Next Article in Journal
The Role of Surface Chemistry in the Efficacy of Protein and DNA Microarrays for Label-Free Detection: An Overview
Next Article in Special Issue
Preparation and Characterization of Chitosan-Coated Manganese-Ferrite Nanoparticles Conjugated with Laccase for Environmental Bioremediation
Previous Article in Journal
Detailed Process Analysis of Biobased Polybutylene Succinate Microfibers Produced by Laboratory-Scale Melt Electrospinning
Previous Article in Special Issue
Polymer Ligands Derived from Jute Fiber for Heavy Metal Removal from Electroplating Wastewater
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 13
Issue 7
10.3390/polym13071025
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthetic Biomimetic Polymethacrylates: Promising Platform for the Design of Anti-Cyanobacterial and Anti-Algal Agents

by
Přemysl Mikula
1,
Marie Mlnaříková
1,
Enrico T. Nadres
2,
Haruko Takahashi
2,
Pavel Babica
1,3,
Kenichi Kuroda
2,
Luděk Bláha
1 and
Iva Sovadinová
1,*
1
RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice 3, CZ-62500 Brno, Czech Republic
2
Department of Biologic and Materials Sciences & Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
3
Department of Experimental Phycology and Ecotoxicology, Institute of Botany of the CAS, CZ-60200 Brno, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2021, 13(7), 1025; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13071025
Submission received: 5 March 2021 / Revised: 20 March 2021 / Accepted: 23 March 2021 / Published: 26 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymers Materials for Water Treatment)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Extensive, uncontrolled growth of algae and cyanobacteria is an environmental, public health, economic, and technical issue in managing natural and engineered water systems. Synthetic biomimetic polymers have been almost exclusively considered antimicrobial alternatives to conventional antibiotics to treat human bacterial infections. Very little is known about their applicability in an aquatic environment. Here, we introduce synthetic biomimetic polymethacrylates (SBPs) as a cost-effective and chemically facile, flexible platform for designing a new type of agent suitable for controlling and mitigating photosynthetic microorganisms. Since SBPs are cationic and membranolytic in heterotrophic bacteria, we hypothesized they could also interact with negatively charged cyanobacterial or algal cell walls and membranes. We demonstrated that SBPs inhibited the growth of aquatic photosynthetic organisms of concern, i.e., cyanobacteria (Microcystis aeruginosa and Synechococcus elongatus) and green algae (Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Desmodesmus quadricauda), with 50% effective growth-inhibiting concentrations ranging between 95 nM and 6.5 μM. Additionally, SBPs exhibited algicidal effects on C. reinhardtii and cyanocidal effects on picocyanobacterium S. elongatus and microcystin-producing cyanobacterium M. aeruginosa. SBP copolymers, particularly those with moderate hydrophobic content, induced more potent cyanostatic and cyanocidal effects than homopolymers. Thus, biomimetic polymers are a promising platform for the design of anti-cyanobacterial and anti-algal agents for water treatment.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Algae and cyanobacteria are widely distributed in water bodies in the regions with sufficient sunlight, moisture, and nutrients. Their growth is essential in providing oxygen and nutrients for other organisms. However, their excessive propagation is ecological, public health, economic, and technical issues in water management in different societal sectors, including public health, recreation, or industry. Cyanobacteria and algae form blooms in water bodies reducing water quality, which constitutes a hazard concerning the use, safety, and sustainability of drinking and recreational water supplies and fisheries, aquacultures, and agricultural waters [1,2]. Additionally, cyanobacteria and algae accumulate and excessively grow in cooling water industrial systems, which are among the primary problems affecting their efficient operations in many industries, including chemical, petrochemical and food industries, water treatment or power plants [3]. They also colonize surfaces, i.e., form microbial biofilms, by which they can cause biocorrosion, reduce conductive heat transfer across surfaces, and clog hydraulic systems [3,4]. Cyanobacterial and algal blooms and their biofilms have attracted scientific and regulatory attention, and many efforts have been made to prevent, control, and mitigate unwanted cyanobacterial and algal propagation.
Cyanobacterial or algal growth can be inhibited or suppressed by mechanical, physical, biological, or chemical methods [3,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Current chemical methods to control undesired organisms involve various chemicals such as herbicides, flocculating agents, natural products, metals, or photodynamic agents [6,7,9,11]. However, their application is often limited by their non-specificity, low efficiency, and non-target toxicity (reviewed in [9]). For example, metal salts and organometals pose a substantial risk to non-target organisms and an excessive burden on the environment [12]. Herbicide diuron is a general algicide effective in removing phytoplankton but is persistent in the environment and harms non-target biota [9]. Ozone, chlorine, and permanganate are highly effective non-selective algicides used for drinking water and wastewater sanitation with low ecosafety [9].
Antimicrobial synthetic polymers represent a promising tool for fighting microorganisms [13]. The antimicrobial activity against emergency human pathogens has already been demonstrated for different synthetic polymers such as quaternary ammonium, phosphonium, or N-halamine polymers (reviewed in [14,15]). Recently, the concept of cost-effective and biocompatible peptide-mimetic antimicrobial polymers has been introduced [13]. The chemical structure of peptide-mimetic antimicrobial polymers has been inspired by the natural design principle of antimicrobial peptides (host defense peptides). The peptide-mimetic design principle has recently offered significant flexibility and diversity in creating new antimicrobial materials and their potential biomedical applications [13,16,17]. Synthetic biomimetic polymethacrylates (SBPs) are excellent examples of this type of polymers. A cationic amphiphilic nature of these biomimetic polymers is responsible for their antimicrobial activity. This structure was tuned by molecular designing to achieve required antimicrobial activity against a broad spectrum of human pathogenic bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, but cause no harm to mammalian cells [16,18,19]. Notably, these polymers did not result in any measurable resistance development in Escherichia coli and displayed high biocompatibility (low or no adverse hemolytic activity).
Although the antimicrobial activity of peptide-mimetic antimicrobial polymers has already been well-documented, the previous research was almost exclusively focused on human bacterial pathogens to discover novel antibiotics for biomedical applications. Until now, data about their activity against environmentally-relevant target microorganisms have still been limited, which is quite surprising considering the broad spectrum of possible environmental applications of this type of antimicrobial agent. Since SBPs are cationic and membranolytic in heterotrophic bacteria, we hypothesized they could also disrupt negatively charged cyanobacterial or algal cell walls and membranes. Here, we present a systematic screening of cyanostatic/algistatic and cyanocidal/algicidal properties of SBPs against environmentally relevant aquatic photosynthetic microorganisms. To find possible structure-activity relationships and create more potent algicides or cyanocides, we studied structurally different variants focusing on cationic−hydrophobic balance as well as end-group functionality (modified hydrophobic vs. cationic end-group).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Synthesis of Cationic Amphiphilic Poly(Methacrylate) Derivatives (SBPs)

Methacrylate polymers were synthesized by reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization, according to the previous report [20]. The schematic illustration of the synthesis of SBPs is in Figure 1. See Supplementary Materials for further details (Text S1 and Supplementary Table S1). Here the synthesis of HP1 is described as a representative reaction. For HP1, 4-((tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino)ethyl methacrylate (ABMA; 4 mmol, 4 mL of 1 M solution in MeCN), 2-cycanopropyl-2-yl-dithiobenzoate (0.6 mmol, 132.6 mg), and AIBN (azobisisobutyronitrile; 0.06 mmol, 9.8 mg) were mixed, and the oxygen of mixture was removed by bubbling with nitrogen for 2 min. The reaction mixture was then stirred at 70 °C for 16 h. The polymer product was isolated by evaporating the MeCN solvent under reduced pressure, and then the residue was dissolved in dichloromethane and precipitated in excess hexanes twice to give Boc-HP1 (Boc-protected HP1). The mole percentage of EMA (ethyl methacrylate; MPethyl, % of hydrophobic groups) was determined by comparing integrated peaks of butylene groups of Boc-ABMA (boc-protected ABMA) and ethylene groups of EMA in the 1H NMR spectrum (deuterochloroform CDCl3 used as a solvent with tetramethylsilane TMS as a stabilizer, 0 ppm). The degree of polymerization (DP) was calculated by comparing integrated peaks of the phenyl group of chain transfer agent at the polymer ω-end and side chains in the 1H NMR spectrum. The number average molecular weight (Mn) of the boc-protected polymers was calculated using the DP, MPethyl, and the molecular weights of monomers and RAFT agent. The boc-protected polymers were also characterized by GPC (gel permeation chromatography) analysis to measure the number average molecular weight (Mn), and the weight average molecular weight (Mw) calculated using a calibration curve based on 10 standard samples of poly(methyl methacrylate), MW 500–50,000 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA; M-L-10, no. PL2020-0100).
Boc-HP1 (200 mg) was further mixed with methyl 3-mercaptopropionate (MMP) (100 µL), followed by the addition of trifluoracetic acid (TFA) (8 mL). After stirring for 30 min, the TFA was removed by blowing with nitrogen gas in a closed container connected to a NaOH aq bath to trap TFA gas. The residue was dissolved in methanol and then deprotected HP1 was isolated by precipitating in excess diethyl ether. Subsequently, the precipitate was dissolved in distilled water and lyophilized to yield a light pink fluffy product (200.7 mg). The boc-deprotected polymer was characterized by 1H NMR in solvent methanol-d4 CD3OD. The 1H NMR spectrum was also analyzed using the same method used for the boc-protected polymer; DP = 15.2, MPethyl = 0 mol %. Using these values and molecular weights of monomers and RAFT agent, the Mn was calculated (=3900 g/mol, including TFA). GPC analysis was not performed for the boc-deprotected polymer due to the low solubility of the boc-deprotected polymers in the elution solvent (THF, tetrahydrofuran).
The polymer HP2 and CP5 were prepared by transforming the RAFT (dithioester) end group by radical-mediated reaction using AIBN. Due to the lack of phenyl end group, the DP of these polymers cannot be determined by 1H NMR analysis. The DP values used for Mn calculations are those of precursor polymers.
The polymer solution was prepared and diluted in 0.01% acetic acid. A range of final experimental polymer concentrations varied from 0.08 μg mL−1 to 40 μg mL−1.

2.2. Cyanobacterial and Algal Cultures

The laboratory cultures of green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (CR, CCALA 928) and Desmodesmus quadricauda (DQ, CCALA 463) and cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongates (SE, CCALA 187) were purchased from the Culture Collection of Autotrophic Organisms (CCALA, Trebon, Czech Republic). The laboratory culture of cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa (MA, PCC 7806) was obtained from the Pasteur Culture Collection of Cyanobacteria (Institute Pasteur of Paris, Paris, France). Representative bright-field and fluorescence images of studied freshwater green algae and cyanobacteria species are shown in Figure S1A. All species were continuously cultivated in Erlenmeyer flasks in 50% ZBB medium (freshwater-based medium, pH 7.1, salinity < 0.05%, conductivity 725 μS/cm, Na+: 2.3 mM; Ca2+: 0.1 mM; Mg2+: 0.1 mM), as previously reported [21]. Briefly, the ZBB medium was prepared by mixing the medium Z (ZEHNDER [22]) with the BB medium (Bold’s basal medium [23]) in a ratio of 1:1, autoclaving and subsequent diluting by sterile ultrapure water to 50%. The algae and cyanobacteria were grown under permanent illumination provided by cool white fluorescent tubes (PHILIPS 36 W/33; 1500 l×) at a temperature of 21 ± 1 °C and aerated with sterilized air by passing through 0.22 μm filter (Labicom, Olomouc, Czech Republic). Once a week, half of a cell suspension volume was replaced by the fresh sterile ZBB medium. The population doubling time under the cultivation conditions was 19 h for CR, 26 h for DQ, 14 h for SE, and 27 h for MA [21].

2.3. Growth Inhibition Assay

Growth inhibition assay was conducted in a microplate format (96-well plates Greiner Bio-One, Kremsmünster, Austria; cat. no. 655201), as reported previously [21]. Briefly, the initial cell concentration (initial inoculum of cells that reached the exponential growth phase diluted in the ZBB medium) was ca. 1 × 107 cells mL−1 for cyanobacteria and 1 × 106 cells mL−1 for algae. Optical density at 680 nm (OD680) is directly related to cyanobacterial or algal density (cell number) in culture media. The OD680 was measured using Synergy MX microplate reader (Biotek, Bad Friedrichshall, Germany) at the beginning of each experiment (time = 0 h), 24, 48, and 72 h for faster-growing species CR and SE, and after 48, 72, and 96 h for slower-growing species DQ and MA [21]. A typical image of a 96-well plate at the end of the growth inhibition assay is shown in Figure S1B.

2.4. Algicidal/Cyanocidal Activity Assay

The viability status of algal or cyanobacterial cells can be assessed by measuring the fluorescence of chlorophylls and other photosynthetic pigments, whereby a lack of fluorescence indicates the irreversible damage and death of the cell connected with the disappearance of fluorescence [24,25,26]. Algicidal/cyanocidal activity assay was based on decreased autofluorescence of algal or cyanobacterial cells below the level of inoculated cells. The assay was done as reported previously [21]. The experimental set-up was the same as for the growth inhibition assay. A decline of cell numbers below initial inoculum indicating algicidal or cyanocidal activity was evaluated by monitoring autofluorescence from photosynthetic pigments (λex = 485 nm/λem = 675 nm for green algae; λex = 590 nm/λem = 675 nm for cyanobacteria) using Synergy MX microplate reader (Biotek) measured at the same time points as an optical density for growth inhibition assay. A typical image of a 96-well plate at the end of the algicidal/cyanocidal activity assay is shown in Figure S1B.

2.5. Data Analysis and Statistics

Non- and solvent-treated cells (final concentrations of acetic acid: 0.001 vol%) were included for each treatment. Solvent did not affect the growth or viability of used cyanobacterial or algal strains compared to non-treated cells. Each experiment was repeated at least three times independently. In the growth inhibition assay, optical reading values were normalized to non-treated cells by dividing the OD680 values of the polymer-exposed cells with that of the control groups (the growth of non-treated cells = 100%) for each exposure time. Cyanobacterial and algal growth at each time point was expressed as a percentage of the given negative control. In the algicidal/cyanocidal activity assay, fluorescence readings were normalized to the autofluorescence of inoculated cells at time = 0 h and data are expressed as a percentage of relative fluorescence units (RFUs) for the initial inoculum. IC50 values were calculated using non-linear curve fitting (GraphPad Prism 6 software). The final IC50 value was calculated as geometric means of IC50 values determined for each independent experiment with 95% CI (confidence interval). Graphs were prepared using SigmaPlot 12.1 (Systat Software, Krakow, Poland). One-way ANOVA for normally distributed data with equal variance or Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA was done in SigmaPlot 12.1. Dunnett’s method (multiple comparisons versus control group) or Tukey’s method (multiple comparisons) were selected as post-hoc tests. p-values less than or equal to 0.05 were considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. Design and Characterization of Studied Biomimetic Polymethacrylates (SBPs)

We selected an SBP platform due to providing a set of different structural properties to be tailored. In this study, we tested eight structurally different SBPs to probe their efficacy against cyanobacteria and algae and examine the effect of polymer structures on their antimicrobial activity against them (Table 1, Figure 2 and Table S1). The cationic groups of copolymers provide an electrostatic binding to anionic bacterial or algal cell membranes in the polymer design. The hydrophobic groups are inserted into the hydrophobic domain of the cell membranes to disrupt the membrane, causing leakage of cellular contents and ultimately cell death. Therefore, the polymer structures, net cationic charges, and hydrophobicity would be determined in their activity against cyanobacteria and algae.
SBPs may contain more hydrophobic groups than conventional polymers, and it may be common to use the minimum content of hydrophobic groups to favor the processing of the material obtained. However, SBPs and their analogs have previously shown potent antimicrobial activity against a broad spectrum of microorganisms and low hemolytic activity against human red blood cells, thereby would be good candidates for environmental applications [20,27].
Although the stability of the polymers is beyond the scope of this report, long-term exposure to microbes and the environment may cause polymer degradation. Specifically, it has been known for antimicrobial polymer coatings by acrylic polymers prone to photochemical degradation due to the acrylic hydrogen atom in alpha to the carbonyl group, promoting fungi attack and proliferation on the coatings [28]. However, while the polymers studied here are tested as antimicrobials in solution, not as coatings, they are methacrylate polymers that lack the acrylic hydrogen atom in the alpha position. Therefore, the methacrylate backbone would be relatively stable, and it will be advantageous to provide long-lasting antimicrobial effects in the solution.
The polymers were synthesized by RAFT polymerization to give narrow molecular weight distribution [20]. Three SBPs do not bear hydrophobic groups (homopolymers: HP1–3). Five SBPs do bear hydrophobic groups (copolymers) with a different extent (~30–50%: CP1–5). Selected polymers were further modified to modulate the end groups (see the synthesis scheme of HP2 and CP5 in Text S1B and F) [20]. CP1, CP2, and CP3 have the same α- and ω- end groups but were designed to have different compositions of the cationic and hydrophobic groups to examine the effect of the cationic charges and hydrophobicity on their antimicrobial activities. Three SBPs contain the cationic α-end (HP3, CP4, CP5) and five do not (HP1, HP2, CP1–3). SBPs also differ in the ω-end group (phenyl thio-ester: HP1, HP3, CP1–4; cyanoisobutyl: HP2 and cationic: CP5).
The boc-protected polymers were analyzed by GPC to determine the molecular weight distribution. Due to the low solubility of the polymers in the GPC elution solvent (THF), GPC analyses of boc-deprotected polymers were not performed. The polydispersity (Mw/Mn) of the boc-protected polymers was around 1.1–1.2, indicating the polymers have a relatively narrow molecular weight distribution. The discrepancies between the Mn values determined by 1H NMR and those by GPC in Table 1 are likely because (1) the 1H NMR Mn values were calculated for the boc-deprotected polymers while GPC Mn was determined for the boc-protected polymers, and (2) the molecular weights measured using GPC are determined relative to the standard samples of polymethylmethacrylate; these cannot be directly compared to the Mn values determined by 1H NMR.

3.2. Growth-Inhibitory Activity

First, we screened a growth-inhibitory activity of selected SBPs in a 72-h toxicity assay with cyanobacteria SE and MA and green algae DQ and CR as model photosynthetic microorganisms by recording optical density as a marker of microbial growth. SE and MA are common freshwater cyanobacteria and are often utilized as model cyanobacterial species in experimental studies. MA produces cyanotoxins (microcystins) and can form harmful algal blooms causing human health and ecological problems [29]. CR and DQ are ubiquitous eucaryotic freshwater green algae in natural and industrial water systems and can occur in water blooms [30]. Both species are used as a model for antifouling and anti-algal assessments [30,31].
The tested polymers were active against all four autotrophic microorganism species. SBPs caused a concentration-dependent decrease of their growth (Figure 3) with the 72hIC50 (the concentration of polymer causing a 50% inhibition of the cyanobacterial or algal growth after a 72-h exposure) values ranging from 0.2 to 9.1 μg mL−1 (Table S2). All SBPs inhibited CR and SE growth within a relatively narrow concentration range (72hIC50: 0.6–1.2 μg mL−1) and were less efficient against DQ (about ten times higher IC50 values; 72hIC50: 4.9–9.1 μg mL−1). The most sensitive species was MA, with the minimal 72hIC50 values up to three times lower than for SE and CR (72hIC50: 0.2–1.1 μg mL−1).
We did not observe strong structure-dependent effects of SBPs against algae CR and DQ and cyanobacterium SE, i.e., all polymers inhibited the growth of these algal and cyanobacterial species with similar intensity (Figure 3 and Table S2). In contrast, copolymers were active against cyanobacterium MA at lower concentrations than homopolymers, suggesting that efficiency against MA improved with increasing hydrophobicity.
Further, the time-dependency of growth-inhibitory activity was evaluated. We screened polymer activity for 24–72 h or 48–96 h exposures (Figure 4 and Table S2). The polymers inhibited the growth of the tested microorganisms within the first 24 h (CR and SE) or 48 h (DQ and MA). For most polymers, IC50 values did not strongly change with increasing exposure duration (72–96 h). Only the activity of homopolymers HP1 and HP2 against DQ significantly (two-times) increased within time (Figure 3; 48hIC50 = 9.7 and 11.9 vs. 96hIC50 = 5.1 and 4.3 μg mL−1, respectively). Anti-algal and anti-cyanobacterial activities were not structure-dependent even after shorter exposure times except for MA. Copolymers CP2–5 with ~30% hydrophobic groups were significantly (almost five times) more active against MA after 48 up to 96 h than homopolymers (0% hydrophobic groups), while the effects of the most hydrophobic copolymer CP1 (47.5% hydrophobic groups) were in between homopolymers and copolymers CP2–5.

3.3. Algicidal/Cyanocidal Activity

Additionally, we evaluated the cyanocidal and algicidal activities of polymers by monitoring the autofluorescence of chlorophylls and other photosynthetic pigments (HP1: Figure 5, HP2: Figure S2, HP3: Figure 6, CP1: Figure S3, CP2: Figure 7, CP3: Figure S4, CP4: Figure 8, CP5: Figure S5). Based on fluorescence reading, we could determine whether the polymer decreased the initial (inoculated) number of cells and exhibited algicidal or cyanocidal activities. SBPs could not decrease fluorescence values below the initial inoculum of DQ, even at the highest concentration (40 μg mL−1) up to 96 h. On the other hand, all homopolymers and copolymers decreased the autofluorescence of CR significantly below the autofluorescence of inoculated algal cells within the first 24 h at the concentrations of ≥5 μg mL−1 that were higher than those causing the growth inhibition. In contrast, the cyanocidal activity of SBPs against SE was structure-dependent. Homopolymers were not active (HP2 and HP3), or their activity was limited (HP1). Copolymers decreased a cell number of SE below the initial cell numbers in inoculum at the concentration of 5 μg mL−1 and higher after the prolonged exposure times (48–72 h). The most potent cytocidal activity of SBPs was observed for MA. Like CR, all types of SBPs decreased the autofluorescence of MA below the level of inoculated algal cells within the first 24 h, but their effects were manifested at lower concentrations than for CR: ≥1.3 μg mL−1 for copolymers CP3–5 and ≥2.5 μg mL−1 for the other SBPs. Additionally, the effective cyanocidal concentrations for SE and MA were higher than those causing the growth inhibition.

4. Discussion

The extensive growth of microorganisms has become a widespread issue in managing natural or engineered water systems. Suggested methods for preventing, controlling or mitigating unwanted growth of aquatic microorganisms are limited to a few strategies with practical limitations; therefore, new approaches are urgently required [5,6,7,8,9,12]. Although numerous previously published papers suggested synthetic peptide-mimetic antimicrobial polymers can serve as potent, selective antimicrobial agents with low toxicity to non-target organisms [16,18,19,32,33,34], the research was mainly focused on possible applications of biomimetic polymers in medicine. Model human pathogenic bacteria were almost exclusively used as experimental microorganisms. The studies on the anti-algal or anti-cyanobacterial activities of antimicrobial peptides, whose structure and functions are mimicked by the antimicrobial polymers, against aquatic photosynthetic microorganisms are scarce [35,36]. Very little is also known about the potential effects of synthetic biomimetic polymers in the aquatic environment [21]. Therefore, we transferred a successful polymer-based antimicrobial platform from biomedical applications into a water management sector and studied the potential application of synthetic biomimetic polymers to deal with environmental and engineering issues related to the massive growth of photosynthetic microorganisms.
We used a polymethacrylate platform for designing a new anti-algal or cyanobacterial agent because the polymethacrylate platform can be easily tailored towards the optimization of their biological activities [13], and some of them exhibit strong antimicrobial activity against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria [16,18,33]. Our study demonstrated that SBPs, synthetic biomimetic polymers based on polymethacrylates, promising antibacterial agents in biomedical applications [16], can be proposed as a promising platform for designing a new type of anti-algal or anti–cyanobacterial agents. SBPs were active against environmentally relevant aquatic photosynthetic microorganisms at concentrations comparable to conventional herbicides with the IC50 values ranging from 0.2 to 13 μg mL−1, i.e., ca. 95 nM to 6.5 μM. For example, the widely used herbicide diuron [9] is active against algae with the IC50 values of 10 up to 900 nM [37,38]. The growth-inhibitory activity of SBPs is similar to the activity of another type of synthetic polymers, branched poly(ethylene imine)s (PEIs), with IC50 values ranging from 0.2 to 40 μg mL−1 [21].
Although the clarification of the molecular mechanisms of SBPs is beyond the scope of this study, we hypothesize that cationic SBPs act primarily through an electrostatic attraction by interacting with the negatively charged components of the algal or cyanobacterial cell wall or membranes as proposed for their effects on human pathogenic bacteria or red blood cells [16,18,19,33]. The negatively charged components of the cell wall are the de-protonation of carboxyl or sulfate groups in the algal cell walls [39,40], peptidoglycan in the cyanobacterial cell walls [41] or the extracellular polysaccharide glycocalyx layer surrounding cell walls [42]. SBPs might bind to the bacterial cell surface, increase the permeability of the outer membrane and block cell division, as reported for cathelin-related antimicrobial peptides and their truncated versions [43]. Additionally, cyanobacterial and algal plasma membranes have an amphipathic character and might also interact with cationic compounds such as SBPs through electrostatic interaction, resulting in blocking cell dividing and inhibiting their growth.
SBPs inhibited the growth of picocyanobacterium SE (a small unicellular cyanobacterium), toxin-producing cyanobacterium MA and the unicellular flagellated freshwater green alga CR with similar intensity. However, all studied SBPs exhibited substantial cytocidal activity only against alga CR and cyanobacterium MA. Namely, SBPs decreased autofluorescence of photosynthetic pigments below the autofluorescence level of the initial inoculum of CR and MA, suggesting the cytocidal activity against these microorganisms. The cytocidal activity of the studied cationic polymers on CR and MA may be related to their cationic nature, as demonstrated for their effects on human pathogenic bacteria or red blood cells [16,18,19,33]. Recently, selective algicidal action of modified antimicrobial peptides with membranolytic activity against marine algal species has been reported [36]. SBPs might bind to and possibly cross the cell wall of CR and MA, subsequently destabilize and permeabilize cell membranes leading to membrane disruption and cell lysis once the concentrations inside the cell are too high [44,45], as reported for cationic peptides [36]. Moreover, SBPs might bind and internalize into treated algal or cyanobacterial cells and interact with intracellular targets. Mitochondria, thylakoid, or chloroplast membranes of cyanobacterial or algal cells are also negatively charged, and SBPs after internalization might affect or disrupt the structure and function of these organelles as proposed mechanisms for cationic PAMAM dendrimers, branched PEIs or antimicrobial peptides HPA3 and HPA3NT3 [21,36,46,47,48].
In contrast, copolymers manifested a cyanocidal effect against SE, which appeared after prolonged exposure times (72 h) at the highest polymer concentrations (5–20 μg L−1). Thus, these results suggest the selectivity of cytocidal activity of SBPs to CR and MA over picocyanobacterium SE. The cytocidal selectivity might be explained by differences in size (biovolume calculated based on geometric models for phytoplankton [49]: CR—113–904 μm3 and MA—22–113 μm3 vs. SE—0.1–2 μm3), cell shape (spherical shape for CR and MA vs. rod shape for SE [49]) or the cell wall and membrane chemical composition [21].
Alga DQ was more resistant to the SBP action than algae CR and cyanobacteria SE and MA, also reported for branched PEIs [21]. The sensitivity difference in the growth inhibition was one order of magnitude. Additionally, SBPs acted against DQ primarily as algistatic but not algicidal agents even at the highest concentrations and after the prolonged exposure times. This difference in species sensitivity to SBPs might be explained by cell wall composition and cellular arrangements varying among the tested species. The cell wall of DQ is primarily formed by a robust biopolymer network consisting of hemicellulosic and sporopolleninic layers [50]. This network likely constitutes a primary site for interaction with SBPs; however, simultaneously, a barrier to the entrance of these polymers into the proximity of the plasma membrane and subsequently into DQ cells. Glycoproteins (CR) [51,52], peptidoglycans (SE, MA), or lipopolysaccharides (SE, MA) [41,42,53,54] are the primary building blocks of the cell walls of other studied species. They might be more vulnerable to the actions of SBPs than hemicellulosic and sporopolleninic layers, as also observed for branched PEIs [21]. Moreover, DQ cells form coenobia, which are colonies of laterally joined ellipsoidal cells (2–8 cells). Algae CR and cyanobacteria SE and MA are only unicellular cells, not forming colonies under the experimental conditions in our study. Compact coenobium might reduce the possibility for SBPs to access the individual cells and increase the resistance of joined cells to polymer action compared to solitary cells, as suggested for branched PEIs [21].
SBPs were designed to study what is the desired balance of hydrophobic and cationic character to incorporate the minimum amount of hydrophobic content needed to confer anti-algal and anti-cyanobacterial activities as suggested for their activity against bacterial pathogens [13]. To address that, we evaluated structurally different variants of SBPs varying in hydrophobicity and type of end groups to determine the possible structure-activity relationships. Hydrophobicity and the type of end groups did not play a critical role in the effects of SBPs on the growth of green algae DQ and CR, as homopolymers and copolymers with different hydrophobicities as well as types of end groups induced comparable effects. Also, the algicidal activity of SBPs observed against CR was not dependent on their hydrophobicity or the type of end groups. This finding contrasts with the reported activity of these SBPs against bacterial pathogens or red blood cells [16,18,19], critically dependent on the hydrophobicity. However, the similar structure-dependent activity of SBPs was observed against cyanobacteria, where copolymers, particularly those with moderate content of hydrophobic groups (CP2–5), inhibited the growth of MA more effectively than homopolymers.
Similarly, copolymers but not homopolymers induced significant cyanocidal effects against SE. Finally, moderately hydrophobic copolymers CP3–5 exhibited the most pronounced cyanocidal activity against MA. Overall, SBPs represent a promising platform that can be further exploited to design biomimetic polymers with improved anti-cyanobacterial and cyanocidal activities and selectivity.

5. Conclusions

SBPs have been widely studied for their biomedical applications against relevant human pathogens. Our study implicates that SBPs are a promising platform for developing a new type of anti-cyanobacterial and anti-algal agents applicable in water systems. The effective doses (95–6.5 μM) were very low comparable, e.g., with those of herbicides. The practical aspects of the anti-algal and anti-cyanobacterial polymers in the real application, especially in open systems such as water reservoirs, should be considered. The non-target toxicity of SBPs to other biota living in water reservoirs needs to be evaluated before their applications to water reservoirs. As SBPs are likely stable and slowly biodegradable, this may be considered undesirable in certain situations such open systems. In such conditions, other structural analogs of SBPs such as poly(ester)-poly(methyl methacrylate) copolymers [55] or polymethacrylic acid grafted psyllium [56] might have a different environmental fate. They should be assessed for their anti-algal and anti-cyanobacterial activities. Our further research aims to determine the anti-algal and anti-cyanobacterial potential of SBPs and their environmentally friendly variants under conditions related to their potential applications. External environmental factors, such as temperature, ionic strength, and pH, vary in different natural or industrial waters and might affect SBP potential against photosynthetic microorganisms.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/polym13071025/s1, Text S1: Polymer synthesis, Table S1: Polymer characterization, Table S2: Growth inhibitory effect of SBPs, Figure S1: The cytocidal activity of homopolymer HP2, Figure S2: The cytocidal activity of copolymer CP1, Figure S3: The cytocidal activity of copolymer CP3, Figure S4: The cytocidal activity of copolymer CP5.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: P.B., K.K., L.B. and I.S.; data curation: P.M. and I.S.; formal analysis: P.M., M.M., H.T., K.K. and I.S.; funding acquisition: L.B.; investigation: P.M., M.M., E.T.N. and H.T.; methodology: P.M., M.M., E.T.N., H.T., P.B., K.K. and L.B.; project administration: P.B., L.B. and I.S.; resources: P.B. and L.B.; supervision: P.B., K.K., L.B. and I.S.; visualization: I.S.; writing—original draft: P.M. and I.S.; writing—review and editing: P.M., M.M., E.T.N., H.T., P.B., K.K., L.B. and I.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Authors thank to Research Infrastructure RECETOX RI (No. LM2018121) financed by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports, and Operational Programme Research, Development and Innovation—project CETOCOEN EXCELLENCE (No CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/17_043/0009632) for supportive background. The research was also funded by the long-term research development project of the Institute of Botany (RVO 67985939), and NSF National Science Foundation for NSF CAREER Award (DMR-0845592 to K.K.). H.T. was supported by JSPS Postdoctoral Fellowships for Research Abroad (No. 26-774).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in [insert article or supplementary material here].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Vardaka, E.; Kormas, K.A. Advancing knowledge on cyanobacterial blooms in freshwaters. Water 2020, 12, 2583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. World Health Organization. Algae and cyanobacteria in fresh water. In Guidelines for Safe Recreational Water Environments; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003; pp. 136–154. [Google Scholar]
  3. Di Pippo, F.; Di Gregorio, L.; Congestri, R.; Tandoi, V.; Rossetti, S. Biofilm growth and control in cooling water industrial systems. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2018, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Hauer, T.; Čapek, P.; Böhmová, P. Main photoautotrophic components of biofilms in natural draft cooling towers. Folia Microbiol. 2016, 61, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Dehghani, M.H. Removal of cyanobacterial and algal cells from water by ultrasonic waves—A review. J. Mol. Liq. 2016, 222, 1109–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sengco, M.R.; Anderson, D.M. Controlling harmful algal blooms through clay flocculation. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2004, 51, 169–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Anderson, D.M. Approaches to monitoring, control and management of harmful algal blooms (HABs). Ocean Coast. Manag. 2009, 52, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Hamilton, D.P.; Salmaso, N.; Paerl, H.W. Mitigating harmful cyanobacterial blooms: Strategies for control of nitrogen and phosphorus loads. Aquat. Ecol. 2016, 50, 351–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Matthijs, H.C.P.; Jančula, D.; Visser, P.M.; Maršálek, B. Existing and emerging cyanocidal compounds: New perspectives for cyanobacterial bloom mitigation. Aquat. Ecol. 2016, 50, 443–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Westrick, J.A.; Szlag, D.C.; Southwell, B.J.; Sinclair, J. A review of cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins removal/inactivation in drinking water treatment. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010, 397, 1705–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jančula, D.; Maršálek, B. Critical review of actually available chemical compounds for prevention and management of cyanobacterial blooms. Chemosphere 2011, 85, 1415–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Qian, P.-Y.; Xu, Y.; Fusetani, N. Natural products as antifouling compounds: Recent progress and future perspectives. Biofouling 2010, 26, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ergene, C.; Yasuhara, K.; Palermo, E.F. Biomimetic antimicrobial polymers: Recent advances in molecular design. Polym. Chem. 2018, 9, 2407–2427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Kamaruzzaman, N.F.; Tan, L.P.; Hamdan, R.H.; Choong, S.S.; Wong, W.K.; Gibson, A.J.; Chivu, A.; Pina, M.d.F. Antimicrobial polymers: The potential replacement of existing antibiotics? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Santos, M.R.E.; Fonseca, A.C.; Mendonça, P.V.; Branco, R.; Serra, A.C.; Morais, P.V.; Coelho, J.F.J. Recent developments in antimicrobial polymers: A review. Materials 2016, 9, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Takahashi, H.; Palermo, E.F.; Yasuhara, K.; Caputo, G.A.; Kuroda, K. Molecular design, structures, and activity of antimicrobial peptide-mimetic polymers. Macromol. Biosci. 2013, 13, 1285–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Fjell, C.D.; Hiss, J.A.; Hancock, R.E.W.; Schneider, G. Designing antimicrobial peptides: Form follows function. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2012, 11, 37–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Sovadinova, I.; Palermo, E.F.; Urban, M.; Mpiga, P.; Caputo, G.A.; Kuroda, K. Activity and mechanism of antimicrobial peptide-mimetic amphiphilic polymethacrylate derivatives. Polymers 2011, 3, 1512–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sovadinova, I.; Palermo, E.F.; Huang, R.; Thoma, L.M.; Kuroda, K. Mechanism of polymer-induced hemolysis: Nanosized pore formation and osmotic lysis. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12, 260–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nadres, E.T.; Takahashi, H.; Kuroda, K. Radical-medicated end-group transformation of amphiphilic methacrylate random copolymers for modulation of antimicrobial and hemolytic activities. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2017, 55, 304–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mikula, P.; Mlnarikova, M.; Takahashi, H.; Babica, P.; Kuroda, K.; Blaha, L.; Sovadinova, I. Branched poly(ethylene imine)s as anti-algal and anti-cyanobacterial agents with selective flocculation behavior to cyanobacteria over algae. Macromol. Biosci. 2018, 18, e1800187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Staub, R. Research on physiology of nutrients of the planktonic cyanobacterium Oscillatoria rubescens. Schweiz. Z. Hydrol. 1961, 23, 83–198. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bold, H.C. The morphology of Chlamydomonas chlamydogama, Sp. Nov. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 1949, 76, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pouneva, I. Evaluation of algal culture viability and physiological state by fluorescent microscopic methods. Bulg. J. Plant Physiol. 1997, 23, 67–76. [Google Scholar]
  25. Schulze, K.; Lopez, D.A.; Tillich, U.M.; Frohme, M. A simple viability analysis for unicellular cyanobacteria using a new autofluorescence assay, automated microscopy, and ImageJ. BMC Biotechnol. 2011, 11, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Zetsche, E.-M.; Meysman, F.J.R. Dead or alive? Viability assessment of micro- and mesoplankton. J. Plankton Res. 2012, 34, 493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Palermo, E.F.; Vemparala, S.; Kuroda, K. Cationic spacer arm design strategy for control of antimicrobial activity and conformation of amphiphilic methacrylate random copolymers. Biomacromolecules 2012, 13, 1632–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sabatini, V.; Cattò, C.; Cappelletti, G.; Cappitelli, F.; Antenucci, S.; Farina, H.; Ortenzi, M.A.; Camazzola, S.; Di Silvestro, G. Protective features, durability and biodegration study of acrylic and methacrylic fluorinated polymer coatings for marble protection. Prog. Org. Coat. 2018, 114, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Preece, E.P.; Hardy, F.J.; Moore, B.C.; Bryan, M. A review of microcystin detections in Estuarine and Marine waters: Environmental implications and human health risk. Harmful Algae 2017, 61, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Arora, M.; Sahoo, D. Green Algae BT. In The Algae World; Sahoo, D., Seckbach, J., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 91–120. ISBN 978-94-017-7321-8. [Google Scholar]
  31. Janssen, C.R.; Vangheluwe, M.; Van Sprang, P. A brief review and critical evaluation of the status of microbiotests BT. In New Microbiotests for Routine Toxicity Screening and Biomonitoring; Persoone, G., Janssen, C., De Coen, W., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2000; pp. 27–37. ISBN 978-1-4615-4289-6. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kenawy, E.-R.; Worley, S.D.; Broughton, R. The chemistry and applications of antimicrobial polymers: A state-of-the-art review. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8, 1359–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Palermo, E.F.; Sovadinova, I.; Kuroda, K. Structural determinants of antimicrobial activity and biocompatibility in membrane-disrupting methacrylamide random copolymers. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10, 3098–3107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Taha, S.T.; Han, H.; Chang, S.-R.; Sovadinova, I.; Kuroda, K.; Langford, R.M.; Clarkson, B.H. Nano/micro fluorhydroxyapatite crystal pastes in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity: An in vitro study. Clin. Oral Investig. 2015, 19, 1921–1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Park, S.-C.; Moon, J.C.; Kim, N.-H.; Kim, E.-J.; Jeong, J.-E.; Nelson, A.D.L.; Jo, B.-H.; Jang, M.-K.; Lee, J.R. Algicidal effect of hybrid peptides as potential inhibitors of harmful algal blooms. Biotechnol. Lett. 2016, 38, 847–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Park, S.-C.; Lee, J.-K.; Kim, S.W.; Park, Y. Selective algicidal action of peptides against harmful algal bloom species. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e26733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Schafer, H.; Hettler, H.; Fritsche, U.; Pitzen, G.; Roderer, G.; Wenzel, A. Biotests using unicellular algae and ciliates for predicting long-term effects of toxicants. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 1994, 27, 64–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. US Environmental Protection Agency. OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database; US Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2016.
  39. Wyatt, N.B.; Gloe, L.M.; Brady, P.V.; Hewson, J.C.; Grillet, A.M.; Hankins, M.G.; Pohl, P.I. Critical conditions for ferric chloride-induced flocculation of freshwater algae. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012, 109, 493–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Liu, J.; Zhu, Y.; Tao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, A.; Li, T.; Sang, M.; Zhang, C. Freshwater microalgae harvested via flocculation induced by pH decrease. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2013, 6, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Hoiczyk, E.; Hansel, A. Cyanobacterial cell walls: News from an unusual prokaryotic envelope. J. Bacteriol. 2000, 182, 1191–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Gantt, E. Supramolecular membrane organization. In The Molecular Biology of Cyanobacteria; Bryant, D.A., Ed.; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; p. 121. [Google Scholar]
  43. Haranahalli, K.; Tong, S.; Ojima, I. Recent advances in the discovery and development of antibacterial agents targeting the cell-division protein FtsZ. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2016, 24, 6354–6369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Klibanov, A.M. Permanently microbicidal materials coatings. J. Mater. Chem. 2007, 17, 2479–2482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tashiro, T. Antibacterial and bacterium adsorbing macromolecules. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2001, 286, 63–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gonzalo, S.; Rodea-Palomares, I.; Leganes, F.; Garcia-Calvo, E.; Rosal, R.; Fernandez-Pinas, F. First evidences of PAMAM dendrimer internalization in microorganisms of environmental relevance: A linkage with toxicity and oxidative stress. Nanotoxicology 2015, 9, 706–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Petit, A.-N.; Debenest, T.; Eullaffroy, P.; Gagne, F. Effects of a cationic PAMAM dendrimer on photosynthesis and ROS production of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Nanotoxicology 2012, 6, 315–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Petit, A.-N.; Eullaffroy, P.; Debenest, T.; Gagne, F. Toxicity of PAMAM dendrimers to Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Aquat. Toxicol. 2010, 100, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Sun, J.; Liu, D. Geometric models for calculating cell biovolume and surface area for phytoplankton. J. Plankton Res. 2003, 25, 1331–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Umysova, D.; Vitova, M.; Douskova, I.; Bisova, K.; Hlavova, M.; Cizkova, M.; Machat, J.; Doucha, J.; Zachleder, V. Bioaccumulation and toxicity of selenium compounds in the green alga Scenedesmus quadricauda. BMC Plant Biol. 2009, 9, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Domozych, D.S.; Ciancia, M.; Fangel, J.U.; Mikkelsen, M.D.; Ulvskov, P.; Willats, W.G.T. The cell walls of green algae: A journey through evolution and diversity. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Voigt, J.; Woestemeyer, J.; Frank, R. The chaotrope-soluble glycoprotein GP2 is a precursor of the insoluble glycoprotein framework of the Chlamydomonas cell wall. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 30381–30392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Fiore, M.F.; Trevors, J.T. Cell composition and metal tolerance in cyanobacteria. Biometals 1994, 7, 83–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Jürgens, U.J.; Martin, C.; Weckesser, J. Cell wall constituents of Microcystis sp. PCC 7806. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1989, 65, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Dai, H.; Huang, Y.; Huang, H. Eco-friendly polyvinyl alcohol/carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogels reinforced with graphene oxide and bentonite for enhanced adsorption of methylene blue. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 185, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Kumar, R.; Sharma, K.; Tiwary, K.P.; Sen, G. Polymethacrylic acid grafted psyllium (Psy-g-PMA): A novel material for waste water treatment. Appl. Water Sci. 2013, 3, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Polymers 13 01025 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the synthesis of synthetic biomimetic polymethacrylates (SBPs).
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the synthesis of synthetic biomimetic polymethacrylates (SBPs).
Polymers 13 01025 g001
Polymers 13 01025 g002 550
Figure 2. The structure of synthetic biomimetic polymethacrylates (SBPs) studied within this study.
Figure 2. The structure of synthetic biomimetic polymethacrylates (SBPs) studied within this study.
Polymers 13 01025 g002
Polymers 13 01025 g003 550
Figure 3. The growth-inhibitory activity of synthetic biomimetic polymethacrylates (SBPs) against freshwater green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (CR) and Desmodesmus quadricauda (DQ) and cyanobacteria Synechococcus elongatus (SE) and Microcystis aeruginosa (MA). The growth inhibition was measured by optical density at 680 nm after 72-h exposure. The studied polymers were homopolymers (HP1–3) and copolymers (CP1–5). Data are expressed as a percentage of a non-treated control and presented as means (±SD) of 3–5 independent experiments.
Figure 3. The growth-inhibitory activity of synthetic biomimetic polymethacrylates (SBPs) against freshwater green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (CR) and Desmodesmus quadricauda (DQ) and cyanobacteria Synechococcus elongatus (SE) and Microcystis aeruginosa (MA). The growth inhibition was measured by optical density at 680 nm after 72-h exposure. The studied polymers were homopolymers (HP1–3) and copolymers (CP1–5). Data are expressed as a percentage of a non-treated control and presented as means (±SD) of 3–5 independent experiments.
Polymers 13 01025 g003
Polymers 13 01025 g004 550
Figure 4. The time-dependency of growth-inhibitory activity of synthetic biomimetic polymethacrylates (SBPs) against freshwater green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (CR) and Desmodesmus quadricauda (DQ) and cyanobacteria Synechococcus elongatus (SE) and Microcystis aeruginosa (MA). The growth inhibition was measured by optical density at 680 nm after 24–72 h (CR, SE) or 48–96 h (DQ, MA) exposures. The studied polymers were homopolymers (HP1–3) and copolymers (CP1–5). Data are expressed as a percentage of a non-treated control and presented as means (±SD) of 3–5 independent experiments. Data are presented as geometric means of IC50 values of independent experiments (n = 3–5) with a 95% confidence interval. Asterisk “*” denotes statistically significant differences of IC50 value measured after prolonged exposures (48, 72, 96 h) compared to the IC50 value after the shortest exposure time (24 h for CR and SE, 48 h for DQ and MA) determined by ANOVA with Dunnett’s test (p < 0.05). The blue circle marks polymers with profound inhibitory activity against MA, which differs from the rest of polymers (one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test).
Figure 4. The time-dependency of growth-inhibitory activity of synthetic biomimetic polymethacrylates (SBPs) against freshwater green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (CR) and Desmodesmus quadricauda (DQ) and cyanobacteria Synechococcus elongatus (SE) and Microcystis aeruginosa (MA). The growth inhibition was measured by optical density at 680 nm after 24–72 h (CR, SE) or 48–96 h (DQ, MA) exposures. The studied polymers were homopolymers (HP1–3) and copolymers (CP1–5). Data are expressed as a percentage of a non-treated control and presented as means (±SD) of 3–5 independent experiments. Data are presented as geometric means of IC50 values of independent experiments (n = 3–5) with a 95% confidence interval. Asterisk “*” denotes statistically significant differences of IC50 value measured after prolonged exposures (48, 72, 96 h) compared to the IC50 value after the shortest exposure time (24 h for CR and SE, 48 h for DQ and MA) determined by ANOVA with Dunnett’s test (p < 0.05). The blue circle marks polymers with profound inhibitory activity against MA, which differs from the rest of polymers (one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test).
Polymers 13 01025 g004
Polymers 13 01025 g005 550
Figure 5. The cytocidal activity of homopolymer HP1 against freshwater green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (CR) and Desmodesmus quadricauda (DQ) and cyanobacteria Synechococcus elongatus (SE) and Microcystis aeruginosa (MA). The time- and concentration-dependent effects of the polymers in the range of concentrations of 0–40 μg mL−1 on the initial cell number (inoculum) was assessed by red fluorescence (λex = 485 nm/λex = 675 nm for algae, λex = 590 nm/λex = 675 nm for cyanobacteria) at different time points: 24–72-h (CR, SE) or 48–96-h (DQ, MA). Data are expressed as a percentage of fluorescence units (RFUs) for initial inoculum and presented as means (±SD) of 3–5 independent experiments.
Figure 5. The cytocidal activity of homopolymer HP1 against freshwater green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (CR) and Desmodesmus quadricauda (DQ) and cyanobacteria Synechococcus elongatus (SE) and Microcystis aeruginosa (MA). The time- and concentration-dependent effects of the polymers in the range of concentrations of 0–40 μg mL−1 on the initial cell number (inoculum) was assessed by red fluorescence (λex = 485 nm/λex = 675 nm for algae, λex = 590 nm/λex = 675 nm for cyanobacteria) at different time points: 24–72-h (CR, SE) or 48–96-h (DQ, MA). Data are expressed as a percentage of fluorescence units (RFUs) for initial inoculum and presented as means (±SD) of 3–5 independent experiments.
Polymers 13 01025 g005
Polymers 13 01025 g006 550
Figure 6. The cytocidal activity of homopolymer HP3 against freshwater green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (CR) and Desmodesmus quadricauda (DQ) and cyanobacteria Synechococcus elongatus (SE) and Microcystis aeruginosa (MA). The time- and concentration-dependent effects of the polymers in the range of concentrations of 0–40 μg mL−1 on the initial cell number (inoculum) was assessed by red fluorescence (λex = 485 nm/λex = 675 nm for algae, λex = 590 nm/λex = 675 nm for cyanobacteria) at different time points: 24–72 h (CR, SE) or 48–96 h (DQ, MA). Data are expressed as a percentage of fluorescence units (RFUs) for initial inoculum and presented as means (±SD) of 3–5 independent experiments.
Figure 6. The cytocidal activity of homopolymer HP3 against freshwater green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (CR) and Desmodesmus quadricauda (DQ) and cyanobacteria Synechococcus elongatus (SE) and Microcystis aeruginosa (MA). The time- and concentration-dependent effects of the polymers in the range of concentrations of 0–40 μg mL−1 on the initial cell number (inoculum) was assessed by red fluorescence (λex = 485 nm/λex = 675 nm for algae, λex = 590 nm/λex = 675 nm for cyanobacteria) at different time points: 24–72 h (CR, SE) or 48–96 h (DQ, MA). Data are expressed as a percentage of fluorescence units (RFUs) for initial inoculum and presented as means (±SD) of 3–5 independent experiments.
Polymers 13 01025 g006
Polymers 13 01025 g007 550
Figure 7. The cytocidal activity of copolymer CP2 against freshwater green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (CR) and Desmodesmus quadricauda (DQ) and cyanobacteria Synechococcus elongatus (SE) and Microcystis aeruginosa (MA). The time- and concentration-dependent effects of the polymers in the range of concentrations of 0–40 μg mL−1 on the initial cell number (inoculum) was assessed by red fluorescence (λex = 485 nm/λex = 675 nm for algae, λex = 590 nm/λex = 675 nm for cyanobacteria) at different time points: 24–72 h (CR, SE) or 48–96 h (DQ, MA). Data are expressed as a percentage of fluorescence units (RFUs) for initial inoculum and presented as means (±SD) of 3–5 independent experiments.
Figure 7. The cytocidal activity of copolymer CP2 against freshwater green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (CR) and Desmodesmus quadricauda (DQ) and cyanobacteria Synechococcus elongatus (SE) and Microcystis aeruginosa (MA). The time- and concentration-dependent effects of the polymers in the range of concentrations of 0–40 μg mL−1 on the initial cell number (inoculum) was assessed by red fluorescence (λex = 485 nm/λex = 675 nm for algae, λex = 590 nm/λex = 675 nm for cyanobacteria) at different time points: 24–72 h (CR, SE) or 48–96 h (DQ, MA). Data are expressed as a percentage of fluorescence units (RFUs) for initial inoculum and presented as means (±SD) of 3–5 independent experiments.
Polymers 13 01025 g007
Polymers 13 01025 g008 550
Figure 8. The cytocidal activity of copolymer CP4 against freshwater green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (CR) and Desmodesmus quadricauda (DQ) and cyanobacteria Synechococcus elongatus (SE) and Microcystis aeruginosa (MA). The time- and concentration-dependent effects of the polymers in the range of concentrations of 0–40 μg mL−1 on the initial cell number (inoculum) was assessed by red fluorescence (λex = 485 nm/λex = 675 nm for algae, λex = 590 nm/λex = 675 nm for cyanobacteria) at different time points: 24–72 h (CR, SE) or 48–96 h (DQ, MA). Data are expressed as a percentage of fluorescence units (RFUs) for initial inoculum and presented as means (±SD) of 3–5 independent experiments.
Figure 8. The cytocidal activity of copolymer CP4 against freshwater green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (CR) and Desmodesmus quadricauda (DQ) and cyanobacteria Synechococcus elongatus (SE) and Microcystis aeruginosa (MA). The time- and concentration-dependent effects of the polymers in the range of concentrations of 0–40 μg mL−1 on the initial cell number (inoculum) was assessed by red fluorescence (λex = 485 nm/λex = 675 nm for algae, λex = 590 nm/λex = 675 nm for cyanobacteria) at different time points: 24–72 h (CR, SE) or 48–96 h (DQ, MA). Data are expressed as a percentage of fluorescence units (RFUs) for initial inoculum and presented as means (±SD) of 3–5 independent experiments.
Polymers 13 01025 g008
Table
Table 1. Structural characterization of studied synthetic biomimetic polymethacrylates (SBPs) (Structures in Figure 2).
Table 1. Structural characterization of studied synthetic biomimetic polymethacrylates (SBPs) (Structures in Figure 2).
SBPEnd GroupHG 1 (mol. %)DP 2
1H NMR		Mn3 (g/mol) 1H NMRMn4 (g/mol) GPC (boc-protected polymer)Đ 5 GPC
αω(boc-protected polymer)
HP1AIBNPhenyl thio-ester015.2390024001.15
HP2AIBNCyanoisobutyl0n.d.n.d.27001.15
HP3CationicPhenyl thio-ester015.7360024001.11
CP1AIBNPhenyl thio-ester47.516.8350021001.12
CP2AIBNPhenyl thio-ester27.316.2390021001.14
CP3AIBNPhenyl thio-ester32.814.1340021001.17
CP4CationicPhenyl thio-ester27.610.5290020001.11
CP5CationicCationic26.8n.d.n.d.20001.11
1 Hydrophobic group; 2 The degree of polymerization (the number of monomeric units in a polymer molecule) determined by 1H NMR (proton nuclear magnetic resonance); 3 The number average molecular weight (Mn) determined by 1H NMR (including trifluoroacetate). The molecular weight calibration was based on poly(methyl methacrylate) standards; 4 The number average molecular weight (Mn) of Boc-protected polymer determined by GPC (gel permeation chromatography). The molecular weight calibration was based on poly(methyl methacrylate) standards; 5 Dispersity (molecular weight distribution) calculated as Mw/Mn using Mw (the weight average molecular weight) and Mn values determined by GPC. AIBN, azobisisobutyronitrile; n.d., not determined.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mikula, P.; Mlnaříková, M.; Nadres, E.T.; Takahashi, H.; Babica, P.; Kuroda, K.; Bláha, L.; Sovadinová, I. Synthetic Biomimetic Polymethacrylates: Promising Platform for the Design of Anti-Cyanobacterial and Anti-Algal Agents. Polymers 2021, 13, 1025. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13071025

AMA Style

Mikula P, Mlnaříková M, Nadres ET, Takahashi H, Babica P, Kuroda K, Bláha L, Sovadinová I. Synthetic Biomimetic Polymethacrylates: Promising Platform for the Design of Anti-Cyanobacterial and Anti-Algal Agents. Polymers. 2021; 13(7):1025. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13071025

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mikula, Přemysl, Marie Mlnaříková, Enrico T. Nadres, Haruko Takahashi, Pavel Babica, Kenichi Kuroda, Luděk Bláha, and Iva Sovadinová. 2021. "Synthetic Biomimetic Polymethacrylates: Promising Platform for the Design of Anti-Cyanobacterial and Anti-Algal Agents" Polymers 13, no. 7: 1025. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13071025

APA Style

Mikula, P., Mlnaříková, M., Nadres, E. T., Takahashi, H., Babica, P., Kuroda, K., Bláha, L., & Sovadinová, I. (2021). Synthetic Biomimetic Polymethacrylates: Promising Platform for the Design of Anti-Cyanobacterial and Anti-Algal Agents. Polymers, 13(7), 1025. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13071025

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop