Next Article in Journal
Dioctyl Phthalate-Modified Graphene Nanoplatelets: An Effective Additive for Enhanced Mechanical Properties of Natural Rubber
Next Article in Special Issue
Microscopic and Spectroscopic Imaging and Thermal Analysis of Acrylates, Silicones and Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients in Adhesive Transdermal Patches
Previous Article in Journal
Long-Term Creep Compliance of Wood Polymer Composites: Using Untreated Wood Fibers as a Filler in Recycled and Neat Polypropylene Matrix
Previous Article in Special Issue
Antiseptic Polymer–Surfactant Complexes with Long-Lasting Activity against SARS-CoV-2
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Layer-By-Layer Self-Assembled Dip Coating for Antifouling Functionalized Finishing of Cotton Textile

1
School of Natural Science (SNS), National University of Science and Technology (NUST), Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
2
Department of Chemistry, University of Wah, Wah Cantt 47040, Pakistan
3
Department of Pharmacy, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
4
Polymer Research Lab, School of Chemical and Materials Engineering (SCME), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(13), 2540; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14132540
Submission received: 15 April 2022 / Revised: 28 April 2022 / Accepted: 29 April 2022 / Published: 22 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomedical Applications of Polymeric Materials)

Abstract

:
The fouling of surfaces such as textiles is a major health challenge, and there is a continuous effort to develop materials and processes to overcome it. In consideration of this, this study regards the development of antifouling functional nanoencapsulated finishing for the cotton textile fabric by employing a layer-by-layer dip coating technique. Antifouling textile finishing was formulated by inducing the nanoencapsulation of the antifouling functional group inside the hydrophobic polymeric shell. Cotton fabric was taken as a substrate to incorporate antibacterial functionality by alternatively fabricating multilayers of antifouling polymeric formulation (APF) and polyelectrolyte solution. The surface morphology of nanoencapsulated finished textile fabric was characterized through scanning electron microscopy to confirm the uniform distribution of nanoparticles on the cotton textile fabric. Optical profilometry and atomic force microscopy studies indicated increased surface roughness in the coated textile substrate as compared to the uncoated textile. The surface thickness of the fabricated textile increased with the number of deposited bilayers on the textile substrate. Surface hydrophobicity increased with number of coating bilayers with θ values of x for single layer, up to y for 20 bilayers. The antibacterial activity of the uncoated and layer-by-layer coated finished textile was also evaluated. It was significant and exhibited a significant zone of inhibition against microbial strains Gram-positive S. aureus and Gram-negative E. coli. The bilayer coating exhibited water repellency, hydrophobicity, and antibacterial activity. Thus, the fabricated textile could be highly useful for many industrial and biomedical applications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Textile substrates are susceptible to the growth of bacteria, fungi, and various other microbes [1]. The proliferation rate of bacteria and other microbes is aggravated under suitable conditions of optimal temperature, pH, humidity, and moisture. The deterioration and biofouling of textile material in industrial and medical or health sectors pose serious threats. The spread of pathogenic microbes through contaminated textiles is a major source of nosocomial infections [2]. Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria species such as Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus are among those bacterial strains responsible for hospital-acquired infections [3,4,5]. In consideration of such concerns, the global demand for antifouling textiles has tremendously increased due to consumer awareness regarding hygiene, health, and safety [6]. The annual production of medical textiles is predicted to significantly increase to up to 3500 metric tons by 2025 [7].
Textile functionalization through antifouling agents has allowed for many technological applications in biomedical fields, such as bandages, wound dressing, artificial sutures, body-implanted and nonimplanted devices, and tissue scaffolding [8,9]. Nanotechnology plays a significant role in the functionalization and modification of textiles by incorporating immobilized nanoparticles on the textile surface by encapsulating active agents [10]. Advancements in nanoencapsulation for functional finishes impart dyeing, anti-UV, flame-retardant, insect- and moth-repellent, antibacterial, self-healing, and aroma-producing properties to textiles [11,12,13,14].
Polymeric natural and synthetic nanomaterial is an efficient carrier of active agents to specific sites owing to its biodegradability, biocompatibility, and nontoxicity [15]. Polycaprolactone fulfills the requirements of bioapplications with suitable features for encapsulating antifouling functionalities [16,17]. Because of the above, the development and modification of biodegradable PCL nanoparticles for the slow release of an active agent through nanoencapsulation are very important, particularly in skin applications [18,19,20]. Different approaches for achieving nanoencapsulation by using biodegradable polymeric shells and bioactive core material include emulsification through coacervation, diffusion, or evaporation, and interfacial and in situ polymerization [21,22,23,24]. Both physical and chemical methods for nanoencapsulation have been studied. Natural cotton textiles incorporating nanocapsules for imparting antibacterial properties require attention for hygienic wound dressing [25]. Eugenol-loaded human serum albumin/silk fibroin (HSA/SF) nanocapsules with antibacterial properties were synthesized for the functionalization of cotton/polyethylene terephthalate blends. Functionalization was achieved for cotton wound dressing with significant antibacterial properties against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. The in vitro release of pH-sensitive antimicrobial agents from nanocapsules reached the textile surface to inhibit bacteria [26]. Antibacterial formulations are generally coated on textiles with various techniques such as pad–dry–cure (dipping method) or padding, spray coating, and the sol-gel technique [27]. Padding is the most conventional treatment for functionalized, but it is difficult to manipulate the effect of shearing forces acting on textile surfaces of due to the large number of process parameters. Among various coating techniques, the layer-by-layer (LBL) deposition of polyelectrolytes for the antifouling functional finishing of cotton is the simplest, easiest, and environmentally friendly approach [28]. Regarding this, chitosan/pentasodium tripolyphosphate as antibacterial functionality was coated on ionized cotton using the LBL deposition of oppositely charged polyelectrolytes. The subsequent deposition of multiple bilayers consequently increased the antibacterial efficacy of cotton against E. coli and S. aureus [29].
Considering the significance of antibacterial functional textiles for biomedical and industrial applications, we employed nanoencapsulation for antifouling finishing. Nanocapsules were prepared with biodegradable polycaprolactone (PCL)-encapsulated cefotaxime as antifouling moiety, and they were immobilized on a cotton textile. PCL is semicrystalline and biocompatible, achieving significant performance in the slow release of active molecules on fabric surfaces [30]. Cefotaxime, a third-generation semisynthetic cephalosporine, was chosen as an antifouling functional moiety having a broad range of antibacterial activity, particularly against E. coli and S. aureus. The efficacy of cefotaxime in bactericidal action by inhibiting the synthesis of peptidoglycan is associated with the high stability of its beta-lactamase. The toxicity of cefotaxime was significantly reduced by encapsulation, and caused the slow and sustained release that is particularly suitable for fabricating functional textiles. The molecular structure of cefotaxime is presented in Figure 1.
Antifouling polymeric formulations (APFs) were previously developed through nanoprecipitation and employed to fabricate antifouling textiles. Thus, the layer-by-layer technique was used to develop self-assembled multilayers through the dip coating of an antifouling formulation to fabricate cotton textiles for the in vitro and gradual release of antifouling activity. A cotton substrate was selected as the model textile fabric for antifouling due to its hydrophilicity and rapid deterioration in moist environments to allow for microbial degradation. The layer-by-layer coating of a polymeric formulation on cotton textile fabric induced significant hydrophobicity. The fabricated textile was analyzed through various characterization techniques. Surface wettability was analyzed by measuring the contact angle (θ), and surface roughness, thickness, and morphology were studied through optical profilometry, atomic force microscopy (AFM), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In vitro antibacterial tests were conducted to assess antifouling properties. The efficacy of antifouling activity of the developed cotton textile was dependent on the concentration of APF, deposited via self-assembled bilayers. The fabricated textile showed antibacterial activity against Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus and Gram-negative Escherichia coli with a significant reduction in bacterial colony numbers. The novel nanoencapsulation finishing could be used in developing woven and nonwoven textiles with antibacterial functionalities. It could be utilized to fabricate various types of industrial smart textiles, including cotton wound dressing for healing skin irritations and skin allergies.

2. Materials and Methods

Polycaprolactone (PCL) (Mw-1400 g/mol), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) (Mw 3100 g/mol), poly (diallyl dimethyl ammonium chloride) (PDAC) (average Mw 200,000–350,000, 20 wt% solution), and dichloromethane (DCM) (Mw-84.93) with 99.9% purity were purchased from Sigma Aldrich, Germany. Deionized ultrapure water with total dissolved solids (TDS~0.00) was used for solution preparation and washing. Cefotaxime (Mw 455.47 g/mol in powder form) as an antifouling functional moiety was obtained from Nectar Life sciences, India. Mercerized bleached (100%) whitish pure cotton with areal density of 1.31 g/m3 was obtained from the National Textile University (NTU), Faisalabad, Pakistan. Sodium chloride (NaCl), purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Germany), was used as a buffer saline solution. Mueller-Hinton II Agar (MHA) (Biolab, Budapest, Hungry) was utilized as the nutrient broth for the bacterial culture. In vitro antibacterial assay was performed against clinical bacterial strains of Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538) and Gram-negative Escherichia coli (ATCC 8739).

2.1. Synthesis of Antifouling Polymeric Formulation

The antifouling polymeric formulation (APF) was synthesized and characterized of as described in previous work [31]. The nanoencapsulation of antifouling functional cefotaxime was conducted by using polycaprolactone as the shell material through nanoprecipitation. The organic phase containing polycaprolactone (PCL) was dissolved in dichloromethane (DCM), while the aqueous phase containing polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) was used as a stabilizing agent. To optimize the blank formulation, an organic phase was slowly injected into an aqueous phase. After achieving a stable formulation by varying the process parameters, cefotaxime was dissolved in the organic phase and slowly injected into an aqueous phase. The subsequent addition of the organic phase containing cefotaxime into an aqueous phase formed the antifouling polymeric nanoformulation.

2.2. Characterization of Antifouling Polymeric Formulation

The prepared antifouling polymeric nanoformulation was analyzed with different techniques. Surface morphology was studied with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (model JEOL JSM 6490 LA, Tokyo, Japan); applied voltage was 10 KV. The encapsulation of antifouling functionality in the polymeric nanoparticles was evidenced with Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) using an FTIR spectrophotometer (Modal Shimadzu 8400, Markham, ON, Canada). Dynamic light scattering (DLS) (Nano ZS, Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK) was used to observe the average size, surface charge, and distribution of nanoparticles.

2.3. Fabrication of Antifouling Polymeric Coating on Textile

Pretreated and mercerized cotton textile fabric was received as plain whitish woven with an areal density of 1.31 g/m3. The antifouling polymeric coating on the cotton textile was fabricated through a layer-by-layer technique. Cotton textile fabric was alternatively dipped in a polycation solution of 10−3 M poly(diallyl dimethyl ammonium chloride) (PDAC) solution and 100 mL of diluted antifouling polymeric formulation (APF) comprising 25 mg of PCL in a series of steps. Antibacterial tests were conducted against clinical isolates of Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538) and Gram-negative Escherichia coli (ATCC 8739).
The pretreated cotton textile was cut into swatches of 75 by 25 mm. Negatively charged cotton swatches were first dipped in PDAC (a polycation solution maintained at neutral pH) for 10 min, resulting in positive charge deposition (single ion layer) followed by subsequent washing with deionized water twice for 5 min in two separate beakers to achieve the uniform deposition of charges, and to remove unbound or loosely attached molecules from the textile surface. For the opposite charge of another single ion layer, cotton swatches were dipped in an antifouling polymeric formulation (APF maintained at neutral pH) for 10 min, followed by washing with deionized water twice for 5 min in two separate beakers. Thus, a bilayer (1bL) of oppositely charged ions was formed due to electrostatic interaction on the cotton textile between the positively charged polyelectrolyte and negatively charged antifouling polymeric formulation (APF). The whole process of fabricating a single bilayer was accomplished in 40 min. The same procedure was repeated to cyclically fabricate 5, 10, 15, and 20 bilayers without the textile drying in each step. Fabricated textiles with top layers of negatively charged APF were considered for the slow release of antifouling functionality and characterized for an in vitro antibacterial test. The schematic representation of the layer-by-layer coating of the cotton textile is given in Figure 2.

2.4. Characterization of Fabricated Cotton Textile Fabric

The layer-by-layer coated textile fabric was analyzed by different techniques. The antifouling finished cotton textile fabric was analyzed for surface morphology, thickness, and roughness. The surface morphology of the coated and uncoated textile samples was observed through SEM (Modal JSM 6490LA, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). Textile swatches of equal dimensions were fixed on the glass slide, followed by sputter-coating with gold for analysis. Optical profilometry was used for measuring the difference between the average roughness and thickness of the uncoated and coated textiles in micrometers. We fixed 20 × 5 mm textile swatches at the center of the glass slide with double tape, and analyzed them through a 2D noncontact profilometer (model NANOVEA PS-50, USA). The subsequent roughness due to the layer-by-layer deposition of the nanoformulation inducing nanoencapsulated finished cotton textile fabric was further confirmed through scanning probe microscopy (Modal JSPM-5200, JEOL, Japan). Then, 20 × 5 mm textile swatches were cut and fixed on the glass slides with the double tape, and were analyzed in tapping mode. Uncoated and coated textile samples were topographically analyzed through 3D plots for detailed visualization. The surface wettability and hydrophobicity of the fabricated cotton textile were analyzed by measuring the contact angle (θ). Textile swatches (20 × 5 mm dimension) were clipped at the center of the glass slide and placed under a drop-shape analyzer (Model Kruss Gmbh 2014–2020, Hamburg, Germany).

2.5. In Vitro Antibacterial Bioassay

Standard qualitative textile testing with AATCC TM 100 with slight modification was performed to assess antibacterial activity over the course of 24 h [32]. Clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538) and Escherichia coli (ATCC 8739) were utilized to check the antibacterial activity of the fabricated cotton textile by agar disk diffusion or Kirby–Bauer assay. For this purpose, a Muller Hinton Agar (MHA) solution was prepared as commercially recommended and autoclaved overnight. The freshly prepared nutrient broth was streaked with microbial cells and incubated overnight at 37 °C. Then, a 10 mL saline solution was poured into a 50 mL sterilized falcon tube and inoculated with pathogenic colonies, followed by vortexed mixing for constant distribution. Afterwards, 0.5 McFarland was utilized to set the optical density and turbidity [33]. MHA (25 mL) solution was poured in sterilized Petri dishes and it was allowed to solidify the agar; then, it was placed in an incubator at 37 °C overnight. Solid agar plates were streaked with sterile cotton swabs by adding the bacterial culture (about 50 microliters). Streaking was conducted by rotating the Petri plate about 60 degrees thrice for uniform inoculation. Uncoated and coated (1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 bl) textiles of 40 × 10 mm dimensions were placed onto solid agar plates by gently pressing the textile at the center of each Petri dish. Plates were placed in an incubator at 37 °C overnight, and antibacterial activity was observed after 24 h. The zone of inhibition around the textile sample was measured as mean standard deviation.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Antifouling Polymeric Formulation (AFP)

Cefotaxime was nanoencapsulated as a core antifouling functionality inside the polymeric shell for the slow release of in vitro antibacterial activity as described previously [31]. Polycaprolactone nanoparticles were characterized for average size, surface charge, and morphology. The average size and zeta potential of the drug-loaded polymeric nanoparticles were 216 nm and −11.1 mV, respectively, as shown in Figure 3. Uniformity in particle size distribution was observed at a PDI of 0.4 (less than 0.5 shows uniformity in distribution). The negatively charged zeta potential of PCL nanoparticles was attributed to the hydrolysis of the carboxyl and hydroxyl groups present at the surface.

3.2. Characterization of Antifouling Fabricated Cotton Textile

3.2.1. Surface Morphology Studies

The surface morphology of layer-by-layer-deposited thin films of antifouling polymeric (APF) coating was studied by observing the SEM micrographs. Cross-sectional views of SEM micrographs showed the surface morphology of the uncoated and coated cotton textiles, as given in Figure 4. The smooth and uniform surface of the uncoated mercerized cotton textile fabric is shown in Figure 4a, while a significant increase in roughness in the morphology of the coated textile appeared after coating 1 bilayer up to 20 bilayers as shown in Figure 4b–f. The multilayer coating of polyelectrolytes over the cotton textile surface produced an agglomeration [34]. The density of agglomerates increased with the sequential adsorption of the number of bilayers. SEM micrographs of the coated textile fabric showed the uniform and homogeneous deposition of nanoparticles over the surface. There were fewer agglomerates with the coating of 1 and 5 bilayers, as shown in Figure 4b,c, as compared with the coated textile fabric with 10, 15, and 20 bilayers, as shown in Figure 4d–f, with a subsequent increase in the population of agglomerates. The less and dense agglomeration of charged particles over the textile surface depends upon various factors, including the nature and concentration of the polyelectrolyte solution (cationic or anionic polyelectrolyte), immersion time in deionized water, polyelectrolytes, and nanoformulations, besides the cyclical drying process in each step [35]. The roughened surface of the fabricate textile fabric after subsequent bilayer coating potentially created hydrophobicity and antifouling activity [36].
The surface roughness of the functionalized cotton textile from the layer-by-layer dip coating of polyelectrolyte solution and APF formulation was observed through optical profilometry. Mercerized/bleached cotton was smooth, shiny, and whitish before coating. There was significantly increased average roughness (Ra) in the deposited thin film over cotton textile [37]. The average roughness (Ra) of the uncoated (0 BL) and coated textiles (1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 BL) was calculated in µm with a 2D noncontact profilometer. A marked difference in the roughness profile of the uncoated and coated textiles was attributed to the incremental deposition of antifouling polymeric formulation (APF) and poly(diallyl dimethyl ammonium chloride) (PDAC) solution. The comparatively smooth surface of uncoated textile and increasing trend in average roughness of the coated textiles with a deposited number of bilayers are shown in Figure 5. This was also evidenced by the scanning electron micrographs of the uncoated and coated textiles [38].
The surface topography of the uncoated and coated textile samples was further studied by using atomic force microscopy (AFM). The topography of the uncoated and coated textiles was better visualized by scanning a small area and taking 3D plots, as shown in Figure 6. Tapping mode AFM was used for the topographical analysis of the textile samples by scanning an area in µm. The marked difference in the roughness profile of the uncoated and coated textiles was quantitively analyzed in terms of root mean square roughness (Rq) by plotting a graph between Rq values and the number of deposited bilayers on the cotton textile fabrics, as shown in Figure 7. Rq values were evaluated in terms of height or thickness as measured from the mean level of surface [39]. The value of Rq increased with the increase in the number of deposited bilayers, confirming that the Rq value varies with the composition and density of the sample [40]. Topographical AFM 3D plots showed characteristic bright and dark portions, with brighter groves indicating the deposition of nanoparticles. As the number of deposited bilayers increased, the bright portion of the peaks and valleys groves became more significant in the case of the coated textiles with 5, 10, 15, and 20 bilayers. These bright groves and thickness in peak and valleys resulted due to the electrostatic interaction between the tip and surface of the textile. The denser the textile surface with the increased number of bilayers was, the more significant the portion of bright groves with characteristic roughness that appeared was. The resulting variation depended upon the alternative deposition of the antifouling polymeric formulation (APF) and PDAC solution in the modified textile samples [41]. The mercerized cotton was smooth and shiny, while the nanoencapsulated finished cotton textile induced the aggregation of nanoparticles with the addition of some bilayers on the textile surface, thus enhancing micro- and nanoscale roughness [38,42]. The acquired roughness (Rq) of the nanoencapsulated finished cotton textile fabric was evidenced by contact angle measurement for water repellency and the desirable antifouling properties.

3.2.2. Surface Wettability Analyses

The surface wettability of thenanoencapsulated finished cotton textile fabric was studied by measuring the contact angle (θ) as shown in Figure 8. The hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity of the fabricated textile was quantitatively analyzed by observing the values of the contact angle (θ) and surface energy (γs). The surface energy of the finished textile substrates was calculated from the contact angle measurement by considering the interaction at the interface of solid and liquid surfaces [43,44]. Variation in contact angle (θ) and surface energy (γs) with the number of deposited bilayers in the nanoencapsulated finished textile is shown in Figure 9a,b respectively. The uncoated cotton textile with a low contact angle (θ) had a mercerized fine cotton texture and the presence of hydroxyl group that lead to maximal hydrophilicity and high surface energy (γs). Moreover, the increased value of surface energy was associated with pronounced wettability and maximal surface coverage, and this could lead to a poor antifouling effect [36]. The water contact angle (θ) of the 1 bilayer coated textile was greater than that of the uncoated textile substrate due to the hydrophobic nature of PCL. The increased value of the contact angle (θ) resulted from the deposition of 5 bilayers, and was associated with the roughness and uneven protrusions on the textile substrate [45]. Further coating with 10, 15 and 20 bilayers showed an increased value of θ with differences among them as compared to the 1- and 5-bilayer-coated textile due to the interpenetration of the next bilayer with the previously adsorbed bilayer [46]. Thus, a greater number of bilayers coating led to nonuniform deposition and inhomogeneous surface of the textiles. Therefore, water repellency and comparative hydrophobicity were a result of the deposited bilayers in the nanoencapsulated finished cotton textile fabric.
The surface energy of the fabricated cotton textile was evaluated through the results of contact angle (θ) [47]. Thus, Young’s model summarizes the theoretical description in Young’s equation (γs = γs -l + γl cosθ), a best fit for smooth surfaces before coating applications. γs stands for surface energy of solids, γs -l is the surface energy of the solid–liquid interface, γl is the surface energy of liquids, and θ is the contact angle of a liquid droplet. The developed layer-by-layer dip coating of antifouling polymeric formulation (APF) induces significant water repellency associated with the hydrophobicity of PCL [48].

3.2.3. Antibacterial Assay of Textile Fabric

The antibacterial activity of the uncoated and nanoencapsulated finished cotton textiles was established against two bacterial strains, Gram-positive S. aureus and Gram-negative E. coli, by using a qualitative agar disk diffusion assay [49]. The antibacterial test results of the uncoated and coated textile fabrics against E. coli and S. aureus are shown in Figure 10 and Figure 11 respectively. The uncoated textile was taken as a control against both strains to compare the antibacterial efficacy of the nanoencapsulated finished cotton textile fabricated with the layer-by-layer coating of the antifouling polymeric formulation (APF). The antibacterial efficacy of fabricated finished textile was analyzed by placing the textile swatches (40 × 10 mm) in intimate contact on agar plates prestreaked with bacterial inoculum [50]. A clear zone of inhibition was observed around the modified textiles coated with 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 bilayers. The zone of inhibition against both strains progressively increased around the textile swatches fabricated with a progressive coating of bilayers. These results were attributed to the significant release of antifouling functional drugs from the polymeric nanoencapsulated finished textile in a concentration-dependent manner [31,51]. The release of antifouling drug cefotaxime from APF was responsible for the antifouling activity of the fabricated textiles. The antibacterial activity of the fabricated textiles was further compared against both strains with a greater zone of inhibition against E. coli as compared to S. aureus, as shown in Figure 12. Thin-walled Gram-negative E. coli was more susceptible to bactericidal action than Gram-positive S. aureus was. Moreover, there was electrostatic repulsion between Gram-negative E. coli and the negatively charged layer of the antifouling polymeric formulation (APF) coated on the textile [52]. The antifouling activity of the nanoencapsulated finished textile fabric was attributed to the slow release of cefotaxime encapsulated inside the PCL shell. As the number of deposited bilayers increased, antifouling activity increased due to the increased release of cefotaxime form PCL nanoparticles. Thus, the antifouling polymeric formulation (APF) encapsulated nanoparticles of cefotaxime, as a notable antibacterial moiety has significant bactericidal action attributed to the high stability of beta-lactamase enzymes, thus inhibiting the synthesis of bacterial cell walls. It has significant bactericidal action against Gram-negative bacterial strains, while it is associated with adequate action towards Gram-positive bacteria [53].

4. Conclusions

The growing demand for health and hygiene regarding textile products has led to industrial concerns about antifouling textiles. Thus, the present work illustrates a novel approach to fabricating nanoencapsulated finished cotton textile fabrics by incorporating the antifouling functional group finishing of cotton textile achieved by employing a layer-by-layer technique through the alternate dip coating of oppositely charged polyelectrolyte solution and antifouling polymeric formulation (APF). SEM and AFM images confirmed the significant deposition of polymeric nanoparticles with the increasing number of coating bilayers. The optical profilometry analysis of the functionalized textiles showed that the multilayer deposition of thin films resulting in the subsequent coating of 1 to 20 bilayers increased surface roughness from 16.4 to 69.4 µm. Further, the surface wettability of the functionalized textiles was evaluated by measuring the contact angle (θ), which increased from 23° to 48.5°, and surface energy decreased from 145 to 18 dynes/cm, which showed the decreased wettability and increased surface hydrophobicity associated with the deposited bilayers. The nanoencapsulated finished textiles were also analyzed through an in vitro antibacterial assay against Gram-negative E. coli and Gram-positive S. aureus, with a significant reduction in the bacterial cell colonies of both strains. Moreover, the bactericidal efficacy of the fabricated textiles was evaluated in a concentration-dependent manner, and showed an exponential zone of inhibition with the number of coating bilayers on the textiles. The zone of inhibition against both strains increased with the number of deposited bilayers due to the increased release of cefotaxime from the polymeric nanoparticles. The resulting antifouling functional finishing, achieved through the nanoencapsulation of the antifouling functional group, could provide a substantial route in fulfilling the growing global needs for antifouling textiles. The nanoencapsulated finished antifouling cotton textile fabric could be used in wound dressing, for skin infections, and in various other industrial applications.

Author Contributions

S.J. conducted the experimental work and wrote the original manuscript. N.M.A. designed and evaluated this work as the principal investigator. A.M., formal analysis. H.N., M.I. and N.A., final editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are available to the readers.

Acknowledgments

Sana Javaid acknowledges the financial support of NUST Research Directorate. Nasir M. Ahmad acknowledges the support of Higher Education Commission (HEC), Pakistan through NRPU grant no. 3526 and 6020.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mahall, K. Microbiological Damage to Fibers. In Quality Assessment of Textiles; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1993; pp. 195–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Morais, D.S.; Guedes, R.M.; Lopes, M.A. Antimicrobial Approaches for Textiles: From Research to Market. Materials 2016, 9, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Khan, H.A.; Ahmad, A.; Mehboob, R. Nosocomial infections and their control strategies. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2015, 5, 509–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Abla, H.-H.; Chafia, B.; Abdesselam, L.; Houcine, L.; Kaddour, B.; Farida, S. Multidrug-resistant bacteria isolated from patients hospitalized in Intensive Care Unit in University Hospital of Constantine, Algeria (2011–2015). Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 10, 1328–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Paszkiewicz, M.; Gołąbiewska, A.; Rajski, Ł.; Kowal, E.; Sajdak, A.; Zaleska-Medynska, A. The Antibacterial and Antifungal Textile Properties Functionalized by Bimetallic Nanoparticles of Ag/Cu with Different Structures. J. Nanomater. 2016, 2016, 6056980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Windler, L.; Height, M.; Nowack, B. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobials for textile applications. Environ. Int. 2013, 53, 62–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gao, Y.; Cranston, R. Recent Advances in Antimicrobial Treatments of Textiles. Text. Res. J. 2008, 78, 60–72. [Google Scholar]
  8. Höfer, D. Antimicrobial Textiles—Evaluation of Their Effectiveness and Safety. Curr. Probl. Dermatol. 2006, 33, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mahltig, B.; Zhang, J.; Wu, L.; Darko, D.; Wendt, M.; Lempa, E.; Rabe, M.; Haase, H. Effect pigments for textile coating: A review of the broad range of advantageous functionalization. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2016, 14, 35–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Martí, M.; Martínez, V.; Rubio, L.; Coderch, L.; Parra, J.L. Biofunctional textiles prepared with liposomes: In vivo and in vitro assessment. J. Microencapsul. 2011, 28, 799–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nelson, G. Application of microencapsulation in textiles. Int. J. Pharm. 2002, 242, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cheng, S.Y.; Yuen, M.C.W.; Kan, C.W.; Cheuk, K.K.L.; Chui, C.H.; Lam, K.H. Cosmetic textiles with biological benefits: Gelatin microcapsules containing vitamin C. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2009, 24, 411–419. [Google Scholar]
  13. Monllor, P.; Bonet-Aracil, M.; Cases, F. Characterization of the behaviour of flavour microcapsules in cotton fabrics. Eur. Polym. J. 2007, 43, 2481–2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xiao, Z.; Liu, W.; Zhu, G.; Zhou, R.; Niu, Y. A review of the preparation and application of flavour and essential oils microcapsules based on complex coacervation technology. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013, 94, 1482–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kumari, A.; Yadav, S.K.; Yadav, S.C. Biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles based drug delivery systems. Colloids. Surf. B Biointerfaces 2010, 75, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cesca, F.; Limongi, T.; Accardo, A.; Rocchi, A.; Orlando, M.; Shalabaeva, V.; Di Fabrizio, E.; Benfenati, F. Fabrication of biocompatible free-standing nanopatterned films for primary neuronal cultures. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 45696–45702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Limongi, T.; Lizzul, L.; Giugni, A.; Tirinato, L.; Pagliari, F.; Tan, H.; Das, G.; Moretti, M.; Marini, M.; Brusatin, G.; et al. Laboratory injection molder for the fabrication of polymeric porous poly-epsilon-caprolactone scaffolds for preliminary mesenchymal stem cells tissue engineering applications. Microelectron. Eng. 2017, 175, 12–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sinha, V.R.; Bansal, K.; Kaushik, R.; Kumria, R.; Trehan, A. Poly-ϵ-caprolactone microspheres and nanospheres: An overview. Int. J. Pharm. 2004, 278, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Madhaiyan, K.; Sridhar, R.; Sundarrajan, S.; Venugopal, J.R.; Ramakrishna, S. Vitamin B12 loaded polycaprolactone nanofibers: A novel transdermal route for the water soluble energy supplement delivery. Int. J. Pharm. 2013, 444, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Alonso, C.; Martí, M.; Barba, C.; Lis, M.; Rubio, L.; Coderch, L. Skin penetration and antioxidant effect of cosmeto-textiles with gallic acid. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2016, 156, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Reis, C.; Neufeld, R.J.; Ribeiro, A.; Veiga, F. Nanoencapsulation I. Methods for preparation of drug-loaded polymeric nanoparticles. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2006, 2, 8–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Xing, F.; Cheng, G.; Yi, K.; Ma, L. Nanoencapsulation of capsaicin by complex coacervation of gelatin, acacia, and tannins. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2005, 96, 2225–2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Moinard-Chécot, D.; Chevalier, Y.; Briancon, S.; Beney, L.; Fessi, H. Mechanism of nanocapsules formation by the emulsion–diffusion process. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2008, 317, 458–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Quaglia, F.; Ostacolo, L.; Mazzaglia, A.; Villari, V.; Zaccaria, D.; Sciortino, M.T. The intracellular effects of non-ionic amphiphilic cyclodextrin nanoparticles in the delivery of anticancer drugs. Biomaterials 2009, 30, 374–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ghayempour, S.; Montazer, M. Micro/nanoencapsulation of essential oils and fragrances: Focus on perfumed, antimicrobial, mosquito-repellent and medical textiles. J. Microencapsul. 2016, 33, 497–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Quartinello, F.; Tallian, C.; Auer, J.; Schön, H.; Vielnascher, R.; Weinberger, S.; Wieland, K.; Weihs, A.M.; Herrero-Rollett, A.; Lendl, B.; et al. Smart textiles in wound care: Functionalization of cotton/PET blends with antimicrobial nanocap-sules. J. Mater. Chem. B 2019, 7, 6592–6603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Singha, K. A Review on Coating & Lamination in Textiles: Processes and Applications. Am. J. Polym. Sci. 2012, 2, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Aubert, V.F.; Mogrovejo, V.A.; Tabary, N.; Maton, M.; Chai, F.; Neut, C.; Martel, B.; Blanchemain, N. Evaluation of antibacterial textile covered by layer-by-layer coating and loaded with chlorhexidine for wound dressing application. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019, 100, 554–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shirvan, A.R.; Nejad, N.H.; Bashari, A. Antibacterial finishing of cotton fabric via the chitosan/TPP self-assembled nano layers. Fibers Polym. 2014, 15, 1908–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Massella, D.; Leone, F.; Peila, R.; Barresi, A.A.; Ferri, A. Functionalization of Cotton Fabrics with Polycaprolactone Nanoparticles for Transdermal Release of Melatonin. J. Funct. Biomater. 2017, 9, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Javaid, S.; Ahmad, N.; Mahmood, A.; Nasir, H.; Iqbal, M.; Ahmad, N.; Irshad, S. Cefotaxime Loaded Polycaprolactone Based Polymeric Nanoparticles with Antifouling Properties for In-Vitro Drug Release Applications. Polymers 2021, 13, 2180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pinho, E.; Magalhães, L.; Henriques, M.; Oliveira, R. Antimicrobial activity assessment of textiles: Standard methods comparison. Ann. Microbiol. 2010, 61, 493–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Andrews, J.M. Testing, BSAC standardized disc susceptibility testing method (version 5). J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2006, 58, 511–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ostrander, J.W.; Mamedov, A.A.; Kotov, N.A. Two modes of linear layer-by-layer growth of nanoparticle–polylectrolyte multilayers and different interactions in the layer-by-layer deposition. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1101–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rivero, P.J.; Urrutia, A.; Goicoechea, J.; Arregui, F.J. Nanomaterials for Functional Textiles and Fibers. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2015, 10, 501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Ouadil, B.; Amadine, O.; Essamlali, Y.; Cherkaoui, O.; Zahouily, M. A new route for the preparation of hydrophobic and antibacterial textiles fabrics using Ag-loaded graphene nanocomposite. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019, 579, 123713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bhushan, B. Modern Tribology Handbook, 1st ed.; Two Volume Set; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cai, R.; Glinel, K.; De Smet, D.; Vanneste, M.; Mannu, N.; Kartheuser, B.; Nysten, B.; Jonas, A.M. Environmentally Friendly Super-Water-Repellent Fabrics Prepared from Water-Based Suspensions. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 15346–15351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Simpson, G.J.; Sedin, D.L.; Rowlen, K.L. Surface Roughness by Contact versus Tapping Mode Atomic Force Microscopy. Langmuir 1999, 15, 1429–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Koc, S.K. Applications of Atomic Force Microscopy in Textiles. J. Eng. Fibers Fabr. 2015, 10, 155892501501000118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Dong, X.; Gao, S.; Huang, J.; Li, S.; Zhu, T.; Cheng, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, Z.; Lai, Y. A self-roughened and biodegradable superhydrophobic coating with UV shielding, solar-induced self-healing and versatile oil–water separation ability. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 7, 2122–2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jonas, A.M.; Cai, R.; Vermeyen, R.; Nysten, B.; Vanneste, M.; De Smet, D.; Glinel, K. How roughness controls the water repellency of woven fabrics. Mater. Des. 2019, 187, 108389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, S.; Huang, J.; Chen, Z.; Chen, G.; Lai, Y. A review on special wettability textiles: Theoretical models, fabrication technologies and multifunctional applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 5, 31–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Żenkiewicz, M. Methods for the calculation of surface free energy of solids. J. Achiev. Mater. Manuf. Eng. 2007, 24, 137–145. [Google Scholar]
  45. Deng, H.; Zhou, X.; Wang, X.; Zhang, C.; Ding, B.; Zhang, Q.; Du, Y. Layer-by-layer structured polysaccharides film-coated cellulose nanofibrous mats for cell culture. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 80, 474–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Deng, H.; Wang, X.; Liu, P.; Ding, B.; Du, Y.; Li, G.; Hu, X.; Yang, J. Enhanced bacterial inhibition activity of layer-by-layer structured polysaccharide film-coated cellulose nanofibrous mats via addition of layered silicate. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 83, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Calvimontes, A. The measurement of the surface energy of solids using a laboratory drop tower. NPJ Microgravity 2017, 3, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Siddig, E.A.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, B.; Wang, T.; Shi, J.; Guo, Y.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, J. Plasma-exposed TiO2 nanoparticles on polyethylene terephthalate matrix surface and its effects on the durable hydrophobic coating. Text. Res. J. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Haase, H.; Jordan, L.; Keitel, L.; Keil, C.; Mahltig, B. Comparison of methods for determining the effectiveness of antibacterial functionalized textiles. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0188304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Lalitha, P.; Jayanthi, P.; Sujitha, R. Antimicrobial Activity of Perspiration Pads and Cotton Cloth Fabricated with the Ethyl Acetate Extract of Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms. J. Text. 2014, 2014, 943287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Hipler, U.-C.; Elsner, P.; Fluhr, J.W. Antifungal and antibacterial properties of a silver-loaded cellulosic fiber. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2006, 77, 156–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Niño-Martínez, N.; Salas Orozco, M.F.; Martínez-Castañón, G.-A.; Torres Méndez, F.; Ruiz, F. Molecular Mechanisms of Bacterial Resistance to Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Lefrock, J.L.; Prince, R.A.; Left, R.D. Mechanism of Action, Antimicrobial Activity, Pharmacology, Adverse Effects, and Clinical Efficacy of Cefotaxime. Pharmacother. J. Hum. Pharmacol. Drug Ther. 1982, 2, 174–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Molecular structure of cefotaxime.
Figure 1. Molecular structure of cefotaxime.
Polymers 14 02540 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representation of fabrication of antifouling functional cotton textile through layer-by-layer technique.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of fabrication of antifouling functional cotton textile through layer-by-layer technique.
Polymers 14 02540 g002
Figure 3. (a) Zeta size, (b) zeta potential, and (c) scanning electron microscope images of drug loaded nanoformulation.
Figure 3. (a) Zeta size, (b) zeta potential, and (c) scanning electron microscope images of drug loaded nanoformulation.
Polymers 14 02540 g003
Figure 4. (a) EM images of uncoated cotton textile fabric; coated cotton textile with (b) 1 BL, (c) 5 BL, (d) 10 BL, (e) 15 BL, and (f) 20 BL.
Figure 4. (a) EM images of uncoated cotton textile fabric; coated cotton textile with (b) 1 BL, (c) 5 BL, (d) 10 BL, (e) 15 BL, and (f) 20 BL.
Polymers 14 02540 g004
Figure 5. Average roughness (Ra) profile in µm of uncoated and coated cotton textile fabrics (1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 BL).
Figure 5. Average roughness (Ra) profile in µm of uncoated and coated cotton textile fabrics (1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 BL).
Polymers 14 02540 g005
Figure 6. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images of uncoated (0 BL) and coated cotton textile (1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 BL).
Figure 6. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images of uncoated (0 BL) and coated cotton textile (1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 BL).
Polymers 14 02540 g006
Figure 7. Root mean square roughness (Rq) in nm of uncoated and coated textile with deposited number of bilayers (1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 BL).
Figure 7. Root mean square roughness (Rq) in nm of uncoated and coated textile with deposited number of bilayers (1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 BL).
Polymers 14 02540 g007
Figure 8. Contact angle measurement of 0, 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 BL coated cotton textile.
Figure 8. Contact angle measurement of 0, 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 BL coated cotton textile.
Polymers 14 02540 g008
Figure 9. (a) Contact angle θ of fabricated cotton textile plot versus number of deposited bilayers; (b) surface energy of fabricated cotton textile plot versus number of deposited bilayers.
Figure 9. (a) Contact angle θ of fabricated cotton textile plot versus number of deposited bilayers; (b) surface energy of fabricated cotton textile plot versus number of deposited bilayers.
Polymers 14 02540 g009
Figure 10. Antibacterial activity of (a) uncoated and coated in (b) 1 BL, (c) 5 BL, (d) 10 BL, (e) 15 BL, and (f) 20 BL against Escherichia coli.
Figure 10. Antibacterial activity of (a) uncoated and coated in (b) 1 BL, (c) 5 BL, (d) 10 BL, (e) 15 BL, and (f) 20 BL against Escherichia coli.
Polymers 14 02540 g010
Figure 11. Antibacterial activity of (a) uncoated and coated in (b) 1 BL, (c) 5 BL, (d) 10 BL, (e) 15 BL, and (f) 20 BL textiles against Staphylococcus aureus.
Figure 11. Antibacterial activity of (a) uncoated and coated in (b) 1 BL, (c) 5 BL, (d) 10 BL, (e) 15 BL, and (f) 20 BL textiles against Staphylococcus aureus.
Polymers 14 02540 g011
Figure 12. Zone of inhibition of uncoated (0 BL) and coated textiles (1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 BL) against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus.
Figure 12. Zone of inhibition of uncoated (0 BL) and coated textiles (1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 BL) against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus.
Polymers 14 02540 g012
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Javaid, S.; Mahmood, A.; Nasir, H.; Iqbal, M.; Ahmed, N.; Ahmad, N.M. Layer-By-Layer Self-Assembled Dip Coating for Antifouling Functionalized Finishing of Cotton Textile. Polymers 2022, 14, 2540. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14132540

AMA Style

Javaid S, Mahmood A, Nasir H, Iqbal M, Ahmed N, Ahmad NM. Layer-By-Layer Self-Assembled Dip Coating for Antifouling Functionalized Finishing of Cotton Textile. Polymers. 2022; 14(13):2540. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14132540

Chicago/Turabian Style

Javaid, Sana, Azhar Mahmood, Habib Nasir, Mudassir Iqbal, Naveed Ahmed, and Nasir M. Ahmad. 2022. "Layer-By-Layer Self-Assembled Dip Coating for Antifouling Functionalized Finishing of Cotton Textile" Polymers 14, no. 13: 2540. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14132540

APA Style

Javaid, S., Mahmood, A., Nasir, H., Iqbal, M., Ahmed, N., & Ahmad, N. M. (2022). Layer-By-Layer Self-Assembled Dip Coating for Antifouling Functionalized Finishing of Cotton Textile. Polymers, 14(13), 2540. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14132540

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop