The Effect of Acetic Acid Treatments on the Quality of Stored Carrot (Daucus carota L.) Seeds
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Tylkowska, K. The influence of Alternaria alternata (Fr.) Keissler on carrot (Daucus carota L.) seed germination. Phytopathol. Pol. 1991, 1, 14–18. [Google Scholar]
- Tylkowska, K. Carrot seed-borne diseases caused by Alternaria species. In Alternaria, Biology, Plant Diseases and Metabolites; Chełkowski, J., Visconti, A., Eds.; Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1992; pp. 337–352. [Google Scholar]
- Stiles, M.E. Biopreservation by lactic acid bacteria. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 1996, 70, 331–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gullo, M.; Verzelloni, E.; Canonico, M. Aerobic submerged fermentation by acetic acid bacteria for vinegar production: Process and biotechnological aspects. Process Biochem. 2014, 49, 1571–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Borgen, A.; Nielsen, B. Effect of seed treatment with acetic acids in control of seed borne diseases. In Proceedings of BCPC Symposium No. 76, 2001: “Seed Treatment: Challenges & Opportunities”, North Warwickshire, UK, 26–27 February 2001; Biddle, A.J., Ed.; BCPC: Farnham, UK, 2001; pp. 135–140. [Google Scholar]
- Saidi, B.; Azmeh, F.; Mamluk, O.F.; Sikora, R.A. Effect of seed treatment with organic acids on the control of common bunt (Tilletia tritici and T. laevis) in wheat. Meded. Rijksuniv. Gent. Fak. Landbouwkd. Toegep. Biol. Wet. 2001, 66, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Sholberg, P.L.; Gaudet, D.A.; Puchalski, B.; Randall, P. Control of common bunt (Tilletia tritici and T. laevis) of wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. ‘Laura’) by fumigation with acetic acid vapour. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 2006, 86, 839–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rioux, S.; Pouleur, S.; Randall, P.; Vanasse, A.; Turkington, T.K.; Dion, Y.; Belkacemi, K. Efficacy of acetic acid vapours and dry heat to control Fusarium graminearum and Bipolaris sorokiniana in barley and wheat seeds. Phytoprotection 2016, 96, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sholberg, P.L.; Gaunce, A.P. Fumigation of high moisture seed with acetic acid to control storage mold. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1996, 76, 551–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szopińska, D. The Effects of Organic Acids Treatment on Germination, Vigour and Health of Zinnia (Zinnia elegans Jacq.) Seeds. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 2013, 12, 17–29. Available online: MicrosoftWord-02SzopinskaHort12_5_2013.doc(actapol.net) (accessed on 26 April 2021).
- El-Saidy, A.E.A.; El-Hai, A.K.M. Effect of some evaporation matters on storability of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) seed. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2016, 19, 239–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Van der Wolf, J.M.; Birnbaum, Y.; van der Zouwen, P.S.; Groot, S.P.C. Disinfection of vegetable seed by treatment with essential oils, organic acids and plant extracts. Seed Sci. Technol. 2008, 36, 76–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dorna, H.; Qi, Y.; Szopińska, D. The effect of acetic acid, grapefruit extract and selected essential oils on germination, vigour and health of carrot (Daucus carota L.) seeds. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 2018, 17, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OEPP/EPPO. Efficacy evaluation of plant protection products. PP 1/135 (4) Phytotoxicity assessment. Bull. OEPP/EPPO Bull. 2014, 44, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- International Rules for Seed Testing; International Seed Testing Association (ISTA): Bassersdorf, Switzerland, 2012.
- International Rules for Seed Testing; Annexe to Chapter 7; Seed Health Testing Methods 7-001a: Blotter Method for the Detection of Alternaria Dauci on Daucus Carota (Carrot); International Seed Testing Association (ISTA): Bassersdorf, Switzerland, 2021; Available online: ISTA_SHMethods_2021_7-001a_final.pdf(seedtest.org) (accessed on 26 April 2021).
- International Rules for Seed Testing; Annexe to Chapter 7; Seed Health Testing Methods 7-002a: Blotter Method for the Detection of Alternaria radicina on Daucus carota (Carrot); International Seed Testing Association (ISTA): Bassersdorf, Switzerland, 2021; Available online: ISTA_SHMethods_2021_7-002a_final.pdf(seedtest.org) (accessed on 26 April 2021).
- Machado, J.C.; Langerak, C.J.; Jaccoud-Filho, D.S. Seed-borne Fungi: A Contribution to Routine Seed Health Analysis; International Seed Testing Association: Bassersdorf, Switzerland, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Mathur, S.B.; Kongsdal, O. Common Laboratory Seed Health Testing Methods for Detecting Fungi; International Seed Testing Association: Bassersdorf, Switzerland, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Jalink, H.; Van der Schoor, R. Seed Calculator 2.1. License Number: 100200122; Plant Research International: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Sholberg, P.L.; Gaunce, A.P. Fumigation of fruit with acetic acid to prevent post harvest decay. HortScience 1995, 30, 1271–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lang, M.M.; Ingham, B.H.; Ingham, S.C. Efficacy of novel organic acid and hypochlorite treatments for eliminating Escherichia coli O157:H7 from alfalfa seeds prior to sprouting. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2000, 58, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pao, S.; Kalantari, A.; Khalid, M.F. Eliminating Salmonella enterica in alfalfa and mung bean sprouts by organic acid and hot water immersions. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2008, 32, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alawlaqi, M.M.; Alharbi Asmaa, A. Impact of acetic acid on controlling tomato fruit decay. Life Sci. J. 2014, 11, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Escamilla, D.; Rosso, M.L.; Zhang, B. Identification of fungi associated with soybeans and effective seed disinfection treatments. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 7, 3194–3205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Pasini, C.; D’Aquila, F.; Curir, P.; Gullino, M.L. Effectiveness of antifungal compounds against rose powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca pannosa var. rosae) in glasshouses. Crop Prot. 1997, 16, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hewett, P.D. Pathogen viability on seed in deep freeze storage. Seed Sci. Technol. 1987, 15, 73–77. [Google Scholar]
- Maude, R.B. Seedborne Diseases and Their Control. Principles and Practice; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Rotem, J. The Genus Alternaria. Biology, Epidemiology and Pathogenicity; APS (The American Phytopathological Society) Press: St. Paul, MN, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
Sample | Treatment | Germination Parameters (%) | Mean Germination Time (Days) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Germination Capacity | Abnormal Diseased Seedlings | Dead Seeds | |||||||
I | C 1 | 44.0 | a 2 | 35.7 | d | 11.7 | ab | 3.41 | a |
W | 52.0 | ab | 22.7 | c | 16.0 | bc | 3.36 | a | |
F | 79.0 | c | 4.3 | a | 9.0 | a | 3.65 | ab | |
0.5%AA | 57.0 | b | 19.3 | bc | 20.0 | c | 3.90 | bc | |
1%AA | 49.3 | ab | 20.3 | bc | 21.0 | c | 4.18 | c | |
2%AA | 49.3 | ab | 14.0 | b | 29.7 | d | 3.59 | ab | |
II | C 1 | 77.0 | a | 11.7 | b | 8.0 | ab | 3.10 | a |
W | 83.0 | bc | 5.3 | a | 9.0 | bc | 3.09 | a | |
F | 85.0 | c | 2.7 | a | 5.3 | a | 3.55 | bc | |
0.5%AA | 81.7 | a–c | 4.3 | a | 9.7 | bc | 3.31 | ab | |
1%AA | 80.3 | a–c | 2.7 | a | 12.7 | c | 3.38 | ab | |
2%AA | 79.3 | ab | 2.0 | a | 10.7 | bc | 4.87 | c |
Sample | Treatment | Seed Infestation with Fungi (%) | Seeds Free of Fungi | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alternaria alternata | Alternaria dauci | Alternaria radicina | |||||||
I | C 1 | 98.5 | e 2 | 12.0 | b | 59.5 | c | 0 | a |
W | 99.0 | e | 9.0 | b | 49.0 | c | 0.5 | a | |
F | 44.0 | b | 0 | a | 28.5 | b | 23.0 | d | |
0.5%AA | 62.0 | d | 7.0 | b | 21.0 | ab | 3.5 | b | |
1%AA | 68.5 | c | 7.5 | b | 22.5 | ab | 5.0 | b | |
2%AA | 28.5 | a | 2.0 | a | 15.0 | a | 12.5 | c | |
II | C 1 | 99.5 | d | 2.0 | a | 17.5 | b | 0 | a |
W | 99.5 | d | 2.0 | a | 10.0 | b | 0 | a | |
F | 53.5 | a | 1.0 | a | 1.0 | a | 38.0 | d | |
0.5%AA | 89.0 | c | 0 | a | 2.0 | a | 7.0 | b | |
1%AA | 71.0 | b | 1.5 | a | 0.5 | a | 24.0 | c | |
2%AA | 60.0 | ab | 1.5 | a | 1.5 | a | 31.5 | cd |
Germination Parameters (%) | Storage Duration (Months) | Storage Temp. (°C) | Treatment | Mean | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C 1 | W | F | 0.5%AA | 1%AA | 2%AA | |||||||||||
Germination capacity | 5 | 4 | 55.3 | c 2 | 62.7 | c | 75.3 | d | 64.0 | c | 55.3 | c | 39.3 | b | 58.7 | A |
20 | 46.0 | b | 60.7 | c | 72.7 | d | 73.7 | d | 62.0 | c | 25.3 | a | 56.7 | A | ||
Mean | 50.7 | D | 61.7 | C | 74.0 | E | 68.9 | D | 58.7 | C | 32.3 | A | ||||
12 | 4 | 41.3 | cd | 65.7 | f | 69.0 | g | 67.7 | fg | 53.0 | e | 38.0 | bc | 55.8 | B | |
20 | 30.3 | ab | 48.0 | de | 75.3 | g | 69.7 | fg | 56.3 | e | 29.3 | a | 51.5 | A | ||
Mean | 35.8 | A | 56.9 | B | 72.2 | C | 68.7 | C | 54.7 | B | 33.7 | A | ||||
Abnormal diseased seedlings | 5 | 4 | 23.7 | ef | 16.3 | c–e | 9.0 | bc | 19.0 | de | 14.0 | cd | 15.7 | c–e | 16.3 | B |
20 | 31.7 | f | 21.7 | d–f | 3.0 | a | 6.0 | ab | 10.0 | bc | 10.7 | bc | 13.9 | A | ||
Mean | 27.7 | D | 19.0 | C | 6.0 | A | 12.5 | B | 12.0 | B | 13.2 | B | ||||
12 | 4 | 29.3 | f | 16.7 | cd | 5.3 | ab | 9.7 | bc | 15.7 | cd | 18.7 | de | 15.9 | B | |
20 | 42.3 | g | 28.3 | ef | 3.3 | a | 5.7 | ab | 5.0 | ab | 5.7 | ab | 15.1 | A | ||
Mean | 35.8 | D | 22.5 | C | 4.3 | A | 7.7 | AB | 10.4 | B | 12.2 | B | ||||
Dead seeds | 5 | 4 | 14.3 | c–e | 12.0 | b–d | 4.0 | a | 10.3 | b–d | 20.7 | ef | 28.0 | f | 14.9 | A |
20 | 14.0 | c–e | 9.3 | b–d | 8.0 | a–c | 7.7 | ab | 15.3 | de | 45.0 | g | 16.6 | A | ||
Mean | 14.2 | CD | 10.7 | BC | 6.0 | A | 9.0 | AB | 18.0 | D | 36.5 | E | ||||
12 | 4 | 22.7 | f | 8.7 | b–d | 5.7 | ab | 8.7 | b–d | 12.7 | c–e | 20.7 | ef | 13.2 | A | |
20 | 14.7 | d–f | 11.7 | b–d | 2.7 | a | 6.3 | a–c | 12.7 | b–e | 24.3 | f | 10.1 | A | ||
Mean | 18.7 | D | 10.2 | BC | 4.2 | A | 7.5 | B | 12.7 | C | 22.5 | D |
Germination Parameters (%) | Storage Duration (Months) | Storage Temp. (°C) | Treatment | Mean | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C 1 | W | F | 0.5%AA | 1%AA | 2%AA | |||||||||||
Germination capacity | 5 | 4 | 76.3 | a–c 2 | 82.3 | cd | 86.0 | d | 82.0 | cd | 83.0 | cd | 64.3 | ab | 79.0 | A |
20 | 69.3 | a | 78.0 | bc | 91.3 | e | 83.7 | cd | 82.0 | cd | 73.0 | ab | 79.6 | A | ||
Mean | 72.8 | A | 80.2 | B | 88.7 | C | 82.9 | B | 82.5 | B | 68.7 | A | ||||
12 | 4 | 64.7 | ab | 76.7 | cd | 83.7 | de | 83.7 | c–e | 83.0 | c–e | 73.7 | bc | 77.6 | A | |
20 | 60.0 | a | 81.7 | c–e | 86.7 | e | 84.0 | e | 86.7 | e | 75.7 | cd | 79.1 | A | ||
Mean | 62.4 | A | 79.2 | BC | 85.2 | D | 83.9 | CD | 84.9 | CD | 74.7 | B | ||||
Abnormal diseased seedlings | 5 | 4 | 11.7 | d | 12.0 | d | 3.3 | ab | 7.7 | cd | 7.3 | bc | 5.0 | bc | 7.8 | A |
20 | 21.3 | e | 10.0 | cd | 1.3 | a | 4.7 | bc | 4.7 | bc | 5.0 | bc | 7.8 | A | ||
Mean | 16.5 | D | 11.0 | C | 2.3 | A | 6.2 | B | 6.0 | B | 5.0 | B | ||||
12 | 4 | 22.7 | de | 15.7 | d | 8.7 | c | 7.0 | bc | 6.3 | bc | 4.7 | bc | 10.9 | B | |
20 | 30.0 | e | 8.3 | c | 3.0 | ab | 5.3 | bc | 3.0 | ab | 1.3 | a | 8.5 | A | ||
Mean | 26.4 | D | 12.0 | C | 5.9 | AB | 6.2 | B | 4.7 | AB | 3.0 | A | ||||
Dead seeds | 5 | 4 | 9.3 | d | 4.0 | a–c | 2.7 | a-c | 6.0 | b-d | 4.0 | a–d | 7.0 | cd | 5.5 | B |
20 | 4.0 | a–c | 5.7 | b–d | 2.3 | ab | 3.0 | a-c | 2.0 | a | 5.7 | b–d | 3.8 | A | ||
Mean | 6.7 | B | 4.9 | AB | 2.5 | A | 4.5 | AB | 3.0 | A | 6.4 | B | ||||
12 | 4 | 7.3 | c | 3.3 | a–c | 0.3 | a | 1.0 | a | 2.0 | ab | 2.0 | ab | 2.7 | A | |
20 | 5.3 | bc | 2.7 | a–c | 2.0 | ab | 1.3 | ab | 0.3 | a | 1.0 | a | 2.1 | A | ||
Mean | 6.3 | B | 3.0 | A | 1.2 | A | 1.2 | A | 1.2 | A | 1.5 | A |
Sample | Storage Duration (Months) | Storage Temp. (°C) | Treatment | Mean | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C 1 | W | F | 0.5%AA | 1%AA | 2%AA | |||||||||||
I | 5 | 4 | 3.18 | b 2 | 3.38 | bc | 3.49 | bc | 3.11 | a | 4.24 | d | 4.64 | e | 3.67 | A |
20 | 3.39 | bc | 3.33 | bc | 3.68 | c | 3.64 | c | 4.35 | de | 5.28 | f | 3.95 | B | ||
Mean | 3.29 | A | 3.36 | A | 3.59 | B | 3.38 | A | 4.30 | C | 4.96 | D | ||||
12 | 4 | 3.25 | ab | 3.00 | a | 3.47 | b | 3.12 | ab | 4.15 | c | 4.50 | d | 3.58 | A | |
20 | 3.28 | ab | 3.14 | ab | 3.49 | ab | 3.52 | b | 4.32 | cd | 5.26 | e | 3.84 | B | ||
Mean | 3.27 | AB | 3.07 | A | 3.48 | B | 3.32 | AB | 4.24 | C | 4.88 | D | ||||
II | 5 | 4 | 3.29 | b | 3.11 | a | 3.52 | cd | 3.43 | bc | 3.34 | b | 3.89 | f | 3.43 | A |
20 | 3.55 | cd | 3.45 | bc | 3.85 | ef | 3.44 | bc | 3.73 | de | 4.45 | g | 3.75 | B | ||
Mean | 3.42 | B | 3.28 | A | 3.69 | C | 3.44 | B | 3.54 | B | 4.17 | D | ||||
12 | 4 | 3.11 | a | 3.20 | ab | 3.45 | cd | 3.07 | a | 3.36 | bc | 4.00 | e | 3.37 | A | |
20 | 3.19 | a | 3.41 | b–d | 3.59 | d | 3.38 | bc | 3.49 | cd | 4.36 | f | 3.57 | B | ||
Mean | 3.15 | A | 3.31 | BC | 3.52 | D | 3.23 | AB | 3.43 | CD | 4.18 | E |
Seed Infestation with Fungi (%) | Storage Duration (Months) | Storage Temp. (°C) | Treatment | Mean | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C 1 | W | F | 0.5%AA | 1%AA | 2%AA | |||||||||||
Alternaria alternata | 5 | 4 | 98.5 | h 2 | 95.5 | gh | 18.0 | cd | 66.0 | f | 29.5 | de | 35.5 | e | 57.2 | B |
20 | 92.5 | g | 76.0 | f | 7.0 | ab | 12.0 | bc | 3.0 | a | 2.5 | a | 32.2 | A | ||
Mean | 95.5 | D | 85.8 | C | 12.5 | A | 39.0 | B | 16.3 | A | 19.0 | A | ||||
12 | 4 | 100.0 | h | 93.5 | g | 24.0 | d | 21.5 | d | 11.0 | c | 12.0 | c | 43.7 | B | |
20 | 81.5 | f | 47.0 | e | 4.5 | b | 1.5 | ab | 2.0 | ab | 0 | a | 22.8 | A | ||
Mean | 90.8 | E | 70.3 | D | 14.3 | C | 11.5 | BC | 6.5 | AB | 6.0 | A | ||||
Alternaria dauci | 5 | 4 | 11.0 | d | 9.0 | cd | 1.0 | ab | 11.0 | d | 2.5 | ab | 4.0 | bc | 6.4 | B |
20 | 7.5 | cd | 8.5 | cd | 3.0 | bc | 0.5 | a | 1.5 | ab | 2.5 | ab | 3.9 | A | ||
Mean | 9.3 | B | 8.8 | B | 2.0 | A | 5.8 | A | 2.0 | A | 3.3 | A | ||||
12 | 4 | 8.5 | d | 8.0 | d | 2.5 | bc | 5.0 | bc | 6.5 | ac | 3.5 | bc | 5.7 | B | |
20 | 12.0 | d | 7.5 | cd | 1.0 | ab | 0.5 | ab | 0 | a | 0 | a | 3.5 | A | ||
Mean | 10.3 | B | 7.7 | B | 1.8 | A | 2.8 | A | 3.3 | A | 1.8 | A | ||||
Alternaria radicina | 5 | 4 | 47.0 | e | 34.0 | d | 16.5 | c | 18.0 | c | 13.0 | bc | 18.0 | c | 24.4 | B |
20 | 54.5 | e | 38.5 | de | 13.5 | bc | 11.0 | a-c | 8.5 | ab | 6.0 | a | 22.0 | A | ||
Mean | 50.8 | C | 36.3 | B | 15.0 | A | 14.5 | A | 10.8 | A | 12.0 | A | ||||
12 | 4 | 62.5 | d | 35.5 | c | 12.5 | b | 14.5 | b | 10.0 | b | 9.0 | b | 24.5 | B | |
20 | 75.0 | e | 29.0 | c | 12.0 | b | 3.0 | a | 2.5 | a | 3.0 | a | 20.8 | A | ||
Mean | 68.8 | D | 32.3 | C | 12.3 | B | 8.8 | A | 6.3 | A | 6.0 | A | ||||
Seeds free of fungi | 5 | 4 | 0 | a | 0.5 | a | 58.5 | d | 12.0 | b | 13.0 | b | 35.5 | c | 20.4 | A |
20 | 0 | a | 9.0 | b | 67.0 | e | 65.0 | e | 66.0 | e | 73.5 | e | 46.8 | B | ||
Mean | 0 | A | 4.8 | B | 62.8 | D | 38.5 | C | 39.5 | C | 54.5 | D | ||||
12 | 4 | 0 | a | 0.5 | a | 53.5 | c | 50.0 | c | 60.5 | c | 73.0 | d | 39.6 | A | |
20 | 0 | a | 36.0 | b | 75.0 | d | 91.0 | e | 89.0 | e | 93.0 | e | 64.0 | B | ||
Mean | 0 | A | 18.3 | B | 64.3 | C | 70.5 | D | 74.8 | D | 83.0 | E |
Seed Infestation with Fungi (%) | Storage Duration (Months) | Storage Temp. (°C) | Treatment | Mean | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C 1 | W | F | 0.5%AA | 1%AA | 2%AA | |||||||||||
Alternaria alternata | 5 | 4 | 100.0 | g 2 | 96.5 | f | 32.0 | cd | 40.0 | d | 31.5 | cd | 17.0 | ab | 52.8 | B |
20 | 100.0 | g | 62.5 | e | 10.0 | a | 29.0 | cd | 22.5 | bc | 14.5 | ab | 39.8 | A | ||
Mean | 100.0 | D | 79.5 | C | 21.0 | A | 34.5 | B | 27.0 | B | 15.8 | A | ||||
12 | 4 | 98.5 | d | 81.5 | c | 29.5 | b | 30.5 | b | 25.0 | b | 5.0 | a | 45.0 | B | |
20 | 93.5 | c | 29.0 | b | 1.5 | a | 4.5 | a | 3.0 | a | 5.0 | a | 22.8 | A | ||
Mean | 96.0 | D | 55.3 | C | 15.5 | B | 17.5 | B | 14.0 | B | 5.0 | A | ||||
Alternaria dauci | 5 | 4 | 2.0 | a | 0.5 | a | 1.5 | a | 1.5 | a | 0 | a | 0 | a | 0.9 | A |
20 | 2.5 | a | 3.0 | a | 0.5 | a | 0.5 | a | 1.0 | a | 0 | a | 1.3 | A | ||
Mean | 2.3 | A | 1.8 | A | 1.0 | A | 1.0 | A | 0.5 | A | 0 | A | ||||
12 | 4 | 4.5 | b | 1.5 | a | 0.5 | a | 1.5 | a | 0 | a | 1.5 | a | 1.6 | B | |
20 | 0.5 | a | 0.5 | a | 0 | a | 0.5 | a | 0 | a | 0 | a | 0.3 | A | ||
Mean | 2.5 | B | 1.0 | A | 0.3 | A | 1.0 | A | 0 | A | 0.8 | A | ||||
Alternaria radicina | 5 | 4 | 16.5 | ef | 9.0 | c–e | 1.0 | a | 3.5 | a–d | 3.0 | a–c | 1.5 | ab | 5.8 | A |
20 | 25.0 | f | 9.0 | de | 5.5 | b-d | 1.5 | ab | 1.5 | ab | 4.0 | a–d | 7.8 | A | ||
Mean | 20.8 | C | 9.0 | B | 3.3 | A | 2.5 | A | 2.3 | A | 2.8 | A | ||||
12 | 4 | 23.0 | d | 10.5 | c | 3.0 | ab | 2.0 | ab | 1.0 | a | 1.5 | a | 6.8 | B | |
20 | 19.5 | d | 5.5 | bc | 0 | a | 1.0 | a | 3.0 | ab | 0 | a | 4.8 | A | ||
Mean | 21.3 | C | 8.0 | B | 1.5 | A | 1.5 | A | 2.0 | A | 0.8 | A | ||||
Seeds free of fungi | 5 | 4 | 0 | a | 1.0 | a | 46.5 | bc | 44.5 | bc | 52.5 | cd | 65.5 | de | 35.0 | A |
20 | 0 | a | 32.5 | b | 79.5 | f | 56.5 | c–e | 58.0 | c–e | 69.0 | ef | 49.3 | B | ||
Mean | 0 | A | 16.8 | B | 63.0 | DE | 50.5 | C | 55.3 | CD | 67.3 | E | ||||
12 | 4 | 0 | a | 7.5 | b | 59.0 | c | 60.5 | c | 67.0 | c | 83.0 | d | 46.2 | A | |
20 | 1.5 | a | 66.5 | c | 97.0 | e | 86.0 | d | 86.5 | d | 90.0 | d | 71.3 | B | ||
Mean | 0.8 | A | 37.0 | B | 78.0 | DE | 73.3 | C | 76.8 | CD | 86.5 | E |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Dorna, H.; Rosińska, A.; Szopińska, D. The Effect of Acetic Acid Treatments on the Quality of Stored Carrot (Daucus carota L.) Seeds. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1176. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11061176
Dorna H, Rosińska A, Szopińska D. The Effect of Acetic Acid Treatments on the Quality of Stored Carrot (Daucus carota L.) Seeds. Agronomy. 2021; 11(6):1176. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11061176
Chicago/Turabian StyleDorna, Hanna, Agnieszka Rosińska, and Dorota Szopińska. 2021. "The Effect of Acetic Acid Treatments on the Quality of Stored Carrot (Daucus carota L.) Seeds" Agronomy 11, no. 6: 1176. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11061176
APA StyleDorna, H., Rosińska, A., & Szopińska, D. (2021). The Effect of Acetic Acid Treatments on the Quality of Stored Carrot (Daucus carota L.) Seeds. Agronomy, 11(6), 1176. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11061176