Next Article in Journal
Validation of Propidium Monoazide-qPCR for Assessing Treatment Effectiveness against ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ in Citrus
Next Article in Special Issue
Use of Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Residues for Partial Peat Substitution in Growing Media for Sonchus oleraceus Production
Previous Article in Journal
Straw Management and Slurry Application Affect the Soil Microbial Community Composition and Its Activity
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Overview on Traditional vs. Green Technology of Extraction Methods for Producing High Quality Walnut Oil
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agronomy
Volume 12
Issue 11
10.3390/agronomy12112782
agronomy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effect of Sinapis alba Mustard Seed Meal Extract on Potato Tuber Quality in Organic Potato Production

by
Daniel Temmen
1,
John Randall
1 and
Inna Popova
1,2,*
1
Department of Soil & Water Systems, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA
2
Department of Soil Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2022, 12(11), 2782; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112782
Submission received: 18 October 2022 / Revised: 3 November 2022 / Accepted: 4 November 2022 / Published: 9 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integrated Management of Crop Residues and Their Bioactive Properties in Agri-Food Production)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Utilizing innovative agricultural practices that enhance the nutritional quality of staple foods such as potatoes provides farmers with tools to successfully meet the challenges of feeding a rising global population while sustaining organic food production. In the present study, we have demonstrated the potential of white mustard (Sinapis alba) seed meal extract to improve potato nutritional properties. Sinapis alba extract is a low-cost by-product of mustard oil extraction that contains a relatively high concentration of biologically active compounds. When applied to soil, S. alba extract had a positive impact on nutritional quality of potatoes. For example, total phenolic content in potatoes treated with S. alba extract increased by ~1.5 times, and potato nitrogen content increased from 1.52% to 1.73% with one application of S. alba extract. At the same time, application of S. alba extract had limited impact on the accumulation of anti-nutrients such as glycoalkaloids in potato tubers. The ability to boost the phenolics content of potatoes by applying an organic amendment is a valuable tool in organic farming as it creates more nutritional crop. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the effect of S. alba extract on the nutritional quality of potatoes, or indeed of any food crop.

1. Introduction

Potatoes represent the third largest carbohydrate food source in the world, and they contribute key nutrients, antioxidants, and fibers to human diet [1]. Organic potatoes account for approximately 4.2% of the total potato market [2]. While there is a strong public demand for organic produce, there are many challenges associated with organic potato production. For example, one of these challenges is assessing the nitrogen sources for meeting potato plant nutrient requirements [2].
Seed meal of Brassicaceae crops can contain up to 5% nitrogen and thus can serve as an organic source of nitrogen in agricultural production systems [3,4]. For example, seed meal of white mustard (Sinapis alba) is a low cost by-product of mustard oil extraction, that is both affordable and easily accessible [5,6]. Mustard seed meal can be further extracted to obtain a concentrated product that can serve as a soil amendment to fulfil nitrogen requirements and provide a benefit of improving soil health [7,8,9]. In addition, concentrated white mustard (Sinapis alba) seed meal extract contains consistently high concentrations of the biologically active compounds that can potentially improve crop nutritional properties [8,10,11,12]. While the antioxidant activity of mustard meal is attributed to phenolic compounds, such as sinapine and benzoic and cinnamic acid derivatives, little is known about the effect of mustard meal extract on potato nutritional value [13,14,15,16].
Thus, the objective of the presented study was to evaluate the effect of S. alba extract on (1) the nutritional quality of potatoes; (2) phenolic content in potato tubers; and (3) accumulation of anti-nutrients such as glycoalkaloids. To accomplish this, we conducted a trial in a certified organic farm to reflect the typical organic production practice. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report studying the effect of S. alba seed meal extract on nutritional quality of organic potatoes. In addition to human health benefits, using S. alba extract in organic potato production can improve product marketability due to the zero-waste technology used for S. alba extract production and by focusing on sustainability, recovery, and reuse, and multiple high-value products [17,18,19]. Mustard itself is also a great rotational and cover crop that can be used to improve soil health and reduce pest pressure, which makes mustard production an environmentally sustainable soil amendment option [20,21].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

Mustard seed meal extract (MSME) was prepared using the procedure described previously from Organic Materials Review Institute (OMRI) certified S. alba (IdaGold variety) seed meal (Farm Fuel Inc., Watsonville, CA, USA) [7]. Briefly, cold press mustard meal was extracted with water at room temperature. Mustard meal sludge was pressed through the decanter centrifuge to remove most of the debris. Clarified extract was filtered through 100 µm filter and freeze dried. Certified Organic Yukon Gold seed potatoes were purchased from New Sprout Farms (Asheville, NC, USA).

2.2. S. alba Mustard Meal Extract Phytotoxicity Assay

Potato toxicity assays were conducted in 5 Ga (506.7 cm2 surface area) pots that were filled with moist OMRI soil, and one seed potato was planted 5 inches deep in each pot. The pots were organized in a random block design with five replicates per treatment. Following treatments were used: S. alba extract applied (1) on the same day as planting, (2) 2 weeks after planting, (3) 4 weeks after planting, (4) or left untreated to act as a control. An application rate of 450 g/m2 of S. alba extract was used for each of the aforementioned experimental groups by sprinkling the S. alba extract powder evenly over the surface of the soil and watering to incorporate it. Pots were kept in a greenhouse with a 14.5-h day length and maintained at 26/16 °C maximum/minimum temperatures. Soil was maintained moist by watering every other day using a lightly sprinkling hose attachment. Each week, percent damage was recorded for the potato plants in each pot. Percent damage was expressed based on total aboveground biomass conditions with 0% = unaffected and healthy-looking plant and 100% = completely dead plant. Damage was assigned the following ranges based on a visual observation: 1–30% minor burning of leaves and stems, 30–60% significant damage, and 60–90% major damage with extended necrosis of leaves and stems. When the potatoes were ready for harvest, fresh mass of potato yield was measured for each pot and averaged for each experimental group. A cross section of each tuber was manually measured.

2.3. Field Trials

The potato field trials were conducted on Soil Stewards Organic farm (Moscow, ID, USA), a certified organic farm in Northern Idaho. Soil Stewards farm has silty clay loam Mollisolls from two soil series: Latahco (Argiaquic Xeric Argialbolls) and Thatune (Oxyaquic Argixerolls). Moscow, ID receives an average of 69 cm of rain and 124 cm of snow annually and has an annual average temperature of 8.3° (U.S. Climate Data, 2018). Twenty plots (90 × 60 cm2) were randomly assigned in one long row with a 30 × 60 cm2 buffer zone. Within each experimental plot, four seed potatoes were planted. The potato row was watered via drip irrigation at a rate of 2.5 cm/week. Three weeks after planting, S. alba extract (4.5 t ha−1) was applied once (1×), twice with a two-week interval (2×), or three times with a two-week interval (3×). Application was performed by top applying the dry S. alba extract on the surface of soil and irrigating afterwards. For the second and third application, when the shoots already appeared above the ground, S. alba extract was applied around the plant with 5–7 cm distance to avoid any potential plant damage. Untreated control received no S. alba extract.

2.4. Potato Chemical Analysis

Potato tubers were harvested, weighed to determine the yield, and visually evaluated for quality appearance. A cross section of each tuber was manually measured. Potato tubers were then freeze-dried. Dry tissues were pulverized using cyclone mill (UDY Corporation, Fort Collins, CO, USA) and kept at −20 °C until extraction and analysis. Standard plant analysis for macro and micronutrients was performed by Ward Laboratories, Inc., (Kearney, NE, USA). The total starch content of the potatoes was measured using a Megazyme® Total Starch Assay Kit. Corresponding antioxidant activity of potato extracts was assessed using a Folin-Ciocalteu assay [22].

2.5. Phenolics and Glycoalkaloids Analysis

Freeze-dried tuber tissues (1 g) were homogenized with 20 mL of methanol in Omni Prep homogenizer (Omni Int, Kennesaw, GA, USA) at 1500 rpm for 10 min. The suspension was centrifuged at 4000× g rpm and 18 °C for 10 min and supernatant was collected. The extraction was repeated two more times. All supernatants were combined, evaporated until dry using a rotary evaporator, and reconstituted in 1 mL of methanol. Phenolics and antinutrient contents were evaluated as described previously using HPLC/MS method describe below [23,24]. Analysis of glycoalkaloids and phenolics were performed using an Agilent 1200 Series HPLC coupled to an Agilent G6230 ESI TOF MS (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The chromatographic separation of glycoalkaloids was performed on an Extend-C18 3.5 µm, 2.1 × 100 mm (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) reversed phase chromatographic column. The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% formic acid in water (solvent A) and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (solvent B). The gradient program started with isocratic elution using 0% B for 1 min, followed by a linear gradient to 35% B from 2 to 11 min, followed by a linear gradient to 65% in 4 min, then organic solvent was increased to 100% B in 2 min, kept at 100% for 1 min, and re-equilibrated back to the initial mobile phase composition in 5 min. Column was maintained at 30 °C. The injection volume was 5 μL. The flow rate was 0.4 mL/min.
Electrospray ionization was operated in the positive and negative modes with absolute value for electrospray ionization potential at 3500 V. Collision-induced dissociation potential was set at 150 and 250 V to analyze spectra for molecular ion and fragmentation pattern, respectively. Gas temperature was 350 °C, drying gas (N2) flow rate was 10 l/min, and nebulizer pressure was 2.4 × 105 Pa. The analyses were conducted in a centroid mode within an m/z range from 100 to 1700 amu. Quantification of total glycoalkaloid concentration was done based on the external calibration curve constructed based on the pseudomolecular ion (Table 1). In the absences of analytical standards, glycoalkaloids were tentatively identified based on the literature data and in silico using open-source databases [24,25,26].

2.6. Data Analysis

Data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using JASP (University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands), a graphical open-source software package for basic statistical procedures [27]. Pairwise comparisons were performed using Student’s t-test to assess the treatment differences and means were considered significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Plant Damage

Plants that were treated with S. alba extract at the same day of planting (0 days) exhibited minimum degree of stress and recovered shortly after (Figure 1). Plants that were applied with S. alba extract 14 days after planting were the most susceptible for damage as reflected by leaf wilt and yellowing. For example, one week after S. alba extract application, 24% of plant leaf surface was affected and the affected area has increased to 62 % over the next seven days. Plants that were treated with S. alba extract 28 days after planting had significant damage with 35–54% of leaf area affected. While visible damage persisted for several days after S. alba extract application for potatoes treated 14 and 28 days after planting, plants did recover 14–21 days after.

3.2. Plant Nutrients

Potato tubers grown in S. alba extract applied plots were analyzed for essential nutrient content (Table 2). Potato starch content was not significantly affected by S. alba extract application and ranged from 52 to 58 g/100 g of potatoes on dry weight basis (Table 2). Similarly, no changes were observed for phosphorous content in potatoes treated with S. alba extract with the average phosphorous content of 0.26%. Potato nitrogen content increased from 1.52% to 1.73% with one application of S. alba extract. However, no changes were observed with the additional applications of S. alba extract. Potassium, another critical plant nutrient, increased from 2.27 to 2.37% in potatoes treated with S. alba extract with only 2× application being statistically higher than the control treatment. Sulfur content significantly increased in potato tubers after S. alba extract application. One application of S. alba extract increased the concentration of sulfur by 3%, with each subsequent application bringing an additional 3% increase. For calcium and magnesium, one S. alba extract application resulted in a 13% and 2% increase, respectively. Concentrations of trace minerals (zinc, iron, manganese, copper, boron, and molybdenum) were not significantly altered by the addition of S. alba extract to potato plots.

3.3. Potato Phenolics

Total phenolic content for control treatment with no S. alba extract application was 0.6 mg/g based on gallic acid equivalent (Table 2). After one application of S. alba extract, total phenolics content accounted for 1.6 mg/g. Each consequent application of S. alba extract resulted in the steady increase of phenolics content to 2.6 and 3.3 mg/g, respectively. Caffeic acid was identified as one of the major contributors to the overall phenolic content with the concentration increasing up to 1.6 times after S. alba extract application from 2.7 to 3.6–4.1 mg/g with no statistical difference between one, two, and three applications.

3.4. Potato Glycoalkaloids

Concentration of α-solanine, one of the major glycoalkaloids in potatoes, was 0.78–1.15 mg/g on dry weight basis when treated with S. alba extract with no statistical difference between one, two, and three applications. These values are not statistically different from α-solanine concentrations (0.80 mg/g) in potatoes from control plots. Concentrations of α-chaconine, another major glycoalkaloid, were 3.52–3.84 mg/g in potatoes treated with S. alba extract and 3.10 mg/g in potatoes not treated with S. alba extract. In addition to these two major glycoalkaloids, 15 other compounds assigned as glycoalkaloids were detected in all potato samples (Table 1). Due to the lack of analytical standards, exact concentrations of each compound in potatoes were not quantified. However, amounts of the glycoalkaloids were expressed on relative amount basis to reflect the changes in their distribution under different treatments (Figure 2). Out of 15 additional glycoalkaloids, only five glycoalkaloids (α-chaconine isomer, dehydrochaconine, solanidadienol, solanidenediol, and leptinine) were sensitive to S. alba extract treatment (Figure 2). For example, α-chaconine isomer amounts in S. alba extract treated potatoes were higher as compared to non-treated control. Dehydrochaconine content, on the other hand, did decrease with the increase of S. alba extract application. Similarly, the relative amounts of solanidadienol and leptinine II were lower after repeated application of S. alba extract.

4. Discussion

4.1. Plant Damage

Along with biologically active compounds, such as sinapine and sinapic acid, S. alba extract contains ionic thiocyanate, a compound that has been shown to exhibit toxicity toward a range of plants by inhibiting germination and stunting plant growth [28,29]. Ionic thiocyanate is freely soluble in water and can be taken up by plant roots. As a result, the extent of ionic thiocyanate’s effect on a plant is determined by the compound concentrations in soil and the ability of plant to uptake it from soil pore water. The timing of S. alba mustard extract application is one the factors that defines the ionic thiocyanate concentration in soils for plant uptake. For example, it was shown that two weeks after application, the concentration of ionic thiocyanate declines twofold in the top 5 cm of soil [30]. However, a corresponding increase is observed in deeper soil layer. Depending on the root system of the specific crop, the uptake of ionic thiocyanate will be highest when the migration of ionic thiocyanate within the soil profile coincides with the active root uptake zone. For potatoes, the depth of the rootzone depends on the seed planting depth, but generally falls in 10–25 cm [31]. This is consistent with the obtained results for potato that were applied with S. alba extract two weeks after planting and were the most susceptible for plant damage (Figure 1). At the same time, application of S. alba extract during the planting (0 days) inflicted minimum degree of stress on plants, presumably due to the misalignment between the ionic thiocyanate translocation in soils and the active uptake rootzone of potatoes. On the opposite side, delaying application of S. alba extract to four weeks after planting did inflict significant damage to plants. However, the timing of damage coincided with the potato senescence and tuber bulking, and it could not be differentiated purely from the observation. While visible damage persisted for several days after S. alba extract application for plants treated two and four weeks after planting, plants did recover 14–21 days after. However, the plant stress induced did result in significantly lower potato yields (Supplemental Material Table S1). For example, the yields for potatoes treated with S. alba extract at the same day as planting and four weeks after planting were 3.6 times lower than non-treated pots. While the number of potato tubers was not significantly different among the treatments, the size of potatoes treated with S. alba extract was 2.5–3 times lower compared to the control. Thus, based on the greenhouse data, the field application of S. alba two weeks after planting minimizes the effects of ionic thiocyanate on potato plants (Figure 1). However, the plant yields were still significantly affected by multiple S. alba extract applications with both the number and average size of potatoes being lower than for non-treated control. Previously, it was also reported that the use of mustard in potato did not improve total tuber yields or marketable yields [32].

4.2. Plant Nutrients

Several plant nutrients were monitored in potatoes treated with S. alba extract (Table 2). While starch content of potatoes was not affected, application of S. alba extract to soil resulted in the increase of minerals such as nitrogen, potassium, sulfur, and calcium contents in potatoes (Table 2). Nitrogen content was not significantly different when the application of S. alba was increased from one application to two or three applications during the growing season. While S. alba has relatively high nitrogen content (2.1% by weight), the uptake of nitrogen from soil is limited to the plant available form of nitrogen. Thus, while the absolute nitrogen concentrations were higher with the repeated application rates, they were not proportional to the increase in the nitrogen input through S. alba application. Phosphorous concentrations in tubers were not affected by the application of S. alba extract. While both organic and inorganic phosphorous in soil increased significantly after S. alba application, the translocation of phosphorous into tubers was not observed [9].
While the concentrations of potassium in potato tubers were increased up to 25% after S. alba extract application, the increase was not significantly different among three application rates suggesting the that the plant uptake is limited by factors other than the plant available potassium content. In general, potatoes contain more potassium than other commonly consumed vegetables [33]. However, potassium shortages are associated with low protein content in potato tubers [34,35]. Thus, S. alba extract has potential to serve as an organic fertilizer to not only boost potassium content in potato tuber, but also positively affect other nutritional properties.
S. alba extract is sulfur rich due to the presence of sulfur-containing glucosinolates, that can be converted by enzyme myrosinase to inorganic sulfate, that, in turn, can be uptaken by plants. The potential of S. alba extract to increase sulfur content in potato tubers is advantageous as sulfur represents an essential dietary component for human diet and plays an important role in disease prevention [36]. In addition to the increased sulfur content of potato tubers, sulfur fertilization provides the benefit of improved micronutrients uptake, infection reduction in potato plants, and minimizing defects in potato tubers [37,38,39].
Based on the results from this study, S. alba extract can also act as an additional booster of calcium and magnesium in potato tubers (Table 2). The adequate calcium content in food, especially in gluten-free foods such as potatoes, is important for maintaining healthy bones and muscular systems [40].

4.3. Potato Phenolics

Total phenolic content in potatoes is generally one of the highest among other staple vegetables like carrots and onions [41]. The application of S. alba extract had a positive effect on the overall phenolics content in potatoes (Table 2). However, the total phenolic content value in potatoes from this trial was relatively low as compared to previously reported values [42,43]. While the lower value could be due to the specific variety used, it could also be due to the atypically dry growing season. Nevertheless, the application of S. alba extract resulted in more than a two-fold increase in total phenolic content of tubers. Every additional application of S. alba extract increased the phenolic content by ~1.5 times (Table 2). Phenolic compounds in potatoes are mostly represented by substituted hydroxycinnamic and hydroxybenzoic acids such as caffeic acid [44,45]. Caffeic acid represented the major phenolic compound in analyzed potatoes that increased after S. alba extract treatment, indicating the potential for boosting it in potatoes by using soil organic amendments. Caffeic acid has been shown to exhibit antioxidant and anticarcinogenic activity and its increase in potatoes is beneficial for human health [46].

4.4. Potato Glycoalkaloids

In addition to monitoring phenolics, potato glycoalkaloid content in potato tubers was measured. Glycoalkaloids are considered antinutrients as they are toxic to human and are generally undesirable [42,47]. At the same time, it has been shown that low concentrations of glycoalkaloid can exhibit anticancer activity [48]. The concentration of α-solanine, one of the major glycoalkaloids in potatoes, was not significantly different in the potatoes treated with S. alba extract compared to the control untreated potatoes. At the same time, concentrations of α-chaconine, another major glycoalkaloid, were statistically higher in potatoes after S. alba extract treatment but were not different for the three S. alba extract application rates. Still, the concentrations of α-chaconine were far below the established health-based maximum levels for human consumption [49]. The observed changes in other glycoalkaloids indicate that changes induced by S. alba extract are glycoalkaloid chemistry dependent.

5. Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the effect of S. alba extract on the nutritional quality of potatoes, or indeed of any food crop. S. alba extract is an organic amendment that has the benefit of boosting soil health and can potentially be beneficial for improving potato quality. Specifically, we have demonstrated that out of all measured nutritional properties, phenolic content of potatoes was the most impacted by the addition of S. alba extract. The ability to increase the phenolics content of potatoes by applying an organic amendment is a valuable tool in organic farming as it creates a more nutrient-dense product. At the same time, more research needs to be done to evaluate the overall applicability of S. alba extract in organic management practices to assure the productivity and sustainability of the system, especially regarding the yield reduction associated with the application of S. alba extract.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agronomy12112782/s1, Table S1: Potato plants above ground biomass and tuber yields after S. alba extract treatment for greenhouse and field trials. Data are average for six individual plants (greenhouse study) or five plots (field study). Values within the same set followed by a common letter are not significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.P.; data curation, I.P.; formal analysis, I.P. and D.T.; funding acquisition, I.P.; investigation, D.T. and J.R.; methodology—D.T.; visualization, D.T.; writing—original draft, D.T.; writing—review & editing, D.T., J.R. and I.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by This project was supported by the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative competitive grant 2021-67021-34414 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture and Organic Farming Research Foundation grant.

Data Availability Statement

Data available upon request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Emma Welch for help with potato analysis and Alison Detjens for help with field trials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Beals, K.A. Potatoes, Nutrition and Health. Am. J. Potato Res. 2019, 96, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Moore, A.; Olsen, N.; Satterwhite, M.; Frazier, M. Organic Potato Production in Idaho: Nutrient Management and Variety Selection; University of Idaho Extension: Moscow, ID, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gale, E.S.; Sullivan, D.M.; Cogger, C.G.; Bary, A.I.; Hemphill, D.D.; Myhre, E.A. Estimating Plant-Available Nitrogen Release from Manures, Composts, and Specialty Products. J. Environ. Qual. 2006, 35, 2321–2332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Snyder, A.; Morra, M.J.; Johnson-Maynard, J.; Thill, D.C. Seed Meals from Brassicaceae Oilseed Crops as Soil Amendments: Influence on Carrot Growth, Microbial Biomass Nitrogen, and Nitrogen Mineralization. HortScience 2009, 44, 354–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Ahmad, M.; Sadia, H.; Zafar, M.; Sultana, S.; Khan, M.A.; Khan, Z. The Production and Quality Assessment of Mustard Oil Biodiesel: A Cultivated Potential Oil Seed Crop. Energy Sources Part A Recover. Util. Environ. Eff. 2012, 34, 1480–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Valdes, Y.; Viaene, N.; Moens, M. Effects of Yellow Mustard Amendments on the Soil Nematode Community in a Potato Field with Focus on Globodera Rostochiensis. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2012, 59, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Morra, M.J.; Popova, I.E.; Dubie, J. Method for Using Mustard Meal or an Extract Thereof; U.S. Patent and Trademark Office: Washington, DC, USA, 2020.
  8. Morra, M.J.; Popova, I.E.; Boydston, R.A. Bioherbicidal Activity of Sinapis alba Seed Meal Extracts. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 115, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Temmen, D.; Randall, J.; Popova, I. Utilization of Mustard Seed Meal Extract for Improving Soil Health in a Small-Scale Organic Potato Cropping System. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Popova, I.E.; Morra, M.J. Simultaneous Quantification of Sinigrin, Sinalbin, and Anionic Glucosinolate Hydrolysis Products in Brassica juncea and Sinapis alba Seed Extracts Using Ion Chromatography. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 10687–10693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Popova, I.E.; Dubie, J.S.; Morra, M.J. Optimization of Hydrolysis Conditions for Release of Biopesticides from Glucosinolates in Brassica juncea and Sinapis alba Seed Meal Extracts. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 97, 354–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Popova, I.E.; Morra, M.J. Sinigrin and Sinalbin Quantification in Mustard Seed Using High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2014, 35, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dubie, J.; Stancik, A.; Morra, M.; Nindo, C. Antioxidant Extraction from Mustard (Brassica juncea) Seed Meal Using High-Intensity Ultrasound. J. Food Sci. 2013, 78, E542–E548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kozlowska, H.; Rotkiewicz, D.A.; Zadernowski, R. Phenolic Acids in Rapeseed and Mustard. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1983, 60, 1119–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Szydłowska-Czerniak, A. Rapeseed and Its Products—Sources of Bioactive Compounds: A Review of Their Characteristics and Analysis. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2013, 53, 307–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Terpinc, P.; Čeh, B.; Ulrih, N.P.; Abramovič, H. Studies of the Correlation between Antioxidant Properties and the Total Phenolic Content of Different Oil Cake Extracts. Ind. Crops Prod. 2012, 39, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dandurand, L.-M.; Morra, M.J.; Zasada, I.A.; Phillips, W.S.; Popova, I.; Harder, C. Control of Globodera Spp. Using Brassica juncea Seed Meal and Seed Meal Extract. J. Nematol. 2017, 49, 437–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Popova, I.E.; Morra, M.J. Sinapis alba Seed Meal as a Feedstock for Extracting the Natural Tyrosinase Inhibitor 4-Hydroxybenzyl Alcohol. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 124, 505–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Golmohamadi, A.; Morra, M.J.; Popova, I.; Nindo, C.I. Optimizing the Use of Sinapis alba Seed Meal Extracts as a Source of Thiocyanate (SCN-) for the Lactoperoxidase System. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 72, 416–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Brennan, E.B.; Smith, R.F. Mustard Cover Crop Growth and Weed Suppression in Organic, Strawberry Furrows in California. HortScience 2018, 53, 432–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Björkman, T.; Lowry, C.; Shail, J.W.; Brainard, D.C.; Anderson, D.S.; Masiunas, J.B. Mustard Cover Crops for Biomass Production and Weed Suppression in the Great Lakes Region. Agron. J. 2015, 107, 1235–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Albishi, T.; John, J.A.; Al-Khalifa, A.S.; Shahidi, F. Phenolic Content and Antioxidant Activities of Selected Potato Varieties and Their Processing By-Products. J. Funct. Foods 2013, 5, 590–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Navarre, D.A.; Pillai, S.S.; Shakya, R.; Holden, M.J. HPLC Profiling of Phenolics in Diverse Potato Genotypes. Food Chem. 2011, 127, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shakya, R.; Navarre, D.A. LC-MS Analysis of Solanidane Glycoalkaloid Diversity among Tubers of Four Wild Potato Species and Three Cultivars (Solanum tuberosum). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 6949–6958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Tsugawa, H.; Cajka, T.; Kind, T.; Ma, Y.; Higgins, B.; Ikeda, K.; Kanazawa, M.; VanderGheynst, J.; Fiehn, O.; Arita, M. MS-DIAL: Data-Independent MS/MS Deconvolution for Comprehensive Metabolome Analysis. Nat. Methods 2015, 12, 523–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Popova, I.; Sell, B.; Pillai, S.; Kuhl, J.; Dandurand, L.-M. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Glycoalkaloids from Underexploited Solanum Species and Their Acetylcholinesterase Inhibition Activity. Plants 2022, 11, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Love, J.; Selker, R.; Marsman, M.; Jamil, T.; Dropmann, D.; Verhagen, J.; Ly, A.; Gronau, Q.F.; Šmíra, M.; Epskamp, S.; et al. JASP: Graphical Statistical Software for Common Statistical Designs. J. Stat. Softw. 2019, 88, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Ju, H.-Y.; Bible, B.B.; Chong, C. Influence of Ionic Thiocyanate on Growth of Cabbage, Bean, and Tobacco. J. Chem. Ecol. 1983, 9, 1255–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Stiehl, B.; Bible, B.B. Reaction of Crop Species to Thiocyanate Ion Toxicity. HortScience 1989, 24, 99–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hansson, D.; Morra, M.J.; Borek, V.; Snyder, A.J.; Johnson-Maynard, J.L.; Thill, D.C. Ionic Thiocyanate (SCN−) Production, Fate, and Phytotoxicity in Soil Amended with Brassicaceae Seed Meals. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 3912–3917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pavek, M.J.; Thornton, R.E. Planting Depth Influences Potato Plant Morphology and Economic Value. Am. J. Potato Res. 2009, 86, 56–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Essah, S.Y.C.; Delgado, J.A.; Sparks, R.; Dillon, M. Cover Crops Can Improve Potato Tuber Yield and Quality. HortTechnology 2012, 22, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Storey, M.L.; Anderson, P.A. Contributions of White Vegetables to Nutrient Intake: NHANES 2009-2010. Adv. Nutr. 2013, 4, 335S–344S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. AbdelGadir, A.H.; Errebhi, M.A.; Al-Sarhan, H.M.; Ibrahim, M. The Effect of Different Levels of Additional Potassium on Yield and Industrial Qualities of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in an Irrigated Arid Region. Am. J. Potato Res. 2003, 80, 219–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Xia, G.; Guo, Z. Effect of Yield Increasing and Quality Promoting of High Starch Potato by Increasing of Potassium Fertilizer Applying in Different Growth Stages. J. Fujian Agric. For. Univ. 2008, 37, 449–452. [Google Scholar]
  36. Hill, C.R.; Shafaei, A.; Balmer, L.; Lewis, J.R.; Hodgson, J.M.; Millar, A.H.; Blekkenhorst, L.C. Sulfur Compounds: From Plants to Humans and Their Role in Chronic Disease Prevention. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Klikocka, H.; Haneklaus, S.; Bloem, E.; Schnug, E. Influence of Sulfur Fertilization on Infection of Potato Tubers with Rhizoctonia Solani and Streptomyces Scabies. J. Plant Nutr. 2005, 28, 819–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pavlista, A.D. Early-Season Applications of Sulfur Fertilizers Increase Potato Yield and Reduce Tuber Defects. Agron. J. 2005, 97, 599–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Klikocka, H. The Effect of Sulphur Kind and Dose on Content and Uptake of Micro-Nutrients by Potato Tubers (Solanum tubersosum L.). Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 2011, 10, 137–151. [Google Scholar]
  40. Shepherd, S.J.; Gibson, P.R. Nutritional Inadequacies of the Gluten-Free Diet in Both Recently-Diagnosed and Long-Term Patients with Coeliac Disease. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2013, 26, 349–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chun, O.K.; Kim, D.-O.; Smith, N.; Schroeder, D.; Han, J.T.; Lee, C.Y. Daily Consumption of Phenolics and Total Antioxidant Capacity from Fruit and Vegetables in the American Diet. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2005, 85, 1715–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mäder, J.; Rawel, H.; Kroh, L.W. Composition of Phenolic Compounds and Glycoalkaloids α-Solanine and α-Chaconine during Commercial Potato Processing. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 6292–6297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Friedman, M.; Kozukue, N.; Kim, H.-J.; Choi, S.-H.; Mizuno, M. Glycoalkaloid, Phenolic, and Flavonoid Content and Antioxidative Activities of Conventional Nonorganic and Organic Potato Peel Powders from Commercial Gold, Red, and Russet Potatoes. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2017, 62, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Shahidi, F.; Naczk, M. Food Phenolics; Technomic Pub. Co.: Lancaster, PA, USA, 1995; ISBN 1566762790. [Google Scholar]
  45. Akyol, H.; Riciputi, Y.; Capanoglu, E.; Caboni, M.F.; Verardo, V. Phenolic Compounds in the Potato and Its Byproducts: An Overview. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Espíndola, K.M.M.; Ferreira, R.G.; Narvaez, L.E.M.; Silva Rosario, A.C.R.; da Silva, A.H.M.; Silva, A.G.B.; Vieira, A.P.O.; Monteiro, M.C. Chemical and Pharmacological Aspects of Caffeic Acid and Its Activity in Hepatocarcinoma. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Friedman, M. Potato Glycoalkaloids and Metabolites:  Roles in the Plant and in the Diet. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 8655–8681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Friedman, M. Chemistry and Anticarcinogenic Mechanisms of Glycoalkaloids Produced by Eggplants, Potatoes, and Tomatoes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 3323–3337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM); Schrenk, D.; Bignami, M.; Bodin, L.; Chipman, J.K.; del Mazo, J.; Hogstrand, C.; Hoogenboom, L.; Leblanc, J.-C.; Nebbia, C.S.; et al. Risk Assessment of Glycoalkaloids in Feed and Food, in Particular in Potatoes and Potato-Derived Products. EFSA J. 2020, 18, e06222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Agronomy 12 02782 g001 550
Figure 1. Damage in potatoes treated with S. alba extract at the time planting (0 days), 14 and 28 days after planting. Plant damage was calculated as a percentage of discoloured leaf area relative to the total area.
Figure 1. Damage in potatoes treated with S. alba extract at the time planting (0 days), 14 and 28 days after planting. Plant damage was calculated as a percentage of discoloured leaf area relative to the total area.
Agronomy 12 02782 g001
Agronomy 12 02782 g002 550
Figure 2. Amounts of six glycoalkaloids that were sensitive to S. alba extract treatment. Values ± standard errors are the average of five replicates. Values within the same series followed by a common letter are not significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 2. Amounts of six glycoalkaloids that were sensitive to S. alba extract treatment. Values ± standard errors are the average of five replicates. Values within the same series followed by a common letter are not significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).
Agronomy 12 02782 g002
Table
Table 1. Glycoalkaloids identified in potato samples using analytical standards (α-chaconine and α-solanine) and literature and in silico search.
Table 1. Glycoalkaloids identified in potato samples using analytical standards (α-chaconine and α-solanine) and literature and in silico search.
Retention Time, minGlycoalkaloidPseudomolecular Ion
12.709Solanidatetraenol isomer862.446
12.865Solanidadienol866.525
12.980α-Chaconine isomer852.509
13.047Solanidenol884.487
13.059Dehydrochaconine isomer850.485
13.200Solanidatetraenol862.446
13.320Solanidenediol884.487
13.470Solanidatetraenol isomer862.446
13.592Solanidene1030.557
13.820Dehydrochaconine isomer850.485
13.854Solanidenetriol916.480
13.865Solanidadienol isomer866.525
13.899α-Solanine868.501
14.128α-Chaconine852.509
14.763Solanidadienol isomer866.525
14.790Leptinine II884.487
15.616Leptine II926.503
Table
Table 2. Selected nutritional qualities of potatoes treated with one, two, and three repeated application of S. alba extract under field conditions. Values ± standard errors are the average of five replicates. Values within the same row followed by a common letter are not significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 2. Selected nutritional qualities of potatoes treated with one, two, and three repeated application of S. alba extract under field conditions. Values ± standard errors are the average of five replicates. Values within the same row followed by a common letter are not significantly different (p ≤ 0.05).
ControlS. alba Extract
1×2×3×
Starch, g/100 g52.0 ± 4.7 a53.6 ± 3.1 a52.2 ± 5.0 a57.1 ± 1.8 a
Essential nutrients, %
Nitrogen1.52 ± 0.16 bc1.73 ± 0.15 a1.69 ± 0.10 ab1.73 ± 0.14 a
Phosphorous0.34 ± 0.04 a0.38 ± 0.03 a0.38 ± 0.02 a0.36 ± 0.05 a
Potassium2.27 ± 0.15 ab2.29 ± 0.10 ab2.37 ± 0.13 a2.34 ± 0.22 ab
Sulfur0.128 ± 0.010 bc0.132 ± 0.007 abc0.138 ± 0.007 ab0.143 ± 0.012 a
Calcium0.099 ± 0.020 b0.112 ± 0.017 ab0.112 ± 0.005 ab0.124 ± 0.018 a
Magnesium0.136 ± 0.011 a0.138 ± 0.008 a0.143 ± 0.003 a0.144 ± 0.009 a
Trace mineral, ppm
Zinc20.9 ± 3.0 a21.0 ± 1.2 a22.4 ± 1.8 a24.0 ± 5.7 a
Iron271 ± 122 a231 ± 93 a319 ± 106 a239 ± 135 a
Manganese10.8 ± 1.6 a10.0 ± 1.4 a11.8 ± 1.6 a11.8 ± 2.9 a
Copper8.8 ± 0.9 a8.4 ± 0.4 a8.5 ± 0.8 a8.5 ± 0.9 a
Boron7.7 ± 0.6 a7.2 ± 0.3 a7.2 ± 0.5 a7.2 ± 0.4 a
Molybdenum0.57 ± 0.20 ab0.67 ± 0.12 a0.54 ± 0.09 ab0.43 ± 0.16 b
Phenolics content, mg/g
Total phenolics0.6 ± 0.1 c1.6 ± 0.3 bc2.6 ± 0.8 ab3.3 ± 0.9 ab
Caffeic acid2.7 ± 0.4 a4.1 ± 0.7 a4.1 ± 0.5 a3.6 ± 2.0 a
Antinutrients conc., mg/g
α-Solanine0.80 ± 0.02 a1.15 ± 0.13 a0.78 ± 0.44 a1.06 ± 0.43 a
α-Chaconine 3.10 ± 0.46 a3.52 ± 0.25 a3.67 ± 0.26 a3.84 ± 0.49 a
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Temmen, D.; Randall, J.; Popova, I. The Effect of Sinapis alba Mustard Seed Meal Extract on Potato Tuber Quality in Organic Potato Production. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2782. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112782

AMA Style

Temmen D, Randall J, Popova I. The Effect of Sinapis alba Mustard Seed Meal Extract on Potato Tuber Quality in Organic Potato Production. Agronomy. 2022; 12(11):2782. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112782

Chicago/Turabian Style

Temmen, Daniel, John Randall, and Inna Popova. 2022. "The Effect of Sinapis alba Mustard Seed Meal Extract on Potato Tuber Quality in Organic Potato Production" Agronomy 12, no. 11: 2782. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112782

APA Style

Temmen, D., Randall, J., & Popova, I. (2022). The Effect of Sinapis alba Mustard Seed Meal Extract on Potato Tuber Quality in Organic Potato Production. Agronomy, 12(11), 2782. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112782

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop