Next Article in Journal
Optimization of Boron Nitride Sphere Loading in Epoxy: Enhanced Thermal Conductivity and Excellent Electrical Insulation
Next Article in Special Issue
Selective Wet-Etching of Polymer/Fullerene Blend Films for Surface- and Nanoscale Morphology-Controlled Organic Transistors and Sensitivity-Enhanced Gas Sensors
Previous Article in Journal
Synthetic Environmentally Friendly Castor Oil Based-Polyurethane with Carbon Black as a Microphase Separation Promoter
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 11
Issue 8
10.3390/polym11081334
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ferrocene-Containing Conjugated Oligomers Synthesized by Acyclic Diene Metathesis Polymerization

by
Xin Gao
1,
Lei Deng
1,
Jianfeng Hu
1,2 and
Hao Zhang
1,2,*
1
College of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China
2
Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Fine Organic Synthesis, Hohhot 010021, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2019, 11(8), 1334; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11081334
Submission received: 11 July 2019 / Revised: 3 August 2019 / Accepted: 6 August 2019 / Published: 12 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Conjugated Oligomers and Polymer Nanomaterials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A series of conjugated, symmetrical, and ferrocene-containing main-chain monomers was prepared following a gentle coupling reaction. Ferrocene-containing oligomers with all-trans-configured vinylene bonds could be synthesized via acyclic diene metathesis (ADMET) polymerization. These oligomers had a larger Stokes shift (2400 to 2600 cm−1) and both exhibited stable and reversible electrochemistry. Meanwhile, the copolymerization of 1,1’-bis[1-methyl-2-(4-vinylphenyl)ethenyl]ferrocene with 2,7-divinyl-9,9-dioctylfluorene was achieved. The structurally regular copolymers proved their optical and electrochemical properties. The fluorescence intensity of the copolymer gradually enhanced with the increasing number of fluorene units. At the same time, it was also found that the color of the copolymers had a significant change from yellow-green to red.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Ferrocene is the most stable metallocene with a steady 18-electron structure and the highest average dissociation energy, which is the trait of being impervious to air and humidity [1]. Therefore, since the first example of polyferrocenes was reported in 1955, the study of ferrocene-containing polymers has intrigued chemists and blossomed into a mature field [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. These polymers are sought due to their useful properties, which range from catalysis to magnetism and electrochemical characteristics [19,20,21]. Generally, there are several methods for transitioning metal-containing polymers in the main chain, such as ring-opening [4,18,22,23,24] polymerization (ROP) (Scheme 1a), ring opening metathesis [25,26,27,28,29] polymerization (ROMP) (Scheme 1b), and acyclic diene metathesis [30,31,32] (ADMET) polymerization (Scheme 1c). Up to now, only a few papers about ADMET polymerization have been reported, comparing ROP and ROMP. Their results were unsatisfactory because of low molecular weight or negative experimental results.
Over the past decade, transition metal-containing polymers, especially oligomers, have attracted much interest due to their applications. On first reflection, the incorporation of metals into polymers naturally enhanced conductivity, given the high values associated with the metallic state [7,16]. Chen et al. [33] and Swager group [34] prepared polymers successfully showing conductivity. Metallated conjugated polymers have also demonstrated exceptional promise in the creation of high-efficiency polymer solar cells [16]. Recently, great efforts have been dedicated to developing new oligomer molecules for applications in solar cells as active layer materials, including electron donors and electron acceptors [35].
Conjugate polymers are promising macromolecular compounds, owing to their potential applications in electrochemical devices and optical properties [36,37,38,39]. However, conjugate monomers are rarely used in ADMET polymerization. Therefore, the discovery of new conjugate compounds containing ferrocene as monomers in ADMET polymerization is also desirable. In this paper, the successful synthesis of a series of conjugated, symmetrical, and ferrocene-containing monomers using a metal-free carbon–carbon bond-forming coupling reaction was reported [40]. Using ADMET strategy, the polymerization (Scheme 2) of a series of ferrocene-containing conjugated monomers and copolymerization with 2,7-divinyl-9,9-dioctylfluorene (monomer D) were carried out. The properties of oligomers and copolymers were characterized.

2. Materials and Methods

All hydrocarbon solvents were distilled from sodium before use. All reagents were used as received from commercial sources, unless otherwise noted, and the Grubbs type catalysts were prepared according to the literature [41,42]. All experiments were carried out under a nitrogen atmosphere in a dry box and conventional Schlenk line techniques unless otherwise specified. All 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker 500 spectrometer (499.65 MHz, 1H). The polymer samples for analysis were prepared by dissolving the polymers in CDCl3 solution and the spectra were measured at 25 °C. Number- (Mn) and weight- (Mw) averaged molecular weights and polydispersity indices (Mw/Mn) of the polymers were estimated by a Waters 2545 instrument equipped with four Waters Styragel HR columns, i.e., HR-1, HR-3, HR-4, and HR-5E. HPLC grade THF was used as eluent at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min at 35 °C. IR spectra were recorded on a Nicolet nexus 670 FT-IR spectrophotometer. UV spectra were measured on an FLS 920 spectrophotometer. Fluorescence spectra were recorded with a HitachiF-7000 spectrofluorimeter. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) measurements were carried out under nitrogen on a Perkin-Elmer TGA 7 analyzer at a heating rate of 20 °C ·min−1. DSC measurements were performed on a Mettler-Toledo S1. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) analyses were recorded on an autolab–pgstat (model 302). The samples for electron microscopy were prepared by drop casting 1 drop of suspension of the sample onto a carbon coated copper grid, which was placed on a piece of filter paper to remove excess solvent. Bright field transmission electron microscopy (TEM) micrographs were obtained both on a JEOL1200EX TEM Mk1 and Mk2 microscope operating at 120 kV.

2.1. Synthesis of 1,1’-Diacetylferrocene (2)

The AlCl3 (8.97 g, 0.07 mol) was added to 1,2-dichloroethane (30 mL) and stirred at room temperature. The solution of acetylchloride (6.33 g, 0.08 mol) in 1,2–dichloroethane (8.4 mL) was dropwise added into the above solution and stirred at 0 °C in a three-necked flask. The solution of ferrocene (5 g, 0.03 mol) in 1,2-dichloroethane (40 mL) was added to the flask to give the mixture as a purple complex and stirred at 0 °C for 3 h. Then the solution was restored to room temperature and stirred at 40 °C for 1 h. The mixture was poured into ice water and diluted with 1,2-dichloroethane. The organic layer was dried over MgSO4 and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography (PE: EA = 10:1) to give 2 as a red solid (4.52 g, 62% yield).

2.2. Synthesis of N’,N’’-(1,1’-ferrocenylbis(ethan-1-yl-1-ylidene))bis(4-methylbenzenesulfonohydrazide) (3)

The solution of 2 (3.52 g, 13 mmol) in methanol (16 mL) was dropwise added to the solution of methylbenzenesulfonhydrazide (10.55 g, 56 mmol) in methanol (56 mL) at 60 °C for 4 h. Then the mixture was washed with PE to give 3 as a yellow solid (7.56 g, 95% yield).

2.3. Synthesis of Monomer A

In a glovebox, a toluene solution (5 mL) of Pd2(dba)3 (9.2 mg, 5.0 mol%), P-(4-MePh)3 (6.1 mg, 10 mol%), 3 (121.2 mg, 0.20 mmol), and LiOtBu (96.1 mg, 6 equiv) were added into a 25 mL Schlenk tube, then 4-vinylbenzyl chloride was added to the mixture. The Schlenk tube was sealed and taken out of the glovebox and then heated at 70 °C for 12 h. Then, the solution was evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure and the mixture was purified by column chromatography (PE as eluent) to give monomer A as a red solid (48.2 mg, 41% yield, Z: E = 1:3). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.33 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 3H), 7.20 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 3H), 6.74–6.70 (m, 2H), 6.68 (s, 2H), 5.75 (d, J = 17.7 Hz, 2H), 5.24 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, 2H), 4.46 (s, 4H), 4.27 (s, 4H), 2.19 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3), δ 138.0, 136.7, 135.3, 134.8, 129.2, 128.2, 126.1, 123.4, 113.4, 90.1, 70.0, 66.9, 17.3.

2.4. Synthesis of Monomer B

In a glovebox, a solution of Pd2(dba)3 (9.2 mg, 5.0 mol%), PCy3 (5.6 mg, 10 mol%), 3 (121.2 mg, 0.20 mmol), and LiOtBu (96.1 mg, 6 equiv.) in toluene (3 mL) and dioxane (2 mL) were added into a 25 mL Schlenk tube and stirred at 90 °C for 0.5 h. Then, 4-vinylphenylboronic acid was added to the tube and stirred at 90 °C for 12 h. The mixture was evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure and washed with dichloromethane. The organic layer was dried over MgSO4 and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography (PE as eluent) to give monomer B as a red solid (74.7 mg, 60% yield, Z: E = 1:1). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.65–7.55 (m, 6H), 7.52–7.44 (m, 6H), 7.44–7.39 (m, 6H), 7.37 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 4H), 7.33 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 7.23 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 4H), 6.72 (s, 2H), 6.46 (s, 2H), 4.42 (s, 4H), 4.26 (s, 4H), 4.16 (s, 4H), 4.13 (s, 4H), 2.29 (s, 6H), 2.21 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3), δ 141.0, 138.7, 138.1, 137.6, 135.0, 134.3, 129.5, 128.9, 128.8, 127.2, 127.0, 126.9, 126.7, 125.9, 123.2, 90.0, 85.7, 70.2, 70.0, 69.6, 67.0, 25.3, 17.3.

2.5. Synthesis of Monomer C

Monomer C was prepared under the same synthetic procedure to that of monomer B. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.51 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 4H), 7.46 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 4H), 7.44 (s, 2H), 7.39 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.31 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.23 (d, J = 10.1 Hz, 2H), 6.77 (s, 2H), 6.76–6.70 (m, 2H), 5.77 (d, J = 17.6 Hz, 2H), 5.26 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, 2H), 4.46 (s, 4H), 4.28 (s, 4H), 2.24 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 140.7, 138.9, 136.6, 136.5, 135.0, 128.6, 128.0, 127.7, 127.3, 126.7, 124.7, 123.5, 113.9, 89.9, 70.1, 67.0, 17.3.

2.6. Synthesis of 9,9-dioctyl-2,7-divinylfluorene (Monomer D)

In a glovebox, a solution of 9,9-di-n-octyl-2,7-dibromofluorene (500 mg, 0.91 mmol), tributyl(vinyl)tin (635 mg, 2.0mmol), Pd(PPh3)4 (42 mg, 3.9 mol%), and a small amount of 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol in toluene (3 mL) was added to a 25 mL Schlenk tube and stirred at 90 °C for 20 h. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and residue was purified by column chromatography (PE as eluent) to give monomer D as a colorless oil (184.6 mg, 48% yield). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.63 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.40 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.37 (s, 2H), 6.81 (d, J = 10 Hz, 10.9 Hz, 2H), 5.81 (d, J = 10 Hz, 2H), 5.26 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, 2H), 1.99–1.96 (m, 4H), 1.45–0.91 (m, 20H), 0.84–0.81 (m, 8H).

2.7. Synthesis of Oligomer A

A 100 mL reaction tube was charged with monomer A (0.1 g, 0.21 mmol, 0.21 M) and 1 mL toluene in glovebox. The catalyst solution of Grubbs 2nd catalyst (1.8 mg, 2.1 μmol, 100 μL, 0.02 M) was injected into the reaction tube. The reaction took place under vacuum at 80 °C. After 12 h, the polymerization was quenched by adding a substantial amount of methanol. The reaction mixture was then stirred for 1 h for completion. To end the reaction, 100 mL methanol was added into the reaction solution. The yellow solid oligomer was collected by filtration and was then dried in a vacuum (68 mg, 72% yield). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.33–7.29 (d, J = 3.8 Hz, 4H), 7.27 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 4H), 7.21 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 6.73 (s, 2H), 4.46 (s, 4H), 4.28 (s, 4H), 2.21 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 138.4, 134.6, 129.1, 128.2, 126.0, 123.6, 90.0, 70.0, 66.9, 17.1.

2.8. Synthesis of Copolymer 1

A 100 mL reaction tube was charged with monomer A (0.1 g, 0.21 mmol, 0.21 M), monomer D (0.37 g, 0.84 mmol, 0.84 M), and 1 mL toluene in a glovebox. The catalyst solution of Grubbs second catalyst (1.8 mg, 2.1 μmol, 100 μL, 0.02 M) was injected into the reaction tube. The reaction took place under a vacuum and 60 °C. After 24 h, the polymerization was quenched by adding a substantial amount of methanol. The reaction mixture was then stirred for 1 h for completion. To end the reaction, 100 mL methanol was added into the reaction solution. The sticky yellow copolymer was collected by filtration and was then dried in a vacuum. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.68 (d, J = 10.0, 4.4 Hz, 2H), 7.54 (t, J = 9.9 Hz, 4H), 7.51–7.47 (m, 4H), 7.45 (d, J = 6.0, 3.6 Hz, 2H), 7.29 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 4H), 7.22–7.18 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 2H), 6.72 (s, 2H), 4.47 (s, 4H), 4.29 (s, 4H), 2.23 (d, J = 24.0 Hz, 6H), 2.04 (s, 5H), 1.65(d, J = 15.7, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 1.54 (s, 2H), 1.44 (s, 1H), 1.36 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H), 1.26 (s, 5H), 1.19 (s,7H), 1.08 (s, 22H), 0.93 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 0.81 (s, 10H), 0.69 (s, 5H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 151.6, 140.7, 138.4, 135.3, 134.9, 134.6, 132.6, 130.6, 129.4, 129.1, 128.2, 127.8, 126.3, 126.0,123.7, 123.4, 120.7, 120.0, 90.0, 70.0, 66.9, 55.1, 31.9, 30.2, 29.8, 29.3, 23.9, 22.7, 17.2, 14.2.

3. Results

3.1. Monomer Synthesis and Characterisation

Monomer A, monomer B, and monomer C could be synthesized by the route outlined in Scheme 3. These monomers were fully characterized by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and HRMS (Figures S1–S9).

3.2. Acyclic Diene Metathesis (ADMET) Polymerization of Monomers

The effect of time, solvent, and type of catalyst on the polymerization was evaluated as shown in Table 1. First of all, the ADMET of monomer A was successfully carried out using the ruthenium-based Grubbs second generation catalyst, oligomer A, with a number-average molecular weight Mn = 2001 Da and molecular weight distribution Mw/Mn = 1.10 was obtained (Table 1, Entry 1). The yield of oligomer A increased with the increase in temperature from 80 to 100 °C, but the metathesis of monomer A still only gave oligomers (Table 1, Entry 2). Likewise, further prolonging the reaction time to 24 h resulted in a lower Mn = 1614 Da (Table 1, Entry 3). The result (Mn = 2021 Da) was similar to Entry 1 using 1,2-dichlorobenzene (DCB) as a solvent with a higher boiling point (Table 1, Entry 4). Finally, we still obtained oligomers with an average of three repeating units using a Grubbs–Hoveyda second generation catalyst and mixed solvents of toluene and DCB (Table 1, Entries 5 to 7). On the basis of monomer A, the optimal conditions of monomers B and C were investigated (Table 1, Entries 8 to 13). Monomers B and C were more rigid than monomer A, so we gained a lower Mn of 2160 Da and 3360 Da, respectively. However, above all, the ADMET results with the various monomers all obtained low molecular weight. Low molecular weight may be attributed to limited solubility, which may be caused by ferrocene-containing main-chain oligomers and a lack of alkyl groups. Some related generated ferrocene polymers were reported to be soluble only in the presence of such moieties [27,43,44].

3.3. Microstructure via NMR and FT-IR

The microstructure of both the monomers and the oligomers was determined by 1H and 13C NMR spectra (Figures S20–S25). Respectively, the 1H and 13C NMR spectra of monomer A and oligomer A were depicted in Figure 1. Their 1H NMR spectra were consistent with their structures. The appearance of a resonance at 7.20 ppm manifested the formation of internal trans-vinylene protons (–CHa’=CHa’–) in oligomer A [45,46]. No resonances for a cis-configured double bond were observed at 6.5 ppm (reported value for the internal vinylene proton signals in cis-stilbene). The aromatic protons appeared at 7.25 and 7.30 ppm. The downfield shift of the aromatic protons in oligomer A relative to monomer A might be due to the extended electron conjugation. It’s worth noting that we could clearly see the terminal vinyl group in the 1H NMR spectrum (Figure 1B). Moreover, after ADMET, the 13C NMR spectrum of the terminal vinyl group (–CaH=CbH2) at 113.1 and 136.7 ppm disappeared and a new peak emerged at 129.2 ppm, corresponding to the internal vinylene carbons (–Ca’H=Ca’H–).
FT-IR spectroscopy showed the obvious differences between monomer A and oligomer A. Figure S26 illustrated this for a select region of the FT-IR spectra of monomer A and its ADMET product. It was obvious that the absorption peaks of C=C stretching at 861 cm−1 and 807 cm−1 for monomer A disappeared after the ADMET reaction and a new C=C stretching was observed at 989 cm−1, strongly indicating that there is a newly generated out-of-plane (oop) bending internal trans-vinylene bond. Strong evidence from FT-IR, 1H, and 13C NMR clearly indicated that an exclusively trans-configured vinylene bond of stilbene was formed by ADMET polymerization of monomer A.
To further evaluate degree of polymerization, we tested the resulting oligomer by matrix-assisted laser desorption time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (Figure S11). On the basis of this, we could conclude that ions identify with the different molecular weight oligomers with n values between 2 and 5 repetitive individual monomer units, which were in good accordance with the data of GPC.

3.4. Optical Property

Oligomer samples with different conjugation repeat units were analyzed with regard to their optical characterization by UV/Vis absorption spectra and fluorescence spectra (Figure 2), recorded as dichloromethane solutions (0.05 mM). There are broad featureless absorption bands of these oligomers in the visible region that could be put down to MLCT transitions, with their absorption maxima between 454 and 468 nm. The emission showed λmax = 510–524 nm for all oligomers, indicating that these oligomers had Stokes shift values ranging from 2400 to 2600 cm−1. As expected, the absorption of oligomers was red-shifted compared to the monomers (Figure 2a and Figure S27). On the basis of the above observations, we analyzed the bathochromic shift of the oligomers related to the different chain length and provided evidence for extended conjugation chain lengths. The fluorescence of all oligomers is quenched due to containing ferrocene in the oligomers, as shown in Figure 2c. However, as shown in Figure 2c, on account of the different degrees of polymerization, fluorescence intensity of oligomer C (n = 5) compared to oligomer A and oligomer B (n = 3) dramatically decreased. The difference in fluorescence intensity of oligomer B and oligomer C may be due to the reason that ferrocene is known to act as an efficient quencher [32]. Molar extinction coefficients for new molecules were shown in Table 2. Oligomers A, B, and C had almost extinction coefficient because of the low molecular weight, while the extinction coefficient of copolymer 1 was higher than that of the oligomers.

3.5. Thermal Stability Studies

In order to test the thermal stability of the oligomers, we then investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Thermogravimetric analysis (Figure 3a) was performed under inert atmosphere (N2) and air to compare the stability of oligomer A in a different atmosphere. A similar trend of thermal decomposition behavior was obtained from the oligomer with a different molecular weight. At a scan rate of 10 °C·min−1, oligomer A showed good stability up to ca. 334.5 °C under air and it revealed that oligomer A had good resistance to thermolysis. But when we continued to raise the temperature, it led to rapid degrading. Moreover, no appreciable weight loss of oligomer A was found with the TGA analysis up to ≈ 493 °C under air. Oligomer A showed a glass transition temperature (Tg) of 153.9 °C (Figure 3b), whereas the DSC curve showed that oligomer A was amorphous without a clear melting point (Tm).

3.6. Electrochemical Properties

In attempts to see the electrochemical properties of monomers and oligomers, cyclic voltammetry was used (Figure 4 and Figures S36 and S37). The voltammogram was obtained in a CH2Cl2 solution (0.5 mM) at a scan rate of 100 mV/s, using Bu4NPO4F6 as the supporting electrolyte. As shown in Figure 4, the result demonstrated that stable and reversible electrochemical properties of oligomers could be recorded in an organic solvent. An example of oligomer B, the oxidation process appeared at 0.55 V and the reduction was about 0.48 V, indicating a one-electron transfer reaction (~0.07 V). Similarly, ipa/ipc ≈ 1 demonstrated an electrochemical reversibility. The same analysis can be applied to oligomer A and oligomer C (Table 3).

3.7. Copolymerization of Monomer A and 9,9-Dioctyl-2,7-Divinylfluorene (Monomer D)

After having proved the validity of the ADMET method, we then examined the copolymerization of monomer A with monomer D (Scheme 4). Some representative results are shown in Table 4. Remarkably, these results of 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra suggested that copolymers were obtained successfully (Figures S29 to S32). According to the data of Table 4, it was reasonable to assume that the ratio of incorporation of the ferrocene group could be adjusted by simple variation of the monomer feed ratio.
It was interesting to note that fluorescence intensity of copolymers was related to the ratio of fluorene and ferrocene (Figure 5). The fluorescence intensity of copolymer 1 was gradually enhanced with the increasing number of fluorene units. The fluorescence intensity of monomer D was the strongest. The emission spectra of copolymer 1 with different ratios of ferrocene and fluorene all showed two emission bands, which were attributed to the ferrocene unit and fluorene segment, respectively [47]. With the increasing of ferrocene units in copolymer 1, the sharp band gradually widened and passivated. There was only an emission peak when the number of ferrocenes was too high (x = 5, y = 25, Figure 5) in the copolymer because of serious band passivation. Oligomer A without the fluorene segment eventually turned like a parabola. Figure 5 showed the emission of polymer D in the 375 nm, whereas the emission of the copolymer with one or two fluorene units which were assigned to the content of the ferrocene unit was at 460 nm. Owing to increasing content of ferrocene, we could notice that the emission peak became a long wavelength. Meanwhile, it was also found that the color of the copolymer had a significant change from yellow-green to red (Figures S33 and S34) with the monomer D/monomer A feed ratio being 4/1 to 1/4. As shown in Figure S33, we could observe that the state of the copolymer has a gradient process from an oily, semi-solid to a solid with a varying incorporation ratio of monomer D/monomer A. The reason for this phenomenon could be that monomer D was an oil and monomer A was solid. When the relative amount of monomer A in the copolymer was more than that of monomer D, the copolymer would tend to exhibit a solid-like state. Conversely, the copolymer would behave in an oil-like state.
Electrochemical properties are intrinsic properties of ferrocene, so the electrochemical properties of copolymer 1 were probed using cyclic voltammetry (Figure S35). As shown in Table 5, when the number of ferrocenes in polymer was certain, the redox capacity of ferrocene decreased with the increasing number of fluorene units. Therefore, it suggested that the redox ability of copolymers could be adjusted by regulating the ratio of fluorene in the copolymer. This property may be beneficial for the future application of ferrocene-containing polymers.

3.8. SEM and TEM Studies

The morphology of oligomers was investigated using SEM and TEM (Figure 6). The morphology of oligomer A basically presented as a regular sphere under SEM and the diameter of the nanosphere was estimated to be about 400 nm from TEM. As shown in Figure 6, because the outer layer of oligomer A was encased in a small molecule oligomer with a lower density, the surface of oligomer A had a 10 nm shell. Oligomer B was layered and oligomer C was a heterogeneous spherical shape with a diameter ranging from 50 to 200 nm. It can be seen in the TEM image of oligomer C that it displayed an orderly arrangement as a chain. The reason for the huge difference in morphology of oligomer B and oligomer C could be the different substitution position of phenyl in monomers. The morphology of the oligomer tending towards a lamellar structure when the phenyl group was substituted in the para-position, corresponding to oligomer B, could be observed in TEM. Copolymer 1 was made up of fine particles with a diameter approaching 50 nm, which was visible in Figure 6. The microstructure and particle size of copolymer 1 after adding monomer D were further optimized in comparison to oligomer A.

4. Conclusions

In summary, ferrocene-containing conjugated oligomers were synthesized by ADMET polymerization. The microstructures of oligomers were confirmed by means of 1H NMR, 13C NMR, FT-IR, and MS. These results showed that the organic conjugated segment had formed with only trans-configured vinylene bonds. These oligomers had a larger Stokes shift (2400 to 2600 cm−1) and both exhibited stable and reversible electrochemistry in an organic solvent. The oligomers showed good thermal stability, evidenced by TGA and DSC. Moreover, the copolymerization of divinylferrocene (monomer A) and divinylfluorene (monomer D) was successful. Electrochemical properties of the copolymer indicated a negative correlation between the redox capacity of ferrocene and the amount of fluorene.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/11/8/1334/s1, Figures S1–S11: 1H, 13C NMR spectra, and HRMS spectra of monomers and oligomer A, Figures S12–S19: GPC data, Figures S20–S25: 1H, 13C NMR spectra of oligomer A-C, Figures S26-S28: spectral analysis, Figures S29–S32: 1H, 13C NMR spectra of copolymers, Figures S33–S37: The color variance and cyclic voltammogram spectra.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.Z.; Funding acquisition, H.Z.; Investigation, L.D.; Project administration, X.G. and L.D.; Resources, H.Z.; Software, J.H.; Supervision, H.Z.and J.H.; Writing-original draft, X.G.; Writing-review and editing, X.G.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 21861028), Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia (2017MS0206), Grassland Talent Innovative Teams of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region.

Acknowledgments

The project was supported by Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Polymer Physics and Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gonçalves, C.S.; Serbena, J.P.; Hümmelgen, I.A.; Gruber, J. A novel ferrocene-DOPPV conjugated copolymer. Macromol. Symp. 2006, 245, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Arimoto, F.S.; Haven, A.C., Jr. Derivatives of dicyclopentadienyliron. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 6295–6297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hudson, Z.M.; Manners, I. Assembly and disassembly of ferrocene-based nanotubes. Science 2014, 344, 482–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Pittman, C.U., Jr. The discovery of metallocene- and metallocene-like addition polymers. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. 2005, 15, 33–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bellas, V.; Rehahn, M. Polyferrocenylsilane-based polymer systems. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 5082–5104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Abd-El-Aziz, A.S.; Manners, I. Neutral and cationic macromolecules based on iron sandwich complexes. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. 2005, 15, 157–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Whittell, G.R.; Manners, I. Metallopolymers: New multifunctional materials. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 3439–3468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Astruc, D.; Ornelas, C.; Ruiz, J. Metallocenyl dendrimers and their applications in molecular electronics, sensing, and catalysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 841–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abd-El-Aziz, A.S.; Manners, I. Frontiers in Transition Metal-Containing Polymers; John Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zamora, M.; Bruña, S.; Alonso, B.; Cuadrado, I. Polysiloxanes bearing pendant redox-active dendritic wedges containing ferrocenyl and (η6−aryl)tricarbonylchromium moieties. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 7994–8007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, X.; McHale, R. Metal-containing polymers: Building blocks for functional (nano)materials. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2010, 31, 331–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Abd-El-Aziz, A.S.; Strohm, E.A. Transition metal-containing macromolecules: En route to new functional materials. Polymer 2012, 53, 4879–4921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Choueiri, R.M.; Klinkova, A.; Pearce, S.; Manners, I.; Kumacheva, E. Self-assembly and surface patterning of polyferrocenylsilane-functionalized gold nanoparticles. Macromol. Rapid. Commun. 2018, 39, 1700554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Amer, W.A.; Yu, H.; Wang, L.; Vatsadze, S.; Tong, R. Synthesis, characterization and properties of some main-chain ferrocene-based polymers containing aromatic units. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. 2013, 23, 1431–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bruña, S.; González-Vadillo, A.M.; Nieto, D.; Pastor, J.C.; Cuadrado, I. Redox-active macrocyclic and linear oligo-carbosiloxanes prepared via hydrosilylation from 1,3-divinyl-1,3-dimethyl-1,3-diferrocenyldisiloxane. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 781–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Eloi, J.C.; Chabanne, L.; Whittell, G.R.; Manners, I. Metallopolymers with emerging applications. Mater. Today 2008, 11, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chai, H.; Hu, J.; Shi, Q.; Zhang, H. Synthesis and chiroptical properties of helical polyallenylferrocenes. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2017, 55, 2663–2669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hailes, R.L.N.; Musgrave, R.A.; Kilpatrick, A.F.R.; Russell, A.D.; Whittell, G.R.; O’Hare, D.; Manners, I. Ring-opening polymerisation of low-strain nickelocenophanes: Synthesis and magnetic properties of polynickelocenes with carbon and silicon main chain spacers. Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 1044–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Williams, K.A.; Boydston, A.J.; Bielawski, C.W. Main-chain organometallic polymers: Synthetic strategies, applications, and perspectives. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 729–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, J.; Ren, L.; Yan, Y.; Tang, C. Metal-containing and related polymers for biomedical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 5232–5263. [Google Scholar] [Green Version]
  21. Hailes, R.L.N.; Oliver, A.M.; Gwyther, J.; Whittell, G.R.; Manners, I. Polyferrocenylsilanes: Synthesis, properties, and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 5358–5407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Musgrave, R.A.; Russell, A.D.; Hayward, D.W.; Whittell, G.R.; Lawrence, P.G.; Gates, P.J.; Green, J.C.; Manners, I. Main-chain metallopolymers at the static-dynamic boundary based on nickelocene. Nature Chem. 2017, 9, 743–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kobayashi, Y.; Honjo, K.; Kitagawa, S.; Gwyther, J.; Manners, I.; Uemura, T. Thermal ring-opening polymerization of an unsymmetrical silicon-bridged [1]ferrocenophane in coordination nanochannels. Chem. Comm. 2017, 53, 6945–6948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Sharma, H.K.; Lee, F.C.; Mahmoud, J.S.; Pannell, K.H. (Bis{2,4,6-triisopropylphenyl}stannylene)ferrocenophane and related ring-opened products. Organometallics 1999, 18, 399–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sha, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, T.; Tan, S.; Cha, Y.; Craig, S.L.; Tang, C. Ring-closing metathesis and ring-opening metathesis polymerization toward main-chain ferrocene-containing polymers. Macromolecules 2018, 51, 9131–9139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Buretea, M.A.; Tilley, T.D. Poly(ferrocenylenevinylene) from ring-opening metathesis polymerization of ansa-(vinylene)ferrocene. Organometallics 1997, 16, 1507–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Stanton, C.E.; Lee, T.R.; Grubbs, R.H.; Lewis, N.S. Routes to conjugated polymers with ferrocenes in their backbones: Synthesis and characterization of poly(ferrocenylenedivinylene) and poly(ferrocenylenebutenylene). Macromolecules 1995, 28, 8713–8721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Heo, R.W.; Somoza, F.B.; Lee, T.R. Soluble conjugated polymers that contain ferrocenylene units in the backbone. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 1621–1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Masson, G.; Lough, A.J.; Manners, I. Soluble poly(ferrocenylenevinylene) with t-butyl substituents on the cyclopentadienyl ligands via ring-opening metathesis polymerization. Macromolecules 2008, 41, 539–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Caire da Silva, L.; Rojas, G.; Schulz, M.D.; Wagener, K.B. Acyclic diene metathesis polymerization: History, methods and applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2017, 69, 79–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, F.; Cao, J.; Sun, R.; Zhang, H. Ferrocene-containing polymers synthesized by acyclic diene metathesis (ADMET) polymerization. Chinese J. Polym. Sci. 2016, 34, 242–252. [Google Scholar]
  32. Weychardt, H.; Plenio, H. Acyclic diene metathesis polymerization of divinylarenes and divinylferrocenes with grubbs-type olefin metathesis catalysts. Organometallics 2008, 27, 1479–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jiang, K.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, Y.; Lin, J.; Chen, M. Palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling polymerization: A new access to cross-conjugated polymers with modifiable structure and tunable optical/conductive properties. Macromolecules 2018, 51, 9662–9668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Holliday, B.J.; Swager, T.M. Conducting metallopolymers: The roles of molecular architecture and redox matching. Chem. Commun. 2005, 1, 23–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lin, Y.; Zhan, X. Oligomer molecules for efficient organic photovoltaics. Acc. Chem. Res. 2016, 49, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kagota, D.; Haque, T.; Koinuma, M.; Inagaki, A.; Asano, M.S.; Nomur, K. Time-resolved fluorescence spectra in the end-functionalized conjugated triblock copolymers consisting of poly(fluorene vinylene) and oligo(phenylene vinylene): Proposal of dynamical distortion in the excited state. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 6233–6240. [Google Scholar]
  37. Thomas, S.W.; Joly, G.D.; Swager, T.M. Chemical sensors based on amplifying fluorescent conjugated polymers. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 1339–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Günes, S.; Neugebauer, H.; Sariciftci, N.S. Conjugated polymer-based organic solar cells. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 1324–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kraft, A.; Grimsdale, A.C.; Holmes, A.B. Electroluminescent conjugated polymers-seeing polymers in a new light. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 402–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Barluenga, J.; Tomás-Gamasa, M.; Aznar, F.; Valdés, C. Metal-free carbon–carbon bond-forming reductive coupling between boronic acids and tosylhydrazones. Nat. Chem. 2009, 1, 494–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Scholl, M.; Ding, S.; Lee, C.W.; Grubbs, R.H. Synthesis and activity of a new generation of ruthenium-based olefin metathesis catalysts coordinated with 1,3-dimesityl-4,5-dihydroimidazol-2-ylidene Ligands. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 953–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Garber, S.B.; Kingsbury, J.S.; Gray, B.L.; Hoveyda, A.H. Efficient and recyclable monomeric and dendritic Ru-based metathesis catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8168–8179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Heo, R.W.; Park, J.-S.; Goodson, J.T.; Claudio, G.C.; Takenaga, M.; Albright, T.A.; Lee, T.R. ROMP of t-butyl-substituted ferrocenophanes affords soluble conjugated polymers that contain ferrocene moieties in the backbone. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 7225–7235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Heo, R.W.; Park, J.-S.; Lee, T.R. Synthesis and ring-opening metathesis polymerization of aryl-substituted 1,1’-(1,3-butadienylene)ferrocenes. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 2564–2573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kvaranl, A.; Konradsson, A.E.; Evans, C.; Gerisson, J.K.F. 1H NMR and UV-Vis spectroscopy of chlorine substituted stilbenes: Conformational studies. J. Mol. Struct. 2000, 553, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mukherjee, N.; Peetz, R.M. Acyclic diene metathesis synthesis of silylene- and siloxane-containing conjugated polymers and macrocycles. Macromolecules 2008, 41, 6677–6685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liu, J.; Gao, B.; Cheng, Y.; Xie, Z.; Geng, Y.; Wang, L.; Jing, X.; Wang, F. Novel white electroluminescent single polymer derived from fluorene and quinacidone. Macromolecules 2008, 41, 1162–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 11 01334 sch001 550
Scheme 1. General polymerization method for synthesizing polyferrocenes.
Scheme 1. General polymerization method for synthesizing polyferrocenes.
Polymers 11 01334 sch001
Polymers 11 01334 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Ferrocene-containing conjugated oligomers synthesized by acyclic diene metathesis (ADMET) polymerization.
Scheme 2. Ferrocene-containing conjugated oligomers synthesized by acyclic diene metathesis (ADMET) polymerization.
Polymers 11 01334 sch002
Polymers 11 01334 sch003 550
Scheme 3. Synthetic route of monomers.
Scheme 3. Synthetic route of monomers.
Polymers 11 01334 sch003
Polymers 11 01334 g001 550
Figure 1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) spectra of (a,c) monomer A and (b,d) oligomer A (Table 1, Entry 1).
Figure 1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) spectra of (a,c) monomer A and (b,d) oligomer A (Table 1, Entry 1).
Polymers 11 01334 g001
Polymers 11 01334 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) UV–Vis spectra of monomer A and oligomer A in CH2Cl2. (b) UV–Vis spectra of oligomers A, B, and C in CH2Cl2. (c) Fluorescence spectra of oligomers A, B, and C in CH2Cl2 (insert of magnified image of oligomer C).
Figure 2. (a) UV–Vis spectra of monomer A and oligomer A in CH2Cl2. (b) UV–Vis spectra of oligomers A, B, and C in CH2Cl2. (c) Fluorescence spectra of oligomers A, B, and C in CH2Cl2 (insert of magnified image of oligomer C).
Polymers 11 01334 g002
Polymers 11 01334 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curves of oligomer A under N2 and air; (b) differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curve of oligomer A.
Figure 3. (a) Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curves of oligomer A under N2 and air; (b) differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curve of oligomer A.
Polymers 11 01334 g003
Polymers 11 01334 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Cyclic voltammogram of monomer A and oligomer A. (b) Cyclic voltammogram of oligomer A, oligomer B, and oligomer C.
Figure 4. (a) Cyclic voltammogram of monomer A and oligomer A. (b) Cyclic voltammogram of oligomer A, oligomer B, and oligomer C.
Polymers 11 01334 g004
Polymers 11 01334 sch004 550
Scheme 4. Copolymerization of monomer A with monomer D.
Scheme 4. Copolymerization of monomer A with monomer D.
Polymers 11 01334 sch004
Polymers 11 01334 g005 550
Figure 5. Emission spectra of copolymer 1, oligomer A, and polymer D (5 × 10 −5 M, in CH2Cl2).
Figure 5. Emission spectra of copolymer 1, oligomer A, and polymer D (5 × 10 −5 M, in CH2Cl2).
Polymers 11 01334 g005
Polymers 11 01334 g006 550
Figure 6. SEM and TEM pictures (a,e) oligomer A; (b,f) oligomer B; (c,g) oligomer C; (d,h) copolymer 1.
Figure 6. SEM and TEM pictures (a,e) oligomer A; (b,f) oligomer B; (c,g) oligomer C; (d,h) copolymer 1.
Polymers 11 01334 g006
Table
Table 1. ADMET of monomers A, B, and C using Grubbs-type catalyst a.
Table 1. ADMET of monomers A, B, and C using Grubbs-type catalyst a.
EntryCatalystSolventTemp. (°C)t (h)Yield b (%)Mn c (Da)Mw c (Da) Ðc
Monomer A
1G2toluene801273200122071.10
2G2toluene1001282171418021.05
3G2toluene d802481161416661.03
4G2DCB1001283202122501.06
5G-H2toluene801278167217451.04
6G-H2toluene1001280170517881.05
7G2toluene/DCB802476186720291.09
Monomer B
8G2toluene802481171417911.04
9G-H2toluene802483137213771.00
10G2toluene/DCB802479216023741.10
Monomer C
11G2toluene802476275235581.29
12G3toluene/DCB60 2479335537241.11
13G3toluene/DCB604875336040661.21
a All reactions were finished under a vacuum; 1 mL solvent, and 1 mol % of catalyst were used. Degasification after 6 h (monomer A) or 12 h (monomers B and C); b isolated yield by precipitation using methanol; c GPC data in THF against a polystyrene standard; d 0.5 mL toluene was used.
Table
Table 2. Extinction coefficients of oligomers and copolymer.
Table 2. Extinction coefficients of oligomers and copolymer.
EntrySubstanceAε (Lmol−1cm−1)Equation a
1Oligomer A0.397800ε = A/BC (1)
2Oligomer B0.3887760
3Oligomer C0.3867720
4Copolymer 11.0521000
a ε Molar extinction coefficient (Lmol−1cm−1), A = absorbance, B = the length of light (cm), C = the concentration of substance (mol/L). b B = 1 cm, C = 5 × 10−5 M.
Table
Table 3. Electrochemical date of oligomers.
Table 3. Electrochemical date of oligomers.
CompoundOxidationReduction
I (μA)E (V)I (μA)E (V)
Oligomer A1.020.570.990.43
Oligomer B0.550.550.530.48
Oligomer C0.570.540.560.47
Table
Table 4. Copolymerization of monomer A with monomer D.
Table 4. Copolymerization of monomer A with monomer D.
EntryMA/MDYield (%) bMn (Da) cMw (Da) c Ð cx dy d
11:47613453238241.77525
21:2806602108931.65212
31:178261039731.5224
42:179243629011.1932
54:175189620581.0931
a All reactions were finished under a vacuum; 1 mL solvent and 1 mol % catalyst was used; b isolated yield by precipitation using methanol; c GPC data in THF against a polystyrene standard; d determined by 1H NMR and GPC; x = number of ferrocene units, y = number of fluorene units.
Table
Table 5. Oxidation–reduction potential of copolymer 1 with different molecular weights.
Table 5. Oxidation–reduction potential of copolymer 1 with different molecular weights.
Entryx ay bE (V)
1240.627
22120.577
3310.663
4320.661
a x = number of ferrocene units; b y = number of fluorene units.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gao, X.; Deng, L.; Hu, J.; Zhang, H. Ferrocene-Containing Conjugated Oligomers Synthesized by Acyclic Diene Metathesis Polymerization. Polymers 2019, 11, 1334. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11081334

AMA Style

Gao X, Deng L, Hu J, Zhang H. Ferrocene-Containing Conjugated Oligomers Synthesized by Acyclic Diene Metathesis Polymerization. Polymers. 2019; 11(8):1334. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11081334

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gao, Xin, Lei Deng, Jianfeng Hu, and Hao Zhang. 2019. "Ferrocene-Containing Conjugated Oligomers Synthesized by Acyclic Diene Metathesis Polymerization" Polymers 11, no. 8: 1334. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11081334

APA Style

Gao, X., Deng, L., Hu, J., & Zhang, H. (2019). Ferrocene-Containing Conjugated Oligomers Synthesized by Acyclic Diene Metathesis Polymerization. Polymers, 11(8), 1334. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11081334

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop