Next Article in Journal
Mathematical Modeling and Optimization of Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) Process Parameters for Shape Deviation Control of Polyamide 6 Using Taguchi Method
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis of Biobased and Hybrid Polyurethane Xerogels from Bacterial Polyester for Potential Biomedical Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Toothbrush Abrasion and Surface Treatments on Roughness and Gloss of Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparative Analysis of the Mechanical Behaviour of PEF and PET Uniaxial Stretching Based on the Time/Temperature Superposition Principle
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 13
Issue 21
10.3390/polym13213693
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ferulic Acid as Building Block for the Lipase-Catalyzed Synthesis of Biobased Aromatic Polyesters

by
Alfred Bazin
,
Luc Avérous
and
Eric Pollet
*
BioTeam/ICPEES-ECPM, UMR CNRS 7515, Université de Strasbourg, 25 Rue Becquerel, CEDEX 2, 67087 Strasbourg, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2021, 13(21), 3693; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13213693
Submission received: 30 September 2021 / Revised: 21 October 2021 / Accepted: 22 October 2021 / Published: 27 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Green Chemistry in Polymer Science and Sustainable Polymers)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Enzymatic synthesis of aromatic biobased polyesters is a recent and rapidly expanding research field. However, the direct lipase-catalyzed synthesis of polyesters from ferulic acid has not yet been reported. In this work, various ferulic-based monomers were considered for their capability to undergo CALB-catalyzed polymerization. After conversion into diesters of different lengths, the CALB-catalyzed polymerization of these monomers with 1,4-butanediol resulted in short oligomers with a DPn up to 5. Hydrogenation of the double bond resulted in monomers allowing obtaining polyesters of higher molar masses with DPn up to 58 and Mw up to 33,100 g·mol−1. These polyesters presented good thermal resistance up to 350 °C and Tg up to 7 °C. Reduction of the ferulic-based diesters into diols allowed preserving the double bond and synthesizing polyesters with a DPn up to 19 and Mw up to 15,500 g·mol−1 and higher Tg (up to 21 °C). Thus, this study has shown that the monomer hydrogenation strategy proved to be the most promising route to achieve ferulic-based polyester chains of high DPn. This study also demonstrates for the first time that ferulic-based diols allow the synthesis of high Tg polyesters. Therefore, this is an important first step toward the synthesis of competitive biobased aromatic polyesters by enzymatic catalysis.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The current environmental issues are directing research toward the production of greener materials through a more environmentally friendly processes. This trend is particularly important in the field of polyesters. Indeed, the vast majority of polyesters are fossil-based, often show poor biodegradability, and are synthesized through harsh reaction conditions [1].
For this reason, biobased polymers are gaining much attention. Indeed, such polymers are produced from a renewable feedstock [2,3] and can sometimes present good biodegradability [4]. However, similarly to their oil-based counterparts, these biobased polymers are also generally synthesized at high temperatures by employing potentially hazardous organometallic catalysts [5].
The lipase B from Candida antarctica (CALB) is an enzyme capable, in specific conditions, of catalyzing esterification and transesterification reactions. It is a versatile enzyme that accepts a wide variety of substrates [6]. Thus, CALB can be employed as a biocatalyst for the synthesis of various polyesters, replacing the organometallic catalyst and allowing milder reaction conditions [7,8]. As an example, our team studied the synthesis of various biobased aliphatic polyesters [9,10,11]. However, because of the superior thermal and mechanical properties of aromatic and semi-aromatic polyesters, their enzymatic synthesis is gaining attention [12,13]. As an example, the enzymatic synthesis of semi-aromatic furan-based polyesters has been studied [14,15,16,17], as these polymers represent a promising alternative to common oil-based aromatic polyesters such as polyethylene terephthalate [18]. However, furans are a particular case of C5 aromatic molecules. Therefore, we directed our research toward more classical C6 aromatic compounds as is the case for terephthalic acid. Several biobased compounds with C6 aromatic rings can be extracted from biomass and are promising candidates for biobased polymers synthesis, one of them being ferulic acid [19,20].
Ferulic acid can be extracted from various natural sources such as orange pulp, sugarcane bagasse, or corn and wheat bran [21]. This compound is present in hemicellulose as a crosslinker of the polysaccharide chains [22] and can also be produced from lignin [23]. Ferulic acid has been considered for potential uses as an additive in food and cosmetic products due to its interesting antioxidant and potential drug-like properties [24,25,26]. As a result of its rigid structure and adequate functionality, ferulic acid has been investigated for the synthesis of various polyesters with advanced properties. As an example, Thi et al. investigated the homopolymerization of coumaric derivatives, such as ferulic acid, catalyzed by an anhydride at temperatures up to 200 °C. The obtained polyesters showed interesting liquid–crystalline behavior but presented limited solubility in common organic solvents. Indeed, purely ferulic-based polymers result in very rigid materials with high glass transition and melting temperatures around 113 °C and 325 °C [27], respectively. The processability of these materials ends up hindered, and strategies of copolymerization as well as the modification of ferulic acid have been investigated to produce materials with more controlled and appropriate thermal properties [28]. Nguyen et al. [29] studied the polymerization of ferulic acid derivatives bearing hydroxyether moieties of various lengths, as represented in Scheme 1. Varying the length of the hydroxyether allowed fine-tuning the polymers’ thermal properties. The authors also showed the strong influence of the ferulic acid double bound on the polyester thermal properties by hydrogenating the ferulic derivatives. The same authors obtained interesting results on the copolymerization of these derivatives with cyclic monomers such as ε-caprolactone or l-lactide [30].
Recently, Kurt et al. [31] used hydrogenated derivatives of ferulic acid for the synthesis of aromatic polyesters catalyzed by zinc acetate and obtained Mn up to 8000 g·mol−1. Moreover, because of its therapeutic as well as anti-UV properties, native unmodified ferulic acid also allows the synthesis of material with innovative properties. As an example, Ouimet et al. produced a biobased copolyester from ferulic acid and diethyl adipate. Upon degradation, this polymer then allowed the controlled release of ferulic acid as an antibacterial and antioxidant agent [32]. Recently, Parthiban et al. used ferulic acid for the synthesis of UV-absorbing polymers. Pospiech et al. [33] showed that insertion of ferulic acid units in an aliphatic polyester significantly improved the material Tg.
Enzymes such as CALB have been investigated by Pion et al. in processes for the synthesis of ferulic-based monomers subsequently used for the elaboration of various materials [34]. This method allowed the production of various polymers such as isocyanate-free poly(hydroxy)urethanes [35] and epoxy thermosets [36]. Polyesters were also synthesized with acyl chloride [37] or by ADMET [38]. These studies showed the great potential of ferulic acid for the synthesis of materials with tunable thermal and mechanical properties as well as antioxidant properties. However, the enzymatic catalysis was not used for the polymerization step. The polymerization of ferulic-based monomers is often performed under harsh thermal conditions that can be deleterious to the monomer integrity, leading to a coloration of the material. Moreover, the often toxic metal-based catalyst can remain in the final material, leading to environmental and health issues [39].
CALB has already been used for the synthesis of aromatic polyesters [40]. However, lipase-catalyzed polymerization of aromatic monomers often results in low molar mass polyesters [14,15]. Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, CALB and lipases in general have never been studied as biocatalysts for the polymerization of ferulic monomers.
In this study, ferulic acid was modified into new diesters of different lengths and polymerized with 1,4-butanediol using CALB as a biocatalyst. Then, two strategies were developed to enhance the reactivity of ferulic-based monomers in CALB-catalyzed polymerization and achieve higher molar masses: the hydrogenation and reduction of the monomer. Then, the structure and the properties of the final materials were investigated. The impact of the structure of the ferulic-based moieties first on the reactivity of the CALB and then on the thermal properties (glass transition, melting temperature, and degradation temperatures) of the final materials were assessed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Lipase B from Candida antarctica immobilized on acrylic resin (activity measured to 11,000 PLU/g (propyl laurate units)) (CALB), deuterated chloroform (CDCl3), dibutyl aluminum hydride (DIBAL-H) solution in toluene (25 wt %), and palladium on activated charcoal (Pd/C) were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich (Saint-Louis, MO, USA). Diethyl adipate (DEA), potassium iodine, methyl 4-chlorobutyrate, and diphenyl ether were purchased from Acros Organics (Geel, Belgium). 1,4-butanediol (1,4-BDO), acetophenone, ferulic acid, and methyl chloroacetate were supplied by Alfa Aesar (Heysham, UK). Methanol and potassium carbonate were supplied by Fisher scientific (Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France). Chloroform was supplied by Carlo Erba (Emmendingen, Germany). CALB was dried at 25 °C for 24 h under vacuum before use. Other reactants were employed without further purification.

2.2. Characterization

A 400 MHz (Bruker, Wissembourg, France) spectrometer was used for 1H NMR analysis, and a Bruker 500 MHz spectrometer was used for 2D and 13C NMR analyses. The solvents employed were CDCl3 and DMSO-d6, depending on the solubility of the substrate. Calibration of the spectra was performed using the CDCl3 peak (δH = 7.26 ppm, δC = 77.16 ppm) and DMSO-d6 peak (δH = 2.50 ppm, δC = 39.52 ppm).
Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC) was performed to estimate the number average molar mass (Mn), mass average molar mass (Mw), and dispersity (Đ). The analyses were performed in THF at 40 °C in an Acquity-APC (Waters, Guyancourt, France) equipped with three columns (Acquity APC XT 450, 200 and 45Å 2.5 µm 4.6 × 150 mm). First, 10 µL of dissolved polymer were injected, and a flow of 0.6 mL/min was applied for the 11 min run. Refractive index (RI) detector and photodiode array (PDA) detector at 254 nm were used. A calibration curve with polystyrene (PS) standards was carried out for molar mass determination. The molar mass calculation was performed with data collected from the UV detector.
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analyses were performed using a Q2000 DSC apparatus from TA Instrument (TA Instrument, New Castle, DE, USA) to estimate the polymers’ glass transition temperature (Tg) as well as their melting temperature (Tm) and crystallization temperature (Tc), if applicable. Typically, a 1 to 3 mg sample in a sealed aluminum pan was treated following a three-step method: (1) fast heating to 180 °C (the sample was kept for 3 min at this high temperature to erase all thermal history), (2) cooling at 10 °C/min to −80 °C followed by an isotherm of 5 min, and (3) second heating at 10 °C/min to 180 °C. The characteristic temperatures were determined from this second heating scan. DSC was employed as well for the determination of the synthesized compounds melting points.
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed to determine the thermal stability of the polymers. The measurements were conducted on a High-Res TGA Q5000 from TA Instrument (New Castle, DE, USA). Samples between 1 and 2 mg were heated at 10 °C/min from room temperature to 600 °C.
Infrared spectroscopy (IR) was performed with a Nicolet 380 Fourier transformed infrared spectrometer (Thermo Electron Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA) used in reflection mode and equipped with an ATR diamond module (ATR-FTIR). The spectra were collected at a resolution of 4 cm−1 and with 32 scans per run.
MALDI-TOF analyses were carried out on an AutoflexTM MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics GmbH, Bremen, Germany) used at a maximum accelerating potential of 20 kV in positive mode and operated in linear mode. The delay extraction was fixed at 560 ns, and the frequency of the laser (nitrogen 337 nm) was set at 5 Hz. The acquisition mass range was set to 1500–10,000 m/z with a matrix suppression deflection (cut off) set to 1500 m/z. The equipment was calibrated with ACTH 1-17 ([M+H]+ 2094.42), insulin ([M+H]+ 5732.52), ubiquitin I ([M+H]+ 8565.76), and myoglobin ([M+H]+ 16,952.31). Spectra were processed with flexAnalysis software (Version, Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA). Sample preparation was performed with the dried droplet method using a mixture of 0.5 µL of sample with 0.5 µL of matrix solution dried at room temperature. The 2-[(2E)-3-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-2-methylprop-2-enylidene]malononitrile (DCTB) matrix was prepared at 20 mg/mL in dichloromethane.

2.3. Synthesis of Ferulic Diesters

Ferulic acid was dissolved in a large volume of methanol. A few drops of sulfuric acid were added as the catalyst. The solution was refluxed overnight. Then, the solution was neutralized by a few drops of saturated sodium carbonate solution. Afterwards, the solvent was evaporated, and the product was recovered in ethyl acetate and dried over MgSO4. The salts were extracted by filtration, and the solvent was evaporated. Methyl ferulate (1) was obtained as a clear yellow oil and used without further purification. (Yield: quantitative, IR: 3391 cm−1 (O-H), 2949 cm−1 (C-H), 1698 cm−1 (C=O ester), 1510 cm−1 (C=C Ar), 1262 cm−1 (C-O ester), 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (in ppm): 7.62 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H), 7.07 (dd, 1H), 7.03 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H), 6.92 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.29 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H), 5.83 (brs, 1H), 3.93 (s, 3H), 3.80 (s, 3H)). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ (in ppm): 167.81, 148.08, 146.87, 145.04, 126.93, 123.05, 115.12, 114.83, 109.47, 77.10, 55.95, 51.64, 30.93.
Then, the methyl ferulate (1) (4 g, 19.2 mmol, 1 eq.) was dissolved in acetonitrile (95 mL). Potassium carbonate (7.97 g, 57.63 mmol, 3 eq.) and potassium iodine (0.77 g, 4.61 mmol, 0.24 eq.) were added as catalyst. The corresponding chloroester (methyl chloroacetate or methylchlorobutyrate) was added (38.42 mmol, 2 eq.). Then, the solution was refluxed overnight. After cooling down, the solution was filtered to eliminate the undissolved catalyst. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude product was recovered in ethyl acetate and washed once with a saturated solution of sodium carbonate and twice with brine. The organic solution was dried over MgSO4, and the solvent was evaporated. Then, the product was recrystallized in a mixture of ethanol and water.
The methyl 4-(methyl ethanoate-oxy)-ferulate (2a) was obtained as white crystals (yield: 80%, melting point: 64 °C, IR (in cm−1): 2952 (C-H), 1735 (C=O ester), 1709 (C=O ester), 1517 (C=C Ar), 1268 (C-O ester), 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (in ppm): 7.62 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 7.12–7.02 (m, 2H), 6.78 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 6.32 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 4.73 (s, 2H), 3.91 (s, 3H), 3.80 (s, 6H)). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ (in ppm): 169.02, 167.56, 149.70, 149.14, 144.49, 128.90, 122.09, 116.31, 113.52, 110.59, 77.06, 66.10, 56.00, 52.38, 51.70.
The methyl 4-(methyl butanoate-oxy)-ferulate (2b) was obtained as off-white needles (yield: 80%, melting point: 83 °C, IR (in cm−1): 2952 (C-H), 1699 (C=O ester), 1510 (C=C Ar), 1250 (C-O ester), 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (in ppm) 7.62 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H), 7.13–7.01 (m, 2H), 6.86 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.30 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 4.09 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 2H), 3.88 (s, 3H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.68 (s, 3H), 2.54 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.23–2.08 (m, 2H)). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ (in ppm): 173.54, 167.69, 150.46, 149.60, 144.80, 127.54, 122.52, 115.53, 112.66, 110.22, 77.09, 67.79, 55.96, 51.68, 51.63, 30.41, 24.40.

2.4. Hydrogenation of the Ferulic Diesters

Pd/C (75 mg, 5 wt %) and the diester 2a or 2b (1.5 g, 5.1 mmol) were placed in a round-bottom flask and sealed with a septum. The powders were placed under argon, and ethanol (15 mL) was carefully added with a syringe. Then, hydrogen was bubbled for 15 min in the solution. Finally, the solution was stirred for 24 h with hydrogen overpressure. The solution was filtered through celite, and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure.
The methyl 3-(3-methoxy-4-(2-methoxy-2-oxoethoxy)phenyl)propanoate (4a) was obtained as a transparent oil (yield: 97%, IR (in cm−1): 2952 (C-H), 1731 (C=O ester), 1512 (C=C Ar), 1258 (C-O ester), 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (in ppm): 6.80–6.65 (m, 3H), 4.67 (s, 2H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.67 (s, 3H), 2.90 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.61 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H)). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ (in ppm) 173.32, 169.61, 149.57, 145.69, 135.08, 120.11, 114.56, 112.38, 77.13, 66.62, 55.88, 52.18, 51.64, 35.84, 30.61.
The methyl 4-(2-methoxy-4-(3-methoxy-3-oxopropyl)phenoxy)butanoate (4b) was obtained as a yellow oil (yield: 99%, IR (in cm−1): 2951 (C-H), 1731 (C=O ester), 1513 (C=C Ar), 1257 (C-O ester), 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (in ppm): 6.80 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 6.75–6.65 (m, 2H), 4.03 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 2H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 3.67 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 6H), 2.89 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 2.61 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.54 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 2.13 (m, 2H)). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ (in ppm): 173.72, 173.42, 149.50, 146.75, 133.63, 120.19, 113.62, 112.25, 77.09, 68.03, 55.94, 51.64, 51.62, 35.99, 30.62, 30.54, 24.60.

2.5. Synthesis of the Ferulic Diols

Ferulic diester 2a or 2b (1.5 g) was added to a three-neck flask equipped with a condenser and a dropping funnel. The flask was sealed with a septum and flushed with argon. Dry toluene (55 mL) was added. The solution was cooled at −78 °C, and a solution of DIBAL-H in toluene (27.1 mmol, 5 eq.) was added dropwise over 20 min. Then, the solution was left for 2 h at room temperature. Afterwards, the solution was cooled down at 0 °C, and ethyl acetate (20 mL) was carefully added. Then, a saturated solution of Rochel salts was added (30 mL) to complete the quenching of the reaction medium. The solution was left stirring overnight. The aqueous phase was washed 3 times with ethyl acetate. Then, the organic phase was washed once with brine and dried over MgSO4. Afterwards, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure.
The 4-(hydroxyethoxy)-coniferyl alcohol (6a) was obtained as a white powder (yield: 94%, melting point: 103 °C, IR (in cm−1): 3448 (O-H), 2932 (C-H), 1511 (C=C Ar), 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (in ppm): 7.05 (s, 1H), 6.90 (s, 2H), 6.47 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H), 6.26 (dt, J = 15.9, 5.3 Hz, 1H), 4.84 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H), 4.81 (t, J = 5.4 Hz, 1H), 4.10 (t, J = 4.8 Hz, 2H), 3.96 (t, J = 5.1 Hz, 2H), 3.78 (s, 3H), 3.71 (q, J = 5.3 Hz, 2H)). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (in ppm): 149.51, 148.12, 130.43, 129.04, 129.00, 119.61, 113.49, 109.79, 70.63, 62.11, 60.06, 55.86, 39.98.
The 4-(hydroxybutoxy)-coniferyl alcohol (6b) was obtained as an off-white powder (yield: 98%, melting point: 87 °C, IR (in cm−1): 3273 (O-H), 2923 (C-H), 1512 (C=C Ar), 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (in ppm): 7.04 (s, 1H), 6.88 (s, 2H), 6.46 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H), 6.25 (dt, J = 15.9, 5.3 Hz, 1H), 4.80 (t, J = 5.4 Hz, 1H), 4.44 (t, J = 5.2 Hz, 1H), 4.10 (td, J = 5.3, 1.7 Hz, 2H), 3.94 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 3.78 (s, 3H), 3.45 (q, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 1.85–1.67 (m, 2H), 1.64–1.50 (m, 2H)). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (in ppm): 149.54, 148.14, 130.30, 129.05, 128.94, 119.64, 113.42, 109.84, 68.59, 62.10, 60.90, 55.96, 39.99, 29.50, 26.02.

2.6. Enzymatic Polymerization

Each polyester was synthesized according to a procedure adapted from a previous study [17] (with optimal temperature, solvent, and concentrations) but varying the nature of the solvent, reaction time, and pressure when necessary or desired. Then, the obtained polymers were recovered with the same procedure as in the literature.
From ferulic-based diesters (3a-b and 5a-b):
The ferulic-based diester (150 mg) and 1,4-BDO were placed in a Schlenck reactor in equimolar proportions. Then, diphenyl ether (300 wt % vs. the mass of the monomers) and CALB (20 wt % regarding the mass of the monomers) were added. The solution was magnetically stirred and placed at 90 °C and 350 mbar. After 4 h, the pressure was decreased to 100 mbar. After another 4 h, the pressure was finally set to 20 mbar and was kept to this value until the end of the reaction.
From ferulic-based diols (7a-b):
The ferulic-based diol (150 mg) and diethyl adipate were placed in a Schlenck reactor in equimolar proportions. Then, acetophenone (300 wt % vs. the mass of the monomers) and CALB (20 wt % regarding the mass of the monomers) were added. The solution was magnetically stirred and placed at 90 °C and 350 mbar. After 4 h, the pressure was decreased to 250 mbar and was kept to this value until the end of the reaction.
Recovery of the polyesters:
The solution was diluted with chloroform (2 mL) and filtered through cotton wool to remove the catalyst. Then, the polymer was precipitated in a cold methanol bath under vigorous stirring. Afterwards, the solution was centrifuged (8000 RCF, 10 min, 4 °C), and the supernatant was eliminated. Finally, the recovered polymer was dried for 24 h in a vacuum oven at 40 °C before analysis.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Polyesters Based on Ferulic Diesters

Various ferulic acid derivatives were synthesized and enzymatically polymerized. The first step has been to modify the ferulic acid to optimize its reactivity toward CALB. Indeed, CALB catalyzed polymerization results in faster kinetics and higher molar masses by transesterification with methyl or ethyl esters than by polycondensation [41,42,43]. The small alcohol adduct in transesterification can easily be eliminated, compared to water, shifting the equilibrium of the reaction. Therefore, ferulic acid was first esterified to give methyl ferulate (1) (confirmed by 1H and 13C NMR, see Supplementary Materials Sections Figures S1 and S8). Ferulic acid is a bifunctional molecule able to undergo homopolymerization through polycondensation [44]. Homopolymers of ferulic acid give incredibly rigid polyesters with high Tg [27], making them difficult to process because of their extreme melting temperature and difficulty to dissolve in common solvents. In addition, phenols, such as the one in methyl ferulate, have a lower reactivity compared to primary alcohols, especially in CALB-catalyzed transesterification [24,45]. For all these reasons, ferulic acid is often modified before polymerization [28,29,31]. This allows at the same time to fine-tune the properties of the monomer and those of the resulting polymer, especially of the chain rigidity. Thus, methyl ferulate was modified through Williamson ether synthesis with chloroesters of different lengths (2a-b) (Scheme 2). This process allowed to overcome the low reactivity of the methyl ferulate phenol group toward CALB. The structure of the obtained monomers was confirmed by 1H and 13C NMR (see Supplementary Materials Sections Figures S2, S3, S9 and S10). The resulting products were diesters capable of undergoing enzymatic transesterification with CALB.
The obtained diesters were assayed for CALB-catalyzed polymerization with 1,4-BDO in diphenyl ether under reduced pressure. Then, the obtained products were analyzed by 1H NMR (Figure 1 and Supplementary Materials Sections Figures S17 and S18).
The appearance of characteristic peaks (a-IV and b-IV on Figure 1) of the (CH2-OC(O)) protons from esters between δ = 4.05 and 4.30 ppm confirms the transesterification of the methyl esters with 1,4-BDO. For both monomers 2a and 2b, the intensity of the characteristic peaks of the methyl ester functions (respectively a-II, a-III on Figure 1 at δ = 3.72 ppm for 2a and b-II at δ = 3.79 ppm and b-III at δ = 3.68 ppm on Figure 1 for 2b) decreased after polymerization when compared with the starting material. This confirms that the methyl ester moieties were consumed during the reaction and therefore converted by CALB. However, the intensities of the end groups signals a-II, a-III, and b-II in the products are still important, indicating a low conversion of the monomer and consequently low molar mass chains. This was confirmed by SEC analysis (see Table 1 and Supplementary Materials Sections Figure S23) that gave molar masses of 1300 g·mol−1 and 2000 g·mol−1 for 3a and 3b, respectively.
The signals corresponding to the two esters of the ferulic diester 2b can be distinguished and were unambiguously attributed thanks to 2D NMR (Figure 1 and Supplementary Materials Sections Figures S15 and S16). The low intensity of the peak corresponding to the remaining terminal methyl of the methyl butyrate moiety (b-III) in the product suggests a quantitative conversion of this ester function. On the contrary, the intensity of the peak corresponding to the terminal protons of the ester neighboring the double bond (b-II) is only reduced by half after the reaction (Figure 1b and Supplementary Materials Sections Figure S18). This suggests a lower conversion and thus a lower reactivity of this ester function toward CALB. Therefore, this poorly reactive function could rapidly become a terminal group at both ends of the growing chains and thus strongly limit their growth, leading to low molar masses.
The low reactivity of the ferulic acid and its corresponding ester toward CALB has already been described in the literature [46,47,48], showing that para and ortho hydroxyl and methoxy substituents on the aromatic ring of coumaric derivatives had an inhibitory effect on the CALB activity in esterification and transesterification. Computational modeling performed by Otto et al. [49] suggests that steric hindrance cannot explain this loss of reactivity toward specific substitutions and rather indicates that charge distribution could be the cause. We observe here that this lack of reactivity hindered the synthesis of high molar mass polyesters after 72 h of reaction, resulting in oligoesters with a DPn up to 5.

3.2. Polyesters Based on Hydrogenated Ferulic Diesters

The hydrogenation of the double bond has been shown to unlock the reactivity of ferulic acid [47,48]. This method was previously used for the CALB-catalyzed synthesis of ferulic-based monomers [34]. It allowed a high conversion of the substrate in only 4 h. We used a similar strategy to improve the reactivity of the studied monomers toward CALB but this time in a process of enzymatic polymerization.
The monomers 2a and 2b were hydrogenated using Pd/C as catalyst in ethanol to obtain 5a and 5b. The structure of the products was confirmed by 1H and 13C NMR (see Supplementary Materials Sections Figures S4, S5, S11 and S12). Then, they were polymerized with 1,4-BDO (Scheme 3). The reaction was monitored by SEC analysis of samples withdrawn at regular intervals (Figure 2).
As expected, the reactivity of the ferulic moieties was greatly enhanced by hydrogenation. Quantitative conversion of the monomers 4a and 4b was observed from NMR analyses in Supplementary Materials Sections Figures S19 and S20. From NMR analysis of 5a, it is possible to distinguish the signal corresponding to the CH2 of the diol linked to the ester vicinal to where the double bond at δ = 4.19 ppm and the CH2 of the diol linked to the ester coming from the Williamson ether synthesis at δ = 4.06 ppm. Both peaks have similar intensity, indicating that the diol has bound to both esters without distinction. This result would suggest that both esters have an equivalent reactivity toward CALB.
The polyesters 5a and 5b were obtained with high Mw of 39,400 g·mol−1 and 38,000 g·mol−1, respectively, as measured by SEC (see Supplementary Materials Sections Figure S24 and Table 1). It is interesting to notice that 5a systematically resulted in higher DPn than 5b (58 for 5a compared to 37 for 5b). This result is counterintuitive and quite unexpected, since previous studies showed that CALB presented a higher activity toward aliphatic monomers with a number of carbons higher than 4 [9,50,51]. A higher reactivity of 4b in comparison to 4a would be expected, as previous studies showed higher reactivity of the ester function with increasing distance from the bulky aromatic ring [49]. However, prediction of the enzyme activity cannot be only based on steric hindrance considerations because of the complex interactions with the substrate [48]. The Mn of 5a (17,900 g·mol−1) is comparable to values obtained for equivalent aliphatic polyesters enzymatically synthesized with 1,6-HDO. However, the aromatic polyesters show lower DPn compared to aliphatic ones because of the high molar mass of the ferulic-based diesters (58 for 4a compared to 81–83 in the literature [52]).
Thus, the activity of CALB toward the ferulic-based diester was efficiently unlocked by hydrogenation of the double bond, leading to high molar mass polyesters. As depicted before, two main hypotheses could explain this result. First, the hydrogenation of the double bond lowers the rigidity of the molecule, facilitating its introduction and orientation in the active site of the enzyme. The second hypothesis is that the electronic conjugation between the ester and the aromatic ring is broken by the disappearance of the double bond. This conjugation could lower the reactivity of the ferulic esters [42,47,49]. Indeed, because of its double bond, ferulic acid presents multiple resonance forms, making it less prompt to nucleophilic attack from the serine amino acid of the CALB active site, hindering enzymatic activity.
The thermal properties of the obtained polyesters were assessed (Figure 3 and Table 1). Both polyesters 5a and 5b were fully amorphous with a Tg measured by DSC (Figure 3a) at 7 and −9 °C, respectively. It is the first time these monomers are used for polymer synthesis and no similar structures, even synthesized by any other means than enzymatic catalysis, could be found in the literature for comparison. Polyesters 5a and 5b present low Tg in comparison to fully ferulic-based polyesters showing a Tg above 113 °C [27]. The hydrogenation of the monomer’s double bond as well as the use of an aliphatic diol leads to a polymer structure with a lower Tg. However, when compared to fully aliphatic polyesters synthesized from 1,4-BDO such as polybutylene adipate (PBAd) or polybutylene succinate (PBS) (with a Tg of −59 and −37 °C, respectively [9]), the use of the ferulic-based hydrogenated diester increased the Tg of the polyesters. These results are in agreement with previous studies showing that adding ferulic-based units to a polymeric structure leads to mostly amorphous materials with increased Tg [38,53]. Finally, the polyester synthesized from methyl 4-chlorobutyrate-based diester (5b) presents a lower Tg compared to the one based on methyl chloroacetate (5a). Indeed, its longer aliphatic moiety induces more chain flexibility, reducing the Tg of the final polymer.
The polymers were also analyzed by TGA, and the weight loss curves are presented in Figure 3b. The temperature of degradation at the maximum rate (Tdmax) was measured at 373 °C and 394 °C for 5a and 5b, respectively. These values are within the range of those found for aliphatic polyesters such as PBAd and PBS (391 and 355 °C, respectively [9]). Interestingly, the degradation of both polyesters 5a and 5b occurred in two steps. This degradation pattern has already been observed in other aromatic polyesters such as PET [54]. The first step could correspond to the thermal degradation of the aliphatic parts of the polymer and correspond to the temperature of the ester bonds breaking. Then, the aromatic parts get reorganized into more thermally stable aromatic polycyclic ashes, which get decomposed during the second step occurring at a much higher temperature.

3.3. Polyesters Based on Ferulic Diols

Another strategy of ferulic acid modification was evaluated. Reducing the methyl ferulate to its corresponding alcohol could offer a similar effect to hydrogenation. Indeed, after the reduction, the monomer gains a CH2 and thus flexibility (Scheme 4), which could favor the accessibility of the molecule to the enzyme active site. Moreover, the alcohol resulting from the reduction would not be electronically conjugated to the aromatic ring. Additionally, along this synthesis path, the monomer double bond is preserved, bringing rigidity to the chain backbone and allowing further modification of the polymer [44,55].
Both ferulic-based diesters previously synthesized (2a and 2b) have been reduced to their corresponding diols by diisobutyl aluminum hydride (DIBAL-H). The structure of the monomers was confirmed by 1H and 13C NMR (see Supplementary Materials Sections Figures S6, S7, S13 and S14). Then, the monomers were evaluated for the synthesis of polyesters via CALB-catalyzed polymerization, as presented in Scheme 4. Diethyl adipate has been selected as a co-monomer, since previous studies demonstrated its good reactivity with CALB, thus maximizing the chances of obtaining a high molar mass polyester [50,56].
The obtained polyester 7a and 7b were analyzed by NMR (Supplementary Materials Sections Figures S21 and S22) and SEC (Supplementary Materials Sections Figure S25). The Mn of 7a and 7b determined by SEC after 24 h were respectively of 6500 and 6300 g·mol−1 corresponding to a DPn of 19 and 17. The two polyesters were obtained with similar molar masses and kinetics, which is in agreement with the study by Pellis et al. [57], who showed that moving the hydroxyl group further away from the aromatic ring did not significantly alter the molar mass of the obtained polyesters. Longer times of polymerization did not increase the polymers’ molar masses. On the contrary, a decrease in Mn was even observed after 24 h of reaction (Figure 4). Side reactions could be responsible for such a decrease in molar masses. To investigate this phenomenon and to understand more deeply the structure of the formed polymeric chains, the synthesized polyesters have been analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS.
Although the large polydispersity of the polymer does not allow obtaining quantitative results from the MALDI-TOF MS [58], it is possible to qualitatively compare the end groups with each other. A large number of polymeric chains are ended with both an ester and a hydroxyl group (green triangles in Figure 5a). This is expected due to the one-to-one stoichiometry of the monomers. However, a significant proportion of polymeric chains are terminated on both ends by an ester group (red triangles in Figure 5a). This result indicates an unbalanced stoichiometry in the reaction medium with an excess of the diester. Side reactions involving one of the monomers could result in its deactivation or loss of reactivity and thus unbalance the stoichiometry of the reaction. However, no obvious traces of side products could be found on the NMR analyses. Moreover, reacting the diol alone with and without CALB in the presence of ethanol did not allow clearly identifying any side product from 6a. Using an excess of diol resulted in polymers with a majority of chains terminated with both an ester and a hydroxyl group (Supplementary Materials Sections Figure S26 and Table S1). However, the polymer presented similar or lower molar masses (Supplementary Materials Sections Figure S27 and Table S2) than for the synthesis with a stoichiometric ratio. The end group analysis also showed traces of hydrolysis with chains ended with both an acid and an ester, resulting in a residue m/z equal to 174 (purple triangles in Figure 5a). This phenomenon could also explain the end of chain growth followed by the slight decrease in molar masses (Figure 4). Finally, macrocycles were detected, and although they were present in a lower amount compared to other end groups, they could also contribute to lowering the apparent molar mass determined by SEC.
The thermal properties of the polyesters have been assessed by DSC and TGA (Figure 6 and Table 1). The Tg of 7a and 7b were measured at 21 °C and 2 °C, respectively. Once again, the materials synthesized are fully amorphous and therefore present no melting or crystallization temperatures. However, despite a lower molar mass, polyester 7a presents the highest Tg when compared with all other polymers from this study. As expected, the preservation of the double bond resulted in a more rigid polymeric backbone and therefore a higher Tg. This observation is in agreement with recent results from Prezzana et al. [59]. The diol originating from methyl 4-chlorobutyrate (6b) gives a polyester with lower Tg compared to the diol obtained from methyl chloroacetate (6a). Again, the longer aliphatic chain of monomer 6b decreases the Tg of the resulting polyester 7b. The Tg of this polyester was even lower than the Tg measured for polyesters synthesized from the methyl 4-chlorobutyrate hydrogenated-based diester (5b). However, these results are not fully com-parable, since in 7b, the aromaticity is brought by the diol when in 5b, it comes from the diester. Thus, these polyesters present aliphatic co-monomers (1,4-BDO and DEA) that are not directly comparable and could have an impact on the thermal transitions of the final material.
The thermal degradation of 7a and 7b was measured by TGA. A similar degradation behavior was observed for both polymers. When compared with 5a and 5b, the degradation begins at lower temperatures with a Td5% of only 316 and 308 °C for 7a and 7b, respectively. This early degradation could be due to the presence of the double bond of the α,β-unsaturated alcohol (coniferyl). It is known to form by-products such as aldehydes through radical pathways during thermal degradation [60]. The degradation of the polymers appears as three steps with maximum rates of degradation at 343, 403, and 506 °C for 7a and 321, 418, and 507 °C for 7b. As depicted before, the first step of degradation could correspond to the degradation linked to the presence of coniferyl alcohol moieties. The second degradation step is the fastest and is in the temperature range of degradation of aliphatic polyesters. The final degradation step corresponds to the aromatic part of the polyesters that only get fully degraded above 530 °C, as observed for the previous polymers.

4. Conclusions

In this study, several various monomers derived from ferulic acid were synthesized and tested for CALB-catalyzed polymerization. First, ferulic acid was converted into a long and a short diester. With both substrates, only partial monomer conversion by CALB was observed, resulting in low molar mass oligomers. This observation was in good agreement with studies in the literature pointing to the α,β-unsaturation as responsible for the lack of reactivity of ferulic compounds. Thus, α,β-unsaturation of the monomers was eliminated by hydrogenation prior to their assessment for CALB-catalyzed polymerization. The hydrogenation of the monomers allowed the synthesis of polyesters with the highest molar masses in this study, with Mw up to 33,100 g·mol−1 for the shorter diester (4a). The Mn of the polyester (17,900 g·mol−1) is comparable to values obtained for equivalent fully aliphatic polyesters synthesized by CALB-catalyzed polymerization. However, lower DPn (58 for 4a) values were obtained with aromatic monomers when compared to aliphatic ones (81–83 [52]) due to the high molar mass of the ferulic-based diester monomer. Moreover, hydrogenation of the ferulic-based monomers led to polymer Tg up to 7 °C, which was below ambient temperature. Another strategy used in this study was the reduction of the ferulic diesters into their corresponding diols. The polyesters synthesized from the reduced monomers resulted in Mw up to 15,500 g·mol−1. However, the presence of side reactions (hydrolysis, cyclization) was observed in the medium, explaining the lower molar mass obtained when compared to the hydrogenated monomers. However, in line with existing literature, it has been shown that preserving the monomer double bond, as in the reduction of the ferulic diesters, stiffens the polymer chain backbone, resulting in higher Tg (up to 21 °C). However, although the presence of the double bond increases the Tg of the polymer, it could constitute its weak point during thermal degradation, resulting in an early thermal degradation when compared with the other polyesters.
This study constitutes a first step in understanding the optimal condition for the CALB-catalyzed synthesis of ferulic-based aromatic polyesters. Other modifications of ferulic acid as well as the combination of the previously synthesized monomers with other co-monomers will be investigated. Indeed, such monomers could give access to biobased polymers with innovative properties that could challenge conventional petroleum-based materials.
Moreover, the enzymatic degradation of the polymers produced in this study could be investigated in order to reduce their end-of-life environmental impact through recycling [61,62]. Indeed, several studies focused on the CALB-catalyzed depolymerization of polyesters [63,64]. This could allow both the synthesis and recycling of ferulic-based polyester using the same enzyme.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/polym13213693/s1, Figure S1. 1H NMR analysis of methyl ferulate; Figure S2. 1H NMR analysis of methyl 4-(methyl ethanoate-oxy)-ferulate (2a); Figure S3. 1H NMR analysis of methyl 4-(methyl butanoate-oxy)-ferulate (2b); Figure S4. 1H NMR analysis of methyl 3-(3-methoxy-4-(2-methoxy-2-oxoethoxy)phenyl)propanoate (4a); Figure S5. 1H NMR analysis of methyl 4-(2-methoxy-4-(3-methoxy-3-oxopropyl)phenoxy)butanoate (4b); Figure S6. 1H NMR analysis of 4-(hydroxyethoxy)-coniferyl alcohol (6a); Figure S7. 1H NMR analysis of 4-(hydroxybutoxy)-coniferyl alcohol (6b); Figure S8. 13C NMR analysis of methyl ferulate (1); Figure S9. 13C NMR analysis of methyl 4-(methyl ethanoate-oxy)-ferulate (2a); Figure S10. 13C NMR analysis of methyl 4-(methyl butanoate-oxy)-ferulate (2b); Figure S11. 13C NMR analysis of methyl 3-(3-methoxy-4-(2-methoxy-2-oxoethoxy)phenyl)propanoate (4a); Figure S12. 13C NMR analysis of methyl 4-(2-methoxy-4-(3-methoxy-3-oxopropyl)phenoxy)butanoate (4b); Figure S13. 13C NMR analysis of 4-(hydroxyethoxy)-coniferyl alcohol (6a); Figure S14. 13C NMR analysis of 4-(hydroxybutoxy)-coniferyl alcohol (6b); Figure S15. HMBC NMR analysis of methyl 4-(methyl butanoate-oxy)-ferulate (2b) in CDCl3; Figure S16. HSQC NMR analysis of methyl 4-(methyl butanoate-oxy)-ferulate (2b) in CDCl3; Figure S17. 1H NMR analysis of poly(butylene-co-4-(methyl ethanoate-oxy)-ferulate) (3a); Figure S18. 1H NMR analysis of poly(butylene-co-4-(methyl butanoate-oxy)-ferulate) (3b); Figure S19. 1H NMR analysis of poly(butylene-co-3-(3-methoxy-4-(2-methoxy-2-oxoethoxy)phenyl)propanoate) (5a); Figure S20. 1H NMR analysis of poly(butylene-co-4-(2-methoxy-4-(3-methoxy-3-oxopropyl)phenoxy)butanoate) (5b); Figure S21. 1H NMR analysis of poly(4-(hydroxyethoxy)-coniferylene -co-adipate) (7a); Figure S22. 1H NMR analysis of poly(4-(hydroxybutoxy)-coniferylene-co-adipate) (7b); Figure S23. SEC analyses in THF of the ferulic diester-based polyesters 3a and 3b (curves were normalised by their area); Figure S24. SEC analyses in THF of the hydrogenated ferulic diester-based polyesters 5a and 5b (curves were normalised by their area); Figure S25. SEC analyses in THF of ferulic diol-based polyesters 7a and 7b (curves were normalised by their area); Figure S26. MALDI-TOF MS analysis of 7a obtained with 1.1 equivalent of diol in comparison to the diester after 24 h of synthesis in acetophenone at 90°C and under reduced pressure; Table S1. Mass of the corresponding end-groups in MALDI-TOF MS analysis of 7a obtained with 1.1 equivalent of diol in comparison to the diester after 24 h of synthesis in acetophenone at 90°C and under reduced pressure; Figure S27. SEC analyses in THF of ferulic diol-based polyesters 7a synthesized with and without an excess of diol (curves were normalised by their area); Table S2. Average molar mass and dispersity from the SEC analyses in THF of ferulic diol-based polyesters 7a synthesized with and without an excess of diol.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.P., and A.B.; methodology, E.P., and A.B.; formal analysis, A.B.; investigation, A.B.; writing—review and editing, E.P., A.B., L.A.; visualization, A.B.; supervision, E.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jean-Marc Strub of LSMBO-IPHC Strasbourg for MALDI-TOF MS analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mandal, S.; Dey, A. PET Chemistry. In Recycling of Polyethylene Terephthalate Bottles; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 1–22. ISBN 978-0-12-811361-5. [Google Scholar]
  2. John, G.; Nagarajan, S.; Vemula, P.K.; Silverman, J.R.; Pillai, C.K.S. Natural Monomers: A Mine for Functional and Sustainable Materials—Occurrence, Chemical Modification and Polymerization. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2019, 92, 158–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Delidovich, I.; Hausoul, P.J.C.; Deng, L.; Pfützenreuter, R.; Rose, M.; Palkovits, R. Alternative Monomers Based on Lignocellulose and Their Use for Polymer Production. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 1540–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Satti, S.M.; Shah, A.A. Polyester-Based Biodegradable Plastics: An Approach Towards Sustainable Development. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 413–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, Q.; Ma, S.; Xu, X.; Zhu, J. Bio-based Unsaturated Polyesters. In Unsaturated Polyester Resins; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 515–555. ISBN 978-0-12-816129-6. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ortiz, C.; Ferreira, M.L.; Barbosa, O.; dos Santos, J.C.S.; Rodrigues, R.C.; Berenguer-Murcia, Á.; Briand, L.E.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R. Novozym 435: The “Perfect” Lipase Immobilized Biocatalyst? Catal. Sci. Technol. 2019, 9, 2380–2420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Pellis, A.; Nyanhongo, G.S.; Farmer, T.J. Recent Advances on Enzymatic Catalysis as a Powerful Tool for the Sustainable Synthesis of Bio-Based Polyesters. In Biorefinery; Bastidas-Oyanedel, J.-R., Schmidt, J.E., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 555–570. ISBN 978-3-030-10960-8. [Google Scholar]
  8. Todea, A.; Dreavă, D.M.; Benea, I.C.; Bîtcan, I.; Peter, F.; Boeriu, C.G. Achievements and Trends in Biocatalytic Synthesis of Specialty Polymers from Biomass-Derived Monomers Using Lipases. Processes 2021, 9, 646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Debuissy, T.; Pollet, E.; Avérous, L. Lipase-Catalyzed Synthesis of Biobased and Biodegradable Aliphatic Copolyesters from Short Building Blocks. Effect of the Monomer Length. Eur. Polym. J. 2017, 97, 328–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Debuissy, T.; Pollet, E.; Avérous, L. Enzymatic Synthesis of Biobased Poly(1,4-Butylene Succinate- Ran -2,3-Butylene Succinate) Copolyesters and Characterization. Influence of 1,4- and 2,3-Butanediol Contents. Eur. Polym. J. 2017, 93, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Duchiron, S.W.; Pollet, E.; Givry, S.; Avérous, L. Enzymatic Synthesis of Poly(ε-Caprolactone-co-ε-Thiocaprolactone). Eur. Polym. J. 2017, 87, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nguyen, H.T.H.; Qi, P.; Rostagno, M.; Feteha, A.; Miller, S.A. The Quest for High Glass Transition Temperature Bioplastics. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 9298–9331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Albanese, M.; Boyenval, J.; Marchese, P.; Sullalti, S.; Celli, A. The Aliphatic Counterpart of PET, PPT and PBT Aromatic Polyesters: Effect of the Molecular Structure on Thermo-Mechanical Properties. AIMS Mol. Sci. 2016, 3, 32–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Comerford, J.W.; Byrne, F.P.; Weinberger, S.; Farmer, T.J.; Guebitz, G.M.; Gardossi, L.; Pellis, A. Thermal Upgrade of Enzymatically Synthesized Aliphatic and Aromatic Oligoesters. Materials 2020, 13, 368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Skoczinski, P.; Cangahuala, M.K.E.; Maniar, D.; Albach, R.W.; Bittner, N.; Loos, K. Biocatalytic Synthesis of Furan-Based Oligomer Diols with Enhanced End-Group Fidelity. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 1068–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Flores, I.; de Ilarduya, A.M.; Sardon, H.; Müller, A.J.; Muñoz-Guerra, S. Synthesis of Aromatic–Aliphatic Polyesters by Enzymatic Ring Opening Polymerization of Cyclic Oligoesters and Their Cyclodepolymerization for a Circular Economy. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2019, 1, 321–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bazin, A.; Avérous, L.; Pollet, E. Lipase-Catalyzed Synthesis of Furan-Based Aliphatic-Aromatic Biobased Copolyesters: Impact of the Solvent. Eur. Polym. J. 2021, 159, 110717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Loos, K.; Zhang, R.; Pereira, I.; Agostinho, B.; Hu, H.; Maniar, D.; Sbirrazzuoli, N.; Silvestre, A.J.D.; Guigo, N.; Sousa, A.F. A Perspective on PEF Synthesis, Properties, and End-Life. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Crozier, A.; Jaganath, I.B.; Clifford, M.N. Phenols, Polyphenols and Tannins: An Overview. In Plant Secondary Metabolites; Crozier, A., Clifford, M.N., Ashihara, H., Eds.; Blackwell Publishing Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2006; pp. 1–24. ISBN 978-0-470-98855-8. [Google Scholar]
  20. Tinikul, R.; Chenprakhon, P.; Maenpuen, S.; Chaiyen, P. Biotransformation of Plant-Derived Phenolic Acids. Biotechnol. J. 2018, 13, e1700632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Flourat, A.L.; Combes, J.; Bailly-Maitre-Grand, C.; Magnien, K.; Haudrechy, A.; Renault, J.; Allais, F. Accessing p-Hydroxycinnamic Acids: Chemical Synthesis, Biomass Recovery, or Engineered Microbial Production? ChemSusChem 2021, 14, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Terrett, O.M.; Dupree, P. Covalent Interactions between Lignin and Hemicelluloses in Plant Secondary Cell Walls. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2019, 56, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Li, M.; Wilkins, M. Lignin Bioconversion into Valuable Products: Fractionation, Depolymerization, Aromatic Compound Conversion, and Bioproduct Formation. Syst. Microbiol. Biomanuf. 2021, 1, 166–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sandoval, G.; Quintana, P.G.; Baldessari, A.; Ballesteros, A.O.; Plou, F.J. Lipase-Catalyzed Preparation of Mono- and Diesters of Ferulic Acid. Biocatal. Biotransform. 2015, 33, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Figueroa-Espinoza, M.C.; Laguerre, M.; Villeneuve, P.; Lecomte, J. From Phenolics to Phenolipids: Optimizing Antioxidants in Lipid Dispersions. Lipid Technol. 2013, 25, 131–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mancuso, C.; Santangelo, R. Ferulic Acid: Pharmacological and Toxicological Aspects. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2014, 65, 185–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Elias, H.-G.; Palacios, J.A. Poly(Ferulic Acid) by Thionyl Chloride Activated Polycondensation. Makromol. Chem. 1985, 186, 1027–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Llevot, A.; Grau, E.; Carlotti, S.; Grelier, S.; Cramail, H. From Lignin-Derived Aromatic Compounds to Novel Biobased Polymers. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2016, 37, 9–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Nguyen, H.T.H.; Reis, M.H.; Qi, P.; Miller, S.A. Polyethylene Ferulate (PEF) and Congeners: Polystyrene Mimics Derived from Biorenewable Aromatics. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 4512–4517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nguyen, H.T.H.; Short, G.N.; Qi, P.; Miller, S.A. Copolymerization of Lactones and Bioaromatics via Concurrent Ring-Opening Polymerization/Polycondensation. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 1877–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kurt, G.; Gokturk, E. Synthesis of Polyesters Mimicking Polyethylene Terephthalate and Their Thermal and Mechanical Properties. J. Polym. Res. 2020, 27, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ouimet, M.A.; Griffin, J.; Carbone-Howell, A.L.; Wu, W.-H.; Stebbins, N.D.; Di, R.; Uhrich, K.E. Biodegradable Ferulic Acid-Containing Poly(Anhydride-Ester): Degradation Products with Controlled Release and Sustained Antioxidant Activity. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14, 854–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Pospiech, D.; Korwitz, A.; Komber, H.; Jehnichen, D.; Arnhold, K.; Brünig, H.; Scheibner, H.; Müller, M.T.; Voit, B. Polyesters with Bio-Based Ferulic Acid Units: Crosslinking Paves the Way to Property Consolidation. Polym. Chem. 2021, 12, 5139–5148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pion, F.; Reano, A.F.; Ducrot, P.-H.; Allais, F. Chemo-Enzymatic Preparation of New Bio-Based Bis- and Trisphenols: New Versatile Building Blocks for Polymer Chemistry. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 8988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ménard, R.; Caillol, S.; Allais, F. Chemo-Enzymatic Synthesis and Characterization of Renewable Thermoplastic and Thermoset Isocyanate-Free Poly(Hydroxy)Urethanes from Ferulic Acid Derivatives. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 1446–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ménard, R.; Caillol, S.; Allais, F. Ferulic Acid-Based Renewable Esters and Amides-Containing Epoxy Thermosets from Wheat Bran and Beetroot Pulp: Chemo-Enzymatic Synthesis and Thermo-Mechanical Properties Characterization. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2017, 95, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pion, F.; Ducrot, P.-H.; Allais, F. Renewable Alternating Aliphatic-Aromatic Copolyesters Derived from Biobased Ferulic Acid, Diols, and Diacids: Sustainable Polymers with Tunable Thermal Properties. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2014, 215, 431–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Barbara, I.; Flourat, A.L.; Allais, F. Renewable Polymers Derived from Ferulic Acid and Biobased Diols via ADMET. Eur. Polym. J. 2015, 62, 236–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Rovira, J.; Nadal, M.; Schuhmacher, M.; Domingo, J.L. Human Exposure to Trace Elements through the Skin by Direct Contact with Clothing: Risk Assessment. Environ. Res. 2015, 140, 308–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pellis, A.; Acero, E.H.; Gardossi, L.; Ferrario, V.; Guebitz, G.M. Renewable Building Blocks for Sustainable Polyesters: New Biotechnological Routes for Greener Plastics: Renewable Building Blocks for Sustainable Polyesters. Polym. Int. 2016, 65, 861–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kobayashi, S.; Uyama, H. Synthesis of Polyesters I: Hydrolase as Catalyst for Polycondensation (Condensation Polymerization). In Enzymatic Polymerization towards Green Polymer Chemistry, Green Chemistry and Sustainable Technology; Kobayashi, S., Uyama, H., Kadokawa, J., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 105–163. ISBN 9789811338120. [Google Scholar]
  42. Vosmann, K.; Wiege, B.; Weitkamp, P.; Weber, N. Preparation of Lipophilic Alkyl (Hydroxy)Benzoates by Solvent-Free Lipase-Catalyzed Esterification and Transesterification. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 80, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Douka, A.; Vouyiouka, S.; Papaspyridi, L.-M.; Papaspyrides, C.D. A Review on Enzymatic Polymerization to Produce Polycondensation Polymers: The Case of Aliphatic Polyesters, Polyamides and Polyesteramides. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2018, 79, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Parthiban, A.; Vasantha, V.A. Biorenewable Functional Oligomers and Polymers—Direct Copolymerization of Ferulic Acid to Obtain Polymeric UV Absorbers and Multifunctional Materials. Polymer 2020, 188, 122122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Christelle, B.; Eduardo, B.D.O.; Latifa, C.; Elaine-Rose, M.; Bernard, M.; Evelyne, R.-H.; Mohamed, G.; Jean-Marc, E.; Catherine, H. Combined Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulations to Enlighten the Capacity of Pseudomonas Cepacia and Candida Antarctica Lipases to Catalyze Quercetin Acetylation. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 156, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Stamatis, H.; Sereti, V.; Kolisis, F.N. Studies on the Enzymatic Synthesis of Lipophilic Derivatives of Natural Antioxidants. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1999, 76, 1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cassani, J.; Luna, H.; Navarro, A.; Castillo, E. Comparative Esterification of Phenylpropanoids versus Hydrophenylpropanoids Acids Catalyzed by Lipase in Organic Solvent Media. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 10, 508–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Zoumpanioti, M.; Merianou, E.; Karandreas, T.; Stamatis, H.; Xenakis, A. Esterification of Phenolic Acids Catalyzed by Lipases Immobilized in Organogels. Biotechnol. Lett. 2010, 32, 1457–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Otto, R.T.; Scheib, H.; Bornscheuer, U.T.; Pleiss, J.; Syldatk, C.; Schmid, R.D. Substrate Specificity of Lipase B from Candida Antarctica in the Synthesis of Arylaliphatic Glycolipids. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2000, 8, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mahapatro, A.; Kalra, B.; Kumar, A.; Gross, R.A. Lipase-Catalyzed Polycondensations: Effect of Substrates and Solvent on Chain Formation, Dispersity, and End-Group Structure. Biomacromolecules 2003, 4, 544–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pellis, A.; Comerford, J.W.; Maneffa, A.J.; Sipponen, M.H.; Clark, J.H.; Farmer, T.J. Elucidating Enzymatic Polymerisations: Chain-Length Selectivity of Candida Antarctica Lipase B towards Various Aliphatic Diols and Dicarboxylic Acid Diesters. Eur. Polym. J. 2018, 106, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nasr, K.; Meimoun, J.; Favrelle-Huret, A.; Winter, J.D.; Raquez, J.-M.; Zinck, P. Enzymatic Polycondensation of 1,6-Hexanediol and Diethyl Adipate: A Statistical Approach Predicting the Key-Parameters in Solution and in Bulk. Polymers 2020, 12, 1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kreye, O.; Tóth, T.; Meier, M.A.R. Copolymers Derived from Rapeseed Derivatives via ADMET and Thiol-Ene Addition. Eur. Polym. J. 2011, 47, 1804–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Oh, S.-C.; Lee, D.-G.; Kwak, H.; Bae, S.-Y. Combustion Kinetics Of Polyethylene Terephthalate. Environ. Eng. Res. 2006, 11, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jawerth, M.; Lawoko, M.; Lundmark, S.; Perez-Berumen, C.; Johansson, M. Allylation of a Lignin Model Phenol: A Highly Selective Reaction under Benign Conditions towards a New Thermoset Resin Platform. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 96281–96288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Debuissy, T.; Sangwan, P.; Pollet, E.; Avérous, L. Study on the Structure-Properties Relationship of Biodegradable and Biobased Aliphatic Copolyesters Based on 1,3-Propanediol, 1,4-Butanediol, Succinic and Adipic Acids. Polymer 2017, 122, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pellis, A.; Weinberger, S.; Gigli, M.; Guebitz, G.M.; Farmer, T.J. Enzymatic Synthesis of Biobased Polyesters Utilizing Aromatic Diols as the Rigid Component. Eur. Polym. J. 2020, 130, 109680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Rashidzadeh, H.; Guo, B. Use of MALDI-TOF To Measure Molecular Weight Distributions of Polydisperse Poly(Methyl Methacrylate). Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pezzana, L.; Mousa, M.; Malmström, E.; Johansson, M.; Sangermano, M. Bio-Based Monomers for UV-Curable Coatings: Allylation of Ferulic Acid and Investigation of Photocured Thiol-Ene Network. Prog. Org. Coat. 2021, 150, 105986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Masuku, C.P. Thermolytic Decomposition of Coniferyl Alcohol. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 1992, 23, 195–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tournier, V.; Topham, C.M.; Gilles, A.; David, B.; Folgoas, C.; Moya-Leclair, E.; Kamionka, E.; Desrousseaux, M.-L.; Texier, H.; Gavalda, S.; et al. An Engineered PET Depolymerase to Break down and Recycle Plastic Bottles. Nature 2020, 580, 216–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Salam, M.D.; Varma, A.; Prashar, R.; Choudhary, D. Review on Efficacy of Microbial Degradation of Polyethylene Terephthalate and Bio-Upcycling as a Part of Plastic Waste Management. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 2021, 9, 695–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Magnin, A.; Entzmann, L.; Bazin, A.; Pollet, E.; Avérous, L. Green Recycling Process for Polyurethane Foams by a Chem-Biotech Approach. ChemSusChem 2021, 14, 4234–4241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Carniel, A.; Valoni, É.; Nicomedes, J.; Gomes, A.D.C.; de Castro, A.M. Lipase from Candida Antarctica (CALB) and Cutinase from Humicola Insolens Act Synergistically for PET Hydrolysis to Terephthalic Acid. Process. Biochem. 2017, 59, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 13 03693 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Representation of the synthesis of polyesters from ferulic derivatives of different lengths as well as with and without hydrogenation. Adapted from [29].
Scheme 1. Representation of the synthesis of polyesters from ferulic derivatives of different lengths as well as with and without hydrogenation. Adapted from [29].
Polymers 13 03693 sch001
Polymers 13 03693 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Synthesis and polymerization of the ferulic diesters 2a and 2b, i: MeOH, H2SO4, 70 °C 16 h. ii(a): Methyl chloroacetate, K2CO3, KI, acetonitrile, 85 °C 16 h. ii(b): Methyl 4-chlorobutyrate, K2CO3, KI, acetonitrile, 85 °C 16 h.
Scheme 2. Synthesis and polymerization of the ferulic diesters 2a and 2b, i: MeOH, H2SO4, 70 °C 16 h. ii(a): Methyl chloroacetate, K2CO3, KI, acetonitrile, 85 °C 16 h. ii(b): Methyl 4-chlorobutyrate, K2CO3, KI, acetonitrile, 85 °C 16 h.
Polymers 13 03693 sch002
Polymers 13 03693 g001 550
Figure 1. NMR spectra in CDCl3 of the ferulic-based diesters and their corresponding polyesters: (a) 2a and 3a; (b) 2b and 3b.
Figure 1. NMR spectra in CDCl3 of the ferulic-based diesters and their corresponding polyesters: (a) 2a and 3a; (b) 2b and 3b.
Polymers 13 03693 g001
Polymers 13 03693 sch003 550
Scheme 3. Synthesis and polymerization of the hydrogenated ferulic diesters 4a and 4b.
Scheme 3. Synthesis and polymerization of the hydrogenated ferulic diesters 4a and 4b.
Polymers 13 03693 sch003
Polymers 13 03693 g002 550
Figure 2. Molar mass of the polymers synthesized from the hydrogenated monomers. Polymers 13 03693 i007 5a, Polymers 13 03693 i008 5b.
Figure 2. Molar mass of the polymers synthesized from the hydrogenated monomers. Polymers 13 03693 i007 5a, Polymers 13 03693 i008 5b.
Polymers 13 03693 g002
Polymers 13 03693 g003 550
Figure 3. Thermal analysis of 5a and 5b: (a) DSC measurement, heating rate 10 °C/min, data have been offset one from another by −0.5 W·g−1; (b) TGA measurement under air at a heating rate of 10 °C/min.
Figure 3. Thermal analysis of 5a and 5b: (a) DSC measurement, heating rate 10 °C/min, data have been offset one from another by −0.5 W·g−1; (b) TGA measurement under air at a heating rate of 10 °C/min.
Polymers 13 03693 g003
Polymers 13 03693 sch004 550
Scheme 4. Synthesis and polymerization of the ferulic-based diols 6a and 6b.
Scheme 4. Synthesis and polymerization of the ferulic-based diols 6a and 6b.
Polymers 13 03693 sch004
Polymers 13 03693 g004 550
Figure 4. Molar masses of the polyesters synthesized from the ferulic-based diols. Polymers 13 03693 i007 7a, Polymers 13 03693 i008 7b.
Figure 4. Molar masses of the polyesters synthesized from the ferulic-based diols. Polymers 13 03693 i007 7a, Polymers 13 03693 i008 7b.
Polymers 13 03693 g004
Polymers 13 03693 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) MALDI-TOF MS spectrum of 7a; (b) corresponding identified polymer structures.
Figure 5. (a) MALDI-TOF MS spectrum of 7a; (b) corresponding identified polymer structures.
Polymers 13 03693 g005
Polymers 13 03693 g006 550
Figure 6. Thermal analysis of 7a and 7b: (a) DSC measurement, heating rate 10 °C/min, data have been offset one from another by −0.5 W·g−1; (b) TGA measurement, under air at a heating rate of 10 °C/min.
Figure 6. Thermal analysis of 7a and 7b: (a) DSC measurement, heating rate 10 °C/min, data have been offset one from another by −0.5 W·g−1; (b) TGA measurement, under air at a heating rate of 10 °C/min.
Polymers 13 03693 g006
Table
Table 1. Main properties of the enzymatically synthesized polyesters.
Table 1. Main properties of the enzymatically synthesized polyesters.
Ferulic-Based MonomerCo-MonomerYield aMn (g·mol−1)Mw (g·mol−1)DPnTg (°C)Tdmax (°C)Td5% (°C)
(2a)
Polymers 13 03693 i001		1,4-BDOn.d. b130016004n.d. bn.d. bn.d. b
(2b)
Polymers 13 03693 i002		1,4-BDOn.d. b200025005n.d. bn.d. bn.d. b
(4a)
Polymers 13 03693 i003		1,4-BDO58%17,90033,100587373346
(4b)
Polymers 13 03693 i004		1,4-BDO96%12,60029,80037−9394350
(6a)
Polymers 13 03693 i005		DEA82%650015,0001921403316
(6b)
Polymers 13 03693 i006		DEA79%630015,500172418308
a Recovered mass yield taking into account the loss of methanol or ethanol during the reaction. b Not determined as only low molar mass oligomers were obtained.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bazin, A.; Avérous, L.; Pollet, E. Ferulic Acid as Building Block for the Lipase-Catalyzed Synthesis of Biobased Aromatic Polyesters. Polymers 2021, 13, 3693. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13213693

AMA Style

Bazin A, Avérous L, Pollet E. Ferulic Acid as Building Block for the Lipase-Catalyzed Synthesis of Biobased Aromatic Polyesters. Polymers. 2021; 13(21):3693. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13213693

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bazin, Alfred, Luc Avérous, and Eric Pollet. 2021. "Ferulic Acid as Building Block for the Lipase-Catalyzed Synthesis of Biobased Aromatic Polyesters" Polymers 13, no. 21: 3693. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13213693

APA Style

Bazin, A., Avérous, L., & Pollet, E. (2021). Ferulic Acid as Building Block for the Lipase-Catalyzed Synthesis of Biobased Aromatic Polyesters. Polymers, 13(21), 3693. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13213693

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop