Next Article in Journal
Effect of Bead Composition, PVS Type, and Recovery Medium in Cryopreservation of Bleeding Heart ‘Valentine’—Preliminary Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparative Study on Multiway Enhanced Bio- and Phytoremediation of Aged Petroleum-Contaminated Soil
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Glycine max and Glycine soja for Resistance to Calonectria ilicicola
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role of Biochar and Soil Properties in Determining the Available Content of Al, Cu, Zn, Mn, and Cd in Soil
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Health Risk Assessment in Agricultural Soil Potentially Contaminated by Geogenic Thallium: Influence of Plant Species on Metal Mobility in Soil-Plant System

by
Luigi Giuseppe Duri
1,†,
Donato Visconti
1,*,†,
Nunzio Fiorentino
1,
Paola Adamo
1,2,
Massimo Fagnano
1 and
Antonio Giandonato Caporale
1
1
Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici, Italy
2
Interdepartmental Research Centre on the ‘Earth Critical Zone’ for Supporting the Landscape and Agroenvironment Management (CRISP), University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
L.G.D. and D.V. contributed equally to this work.
Agronomy 2020, 10(6), 890; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10060890
Submission received: 17 May 2020 / Revised: 15 June 2020 / Accepted: 19 June 2020 / Published: 23 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Agronomic Approaches for Remediation of Contaminated Soils)

Abstract

:
In agricultural soils, thallium (Tl) of geogenic origin may represent a potential risk for human health, mainly via ingestion of food crops. In this work, a pot experiment was carried out to evaluate (1) the bioavailability of Tl and other potentially toxic elements (PTEs) in an agricultural soil with naturally occurring Tl; (2) the uptake and accumulation of PTEs in Lactuca sativa L. var. acephala, Diplotaxis tenuifolia L. DC and Silene latifolia Poir; (3) the health risks arising from plant and soil ingestion by different subpopulations and dermal contact of soil by farmers. In soil, only Tl and Pb pseudototal contents were above Italian screening values. Nevertheless, the promptly bioavailable contents of all PTEs were always below internationally recognized trigger values. Plants affected PTE bioavailability in soil by their rhizodepositions and accumulated PTEs in their shoots. Acceptable risks (hazard index < 1) arose from dietary intake of both L. sativa L., D. tenuifolia L. and dermal contact of soil by farmers. Significant health risks can derive from the intake of S. latifolia Poir. (accumulating high Tl concentrations), in particular by children (HI = 74). In conclusion, an adequate management and crop selection are needed to profitably exploit soils with geogenic Tl for agricultural purposes.

1. Introduction

Thallium (Tl) is a nonessential and highly-toxic element for living organisms, generally showing a greater acute and chronic toxicity than other harmful elements, such as As, Cd, Hg and Pb [1,2]. Serious Tl poisoning may lead to gastrointestinal dysfunction, ascending paralysis and mental disorders, whilst polyneuritis may occur with chronic poisoning [3,4,5]. The lethal dose of Tl for an adult human is only 8–10 mg kg−1; therefore, it is classified as one of the 13 priority metal pollutants by the United States Environmental Protection Agency and also listed in the European Union (EU) as a dangerous pollutant [6,7,8]. The main routes of human exposure to Tl are the ingestion of contaminated food and drinking water [9]. Once ingested, Tl quickly reaches the principal human organs and eventually accumulates in the nervous system [10].
Although Tl is a rare element, ranging from 0.1 to 2.0 mg kg−1 in terrestrial environments (average content of 0.5 mg kg−1 in the continental crust) [11,12], it can occur at higher extent in various sulphide minerals (e.g., sphalerite, galena, pyrite and chacopyrite) and in K-bearing silicates such as micas and feldspars [13], thus resembling the chemical behaviour of both chalcophile (Cu, Pb, Zn) and lithophile (K) elements. Accordingly, monovalent Tl (Tl+) shows chemical similarities to Pb2+ (similar atomic weight) and K+ (similar radius). Since it can replace K+ in the metabolic processes, Tl is highly toxic for the plants [14]. Thallium can form stable interactions with sulfhydryl and phosphate ligands of proteins, causing their inactivation [15].
In recent years, soil contamination by Tl has been reported in many countries worldwide, mainly due to industrial activities, such as mining/smelting of Tl-bearing sulphide deposits, burning fossil fuels and cement production [1]. The mobility and bioavailability of Tl in the soil depends on many factors, such as the nature of Tl sources, soil mineralogy, content and quality of soil organic matter (SOM), water precipitation and cycle and biological activity [16]. Unlike other PTEs such as As, Cd, Cr, Hg or Pb, there is still a lack of information on the health risks arising from the exposure to Tl naturally occurring in the soil, which can be potentially transferred to pore water and thus to crop plants [8].
The understanding of the sources, extent and spatial distribution of potentially toxic elements (PTEs) such as Tl in the soil, and the study of possible contaminant transfer to food crops and farmers, are pivotal to properly manage the risks deriving from the cultivation of a contaminated farmland.
To assess the potential health risks due to the ingestion of crops produced in a contaminated soil, the worst case approach may be applied by growing plants able to tolerate or accumulate PTEs, such as lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. acephala), perennial wall rocket (Diplotaxis tenuifolia L. DC) and white campion (Silene latifolia Poir.) in pot trials under controlled conditions [17]. Lactuca sativa L. is a common crop plant showing a good capacity to accumulate Pb, Tl and Zn in its own tissues [18,19]. D. tenuifolia L. DC is an edible native wild plant species in Italy [20], but is also cultivated in open fields or greenhouses [21], where it can be an effective biomonitor of soil contamination [22]. Silene latifolia Poir. is a native perennial wild plant species in Italy [20]. Leaves and young stems of this plant are consumed in many Mediterranean countries [23,24,25] where it can be boiled, fried, cooked to make soups or pasta and risotto dishes [26]. Silene latifolia Poir. can accumulate high concentrations of PTEs in its biomass, in particular Tl [27,28]. To evaluate and compare the uptake and accumulation of PTEs in the shoots of these biomonitor plants, the bioaccumulation coefficient (BAC) is basically adopted as index relating the concentration of PTEs in plant shoots to that in the cultivation soil [28,29].
A proper management of soil contamination leads to the minimisation of the ecological threat and the health risks due to exposure to soil contaminants [30]. The assessment of the pseudototal content of PTEs after aqua regia digestion can give insight on the extent and spatial variability of contamination, but it is not adequate to quantify the soluble and promptly bioavailable fractions of PTEs actually interacting with plant roots and soil microbiota in the highly dynamic rhizospheric environment [31,32]. Different single-step chemical extractions have been developed and standardised to estimate the promptly bioavailable fractions of PTEs in the soil, some of them are also officially recognised by many European countries to assess potential risks for growth and food safety of crops [33,34].
The present work aims at studying (1) the bioavailability of Tl and other PTEs occurring in an agricultural soil of south Italy and mainly originating from the volcanic activity of the Somma–Vesuvius complex; (2) the influence of plant species (Lactuca sativa L. var. acephala, Diplotaxis tenuifolia L. DC and Silene latifolia Poir.) on the mobility of PTEs in the soil and their assimilation in plant tissues; (3) the health risks for different subpopulations potentially consuming edible plants grown on the studied soil and farmers working and exploiting the site for agricultural purposes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Geological Features of the Study Area and Soil Sampling on Field

An agricultural soil was collected from a farmland of 35,000 m2, sited in a rural area of the Afragola municipality (Naples, Campania, Italy). Eight discrete samples were collected on a grid (40 × 40 m) in the 0–20 cm soil layer (Figure S1) and then mixed thoroughly to form a composite sample which was successively used for the pot experiment with three plant species.
A portion of discrete samples and composite sample was dried at 50 °C until constant weight, homogenized and sieved at 2 mm, in order to evaluate the main physicochemical properties.
The study area is in the Piana Campana graben, to the NW of the Somma–Vesuvius complex and NE of the Phlegrean Fields (Figure S1), the main active volcanoes of Campania. In this volcanic area, there was an accumulation of pyroclastic deposits [35]. Therefore, the soils of this territory are the result of a different extent of andosolization, which produced soils that can be classified as Pachi-Vitric Andosols and Hypereutric Cambisols [36,37].

2.2. Experimental Setup

The pot experiment was carried out in an unheated polyethylene greenhouse sited at the Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, southern Italy (40°49′ N, 14°15′ E). Seeds of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. acephala) and perennial wall rocket (Diplotaxis tenuifolia L. DC) where bought from a local supplier, while white campion seeds (Silene latifolia Poir.) were collected in 2017 from spontaneous plants growing near the roads or in open fields of the Parco Gussone (Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, southern Italy). Then, seeds were surface-sterilized before storing by immersion in 5% (V/V) sodium hypochlorite for 10 min and washed three times in sterile water [38]. Soil from the composite sample was transferred to pots (four replicates per plant species; Ø 16 cm; V 2 L). Then, seeds of white campion (0.4 g per pot), lettuce (0.2 g per pot) and perennial wall rocket (0.1 g per pot) were sown at the end of October 2018 in the pots (Figure S1). White campion and lettuce were then thinned to five plants per pot after germination. Pots were watered regularly to keep soil moisture close to field capacity and all plants were harvested three times in the same pot (from March to June 2019) during the experiment that lasted for a total of 33 weeks.

2.3. Plant Sampling, Processing and Analysis

Each harvest of shoot biomass was carried out when stem length was at least 15 cm. All the fresh shoot samples were thoroughly washed with tap water and then deionized water, gently blotted, weighed (fresh weight), oven-dried at 60 °C to constant dry weight and, later, finely ground in an electric mill. Shoot dried samples were firstly digested by concentrated HNO3 and secondly by aqua regia in a microwave oven, then the concentration of PTEs in the extracts were detected by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) (analytical package VG101-EXT) at Acme Analytical Laboratories Ltd. (Vancouver, Canada) within a time span of 25 days from receiving the samples to final delivery of analytical results. Certified reference material (oriental tobacco leaves CTA-OTL-1) and lab standard materials (STD CDV-1 and STD V16) were used to monitor the data quality of analyses, with metal recoveries around ±8% of the certified values. PTE concentrations in the plants were compared to PTE thresholds indicated in EC Reg. 1881/2006 for vegetables (Cd: 0.2 mg kg−1 f.w.; Pb: 0.3 mg kg−1 f.w.) [39]. In addition, the range values of PTEs found in food plants growing on nonpolluted sites (Cd: 0.029–0.4 mg kg−1 d.w.; Cu: 6–8 mg kg−1 d.w.; Pb: 0.7–3.6 mg kg−1 d.w.; Tl: 0.02–0.125 kg−1 d.w.; Zn: 44–73 kg−1 d.w.) by Kabata-Pendias, [12], were used as reference values.
To evaluate the accumulation of PTEs, the bioaccumulation coefficient (BAC) was calculated as follows:
BAC   = C shoots C soil
where Cshoots and Csoil are the PTE concentrations (mg kg−1) in shoots and soil, respectively [28,29].

2.4. Soil Sampling at Pot Scale and Physicochemical Characterization

At the end of the experiment, the soils in the pots were dried at 50 °C until constant weight, homogenized and sieved at 2 mm before analysis. Afterwards, all the sieved and dried soil samples (before and after plant cultivation) were characterized for the following physicochemical properties: pH-H2O (1:2.5 soil:water solution ratio, pH meter GLP 22, Crison), electrical conductivity (1:5 soil:water solution ratio, Conductimeter basic 30, Crison), organic carbon [40], extraction of promptly bioavailable fraction of PTEs by ammonium nitrate (described in the Section 2.4.2).
In the discrete and composite soil samples collected before plant cultivation, the texture (pipette and sieving method, after pretreatment with H2O2 to oxidize organic matter and particle dispersion by sodium hexametaphosphate), total nitrogen (Kjeldahl method), available phosphorous (Olsen method), exchangeable potassium (extraction with 0.5 M ammonium acetate and potassium evaluation by spectrophotometer) and pseudototal content of PTEs (described in the Section 2.4.1) were also determined.

2.4.1. Determination of Pseudototal Content of PTEs

Pseudototal PTE contents were quantified in 1 g of each pulverized soil sample by aqua regia digestion [41] and ICP-MS at Acme Analytical Laboratories Ltd. (Vancouver, Canada), within a time span of 25 days from receiving the samples to final delivery of analytical results. Certified reference material ERM-CC141 Loam Soil and BCR-141R Calcareous Loam Soil (European Reference Materials, ERM®) and lab standard materials (STD DS10 and STD OREAS45EA) were used to monitor the data quality of soil analyses, with metal recoveries around ±10% of the certified values.

2.4.2. Extraction of Promptly Bioavailable Fraction of Metals by Ammonium Nitrate

Ten grams of 2 mm-sieved soil were extracted with 25 mL of 1 M NH4NO3 solution (m/V = 1:2.5) into a 50 mL FalconTM tube, by shaking for 120 min at 20 ± 2 °C with a horizontal shaker [42]. The extract was separated from the solid residue by centrifugation at 1000× g for 10 min and the supernatant was filtered by 25 mL syringe equipped with a 0.45 μm disposable in-line membrane filter, acidified by 65% HNO3 (final acid concentration: 1%) and then stored at 4 °C in a refrigerator prior to being analysed. The promptly bioavailable metal contents in the filtrates were measured by ICP-MS at Acme Analytical Laboratories Ltd. (Vancouver, BC, Canada) within a time span of 25 days from receiving the samples to final delivery of analytical results. The detection limits of Cd, Cu, Pb, Tl and Zn were respectively 0.005, 0.010, 0.020, 0.001 and 0.025 mg kg−1.

2.5. Health Risk Assessment

PTEs may cause both carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic risks through different pathways. According to Italian law, the main risk for human health in agricultural lands is through crop ingestion [43]; however, agricultural workers’ exposure through ingestion and dermal contact of soil were evaluated in a health risk assessment [44]. The noncarcinogenic risks were assessed by calculating the hazard quotient (HQ) for each exposure pathway and each PTE [17,45,46]:
HQ   = ADD RfD
where ADD is the average daily dose (mg kg−1 day−1) and RfD is the chronic reference dose of each PTE (mg kg−1 day−1). Oral reference dose (RfDo) values used in the dietary and soil ingestion health risk assessment are shown in Table S1 [47].
Reference dose for dermal absorption (RfDd) was calculated for each PTE from oral reference dose using equation [48]:
RfDd   = RfDo ABS GI
where RfDd is the adjusted reference dose for dermal exposure (mg kg−1 day−1) and ABSGI is the gastrointestinal absorption factor (dimensionless).
The cumulative risk of all PTEs for each exposure pathway was evaluated by calculating the Hazard Index (HI) by using the equation:
HI   =   HQ
HQ or HI values >1 indicate significant risk to human health [45,46].
The ADD was calculated for the dietary intake (ADDdietary) for different age groups (children, 3–9 years; adolescents, 10–17 years; adults, 18–64 years; elderly, 65–74 years) while ADDs for soil ingestion (ADDing) and dermal contact with soil (ADDdermal) were assessed for adult farm workers as follows [43,45,49,50]:
ADD dietary =   C plant × IngR plant ×   EF   ×   ED   BW × AT
ADD ing =   C soil × IngR soil ×   EF   ×   ED   BW   ×   AT × 10 6
ADD dermal = C soil × SA   ×   AF   ×   ABS   ×   EF   ×   ED   BW   ×   AT × 10 6
where:
  • Cplant (mg g−1) and Csoil (mg kg−1) are the PTEs concentrations in plants and soil, respectively. For each plant, max PTE concentrations found in the shoot at the three harvests were used in this study;
  • IngRplant (g day−1) and IngRsoil (mg day−1) are the plants and soil ingestion rate per day, respectively;
  • SA is the exposed skin surface area (cm2);
  • AF is the skin adherence factor (mg cm−2 day−1);
  • ABS is the dermal absorption factor (dimensionless);
  • EF is the exposure frequency (day year−1);
  • ED is the exposure duration (years);
  • BW is the body weight (kg);
  • AT is the period over witch exposure is averaged (days). For non-carcinogenic risk assessment AT = ED × 365 days while for carcinogenic risk assessment AT = 70 × 365 assuming that carcinogenic effects may occur also when exposure ends.
Carcinogenic risks were evaluated by equation:
CR   =   ADD × SF
where CR is the cancer risk (dimensionless) and SF is the cancer slope factor (mg kg−1 day−1)−1. Oral slope factor (SFo) values are shown in Table S1 [47], while the dermal slope factor (SFd) was evaluated by the following equation [48]:
SFd   = SFo ABS GI
where SFd is the dermal slope factor, SFo is the oral slope factor and ABSGI is the gastrointestinal absorption factor (dimensionless).
The acceptable or tolerable risk is within the range of 1 × 10−6–1 × 10−4 and values lower than 1 × 10−6 are considered negligible. Carcinogenic risk values higher than 1 × 10−4 are likely to be harmful to humans [51].
All the parameters used in the health risk assessment equations are shown in Tables S2 and S3.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

All data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) via a general linear model and mean values were separated according to a least significant difference (LSD) test with p < 0.05, using the software IBM SPSS Statistics 25. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Levene tests were used to verify normality of distribution and homogeneity of variance, respectively. Logarithmic transformation was applied, when needed, to variables that did not accomplish normality. Pearson correlation analysis was carried out between soil and plant PTE concentrations by XLStat (Addinsoft, Paris, France) to evaluate general tendencies.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Soil Physicochemical Properties, Pseudototal and Promptly Bioavailable Contents of PTEs

The main physicochemical properties and pseudototal content of PTEs of the composite soil sample used in the pot experiment, obtained by mixing discrete soil samples collected from the agricultural soil, are reported in Table 1.
The soil was sandy loam and showed a slightly acid to subneutral pH (6.43), which made the bioavailability of the main nutrients such as phosphate optimal for plant growth. The electrical conductivity was quite low, hence there was no accumulation of soluble salts which could potentially inhibit plant growth. The soil showed a medium-low content in organic matter (OM), typical of soils exploited for agricultural purposes in Mediterranean countries. The content in total N was moderate, in a good equilibrium with the organic C content; the C/N ratio was 9.57, a value which indicated that the primary inputs of organic matter from crop residues were properly mineralised by soil microbiota. The medium-high availability of P and the good cation exchange capacity (CEC) adequately saturated by exchangeable K revealed a good soil chemical fertility and availability of the major plant nutrients. The good fertility of the volcanic soils of metropolitan area of Naples was also highlighted in other studies [36,37].
The pseudototal contents of Cd, Cu and Zn were below the screening values set by the Italian Ministerial Decree 46 for agricultural soils [43], but also lower than the baseline values of volcanic soils in the metropolitan area of Naples proposed by Cicchella et al. [52] and De Vivo et al. [53]. These findings can be observed in all the eight discrete samples collected from the agricultural soil (Table S4) and, as a consequence, in the composite soil sample used in the pot experiment (Table 1). On the other hand, the pseudototal content of Tl was twofold higher (Table 1 and Table S4) than the screening value for agricultural soils (1 mg kg−1, [43]); however, it was within the range of Tl baseline values (1.7–2.7 mg kg−1) found by Cicchella et al. [52] and De Vivo et al. [53] in the volcanic soils originating from the Somma–Vesuvius complex. Therefore, according to these comprehensive geological studies, the Tl content in the studied farmland should be basically of geogenic nature. Similarly, the pseudototal content of Pb exceeded of ~20% the screening value for agricultural soils (100 mg kg−1, [43]), but it was within the medium-high baseline values of the metropolitan area of Naples [52,53], due to both geogenic factors (e.g., hydrothermal fluids related to Vesuvius fractures) and anthropogenic contribution (fall-out and accumulation of Pb from tetraethyl lead, added to gasoline as an anti-knock agent until the 1990s).
The bioavailable content of PTEs in the soil, along with pH, EC and OC measures, before (T0) and after the growing cycle of lettuce (T1-L), perennial wall rocket (T1-R) and white campion (T1-S) plants, are shown in Table 2.
After plant growing cycles, we found a statistically significant increase of both soil pH and EC values, probably due to the enhanced biological activity triggered by the release of rhizodepositions by plant roots. Nevertheless, the content in organic C after plant growing cycles did not showed statistically significant differences in comparison to the initial medium-low content.
The promptly bioavailable fractions of all the PTEs in the soil before plant growth were lower than the trigger values settled by Germany and Slovak Republic to indicate a potential risk for growth and food safety of crops (Table 2) [33,34,54]. This means that all the PTEs are basically poorly bioavailable in the soil, even those showing pseudototal contents higher than screening values for agricultural soils [43], such as Tl (the most concerning metal in the site) and Pb. In terms of percentage, the promptly bioavailable fractions of Cd, Cu, Pb, Tl and Zn were the 2.1, 0.2, <0.1, 3.4 and 0.5%, respectively, of the pseudototal contents. These outcomes can be justified by the presumed geogenic nature of all the PTEs in the soil [52,53], which can be likely occluded or interlayered in the soil mineral lattice. Additionally, the soil physicochemical properties and the subneutral pH may contribute to minimise the solubility and bioavailability of PTEs in the soil, which tends to precipitate as metal (hydr)oxides or form stable and sparingly soluble organomineral complexes [31,55].
The promptly bioavailable contents of Cu and Tl in the soil increased after plant growing cycles, whereas the opposite was observed for Zn bioavailable fraction (Table 2). A significant reduction of bioavailable Zn (from 43 to 92%) was also observed by Rocco et al. [56] in two soils potentially polluted by Cu and Zn of Campania (southern Italy), after one year of phytoremediation with Eucalyptus camedulensis L. and Populus nigra L. The increased bioavailability of Tl after plant growth might be related to the enhanced bioavailability of K triggered by rhizodepositions and soil microbiota at the soil–root interface, since the geochemistry of two elements in the soil is very similar [57]. Moreover, since Tl seems not to be strongly complexed by humic acids in soils [58], in the OM-rich rhizospheric soil, Tl can move from soil to pore waters and thus become bioavailable to plants [8,59]. No statistically significant variation from the start point was found for bioavailable Pb after plant growing cycles, as well as for bioavailable Cd whose concentrations after plant growth were below the instrumental detection limit (0.005 mg kg−1). The perennial wall rocket was able to rise 4.6-fold the initial Cu bioavailable fraction after three harvest cycles, but also white campion and lettuce plants produced a significant increase of bioavailable Cu (3.3-fold and 2.5-fold higher than the start point, respectively). This enhanced Cu bioavailability after plant growth may be due to the strong affinity of the metal for dissolved organic matter (DOM). Rhizodepositions and the consequent increase in microbial activity usually contribute to raise the concentration of DOM in the rhizospheric soil which often leads to a concomitant increase of Cu promptly bioavailable content [60]. Likewise, the promptly bioavailable content of Tl was raised of 57% after three harvest cycles of lettuce and perennial wall rocket and of 14% after three harvest cycles of white campion. On the other hand, the initial bioavailable content of Zn was lowered 49, 57 and 72% by white campion, lettuce and perennial wall rocket plants, respectively.

3.2. Plant Biomass and PTE Uptake in Relation to Soil Promptly Bioavailable Contents

The dried biomass and PTE concentrations in shoots of the three plant species, at the first, second and third harvests, are shown in Table 3.
The dried biomass of the three plants was not significantly different between the first and second harvests, while a reduction of 51% for lettuce and of 37% for white campion at the third harvest occurred in comparison to the second harvest (Table 3). Lettuce requires a sufficient supply of essential macronutrients (particularly nitrogen) generally by mineral fertilizers, which can be integrated with plant biostimulants [61,62]. Consequently, the biomass reduction showed by lettuce was probably related to low agronomical inputs. In contrast, perennial wall rocket showed no biomass reduction at the third harvest, showing a good adaptability to continuous harvests, as observed by Caruso et al. [21] reporting a stable biomass production up to five consecutive harvests.
Cadmium concentration in all plant shoots (Table 3) were above the reference ranges observed in food plants grown in nonpolluted sites [12], despite the low bioavailability of Cd in soil (Table 2). White campion also showed Cd concentration (fresh weight) higher than the threshold for vegetables at the third harvest (Table S5—[39]), suggesting a potential risk for human health linked to the ingestion of this plant. On average, lettuce and white campion showed the highest Cd concentration, twofold higher than perennial wall rocket (Table 4).
The BAF of Cd was higher than other PTEs in most of the studied plants (Table 5), indicating its high mobility in the soil and transfer into plant tissues [50]. Furthermore, lettuce and white campion showed a BAF above unity (Table 5), thus suggesting a high Cd accumulation ability of the two crops in the studied soils [63]. Leafy vegetables such as lettuce showed a high tendency to accumulate Cd in previous studies [64,65], while white campion reported high Cd accumulation in polluted soils [28].
Copper concentration in plant tissues was higher than reference ranges measured in food plants grown on nonpolluted sites (Table 3—[12]). Additionally, perennial wall rocket showed the highest Cu concentration in shoots as compared to the other studied plants (Table 4), in accordance to the high bioavailable Cu content measured in the cultivation soil after plant growing cycles (above the trigger value settled by Germany and Slovak Republic; Table 2 [33,34,54]). Cu is a micronutrient for plants and this can justify, at least in part, the high Cu concentration in plant shoots. Indeed, many studied demonstrated as root exudates are able to mobilise Cu in the soil [66,67].
Lead concentration in plant shoots (ranging from 0.57 to 0.66 mg kg−1) was below the reference ranges proposed by Kabata-Pendias [12] for food plants (Table 3; Table 4). The low concentration in plants and the low mobility of this PTE in soil (Table 2) suggested a low risk of Pb transfer into the food chain. However, white campion showed Pb concentration in shoots (fresh weight) higher than the threshold for vegetables at the third harvest (Table S5—[39]), suggesting a potential risk for human health linked to the ingestion of this plant.
Thallium concentration in perennial wall rocket and white campion was higher than reference ranges proposed by Kabata-Pendias [12] for food plants. This result was consistent with the high bioavailable Tl content in the soil, above the threshold for food safety (Table 2—[33,34,54]). D’Orazio et al. [8] reported that plants belonging to Brassicacea family as perennial wall rocket may accumulate high concentrations of Tl. On the other hand, the low Tl concentration in lettuce plants was similar to that of Bunzl et al. [68] in plants grown in noncontaminated soils, to indicate that lettuce plants are sensitive to Tl and do not take easily it up, even when its bioavailability is enhanced in the rhizosphere soil. White campion showed the highest Tl concentration in shoots as compared to the other studied plants and a BAF > 1 (Table 4, Table 5), which indicates a high Tl accumulation efficiency of this plant. Accordingly, many authors demonstrated that white campion highly accumulates Tl in its shoots and can show a Tl BAF up to 11 in soils polluted by anthropogenic Tl [27,28,69]. Our findings thus reveals that white campion can take up and accumulate high Tl concentrations also in soil where Tl derives from geological sources.
Zinc concentration in lettuce shoots at the third harvest was higher than reference ranges proposed by Kabata-Pendias [12] for food plants (Table 3). The concentrations of Zn found in our lettuces were analogous to those observed by Antoniadis et al. [19], who grew the plants in soils showing a similar Zn mobility. Zn is an essential micronutrient for plants, moreover it is generally quite mobile and bioavailable in the soil [67,70], hence it is conceivable that plants as lettuce can take up and assimilate high concentrations of this metal from the rhizosphere soil.
In general, PTE concentrations in plant shoots tended to increase in the second and third harvests, except for Tl in lettuce and white campion (Table 3). The promptly bioavailable fractions of Cu and Tl in the soil raised from the time T0 to the end of the experiment, after plant growth and three consecutive harvests, while on the contrary those of Cd and Zn decreased over time (Table 2). This behaviour for Cd and Zn suggested that the uptake of the promptly bioavailable fractions of these two metals by plants was intense and faster than the progressive conversion of less bioavailable pools into easily available pools in the soil [71]. On the contrary, the promptly bioavailable contents of Cu and Tl in the soil were enhanced over time probably because the less available pools were easily turned into easily available pools by root exudates and soil biota [72].
These trends were also ascertained by correlating the metal promptly bioavailable contents in the soil and PTE concentrations in plants (Table 6).
A statistically significant positive soil vs plant correlation was observed for Cu and Tl (only for perennial wall rocket), while a statistically significant negative soil vs plant correlation was noticed for Zn (Table 6). A similar positive correlation between NH4NO3-extractable fraction in soil and total content in plant was reported for Cu and Tl in previous studies, to indicate that the fluctuations of promptly bioavailable contents of metals in the soil are generally related to the amounts taken up and assimilated by the plants [73,74].

3.3. Health Risk Assessment

The risk of non-carcinogenic toxicity to different age classes of humans due to dietary intake of PTEs from the studied crops are shown in Table 7.
Thallium was the element with the highest risk for human health, representing the 85%, 94% and 99% of the hazard index (HI), respectively, for lettuce, perennial wall rocket and white campion. This is a consequence of both high Tl concentration in plants and the lowest oral reference dose of Tl (0.001 mg kg−1), if compared to the other PTEs [75]. Thallium HQ was above 1 only for white campion ranging from 34.7 for elderly to 74.6 for children (Table 7) indicating a significant non-carcinogenic risk for human health. HQs found for Tl in our pot trial were similar to those of other studies in Tl-rich soils, this means that the possible intake of white campion may pose a serious risk for human health if grown in a soil rich in Tl of geogenic nature. In particular, Wang et al. [76] reported HQ up to 50 for children and 30 for adults in food plants grown on soils with total Tl concentrations up to 177 mg kg−1. Similarly, Huang et al. [77], reported Tl HQ of 57.6 in soil with Tl concentration of 6.3 mg kg−1. The noncarcinogenic hazard indexes (HI) related to the intake of lettuce and perennial wall rocket were below the safe level (<1). On the contrary, the HI for white campion was above 1, ranging from 34.8 for elderly to 74.9 for children (Table 7), thus indicating a potential noncarcinogenic risk due to the ingestion of this plant. Results of the health risk assessment for white campion also showed that children are at higher risk to PTE exposure than adults and elderly. This is essentially due to the high food ingestion of children in proportion to their body size and to the low ability to metabolize, detoxify and excrete toxins; in other words, a not-dangerous dose for an adult may be dangerous for a child [50,78].
Health risk assessment was also calculated for farm workers based on two exposure pathways: direct soil ingestion and soil dermal contact (Table 8).
The risk linked to each PTE (HQ) and the total risk (HI) were below 1 for both the exposure pathways, thus there is no risk for farmers working on the studied farmland. The low risk is mostly related to the low exposure frequency of farm workers that in turn limits the exposure to PTEs [79]. As for dietary risk assessment, Tl was the most risky element for soil ingestion and dermal contact as well, representing 84% and 50%, respectively, of the hazard index (HI) (Table 8). The high toxicity of this element, showing a very low oral and dermal RfD (0.001 µg kg−1), is the main responsible of this prominent contribution to the overall risk [47,48,75].
Only the carcinogenic risk of Pb was calculated, since the carcinogenic slope factors for Cd, Cu, Tl and Zn are not available [47]. The cancer risk of Pb through dietary intake of the three plants was always lower than 1 × 10−6, thus resulting negligible for all the classes of humans (Figure 1 [51]). Similarly, cancer risk of Pb for farm workers through ingestion and dermal contact of soil were insignificant, with values of 9.2 × 10−7 and 4.1 × 10−9, respectively [51].

4. Conclusions

This study aimed to assess the potential risks for human health deriving from the agriculture use of a soil located in the volcanic metropolitan area of Naples (southern Italy) and showing pseudototal contents of Tl and Pb of geogenic nature above screening values for agricultural soils. The soil extraction by 1M NH4NO3 basically revealed that all the PTEs, including Tl and Pb, were poorly bioavailable in the soil. This behaviour is essentially due to the geogenic nature of all the PTEs in the soil, which are likely occluded or interlayered in the soil mineral lattice. Nevertheless, repeated croppings of L. sativa L., D. tenuifolia L. and S. latifolia Poir. raised the promptly bioavailable content of Cu and Tl in the soil above internationally recognized trigger values and accumulated relatively high concentrations of Cd, Cu, Tl and Zn in shoots. However, acceptable risks (HI < 1) were found, arising from the dietary intake of lettuce and perennial wall rocket, soil ingestion and dermal contact by farm workers. Only the ingestion of white campion might lead to significant health risks, in particular for children. No carcinogenic risks due to Pb exposure were found.
The findings of this work demand the proper management of soil used for agricultural purposes, in order to minimise the possible transfer of Tl and other PTEs to food crops and hence to consumers eating vegetables grown on site or farmers working out in the field. It is evident that the selection of food crops is crucial to cultivate on site, since different plant species can differently affect the mobility and bioavailability of Tl and other PTEs in the soil by their own rhizodepositions, taking up and accumulating the metals in the edible portions to a different extent.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/6/890/s1, Figure S1: Map of the studied site and sampling points (top) in the rural area of Afragola (Naples, Campania, Italy) and greenhouse pot experiment with L. sativa, D. tenuifolia and S. latifolia. Table S1: Oral reference doses (RfDo) related to non-carcinogenic health risk and oral slope factor (SFo; unitless) related to carcinogenic health risk. Table S2: Reference parameters used in health risk assessment on the consumption of vegetables by children, teenagers, adults and elderly. Table S3: Reference parameters used in health risk assessment on the ingestion and dermal contact of soil by farm workers. Table S4: Pseudo-total content of PTEs (mg kg−1) in the eight discrete soil samples collected from the studied agricultural soil. Table S5: PTEs concentrations (mg kg−1 f. w.) in shoots of L. sativa, D. tenuifolia and S. latifolia from the first, second and third harvest.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.F., D.V., N.F. and P.A.; methodology, D.V. and L.G.D.; formal analysis, D.V. and A.G.C.; investigation, D.V. and L.G.D.; writing—original draft preparation, D.V. and A.G.C.; writing—review and editing, M.F., N.F. and P.A.; supervision, A.G.C. and M.F.; project administration, M.F.; funding acquisition, M.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by EC LIFE11/ENV/IT 275 Ecoremed and Italian MIUR PRIN2017BHH84R.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Eugenio Cozzolino and Vincenzo Cenvinzo for their support in crop management and sampling.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Peter, A.L.J.; Viraraghavan, T. Thallium: A review of public health and environmental concerns. Environ. Int. 2005, 31, 493–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. USEPA. Toxicological review of thallium and compounds. In Support of Summary Information on the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS); Report no. EPA/635/R-08/001F; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhao, G.; Ding, M.; Zhang, B.; Lv, W.; Yin, H.; Zhang, L.; Ying, Z.; Zhang, Q. Clinical manifestations and management of acute thallium poisoning. Eur. Neurol. 2008, 60, 292–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tsai, Y.; Huang, C.; Kuo, H.; Wang, H.; Shen, W.; Shih, T.; Chu, N. Central nervous system effects in acute thallium poisoning. Neuro. Toxicol. 2006, 27, 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pelclová, D.; Urban, P.; Ridzoň, P.; Šenholdová, Z.; Lukáš, E.; Diblík, P.; Lacina, L. Two-year follow-up of two patients after severe thallium intoxication. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2009, 28, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. USEPA. Priority Pollutant List; United States Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2014.
  7. Cobelo-García, A.; Filella, M.; Croot, P.; Frazzoli, C.; Du Laing, G.; Ospina-Alvarez, N.; Rauch, S.; Salaun, P.; Schäfer, J.; Zimmermann, S.; et al. COST action TD1407: Network on technology-critical elements (NOTICE)—From environmental processes to human health threats. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 15188–15194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. D’Orazio, M.; Campanella, B.; Bramanti, E.; Ghezzi, L.; Onor, M.; Vianello, G.; Vittori Antisari, L.; Petrini, R. Thallium pollution in water, soils and plants from a past-mining site of Tuscany: Sources, transfer processes and toxicity. J. Geochem. Explor. 2020, 209, 106434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Karbowska, B. Presence of thallium in the environment: Sources of contaminations, distribution and monitoring methods. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2016, 188, 640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Viraraghavan, T.; Srinivasan, A. Thallium: Environmental pollution and health effects. In Encyclopedia of Environmental Health; Nriagu, J.O., Ed.; Elsevier: Burlington, MA, USA, 2011; pp. 325–333. [Google Scholar]
  11. Belzile, N.; Chen, Y.W. Thallium in the environment: A critical review focused on natural waters, soils, sediments and airborne particles. Appl. Geochem. 2017, 84, 218–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kabata-Pendias, A. Trace Elements in Soils and Plants; CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu, J.; Wei, X.; Zhou, Y.; Tsang, D.C.W.; Bao, Z.; Yin, M.; Lippold, H.; Yuan, W.; Wang, J.; Feng, Y.; et al. Thallium contamination, health risk assessment and source apportionment in common vegetables. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 703, 135547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, J.; Li, N.; Zhang, W.; Wei, X.; Tsang, D.C.W.; Sun, Y.; Luo, X.; Bao, Z.; Zheng, W.; Wang, J.; et al. Thallium contamination in farmlands and common vegetables in a pyritemining city and potential health risks. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 248, 906–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tremel, A.; Masson, P.; Garraud, H.; Donard, O.F.X.; Baize, D.; Mench, M. Thallium in French agrosystems—II. concentration of thallium in field-grown rape and some other plant species. Environ. Pollut. 1997, 97, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Grösslovà, Z.; Vanèk, A.; Obornà, V.; Mihaljevìc, M.; Ettler, V.; Trubač, J.; Drahota, P.; Penízek, V.; Pavlù, L.; Sracek, O.; et al. Thallium contamination of desert soil in Namibia: Chemical, mineralogical and isotopic insights. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 239, 272–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Duri, L.G.; Fiorentino, N.; Cozzolino, E.; Ottaiano, L.; Agrelli, D.; Fagnano, M. Bioassays for evaluation of sanitary risks from food crops cultivated in potentially contaminated sites. Ital. J. Agron. 2018, 13 (Suppl. 1), 45–52. [Google Scholar]
  18. LaCoste, C.; Robinson, B.; Brooks, R. Uptake of thallium by vegetables: Its significance for human health, phytoremediation, and phytomining. J. Plant Nutr. 2001, 24, 1205–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Antoniadis, V.; Shaheen, S.M.; Boersch, J.; Frohne, T.; Du Laing, G.; Rinklebe, J. Bioavailability and risk assessment of potentially toxic elements in garden edible vegetables and soils around a highly contaminated former mining area in Germany. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 186, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Pignatti, S.; Guarino, R.; La Rosa, M. Flora d’Italia; Edagricole: Bologna, Italy, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  21. Caruso, G.; Parrella, G.; Giorgini, M.; Nicoletti, R. Crop systems, quality and protection of Diplotaxis tenuifolia. Agriculture 2018, 8, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Grabner, B.; Ribaric-Lasnik, C.; Romih, N.; Pfeifhofer, H.W.; Batic, F. Bioaccumulation capacity for Pb, Cd and Zn from polluted soil in selected species of the Brassicaceae family growing in different vegetation types. Phyton 2011, 50, 287–300. [Google Scholar]
  23. Alarcon, R.; Ortiz, L.T.; Garcia, P. Nutrient and fatty acid composition of wild edible bladder campion populations [Silene vulgaris (Moench.) Garcke]. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2006, 41, 1239–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tardío, J.; De-Santayana, M.P.; Morales, R. Ethnobotanical review of wild edible plants in Spain. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2006, 152, 27–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Luczaj, L.; Dolina, K. A hundred years of change in wild vegetable use in southern Herzegovina. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 166, 297–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Guarrera, P.M.; Savo, V. Wild food plants used in traditional vegetable mixtures in Italy. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 185, 202–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Escarrè, J.; Lefebvre, C.; Raboyeau, S.; Dossantos, A.; Gruber, W.; Cleyet Marel, J.C.; Frerot, H.; Noret, N.; Mahieu, S.; Collin, C.; et al. Heavy metal concentration survey in soils and plants of the les Malines mining district (Southern France): Implications for soil restoration. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2011, 216, 485–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Visconti, D.; Fiorentino, N.; Stinca, A.; Di Mola, I.; Fagnano, M. Use of the native vascular flora for risk assessment and management of an industrial contaminated soil. Ital. J. Agron. 2018, 13, 23–33. [Google Scholar]
  29. Visconti, D.; Fiorentino, N.; Caporale, A.G.; Stinca, A.; Adamo, P.; Motti, R.; Fagnano, M. Analysis of native vegetation for detailed characterization of a soil contaminated by tannery waste. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 252, 1599–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Khelifi, F.; Melki, A.; Hamed, Y.; Adamo, P.; Caporale, A.G. Environmental and human health risk assessment of potentially toxic elements in soil, sediments and ore-processing wastes from a mining area of southwestern Tunisia. Environ. Geochem. Health 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Adamo, P.; Agrelli, D.; Zampella, M. Chemical speciation to assess bioavailability, bioaccessibility and geochemical forms of potentially toxic metals (PTMs) in polluted soils. In Environmental Geochemistry, Site Characterization, Data Analysis and Case Histories, 2nd ed.; De Vivo, B., Belkin, H.E., Lima, A., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 153–194. [Google Scholar]
  32. Violante, A.; Caporale, A.G. Biogeochemical processes at soil-root interface. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2015, 15, 422–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. BBodSchV. Bodenschutz- und Altlastenverordnung (Federal Soil Protection and Contaminated Sites Ordinance). 12 July 1999. Germany. Available online: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bbodschv/BBodSchV.pdf (accessed on 21 June 2020).
  34. ASP. Act No. 220/2004 Coll. on the Protection and Use of the Agricultural Soil; The National Council of the Slovak Republic: Bratislava, Slovakia, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  35. Caporale, A.G.; Adamo, P.; Capozzi, F.; Langella, G.; Terribile, F.; Vingiani, S. Monitoring metal pollution in soils using portable-XRF and conventional laboratory-based techniques: Evaluation of the performance and limitations according to metal properties and sources. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 643, 516–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Di Gennaro, A.; Aronne, G.; De Mascellis, R.; Vingiani, S.; Sarnataro, M.; Abalsamo, P.; Cona, F.; Vitelli, L.; Arpaia, G. I sistemi di Terre Della Campania. Monografia e Carta 1:250.000, con Legenda; Società Elaborazioni Cartografiche: Firenze, Italy, 2002; p. 63. [Google Scholar]
  37. Vingiani, S.; Buonanno, M.; Coraggio, S.; D’Antonio, A.; De Mascellis, R.; Di Gennaro, A.; Iamarino, M.; Langella, G.; Manna, P.; Moretti, P.; et al. Soils of the Aversa plain (southern Italy). J. Maps 2018, 14, 312–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Ellili, A.; Rabier, J.; Prudent, P.; Salducci, M.D.; Heckenroth, A.; Lachaal, M.; Laffont-Schwob, I. Decision-making criteria for plant-species selection for phytostabilization: Issues of biodiversity and functionality. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 201, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006—Setting Maximum Levels for Certain Contaminants in Foodstuffs. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex:32006R1881 (accessed on 16 May 2020).
  40. Walkley, A.; Black, I.A. An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934, 37, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. ISO 12914. Soil Quality—Microwave-Assisted Extraction of the Aqua Regia Soluble Fraction for the Determination of Elements; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  42. DIN 19730. Bodenbeschaffenheit-Extraktion von Spurenelementen mit Ammoniumnitratlösung; Beuth Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  43. Italian Ministerial Decree 46. Collection of Laws No. 220 of 10 March 2004 on the Protection and Use of Agricultural Land. Available online: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2019/06/07/19G00052/sg (accessed on 21 June 2020).
  44. USEPA. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund vol. I: Human Health Evaluation Manual Supplemental Guidance: Standard Default Exposure Factors, Interim Final, OSWER Directive 9285.6-03; Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, US Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 1991.
  45. USEPA. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Human Health Evaluation Manual, Part A, vol. 1; Report no. EPA/540/1-89/002; Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, US Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 1989.
  46. USEPA. Handbook for Non-Cancer Health Effects Evaluation; US Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2000.
  47. USEPA. Toxicity and Chemical/Physical Properties for Regional Screening Level (RSL) of Chemical Contaminants at Superfund Sites. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/region9/superfund/prg/table-generic-tables (accessed on 16 May 2020).
  48. USEPA. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual. Part E, Supplemental Guidance for Dermal Risk Assessment. Final [EPA/540/R/99/005]; Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, US Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2004.
  49. USEPA. Exposure Factors Handbook [EPA/600/R-09/052F]; US Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2011.
  50. Lian, M.; Wang, J.; Sun, L.; Xu, Z.; Tang, J.; Yan, J.; Zeng, X. Profiles and potential health risks of heavy metals in soil and crops from the watershed of Xi River in Northeast China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 169, 442–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. USEPA. Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superfund Sites, [OSWER 9355.4-24]; Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, US Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2002.
  52. Cicchella, D.; De Vivo, B.; Lima, A. Background and baseline concentration values of harmful elements in the volcanic soils of metropolitan and Provincial areas of Napoli (Italy). Geochem. Explor. Environ. Anal. 2005, 5, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. De Vivo, B.; Lima, A.; Albanese, S.; Rezza, C.; Civitillo, D.; Minolfi, G.; Zuzolo, D. Atlante Geochimico-Ambientale dei Suoli Della Campania—Environmental Geochemical Atlas of Campania Soils; Aracne: Ariccia, Italy, 2016; p. 364. [Google Scholar]
  54. Carlon, C. Derivation Methods of Soil Screening Values in Europe. A Review and Evaluation of National Procedures towards Harmonization, EUR 22805-EN.; European Commission, Joint Research Centre, ISPRA: Rome, Italy, 2007; p. 306. [Google Scholar]
  55. Caporale, A.G.; Violante, A. Chemical processes affecting the mobility of heavy metals and metalloids in soil environments. Curr. Pollut. Rep. 2016, 2, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Rocco, C.; Agrelli, D.; Tafuro, M.; Caporale, A.G.; Adamo, P. Assessing the bioavailability of potentially toxic elements in soil: A proposed approach. Ital. J. Agron. 2018, 13, 16–22. [Google Scholar]
  57. Wedepohl, K.H. The composition of the continental crust. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1995, 59, 1217–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jacobson, A.R.; McBride, M.B.; Baveye, P.; Steenhuis, T.S. Environmental factors determining the trace-level sorption of silver and thallium to soils. Sci. Total Environ. 2005, 345, 191–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pavoni, E.; Petranich, E.; Adami, G.; Baracchini, E.; Crosera, M.; Emili, A.; Lenaz, D.; Higueras, P.; Covelli, S. Bioaccumulation of thallium and other trace metals in Biscutella laevigata nearby a decommisioned zinc-lead mine (Northeastern Italian Alps). J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 186, 214–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bravin, M.N.; Garnier, C.; Lenoble, V.; Gèrard, F.; Dudal, Y.; Hinsinger, P. Root-induced changes in pH and dissolved organic matter binding capacity affect copper dynamic speciation in the rhizosphere. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2012, 84, 256–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Visconti, D.; Fiorentino, N.; Cozzolino, E.; Woo, S.L.; Fagnano, M.; Rouphael, Y. Can trichoderma-based biostimulants optimize N use efficiency and stimulate growth of leafy vegetables in greenhouse intensive cropping systems? Agronomy 2019, 10, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Simko, I. Genetic variation in response to N, P, or K deprivation in baby leaf lettuce. Horticulturae 2020, 6, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Li, X.Y.; Li, Z.G.; Lin, C.J.; Bi, X.Y.; Liu, J.L.; Feng, X.B.; Zhang, H.; Chen, J.; Wu, T.T. Health risks of heavy metal exposure through vegetable consumption near a large-scale Pb/Zn smelter in central China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 161, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Menzies, N.W.; Donn, M.J.; Kopittke, P.M. Evaluation of extractants for the estimation of the phytoavailable trace metals in soils. Environ. Pollut. 2007, 145, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Fang, H.W.; Li, W.S.; Tu, S.X.; Ding, Y.Z.; Wang, R.G.; Rensing, C.; Li, Y.P.; Feng, R.W. Differences in cadmium absorption by 71 leaf vegetable varieties from different families and genera and their health risk assessment. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 184, 109593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Lyubenova, L.; Kuhn, A.J.; Höltkemeier, A.; Schröder, P. Root exudation pattern of Typha latifolia L. plants after copper exposure. Plant Soil 2013, 370, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Franca, F.C.S.S.; Albuuerque, A.M.A.; Almeida, A.C.; Silveira, P.B.; Filho, C.A.; Hazin, C.A.; Honorato, E.V. Heavy metals deposited in the culture of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) by the influence of vehicular traffic in Pernambuco Brazil. Food Chem. 2017, 215, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Bunzl, K.; Trautmannsheimer, M.; Schramel, P.; Reifenhauser, W. Availability of arsenic, copper, lead, thallium, and zinc to various vegetables grown in slag-contaminated soils. J. Environ. Qual. 2001, 30, 934–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Marchiol, L.; Fellet, G.; Boscutti, F.; Montella, C.; Mozzi, R.; Guarino, C. Gentle remediation at the former “Pertusola Sud” zinc smelter: Evaluation of native species for phytoremediation purposes. Ecol. Eng. 2013, 53, 343–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Yang, Q.W.; Xu, Y.; Liu, S.J.; He, J.F.; Long, F.Y. Concentration and potential health risk of heavy metals in market vegetables in Chongqing, China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2011, 74, 1664–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Gremion, F.; Chatzinotas, A.; Kaufmann, K.; Von Sigler, W.; Harms, H. Impacts of heavy metal contamination and phytoremediation on a microbial community during a twelve-month microcosm experiment. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2004, 48, 273–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Fischerovà, Z.; Tlustos, P.; Szakova, J.; Sichorova, K. A comparison of phytoremediation capability of selected plant species for given trace elements. Environ. Pollut. 2006, 144, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Song, J.; Zhao, F.J.; Luo, Y.M.; McGrath, S.P.; Zhang, H. Copper uptake by Elsholtzia splendens and Silene vulgaris and assessment of copper phytoavailability in contaminated soils. Environ. Pollut. 2004, 128, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Madejon, P.; Murillo, J.M.; Maranon, T.; Lepp, N.W. Factors affecting accumulation of thallium and other trace elements in two wild Brassicaceae spontaneously growing on soils contaminated by tailings dam waste. Chemosphere 2007, 67, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Antoniadis, V.; Golia, E.E.; Liu, Y.-T.; Wang, S.-L.; Shaheen, S.M.; Rinklebe, J. Soil and maize contamination by trace elements and associated health risk assessment in the industrial area of Volos, Greece. Environ. Int. 2019, 124, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Wang, C.; Chen, Y.; Liu, J.; Wang, J.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y. Health risks of thallium in contaminated arable soils and food crops irrigated with wastewater from sulfuric acid plant in western Guangdong province, China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2013, 90, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Huang, X.; Li, N.; Wu, Q.; Long, J.; Luo, D.; Huang, X.; Li, D.; Zhao, D. Fractional distribution of thallium in paddy soil and its bioavailability to rice. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 148, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zeng, X.F.; Wang, Z.W.; Wang, J.; Guo, J.T.; Chen, X.J.; Zhuang, J. Health risk assessment of heavy metals via dietary intake of wheat grown in Tianjin sewage irrigation area. Ecotoxicology 2015, 24, 2115–2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Arslan, S.; Aybek, A. Particulate matter exposure in agriculture. In Air Pollution. A Comprehensive Perspective; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2012; Volume 10, pp. 73–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Cancer risk (CR) of Pb through dietary intake of L. Sativa and D. tenuifolia (a) and of S. latifolia (b).
Figure 1. Cancer risk (CR) of Pb through dietary intake of L. Sativa and D. tenuifolia (a) and of S. latifolia (b).
Agronomy 10 00890 g001
Table 1. Physicochemical properties of the composite soil sample used in the pot experiment before plant sowing (time T0).
Table 1. Physicochemical properties of the composite soil sample used in the pot experiment before plant sowing (time T0).
SoilSandSiltClaypHECCECOCOMTNC/N
g kg−1 dS m−1cmol(+) kg−1g kg−1
554 ± 24249 ± 13197 ± 96.43 ± 0.020.15 ± 0.0127.1 ± 0.215.5 ± 0.226.7 ± 0.41.6 ± 0.19.6
Pseudo-total
CdCuPbTlZnAPEK
mg kg−1g kg−1
Soil0.29 ± 0.02116 ± 4117 ± 122.0 ± 0.1127 ± 40.10 ± 0.011.60 ± 0.01
SV a52001001.0300--
BV b0.501631001.5142--
a Screening values (SV) of Italian Ministerial Decree 46 [43]. b Baseline values (BV) of Neapolitan volcanic soils [52]. In bold values above the Italian screening values or baseline values of Neapolitan volcanic soils. EC: electrical conductivity; CEC: cation exchange capacity; OC: organic carbon, OM: organic matter; TN: total nitrogen; C/N: carbon-to-nitrogen ratio; AP: available phosphorus; EK: exchangeable potassium. Values (mean ± standard error).
Table 2. pH, electric conductivity (EC), organic C (TOC) and NH4NO3-extractable Cd, Cu, Pb, Tl and Zn in soil before plant sowing (T0) and at the end of the experiment (T1).
Table 2. pH, electric conductivity (EC), organic C (TOC) and NH4NO3-extractable Cd, Cu, Pb, Tl and Zn in soil before plant sowing (T0) and at the end of the experiment (T1).
pHEC
(μS cm−1)
TOC
(g kg−1)
Cd
(mg kg−1)
Cu
(mg kg−1)
Pb
(mg kg−1)
Tl
(mg kg−1)
Zn
(mg kg−1)
T0mean6.43 d148 c1.550.0060.27 d0.050.067 d0.68 a
st. dev.0.02180.030.0020.010.010.0010.03
T1-Lmean6.58 c442 a1.48b.d.l. (<0.005)0.68 c0.040.109 a0.29 b
st. dev.0.06490.09 0.060.010.0010.04
T1-Rmean6.88 a319 b1.55b.d.l. (<0.005)1.25 a0.040.106 b0.19 c
st. dev.0.10270.05 0.120.010.0020.01
T1-Smean6.71 b279 b1.52b.d.l. (<0.005)0.88 b0.050.084 c0.35 b
st. dev.0.11660.01 0.110.010.0020.08
ANOVA ****n.s. **n.s.****
Trigger values a 0.110.10.12
L, lettuce; R, perennial wall rocket; S, S. latifolia. Values followed by the same letter do not differ significantly according to the LSD test (p < 0.05). b.d.l., below detection limit. *, **: p < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively; n.s., not significant. a Trigger values settled by Germany [33] and Slovak Republic [34] to indicate a potential risk for the soil–food-plant pollutant transition in agricultural areas and in vegetable gardens with regard to the plant quality. In italic—values above the reference trigger values.
Table 3. Plant biomass (g d.w.) and concentration of PTEs (mg kg−1 d.w.) in shoots of L. sativa, D. tenuifolia and S. latifolia at the first, second and third harvests.
Table 3. Plant biomass (g d.w.) and concentration of PTEs (mg kg−1 d.w.) in shoots of L. sativa, D. tenuifolia and S. latifolia at the first, second and third harvests.
DW
(g pot−1)
Cd
(mg kg−1)
Cu
(mg kg−1)
Pb
(mg kg−1)
Tl
(mg kg−1)
Zn
(mg kg−1)
L. sativa1st harvest4.34 a0.51 b14 b0.82 a0.1058 b
2nd harvest4.11 a0.46 b8 b0.36 b0.0951 b
3rd harvest2.08 b0.68 a24 a0.99 a0.1075 a
ANOVA********n.s.**
D. tenuifolia1st harvest6.020.13 b7 b0.430.06 b40 b
2nd harvest6.450.31 a24 a0.490.23 a56 a
3rd harvest5.490.43 a25 a0.790.23 a60 a
ANOVAn.s.****n.s.***
S. latifolia1st harvest13.73 a0.30 b6 c0.45 b7.66 a21 b
2nd harvest6.69 b0.95 a16 b0.45 b4.44 b47 a
3rd harvest2.45 c1.11 a48 a1.60 a4.17 b49 a
ANOVA***********
Mean values with the same letter do not differ according to the least significant difference (LSD) test (p < 0.05). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; n.s., not significant.
Table 4. Concentration of potentially toxic elements (PTEs) (mg kg−1 d. w.) in shoots of L. sativa, D. tenuifolia and S. latifolia (three harvests weighted average).
Table 4. Concentration of potentially toxic elements (PTEs) (mg kg−1 d. w.) in shoots of L. sativa, D. tenuifolia and S. latifolia (three harvests weighted average).
Cd
(mg kg−1)
Cu
(mg kg−1)
Pb
(mg kg−1)
Tl
(mg kg−1)
Zn
(mg kg−1)
L. sativa0.52 a13.4 b0.660.09 b58.8 a
D. tenuifolia0.28 b18.6 a0.570.17 b51.8 a
S. latifolia0.57 a13.7 b0.576.35 a31.1 b
ANOVA****n.s.****
Mean values with the same letter do not differ according to the LSD test (p < 0.05). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; n.s., not significant.
Table 5. Bioaccumulation factor (BAF) of each PTE in shoots of L. sativa, D. tenuifolia and S. latifolia (three harvests weighted average).
Table 5. Bioaccumulation factor (BAF) of each PTE in shoots of L. sativa, D. tenuifolia and S. latifolia (three harvests weighted average).
BAF
CdCuPbTlZn
L. sativa1.830.110.0060.050.46
D. tenuifolia0.980.160.0050.090.41
S. latifolia1.980.120.0053.260.24
In bold values >1.
Table 6. Pearson correlation coefficients showing the relationship between the promptly available content of PTEs in soil and concentration of PTEs in aerial plant biomass.
Table 6. Pearson correlation coefficients showing the relationship between the promptly available content of PTEs in soil and concentration of PTEs in aerial plant biomass.
Soil
CuPbTlZn
L. sativaCu0.741 *
Pb −0.391
Tl 0.088
Zn −0.873 *
D. tenuifoliaCu0.974 *
Pb −0.680
Tl 0.958 *
Zn −0.738 *
S. latifoliaCu0.944 *
Pb 0.187
Tl −0.658
Zn −0.957 *
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed).
Table 7. Hazard quotients (HQ) and hazard indexes (HI) through dietary intake of L. sativa, D. tenuifolia and S. latifolia by consumers.
Table 7. Hazard quotients (HQ) and hazard indexes (HI) through dietary intake of L. sativa, D. tenuifolia and S. latifolia by consumers.
HQ
PlantAge groupCdCuPbTlZnHI
L. SativaChildren3.14 × 10−22.71 × 1021.27 × 1024.66 × 1011.17 × 1025.49 × 101
Teenagers2.33 × 1022.01 × 1029.42 × 1033.45 × 1018.65 × 10−34.06 × 101
Adults2.54 × 1022.19 × 1021.03 × 1023.76 × 1019.43 × 10−34.43 × 101
Elderly2.53 × 1022.18 × 1021.02 × 1023.75 × 1019.41 × 10−34.42 × 101
S. latifoliaChildren1.34 × 1011.48 × 10−15.51 × 1027.46 × 1011.98 × 1027.49 × 101
Teenagers9.70 × 1021.07 × 1013.98 × 1025.39 × 1011.43 × 1025.41 × 101
Adults8.48 × 1029.38 × 1023.48 × 1024.71 × 1011.25 × 1024.73 × 101
Elderly6.24 × 1026.90 × 1022.56 × 1023.47 × 1019.21 × 10−33.48 × 101
D. tenuifoliaChildren7.36 × 1031.07 × 1023.81 × 1033.95 × 1013.43 × 1034.20 × 101
Teenagers4.72 × 10−36.87 × 10−32.44 × 1032.54 × 1012.20 × 1032.70 × 101
Adults4.98 × 10−37.24 × 1032.58 × 1032.67 × 1012.32 × 1032.84 × 101
Elderly6.45 × 10−39.38 × 1033.33 × 1033.46 × 1013.00 × 10−33.68 × 101
In bold values >1.
Table 8. Hazard quotients (HQ) and hazard indexes (HI) through soil ingestion and dermal contact by farm workers.
Table 8. Hazard quotients (HQ) and hazard indexes (HI) through soil ingestion and dermal contact by farm workers.
HQ
Exposure PathwayCdCuPbTlZnHI
Ingestion4.31 × 1044.38 × 1035.04 × 1022.93 × 1016.38 × 1043.49 × 101
Dermal1.52 × 1051.93 × 1052.22 × 1042.59 × 1042.81 × 1065.18 × 104

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Duri, L.G.; Visconti, D.; Fiorentino, N.; Adamo, P.; Fagnano, M.; Caporale, A.G. Health Risk Assessment in Agricultural Soil Potentially Contaminated by Geogenic Thallium: Influence of Plant Species on Metal Mobility in Soil-Plant System. Agronomy 2020, 10, 890. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10060890

AMA Style

Duri LG, Visconti D, Fiorentino N, Adamo P, Fagnano M, Caporale AG. Health Risk Assessment in Agricultural Soil Potentially Contaminated by Geogenic Thallium: Influence of Plant Species on Metal Mobility in Soil-Plant System. Agronomy. 2020; 10(6):890. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10060890

Chicago/Turabian Style

Duri, Luigi Giuseppe, Donato Visconti, Nunzio Fiorentino, Paola Adamo, Massimo Fagnano, and Antonio Giandonato Caporale. 2020. "Health Risk Assessment in Agricultural Soil Potentially Contaminated by Geogenic Thallium: Influence of Plant Species on Metal Mobility in Soil-Plant System" Agronomy 10, no. 6: 890. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10060890

APA Style

Duri, L. G., Visconti, D., Fiorentino, N., Adamo, P., Fagnano, M., & Caporale, A. G. (2020). Health Risk Assessment in Agricultural Soil Potentially Contaminated by Geogenic Thallium: Influence of Plant Species on Metal Mobility in Soil-Plant System. Agronomy, 10(6), 890. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10060890

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop