Next Article in Journal
Constructing Continuous Proton-Conducting Highways within Sulfonated Poly(Arylene Ether Nitrile) Composite Membrane by Incorporating Amino-Sulfo-Bifunctionalized GO
Next Article in Special Issue
Mechanical and Water-Resistant Properties of Eco-Friendly Chitosan Membrane Reinforced with Cellulose Nanocrystals
Previous Article in Journal
A Pseudopeptide Polymer Micelle Used for Asymmetric Catalysis of the Aldol Reaction in Water
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fabrication of Reactive Poly(Phenyl-Substituted Siloxanes/Silsesquioxanes) with Si‒H and Alkoxy Functional Groups via the Piers–Rubinsztajn Reaction

1
Engineering Research Center of Silicone Electronic Fine Chemicals, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510220, China
2
Guangzhou Key Laboratory for Efficient Utilization of Agricultural Chemicals, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510220, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2018, 10(9), 1006; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10091006
Submission received: 22 August 2018 / Revised: 5 September 2018 / Accepted: 6 September 2018 / Published: 10 September 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Processing and Molding of Polymers)

Abstract

:
Poly(phenyl-substituted siloxanes/silsesquioxanes) are obtained by the Piers–Rubinsztajn (PR) reaction of hydrogen-containing siloxanes (HCS) with diphenyldialkoxysilanes such as diphenyldimethoxysilane and diphenyldiethoxysilane catalyzed by tris(pentafluorophenyl)borane. 29Si nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, gel permeation chromatography, and refractive index analysis revealed that apart from phenyl substituents and complex structures such as molecular bridges composed of D2Ph2[(C6H5)2Si(OSi)2], structures also existed in these polymers, having high refractive indexes (above 1.50) and high molecular weights (75.60 KDa·mol−1). As revealed by thermogravimetric analysis, these polymers have high thermal stability as well, with temperature at 5% mass loss (T5%) increasing by 182.5 °C and Rw (residual weight ratio) increasing by 5.17 times from 14.63% to 75.60%, as compared to HCS, exhibiting its potential application as resins for resisting strong heat. Such high-refractive-index and temperature-resistant poly(phenyl-substituted siloxanes/silsesquioxanes) with Si–H and alkoxy functional groups can be used as a good addition-type crosslinking agent with adhesion-promoting properties or a special curing agent that can solidify silicone materials through simultaneous addition and condensation reactions, which has potential application in the light-emitting diode (LED) packaging industry.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Even though its synthesis was first reported in the early 1960s, with no obvious purpose, tris(pentafluorophenyl)borane (B(C6F5)3) remained uninvestigated for decades [1,2]. However, Marks and his co-workers as well as Piers eventually reported B(C6F5)3 as an excellent polymerization catalyst in the 1990s [3,4,5,6]. B(C6F5)3 readily catalyzes the transfer of hydride ions from silicon to organic compounds. Thus, it is not only used as a catalyst in the reduction of organic compounds by hydrosilanes [7,8]. but also in hydrosilylation reactions in organosilicon chemistry, leading to the formation of siloxane or silylether bonds [9,10]. Typical oxygen-based nucleophiles containing –OH or alkoxy groups [11] including phenols [11] and even graphene oxide [12] and lignin [13,14] are effectively reduced by hydrosilanes in the presence of B(C6F5)3 to give alkanes or silyl ethers—this is the Piers–Rubinsztajn (PR) reaction, which is a kind of hydrosilylation reaction.
A convenient synthetic method to more well-defined polysiloxanes is the dehydrogenative coupling of organohydrosilanes with organohydrosilanols owing to the high selectivity and easy removal of the hydrogen by-product [15]. However, this type of reaction requires relatively high concentrations (≥0.1 mol %) of precious metal catalysts such as platinum, palladium, ruthenium, or rhodium. Furthermore, only moderate molecular-weight polymers are achieved, and undesired silanol self-condensation can occur and lead to the disruption of a perfectly alternating polymer structure [16,17]. Because of economic concerns (platinum catalyst is expensive) and environmental concerns (tin catalysts are currently under scrutiny by regulatory agencies in many parts of the world [18]), replacing metals in moderate and efficient polymerization processes is desirable. In sharp contrast, hydrosilylation reactions catalyzed by B(C6F5)3, the “metal-free” catalyst [19], can also be used to synthesize well-defined polysiloxanes [20]. These reactions are often carried out under stringently controlled conditions to avoid the presence of water that will cause both structural defects and undesirable side reactions [21,22]. In addition, these reactions offer several advantages including high reaction effectiveness, convenient removal of (gaseous) by-products, mild temperatures, low catalyst concentrations, and the simple control of 3D structures by the opportune use of simple starting materials. Moreover, complex structures can be prepared that are otherwise unavailable by traditional routes [23].
The traditional route to preparing phenyl-substituted polysiloxanes is the hydrolytic polymerization of chlorosilane. The process causes strong acid contamination and produces silanol as a by-product, which leads to a decrease in the degree of crosslinking and interferes with the polymer structure.
Herein, we used B(C6F5)3 to catalyze the dehydrocarbon polycondensation, i.e., PR reaction under anhydrous conditions, of diphenyldialkoxysilanes with hydrogen-containing siloxanes (HCS) to yield specially designed poly(phenyl-substituted siloxanes/silsesquioxanes) along with lower alkanes as inert by-products at very low catalyst concentrations. The polymers possess good thermal stability and satisfactory refractive index because of the presence of phenyl substituents and molecular bridges [24]. In addition, the polymer retains reactive functional groups such as the Si‒H bonds and alkoxy groups, which would render it suitable as an additive crosslinking agent or a special curing agent.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

HCS (content of hydrogen: 1.6%, purity > 99.5%) were obtained from Dongguan LetterKang Silicone Co., Ltd. (Dongguan, China), and toluene was obtained from Guangzhou YiMa Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China). B(C6F5)3 (purity > 98%) was purchased from Jilin University (Changchun, China). Diphenyldiethoxysilane (DPDES, purity > 99%) was supplied by Shanghai XinYu New Materials and Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), and diphenyldimethoxysilane (DPDMS, purity > 99%) was provided by Guangzhou ShuangTao Fine Chemical Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China).

2.2. Dehydrocarbon Polycondensation of Diphenyldimethoxysilane (DPDMS) with Hydrogen-Containing Siloxanes (HCS)

The molar ratio of the alkoxy groups in DPDMS to the Si‒H Bonds in HCS was set at 0.8. Dry toluene (60.95 g), B(C6F5)3, (55.16 mg, 107.7 µmol) and HCS (17 g, molar amount of Si-H bond: 272.0 mmol) were loaded into a 250 mL three-necked round bottom flask equipped with a thermometer, reflux condenser, and magnetic stirrer. DPDMS (26.59 g, 108.8 mmol) was dissolved in toluene (20 g), and then added dropwise to the above solution for 3 h by a syringe pump at the required temperature. To obtain the product, the reaction must proceed for 1 h. After completion of the reaction, 2 g of activated carbon was introduced into the system to adsorb the catalyst. Thereafter, adsorption and suction filtration were performed twice after stirring for 20 min. Finally, the solvent and the product were separated by reduced-pressure distillation at 150 °C for 30 min by inletting air when the vacuum was below −0.095 MPa. The detailed experimental conditions and results are shown in Table 1.

2.3. Dehydrocarbon Polycondensation of Diphenyldiethoxysilane (DPDES) with HCS

The molar ratio of the alkoxy groups in DPDES to the Si‒H bonds in HCS was set at 0.8. Dry toluene (66.92 g), B(C6F5)3,(59.53 mg, 116.3 µmol) and HCS (17 g·mol amount of Si–H bond: 272.0 mmol) were loaded into a 250 mL three-necked round bottom flask equipped with a thermometer, reflux condenser, and magnetic stirrer. DPDES (29.64 g, 108.8 mmol) was dissolved in toluene (20 g), and then added dropwise to the above solution for 3 h by a syringe pump at the required temperature. To obtain the product, the reaction must proceed for 1 h. After completion of the reaction, 2 g of activated carbon was introduced into the system to adsorb the catalyst. Thereafter, adsorption and suction filtration was performed twice after stirring for 20 min. Finally, the solvent and the product were separated by reduced-pressure distillation at 150 °C for 30 min by inletting air when the vacuum was below −0.095 MPa. The detailed experimental conditions and results are shown in Table 1.

2.4. Measurements

The geometries of the various reactants and intermediates are optimized at the B3LYP/6-311G or B3LYP/STO-3G level based on the quantum chemical density functional theory (DFT). The refractive indexes were measured using a WZS-1 refractometer (Shanghai Optical Instrument Factory, Shanghai, China) at 25 °C. 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) (400 MHz, CDCl3, TMS) and 29Si NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) spectra were recorded using a Bruker AVANCE AV 400 MHz spectrometer (Bruker Co., Karlsruhe, Germany) at room temperature. Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) was carried out on a Waters 1525/2414 chromatograph (WATERS Co., Milford, MA, USA) in a linear column eluted with tetrahydrofuran at a flow rate of 1.0 mL·min−1. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was carried out on a TGA 2 thermogravimetric analyzer (Mettler-Toledo AG Co., Columbus, OH, USA) in nitrogen atmosphere (at a flow rate of 20 mL·min−1) from 40 to 700 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C·min−1.

3. Results and Discussion

As shown in Table 2, because of the strong electron-withdrawing effect of the ‒(C6F5) groups in B(C6F5)3, the electron density of the central B atom decreases (qB = 0.802). This is in line with the behaviour of B(C6F5)3 like a Lewis acid [25]. When only miniHCS (((CH3)3SiOSiH2O)2, simplified model of HCS) is present, the difference in negative charge distribution on the active hydrogen is in the range of 0.0012–0.0072 Å, and the difference in the Si‒H bond length is only 0.0001–0.0008 Å. When B(C6F5)3 and miniHCS coexist, the positive charge of the B atom decreases by 0.5275, and the negative charge of H(38) in miniHCS, which may be closest to B(C6F5)3, is 0.0188–1.0353 higher than that of the other active hydrogens. At the same time, because of the coulomb force between the B atom and the H(38) atom, the H(38)‒Si(36) bond extended by 0.0054‒0.0072 Å compared with the other active Si‒H bonds in miniHCS, which implies that the difference increased by 6.75‒72 times. This provides evidence that the Si‒H bonds activated gradually but not simultaneously; thus, there will be mono- and di-substituted stages in the phenyl substitution process.
In systems where HCS coexist with B(C6F5)3, it is generally accepted that B(C6F5)3 first activates the Si‒H bonds and that the electron-rich O atoms in diphenyldialkoxysilane attack the Si positive atoms in the Si‒H‒B(C6F5)3 complex, eventually forming a stable structure with Si‒O‒Si bonds, accompanying the transfer of H atoms by breaking the Si‒H bonds and releasing alkanes [26]. In this process, the negative charges on the O atoms and even a slight difference in the Si‒O bond length in diphenyldialkoxysilane will greatly affect the PR reaction. The positive charge on the Si atom in DPDES (qSi(1) = 1.1188) is 0.3289 higher than that on the Si atom in DPDMS (qSi(1) = 0.7899), while the negative charge on the O atom in DPDMS (qO(24) = −0.4336) is 0.0545‒0.0547 higher than that on the O atom in DPDES (qO(24) = −0.3791, qO(25) = −0.3789). In order to share fewer electron clouds, Si atoms and O atoms in DPDES should be close to each other. Because of this, the Si‒O bonds in DPDES are shorter than those in DPDMS (DPDES: RO-Si = 1.6628 Å, DPDMS: RO-Si = 1.666 Å). Of course, DPDMS with more negative charges on the O atoms, more electropositive C atoms (DPDMS: qC(26) = 0.2844, DPDES: qC(26) = 0.2034), and longer Si‒O bonds are more likely to be catalyzed by B(C6F5)3 to participate in the reaction. Furthermore, according to literature, the H group attacks the Si atom on the alkoxy group to promote an exchange reaction between the functional groups, which proceeds simultaneously with the PR reaction [9]. The calculation results of various compounds in Table 2 predict that the reaction system with DPDMS precursor is much easier and the degree of polymerization will be greater. Based on DFT, Scheme 1 reveals two reaction pathways that occur in this experiment. The polycondensation reaction is necessary to obtain high molecular-weight poly(phenyl-substituted siloxanes/silsesquioxanes), and the functional group exchange reaction can introduce alkoxy groups on the main chain of the polymers. To prevent the intermolecular polymerization of the byproducts ((C6H5)2SiHOR) produced by the exchange reaction, it must be ensured that the feed flow rate is slow enough to allow their polymerization with HCS. However, a part of the introduced alkoxy groups, owing to their propensity toward exchange reaction, has the potential to form macromolecular bridges (as shown in Scheme 2).
Further, the reaction results in Table 1 indicate that the molecular weights of the polymers resulted from DPDMS and DPDES showed very good regularity. The higher the catalyst concentration, the greater is the molecular weight of the product and the broader is the molecular weight distribution. Polycondensation of alkoxysilanes with hydrosilanes is a strongly exothermic reaction [27] which is favored by low temperatures. Furthermore, the two groups with the highest molecular weight in the low-temperature range (0 °C, 10 °C) indicated that diphenyl structures were likely to form bridges between the macromolecules. We speculate that the difference in the molecular weights of the products may be related to different crosslinking degrees and complicated structures which are not limited to the planar linear structures and have many molecular bridges to form complex-space polymers (as shown in Scheme 3). Because silicone polymers are flexible owing to the rotational freedom of the Si‒O‒Si bonds, which may facilitate more Si-O-Si chain units except for diphenyl siloxy bridges between linear polymers [28]. In the two sets of experiments with different precursors, a large amount of catalyst always yields a high-molecular weight product with high polydispersity. At higher temperatures, the molecular weights of the obtained products decrease. For this PR reaction, increasing the concentration of reactants in toluene results in an increase in the molecular weight, the broadening of polydispersity, and an earlier gelation point. For the same reaction conditions, the molecular weights of the products obtained from DPDMS are slightly higher than those of the products obtained from DPDES. Together with the DFT calculation results, it was concluded that this is because the electron-rich O atoms and the more electropositive C atoms in the methoxy groups of DPDMS are more susceptible to the electron-deficient center of B(C6F5)3, which catalyzes this reaction.
The 29Si NMR spectra of these polymers revealed that all the predicted structures were observed. The phenyl substitution process begins with the formation of a D1Ph2[(C6H5)2Si(OSi)OR] structure, followed by further polycondensation to form the D2Ph2[(C6H5)2Si(OSi)2] one. These reactions consume Si‒H bonds and form linear, annular, and networked structures. This implies that mono- and di-substituted structures would exist at the same time [29] because of the wrapped Si‒H bonds, the increase in steric hindrance due to the increase in the phenyl content of the polymer, and structural complication. Subsequently, the tendency of the polycondensation reaction starts to weaken due to the increase in the degree of polymerization and the reduction of hydrogen groups. The diphenyldialkoxysilane generates a Si atom signal from −28.87 to −28.90 ppm, while the polymer generates a signal at −29 ppm that can only arise from mono-substituted structures; this proves that part of the substitution process remained in the D1Ph2 structure without evolving into the D2Ph2 structure. Further polycondensation of the T2[R’OSi(OSi)2R] links is another way to form a bridge between the macromolecules; this explains the formation of a polymer such as D08 with a molecular weight of tens of thousands with few D2Ph2[(C6H5)2Si(OSi)2] structures in some cases. Indeed, 29Si NMR spectroscopy can be used to confirm the appearance of macrocyclic structures because the signal generated from the Si in the ring generally has a lower field than the Si atoms of the unconstrained linear polymer with similar structures do [30]. The HCS spectrum shows the presence of small ring structures (m in Figure 1e) although HCS was obtained by ring-opening synthesis. Similar signals of suspected macrocyclic structures (M in Figure 1a–d) are more pronounced and more numerous in the polymers. This may be due to the fact that some molecular bridges are too close together and result in higher strain energy, causing signals of similar macrocyclic structures [31]. However, we have no effective tools to verify the presence of macrocyclic structures in polymers. Moreover, the peaks of the suspected ring structure (M) are more scattered in Figure 1a than in Figure 1b. The signals from −37.0 to −38.5 ppm are still significant and distinct, demonstrating that the macromolecular bridges structure of product D01 catalyzed by a high concentration of catalyst is more complex and more numerous. However, the analogous ring structure peak of product D04 was concentrated at −35.5 ppm and the signal was weaker after −38.0 ppm, revealing that a relatively small number of macromolecular bridges were produced in the polymers synthesized with a low catalyst concentration.
Compared to the distinct signal of the analogous ring structure of product D01, the signal of the analogous ring structure of product D08 (Figure 1c) showed multiple peaks between −35 and −38.5 ppm, indicating that the macromolecular bridges of the prepared polymer at a higher temperature were disordered and uneven. The analogous ring structure signal of product D11 was evenly distributed near −35.5 ppm compared with that of product D04, but was approximately the same in the ring structure signal region of −37 to −38.5 ppm. This shows that the effect on the macromolecular bridges is insignificant between 20% and 35% of reactant concentration. The T2 units [R‘‘OSi(OSi)2R] are divided into two broad signals (d1,2), which distinguish the structure of the straight chain from that of the molecular bridge, and provide evidence for intramolecular bonding between the linear chains and molecular bridges.
The 1H NMR spectra (see Figure 2) show that the active hydrogen on HCS was consumed in large amounts. Furthermore, the presence of phenyl and significant attenuation of the Si‒H bond signal revealed that dehydrocarbon polycondensation proceeded successfully. Thus, it is deduced that the consumption of Si‒H bonds by polycondensation reaction is consistent with our expectation, subsequently leading to the introduction of phenyl groups. The NMR signal of the alkoxy groups indicated that the polymer received a number of functional groups owing to the exchange reaction between the reactants, which lays the foundation for its other reactions as a prepolymer.
The refractive index and thermal properties of the polymers were studied, and the results are presented in Table 3 and Figure 3. It is well known that the introduction of phenyl groups would enhance the refractive index of pure polysiloxanes [32]. The refractive indexes of the obtained poly(phenyl-substituted siloxanes/silsesquioxanes) ranged from 1.5056 to 1.5191, indicating their potential application as optical materials. The presence of molecular bridges like D2Ph2 structures and Si–O–Si chain units in poly(phenyl-substituted siloxanes/silsesquioxanes) is also supported by its heat resistance performance. Since the main chain consists of pure Si–O bonds, polydsiloxane is susceptible to unbuttoned and thermal rearrangement degradation at high temperatures [33,34] whereas the phenyl-substituted polymers with complex structures have excellent thermal stability. Compared with HCS, the temperature at 5% mass loss (T5%) of B05 was higher by 182.5 °C, and the Rw (residual weight ratio) increased by 5.17 times from 14.63% to 75.60%. This shows that the high-molecular weight polymers obtained at a high catalyst concentration and low temperature have more phenyl substituents and a greater degree of cross-linking. The thermal stability of D08 obtained at a high temperature (60 °C) is worse than that of D01, which reveals that significant difference is caused by a higher degree of cross-linking. A low molecular weight implies a low degree of crosslinking. The thermal properties as well as the molecular weights of the polymers at low reagent concentrations are not significantly different, which indicates that their structures are not very different. Under the same reaction conditions, the thermal stability of the reaction products D01‒D08 and D11 of DPDMS are lower than that of the reaction products B01‒B08 and B11 of DPDES. The GPC data show that the molecular weights of the D-series products are generally larger than that of the B-series products; however, the molecular weight distribution of the D series is generally wider than that of the B series. Thus, the lower thermal decomposition temperature may be because of the small molecules.

4. Conclusions

Dehydrocarbon polycondensation between diphenyldialkoxysilanes and HCS catalyzed by B(C6F5)3 can yield the expected poly(phenyl-substituted siloxanes/silsesquioxanes). The ideal conditions for obtaining stable polymers with complex structures are low temperature (0 °C) to room temperature (25 °C) at which the polycondensation reaction can be promoted, high catalyst concentration (0.8 mmol·L−1) at which the product can attain a high molecular weight, and appropriate reactant concentration (35%) at which the reaction can avoid gelling and excessive consumption of toluene. The aforementioned reaction condition implies that the preparation method is both energy-efficient and environmentally friendly, and avoids by-products that can severely erode the instruments. The presence of side groups or molecular bridges in the poly(phenyl-substituted siloxanes/silsesquioxanes) significantly improved the refractive index and thermal stability of the polymers. The poly(phenyl-substituted siloxane/silsesquioxane), which retains Si‒H bonds and alkoxy groups, can be reapplied to addition- and condensation-type curing. We are not content to develop only this type of poly(phenyl-substituted siloxane/silsesquioxane) but aim to develop another type of poly(phenyl-substituted siloxane/silsesquioxane) and investigate its properties after curing.

5. Patents

The research results have been patented and the application number is CN201710611199.5.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/10/9/1006/s1, Image S1: The calculation model of DPDMS, Image S2: The calculation model of DPDES, Image S3: The calculation model of B(C6F5)3, Image S4: The calculation model of miniHCS, Image S5: The calculation model of B(C6F5)3 and miniHCS, Table S1: GPC data of the products, Figure S1: Thermogravimetric analysis of HCS, B01, B02, B03 and B04, Figure S2: Thermogravimetric analysis of HCS, B04 and B11, Figure S3: Thermogravimetric analysis of HCS, B05, B06, B01, B07 and B08, Figure S4: Thermogravimetric analysis of HCS, D01, D02, D03 and D04, Figure S5: Thermogravimetric analysis of HCS, D04 and D11, Figure S6: Thermogravimetric analysis of HCS, D05, D06, D01, D07and D08, Figure S7: 1H NMR of HCS, Figure S8: 1H NMR of B01, Figure S9: 1H NMR of D01, Figure S10: 29Si NMR of HCS, Figure S11: 29Si NMR of DPDMS, Figure S12: 29Si NMR of DPDES, Figure S13: 29Si NMR of B01, Figure S14: 29Si NMR of B02, Figure S15: 29Si NMR of B03, Figure S16: 29Si NMR of B04, Figure S17: 29Si NMR of B05, Figure S18: 29Si NMR of B06, Figure S19: 29Si NMR of B07, Figure S20: 29Si NMR of B08, Figure S21: 29Si NMR of B11, Figure S22: 29Si NMR of D01, Figure S23: 29Si NMR of D02, Figure S24: 29Si NMR of D03, Figure S25: 29Si NMR of D04, Figure S26: 29Si NMR of D05, Figure S27: 29Si NMR of D06, Figure S28: 29Si NMR of D07, Figure S29: 29Si NMR of D08, Figure S30: 29Si NMR of D11.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.C. and M.Y.; Methodology, M.Y.; Software, M.Y.; Validation, X.C.; Formal Analysis, M.Y.; Investigation, S.W.; Resources, X.C.; Data Curation, S.W.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation, M.Y.; Writing-Review and Editing, M.Y. and X.C.; Visualization, G.Y.; Supervision, J.G.; Project Administration, X.C.; Funding Acquisition, X.Z.

Funding

This research was funded by Guangdong Science and Technology Project: Key Technologies for the Industrialization of Silicone Rubber Materials with High Sulfur-resistance and High Refractive Index (2016B090930010), Applied Science and Technology Research and Development of Guangdong Province (2015B090925022), and the Guangdong Public Welfare Fund and Ability Construction Project (2016A010103037).

Acknowledgments

The authors also thank everyone at the Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Silicone Electronic Fine Chemicals for their selfless contribution.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Massey, A.G.; Park, A.J. Perfluorophenyl derivatives of the elements: I. Tris(pentafluorophenyl)boron. J. Organomet. Chem. 1964, 2, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Massey, A.G.; Park, A.J. Perfluorophenyl derivatives of the elements: VII. Further studies on tris(pentafluorophenyl)boron. J. Organomet. Chem. 1966, 5, 218–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yang, X.; Stern, C.L.; Marks, T.J. Cation-like homogeneous olefin polymerization catalysts based upon zirconocene alkyls and tris(pentafluorophenyl)borane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 3623–3625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yang, X.; Stern, C.L.; Marks, T.J. Cationic zirconocene olefin polymerization catalysts based on the organo-lewis acid tris(pentafluorophenyl)borane. A synthetic, structural, solution dynamic, and polymerization catalytic study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 10015–10031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Parks, D.J.; Piers, W.E. Cheminform abstract: Tris(pentafluorophenyl)boron-catalyzed hydrosilation of aromatic aldehydes, ketones, and esters. J. Cheminf. 1997, 28, 9440–9441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Parks, D.J.; Blackwell, J.M.; Piers, W.E. Studies on the mechanism of b(c(6)f(5))(3)-catalyzed hydrosilation of carbonyl functions. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 3090–3098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Piers, W.E. The chemistry of perfluoroaryl boranes. Adv. Organomet. Chem. 2004, 52, 1–76. [Google Scholar]
  8. Berkefeld, A.; Piers, W.E.; Parvez, M. Tandem frustrated lewis pair/tris(pentafluorophenyl)borane-catalyzed deoxygenative hydrosilylation of carbon dioxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 10660–10661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Brook, M.A.; Grande, J.B.; Ganachaud, F. New synthetic strategies for structured silicones using B(C6F5)3. Adv. Polym. Sci. 2010, 235, 161–183. [Google Scholar]
  10. Cheesman, B.T.; Gates, P.J.; Castle, T.C.; Cosgrove, T.; Prescott, S.W. Linear and star architecture methacrylate-functionalised pdms. Mater. Today Commun. 2015, 3, 122–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Szawiola, A.M.; de Melo Souza, N.; Lessard, B.H.; Bender, T.P. Phenoxylated siloxane-based polymers via the piers-rubinsztajn process. Polym. Int. 2017, 66, 1324–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, J.F.; Liang, S.; Yu, L.Y.; Skov, A.L.; Etmimi, H.M.; Mallon, P.E.; Adronov, A.; Brook, M.A. Silicone-modified graphene oxide fillers via the piers-rubinsztajn reaction. J. Polym. Sci. Pol. Chem. 2016, 54, 2379–2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Zhang, J.F.; Chen, Y.; Brook, M.A. Reductive degradation of lignin and model compounds by hydrosilanes. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2014, 2, 1983–1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Macphail, B.; Brook, M.A. Controlling silicone-saccharide interfaces: Greening silicones. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 4373–4379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Madsen, F.B.; Javakhishvili, I.; Jensen, R.E.; Daugaard, A.E.; Hvilsted, S.; Skov, A.L. Synthesis of telechelic vinyl/allyl functional siloxane copolymers with structural control. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5, 7054–7061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Homrighausen, C.L.; Keller, T.M. Synthesis of hydroxy-terminated, oligomeric poly(silarylene disiloxane)s via rhodium-catalyzed dehydrogenative coupling and their use in the aminosilane–disilanol polymerization reaction. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2002, 40, 1334–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, R.; Mark, J.E.; Pinhas, A.R. Dehydrocoupling polymerization of bis-silanes and disilanols to poly(silphenylenesiloxane) as catalyzed by rhodium complexes. Macromolecules 2000, 33, 3508–3510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Utracki, L.A.; Groeninckx, G. Polymer Blends Handbook. C. Wilkie; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2002; Volume 1, pp. 171–289. ISBN 978-94-007-6065-3. [Google Scholar]
  19. Houghton, A.Y.; Hurmalainen, J.; Mansikkamäki, A.; Piers, W.E.; Tuononen, H.M. Direct observation of a borane-silane complex involved in frustrated lewis-pair-mediated hydrosilylations. Nat. Chem. 2014, 6, 983–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Chadwick, R.C.; Grande, J.B.; Brook, M.A.; Adronov, A. Functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotubes via the piers-rubinsztajn reaction. Macromolecules 2014, 47, 6527–6530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dudziec, B.; Rzonsowska, M.; Marciniec, B.; Brząkalski, D.; Woźniak, B. New mono- and diethynylsiloxysilsesquioxanes—Efficient procedures for their synthesis. Dalton Trans. 2014, 43, 13201–13207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Grande, J.B.; Urlich, T.; Dickie, T.; Brook, M.A. Silicone dendrons and dendrimers from orthogonal sih coupling reactions. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5, 6728–6739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Thompson, D.B.; Brook, M.A. Rapid assembly of complex 3d siloxane architectures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 32–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Blanco, I.; Abate, L.; Bottino, F.A.; Bottino, P. Synthesis, characterization and thermal stability of new dumbbell-shaped isobutyl-substituted posss linked by aromatic bridges. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2014, 117, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gusev, D.; Llamazares, A.; Artus, G.; Heiko Jacobsen, A.; Berke, H. Classical and nonclassical nitrosyl hydride complexes of rhenium in various oxidation states. Organometallics 1999, 18, 75–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Laengert, S.E.; Schneider, A.F.; Chen, Y.; Brook, M.A. Sequential functionalization of a natural crosslinker leads to designer silicone networks. Chem. Asian J. 2017, 12, 1208–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Rubinsztajn, S.; Cella, J.A. A new polycondensation process for the preparation of polysiloxane copolymers. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 1061–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yu, J.; Liu, Y. Cyclic polysiloxanes with linked rings. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Lee, P.T.K.; Rosenberg, L. Scope and selectivity of b(c6f5)(3)-catalyzed reactions of the disilane (ph2sih)(2). J. Organomet. Chem. 2016, 809, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Casserly, T.B.; Gleason, K.K. Density functional theory calculation of 29si nmr chemical shifts of organosiloxanes. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 13605–13610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Wu, C.; Yu, J.; Li, Q.; Liu, Y. High molecular weight cyclic polysiloxanes from organocatalytic zwitterionic polymerization of constrained spirocyclosiloxanes. Polym. Chem. 2017, 8, 7301–7306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, J.; Du, M.; Xu, C.; Zhu, H.; Fu, Y. Synthesis of transparent densely crosslinked polysiloxane with high refractive index. J. Macromol. Sci. Part B Phys. 2012, 51, 2462–2472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Patel, M.; Murphy, J.J.; Skinner, A.R.; Powell, S.J.; Smith, P.F. Volatile evolution from room temperature cured polysiloxane rubber induced by irradiation with he2+ ions. Polym. Test. 2003, 22, 923–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chien, A.; Maxwell, R.; Chambers, D.; Balazs, B.; Lemay, J. Characterization of radiation-induced aging in silica-reinforced polysiloxane composites. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2000, 59, 493–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. (a) Reaction between HCS and diphenyldialkoxysilane, (b) Functional group exchange reaction.
Scheme 1. (a) Reaction between HCS and diphenyldialkoxysilane, (b) Functional group exchange reaction.
Polymers 10 01006 sch001
Scheme 2. Formation of molecular bridges through condensation of functional groups on linear polymers. (R represents methyl or ethyl).
Scheme 2. Formation of molecular bridges through condensation of functional groups on linear polymers. (R represents methyl or ethyl).
Polymers 10 01006 sch002
Scheme 3. Polymers with complex structures obtained by condensation polymerization of diphenyldialkoxysilane and HCS. ‒OR represents ‒OCH3 or ‒OCH2CH3.
Scheme 3. Polymers with complex structures obtained by condensation polymerization of diphenyldialkoxysilane and HCS. ‒OR represents ‒OCH3 or ‒OCH2CH3.
Polymers 10 01006 sch003
Figure 1. 29Si nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra of D01 (a), D04 (b), D08 (c), D11 (d), HCS (e), DPDMS (f), and DPDES (g). M represents overclose molecular bridges. m represents small ring structure.
Figure 1. 29Si nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra of D01 (a), D04 (b), D08 (c), D11 (d), HCS (e), DPDMS (f), and DPDES (g). M represents overclose molecular bridges. m represents small ring structure.
Polymers 10 01006 g001aPolymers 10 01006 g001b
Figure 2. 1H NMR spectra of HCS (a) and D01 (b).
Figure 2. 1H NMR spectra of HCS (a) and D01 (b).
Polymers 10 01006 g002
Figure 3. TGA of HCS (T5% = 141.5 °C, T10% = 229.3 °C, Rw = 14.63%), D01 (T5% = 284.7 °C, T10% = 351.8 °C, Rw = 68.94%), D04 (T5% = 235.2 °C, T10% = 309.5 °C, Rw = 69.0%), D08 (T5% = 217.5 °C, T10% = 272.8 °C, Rw = 59.96%), D11 (T5% = 203.7 °C, T10% = 259.0 °C, Rw = 58.45%).
Figure 3. TGA of HCS (T5% = 141.5 °C, T10% = 229.3 °C, Rw = 14.63%), D01 (T5% = 284.7 °C, T10% = 351.8 °C, Rw = 68.94%), D04 (T5% = 235.2 °C, T10% = 309.5 °C, Rw = 69.0%), D08 (T5% = 217.5 °C, T10% = 272.8 °C, Rw = 59.96%), D11 (T5% = 203.7 °C, T10% = 259.0 °C, Rw = 58.45%).
Polymers 10 01006 g003
Table 1. Specific reaction conditions and gel permeation chromatography (GPC) data of polycondensation of diphenyldialkoxysilane with hydrogen-containing siloxanes (HCS) in toluene.
Table 1. Specific reaction conditions and gel permeation chromatography (GPC) data of polycondensation of diphenyldialkoxysilane with hydrogen-containing siloxanes (HCS) in toluene.
No.Temperature (°C)Catalyst Concentration (mmol·L−1)Reactant Concentration (wt %)Yield (%)Mw (KDa)Mw/Mn
B01250.83571.4226.133.57
B02250.43579.0011.642.11
B03250.23579.487.391.68
B04250.13586.486.101.52
B0500.83572.3232.173.83
B06100.83578.3065.097.08
B07400.83576.7420.633.17
B08600.83573.5714.382.50
B09250.165gel//
B10250.150gel//
B11250.12080.608.782.01
D01250.83560.6040.524.76
D02250.43562.749.103.73
D03250.23574.247.253.88
D04250.13578.684.773.85
D0500.83572.1948.034.50
D06100.83563.2975.605.37
D07400.83573.4734.363.28
D08600.83573.5722.524.72
D09250.165gel//
D10250.150gel//
D11250.12083.825.771.53
B01~B11 represent a series of experiments involving Piers–Rubinsztajn (PR) reaction between diphenyldiethoxysilane (DPDES) and HCS in the above-mentioned specific experimental conditions. D01~D11 represent a series of experiments involving PR reaction between diphenyldimethoxysilane (DPDMS) and HCS in the above-mentioned specific experimental conditions. The reactant concentration is equal to the sum of the masses of diphenyldialkoxysilane and HCS divided by the sum of the masses of diphenyldialkoxysilane, HCS, and toluene. For example, B01: 17 g HCS, 29.64 g DPDES, 86.62 g toluene.
Table 2. Key parameters of various reactants and catalyst optimized at B3LYP/6-311G or STO-3G level.
Table 2. Key parameters of various reactants and catalyst optimized at B3LYP/6-311G or STO-3G level.
SpeciesBond Length (Å)Atomic ChargeSpeciesBond Length (Å)Atomic Charge
DPDMSRO(24)-C(26) = 1.4249qSi(1) = 0.7899DPDESRO(24)-C(29) = 1.4306qSi(1) = 1.1188
RO(25)-C(30) = 1.4249qO(24) = −0.4336 RO(25)-C(26) = 1.4307qO(24) = −0.3791
RO(24)-Si(1) = 1.666qO(25) = −0.4335 RO(24)-Si(1) = 1.6628qO(25) = −0.3789
RO(25)-Si(1) = 1.666qC(26) = 0.2844 RO(25)-Si(1) = 1.6628qC(26) = 0.2034
qC(30) = 0.2844 qC(29) = 0.2035
miniHCS /B(C6F5)3RH(37)-Si(36) = 1.4474qB = 0.2745miniHCSRH(3)-Si(2) = 1.4523qSi(2) = 0.7965
RH(38)-Si(36) = 1.4546qSi(36) = 0.5359 RH(4)-Si(2) = 1.453qSi(5) = 0.7940
RH(40)-Si(39) = 1.4476qSi(39) = 0.5743 RH(6)-Si(5) = 1.4531qH(3) = −0.1519
RH(41)-Si(39) = 1.4492qH(37) = −0.1314 RH(7)-Si(5) = 1.4527qH(4) = −0.1499
qH(38) = −0.1502 qH(6) = −0.1447
qH(40) = −0.1153 qH(7) = −0.1507
qH(41) = −0.1149B(C6F5)3 qB = 0.802
((CH3)3SiOSiH2O)2 (miniHCS) was used as a simplified model for HCS to simplify the calculation. MiniHCS/B(C6F5)3 and miniHCS optimized at B3LYP/STO-3G level. DPDMS, DPDES, and B(C6F5)3 optimized at B3LYP/6-311G level. Atomic charges with hydrogens of DPDMS and DPDES summed into heavy atoms of C bonded to H. The numbered elements’ (Si, O, C) specific location in DPDMS: (1)Si-(24)O-(26)CH3, (1)Si-(25)O-(30)CH3. The numbered elements’ (Si, O, C) specific location in DPDES: (1)Si-(24)O-(29)CH2CH3, (1)Si-(25)O-(26)CH2CH3. The numbered elements’ (Si, H) specific location in miniHCS/B(C6F5)3: (37)H-(36)Si-(38)H, (40)H-(39)Si-(41)H. The numbered elements’ (Si, H) specific location in miniHCS: (3)H-(2)Si-(4)H, (6)H-(5)Si-(7)H. (see supplementary Image 1–5 about the specific calculation models).
Table 3. Refractive index and thermal properties of the products
Table 3. Refractive index and thermal properties of the products
No.Refractive IndexT5% (°C)T10% (°C)RW (%)
HCS1.4123141.5229.314.6
B011.5190309.8374.572.4
B021.5189302362.272.32
B031.5186290.3342.765.43
B041.5078270.8332.768.74
B051.5191324380.875.60
B061.5190316.836865.54
B071.5163263335.870.38
B081.5151233.7306.566.66
B09
B10
B111.5056265369.371.47
D011.5173284.7351.868.94
D021.5160265.5319.764.66
D031.5142260.7339.372.51
D041.5119235.2309.568.99
D051.5162280.5371.775.92
D061.5168273.2356.272.81
D071.5159250.232773.92
D081.5151217.5272.859.96
D09
D10
D111.5159203.725958.45
Temperature and Rw means residual weight ratio T5% means 5% thermal decomposition temperature, T10% means 10% thermal decomposition temperature and Rw means residual weight ratio.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yi, M.; Chen, X.; Wu, S.; Ge, J.; Zhou, X.; Yin, G. Fabrication of Reactive Poly(Phenyl-Substituted Siloxanes/Silsesquioxanes) with Si‒H and Alkoxy Functional Groups via the Piers–Rubinsztajn Reaction. Polymers 2018, 10, 1006. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10091006

AMA Style

Yi M, Chen X, Wu S, Ge J, Zhou X, Yin G. Fabrication of Reactive Poly(Phenyl-Substituted Siloxanes/Silsesquioxanes) with Si‒H and Alkoxy Functional Groups via the Piers–Rubinsztajn Reaction. Polymers. 2018; 10(9):1006. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10091006

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yi, Minghao, Xunjun Chen, Shufang Wu, Jianfang Ge, Xinhua Zhou, and Guoqiang Yin. 2018. "Fabrication of Reactive Poly(Phenyl-Substituted Siloxanes/Silsesquioxanes) with Si‒H and Alkoxy Functional Groups via the Piers–Rubinsztajn Reaction" Polymers 10, no. 9: 1006. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10091006

APA Style

Yi, M., Chen, X., Wu, S., Ge, J., Zhou, X., & Yin, G. (2018). Fabrication of Reactive Poly(Phenyl-Substituted Siloxanes/Silsesquioxanes) with Si‒H and Alkoxy Functional Groups via the Piers–Rubinsztajn Reaction. Polymers, 10(9), 1006. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10091006

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop