Next Article in Journal
Recent Advances in the Rejection of Endocrine-Disrupting Compounds from Water Using Membrane and Membrane Bioreactor Technologies: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Anthocyanin Hybrid Nanopigments from Pomegranate Waste: Colour, Thermomechanical Stability and Environmental Impact of Polyester-Based Bionanocomposites
Previous Article in Journal
Corn Starch/Chitosan Nanoparticles/Thymol Bio-Nanocomposite Films for Potential Food Packaging Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Linking Expansion Behaviour of Extruded Potato Starch/Rapeseed Press Cake Blends to Rheological and Technofunctional Properties
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 13
Issue 3
10.3390/polym13030391
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Morphological, Structural, Thermal, Permeability, and Antimicrobial Activity of PBS and PBS/TPS Films Incorporated with Biomaster-Silver for Food Packaging Application

by
Nurain Aziman
1,2,
Lau Kia Kian
3,
Mohammad Jawaid
3,*,
Maimunah Sanny
1,4 and
Salman Alamery
5
1
Department of Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
2
School of Industrial Technology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Kampus Kuala Pilah, Kuala Pilah 72000, Malaysia
3
Laboratory of Biocomposite Technology, Institute of Tropical Forestry and Forest Products (INTROP), Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
4
Laboratory of Food Safety and Food Security, Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
5
Department of Biochemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 22452, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2021, 13(3), 391; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13030391
Submission received: 24 November 2020 / Revised: 21 December 2020 / Accepted: 22 December 2020 / Published: 27 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Bio-Based Polymers: Towards a Circular Bioeconomy)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The development of antimicrobial film for food packaging application had become the focus for researchers and scientists. This research aims to study the characteristics and antimicrobial activity of novel biofilms made of poly (butylene succinate) (PBS) and tapioca starch (TPS) added with 1.5% or 3% of Biomaster-silver (BM) particle. In morphological examination, the incorporation of 3% BM particle was considerably good in forming well-structured PBS film. Meanwhile, the functional groups analysis revealed the 3% BM particle was effectively interacted with PBS molecular chains. The flame retard behavior of BM metal particle also helped in enhancing the thermal stability for pure PBS and PBS/TPS films. The nucleating effect of BM particles had improved the films crystallinity. Small pore size features with high barrier property for gas permeability was obtained for BM filled PBS/TPS films. From antimicrobial analysis, the BM particles possessed antimicrobial activity against three bacteria Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Salmonella Typhimurium in which PBS/TPS 3% BM film exhibited strong antimicrobial activity against all tested bacteria, however, PBS/TPS 1.5% BM film exhibited strong antimicrobial activity against E. coli only. Hence, the incorporation of BM into PBS/TPS film could be a sustainable way for developing packaging films to preserve food products.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The increased use of synthetic polymers for food packaging has become primary concern in publicity due to their non-biodegradability. This has inspired researchers to explore biodegradable films such as poly (butylene succinate) (PBS) for general food packaging or film. PBS is a biodegradable aliphatic polyester which has high flexibility, excellent impact strength, as well as chemical and thermal resistance formed by polycondensation reaction between 1, 4-butanediol and succinic acid [1,2]. Compared to the low density polyethylene (LDPE) with great flexible strength that frequently used in food packaging, PBS could be equally potential for such applications [3,4]. Also, because of the costly PBS material, PBS usually mixed with starch and natural fiber to achieve stable viable products and enhance their properties [5]. Starch-based materials have been widely considered in the food packaging sector as alternatives to plastics due to their biodegradability, abundance, potential for production at large scale, low cost, wide availability, ease of use, and hypoallergenic quality [6]. In addition, the plasticization of starch has enhanced the interfacial bonding of the polymer matrix [7]. Thermoplastic starch/PBS blends with malleated PBS possess good biodegradability, improved strength, and high water resistance, and are this expected to serve as a packing material [8]. Without any addition of chemicals into the films, tapioca starch is able to form flexible transparent film [9]. Furthermore, the better strength properties and thermal stability of PBS can be achieved by addition of modified tapioca starch into PBS polymer blends as compared to pure starch [10].
The growth of foodborne pathogens is one of the major factors for short-term of food shelf-life and ultimately leading to deterioration of food products. To resolve this issue, active packaging, is an innovative concept, which currently applied for developing antimicrobial food packaging due to their highly active antimicrobial reactivity, biocompatibility, great barrier performance, and promising storage ability in preserving foodstuff [11]. The effectiveness of antimicrobial packaging films in inhibiting foodborne-pathogens has been proven by some researchers. As reported by Zhao et al. [12], they had produced antimicrobial films of silver nanoparticles embedded soy protein isolate, which exhibited antimicrobial activity in against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Also, a nisin-coated antimicrobial film was fabricated by Mauriello et al. [13], that effectively inhibited Micrococcus luteus ATCC 10240 and bacterial flora in milk. Calatayud et al. [14] had reported a study on ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer films incorporated with 10%, 15%, and 20% cocoa extracts. Their results showed great antimicrobial activity against S. aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, E. coli, and Salmonella enterica. A chitosan-coated poly(lactic acid)/poly(butylene succinate) blend film made by Hongsriphan and Sanga [15] also able to present antimicrobial activity against S. aureus and E. coli. Apart from that, several studies on antimicrobial PBS or TPS packaging have also been done by previous researchers. The incorporation of thymol in PBS film was found to inhibit S. aureus and E. coli at 6 wt % and 10 wt %, respectively [16]. Carvacrol essential oil at 4 wt % incorporated into PBS was found to effectively inhibit S. aureus, while inhibit E. coli growth at 10 wt % [17]. The incorporation of 4% nano-ZnO in the PBS packaging could extend shelf-life of fresh-cut apples up to 18 days of cold storage [18]. Addition of TiO2 improved thermal stability of PET/PBS blends, and this thin film was active against both S. aureus and E. coli [19]. TPS/cellulose nanocrystal active nanocomposite films containing grape pomace extracts showed a strong antimicrobial activity against S. aureus ATCC 29213 [20]. TPS film incorporating ZnO nanoparticle showed antibacterial properties against Salmonella sp. with 6.97 mm of clear zone of diameter [9]. TPS/hydroxypropyl methylcellulose film incorporated with two antimicrobial agents, nisin and potassium sorbate was effective against Listeria innocua and Zygosaccharomyces bailii [21].
Recently, the commercialization of antimicrobial food packaging has grown rapidly since there are several companies commercializing their services to provide active packaging system. One of them is Biomaster®, the silver based antimicrobial packaging from Addmaster Limited, USA. Biomaster-silver (BM) was based on silver ion technology, in which the silver-based active ingredient can be used at every stage of the manufacturing process. It is available in the form of liquids or powders for textiles, plastics, paper and coatings, and has been known to be effective against various microorganisms. According to Jung et al. [22], silver ions binds with the bacteria and may cause S. aureus and E. coli to reach an active but nonculturable state and ultimately die. There are two bactericidal mechanisms of silver ions against S. aureus and E. coli; (1) As a reaction against the denaturation effects of silver ions, DNA molecules become condensed and lose their ability of replication [23]; (2) Silver ions induce the inactivation of the bacterial proteins by interact with thiol (sulfhydryl) groups in the protein [23,24,25,26], even though other target sites remain a possibility [27].
To date, there are have been no researchers reporting on the application of PBS or PBS/TPS containing Biomaster-silver particles as an antimicrobial packaging material. Thus, the aim of this research was to determine the effectiveness of Biomass-silver particles to inhibit three bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538P), Escherichia coli (ATCC 11229), and Salmonella Typhimurium (ATCC 14028) in PBS and PBS/TPS films. The produced PBS and PBS/TPS films in this work were also subjected to characterization to comprehensively study their properties of morphology, functional chemistry, thermal stability, crystallinity, porosity, and permeability. Hence, the novelty of this work focused on developing new types of antimicrobial PBS and PBS/TPS packaging films to preserve food products.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Chemicals

The PBS pellets (Density = 1.26 g/cm3; Melting point = 114 °C; Glass transition temperature = −32 °C) were purchased from PTT Public Co. Ltd. in Bangkok, Thailand. Tapioca starch (TPS) powder (Moisture = 11.1%; Bulk density = 0.63 g/cm3; Gelatanization temperature = 51 °C; Viscosity = 5.5 Cp) was bought from PT. Starch Solution Int. in Karawang, Indonesia. Meanwhile, Biomaster-silver (BM) particles were provided by Indochine Bio Plastiques, Senai, Johor, Malaysia. The bacteria strains, Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538P), Escherichia coli (ATCC 11229), and Salmonella Typhimurium (ATCC 14028) (Microbiologics, KWIK-STIKTM 2 pack, St. Cloud, MN, USA) were purchased from the Choice-Care Sdn. Bhd, Malaysia. The culture media including LB agar and LB broth were obtained from Oxoid, Malaysia.

2.2. Preparation of PBS and PBS/TPS Films

The films fabrication was conducted using melt-blown technique since this method was easy-handling to control the optimal interaction between different components for generating good structure of films. The pure PBS film was prepared using 100 wt % PBS pellets, while PBS/TPS film was prepared by mixing 40 wt % TPS powder with 60 wt % PBS pellets through melt-blown machine. For antimicrobial effect enhancement, different amounts of 1.5% and 3% BM particles (on the basis of total 100 wt % PBS or PBS/TPS), were incorporated to form PBS 1.5% BM, PBS 3% BM, PBS/TPS 1.5% BM, and PBS/TPS 3% BM films. The denotations and formulations for all produced films were shown in Table 1.

2.3. Characterization of PBS and PBS/TPS Films

2.3.1. Morphological Examination

The morphological properties of film samples were determined using a S3000-N scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Hitachi, Schaumburg, IL, USA) at 5 kV of accelerating voltage. In specimen preparation, those samples were immersed in liquid nitrogen, and then fractured to expose the cross-sectional surface. The fractured samples were loaded on a stub, and coated with platinum before viewing.

2.3.2. Functional Chemistry Analysis

The FTIR spectrum of each film sample was analyzed using an attenuated total reflection (ATR) equipped Nicolet 380 FTIR spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The analysis was run for 32 scans from 200–4000 cm−1 at 4 cm−1 resolutions.

2.3.3. Thermal Analysis

A Q500 Thermogravimetric analyzer (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) was used to study the thermal stability of film samples. The TGA analysis was conducted under a nitrogen atmospheric condition from 25 °C to 1000 °C temperature range at a 20 °C min−1 heating rate. Also, the thermo-molecular characteristics were assessed using a DSC system. The film samples were heated from 25–600 °C temperature range at heating rate of 20 °C min−1 under nitrogen purge atmosphere.

2.3.4. BET Analysis

The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis was used to determine the surface area, total pore volume, and average pore size of film samples using a 3Flex Surface Characterization analyzer (Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA). Each film sample was degassed for 20 min at 60 °C with nitrogen purging before analysis.

2.3.5. Permeability Analysis

The water vapor permeability of each film sample was determined using a W3/330 Water Vapor Transmission Rate Test System (Labthink, Medford, MA, USA). The condition for flowing nitrogen gas was adjusted to partial pressure gradient of 50% to 75% relative humidity (RH) between the two chambers and the analysis was carried out at constant 25 °C temperature.
For oxygen permeability, it was assessed using a 8001 permeameter (Systech, Princeton, NJ, USA) at constant 25 °C temperature and 50% RH. Film samples were placed between the two chambers and the upstream chamber was maintained at 1 atm oxygen partial pressure, whereas the downstream chamber was flown with nitrogen sweep gas. The oxygen flux was recorded with an internal equipped coulometric oxygen sensor until reaching steady state with plateau value.

2.4. Antimicrobial Activity Determination

For antimicrobial analysis, all PBS films were prepared in a roll. Those films were collected at three different locations from each roll, and labelled with different numbers of 1, 2, and 3. The ISO 22916 method [28] was used to determine the antimicrobial activity of six PBS films against bacteria of Salmonella typhimurium (ATCC 14028), Escherichia coli (ATCC 11229), and Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538P). Active cultures were prepared by inoculating freshly cultured bacteria (24 h) from LB agar into LB broth, then incubated in an incubator shaker (200 rpm) for 24 h at 30 °C. The optical density (OD) for each culture was adjusted into 1–2 × 105 CFU/mL (known as a start) by adding LB broth. The adjusted bacterial suspension (0.4 mL) was aliquoted onto each film sample (5 × 5 cm2) and overlaid with the same film (4 × 4 cm2) which facing downward, followed by incubation for 24 h in humidified condition at 30 °C. Each film sample was resuspended with 0.85% sodium chloride (4.6 mL). A serial dilution was conducted, and 100 μL for each dilution was pipetted to LB agar plates. Then, those agar plates were allowed to undergo incubation for 24 h at 30 °C, while gentamicin used as a positive control and no PBS film (no sample) was used as a negative control for the microbial culture. The antimicrobial activity of PBS films was determined from the microbial growth population after incubation. This assay was conducted triplicate to obtain average values. The microbial population was expressed as the log 10 number of CFU per ml of sample (log CFU/mL sample), and the total count was calculated for dishes containing 30–300 colonies using Equation (1) as
Total   count   ( log CFU ml   sample ) = log [ Σ C V ( n 1 + 0.1 n 2 ) D ]
where C refers to the total of bacterial counts in all retained dishes; V refers to the volume used for sample dilution (mL); n1 refers to the number of retained dishes in first dilution; n2 refers to the number of retained dishes in second dilution; D refers to dilution factor of first dilution.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistical Analysis System (SAS) software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) was used to analyze all statistical evaluations of the results. The triplicates data for each analysis were subjected to ANOVA, and expressed as the Mean ± Standard deviation. Differences with p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Morphology of PBS and PBS/TPS Films

Figure 1 depicted the cross-sectional morphology of film samples. Pure PBS film showed a smooth feature, revealing its relatively tough and ductile structure [29]. Meanwhile, PBS 1.5% BM film exhibited rougher surface feature comparing to pure PBS film. It was likely resulted by the poor interaction of BM particles with PBS matrix [30]. However, with increased BM loadings, an integrated film structure was presented by PBS 3% BM film, indicating that this compositional mixture was better in establishing intermolecular interaction between the two components [31].
For PBS/TPS film, it revealed ruptured surface morphology and this implied the incorporation of TPS component had somehow affected the structural integrity of PBS polymer [32,33]. Furthermore, thicker and softer film structure was observed for PBS/TPS 1.5% BM film. It might be attributed to the incompatibility of components mixture at this ratio leading to the expanded free volume in polymeric structure [34,35]. The further increased BM loading had apparently improved the compactness of polymeric structure with reduced thickness as shown by the PBS/TPS 3% BM film. This showcased the addition of 3% BM more able to compatibilize well between TPS and PBS components when comparing to 1.5% BM filling [36,37].

3.2. Structural Properties of PBS and PBS/TPS Films

The FTIR spectra of film samples are illustrated in Figure 2. The pure PBS film revealed its prominent peaks at about 2918 cm−1 (methylene group CH2 stretching), 1718 cm−1 (carboxyl group C=O vibration), 1332 cm−1 (ester group C–O vibration), and 1157 cm−1 (carbonyl group C=O vibration), representing the general functional groups of PBS polymer [10,38]. With the 1.5% BM filling, two significant sharp peaks were presented by PBS 1.5% BM and PBS/TPS 1.5% BM films at around 2856 cm−1 and 2918 cm−1. This implied that the PBS backbone structure was more likely to show up for both films, revealing the poor miscibility between 1.5% BM and PBS polymer [39]. Similarly, these characteristic peaks were also prominently exhibited by PBS/TPS film, probably due to the unreacted TPS fraction within PBS matrix, which in agreement with the ruptured morphology as observed in SEM examination. From reported work by Ayu et al. [10], who blended PBS with TPS component, also revealed similar peaks on their FTIR spectra. However, these peak intensities remained unobvious change for PBS 3% BM and PBS/TPS 3% BM films as similar with pure PBS film. This further evidenced the 3% BM filling was better in interacting with PBS molecules as compared to 1.5% BM and TPS fillings [32,40]. Moreover, the broad band observed at about 3372 cm−1 was with reduced intensity for PBS 3% BM film when comparing to PBS/TPS 3% BM film, showcasing the greater structural integration of 3% BM filling alone in PBS matrix without TPS component [31]. For TPS filled films, they presented a broader peak at about 1041 cm−1 along with a small shoulder band appeared at around 1258 cm−1, signaling the plasticization of TPS towards PBS molecular chains [29,35].

3.3. Thermal Properties of PBS and PBS/TPS Films

The thermal decomposition of film samples was evaluated by TGA curves and DTG curves as shown in Figure 3a,b, respectively, while the TGA analyzed data is listed in Table 2. Both PBS 1.5% BM and PBS 3% BM films showed slightly improved onset decomposition temperature (TON) at 357.0 °C and 356.8 °C, respectively when compared with pure PBS film at 355.1 °C. It was possibly promoted by the presence of high flame retardant property of BM metal particles [41]. Interestingly, the observed horizontal curve had apparently arise before TON for PBS 1.5% BM film comparing to other curves probably due to the vaporization of entrapped water molecules that triggered weight gain during thermal heating. Furthermore, all TPS filled PBS films revealed tremendous decrement of onset decomposition temperature after the TPS introduction [10]. Meanwhile, they presented irregular shape of TGA curves, implying the inconsistent decomposition behavior of polymeric films [32,42]. However, the onset decomposition temperature was somehow improved for both PBS/TPS 1.5% BM and PBS/TPS 3% BM films when in comparison to PBS/TPS film, probably contributed by the crystallizing effect of BM silver particles [43].
As evaluated by DTG curves in Figure 3b, the initial peaks were presented at 326.9 °C, 318.0 °C, and 311.8 °C, for PBS/TPS, PBS/TPS 1.5% BM, and PBS/TPS 3% BM films, respectively. This signalled the earlier decomposition of TPS component [10]. The peak decomposition temperature (TPD) determined in this work was found in the range of 399–404 °C for each film sample, indicating the main decomposition behavior of PBS polymer. Also, the additional peaks had occurred at 481.1 °C for PBS/TPS film and at 483.3 °C for PBS/TPS 1.5% BM film. It showcased the thermal decomposition of PBS polymer was somehow modified by the different components incorporation. Nonetheless, both PBS 1.5% BM and PBS 3% BM films were regarded as the most thermally stable packaging films by attributing to the enhanced TPD values as well as their symmetrical DTG curves as pure PBS film [30,40].
Thermo-molecular property of film samples is assessed with DSC analysis as displayed in Figure 4 and the data is summarized in Table 3. From the analyzed results, PBS 1.5% BM film showed higher crystallization temperature (Tc), whereas PBS 3% BM film presented lower Tc when in comparison with pure PBS film. This indicated the polymeric solidification behavior had been better improved for PBS 3% BM film when comparing to PBS 1.5% BM film [30].
Additionally, the crystallization temperature for PBS/TPS film was nearly closed to pure PBS film, implying the incorporation of TPS component did not affects the crystallization behavior of PBS molecules [33,44]. Nevertheless, the introduction of BM filling had further reduced the Tc of PBS/TPS 1.5% BM and PBS/TPS 3% BM films. It evidenced the BM silver particles could play the role in crystallizing the PBS polymer. Apart from that, all film samples presented insignificant change of melting temperature (Tm), possibly contributed by the large portion of PBS used this work. However, the melting enthalpy (∆Hm), which corresponding to crystallinity (XC) was different for each film sample. The PBS 1.5% BM film presented decreased ∆Hm and XC as compared to pure PBS film, showcasing lesser energy amount was needed to melt down the low crystalline polymeric structure [29]. In among all film samples, PBS 3% BM film was determined with the highest XC with 37.06%, which promoted by the great nucleating effect of 3% BM filling [41,45]. Also, PBS/TPS 3% BM film is the only sample exhibited XC value that closed to pure PBS film. This proved that the compositional mixture of PBS/TPS 3% BM film was optimum to maintain the crystal structure of PBS packaging film [39,46].

3.4. Porosity, Water Vapor, and Oxygen Gas Permeability of PBS and PBS/TPS Films

BET, water vapor, and oxygen gas permeability analysis of film samples is shown in Table 4. From BET analysis, the total pore volume and average pore diameter were increased for both PBS 1.5% BM and PBS 3% BM films when comparing to pure PBS film. It was because the poor miscibility between BM and PBS resulting in the large voids formation. However, the PBS 3% BM film showed a remarkably lower surface area than the other two films. This indicated that the 3% BM filling was well interacted with PBS polymer and subsequently formed an integrated film structure as examined by SEM.
For PBS/TPS film, its average pore diameter was dramatically increased up to 604.90 nm, whereas its total pore volume and surface area were decreased to as low as 0.102 cm3/g and 0.336 m2/g, respectively, owing to the contribution of TPS plasticizing structure. Furthermore, the average pore diameters were tremendously reduced to 128.97 nm and 33.07 nm for PBS/TPS 1.5% BM and PBS/TPS 3% BM films, respectively. This implied that the nucleating effect of BM particles were more likely to show up when mixing with TPS and PBS components together [47,48]. The total pore volume remained insignificant change for PBS/TPS 1.5% BM and PBS/TPS 3% BM films as comparing to PBS/TPS film, possibly the TPS plasticizer still taking strong effect in enclosing the porosity of the film. Moreover, the gradual increment of surface area for PBS/TPS 1.5% BM and PBS/TPS 3% BM films probably driven by the formation of small size pores that ultimately increased the surface roughness of the films [38,49].
Water vapor and oxygen permeability of film samples are illustrated in Figure 5a,b, respectively. Pure PBS film showed relatively great barrier to water vapor permeability by attributing to its well assimilated polymeric film structure. With BM loadings, the water vapor permeability was increased for PBS 1.5% BM and PBS 3% BM films. It was attributed to the polar characteristic of BM silver ions that favored the water molecules affinity towards film [17,30]. Besides this, the water vapor permeability was significantly increased for PBS/TPS film, due to the hydrophilic nature of TPS component which facilitated the water penetration [36,44]. The further incorporation of BM had improved the water barrier for PBS/TPS 1.5% BM and PBS/TPS 3% BM films. This was promoted by the reduced pore sizes for both films through BM nucleation as mentioned in BET analysis.
As for oxygen permeability (Figure 5b), only PBS 1.5% BM film showed poorer oxygen barrier comparing to pure PBS film, which resulted by its larger total pore volume and bigger pore size properties. However, PBS 3% BM film still presented reduced oxygen permeability probably contributed by its lower surface area formed by good polymer interaction [43,49]. Furthermore, the oxygen barrier was remarkably enhanced for PBS/TPS, PBS/TPS 1.5% BM, and PBS/TPS 3% BM films, signaling the componential mixture used in this study was promising to produce highly impermeable PBS packaging film for preserving food product. The schematic diagram below briefly revealed the mechanism of produced PBS/TPS films in response to the penetration of oxygen and water (Figure 6).

3.5. Antimicrobial Activity of PBS and PBS/TPS Films

The antimicrobial activity of film samples against S. aureus (ATCC 6538P), E. coli (ATCC 11229), and S. Typhimurium (ATCC 14028) are shown in Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9, respectively. This activity was compared with the positive control (gentamicin) and negative control (no PBS film/no sample). The cell number of each culture for this study was standardized into 5 log CFU/mL and known as at start. Based on Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9, the populations of three bacteria without PBS film (no sample) were increased (p < 0.05) after incubation from 5 (at start) to 6, 6 and 7 log CFU/mL, respectively.
In Figure 7, the pure PBS film was not significantly different (p > 0.05) with the negative control (no sample), however, the PBS/TPS film exhibited slightly reduction (p < 0.05) of S. aureus (ATCC 6538P) population. In comparison between control (pure PBS and PBS/TPS films) and treated film samples, the populations of S. aureus (ATCC 6538P) were decreased (p < 0.05) by addition of BM into the films. The PBS/TPS 3% BM film exhibited strong antimicrobial activity, and this sample was comparable with positive control, gentamicin. This indicates that PBS/TPS 3% BM film showed the killing effect on S. aureus (ATCC 6538P). The other treated film samples also showed antimicrobial activity as follow: PBS/TPS 1.5% BM > PBS 3% BM > PBS/TPS 1.5% BM films against S. aureus (ATCC 6538P).
In Figure 8, the pure PBS film was not significantly different (p > 0.05) with the negative control (no sample), and the PBS/TPS film exhibited slightly reduction (p < 0.05) of E. coli (ATCC 11229) population. Addition of BM into the films also showed good antimicrobial activity against E. coli (ATCC 11229), especially the PBS/TPS 1.5% BM and PBS/TPS 3% BM films, and these films were comparable with positive control, gentamicin. The other treated film samples also showed antimicrobial activity as follow: PBS 3% BM > PBS 1.5% BM films against E. coli (ATCC 11229).
In Figure 9, both pure PBS and PBS/TPS films was not significantly different (p < 0.05) with the negative control (no sample). However, the BM only exhibited good antimicrobial activity against S. Typhimurium (ATCC 14028) in PBS/TPS film. The effective sample as well as gentamicin was PBS/TPS 3% BM film. The other treated film samples also showed antimicrobial activity as follow: PBS 3% BM > PBS/TPS 1.5% BM ≥ PBS 1.5% BM films against S. Typhimurium (ATCC 14028).
Among six PBS films, the treated PBS films (with BM) showed the lowest (p < 0.05) populations of all three bacteria than the pure PBS and PBS/TPS films. This indicates that the BM exhibited antimicrobial effects even in pure PBS or PBS/TPS films. The higher percentages of each BM exhibited a good antimicrobial activity compared to the lowest percentages of BM. However, in comparison among four treated PBS films (with BM), the addition of BM into the PBS/TPS film was more effective compared to the addition of BM into the pure PBS film. It was probably contributed by the presence of hydrophilic TPS component in PBS film, that helped in interacting with ionic BM through physisorption process, and while the other active sites of BM with positive charge able to continuously reacting with bacterial cell membrane, thereby suppressing their growth. Herein, the antimicrobial testing is regarded as the only analysis which could strongly prove the presence of BM in PBS film by showing off its antimicrobial effect, despite the amount of BM used is remarkably low and undetectable by other analyses in this study.
In this study, we also found that the treated film samples were more effective against E. coli (ATCC 11229), followed by S. aureus (ATCC 6538P) and S. Typhimurium (ATCC 14028). The bacterial resistance was shown by the different degree of antimicrobial activity from each film in against each tested bacteria. Besides this, the superior suppression of bacterial growth presented by the produced films in our work, especially for PBS/TPS 3%BM was comparable to the work reported by Wattanawong et al. [50], who produced silver loaded zeolite filled PBS films with 99.9% of bacterial reduction on E. coli and S. aureus. Also, from the reported work by Warsiki and Bawardi [9], their tapioca starch/zinc oxide (ZnO) antimicrobial films could exhibit antimicrobial activity in against Salmonella sp. and E. coli at 1–2 wt % ZnO, however the ZnO nanoparticle filled PBS antimicrobial film produced by Petchwattana et al. [51] could only inhibit S. aureus and E. coli at above 6 wt % ZnO. Hence, the using of less amount antimicrobial agent, BM in our work was efficient in giving great antimicrobial effect, for developing high-performed antimicrobial packaging films.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, the BM was successfully incorporated in PBS and PBS/TPS films using melt-blown technique. From morphology examination, the PBS 3% BM and PBS/TPS 3% BM films revealed good film structure. This was supported by the FTIR analysis showing that both film samples had insignificant change of spectra compared to pure PBS film. Meanwhile, the high flame retardancy property of BM metal particles had improved the thermal resistance for all BM filled PBS films. The crystallizing effect of BM particles also aided in enhancing the crystallization behavior of PBS/TPS film. Moreover, the good compositional mixture of PBS/TPS 1.5% BM and PBS/TPS 3% BM films endowed them with high surface area and total pore volume, as well as small pore size features. This further contributes a great barrier for water vapor and oxygen gas permeability. By antimicrobial analysis, the BM acted as an antimicrobial agent in PBS films against S. aureus (ATCC 6538P), E. coli (ATCC 11229), and S. Typhimurium (ATCC 14028). The PBS/TPS 3% BM film showed strong antimicrobial activity against all three bacteria as well as gentamicin, whereas the PBS/TPS 1.5% BM film only presented antimicrobial effect against E. coli (ATCC 11229). Hence, it is suggested that the BM filled PBS/TPS films can be used in food packaging application in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.J., M.S., and S.A.; Methodology, N.A., L.K.K., and M.J.; Validation, M.J. and S.A.; Formal analysis and investigation, N.A., and L.K.K.; Writing—original draft preparation, N.A., and L.K.K.; Writing—review and editing, M.J., S.A., and M.S.; Supervision and project administration, M.J.; Funding acquisition, M.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors are grateful to Malaysian Industry-Government Group for High Technology (MIGHT) for Financial support of this work under Newton-Ungku Omar Fund (grant no. 6300873). The authors would like to extend their gratitude to King Saud University (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) for the funding of this research through Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2020/241).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Doi, Y.; Kasuya, K.; Abe, H.; Koyama, N.; Ishiwatari, S.; Takagi, K. Evaluation of biodegradabilities of biosynthetic and chemosynthetic polyesters in river water. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 1996, 51, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bahari, K.; Mitomo, H.; Enjoji, T.; Yoshii, F.; Makuuchi, K. Radiation crosslinked poly (butylene succinate) foam and its biodegradation. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 1998, 62, 551–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Phua, Y.J.; Chow, W.J.; Ishak, Z.A.M. Mechanical properties and structure development in poly (butylene succinate)/organo-montmorillonite nanocomposites under uniaxial cold rolling. EXPRESS Polym. Lett. 2011, 5, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Thurber, H.; Curtzwiler, G.W. Suitability of poly (butylene succinate) as a coating for paperboard convenience food packaging. Int. J. Biobased Plast. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nazrin, A.; Sapuan, S.M.; Zuhri, M.Y.M.; Ilyas, R.A.; Syafiq, R.; Sherwani, S.F.K. Nanocellulose reinforced thermoplastic starch (TPS), polylactic acid (PLA), and polybutylene succinate (PBS) for food packaging applications. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Doles, P.E.; Babu, S.M.; Ittera, N.; John, I.; John, L.; John, N. Tapioca starch based antimicrobial food packaging material. Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. 2014, 3, 1051–1056. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang, T.; Drzal, L.T. Cellulose-nanofiber-reinforced poly (lactic acid) composites prepared by a water-based approach. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, 5079–5085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yin, Q.; Chen, F.; Zhang, H.; Liu, C. Fabrication and characterisation of thermoplastic starch/poly(butylene succinate) blends with maleated poly(butylene succinate) as compatibiliser. Plast. Rubber Compos. 2015, 44, 362–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Warsiki, E.; Bawardi, J.T. Assessing Mechanical Properties And Antimicrobial Activity Of Zinc Oxide-Starch Biofilm. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Biomass: Accelerating the Technical Develop-ment and Commercialization for Sustainable Bio-based Products and Energy, Bogor, Indonesia, 1–2 August 2018; IOP Conference Series Earth Environmental Science: Bristol, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ayu, R.S.; Khalina, A.; Harmaen, A.S.; Zaman, K.; Jawaid, M.; Lee, C.H. Effect of modified tapioca starch on mechanical, thermal, and morphological properties of PBS blends for food packaging. Polymers 2018, 10, 1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Wyrwa, J.; Barska, A. Innovations in the food packaging market: Active packaging. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2017, 243, 1681–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhao, S.; Yao, J.; Fei, X.; Shao, Z.; Chen, X. An antimicrobial film by embedding in situ synthesized silver nanoparticles in soy protein isolate. Mater. Lett. 2013, 95, 142–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mauriello, G.; De Luca, E.; La Storia, A.; Villani, F.; Ercolini, D. Antimicrobial activity of a nisin-activated plastic film for food packaging. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2005, 41, 464–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Calatayud, M.; Lopez-de-Dicastillo, C.; Lopez-Carballo, G.; Velez, D.; Munoz, P.H.; Gavara, R. Active films based on cocoa extract with antioxidant, antimicrobial and biological applications. Food Chem. 2013, 139, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hongsriphan, N.; Sanga, S. Antibacterial food packaging sheets prepared by coating chitosan on corona-treated extruded poly (lactic acid)/poly (butylene succinate) blends. J. Plast. Film Sheeting 2018, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Petchwattana, N.; Naknaen, P. Utilization of thymol as an antimicrobial agent for biodegradable poly (butylene succinate). Mater. Chem. Phys. 2015, 163, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wiburanawong, S.; Petchwattana, N.; Covavisaruch, S. Carvacrol as an antimicrobial agent for poly (butylene succinate): Tensile properties and antimicrobial activity observations. Adv. Mat. Res. 2014, 931, 111–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Naknaen, P. Utilization possibilities of antimicrobial biodegradable packaging produced by poly (butylene succinate) modified with zinc oxide nanoparticles in fresh-cut apple slices. Int. Food Res. J. 2014, 21, 2413–2420. Available online: http://www.ifrj.upm.edu.my (accessed on 20 April 2020).
  19. Threepopnatkul, P.; Wongnarat, C.; Intolo, W.; Suato, S.; Kulsetthanchalee, C. Effect of TiO2 and ZnO on thin film properties of PET/PBS blend for food packaging applications. Energy Procedia 2014, 56, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Xu, Y.; Rehmani, N.; Alsubaie, L.; Kim, C.; Sismour, E.; Scales, A. Tapioca starch active nanocomposite films and their antimicrobial effectiveness on ready-to-eat chicken meat. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2018, 16, 86–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Basch, C.Y.; Jagus, R.J.; Flores, S.K. Physical and antimicrobial properties of tapioca starch-HPMC edible films incorporated with nisin and/or potassium sorbate. Food Bioproc. Technol. 2013, 6, 2419–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jung, W.K.; Koo, H.C.; Kim, K.W.; Shin, S.; Kim, S.H.; Park, Y.H. Antibacterial activity and mechanism of action of the silver ion in Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 2171–2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Feng, Q.L.; Wu, J.; Chen, G.Q.; Cui, F.Z.; Kim, T.N.; Kim, J.O. A mechanistic study of the antibacterial effect of silver ions on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2000, 52, 662–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bragg, P.D.; Rainnie, D.J. The effect of silver ions on the respiratory chain of Escherichia coli. Can. J. Microbiol. 1974, 20, 883–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Belly, R.T.; Kydd, G.C. Silver Resistance in Microorganisms. In Proceedings of the 38th General Meeting of the Society for Industrial Microbiology—Volume 23, Richmond, VA, USA, 9–14 August 1981; Developments Industrial Microbiology: Richmond, VA, USA, 1981; pp. 567–577. [Google Scholar]
  26. Furr, J.R.; Russell, A.D.; Turner, T.D.; Andrews, A. Antibacterial activity of Actisorb Plus, Actisorb and silver nitrate. J. Hosp. Infect. 1994, 27, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Thurman, R.B.; Gerba, C.P. The molecular mechanisms of copper and silver ion disinfection of bacteria and viruses. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1989, 18, 295–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. ISO 22196. Plastics—Measurement of Antibacterial Activity on Plastics Surfaces; International Standard Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhang, M.; Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Li, S. Compatibility and mechanical properties of gelatin-filled polybutylene succinate composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 137, 48881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cao, C.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, S.; Zhang, J.; Li, W.; Li, B.; Yu, J. Poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate)/titanium dioxide/silver composite biofilms for food packaging application. LWT. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 109874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, J.; Cao, C.; Zheng, S.; Li, W.; Li, B.; Xie, X. Poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate)/magnesium oxide/silver ternary composite bio films for food packaging application. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 24, 100487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lu, D.; Xiao, C.; Sun, F. Controlled grafting of poly (vinyl acetate) onto starch via RAFT polymerization. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2012, 124, 3450–3455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhao, Y.; Qu, J.; Feng, Y.; Wu, Z. Mechanical and thermal properties of epoxidized soybean oil plasticized polybutylene succinate blends. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2012, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wootthikanokkhan, J.; Wongta, N.; Sombatsompop, N.; Kositchaiyong, A.; Ayutthaya, S.I.; Kaabbuathong, N.; Noi, W. Effect of blending conditions on mechanical, thermal, and rheological properties of plasticized poly (lactic acid)/maleated thermoplastic starch blends. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2011, 124, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mathew, S.; Snigdha, S.; Mathew, J.; Radhakrishnan, E.K. Poly (vinyl alcohol): Montmorillonite: Boiled rice water (starch) blend film reinforced with silver nanoparticles; characterization and antibacterial properties. Appl. Clay Sci. 2018, 161, 464–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Khalil, F.; Galland, S.; Cottaz, A.; Joly, C.; Degraeve, P. Polybutylene succinate adipate/starch blends: A morphological study for the design of controlled release films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 108, 272–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Phiriyawirut, M.; Mekaroonluck, J.; Hauyam, T.; Kittilaksanon, A. Biomass-based foam from crosslinked tapioca starch/polybutylene succinate blend. J. Renew. Mater. 2016, 4, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mizuno, S.; Maeda, T.; Kanemura, C.; Hotta, A. Biodegradability, reprocessability, and mechanical properties of polybutylene succinate (PBS) photografted by hydrophilic or hydrophobic membranes. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2015, 117, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lule, Z.; Ju, H.; Kim, J. Effect of surface-modified Al2O3 on the thermomechanical properties of polybutylene succinate/Al2O3 composites. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 13530–13537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Abidin, A.S.Z.; Yusoh, K.; Jamari, S.S.; Abdullah, A.H.; Ismail, Z. Surface functionalization of graphene oxide with octadecylamine for improved thermal and mechanical properties in polybutylene succinate nanocomposite. Polym. Bull. 2017, 75, 3499–3522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Huang, J.; Lu, X.; Zhang, N.; Yang, L.; Yan, M.; Liu, H.; Qu, J. Study on the properties of nano-TiO2/polybutylene succinate composites prepared by vane extruder. Polym. Compos. 2014, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Xu, A.; Wang, F. Carboxylate ionic liquid solvent systems from 2006 to 2020: Thermal properties and application in cellulose processing. Green Chem. 2020, 22, 7622–7664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mohanty, F.; Swain, S.K. Nano silver embedded starch hybrid graphene oxide sandwiched poly (ethylmethacrylate) for packaging application. Nano. Struct. Nano. Objects 2019, 18, 100300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, Z.; Jiang, M.; Bai, X.; Dong, X.; Tong, J.; Zhou, J. Effect of postcrosslinking modification with glutaraldehyde on the properties of thermoplastic starch/poly(vinyl alcohol) blend films. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2011, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, Y.; Duo, T.; Xu, X.; Xiao, Z.; Xu, A.; Liu, R.; Jiang, C.; Lu, J. Eco-friendly high-performance poly(methyl methacrylate) film reinforced with methylcellulose. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 24256–24261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Xu, A.; Wang, Y.; Gao, J.; Wang, J. Facile fabrication of a homogeneous cellulose/polylactic acid composite film with improved biocompatibility, biodegradability and mechanical properties. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 4449–4456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Messin, T.; Guinault, A.; Delpouve, N.; Sollogoub, C. Biodegradable PLA/PBS multinanolayer membrane with enhanced barrier performances. J. Membr. Sci. 2020, 598, 117777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Xu, A.; Wang, F.; Zhang, L.; Xu, X.; Xiao, Z.; Liu, R. Composites from biodegradable and biocompatible methylcellulose, poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) and poly(1,4-butylene succinate) with enhanced properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020, 50320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wei, Z.; Gu, J.; Ye, Y.; Fang, M.; Lang, J.; Yang, D. Biodegradable poly (butylene succinate) nanofibrous membrane treated with oxygen plasma for super hydrophilicity. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2019, 381, 125147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wattanawong, N.; Chatchaipaiboon, K.; Sreekirin, N.; Aht-Ong, D. Migration, physical and antibacterial properties of silver zeolite/poly (butylene succinate) composite films for food packaging applications. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2020, 39, 3–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Petchwattana, N.; Covavisaruch, S.; Wibooranawong, S.; Naknaen, P. Antimicrobial food packaging prepared from poly (butylene succinate) and zinc oxide. Measurement 2016, 93, 442–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 13 00391 g001a 550Polymers 13 00391 g001b 550
Figure 1. SEM images of cross-sectional morphology for film samples of (a) PBS, (b) PBS 1.5% BM, (c) PBS 3% BM, (d) PBS/TPS, (e) PBS/TPS 1.5% BM, and (f) PBS/TPS 3% BM under ×1000 magnification viewing.
Figure 1. SEM images of cross-sectional morphology for film samples of (a) PBS, (b) PBS 1.5% BM, (c) PBS 3% BM, (d) PBS/TPS, (e) PBS/TPS 1.5% BM, and (f) PBS/TPS 3% BM under ×1000 magnification viewing.
Polymers 13 00391 g001aPolymers 13 00391 g001b
Polymers 13 00391 g002 550
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of PBS films.
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of PBS films.
Polymers 13 00391 g002
Polymers 13 00391 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) TGA and (b) DTG curves of PBS films.
Figure 3. (a) TGA and (b) DTG curves of PBS films.
Polymers 13 00391 g003
Polymers 13 00391 g004 550
Figure 4. DSC spectra of PBS films.
Figure 4. DSC spectra of PBS films.
Polymers 13 00391 g004
Polymers 13 00391 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Water vapor and (b) oxygen gas permeability of PBS films.
Figure 5. (a) Water vapor and (b) oxygen gas permeability of PBS films.
Polymers 13 00391 g005
Polymers 13 00391 g006a 550Polymers 13 00391 g006b 550
Figure 6. Schematic diagrams of (a) PBS, (b) PBS/BM, (c) PBS/TPS, and (d) PBS/TPS BM films in response to the penetration of oxygen and water.
Figure 6. Schematic diagrams of (a) PBS, (b) PBS/BM, (c) PBS/TPS, and (d) PBS/TPS BM films in response to the penetration of oxygen and water.
Polymers 13 00391 g006aPolymers 13 00391 g006b
Polymers 13 00391 g007 550
Figure 7. Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538P) growth on different PBS films. Note: At start: the cell number of culture before incubation (5 log CFU/mL); No sample: no PBS film; PBS: PBS film without antimicrobial agent; PBS 1.5% BM: PBS with 1.5% BM; PBS 3% BM: PBS with 3% BM; PBS/TPS: PBS with tapioca starch; PBS/TPS 1.5% BM: PBS/tapioca starch with 1.5% BM; PBS/TPS 3% BM: PBS/tapioca starch with 3% BM; G: Gentamicin. Error bars represent standard deviation (n = 3). The different a–f small letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) among film samples.
Figure 7. Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538P) growth on different PBS films. Note: At start: the cell number of culture before incubation (5 log CFU/mL); No sample: no PBS film; PBS: PBS film without antimicrobial agent; PBS 1.5% BM: PBS with 1.5% BM; PBS 3% BM: PBS with 3% BM; PBS/TPS: PBS with tapioca starch; PBS/TPS 1.5% BM: PBS/tapioca starch with 1.5% BM; PBS/TPS 3% BM: PBS/tapioca starch with 3% BM; G: Gentamicin. Error bars represent standard deviation (n = 3). The different a–f small letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) among film samples.
Polymers 13 00391 g007
Polymers 13 00391 g008 550
Figure 8. Escherichia coli (ATCC 11229) growth on different PBS films. Note: At start: the cell number of culture before incubation (5 log CFU/mL); No sample: no PBS film; PBS: PBS film without antimicrobial agent; PBS 1.5% BM: PBS with 1.5% BM; PBS 3% BM: PBS with 3% BM; PBS/TPS: PBS with tapioca starch; PBS/TPS 1.5% BM: PBS/tapioca starch with 1.5% BM; PBS/TPS 3% BM: PBS/tapioca starch with 3% BM; G: Gentamicin. Error bars represent standard deviation (n = 3). The different a–f small letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) among film samples.
Figure 8. Escherichia coli (ATCC 11229) growth on different PBS films. Note: At start: the cell number of culture before incubation (5 log CFU/mL); No sample: no PBS film; PBS: PBS film without antimicrobial agent; PBS 1.5% BM: PBS with 1.5% BM; PBS 3% BM: PBS with 3% BM; PBS/TPS: PBS with tapioca starch; PBS/TPS 1.5% BM: PBS/tapioca starch with 1.5% BM; PBS/TPS 3% BM: PBS/tapioca starch with 3% BM; G: Gentamicin. Error bars represent standard deviation (n = 3). The different a–f small letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) among film samples.
Polymers 13 00391 g008
Polymers 13 00391 g009 550
Figure 9. Salmonella Typhimurium (ATCC 14028) growth on different PBS films. Note: At start: the cell number of culture before incubation (5 log CFU/mL); No sample: no PBS film; PBS: PBS film without antimicrobial agent; PBS 1.5% BM: PBS with 1.5% BM; PBS 3% BM: PBS with 3% BM; PBS/TPS: PBS with tapioca starch; PBS/TPS 1.5% BM: PBS/tapioca starch with 1.5% BM; PBS/TPS 3% BM: PBS/tapioca starch with 3% BM; G: Gentamicin. Error bars represent standard deviation (n = 3). The different a–f small letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) among film samples.
Figure 9. Salmonella Typhimurium (ATCC 14028) growth on different PBS films. Note: At start: the cell number of culture before incubation (5 log CFU/mL); No sample: no PBS film; PBS: PBS film without antimicrobial agent; PBS 1.5% BM: PBS with 1.5% BM; PBS 3% BM: PBS with 3% BM; PBS/TPS: PBS with tapioca starch; PBS/TPS 1.5% BM: PBS/tapioca starch with 1.5% BM; PBS/TPS 3% BM: PBS/tapioca starch with 3% BM; G: Gentamicin. Error bars represent standard deviation (n = 3). The different a–f small letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) among film samples.
Polymers 13 00391 g009
Table
Table 1. Denotations and formulations of produced films.
Table 1. Denotations and formulations of produced films.
No.Film DenotationsAmount of TPS (wt %)Amount of BM (wt %)
1PBSN/AN/A
2PBS 1.5% BMN/A1.5
3PBS 3% BMN/A3
4PBS/TPS40N/A
5PBS/TPS 1.5% BM401.5
6PBS/TPS 3% BM403
Note: N/A: not available.
Table
Table 2. TGA data of PBS films.
Table 2. TGA data of PBS films.
SamplesTON (°C) aTPD (°C) bWML (J/g) cRF (%) d
PBS355.1399.395.624.75
PBS 1.5% BM357.0403.297.815.36
PBS 3% BM356.8402.593.047.80
PBS/TPS283.7399.596.081.19
PBS/TPS 1.5% BM288.7399.893.116.30
PBS/TPS 3% BM290.2401.993.386.50
Note: a Onset decomposition temperature; b Peak decomposition temperature; c Maximum weight loss; d residue formation.
Table
Table 3. DSC data of PBS films
Table 3. DSC data of PBS films
SamplesTc (°C) aTm (°C) b∆Hm (J/g) cXC (%) d
PBS94.4113.369.4234.71
PBS 1.5% BM95.3113.763.5332.25
PBS 3% BM92.2113.571.8937.06
PBS/TPS94.5113.351.5028.61
PBS/TPS 1.5% BM94.0113.656.5331.94
PBS/TPS 3% BM92.0112.662.2035.75
Note: a Crystallization temperature; b Melting temperature; c Melting enthalpy; d Crystallinity degree, XC = ∆Hm/[∆Hom (1 − Wf)] × 100%, where ∆Hom is the enthalpy of 100% pure PBS (200 J/g); Wf is the weight fraction of active agents in the PBS film.
Table
Table 4. BET, water vapor, and oxygen gas permeability data of PBS films
Table 4. BET, water vapor, and oxygen gas permeability data of PBS films
SamplesBETPermeability
Surface Area (m2/g)Total Pore Volume (cm3/g)Average Pore Diameter (nm)Water Vapor (g μm/m2)Oxygen (cm3 μm/m2 s Pa)
PBS3.5980.211117.2190,17027,320
PBS 1.5% BM3.5720.414231.6291,37028,650
PBS 3% BM3.0300.436287.4491,94026,470
PBS/TPS0.3360.102604.9095,40022,540
PBS/TPS 1.5% BM1.5040.097128.9794,66019,860
PBS/TPS 3% BM4.8720.08133.0793,50017,420
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aziman, N.; Kian, L.K.; Jawaid, M.; Sanny, M.; Alamery, S. Morphological, Structural, Thermal, Permeability, and Antimicrobial Activity of PBS and PBS/TPS Films Incorporated with Biomaster-Silver for Food Packaging Application. Polymers 2021, 13, 391. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13030391

AMA Style

Aziman N, Kian LK, Jawaid M, Sanny M, Alamery S. Morphological, Structural, Thermal, Permeability, and Antimicrobial Activity of PBS and PBS/TPS Films Incorporated with Biomaster-Silver for Food Packaging Application. Polymers. 2021; 13(3):391. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13030391

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aziman, Nurain, Lau Kia Kian, Mohammad Jawaid, Maimunah Sanny, and Salman Alamery. 2021. "Morphological, Structural, Thermal, Permeability, and Antimicrobial Activity of PBS and PBS/TPS Films Incorporated with Biomaster-Silver for Food Packaging Application" Polymers 13, no. 3: 391. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13030391

APA Style

Aziman, N., Kian, L. K., Jawaid, M., Sanny, M., & Alamery, S. (2021). Morphological, Structural, Thermal, Permeability, and Antimicrobial Activity of PBS and PBS/TPS Films Incorporated with Biomaster-Silver for Food Packaging Application. Polymers, 13(3), 391. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13030391

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop