1. Introduction
In recent years, there has been a growing environmental concern regarding the use of polyolefin-based plastics such as poly(ethylene) (PE), poly(propylene) (PP), and poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), which are non-biodegradable. This non-biodegradable nature of such products results in plastics pollution, which involves a rapid buildup of plastic waste in landfills and increases in greenhouse gas emission. All of these problems related to the use of non-biodegradable polymer or synthetic plastics have urged scientists to search for new materials that are bio-inspired or bio-based as an alternative. Biodegradable plastics or biopolymers offer a solution and are receiving a significant amount of attention because they are environmentally friendly, biodegradable, compostable, and derived from renewable natural and sustainable biomass resources. Moreover, they decrease global dependency on depleting fossil fuels and reduce the generation of hazardous substance.
Poly(lactic acid) (PLA), a biodegradable polymer has been proposed as a solution to the waste problems related to non-biodegradable polymers. PLA-based materials have many advantages over their non-biodegradable competitors, such as stiffness, transparency, and recyclability. Unfortunately, the brittleness and poor barrier properties are the main challenges restricting their use and competing with conventional plastics, particularly in the field of flexible films. Therefore, to extend the range of PLA applications, considerable efforts have been made to enhance its properties by employing various plasticizers such as poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) [
1,
2], oligomeric lactic acid (OLA) [
3], tributyl citrate (TBC) [
4], and octyl epoxy stearate (OES) [
5]. Another interesting approach is the use of environmentally friendly and non-toxic vegetable oil-based plasticizer.
Vegetable oils are chemically composed of glycerols and fatty acids. As vegetable oil is derived from plants, it is biodegradable, renewable, and relatively inexpensive for various industrial applications. Edible vegetable oils, such as palm oil, soybean oil, rapeseed oil, and sunflower oil, have all become major sources for plasticizer production in recent decades. Extensive research on epoxidized palm oil as a plasticizer has been conducted by researchers from Malaysia, including Al-Mulla et al. [
6], Silverajah et al. [
7], Tee et al. [
8], and Chieng et al. [
9]. In Malaysia, oil palm plantations possess higher productivity, with the lowest oil production cost as compared to other oil-producing crops [
10]. This keeps the price of palm-based plasticizer competitive enough to meet the demand of the commodity market. However, there are serious concerns regarding the use of these edible oils as plasticizer feedstock. This edible plasticizer feedstock may compete with food supply and cause the edible oil price increase in the near future. Environmental issues such as deforestation will likely develop as the massive propagation of plants producing edible oil takes place. As an alternative, researchers have focused on non-edible oil for plasticizer production to overcome these drawbacks.
Amongst the varieties of non-edible vegetable oil, jatropha oil (JO) is the most favorable for plasticizer production due to the relatively high content of unsaturated fatty acids. The jatropha plant,
Jatropha curcas, belongs to the Euphorbiaceae family. The jatropha plant is a multipurpose, drought-resistant, oil-bearing plant, originating from South America [
11]. The kernel seed of the jatropha plant contains the most valuable oil, consisting of 40% by weight of triacylglycerol with linear fatty acid chains. This high oil content indicated that the jatropha plant is suitable as a feedstock for plasticizer production. JO is not suitable for daily nutrient consumption purposes due to the presence of toxic compounds in oil such as curcin and purgative, but it has many medicinal values. Thus, JO is non-edible vegetable oil and traditionally used for soap manufacturing and medicinal applications [
12].
In general, the use of plasticizer as a modifier to PLA is bound by its safety, environmental favorability, and chemical and physical properties, which dictate its miscibility and required flexibility towards the target applications. The plasticizer leaching during storage or end-user applications, as well as toxicity, has become a major safety risk and restricts plasticizer from applications in many industries, including medical, pharmaceutical, and food packaging fields. The ideal plasticizer originates from renewable sources, are biodegradable, stable, and toxic-free, and exhibit no or minimum leaching or migration during use or aging. Therefore, it is advantageous to provide a plant-based, non-edible oil of Jatropha curcas for use as a plasticizer in the PLA biodegradable polymer, which is capable of overcoming at least one of the above-mentioned problems. In this study, we report our findings on the application of the epoxidized jatropha oil (EJO) as a plasticizer to improve the flexibility of the PLA polymer.
3. Results and Discussion
Epoxidaton reaction, which adds an oxygen atom to a carbon–carbon double bond, has been established as an important method for the formation of carbon–oxygen bonds [
14]. Unsaturated fatty acids were the components of interest in the epoxidation of vegetable oils due to the presence of carbon–carbon double bonds required in the reaction. JO contains high unsaturated fatty acid content, including oleic (C18:1) and linolenic (C18:2) acid, and was suitably converted to an epoxide group via epoxidation to produce epoxidized jatropha oil (EJO). Daniel et al. [
15] reported that the average number of double bonds in a fatty acid of JO is about 1.08–1.13, the fraction of unsaturated fatty acid is 0.78–0.79, and the average carbon length of fatty acid chain is 17.3–17.8.
Figure 1 shows the structure and epoxidation process of JO to form EJO.
Figure 2 shows the FTIR spectra of PLA, EJO, and EJO-plasticized PLA. Typical characteristic peaks of PLA were stretching vibrations of –CH
2 (2995 cm
−1 and 2964 cm
−1) and –C=O (1746 cm
−1). EJO reveals the aliphatic –C=O stretching of ester at a wavelength of 1741 cm
−1. In addition, two strong peaks at around 2900–3000 cm
−1 were derived from the –CH
2 stretching vibrations. The presence of the epoxide group in EJO was proven by the stretching band at 832 cm
−1. The disappearance of this epoxide stretching vibration peak in EJO-plasticized PLA indicated the possibility of interaction between the EJO plasticizer and PLA. This finding is similar to PLA/epoxidized palm oil (EPO) and PLA/epoxidized soybean oil (ESO) reported by Silverajah et al. [
16] and Tee et al. [
17], respectively. Silverajah et al. proposed that the possible interaction was raised from the hydrogen bonding between the terminal hydroxyl group of PLA and the epoxide group of EPO.
The interaction between the polymer and plasticizer (PLA-EVO) contributes to hydrogen bonding, which is influenced by the epoxy content, also known as the oxirane oxygen content (OOC), of the epoxidized oils. The OOC value indicates the epoxy groups present in the plasticizer. A higher OCC value in EPSO (3.58%) compared to EPO (3.23%) resembles stronger interaction (hydrogen bonding) between PLA and EPSO, which gives better tensile properties.
The tensile results of EJO-plasticized PLA are shown in
Figure 3. The pristine PLA is typically rigid and brittle in nature. PLA has a very low flexibility or elongation at break of 5.37%, despite the fact that it has very high tensile strength and tensile modulus. The elongation at break of PLA was significantly increased after being plasticized by EJO plasticizer. For example, the elongation attained the highest value of 388.03% when 3 wt % EJO plasticizer was incorporated into the PLA matrix. It shows around 7000% improvement compared to pristine PLA. However, a higher amount of EJO content led to a decrease in elongation at break because PLA was saturated with plasticizer and phase separation occurred, leading to the formation of PLA-rich and EJO-rich phases within the EJO-plasticized PLA. Interestingly, the elongation at break improvement was very pronounced compared to epoxidized palm oil (EPO) and epoxidized soybean oil (ESO). Silverajah et al. [
16] reported an improvement of around 1500% in the elongation at break for EPO-plasticized PLA (tested at a crosshead speed 5 mm/min, dumbbell specimen), while Tee et al. [
17] reported even lower increments of around 900% (tested at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min, rectangular specimen), both at 3 wt % EPO. For the ESO plasticization effect on PLA, both Tee et al. and Xu et al. [
18] revealed that there was no significant increase in ESO-plasticized PLA at ESO loading of 3 wt %.
On the other hand, the tensile modulus of EJO-plasticized PLA decreases at 1 wt % EJO, it remains stable at 3% and 5% EJO, and a second slight drop occurs at 7 and 10% EJO (
Figure 3b). A gradually decrease in tensile strength of EJO-plasticized PLA from 57.98 to 28.76 MPa was observed as the content of EJO increased from 0 to 10 wt % (
Figure 3c). An increase in the elongation at break means that the brittleness of samples decreases since the elongation at break and brittleness are inversely proportional. The change in the flexibility of PLA upon the addition of EJO can be observed in
Figure 4, where the tensile deformed samples exhibited stress whitening and appeared to be more elongated in length compared to the rigid PLA.
The thermal characteristics of PLA and EJO-plasticized PLA were investigated by means of TGA and DSC. The thermogravimetric curves from TGA provide information about the nature and extent of degradation of the polymeric materials.
Figure 5 shows the (a) TG and (b) DTG of PLA and EJO-plasticized PLA. The thermogravimetric behavior of EJO-plasticized PLA, similar to PLA, revealed only one major degradation step at around 300–400 °C.
Thermal characteristic factors such as initial decomposition temperature (
Tonset), temperature of maximum rate of degradation (
Tmax), and decomposition temperature at 50% weight loss (
T50) can be determined from the TG and DTG thermograms, and the results are tabulated in
Table 2. Neat PLA has a
Tonset,
Tmax, and
T50 of 274.26, 345.12 and 339.16 °C, respectively. The addition of 3 wt % EJO into PLA improved the thermal stability of PLA, as can be seen from the increased
Tonset (303.17 °C),
Tmax (362.81 °C), and
T50 (362.33 °C), compared to those of neat PLA. It was reported in the literature that an increase in thermal stability of epoxidized oil-plasticized PLA was due to their good interaction and plasticizer dispersion within the PLA matrix [
3,
9,
19]. Furthermore, the homogeneously and well dispersed EJO could act as a protective layer, which deterred the release of volatile degradation products out from the composites and therefore delayed the thermal degradation [
7].
The DSC thermograms of PLA and EJO-plasticized PLA are shown in
Figure 6. The PLA shows a sharp glass transition temperature (
Tg) at 62.85 °C, and a melting temperature (
Tm) at 149.79 °C, but no obvious crystallization exotherm (
Tc) peak was observed. The addition of EJO plasticizer to PLA induces a shift of
Tg to a lower temperature, e.g., from 62.85 to 59.92 °C, which is due to an enhanced chain mobility of PLA. Enhanced PLA chain mobility further promotes
Tc and thus the
Tm of PLA at around 111.79 and 146.69 °C, respectively, as can be seen in EJO-plasticized PLA thermogram. This is typical plasticized thermoplastics behavior as reported by many researchers [
20].
SEM was employed to examine the surface morphology of fractured tensile samples and the state of EJO dispersion in the PLA polymer matrix.
Figure 7a shows a fracture surface of PLA, which exhibited flat and smooth surface corresponding to brittle crack growth behavior. Meanwhile, the fracture surface of EJO-plasticized PLA shows a typical ductile material characterized by an uneven surface and the presence of fibrils due to plastic stretching or deformation, as shown in
Figure 7b. No microvoids of EJO were observed in EJO-plasticized PLA, which signified that EJO was homogenously mixed with the PLA matrix and good miscibility. The incorporation of EJO as a plasticizer into the PLA matrix determined remarkable changes on the morphology due to the enhanced interfacial adhesion and EJO dispersion. PLA changed the tough and brittle nature of the flexible materials, which is consistent with the tensile test results discussed in the previous section.