Next Article in Journal
Yields of Buckwheat and Alfalfa in an Intercropping System Inoculated with Dark Septate Endophytes in a Coal Mining Subsidence Dryland Area
Next Article in Special Issue
Aboveground Biomass in China’s Managed Grasslands and Their Responses to Environmental and Management Variations
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Biochar on the Microenvironment of Saline-Sodic Soil and Maize Growth
Previous Article in Special Issue
Applying Trait-Based Modeling to Achieve Functional Targets during the Ecological Restoration of an Arid Mine Area
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sandy Habitats Play an Important Role in Shrub Encroachment in Grasslands

1
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Animal and Plant Resistance, College of Life Sciences, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China
2
College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2022, 12(11), 2858; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112858
Submission received: 16 October 2022 / Revised: 12 November 2022 / Accepted: 14 November 2022 / Published: 16 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Grassland and Pasture Ecological Management and Utilization)

Abstract

:
Shrub species have increased in density and cover in desertification areas, however, the role of sandy habitats in contributing to the expansion of shrubs is poorly understood. Although the effect of sandy habitats on plant growth and reproduction have been demonstrated, most existing studies lack either experimental demonstration or an integrated study during the whole shrub life cycle. We performed field and laboratory experiments to examine the responses of four stages in the life cycle of shrubs (seed germination, plant growth, seed reproduction, clonal reproduction) to sandy habitats (including sand substrate, sand burial and wind erosion) for Caragana shrubs. Results showed that both sand substrate and sand burial facilitated seed germination, seedling biomass, sapling establishment, plant growth, and root-shoot ratio of Caragana. Meanwhile, they both strongly increased seed number and seed preservation, and thus enhanced sexual reproduction. Sand burial favored clonal reproduction of Caragana by promoting the formation of branch-derived ramets, while wind erosion benefited clonal reproduction by facilitating the formation of root-derived ramets. These results suggested that sandy habitats facilitated seed germination, plant growth, sexual reproduction, and clonal reproduction of Caragana, which could explain why shrub abundance, shrub area and shrub height of Caragana in sandy areas was higher than in grasslands. Our study provided an experimental demonstration that sandy habitats promoted the population growth of Caragana shrubs during the whole life cycle and highlighted the significant role of sandy habitats in facilitating shrub encroachment in grasslands.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Desertification, resulting from climatic changes (such as elevated levels of CO2 and parallel increase in temperature) and human activities (such as overgrazing), is considered as one of the most critical ecological and environmental issues in grasslands worldwide [1,2]. Arid and semi-arid regions of northern China, characterized by low precipitation, loose soil structure and frequent strong winds, are especially vulnerable to desertification. The local herbaceous species are easily degraded under certain extreme conditions (e.g., drought, burial and erosion). However, such harsh sandy conditions favored the growth of the woody plants, most of which are psammophytes shrubs, due to their high windbreak and sand-fixation capacities [3]. Therefore, a large and rapidly increasing number of shrub plants encroach into grasslands, resulting in thicket grasslands with shrub patches [4,5]. A large number of studies have focused on the causes and consequences of shrub encroachment into grasslands [2], and some attention has also been paid to how shrubs adapt to the harsh conditions [6,7]. However, the contribution of sandy habitats in the process of shrub encroachment is poorly understood.
The relative proportions of sand, silt and clay particles, also known as soil texture, has a major role in influencing plants’ growth [8]. Usually, a sandy soil substrate is specialized by a lower nutrient content and water retention capacity, but have a large overall volume of pore spaces and high permeability. Therefore, plants growing in sandy soil will allow their roots to extend more easily [9] and increase seed germination [10], but will reduce the cover and biomass of both shrubs and herbaceous species [11], and constrain the distribution of plants species [12]. Additionally, soils with high sand content would alter the relationship between mycorrhizal fungi and plants, thereby influencing plant biomass production in grasslands [13].
Sand burial and wind erosion are strong stresses for plants in sandy habitats. Previous studies have reported that sand burial or wind erosion affected the critical stages of plant life cycle. For example, sand burial affected seed germination [7,14,15,16,17], plant growth [18,19,20], clonal reproduction [21,22,23], and sexual reproduction [24], thus influencing community cover in sandy habitats [25]. Wind erosion also influenced seedling survival, plant growth [26,27], ramet numbers, survival rate and biomass [6,22,28], thereby influencing total community cover and ecosystem productivity [29].
Thus far, some studies have examined the effects of sandy habitats on plant growth and reproduction based on field observations [11,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. However, such effects have never been examined by factor control experiments (except for seed germination) with psammophyte shrubs that commonly colonize and stabilize sandy land habitats. Moreover, studies assessing the effects of sandy habitats on shrub encroachment at population level, during the whole life cycle, are scarce.
Here, we conducted field and laboratory experiments to examine the response of four stages in the life cycle: seed germination, plant growth (plant height, plant biomass and root -shoot ratio), seed reproduction (reproduction effort and seed preservation), and clonal reproduction, in sandy habitats (including sand substrate, sand burial and wind erosion) for Caragana shrubs, which are the pioneer plants occurring naturally in the harsh, sandy conditions with frequent sand burial and wind erosion. It is the common observation that Caragana encroached into grassland in Inner Mongolia [4,5]. Previous studies have suggested that the causes of Caragana encroachment into grassland might be a result of their tolerance to drought and grazing [4,5]. However, limited empirical evidence exists on the role of sandy habitats in this ecological process. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine the effects of sandy habitats on population growth of shrubs from the whole life cycle perspective, using Caragana as the model shrub, and to evaluate the role of sandy habitats in the process of shrub encroachment.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Species and Study Site

Caragana (Fabaceae) are xeromorphic, winter-deciduous shrubs with a high capability of trapping sand. They are widely distributed in sandy lands or in grasslands with high sand content. Therefore, Caragana shrubs are an ideal model for studying the value of sand context to the population growth of shrubs. There are 16 Caragana species distributed in the Inner Mongolia Steppe; C. stenophylla Pojark is one of the most important species due to its widespread distribution, forage value, and other ecological functions in the region [30]. C. stenophylla realizes population recruitment by both sexual and clonal reproduction. The clonal reproduction of C. stenophylla includes branch-derived and root-derived clonal reproduction. The branch-derived clonal reproduction produces adventitious roots from branches, forming new ramets. The root-derived clonal reproduction produces horizontal roots (spacers) from taproots of the mother plant or adult ramets; at the end or the middle of the horizontal roots, vertical roots grow deeper, and adventitious buds grow towards the soil surface, forming new ramets [31,32].
The Alxa region (37°24′~42°47′ N, 97°10′~106°52′ E; altitude ~1550 m; area ~270,000 km2) in Inner Mongolia, China, is a hyper-arid area. The whole Alxa region is enclosed by the Helan Mountains to the east, the Qilian Mountains to the south, and the north-eastern part of the Tibetan Plateau to the south-west. The region has three deserts: the Tengger (Tengri) Desert in the south, the Badain Jaran (Baden Dzareng or Batan Tsalang) in the west, and the Ulan Buh (Wulanbuhe) in the northeast. We conducted the field study in the Alashan Left Banner, which is located in the northeast of the Tengger Desert (38°19′ N, 105°41′ E). In the study area, the mean annual precipitation is 110 mm; the mean annual temperature is 7.8 °C; the mean annual total sunshine time is 3200 h, with a mean daily solar radiation intensity of 1.71 kJ cm−2 d−1. Driven by wind, sand burial with little vegetation cover (<20%) is dominated by xerophytic shrubs, such as the Caragana shrub species, accounting for ~60% of the total plant biomass.

2.2. Caragana Population Survey in Grassland and Sandy Land

In July 2019, we conducted a Caragana survey in two distinct microhabitats (sandy land and grassland). Here, we define “sandy land” as land covered by a sandy soil, with a vegetation cover of less than 5%, which includes areas of sandy desert [33]. Three plots were established on each of the two microhabitats. Each plot contained a 50 m × 50 m quadrat. For each quadrat, we first recorded the number of C. stenophylla shrubs in order to assess the shrub abundance (shrub/hectare). Then, we chose 10 shrubs at random, measured the length of the long axis and short axis of the shrub crown, the shrub height and nabkha height for each selected shrub, and calculated the shrub area (shrub area = π × semi-long axis × semi-short axis). Meanwhile, at the seed maturation stage, we cut three branches from each shrub, counted the number of seeds on branches, and calculated the reproductive effort (number of seeds/dry biomass (g)) after drying the branches at 60 °C for 72 h. Reproductive effort is traditionally defined as the proportion of total biomass allocation to seeds and other “obvious” reproductive structures [34].

2.3. Seed Preservation Experiment for Sand Burial Treatments

To assess the effect of sand burial on the preservation of the seeds, in July 2021, we performed seed preservation experiments in the three sandy land plots. In each plot, we established ten 50 cm × 50 cm quadrates, which were randomly assigned to two treatments: five quadrates for no sand burial treatment (seeds was totally exposed to the air, referred to “ground surface preservation” hereafter) and the other five quadrates for sand burial treatment (seeds was burial with 1 cm sandy soil, referred to “sand burial preservation” hereafter). We scattered 100 seeds, evenly, in each quadrate. We recorded the number of remaining seeds in each quadrate after 15 days.

2.4. Seed Germination Experiment for Burial Treatments

Washed, moist sand was placed in pots (10 cm deep × 20 cm diameter) with drainage holes on the bottom, to a depth of 3 cm; 100 Caragana seeds were placed in each of the pots and then assigned in the following treatments: buried by sand of 2 cm, 3 cm or 5 cm deep, or not buried (seeds lying on the sand surface). There were 5 replicates for each treatment. We conducted the germination trials in an incubator with 12 h light and dark cycles, and with temperature of 25 °C under light condition/15 °C under dark condition. Tap water was applied to keep the soil moist during the seed germination period. We recorded the number of seed germination after 30 days. All the seedlings were weighted after being oven-dried at 60 °C for 72 h. For the ungerminated seeds, we used 1% TTC stain to evaluate their vigor. If seeds showed viability but did not germinate, they were considered dormant seeds. If seeds showed no viability, they were considered dead seeds. We then calculated the seed germination rate and seed mortality rate.

2.5. Planting Experiment with Grassland Soil and Sandy Land Soil

Soils for this experiment were collected from the natural grassland (the soil is typical grey-brown desert soil, referred to hereafter as “grassland soil”) and the sandy land (referred to hereafter as “sandy soil”) in the field. After collection, soil was immediately sieved through a 5 mm mesh to remove stones and roots, thoroughly mixed, and brought back to the laboratory. A total of 15 plastic pots (17 cm diameter ×18 cm height) were used and divided into two treatments. Of these, 5 pots were randomly selected for the grassland soil treatment (G), and the remaining 10 pots were used for the sandy soil treatment (S). Each pot was filled with 3.5 kg of field soil and immediately watered with 100 mL Hoagland’s solution; 50 Caragana seeds were sowed per pot at 2 cm burial depth. All pots were randomly kept in a greenhouse with a temperature regime of ~22 °C during daytime and ~18 °C during night and were watered regularly to keep the soil moist during the experiment. Forty-five days after sowing, we first calculated the sapling establishment rate (the number of saplings formed by 100 seeds). Then, we kept eight vigorous saplings in each pot and the others were removed. Five pots of S treatment were randomly selected for experimental sand burial treatment (SB) by artificially adding sand. Sand was added to each pot in the following 60 days with a total burial depth of 2 cm. The plant height, above and below ground biomass was measured 120 days after sowing, and the root-shoot ratio was calculated.

2.6. Probability of Branches Forming Adventitious Roots under Buried or Not Buried Conditions

In August 2019, we selected 10 Caragana shrubs in each of the three plots in sandy land. For each selected shrub, we marked four branches, of which two branches were buried in sand from the base up to 2/3 of their heights, the other two was completely exposed to the air. In August 2020, we counted the number of branches forming adventitious roots, and calculated their percentage.

2.7. The Number of Adventitious Buds on Horizontal Roots under Wind Eroded and Non-Wind Eroded Conditions

In August 2019, we selected five Caragana shrubs in each of the three plots in sandy land. For each selected shrub, we first carefully removed the sand dune and dug, 20 cm down from the surface, to expose the horizontal roots. Then, we chose two horizontal roots, one of which was buried in sand, and the other one was exposed to the air, with an exposure length of 100~120 cm. These selected roots were marked. In August 2020, we counted the number of adventitious buds on each horizontal root buried in sand and exposed to the air, respectively.

2.8. Statistical Analyses

We performed one-way ANOVA to examine the differences in seed germination rate, seed death rate and seedling biomass among burial depth treatments. If ANOVA showed significant differences, post hoc tests (Tukey HSD) were performed to compare these indices among the burial depth treatments. We performed t-tests to examine the differences in reproduction effort between grassland and sandy land, the differences in seed preservation between sand burial and ground surface, the differences in sapling establish rate and plant growth between grassland soil and sandy land soil, the differences in plant growth between sandy land soil and sandy land soil + sand burial, the differences in percentage of branches forming adventitious roots between sand burial and control, the differences in ramet number on horizontal roots between wind erosion and control, and the differences in shrub abundance between grassland and sandy land. We performed analyses, using GLMMs, with sampling shrubs within plot and plots within landscape (grassland and sandy land) as random variables (sampling shrubs were nested in plot; plots were nested in landscape) in order to examine the differences in shrub height, shrub area and nabkha height between grassland and sandy land. All analyses were performed with SPSS 21.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) and the significant level was p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Sand Burial on Seed Germination

The burial depth significantly affected the seed germination rate (F4,20 = 20.46, p < 0.05), seed death rate (F4,20 = 16.21, p < 0.05) and seedling biomass (F4,20 = 24.68, p < 0.05) of Caragana. With an increased burial depth, the seed germination rate and seedling biomass first increased and then decreased. They were both highest at the intermediate burial depth of 2 cm (Figure 1). In contrast to the seed germination rate and seedling biomass, the seed death rate first decreased and then increased with the increase of burial depth, and it was the lowest when burial depth was 2 cm (Figure 1).

3.2. Effects of Sandy Soil on Sapling Establishment and Plant Growth

The sapling establish rate, plant height and biomass of Caragana was higher in sandy soil than in grassland soil (Figure 2a–c). Sand burial did not increase Caragana plant height, but significantly increased its biomass and root-shoot ratio (Figure 2b–d).

3.3. Effect of Sandy Habitats on Seed Production and Seed Preservation

The reproduction effort of Caragana increased in sandy land, as shown by the strongly increased biomass allocation to seeds. Caragana produced, on average, 4.63 seeds/g biomass in grassland, while 6.80 seeds/g biomass in sandy land (Figure 3a).
Sand burial significantly increased the seed preservation of Caragana (5.71 times higher than ground surface; Figure 3b). This indicated that sand habitat was beneficial to seed preservation in sandy land.

3.4. Effect of Sand Burial and Wind Erosion on Clonal Reproduction

Almost no adventitious roots were formed on the branches of Caragana under the control condition (no sand burial), and 70.0% of branches produced adventitious roots after soil burial, indicating that sand burial greatly facilitated branch-derived ramet formation (Figure 4a).
Caragana produced more adventitious buds on horizontal exposed roots than buried roots. These results indicated that wind erosion could promote the ramet formation from root-derived clonal reproduction (Figure 4b).

3.5. Population Characteristics of Caragana in Grassland and Sandy Land

The Caragana population in grassland and sandy land had different quantity characteristics. The shrub abundance, area and height of Caragana in sandy land was higher than that in grassland (although marginally significant for shrub abundance; p = 0.07; Figure 5a–c), which indicates that sandy land enhances the population growth of Caragana in general. With an increasing shrub size and strong sand movement in sandy land, the nabkha height of Caragana in sandy land was 854% greater than that in grassland (Figure 5d).

4. Discussion

4.1. Sandy Habitats Facilitate Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Shrubs

In the Alxa region, the wind is frequently strong and wind erosion occurs throughout the year. The bare land outside the shrub area is subjected to wind erosion, while the shrub area is frequently partially or completely buried by sand (Figure 5d). Some studies have shown that moderate burial improved seed germination, seedling survival and the growth of herbaceous plants, such as Psammochloa villosa [35], Leymus secalinus [15], as well as of desert shrubs, such as Nitraria sphaerocarpa and Haloxylon ammodendron [7], while others also found that seed germination of Eremosparton songoricum [14] and Pinus thunbergii [36] decreased after shallow partial burial treatment. We found that the seed germination and seedling biomass of Caragana reached the highest level at a sand burial depth of 1–2 cm. Similar results were observed for Caragana korshinskii [37]. Collectively, these results demonstrated that shallow sand burial stimulated germination and subsequent seedling recruitment. This is likely explained by the fact that sand burial could keep the seeds moist and stimulate seed germination. This led to higher shrub abundance in sandy habitats than in grassland habitats (Figure 5a).

4.2. Sandy Habitats Facilitate Plant Growth of Shrubs

Soil texture changes the water, air, heat, and nutrition status of land, thereby affecting the growth and development of plants growing in the soil. Our results showed that sandy soil promoted the sapling establishment of Caragana (Figure 2a). Sladonja et al. (2014) [10] also found that the percentage of seedling of pyrethrum was positively related to sand content. This might be because the sandy soil substrate had good air permeability with loosely packed matrixes, which would be beneficial for seed respiration, seed germination, thus facilitating seedling emergence and root expansion.
Previous studies found that the relative proportions of sand had strong negative effects on plant performance in general [38]. For example, soils with a higher sand content reduced cover and biomass for both shrub and herbaceous species [11] and constrained the distribution of species [12]. In contrast, our study found that sandy substrates favored Caragana growth (Figure 2b,c), which could explain why the height and area of the Caragana shrub in the sandy land was larger than that in the grassland (Figure 5b,c). This indicates that Caragana possesses an inherent ability to respond to sandy soil, which is consistent with its role as a primary colonizer in dry areas with high sand content.
Following the successful establishment of saplings of Caragana in the sandy land, they will continue to be buried by wind-deposited sand (Figure 5d). The sand burial significantly facilitated sapling growth (Figure 2c), thus forming large shrubs (Figure 5b,c). Similar results were also reported that partial sand burial promoted biomass in Hedysarum laeve [39], Ulmus pumila [18], and Agriophyllum squarrosum [17], while others found that when whole or partial shoots were buried by sand, biomass production decreased [20,24,35]. Those results suggested that the responses of sapling growth to sand burial might be species-specific.
The allocation and utilization of resources is a fundamental and vital activity of plants. Our study found that sand burial increased the root growth and root-shoot ratio (Figure 2d), indicating that resource allocation to the root increased after burial. Such results were also shown in Nitraria sphaerocarpa [40]. In the hyper-arid region (such as Alax with annal precipitation of 110 mm), water is the major limiting factor affecting plant growth and development. Caragana that withstand sand burial could increase biomass allocation to roots, thus acquiring more water from dry sandy soil to support its growth. However, contrasting results have been reported for Artemisia ordosica, which showed more biomass investment in shoots under burial [26,41].

4.3. Sandy Habitats Facilitate Seed Reproduction of Shrubs

The sexual reproductive efforts of Caragana in sandy land was higher than that in grassland (Figure 3a). Higher sexual reproductive efforts mean more seeds produced by Caragana in sandy land, thus forming more seedlings. This result was likely because sandy land enhanced the growth of Caragana (Figure 5b,c). The better the plant’s growth, the stronger their fecundity capacity, and the more they invest in sexual reproductive organs, resulting in higher reproductive efforts in the sandy land.
In grassland, seed consumption by predators is very common, which immensely reduces seed quantity. Previous studies in the grassland of Loess Plateau showed that almost all Caragana seeds were eaten by seed predators within one week of the seeds falling on the ground [42]. However, in sandy land, shrubs can easily be buried by sand, thereby forming nabkhas of various sizes, from 20 to 40 cm in height, under shrub canopies due to wind-deposited sand (Figure 5d) [43]. In this case, Caragana seeds may fall under or next to shrub canopies where they were later buried at various depths in sand together with leaves of shrubs and other debris. Partial sand burial prevented seeds from predation and shielded dispersed seeds from wind, resulting in higher seed preservation (Figure 3b). Therefore, we hypothesized that sandy habitats facilitated the abundance of Caragana by improving seed preservation.
In summary, sandy soil substrate and sand burial are important environmental factors in sandy land, which increases seed number, seed preservation, seed germination, and subsequently improves sapling establishment and species fitness, and finally increases the individual numbers in population. This would explain why we found a higher abundance of Caragana in sandy land (Figure 5a). In addition, Caragana, cluster shrubs with a combined canopy, usually consists of many individuals of sexually reproduction [44]. An increase in sexual reproduction led to more individuals in each shrub cluster, resulting in an increase in shrub area (Figure 5b).

4.4. Sandy Habitats Facilitate Clonal Reproduction of Shrubs

Most studies found that sand burial had negative effects on clonal reproduction (number of ramets) for Spartina alterniflora [24] and Calligonum arborescens [6,23]. However, our results showed that sand burial promoted clonal reproduction of Caragana by producing more adventitious roots on their branches (Figure 4a). Such adventitious roots would be capable of forming more branch-derived ramets, thereby leading to increase of shrub area (Figure 5b). The positive effect of sand burial on formation of adventitious roots was also found for Artemisia species [45].
Severe erosion had negative effects on the clonal reproduction of xylophyta, such as Calligonum arborescens [6,23] and Calligonum mongolicum [22]. In our study, the horizontal roots, the reproductive organs of Caragana, could extend outward by more than 130 cm from the shrub [31]. Wind erosion exposed these horizontal roots to air, which promoted the formation of root-derived ramets (Figure 4b). Ramets close to the mother plant were interconnected with the mother plant to form larger shrubs (Figure 5b), while ramets away from the mother plant formed new shrubs that would increase the abundance of the Caragana population (Figure 5a). Our study suggested that spreading the horizontal roots may be an important adaptive strategy for shrub population persistence in sand habitats. Our results are contrary to Yu et al. (2008) [28], who showed that once rhizomes of Psammochloa villosa were exposed to the air, the associated ramets either died or became very weak, and ramet number decreased as erosion severity increased.
In summary, both concurrent branch-derived and root-derived clonal reproduction are important biological characteristics for Caragana to adapt to sandy environments. Sand burial favored the clonal reproduction of Caragana by promoting the formation of branch-derived ramets, while wind erosion benefited the clonal reproduction by facilitating the formation of root-derived ramets. Such mechanisms led to greater abundance and larger areas of Caragana shrubs in the sandy land.

5. Conclusions

Sandy habitats stimulated seed germination, promoted plant growth, increased sexual reproduction, and facilitated clonal reproduction of Caragana shrubs, which could explain why the abundance, area and height of the Caragana shrubs in sandy lands was higher than that in grasslands. Our results suggested that grassland degradation led to land desertification and such sandy habitats favored the population growth of Caragana shrubs, which was one of the important mechanisms for shrub encroachment in grasslands. In addition, the capability of fast growth and rapid population expansion in sandy land makes Caragana an ecological engineering species in ameliorate desertification.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.X. and C.M.; methodology, L.X. and P.H.; formal analysis, Y.L.; investigation, L.X., Y.L. and C.W.; data curation, L.X. and P.H.; writing—original draft preparation, L.X. and C.M.; writing—review and editing, H.G., Q.C. and C.M.; visualization, L.X. and C.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31901140, 31570453, 31971437) (http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/; accessed on 1 January 2020).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Reynolds, J.F.; Smith, D.M.S.; Lambin, E.F.; Turner, B.L.; Mortimore, M.; Batterbury, S.P.; Downing, T.E.; Dowlatabadi, H.; Fernández, R.J.; Herrick, J.E.; et al. Global desertification: Building a science for dryland development. Science 2007, 316, 847–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Van Auken, O.W. Causes and consequences of woody plant encroachment into western North American grasslands. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 2931–2942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, S.L.; Yu, F.H.; Werger, M.J.; Dong, M.; During, H.J.; Zuidema, P.A. Mobile dune fixation by a fast-growing clonal plant: A full life-cycle analysis. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Xiong, X.; Han, X.; Bai, Y.; Pan, Q. Increased distribution of Caragana microphylla in rangelands and its causes and consequences in Xilin River Basin. Acta Prataculturae Sin. 2003, 12, 57–62. [Google Scholar]
  5. Xiong, X.; Han, X.; Chen, Q.; Pan, Q. Increased abundance of woody plants in grasslands and savannas. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2003, 23, 2436–2443. [Google Scholar]
  6. Luo, W.; Zhao, W. Effects of wind erosion and sand burial on growth and reproduction of a clonal shrub. Flora 2015, 217, 164–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, G.; Yu, K.; Gou, Q. Effects of sand burial disturbance on establishment of three desert shrub species in the margin of oasis in northwestern China. Ecol. Res. 2019, 34, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tracy, S.R.; Black, C.R.; Roberts, J.A.; Mooney, S.J. Exploring the interacting effect of soil texture and bulk density on root system development in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Environ. Exp. Bot. 2013, 91, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. White, R.E. Principles and Practice of Soil Science: The Soil as a Natural Resource, 4th ed.; Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  10. Sladonja, B.; Krapac, M.; Ban, D.; Uzila, Z.; Dudas, S.; Dorcic, D. Effect of soil type on pyrethrum seed germination. J. Plant Prot. Res. 2014, 54, 421–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, X.R.; Zhang, Z.S.; Zhang, J.G.; Wang, X.P.; Jia, X.H. Association between vegetation patterns and soil properties in the southeastern Tengger Desert, China. Arid Land Res. Manag. 2004, 18, 369–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Medinski, T.V.; Mills, A.J.; Esler, K.J.; Schmiedel, U.; Jürgens, N. Do soil properties constrain species richness? Insights from boundary line analysis across several biomes in south western Africa. J. Arid Environ. 2010, 74, 1052–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zaller, J.G.; Frank, T.; Drapela, T. Soil sand content can alter effects of different taxa of mycorrhizal fungi on plant biomass production of grassland species. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2011, 47, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Liu, H.L.; Shi, X.; Wang, J.C.; Yin, L.K.; Huang, Z.Y.; Zhang, D.Y. Effects of sand burial, soil water content and distribution pattern of seeds in sand on seed germination and seedling survival of Eremosparton songoricum (Fabaceae), a rare species inhabiting the moving sand dunes of the Gurbantunggut Desert of China. Plant Soil 2011, 345, 69–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhu, Y.; Yang, X.; Baskin, C.C.; Baskin, J.M.; Dong, M.; Huang, Z. Effects of amount and frequency of precipitation and sand burial on seed germination, seedling emergence and survival of the dune grass Leymus secalinus in semiarid China. Plant Soil 2014, 374, 399–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ye, X.; Li, L.; Baskin, C.C.; Baskin, J.M.; Du, J.; Huang, Z. Sand burial helps regulate timing of seed germination of a dominant herb in an inland dune ecosystem with a semiarid temperate climate. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 680, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, J.; Qu, H.; Zhao, H.; Zhou, R.; Yun, J.; Pan, C. Growth and physiological responses of Agriophyllum squarrosum to sand burial stress. J. Arid Land 2015, 7, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Shi, L.; Zhang, Z.J.; Zhang, C.Y.; Zhang, J.Z. Effects of sand burial on survival, growth, gas exchange and biomass allocation of Ulmus pumila seedlings in the Hunshandak Sandland, China. Ann. Bot. 2004, 94, 553–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Zheng, M.; Lai, L.; Jiang, L.; An, P.; Yu, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Shimizue, H.; Baskin, J.M.; Baskin, C.C. Moderate water supply and partial sand burial increase relative growth rate of two Artemisia species in an inland sandy land. J. Arid Environ. 2012, 8, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xu, L.; Huber, H.; During, H.J.; Dong, M.; Anten, N.P. Intraspecific variation of a desert shrub species in phenotypic plasticity in response to sand burial. New Phytol. 2013, 199, 991–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, F.; Xie, Y.; Zhu, L.; Jiang, L.; Chen, X.; Pan, B.; Deng, Z. Changed clonal growth form induced by sand burial facilitates the acclimation of Carex brevicuspis to competition. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0121270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fan, B.; Zhao, C.; Zhang, X.; Sun, K. Impacts of sand burial and wind erosion on regeneration and growth of a desert clonal shrub. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Luo, W.; Zhao, W.; Zhuang, Y. Sand-burial and wind erosion promote oriented-growth and patchy distribution of a clonal shrub in dune ecosystems. Catena 2018, 167, 212–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xiao, Y.; Zhao, H.; Yang, W.; Qing, H.; Zhou, C.; Tang, J.; An, S. Variations in growth, clonal and sexual reproduction of Spartina alterniflora responding to changes in clonal integration and sand burial. CLEAN–Soil Air Water 2015, 43, 1100–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ye, X.; Liu, Z.; Gao, S.; Cui, Q.; Liu, G.; Du, J.; Dong, M.; Huang, Z.; Cornelissen, J.H.C. Differential plant species responses to interactions of sand burial, precipitation enhancement and climatic variation promote co-existence in Chinese steppe vegetation. J. Veg. Sci. 2017, 28, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, S.L.; Werger, M.J.; Zuidema, P.A.; Yu, F.H.; Dong, M. Seedlings of the semi-shrub Artemisia ordosica are resistant to moderate wind denudation and sand burial in Mu Us sandland, China. Trees 2010, 24, 515–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, B.; Liu, Z.; Wang, L.; Wang, Z. Responses of rhizomatous grass Phragmites communis to wind erosion: Effects on biomass allocation. Plant Soil 2014, 380, 389–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yu, F.H.; Wang, N.; He, W.M.; Chu, Y.; Dong, M. Adaptation of rhizome connections in drylands: Increasing tolerance of clones to wind erosion. Ann. Bot. 2008, 102, 571–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Zheng, M.; Song, J.; Ru, J.; Zhou, Z.; Zhong, M.; Jiang, L.; Hui, D.F.; Wan, S. Effects of grazing, wind erosion, and dust deposition on plant community composition and structure in a temperate steppe. Ecosystems 2021, 24, 403–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xie, L.N.; Ma, C.C.; Guo, H.Y.; Li, Q.F.; Gao, Y.B. Distribution pattern of Caragana species under the influence of climate gradient in the Inner Mongolia region, China. J. Arid Land 2014, 6, 311–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ma, C.C.; Zhang, J.H.; Guo, H.Y.; Li, Q.F.; Xie, L.N.; Gao, Y.B. Alterations in canopy size and reproduction of Caragana stenophylla along a climate gradient on the Inner Mongolian Plateau. Flora 2013, 208, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, Z.W.; Xie, L.N.; Prather, M.C.; Guo, H.Y.; Han, G.D.; Ma, C.C. What drives the shift between sexual and clonal reproduction of Caragana stenophylla along a climatic aridity gradient? BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Yan, C.Z.; Wang, Y.M.; Feng, Y.S.; Wang, J.H. Macro-scale survey and dynamic studies of sandy land in Ningxia by remote sensing. J. Desert Res. 2003, 23, 34–37. [Google Scholar]
  34. Reekie, E.G.; Bazzaz, F.A. Reproductive effort in plants. 1. Carbon allocation to reproduction. Am. Nat. 1987, 129, 876–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhu, Y.; Dong, M.; Huang, Z. Response of seed germination and seedling growth to sand burial of two dominant perennial grasses in Mu-Us sandy grassland, semiarid China. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2009, 62, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mao, P.L.; Mu, H.X.; Cao, B.H.; Liu, Y.H.; Fan, Z.F.; Wang, S.M. Effects of sand burial and overstory tree age on seedling establishment in coastal Pinus thunbergii forests in the northern Shandong Peninsula, China. For. Chron. 2016, 92, 357–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Yang, H.L.; Liang, Z.L.; Zhu, X.W.; Mei, S.X.; Wang, H.Q.; Shen, Y.; Huang, Z.Y. Effects of sand burial and seed size on seed germination, seedling emergence and growth of Caragana korshinskii Kom (Fabaceae). Acta Ecol. Sin. 2012, 32, 7757–7763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Hook, P.B.; Burke, I.C. Biogeochemistry in a shortgrass landscape: Control by topography, soil texture, and microclimate. Ecology 2000, 81, 2686–2703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, C.Y.; Yu, F.H.; Dong, M. Effects of sand burial on the survival, growth, and biomass allocation in semi-shrub Hedysarum laeve seedlings. Acta Bot. Sin. 2002, 44, 337–343. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhao, W.Z.; Li, Q.Y.; Fang, H.Y. Effects of sand burial disturbance on seedling growth of Nitraria sphaerocarpa. Plant Soil 2007, 295, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, B.; Liu, Z.; Guan, D. Seedling growth variation in response to sand burial in four Artemisia species from different habitats in the semi-arid dune field. Trees 2008, 22, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhao, X.; Ren, J. Influence of seed predation on regeneration of three Caragana species. Biodivers. Sci. 2005, 13, 514–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Zhang, Y.Y.; Ma, C.C.; Han, L.; Gao, Y.B. Nabkha morphology and sand-fixing capability of four dominant Caragana species in the desert region of the Inner Mongolia Plateau. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2012, 32, 3343–3351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Xie, L.N.; Guo, H.Y.; Gabler, C.A.; Li, Q.F.; Ma, C.C. Changes in Spatial Patterns of Caragana stenophylla along a Climatic Drought Gradient on the Inner Mongolian Plateau. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0121234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Liu, B.; Liu, Z.; Lü, X.; Maestre, F.T.; Wang, L. Sand burial compensates for the negative effects of erosion on the dune-building shrub Artemisia wudanica. Plant Soil 2014, 374, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effect of burial depth on seed germination rate, seed death rate and seedling biomass of Caragana stenophylla (mean ± SE). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments, p < 0.05, Tukey HSD.
Figure 1. Effect of burial depth on seed germination rate, seed death rate and seedling biomass of Caragana stenophylla (mean ± SE). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments, p < 0.05, Tukey HSD.
Agronomy 12 02858 g001
Figure 2. Effect of soil types on sapling establish rate (a), plant height (b), plant biomass (c) and root -shoot ratio (d) of Caragana stenophylla (mean ± SE). G, grassland soil; S, sandy land soil; SB, sandy land + sand burial. * indicate significant differences between G and S, and between S and SB, p < 0.05, ns indicates not significant difference, p > 0.05, t-test.
Figure 2. Effect of soil types on sapling establish rate (a), plant height (b), plant biomass (c) and root -shoot ratio (d) of Caragana stenophylla (mean ± SE). G, grassland soil; S, sandy land soil; SB, sandy land + sand burial. * indicate significant differences between G and S, and between S and SB, p < 0.05, ns indicates not significant difference, p > 0.05, t-test.
Agronomy 12 02858 g002
Figure 3. (a) Reproduction effort (seed/g biomass) of Caragana stenophylla in grassland and sandy land (mean ± SE). G, grassland; S, sandy land. * indicate significant differences between grassland and sandy land, p < 0.05, t-test. (b) Effect of sand burial on seed preservation of Caragana stenophylla (mean ± SE). CK, ground surface; SB, sand burial. * indicate significant differences between sand burial and ground surface, p < 0.05, t-test.
Figure 3. (a) Reproduction effort (seed/g biomass) of Caragana stenophylla in grassland and sandy land (mean ± SE). G, grassland; S, sandy land. * indicate significant differences between grassland and sandy land, p < 0.05, t-test. (b) Effect of sand burial on seed preservation of Caragana stenophylla (mean ± SE). CK, ground surface; SB, sand burial. * indicate significant differences between sand burial and ground surface, p < 0.05, t-test.
Agronomy 12 02858 g003
Figure 4. (a) Percentage of branches forming adventitious roots after Caragana stenophylla branches were sand buried (mean ± SE). CK, control; SB, sand burial. (b) Ramet establishment on the horizontal buried roots and the exposed roots for Caragana stenophylla (mean ± SE). CK, buried roots; EA, exposed roots. * indicate significant differences between treatments, p < 0.05, t-test.
Figure 4. (a) Percentage of branches forming adventitious roots after Caragana stenophylla branches were sand buried (mean ± SE). CK, control; SB, sand burial. (b) Ramet establishment on the horizontal buried roots and the exposed roots for Caragana stenophylla (mean ± SE). CK, buried roots; EA, exposed roots. * indicate significant differences between treatments, p < 0.05, t-test.
Agronomy 12 02858 g004
Figure 5. Shrub abundance (a), shrub area (b), shrub height (c) and nabkha height (d) of Caragana stenophylla in grassland and sandy land (mean ± SE). G, grassland; S, sandy land. * indicate significant differences between grassland and sandy land, p < 0.05, ns indicates not significant difference, p > 0.05, t-test or GLMMs.
Figure 5. Shrub abundance (a), shrub area (b), shrub height (c) and nabkha height (d) of Caragana stenophylla in grassland and sandy land (mean ± SE). G, grassland; S, sandy land. * indicate significant differences between grassland and sandy land, p < 0.05, ns indicates not significant difference, p > 0.05, t-test or GLMMs.
Agronomy 12 02858 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xie, L.; Li, Y.; Guo, H.; Wang, C.; Chen, Q.; He, P.; Ma, C. Sandy Habitats Play an Important Role in Shrub Encroachment in Grasslands. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2858. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112858

AMA Style

Xie L, Li Y, Guo H, Wang C, Chen Q, He P, Ma C. Sandy Habitats Play an Important Role in Shrub Encroachment in Grasslands. Agronomy. 2022; 12(11):2858. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112858

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xie, Lina, Yuchen Li, Hongyu Guo, Chunwen Wang, Qing Chen, Peng He, and Chengcang Ma. 2022. "Sandy Habitats Play an Important Role in Shrub Encroachment in Grasslands" Agronomy 12, no. 11: 2858. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112858

APA Style

Xie, L., Li, Y., Guo, H., Wang, C., Chen, Q., He, P., & Ma, C. (2022). Sandy Habitats Play an Important Role in Shrub Encroachment in Grasslands. Agronomy, 12(11), 2858. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112858

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop