Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of Dimethyl-Substituted Polyviologen and Control of Charge Transport in Electrodes for High-Resolution Electrochromic Displays
Next Article in Special Issue
Polyolefins, a Success Story
Previous Article in Journal
Superiorly Plasticized PVC/PBSA Blends through Crotonic and Acrylic Acid Functionalization of PVC
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 9
Issue 3
10.3390/polym9030083
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis of Aluminum Complexes Bearing 8-Anilide-5,6,7-trihydroquinoline Ligands: Highly Active Catalyst Precursors for Ring-Opening Polymerization of Cyclic Esters

by
Shaofeng Liu
1,2,*,
Jie Zhang
3,
Weiwei Zuo
1,
Wenjuan Zhang
4,
Wen-Hua Sun
4,*,
Hongqi Ye
3 and
Zhibo Li
2
1
State Key Laboratory for Modification of Chemical Fibers and Polymer Materials, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China
2
School of Polymer Science and Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266042, China
3
Department of Chemistry and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
4
Key Laboratory of Engineering Plastics and Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2017, 9(3), 83; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9030083
Submission received: 6 February 2017 / Revised: 24 February 2017 / Accepted: 25 February 2017 / Published: 1 March 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tailored Polymer Synthesis by Advanced Polymerization Techniques)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The stoichiometric reactions of 8-(2,6-R1-4-R2-anilide)-5,6,7-trihydroquinoline (LH) with AlR3 (R = Me or Et) afforded the aluminum complexes LAlR2 (Al1–Al5,Al1: R1 = iPr, R2 = H, R = Me; Al2: R1 = Me, R2 = H, R = Me; Al3: R1 = H, R2 = H, R = Me; Al4: R1 = Me, R2 = Me, R = Me; Al5: R1 = Me, R2 = Me, R = Et) in high yields. All aluminum complexes were characterized by NMR spectroscopy and elemental analysis. The molecular structures of complexes Al4 and Al5 were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffractions and revealed a distorted tetrahedral geometry at aluminum. In the presence of BnOH, complexes Al1–Al5 efficiently initiated the ring-opening homopolymerization of ε-caprolactone (ε-CL) and rac-lactide (rac-LA), respectively, in a living/controlled manner.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Polyesters including polycaprolactone (PCL), polylactide (PLA), and their copolymers are ubiquitous engineering materials in our daily life and have attracted considerable attention over the past decades due to their potential as renewable resources and their biodegradable characteristics [1,2,3]. It is notable that they are not only biodegradable but also bioassimilable, and much interest has been focused on their biomedical and pharmaceutical applications such as drug delivery excipients, adsorbable surgical sutures, bone screws, and materials for tissue engineering [4].
A particularly convenient method for the synthesis of polyesters is the ring-opening polymerization (ROP) of cyclic esters using metal complexes as catalysts or initiators, including aluminum [5,6,7,8,9], rare earth metals [10,11,12,13], titanium and zirconium [14,15], magnesium and zinc [16,17,18,19,20,21,22], tin [23,24], and iron [25,26,27,28] complexes. Among these, aluminum complexes bearing ancillary ligands have attract the most of attention and are one kind of the most promising catalysts for ROP of cyclic esters owing to tremendous catalytic activities, low toxicity, excellent controllability over the molar mass, dispersities, and regio- or stereo-selectivities of the resultant polymers. The ancillary ligands in the aluminum-based catalytic systems have been proved to be an important role in determining the catalytic performances by tuning the electronic and steric properties. Gibson [29] systematically studied the factors influencing the ROP of rac-LA by (salen)Al complexes, for instance, which are well known as highly efficient catalysts, and found that high activities were favored by electron-withdrawing substituents on the phenoxy, but suppressed by large ortho-phenoxy substituents. In contrast, the isoselectivity was favored by sterically demanding ortho-phenoxy groups. More recently, Nomura [30] reported successful controlled random copolymerization of ε-CL and LA with a homo salen-Al catalyst by introduction of a bulky iPr3Si group, which could narrow the reactivity ratio gap of ε-CL and LA.
Over the past few years, we studied Al complexes bearing bidentate and tridentate ligands such as bis-phenolate [31], 8-quinolinolates [32], aldiminophenolates [33], imidazolylphenolates [34] and amidates [35]. During the course of this research, it is clearly that thoughtfully tuning of the environments of the ligands, namely, incorporation of different substituents or heteroatoms in the framework of the ligands, could tremendously influence the observed catalytic activities and resulting properties of the products. Therefore, we continue to pursue the new catalytic models design. Recently, nickel complexes (Scheme 1, Left) containing 8-arylimino-5,6,7-trihydroquinolyl ligand [36,37,38,39] and vanadium complexes (Scheme 1, Middle) bearing 8-(2,6-dimethylanilide)-5,6,7-trihydroquinoline ligand [40] were reported exhibiting remarkable reactivity with ethylene, and the fused six-member-ring seemed to be the key fact in regard to the catalyst design. In this context, the Al complexes (Scheme 1, Right) bearing a series of 8-(2,6-R1-4-R2-anilide)-5,6,7-trihydroquinoline ligands have been prepared and applied as initiates for ring-opening homo and copolymerization of ε-CL and rac-LA.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. General Considerations

Schlenk techniques or glove-box techniques were employed for compounds and reactions which are moisture/oxygen sensitive. n-Hexane, toluene and THF were dried by refluxing over sodium/benzophenone. CH2Cl2 was dried over CaH2, distilled and stored with activated molecular sieves (4A) under nitrogen. CDCl3 dried over CaH2 and C6D6 dried over Na/K were vacuum transferred prior to use. AlMe3 and AlEt3 were purchased from Aldrich. ε-CL was purchased from Aladdin and dried over CaH2. rac-LA was purchased from TCI and used as received. FT-IR and elemental analysis were performed on the Bruker Tensor 27 (Bruker, Qingdao, China) and Perkin-Elmer 2400II (PerkinElmer, Qingdao, China), respectively. NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker DMX-500 (1H: 500 MHz, 13C: 125 MHz, Bruker, Qingdao, China). The GPC analysis was carried out at 40 °C on Wyatt OPTILAB rEX with StyragelP8512-10E3A10 (the effective molar mass range is from 100 to 40,000, Wyatt Technology Corporation, Qingdao, China) using THF as the eluent. Molar mass and dispersity Ð were calculated using polystyrenes as standard, correcting factors of 0.56 and 0.58 for PCL and PLA, respectively [41].

2.2. Synthesis of 8-(2,6-R1-4-R2-anilide)-5,6,7-trihydroquinoline (LH1–LH4)

Synthesis of 8-(2,6-iPr-anilide)-5,6,7-trihydroquinoline (LH1). The synthetic procedure of the ligands is similar as reported method [40]. In a 100 mL sealed Schlenk tube, were placed 5,6,7-trihydroquinolin-8-one (1.47 g, 10.0 mmol), toluene (40 mL), 2,6-diisopropylaniline (1.77 g, 10.0 mmol), and p-toluenesulfonic acid hydrate (20 mg). The mixture was stirred overnight at 110 °C. Next, the mixture was cooled down to room temperature and filtered. The filtrate was dried under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in methanol and CH2Cl2 (v/v = 1/1). To this solution was added sodium borohydride (NaBH4, 3.78 g, 100 mmol) slowly, and the mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature. Water (50 mL) was added to quench the reaction. The product was extracted by chloroform and purified by column chromatography (silica gel, petroleum eather/ethyl acetate = 2/1) to be a yellow solid (1.31 g, 5.60 mmol, 56.0%). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 8.48 (d, 1 H, J = 4.5 Hz, quino–H), 7.42 (d, 1 H, J = 7.6 Hz, quino–H), 7.14–7.11 (m, 4 H, quino–H + Ar–H), 4.46 (br, 1 H, N–H), 4.04 (dd, 1 H, J = 8.5, 4.6 Hz, NCH), 3.59 (hept, 2 H, J = 6.9 Hz, CHMe2), 2.91–2.73 (m, 2 H, quino–H), 2.03–1.87 (m, 2 H, quino–H), 1.81–1.65 (m, 2 H, quino–H), 1.26 (d, 6 H, J = 6.9 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 1.18 (d, 6 H, J = 6.9 Hz, CH(CH3)2). 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ 157.37, 147.13, 145.65, 141.96, 136.92, 132.05, 124.76, 123.54, 122.08, 60.50, 29.27, 28.88, 27.56, 24.83, 24.26, 20.28. FT-IR (KBr, cm−1): 3311, 3060, 2955, 2864, 1574, 1457, 1417, 1324, 1250, 1194, 1147, 1104, 1055, 1002, 935, 807, 781, 745, 707, 546. Anal. Calcd for C21H28N2: C, 81.77; H, 9.15; N, 9.08. Found: C, 81.95; H, 9.01; N, 8.97.
Synthesis of 8-(2,6-Me-anilide)-5,6,7-trihydroquinoline (LH2). Using the method described above, 8-(2,6-Me-anilide)-5,6,7-trihydroquinoline was obtained as a yellow solid (1.28 g, 5.08 mmol, 50.8%) 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 8.47 (d, 1 H, J = 4.3 Hz, quino–H), 7.42 (d, 1 H, J = 7.6 Hz, quino–H), 7.12 (dd, 1 H, J = 7.6, 4.7 Hz, quino–H), 7.02 (d, 2 H, J = 7.4 Hz, Ar–H), 6.87 (t, 1 H, J = 7.4 Hz, Ar–H), 4.37–4.36 (m, 1 H, NCH), 4.01 (br, 1 H, NH), 2.94–2.72 (m, 2 H, quino–H), 2.33 (s, 6 H, Me), 2.03–1.86 (m, 2 H, quino–H), 1.85–1.71 (m, 2 H, quino–H). 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ 157.68, 147.29, 145.05, 136.92, 132.08, 131.23, 128.79, 122.24, 122.09, 57.31, 29.76, 28.72, 19.57, 19.11. FT-IR (KBr, cm–1): 3333, 3042, 2940, 1589, 1570, 1471, 1438, 1256, 1214, 1186, 1160, 1093, 1033, 1013, 877, 846, 791, 752, 705, 681, 571. Anal. Calcd for C17H20N2: C, 80.91; H, 7.99; N, 11.10. Found: C, 80.78; H, 8.15; N, 11.02.
Synthesis of 8-anilide-5,6,7-trihydroquinoline (LH3). Using the method described above, 8-anilide-5,6,7-trihydroquinoline was obtained as a yellow solid (1.01 g, 4.51 mmol, 45.1%). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 8.45 (d, 1 H, J = 3.9 Hz, quino–H), 7.44 (d, 1 H, J = 7.6 Hz, quino–H), 7.21 (t, 2 H, J = 7.9 Hz, Ar–H), 7.17–7.10 (m, 1 H, quino–H), 6.78 (d, 2 H, J = 8.3 Hz, Ar–H), 6.73 (t, 1 H, J = 7.3 Hz, Ar–H), 4.86 (br, 1 H, NH), 4.50 (t, 1 H, J = 5.5 Hz, NCH), 2.94–2.75 (m, 2 H, quino–H), 2.35–2.30 (m, 2 H, quino–H), 2.01–1.84 (m, 2 H, quino–H). 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ 156.61, 148.16, 147.25, 137.14, 132.87, 129.28, 122.38, 117.63, 113.90, 54.04, 29.18, 28.56, 19.36. FT-IR (KBr, cm−1): 3320, 3096, 3054, 3016, 2943, 2865, 1604, 1516, 1441, 1312, 1255, 1160, 1108, 1021, 983, 864, 793, 737, 689, 508. Anal. Calcd for C15H16N2: C, 80.32; H, 7.19; N, 12.49. Found: C, 80.53; H, 7.18; N, 12.26.
Synthesis of 8-(2,6-Me-4-Me-anilide)-5,6,7-trihydroquinoline (LH4). Using the method described above, 8-(2,6-Me-4-Me-anilide)-5,6,7-trihydroquinoline was obtained as a yellow solid (1.67 g, 6.28 mmol, 62.8%). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 8.46 (d, 1 H, J = 4.3 Hz, quino–H), 7.41 (d, 1 H, J = 7.6 Hz, quino–H), 7.11 (dd, 1 H, J = 7.6, 4.7 Hz, quino–H), 6.85 (s, 2 H, Ar–H), 4.30–4.21 (m, 1 H, NCH), 3.98 (br, 1 H, NH), 2.94–2.69 (m, 2 H, quino–H), 2.30 (s, 6 H, Me), 2.25 (s, 3 H, Me), 2.00–1.87 (m, 2 H, quino–H), 1.84–1.71 (m, 2 H, quino–H). 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ 157.70, 147.28, 142.42, 136.98, 132.13, 131.95, 129.51, 122.21, 122.06, 57.82, 29.70, 28.82, 20.80, 19.68, 18.99. FT-IR (KBr, cm–1): 3326, 2936, 1570, 1483, 1439, 1368, 1299, 1228, 1156, 1088, 1014, 967, 849, 786, 736, 690, 579. Anal. Calcd for C18H22N2: C, 81.16; H, 8.32; N, 10.52. Found: C, 81.20; H, 8.21; N, 10.58.

2.3. Synthesis of Aluminum Complexes (Al1–Al5)

Synthesis of Al1. To a stirred solution of 8-(2,6-iPr-anilide)-5,6,7-trihydroquinoline (0.308 g, 1.00 mmol) in dried toluene (30 mL) at room temperature, AlMe3 (1.00 mmol, 1.0 mL, 1 M in toluene) was added by syringe. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 12 h and a yellow solution was obtained. The residue, after removing the solvent under vacuum, was washed by cold n-hexane (10 mL) to give a yellow powder (0.335 g, 0.92 mmol, yield 92%). 1H NMR (C6D6): δ 7.58 (d, 1 H, J = 5.1 Hz, quino–H), 7.30–7.22 (m, 3 H, quino–H + Ar–H), 6.59 (d, 1 H, J = 7.6 Hz, Ar–H), 6.35 (t, 1 H, J = 7.5 Hz, Ar–H), 4.48 (dd, 1 H, J = 11.6, 4.4 Hz, NCH), 4.17 (hept, 1 H, J = 6.8 Hz, CHMe2), 3.70 (hept, 1 H, J = 6.8 Hz, CHMe2), 2.17 (dd, 1 H, J = 17.5, 5.8 Hz, quino–H), 2.05 (dt, 1 H, J = 17.5, 8.7 Hz, quino–H), 1.86–1.77 (m, 1 H, quino–H), 1.42 (d, 3 H, J = 6.7 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 1.39 (d, 3 H, J = 6.7 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 1.37–1.32 (m, 2 H, quino–H), 1.30 (d, 3 H, J = 6.9 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 1.27 (d, 3 H, J = 6.9 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 1.25 (qd, 1 H, J = 12.2, 4.4 Hz, quino–H), −0.22 (s, 3 H, Al–Me), –0.25 (s, 3 H, Al–Me). 13C NMR (C6D6): δ 163.05, 149.62, 148.61, 144.06, 141.34, 139.11, 133.77, 129.23, 124.53, 124.26, 123.93, 122.80, 63.85, 29.32, 28.35, 26.98, 26.59, 26.22, 25.95, 25.59, 24.95, 20.52, −6.95, −8.59. Anal. Calcd for C23H33AlN2: C, 75.79; H, 9.13; N, 7.69. Found: C, 75.53; H, 8.98; N, 7.39.
Synthesis of Al2. Using the method described for Al1, Al2 was obtained as a yellow powder (0.292 g, 0.95 mmol, yield 95%). 1H NMR (C6D6): δ 7.64 (d, 1 H, J = 5.2 Hz, quino–H), 7.35 (d, 1 H, J = 7.4 Hz, quino–H), 7.30 (d, 1 H, J = 7.3, Ar–H), 7.17 (t, 1 H, J = 7.5 Hz, quino–H), 6.68 (d, 1 H, J = 7.7 Hz, Ar–H), 6.43 (dd, 1 H, J = 7.5, 5.5 Hz, Ar–H), 4.58 (dd, 1 H, J = 11.6, 4.8 Hz, NCH), 2.65 (s, 3 H, Ar–Me), 2.59 (s, 3 H, Ar–Me), 2.27–2.18 (m, 1 H, quino–H), 2.14–2.07 (m, 1 H, quino–H), 1.88–1.83 (m, 1 H, quino–H), 1.44–1.26 (m, 2 H, quino–H), 1.13–1.05 (m, 1 H, quino–H), −0.14 (s, 3 H, Al–Me), −0.15 (s, 3 H, Al–Me). 13C NMR (C6D6): δ 163.34, 148.04, 141.35, 139.11, 138.52, 137.40, 133.84, 129.06, 128.62, 123.18, 122.67, 61.11, 29.06, 26.57, 20.60, 20.20, 19.85, −6.99, −8.31. Anal. Calcd for C19H25AlN2: C, 74.00; H, 8.17; N, 9.08. Found: C, 73.88; H, 8.01; N, 9.03.
Synthesis of Al3. Using the method described for Al1, Al3 was obtained as a yellow powder (0.254 g, 0.91 mmol, yield 91%). 1H NMR (C6D6): δ 7.47 (br, 1 H, quino–H), 7.32 (br, 2 H, J = 7.6 Hz, Ar–H), 7.00 (d, 2 H, J = 7.5 Hz, Ar–H), 6.79 (t, 1 H, J = 7.0 Hz, Ar–H), 6.64 (d, 1 H, J = 7.3 Hz, quino–H), 6.39 (br, 1 H, quino–H), 4.24 (br, 1 H, NCH), 2.69 (br, 1 H, quino–H), 2.19–1.92 (m, 2 H, quino–H), 1.41–1.28 (m, 2 H, quino–H), 0.88-0.64 (m, 1 H, quino–H), −0.13 (s, 3 H, Al–Me), -0.19 (s, 3 H, Al–Me). 13C NMR (C6D6): δ 162.70, 152.63, 140.86, 139.31, 134.96, 129.76, 129.34, 123.19, 115.73, 57.21, 26.62, 25.81, 19.26, −6.82, −10.10. Anal. Calcd for C17H21AlN2: C, 72.83; H, 7.55; N, 9.99. Found: C, 72.55; H, 7.41; N, 9.67.
Synthesis of Al4. Using the method described for Al1, Al4 was obtained as a yellow powder (0.309 g, 0.96 mmol, yield 96%). 1H NMR (C6D6): δ 7.58 (d, 1 H, J = 5.1 Hz, quino–H), 7.04 (s, 1 H, Ar–H), 6.99 (s, 1 H, Ar–H), 6.64 (d, 1 H, J = 7.5 Hz, quino–H), 6.37 (dd, 1 H, J = 7.4, 5.6 Hz, quino–H), 4.50 (dd, 1 H, J = 11.6, 4.7 Hz, NCH), 2.52 (s, 3 H, Ar–Me), 2.47 (s, 3 H, Ar–Me), 2.29 (s, 3 H, Ar–Me), 2.22–2.14 (m, 1 H, quino–H), 2.09–2.02 (m, 1 H, quino–H), 1.84–1.79 (m, 1 H, quino–H), 1.37–1.22 (m, 2 H, quino–H), 1.07–0.99 (m, 1 H, quino–H), −0.23 (s, 3 H, Al–Me), −0.26 (s, 3 H, Al–Me). 13C NMR (C6D6): δ 163.58, 145.02, 141.37, 139.04, 138.14, 137.04, 133.88, 131.72, 129.83, 129.41, 122.64, 61.32, 29.08, 26.61, 21.04, 20.48, 20.24, 19.71, –7.05, –8.37. Anal. Calcd for C20H27AlN2: C, 74.50; H, 8.44; N, 8.69. Found: C, 74.22; H, 8.37; N, 8.51.
Synthesis of Al5. Using the method described for Al1, Al5 was obtained as a yellow powder (0.325 g, 0.93 mmol, yield 93%). 1H NMR (C6D6): δ 7.72 (d, 1 H, J = 5.0 Hz, quino–H), 7.02 (s, 1 H, Ar–H), 6.97 (s, 1 H, Ar–H), 6.67 (d, 1 H, J = 7.6 Hz, quino–H), 6.42 (dd, 1 H, J = 7.2, 5.7 Hz, quino–H), 4.49 (dd, 1 H, J = 11.4, 4.6 Hz, NCH), 2.52 (s, 3 H, Ar–Me), 2.47 (s, 3 H, Ar–Me), 2.27 (s, 3 H, Ar–Me), 2.21–2.14 (m, 1 H, quino–H), 2.10–2.03 (m, 1 H, quino–H), 1.85–1.80 (m, 1 H, quino–H), 1.42 (t, 3 H, J = 8.1 Hz, CH2CH3), 1.36–1.31 (m, 2 H, quino–H), 1.27 (t, 3 H, J = 8.1 Hz, CH2CH3), 1.05 (qd, 1 H, J = 12.0, 5.0 Hz, quino–H), 0.48–0.31 (m, 4 H, CH2CH3). 13C NMR (C6D6): δ 163.88, 145.28, 141.58, 139.11, 137.99, 136.82, 134.13, 131.69, 129.86, 129.40, 122.56, 61.79, 29.33, 26.56, 21.02, 20.35, 20.18, 19.56, 10.49, 9.94, 1.98, 1.21. Anal. Calcd for C22H31AlN2: C, 75.39; H, 8.92; N, 7.99. Found: C, 75.13; H, 8.78; N, 7.95.

2.4. The ROP of ε-CL and rac-LA

A general procedure for homopolymerization in the presence of benzyl alcohol (run 3, Table 1) is given as follows and other ROPs of ε-CL and rac-LA including the copolymerization were carried out by the similar procedure described here. A toluene solution of Al2 (0.020 mmol), BnOH (0.020 mmol), and ε-caprolactone (5.0 mmol), along with 3.44 mL toluene, was added into a Schlenk tube at room temperature in glove-box. The tube was taken out and placed into the oil bath at 110 °C for the 30 min. Then, the mixture was quenched by few drops of glacial acetic acid. A little amount of solution was transferred to another Schlenk tube, and all the volatiles were removed under vacuum. The residues were dissolved in CDCl3 for 1H NMR characterization to determine the conversion. The rest solution was poured into methanol (200 mL) to precipitate the polymer. The resultant polymer was then collected by filtration and dried in vacuo.

2.5. Crystal Structure Determinations

Single crystals of Al4 and Al5 were grown by diffusion of n-hexane into their toluene solutions slowly at room temperature. X-ray diffractions for Al4 and Al5 were carried out at 173(2) K on a Rigaku RAXIS Rapid IP diffractometer with graphite-monochromated Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å). The structures were solved with the method of XS [42] and refined with ShelXL [43] according to Olex2 [44]. The hydrogen atoms were calculated and introduced riding on the corresponding parent atoms. Crystal data for Al4 and Al5 were summarized in Table S1 in ESI. CCDC reference numbers 1495111 and 1495112 were for complexes Al4 and Al5, respectively.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis and Characterization of the Ligands and Complexes

The 8-substituted-anilide-5,6,7-trihydroquinoline ligands (Scheme 2, LH1-LH4) were prepared using the modified procedure reported previously [40]. The ligands LH1-LH4 were prepared by reduction of the imine analogue with NaBH4 in the mixture of MeOH and CH2Cl2 (v/v = 1/1), which accounts for faster reaction and higher yields (45%–63%). The Al complexes Al1–Al5 (Scheme 2) were synthesized as yellow solids by the stoichiometric reactions of AlMe3 or AlEt3 and the corresponding ligands in toluene overnight at room temperature in high yields (91%–96%). Al1–Al5 are highly sensitive to air and moisture. However, they can be conserved without decomposition over months under N2 or in the glove-box.
Complexes Al1–Al5 were characterized by NMR spectra (1H and 13C) and elemental analysis, which were consistent with the chemical structure of LAlR2. In the 1H NMR spectrum of Al1, as compared to that of the corresponding ligand LH1, the new additional resonances in the high field region (−0.22 to −0.25 ppm) were observed and attributed to the methyl groups on Al center (Al–CH3). In the meantime, the N–H signal (broad resonance at 4.46 ppm) of LH1 disappeared as expected. In addition, there were two sets of resonances of CH(CH3)2 (4.17 and 3.70 ppm) for Al1 (Figure S4 in ESI), which was distinguished from only one (3.59 ppm) for LH1. It was assumed that the aryl-N bonding of complex Al1 could not freely rotate in solution because of the steric hindrance of the ortho-isopropyl groups of the N-aryl rings in Al complex. The similar characteristics were even observed for complexes Al2–Al5 with less steric hindrance. The structures of Al4 and Al5 were determined by X-ray crystallography and depicted in Figure 1 and Figure 2 with the selected bond lengths and angles. In the molecule of Al4, the geometry around Al can be best described as a distorted tetrahedron, as evidenced in the bond angles for N1–Al1–N2 = 85.07(10), N1–Al1–C20= 105.08(14), N1–Al1–C19 = 111.83(14), N2–Al1–C19 = 117.26(14), N2–Al1–C20 = 120.84(13). The bond distance of Al1–N1 (1.981(3)) was significant longer than that of Al1–N2 (1.844(2)), indicating two different types of bonding. The aryl ring was almost perpendicular to the coordination plane with the dihedral angle of 78.19°. The coordination features (geometry and coordination mode) of complex Al5 (Figure 2) were similar as those of complex Al4, despite the different alkyls (Me or Et) on Al centres.

3.2. Ring-opening Polymerization of ε-CL and rac-LA

Catalytic performances of complexes Al1–Al5 for ε-CL homopolymerization were examined and the results were shown in Table 1. The catalytic system using Al2 without alcohol produced PLAs with a broad dispersity Ð (Table 1 run 1), consistent with the fact that the metal alkoxides generally polymerized cyclic esters in better controllable way than their alkyl analogues [45,46,47,48,49]. We previously reported that quinolin-8-amine-Al complexes had high activity for ROP of ε-CLwithout the addition of alcohol, but being short of a controlled manner [45]. In contrast, Nomura reported that for phenoxy-imine-Al complexes, addition of alcohol was essential, and the polymerization did not occur in the absence of alcohol [1]. Thus, the polymerizations using other Al complexes (Al1, Al3–Al5) without an alcohol were not investigated further. Instead, benzyl alcohol, one equivalent to metal, was employed to generate in situ the aluminum benzyloxide, which can act as the catalyst via a coordination insertion mechanism. This was consistent with the analysis of 1H NMR of resultant polymer possessing a benzyl as the end group (see ESI, Figure S1). All catalytic systems (runs 2–6, Table 1) exhibited very high efficiency for ROP of ε-CL with the conversion of 99%–100% according to Redshaw’s classification of the activity for ROP of ε-CL [1], and produced PCLs with narrow dispersity Ð of 1.18–1.24, which was believed as a living/controlled polymerization process. The different ligands with different substituents on the aryl and the alkyl groups on the Al center had no clear distinctive influence on the catalytic performance in regarding to the activities.
According to runs 3 and 7–9 in Table 1, the linear relationship between the conversion of monomer and Mn was observed, together with narrow dispersity Ð (1.10–1.18), suggesting a typical living polymerization process (Figure 3, gray). The dispersity Ð (Mw/Mn) of the produced polyesters were somewhat broad with increased monomer conversions, indicating sort of transesterification accompanied by the propagation. Similar phenomenon was also observed for quinolin-8-amine-Al system [45]. Note that from Figure 4 the rate of the ROPs was first-order dependent upon the monomer concentration, which was also observed for other systems [14,35]. This was agreement with a living polymerization process for the current catalytic systems. As observed for the catalytic system Al2/BnOH, increasing molar ratios of CL/Al (runs 3, 10 and 11, Table 1), led to higher molar mass polymers but less efficient. Note that increasing the amount of alcohol (molar ratio of BnOH/Al from 1 to 10, runs 3, 12, and 13, Table 1), the polymerization went quite well and the additional alcohol decreased the Mn, while the dispersity Ð kept almost invariant (narrow and monomodel). According to 1H NMR of produced PCL (run 13, Table 1; Figure S1 in ESI), the Mn (NMR) (3000 g∙mol−1) could be excellent to match the values of Mn (GPC) (3100 g∙mol−1) and Mn (cal.) (2900 g∙mol−1). Take these into account, the current Al complexes were tolerant to excess of alcohol and thus a highly catalytic efficiency was achieved, which was recognized as immortal polymerization with the advantages of atom economy, molar masscontrol, and low metal residues [7,50,51,52,53,54,55].
The ROP of rac-LA by complexes Al1–Al5 in the presence of BnOH were also investigated and the results were tabulated in Table 2. Compared to the ROP of ε-CL, it was obviously that under the identical conditions all catalytic systems showed less efficient for the ROP of rac-LA, similar as other reported catalytic systems [56,57]. However, within 12 h, high conversions (92%–96%) were obtained with narrow dispersity Ð. Moreover, a linear relationship was observed (Figure 3, dark) between the monomer conversions and the Mns, suggesting a controlled manner of polymerization. The decoupled 1H NMR spectra of PLAs (Figure S2 in ESI) indicated atactic PLAs obtained, which is in contrast to well-known stereoselective salen-Al catalytic system [29].
Copolymers of ε-CL and rac-LA, particularly the random copolymers, are intriguing biodegradable materials with improved properties as comparing to their homopolyesters.[30,58,59,60,61,62] Thus, copolymerization of ε-CL and rac-LA with Al2/BnOH (run 9, Table 2) was tested under similar polymerization conditions as homopolymerization. Unfortunately, the 1H NMR results showed that, as most of other reported systems, LA was far more preferentially polymerized as compared to CL during the copolymerization [57]. The analysis of the spectrum indicated an entire conversion of LA and 6.1% of CL (Figure S3 in ESI). Consequently, a gradient polymer rather than a random one was prepared in this case. As mentioned in the introduction, Nomura introduced a bulky group, iPr3Si, on the ortho-phenoxy positions for the salen-Al system, resulting in the strict random copolymerization of ε-CL and LA for the very first time with a designed catalyst [30]. Nowadays we are also working on the modification of the structure of Al complexes to achieve copolymerization with better control.

4. Conclusions

Dialkylaluminum complexes (Al1–Al5) bearing 8-anilide-5,6,7-trihydroquinoline ligands were prepared and characterized by 1H and 13C NMR and elemental analysis. The solid state structures of Al4 and Al5 were analyzed by X-ray diffractions and revealed distorted tetrahedral geometries around Al centers. All the Al complexes were highly active toward the ring-opening homopolymerization of ε-CL and rac-LA in the presence of one equivalent of BnOH in a living/controlled manner. Note that the excess of alcohol to Al initiator would lead to an efficient catalytic system rather than termination of the active propagation processes, although the resultant polymers possessed low molar masss with narrow distributions.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/9/3/83/s1, Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) for NMR of polymers and Al1 (Figure S1–S4) and crystal data and structure refinement (Table S1), Crystallographic details (CIFs of Al4 and Al5).

Acknowledgments

The project was supported by NSFC No. B040102, Department of Science and Technology of Qingdao and Shandong Province No. 159181jch and 2015GGX107015. The project was also funded by the State Key Laboratory for Modification of Chemical Fibers and Polymer Materials, Donghua University.

Author Contributions

Shaofengliu, Jie Zhang, Weiwei Zuo, and Wen-Hua Sun conceived and designed the experiments; Shaofeng Liu and Jie Zhang performed the experiments; Shaofeng Liu, Hongqi Ye and Wen-Hua Sun analyzed the data; Wenjuan Zhang and Zhibo Li contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; Shaofeng Liu and Wen-Hua Sun wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Arbaoui, A.; Redshaw, C. Metal catalysts for ε-caprolactone polymerisation. Polym. Chem. 2010, 1, 801–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Winzenburg, G.; Schmidt, C.; Fuchs, S.; Kissel, T. Biodegradable polymers and their potential use in parenteral veterinary drug delivery systems. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2004, 56, 1453–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gross, R.A.; Kalra, B. Biodegradable polymers for the environment. Science 2002, 297, 803–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Place, E.S.; Evans, N.D.; Stevens, M.M. Complexity in biomaterials for tissue engineering. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 457–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Marlier, E.E.; Macaranas, J.A.; Marell, D.J.; Dunbar, C.R.; Johnson, M.A.; DePorre, Y.; Miranda, M.O.; Neisen, B.D.; Cramer, C.J.; Hillmyer, M.A.; et al. Mechanistic studies of ε-caprolactone polymerization by (salen)alor complexes and a predictive model for cyclic ester polymerizations. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 1215–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chen, L.; Li, W.; Yuan, D.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, Q.; Yao, Y. Syntheses of mononuclear and dinuclear aluminum complexes stabilized by phenolato ligands and their applications in the polymerization of ε-caprolactone: A comparative study. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 4699–4708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Li, L.; Liu, B.; Liu, D.; Wu, C.; Li, S.; Liu, B.; Cui, D. Copolymerization of ε-caprolactone and l-lactide catalyzed by multinuclear aluminum complexes: An immortal approach. Organometallics 2014, 33, 6474–6480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, C.; Wang, Z.-X. Aluminum and zinc complexes supported by functionalized phenolate ligands: Synthesis, characterization and catalysis in the ring-opening polymerization of ε-caprolactone and rac-lactide. J. Organomet. Chem. 2008, 693, 3151–3158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ovitt, T.M.; Coates, G.W. Stereochemistry of lactide polymerization with chiral catalysts: New opportunities for stereocontrol using polymer exchange mechanisms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1316–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Klitzke, J.S.; Roisnel, T.; Kirillov, E.; Casagrande, O.D.L.; Carpentier, J.-F. Yttrium– and aluminum–bis(phenolate)pyridine complexes: Catalysts and model compounds of the intermediates for the stereoselective ring-opening polymerization of racemic lactide and β-butyrolactone. Organometallics 2014, 33, 309–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fang, J.; Tschan, M.J.L.; Roisnel, T.; Trivelli, X.; Gauvin, R.M.; Thomas, C.M.; Maron, L. Yttrium catalysts for syndioselective β-butyrolactone polymerization: On the origin of ligand-induced stereoselectivity. Polym. Chem. 2013, 4, 360–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, W.; Liu, S.; Yang, W.; Hao, X.; Glaser, R.; Sun, W.-H. Chloroyttrium 2-(1-(Arylimino)alkyl)quinolin-8-olate Complexes: Synthesis, characterization, and catalysis of the ring-opening polymerization of epsilon-caprolactone. Organometallics 2012, 31, 8178–8188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, W.; Liu, S.; Sun, W.-H.; Hao, X.; Redshaw, C. Trimetallic yttrium N-(2-methylquinolin-8-yl)benzamides: Synthesis, structure and use in ring-opening polymerization (ROP) of [varepsilon]-caprolactone. New J. Chem. 2012, 36, 2392–2396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ning, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Rodriguez-Delgado, A.; Chen, E.Y.X. Neutral metallocene ester enolate and non-metallocene alkoxy complexes of zirconium for catalytic ring-opening polymerization of cyclic esters. Organometallics 2008, 27, 5632–5640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Takeuchi, D.; Nakamura, T.; Aida, T. Bulky titanium bis(phenolate) complexes as novel initiators for living anionic polymerization of ε-caprolactone. Macromolecules 2000, 33, 725–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Honrado, M.; Otero, A.; Fernandez-Baeza, J.; Sanchez-Barba, L.F.; Garces, A.; Lara-Sanchez, A.; Rodriguez, A.M. Copolymerization of cyclic esters controlled by chiral NNO-scorpionate zinc initiators. Organometallics 2016, 35, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kremer, A.B.; Osten, K.M.; Yu, I.; Ebrahimi, T.; Aluthge, D.C.; Mehrkhodavandi, P. Dinucleating ligand platforms supporting indium and zinc catalysts for cyclic ester polymerization. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 5365–5374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kronast, A.; Reiter, M.; Altenbuchner, P.T.; Jandl, C.; Pöthig, A.; Rieger, B. Electron-deficient β-diiminato-zinc-ethyl complexes: Synthesis, structure, and reactivity in ring-opening polymerization of lactones. Organometallics 2016, 35, 681–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rieth, L.R.; Moore, D.R.; Lobkovsky, E.B.; Coates, G.W. Single-site β-diiminate zinc catalysts for the ring-opening polymerization of β-butyrolactone and β-valerolactone to poly(3-hydroxyalkanoates). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 15239–15248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Cheng, M.; Moore, D.R.; Reczek, J.J.; Chamberlain, B.M.; Lobkovsky, E.B.; Coates, G.W. Single-Site β-Diiminate Zinc Catalysts for the Alternating Copolymerization of CO2 and Epoxides:  Catalyst Synthesis and Unprecedented Polymerization Activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 8738–8749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Chamberlain, B.M.; Cheng, M.; Moore, D.R.; Ovitt, T.M.; Lobkovsky, E.B.; Coates, G.W. Polymerization of Lactide with Zinc and Magnesium β-Diiminate Complexes:  Stereocontrol and Mechanism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3229–3238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Cheng, M.; Attygalle, A.B.; Lobkovsky, E.B.; Coates, G.W. Single-site catalysts for ring-opening polymerization:  Synthesis of heterotactic poly(lactic acid) from rac-lactide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 11583–11584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Qi, C.-Y.; Wang, Z.-X. Synthesis and characterization of Aluminum(III) and Tin(II) complexes supported by diiminophosphinate ligands and their application in ring-opening polymerization catalysis of ε-caprolactone. J. Polym. Sci. Part A 2006, 44, 4621–4631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kowalski, A.; Libiszowski, J.; Duda, A.; Penczek, S. Polymerization of l,l-Dilactide Initiated by Tin(II) Butoxide. Macromolecules 2000, 33, 1964–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, H.-Y.; Liu, M.-Y.; Sutar, A.K.; Lin, C.-C. Synthesis and structural studies of heterobimetallic alkoxide complexes supported by bis(phenolate) ligands: Efficient catalysts for ring-opening polymerization of l-lactide. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 665–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Chen, M.-Z.; Sun, H.-M.; Li, W.-F.; Wang, Z.-G.; Shen, Q.; Zhang, Y. Synthesis, structure of functionalized N-heterocyclic carbene complexes of Fe(II) and their catalytic activity for ring-opening polymerization of ε-caprolactone. J. Organomet. Chem. 2006, 691, 2489–2494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. O'Keefe, B.J.; Monnier, S.M.; Hillmyer, M.A.; Tolman, W.B. Rapid and controlled polymerization of lactide by structurally characterized ferric alkoxides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 339–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. O'Keefe, B.J.; Breyfogle, L.E.; Hillmyer, M.A.; Tolman, W.B. Mechanistic comparison of cyclic ester polymerizations by novel iron(iii)−alkoxide complexes:  Single vs. multiple site catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 4384–4393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Hormnirun, P.; Marshall, E.L.; Gibson, V.C.; Pugh, R.I.; White, A.J.P. Study of ligand substituent effects on the rate and stereoselectivity of lactide polymerization using aluminum salen-type initiators. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 15343–15348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Nomura, N.; Akita, A.; Ishii, R.; Mizuno, M. random copolymerization of epsilon-caprolactone with lactide using a homosalen-al complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 1750–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zhang, J.; Liu, S.; Zuo, W.; Ye, H.; Li, Z. Synthesis of dinuclear aluminum complexes bearing bis-phenolate ligand and application in ring-opening polymerization of ε-caprolactone. New J. Chem. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sun, W.-H.; Shen, M.; Zhang, W.; Huang, W.; Liu, S.; Redshaw, C. Methylaluminium 8-quinolinolates: Synthesis, characterization and use in ring-opening polymerization (ROP) of caprolactone. Dalton Trans. 2011, 40, 2645–2653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhang, W.; Wang, Y.; Sun, W.-H.; Wang, L.; Redshaw, C. Dimethylaluminium aldiminophenolates: Synthesis, characterization and ring-opening polymerization behavior towards lactides. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 11587–11596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhang, W.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Redshaw, C.; Sun, W.-H. Dialkylaluminium 2-imidazolylphenolates: Synthesis, characterization and ring-opening polymerization behavior towards lactides. J. Organomet. Chem. 2014, 750, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, W.; Wang, Y.; Cao, J.; Wang, L.; Pan, Y.; Redshaw, C.; Sun, W.-H. Synthesis and characterization of dialkylaluminum amidates and their ring-opening polymerization of ε-caprolactone. Organometallics 2011, 30, 6253–6261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hou, X.; Cai, Z.; Chen, X.; Wang, L.; Redshaw, C.; Sun, W.-H. N-(5,6,7-Trihydroquinolin-8-ylidene)-2-benzhydrylbenzenaminonickel halide complexes: Synthesis, characterization and catalytic behavior towards ethylene polymerization. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 1617–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhang, L.; Hao, X.; Sun, W.-H.; Redshaw, C. Synthesis, characterization, and ethylene polymerization behavior of 8-(nitroarylamino)-5,6,7-trihydroquinolylnickel dichlorides: Influence of the nitro group and impurities on catalytic activity. ACS Catal. 2011, 1, 1213–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yu, J.; Hu, X.; Zeng, Y.; Zhang, L.; Ni, C.; Hao, X.; Sun, W.-H. Synthesis, characterisation and ethylene oligomerization behaviour of N-(2-substituted-5,6,7-trihydroquinolin-8-ylidene)arylaminonickel dichlorides. New J. Chem. 2011, 35, 178–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yu, J.; Zeng, Y.; Huang, W.; Hao, X.; Sun, W.-H. N-(5,6,7-trihydroquinolin-8-ylidene)arylaminonickel dichlorides as highly active single-site pro-catalysts in ethylene polymerization. Dalton Trans. 2011, 40, 8436–8443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Tang, X.-Y.; Igarashi, A.; Sun, W.-H.; Inagaki, A.; Liu, J.; Zhang, W.; Li, Y.-S.; Nomura, K. Synthesis of (imido)vanadium(v) complexes containing 8-(2,6-dimethylanilide)-5,6,7-trihydroquinoline ligands: Highly active catalyst precursors for ethylene dimerization. Organometallics 2014, 33, 1053–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Save, M.; Schappacher, M.; Soum, A. Controlled ring-opening polymerization of lactones and lactides initiated by lanthanum isopropoxide, 1. General aspects and kinetics. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2002, 203, 889–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sheldrick, G.M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Cryst. 2008, A64, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXTL PC, Version 5.0, An Integrated System for Solving, Refining, and Displaying Crystal Structures from Diffraction Data, 6th ed.; Bruker AXS: Madison, WI, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  44. Dolomanov, O.V.; Bourhis, L.J.; Gildea, R.J.; Howard, J.A.K.; Puschmann, H.J. OLEX2: A complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program. Appl. Cryst. 2009, 42, 339–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Shen, M.; Zhang, W.; Nomura, K.; Sun, W.H. Synthesis and characterization of organoaluminum compounds containing quinolin-8-amine derivatives and their catalytic behaviour for ring-opening polymerization of ε-caprolactone. Dalton Trans. 2009, 9000–9009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Du, H.; Velders, A.H.; Dijkstra, P.J.; Zhong, Z.; Chen, X.; Feijen, J. Polymerization of lactide using achiral bis(pyrrolidene) schiff base aluminum complexes. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 1058–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Haddad, M.; Laghzaoui, M.; Welter, R.; Dagorne, S. Synthesis and structure of neutral and cationic aluminum complexes supported by bidentate o,p-phosphinophenolate ligands and their reactivity with propylene oxide and ε-caprolactone. Organometallics 2009, 28, 4584–4592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pang, X.; Chen, X.; Du, H.; Wang, X.; Jing, X. Enolic Schiff-base aluminum complexes and their application in lactide polymerization. J. Organomet. Chem. 2007, 692, 5605–5613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ma, H.; Okuda, J. Kinetics and mechanism of l-Lactide polymerization by rare earth metal silylamido complexes:  Effect of alcohol addition. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 2665–2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhao, W.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Cui, D. Facile synthesis of pendant- and α,ϖ-chain-end-functionalized polycarbonates via immortal polymerization by using a salan lutetium alkyl precursor. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 4588–4590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Zhao, W.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Chen, X.; Cui, D.; Chen, E.Y.X. Protic compound mediated living cross-chain-transfer polymerization of rac-lactide: Synthesis of isotactic (crystalline)-heterotactic (amorphous) stereomultiblock polylactide. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 6375–6377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Zhao, W.; Cui, D.; Liu, X.; Chen, X. Facile synthesis of hydroxyl-ended, highly stereoregular, star-shaped poly(lactide) from immortal rop of rac-lactide and kinetics study. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 6678–6684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Helou, M.; Miserque, O.; Brusson, J.-M.; Carpentier, J.-F.; Guillaume, S. M. Ultraproductive, zinc-mediated, immortal ring-opening polymerization of trimethylene carbonate. Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 8772–8775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Amgoune, A.; Thomas, C.M.; Carpentier, J.-F. Yttrium Complexes as catalysts for living and immortal polymerization of lactide to highly heterotactic PLA. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2007, 28, 693–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Inoue, S. Immortal polymerization: The outset, development, and application. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2000, 38, 2861–2871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Koller, J.; Bergman, R.G. Highly efficient aluminum-catalyzed ring-opening polymerization of cyclic carbonates, lactones, and lactides, including a unique crystallographic snapshot of an intermediate. Organometallics 2011, 30, 3217–3224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pappalardo, D.; Annunziata, L.; Pellecchia, C. Living Ring-opening homo- and copolymerization of ε-caprolactone and l- and d,l-lactides by dimethyl(salicylaldiminato)aluminum compounds. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 6056–6062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sun, Z.; Duan, R.; Yang, J.; Zhang, H.; Li, S.; Pang, X.; Chen, W.; Chen, X. Bimetallic Schiff base complexes for stereoselective polymerisation of racemic-lactide and copolymerisation of racemic-lactide with ε-caprolactone. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 17531–17538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gilmour, D.J.; Webster, R.L.; Perry, M.R.; Schafer, L.L. Titanium pyridonates for the homo- and copolymerization of rac-lactide and ε-caprolactone. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 12411–12419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Darensbourg, D.J.; Karroonnirun, O. Ring-opening polymerization of l-lactide and ε-caprolactone utilizing biocompatible Zinc catalysts. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 8880–8886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kricheldorf, H.R.; Bornhorst, K.; Hachmann-Thiessen, H. Bismuth(III) n-hexanoate and tin(II) 2-ethylhexanoate initiated copolymerizations of ε-caprolactone and l-lactide. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 5017–5024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Florczak, M.; Duda, A. Effect of the configuration of the active center on comonomer reactivities: The case of ε-caprolactone/l,l-lactide copolymerization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 9088–9091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Polymers 09 00083 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Highly active catalytic systems containing 5,6,7-trihydroquinolyl ligands.
Scheme 1. Highly active catalytic systems containing 5,6,7-trihydroquinolyl ligands.
Polymers 09 00083 sch001
Polymers 09 00083 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Synthesis of the Ligands (LH1–LH4) and Al complexes (Al1–Al5).
Scheme 2. Synthesis of the Ligands (LH1–LH4) and Al complexes (Al1–Al5).
Polymers 09 00083 sch002
Polymers 09 00083 g001 550
Figure 1. ORTEP of the molecular structure of Al4. Ellipsoids at 50% probability level. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected distances (Å) and angles (deg): A1–N1 1.981(3), A1–N2 1.844(2), A1–C19 1.971(3), A1–C20 1.972(4); N1–Al1–N2 85.07(10), N1–Al1–C20 105.08(14), N1–Al1–C19 111.83(14), N2–Al1–C19 117.26(14), N2–Al1–C20 120.84(13), C19–Al1–C20 112.16(17).
Figure 1. ORTEP of the molecular structure of Al4. Ellipsoids at 50% probability level. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected distances (Å) and angles (deg): A1–N1 1.981(3), A1–N2 1.844(2), A1–C19 1.971(3), A1–C20 1.972(4); N1–Al1–N2 85.07(10), N1–Al1–C20 105.08(14), N1–Al1–C19 111.83(14), N2–Al1–C19 117.26(14), N2–Al1–C20 120.84(13), C19–Al1–C20 112.16(17).
Polymers 09 00083 g001
Polymers 09 00083 g002 550
Figure 2. ORTEP of the molecular structure of Al5. Ellipsoids at 50% probability level. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected distances (Å) and angles (deg): A1–N1 1.980(3), A1–N2 1.844(3), A1–C19 1.974(3), A1–C21 1.971(4); N1–Al1–N2 85.13(12), N1–Al1–C21 109.55(17), N1–Al1–C19 106.06(16), N2–Al1–C19 120.76(17), N2–Al1–C21 117.96(15), C19–Al1–C21 112.27(18).
Figure 2. ORTEP of the molecular structure of Al5. Ellipsoids at 50% probability level. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected distances (Å) and angles (deg): A1–N1 1.980(3), A1–N2 1.844(3), A1–C19 1.974(3), A1–C21 1.971(4); N1–Al1–N2 85.13(12), N1–Al1–C21 109.55(17), N1–Al1–C19 106.06(16), N2–Al1–C19 120.76(17), N2–Al1–C21 117.96(15), C19–Al1–C21 112.27(18).
Polymers 09 00083 g002
Polymers 09 00083 g003 550
Figure 3. Mn vs. monomer conversion in the ROP of ε-CL (gray, runs 3 and 7–9 in Table 1) and rac-LA (dark, runs 2 and 6–8 in Table 2) initiated by Al2/BnOH.
Figure 3. Mn vs. monomer conversion in the ROP of ε-CL (gray, runs 3 and 7–9 in Table 1) and rac-LA (dark, runs 2 and 6–8 in Table 2) initiated by Al2/BnOH.
Polymers 09 00083 g003
Polymers 09 00083 g004 550
Figure 4. Plots of -Ln([CL]/[CL]0) vs. time in the ROP of ε-CL initiated by Al2/BnOH (runs 3 and 7–9, Table 1).
Figure 4. Plots of -Ln([CL]/[CL]0) vs. time in the ROP of ε-CL initiated by Al2/BnOH (runs 3 and 7–9, Table 1).
Polymers 09 00083 g004
Table
Table 1. Homopolymerization ROP of ε-CL by Al1–Al5/BnOH a.
Table 1. Homopolymerization ROP of ε-CL by Al1–Al5/BnOH a.
runCom.CL:Al:BnOHt
min		conv.
(%) b		Mn c
× 10−4		ÐcMn d (cal.)
× 10−4
1Al2250:1:030983.791.59-
2Al1250:1:130992.271.202.83
3Al2250:1:130992.761.182.83
4Al3250:1:130992.861.192.83
5Al4250:1:1301002.501.232.86
6Al5250:1:130992.431.242.83
7Al2250:1:15481.331.101.37
8Al2250:1:110762.201.102.16
9Al2250:1:120942.591.122.68
10Al2125:1:1301001.441.141.43
11Al2500:1:130803.591.464.57
12Al2250:1:530990.541.070.51
13Al2250:1:1030990.311.130.29
a Conditions: 20 μmol Al, 1.0 M ε-CL toluene solution, 110 °C. b Determined by 1H NMR. c GPC data in THF vs. polystyrene standards, using a correcting factor 0.56 [41]. d Mn (cal.) = MCL × ([CL]:[Al]) × ([Al]:[BnOH]) × conversion + MBnOH.
Table
Table 2. Homopolymerization ROP of rac-LA by Al1–Al5/BnOH a.
Table 2. Homopolymerization ROP of rac-LA by Al1–Al5/BnOH a.
runCom.t/hconv.
(%) b		Mn c
× 10−4		ÐcMn d (cal.)
× 10−4
1Al112962.651.313.46
2Al212962.961.263.33
3Al312942.341.383.39
4Al412953.021.323.42
5Al512962.891.363.46
6Al21421.461.121.52
7Al23672.061.152.42
8Al26872.871.323.13
9 eAl212100/6.1 f3.581.053.78
a Conditions: 20 μmol Al, 1.0 M rac-LA toluene solution, [LA]:[Al]:[BnOH] = 250:1:1, 110 °C. b Determined by 1H NMR. c GPC data in THF vs. polystyrene standards, using a correcting factor 0.58 [41]. d Mn (cal.) = MLA × ([LA]:[Al]) × ([Al]:[BnOH]) × conversion + MBnOH. e Copolymerization of ε-CL and rac-LA, [LA]:[CL]:[Al]:[BnOH] = 250:250:1:1. f conversions of LA/CL.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, S.; Zhang, J.; Zuo, W.; Zhang, W.; Sun, W.-H.; Ye, H.; Li, Z. Synthesis of Aluminum Complexes Bearing 8-Anilide-5,6,7-trihydroquinoline Ligands: Highly Active Catalyst Precursors for Ring-Opening Polymerization of Cyclic Esters. Polymers 2017, 9, 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9030083

AMA Style

Liu S, Zhang J, Zuo W, Zhang W, Sun W-H, Ye H, Li Z. Synthesis of Aluminum Complexes Bearing 8-Anilide-5,6,7-trihydroquinoline Ligands: Highly Active Catalyst Precursors for Ring-Opening Polymerization of Cyclic Esters. Polymers. 2017; 9(3):83. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9030083

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Shaofeng, Jie Zhang, Weiwei Zuo, Wenjuan Zhang, Wen-Hua Sun, Hongqi Ye, and Zhibo Li. 2017. "Synthesis of Aluminum Complexes Bearing 8-Anilide-5,6,7-trihydroquinoline Ligands: Highly Active Catalyst Precursors for Ring-Opening Polymerization of Cyclic Esters" Polymers 9, no. 3: 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9030083

APA Style

Liu, S., Zhang, J., Zuo, W., Zhang, W., Sun, W. -H., Ye, H., & Li, Z. (2017). Synthesis of Aluminum Complexes Bearing 8-Anilide-5,6,7-trihydroquinoline Ligands: Highly Active Catalyst Precursors for Ring-Opening Polymerization of Cyclic Esters. Polymers, 9(3), 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9030083

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop