Next Article in Journal
Natural Fiber-Reinforced Thermoplastic ENR/PVC Composites as Potential Membrane Technology in Industrial Wastewater Treatment: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Simultaneous Removal of Cr(VI) and Phenol from Water Using Silica-di-Block Polymer Hybrids: Adsorption Kinetics and Thermodynamics
Previous Article in Journal
Crosslinked Collagenic Scaffold Behavior Evaluation by Physico-Chemical, Mechanical and Biological Assessments in an In Vitro Microenvironment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Block Copolymer Modified Nanonetwork Epoxy Resin for Superior Energy Dissipation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 14
Issue 12
10.3390/polym14122431
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis and Thermal Analysis of Non-Covalent PS-b-SC-b-P2VP Triblock Terpolymers via Polylactide Stereocomplexation

by
Ameen Arkanji
,
Viko Ladelta
*,
Konstantinos Ntetsikas
* and
Nikos Hadjichristidis
*
Polymer Synthesis Laboratory, KAUST Catalysis Center, Physical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(12), 2431; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14122431
Submission received: 23 May 2022 / Revised: 13 June 2022 / Accepted: 13 June 2022 / Published: 15 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances and Applications of Block Copolymers)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Polylactides (PLAs) are thermoplastic materials known for their wide range of applications. Moreover, the equimolar mixtures of poly(L-Lactide) (PLLA) and poly(D-Lactide) (PDLA) can form stereocomplexes (SCs), which leads to the formation of new non-covalent complex macromolecular architectures. In this work, we report the synthesis and characterization of non-covalent triblock terpolymers of polystyrene-b-stereocomplex PLA-b-poly(2-vinylpyridine) (PS-b-SC-b-P2VP). Well-defined ω-hydroxy-PS and P2VP were synthesized by “living” anionic polymerization high-vacuum techniques with sec-BuLi as initiator, followed by termination with ethylene oxide. The resulting PS-OH and P2VP-OH were used as macroinitiators for the ring-opening polymerization (ROP) of DLA and LLA with Sn(Oct)2 as a catalyst to afford PS-b-PDLA and P2VP-b-PLLA, respectively. SC formation was achieved by mixing PS-b-PDLA and P2VP-b-PLLA chloroform solutions containing equimolar PLAs segments, followed by precipitation into n-hexane. The molecular characteristics of the resulting block copolymers (BCPs) were determined by 1H NMR, size exclusion chromatography, and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. The formation of PS-b-SC-b-P2VP and the effect of molecular weight variation of PLA blocks on the resulting polymers, were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry, X-ray powder diffraction, and circular dichroism spectroscopies.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Among synthetic aliphatic polyesters, poly(lactic acids)/polylactides (PLAs) have attracted enormous interest because they are biocompatible and biodegradable [1,2,3]. PLAs are derived from natural renewable resources, are non-toxic to the human body, and possess good thermomechanical properties [4,5]. As a result, PLAs have been widely used in a broad range of applications, such as packaging materials [6,7] and biomedical materials (e.g., surgical sutures, implant materials, and controllable drug delivery systems) [8,9,10], among many other applications [11,12,13,14].
PLAs also possess several inherent defects [15,16], such as long degradation periods and slow crystallization rates, leading to inferior properties, and low heat distortion temperature, which increases the difficulty of processing [17,18]. Diverse strategies and chemical modifications have been employed to overcome such drawbacks, including the use of blends and additives [19]. Another approach is the use of PLA stereocomplex (SC)-based copolymers to enhance the properties of PLA.
Lactide (LA) exists in two optically active forms, i.e., stereoisomers, (R,R)L-lactide (LLA) and (S,S)D-lactide (DLA), and one optically inactive form, (R,S)meso-lactide (mLA) [20,21]. When LA is converted into a polymer, the stereoregularity of the chain has a strong influence on the thermomechanical properties. Consequently, PLA derived from different stereoisomers exhibits various physical and chemical properties. For example, isotactic PLLA and PDLA with high stereoregularity are semi-crystalline polymers with a melting temperature (Tm) between 170 and 190 °C [22], whereas atactic poly(rac-lactide) (PDLA) is amorphous due to the absence of stereoregularity. Moreover, the mixture of isotactic PLLA and PDLA can form superior material called PLA stereocomplex (SC).
The formation of SC crystallites between PLLA and PDLA was first reported by Ikada et al. in 1986 [23]. They found that an equimolar mixture of isotactic PLLA and PDLA in dichloromethane undergoes stereoselective physical association through multicenter hydrogen bonding interaction between the methyl and the carbonyl groups of the opposite configurations. This interaction was proved later by Ozaki et al. by an ultrasensitive IR spectroscopy [24,25]. These interactions result in a new arrangement of helicoidal chains (31) between L- and D-lactyl units interlocked side by side within the same crystal unit (i.e., racemic crystal), indicating more dense crystal packing compared to that of the homo-crystallites. Due to the strong interactions, SC exhibits exceptional physical and chemical stabilities leading to significantly enhanced properties [23]. For example, SC crystals were found to exhibit higher melting temperatures (ca. 50 °C higher than the corresponding homo-crystals), improved mechanical properties, and stronger hydrolytic resistance compared to PLA homo-crystals. Thus, stereocomplexation between PLLA and PDLA has proven to be a powerful tool for the generation of thermally and mechanically enhanced nanomaterials.
The stereocomplexation of block copolymers containing PLLA and PDLA blocks has been applied to synthesize non-covalent ABA-type triblock copolymers for various applications (A can be crystalline or amorphous block, B is PLA stereocomplex). Several examples of the A block used in such copolymers are polyethylene glycol (PEG) [26,27,28,29], poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) [30], polymenthide (PM) [31], poly(N,N-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate) (PDMAEMA) [32], polyacrylic acid (PAA) [33], polystyrene (PS) [34], and polyisoprene (PI) [35,36]. To the best of our knowledge, P2VP-b-PLA systems have not been used in stereocomplex systems, even though the synthesis of such diblock copolymer has been reported via the combination of ring-opening polymerization (ROP) and reversible addition–fragmentation chain-transfer (RAFT) polymerization [37,38].
While much research has been conducted on non-covalent triblock copolymers using PLA SC, little information is known about PLA SC systems containing different block copolymers, i.e., non-covalent triblock terpolymer (ABC-type triblock terpolymer). This approach provides new insights into polymer design strategies for high-performance PLA-based materials. Therefore, a fundamental study of the synthesis and properties of such materials is required to establish the structure-property relationships.
Recently, our group reported the synthesis and characterization of non-covalent PS-b-SC-b-PI triblock terpolymers by the stereocomplex formation between well-defined PI-b-PLLA and PS-b-PDLA [39]. The synthesis of these block copolymers was accomplished by combining anionic polymerization high-vacuum techniques (HVTs) and ROP. Hydroxy-terminated PI and PS were synthesized via anionic polymerization and were used as macroinitiators for the ROP of LLA and DLA in the presence of Sn(Oct)2 catalyst. The molecular characteristics, as well as the thermal properties of the precursors and the triblock terpolymers, were studied.
This study focuses on the synthesis and characterization of well-defined PS-b-SC-b-P2VP via the stereocomplex formation between P2VP-b-PLLA and PS-b-PDLA. Both BCPs were synthesized by combining anionic polymerization and ROP. First, hydroxy-functionalized P2VP and PS were synthesized by anionic polymerization HVTs, followed by termination with ethylene oxide and neutralization with methanol. The resulting polymers were then used as macroinitiators for the ROP of the corresponding LA using Sn(Oct)2 as a catalyst. The synthesized BCPs were characterized by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and size exclusion chromatography (SEC). Stereocomplex formation was accomplished by mixing PS-b-PDLA and P2VP-b-PLLA in chloroform, followed by precipitation in hexane. Both BCPs and their corresponding stereocomplexes were characterized by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier-tranform infrared (FT-IR), powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), and circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopies to study the formation of PS-b-SC-b-P2VP and to evaluate the effect of the molecular weight of PLA on the resulting PS-b-SC-b-P2VP non-covalent triblock terpolymer properties.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. For Anionic Polymerization

Benzene (VWR, Pris, France, 99%) and tetrahydrofuran (THF, VWR, Gliwice, Poland, ≥99.0%) were dried over calcium hydride (CaH2, 95%) followed by distillation into a glass cylinder containing polystyrilithium (PS(−)Li(+)) for benzene, and sodium/potassium alloy for THF, under high vacuum. Styrene (Sigma-Aldrich, 99%) was dried over CaH2 followed by distillation over di-n-butylmagnesium (Bu2Mg) and stored at −20 °C in pre-calibrated ampoules. 2-Vinylpyridine (2VP,) was dried twice over CaH2 and subsequently purified using a sodium mirror and triethylaluminum (TEA), followed by distillation into pre-calibrated ampoules. sec-Butyllithium (1.4 M in cyclohexane, Sigma-Aldrich) was diluted to the appropriate concentration in benzene for the polymerization of styrene, or in n-hexane (Sigma-Aldrich, 95%) for the polymerization of 2VP, and stored under vacuum at −20 °C within a home-made glass apparatus equipped with ampoules. Ethylene oxide (EO, Sigma-Aldrich, 99.5%) was purified by distillation over CaH2, over n-BuLi at 0 °C, and stored under high vacuum in ampoules. Methanol (MeOH, Sigma-Aldrich, ≥99.9%) was purified by distillation over CaH2 and stored in ampoules under a high vacuum.

2.2. For Ring-Opening Polymerization

Toluene, 1,4-dioxane (anhydrous, >99.9%), and benzoic acid (99.5%) were dried over CaH2 and PS(−)Li(+). Ethyl acetate (EtOAc) was purchased from VWR Chemicals (HiPerSolv Chromanorm) and used as received. LLA (Sigma-Aldrich, Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands, 99%) and DLA (Jinan Daigang Biomaterial Co., Ltd., Jinan, China, ≥99.5%) were recrystallized from EtOAc three times and dissolved in anhydrous 1,4-dioxane, cryo-evaporating the 1,4-dioxane, followed by drying under vacuum overnight. Stannous octoate (Sn(Oct)2, Sigma-Aldrich, 95%) was distilled twice over anhydrous MgSO4 and activated 4 Å molecular sieves, followed by azeotropic distillation with dry toluene. PS-OH and P2VP-OH macronitiators obtained by anionic polymerization were dried through a freeze-drying process in benzene two times. All monomers, solvents, and catalysts for polymerizations were stored under argon (Ar) in a glove box (LABmaster SP, MBraun, Stratham, NH, USA).

2.3. Instrumentation

1H NMR measurements were performed using Bruker AVANCE III spectrometers operating at 400 or 500 MHz; chloroform-d (CDCl3, 99.8% D, Sigma-Aldrich) was used as the solvent for all samples. 1H NMR spectra were used to calculate the number-average molecular weight (Mn) of each block by using the integrals of the characteristic signals from the end-groups and repeating unit of each block. SEC measurements were performed using Agilent SEC (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a PLgel 5 μm MIXED-C and PLgel 5 μm MIXED-D columns. THF was used as eluent at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1 at 35 °C. The instrument was calibrated with PS standards. SEC samples were prepared by dissolving 2 mg/mL solutions in THF and filtered through 0.22 μm Teflon filters before injection. DSC measurements were performed with a Mettler Toledo DSC1/TC100 under nitrogen (N2) and calibrated with Indium (purity > 99.999%). The samples were first heated from 25 to 200 °C to erase the thermal history and then cooled to −20 °C with a heating/cooling rate of 10 °C min−1. This cycle was repeated twice before the glass transition, melting, and crystallization temperatures (Tg, Tm, and Tc) were recorded. X-ray diffractograms were obtained from XRD Bruker D8 Advance using Cu Kα irradiation. The sample for XRD measurements was deposited on a glass substrate with an approximate size of 1.5  cm  ×  1  cm, from a chloroform solution. Circular dichroism (CD) was performed with a Jasco J-815 model, featuring a Peltier model PTC-423S/15 thermo-stabilizing system. The cell used was a 1 mm quartz suprasil cell. The solutions of the PS-b-PDLA, P2VP-b-PLLA, and their stereocomplexes were made with acetonitrile. Typical concentrations were ∼0.1 mg/mL.

2.4. Synthetic Procedures

The anionic polymerization of styrene and 2VP was carried out in specific custom-made glass apparatuses, which were evacuated and washed with n-BuLi solution prior to polymerization. Break seals were used for the introduction of reagents. Further details regarding the polymerization techniques are provided in previous reports [40,41,42].

2.5. Synthesis of Hydroxy-Terminated Polystyrene (PS-OH)

Styrene (5 g) was added to the appropriate amount of solvent (benzene, 5–10% polymer concentration), followed by the addition of the initiator, sec-BuLi (0.833 mmol). The polymerization was left to proceed until total monomer consumption (~18 h) at room temperature. An aliquot was taken to verify the molecular characteristics (molecular weight and distribution) by heat-sealing the proper constriction. EO (~1 mL) was then added to the reaction mixture and kept for 12 h at room temperature. Finally, methanol (~0.5 mL) was added for the termination of the living polymer. The polymer solution was precipitated into a large excess of methanol. The resulting polymer was filtered and dried in a vacuum oven at 40 °C for 24 h. Mn of PS-OH was calculated to be 6300 g mol−1 by using 1H NMR end-group analysis. SEC analysis indicated an Mn of 6200 g mol−1 and Đ of 1.02.

2.6. Synthesis of Hydroxy-Terminated Poly(2-vinylpyridine) (P2VP-OH)

2VP (6 g) was distilled into the glass reactor containing the appropriate amount of solvent (150 mL of THF), followed by the addition of sec-BuLi (1.2 mmol). The polymerization was conducted at −78 °C and was left to proceed for 1 h. EO (~1 mL) was then added to the reaction mixture and kept for 12 h at room temperature. Finally, methanol (~0.5 mL) was added for the termination of the living polymer. The polymer solution was precipitated into a large excess of n-hexane. The resulting polymer was filtered and dried in a vacuum oven at 40 °C for 24 h. Mn of P2VP-OH was calculated to be 6000 g mol−1 by using 1H NMR end-group analysis. SEC analysis indicated an Mn of 5500 g mol−1 and Đ of 1.03.

2.7. Synthesis of PS-b-PDLA

In a glove box under Ar atmosphere, dry PS-OH (248 mg, 0.039 mmol), Sn(Oct)2 (8.1 mg, 0.02 mmol), D-LA (288 mg, 2 mmol), and 3 mL dry toluene were added to a dry Schlenk flask equipped with a stirrer bar. The reaction mixture was stirred for 24 h at 80 °C, and the conversion was monitored by 1H NMR spectroscopy. After 24 h, the reaction mixture was quenched with benzoic acid and precipitated in cold MeOH. The resulting diblock copolymer was centrifuged and dried under a vacuum for 24 h at 40 °C.

2.8. Synthesis of P2VP-b-PLLA

In a glove box under Ar atmosphere, dry P2VP-OH (240 mg, 0.04 mmol), Sn(Oct)2 (8.1 mg, 0.02 mmol), L-LA (290 mg, 2 mmol), and 3 mL dry toluene were added to a dry Schlenk flask equipped with a stirrer bar. The reaction mixture was stirred for 24 h at 80 °C, and the conversion was monitored by 1H NMR spectroscopy. After 24 h, the reaction mixture was quenched with benzoic acid and precipitated in cold n-hexane. The resulting diblock copolymer was centrifuged and dried under vacuum for 24 h at 40 °C.

2.9. Stereocomplex Formation (PS-b-SC-b-P2VP)

Equimolar solutions of PS-b-PDLA and P2VP-b-PLLA were prepared separately by dissolving each polymer (~100 mg) in chloroform (5 mL) under vigorous stirring for 15 min at 400 rpm. Subsequently, the two solutions were mixed and stirred for another 15 min at 400 rpm. Finally, the final solution was precipitated in cold n-hexane (200 mL) and stirred for 30 min at 200 rpm. The precipitate was centrifuged and dried under vacuum for 24 h at 40 °C. In the following discussion, the stereocomplex-based samples (PS-b-SC-b-P2VP) are referred to as SCPLAx, where x is the calculated molecular weight of the PLA segments.

3. Results and Discussion

The anionic polymerization of 2VP and styrene was carried out in THF (at −78 °C) and benzene (at room temperature), respectively, using sec-BuLi as the initiator (Scheme 1). After complete consumption of monomers, the living polymers were end-capped by an excess amount of EO at room temperature. Quantitative functionalization reaction of polymeric organolithium compounds in hydrocarbon solutions with EO at room temperature proceeds in the absence of EO oligomerization [43]. The anionic polymerization of EO does not happen under these conditions, resulting in initiation without propagation. Therefore, only one monomeric unit of EO is inserted at the chain-end. This is due to the high charge density of the lithium cation resulting in the strong aggregation of terminal lithium alkoxides.
The functionalization of both polymers (PS and P2VP) with EO was confirmed by 1H NMR and by FT-IR spectrosocopies. 1H NMR spectrum shows a peak around (δ = 3.2–3.7 ppm), which corresponds to the –CH2 attached to the hydroxyl end-group (Figure S1). Moreover, the –OH group can be observed using FT-IR as a broad peak around 3401 cm−1 and 3394 cm−1 for PS-OH and P2VP-OH, respectively (Figure S2). Further confirmation is evident by the successful copolymerization of PLA via ROP using PS-OH and P2VP-OH as macroinitiators, as confirmed by SEC and 1H NMR spectroscopy (Table 1).
PS-OH and P2VP-OH were synthesized with an Mn of 6300 and 6000 g mol−1, as obtained by 1H NMR end-group analysis, respectively. Their molecular characteristics are presented in Table 1. Both homopolymers have low molar-mass dispersity, as indicated by SEC, suggesting that the polymers can be considered to be well defined (Figure S3).
ROP of DLA/LLA initiated by dry PS-OH and P2VP-OH macroinitiators and catalyzed by Sn(Oct)2 was performed in toluene at 80 °C to afford PS-b-PDLA and P2VP-b-PLLA diblock copolymers, respectively. Sn(Oct)2, is considered one of the most effective catalysts for the ROP of lactides under a wide range of conditions [44,45,46,47,48]. Moreover, it is commercially available, soluble in most organic solvents, and has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. The targeted molecular weights of PLAs were varied: 5000, 7000, and 10,000 g mol−1. The molecular characteristics of the resulting diblock copolymers were determined by SEC and 1H NMR measurements and are presented in Table 1.
Figure 1 shows the SEC traces of the homopolymer precursors compared to the corresponding diblock copolymers. The SEC traces clearly show a shift towards a lower elution time, indicating an increase in molecular weight compared to the PS-OH and P2VP-OH precursors. The Đ values of all copolymers are below 1.1 (between 1.02 and 1.08), indicating that the diblock copolymers are nearly uniform (in molar mass).
For the following discussion on 1H NMR, FT-IR, and CD results, P2VP5.5-b-PLLA5.6 and PS6.2-b-PDLA5.5 will be used as representative samples. 1H NMR spectra of the diblock copolymers (Figure 2) show the characteristic peaks of methine proton from PLA main chain (c, δ = 5.2–5.3 ppm) and the terminal C–H (d, δ = 4.3–4.4 ppm). The molecular weights of the PLA blocks were determined by calculating the integral ratio of proton (c) and (d), i.e., end-group analysis.
FT-IR spectroscopy was used to investigate the formation of the diblock copolymers and their corresponding stereocomplexes. The FT-IR spectra of the diblock copolymers reveal that a new peak is present at ∼1750 cm−1, which corresponds to the carbonyl (C=O) stretching, and two other peaks at ∼1184 and 1088 cm−1 correspond to the (C–O) stretching of PLA (Figure 3).
Upon the formation of stereocomplex, the vibrational stretch of the carbonyl group of PLA, i.e., ν(C=O) band, in the SCPLA (Figure 3) shifted to a slightly lower wavenumber than that of the PS-b-PDLA (from 1756 to 1749 cm−1) and P2VP-b-PLLA (from 1754 to 1749 cm−1). This shift is attributed to the arrangement of the PLA chains into a more dense crystal packing due to stereocomplex formation via intermolecular H-bond interaction [49].
The specific optical rotation of PDLA/PLLA blocks in the block copolymers was evaluated by CD experiments. It is worth noting that PDLA chains take the right-handed helical conformation, whereas PLLA takes the left-handed helical conformation in acetonitrile solution. Figure S4 shows the CD spectra for both PS6.2-b-PDLA5.5 and P2VP5.5-b-PLLA5.6 in acetonitrile. The carboxylic group of PLAs with a helical conformation is accompanied by a characteristic absorption band of n → π* transition. Therefore, a positive Cotton effect for P2VP5.5-b-PLLA5.6 and a negative Cotton effect for PS6.2-b-PDLA5.5 can be observed at ~233 nm. On the other hand, the solution of SCPLA5.5 does not show such an effect, indicating that the D- and L-helical conformations complement each other due to the stereocomplex formation, resulting in zero CD response.
The influence of the molecular weight of PLA segments on the physical properties of the diblock copolymers, as well as their corresponding stereocomplexes, was investigated on the basis of DSC and XRD analyses. Figure 4 and Figure 5 show the DSC thermograms and XRD patterns of the block copolymers and the stereocomplexes obtained by precipitation.
DSC analysis was performed in order to evaluate the thermal properties, including glass transition temperature (Tg) and melting temperature (Tm), of the homopolymers (PS6.2-OH and P2VP5.2-OH) and diblock copolymers (PS6.2-b-PDLAx and P2VP5.2-b-PLLAy), as well as the corresponding SCPLAs. The DSC thermograms of the homopolymers, block copolymers, and corresponding SCPLAs are shown in Figure 4.
The Tg values of the amorphous PS6.2-OH and P2VP5.2-OH precursors are observed to be 92.3 °C and 93.6 °C (Table 2), respectively. In the case of the diblock copolymers, the Tg values of PS and P2VP blocks cannot be observed, indicating that the PS/P2VP (amorphous blocks) and PLLA/PDLA (crystalline blocks) are miscible in the melt [50,51]. The PLLA/PDLA crystallites are well organized (as proved by the distinct ΔHm) and limit the mobility of the amorphous blocks [50]. In addition, for PS6.2-b-PDLA7.1 (Figure 4c), the Tg of PS overlaps with the exothermic peaks from the cold-crystallization temperature (Tcc) of PLA. Therefore, the effect of the molecular weight of crystalline PLA blocks on the Tg of the amorphous blocks cannot be evaluated. The small endothermic humps observed between 50 and 80 °C are attributed to the Tg values of PLA.
All block copolymers exhibited a Tm of PLAs in the range of 150–180 °C, indicating the existence of crystalline PDLA/PLLA block. The PLLA block in P2VP5.2-b-PLLA5.6 and P2VP5.2-b-PLLA7 shows double melting (Tm) peaks. Two plausible explanations have been proposed for this observed phenomenon. The first concerns the lamellar crystal thickness [52,53], and suggests that the double endothermic behavior is the result of the existence of two kinds of crystal lamellae having different thicknesses. Consequently, the melting of the thinner lamellae would be observed at a lower temperature endotherm, whereas the thicker lamellae are related to the higher temperature endotherm. The second possible explanation is the partial melting and recrystallization process [54,55], where the lower-temperature endotherm is the result of the melting of the initial lamellae followed by recrystallization into more perfect lamellae.
In general, the Tm values of PLLA and PDLA are affected by the increase in molecular weight. Such a trend is also observed in the PS6.2-b-PDLA and P2VP5.2-b-PLLA block copolymers. The higher the molecular weight of PLLA and PDLA, the higher the Tm in the diblock copolymers. When the molecular weight is increased from ~5000 g mol−1 to ~10,000 g mol−1, the Tm values increase from 153.0 to 162.6 °C for PDLA-containing BCPs, and from 156.0 to 162.9 °C in the case of PLLA-containing BCPs. Similarly, the Tm and the melting enthalpy (∆Hm) of SCPLA also increase with the increase in the molecular weight of PLA (from 220.3 to 230.3 °C). These results are in good agreement with our recent findings on the thermal properties of PS-b-SC-b-PI [39]. It is worth noting that the Tm of SCPLA is always ~70 °C higher than the Tm of their corresponding diblock copolymers, indicating that the effect of the amorphous PS6.2 and P2VP5.2 on the crystal packing of SCPLA is not significant in this case.
The investigation of crystal structure and degree of crystallinity (Xc) for the homopolymers, block copolymers, and their stereocomplexes obtained by precipitation was carried out by means of XRD analysis. The diffraction patterns are presented in Figure 5. The diblock copolymers exhibited diffraction peaks at 2θ = 16.7°, 17.6°, 19.5°, 22°, and 26°, verifying the presence of α crystals, i.e., orthorhombic unit cells. In addition, the crystal structure of SCPLAs obtained from the equimolar ratio of PLLA:PDLA was also investigated. The diffractograms (Figure 5) show diffraction peaks of triclinic crystal at 2θ = 14°, 24°, and 28°, confirming the formation of stereocomplexes. Overall, the XRD patterns of block copolymers and their stereocomplexes are in good agreement with the literature, as the α crystals show the reflection at 2θ = 16.6°, 19.1° and 17°, 19°, and the SCPLA crystals show the reflection at 2θ = 12°, 21°, 24°, and 12°, 20.9°, 24° [23].
The total degree of crystallinity (Xc) of a polymeric material can be calculated from its XRD pattern. Xc is defined as the ratio of the area of all crystalline peaks to the total area under the XRD peaks (crystalline + amorphous), as shown in Equation (1):
%   C r y s t a l l i n i t y = I c I c + I a × 100 ,
where Ia and Ic are the areas of the amorphous and crystalline domains, respectively. Based on DSC and XRD results, both PS and P2VP segments are amorphous. Therefore, the Xc of the diblock copolymers and their SCPLAs obtained from XRD can be attributed to the Xc of their PLA segments.
As can be seen in Figure 5, the Xcs of PS-b-PDLAs (14.5 < Xc < 52.4) and P2VP-b-PLLAs (34.0 < Xc < 51.4) increase with increasing molecular weight of the PLA blocks. This clearly indicates that the fraction crystalline domain increases with increasing molecular weight of PLA. A similar trend is also observed for the SCPLA (33.0 < Xc < 39.3), although the increment is insignificant.

4. Conclusions

Several well-defined diblock copolymers, PS6.2-b-PDLAx and P2VP5.5-b-PLLAy, were successfully synthesized via the combination of anionic polymerization high-vacuum techniques and ring-opening polymerization. PS6.2-b-PDLAx and P2VP5.5-b-PLLAy were used as the precursors to synthesize non-covalent PS6.2-b-SC-b-P2VP5.5 triblock terpolymers via stereocomplexation of PDLA and PLLA blocks in chloroform. 1H NMR spectroscopy and SEC confirmed the molecular characteristics of the copolymers. FT-IR, DSC, XRD, and CD spectroscopies revealed the formation of PS6.2-b-SC-b-P2VP5.5 as well as the effect of varying PLA molecular weights on the thermal properties of co/terpolymers. It was found that the Tm and Xc of the co/terpolymers increase with the increase of the molecular weights of PLA segments.
Comprehensive studies are necessary to further understand this system and determine a range of potential applications. Morphological and mechanical studies, including Young’s modulus and tensile strength, will be conducted to fully establish the structure–properties relationship of these new non-covalent triblock terpolymers. Moreover, the presence of P2VP segments in these triblock terpolymers can be promising for biomedical applications due to their pH-sensitive nature and the ability to bind with metal cations.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/polym14122431/s1. Figure S1: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) spectra of (a) PS-OH and (b) P2VP-OH; Figure S2: FT-IR spectra of (a) PS-OH and (b) P2VP-OH; Figure S3: SEC traces of (a) PS-OH and (b) P2VP-OH in THF at 35 °C; Figure S4: CD spectra of PS6.2-b-PDLA5.5, P2VP5.5-b-PLLA5.6, and SCPLA5.5 were measured in acetonitrile with a concentration of 0.1 mg mL−1 at room temperature.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization was designed by N.H.; methodology and materials (homopolymers, diblock copolymers, and stereocomplexes) were synthesized by A.A., V.L. and K.N. under the supervision of N.H. writing—original draft preparation by A.A.; writing—review and editing, A.A., V.L., K.N. and N.H.; supervision by N.H; funding acquisition by KAUST. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge the financial support and facilities provided by the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ikada, Y.; Tsuji, H. Biodegradable polyesters for medical and ecological applications. Macromol. Rapid. Comm. 2000, 21, 117–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nair, L.S.; Laurencin, C.T. Biodegradable polymers as biomaterials. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2007, 32, 762–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bai, H.; Deng, S.; Bai, D.; Zhang, Q.; Fu, Q. Recent Advances in Processing of Stereocomplex-Type Polylactide. Macromol. Rapid. Commun. 2017, 38, 1700454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Nofar, M.; Sacligil, D.; Carreau, P.J.; Kamal, M.R.; Heuzey, M.-C. Poly (lactic acid) blends: Processing, properties and applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 125, 307–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wu, C.-S. Renewable resource-based composites of recycled natural fibers and maleated polylactide bioplastic: Characterization and biodegradability. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2009, 94, 1076–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bai, H.; Huang, C.; Xiu, H.; Zhang, Q.; Deng, H.; Wang, K.; Chen, F.; Fu, Q. Significantly Improving Oxygen Barrier Properties of Polylactide via Constructing Parallel-Aligned Shish-Kebab-Like Crystals with Well-Interlocked Boundaries. Biomacromolecules 2014, 15, 1507–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tawakkal, I.S.M.A.; Cran, M.J.; Miltz, J.; Bigger, S. A Review of Poly(Lactic Acid)-Based Materials for Antimicrobial Packaging. J. Food Sci. 2014, 79, R1477–R1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Drumright, R.E.; Gruber, P.R.; Henton, D.E. Polylactic acid technology. Adv. Mater. 2000, 12, 1841–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jacobson, G.B.; Shinde, R.; Contag, C.; Zare, R.N. Sustained Release of Drugs Dispersed in Polymer Nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7880–7882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Casalini, T.; Rossi, F.; Castrovinci, A.; Perale, G. A Perspective on Polylactic Acid-Based Polymers Use for Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, Y.; Qiang, Z.; Chen, X.; Ren, J. Understanding thermal decomposition kinetics of flame-retardant thermoset polylactic acid. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 3128–3139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Cai, S.; Qiang, Z.; Zeng, C.; Ren, J. Multifunctional poly(lactic acid) copolymers with room temperature self-healing and rewritable shape memory properties via Diels-Alder reaction. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 045701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Armentano, I.; Bitinis, N.; Fortunati, E.; Mattioli, S.; Rescignano, N.; Verdejo, R.; Lopez-Manchado, M.; Kenny, J. Multifunctional nanostructured PLA materials for packaging and tissue engineering. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2013, 38, 1720–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Jing, Y.; Quan, C.; Liu, B.; Jiang, Q.; Zhang, C. A Mini Review on the Functional Biomaterials Based on Poly(lactic acid) Stereocomplex. Polym. Rev. 2016, 56, 262–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rasal, R.M.; Janorkar, A.V.; Hirt, D.E. Poly(lactic acid) modifications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2010, 35, 338–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gao, C.; Yu, L.; Liu, H.; Chen, L. Development of self-reinforced polymer composites. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012, 37, 767–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gupta, B.; Revagade, N.; Hilborn, J. Poly(lactic acid) fiber: An overview. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2007, 32, 455–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Raquez, J.-M.; Habibi, Y.; Murariu, M.; Dubois, P. Polylactide (PLA)-based nanocomposites. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2013, 38, 1504–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ye, S.; Lin, T.T.; Tjiu, W.W.; Wong, P.K.; He, C. Rubber toughening of poly(lactic acid): Effect of stereocomplex formation at the rubber-matrix interface. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2012, 128, 2541–2547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Garlotta, D. A Literature Review of Poly(Lactic Acid). J. Polym. Environ. 2001, 9, 63–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Södergård, A.; Stolt, M. Properties of lactic acid based polymers and their correlation with composition. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2002, 27, 1123–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jamshidi, K.; Hyon, S.-H.; Ikada, Y. Thermal characterization of polylactides. Polymers 1988, 29, 2229–2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ikada, Y.; Jamshidi, K.; Tsuji, H.; Hyon, S.H. Stereocomplex formation between enantiomeric poly(lactides). Macromolecules 1987, 20, 904–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wan, Z.-Q.; Longo, J.M.; Liang, L.-X.; Chen, H.-Y.; Hou, G.-J.; Yang, S.; Zhang, W.-P.; Coates, G.W.; Lu, X.-B. Comprehensive Understanding of Polyester Stereocomplexation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 14780–14787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, J.; Sato, H.; Tsuji, H.; Noda, A.I.; Ozaki, Y. Infrared spectroscopic study of CH3 center dot center dot center dot O=C interaction during poly(L-lactide)/poly(D-lactide) stereocomplex formation. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 1822–1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fujiwara, T.; Mukose, T.; Yamaoka, T.; Yamane, H.; Sakurai, S.; Kimura, Y. Novel thermo-responsive formation of a hydrogel by stereo-complexation between PLLA-PEG-PLLA and PDLA-PEG-PDLA block copolymers. Macromol. Biosci. 2001, 1, 204–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, L.; El Ghzaoui, A.; Li, S. In vitro degradation behavior of poly(lactide)–poly(ethylene glycol) block copolymer micelles in aqueous solution. Int. J. Pharm. 2010, 400, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, L.; Xie, Z.; Hu, J.; Chen, X.; Jing, X. Enantiomeric PLA–PEG block copolymers and their stereocomplex micelles used as rifampin delivery. J. Nanopart. Res. 2006, 9, 777–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Song, Y.; Wang, D.; Jiang, N.; Gan, Z. Role of PEG Segment in Stereocomplex Crystallization for PLLA/PDLA-b-PEG-b-PDLA Blends. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 1492–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shirahama, H.; Ichimaru, A.; Tsutsumi, C.; Nakayama, Y.; Yasuda, H. Characteristics of the biodegradability and physical properties of stereocomplexes between poly(L-lactide) and poly(D-lactide) copolymers. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2004, 43, 438–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wanamaker, C.L.; Bluemle, M.J.; Pitet, L.; O’Leary, L.E.; Tolman, W.B.; Hillmyer, M.A. Consequences of Polylactide Stereochemistry on the Properties of Polylactide-Polymenthide-Polylactide Thermoplastic Elastomers. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10, 2904–2911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, Z.; Yuan, D.; Fan, X.; Tan, B.H.; He, C. Poly(ethylene glycol) Conjugated Poly(lactide)-Based Polyelectrolytes: Synthesis and Formation of Stable Self-Assemblies Induced by Stereocomplexation. Langmuir 2015, 31, 2321–2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fan, X.; Wang, Z.; Yuan, D.; Sun, Y.; Li, Z.; He, C. Novel linear-dendritic-like amphiphilic copolymers: Synthesis and self-assembly characteristics. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5, 4069–4075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Uehara, H.; Karaki, Y.; Wada, S.; Yamanobe, T. Stereo-Complex Crystallization of Poly(lactic acid)s in Block-Copolymer Phase Separation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2010, 2, 2707–2710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Schmidt, S.C.; Hillmyer, M.A. Synthesis and Characterization of Model Polyisoprene−Polylactide Diblock Copolymers. Macromolecules 1999, 32, 4794–4801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Frick, E.M.; Hillmyer, M.A. Synthesis and characterization of polylactide-block-polyisoprene-block-polylactide triblock copolymers: New thermoplastic elastomers containing biodegradable segments. Macromol. Rapid. Comm. 2000, 21, 1317–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. He, X.; He, Y.; Hsiao, M.-S.; Harniman, R.L.; Pearce, S.; Winnik, M.A.; Manners, I. Complex and Hierarchical 2D Assemblies via Crystallization-Driven Self-Assembly of Poly(l-lactide) Homopolymers with Charged Termini. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 9221–9228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Long, J.; Azmi, A.S.; Kim, M.P.; Ali, F.B. Comparative Study of Poly(4-vinylpyridine) and Polylactic Acid-block-poly (2-vinylpyridine) Nanocomposites on Structural, Morphological and Electrochemical Properties. Sains Malays. 2017, 46, 1097–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ladelta, V.; Ntetsikas, K.; Zapsas, G.; Hadjichristidis, N. Non-Covalent PS–SC–PI Triblock Terpolymers via Polylactide Stereocomplexation: Synthesis and Thermal Properties. Macromolecules 2022, 55, 2832–2843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hadjichristidis, N.; Iatrou, H.; Pispas, S.; Pitsikalis, M. Anionic polymerization: High vacuum techniques. J. Polym. Sci. Pol. Chem. 2000, 38, 3211–3234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Uhrig, D.; Mays, J.W. Experimental techniques in high-vacuum anionic polymerization. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2005, 43, 6179–6222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bhaumik, S.; Ntetsikas, K.; Hadjichristidis, N. Noncovalent Supramolecular Diblock Copolymers: Synthesis and Microphase Separation. Macromolecules 2020, 53, 6682–6689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Quirk, R.P.; Ma, J.-J. Characterization of the functionalization reaction product of poly(styryl)lithium with ethylene oxide. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 1988, 26, 2031–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kowalski, A.; Libiszowski, J.; Biela, T.; Cypryk, M.; Duda, A.A.; Penczek, S. Kinetics and Mechanism of Cyclic Esters Polymerization Initiated with Tin(II) Octoate. Polymerization of ε-Caprolactone and l,l-Lactide Co-initiated with Primary Amines. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 8170–8176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Grijpma, D.W.; Pennings, A.J. Polymerization Temperature Effects on the Properties of L-Lactide and Epsilon-Caprolactone Copolymers. Polym. Bull. 1991, 25, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kricheldorf, H.R.; Meierhaack, J. Polylactones, 22 Aba Triblock Copolymers of L-Lactide and Poly(Ethylene Glycol). Makromol. Chem. 1993, 194, 715–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ryner, M.; Stridsberg, K.; Albertsson, A.-C.; von Schenck, H.; Svensson, M. Mechanism of Ring-Opening Polymerization of 1,5-Dioxepan-2-one and l-Lactide with Stannous 2-Ethylhexanoate. A Theoretical Study. Macromolecules 2001, 34, 3877–3881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ladelta, V.; Zapsas, G.; Abou-Hamad, E.; Gnanou, Y.; Hadjichristidis, N. Tetracrystalline Tetrablock Quarterpolymers: Four Different Crystallites under the Same Roof. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 16267–16274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Chang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Yang, Y. Benign Fabrication of Fully Stereocomplex Polylactide with High Molecular Weights via a Thermally Induced Technique. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 7979–7984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Ji, E.; Cummins, C.; Fleury, G. Precise Synthesis and Thin Film Self-Assembly of PLLA-b-PS Bottlebrush Block Copolymers. Molecules 2021, 26, 1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Michell, R.M.; Müller, A.J.; Spasova, M.; Dubois, P.; Burattini, S.; Greenland, B.W.; Hamley, I.W.; Hermida-Merino, D.; Cheval, N.; Fahmi, A. Crystallization and Stereocomplexation Behavior of Poly(D- and L-lactide)-b-Poly(N,N-dimethylamino-2-ethyl methacrylate) Block Copolymers. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 2011, 49, 1397–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Cebe, P.; Hong, S.-D. Crystallization behaviour of poly(ether-ether-ketone). Polymer 1986, 27, 1183–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bassett, D.; Olley, R.; Alraheil, I. On crystallization phenomena in PEEK. Polymer 1988, 29, 1745–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lee, Y.; Porter, R.S.; Lin, J.S. On the double-melting behavior of poly(ether ether ketone). Macromolecules 1989, 22, 1756–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jonas, A.M.; Russell, T.P.; Yoon, D.Y. Synchrotron X-ray Scattering Studies of Crystallization of Poly(ether-ether-ketone) from the Glass and Structural Changes during Subsequent Heating-Cooling Processes. Macromolecules 1995, 28, 8491–8503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 14 02431 sch001 550
Scheme 1. General reactions for the synthesis of ω-hydroxyl functionalized PS and P2VP via anionic polymerization and the subsequent ROP of DLA/LLA.
Scheme 1. General reactions for the synthesis of ω-hydroxyl functionalized PS and P2VP via anionic polymerization and the subsequent ROP of DLA/LLA.
Polymers 14 02431 sch001
Polymers 14 02431 g001 550
Figure 1. SEC traces of (a) P2VP-OH precursor and P2VP-b-PLLA diblock copolymers and (b) PS-OH precursor and PS-b-PDLA diblock copolymers (THF as eluent, 35 °C, PS standards).
Figure 1. SEC traces of (a) P2VP-OH precursor and P2VP-b-PLLA diblock copolymers and (b) PS-OH precursor and PS-b-PDLA diblock copolymers (THF as eluent, 35 °C, PS standards).
Polymers 14 02431 g001
Polymers 14 02431 g002 550
Figure 2. 1H NMR spectra of (a) P2VP5.5-b-PLLA5.6, and (b) PS6.2-b-PDLA5.5 diblock copolymers (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C).
Figure 2. 1H NMR spectra of (a) P2VP5.5-b-PLLA5.6, and (b) PS6.2-b-PDLA5.5 diblock copolymers (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C).
Polymers 14 02431 g002
Polymers 14 02431 g003 550
Figure 3. FT-IR spectra of (a) P2VP5.5-OH, P2VP5.5-b-PLLA5.6, and SCPLA5.5, and (b) PS6.2-OH, PS6.2-b-PDLA5.5 and SCPLA5.5.
Figure 3. FT-IR spectra of (a) P2VP5.5-OH, P2VP5.5-b-PLLA5.6, and SCPLA5.5, and (b) PS6.2-OH, PS6.2-b-PDLA5.5 and SCPLA5.5.
Polymers 14 02431 g003
Polymers 14 02431 g004 550
Figure 4. DSC thermograms of PS, P2VP homopolymers (a), PS-b-PDLAs, P2VP-b-PLLAs, and the corresponding SCPLAs with varying PLA segments with molecular weights of (b) 5 kg mol−1 (c) 7 kg mol−1, and (d) 11 kg mol−1 (heating scan 10 °C/min, under N2 atmosphere).
Figure 4. DSC thermograms of PS, P2VP homopolymers (a), PS-b-PDLAs, P2VP-b-PLLAs, and the corresponding SCPLAs with varying PLA segments with molecular weights of (b) 5 kg mol−1 (c) 7 kg mol−1, and (d) 11 kg mol−1 (heating scan 10 °C/min, under N2 atmosphere).
Polymers 14 02431 g004
Polymers 14 02431 g005 550
Figure 5. XRD patterns of PS-b-PDLAs, P2VP-b-PLLAs, and the corresponding SCPLAs with PLA segments with molecular weight of (a) 5 kg mol−1, (b) 7 kg mol−1, and (c) 11 kg mol−1 (samples were cast on top of the glass substrate).
Figure 5. XRD patterns of PS-b-PDLAs, P2VP-b-PLLAs, and the corresponding SCPLAs with PLA segments with molecular weight of (a) 5 kg mol−1, (b) 7 kg mol−1, and (c) 11 kg mol−1 (samples were cast on top of the glass substrate).
Polymers 14 02431 g005
Table
Table 1. Molecular characteristics of homopolymers, diblock copolymers, and the corresponding stereocomplex.
Table 1. Molecular characteristics of homopolymers, diblock copolymers, and the corresponding stereocomplex.
EntrySampleConv c (%)Mn (kg mol−1)Đ d
1PS6.2-OH a1006.20 d1.02
2P2VP5.5-OH a1005.54 d1.03
3PS6.2-b-PDLA5.5 b975.49 e1.03
4P2VP5.5-b-PLLA5.6 b965.57 e1.08
5PS6.2-b-PDLA7.1 b987.06 e1.04
6P2VP5.5-b-PLLA7 b996.96 e1.04
7PS6.2-b-PDLA10.7 b9910.7 e1.05
8P2VP5.5-b-PLLA11 b9911.0 e1.07
a Synthesized by anionic polymerization high-vacuum techniques. b Synthesized by ROP of DLA/LLA with Sn(Oct)2 as the catalyst. c Conversions of the monomers were determined by 400 MHz 1H NMR spectra of crude products in CDCl3 at 25 °C. d Determined by SEC in THF at 35 °C (calibrated with PS standards). e The molecular weight corresponds to the PLA block.
Table
Table 2. Thermal properties of homopolymers, block copolymers, and the corresponding SCPLA.
Table 2. Thermal properties of homopolymers, block copolymers, and the corresponding SCPLA.
SampleTg (°C) 1Tm (°C) 1∆Hm (J/g) 1Xc (%) 2
PS6.2-OH92.3--Amorphous
P2VP5.5-OH93.6--Amorphous
PS6.2-b-PDLA5.5-153.024.414.5
P2VP5.5-b-PLLA5.683.0156.023.534.0
SCPLA5.5-220.336.133.0
PS6.2-b-PDLA7.154.2154.025.537.3
P2VP5.5-b-PLLA758.9152.627.739.6
SCPLA7-223.341.338.3
PS6.2-b-PDLA10.773.9162.630.052.4
P2VP5.5-b-PLLA1159.9162.943.251.4
SCPLA11-231.139.939.3
1 Determined by DSC (heating scan 10 °C min−1, N2 atmosphere). 2 Determined by XRD (samples were deposited on top of a glass substrate).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Arkanji, A.; Ladelta, V.; Ntetsikas, K.; Hadjichristidis, N. Synthesis and Thermal Analysis of Non-Covalent PS-b-SC-b-P2VP Triblock Terpolymers via Polylactide Stereocomplexation. Polymers 2022, 14, 2431. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14122431

AMA Style

Arkanji A, Ladelta V, Ntetsikas K, Hadjichristidis N. Synthesis and Thermal Analysis of Non-Covalent PS-b-SC-b-P2VP Triblock Terpolymers via Polylactide Stereocomplexation. Polymers. 2022; 14(12):2431. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14122431

Chicago/Turabian Style

Arkanji, Ameen, Viko Ladelta, Konstantinos Ntetsikas, and Nikos Hadjichristidis. 2022. "Synthesis and Thermal Analysis of Non-Covalent PS-b-SC-b-P2VP Triblock Terpolymers via Polylactide Stereocomplexation" Polymers 14, no. 12: 2431. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14122431

APA Style

Arkanji, A., Ladelta, V., Ntetsikas, K., & Hadjichristidis, N. (2022). Synthesis and Thermal Analysis of Non-Covalent PS-b-SC-b-P2VP Triblock Terpolymers via Polylactide Stereocomplexation. Polymers, 14(12), 2431. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14122431

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop