Organic Matter Properties of Spent Button Mushroom Substrate in the Context of Soil Organic Matter Reproduction
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- -
- spent substrate for growing mushrooms—quantitatively, the most important component of the waste produced from compost based on cereal straw with an addition of chicken manure, peat, soy protein, urea, dolomite, and gypsum;
- -
- a surface covering which is the top layer, several centimetres deep, from which button mushrooms grow out; it is produced from low peat with an addition of a component which contains CaCO3 to neutralise acidity;
- -
- mushroom mycelium which abundantly grows through the substrate used for cultivation;
- -
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research Site, Physical Properties, and pH
- -
- dry matter (d.m.) content by weighing after a representative sample was dried at 105 °C;
- -
- pH by the potentiometric method following pouring deionised water over the sample, (v/v = 1/5).
2.2. Chemical Properties
- -
- total carbon and nitrogen contents (TC and TN, respectively) by means of an elemental analyser Series II 2400, Perkin Elmer (TCD), Norwalk, CT USA and by using acetanilide as reference material to calibrate the device;
- -
- carbon content in total organic compounds (TOC) by means of an elemental analyser following carbonate decomposition in a sample weighed out with H3PO4 solution;
- -
- carbon content in mineral compounds (IC) calculated using the formulaIC = TC − TOC;
- -
- (approximate) CaCO3 content estimated based on IC contentCaCO3 = IC · 8.33;
- -
- organic matter content (OM) calculated using the formulaOM = TC · 1.724.
2.3. Fractioning of Carbon Compounds
2.4. Analyses of Humic Acids (HAs)
- -
- elemental composition: C, H, and N contents which were determined with an elemental analyser; O content (in %): O = 100 − (C + H + N); atomic ratios and internal oxidation degree of HAs particles according to the formula ω = [(2O+3N) − H]/C [27]; ash content which averaged 0.98% (SD = 0.17) and was determined following incineration in a muffle furnace (at 600 °C); elemental composition results are expressed as the ash-free HAs weight;
- -
- spectrophotometric properties of HAs solutions: Analysis of 0.02% HAs solution (in 0.05 M NaHCO3) was conducted using a spectrophotometer Lambda 25 (Perkin Elmer), Ueberlingen, Germany. Absorbance was measured at wavelengths of 280 nm (A280), 400 nm (A400), 465 nm (A465), 600 nm (A600), and 665 nm (A665). Also, spectrometric coefficients were calculated,
- -
- chromatographic testing was performed with a liquid chromatograph HPLC Series 200 with a DAD by Perkin-Elmer, Shelton, CT, USA. Separation of humic acids into hydrophilic and hydrophobic fractions was obtained with a column Spheri-10 RP-18, 10 μm, 220 mm × 4.6 mm. The solutions of humic acids were prepared in 0.01 M NaOH at the concentration of 2 mg mL−1; injection of the sample was 100 µL; solvent—acetonitrile–water; solvents flow in the gradient (ratio H2O:ACN (v/v) over 0 min–6 min, 99.5:0.5; 7 min–13 min, 70:30; 13 min–20 min, 10:90); detection, at the 254 nm. Based on the areas determined under peaks, the share of hydrophilic (HIL) and hydrophobic (ΣHOB = HOB-1 + HOB-2) fractions in humic acid molecules and the parameter HIL/ΣHOB were determined [21,29].
2.5. Statistical Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. SMS Properties
3.2. Carbon Fractions
3.3. Properties of Humic Acids (HAs)
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kalembasa, D.; Becher, M.; Bik, B.; Makolewski, A. Properties of organic matter of spent mush-room substrate. Acta Agroph. 2012, 19, 713–723. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Becher, M.; Pakuła, K. Nitrogen fractions in spent mushroom substrate. J. Elem. 2014, 19, 947–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Medina, E.; Paredes, C.; Bustamante, M.A.; Moral, R.; Moreno-Caselles, J. Relationships between soil physico-chemical, chemical and biological properties in a soil amended with spent mushroom substrate. Geoderma 2012, 173, 152–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanafi, F.H.; Rezania, S.; Taib, S.M.; Din, M.F.; Yamauchi, M.; Sakamoto, M.; Hara, H.; Park, J.; Ebrahimi, S.S. Environmentally sustainable applications of agro-based spent mushroom substrate (SMS): An overview. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2018, 20, 1383–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zied, D.C.; Sánchez, J.E.; Noble, R.; Pardo-Giménez, A. Use of Spent Mushroom Substrate in New Mushroom Crops to Promote the Transition towards A Circular Economy. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalembasa, D.; Becher, M. Speciation of carbon and selected metals in spent mushroom substrates. J. Elem. 2012, 3, 409–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Becher, M. Properties of organic matter of soil fertilised with spent mushroom (Agaricus L.) Substrate. Acta Agroph. 2013, 20, 241–252. [Google Scholar]
- Paredes, C.; Medina, E.; Bustamante, M.A.; Moral, R. Effects of spent mushroom substrates and inorganic fertilizer on the characteristics of a calcareous clayey-loam soil and lettuce production. Soil Use Manag. 2016, 32, 487–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lanyi, K. Assessment of the relations between the spectroscopic characteristics of soils and their ability to adsorb organic pollutants. Microchem. J. 2010, 79, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Canellas, L.P.; Piccolo, A.; Dobbss, L.B.; Spaccini, R.; Olivares, F.L.; Zandonadi, D.B.; Façanha, A.R. Chemical composition and bioactivity properties of size-fractions separated from a vermicompost humic acid. Chemosphere 2010, 78, 457–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weber, J.; Chen, Y.; Jamroz, E.; Miano, T. Preface: Humic substances in the environment. J. Soils Sediments 2018, 18, 2665–2667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hayes, M.H.B.; Swift, R.S. Vindication of humic substances as a key component of organic matter in soil and water. Adv. Agron. 2020, 163, 1–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fuentes, M.; Baigorri, R.; González-Gaitano, G.; García-Mina, J.M. The complementary use of 1H NMR, 13C NMR, FTIR and size exclusion chromatography to investigate the principal structural changes associated with composting of organic materials with diverse origin. Org. Geochem. 2007, 38, 2012–2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trubetskaya, O.E.; Trubetskoj, O.A.; Voyard, G.; Richard, C. Determination of hydrophobicity and optical properties of soil humic acids isolated by different methods. J. Geochem. Explor. 2013, 132, 84–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boguta, P.; D’Orazio, V.; Sokołowska, Z.; Senesi, N. Effects of selected chemical and physicochemical properties of humic acids from peat soils on their interaction mechanisms with copper ions at various pHs. J. Geochem. Explor. 2016, 168, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumada, K. Chemistry of Soil Organic Matter; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Oxford, UK; New York, NY, USA; Tokyo, Japan, 1988; p. 240. [Google Scholar]
- Weishaar, J.L.; Aiken, G.R.; Bergamaschi, B.A.; Fram, M.S.; Fujii, R.; Mopper, K. Evaluation of specific ultraviolet absorbance as an indicator of the chemical composition and reactivity of dissolved organic carbon. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 4702–4708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polak, J.; Bartoszek, M.; Żądło, M.; Kos, A.; Sułkowski, W.W. The spectroscopic studies of humic acid extracted from sediment collected at different seasons. Chemosphere 2011, 84, 1548–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodriguez, F.J.; Schlenger, P.; García-Valverde, M. Monitoring changes in the structure and properties of humic substances following ozonation using UV-Vis, FTIR and H NMR techniques. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 541, 626–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dębska, B.; Banach-Szott, M.; Dziamski, A.; Gonet, S.S. Chromatographic characteristics (HPLC, HPSEC) of humic acids of soil fertilised with various organic fertilisers. Chem. Ecol. 2010, 26, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Preube, G.; Friedrich, S.; Salzer, R. Retention behavior of humic substances in reversed phase HPLC. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 2000, 368, 268–273. [Google Scholar]
- Sierra, M.D.; Giovanela, M.; Parlanti, E.; Soriano-Sierra, E.J. 3D-fluorescence spectroscopic analysis of HPLC fractionated estuarine fulvic and humic acids. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2006, 17, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- COM 231 Final. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection, Brussels. 2006. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52006DC0231&from=EN (accessed on 26 September 2006).
- Becher, M.; Symanowicz, B.; Jaremko, D.; Trzcińska, E. Chemical composition of compost from municipal waste in the context of use as fertiliser. Acta Agroph. 2018, 25, 329–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Becher, M.; Pakuła, K.; Czapliński, K. Soil Organic Matter Quality in Soils with Different Levels of Manure Fertilisation. Environ. Nat. Resour. J. 2020, 31, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalembasa, S. Quick method of determination of organic carbon in soil. Polish J. Soil Sci. 1991, 24, 17–22. [Google Scholar]
- Zdanov, J.A. Average carbon oxidation degree and aminoacids. Biochimija 1965, 30, 1257–1259. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Y.; Senesi, N.; Schnitzer, M. Information provided on humic substances by E4/6 rations. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1977, 41, 352–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dębska, B.; Drąg, M.; Banach-Szott, M. Molecular size distribution and hydrophilic and hydrophobic properties of humic acids isolated from forest soil. Soil Water Res. 2007, 2, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Atiyeh, R.M.; Domínguez, J.; Subler, S.; Edwards, C.A. Changes in biochemical properties of cow manure during processing by earthworms (Eisenia andrei, Bouché) and the effects on seedling growth. Pedobiologia 2000, 44, 709–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zmora-Nahum, S.; Hadar, Y.; Chen, Y. Physico-chemical properties ofcommercial compo-sts varying in their Skurce materials and country of origin. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2007, 39, 1263–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Becher, M.; Kalembasa, D.; Pakuła, K.; Malinowska, E. Resources and quality of organic matter in arable grey-brown podzolic soils of Siedlecka Upland. Acta Sci. Pol. Agric. 2013, 12, 7–17. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Kabała, C.; Charzyński, P.; Chodorowski, J.; Drewnik, M.; Glina, B.; Greinert, A.; Hulisz, P.; Jankowski, M.; Jonczak, J.; Łabaz, B.; et al. Polish Soil Classification, 6th edition—Principles, classification scheme and correlations. Soil Sci. Ann. 2019, 70, 71–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Stevenson, F.J. Geochemistry of Soil Humic Substances. In Humic Substances in Soil, Sediment and Wate; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1985; pp. 13–53. [Google Scholar]
- Becher, M.; Kalembasa, D. Fractions of nitrogen and carbon in humus horizons of arable luvisols and cambisols located on Siedlce Upland. Acta Agroph. 2011, 18, 7–16. [Google Scholar]
- Becher, M.; Kalembasa, D. Characterisation of bitumens of forest cambic arenosols and pod-zolic soils in the South Podlasoe Lowland. Soil Sci. Ann. 2006, 57, 5–12. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Neves, L.; Ferreira, V.; Oliveira, R. Co-composting cow manure with food waste: The influence of lipids content. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2009, 58, 986–991. [Google Scholar]
- Wiesenberg, G.L.B.; Schwark, L.; Schmidt, W.I. Improved automated extraction and separation procedure for soil lipid analyses. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2004, 55, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gonet, S.S.; Dębska, B.; Dziamski, A.; Banach-Szott, M.; Zaujec, A.; Szombathova, N. Properties of organic matter in Haplic Luvisol under arable, meadow and forest management. Polish J. Soil Sci. 2009, 42, 138–148. [Google Scholar]
- Veeken, A.; Nierop, K.; de Wilde, V.; Hamelers, B. Characterization of NaOH-extraction humic acids during composting of a biowaste. Bioresour. Technol. 2000, 72, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dębska, B.; Szombathová, N.; Banach-Szott, M. Properties of humic acids of soil under different management regimes. Pol. J. Soil Sci. 2009, 42, 131–138. [Google Scholar]
- Visser, S.A. Application of van Krevelen’s graphical statistical method for the study of aquatic humic material. Environ. Sci. Techn. 1983, 17, 412–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amir, S.; Jouraiphy, A.; Meddich, A.; El Gharous, M.; Winterton, P.; Hafidi, M. Structural study of humic acids during composting of activated sludge-green waste: Elemental analysis, FTIR and 13C NMR. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 177, 524–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dergacheva, M.I.; Nekrasova, O.A.; Okoneshnikova, M.V.; Vasileva, D.I.; Gavrilov, D.A.; Ochur, K.O.; Ondar, E.E. Ratio of elements in humic acids as a source of information on the environment of soil formation. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 2012, 5, 497–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tinoco, P.; Almendros, G.; González-Vila, F.; Sanz, J.; González-Pérez, J. Revisiting molecular characteristics responsive for the aromaticity of soil humic acids. J. Soils Sediment. 2015, 15, 781–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gonet, S.S.; Dębska, B.; Zaujec, A.; Banach-Szott, M.; Szombathova, N. Effect of the tree species and soil-and-climate conditions on the properties of humus in forest soils, In Role of Organic Matter in the Environment; Gonet, S.S., Markiewicz, M., Eds.; PTSH: Wroclaw, Poland, 2007; pp. 61–98. [Google Scholar]
- Sanchez-Monedero, M.A.; Cegarra, J.; Garcia, D.; Roig, A. Chemical and structural evolution of humic acids during organic waste composting. Biodegradation 2002, 13, 361–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, J.; Gu, B.; LeBoeuf, E.; Pan, H.; Dai, S. Spectroscopic characterization of the structural and functional properties of natural organic matter fractions. Chemosphere 2002, 48, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moran Vieyra, F.E.; Palazzi, V.I.; Sanchez de Pinto, M.I.; Borsarelli, C.D. Combined UV–Vis absorbance and fluorescence properties of extracted humic substances-like for characterization of composting evolution of domestic solid wastes. Geoderma 2009, 151, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Howard, P.J.A.; Howard, D.M.; Lowe, L.E. Effects of tree species and soil physico-chemical conditions on the nature of soil organic matter. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1998, 30, 285–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Senesi, N.; D’Orazio, V.; Ricca, G. Humic acids in the first generation of EUROSOILS. Geoderma 2003, 116, 325–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalembasa, D.; Becher, M. Properties of organic matter in chosen soils fertilized with sewage sludge. Environ. Prot. Eng. 2009, 35, 165–171. [Google Scholar]
- Jonczak, J. Soil organic matter properties in stagnic luvisols under different land use types. Acta Agroph. 2013, 20, 565–576. [Google Scholar]
- Dores-Silva, P.R.; Landgraf, M.D.; Rezende, M.O.O. Humification process in different kinds of organic residue by composting and vermicomposting: Have microbioreactors really accelerated the process? Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 17490–17498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Susic, M. Replenishing humic acids in agricultural soils. Agronomy 2016, 6, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dębska, B.; Drąg, M.; Tobiasova, E. Effect of post-harvest residue of maize, rapeseed, and sunflower on humic acids properties in various soils. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2012, 21, 603–613. [Google Scholar]
Operational Carbon Fractions | Procedure |
---|---|
Fraction after calcification Lab-C | Extraction with 0.05 M H2SO4; extraction time 24 h; m/v = 1/50; centrifugation (g = 4000 rpm) and filtration through a cellulose filter. Carbon in the solution was determined by the oxidative and titration method [26]. |
Lipid fraction Lip-C | Extraction (ethanol + n-hexane, v/v = 1/1) in an automatic solvent extractor SOXTHERM® (Gerhardt), Königswinter, Germany. The weight of bitumens was determined by weighing. Carbon was determined with an elemental analyser. |
Humus substance fractions HS-C | Extraction with 0.1 M NaOH; extraction time = 24 h; m/v = 1/50; centrifugation (g = 4000 rpm) and filtration through a cellulose filter. Carbon in the solution was determined by the oxidative and titration method. |
Fulvic acid fractions FAs-C | Acidification (2.5 M H2SO4, pH = 1.80) of the measured extraction part 0.1M NaOH. After humic acid precipitation and sedimentation (24 h) in a solution of fulvic acids, carbon was determined by the oxidative and titration method. |
Humic acid fractions HAs-C | Calculation: HAs-C = HS-C − FAs-C |
Residual fraction (post-extraction residue) Res-C | Calculation: Res-C = TC − (Lab-C + Lip-C + HS-C) |
Parameter | Unit of Measure | Mean | Range | SD | CV (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSMS | kg m−3 (fresh matter) | 549 | 499–592 | 34.1 | 6.21 |
kg m−3 (dry matter) | 192 | 120–230 | 12.0 | 6.25 | |
STOCKSMS | kg m−2 (fresh matter) | 109 | 97.1–120 | 6.99 | 6.41 |
kg m−2 (dry matter) | 38.1 | 23.3–48.0 | 2.54 | 6.70 | |
Dry matter | % | 35.0 | 24.5–40.5 | 5.88 | 16.8 |
Parameter (Unit of Measure) | Mean | Range | SD | CV (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
pHKCl | - | 6.29–7.72 | - | - |
CaCO3 (g kg−1 d.m.) | 107 | 62.9–133 | 27.0 | 25.2 |
TC (g kg−1 d.m.) | 279 | 234–312 | 34.1 | 12.2 |
TOC (g kg−1 d.m.) | 266 | 219–301 | 36.2 | 13.6 |
IC (g kg−1 d.m.) | 12.9 | 7.55–16.0 | 3.23 | 25.0 |
TN (g kg−1 d.m.) | 22.6 | 19.6–25.9 | 2.23 | 9.87 |
TOC/TN | 11.8 | 11.1–12.7 | 0.611 | 5.18 |
Organic matter (g kg−1 d.m.) | 458 | 378–378 | 61.4 | 13.4 |
Fraction of Organic Matter | Mean | Range | SD | CV (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
% TOC | ||||
Lab-C | 7.53 | 4.75–9.37 | 1.78 | 23.7 |
Lip-C | 1.97 | 1.44–2.59 | 0.356 | 18.1 |
HS-C | 20.8 | 16.8–24.5 | 2.94 | 14.2 |
FAs-C | 8.58 | 6.47–9.86 | 1.08 | 12.6 |
HAs-C | 12.2 | 9.82–14.6 | 1.98 | 16.2 |
Res-C | 69.8 | 66.0–76.6 | 3.30 | 4.73 |
HAs-C/FAs-C | 1.42 | 1.25–1.60 | 0.135 | 9.54 |
HAs-C/(Lab-C + FAs-C) | 0.767 | 0.571–0.925 | 0.146 | 19.02 |
Element | Unit of Measure | Mean | Range | SD | CV (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C | weight % | 53.6 | 53.1–54.9 | 0.703 | 1.31 |
H | 5.24 | 5.12–5.34 | 0.080 | 1.53 | |
N | 4.30 | 3.99–4.59 | 0.223 | 5.17 | |
O | 36.8 | 35.9–37.4 | 0.573 | 1.56 | |
C | atomic % | 36.3 | 35.8–37.2 | 0.525 | 1.45 |
H | 42.5 | 41.9–43.1 | 0.410 | 0.96 | |
N | 2.49 | 2.30–2.68 | 0.137 | 5.50 | |
O | 18.7 | 18.1–19.0 | 0.297 | 1.59 |
Parameter | Mean | Range | SD | CV (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
H/C | 1.17 | 1.13–1.20 | 0.025 | 2.13 |
O/C | 0.515 | 0.490–0.530 | 0.016 | 3.11 |
O/H | 0.439 | 0.425–0.451 | 0.008 | 1.86 |
ω | 0.063 | 0.014–0.108 | 0.029 | 45.6 |
A2/4 | 11.19 | 10.50–11.6 | 0.360 | 3.22 |
A2/6 | 111.2 | 82.10–129.3 | 13.3 | 11.98 |
A4/6 | 9.96 | 7.10–11.10 | 1.20 | 12.02 |
ΔlogK | 1.10 | 1.01–1.13 | 0.038 | 3.49 |
Parameter | Mean | Range | SD | CV (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
HIL | 35.3 | 33.0–37.6 | 1.65 | 4.69 |
HOB-1 | 50.4 | 49.0–52.1 | 1.23 | 2.44 |
HOB-2 | 14.3 | 13.0–16.1 | 0.97 | 6.78 |
∑HOB | 64.5 | 62.4–67.0 | 1.69 | 2.63 |
HIL/ΣHOB | 0.543 | 0.446–0.602 | 0.052 | 9.50 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Becher, M.; Banach-Szott, M.; Godlewska, A. Organic Matter Properties of Spent Button Mushroom Substrate in the Context of Soil Organic Matter Reproduction. Agronomy 2021, 11, 204. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11020204
Becher M, Banach-Szott M, Godlewska A. Organic Matter Properties of Spent Button Mushroom Substrate in the Context of Soil Organic Matter Reproduction. Agronomy. 2021; 11(2):204. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11020204
Chicago/Turabian StyleBecher, Marcin, Magdalena Banach-Szott, and Agnieszka Godlewska. 2021. "Organic Matter Properties of Spent Button Mushroom Substrate in the Context of Soil Organic Matter Reproduction" Agronomy 11, no. 2: 204. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11020204
APA StyleBecher, M., Banach-Szott, M., & Godlewska, A. (2021). Organic Matter Properties of Spent Button Mushroom Substrate in the Context of Soil Organic Matter Reproduction. Agronomy, 11(2), 204. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11020204