Next Article in Journal
Investigation on the Preparation of Rice Straw-Derived Cellulose Acetate and Its Spinnability for Electrospinning
Next Article in Special Issue
Using Geopolymer Technology on Synthesizing Leucite Ceramics
Previous Article in Journal
Liquid Crystals Investigation Behavior on Azo-Based Compounds: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
FT-IR Study, Thermal Analysis, and Evaluation of the Antibacterial Activity of a MK-Geopolymer Mortar Using Glass Waste as Fine Aggregate
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Investigation on the Compressive Strength and Time of Setting of Low-Calcium Fly Ash Geopolymer Paste Using Response Surface Methodology

Polymers 2021, 13(20), 3461; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13203461
by Pauline Rose J. Quiatchon 1,*, Ithan Jessemar Rebato Dollente 1,2, Anabel Balderama Abulencia 1, Roneh Glenn De Guzman Libre, Jr. 3, Ma. Beatrice Diño Villoria 1, Ernesto J. Guades 4, Michael Angelo Baliwag Promentilla 1,2 and Jason Maximino C. Ongpeng 1,3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Polymers 2021, 13(20), 3461; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13203461
Submission received: 31 August 2021 / Revised: 30 September 2021 / Accepted: 1 October 2021 / Published: 9 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geopolymers - Design, Preparation, Applications)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this paper, the compressive strength and setting time of geopolymers are studied by the response surface methodology. There are a few questions:
1. The serial number of table. Parameters of each factor and table Experiment Design (21 runs) needs to be modified.
2. The introduction part is not detailed, and the advantages of response surface methodology should be explained more. The following references can be cited:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.102101
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00691
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.049
3. Table. Experiment Design. It should be specified that Factor 1 is an interval, not three fixed values.
4. Explain in detail the reasons for the selection of the three factors. For example, why factor 2 is 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4. Why factor 3 is 0.4, 0.5, and 1.
  5. When researching through response surface methodology, there should be a verification process. Please supplement the verification experiment and explain it. Instead of giving a possible mix ratio (Table 10).
6. In the part of the experimental results, the mechanism discussion and analysis of compressive strength and setting time should be detailed.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper is very interesting, well written and well structured. The methodological rigor and the scientific profile are not lacking. Allow me to suggest some additions to improve the attractiveness of the paper to the scientific community.

*) Figure 1 is extremely interesting so it deserves a more detailed caption in order to be self-explanatory.

*) Please highlight the most relevant numerical values ​​shown in the Tables in bold.

*) How did the authors define Compressive Strength? Please specify.

*) Polymer Pastes are often used for the production of membranes for the most diverse uses including membranes for micro-electrostatic devices such as MEMS membranes. So, to highlight the great versatility of these materials, I recommend inserting a sentence in the text of the Introduction of the paper that highlights this versatility by putting the following relevant works in the bibliography:

doi: 10.3390/s21155237

doi:  10.1002/adem.201700858

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper has been modified, and it can be published! 

Back to TopTop