Next Article in Journal
Magnetic Hydrogel Composite for Wastewater Treatment
Next Article in Special Issue
Electrospun Polycaprolactone/ZnO Nanocomposite Membranes with High Antipathogen Activity
Previous Article in Journal
PEDOT:PSS Conductivity Enhancement through Addition of the Surfactant Tween 80
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hollow TiO2/Poly (Vinyl Pyrrolidone) Fibers Obtained via Coaxial Electrospinning as Easy-to-Handle Photocatalysts for Effective Nitrogen Oxide Removal
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Electrospinning Technique for Fabrication of Coaxial Nanofibers of Semiconductive Polymers

by
William Serrano-Garcia
1,*,
Seeram Ramakrishna
2 and
Sylvia W. Thomas
1
1
Advanced Materials Bio & Integration Research (AMBIR) Laboratory, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117574, Singapore
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(23), 5073; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14235073
Submission received: 25 October 2022 / Revised: 16 November 2022 / Accepted: 18 November 2022 / Published: 22 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Progress in Polymer Membranes and Films)

Abstract

:
In this work, the electrospinning technique is used to fabricate a polymer-polymer coaxial structure nanofiber from the p-type regioregular polymer poly(3-hexylthiophene-2,5-diyl) (P3HT) and the n-type conjugated ladder polymer poly(benzimidazobenzophenanthroline) (BBL) of orthogonal solvents. Generally, the fabrication of polymeric coaxial nanostructures tends to be troublesome. Using the electrospinning technique, P3HT was successfully used as the core, and the BBL as the shell, thus conceptually forming a p-n junction that is cylindrical in form with diameters in a range from 280 nm to 2.8 µm. The UV–VIS of P3HT/PS blend solution showed no evidence of separation or precipitation, while the combined solutions of P3HT/PS and BBL were heterogeneous. TEM images show a well-formed coaxial structure that is normally not expected due to rapid reaction and solidification when mixed in vials in response to orthogonal solubility. For this reason, extruding it by using electrostatic forces promoted a quick elongation of the polymers while forming a concise interface. Single nanofiber electrical characterization demonstrated the conductivity of the coaxial surface of ~1.4 × 10−4 S/m. Furthermore, electrospinning has proven to be a viable method for the fabrication of pure semiconducting coaxial nanofibers that can lead to the desired fabrication of fiber-based electronic devices.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Intelligent textiles, air/water filters, bone scaffolds, non-woven films, and drug delivery applications have all directly benefitted from the development of the reliable and low-cost electrospinning techniques for fiber fabrication [1,2,3,4,5,6]. This technique has also been successfully used to fabricate fibrous electronic devices, such as diodes, field effect transistors, photovoltaics, and sensors that use organic conductive-semiconductive polymers (C-SPs) and other relevant materials forming composites [6,7,8]. These materials are known to have preferred thermal stability [9], electrical conductivity [10,11], mechanical flexibility [12,13], and chemical/biological functionality [14,15]. Furthermore, polymeric materials have been researched in coaxial arrangements by electrospinning for use in drug delivery applications and the fabrication of hollow fiber channels, to name a few [16,17]. Previous work has also been reported on organic semiconducting p-n junction nanofibers in a coaxial core-shell (core-sheath) structure but with a focus on small-molecule (organic-organic) heterojunctions and partial organic (organic/polymer-inorganic) heterojunctions rather than polymeric heterojunctions [18]; however, to the best of our knowledge, electroactive polymer-polymer coaxial heterojunctions have not yet been fabricated [15]. Therefore, the fabrication of semiconducting-based coaxial nanofibers by using the electrospinning technique is the main task of this work.
Based on these previous works, we expect that organic semiconductive coaxial nanofibers could produce p-n junctions with electronic properties and fabrication reliability, thus making them excellent candidates for use in flexible electronics and cost-effective nanomanufacturing [12]. Because of this, we propose the electrospinning technique for the fabrication of an electroactive polymer-polymer heterojunction. More specifically, these novel organic semiconductive p-n junctions have the potential to demonstrate high Ion/Ioff ratios and, in field-effect transistor (FET) mode, a reduction in leakage current compared to thin film structures [19]. In diode mode, a tunable depletion region may be achieved by the phase created by the outer covering. In photovoltaic applications, the coaxial structure creates an optimal environment for the generation of charges derived from light irradiation, increasing the photocurrent in the semiconductor. Therefore, due to the large surface area that can be generated by nanofibers (non-woven mesh or aligned nanofibers) in a small region, a coaxial p-n junction matrix will be capable to perform as a sensor, photodiode, and as a photovoltaic cell. As a result, the surface of the nanofibers can be functionalized for specific sensing and higher selectivity, improving the performance for electronic applications [20].
Nanofibers of the semiconductive regioregular polymer poly(3-hexylthiophene-2,5-diyl) (P3HT, with field effect mobilities as high as 0.1 cm2V−1s−1) [21,22] and thin films, as well as self-assembled nanobelts, of the ladder polymer poly(benzimidazobenzophenanthroline) (BBL, with electron mobilities of approximately 1 × 10−3 cm2 V−1 s−1 and 7 × 10−3 cm2 V−1 s−1, respectively) [23,24] have been previously characterized as having morphologies and high-mobility behaviors that make them ideal candidates for organic electronics. [23,25,26]. However, fiber fabrication of pure P3HT is challenging (due to its low molecular weight [27]), and under laboratory conditions, this material tends to degrade over time due to oxygen exposure [28]. BBL, on the other hand, has been shown to exhibit high stability in air over a long period of time, thus improving the shelf life of the formed devices [29]. Polystyrene (PS) can be used to facilitate the formation of P3HT fibers.
For these reasons, the utility of organic semiconductive polymers-specifically, P3HT and BBL-in forming one-dimensional (1D) coaxial p-n junctions can lead to the fabrication of fully functional single-fiber organic electronics. The expectation is that devices can directly be tethered in a single functional fiber that may increase the efficiency and even lower power requirements for textile applications. More broadly, this research seeks to address the technological challenges of using nanoelectronics and nanosensors for flexible, low-power nanodevices (e.g., tethered and 1D components for chemical, vapor, and gas sensing) by enhancing the nanometric morphology of the coaxial structure [30,31].

2. Materials and Methods

Electronic-grade p-type regioregular poly(3-hexylthiophene-2,5-diyl) (P3HT) (Mw > 45,000) from Lumtec (New Taipei City, Taiwan) and n-type polymer poly (benzimidazobenzophenanthroline) (BBL) and polystyrene (PS) (Mw = 350,000), both from Sigma-Aldrich (Burlington, MA, USA), (Figure 1), were used as received. Solutions of PS were prepared with anhydrous chloroform (CHCl3) and used to dissolve the P3HT (and to allow for subsequent UV/VIS characterization); methanesulfonic acid (MSA), from Sigma-Aldrich (Burlington, MA, USA), was used to dissolve the BBL. Solutions were prepared based on weight percent (wt.%). For the core-material solution of P3HT/PS, 7 wt.% PS/CHCl3 was used to lend mechanical support to the P3HT molecules; the final concentration of P3HT in the P3HT/PS/CHCl3 blend was 0.4 wt.%. For the shell-material solution, 0.39 wt.% BBL was dissolved in MSA. Each of the two solutions was thoroughly blended with a magnetic stirrer until homogeneous equilibrium was achieved.
PS dissolved in chloroform is colorless; adding P3HT, which is red, imparts a red color to the solution blend. Dissolving BBL in MSA yields a dark red solution; with continued processing with CHCl3, BBL changes to a vivid blue-violet color [24]. UV/VIS spectra were obtained (using an Evolution 201 PC spectrometer) for the solutions of pure PS, pure P3HT, blended P3HT/PS, and pure BBL, to obtain the optical distinguishable characteristics of the material solutions.
To form the coaxial nanofibers from these solutions, the electrospinning technique was employed, using two luer-lock syringes and a coaxial needle (Ramé-Hart Instrument Co., Succasunna, NJ, USA). The gauge sizes were 23 G for the core material and 18 G for the shell material. The coaxial needle functioned as an anode, and a sheet of aluminum foil served as a grounded cathode. A programmable syringe pump (pump rate = 3000 µL hr−1) was used to maintain a slow, steady flow of the polymeric solutions into the electric field. In this setup, the core needle concentrically separates the polymers that will be extruded into the electric field. Without the application of high voltage, the polymers proceed to meet at the tip and form a pendant drop that quickly reacts by interacting with the solvents and therefore solidifying the polymers. When a voltage is applied to the concentric needles, the electrocapillary effect induces charges on both solutions that change the interfacial tension and consequentially decrease the surface tension, thus enhancing the formation of the charged jet. It is recognized that the high net charge density provided by electroactive polymers in the electrospinning jet increases the induced charges that reduces the surface tension, leading to the formation of nanofibers [32]. At a critical voltage, the formation of the Taylor cone occurs, and the partial solidification of the shell polymer over the core polymer happens while the jet elongates toward the collector, therefore forming the P3HT/PS core and the BBL shell coaxial fibers [33]. This setup resulted in the polymers forming a Taylor cone that emitted a charged jet that continuously moved toward the cathode. Fibers were formed when a critical voltage of 9 kV was applied at the tip of the needle, overcoming the polymer surface tension, stretching the material, enhancing solvent evaporation, and forming the coaxial nanofibers. The formed fibers were collected (i.e., attracted and deposited) onto the aluminum foil and over a silicon wafer (SiO2/Si) with prepatterned gold electrodes.
For topological characterization of the nanofibers, TEM grids with 50 µm × 50 µm apertures were passed near the cathode in a weaving motion to collect in-air nanofibers. These fiber samples were first rinsed gently with deionized water to remove any residue of MSA from the surface and then dried for 15 min at 70 °C prior to characterization. Images were taken with a TEM (Phillips FEI Morgagni M 268).

3. Results and Discussions

In this work, coaxial semiconductive polymer-polymer nanofibers were fabricated and morphologically characterized. The homogeneous composite P3HT/PS served as the core, and the BBL solution formed the shell, thereby achieving the desired structure (Figure 2). The p-n junctions thus formed can perform as diodes [34], sensors [35], and transistors [23,36,37,38], as well as photodiodes for solar cell applications [39,40].
At low concentrations of P3HT, it is difficult for the electrospinning technique to generate well-formed fibers. This difficulty is due to low molecular weight hindering the formation of molecular entanglements, and this, in turn, results in a solution extensional viscosity too low to form fibers. To overcome this impediment, PS was added to the P3HT solution to provide mechanical support for fiber formation without compromising the semiconductive property of P3HT [41,42,43]. At 7 wt.% PS, the solution was sufficiently viscous and electrically charged by the P3HT that core fibers with a diameter of 200 nm were formed. The BBL solution required no additional polymer for fiber production; the PS in the core-material solution did indirectly help to form and support the final structure. This method could also make the PS fiber composite electroactive as the semiconductor carrier [44]. As noted above, the PS and P3HT polymers were dissolved in CHCl3. BBL does not dissolve in CHCl3, resulting in the extrusion of uniformly coated BBL shell and P3HT/PS core nanofibers (Figure 3) moving from a viscous to a flexible state, to solvent evaporation and stretching to form a polymer-polymer coaxial nanofiber.
The UV/VIS spectrum of the P3HT/PS polymer composite was compared to the spectra of the pure (in CHCl3) PS and P3HT solution (Figure 4). Over the wavelength range examined, the spectrum of the colorless PS solution is featureless. The P3HT solution exhibits an absorption peak at approximately 450 nm, as does the P3HT/PS blend. This peak is attributable to the π-π* transition of the electronic absorption spectra, as previously documented for pure P3HT [26]. The coincidence of these peak positions indicates that the PS and P3HT polymers are homogeneously integrated within the blend solution, without phase separation or chemical interaction. Measuring the UV/VIS spectra in this way also enabled the BBL to show the absorption peak that defines its optical band gap. The BBL spectrum showed a peak at approximately 380 nm and a wider peak at approximately 540 nm, consistent with previous results [40,45], due to the onset of π-π* transition; this spectrum is characteristic of this ladder polymer [46]. These π-π* transitions determine the band gaps of P3HT and BBL, which are generally 2.2 eV and 1.9 eV, respectively [46,47], in agreement with the optical band gap cutoff values determined from the UV–VIS spectra shown in Figure 4.
While the P3HT/PS blend solution showed no evidence of separation or precipitation, the combined solutions of P3HT/PS and BBL were heterogeneous. The reason is that BBL is insoluble in CHCl3, and P3HT is insoluble in MSA. These characteristics led to the successful formation of nanometric coaxial fibers. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the fibers show well-formed core and shell structures (Figure 5). The smallest nanofiber examined had a total diameter of approximately 225 nm, with a core diameter of approximately 194 nm and a stable BBL shell thickness of 31 nm.
With the electrospinning technique, a variety of fiber sizes can be generated within a single production run. However, the diameters of the coaxial nanofiber can be controlled (e.g., solvent-types, concentration of the solutions, molecular weights, and pump rate). Figure 6 shows electrospun fibers from a single run, with outside diameters ranging from approximately 280 (a) to 2772 (d) nanometers. The variety of sizes is due to weak agglomeration at the syringe tip because of quick core-shell interaction, which slightly changes the material extrusion into the electric field. A subsequent production run can yield coaxial nanofibers with a narrow range of diameters. Future work aims to fabricate nanofibers of a single specific diameter by fine-tuning the solution concentrations and feeding rates, controlling the solution’s interaction rate at the concentric needle tip.
Electrical characterization was performed for a single nanofiber, collected between two gold electrodes during the electrospinning process, as shown in Figure 7. The fiber was deposited by rapidly waving the electrodes perpendicularly to the spinning direction near the collector. The formed device was dipped in deionized water and vacuum dried at 70 °C for 15 min, ensuring electrical contact on the electrodes. The fiber has a diameter of 1.2 µm with electrode separation of 40 µm. The electrical connections are made directly to the shell of the fiber, therefore characterizing the BBL. The fiber showed a linear IV characterization with a conductivity of ~ 1.4×10−4 S/m.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, in this paper, we described, for the first time, the electrospinning fabrication of pure-polymer composite coaxial P3HT/PS-BBL fibers to form a p-n junction coaxial structure. The electrically active materials used in this work are the electronic-grade regioregular P3HT and the ladder polymer BBL, with PS providing mechanical support for the thin fiber P3HT core. Our UV–VIS analysis shows that no chemical or physical changes occurred when the P3HT was blended with the PS. Strategic solvent selection ensures the formation of electrospun fibers that are simultaneously coated with a protective BBL shell. TEM imaging characterizations show that the formed composite fibers had diameters ranging from approximately 280 to 2.77 µm. We expect this coaxial structure not only to support the development of flexible, multifunctional electronic devices, including tunable diodes for UV radiation detectors and rectifiers for integrated intelligent textiles, but also to be able to sense, communicate, and generate its own energy, all in a single nanofiber. The ability to use the electrospinning technique to make electroactive coaxial nanofibers from novel organic polymer-based structures will have profound implications for the construction of the mentioned electronic devices.

5. Patents

Patent number 10,629,814—Coaxial Semiconductive Organic Nanofibers and Electrospinning Fabrication.

Author Contributions

W.S.-G., conceptualization, writing—original draft, funding acquisition, experimental analysis, manuscript writing, and data elaboration; S.R., funding acquisition, supervision, and validation; S.W.T., data curation, supervision, validation, and funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a Bridge to the Doctorate award (#HRD 1400837) from the National Science Foundation’s Florida Georgia Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation (FGLSAMP), USF Alfred P. Sloan Foundation University Center of Exemplary Mentoring (UCEM), and the East Asia and Pacific Summer Institutes for U.S. Graduate Students (EAPSI) award (#1714002).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Bio-Organic Electronics Laboratory, the Partnership for Research and Education in Materials (PREM) UPRH-PENN, Nanotechnology Research & Education Center (NREC), and the Microscopy Core Facility in the Department of Integrative Biology at the University of South Florida for their technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shi, S.; Si, Y.; Han, Y.; Wu, T.; Iqbal, M.I.; Fei, B.; Li, R.K.Y.; Hu, J.; Qu, J. Recent Progress in Protective Membranes Fabricated via Electrospinning: Advanced Materials, Biomimetic Structures, and Functional Applications. Adv. Mater. 2021, 34, 2107938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Park, K.; Kang, S.; Park, J.; Hwang, J.J. Fabrication of silver nanowire coated fibrous air filter medium via a two-step process of electrospinning and electrospray for anti-bioaerosol treatment. Haz. Mat. 2021, 411, 125043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yang, L.; Zhao, Y.; Cui, D.; Liu, Y.; Zou, Q.; Xu, S.; Luo, S.; Ye, C. Coaxial bioelectrospinning of P34HB/PVA microfibers biomimetic scaffolds with simultaneity cell-laden for improving bone regeneration. Mat. Des. 2022, 213, 110349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Han, D.; Steckl, A.J. Coaxial electrospinning formation of complex polymer fibers and their applications. Chem. Plus Chem. 2019, 84, 1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Abdelhakim, H.E. Drug Delivery Applications of Coaxial Electrospun Nanofibres in Cancer Therapy. Molecules 2022, 27, 1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Serrano-Garcia, W.; Jayathilaka, W.A.D.M.; Chinnappan, A.; Tran, T.Q.; Baskar, C.; Thomas, S.; Ramakrishna, S. Nanocomposites for electronic applications that can be embedded for textiles and wearables. Sci. China. Tech. Sci. 2019, 62, 895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jayathilaka, W.A.D.M.; Qi, K.; Qin, Y.; Chinnappan, A.; Serrano-Garcia, W.; Chinnappan, B.; Wang, H.; He, J.; Cui, S.; Thomas, S.; et al. Significance of nanomaterials in wearables: A review on wearable actuators and sensors. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1805921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bayan, M.A.H.; Taromi, F.A.; Lanzi, M.; Pierini, F. Enhanced efficiency in hollow core electrospun nanofiber-based organic solar cells. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 21144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ma, W.; Yang, C.; Gong, X.; Lee, K.; Heeger, A.J. Thermally stable, efficient polymer solar cells with nanoscale control of the interpenetrating network morphology. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2005, 15, 1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fukuda, K.; Takeda, Y.; Mizukami, M.; Kumaki, D.; Tokito, S. Fully solution-processed flexible organic thin film transistor arrays with high mobility and exceptional uniformity. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 3947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Luzio, A.; Canesi, E.V.; Bertarelli, C.; Caironi, M. Electrospun polymer fibers for electronic applications. Materials 2014, 7, 906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kleinschmidt, A.T.; Root, S.E.; Lipomi, D.J. Poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT): Fruit fly or outlier in organic solar cell research? Mater. Chem. 2017, 5, 11396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chang, H.C.; Liu, C.L.; Chen, W.C. Flexible nonvolatile transistor memory devices based on One-Dimensional electrospun P3HT: Au hybrid nanofibers. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 4960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Irimia-Vladu, M. “Green” electronics: Biodegradable and biocompatible materials and devices for sustainable future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Jin, G.; Prabhakaran, M.P.; Kai, D.; Kotaki, M.; Ramakrishna, S. Electrospun photosensitive nanofibers: Potential for photocurrent therapy in skin regeneration. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2012, 12, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Guarino, V.; Altobelli, R.; Cirillo, V.; Cummaro, A.; Ambrosio, L. Additive electrospraying: A route to process electrospun scaffolds for controlled molecular release. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2015, 26, 1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Moge, A.K.; Gupta, B.S. Co-axial electrospinning for nanofiber structures: Preparation and applications. Polym. Rev. 2008, 48, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, Q.; Ding, S.; Zhu, W.; Feng, L.; Dong, H.; Hu, W.J. Recent advances in one-dimensional organic p-n heterojunctions for optoelectronic device applications. Mater. Chem. C 2016, 4, 9388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Aleshin, A.N. Polymer Nanofibers and Nanotubes: Charge Transport and Device Applications. Adv. Mater. 2006, 18, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Gonzales, R.; Pinto, N.J. Electrospun poly (3-hexylthiophene-2, 5-diyl) fiber field effect transistor. Synth. Met. 2005, 151, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chang, J.F.; Sun, B.; Breiby, D.W.; Nielsen, M.M.; Sölling, T.I.; Giles, M.; McCulloch, I.; Sirringhaus, H. Enhanced mobility of poly (3-hexylthiophene) transistors by spin-coating from high-boiling-point solvents. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 4772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Merlo, J.A.; Frisbie, C.D.J. Field effect transport and trapping in regioregular polythiophene nanofibers. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 19169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Babel, A.; Jenekhe, S.A. High electron mobility in ladder polymer field-effect transistors. JACS 2003, 125, 13656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Briseno, A.L.; Mansfeld, S.C.B.; Shamberger, P.J.; Ohuchi, F.S.; Bao, Z.; Jenekhe, S.A.; Xia, Y. Self-assembly, molecular packing, and electron transport in n-type polymer semiconductor nanobelts. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 4712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Serrano, W.; Pinto, N.J. Electrospun fibers of poly (vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene)/poly (3-hexylthiophene) blends from tetrahydrofuran. Ferroelectrics 2012, 432, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Serrano, W.; Meléndez, A.; Ramos, I.; Pinto, N.J. Poly (lactic acid)/poly (3-hexylthiophene) composite nanofiber fabrication for electronic applications. Polym. Int. 2016, 65, 503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yoo, H.S.; Kim, T.G.; Park, T.G. Surface-functionalized electrospun nanofibers for tissue engineering and drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2009, 61, 1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Reese, M.O.; Morfa, A.J.; White, M.S.; Kopidakis, N.; Shaheen, S.E.; Rumbles, G.; Ginley, D.S. Pathways for the degradation of organic photovoltaic P3HT:PCBM based devices. Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells 2008, 92, 746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Briseno, A.L.; Kim, F.S.; Babel, A.; Xia, Y.; Jenekhe, S.A. n-Channel polymer thin film transistors with long-term air-stability and durability and their use in complementary inverters. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 16461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Anthony, J.E. Addressing challenges. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Serrano-Garcia, W. Advanced Organic Polymers for the Nanoscale Fabrication of Fiber-Based Electronics Using the Electrospinning Technique. USF Tampa Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 2021. Available online: https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/etd/9228 (accessed on 24 October 2022).
  32. Sundarrajan, S.; Murugan, R.; Nair, A.S.; Ramakrishna, S. Fabrication of P3HT/PCBM solar cloth by electrospinning technique. Mater. Lett. 2010, 64, 2369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rathore, P.; Schiffman, J.D. Beyond the single-nozzle: Coaxial electrospinning enables innovative nanofiber chemistries, geometries, and applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 48–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Pinto, N.J.; Carrasquillo, K.V.; Rodd, C.M.; Agarwal, R. Rectifying junctions of tin oxide and poly (3-hexylthiophene) nanofibers fabricated via electrospinning. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 083504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Gao, Q.; Meguro, H.; Okamoto, S.; Kimura, M. Flexible tactile sensor using the reversible deformation of poly (3-hexylthiophene) nanofiber assemblies. Langmuir 2012, 28, 17593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lee, S.; Moon, G.D.; Jeong, U.J. Continuous production of uniform poly (3-hexylthiophene)(P3HT) nanofibers by electrospinning and their electrical properties. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lee, S.W.; Lee, H.J.; Choi, J.H.; Koh, W.G.; Myoung, J.M.; Hur, J.H.; Park, J.J.; Cho, J.H.; Jeong, U. Periodic array of polyelectrolyte-gated organic transistors from electrospun poly (3-hexylthiophene) nanofibers. Nano. Lett. 2010, 10, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Babel, A.; Wind, J.D.; Jenekhe, S.A. Ambipolar charge transport in air-stable polymer blend thin-film transistors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2004, 14, 891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jenekhe, S.A.; Yi, S. Efficient photovoltaic cells from semiconducting polymer heterojunctions. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000, 77, 2635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Alam, M.M.; Jenekhe, S.A. Efficient solar cells from layered nanostructures of donor and acceptor conjugated polymers. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 4647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Qiu, L.; Wang, X.; Lee, W.H.; Lim, J.A.; Kim, J.S.; Kwak, D.; Cho, K. Organic thin-film transistors based on blends of poly (3-hexylthiophene) and polystyrene with a solubility-induced low percolation threshold. Chem. Mater. 2009, 21, 4380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Qiu, L.; Lim, J.A.; Wang, X.; Lee, W.H.; Hwang, M.; Cho, K. Versatile use of vertical-phase-separation-induced bilayer structures in organic thin-film transistors. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 1141–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hur, J.; Cha, S.N.; Im, K.; Lee, S.W.; Jeong, U.; Kim, J.; Park, J.J. P3HT-PS blend nanofiber FET based on electrospinning. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Nanotechnology: Joint Symposium with NANO Korea 2010, Ilsan, Republic of Korea, 17–20 August 2010; pp. 533–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Serrano, W.; Meléndez, A.; Ramos, I.; Pinto, N.J. Electrospun composite poly (lactic acid)/polyaniline nanofibers from low concentrations in CHCl3: Making a biocompatible polyester electro-active. Polymer 2014, 55, 5727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jenekhe, S.A.; de Paor, L.R.; Chen, X.L.; Tarkka, R.M. Photoinduced electron transfer in binary blends of conjugated polymers. Chem. Mater. 1996, 8, 2401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sun, Q.; Park, K.; Dai, L.J. Liquid crystalline polymers for efficient bilayer-bulk-heterojunction solar cells. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 7892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Narayan, K.S.; Taylor-Hamilton, B.E.; Spry, R.J.; Ferguson, J.B. Photoconducting properties of a ladder polymer. J. Appl. Phys. 1995, 77, 3938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Coaxial nanofiber was fabricated by using P3HT (a) and BBL (b) as the semiconducting polymers. Because pure P3HT is unable to form fibers (due to its low molecular weight), PS (c) was added to improve mechanical support for fiber formation.
Figure 1. Coaxial nanofiber was fabricated by using P3HT (a) and BBL (b) as the semiconducting polymers. Because pure P3HT is unable to form fibers (due to its low molecular weight), PS (c) was added to improve mechanical support for fiber formation.
Polymers 14 05073 g001
Figure 2. Coaxial nanofiber with p- and n-type semiconducting polymers. This nanofiber provides an opportunity to form p-n junctions that can be tethered for electroactive textiles and single-nanofiber devices.
Figure 2. Coaxial nanofiber with p- and n-type semiconducting polymers. This nanofiber provides an opportunity to form p-n junctions that can be tethered for electroactive textiles and single-nanofiber devices.
Polymers 14 05073 g002
Figure 3. Continuous fabrication of coaxial nanofiber p-n junctions, using the electrospinning technique. The BBL solution (a, blue) forms the shell/sheath, and the P3HT/PS solution (b, red) forms the core. An electric field overcomes the surface tension, stretching the solution and forming nanofibers. Inset: (c) The coaxial needle tip and magnification (d) after the Taylor cone formation, with the diode symbols representing the continuous heterojunction formed between the core and the shell.
Figure 3. Continuous fabrication of coaxial nanofiber p-n junctions, using the electrospinning technique. The BBL solution (a, blue) forms the shell/sheath, and the P3HT/PS solution (b, red) forms the core. An electric field overcomes the surface tension, stretching the solution and forming nanofibers. Inset: (c) The coaxial needle tip and magnification (d) after the Taylor cone formation, with the diode symbols representing the continuous heterojunction formed between the core and the shell.
Polymers 14 05073 g003
Figure 4. Comparison of the UV/VIS spectra of pure PS (7 wt.%), pure P3HT (2 wt.% in CHCl3), and the P3HT/PS (0.4 wt.%/7 wt.%) blend indicates that adding polystyrene does not change the physical or optical characteristics of P3HT. The BBL solution (0.39 wt.%) exhibits its characteristic broad absorption peak at approximately 540 nm.
Figure 4. Comparison of the UV/VIS spectra of pure PS (7 wt.%), pure P3HT (2 wt.% in CHCl3), and the P3HT/PS (0.4 wt.%/7 wt.%) blend indicates that adding polystyrene does not change the physical or optical characteristics of P3HT. The BBL solution (0.39 wt.%) exhibits its characteristic broad absorption peak at approximately 540 nm.
Polymers 14 05073 g004
Figure 5. TEM image of a coaxial nanofiber with a P3HT/PS (0.4 wt.%/7 wt.%) core and a BBL (0.39 wt.%) shell. This nanofiber was the smallest one examined. The scale bar is 100 nm.
Figure 5. TEM image of a coaxial nanofiber with a P3HT/PS (0.4 wt.%/7 wt.%) core and a BBL (0.39 wt.%) shell. This nanofiber was the smallest one examined. The scale bar is 100 nm.
Polymers 14 05073 g005
Figure 6. TEM images of coaxial nanofibers (P3HT/PS core (white arrow) with BBL shell (black arrow)) created simultaneously within a single run of the electrospinning technique. Scale bars are 1 µm (a), 2 µm (b,c), and 5 µm (d).
Figure 6. TEM images of coaxial nanofibers (P3HT/PS core (white arrow) with BBL shell (black arrow)) created simultaneously within a single run of the electrospinning technique. Scale bars are 1 µm (a), 2 µm (b,c), and 5 µm (d).
Polymers 14 05073 g006
Figure 7. SEM image of coaxial nanofiber electrically connected to the BBL shell (a), device structure with electrode separation of 40 µm (b), and current-voltage (I–V) characterization of a single fiber (c).
Figure 7. SEM image of coaxial nanofiber electrically connected to the BBL shell (a), device structure with electrode separation of 40 µm (b), and current-voltage (I–V) characterization of a single fiber (c).
Polymers 14 05073 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Serrano-Garcia, W.; Ramakrishna, S.; Thomas, S.W. Electrospinning Technique for Fabrication of Coaxial Nanofibers of Semiconductive Polymers. Polymers 2022, 14, 5073. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14235073

AMA Style

Serrano-Garcia W, Ramakrishna S, Thomas SW. Electrospinning Technique for Fabrication of Coaxial Nanofibers of Semiconductive Polymers. Polymers. 2022; 14(23):5073. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14235073

Chicago/Turabian Style

Serrano-Garcia, William, Seeram Ramakrishna, and Sylvia W. Thomas. 2022. "Electrospinning Technique for Fabrication of Coaxial Nanofibers of Semiconductive Polymers" Polymers 14, no. 23: 5073. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14235073

APA Style

Serrano-Garcia, W., Ramakrishna, S., & Thomas, S. W. (2022). Electrospinning Technique for Fabrication of Coaxial Nanofibers of Semiconductive Polymers. Polymers, 14(23), 5073. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14235073

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop