Next Article in Journal
Variation of Polyphenol Content and Antioxidant Activity in Some Bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) Populations from Romania
Previous Article in Journal
Addition of Phosphatases and Phytases to Mature Compost to Increase Available Phosphorus: A Short Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Use of Microbial Biostimulants to Increase the Salinity Tolerance of Vegetable Transplants
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agronomy
Volume 11
Issue 12
10.3390/agronomy11122556
agronomy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Growth, Quality, and Nitrogen Assimilation in Response to High Ammonium or Nitrate Supply in Cabbage (Brassica campestris L.) and Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.)

by
Jinnan Song
1,
Jingli Yang
1 and
Byoung Ryong Jeong
1,2,3,*
1
Department of Horticulture, Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four Program), Graduate School of Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea
2
Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea
3
Research Institute of Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2021, 11(12), 2556; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11122556
Submission received: 22 November 2021 / Revised: 13 December 2021 / Accepted: 14 December 2021 / Published: 16 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Horticultural Crops under Abiotic Stress)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Plants grow better when they are supplied with a combination of ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3−) than when either one is supplied as the sole N (nitrogen) source. However, the effects of N forms on N metabolism and major N assimilation enzymes in different plants, especially vegetables, are largely neglected. This study was conducted on two plants with distinct NH4+ tolerances to compare the responses of two popular leafy vegetables, Korean cabbage (Brassica campestris L.) ‘Ssamchu’ and lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) ‘Caesar green’, to the N source. To this end, plant growth and quality, photosynthesis, carbohydrate, N contents (in the forms of NO3−, NO2−, NH4+, total protein), and key N assimilation-related enzyme (NR, NIR, GS, GDH) activities were investigated. When plants were subjected to one of three NH4+:NO3− regimes, 0:100, 50:50, or 100:0, lettuce was relatively more tolerant while cabbage was extremely sensitive to high NH4+. Both plants benefited more from being grown with 50:50 NH4+:NO3−, as evidenced by the best growth performance, ameliorated photosynthesis, and enriched carbohydrate (C) stock content. In addition, as compared to cabbage, the GS and GDH activities were reinforced in lettuce in response to an increasing external NH4+ level, resulting in low NH4+ accumulation. Our findings suggested that boosting or maintaining high GS and GDH activities is an important strategy for the ammonium tolerance in vegetables.

1. Introduction

Nitrogen (N) is a primary and essential nutrient that affects the plant growth and agricultural production. Many higher plant species acquire their N in the form of nitrate (NO3−) and ammonium (NH4+) from the soil solution [1]. Both can always be absorbed and used via roots, but they vary greatly in the biochemical, energetic, and molecular features for assimilation. However, excessive NO3− is carried away through leaching, which pollutes the environment; furthermore, edible crops, especially leafy vegetables, have been found to accumulate an intermediate product nitrite (NO2−) during the nitrogen assimilation, which has toxic effects on both the plant growth and human health [2]. Fortunately, it has been well established that NH4+ uptake is a relatively energy-efficient process compared to NO3− uptake, leading to the fact that plenty of plant species prefer NH4+ as the N source [3,4].
Paradoxically, plants are often unable to grow optimally with high NH4+ concentrations or with NH4+ as the exclusive N source; intensive applications of ammonium-based fertilizers cause not only environmental problems, but strong toxicity for plant cells, such that excessive NH4+-induced toxicity has been considered as a factor for reduced plant species’ richness [5,6]. Ammonium toxicity alters various physiological characteristics and biochemical attributes in plants. Detrimental symptoms, including reduced plant growth, yield, and root:shoot ratio as well as other side effects, such as leaf chlorosis and stunted root growth, are often observed [7]. Typically, certain integrated influences, such as the inhibition of cation uptake, increase of the oxidative stress, and interference of the photosynthetic activity, as well as limitation of carbohydrates, are dramatically caused by ammonium toxicity [8].
Researchers have observed that adding NH4+ to a NO3− solution or enhanced ammonium nutrition (EAN) and enhanced nitrate nutrition (ENN) can remarkably improve the nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and promote plant growth. It is still important and necessary to gather new knowledge on how EAN and ENN induce biochemical and physiological changes and affect the N uptake and metabolism in marketable crops.
A large number of publications have reported the effects of N forms and different NH4+: NO3− ratios on photosynthesis. NH4+ was found to be able to uncouple the electron transport, which is linked to an important photosynthetic trait, Fv/Fm, which reflects the maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II (PSII) and was adopted for early stress detection in plants [9,10]. Additionally, a declined photosynthetic rate was usually recorded when plants were supplied with NH4+ as the sole N source, because the conversion from NH4+ to amino acids required energy at the cost of carbon skeleton consumption [11]. As a consequence, the stock contents of soluble sugar or starch in plants dropped, which imposed a negative influence on the plant growth and development. Similarly, plants also withdrew the carbohydrates from vegetative tissues for NO3− assimilation; thus, the decrease of NO3− from a threshold level is generally accompanied by an increase of carbohydrates [12]. The photosynthetic capacity was found to be associated with the stomatal conductance, which is responsible for CO2 fixation, diffusion, and assimilation [13].
The classical view of N use pathways in most plant species is conservative and has been well documented, involving uptake, assimilation, and translocation [14]. Two routes of ammonium assimilation have been identified: Usually, plants were unable to directly use NO3−, which is firstly reduced to nitrite (NO2−) by nitrate reductase (NR), then converted to NH4+ by nitrite reductase (NIR) and, finally, the NH4+ was incorporated into amino acids by glutamine synthetase (GS) and glutamate synthase (GOGAT) [15]. The NH4+ appeared to be alternatively catalyzed by glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) [16]. Clearly, abundant NO3− also can result in the accumulations of NH4+ and affect not only the NR and NIR activities, but also the GS, GOGAT, and GDH activities. Although GS and GDH both play an important role in the N detoxification mechanism, the priorities of them differ among species. For instance, Cruz suggested that an increased GS activity level in Solanaceae was an important strategy in determining the ammonium tolerance, whereas GDH was evidenced as mainly responsible for ammonium detoxification in Orchidaceae [17,18]. Such information for vegetables, such as cabbage and lettuce, remain scarce. In addition, the analysis regarding relationships among GS, GDH, and other key enzymes (NR, NIR) and chemicals (free contents of NO3−, NO2− as well as NH4+) during EAN or ENN are not yet well known.
Therefore, the experiment undertaken herein assessed not only the responses of two different vegetables during EAN or ENN, but also the relationships between the key enzymes and chemicals involved in the N assimilation pathways. The growth attributes, photosynthetic capacity, soluble protein contents, and total carbohydrate (soluble sugar and starch) contents were investigated. Thereafter, the activities of key enzymes and contents of major chemicals involved in the N metabolism pathway were monitored in order to provide a potential rationale between the NH4+ tolerance and N assimilating enzymes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

The experiments were conducted in a fiberglass greenhouse, with 13 h of light (26 ± 2 °C) and 11 h of darkness (20 ± 2 °C) at Gyeongsang National University (35°90′ N, 128°06′ E, Jinju, Gyeongnam, Korea) from March to April and from September to October 2021. Seeds of two vegetables, Korean cabbage ‘Ssamchu’ and lettuce ‘Caesar Green’, were sown into 200 square-cell plug trays filled with BVB medium (Bas Van Buuren Substrate, EN-12580, De Lier, The Netherlands) and germinated under an intermittent mist for 5 days. They were subsequently transferred to a metal bench and allowed to grow for 5 additional days.

2.2. Ammonium–Nitrate Ratio Treatments

Subsequently, similar-size seedlings with two to three true leaves were screened and subjected to the different treatment solutions. A multipurpose nutrient solution (MNS), formulated according to our lab’s pioneer publication [19], was modified in order to supply 13.0 me·L−1 N with three different A–N ratios (0/100, 50/50, 100/0) (Table 1). NH4+ or NO3− was used as the sole N source at concentrations of 13.0 me·L−1. All plants were irrigated only with the treatment solutions. For each species, the experimental design was completely randomized, with three biological replicates per treatment, consisting of 60 plants each.

2.3. Measurements of Growth Parameters

Three Weeks later, the growth attributes of juvenile plants were investigated during the harvest, which included shoot-related parameters (shoot length, leaf length and width, and chlorosis), whole plant weight, and root morphology. Specifically, leaf chlorosis was captured with a professional camera. The root morphological traits were determined using a WinRhizo Pro 2007a image analysis system (Regent Instruments, Sainte-Foy, QC, Canada) equipped with a scanner (Expression 1000XL, Epson America Inc., Long Beach, CA, USA).

2.4. Analyses of the Photosynthetic Capacity

The photosynthetic capacity was assessed and characterized herein by certain critical parameters. Chlorophyll a and b contents were spectrophotometrically estimated by using a protocol found in Arnon’s study [20]. The maximum PSII intrinsic light energy conversion efficiency by means of the Fv/Fm and stomatal conductance were assessed using a FluorPen FP 100 (Photon Systems Instruments, Drásov, Czech Republic) and a Decagon Leaf Porometer (SC-1 mode, Decagon Device, Pullman, WA, USA), respectively.

2.5. Destructive Sampling and Quantification of the Total Souble Protein Content

At the end of the experiment, the plants were cut to separate the roots and shoots. Leaves with different sizes and colors were then individually collected, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −70 °C for subsequent experiments.
The leaves in different treatments were individually labeled and ground into fine powder in a pre-cooled mortar. A total of 100-mg samples were homogenized in 50 mM of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) at pH = 7.0, which contained 1 mM of EDTA, 1 mM of polyvinylpyrrolidone, and 0.05% triton-X. The supernatant was obtained after centrifugation (13,000 rpm, 4 °C, 20 min). The total soluble protein estimations were conducted against the aqueous phase using Bradford’s reagent [21].

2.6. Determinations of the Soluble Sugar and Starch Contents

The soluble sugar and starch contents were determined using an anthrone–sulfuric acid colorimetry with slightly modifications [22]. In brief, a 0.5 g finely ground leaf powder was mixed with 25 mL distilled water and placed in a 96 ± 2 °C water bath for 30 min. The mixture was then centrifuged (6500 rpm, 25 °C, 10 min) to obtain the supernatant that would be used afterwards for the soluble sugar content assays. The residue was collected to determine the starch content.

2.7. Measurements of NH4+, NO3−, and NO2− Concentrations

A colorimetric method based on the Berthelot reaction was used for the quantification of NH4+ in plant leaves [23]. A rapid and sensitive procedure via salicylic acid nitration [24] was employed to determine the NO3− concentration in plants. An approach developed based on the Griess reaction [25] was adopted to analyze the NO2− concentrations in plant samples. The detailed procedure can be found in Huang’s publication [26].

2.8. Monitoring the Activities of Key Enzymes in N Metabolism Pathway

The activities of nitrate reductase (NR) and nitrite reductase (NIR) in plants were assayed in vitro in accordance with Hogberg et al. [27] and Ogawa et al. [28], respectively. NR activity is expressed as the amount of nitrite formed per gram of dry weight per hour, while NIR activity was calculated based on the reduction of NO2− in the assay, expressed as μmol NO2− reduced·h−1·g−1 dry weight.
Glutamine synthetase (GS) and NADH-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) activities were spectrophotometrically estimated with slightly modified approaches proposed by Oaks et al. [29] and Kanamori et al. [30], respectively. Approximately 0.5 g of fine-ground frozen powder were extracted in a 3 mL extraction buffer (0.05 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.) consisting of 2 mM Mg2+, 2 mM DTT, and 0.4 M sucrose. The crude extract was collected for the GS and GDH activity assay after centrifugation at 12,000× g, 4 °C for 20 min.
For the GS activity assay, a 0.7 mL crude enzyme extract was subjected to a 30-min incubation at 37 °C in a 2.3 mL assay solution (0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH7.4) containing 80 mM Mg2+, 20 mM sodium glutamate and cysteine, 2 mM EGTA, 80 mM hydroxylamine hydrochloride, and 40 mM ATP (prepared daily). The reaction would then be terminated by adding 1 mL ferric chloride reagent (0.2 M TCA, 0.37 M FeCl3 and 0.6 M HCl). Afterwards, the mixture was vigorously shaken and centrifuged (5000 g, Rt, 10 min), and the supernatant was spectrophotometrically measured at 540 nm. The GS activity was defined as the formation of 1 nmol γ-glutamyl hydroxamate per mg protein per minute.
The NADH-GDH activity was determined with a reaction mixture consisting of 0.1 mL of 30 mM CaCl2, 0.1 mL of 6 mM NADH (prepared daily, stored over ice when used), and 0.3 mL of distilled water, adjusted to a final volume of 3 mL with Tris-HCl (15.4 mM, pH8.0) containing 23.1 mM α-Ketoglutarate and 231 mM NH4Cl. The reaction was triggered by the addition of 0.1 mL crude enzyme extract. The change of absorbance after 3 min in a 30 °C water bath was spectrophotometrically measured at 340 nm. The GDH activity was expressed as the consumption of nmol NADH per mg protein per minute.

2.9. Statistical Analysis and Data Processing

SAS statistical software (SAS 8.2 Inst., Cary, NC, USA) was used to perform the statistical analyses. Data from analysis of one-way ANOVA followed by the Duncan’s multiple range test were considered significant at a probability (p) equal to 0.05. The acquired data were plotted using GraphPad Prism 8.0 software. All of the measurements were conducted with no less than three biological replicates.

3. Results

3.1. Plant Growth as Affected by the NH4+:NO3− Ratio

The growth parameters were significantly affected by different NH4+:NO3− ratios after 4 weeks of cultivation, regardless of the species. As is apparent in Figure 1A,B, large differences were observed among the plants in response to the different treatments. Plants treated with 50:50 NH4+:NO3− always showed the most optimal growth, regardless of the species. The fresh weight of cabbage treated with 50:50 NH4+:NO3− was 12.8% and 1008.49% higher, respectively, compared with that treated with 0:100 and 100:0 NH4+:NO3−. Similarly, the fresh weight of lettuce treated with 50:50 NH4+:NO3− was 89.22% and 197.66% higher than that treated with 0:100 and 100:0 NH4+:NO3−, respectively (Figure 1D).
This enhancement in growth in response to the 50:50 NH4+:NO3− treatment was further evidenced by the growth data as listed in Table 2: the shoot length, root length, leaf length, and width. Among these four traits, the shoot length was the most prominently affected, where that of cabbage treated with 50:50 NH4+:NO3− was 28.53% and 143.25% greater than that of cabbage treated with 0:100 and 100:0 NH4+:NO3−, respectively (Table 2 ‘Cabbage part’). In parallel, lettuce treated with 50:50 NH4+:NO3− had an average shoot length that was 30.73% and 62.25% greater relative to that treated with 0:100 and 100:0 NH4+:NO3−, respectively (Table 2 ‘Lettuce part’).
Furthermore, it is notable that cabbage treated with 100:0 NH4+:NO3− developed ammonium toxicity symptoms, as characterized by chlorosis and leaf necrosis, inhibited growth, and stunted roots (Figure 1C).

3.2. Root Morphology as Affected by the NH4+:NO3− Ratio

Root morphology parameters, including the root volume and root surface area, were assessed in this study after sampling the shoots via destructive harvest. It is noteworthy that distinct differences were recorded in response to the different NH4+:NO3− ratios, irrespective of the species (Figure 2A). Apparently, plants treated with 50:50 or 0:100 NH4+:NO3− developed a larger root system, whereas high ammonium concentration (100:0 NH4+:NO3−) significantly restricted the growth of the adventitious roots and brought severe damages. As expected, values of the root volume and root surface area were in line with the scanned images. Cabbage treated with 50:50 NH4+:NO3− had a root volume that was, respectively, 59.11% and 670.78% greater than the root volume of cabbage treated with 0:100 and 100:0 NH4+:NO3−. Concomitantly, the root surface area of cabbage treated with 50:50 NH4+:NO3− was 10.05% and 207.06% higher compared to the root surface area of cabbage treated with 0:100 and 100:0 NH4+:NO3−, respectively (Figure 2B,C, ‘Cabbage part’). However, lettuce failed to make such major differences among treatments against either the root volume or root surface area in response to the different NH4+:NO3− ratios (Figure 2B,C, ‘Lettuce part’), probably because the roots possessed strong adaptability towards high concentrations of NH4+ or NO3−.

3.3. Effects of the NH4+:NO3− Ratio on the Photosynthetic Capacity

The photosynthetic capacity was determined in terms of the critical photosynthesis-related parameters, including the contents of leaf pigments (chlorophyll and carotenoids), Fv/Fm value, and the stomatal conductance. In Figure 3, it is clearly seen that plants supplied with a mixture of NH4+ and NO3− possessed not only higher contents of leaf pigments but also an increased Fv/Fm value together with greater stomatal conductance in both vegetables. For both vegetables, minor differences were observed in the leaf pigment contents between those treated with 50:50 NH4+:NO3− and those treated with 0:100 NH4+:NO3−, while those treated with 100:0 NH4+:NO3− had significantly lower leaf pigment contents (Figure 3A,B).
The Fv/Fm value in response to treatments of 0:100 or 100:0 NH4+:NO3− with varying degrees of decrease occurred as compared to 50:50 NH4+:NO3−. In cabbage, plants treated with 0:100 and 100:0 NH4+:NO3− had 3.85% and 18.8% lower Fv/Fm values than plants treated with 50:50 NH4+:NO3− did, respectively. In lettuce, plants treated with 0:100 and 100:0 NH4+:NO3− had 6.86% and 10.57% lower Fv/Fm values than those treated with 50:50 NH4+:NO3− (Figure 3C).
The stomatal conductance is regarded to be associated with the net photosynthesis and was accordingly analyzed in this study for the two vegetables in response to different NH4+:NO3− ratios. An Increase of the NH4+ concentration from 0% to 50% progressively reinforced the stomatal conductance, which was in accordance with the changes of other photosynthetic parameters mentioned above. Cabbage treated with 50:50 NH4+:NO3− showed a stomatal conductance of over 800 mmol·m−2·s−1. Those treated with 0:100 and 100:0 NH4+:NO3− had 751.55 mmol·m−2·s−1 and 565.68 mmol·m−2·s−1 of stomatal conductance, respectively (Figure 3D ‘Cabbage part’). Curiously, lettuce treated with 100:0 NH4+:NO3− had only a slightly reduced stomatal conductance compared to plants treated with 50:50 NH4+:NO3−, which was still higher than the stomatal conductance of lettuce treated with 0:100 NH4+:NO3− (Figure 3D ‘Lettuce part’).

3.4. Carbohydrate Content as Affected by the NH4+:NO3− Ratio

In order to understand how the carbohydrate © status in plants is affected by EAN or ENN, we investigated the soluble sugar and starch contents in plants after harvest.
Plants obtained the greatest contents of C when grown with 50:50 NH4+:NO3−, regardless of the C form and species. As shown in Figure 4, lettuce had higher soluble sugar and starch contents relative to cabbage when comparisons were made based on the same treatments. We noticed that, in lettuce, soluble sugar and starch contents differed little between those treated with 100:0 NH4+:NO3− and those treated with 0:100 NH4+:NO3−, whereas in cabbage, the soluble sugar and starch contents markedly differed between those treated with 100:0 and 0:100 NH4+:NO3−.
Specifically, 100:0 NH4+:NO3− dramatically lowered the soluble sugar and starch contents in cabbage: Cabbage grown with 50:50 NH4+:NO3− had 1.38% soluble sugar content while those grown with 100:0 NH4+:NO3− merely had 0.53% soluble sugar content (Figure 4A ‘Cabbage part’). In lettuce, the soluble sugar content was 1.35%, 1.73%, and 1.42% when grown with 100:0, 50:50, and 0:100 NH4+:NO3−, respectively (Figure 4A ‘Lettuce part’). Similarly, the starch content in cabbage grown with 50:50 NH4+:NO3− exhibited a 1.83-fold increase compared with 100:0 NH4+:NO3−; on the other hand, the starch content in lettuce grown with 50:50 NH4+:NO3− was only 16.7% higher than that in lettuce grown with 100:0 NH4+:NO3− (Figure 4B).

3.5. Analysis of the NO3−, NO2−, NH4+, and Total Souble Protein Contents

The contents of various N forms, NO3−, NO2−, and NH4+, and total soluble protein in cabbage and lettuce were quantified and are given in Figure 5. Apart from the NO2− content in cabbage, it is noteworthy that other N contents were significantly influenced by the EAN or ENN. On average, on the basis of constant N input, the summed N contents were similar, regardless of the treatments and species.
A substantially positive correlation was observed between a high NH4+ or NO3− supply and free NH4+ or NO3− content in plants, regardless of the species (Figure 5A,C). For cabbage, no significant or slight differences were observed in response to the different NH4+:NO3− ratios in the intermediate product NO2− content (Figure 5B, ‘Cabbage part’); interestingly, lettuce grown at reducing NO3− concentrations displayed a parallel but significant decrease in the NO2− content (Figure 5B, ‘Lettuce part’).
Proteins are the final product in the N assimilation pathways and originate from the incorporation of NH4+. The total protein content was significantly affected not only by the different treatments of the A–N ratio, as described above, but also according to the species. As presented in Figure 5D, in general, the soluble protein content was positively correlated with the NO3− input. Furthermore, a dramatic reduction in the soluble protein content was observed in cabbage grown with 100:0 NH4+:NO3−, whereas that in lettuce treated with NH4+:NO3− was only slightly affected.

3.6. Activities of Key Enzymes in the N Assimilation Pathway

To better understand the changes of key enzymes in the N assimilation pathway, activities of those enzymes were examined when the plants were supplied with different NH4+:NO3− ratios. Key enzymes in the N assimilation pathways were clearly and widely affected by the different NH4+:NO3− for both species (Figure 6).
A gradual diminishment was observed in the NR activity with an increased concentration of NH4+, regardless of the species. Concomitantly, a parallel reduction of NO3− concentration was also observed, as presented above (Figure 5A and Figure 6A). Similar tendencies are shown in Figure 6B, where the NIR activity was found to show a consistent tendency with the NR activity and NO2− contents in cabbage when the NH4+ concentration increased. However, interestingly, only minor changes were observed in the NIR activity in lettuce with regard to the different NH4+:NO3− ratios (Figure 6B ‘Lettuce part’).
More importantly, large differences were monitored in the activities of NH4+ assimilation enzymes (GS and GDH) in response to the different NH4+:NO3− ratios for both vegetables (Figure 6C,D). Additionally, the GS and GDH activity trends differed between the two vegetables. For instance, when the NH4+:NO3− ratio changed from 50:50 to 100:0, the GS and GDH activities in cabbage decreased sharply, by 45.06% and 50.94%, respectively, whereas in lettuce they both increased slightly, by 9.36% and 0.56%, respectively. Generally, the GS and GDH activities were higher in lettuce than they were in cabbage, regardless of the NH4+:NO3− ratio considered.

4. Discussion

In our trials, several morphological and physiological parameters were remarkably influenced by either high NH4+ or NO3− concentrations. A high NH4+ or NO3− significantly restricted the growth performance of cabbage and lettuce, as displayed by a reduced plant weight, decreased shoot length, and declined root-related traits including the root volume and root surface area (Figure 1 and Figure 2; Table 2). Both cabbage and lettuce benefited more from being grown with the 50:50 NH4+:NO3− solution. However, this ratio is not a universal point that serves all the species. Even in this study, certain plants grown with 0:100 NH4+:NO3− grew better than those with 50:50 NH4+:NO3−, displaying greater soluble protein contents (Figure 5D). The data presented in this study were in agreement with a great deal of previous research [31,32,33]. More importantly, Korean cabbage ‘Ssamchu’ appeared to be an extremely NH4+-sensitive species, whereas lettuce was not, which was characterized by certain key responses, such as chlorosis, leaf necrosis, and stunted root development (Figure 1C).
Many studies have demonstrated that a mixture of nitrate and ammonium deliver outstanding benefits for plant growth and development; however, most of them focused on given plants and which NH4+:NO3− ratio was optimal [34,35,36,37]. Additionally, the variations of the key enzymes and intermediate chemicals involved in the N metabolism pathway in different NH4+-sensitive plants have yet to be thoroughly studied. Therefore, we designed, concentrated, and performed this work to investigate how EAN or ENN influences the plant growth and development, as well as the N metabolism, by using two plants with different NH4+ sensitivities.
Chlorophyll content in leaves has been widely adopted as a key indicator for the determination of photosynthesis behavior [38]. A low Fv/Fm value was believed to be related to dynamic photoinhibition, which may be caused by a high NH4+ stress [39]. Additionally, a higher stomatal conductance was found to be stimulated by the CO2 absorbing rate, which promoted the photosynthetic capacity, as supported by certain plants [40,41,42]. Furthermore, photosynthesis has been well suggested to be associated with the N form, where it was often reported that high NH4+ decreased the photosynthetic capacity [43,44]. This was confirmed again in our study, where we observed reduced pigment contents and lower Fv/Fm and stomatal conductance rate in plants treated with 100:0 NH4+:NO3−, especially in cabbage (Figure 3).
In addition, plants exposed to high NH4+ levels were susceptible to a lower stock of carbohydrate contents, probably due to the fact that the assimilation of excessive NH4+ came at a cost of more carbon skeleton for the energy supply [45]. In our experiments, plants grown with 100:0 NH4+:NO3− experienced a sharp decline in the carbohydrate contents, which was more pronounced in cabbage than in lettuce (Figure 4). Lettuce was observed to be less sensitive to the NH4+ level, as those grown with 0:100 and 100:0 NH4+:NO3− displayed no significant differences in the carbohydrate content.
In order to figure out the differences in the N metabolism pathway between NH4+-sensitive species (cabbage) and tolerant species (lettuce) in response to different nitrogen sources, we not only measured the internal N concentrations (NO3−, NO2−, NH4+, total protein content) but also quantified the activities of key enzymes that catalyzed N reduction and assimilation (NR, NIR, GS, GDH). There were some great differences in the parameters mentioned above in the two species studied.
It is well known that the form of the external N source influences the internal N concentration in plants [46,47]. This differs among species, especially plants with distinct NH4+ sensitivities. An increasing supply of NH4+ or NO3− resulted in a relative increase in the content of each, regardless of the species. However, higher contents of NH4+ and NO2− was detected in cabbage grown with 50:50 and 100:0 NH4+:NO3− compared to lettuce (Figure 5C), which was in accordance with certain pioneer publications [48,49]. This indicated that NH4+-sensitive species are more prone to accumulate free NH4+ and NO2− in their tissues. Besides, a generally increased soluble protein content was produced in plants grown with 0:100 NH4+:NO3− (Figure 5D), which is likely due to a higher overall metabolic activity [50].
Nitrate reductase (NR) is regarded as the initial enzyme involved in the N metabolism, which catalyzes the reduction of nitrate to nitrite. Nitrite is reduced further into ammonium by nitrite reductase (NIR) [51]. A positive correlation between the NR activity and free NO3− content in plants was observed in this study (Figure 5A and Figure 6A), which was in agreement with previous reports [17,32,52,53]. In parallel with NR, a similar regulatory pattern was monitored and displayed by NIR (Figure 6B). The summed higher activities regarding NR and NIR were exhibited in lettuce, which led to the boost of activities of downstream GS and GDH (Figure 6C,D). Most importantly, GS and GDH activities analyzed herein could be used to elucidate a primarily varying NH4+ tolerance within vegetables; for instance, lettuce was determined to be relatively tolerant to high NH4+. It had distinctly higher activities of GS and GDH in comparison to cabbage, which was extremely sensitive to NH4+ (Figure 6C,D). In response to increasing NH4+ concentrations, lettuce employed and reinforced GS and GDH activities for a rapid NH4+ assimilation, and it is thought that GS played an important role in NH4+ detoxification [7,17,32,54]. However, neither GS nor GDH in cabbage displayed parallelly enhanced activities as the NH4+ concentration increased, which may explain why ammonium toxicity symptoms developed only in cabbage. Still, GS activity in lettuce possessed a more rapid increase than GDH activity when the external NH4+ supply elevated from 50% to 100%, which suggested that GS was more important than GDH, at least in leaves, in determining the tolerance of vegetables exposed to a high NH4+ concentration. The results described in this section were also in line with results from studies performed on other plant species, such as rice [55], tomato [17,32], and pea [17,56].

5. Conclusions

Accordingly, this study provided evidence that Korean cabbage ‘Ssamchu’ was extremely sensitive while lettuce was relatively tolerant to high concentrations of ammonium. Concomitantly, in comparison to sole NH4+ or NO3− supply, a combination of the two forms of N appeared to be more beneficial to both vegetables, as characterized by the best growth performance, ameliorated photosynthesis, and enriched carbohydrate (C) stock content. Additionally, a positive correlation was found between the free NO3− and NO2− contents and the NR and NIR activities. The NH4+-sensitive species was more prone to accumulate free NH4+ as the external level of NH4+ increased, which could be attributed to the diminishment of GS and GDH activities. These results suggested that GS together with GDH appeared to underpin the ammonium tolerance of vegetables.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.R.J.; methodology, B.R.J. and J.S.; software, J.S. and J.Y.; validation, B.R.J. and J.S.; formal analysis, B.R.J. and J.S.; investigation, J.S. and J.Y.; resources, B.R.J.; data curation, J.S.; writing—original draft preparation, J.S.; writing—review and editing, B.R.J. and J.S.; supervision, B.R.J.; project administration, B.R.J.; funding acquisition, B.R.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding. J.S. and J.Y. were supported by the BK21 Four Program, Ministry of Education, Korea.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Miller, A.; Cramer, M. Root nitrogen acquisition and assimilation. Plant Soil 2005, 274, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hanley, N. The economics of nitrate pollution. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 1990, 17, 129–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Guerrero, M.G.; Vega, J.M.; Losada, M. The assimilatory nitrate-reducing system and its regulation. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1981, 32, 169–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Clarkson, D.T.; Hanson, J.B. The mineral nutrition of higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1980, 31, 239–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, Q.; Li, B.H.; Kronzucker, H.J.; Shi, W.M. Root growth inhibition by NH4+ in Arabidopsis is mediated by the root tip and is linked to NH4+ efflux and GMPase activity. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33, 1529–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Darwin, C. The action of carbonate of ammonia on the roots of certain plants. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 1882, 19, 239–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Britto, D.T.; Kronzucker, H.J. NH4+ toxicity in higher plants: A critical review. J. Plant Physiol. 2002, 159, 567–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Esteban, R.; Ariz, I.; Cruz, C.; Moran, J.F. Mechanisms of ammonium toxicity and the quest for tolerance. Plant Sci. 2016, 248, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Xu, Z.; Gao, K. NH4+ enrichment and UV radiation interact to affect the photosynthesis and nitrogen uptake of Gracilaria lemaneiformis (Rhodophyta). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2012, 64, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sharma, D.K.; Andersen, S.B.; Ottosen, C.O.; Rosenqvist, E. Wheat cultivars selected for high Fv/Fm under heat stress maintain high photosynthesis, total chlorophyll, stomatal conductance, transpiration and dry matter. Physiol. Plant. 2015, 153, 284–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Raab, T.K.; Terry, N. Carbon, nitrogen, and nutrient interactions in Beta vulgaris L. as influenced by nitrogen source, NO3− versus NH4+. Plant Physiol. 1995, 107, 575–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Claussen, W.; Lenz, F. Effect of ammonium and nitrate on net photosynthesis, flower formation, growth and yield of eggplants (Solanum melongena L.). Plant Soil 1995, 171, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Evans, J.R.; Loreto, F. Acquisition and diffusion of CO2 in higher plant leaves. In Photosynthesis; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2000; pp. 321–351. [Google Scholar]
  14. Masclaux-Daubresse, C.; Daniel-Vedele, F.; Dechorgnat, J.; Chardon, F.; Gaufichon, L.; Suzuki, A. Nitrogen uptake, assimilation and remobilization in plants: Challenges for sustainable and productive agriculture. Ann. Bot. 2010, 105, 1141–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Xu, G.; Fan, X.; Miller, A.J. Plant nitrogen assimilation and use efficiency. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2012, 63, 153–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Labboun, S.; Tercé-Laforgue, T.; Roscher, A.; Bedu, M.; Restivo, F.M.; Velanis, C.N.; Skopelitis, D.S.; Moshou, P.N.; Roubelakis-Angelakis, K.A.; Suzuki, A. Resolving the role of plant glutamate dehydrogenase. I. In vivo real time nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy experiments. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009, 50, 1761–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Cruz, C.; Bio, A.; Domínguez-Valdivia, M.; Aparicio-Tejo, P.M.; Lamsfus, C.; Martins-Louçao, M.A. How does glutamine synthetase activity determine plant tolerance to ammonium? Planta 2006, 223, 1068–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Majerowicz, N.; Kerbauy, G.B. Effects of nitrogen forms on dry matter partitioning and nitrogen metabolism in two contrasting genotypes of Catasetum fimbriatum (Orchidaceae). Environ. Exp. Bot. 2002, 47, 249–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hao, W.; Manivannan, A.; Yuze, C.; Jeong, B.R. Effect of Different Cultivation Systems on the Accumulation of Nutrients and Phytochemicals in Ligularia fischeri. Hortic. Plant J. 2018, 4, 24–29. [Google Scholar]
  20. Arnon, D.I. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 1949, 24, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Hammond, J.B.; Kruger, N.J. The bradford method for protein quantitation. In New Protein Tech.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1988; pp. 25–32. [Google Scholar]
  22. McCready, R.; Guggolz, J.; Silviera, V.; Owens, H. Determination of starch and amylose in vegetables. Anal. Chem. 1950, 22, 1156–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bräutigam, A.; Gagneul, D.; Weber, A.P. High-throughput colorimetric method for the parallel assay of glyoxylic acid and ammonium in a single extract. Anal. Biochem. 2007, 362, 151–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cataldo, D.; Maroon, M.; Schrader, L.E.; Youngs, V.L. Rapid colorimetric determination of nitrate in plant tissue by nitration of salicylic acid. Commun. Soil Sci. Plan. 1975, 6, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Moshage, H.; Kok, B.; Huizenga, J.R.; Jansen, P. Nitrite and nitrate determinations in plasma: A critical evaluation. Clin. Chem. 1995, 41, 892–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Huang, L.; Li, M.; Zhou, K.; Sun, T.; Hu, L.; Li, C.; Ma, F. Uptake and metabolism of ammonium and nitrate in response to drought stress in Malus prunifolia. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 127, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Högberg, P.; Granström, A.; Johansson, T.; Lundmark-Thelin, A.; Näsholm, T. Plant nitrate reductase activity as an indicator of availability of nitrate in forest soils. Can. J. For. Res. 1986, 16, 1165–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ogawa, T.; Fukuoka, H.; Yano, H.; Ohkawa, Y. Relationships between nitrite reductase activity and genotype-dependent callus growth in rice cell cultures. Plant Cell Rep. 1999, 18, 576–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Oaks, A.; Stulen, I.; Jones, K.; Winspear, M.J.; Misra, S.; Boesel, I.L. Enzymes of nitrogen assimilation in maize roots. Planta 1980, 148, 477–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kanamori, T.; Konishi, S.; Takahashi, E. Inducible formation of glutamate dehydrogenase in rice plant roots by the addition of ammonia to the media. Physiol. Plant. 1972, 26, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tabatabaei, S.; Fatemi, L.; Fallahi, E. Effect of ammonium: Nitrate ratio on yield, calcium concentration, and photosynthesis rate in strawberry. J. Plant Nutr. 2006, 29, 1273–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Horchani, F.; Hajri, R.; Aschi-Smiti, S. Effect of ammonium or nitrate nutrition on photosynthesis, growth, and nitrogen assimilation in tomato plants. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2010, 173, 610–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Guo, S.; Zhou, Y.; Shen, Q.; Zhang, F. Effect of ammonium and nitrate nutrition on some physiological processes in higher plants-growth, photosynthesis, photorespiration, and water relations. Plant Biol. 2007, 9, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Magalhaes, J.; Wilcox, G. Growth, free amino acids, and mineral composition of tomato plants in relation to nitrogen form and growing media. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1984, 109, 406–411. [Google Scholar]
  35. Ruan, J.; Gerendás, J.; Härdter, R.; Sattelmacher, B. Effect of nitrogen form and root-zone pH on growth and nitrogen uptake of tea (Camellia sinensis) plants. Ann. Bot. 2007, 99, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Santamaria, P.; Elia, A. Producing nitrate-free endive heads: Effect of nitrogen form on growth, yield, and ion composition of endive. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1997, 122, 140–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Jeong, B.R.; Lee, C.W. Influence of ammonium, nitrate, and chloride on solution pH and ion uptake by ageratum and salvia in hydroponic culture. J. Plant Nutr. 1996, 19, 1343–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kura-Hotta, M.; Satoh, K.; Katoh, S. Relationship between photosynthesis and chlorophyll content during leaf senescence of rice seedlings. Plant Cell Physiol. 1987, 28, 1321–1329. [Google Scholar]
  39. Prieto, P.; Penuelas, J.; Llusia, J.; Asensio, D.; Estiarte, M. Effects of long-term experimental night-time warming and drought on photosynthesis, Fv/Fm and stomatal conductance in the dominant species of a Mediterranean shrubland. Acta Physiol. Plant 2009, 31, 729–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ohsumi, A.; Kanemura, T.; Homma, K.; Horie, T.; Shiraiwa, T. Genotypic variation of stomatal conductance in relation to stomatal density and length in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Prod. Sci. 2007, 10, 322–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lammertsma, E.I.; de Boer, H.J.; Dekker, S.C.; Dilcher, D.L.; Lotter, A.F.; Wagner-Cremer, F. Global CO2 rise leads to reduced maximum stomatal conductance in Florida vegetation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 4035–4040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Purcell, C.; Batke, S.; Yiotis, C.; Caballero, R.; Soh, W.; Murray, M.; McElwain, J.C. Increasing stomatal conductance in response to rising atmospheric CO2. Ann. Bot. 2018, 121, 1137–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Borgognone, D.; Colla, G.; Rouphael, Y.; Cardarelli, M.; Rea, E.; Schwarz, D. Effect of nitrogen form and nutrient solution pH on growth and mineral composition of self-grafted and grafted tomatoes. Sci. Hortic. 2013, 149, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Takács, E.; Técsi, L. Effects of NO3−/NH4+ ratio on photosynthetic rate, nitrate reductase activity and chloroplast ultrastructure in three cultivars of red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). J. Plant Physiol. 1992, 140, 298–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tylová, E.; Steinbachová, L.; Votrubová, O.; Lorenzen, B.; Brix, H. Different sensitivity of Phragmites australis and Glyceria maxima to high availability of ammonium-N. Aquat. Bot. 2008, 88, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tabatabaei, S.; Yusefi, M.; Hajiloo, J. Effects of shading and NO3: NH4 ratio on the yield, quality and N metabolism in strawberry. Sci. Hortic. 2008, 116, 264–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Song, J.N.; Wang, Y.Q.; Li, F.L.; Hu, Y.J.; Yang, H.B. Effect of saline soil and amino acids on quality and yield of field Tartary buckwheat. Land Degrad. Dev. 2021, 32, 2554–2562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sarasketa, A.; González-Moro, M.B.; González-Murua, C.; Marino, D. Exploring ammonium tolerance in a large panel of Arabidopsis thaliana natural accessions. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 6023–6033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Cramer, M.; Lewis, O. The influence of nitrate and ammonium nutrition on the growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and maize (Zea mays) plants. Ann. Bot. 1993, 72, 359–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Doganlar, Z.B.; Demir, K.; Basak, H.; Gul, I. Effects of salt stress on pigment and total soluble protein contents of three different tomato cultivars. Afr. J. Agr. Res. 2010, 5, 2056–2065. [Google Scholar]
  51. Hong, H.S.; Wang, Y.J.; Wang, D.Z. Response of phytoplankton to nitrogen addition in the Taiwan strait upwelling region: Nitrate reductase and glutamine synthetase activities. Cont. Shelf Res. 2011, 31, S57–S66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Finch-Savage, W.E.; Cadman, C.S.; Toorop, P.E.; Lynn, J.R.; Hilhorst, H.W. Seed dormancy release in Arabidopsis Cvi by dry after-ripening, low temperature, nitrate and light shows common quantitative patterns of gene expression directed by environmentally specific sensing. Plant J. 2007, 51, 60–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Liu, G.; Du, Q.; Li, J. Interactive effects of nitrate-ammonium ratios and temperatures on growth, photosynthesis, and nitrogen metabolism of tomato seedlings. Sci. Hortic. 2017, 214, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Skopelitis, D.S.; Paranychianakis, N.V.; Paschalidis, K.A.; Pliakonis, E.D.; Delis, I.D.; Yakoumakis, D.I.; Kouvarakis, A.; Papadakis, A.K.; Stephanou, E.G.; Roubelakis-Angelakis, K.A. Abiotic stress generates ROS that signal expression of anionic glutamate dehydrogenases to form glutamate for proline synthesis in tobacco and grapevine. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 2767–2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Magalhaes, J.; Huber, D. Response of ammonium assimilation enzymes to nitrogen form treatments in different plant species. J. Plant Nutr. 1991, 14, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lasa, B.; Frechilla, S.; Aparicio-Tejo, P.M.; Lamsfus, C. Alternative pathway respiration is associated with ammonium ion sensitivity in spinach and pea plants. Plant Growth Regul. 2002, 37, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Agronomy 11 02556 g001 550
Figure 1. Plant growth of (A) cabbage and (B) lettuce as affected by different NH4+: NO3− ratios after weeks of treatments; 100:0, 50:50, 0:100 NH4+:NO3− are presented from left to right in the picture by two plant replicates with similar growth. (C) Enlarged image of ammonium toxicity symptoms developed in cabbage treated with 100:0 NH4+:NO3−. (D) Whole plant fresh weight (g) as affected by different NH4+: NO3− ratios in cabbage and lettuce; Values are expressed as means ± SE of n = 6 independent biological replicates. Error bars represent standard deviations of the means. Significant differences among treatments were indicated by different lowercase letters according to the one-way ANOVA followed by the Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Plant growth of (A) cabbage and (B) lettuce as affected by different NH4+: NO3− ratios after weeks of treatments; 100:0, 50:50, 0:100 NH4+:NO3− are presented from left to right in the picture by two plant replicates with similar growth. (C) Enlarged image of ammonium toxicity symptoms developed in cabbage treated with 100:0 NH4+:NO3−. (D) Whole plant fresh weight (g) as affected by different NH4+: NO3− ratios in cabbage and lettuce; Values are expressed as means ± SE of n = 6 independent biological replicates. Error bars represent standard deviations of the means. Significant differences among treatments were indicated by different lowercase letters according to the one-way ANOVA followed by the Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Agronomy 11 02556 g001
Agronomy 11 02556 g002 550
Figure 2. Root morphology of two vegetables in response to different NH4+: NO3− ratios after weeks of treatment; (A) Combined images of scanned root segments. (B) Root volume (cm3) of two vegetables supplied with different NH4+: NO3− ratios. (C) Total surface area (cm2) of two vegetables supplied with different NH4+: NO3− ratios; Values are expressed as means ± SE of n = 6 independent biological replicates. Error bars represent standard deviations of the means. Significant differences among treatments are indicated by different lowercase letters, according to the one-way ANOVA followed by the Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Root morphology of two vegetables in response to different NH4+: NO3− ratios after weeks of treatment; (A) Combined images of scanned root segments. (B) Root volume (cm3) of two vegetables supplied with different NH4+: NO3− ratios. (C) Total surface area (cm2) of two vegetables supplied with different NH4+: NO3− ratios; Values are expressed as means ± SE of n = 6 independent biological replicates. Error bars represent standard deviations of the means. Significant differences among treatments are indicated by different lowercase letters, according to the one-way ANOVA followed by the Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Agronomy 11 02556 g002
Agronomy 11 02556 g003 550
Figure 3. Photosynthetic performance of two vegetables in response to different NH4+:NO3− ratios. Pigments’ contents (chlorophyll a, b and carotenoids) of (A) cabbage plants and (B) lettuce plants. (C) Fv/Fm value and (D) stomatal conductance of cabbage and lettuce. All data are expressed as means ± SE of n = 6 independent biological replicates. Error bars represent standard deviations of the means. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences according to the one-way ANOVA followed by the Duncan’s multiple range test (p ˂ 0.05).
Figure 3. Photosynthetic performance of two vegetables in response to different NH4+:NO3− ratios. Pigments’ contents (chlorophyll a, b and carotenoids) of (A) cabbage plants and (B) lettuce plants. (C) Fv/Fm value and (D) stomatal conductance of cabbage and lettuce. All data are expressed as means ± SE of n = 6 independent biological replicates. Error bars represent standard deviations of the means. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences according to the one-way ANOVA followed by the Duncan’s multiple range test (p ˂ 0.05).
Agronomy 11 02556 g003
Agronomy 11 02556 g004 550
Figure 4. Carbohydrate levels in cabbage and lettuce in response to different NH4+:NO3− ratios. (A) Soluble sugar contents and (B) starch contents in two vegetables. All data are expressed as the means ± SE (n = 6 separate plants). Error bars represent standard deviations of the means. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences according to the one-way ANOVA followed by the Duncan’s multiple range test (p ˂ 0.05).
Figure 4. Carbohydrate levels in cabbage and lettuce in response to different NH4+:NO3− ratios. (A) Soluble sugar contents and (B) starch contents in two vegetables. All data are expressed as the means ± SE (n = 6 separate plants). Error bars represent standard deviations of the means. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences according to the one-way ANOVA followed by the Duncan’s multiple range test (p ˂ 0.05).
Agronomy 11 02556 g004
Agronomy 11 02556 g005 550
Figure 5. N contents as affected by different NH4+: NO3− ratios in cabbage and lettuce in the form of (A) nitrate (NO3−), (B) nitrite (NO2−), (C) ammonium (NH4+), and (D) soluble protein. Values are expressed as the means ± SE (n = 6 independent replicates). Error bars represent standard deviations of the means. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences according to the one-way ANOVA followed by the Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. N contents as affected by different NH4+: NO3− ratios in cabbage and lettuce in the form of (A) nitrate (NO3−), (B) nitrite (NO2−), (C) ammonium (NH4+), and (D) soluble protein. Values are expressed as the means ± SE (n = 6 independent replicates). Error bars represent standard deviations of the means. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences according to the one-way ANOVA followed by the Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Agronomy 11 02556 g005
Agronomy 11 02556 g006 550
Figure 6. Activities of key enzymes in the N metabolism pathway as affected by different NH4+: NO3− ratios in cabbage and lettuce. (A) Nitrate reductase activity (NR); (B) Nitrite reductase activity (NIR); (C) Glutamine synthetase activity (GS); and (D) Glutamate dehydrogenase activity (GDH). Values are expressed as the means ± SE (n = 6 independent replicates). Error bars represent standard deviations of the means. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences according to the one-way ANOVA followed by the Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Figure 6. Activities of key enzymes in the N metabolism pathway as affected by different NH4+: NO3− ratios in cabbage and lettuce. (A) Nitrate reductase activity (NR); (B) Nitrite reductase activity (NIR); (C) Glutamine synthetase activity (GS); and (D) Glutamate dehydrogenase activity (GDH). Values are expressed as the means ± SE (n = 6 independent replicates). Error bars represent standard deviations of the means. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences according to the one-way ANOVA followed by the Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Agronomy 11 02556 g006
Table
Table 1. Ion composition (me·L−1) at a constant N concentration (13.0 me·L−1), with three A–N ratios used as the treatment solutions.
Table 1. Ion composition (me·L−1) at a constant N concentration (13.0 me·L−1), with three A–N ratios used as the treatment solutions.
NH4+: NO3−
Ratio (%)		Cation (me·L−1)Anion (me·L−1)Total
Ca2+Mg2+K+NH4+NO3−SO42−Cl−H2PO4−
Standard (MNS)6.02.05.02.011.02.00.02.030.0
0:1006.92.35.80.013.01.00.01.030.0
50:505.92.04.56.56.56.50.02.037.8
100:04.91.73.213.00.015.94.92.045.6
Additions of identical micronutrients (μM) (20 B, 0.5 Cu, 10 Fe, 10 Mn, 0.5 Mo, 4 Zn) to each solution.
Table
Table 2. Growth attributes of two vegetables treated with three NH4+:NO3− ratios.
Table 2. Growth attributes of two vegetables treated with three NH4+:NO3− ratios.
SpeciesN Ratio (NH4+:NO3−)Shoot Length (cm)Root Length (cm)Leaf Length (cm)Leaf Width (cm)
Cabbage0:1007.6b y10.0b6.9b3.3b
50:509.7a13.0a8.7a4.3a
100:04.0c8.1b3.4c0.9c
Lettuce0:1009.5b y10.0b7.0b3.3b
50:5012.4a13.0a8.8a4.3a
100:07.6c7.5c6.7c2.3b
y Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences according to the one-way ANOVA followed by the Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Song, J.; Yang, J.; Jeong, B.R. Growth, Quality, and Nitrogen Assimilation in Response to High Ammonium or Nitrate Supply in Cabbage (Brassica campestris L.) and Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Agronomy 2021, 11, 2556. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11122556

AMA Style

Song J, Yang J, Jeong BR. Growth, Quality, and Nitrogen Assimilation in Response to High Ammonium or Nitrate Supply in Cabbage (Brassica campestris L.) and Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Agronomy. 2021; 11(12):2556. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11122556

Chicago/Turabian Style

Song, Jinnan, Jingli Yang, and Byoung Ryong Jeong. 2021. "Growth, Quality, and Nitrogen Assimilation in Response to High Ammonium or Nitrate Supply in Cabbage (Brassica campestris L.) and Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.)" Agronomy 11, no. 12: 2556. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11122556

APA Style

Song, J., Yang, J., & Jeong, B. R. (2021). Growth, Quality, and Nitrogen Assimilation in Response to High Ammonium or Nitrate Supply in Cabbage (Brassica campestris L.) and Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Agronomy, 11(12), 2556. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11122556

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop