Next Article in Journal
The Investigation of Novel Dynamic Packing Technology for Injection Molded Part Quality Control and Its Production Stability by Using Real-Time PVT Control Method
Next Article in Special Issue
Construction of Bio-Based Polyurethanes via Olefin Metathesis and Their Thermal Reversible Behavior
Previous Article in Journal
Facile Fabrication of Multifunctional Transparent Flame-Retarded Hydrogel for Fire-Resistant Glass with Excellent Transparency, Fire Resistance and Anti-Ageing Property
Previous Article in Special Issue
Theoretical and Experimental Studies of Hydrogen Bonded Dihydroxybenzene Isomers Polyurethane Adhesive Material
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 14
Issue 13
10.3390/polym14132719
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis of Nonisocyanate Poly(hydroxy)urethanes from Bis(cyclic carbonates) and Polyamines

by
Marc Martínez de Sarasa Buchaca
1,
Felipe de la Cruz-Martínez
1,
Enrique Francés-Poveda
1,
Juan Fernández-Baeza
1,
Luis F. Sánchez-Barba
2,
Andrés Garcés
2,
José A. Castro-Osma
3,* and
Agustín Lara-Sánchez
1,*
1
Departamento de Química Inorgánica, Orgánica y Bioquímica-Centro de Innovación en Química Avanzada (ORFEO-CINQA), Facultad de Ciencias y Tecnologías Químicas, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain
2
Departamento de Biología y Geología, Física y Química Inorgánica, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28933 Móstoles, Spain
3
Departamento de Química Inorgánica, Orgánica y Bioquímica-Centro de Innovación en Química Avanzada (ORFEO-CINQA), Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 02071 Albacete, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(13), 2719; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14132719
Submission received: 3 June 2022 / Revised: 27 June 2022 / Accepted: 29 June 2022 / Published: 2 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Polyurethanes)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Nonisocyanate polyurethane materials with pending alcohol groups in the polymeric chain were synthesized by polyaddition reaction of bis(cyclic carbonates) onto diamines. For the platform molecule, 1,4-butanediol bis(glycidyl ether carbonate) (BGBC, 1) was used. The polyaddition reaction of 1 onto a wide range of diamines with different electronic and physical properties was explored. All PHUs were obtained quantitatively after 16 h at 80 °C temperature in MeCN as solvent. The low nucleophilicity of L-lysine has proven unable to ring-open the cyclic carbonate and, thus, no reaction occurred. The addition of DBU or TBD as the catalyst was tested and allows the obtention of the desired PHU. However, the presence of strong bases also led to the formation of polyurea fragments in the new PHU. The different poly(hydroxyurethane) materials were characterized using a wide range of spectroscopic techniques such as NMR, IR, MALDI-ToF, and using GPC studies. The thermal properties of the NIPUs were investigated by DSC and TGA analyses. Moreover, reactions employing different monomer ratios were performed, obtaining novel hydroxycarbamate compounds. Finally, sequential and one-pot experiments were also carried out to synthesize the PHUs polymers in one-step reaction.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In the last 50 years, a compelling growth of interest has emerged within the scientific community and plastic industry for the production of polyurethane (PU) materials due to their versatility and wide range of applications. Thanks to their physical properties such as hardness, elongation, strength, abrasion resistance, light weight, etc., they have been widely used in biomedical, building and construction, automotive, textiles, adhesives, packaging, and several other industries [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Traditionally, these materials have been prepared by the polyaddition reaction of a diol (or polyol) onto a diisocyanate (or poly isocyanate), and this method is still currently in use in industries [8]. However, isocyanate reagents are hazardous for the environment and their production often requires the use of phosgene, which is highly toxic for humans [9]. Therefore, alternative pathways for PU synthesis involving greener intermediates and processes have become more and more attractive for industrial and academic research. In this context, the synthesis of nonisocyanate polyurethanes can be achieved by the transurethanization polycondensation between a biscarbamate and a diol [6,10,11,12,13], the copolymerization of azidirines and CO2 [14,15,16], and the polyaddition reaction of bis(cyclic carbonates) and diamines (Scheme 1) [17,18,19].
Amongst them, most attention has been given to the polyaddition reaction of bis(cyclic carbonates) and diamines since cyclic carbonates have gained much interest from many research groups and industry due to their applications as solvents [20,21], electrolytes for batteries [22,23], and precursors for the synthesis of polymers and fine chemicals [24]. This route exhibits several advantages such as the use of CO2 as a sustainable C1 feedstock to synthesize the cyclic carbonate, which has been seen of vital environmental importance and as a synthetic challenge during the last few years [25,26,27,28,29,30]. Furthermore, the ring-opening reaction with diamines generates linear poly(hydroxyurethane)s, with pending primary or secondary alcohol groups within the main polymeric chain, which gives the polymer specific properties such as better adhesion, thermal stability, and chemical resistance to nonpolar solvents (Scheme 2) [31]. In addition, the reactive hydroxyl groups enable the polymer to undergo postfunctionalization reactions with chemical and biological functionalities [32]. As reported in the literature, the secondary alcohols moieties are mainly generated during the polymerization process with respect to their primary counterparts [32,33,34].
Since the pioneer work of this synthetic route for the NIPUs in 1957 [35], several reviews about the synthesis of polyurethanes have been reported by different research groups [6,10,17,18,19,31,36]. In general, the ring-opening reaction of the cyclic carbonate by the amine takes place without the use of a catalyst. However, the reaction rate can be accelerated through activation of the monomers by using either weak Lewis acid or oxophilic additives to increase the electrophilicity of the cyclic carbonate group or by the addition of basic additives to increase the nucleophilicity of the amine or even deprotonate it [37,38]. Generally, the polyaddition of cyclic carbonates onto diamines is carried out in polar aprotic solvents such as dimethylformamide (DMF), dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAc), etc., due to the better solubility of the starting materials [32,33,39]. The temperature also has an influence on the outcome of the polyaddition reaction [40,41]. Thus, higher yields and reaction rates were obtained when the reaction temperature was increased, which was explained by the decrease of the viscosity in the reaction mixture [41].
In this paper, we reported the synthesis of different NIPUs materials by polyaddition reaction of CO2-based cyclic carbonate, 1,4-butanediol bis(glycidyl ether carbonate) 1 (BGBC), with a wide range of commercial diamines to afford the corresponding NIPUs in quantitative yields, including a crosslinked one, which showed enhanced thermal properties. The obtained PHUs were characterized by NMR, IR, MALDI-ToF, and GPC studies. In addition, the synthesis of different carbamates was designed by varying the ratio of the substrates. Finally, one-pot and sequential experiments were also performed to obtain the corresponding PHU materials.

2. Experimental Details

2.1. Materials and Methods

All manipulations were performed under nitrogen, using standard Schlenk techniques. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Ascend TM-500/400 spectrometers (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) and referenced to the residual deuterated solvent. Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) measurements were performed on a Waters 1515 model (Waters Corporation, Milford, CT, USA), equipped with three different columns: 1× PSS GRAM precolumn 10 µm 8 × 50 mm, 1× PSS GRAM column 10 µm 30 Å 8 × 300 mm, and 1× PSS GRAM column 10 µm 1000 Å 8 × 300 mm, and a refractive index detector (Waters 2414). The GPC column was eluted using DMAc as solvent at 25 °C at 1 mL·min−1 and calibrated using eight monodisperse polystyrene standards in the range of 580–50000 Da. TGA analysis was performed on a TA instruments TGA-Q50 (TA instruments, New Castle, DE, USA). The heating rate for the sample was 10 °C/min, and the nitrogen flow rate was 60 mL/min. DSC curves were obtained under N2 atmosphere on a TA instruments DSC-Q20 (TA instruments, New Castle, DE, USA). Samples were weighed into aluminum crucibles with 5 mg of sample and subjected to two heating cycles at a heating rate of 10 °C/min. The MALDI-ToF spectra were acquired using a Bruker Autoflex II TOF/TOF spectrometer (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) using dithranol (1,8,9-trihydroxyanthracene) as matrix material and NaOAc as additive. Commercially available chemicals were used as received.

2.2. Materials and Reagents

Solvents, deuterated solvents, and all other reagents were purchased from common commercial sources and used as received.

2.3. General Procedure for the Synthesis of 1,4-Butanediol bis(glycidyl ether carbonate) 1

The 1,4-butanediol bis-glycidyl ether (BGBE) (50.00 g, 0.25 mol) and the bifunctional organocatalyst (0.99 g, 2.47 mmol) were placed in a 500 mL stainless steel reactor with a magnetic stirrer bar. The reaction mixture was heated to 80 °C, then pressurised to 10 bar of carbon dioxide pressure and stirred for 2 h. The mixture was purified by flash chromatography using a solvent system of first hexane, then hexane:EtOAc (9:1), then hexane:EtOAc (3:1), then EtOAc to achieve the pure cyclic carbonate as a white solid in 90% yield (65.31 g, 0.22 mol).

2.4. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Poly(hydroxyurethane)s 1a-e

In a 10 mL Schlenk flask equipped with a small stir bar, BGBC 1 (0.25 g, 0.86 mmol), the corresponding diamine (0.86 mmol), and MeCN (2 mL) were added. The reaction mixture was then warmed up at 80 °C and left stirring for 16 h. After that time, the solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue was washed with methanol. The mixture was filtered, and the solvent was dried in vacuo to afford the corresponding poly(hydroxyurethane) as a rubbery material or a solid depending on the diamine used in 80–95% yield.

2.5. Synthesis of Poly(hydroxyurethane) 1f

The synthesis of PHU 1f was carried out in a similar manner to PHUs 1a–e, using BGBC (1) (0.25 g, 0.86 mmol), L-lysine (0.13 g, 0.86 mmol), and 1,5,7-Triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-ene (TBD) (0.12 g, 0.86 mmol) or 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) (0.13 g, 0.86 mmol), and 1f material was obtained as a white-yellowish solid in 93% yield after the appropriate work-up procedure.

2.6. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Hydroxycarbamates 2 and 3

In a 10 mL Schlenck equipped with a small stir bar, 1,4-butanediol bis(glycidyl ether carbonate) 1 (0.25 g, 0.86 mmol), 1,4-diaminobutane (43 µL, 0.43 mmol and 0.13 mL, 1.72 mmol for 2 and 3 respectively), and MeCN (2 mL) were added. The reaction mixture was then warmed up at 80 °C and left stirring for 16 h. After that time, the solvent was removed in vacuo, extracted with MeOH, and filtered off. Removal of the solvent under vacuum afforded the corresponding hydroxycarbamate as a white solid in 95% yield.

2.7. General Procedure for the One-Pot Synthesis of Poly(hydroxyurethane)s 1a,c,d

The 1,4-butanediol bis-glycidyl ether (BGBE) (0.17 g, 0.86 mmol), bifunctional organocatalyst (3.44 mg, 8.6 μmol) and the corresponding diamine) (0.86 mmol), and MeCN (2 mL) were placed in a 50 mL stainless steel reactor with a magnetic stirrer bar. The reaction mixture was then warmed up at 80 °C, then pressurised to 10 bar of carbon dioxide pressure, and left stirring for 16 h. After that time, CO2 was released, the solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue was washed with methanol. The mixture was filtered, and the solvent was dried in vacuo to afford a rubbery mixture composed of the corresponding poly(hydroxyurethane) and polyaminoalcohol was obtained.

2.8. General Procedure for the Sequential Synthesis of Poly(hydroxyurethane)s 1a,c,d

The 1,4-butanediol bis-glycidyl ether (BGBE) (0.17 g, 0.86 mmol) and bifunctional organocatalyst (3.44 mg, 8.6 μmol) were placed in a 50 mL stainless steel reactor with a magnetic stirrer bar. The reaction mixture was then warmed up at 80 °C, then pressurised to 10 bar of carbon dioxide pressure, and left stirring for 2 h. After that time, CO2 was released, MeCN (2 mL) and the corresponding diamine (0.86 mmol) were added, and the reaction mixture was stirred for 16 h. Then, the solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue was washed with methanol. The mixture was filtered, and the solvent was dried in vacuo to afford the corresponding poly(hydroxyurethane) 1a, 1d and 1e as rubbery materials in 85–90% yield.

3. Results and Discussion

Initially, the multigram scale preparation of 1,4-butanediol bis(glycidyl ether carbonate) (1) from the commercially available 1,4-butanediol bis-glycidyl ether and CO2 was carried using 1 mol% of the hydroxy-containing imidazole organocatalyst designed by our group [42] at 10 bar of CO2 and 80 °C for 2 h under solvent-free conditions affording compound 1 in 90% yield (Scheme 3).
Bis(cyclic carbonate) (1) was used along with 1,4-diaminobutane (BDA) in a 1:1 molar ratio to optimize the reaction conditions to synthesize the different NIPUs (Scheme 4). Firstly, the solvent effect on the polyaddition process was investigated (Table 1, entries 1–4). As can be seen, all solvents afforded the formation of the desired PHU quantitatively. However, MeCN was chosen as the optimal solvent to perform this reaction due to its high polarity to increase the solubility of the starting materials and its easy accessibility. Then, the effect of the reaction temperature was studied (Table 1, entries 5–9). As expected, the conversion decreased as the temperature was decreased. Polyaddition of BGBC (1) to BDA at room temperature afforded the corresponding PHU in 67% conversion after 16 h of reaction (Table 1, entry 7). This fact has been previously observed for this process. This is probably due to two factors. First, the low reactivity between five members of cyclic carbonates and diamines, and, second, due to monomer diffusion during polymerization. This is an important phenomenon in which are involved the hydrogen bonds created with carbamate groups. The increase of the temperature allows to decrease the viscosity, and to increase the mobility, and thus the advancement of the reaction and the molar masses [17,36,43,44].
Once the optimal conditions for the polyaddition of BGBC (1) and BDA were determined (80 °C and MeCN as solvent for 16 h), several PHUs were prepared using a wide range of commercial diamines (Scheme 5). The results are shown in Table 2. All PHUs were obtained quantitatively after 16 h (Table 2, entries 1–6), except when L-lysine was used, in which case, no reaction was observed (Table 2, entry 7). This result can be explained based on the low nucleophilicity of L-lysine, which is not able to ring-open the cyclic carbonate, and no polyaddition occurred. Since previous works confirmed that the presence of strong bases catalyzed the process [45], the addition of DBU or TBD as catalyst was tested. The addition of a catalyst resulted in the obtention of the desired PHU (Table 2, entries 8 and 9). However, the presence of strong bases also led to the formation of polyurea fragments (Figure 1 and Figure S35), as has been previously reported in similar reactions [38].
The synthesis of a crosslinked PHU was achieved by the reaction of BGBC (1) with tris(2-aminoethyl)amine in a 3:2 molar ratio (Table 2, entry 6). The higher Tg value obtained by differential scanning calorimetry for polymer 1e suggested the formation of a crosslinked PHU. This high glass transition temperature was attributed to the increased rigidity of the resulting polymer (Table 3, entry 6).
The chemical structures of the PHUs were characterized by 1H-NMR and 13C-{1H}-NMR (Figure 2 and Supplementary Information), diffusion ordered spectroscopy (DOSY) NMR (Figure S35) and IR spectroscopy (Figure 1 and Supplementary Information), MALDI-ToF analysis (Figure 3 and Supplementary Information), and gel permeation chromatography (GPC) (See Supplementary Information). Figure 1 shows the FT-IR spectra of BGBC (1) and PHUs (1c) and (1f). Bis(glycidyl ether carbonate) (1) exhibited two characteristic bands at 1781 and 1050 cm−1 corresponding to the cyclic carbonate groups (Figure 1a). However, those bands disappeared in the PHUs IR spectra, and two new bands were observed at 1695 cm−1 and 1538 cm−1, and 1699 cm−1 and 1537 cm−1 for PHUs (1c) and (1f), respectively, confirming the formation of urethane groups (Figure 1b,c, respectively). In addition, another band at 1646 cm−1 was observed for PHU (1f), which was assigned to the C=O stretching vibration of the urea group, indicating the formation of polyurethane-polyurea chains (Figure 1c) [38]. Analysis of the 1H-NMR spectra of the generated polymers also confirmed the formation of the urethane moieties. Characteristic peaks at 7.11 ppm and 6.74 ppm were assigned to the protons of the urethane groups, confirming the urethane structure of the final product (Figure 2). The pair of resonances at 2.96 ppm; 1.37 ppm and 3.39 ppm; 1.51 ppm were assigned to the methylene protons of the alkyl groups of the diamine and the BGBC (1), respectively. As has been previously mentioned, it is known that both primary and secondary hydroxyl groups can be formed in the PHU backbone depending on the ring-opening pathway of the cyclic carbonate moiety. In Figure 2, two signals are observed at 4.89 and 4.75 ppm, corresponding to the formation of the secondary and primary hydroxyl groups, respectively. Following previously reported results [32,33,34], the PHUs synthesized in this work exhibited a primary:secondary OH ratio ranging from 28:72 to 38:62 (Table 2, entries 1–5).
MALDI-ToF mass spectrometry was also used to determine the end groups of the obtained PHUs. As an example, the MALDI-ToF spectrum for PHU 1b (Figure 3) shows a major series of peaks with an m/z interval of 460 mass units, indicating a controlled alternating microstructure, which is in good agreement with a polymeric chain with one isophorone diamine group in one end and a protonated urethane group in the other end.
Polyhydroxyurethanes 1a–e exhibited molecular weights between 9050 and 17,800 g mol−1 with moderate polydispersity ranging from 1.5 to 2.2 (Table 2). This was attributed to the fact that no catalyst was used during the polymerization process. Thus, there is not a good control over the polyaddition reaction and multiple chains with different molecular weights can be generated; hence, the PDI values obtained. On the other hand, molecular weight increased notably for PHU 1f, since DBU or TBD were added to the polyaddition process, with values of 39,200 g mol−1 and 40,325 g mol−1, respectively (Table 2, entries 8 and 9).
Thermal properties of the NIPUs were investigated by DSC and TGA analyses (Table 3). TGA showed that all PHUs were stable in the range of temperatures from 0 °C to 270 °C (Table 3), except for the PHU (1f) derived from L-lysine (Table 3, entry 7), which was found to be stable between 0 °C and 128 °C. DSC thermograms (Figure 4) revealed that the glass temperature Tg of the PHUs ranged from −13 °C to 43 °C (Table 3, entries 1–7), depending on the chemical structure of the diamines used. Most studies agreed that higher molecular flexibility between the hydroxyurethane groups led to lower Tg of PHUs [46,47,48]. Thus, PHUs derived from rigid amines such as isophorone diamine (Table 3, entry 2), 1,3-cyclohexanebis(methylamine) (Table 3, entry 3), or m-xylene diamine (Table 3, entry 4) exhibited higher Tg values than PHUs derived from aliphatic diamines such as BDA (Table 3, entry 1), tris(2-aminoethyl)amine (Table 3, entry 5), or L-lysine (Table 3, entry 7). On the other hand, the crosslinked PHU derived from tris(2-aminoethyl)amine 1e exhibited the highest Tg (Table 3, entry 6).
The effect of the [diamine]/[BGBC] ratio on the polyaddition reaction of 1 onto 1,4-diaminobutane was also investigated (Scheme 6). Thus, when 0.5 eq. of 1,4-diaminobutane was used (1:2 ratio [diamine]/[BGBC]), a hydroxycarbamate with two cyclic carbonate ending groups was obtained (2). On the other hand, when 2 eq. of diamine was added (2:1 ratio [diamine]/[BGBC]), a hydroxycarbamate with two amine ending groups was obtained (3). The structures for compounds 2 and 3 were confirmed by NMR and IR spectroscopy and MALDI-ToF analysis. The 1H-NMR spectrum for compound 2 exhibited resonances at 4.92 ppm, 4.52 ppm, and 4.27 ppm which confirmed the presence of cyclic carbonate groups, as well as a signal at 7.24 ppm, confirming the formation of the urethane moieties (Figure S38). Additionally, the IR spectrum exhibited two bands at 1787 cm−1 and 1048 cm−1, which correspond to the cyclic carbonate groups, as well as two bands at 1692 cm−1 and 1525 cm−1, assigned to the urethane groups generated (Figure S40). The MALDI-ToF spectrum showed single peak with a m/z of 691 mass units, which is in good agreement with the molecular weight of hydroxycarbamate 2 and Na+ (Figure S41).
The results obtained for the reaction of BGBC (1) with different diamines support the general mechanism proposed for the polymerization process by polyaddition reaction of bis(cyclic carbonates) and diamines [36,49]. Thus, a three-step reaction involving a tetrahedral intermediate was proposed (Figure 5).
After the successful multistep synthesis of PHUs 1a–f, their direct synthesis from BGBE, CO2, and a diamine in a one-pot process was investigated (Scheme 7). For that purpose, BDA, 1,3-cyclohexanebis(methylamine), and m-xylene diamines were used as starting materials. In all cases, full conversion of BGBE to BGBC (1) and subsequent polyaddition onto the corresponding diamine to generate the corresponding NIPU was achieved when the reaction was carried out at 80 °C and 10 bar of CO2 for 16 h using acetonitrile as solvent (Scheme 7). Additionally, to polymer 1a, 1c, and 1d, the formation of crosslinked poly(aminoalcohols) from bis-epoxides and diamines was observed, these polymers were previously reported [50,51]. Moreover, a white precipitate was also obtained and was identified as the corresponding carbamate salt from the diamine and CO2 reaction (Scheme 7) [52].
IR analysis of the resulting mixture confirmed the presence of poly(aminoalcohol), carbamate salt and poly(hydroxyurethane). Figure 6 shows the comparison of the IR spectra of a blank sample containing 1,4-diaminobutane and BGBE (Figure 6a), 1,4-diaminobutane and CO2 (Figure 6b), and the one-pot reaction mixture (Figure 6c). As can be observed from Figure 5, the one-pot reaction mixture (Figure 6c) shows a sharp band at 3315 cm−1 corresponding to the stretching frequency of the amino-end group from the carbamate salt as well as bands at 1555 cm−1 and 1326 cm−1 which correspond to the N−H bending and C-N stretching frequencies of the amine group. Similarly, the presence of poly(aminoalcohol) was confirmed by the presence of two peaks at 1108 cm−1 and 1454 cm−1 corresponding to the C-O stretching and O-H bending from the alcohol group. The obtention of the PHU was confirmed by the presence of a band at 1699 cm−1 corresponding to the urethane moiety.
Finally, in an effort to minimize the formation of the carbamate salt and the poly(aminoalcohol), a sequential one-pot method was developed for the synthesis of PHUs 1a,c,d (Scheme 8). Therefore, bis(cyclic carbonate) BGBC (1) was prepared from BGBE as shown in Scheme 3. The subsequent addition of a solution of the diamine in MeCN to the reaction mixture afforded the formation of the corresponding PHUs.

4. Conclusions

Herein, we reported the synthesis of different nonisocyanate polyurethanes via the polyaddition reaction of bis(butanediol glycidyl ether)carbonate (1) with different diamines under mild reaction conditions. All PHUs were obtained quantitatively after 16 h at 80 °C temperature in MeCN as solvent. The low nucleophilicity of L-lysine has proven unable to ring-open the cyclic carbonate and no polyaddition occurred. The addition of DBU or TBD as a catalyst was tested and allows the obtention of the desired PHU. However, the presence of strong bases also led to the formation of polyurea fragments in the new PHU. All polymers were thoroughly characterized by different spectroscopic techniques and their thermal properties were also investigated by DSC and TGA. As expected, crosslinked PHU (1e) exhibits the highest glass transition temperature of 43 °C due to its higher rigidity. Under the optimized reaction conditions, molecular weights of the synthesized poly(hydroxyurethane)s showed values up to 18.7 kg mol−1 and 40.1 kg mol−1 for PHU (1f), when an external base was used as catalyst. In addition, the use of different cyclic carbonate/diamines ratios was explored, which allowed the preparation of hydroxycarbamates 2 and 3 quantitatively. One-pot experiments led to the formation of different compounds where CO2 carbamate salt and poly(aminoalcohol) products were identified as byproducts. Thus, a sequential one-pot reaction, combining the synthesis of BGBC (1) and subsequent polymerization, afforded the formation of the corresponding NIPUs without further purification of the carbonate intermediate.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/polym14132719/s1, Figure S1. 1H NMR spectrum of PHU 1a in DMSO-d6. Figure S2. C13{1H} NMR spectrum of PHU 1a in DMSO-d6. Figure S3. IR spectrum of PHU 1a. Figure S4. DSC thermogram of PHU 1a. Figure S5. TGA thermogram of PHU 1a. Figure S6. 1H NMR spectrum of PHU 1b in DMSO-d6. Figure S7. C13{1H} NMR spectrum of PHU 1b in DMSO-d6. Figure S8. IR spectrum of PHU 1b. Figure S9. MALDI-ToF spectrum of PHU 1b. Figure S10. DSC thermogram of PHU 1b. Figure S11. TGA thermogram of PHU 1b. Figure S12. 1H NMR spectrum of PHU 1c in DMSO-d6. Figure S13. C13{1H} NMR spectrum of PHU 1c in DMSO-d6. Figure S14. IR spectrum of PHU 1c. Figure S15. DSC thermogram of PHU 1c. Figure S16. TGA thermogram of PHU 1c. Figure S17. 1H NMR spectrum of PHU 1d in DMSO-d6. Figure S18. C13{1H} NMR spectrum of PHU 1d in DMSO-d6. Figure S19. IR spectrum of PHU 1d. Figure S20. GPC trace of PHU 1d. Figure S21. DSC thermogram of PHU 1d. Figure S22. TGA thermogram of PHU 1d. Figure S23. 1H NMR spectrum of PHU 1e in DMSO-d6. Figure S24. C13{1H} NMR spectrum of PHU 1e in DMSO-d6. Figure S25. IR spectrum of PHU 1e. Figure S26. DSC thermogram of PHU 1e. Figure S27. TGA thermogram of PHU 1e. Figure S28. IR spectrum of PHU 1e crosslinked. Figure S29. DSC thermogram of PHU 1e crosslinked. Figure S30. TGA thermogram of PHU 1e crosslinked. Figure S31. 1H NMR spectrum of PHU 1f in DMSO-d6. Figure S32. C13{1H} NMR spectrum of PHU 1f in DMSO-d6. Figure S33. IR spectrum of PHU 1f. Figure S34. GPC trace of PHU 1f. Figure S35. DOSY spectrum of PHU 1f. Figure S36. DSC thermogram of PHU 1f. Figure S37. TGA thermogram of PHU 1f. Figure S38. 1H NMR spectrum of hydroxycarbamate 2 in DMSO-d6. Figure S39. C13{1H} NMR spectrum of hydroxycarbamate 2 in DMSO-d6. Figure S40. IR spectrum of hydroxycarbamate 2. Figure S41. MALDI-ToF spectrum of hydroxycarbamate 2. Figure S42. 1H NMR spectrum of hydroxycarbamate 3 in DMSO-d6. Figure S43. C13{1H} NMR spectrum of hydroxycarbamate 3 in DMSO-d6. Figure S44. IR spectrum of hydroxycarbamate 3. Figure S45. MALDI-ToF spectrum of hydroxycarbamate 3.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.A.C.-O. and A.L.-S.; methodology, F.d.l.C.-M., M.M.d.S.B., L.F.S.-B. and A.G.; formal analysis, F.d.l.C.-M., M.M.d.S.B. and J.A.C.-O.; investigation, F.d.l.C.-M. and M.M.d.S.B.; resources, J.F.-B., E.F.-P. and A.L.-S.; data curation, E.F.-P., J.A.C.-O. and A.L.-S.; writing—original draft preparation, J.A.C.-O.; writing—review and editing, F.d.l.C.-M., J.F.-B., L.F.S.-B., J.A.C.-O. and A.L.-S.; supervision, J.A.C.-O. and A.L.-S.; funding acquisition, A.L.-S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support; grant PID2020-117788RB-I00 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, grant CTQ2017-84131-R funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and, as appropriate, by “ERDF A way of making Europe”, by the “European Union”, grant RED2018-102387-T funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, and grant 2021-GRIN-31240 funded by Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha. Marc Martínez de Sarasa Buchaca acknowledges the Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM) for the PhD Fellowship. Felipe de la Cruz-Martínez acknowledges the Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (MECD) for the FPU Fellowship.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rafiee, Z.; Keshavarz, V. Synthesis and Characterization of Polyurethane/Microcrystalline Cellulose Bionanocomposites. Prog. Org. Coat. 2015, 86, 190–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zia, K.M.; Anjum, S.; Zuber, M.; Mujahid, M.; Jamil, T. Synthesis and Molecular Characterization of Chitosan Based Polyurethane Elastomers Using Aromatic Diisocyanate. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 66, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Madbouly, S.A.; Otaigbe, J.U. Recent Advances in Synthesis, Characterization and Rheological Properties of Polyurethanes and POSS/Polyurethane Nanocomposites Dispersions and Films. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2009, 34, 1283–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Llevot, A.; Meier, M. Perspective: Green Polyurethane Synthesis for Coating Applications. Polym. Int. 2019, 68, 826–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chattopadhyay, D.K.; Raju, K.V.S.N. Structural Engineering of Polyurethane Coatings for High Performance Applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2007, 32, 352–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kathalewar, M.S.; Joshi, P.B.; Sabnis, A.S.; Malshe, V.C. Non-Isocyanate Polyurethanes: From Chemistry to Applications. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 4110–4129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ghasemlou, M.; Daver, F.; Ivanova, E.P.; Adhikari, B. Bio-Based Routes to Synthesize Cyclic Carbonates and Polyamines Precursors of Non-Isocyanate Polyurethanes: A Review. Eur. Polym. J. 2019, 118, 668–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bayer, O. E Das Di-Lsocganat-Poluadditionsverfahren (Polyurethane). Angew. Chem. 1947, 59, 257–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Labunska, I.; Stephenson, A.; Brigden, K.; Stringer, R.; Santillo, D.; Johnston, P.A. The Bhopal Legacy: Toxic Contaminants at the Former Union Carbide Factory Site, Bhopal, India: 15 Years after the Bhopal Accident; Greenpeace Research Laboratories: Exeter, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hahn, C.; Keul, H.; Möller, M. Hydroxyl-Functional Polyurethanes and Polyesters: Synthesis, Properties and Potential Biomedical Application. Polym. Int. 2012, 61, 1048–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Delebecq, E.; Pascault, J.P.; Boutevin, B.; Ganachaud, F. On the Versatility of Urethane/Urea Bonds: Reversibility, Blocked Isocyanate, and Non-Isocyanate Polyurethane. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 80–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Guan, J.; Song, Y.; Lin, Y.; Yin, X.; Zuo, M.; Zhao, Y.; Tao, X.; Zheng, Q. Progress in Study of Non-Isocyanate Polyurethane. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 6517–6527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Persson, P.V.; Casas, J.; Iversen, T.; Córdova, A. Direct Organocatalytic Chemoselective Synthesis of a Dendrimer-like Star Polyester. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 2819–2822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lundberg, R.D.; Albans, S.; Montgomery, D.R. Carbon Dioxide Polymers. U.S. Patent US3523924A, 11 August 1970. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ihata, O.; Kayaki, Y.; Ikariya, T. Synthesis of Thermoresponsive Polyurethane from 2-Methylaziridine and Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 717–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Soga, K.; Chiang, W.-Y.; Ikeda, S. Copolymerization of Carbon Dioxide with Propyleneimine. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem. 1974, 12, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Maisonneuve, L.; Lamarzelle, O.; Rix, E.; Grau, E.; Cramail, H. Isocyanate-Free Routes to Polyurethanes and Poly(Hydroxy Urethane)s. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 12407–12439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Blattmann, H.; Fleischer, M.; Bähr, M.; Mülhaupt, R. Isocyanate- and Phosgene-Free Routes to Polyfunctional Cyclic Carbonates and Green Polyurethanes by Fixation of Carbon Dioxide. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2014, 35, 1238–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nohra, B.; Candy, L.; Blanco, J.F.; Guerin, C.; Raoul, Y.; Mouloungui, Z. From Petrochemical Polyurethanes to Biobased Polyhydroxyurethanes. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 3771–3792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Camp, J.E. Bio-Available Solvent Cyrene: Synthesis, Derivatization, and Applications. ChemSusChem 2018, 11, 3048–3055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Clarke, C.J.; Tu, W.C.; Levers, O.; Bröhl, A.; Hallett, J.P. Green and Sustainable Solvents in Chemical Processes. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 747–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Etacheri, V.; Marom, R.; Elazari, R.; Salitra, G.; Aurbach, D. Challenges in the Development of Advanced Li-Ion Batteries: A Review. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 3243–3262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, K. Nonaqueous Liquid Electrolytes for Lithium-Based Rechargeable Batteries. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 4303–4417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chang, Y.A.; Rudenko, A.E.; Waymouth, R.M. Zwitterionic Ring-Opening Polymerization of N-Substituted Eight-Membered Cyclic Carbonates to Generate Cyclic Poly(Carbonate)s. ACS Macro Lett. 2016, 5, 1162–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Büttner, H.; Longwitz, L.; Steinbauer, J.; Wulf, C.; Werner, T. Recent Developments in the Synthesis of Cyclic Carbonates from Epoxides and CO2. Top. Curr. Chem. 2017, 375, 89–144. [Google Scholar]
  26. Martínez, J.; Fernández-Baeza, J.; Sánchez-Barba, L.F.; Castro-Osma, J.A.; Lara-Sánchez, A.; Otero, A. An Efficient and Versatile Lanthanum Heteroscorpionate Catalyst for Carbon Dioxide Fixation into Cyclic Carbonates. ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 2886–2890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. de La Cruz-Martínez, F.; Martínez, J.; Gaona, M.A.; Fernández-Baeza, J.; Sánchez-Barba, L.F.; Rodríguez, A.M.; Castro-Osma, J.A.; Otero, A.; Lara-Sánchez, A. Bifunctional Aluminum Catalysts for the Chemical Fixation of Carbon Dioxide into Cyclic Carbonates. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 5322–5332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. de La Cruz-Martínez, F.; Martínez De Sarasa Buchaca, M.; Martínez, J.; Fernández-Baeza, J.; Sánchez-Barba, L.F.; Rodríguez-Diéguez, A.; Castro-Osma, J.A.; Lara-Sánchez, A. Synthesis of Bio-Derived Cyclic Carbonates from Renewable Resources. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 20126–20138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gaona, M.A.; de La Cruz-Martínez, F.; Fernández-Baeza, J.; Sánchez-Barba, L.F.; Alonso-Moreno, C.; Rodríguez, A.M.; Rodríguez-Diéguez, A.; Castro-Osma, J.A.; Otero, A.; Lara-Sánchez, A. Synthesis of Helical Aluminium Catalysts for Cyclic Carbonate Formation. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 4218–4227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Khattak, Z.A.K.; Younus, H.A.; Ahmad, N.; Ullah, H.; Suleman, S.; Hossain, M.S.; Elkadi, M.; Verpoort, F. Highly Active Dinuclear Cobalt Complexes for Solvent-Free Cycloaddition of CO2 to Epoxides at Ambient Pressure. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 8274–8277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Figovsky, O.; Shapovalov, L.; Leykin, A.; Birukova, O.; Potashnikova, R. Advacnes in the field of nonisocyanate polyurethanes based on cyclic carbonates. Chem. Chem. Technol. 2013, 7, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bunco, O.; Yuriko, S.; Takeshi, E. Polyaddition of Bifunctional Cyclic Carbonate with Diamine in Ionic Liquids: In Situ Ion Composite Formation and Simple Separation of Ionic Liquid. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2009, 47, 4629–4635. [Google Scholar]
  33. Prömpers, G.; Keul, H.; Höcker, H. Polyurethanes with Pendant Hydroxy Groups: Polycondensation of D-Mannitol-1,2:5,6-Dicarbonate with Diamines. Des. Monomers Polym. 2005, 8, 547–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Blain, M.; Jean-Gérard, L.; Auvergne, R.; Benazet, D.; Caillol, S.; Andrioletti, B. Rational Investigations in the Ring Opening of Cyclic Carbonates by Amines. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 4286–4291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Groszos, S.J.; Drechsel, E.K. Method of Preparing a Polyurethane. U.S. Patent US2802022A, 6 August 1957. [Google Scholar]
  36. Cornille, A.; Auvergne, R.; Figovsky, O.; Boutevin, B.; Caillol, S. A Perspective Approach to Sustainable Routes for Non-Isocyanate Polyurethanes. Eur. Polym. J. 2017, 87, 535–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ochiai, B.; Inoue, S.; Endo, T. Salt Effect on Polyaddition of Bifunctional Cyclic Carbonate and Diamine. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2005, 43, 6282–6286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bossion, A.; Aguirresarobe, R.H.; Irusta, L.; Taton, D.; Cramail, H.; Grau, E.; Mecerreyes, D.; Su, C.; Liu, G.; Müller, A.J.; et al. Unexpected Synthesis of Segmented Poly(Hydroxyurea-Urethane)s from Dicyclic Carbonates and Diamines by Organocatalysis. Macromolecules 2018, 51, 5556–5566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ochiai, B.; Satoh, Y.; Endo, T. Nucleophilic Polyaddition in Water Based on Chemo-Selective Reaction of Cyclic Carbonate with Amine. Green Chem. 2005, 7, 765–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tomita, H.; Sanda, F.; Endo, T. Polyaddition Behavior of Bis(Five-and Six-Membered Cyclic Carbonate)s with Diamine. J. Polym. Sci. Part A 2001, 39, 860–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kihara, N.; Kushida, Y.; Endo, T. Optically Active Poly(Hydroxyurethane)s Derived from Cyclic Carbonate and L-Lysine Derivatives. J. Polym. Sci. Part A 1996, 34, 2173–2179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Castro-Osma, J.A.; Martínez, J.; de La Cruz-Martínez, F.; Caballero, M.P.; Fernández-Baeza, J.; Rodríguez-López, J.; Otero, A.; Lara-Sánchez, A.; Tejeda, J. Development of Hydroxy-Containing Imidazole Organocatalysts for CO2 Fixation into Cyclic Carbonates. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2018, 8, 1981–1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rokicki, G.; Parzuchowski, P.G.; Mazurek, M. Non-isocyanate polyurethanes: Synthesis, properties, and applications. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2015, 26, 707–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fleischer, M.; Blattmann, H.; Mulhaupt, R. Glycerol-, pentaerythritol- and trimethylolpropane-based polyurethanes and their cellulose carbonate composites prepared via the non-isocyanate route with catalytic carbon dioxide fixation. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 934–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lambeth, R.H.; Henderson, T.J. Organocatalytic Synthesis of (Poly)Hydroxyurethanes from Cyclic Carbonates and Amines. Polymer 2013, 54, 5568–5573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Steblyanko, A.; Choi, W.; Sanda, F.; Endo, T. Addition of Five-Membered Cyclic Carbonate with Amine and Its Application to Polymer Synthesis. J. Polym. Sci. Part A 2000, 38, 2375–2380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Benyahya, S.; Boutevin, B.; Caillol, S.; Lapinte, V.; Habas, J.P. Optimization of the Synthesis of Polyhydroxyurethanes Using Dynamic Rheometry. Polym. Int. 2012, 61, 918–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Benyahya, S.; Habas, J.P.; Auvergne, R.; Lapinte, V.; Caillol, S. Structure-Property Relationships in Polyhydroxyurethanes Produced from Terephthaloyl Dicyclocarbonate with Various Polyamines. Polym. Int. 2012, 61, 1666–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Garipov, R.M.; Sysoev, V.A.; Mikheev, V.V.; Zagidullin, A.I.; Deberdeev, V.R.; Irzhak, Y.I.; Berlin, A.A. Reactivity of cyclocarbonate groups in modified epoxy-amine compositions. Dokl. Phys. Chem. 2003, 393, 289–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xu, L.; Fu, J.H.; Schlup, J.R. In Situ Near-Infrared Spectroscopic Investigation of Epoxy Resin-Aromatic Amine Cure Mechanisms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 2821–2826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Saddique, F.A.; Zahoor, A.F.; Faiz, S.; Naqvi, S.A.R.; Usman, M.; Ahmad, M. Recent Trends in Ring Opening of Epoxides by Amines as Nucleophiles. Synth. Commun. 2016, 46, 831–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lee, B.; Lee, K.H.; Lim, B.W.; Cho, J.; Nam, W.; Hur, N.H. Direct Synthesis of Imines via Solid State Reactions of Carbamates with Aldehydes. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2013, 355, 389–394. [Google Scholar]
Polymers 14 02719 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis of nonisocyanate polyurethanes by: (a) transurethanization reaction; (b) coupling of azidirines and CO2; and (c) polyaddition reaction of bis(cyclic carbonates) and diamines.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of nonisocyanate polyurethanes by: (a) transurethanization reaction; (b) coupling of azidirines and CO2; and (c) polyaddition reaction of bis(cyclic carbonates) and diamines.
Polymers 14 02719 sch001
Polymers 14 02719 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Synthesis of poly(hydroxyurethane)s by polyaddition reaction of bis(cyclic carbonates) and diamines.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of poly(hydroxyurethane)s by polyaddition reaction of bis(cyclic carbonates) and diamines.
Polymers 14 02719 sch002
Polymers 14 02719 sch003 550
Scheme 3. Synthesis of 1,4-butanediol bis(glycidyl ether carbonate) (1).
Scheme 3. Synthesis of 1,4-butanediol bis(glycidyl ether carbonate) (1).
Polymers 14 02719 sch003
Polymers 14 02719 sch004 550
Scheme 4. Synthesis of PHU 1a.
Scheme 4. Synthesis of PHU 1a.
Polymers 14 02719 sch004
Polymers 14 02719 sch005 550
Scheme 5. Synthesis of poly(hydroxyurethane)s 1a-f.
Scheme 5. Synthesis of poly(hydroxyurethane)s 1a-f.
Polymers 14 02719 sch005
Polymers 14 02719 g001 550
Figure 1. IR spectra for (a) BGBC and PHUs (b) 1c and (c) 1f.
Figure 1. IR spectra for (a) BGBC and PHUs (b) 1c and (c) 1f.
Polymers 14 02719 g001
Polymers 14 02719 g002 550
Figure 2. 1H-NMR spectrum for poly(hydroxyurethane) 1a in DMSO-d6.
Figure 2. 1H-NMR spectrum for poly(hydroxyurethane) 1a in DMSO-d6.
Polymers 14 02719 g002
Polymers 14 02719 g003 550
Figure 3. MALDI-TOF spectrum for PHU 1b.
Figure 3. MALDI-TOF spectrum for PHU 1b.
Polymers 14 02719 g003
Polymers 14 02719 g004 550
Figure 4. DSC thermograms for selected poly(hydroxyurethanes) PHUs.
Figure 4. DSC thermograms for selected poly(hydroxyurethanes) PHUs.
Polymers 14 02719 g004
Polymers 14 02719 sch006 550
Scheme 6. Synthesis of poly(hydroxyurethane)s 1a–f.
Scheme 6. Synthesis of poly(hydroxyurethane)s 1a–f.
Polymers 14 02719 sch006
Polymers 14 02719 g005 550
Figure 5. General mechanism proposed for the polymerization process by polyaddition reaction of bis(cyclic carbonates) and diamines.
Figure 5. General mechanism proposed for the polymerization process by polyaddition reaction of bis(cyclic carbonates) and diamines.
Polymers 14 02719 g005
Polymers 14 02719 sch007 550
Scheme 7. One-pot synthesis of poly(hydroxyurethane)s 1a,c,d.
Scheme 7. One-pot synthesis of poly(hydroxyurethane)s 1a,c,d.
Polymers 14 02719 sch007
Polymers 14 02719 sch008 550
Scheme 8. Sequential synthesis of poly(hydroxyurethane)s 1a,c,d.
Scheme 8. Sequential synthesis of poly(hydroxyurethane)s 1a,c,d.
Polymers 14 02719 sch008
Polymers 14 02719 g006 550
Figure 6. IR spectra for (a) 1,4-diaminobutane + BGDE reaction, (b) 1,4-diaminobutane + CO2 reaction, and (c) one pot synthesis of PHU 1a.
Figure 6. IR spectra for (a) 1,4-diaminobutane + BGDE reaction, (b) 1,4-diaminobutane + CO2 reaction, and (c) one pot synthesis of PHU 1a.
Polymers 14 02719 g006
Table
Table 1. Optimization of reaction conditions for the polyaddition of BGBC 1 and 1,4-diaminobutane.
Table 1. Optimization of reaction conditions for the polyaddition of BGBC 1 and 1,4-diaminobutane.
EntrySolventTime (h)T (°C)Conversion (%) 1
1DMF1680100
2MEK1680100
3EtOAc1680100
4MeCN1680100
5MeCN166093
6MeCN164083
7MeCN16r.t67
1 Determined by NMR.
Table
Table 2. GPC data for selected PHUs 1.
Table 2. GPC data for selected PHUs 1.
EntryDiamine (PHU)Conversion (%) 2Primary OH: Secondary OHMn, exp 3PDI 3
11,4-diaminobutane (1a)10032:68145002.2
2Isophorone diamine (1b)10036:64132501.5
31,3-cyclohexanebis
(methanamine) (1c)		10036:64178001.6
4m-Xylene diamine (1d)10038:6290502.2
5tris(2-aminoethyl)amine (1e)10028:72172002.1
6 4tris(2-aminoethyl)amine (1e)100---
7L-lysine (1f)0---
8 5L-lysine (1f)88-392002.1
9 6L-lysine (1f)90-403252.2
1 Reactions were carried out at 80 °C in MeCN for 16 h. 2 Determined by NMR. 3 Determined by GPC. 4 0.66 eq. of tris(2-aminoethyl)amine used. 5 1 eq. of DBU was used. 6 1 eq. of TBD was used.
Table
Table 3. DSC and TGA analyses for selected PHUs.
Table 3. DSC and TGA analyses for selected PHUs.
EntryDiamine (PHU)Tg (°C) 1Td, 5% (°C) 2
11,4-diaminobutane (1a)11252
2Isophorone diamine (1b)22272
31,3-cyclohexanebis(methylamine) (1c)22263
4m-Xylene diamine (1d)22231
5tris(2-aminoethyl)amine (1e)−3229
6 3tris(2-aminoethyl)amine (1e)43261
7L-lysine (1f)−13128
1 Determined by differential scanning calorimetry. 2 Determined by thermogravimetric analysis. 3 0.66 eq. of tris(2-aminoethyl)amine used.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martínez de Sarasa Buchaca, M.; de la Cruz-Martínez, F.; Francés-Poveda, E.; Fernández-Baeza, J.; Sánchez-Barba, L.F.; Garcés, A.; Castro-Osma, J.A.; Lara-Sánchez, A. Synthesis of Nonisocyanate Poly(hydroxy)urethanes from Bis(cyclic carbonates) and Polyamines. Polymers 2022, 14, 2719. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14132719

AMA Style

Martínez de Sarasa Buchaca M, de la Cruz-Martínez F, Francés-Poveda E, Fernández-Baeza J, Sánchez-Barba LF, Garcés A, Castro-Osma JA, Lara-Sánchez A. Synthesis of Nonisocyanate Poly(hydroxy)urethanes from Bis(cyclic carbonates) and Polyamines. Polymers. 2022; 14(13):2719. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14132719

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martínez de Sarasa Buchaca, Marc, Felipe de la Cruz-Martínez, Enrique Francés-Poveda, Juan Fernández-Baeza, Luis F. Sánchez-Barba, Andrés Garcés, José A. Castro-Osma, and Agustín Lara-Sánchez. 2022. "Synthesis of Nonisocyanate Poly(hydroxy)urethanes from Bis(cyclic carbonates) and Polyamines" Polymers 14, no. 13: 2719. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14132719

APA Style

Martínez de Sarasa Buchaca, M., de la Cruz-Martínez, F., Francés-Poveda, E., Fernández-Baeza, J., Sánchez-Barba, L. F., Garcés, A., Castro-Osma, J. A., & Lara-Sánchez, A. (2022). Synthesis of Nonisocyanate Poly(hydroxy)urethanes from Bis(cyclic carbonates) and Polyamines. Polymers, 14(13), 2719. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14132719

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop