al. by using ketoenamine-based neutral nickel complexes, in which the use of MAO conducted ethylene oligomerization with high activity [50].
Polymerization activity is strongly depended on the polymerization temperature and the ethylene pressure. The decrease of the temperature to 20 °C resulted in the decrease of the activity in one order of magnitude (entry 5). Although activity decreased as the temperature was increased to 60 °C (entry 6), the catalyst still showed high activity of 336 kg·mol−1·h−1, indicating good thermal stability of this catalytic system. The reason for the small decrease of the activity at 60 °C could be attribute to the reduced ethylene concentration at the high polymerization temperature [51]. The molecular weight increased with decreasing the polymerization temperature, indicating that the increase of chain transfer rate is more effective than chain growth rate with rising the polymerization temperature (Figure 2). Further increase in activity and molecular weight was observed by the increase of ethylene pressure at 40 °C.

3.3. Copolymerization of Ethylene with Polar Monomers

The ethylene copolymerizations with polar monomers such as 5-hexene-1-yl-acetate (HAc), 5-norbornene-2-yl acetate (NBAc), vinyl acetate (VAc), and methyl acrylate (MA) were conducted (Table 2). Although the Ni(COD)2 system showed slightly higher comonomer incorporation than the dMMAO system, the copolymerization activity of Ni(COD)2 system was much lower than that of the dMMAO system, affording lower molecular weight copolymers (entries 1 and 3). In general, the polymerization of the sterically bulky monomers such as higher α-olefins and norbornene catalyzed by the neutral nickel complexes require MAO or MMAO as the phosphine scavenger to provide reasonable monomer coordination site [10].
The incorporation of the copolymers obtained was investigated by 1H NMR, and the typical 1H NMR spectra of copolymers obtained by complex C2 are illustrated in Figure 3. The signals at 4.06 ppm and 2.05 ppm in copolymers were assigned for CH2 and CH3 protons of ester-group label as a and e, respectively. The microstructure of the E-HAc copolymer was also investigated by 13C NMR to demonstrate the incorporation of polar monomers (Figure S5) [16,52]. HAc incorporation was increased (up to 1.33 mol %, entry 4) by increasing HAc concentration in the feed, although copolymerization activity and copolymer molecular weight were decreased slightly. As compare to the results with complex F [47], anilinobenzoic acid methyl ester-ligated complex C2 showed slightly lower copolymerization activity and HAc incorporation.
The nickel complex C2 was also capable of copolymerizing ethylene with 5-norbornene-2-yl acetate (NBAc) with good activity, generating E-NBAC copolymer with reasonable incorporation (3.20 mol %, in Figure S6)). Unfortunately, the commercial polar comonomers such as VAc, and MA shut down copolymerization activity (entries 6, 7). This was mainly caused by the coordination of the carbonyl oxygen atom to the nickel center to generate a stable six-membered nickel chelate compound [4].

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, neutral nickel complexes bearing anilinobenzoic acid methyl ester ligand have been synthesized and characterized. The steric effect on the aniline ligand played a significant role in the polymerization performances, in which isopropyl substituted complex C2 could enhance ethylene polymerization activity. The complex C2 was also able to promote copolymerization of ethylene with polar monomers with high activity (114–277 kg·mol−1·h−1) and reasonable polar monomer incorporation.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/10/7/754/s1, Figure S1: 1H NMR spectrum of ligand L1, Figure S2: 13C NMR spectrum of ligand L1. Figure S3: 1H NMR spectrum of ligand L2, Figure S4: 13C NMR spectrum of ligand L2. Figure S5. 13C NMR spectrum (CDCl3, 50 °C) of E-HAc copolymer by C2-dMMAO (entry 4, Table 2). Figure S6: 1H NMR spectrum (CDCl3) of E-NB-Ac copolymer by C2-dMMAO (entry 5, Table 2). Table S1: Crystal data and structure refinement for complex C1 and complex C2.

Author Contributions

All authors tried their best to contribute effectively to perform and analyze this experimental work. They all participated in the writing of the present manuscript. H.C and Y.S. performed the experimental work and analyzed the data. Y.H. and X.Z. conceived and designed experiments. The settings up of the experimental protocols and the interpretation of the obtained results were performed under the supervision of Z.C.

Funding

This work was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (21474013), Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University, the Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning, “Shu Guang” project supported by Shanghai Municipal Education Commission and Shanghai Education Development Foundation and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Tosoh-Finechem Co. for generously donating the MMAO.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sturzel, M.; Mihan, S.; Mulhaupt, R. From Multisite Polymerization Catalysis to Sustainable Materials and All-Polyolefin Composites. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 1398–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Franssen, N.M.G.; Reek, J.N.H.; Bruin, B.D. Synthesis of Functional ‘Polyolefins’: State of the Art and Remaining Challenges. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 5809–5832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ittel, S.D.; Johnson, L.K.; Brookhart, M. Late-Metal Catalysts for Ethylene Homo- and Copolymerization. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1169–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Nakamura, A.; Ito, S.; Nozaki, K. Coordination-insertion copolymerization of fundamental polar monomers. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 5215–5244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chen, E.Y.X. Coordination Polymerization of Polar Vinyl Monomers by Single-Site Metal Catalysts. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 5157–5214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Camacho, D.H.; Guan, Z. Designing late-transition metal catalysts for olefin insertion polymerization and copolymerization. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 7879–7893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Dong, Z.; Ye, Z. Hyperbranched polyethylenes by chain walking polymerization: Synthesis, properties, functionalization, and applications. Polym. Chem. 2012, 3, 286–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nakamura, A.; Anselment, T.M.J.; Claverie, J.; Goodall, B.; Jordan, R.F.; Mecking, S.; Rieger, B.; Sen, A.; van Leeuwen, P.W.N.M.; Nozaki, K. Ortho-Phosphinobenzenesulfonate: A Superb Ligand for Palladium-Catalyzed Coordination-Insertion Copolymerization of Polar Vinyl Monomers. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 1438–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ye, Z.; Xu, L.; Dong, Z.; Peng, X. Designing polyethylenes of complex chain architectures via Pd–diimine-catalyzed “living” ethylene. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 6235–6255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Mu, H.L.; Pan, L.; Song, D.P.; Li, Y.S. Neutral Nickel Catalysts for Olefin Homo- and Copolymerization: Relationships between Catalyst Structures and Catalytic Properties. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 12091–12137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Carrow, B.P.; Nozaki, K. Transition-Metal-Catalyzed Functional Polyolefin Synthesis: Effecting Control through Chelating Ancillary Ligand Design and Mechanistic Insights. Macromolecules 2014, 47, 2541–2555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Long, B.K.; Eagan, J.M.; Mulzer, M.; Coates, G.W. SemiCrystalline Polar Polyethylene: Ester-Functionalized Linear Polyolefins Enabled by a Functional-Group-Tolerant, Cationic Nickel Catalyst. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 7106–7110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tao, W.; Nakano, R.; Ito, S.; Nozaki, K. Copolymerization of Ethylene and Polar Monomers by Using Ni/IzQO Catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 2835–2839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Xin, B.S.; Sato, N.; Tanna, A.; Oishi, Y.; Konishi, Y.; Shimizu, F. Nickel Catalyzed Copolymerization of Ethylene and Alkyl Acrylates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 3611–3614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chen, M.; Chen, C.L. Design of High-Performance Phosphine Sulfonate Nickel Catalysts for Ethylene Polymerization and Copolymerization with Polar Monomers. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 1308–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fu, X.; Zhang, L.J.; Tanaka, R.; Shiono, T.; Cai, Z. Highly Robust Nickel Catalysts Containing Anilinonaphthoquinone Ligand for Copolymerization of Ethylene and Polar Monomers. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 9216–9221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, M.; Wang, X.B.; Luo, Y.; Chen, C.L. A Second-Coordination-Sphere Strategy to Modulate Nickel- and Palladium-Catalyzed Olefin Polymerization and Copolymerization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 11604–11609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhang, D.; Chen, C.L. Influence of Polyethylene Glycol Unit on Palladium- and NickelCatalyzed Ethylene Polymerization and Copolymerization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 14672–14676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Konishi, Y.; Tao, W.J.; Yasuda, H.; Ito, S.; Oishi, Y.; Ohtaki, H.; Tanna, A.; Tayano, T.; Nozaki, K. Nickel-Catalyzed Propylene/Polar Monomer Copolymerization. ACS Macro Lett. 2018, 7, 213–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, M.; Chen, C.L. A Versatile Ligand Platform for Palladium- and Nickel-Catalyzed Ethylene Copolymerization with Polar Monomers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 3094–3098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Chen, Z.; Mesgar, M.; White, P.S.; Daugulis, O.; Brookhart, M. Synthesis of Branched Ultrahigh-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene Using Highly Active Neutral, Single-Component Ni(II) Catalysts. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 631–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Keim, W.; Kowaldt, F.H.; Goddard, R.; Kruger, C. Novel coordination of (benzoylmethylene) triphenylphosphorane in a nickel oligomerization catalyst. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1978, 17, 466–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Klabunde, U.; Ittel, S.D. Nickel catalysis for ethylene homo- and co-polymerization. J. Mol. Catal. 1987, 41, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Starzewski, K.A.O.; Witte, J. Highly Active Ylide-Nickel Catalysts for the Polymerization of Ethylene. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1985, 24, 599–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, C.; Friedrich, S.; Younkin, T.R.; Li, R.T.; Grubbs, R.H.; Bansleben, D.A.; Day, M.W. Neutral Nickel(II)-Based Catalysts for Ethylene Polymerization. Organometallics 1998, 17, 3149–3151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Younkin, T.R.; Connor, E.F.; Henderson, J.I.; Friedrich, S.K.; Grubbs, R.H.; Bansleben, D.A. Neutral, Single-Component Nickel (II) Polyolefin Catalysts That Tolerate Heteroatoms. Science 2000, 287, 460–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Connor, E.F.; Younkin, T.R.; Henderson, J.I.; Waltman, A.W.; Grubbs, R.H. Synthesis of neutral nickel catalysts for ethylene polymerization–the influence of ligand size on catalyst stability. Chem. Commun. 2003, 18, 2272–2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Waltman, A.W.; Younkin, T.R.; Grubbs, R.H. Insights into the deactivation of neutral nickel ethylene polymerization catalysts in the presence of functionalized olefins. Organometallics 2004, 23, 5121–5123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, D.; Jin, G.X.; Weng, L.H.; Wang, F. Synthesis, Molecular Structures, and Norbornene Addition Polymerization Activity of the Neutral Nickel Catalysts Supported by β-Diketiminato [N, N], Ketiminato [N, O], and Schiff-Base [N, O] Ligands. Organometallics 2004, 23, 3270–3275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, Y.F.; Wu, G.; Bazan, G.C. Remote Activation of Nickel Catalysts for Ethylene Oligomerization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 4, 1108–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Li, X.F.; Li, Y.G.; Li, Y.S.; Chen, Y.X.; Hu, N.H. Copolymerization of Ethylene with Methyl Methacrylate with Neutral Nickel(II) Complexes Bearing β-Ketoiminato Chelate Ligands. Organometallics 2005, 24, 2502–2510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, L.; Brookhart, M.; White, P.S. Synthesis, Characterization, and Ethylene Polymerization Activities of Neutral Nickel(II) Complexes Derived from Anilino-Substituted Enone Ligands Bearing Trifluoromethyl and Trifluoroacetyl Substituents. Organometallics 2006, 25, 1868–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yu, S.M.; Berkefeld, A.; Gottker-Schnetmann, I.; Muller, G.; Mecking, S. Synthesis of Aqueous Polyethylene Dispersions with Electron-Deficient Neutral Nickel(II) Catalysts with Enolatoimine Ligands. Macromolecules 2007, 40, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Song, D.P.; Ye, W.P.; Wang, Y.X.; Liu, J.Y.; Li, Y.S. Highly Active Neutral Nickel(II) Catalysts for Ethylene Polymerization Bearing Modified, β-Ketoiminato Ligands. Organometallics 2009, 28, 5697–5704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Song, D.P.; Wu, J.Q.; Ye, W.P.; Mu, H.L.; Li, Y.S. Accessible, Highly Active Single-Component β-Ketiminato Neutral Nickel(II) Catalysts for Ethylene Polymerization. Organometallics 2010, 29, 2306–2314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Song, D.P.; Wang, Y.X.; Mu, H.L.; Li, B.X.; Li, Y.S. Observations and Mechanistic Insights on Unusual Stability of Neutra Nickel Complexes with a Sterically Crowded Metal Center. Organometallics 2011, 30, 925–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Song, D.P.; Shi, X.C.; Wang, Y.X.; Yang, J.X.; Li, Y.S. Ligand Steric and Electronic Effects on β-Ketiminato Neutral Nickel(II) Olefin Polymerization Catalysts. Organometallics 2012, 31, 966–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hicks, F.A.; Brookhart, M. A Highly Active Anilinotropone-Based Neutral Nickel(II) Catalyst for Ethylene Polymerization. Organometallics 2001, 20, 3217–3219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jenkins, J.C.; Brookhart, M. A Highly Active Anilinoperinaphthenone-Based Neutral Nickel(II) Catalyst for Ethylene Polymerization. Organometallics 2003, 22, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hicks, F.A.; Jenkins, C.J.; Brookhart, M. Synthesis and Ethylene Polymerization Activity of a Series of 2-Anilinotropone-Based Neutral Nickel(II) Catalysts. Organometallics 2003, 22, 3533–3545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jenkins, J.C.; Brookhart, M. A Mechanistic Investigation of the Polymerization of Ethylene Catalyzed by Neutral Ni(II) Complexes Derived from Bulky Anilinotropone Ligands. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5827–5842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Okada, M.; Nakayama, Y.; Ikeda, T.; Shiono, T. Synthesis of Uniquely Branched Polyethylene by Anilinonaphthoquinone Ligated Nickel Complex Activated with Tris(pentafluorophenyl)borane. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2006, 27, 1418–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Okada, M.; Nakayama, Y.; Shiono, T. Synthesis of anilinonaphthoquinone-based nickel complexes and their application for olefin polymerization. J. Organomet. Chem. 2007, 692, 5183–5189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Okada, M.; Nakayama, Y.; Shiono, T. Heterogenization of an Anilinonaphthoquinone-Chelated Nickel Complex for Ethylene Polymerization Using Silica-Supported Modified Methylaluminoxane. Mcromol. Chem. Phys. 2014, 215, 1792–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Okada, M.; Nakayama, Y.; Shiono, T. Highly Soluble Polynorbornene Prepared by an Anilinonaphthoquinone-Ligated Nickel Complex via Coordination-Insertion Polymerization. J. Organomet. Chem. 2015, 798, 384–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cheng, H.L.; Cai, Z. (Anilino)anthraquinone Nickel-Catalyzed Random Copolymerization of Norbornene and Ethylene. ChemCatChem 2018, 10, 497–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cai, Z.; Donghua University, Shanghai, China. Unpublished results of our group. 2018.
  48. Beletskaya, I.P.; Bessmertnykh, A.G.; Averin, A.D.; Denat, F.; Guilard, R. Palladium-Catalyzed Amination of 1,8- and 1,5-Dichloroanthracenes and 1,8- and 1,5-Dichloroanthraquinones. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 36, 281–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zeller, A.; Herdtweck, E.; Strassner, T. Structural Characterization and a New One-Pot Synthesis of trans-Chloro(phenyl)bis(triphenylphosphane)nickel(II). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 2003, 1802–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chandran, D.; Bae, C.; Ahn, I.; Ha, C.S.; Kim, I. Neutral Ni(II) Complexes Based on Keto-Enamine Salicylideneanilines Active for Selective Dimerization of Ethylene. J. Organomet. Chem. 2009, 694, 1254–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wu, J.L.; Pan, Q.M.; Rempel, G.L. Solubility of Ethylene in Toluene and Toluene/Styrene–Butadiene Rubber Solutions. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2005, 96, 645–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Terao, H.; Ishii, S.; Mitani, M.; Tanaka, H.; Fujita, T. Ethylene/Polar Monomer Copolymerization Behavior of Bis(phenoxy–imine)Ti Complexes: Formation of Polar Monomer Copolymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 17636–17637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Chart 1. Representative [N,O] Ni Catalysts.
Chart 1. Representative [N,O] Ni Catalysts.
Polymers 10 00754 ch001
Scheme 1. Synthesis of the Anilinoanthracenequinone Ligands and the Corresponding Nickel Complexes.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of the Anilinoanthracenequinone Ligands and the Corresponding Nickel Complexes.
Polymers 10 00754 sch001
Figure 1. Molecular structures of complexes C1 and C2. H atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg) for C1: Ni1-N1 = 1.9223 (14), Ni-C1 = 1.8841 (17), Ni1-O1 = 1.9180 (12), Ni1-P1 = 2.1758 (5), O1-Ni1-N1 = 91.14 (6), C1-Ni1-P1 = 87.12 (5); C2: Ni1-N1 = 1.932 (2), Ni-C1 = 1.891 (2), Ni1-O1 = 1.9193 (17), Ni1-P1 = 2.1816 (7), O1-Ni1-N1 = 91.33 (8), C1-Ni1-P1 = 86.59 (7).
Figure 1. Molecular structures of complexes C1 and C2. H atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg) for C1: Ni1-N1 = 1.9223 (14), Ni-C1 = 1.8841 (17), Ni1-O1 = 1.9180 (12), Ni1-P1 = 2.1758 (5), O1-Ni1-N1 = 91.14 (6), C1-Ni1-P1 = 87.12 (5); C2: Ni1-N1 = 1.932 (2), Ni-C1 = 1.891 (2), Ni1-O1 = 1.9193 (17), Ni1-P1 = 2.1816 (7), O1-Ni1-N1 = 91.33 (8), C1-Ni1-P1 = 86.59 (7).
Polymers 10 00754 g001
Figure 2. GPC curves of polymers under different polymerization temperatures.
Figure 2. GPC curves of polymers under different polymerization temperatures.
Polymers 10 00754 g002
Figure 3. 1H NMR spectra of the E-HAc copolymers: (a) 0.35 mol %; (b) 0.88 mol %; (c) 1.33 mol %.
Figure 3. 1H NMR spectra of the E-HAc copolymers: (a) 0.35 mol %; (b) 0.88 mol %; (c) 1.33 mol %.
Polymers 10 00754 g003
Table 1. Ethylene polymerizations with complexes C1 and C2 a.
Table 1. Ethylene polymerizations with complexes C1 and C2 a.
EntryCatalystCocatalystP (MPa)Temp (°C)Yield (g)Activity (kg·mol−1·h−1)Mnb (103)PDI bTmc (°C)
1C2-1.5400.063610.42.1497.0
2 dC2dMMAO1.540oligomer616---
3C1Ni(COD)21.540trace----
4C2Ni(COD)21.5401.2977412.22.0890. 6
5C2Ni(COD)21.5200.148476.32.28125.9
6C2Ni(COD)21.5600.563366.92.1145.2
7C2Ni(COD)20.5400.17998.61.8587.3
8C2Ni(COD)23.0401.4687619.12.5495.2
a Polymerization conditions: solvent = toluene, total volume = 25 mL, Ni = 10 μmol, time = 10 min, temperature = 40 °C, Ni(COD)2 = 24 μmol, dMMAO = 10 mmol. b Determined by GPC using polystyrene standard. c Determined by DSC. d Activity was determined by 1H NMR.
Table 2. Copolymerization of ethylene with polar monomers using complex C2 a.
Table 2. Copolymerization of ethylene with polar monomers using complex C2 a.
EntryComonomer (mmol)CocatalystYield (g)Activity (kg·mol−1·h−1)Mnb (104)PDI bTmc (°C)Incorp. d (mol %)
1HAc(30)Ni(COD)20.0550.871.9297.81.01
2HAc(10)dMMAO2.772771.972.0097.90.35
3HAc(30)dMMAO2.012011.312.3978.10.88
4HAc(60)dMMAO1.741741.172.1671.41.33
5NBAc (30)dMMAO1.141141.523.2167.13.20
6VAc(30)dMMAOtrace-----
7MA(30)dMMAOtrace-----
a Polymerization conditions: solvent = toluene, total volume = 25 mL, Ni = 10 μmol, pressure = 15 atm, temperature = 40 °C, time = 1 h, dMMAO = 10 mmol, Ni(COD)2 = 24 μmol. b Determined by GPC using polystyrene standard. c determined by DSC. d Incorporation determined by 1H NMR.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cheng, H.; Su, Y.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Cai, Z. Ethylene Polymerization and Copolymerization with Polar Monomers Using Nickel Complexes Bearing Anilinobenzoic Acid Methyl Ester Ligand. Polymers 2018, 10, 754. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10070754

AMA Style

Cheng H, Su Y, Hu Y, Zhang X, Cai Z. Ethylene Polymerization and Copolymerization with Polar Monomers Using Nickel Complexes Bearing Anilinobenzoic Acid Methyl Ester Ligand. Polymers. 2018; 10(7):754. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10070754

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cheng, Hailong, Yue Su, Yanming Hu, Xuequan Zhang, and Zhengguo Cai. 2018. "Ethylene Polymerization and Copolymerization with Polar Monomers Using Nickel Complexes Bearing Anilinobenzoic Acid Methyl Ester Ligand" Polymers 10, no. 7: 754. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10070754

APA Style

Cheng, H., Su, Y., Hu, Y., Zhang, X., & Cai, Z. (2018). Ethylene Polymerization and Copolymerization with Polar Monomers Using Nickel Complexes Bearing Anilinobenzoic Acid Methyl Ester Ligand. Polymers, 10(7), 754. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10070754

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop