Next Article in Journal
Birefringence of Thin Uniaxial Polymer Films Estimated Using the Light Polarization Ellipse
Next Article in Special Issue
Optimization of Polyacrylic Acid Coating on Graphene Oxide-Functionalized Reverse-Osmosis Membrane Using UV Radiation through Response Surface Methodology
Previous Article in Journal
Hybrid Organic–Inorganic Perovskite Halide Materials for Photovoltaics towards Their Commercialization
Previous Article in Special Issue
A New Three-Component Photo-Initiating System for Visible Light Recording of Volume Holograms with Single-Pulsed Laser
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Adulterant Detection in Peppermint Oil by Means of Holographic Photopolymers Based on Composite Materials with Liquid Crystal

by
Wafaa Miloua
1,*,
Manuel Ortuño
1,2,
Víctor Navarro-Fuster
1,2,
Augusto Beléndez
1,2 and
Inmaculada Pascual
1,3
1
Instituto Universitario de Física Aplicada a las Ciencias y las Tecnologías, Universidad de Alicante, P.O. Box 99, E-03080 Alicante, Spain
2
Departamento de Física, Ingeniería de Sistemas y Teoría de la Señal, Universidad de Alicante, P.O. Box 99, E-03080 Alicante, Spain
3
Departamento de Óptica, Farmacología y Anatomía, Universidad de Alicante, P.O. Box 99, E-03080 Alicante, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(5), 1061; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14051061
Submission received: 6 January 2022 / Revised: 1 March 2022 / Accepted: 3 March 2022 / Published: 7 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Photopolymerization in Advanced Materials)

Abstract

:
Diffraction gratings are recorded in a holographic photopolymer containing nematic liquid crystal and peppermint oil. The presence of the oil modifies the polymerization and the holographic response. The composite containing oil adulterated with triethyl citrate obtains a diffraction efficiency related to the oil’s purity. The results obtained suggest the possibility of developing a holographic chemical analysis method for quality control of raw materials.

1. Introduction

Essential oils are also known as volatile oils, ethereal oils, or simply as the oil of the plant from which they were extracted, such as the peppermint oil that we have been working on in our research. The biosynthesis of these volatile components is done in dedicated cell types present in almost all parts of the plant, from the leaves or flower to the roots depending on the plant’s genus. They are currently of growing importance due to their natural and sustainable origin, their independence from petroleum-based raw materials, and their multiple applications in the manufacture of perfumes, cosmetics, flavorings, and the production of substances with pharmacological properties [1,2].
Peppermint oil is often obtained by hydrodistillation, steam distillation, or solvent extraction of the fresh overground parts of Mentha x piperita L., a member of the Lamiaceae family. It is generally followed by rectification and fractionation before use. It is an essential oil that contains over 40 different compounds, including menthol, which gives peppermint it’s refreshing qualities. It is a common essential oil around the world [3].
Often, a commercial essential oil is adulterated to increase the natural oil’s desirable properties or avoid costly manufacturing of all-natural oil. Adulteration is usually accomplished by adding a similar but cheaper oil, such as cornmint oil (Mentha arvensis), or diluting the oil with various solvent oils [4,5]. Triethyl citrate is a synthetic solvent that could be used to adulterate pure peppermint oil.
In the last years, the development of novel sensors and the detection of substances has become a research area of great interest [6,7,8,9,10,11]. Holographic techniques have been used to detect various chemical substances and other parameters such as humidity or temperature [12,13,14,15].
Photopolymers are a type of holographic recording material in which a diffraction grating is recorded using a spatially localized photopolymerization producing fringes in the material with different refractive indexes. The areas exposed to light are polymerized, and their refractive index is higher than that of adjacent areas not exposed to light and therefore not polymerized [16].
These materials have balanced properties compared to other holographic recording materials. Perhaps the most important is the flexibility in the variation of its formulation to obtain specific characteristics [17]. This is very important for application in sensors; for example, hydrophilic photopolymers based on poly(vinyl alcohol) and acrylamide have been used to detect humidity and different chemical substances [18,19]. On the other hand, hydrophobic materials as holographic polymer-dispersed liquid crystals (HPDLC) have been used to detect vibration or as fingerprint sensors [20,21].
Recently, our research team has combined HPDLC with other substances such as tetrahydrofuran and tert-Butylthiol to obtain changes in the chemistry of the free radical polymerization mechanism that produce variations in the holographic response of the material allowing the detection/analysis of these substances [22].
In HPDLC, the areas exposed to light are polymerized, but their refractive index is lower than that of adjacent areas not exposed to light and therefore not polymerized, unlike in a pure photopolymer. This is due to the diffusion of liquid crystal to unexposed areas during polymerization and the relatively high value of the average refractive index of liquid crystal.
In this work, HPDLC is used to detect peppermint oil adulterated with triethyl citrate by variations obtained in recording a holographic diffraction grating. In order to make this, peppermint oil is introduced in the HPDLC formulation to obtain a composite whose holographic response allows the detection of potential adulterants in the oil.

2. Peppermint Oil Composition

Essential oil is a concentrated hydrophobic liquid containing volatile (easily evaporated at normal temperatures) chemical compounds from the secondary metabolites of plants. Research shows the composition of the essential oils and extracts may vary according to the extraction method used [23]. Variations lie in differences in the proportion of the compounds and even differences in the number of compounds [24].
Peppermint oil contains 4.5–10.0% w/w of esters, calculated as menthyl acetate, C12H22O2; not less than 44 percent w/w of the free alcohols, calculated as menthol, C10H20O; and 15–32% w/w of ketones, calculated as menthone, C10H18O [25].
The structures of the main components are included in Table 1. As can be seen, these terpenes and terpenoids are functionalized hydrocarbons with double bonds, esters, ethers, and ketones. Either they do not contain hydroxyl groups, or they contain only one -OH per molecule; therefore, they are not soluble in aqueous media and are soluble in solvents of higher hydrophobicity. This suggests that this essential oil can be homogeneously mixed with the components of the HPDLC.
Molecules with hydroxyl groups could influence the initiation stage of polymerization, but the radicals formed from them would have no greater stability than those produced by the photopolymer initiator system, so their influence is expected to be negligible.
Of all the functional groups present, the ones most likely to influence a free radical polymerization are the double bonds. Molecules with one double bond can act as comonomers, while molecules with 2 or more double bonds can act as cross-linkers of the chains produced by the main monomer [26].

3. Obtaining Pure Peppermint Oil

For this experiment, pure and freshly obtained essential oil was used to avoid the presence of substances that are the product of hydrolysis, transformation, or degradation (oxidation) of the essential oil, which could affect the results obtained.
The peppermint oil from this study was obtained from the leaves of the perennial herb Mentha Piperita L. by hydrodistillation. For every kilogram of fresh mint leaves, we obtained 9.05 g of peppermint oil, equal to a 0.9% yield of fresh weight mint leaves. The Chromatographic profiling of the peppermint oil was done with gas chromatography with a flame ionization detector. The individual peaks were identified from the retention time compared with those standards; the components are shown in Table 2.
The three main components: menthol, isomenthone, and menthone (75.86% area), cannot act as a comonomer or cross-linker in the polymerization reaction due to their chemical structure; specifically, these molecules do not have any double bond. All of the minority components except eucalyptol and octanol have double bonds, i.e., about 19% maximum area. Therefore, they could act as comonomers or cross-linkers in a free radical polymerization reaction.

4. Peppermint Oil Adulteration

As the prices of peppermint essential oil increase, so does the intentional reduction of its quality through fraudulent means with the overall purpose of obtaining an improvement in economic profit. In case an essential oil has been adulterated, it may still smell much like an unadulterated essential oil, but the composition has been modified, and the oil may not be suitable for its intended application.
There are different ways of adulterating an essential oil. One of them is the addition of single raw materials. This form of adulteration can be easily detected by analytical methods or not, depending on the substance in question [27].
Essential oils are characterized by their physical properties; according to International Pharmacopoeia, some of them have a relative density: 0.900–0.916, a refractive index: 1.457–1.467, and optical rotation: −10° to −30°. These are characteristic features of each essential oil, and they could change when they are diluted or mixed with other substances.
Substances with great potential as adulterants are those that do not change the main physical parameters, act as solvents of essential oils, and have a relatively low cost. We have selected triethyl citrate as a potential adulterant for peppermint oil due to it has characteristics adequate for this use. It is a synthetic substance with a low cost; it is approved for use as a food additive, it is chemically inert under the conditions of use, and it is a good solvent for essential oils. Moreover, it is colorless, and therefore, the color of the essential oil would be almost unaltered. On the other hand, other physical properties as density or refraction index are similar to those of peppermint oil [9,28].
It is necessary to consider that peppermint oil is a natural product, and its physical parameters are not constant but vary between the limits shown in Table 3. Triethyl citrate has constant parameters different from those from the oil, but mixing with the oil in relatively low proportion produces an adulterated oil whose properties are in the intervals shown in the Table. Therefore, the adulteration would be difficult to detect with basic measurements of physical parameters. It would be necessary to perform an analysis using gas chromatography or high-performance liquid chromatography to detect the adulteration [29,30].

5. Photopolymer Formulation and Sample Preparation

The HPDLC is composed of dipentaerythritol penta/hexa-acrylate (DPHPA) as a monomer (refractive index n = 1.490), ethyl eosin (YEt) as a dye, N-phenyl glycine (NPG) as initiator, octanoic acid (OA) as cosolvent and surfactant, all of them obtained from Merck. The photopolymer also contains the nematic liquid crystal QYPDLC-036 from Qingdao QY Liquid Crystal Co., Ltd. (equipement source: Qingdao, China) equipement sourced from China, which is a mixture of 4-cyanobiphenyls with alkyl chains of different lengths. It has an ordinary refractive index n0 = 1.520 and a difference between extraordinary and ordinary index Δn = 0.250. Table 4 shows the composition of the photopolymer.
The solution is prepared by mixing the components in a red light environment to which the photopolymer is not sensitive.
The HPDLC/adulterated peppermint oil composite is prepared by mixing 200 μL of HPDLC with 50 μL of adulterated peppermint oil. The peppermint oil is mixed beforehand with triethyl citrate to obtain solutions of adulterated peppermint oil with different purity.
Five samples of HPDLC/adulterated peppermint oil composite with different purity of the peppermint oil are prepared to modify the volume of triethyl citrate added to peppermint oil (Table 5). These values have been selected in order to simulate a real adulteration. Nevertheless, excessive addition of triethyl citrate could change the organoleptic properties of the mix, and the adulteration could be easily detected.
The solution is introduced in an ultrasonic bath at 35 °C for 15 min. A volume of 16 μL of the solution is deposited between two glass plates 1 mm thick and separated with 13 µm glass hollow microspheres from Merck. The samples were exposed to a laser exposure (λ = 532 nm) in a holographic setup (Section 3) in order to record a diffraction grating in the composite.

6. Holographic Setup

Diffraction gratings are recorded in the HPDLC/adulterated peppermint oil composite samples using the holographic setup shown in Figure 1. A Nd:YAG continuous laser with a wavelength of 532 nm was utilized to record volume diffraction gratings. The laser beam was split into a reference beam and object beam with the same irradiance of 1 mW/cm2. The diameter of these beams was expanded to 10 mm using lenses, and spatial filters with pinholes were used to improve the quality and homogeneity of the beams. The object and reference beams were recombined at the sample at an angle of 16.0 degrees to the normal using mirrors. The spatial frequency obtained in the interference of the two beams was 1036 lines/mm. The diffracted and transmitted intensity were monitored in real-time with a He-Ne laser (632.8 nm) positioned at Bragg’s angle (19.1°). The ambient temperature in which recordings were made was 23 °C.
After recording, the samples are exposed to incoherent white light to fix the hologram.
With this setup, a photopolymerization reaction takes place in the exposed areas of the diffraction grating generated by the 532 nm laser beams. The He-Ne laser is used to reconstruct the hologram.
The initiator system of the HPDLC produces free radicals generated by light from the NPG that start the polymerization of the monomer DPHPA. This produces a highly reticulated polymer network due to DPHPA being a multifunctional monomer. Moreover, a photopolymerization-induced phase separation process (PIPS) takes place due to the high degree of cross-linking of the polymer network. In PIPS, the liquid crystal (LC) molecules diffuse to unexposed areas in the diffraction grating where they remain as droplets [31,32,33].
Figure 2 (left), shows a representation of the diffraction grating obtained into the sample after recording. On the right, the arrows show holes in the network with similar or higher liquid crystal molecules.

7. Results

7.1. Compatibility of Peppermint Oil with the HPDLC

Samples exposed to the holographic recording were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to check that the introduction of peppermint oil in the photopolymer formulation does not affect the diffraction grating formation.
Figure 3 shows SEM images for a sample containing photopolymer with peppermint oil (purity 80%) after holographic exposure and white light fixing. To obtain these images, the samples were cut crosswise and immersed in toluene for 30 s. This process removed the liquid crystal droplets from the unexposed areas of the diffraction grating, leaving voids whose surface is coated with a thin layer of gold.
The images show that the holographic recording produces a diffraction grating in the form of stripes generated using the photopolymerization process. This is the expected result for an HPDLC. Therefore the peppermint oil does not change the overall process of obtaining the diffraction grating as an internal structure into the material [34,35,36].

7.2. Recording Time Selection

The HPDLC was used to select an adequate exposure time for the hologram recording. We made three recordings with exposure times: 40 s, 60 s, and 100 s. Figure 4 shows the maximum diffraction efficiency (DEmax) plus maximum transmission efficiency (TEmax) versus DEmax for the three exposure times.
An exposure time of 60 s obtains the higher value for DEmax + TEmax with a DEmax similar to that of 100 s. A high DEmax + TEmax value implies a low noise level, i.e., low light diffusion losses. Therefore, the 60 s exposure time is selected for the experiments.

7.3. Influence of the Triethyl Citrate Concentration in the Recording of the Diffraction Grating

We studied the influence of the triethyl citrate concentration related to the purity of the adulterated essential oil in recording the diffraction grating. Figure 5 shows the angular response curves obtained by the samples after the holographic recording and white light exposure.
Samples obtain different values for maximum diffraction efficiency (DEmax). These values are included in Table 6.
DEmax increases when the purity of the oil decreases, i.e., when the content of peppermint oil in the HPDLC is high, the DEmax obtained is low. Theoretical DEmax can be calculated with Equation (1) because the diffraction gratings stored in the composites behave as phase and volume gratings according to Kogelnik coupled wave theory [37].
DEmax = Γ sin 2 π n 1 ( t ) max d λ cos θ i
In this equation Γ is the absorption, diffusion, and reflection losses factor. θi’ is the reconstruction beam angle (Figure 1), measured into the material, which could be obtained with refraction Snell law. λ’ is the reconstruction beam wavelength. n1(t)max is the maximum refraction index modulation, and d is the diffraction grating thickness.
DEmax of each curve in Figure 3 is related to the product n1(t)max d with the other factors approximately constant. On the other hand, the width of the angular response curves is related to d that is similar for all samples (sample 3 has a somewhat larger curve width, which affects the value of d). Therefore, DEmax is directly related to the index modulation obtained for the photopolymer [38,39].
A low DEmax is related to a low index modulation that is related to poor diffusion of liquid crystal molecules to the unexposed areas of the diffraction grating. Therefore, the results showed an unexpected problem with the PIPS process when peppermint oil was introduced in the photopolymer formulation. This effect was higher when the oil content in the photopolymer increased, i.e., when the oil’s purity was high.
Figure 6 shows the DEmax values obtained in the holographic recording as a function of the purity of the peppermint oil.
As can be seen in the Figure, there is a linear trend between the DEmax and the purity of the oil. With the experimental equation obtained, it was possible to determine the purity of an oil sample with an unknown purity. This method could serve as a quick or preliminary analysis in quality control of peppermint oil.
A possible explanation for this result is that the unsaturated components of the peppermint oil influence the PIPS process during the recording of the diffraction grating. The number of double bonds in these molecules is lower than in the DPHA main monomer. Therefore, they act as comonomers or cross-linkers during the polymer network formation, joining DPHPA molecules and changing the size of the holes produced in the polymer network. In Figure 2 (right), the size of the holes would be increased by the components with double bonds of the peppermint oil. This affected the diffusion of the LC during the PIPS, and thus, the quantity and size of the LC droplets placed at the unexposed zones would be modified. The quantity of LC diffused to unexposed zones affected the index modulation, and therefore, a low DEmax was obtained if relatively big holes were produced.
Figure 7 shows high-resolution SEM images for a sample with peppermint oil (purity 50%) and with a cross-sectional viewpoint for the center and right images. The SEM technique allows visualizing the structure of the diffraction network generated.
Figure 8 is an enlargement of Figure 7 right. Separating lines between exposed and unexposed areas can be seen (interface)—also, areas with a carryover of material due to the sample cutting process. The fringes are made up of pseudo-spherical clusters that, before sample processing, would be LC droplets or holes in the polymer network.
Consecutive fringes have a different refractive index, but their structure is similar due to the sample’s processes: laser exposure, incoherent white light exposure, cutting, and gold coating for SEM. The areas exposed during the holographic recording are polymerized, and the unexposed areas are subsequently polymerized on exposure to incoherent white light. Therefore, it is not possible to visually differentiate exposed and unexposed areas.

8. Conclusions

Incorporating peppermint essential oil into an HPDLC photopolymer yields a composite material that can be used as a holographic recording material. The components of peppermint essential oil influence photopolymerization by affecting the diffraction efficiency obtained. High purity of the essential oil implies lower diffraction efficiency. A possible explanation for this result has been advanced, which is related to the fact that the presence of substances with double bonds in the essential oil can make them act as comonomers or cross-linkers, modifying the size of the polymer network holes, which would have a direct influence on the diffraction efficiency obtained. The larger the size of the holes in the polymer network, the less diffusion of LC to unexposed areas (PIPS) and therefore less modulation of the refractive index and diffraction efficiency.
Furthermore, it has been obtained that the decrease in the maximum diffraction efficiency is proportional to the purity of the essential oil adulterated with triethyl citrate. This result can be used to develop a holographic method that allows identifying the purity of a peppermint oil adulterated with triethyl citrate. The experiments imply the incorporation of peppermint oil into an HPDLC to reach a concentration of about 17%. For each holographic recording, it is necessary to have 16 μL of the solution, i.e., about 3 μL of oil. As the photopolymer must be mixed with the oil by mechanical means, the quantity of solution prepared must be higher, but the method has the potential for work with small volumes of the sample. The method is not selective, and therefore adulterants other than triethyl citrate could produce the same result since the adulterant acts as a diluent of the oil, changing the concentration of the minority components with double bonds. This could be an advantage to develop a quick analysis method because the adulteration could even be detected if substances different from triethyl citrate were used. Additional work is necessary to evaluate other substances that could be used as adulterants and their influence on the holographic response.
On the other hand, other essential oils or even other kinds of natural products with molecules with double bonds could be analyzed with this method. The research has been done with a standard laboratory holographic setup, but it could be adapted and miniaturized to use this method in quality control.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.N.-F.; Supervision, M.O.; Validation, A.B. and I.P.; Writing—original draft, W.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (Spain) under projects; PID2019-106601RB-I00 FIS2017-82919-R; Generalitat Valenciana (Spain) under projects: IDIFEDER/2021/014; (cofunded by European Union through the FEDER Programme) PROMETEO 2021/006.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (Spain) under project PID2019-106601RB-I00, and Generalitat Valenciana (Spain) under projects IDIFEDER/2021/014 (co-funded by the European Union through the FEDER Programme), PROMETEO 2021/006. Authors would like to thank Laura Pichardo, Departamento de Fitotecnia, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo (Mexico), for the collaboration.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Manion, C.R.; Widder, R.M. Essentials of Essential Oils. Am. J. Health Pharm. 2017, 74, e153–e162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Aziz, Z.A.A.; Ahmad, A.; Setapar, S.H.M.; Karakucuk, A.; Azim, M.M.; Lokhat, D.; Rafatullah, M.; Ganash, M.; Kamal, M.A.; Ashraf, G.M. Essential Oils: Extraction Techniques, Pharmaceutical And Therapeutic Potential-A Review. Curr. Drug Metab. 2018, 19, 1100–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sachan, A.K.; Das, D.R.; Gangwar, S.S. An Overview on Menthae Piperitae (Peppermint Oil) Review Article an Overview on Menthae Piperitae (Peppermint Oil). Int. J. Pharmaceut. Chem. Biol. Sci. 2013, 3, 834–838. [Google Scholar]
  4. A Review on Peppermint Oil. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237842903_A_REVIEW_ON_PEPPERMINT_OIL (accessed on 3 December 2021).
  5. Authentication of Natural Peppermint Oil|Perfumer & Flavorist. Available online: https://www.perfumerflavorist.com/flavor/ingredients/article/21856932/authentication-of-natural-peppermint-oil (accessed on 3 December 2021).
  6. Sikarwar, S.; Yadav, B.C. Opto-Electronic Humidity Sensor: A Review. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2015, 233, 54–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, D.; Yuan, Y.J. Thin-Film Sensors for Detection of Formaldehyde: A Review. IEEE Sens. J. 2015, 15, 6749–6760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, Y.N.; Zhao, Y.; Lv, R.Q. A Review for Optical Sensors Based on Photonic Crystal Cavities. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2015, 233, 374–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Majhi, S.M.; Mirzaei, A.; Kim, H.W.; Kim, S.S.; Kim, T.W. Recent Advances in Energy-Saving Chemiresistive Gas Sensors: A Review. Nano Energy 2021, 79, 105369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schroeder, V.; Savagatrup, S.; He, M.; Lin, S.; Swager, T.M. Carbon Nanotube Chemical Sensors. Chem. Rev. 2018, 119, 599–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, T.; Zhang, X.; Yuan, L.; Yu, J. A Review of Higherature Electrochemical Sensors Based on Stabilized Zirconia. Solid State Ion. 2015, 283, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yetisen, A.K. Holographic Metal Ion Sensors; Springer: Cham, Swizerland, 2015; pp. 85–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yetisen, A.K.; Naydenova, I.; Da Cruz Vasconcellos, F.; Blyth, J.; Lowe, C.R. Holographic Sensors: Three-Dimensional Analyte-Sensitive Nanostructures and Their Applications. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 10654–10696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Naydenova, I.; Grand, J.; Mikulchyk, T.; Martin, S.; Toal, V.; Georgieva, V.; Thomas, S.; Mintova, S. Hybrid Sensors Fabricated by Inkjet Printing and Holographic Patterning. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 6097–6101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vezouviou, E.; Lowe, C.R. A near Infrared Holographic Glucose Sensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 68, 371–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Barachevsky, V.A. The Current Status of the Development of Light-Sensitive Media for Holography (a Review). OptSp 2018, 124, 373–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guo, J.; Gleeson, M.R.; Sheridan, J.T. A Review of the Optimisation of Photopolymer Materials for Holographic Data Storage. Phys. Res. Int. 2012, 2012, 803439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Mikulchyk, T.; Martin, S.; Naydenova, I. Investigation of the Sensitivity to Humidity of an Acrylamide-Based Photopolymer Containing N-Phenylglycine as a Photoinitiator. Opt. Mater. 2014, 37, 810–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Leite, E.; Naydenova, I.; Mintova, S.; Leclercq, L.; Toal, V. Photopolymerizable Nanocomposites for Holographic Recording and Sensor Application. Appl. Opt. 2010, 49, 3652–3660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Shian Li, M.; Trong Wu, S.; Ying-Guey Fuh, A.; Lai, N.D.; Lin, J.H.; Huang, Y.Y.; Hsu, C.C. Sensor for Monitoring the Vibration of a Laser Beam Based on Holographic Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystal Films. Opt. Express 2010, 18, 26300–26306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jie, Y.; Jihong, Z. Fingerprint Sensor Using a Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystal Holographic Lens. Appl. Opt. 2010, 49, 4763–4766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mora, M.P.; Ramírez, M.G.; Brocal, F.; Ortuño, M.; Beléndez, A.; Pascual, I. Influence of Tert-Butylthiol and Tetrahydrofuran on the Holographic Characteristics of a Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystal: A Research Line Toward a Specific Sensor for Natural Gas and Liquefied Petroleum Gas. Polymers 2019, 11, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Guan, W.; Li, S.; Yan, R.; Tang, S.; Quan, C. Comparison of Essential Oils of Clove Buds Extracted with Supercritical Carbon Dioxide and Other Three Traditional Extraction Methods. Food Chem. 2007, 101, 1558–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Peredo-Luna, H.; Palou-García, E.; López-Malo, A. Aceites Esenciales: Métodos de Extracción. Temas Sel. Ing. Aliment. 2009, 3, 8. [Google Scholar]
  25. Greenstein, G.R. The Merck Index: An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs, and Biologicals. Ref. Rev. 2007, 21, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Advanced Organic Chemistry: Reaction Mechanisms-Reinhard Bruckner-Google Livres. Available online: https://books.google.es/books?hl=fr&lr=&id=1nT6c3TQL8wC&oi=fnd&pg=PP2&dq=advanced+organic+chemistry.+Reactions,+mechanisms,+and+structure.+5th+ed.+New+York:+John+Wiley+%26+Sons%3B+2001&ots=NE3oKmc_xx&sig=XAMbyPeoxpsygIRfpNFVv6HU63Y#v=onepage&q&f=false (accessed on 3 December 2021).
  27. Boren, K.E.; Young, D.G.; Woolley, C.L.; Smith, B.L.; Carlson, R.E. Detecting Essential Oil Adulteration. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2015, 2, 1000132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Haynes, W.M.; Lide, D.R.; Bruno, T.J. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 87th ed.; David, R., Ed.; CRC Press/Taylor and Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006; ISBN 0-8493-0487-3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Estimation of Menthone, Menthofuran, Menthyl Acetate and Menthol in Peppermint Oil by Capillary Gas Chromatography. Available online: https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US201302578217 (accessed on 3 December 2021).
  30. Areias, F.M.; Valentão, P.; Andrade, P.B.; Ferreres, F.; Seabra, R.M. Phenolic Fingerprint of Peppermint Leaves. Food Chem. 2001, 73, 307–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Meng, S.; Duran, H.; Hu, J.; Kyu, T.; Natarajan, L.V.; Tondiglia, V.P.; Sutherland, R.L.; Bunning, T.J. Influence of Photopolymerization Reaction Kinetics on Diffraction Efficiency of H-PDLC Undergoing Photopatterning Reaction in Mixtures of Acrylic Monomer/Nematic Liquid Crystals. Macromolecules 2007, 40, 3190–3197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, Y.J.; Sun, X.W. Holographic Polymer-Dispersed Liquid Crystals: Materials, Formation, and Applications. Adv. Optoelectron. 2008, 2008, 684349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Natarajan, L.V.; Brown, D.P.; Wofford, J.M.; Tondiglia, V.P.; Sutherland, R.L.; Lloyd, P.F.; Bunning, T.J. Holographic Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystal Reflection Gratings Formed by Visible Light Initiated Thiol-Ene Photopolymerization. Polymer 2006, 47, 4411–4420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fukuda, Y.; Tomita, Y. Computer Simulation of Bragg Grating Formation in Holographic Polymer-Dispersed Liquid Crystals Based on the Density Functional Theory. In Optical Modelling and Design II; International Society for Optics and Photonics: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2012; Volume 8429, pp. 376–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Francés, J.; Bleda, S.; Puerto, D.; Gallego, S.; Márquez, A.; Neipp, C.; Pascual, I.; Beléndez, A. Accurate, Efficient and Rigorous Numerical Analysis of 3D H-PDLC Gratings. Materials 2020, 13, 3725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Massenot, S.; Kaiser, J.L.; Chevallier, R.; Renotte, Y. Study of the Dynamic Formation of Transmission Gratings Recorded in Photopolymers and Holographic Polymer-Dispersed Liquid Crystals. Appl. Opt. 2004, 43, 5489–5497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Kogelnik, H. Coupled Wave Theory for Thick Hologram Gratings. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 1969, 48, 2909–2947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gallego, S.; Neipp, C.; Estepa, L.A.; Ortuño, M.; Márquez, A.; Francés, J.; Pascual, I.; Beléndez, A. Volume Holograms in Photopolymers: Comparison between Analytical and Rigorous Theories. Materials 2012, 5, 1373–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Gallego, S.; Ortuño, M.; Neipp, C.; Márquez, A.; Beléndez, A.; Pascual, I.; Kelly, J.V.; Sheridan, J.T. Physical and Effective Optical Thickness of Holographic Diffraction Gratings Recorded in Photopolymers. Opt. Express 2005, 13, 1939–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Holographic setup. BS: Beamsplitter, Mi: mirror, SFi: spatial filter, Li: lens, Di: diaphragm, Oi: radiometer, PC: data recorder.
Figure 1. Holographic setup. BS: Beamsplitter, Mi: mirror, SFi: spatial filter, Li: lens, Di: diaphragm, Oi: radiometer, PC: data recorder.
Polymers 14 01061 g001
Figure 2. (Left) sample structure, 1: glass substrate, 2: microspacers, 3: exposed zones with polymer network, 4: unexposed zones with liquid crystal droplets. (Right) 3D polymer network from DPHPA. Arrows show holes in the network with a similar or higher size than an LC molecule.
Figure 2. (Left) sample structure, 1: glass substrate, 2: microspacers, 3: exposed zones with polymer network, 4: unexposed zones with liquid crystal droplets. (Right) 3D polymer network from DPHPA. Arrows show holes in the network with a similar or higher size than an LC molecule.
Polymers 14 01061 g002
Figure 3. SEM images for a sample of HPDLC with peppermint oil (purity 80%).
Figure 3. SEM images for a sample of HPDLC with peppermint oil (purity 80%).
Polymers 14 01061 g003
Figure 4. DEmax + TEmax versus DEmax for different exposure times during the hologram recording.
Figure 4. DEmax + TEmax versus DEmax for different exposure times during the hologram recording.
Polymers 14 01061 g004
Figure 5. Diffraction efficiency versus angular scan for samples with different purity of peppermint oil.
Figure 5. Diffraction efficiency versus angular scan for samples with different purity of peppermint oil.
Polymers 14 01061 g005
Figure 6. Maximum diffraction efficiency obtained as a function of the purity of the peppermint oil.
Figure 6. Maximum diffraction efficiency obtained as a function of the purity of the peppermint oil.
Polymers 14 01061 g006
Figure 7. High-resolution SEM images for a sample of HPDLC with peppermint oil (purity 50%). Center and right images are taken by cross-sectional viewpoint.
Figure 7. High-resolution SEM images for a sample of HPDLC with peppermint oil (purity 50%). Center and right images are taken by cross-sectional viewpoint.
Polymers 14 01061 g007
Figure 8. Enlargement of Figure 7 right showing aspects of the structure: interface between fringes, pseudo-spherical clusters that form the fringes, and areas with the carryover of material.
Figure 8. Enlargement of Figure 7 right showing aspects of the structure: interface between fringes, pseudo-spherical clusters that form the fringes, and areas with the carryover of material.
Polymers 14 01061 g008
Table 1. Main components of the peppermint oil.
Table 1. Main components of the peppermint oil.
(+)-α-PineneSabinene(−)-β-Pineneβ-Myrcene
Polymers 14 01061 i001 Polymers 14 01061 i002 Polymers 14 01061 i003 Polymers 14 01061 i004
3-OctanolR-(+)-LimoneneEucaliptolIsopregol
Polymers 14 01061 i005 Polymers 14 01061 i006 Polymers 14 01061 i007 Polymers 14 01061 i008
(−)-IsopulegolPiperitone(−)-Menthol(−)-Menthone
Polymers 14 01061 i009 Polymers 14 01061 i010 Polymers 14 01061 i011 Polymers 14 01061 i012
(+)-IsomenthoneCis-3-Hexenyl isovalerate(+)-Pulegon(+)-2-Carene
Polymers 14 01061 i013 Polymers 14 01061 i014 Polymers 14 01061 i015 Polymers 14 01061 i016
Table 2. Analysis of the composition of peppermint oil made by gas chromatography.
Table 2. Analysis of the composition of peppermint oil made by gas chromatography.
Peak NumberTR (min)Area Component Area (%)Qual (%)
17.44α-Pinene0.7397
28.54Sabinene0.3491
38.62β-Pinene0.8694
49.02β-Myrcene0.3891
59.153-Octanol0.3983
610.11R-(+)-Limonene4.5494
710.18Eucaliptol4.4398
913.53Isopregol1.6799
1013.79Isomenthone17.8197
1214.09Menthone11.5796
1314.38Menthol (±)45.891
1414.45Isopulegol1.0460
1514.64Menthol0.6891
1616.08Isoleric Acid0.4283
1716.21Pulegon1.2997
1816.63Piperitone0.8795
1917.71(+)-2-Carene6.9691
Table 3. Physical parameters of peppermint oil and triethyl citrate.
Table 3. Physical parameters of peppermint oil and triethyl citrate.
Physical Parameters Peppermint Oil Triethyl Citrate
Density 25 °C (g/cm3)0.893–0.9051.14
nD201.459–1.4651.442
Bp (°C)215235 (150mmHg)
ColorColorless to pale yellowColorless
Optical rotation−18 to −320
Table 4. Composition of the HPDLC.
Table 4. Composition of the HPDLC.
Component Concentration (wt%)
DPHPA52.77
QYPDLC-03636.27
YET0.05
NPG0.47
OA10.44
Table 5. Samples of HPDLC/adulterated peppermint oil composite with different purity of the peppermint oil.
Table 5. Samples of HPDLC/adulterated peppermint oil composite with different purity of the peppermint oil.
SamplePurity of Peppermint Oil (%)DE Max (%)V Peppermint Oil (μL)V Triethyl Citrate (μL)
Sample 1801.54010
Sample 2604.23020
Sample 3505.42525
Sample 4407.52030
Sample 52011.61040
Table 6. DEmax obtained for samples of HPDLC/adulterated peppermint oil composite.
Table 6. DEmax obtained for samples of HPDLC/adulterated peppermint oil composite.
SamplePurity of Peppermint Oil (%)DE Max (%)
Sample 1801.5
Sample 2604.2
Sample 3505.4
Sample 4407.5
Sample 52011.6
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Miloua, W.; Ortuño, M.; Navarro-Fuster, V.; Beléndez, A.; Pascual, I. Adulterant Detection in Peppermint Oil by Means of Holographic Photopolymers Based on Composite Materials with Liquid Crystal. Polymers 2022, 14, 1061. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14051061

AMA Style

Miloua W, Ortuño M, Navarro-Fuster V, Beléndez A, Pascual I. Adulterant Detection in Peppermint Oil by Means of Holographic Photopolymers Based on Composite Materials with Liquid Crystal. Polymers. 2022; 14(5):1061. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14051061

Chicago/Turabian Style

Miloua, Wafaa, Manuel Ortuño, Víctor Navarro-Fuster, Augusto Beléndez, and Inmaculada Pascual. 2022. "Adulterant Detection in Peppermint Oil by Means of Holographic Photopolymers Based on Composite Materials with Liquid Crystal" Polymers 14, no. 5: 1061. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14051061

APA Style

Miloua, W., Ortuño, M., Navarro-Fuster, V., Beléndez, A., & Pascual, I. (2022). Adulterant Detection in Peppermint Oil by Means of Holographic Photopolymers Based on Composite Materials with Liquid Crystal. Polymers, 14(5), 1061. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14051061

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop