Next Article in Journal
Poisson’s Ratio Prediction of Injection Molded Thermoplastics Using Differential Scanning Calorimetry
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation and Structure–Property Relationship Study of Piezoelectric–Conductive Composite Polymer Nanofiber Materials for Bone Tissue Engineering
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Particle Size and Bulk Density on Sound Absorption Performance of Oil Palm Frond-Reinforced Composites Particleboard
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 16
Issue 13
10.3390/polym16131951
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dual First and Second Surface Solar Mirrors of Polished WS2 and Silver by Dynamical Chemical Plating Technique on Polycarbonate

by
Coraquetzali Magdaleno López
1,2,*,
José de Jesús Pérez Bueno
2,*,
Alejandra Xochitl Maldonado Pérez
2,
Yunny Meas Vong
2,
Jorge Morales Hernández
2,
José Emanuel Ambrosio Juárez
1,
Iván Toledo Manuel
1,
José Antonio Cabello Mendez
3 and
David Meneses Rodríguez
4
1
Instituto Tecnológico Superior de Abasolo. Blvd. Cuitzeo de los Naranjos #401, Col. Cuitzeo de los Naranjos, Abasolo C.P. 36976, Guanajuato, Mexico
2
Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo Tecnológico en Electroquímica, S.C., Pedro Escobedo, Querétaro C.P. 76703, Querétaro, Mexico
3
Instituto Mexicano del Transporte, Carretera El Colorado—Galindo Km. 12 Col. Sanfandila, Pedro Escobedo, Querétaro C.P. 76703, Querétaro, Mexico
4
Cátedras—Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados Unidad Mérida, Km. 6 Antigua Carretera a Progreso Apdo. Postal 73, Cordemex, Mérida C.P. 97310, Yucatán, Mexico
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2024, 16(13), 1951; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16131951
Submission received: 30 May 2024 / Revised: 26 June 2024 / Accepted: 30 June 2024 / Published: 8 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances and Innovations in Recycled Polymer Composites)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This work proposes for the first time protecting–reflecting on both sides of plated mirrors and a solution to polycarbonate surface vulnerability to weathering and scratching using tungsten disulfide (WS2) by mechanical polishing. The ability of the dynamic chemical plating (DCP) technique to deposit Ag films at the nanometer scale on a polycarbonate (PC) substrate and its characteristics to be metallized is also shown. These deposits hold significant promise for concentrated solar power (CSP) applications. Complementarily, the application of WS2 as a reflective film for CSP by mechanical polishing on smooth polycarbonate surfaces is both novel and practical. This technique is innovative and scalable without needing reactants or electrical potential, making it highly applicable in real-world scenarios, including, potentially, on-site maintenance. The effects of surface morphology and adhesion, and the reflectivity parameters of the silver metallic surfaces were investigated. Wettability was investigated because it is important for polymeric surfaces in the activation and metal deposition immediately after redox reactions. The flame technique improved wettability by modifying the surface with carbonyl and carboxyl functional groups, with PC among the few industrial polymers that resisted such a part of the process. The change in the chemical composition, roughness, and wettability of the surfaces effectively improved the adhesion between the Ag film and the PC substrate. However, it did not significantly affect the adhesion between PC and WS2 and showed its possible implementation as a first surface mirror. Overall, this work provides a scalable, innovative method for improving the durability and reflectivity of polycarbonate-based mirrors, with significant implications for CSP applications.

1. Introduction

Among the various renewable energy generation methods, concentrated solar power (CSP) has gained significant interest due to its features, such as improved energy efficiency and the ability to collect solar thermal energy at low temperatures [1,2,3]. However, solar power plants are only profitable if the service life of their components, particularly reflective mirrors, exceeds 20 years [4,5].
Solar reflectors are one of the main components of CSP devices [6]. Any imperfections in these reflectors impact their optical performance, affecting the efficiency of the plant. This issue has prompted recent research on manufacturing processes [1], durability [7], and the degradation of reflective and protective layers [8].
Silver glass reflectors are commonly used in CSP systems [9] among the different types of solar mirrors. They are classified as second-surface reflectors based on a thin layer of reflective silver protected by a 1 to 4 mm glass substrate on the front and, typically, several layers of protective paint on the back [10,11]. In contrast, there are first-surface mirrors, such as those used in telescopes [12,13]. These systems have gained popularity because they do not require high-purity glass as a substrate [7,14,15].
The performance of mirrors depends primarily on the films deposited on the substrates [16,17]. Silver (Ag), which has a hemispherical reflectivity of 95–99% in the visible region and 90–95% in the near-infrared, is known to be one of the best solar reflectors [18,19], along with aluminum at 85–90% [20,21,22]. The spectral hemispherical reflectance calculated with the Fresnel equations depends on the complex refractive index, wavelength, incidence angle, roughness, absorption coefficient, and electrical conductivity. Various methods have been used to deposit silver films on substrates, including magnetron sputtering [23,24], thermal evaporation [25], electrodeposition [26], and non-electrolytic coating [27,28].
A suitable way to apply reflective coatings on non-conductive substrates, such as glass or plastics, is through an electroless plating process [29,30]. This process consists of the spontaneous reaction of different solutions without applying an electric current. However, the surfaces are immersed in a bath, requiring large amounts of solution.
Another process for applying thin metallic films to non-conductive substrates is dynamic chemical plating (DCP). It is a wet chemical deposition technique [31,32,33]. The novelty of DCP is based on a highly controlled sequential supply of materials (metal ions, such as Ni2+, Cu2+, Co2+, or Ag+) and an electron source (reducing agent) on the substrate.
DCP is a modified non-electrolytic deposition process in which a chemical reaction occurs without applied current and can coat irregular or non-conductive surfaces. A double-nozzle gun simultaneously sprays two different solutions containing the precursors onto the surface of the substrate [34,35]. After the projection and mixing of the two independent liquid jets on the surface, at a pressure of about 500 kPa (5 bar), the precursors react spontaneously through redox reactions, forming a thin, thermodynamically unstable liquid film on the substrate surface. DCP has enabled the production of compact, dense, and adherent metal coatings, e.g., with Ag and Cu or Ni–B [34], on substrates at room temperature, with deposition rates around 10 m/h.
On the other hand, tungsten disulfide (WS2) has been widely used for different applications, such as sensors [36], catalysts for hydrocracking oil [37], protecting polymers [38], and textiles for oil absorption or oil/water separation [39].
WS2 has been used for saturable absorber mirrors with high-damage-resistant characteristics for solid-state lasers such as Q-switched fiber lasers [40,41]. Han et al. [42] made a plasmonic nanocavity with a nanoparticle on a mirror system composed of Ag nanocubes on an Ag film separated from an Al2O3 spacer. This was coupled with a monolayer of WS2 for studying a second-harmonic generator. On the other hand, Huang et al. [43] studied a hybrid nanocavity composed of a silicon nanoparticle and a gold film. Again, this was coupled with a monolayer of WS2 for studying a second-harmonic generator.
WS2 has another important application as a low-friction dry lubricant coating, competing with or complementing MoS2 [38]. Thus, it can reduce friction and noise. Products such as Dicronite® and DL-5®, in accordance with the standards AMS2530 [44], provide the lubricity effect on surfaces by applying a coating.
This work aims to develop a dynamic solar reflector of Ag and WS2 on a highly reflective polycarbonate substrate, which has a potential application as a concentrating solar technology. The mirrors are a key element that can contribute to solve the main problem that CSP systems are addressing, which is collecting solar energy, but the costs of construction, operation, and maintenance of the facilities severely restrict them. Here, WS2/PC/Ag/epoxy paint is a mirror protecting–reflecting on both sides, directed to a collecting point. The WS2 acts as a thin reflective film, complementing the reflective characteristics of silver surfaces while also protecting the front side of the PC, which can be directly restored on-site. Here, the morphological and optical characteristics of the deposits are presented.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Silver Metallization of PC Samples

Metallic silver was deposited by DCP on solid polycarbonate sheets (LEXANTM 9043, SABIC (Saudi Basic Industries Corporation), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) of 1.22 × 1.22 cm and 1.5 mm thick. Tests were conducted with different thicknesses of the metal coating, from about 45 to 245 nm. This electroless technique allowed the mirror finish to be produced under ambient conditions by sequential spraying, as the aerosols were projected onto the surface of the substrate.
The DCP technique consists of the controlled reduction of a metal cation [31,35]. Two solutions were prepared, the first containing the salts of the metal to be deposited and the second the electron reserve in the form of a reducing chemical compound. With the help of a device (aerosol), the aqueous solutions were projected simultaneously and in the same proportion on the substrate in the form of tiny droplets (Figure 1). Mixing the two aqueous solutions causes a redox reaction on the surface of the substrate (Equation (1)).
M s o l u t i o n n + + R e d s o l u t i o n → M s u r f a c e + O x s o l u t i o n n +
The coalescence of the droplets forms a liquid film that covers and wets the surface exposed to the projection, obtaining a homogeneous and continuous metallic deposit.
The DCP method consists of five stages: cleaning, surface treatment, activation and rinsing, spraying of the solutions, and rinsing–drying (Figure 2).

2.2. Surface Treatment of PC Samples

Improved coating adhesion behavior is necessary due to the poor adhesion properties inherent to polycarbonate, attributed to its low surface free energy and lack of polar groups. The purpose of the surface treatment is to insert functional groups to improve wettability and adhesion to the metal film, so a flame treatment was applied to the surface. The flame treatment was conducted with a Ripack 3000 heat gun (Ripack, IPS Group; Muret, France). The parameters used for the treatment technique are shown in Table 1. The flame was applied manually on the PC plates, first with horizontal movements and later with vertical displacement. The time took about 2.5 s, from one side to the other, for the 1.23 m wide PC plates. The procedure was repeated three times to ensure complete wettability of the entire surface with a pause between them to avoid overheating of the PC.

2.3. Coating of WS2 by Polishing

The WS2 coatings were applied using a mechanical polishing technique with Truper® 15399 LIRO-5N and 102633 PULA-6AM polishers (Truper®; Jilotepec, State of Mexico, Mexico). Tests include samples of WS2 coatings on PCs with and without flame treatment. The WS2 particles were spread on the PC without its protective film. The powder was spread for about 15 min using the polishing machine. Then, it was washed with neutral soap, rinsed with water to remove the excess, and dried.
Figure 3a shows the proposed mirror configuration with nanometric reflective silver surfaces on the back of the PC plates, complemented with WS2 on the front side. The 1.3 mm thick PC plates are proposed as substrates, and an acrylic coating was deposited on the silver to protect it from the weather conditions.
Figure 3b shows a finished silver mirror, and Figure 3c shows an individual mirror of silver on PC with an aluminum frame. Figure 3d shows the designed heliostat structure to hold twelve framed mirrors, and Figure 3e shows the constructed and installed structure, which wears the twelve silver mirrors on PC pieces.

2.4. Characterization

The morphology of the surface was determined by digital light microscopy using a Keyence VHX-5000 microscope (Keyence; Osaka, Japan) with a 5000× optical objective, model VH-Z500R/Z500T (Keyence; Osaka, Japan), with a numerical aperture NA = N sin θ = 0.82 (N refractive index around the objective/N~1 for air).
The chemical state of silver was analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) using a Thermo Scientific™ K-Alpha XPS spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) using internal pressure in the analysis chamber of 6.5 × 10−9 mbar and a hemispherical analyzer with dual 180° focus and a 128-channel detector. The spectrometer used a monochromatic Al Kα X-ray source (hν = 1486.68 eV) and an analysis radius of 400 μm and an ion gun with an energy range of 100 to 4000 eV. The acquired high-resolution Ag 3d spectrum was processed with Avantage software (Thermo Fisher Scientific. (2024). version 6.7. Waltham, MA, USA), referencing the C1s bond of adventitious carbon at 284.8 eV [29].
Adequate adhesion between metallic or protective coatings and substrates was successfully obtained. The adhesion properties of the surfaces were evaluated using Scotch tape adhesion tests. Adhesion classification was performed using the cross-cut tape test method (Precision Gage & Tool Co.; Dayton, OH, USA) in accordance with ASTM D 3359-23 [45]. The tests were conducted at room temperature. Three repetitions were performed and averaged to obtain adhesion values.
The contact angle test measured the surface wettability behavior. Contact angle and surface energy measurements were made using the sessile drop technique with a KRÜSS device (Hamburg, Germany), model DSA30, at a room temperature of 20–25 °C. A drop of deionized water (10 μL droplets) was applied to the surface, the range of the sessile drop was from 0 to 180°, and the hydrophobic or hydrophilic character of the analyzed surface was determined. The model used for the measurement was the Young–Laplace.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Flame Activation on PC Surface Behavior

A pre-treatment was performed on the surface of the polycarbonate to improve the adhesion between the silver layers. The corresponding chemical and topographic changes on the surface of the flame-treated samples were characterized and linked to adhesion properties. It is also important to note that, despite the relatively high temperatures, the short duration of the treatment allows the activation of polymers without damaging the surface visually.
The topography of the surface strongly influences adhesion properties. The decisive factors are the size of the contact area and the size of the voids between the adherents. Figure 4 shows the topographic images of the silver and WS2 coatings. The silver coatings, made of nucleation of atoms by reducing silver ions, were more homogeneous and flat than the overlapping lamellar particles of WS2 (Figure 4a,b). The scales show a surface with more waviness for the WS2, with some irregularities on and within the layer attributed to the polishing process, which, despite being mechanically applied, was homogeneous and reflected light specularly instead of diffusely.
These surface topography changes did not result from thermal effects or chemical reactions of the flame species with the surface, such as carbonyl and carboxyl groups [46]. Physically, these changes are not significant (there is no wear or degradation), but the chemical changes were responsible for surface energy, contact angle, and adhesion variations.
Figure 4c of EDS mapping for Ag and WS2 shows a marked difference on the surfaces. The WS2 surface has different particles contrasting with the green carbon signal from the substrate underneath (polycarbonate) but which is not directly exposed. In the center of SEM figures for WS2, there is a tiny flat particle of about 5 mm that is semitransparent for electrons. Figure 4d–g show the individual mapping for each element in, both cases Ag and WS2. Figure 4h,i show the micrographs of high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) for WS2 with scale bars of 100 nm and 10 nm. The lamellar particles were highly crystalline and Moiré patterns were common because of the displacement between consecutive lamellas.
The wettability of a substrate’s surface is usually related to the quality of adhesion that can be achieved after coating it with another material [47]. Figure 5 shows the variation of contact angle values and surface free energy measured on polycarbonate surfaces before and after flame treatment using a deionized water droplet, where the contact angle values of the non-flame-treated surface are higher than those of the treated surface.
Figure 5c compares the different coatings and the effects of the flame treatment. The untreated surface had low wettability in the different analysis times, i.e., the surface of the CP is hydrophobic, with an initial value of 98.3° ± 0.27°. However, after heat treatment, the contact angle values tended to decrease, so it was observed that the surface was more hydrophilic, where the contact angle value at time zero was 21.4° ± 0.4°. The flame treatment significantly influenced the hydrophilic behavior of all the tested surfaces, causing increased wetting, which led to a decrease in the contact angle and an increase in the free energy of the surface.
The decay rate ( x ) is calculated between the minimum and maximum contact angles (CAmin and CAmax, respectively) [48], as shown in Equation (2).
x = 100 1 − C A m i n C A m a x
The obtained contact angle values demonstrate excellent wettability of the treated surface, which induces adequate adhesion between the substrate and the coating. This improvement in wetting behavior is caused by the formation of functional groups on the surface of the polymer.
The decrease in the contact angle with the activation of the flame treatment implies an increase in the surface free energy of the polycarbonate and, therefore, an increase in the adhesion between the surface and the water droplet, i.e., a higher amount of energy per unit area is required to separate them [49].
Contrary to the expected effect, coated surfaces that were previously flame-treated had higher contact angles than untreated surfaces. Usually, flame treatment and corona electrical discharges or plasma improve wettability by lowering the contact angle [48]. This result was the case for preparing the PC surfaces before wetting, activating, and silver deposition.
On the other hand, comparing the silver and WS2 surfaces revealed a higher surface energy for the silver coatings, which can be attributed to the hydrophobic properties of WS2 [50]. Higher surface energy is typically associated with higher adherence because it promotes interaction with other substances or materials. On the contrary, lower surface energy has a lower affinity with other substances or materials, which repels them and reduces adhesion.
According to the Gibbs free energy equation, increasing the surface free energy of polymers promotes condensation and wettability. It is necessary to increase the Gibbs free energy to improve the wettability area of the liquid droplet on a solid surface since the surface tension is constant and this is an intrinsic property of the material [51,52]. Therefore, the increase in PC free energy observed by decreasing the contact angle with water can promote higher homogeneity of the silver film on the PC substrate.
The polymer base of solar concentrators are substrates with a large surface area. Conventional plating techniques can be very expensive or impractical for large areas. That is why a method is required that allows a metal deposit to be made for large areas practically and efficiently in a short time. The DCP technique makes it possible to make silver deposits with the physicochemical characteristics desired for solar concentrators.
For this metallization stage, two solutions are designed: an oxidizer and reducer. The oxidizing solution consists of silver nitrate complexed by ammonia [53]. As for the reducing solution, it is made only from sugar (glucose) [54]. The reaction takes place as follows [53]:
2 A g + + C 6 H 12 O 6 + H 2 O → 2 A g + C 6 H 11 O 7 − + 3 H +
It is necessary to meet some basic requirements to achieve an excellent metallic layer: the one-to-one stoichiometry between the reducing and oxidizing solution and the thickness of the mixture film (metal salt and reducing solution) on the surface of the substrate. Tests were conducted with different thicknesses to study the influence of the thickness of the metal layer on optimizing the ideal parameters.
Figure 6 shows the deposition thickness of the metallic silver film on the flame-treated polycarbonate substrate. The kinetic growth of the film is linear, corresponding to the increase in the number of layers. Table 2 shows the values of the number of layers placed and the thickness obtained in each, which is increasing.
However, too much thickness caused too much stress, which negatively influenced the adhesion of the film between layers, which is negative for reflectance. Therefore, sixteen spray sequences were chosen as the optimal ones for studying silver films. After sixteen spray sequences, the metal film behaved uniformly and continuously throughout the substrate.
For not exceeding the thickness of the film, the projection was kept in motion throughout the sample, i.e., from left to right and from top to bottom of the substrate. This condition allowed the reaction to occur while projecting onto different points on the polymer’s surface.
According to the results obtained for the continuous projection mode, a silver deposit can be obtained under this condition since the reaction is fast enough to eliminate the relaxation time. A continuous mode can be used to design solutions for an industrial application.
One of the most relevant properties of these surfaces is their optical behavior. Once the deposit was made, the percentage of transmittance was analyzed, and the optimal conditions for the required objectives were determined.
Figure 7 shows the spectra of the transmittance percentage compared to the thickness of the metal layer. There is a loss of 1% of transmittance in the visible region with a thickness of 100 nm. However, in the 200–400 nm region, an absorption signal is not possible because the PC substrate absorbs at this wavelength.
A percentage reflectivity analysis was performed on the approximately 100 nm silver film. The total reflectivity curve is shown in Figure 8. The silver film has high reflectivity behavior in the visible region, absorbing more radiation from the ultraviolet region. The reflectivity in the visible range is about 95%.
Figure 8 compares the transmittance (Figure 8a) and reflectance (Figure 8b) of the surfaces. Considering 100% transmittance without coating, a higher transmittance percentage can be observed in the near-UV region for the silver coating than for the WS2 surfaces. Figure 8a shows that the effect of the flame treatment on both types of coatings was a slight reduction in intensity, maintaining a similar spectrum shape.
Silver surface reflectance shows a significant increase in the visible region with flame treatment, attributed to eliminating residues of silver compounds that could be photoactive, darken the surface, or even cause uneven areas.
On the other hand, comparing the WS2 surface reflectance with and without flame treatment revealed a slight reduction in the Vis-NIR regions, which was attributed to surface lamellae orientation changes.
The Ag + WS2 is darker than Ag or other cases in the 400–800 nm region, but we are highlighting the specularity of the WS2 coating and the beneficial contribution of such a layer as protection for PC. It can keep the surface clean after rain and is a solid lubricant, like MoS2 or graphite, that can avoid scratches, which is a main issue for PC use as a mirror substrate.

3.2. Adhesion Testing

The effectiveness of coatings is primarily based on the interfacial adhesion strength between the coatings and the substrate surface. Since adhesion is one of the most important factors in the coating application, pretreatment of the substrate is needed to improve its adhesion to the film [31]. Such pretreatment involves decontamination, sensitization, and activation of the substrate to aid the subsequent formation of the metal layer [33].
The adhesion between the silver film and the substrate was tested using Scotch tape, a suitable method for laboratory-scale preparation. A 5 × 5 mm grid pattern was made on the metal film by cross-section with a distance of 1 mm between lines. A 2.5 inch piece of tape (3M Scotch® tape) was applied over the cut and manually removed as quickly as possible. Adherence was assessed semi-quantitatively by comparison and description in the same set. Table 3 shows the results obtained from the metallization adhesion test for each layer placed on the substrate. The codes in this table show the percentage of the area removed from a substrate according to ASTM D-3359-23 [45]. The adhesion scale ranges from 5B to 0B.
The tests showed a higher percentage of the detached area after depositing 24 layers, increasing the percentage with 48 layers to more than 65%.
Table 3 data show that as the layers added to the substrate increased, the percentage of the removed area increased. This condition is attributed to the fact that, as the thickness increases, the coating becomes brittle and begins to fracture.
Figure 9 shows a proposed method for measuring the detached area using a quantitative analysis of the detached area by optical digital microscopy [48]. In Figure 9a, the surface without heat treatment had a larger detached area due to poor adhesion to the substrate (70.6% detached area) compared to Figure 9b, the surface with the flame treatment (59.99% detached area). According to ASTM D 3359-23 [45], it could be classified as 1B with >65% detachment, and with the flame treatment it could be classified as 5B [48].
Figure 9c,d compare the WS2 surfaces, showing no significant effect from the flame treatment on the coating. According to ASTM D 3359-23 [45], they could be classified as 5B with 0% detachment. Therefore, in the case of WS2, the treatment could be dispensed. According to the regulations (ASTM D-3359-23 [45]), a detachment of less than 5% could be considered, which could be classified as 4B.

3.3. XPS Analysis of Silver Metallic Film

Figure 10 shows the results of the XPS analyses for Ag and WS2 reflective surface samples. Figure 10b,c show the W4f/W5p and S2p of WS2, respectively. The high-resolution XPS spectrum of Ag3d3/2 and Ag3d5/2 was obtained (Figure 10d). Taking as a reference the main peak of metallic silver (368.2 eV), Ag 3d5/2, located at 368.2 eV, corresponds to the binding energy of metallic silver [55]. Particularly relevant was a perceptible signal for the Sn used as a surface activator on PC for subsequently obtaining the Ag coating (Figure 10e).

4. Conclusions

Metallic electroless silver deposition was accomplished on polycarbonate substrates using the dynamic chemical plating (DCP) technique. The thin films were nanometers in thickness and produced over an area of about 1.5 m2 for individual mirror pieces for concentrated solar power facilities.
  • DCP is a suitable process for depositing metal layers of Ag on non-conductive polycarbonate surfaces, using double-nozzle spray guns at room temperature. The layers obtained were deposited homogeneously on the substrate and had a uniform thickness and excellent adhesion properties as the deposits obtained on the polycarbonate were uniform. Therefore, DCP is a feasible method that does not require plating tanks, racks, drums, or external electric currents.
  • The surface treatment by flame changed the wettability of the surface as the static contact angle with the water decreased. Generally, adequate adhesion was found between the coating and the substrate, quantified accordingly with ASTM D 3359-23 40, obtained from the shear test.
  • Analysis of the chemical composition of the DCP deposit on the PC surface showed metallic silver.
  • Most solar mirrors used in commercial concentrating solar plants are made with a thin reflective layer of silver (<200 nm) between glass and paints to ensure high reflectance across the solar spectrum, with high durability for decades. In this work, the polycarbonate/Ag system showed an excellent reflectivity value of >90%, comparable to commercial rigid reflectors used in concentrated solar power. The flame treatment improved this reflectivity, which was attributed to the elimination of residues of silver compounds that could be photoactive, darken the surface, or even cause different types of dark spots.
  • A specular reflective coating type based on WS2 lamellar powder was achieved using easy, dry, and one-step mechanical polishing. Results showed reflectance higher than 90% for the visible region and >99% for the NIR region. Also, it showed adequate adhesion with and without flame treatment, which caused a slight reflectance reduction attributed to lamellar orientation on the surface.
  • The combination of a silver coating on the back side of the PC and WS2 on the front reduced reflectance, as was expected. However, the change on the external surface could be more extensively studied, as desirable properties can be foreseen. Alternatively, the silver and WS2 specular surfaces could also be used separately.
  • This work, for the first time, proposes protecting–reflecting on both sides of mirrors and a solution to PC surface vulnerability to weathering and scratching. Even more, using mechanical polishing, WS2 is used for reflection and surface protection and can be applied to polymers (PC) and metals (aluminum). The PC pieces were the industrially available substrates that resisted pretreatment with a flame for the silver electroless process.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.M.L., J.d.J.P.B. and Y.M.V.; methodology C.M.L., J.d.J.P.B., A.X.M.P., Y.M.V., J.M.H., J.E.A.J., I.T.M. and J.A.C.M.; validation, C.M.L. and J.d.J.P.B.; formal analysis, C.M.L. and J.d.J.P.B.; investigation, C.M.L., J.d.J.P.B., A.X.M.P., Y.M.V., J.M.H., J.E.A.J., I.T.M., J.A.C.M. and D.M.R.; resources, C.M.L. and J.d.J.P.B.; data curation, C.M.L., J.d.J.P.B., A.X.M.P. and D.M.R.; writing—original draft preparation, C.M.L. and J.d.J.P.B.; writing—review and editing, C.M.L., J.d.J.P.B., A.X.M.P., Y.M.V., J.M.H., J.E.A.J., I.T.M., J.A.C.M. and D.M.R.; visualization, C.M.L. and J.d.J.P.B.; supervision, C.M.L. and J.d.J.P.B.; project administration, J.d.J.P.B.; funding acquisition, C.M.L. and J.d.J.P.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Institute of Innovation, Science, and Entrepreneurship for Competitiveness (IDEA GTO) and the National Council of Humanities Sciences and Technologies (CONAHCYT, Mexico) through the Basic and/or Frontier Science Grant No. 320114, the National Laboratory of Graphenic Materials, and the LANIAUTO. This work was funded by “Fondo Sectorial CONACYT-SENER Sustentabilidad Energetica” through Grant 207450, “Centro Mexicano de Innovación en Energía Solar (CeMIE-Sol)”, within strategic project No. P62, “Prototype hybrid system of a supercritical CO2 expander with flat polycarbonate mirrors on automated heliostats”. The World Bank Group also provided funding (002/2017-PRODETES-PLATA).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the CIDETEQ’s staff members who supported the processes necessary for the projects and laboratory activities. Thanks to José German Flores López for his technical assistance in the SEM characterization. Thanks to Ing. Rosendo Ruiz of Kinematics RRR, S.A. de C.V., and Ricardo Rodríguez Carvajal of Universidad de Guanajuato for their assistance in constructing the heliostats. Thanks to Josue Esaú Romero Ibarra and the Laboratorio Universitario de Microscopía Electrónica (LUME) of the IIM-UNAM for the analyses of HR-TEM.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Alder, F.A.; Charrault, E.; Zuber, K.; Fabretto, M.; Patil, A.; Murphy, P.; Llusca, M. Fabrication of Robust Solar Mirrors on Polymeric Substrates by Physical Vapor Deposition Technique. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2020, 209, 110476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, N.; Yu, Y.; Wu, J.; Du, E.; Zhang, S.; Xiao, J. Optimal Configuration of Concentrating Solar Power Generation in Power System with High Share of Renewable Energy Resources. Renew. Energy 2024, 220, 119535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xu, R.; He, Z.; Yang, L.; Xu, S.; Wang, R.; Wang, H. Concentration Performance of Solar Collector Integrated Compound Parabolic Concentrator and Flat Microchannel Tube with Tracking System. Renew. Energy 2022, 200, 809–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jamali, H. Investigation and Review of Mirrors Reflectance in Parabolic Trough Solar Collectors (PTSCs). Energy Rep. 2019, 5, 145–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Achkari, O.; El Fadar, A. Latest Developments on TES and CSP Technologies—Energy and Environmental Issues, Applications and Research Trends. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2020, 167, 114806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Islam, M.T.; Huda, N.; Abdullah, A.B.; Saidur, R. A Comprehensive Review of State-of-the-Art Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) Technologies: Current Status and Research Trends. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 91, 987–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. García-Segura, A.; Fernández-García, A.; Ariza, M.J.; Sutter, F.; Valenzuela, L. Durability Studies of Solar Reflectors: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 62, 453–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. García-Segura, A.; Fernández-García, A.; Ariza, M.J.; Sutter, F.; Diamantino, T.C.; Martínez-Arcos, L.; Reche-Navarro, T.J.; Valenzuela, L. Influence of Gaseous Pollutants and Their Synergistic Effects on the Aging of Reflector Materials for Concentrating Solar Thermal Technologies. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2019, 200, 109955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fernández, A.G.; Gomez-Vidal, J.; Oró, E.; Kruizenga, A.; Solé, A.; Cabeza, L.F. Mainstreaming Commercial CSP Systems: A Technology Review. Renew. Energy 2019, 140, 152–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. García-Segura, A.; Fernández-García, A.; Ariza, M.J.; Sutter, F.; Valenzuela, L. Effects of Reduced Sulphur Atmospheres on Reflector Materials for Concentrating Solar Thermal Applications. Corros. Sci. 2018, 133, 78–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Múgica-Vidal, R.; Alba-Elías, F.; Sainz-García, E.; Pantoja-Ruiz, M. Atmospheric Pressure Air Plasma Treatment of Glass Substrates for Improved Silver/Glass Adhesion in Solar Mirrors. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2017, 169, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. James, R.A.; Stapleton, A.J.; Hughes, A.; Charrault, E.; Zuber, K.; Switalska, E.; Evans, D.; Murphy, P.; Llusca, M. Metallic Adhesive Layers for Ag-Based First Surface Mirrors. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2018, 20, 1800106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. McElwain, M.W.; Feinberg, L.D.; Perrin, M.D.; Clampin, M.; Mountain, C.M.; Lallo, M.D.; Lajoie, C.-P.; Kimble, R.A.; Bowers, C.W.; Stark, C.C.; et al. The James Webb Space Telescope Mission: Optical Telescope Element Design, Development, and Performance. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 2023, 135, 058001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sutter, F.; Wette, J.; Wiesinger, F.; Fernández-García, A.; Ziegler, S.; Dasbach, R. Lifetime Prediction of Aluminum Solar Mirrors by Correlating Accelerated Aging and Outdoor Exposure Experiments. Solar Energy 2018, 174, 149–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Arias, N.; Jaramillo, F. Highly Reflective Aluminum Films on Polycarbonate Substrates by Physical Vapor Deposition. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 505, 144596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Palacios, A.; Barreneche, C.; Navarro, M.E.; Ding, Y. Thermal Energy Storage Technologies for Concentrated Solar Power—A Review from a Materials Perspective. Renew. Energy 2020, 156, 1244–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Peinado Gonzalo, A.; Pliego Marugán, A.; García Márquez, F.P. A Review of the Application Performances of Concentrated Solar Power Systems. Appl. Energy 2019, 255, 113893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Grosjean, A.; Soum-Glaude, A.; Thomas, L. Replacing Silver by Aluminum in Solar Mirrors by Improving Solar Reflectance with Dielectric Top Layers. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2021, 29, e00307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. İkizler, B.; Erden, S. Simple and Additive-Free Synthesis of Highly Reflective Thin Silver Films and Their Application on Large-Scale Surfaces. Mater. Today Chem. 2024, 35, 101859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nakajima, D.; Kikuchi, T.; Natsui, S.; Suzuki, R.O. Mirror-Finished Superhydrophobic Aluminum Surfaces Modified by Anodic Alumina Nanofibers and Self-Assembled Monolayers. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 440, 506–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ulitschka, M.; Bauer, J.; Frost, F.; Arnold, T. Improvement of the Optical Properties after Surface Error Correction of Aluminium Mirror Surfaces. J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ. 2021, 17, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Abouelata, A.M.A.; Gaballah, S.A. Nano/Micro Smoothing and Reflectivity Enhancement for Preparation of Aluminum Surface Mirror. ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2022, 17, 1026–1033. [Google Scholar]
  23. Mao, L.; Geng, Y.; Cao, Y.; Yan, Y. Uniform High-Reflectivity Silver Film Deposited by Planar Magnetron Sputtering. Vacuum 2021, 185, 109999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ju, H.; Kong, F.; Xu, J.; Geng, Y.; Zhang, C.; Luan, J. Influence of Ag on the Microstructure, Mechanical and Tribological Properties of SiC–Ag Composite Film Deposited by the Industrial DC Magnetron Sputtering System. Vacuum 2023, 218, 112672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pan, Y.; Fan, Y.; Niu, J. Optical Properties of Ultra-Thin Silver Films Deposited by Thermal Evaporation and Its Application in Optical Filters. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2020, 104, 103123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Alves, M.S.; Melo, J.C.S.; Costa, C.V.; Ula, M.; de Freitas, J.D.; Tonholo, J.; Hillman, A.R.; de Assis, A.M.L.; Ribeiro, A.S. Latent Fingerprint Enhancement by Ag Nanoparticle Electrodeposition on Metal Surfaces. Electrochim. Acta 2024, 484, 143925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bragaglia, M.; Pascale, V.; Rinaldi, M.; Nanni, F. Silver Electroless Plating on 3D Printed Resins via Stereolithography: A Sustainable Solution. Thin Solid Films 2022, 757, 139417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Riaz, K.; Imran Ali, F.; Arslan Wasim, A.; Rafique, F.; Naveed Javed, M.; Abid Ali, S.; Ali Hashmi, I. Ionic Liquid Based Electroless Silver Plating Bath for Printable Circuit Boards (PCBs) Finishing. J. Mol. Liq. 2024, 394, 123704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chitvoranund, N.; Jiemsirilers, S.; Kashima, D.P. Effects of Surface Treatment on Adhesion of Silver Film on Glass Substrate Fabricated by Electroless Plating. Adv. Mater. Res. 2013, 664, 566–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lien, W.-F.; Huang, P.-C.; Tseng, S.-C.; Cheng, C.-H.; Lai, S.-M.; Liaw, W.-C. Electroless Silver Plating on Tetraethoxy Silane-Bridged Fiber Glass. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012, 258, 2246–2254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Magallón Cacho, L.; Pérez Bueno, J.J.; Meas Vong, Y.; Stremsdoerfer, G.; Espinoza Beltrán, F.J.; Martínez Vega, J. Novel Green Process to Modify ABS Surface before Its Metallization: Optophysic Treatment. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2015, 12, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Magallón-Cacho, L.; Pérez-Bueno, J.J.; Meas-Vong, Y.; Stremsdoerfer, G.; Espinoza-Beltrán, F.J. Surface Modification of Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene (ABS) with Heterogeneous Photocatalysis (TiO2) for the Substitution of the Etching Stage in the Electroless Process. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2011, 206, 1410–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cacho, L.M.; de Jesús Pérez Bueno, J.; Vong, Y.M.; Stremsdoerfer, G. Effect of Swelling of Chemical Reagents and the Sulfuric-Chromic Acid Bath on Surface Texturizing of Poly(Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene). Acta Chim. Slov. 2019, 66, 638–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. López, J.R.; Méndez, P.F.; Pérez-Bueno, J.J.; Trejo, G.; Stremsdoerfer, G.; Meas, Y.; Stremsdoerfer, G.; López, J.R.; Pérez-Bueno, J.J. Hardness and Corrosion Resistance of Ni/NiB Bi-Layer and Ni/NiB/NiB-PTFE Tri-Layer Coatings Prepared by Electrodeposition and Dynamic Chemical Plating (DCP) Techniques. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018, 165, D753–D760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Magdaleno López, C.; Pérez Bueno, J.d.J.; Cabello Mendez, J.A.; Hernández Leos, R.; Mendoza López, M.L.; Sosa Domínguez, A.; Meas Vong, Y. Deterioration of Novel Silver Coated Mirrors on Polycarbonate Used for Concentrated Solar Power. Sustainability 2022, 14, 16360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, D.; Li, Y.; Xiao, S.; Yang, C.; Zhou, J.; Xiao, B. Single Ni Atom Doped WS2 Monolayer as Sensing Substrate for Dissolved Gases in Transformer Oil: A First-Principles Study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 579, 152141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hur, Y.G.; Kim, M.-S.; Lee, D.-W.; Kim, S.; Eom, H.-J.; Jeong, G.; No, M.-H.; Nho, N.S.; Lee, K.-Y. Hydrocracking of Vacuum Residue into Lighter Fuel Oils Using Nanosheet-Structured WS 2 Catalyst. Fuel 2014, 137, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yan, Z.; Jiang, D.; Fu, Y.; Qiao, D.; Gao, X.; Feng, D.; Sun, J.; Weng, L.; Wang, H. Vacuum Tribological Performance of WS2–MoS2 Composite Film against Oil-Impregnated Porous Polyimide: Influence of Oil Viscosity. Tribol. Lett. 2019, 67, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Krasian, T.; Punyodom, W.; Worajittiphon, P. A Hybrid of 2D Materials (MoS2 and WS2) as an Effective Performance Enhancer for Poly(Lactic Acid) Fibrous Mats in Oil Adsorption and Oil/Water Separation. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 369, 563–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, H.; Chen, Y.; Yin, J.; Zhang, X.; Guo, T.; Yan, P. High-Damage-Resistant Tungsten Disulfide Saturable Absorber Mirror for Passively Q-Switched Fiber Laser. Opt. Express 2016, 24, 16287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Luo, Z.; Wu, D.; Xu, B.; Xu, H.; Cai, Z.; Peng, J.; Weng, J.; Xu, S.; Zhu, C.; Wang, F.; et al. Two-Dimensional Material-Based Saturable Absorbers: Towards Compact Visible-Wavelength All-Fiber Pulsed Lasers. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 1066–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Han, X.; Wang, K.; Persaud, P.D.; Xing, X.; Liu, W.; Long, H.; Li, F.; Wang, B.; Singh, M.R.; Lu, P. Harmonic Resonance Enhanced Second-Harmonic Generation in the Monolayer WS 2—Ag Nanocavity. ACS Photonics 2020, 7, 562–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Huang, H.; Deng, F.; Xiang, J.; Li, S.; Lan, S. Plasmon-Exciton Coupling in Dielectric-Metal Hybrid Nanocavities with an Embedded Two-Dimensional Material. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 542, 148660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. AMS2530A; Tungsten Disulfide Coating, Thin Lubricating Film, Binder-Less Impingement Applied. SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2014.
  45. ASTM D3359-23; Standard Test Methods for Rating Adhesion by Tape Test. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2023.
  46. Farris, S.; Pozzoli, S.; Biagioni, P.; Duó, L.; Mancinelli, S.; Piergiovanni, L. The Fundamentals of Flame Treatment for the Surface Activation of Polyolefin Polymers—A Review. Polymer 2010, 51, 3591–3605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Homola, T.; Matoušek, J.; Kormunda, M.; Wu, L.Y.L.; Černák, M. Plasma Treatment of Glass Surfaces Using Diffuse Coplanar Surface Barrier Discharge in Ambient Air. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2013, 33, 881–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Magdaleno-López, C.; de Jesús Pérez-Bueno, J. Quantitative Evaluation for the ASTM D4541-17/D7234 and ASTM D3359 Adhesion Norms with Digital Optical Microscopy for Surface Modifications with Flame and APPJ. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2020, 98, 102551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sabbatini, L. 7.2 CA and Surface Energy. In Polymer Surface Characterization; De Gruyter Textbook: Berlin, Germany, 2014; p. 306. ISBN 311037692X/9783110376920. [Google Scholar]
  50. Xavier, J.R.; Vinodhini, S.P.; Raja Beryl, J. Anti-Corrosion and Flame-Retardant Properties of Environmentally Benign Smart Functionalized WS2/RGO in Epoxy Coatings for Enhanced Steel Structural Protection in Natural Seawater. Mater. Today Commun. 2024, 38, 107842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, S.; Xu, S.; Liu, Y.; Lei, R.; Guo, T.; Yao, Y.; Gao, S.; Ding, J.; Zhang, Z. The Effect of Surface-Free Energy and Microstructure on the Condensation Mechanism of Water Vapor. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 2023, 33, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hebbar, R.S.; Isloor, A.M.; Ismail, A.F. Contact Angle Measurements. In Membrane Characterization; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 219–255. [Google Scholar]
  53. Stremsdoerfer, S. Non-Electrolytic Method for Metallizing a Substrate by the Reduction of Metallic Salt(s) and the Spraying of Aerosol(S). US8507043B2, 24 November 2006. [Google Scholar]
  54. Mielewczyk, L.; Liebscher, V.; Grothe, J.; Kaskel, S. Sugar-Based Electroless Copper Deposition on Pectin-Coated Alumina Microparticles. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 10, 2300496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Powell, C.J. Elemental Binding Energies for X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. Appl. Surf. Sci. 1995, 89, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 16 01951 g001
Figure 1. Schematic representation of dynamic chemical plating (DCP) apparatus.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of dynamic chemical plating (DCP) apparatus.
Polymers 16 01951 g001
Polymers 16 01951 g002
Figure 2. Diagram of the DCP metallization process.
Figure 2. Diagram of the DCP metallization process.
Polymers 16 01951 g002
Polymers 16 01951 g003
Figure 3. (a) Solar mirror configuration on polycarbonate showing the mirror layers: WS2, 1.3 mm thick PC plate, nanometric reflective silver coating deposited by DCP, and acrylic paint protective coating. (b) Automated facilities for silver DCP mirrors. (c) Silver mirror piece. (d) Heliostat model. (e) Heliostat constructed and installed with twelve silver mirrors of polycarbonate.
Figure 3. (a) Solar mirror configuration on polycarbonate showing the mirror layers: WS2, 1.3 mm thick PC plate, nanometric reflective silver coating deposited by DCP, and acrylic paint protective coating. (b) Automated facilities for silver DCP mirrors. (c) Silver mirror piece. (d) Heliostat model. (e) Heliostat constructed and installed with twelve silver mirrors of polycarbonate.
Polymers 16 01951 g003
Polymers 16 01951 g004
Figure 4. Topographic and chemical characterization of silver (1st column) and WS2 (2nd column) coatings on polycarbonate. (a) Optical micrograph; (b) SEM micrograph at 5000×; (c) EDS mapping showing the global distribution of elements; (d) shows Ag or W; (e) shows Sn or S; (f) shows C; (g) shows O; (h) show HR-TEM micrographs of WS2 with a scale bar of 100 nm and 10 nm, respectively.
Figure 4. Topographic and chemical characterization of silver (1st column) and WS2 (2nd column) coatings on polycarbonate. (a) Optical micrograph; (b) SEM micrograph at 5000×; (c) EDS mapping showing the global distribution of elements; (d) shows Ag or W; (e) shows Sn or S; (f) shows C; (g) shows O; (h) show HR-TEM micrographs of WS2 with a scale bar of 100 nm and 10 nm, respectively.
Polymers 16 01951 g004
Polymers 16 01951 g005
Figure 5. Contact angle and surface free energy measurements of (a) surfaces without flame treatment, (b) surfaces with flame treatment, and (c) a comparison between silver and WS2 surfaces without and with flame treatment. Examples of contact angle images for the surfaces of (d) silver, (e) flame-treated silver, (f) WS2, and (g) flame-treated WS2.
Figure 5. Contact angle and surface free energy measurements of (a) surfaces without flame treatment, (b) surfaces with flame treatment, and (c) a comparison between silver and WS2 surfaces without and with flame treatment. Examples of contact angle images for the surfaces of (d) silver, (e) flame-treated silver, (f) WS2, and (g) flame-treated WS2.
Polymers 16 01951 g005
Polymers 16 01951 g006
Figure 6. Thickness curve of the silver metallic film using the DCP technique.
Figure 6. Thickness curve of the silver metallic film using the DCP technique.
Polymers 16 01951 g006
Polymers 16 01951 g007
Figure 7. Vis-NIR spectra of the percentage of transmittance concerning the thickness of the silver metallic layer on the surface of the polycarbonate.
Figure 7. Vis-NIR spectra of the percentage of transmittance concerning the thickness of the silver metallic layer on the surface of the polycarbonate.
Polymers 16 01951 g007
Polymers 16 01951 g008
Figure 8. (a) Transmittance of the silver and WS2 surfaces. (b) Reflectance curves of the silver metal surface and WS2.
Figure 8. (a) Transmittance of the silver and WS2 surfaces. (b) Reflectance curves of the silver metal surface and WS2.
Polymers 16 01951 g008
Polymers 16 01951 g009
Figure 9. Quantitative analysis of the area detached for coatings using the adhesive tape method and digital microscopy: (a) untreated silver coating, (b) silver coating with flame treatment, (c) untreated WS2 coating, and (d) WS2 coating with flame treatment.
Figure 9. Quantitative analysis of the area detached for coatings using the adhesive tape method and digital microscopy: (a) untreated silver coating, (b) silver coating with flame treatment, (c) untreated WS2 coating, and (d) WS2 coating with flame treatment.
Polymers 16 01951 g009
Polymers 16 01951 g010
Figure 10. XPS spectra of Ag and WS2 reflective coatings. (a) Survey, (b) W4f and W5p of WS2, (c) S2p of WS2, (d) Ag3d of Ag, and (e) Sn3d of surface activator.
Figure 10. XPS spectra of Ag and WS2 reflective coatings. (a) Survey, (b) W4f and W5p of WS2, (c) S2p of WS2, (d) Ag3d of Ag, and (e) Sn3d of surface activator.
Polymers 16 01951 g010
Table 1. Parameters used for flame surface treatment.
Table 1. Parameters used for flame surface treatment.
Pressure (bar)Power (kW)Gas Flow Rate (kg/h)Power Source
1.5–3.545–762.9–5.2Natural gas
Table 2. Different thicknesses for each treatment done.
Table 2. Different thicknesses for each treatment done.
Layers PlatingThickness (nm)
845
16100
24150
40200
48245
Table 3. Scotch test results.
Table 3. Scotch test results.
Number of Layers Added to the Substrate% Area RemovedClassification
8 layers<5%4B
16 layers15–30%2B
24 layers35–65%1B
40 layers35–65%1B
48 layers>65%0B
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Magdaleno López, C.; Pérez Bueno, J.d.J.; Maldonado Pérez, A.X.; Meas Vong, Y.; Morales Hernández, J.; Ambrosio Juárez, J.E.; Toledo Manuel, I.; Cabello Mendez, J.A.; Meneses Rodríguez, D. Dual First and Second Surface Solar Mirrors of Polished WS2 and Silver by Dynamical Chemical Plating Technique on Polycarbonate. Polymers 2024, 16, 1951. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16131951

AMA Style

Magdaleno López C, Pérez Bueno JdJ, Maldonado Pérez AX, Meas Vong Y, Morales Hernández J, Ambrosio Juárez JE, Toledo Manuel I, Cabello Mendez JA, Meneses Rodríguez D. Dual First and Second Surface Solar Mirrors of Polished WS2 and Silver by Dynamical Chemical Plating Technique on Polycarbonate. Polymers. 2024; 16(13):1951. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16131951

Chicago/Turabian Style

Magdaleno López, Coraquetzali, José de Jesús Pérez Bueno, Alejandra Xochitl Maldonado Pérez, Yunny Meas Vong, Jorge Morales Hernández, José Emanuel Ambrosio Juárez, Iván Toledo Manuel, José Antonio Cabello Mendez, and David Meneses Rodríguez. 2024. "Dual First and Second Surface Solar Mirrors of Polished WS2 and Silver by Dynamical Chemical Plating Technique on Polycarbonate" Polymers 16, no. 13: 1951. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16131951

APA Style

Magdaleno López, C., Pérez Bueno, J. d. J., Maldonado Pérez, A. X., Meas Vong, Y., Morales Hernández, J., Ambrosio Juárez, J. E., Toledo Manuel, I., Cabello Mendez, J. A., & Meneses Rodríguez, D. (2024). Dual First and Second Surface Solar Mirrors of Polished WS2 and Silver by Dynamical Chemical Plating Technique on Polycarbonate. Polymers, 16(13), 1951. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16131951

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop