Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Turbulent Air Flow Characteristics Due to the Presence of a 13 × 30 Threads·cm−2 Insect Proof Screen on the Side Windows of a Mediterranean Greenhouse
Previous Article in Journal
Post-Release Evaluation of Diaphorencyrtus aligarhensis (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) and Tamarixia radiata (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) for Biological Control of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae) in Urban California, USA
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agronomy
Volume 12
Issue 3
10.3390/agronomy12030584
agronomy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Application of Humic Substances in Agricultural Industry

by
Olga Bezuglova
* and
Aleksandr Klimenko
Federal State Budget Scientific Institution “Federal Rostov Agricultural Research Centre”, Rassvet Village, Aksay Region, Rostovskaja Oblast, 346735 Rostov-on-Don, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2022, 12(3), 584; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12030584
Submission received: 31 December 2021 / Revised: 14 February 2022 / Accepted: 22 February 2022 / Published: 26 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Frontier Studies in Composition of Humic Substances and Soil Organic Matter)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Increasing agricultural productivity and, in particular, the productivity of livestock is one of the primary tasks in the present stage of development of society. This involves rational feeding and the use of biologically active substances, including humic preparations that activate the digestive and metabolic processes in the animal, promoting the transformation of feed nutrients in assimilable form, raising daily milk production and weight gain, and can play an important role in solving this urgent problem. The applications of humic substances in animal husbandry are diverse, but their use as feed additives is not developed sufficiently, and in the EU countries it is not sanctioned. Researchers in different countries have shown that humic substances in animals operate on the cellular and subcellular level, as they do in plants. Low molecular weight fractions HS enter the cell and are involved in metabolic processes, contributing to the optimization of inorganic ion passage through the intestinal wall, thereby promoting the absorption of minerals necessary for normal functioning of the organism. That is how the stimulating influence of humic substances on separate systems and on the organism as a whole is manifested. Humic substances formed from various natural materials are currently being tested in various branches of animal husbandry (cattle, pig breeding, poultry farming, fish farming, fur farming), and all the information received presents convincing evidence of the high efficiency of the humates. Such materials as peat and brown coal, vegetable waste, and vermicompost can act as a source of humic substances. However, in each case, more research is needed, specifying the dosage and schedule of their use.

1. Introduction

Humic acids (HA) are the main organic components of soil and solid fossil fuels, brown coal, peat, and sapropel. In soils rich in humus, their content reaches 5–7%, whereas in some types of brown coal (leonardite), it can exceed 80%. They are formed during plant and animal residue decomposition under the action of microorganisms and abiotic environmental factors and serve as the main constituent of soil humus. Orlov [1] gave them the following definition, “Humic substances are more or less dark colored and composed of nitrogen-containing high-molecular organic compounds of acidic nature,” emerging in soil as a result of biochemical processes. Humic substances (HS), primarily humic acids and fulvic acids, attract the deliberate attention of scientists for many reasons. The acidic nature of these compounds is explained by the presence of carboxyl groups, which allows them to be considered polycarboxylic acids [1,2,3,4]. However, their nonstoichiometric composition, irregular morphology, heterogeneity of structural elements, and polydispersity make it impossible to use the traditional method of numerical description of the structure of organic compounds, which is to characterize the number of atoms in a molecule, and the number and types of bonds between them. That is precisely why Perminova [5] suggested that with regard to humic substances, the concept of a molecule becomes void; we can only talk about a molecular ensemble with each parameter of it being described by a distribution. In fact, HS are self-assemblies of natural polyelectrolytes widely occurring throughout the environment [6]. Such an interpretation is in line with the hypothesis given by Piccolo, who suggested a supramolecular structure for humic substances [7]. Piccolo [8] considers HS as supramolecular associations of self-organizing heterogeneous and relatively small molecules resulting from plant litter decomposition. This understanding of the structure of humic substances, according to Piccolo, better explains their significant role in ensuring and maintaining soil’s physical and chemical properties and their reactivity toward pesticides and other environmental pollutants. Later, by separating HS into fractions and with subsequent chromatography, Nebbioso and Piccolo [9] showed that hydrophobic compounds are mainly distributed in the largest fraction, while hydrophilic components are eluted in the smallest fraction. Further study of the structure of humic compounds showed [10] that they actually represent a humus matrix of a complex multilevel organization. A possible variant of the supramolecular organization of humic acids is represented by a spatial structure consisting of two to four layers of condensed aromatic systems, supplemented by a network of chain fragments of different regularity and length [11].
Today, however, these purely scientific chemical terms are being increasingly applied in practical agriculture. This is explained by the fact that humic substances have high physiological activity, which is expressed in stimulating the growth and development of both plants and animals.

2. Effect of Humic Substances on Growth Processes in Plants

Humic substances are characterized by stimulating and adaptogenic effects on the cellular and subcellular levels. Numerous confirmations have been obtained in vitro and in the field that they affect the growth processes in plants. Notably, the studies were carried out with HS of various origins on different agricultural plants, in different natural zones, and on soils of different fertility capacities. In such experiments, a comparative assessment of the physiological activity of various preparations was carried out, the range of concentrations stimulating plant growth was determined, and the effect on plant productivity and yield quality was studied. Enhanced root formation accompanied by the development of the assimilation apparatus and increased growth of the aerial part was found in plants under the effect of humic substances [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. In plants, phosphorus metabolism changes, which are expressed in a higher number of organophosphorus compounds participating in the reactions of energy transfer and transformation. Sugars accumulate with the intense use of absorbed phosphorus and increased synthesis of nucleic acids [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Protein metabolism is accelerated, which is accompanied by increased plant growth, decreased nitrate content in the finished product, and improved quality [22,29,30,31,32]. The amount of essential amino acids, such as valine, histidine, leucine, isoleucine, and phenylalanine, increases with a slight decrease in the content of lysine and tryptophan [33,34,35]. The intensity of the processes of respiration, photosynthesis, and water exchange grows, the concentration of chlorophyll and ascorbic acid raises; a clear correlation of the intensity of plant respiration and photosynthesis, the energy potential and activity of redox enzymes with the action of physiologically active substances is observed, especially in the initial phases of plant development [23,36,37,38,39,40]. A decrease in plant attack by root rot is registered [41]. Through the action of humic fertilizers on the plant organism, the yield of agricultural crops increases by an average of 30–90%, even under exposure to fertilizers [24,42,43,44,45,46,47].

3. Effect of Humic Preparations on Microorganisms

It has been found that humic preparations in soils adjust the regime of nutrient intake [48,49]. In particular, in carbonate chernozems, where plants sorely lack phosphorus fertilizers due to soils’ low supply with mobile phosphorus, intensified mobilization processes for this element in plants are observed, which is associated with an increase in the number of microorganisms in the rhizosphere zone [26,47]. The mechanism of humic substances affecting growth, development, and productivity of plants is likely to be explained by their connection with rhizosphere microorganisms and their activation by root secretions of plants treated with humic preparations. The impact of humic substances on soil microorganisms is diverse and affects many aspects of their vital function (Table 1). Most authors agree that the main effects are somehow related to the membrane, its state, and permeability. Nevertheless, it is still too early to state any final concept of the effect of HA on microorganisms.
Scientists’ keen interest in humic substances, and numerous developments in this area have led to the fact that, at present, the application of humic preparations and fertilizers in crop farming is expanding.

4. Application of Humic Preparations in Animal Husbandry

HS can also be successfully used in animal husbandry. Gorovaya and co-authors [69] provide many examples of the use of humic substances in this industry. Humic substances have anti-inflammatory, adsorptive, and antibacterial effects [69,70,71], which makes them possible to be successfully used in many branches of animal husbandry. Numerous experiments proving the positive effects of the use of humic substances have been carried out with such species of animals as laboratory rats [72,73,74,75], pigs [76,77,78], sheep [79,80], and cattle [81,82,83]. A particularly large number of studies have been carried out in poultry farming with broiler chickens and laying hens, quails, and other types of poultry [84,85,86,87,88,89,90] and in fish farming [91,92,93,94].
In the USSR, the Presidium of the Veterinary Pharmacological Council under the Main Directorate of Veterinary Medicine of the State Agro-Industrial Sector of the USSR back in 1987, based on the results of state production tests, made a decision to use concentrated sodium humate as a feed supplement in the diets of cattle and poultry [66]. In the EC, the use of HA and their sodium salt for the oral treatment of all animals on food production farms is currently permitted [95]. However, humic acid substances are not currently authorized as a feed additive under EU regulations, so they cannot be considered for use as such in organic farming [96,97]. The fact that HS are used to treat animals might make EU legislators cautious about authorizing their use as feed additives.
In the meantime, the European Union has permitted the use of organic acids, such as formic, propionic, lactic, citric, fumaric, and sorbic acids and their salts (e.g. calcium formate, calcium propionate) in poultry farming, as they are considered to be safe [98,99]. Therefore, the use of organic acids in growing broilers and laying hens increases their immunity and productivity through improved use of nutrients [100]. At the same time, humic acids are also carboxylic acids of natural origin, the effectiveness and safety of which has been proven in crop farming and animal husbandry, both in experimental studies and in production tests. Table 2 shows examples of the use of humic preparations in poultry farming. They indicate that, notwithstanding some variations in dosage, different age groups of the tested chickens, and the use of humates from various manufacturers, humic preparations, as a rule, improve the growth and condition of broiler chickens. In an experiment where added humate did not have a positive effect [101], the cause should be most likely sought in the dosage of humate. Such facts indicate the need to continue research focusing on experimental conditions. This refers not only to the applied dosage, which should be optimal, but also to the age of chickens.

5. The Mechanism of the Effect of Humic Substances on the Animal Body

Possible ways of exposure of animals to humic substances were explored in vitro and in the work environment. For example, Visser [108] studied the distribution of totally labeled humic acid (HA), which was injected intra-abdominally or with drinking water, in rats when studying the possibility of HS entering the tissues of animal bodies. Irrespective of the method of intake, the label was detected in almost all organs, metabolites, and excretions of animals, which indicates the entry of HAs into the tissues of the animal body and their metabolization. The same author, in experiments with isolated pieces of liver, found that in the presence of humic acid, the metabolism of carbon-labeled D-glucose, L-leucine, and uridine is accelerated. In model experiments with isolated pieces of the small intestine, he also demonstrated that HAs improve the passage of inorganic ions through the intestinal wall. All these facts allowed Visser to draw a conclusion about the possibility of HA passage through cell membranes and their metabolization in an animal body.
Stepchenko [109,110] proved that adding biologically active supplements of humic nature to the diets of animals stimulates metabolic processes and the digestibility of nutrients, promotes increased nitrogen deposition, and activates absorption of calcium and phosphorus, as well as some other mineral elements. A group of scientists from Belarus [111] established, based on studies of the morphobiochemical parameters of the blood of cows, that supplementing the diet of cows with the humic preparation Gumosil was accompanied by a 5.5% higher hemoglobin, 6.6% more erythrocytes, and a 5.2% higher alkaline reserve, which also allowed the authors to draw a conclusion about activation of metabolic processes in the bodies of cows. Total protein in the blood serum, which reflects supply with nutrients and macronutrients, increased in the blood of the cows fed with the humic preparation by 7.7%. At the same time, the content of albumin and gamma globulins increased by 8.3 and 14.2%, respectively, which contributed to improved protective reactions in the animals of the experimental group. As a result, the experiment [110] showed an increase in the average daily milk yield in the experimental group by 6.4%. Meanwhile, the gross milk yield per cow was 1433.4 kg, which is 103.5 kg higher than in the reference group. The fat yield from the milk of the cows in the experimental group increased by 7.8%. It was also established that the quality of products improved in terms of the content of solid matter, lactose, and protein.
Griban [112] showed that humic preparations stimulate formation, development, and maturation of blood cells (leukocytes, erythrocytes, platelets), the synthesis of blood proteins, and the use of glucose by body tissues; as a result, there is a credible increase in the level of daily milk production in cows and body weight gain in calves, piglets, and lambs. Similar results were obtained for the use of the humic preparation Guvital when feeding sows and raising post-weaning piglets [113], and for the preparation Rostok when feeding bulls and heifers [114]. El-Zaiat et al. [115] have shown an improvement in blood values in goats fed with HA. They found an increased level of total protein, globulin, and glucose, a decreased content of urea nitrogen, cholesterol, non-esterified free fatty acids, and ketone concentration in the blood. It turned out that humic acids have the ability to affect the intracellular processes of enzymatic decomposition of proteins in various brain structures; the introduction of hydrohumate into the diet of stressed rats increased the adaptive ability of the animals [116]. The authors suggested that the cause could be explained by the membrane trophic properties of the humic preparation.
American researchers [117] found that HS improves the growth performance of pigs and helps to reduce ammonia excretion from manure. Scientists from Korea [118] conducted research on supplementing pig feed with humic substances and concluded that the supplemented diet improves growth rates, the relative number of blood lymphocytes, and meat quality. The changes listed contribute to improved immunity of the animals under study.
Accordingly, humic substances, as biologically active compounds, penetrate into an animal’s body and ensure optimization of metabolic processes, thus displaying their stimulating effect on individual systems and the entire body as a whole.
The most frequently mentioned humic preparations used in animal husbandry as a feed additive are sodium humate (known as Guminat), oxygumate, and hydrohumate.
Sodium humates are sodium salts of humic acids obtained through alkaline extraction from sedge and reed peat following the technological procedure developed by the Dnepropetrovsk Agricultural Institute [119]. The Cancer Research Center of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences has found that Guminat has a pronounced stimulating effect, is not toxic, has no negative side effects on the animal body, and contains no carcinogenic substances. This drug was recommended as a feed supplement to increase the meat productivity of young cattle and pigs. Ten to twelve milligrams of Guminat per 1 kg of animal body weight for a month contributed to an increase in the average daily gain by over 15%. When the animals were slaughtered after the experiment, no pathologies were found in the muscles or parenchymal organs (liver, heart, lungs, kidneys, spleen) [69].
A positive effect of Guminat has also been established with regard to the reproductive function of cows in the postpartum period. Its daily feeding to cows at the 7–8th months of pregnancy reduces the level of pre- and postnatal complications, facilitates the delivery process, and helps increase the livability of offspring. In cows, erythropoiesis (the process of erythrocyte formation) and immunoglobulin synthesis increase, and the activity of leukocyte phagocytosis grows by 10%. In newborn calves, the content of immune proteins increases by 13%, erythrocytes–by 7%, and hemoglobin–by 12% [69].
Guminat as a microadditive in the diet of bulls improves the quality of their sperm: sperm motility increases by 8%, spermatozoid concentration by 11%, resistance by 23%, and the number of live sperm cells by 20%. In addition, its use increased the number of lymphocytes in the blood of servicing bulls: T-lymphocytes by 6.2% and B-lymphocytes by 5.3% [69].
In addition to sodium humate, liquid and powdery nitrohumic growth stimulants are used as feed supplements in animal husbandry, poultry farming, and fur farming. Feeding its liquid form to suckling pigs contributed to an 8.3% higher average daily weight gain compared to the reference group. Whereas the addition of dry ammonium nitrohuminate in the amount of 400 mg per 1 kg of body weight in the diet of 2–4-month-old animals increased the average daily weight gain by 33.8%. This can be explained by better digestibility of feed nutrients and a large deposition of protein in the body of animals [120]. In recent years, it has been reported about the use of ligno-humate in animal husbandry with an increase in the reproductive capacity of sows and the productivity of suckling pigs, with the latter being explained by an improvement in the chemical composition of sows’ milk [121]. It is also important that the use of humic preparations improves the livability of young animals. At the same time, different preparations differ in the degree of a pronounced effect. In addition, their effectiveness depends on the species, age, and physiological condition of animals [116].
For the same purposes, biostimulant BST is used, which is a growth stimulator obtained from peat by oxidizing it with atmospheric air under pressure. It is added in an amount of 1 g per 100 kg of body weight. Meanwhile, the productivity of cattle increases by 15–25%, and in pigs by 21%, as compared to the reference group. As seen from the findings of long-term tests, the preparations are harmless and do not impair the taste of meat [120].
A technology to produce peat molasses (feed molasses hydrolyzed from peat) by treating peat with sulfuric acid has been developed in Latvia. It is a thick, viscous, opaque brown liquid, bitter with a sweet flavor and caramel smell. It contains about 25% HA and other physiologically active substances: amino acids, organic acids, biogenic amines, and hormones. The addition of molasses to the diet of young cattle in the amount of 5% increases the average daily weight gain by 15% [120].
At the Boksitogorsk Biochemical Plant, feeding peat sugar is produced by means of acid-free hydrolysis of peat containing HAs. Feeding peat sugar to cows contributes to 10–15% higher milk productivity, and the weight of young animals increases by 11–17%. Sugared peat formed in the course of thermochemical destruction of high-moor peat with a low degree of decomposition is a feed supplement, as it contains 16% of easily digestible carbohydrates. In addition, it also includes HS. When included in the diet, the supplement makes it possible to increase weight gain by 10% [120].
Farms in the Leningrad Region have mastered the production of nutritious feed from sphagnum peat. Carbohydrate peat feed is obtained by heating peat with steam in a standard steam cooker and processing it with quicklime and calcium carbonate. When peat is treated with urea or its mixture with alkali, carbohydrate protein peat feed, which also includes HS, is obtained. The use of this technique allows you to increase the digestibility of feed (carbohydrate protein peat feed against carbohydrate peat feed) by 40% [120].
In Kharkov, in the BIOMOS Specialized Research and Production Complex, synthetic biomoses–biologically active metal complex compounds like natural humic substances have been developed [122]. They are used for prevention and treatment of dyspepsia, a digestive disorder resulting from the insufficient release of enzymes, in calves. The effectiveness of dyspepsia treatment with biomos is 98–99% and of its prevention is 99–100%. The content of total protein in the blood serum also increases, and as a result, the weight gain increases by 20%. A similar effect of biomoses is seen in piglets.
The use of sodium humate in poultry farming is very effective. The egg production of laying hens and the biological properties of hatch able eggs are improved, and an immunostimulating effect manifested in increased activity of phagocytes and the response of B cells is also observed [88]. The introduction of sodium humate into the diet of chickens in the form of drinking solutions increases the livability of young animals up to 100% and daily weight gain–by 9–14%; weight gain in ducklings increases to 24–43%, while the values of hemoglobin, vitamin A, and nucleic acids also improve [123].
It was suggested that one of the causes for the positive effect of humates on poultry is increased absorption of nitrogen, phosphorus, and other nutrients under the influence of HS due to their chelating properties [123]. At the same time, a study where laying hens received 30–60 g of sodium humate per 1 ton of grain showed no significant differences in the quality of eggs with a statistically insignificant increase in egg weight compared to the reference group [124].
Potassium humate is a black powder with a high concentration of humic acid salt (up to 80 g/L). Applied in the diets of dry cowbanes (4 g/head per day), it contributed to a 22.4% increase in the body weight of newborn calves, and 23–28% higher intensity of growth and development of young calves of up to 2 months of age [125]. Rapid postpartum recovery of the reproductive system was also noted in cows, which significantly increased the conception rate. Average daily milk yield increased by 18–20% with a simultaneous reduction in the consumption of metabolic energy and crude protein of dry matter of feed by 13.5–14.5%, compared with the reference group of animals.
The same authors showed that the introduction of potassium humate at a dose of 75–100 mg per 1 kg of combined feed contributes to increased productivity of poultry in the experimental groups during the reference period (125 days) by 3.2–15.1%, the weight of eggs by 2.4–4.4%, in comparison with reference poultry.
The advantages of feeding poultry and fine-wool sheep with the addition of potassium and sodium humate have also been established [126,127].
Liquid potassium humate is recommended as a feed supplement to increase weight gain and reduce morbidity in fish. As a matter of curiosity, the introduction of the drug into the fertilization medium raises the percentage of egg fertilization from 34 to 64%. The identical effect is achieved when it is administered to female carp 36 h before the eggs are taken. In addition, more viable off springs were obtained [128].
Humic preparations are used as a feed supplement in fur farming as well. The use of a nitrohumine preparation on minks reduced the number of stillborn kits by 6%, also contributed to an increase in weight gain by 12–15% and an improvement in the quality of skins. The humic preparation Khristekol introduced into the diet of minks had a positive effect on the reproductive function of the animals–the number of littering females and kits in one female increased, the livability of young animals, and the quality of fur increased [120].
The addition of natural HS to the feed of dairy goats (at a dose of 3 g/kg of body weight) was also followed by higher productivity of animals. Increased milk yield did not entail a change in the composition of milk; at the same time, a decrease in the level of cholesterol was observed in the blood serum of goats [129].
It is important that feed supplements with humates help to reduce the negative impact of certain adverse environmental factors. For instance, when keeping cows in the conditions of increased radiation, feeding zeolite in combination with humate and a perlite-humic mineral mixture in the form of supplements to the diet corrected the physiological status of animals and heightened the indices of their immunobiological reactivity and milk productivity [130]. Humic acid is also effective for neutralizing neurotoxins in the case of sublethal chronic botulism in cattle [131]. The use of HA is also effective in neutralizing lead poisoning, which damages the thyroid gland in chickens [132], decreases the accumulation of lead and cadmium in fish, and increases their growth rate [133]. This effect of HS in living organisms is explained by their high chelating ability. They bind to toxins, including heavy metals, pesticides, radioactive particles, and environmental carcinogens, and remove toxins from the body–liver and digestive tract.
Some authors warn that the results of the application of humates are largely determined by their properties, which in turn depend on the source and method of obtaining; therefore, further research and verification of each product is essential to develop specific recommendations for their use [134].

6. Conclusions

Widespread use of humic preparations in animal husbandry is ecologically and economically feasible; however, their use as feed supplements has not been sufficiently developed. Studies by scientists from different countries have demonstrated that humic substances in the animal body work on the cellular and subcellular levels. Low molecular weight fractions of HS penetrate into the cell and are involved in metabolic processes, optimizing them and promoting the passage of inorganic ions through the intestinal wall. Thus, the stimulating effect of humic substances on individual systems and on a whole body is manifested. So far, humic preparations have been tested in various branches of animal husbandry (cattle breeding, pig breeding, poultry farming, fish farming, fur farming, etc.), and all the data obtained present convincing evidence of the high efficiency of humates. Moreover, such media as peat, brown coal, plant waste, and biological humus can act as a source for the production of humic preparations. However, in each specific case, more research is needed to specify the dosage and intake regimens.

Author Contributions

O.B.—conceptualization, writing—review and editing; A.K.—conceptualization, editing, project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

This article is a review of the published literature. All references are given in the list of references.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Orlov, D.S. Humic Substances of Soils and General Theory of Humification (Russian Translations Series), 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1995; p. 266. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kononova, M.M. Soil Organic Matter. Its Nature, Its Role in Soil Formation and in Soil Fertility, 2nd ed.; Elsevier Ltd.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1966; 544p. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Orlov, D.S. Soil Chemistry; Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd.: New Delhi, India, 1992; 402p. [Google Scholar]
  4. Stevenson, F.J. Humus Chemistry: Genesis, Composition, Reactions; Wiley-Inter-Science: New York, NY, USA, 1994; 438p. [Google Scholar]
  5. Perminova, I.V. Humic substances as a challenge to chemists of the 21st century. Khim. Zhizn. 2008, 1, 50–55. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  6. Perminova, I.V. Humic substances-assisted synthesis of nanoparticles in the nature and in the lab. In Functions of Natural Organic Matter in Changing Environmen; Xu, J., Wu, J., He, Y., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 735–740. [Google Scholar]
  7. Piccolo, A. The supramolecular structure of humic substances. Soil Sci. 2001, 166, 810–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Piccolo, A. The supramolecular structure of humic substances. A novel understanding of humus chemistry and implications in soil science. Adv. Agron. 2002, 75, 57–134. [Google Scholar]
  9. Nebbioso, A.; Piccolo, A. Advances in humeomics: Enhanced structural identification of humic molecules after size fractionation of a soil humic acid. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 720, 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fedotov, G.N.; Dobrovolskiy, G.V. Possible ways of nanostructure development in soil gels. Eur. Soil Sci. 2012, 45, 811–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bezuglova, O. Molecular structure of humus acids in soils. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2019, 182, 676–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Khristeva, L.A. On the participation of humic acids and other organic substances in the nutrition of higher plants. Soil Sci. 1953, 10, 24–29. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  13. Reutov, V.A. The Use of Brown Coals of the Dnieper Basin as a Raw Material for the Production of Humic Fertilizers in the Steppe Zone of the Ukrainian SSR. In Humic Fertilizers: Theory and Practice of Their Application: Dnepropetrovsk; Publishing House of the DSKHI: Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine, 1962; Volume 2, pp. 445–467. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  14. Klimova, A.A.; Komissarov, I.D. Influence of humic preparations on the growth processes of plants. Humic preparations. Proceedings of the Tyumen Agricultural Institute. Tyumen 1971, 14, 189–199. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  15. Piccolo, A.; Celano, G.; Pietramellara, G. Effects of fractions of coal-derived humic substances on seed germination and growth of seedlings (Lactuga sativa and Lycopersicum esculentum). Biol. Fertil. Soils 1993, 16, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Canellas, L.P.; Olivares, F.L.; Okorokova-Façanha, A.L.; Façanha, A.R. Humic acids isolated from earthworm compost enhance root elongation, lateral root emergence, and plasma membrane H+-ATPase activity in maize roots. Plant Physiol. 2002, 130, 1951–1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Trevisan, S.; Francioso, O.; Quaggiotti, S.; Nardi, S. Humic substances biological activity at the plant-soil interface. From environmental aspects to molecular factors. Plant Signal. Behav. 2010, 5, 635–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Zandonadi, D.B.; Santos, M.P.; Dobbss, L.B.; Olivares, F.L.; Canellas, L.P.; Binzel, M.L.; Okorokova-Façanha, A.L.; Façanha, A.R. Nitric oxide mediates humic acids-induced root development and plasma membrane H+-ATPase activation. Planta 2010, 231, 1025–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mora, V.; Baigorri, R.; Bacaicoa, E.; Zamarreno, A.M.; García-Mina, J.M. The humic acid-induced changes in the root concentration of nitric oxide, IAA and ethylene do not explain the changes in root architecture caused by humic acid in cucumber. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2012, 76, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Olaetxea, M.; Mora, V.; Bacaicoa, E.; Garnica, M.; Fuentes, M.; Casanova, E.; Zamarreño, A.M.; Iriarte, J.C.; Etayo, D.; Ederra, I. Abscisic acid regulation of root hydraulic conductivity and aquaporin gene expression is crucial to the plant shoot growth enhancement caused by rhizosphere humic acids. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 2587–2596. [Google Scholar]
  21. De Castro, T.A.V.T.; Berbara, R.L.L.; Tavares, O.C.H.; Mello, D.F.D.G.; Pereira, E.G.; de Souza, B.C.; da Costa, C.; Espinosa, L.M.; García, A.C. Humic Acids Induce a Eustress State Via Photosynthesis and Nitrogen Metabolism Leading to a Root Growth Improvement in Rice Plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 162, 171–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Khristeva, L.A.; Lukyanenko, N.V. The role of physiologically active soil substances—Humic acids, bitumen and vitamins B2, C, P-P, A and D in the life of plants and ways of their replenishment. Soil Sci. 1962, 10, 18–27. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  23. Lukyanenko, N.V. Influence of sodium humates on vital activity, morphogenesis and harvest of stubble corn. In Humic Fertilizers: Theory and Practice of Their Application; Publishing House “Urozhaj”: Kiev, Ukraine, 1968; Volume 3, pp. 68–76. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  24. Demyanenko, V.D. Influence of organic fractions of peat on root and air nutrition of plants. Humic fertilizers: Theory and practice of their application. Dnepropetrovsk 1977, 6, 38–44. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  25. Naumova, G.V.; Kosobokova, R.V.; Kosonogova, L.V.; Raitsina, G.I.; Zhmakova, N.A.; Ovchinnikova, T.F. Humic Preparations and Technological Methods of Their Production. Humic Substances in the Biosphere; Publishing House of Moscow State University: Moskow, Russia, 1993; pp. 178–188. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  26. Rosa, S.D.; Silva, C.A.; Maluf, H.J.G.M. Wheat nutrition and growth as affected by humic acid-phosphate interaction. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2018, 181, 870–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mulyatni, A.S.; Praptana, R.H.; Santoso, D. The effect of biostimulant in root and population of phosphate solubilizing bacteria. A study case in upland rice. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2018; pp. 12–16. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bezuglova, O.S.; Gorovtsov, A.V.; Polienko, E.A.; Zinchenko, V.E.; Grinko, A.V.; Lykhman, V.A.; Dubinina, M.N.; Demidov, A. Effect of humic preparation on winter wheat productivity and rhizosphere microbial community under herbicide-induced stress. J. Soils Sediments 2019, 19, 2665–2675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Khristeva, L.A.; Reutov, V.A.; Golikova, O.P. Influence of physiologically active forms of humic acids on the synthesis of nucleic acids in plants. In Growth stimulators of organisms. In Proceedings of the Conf. Balt. Republics on the Stimulation of Plants, Animals and Microorganisms, Vilnius, Lithuania, 30 June–4 July 1969; pp. 146–148. (In Russian). [Google Scholar]
  30. Chaminade, R. Semaine d’etude “Matiere organique et fertilite du Sol”. Pontif. Acad. Sci. 1968, 2, 777. (In French) [Google Scholar]
  31. Mora, V.; Bacaicoa, E.; Zamarreno, A.-M.; Aguirre, E.; Garnica, M.; Fuentes, M.; García-Mina, J.-M. Action of humic acid on promotion of cucumber shoot growth involves nitrate-related changes associated with the root-to-shoot distribution of cytokinins, polyamines and mineral nutrients. J. Plant Physiol. 2010, 167, 633–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Isachkova, O.A.; Ganichev, B.L.; Lapshinov, N.A.; Pakul, V.N.; Zherebtsov, S.I.; Ismagilov, Z.I. Influence of humic preparations on agrobiological indicators of naked oats. Achiev. Sci. Technol. Agro-Ind. Complex 2015, 29, 26–29. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  33. Ronsal, G. Biologically active (mobile) humic substances—A factor of the action of humus on the soil and plant. Theoretical foundations of the physiologist. active substances and the effectiveness of fertilizers containing them. Dnepropetrovsk 1969, 67–76. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  34. Vaccaro, S.; Ertani, A.; Nebbioso, A.; Muscolo, A.; Quaggiotti, S.; Piccolo, A.; Nardi, S. Humic substances stimulate maize nitrogen assimilation and amino acid metabolism at physiological and molecular level. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2015, 2, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Conselvan, G.B.; Fuentes, D.; Merchant, A.; Peggion, C.; Francioso, O.; Carletti, P. Effects of humic substances and indole-3-acetic acid on Arabidopsis sugar and amino acid metabolic profile. Plant Soil 2018, 426, 17–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Starostin, A.N. On the Issue of Thermodynamic Processes in Plants and the Effect of Some Physiologically Active Substances on Them. In Humic Fertilizers: Theory and Practice of Their Application; Publishing House “Urozhaj”: Kiev, Ukraine, 1968; Volume 3, pp. 42–47. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  37. Bobyr, L.F. The intensity of photosynthesis, the state of the electron transport chain and the activity of the phosphorylating system under the influence of humic substances. In Humic Fertilizers: Theory and Practice of Their Application; Publishing House of Agricultural Institute: Dnepropetrovsk, Russia, 1980; Volume 7, pp. 54–63. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  38. Liu, C.; Cooper, R.J.; Bowman, D.C. Humic acid application affects photosynthesis, root development, and nutrient content of creeping bentgrass. HortScience 1998, 33, 1023–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Rivero, R.M.; Shulaev, V.; Blumwald, E. Cytokinin-dependent photorespiration and the protection of photosynthesis during water deficit. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150, 1530–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. El-Shabrawi, H.M.; Bakry, B.A.; Ahmed, M.A.; Abou-El-Lail, M.J.A.S. Humic and oxalic acid stimulates grain yield and induces accumulation of plastidial carbohydrate metabolism enzymes in wheat grown under sandy soil conditions. Agric. Sci. 2015, 6, 1–10. Available online: https://www.scirp.org/html/16-3000929_53564.htm (accessed on 30 December 2021).
  41. Nechaev, L.A.; Putintsev, A.F.; Zotikov, V.I.; Koroteev, V.I.; Erokhin, A.I.; Mordovin, A.N. The influence of the use of potassium humate on the productivity of malting barley. Achiev. Sci. Technol. Agro-Ind. Complex (In Russian). 2014, 6, 33–35. [Google Scholar]
  42. Vinogradova, V.S.; Martyntseva, A.A.; Kazarin, S.N. Influence of humic and micronutrient fertilizers on the yield of spring wheat. Agriculture 2015, 1, 32–34. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  43. Ulanov, N.N. Possibilities of using oxidized coals and humic substances in agriculture. In Humic Substances in the Biosphere; Publishing House of Moscow State University: Moskow, Russia, 1993; pp. 157–161. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  44. Delfine, S.; Tognetti, R.; Desiderio, E.; Alvino, A. Effect of foliar application of N and humic acids on growth and yield of durum wheat. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2005, 25, 183–191. Available online: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00886291 (accessed on 30 December 2021). [CrossRef]
  45. Chaple, Y.; Casal, P.; Korshunov, A.; Klimanov, V.; Mityushkin, A.; Rakhimov, R. Results of Czech-Russian studies on the use of lignohumates and chelates in potato growing. Achiev. Sci. Technol. Agro-Ind. Complex 2011, 4, 36–39. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  46. El-Sheshtawy, A.A.; Hager, M.A.; Shawer, S.S. Effect of bio-fertilizer, Phosphorus source and humic substances on yield, yield components and nutrients uptake by barley plant. J. Biol. Chem. Environ. Sci. 2019, 14, 279–300. [Google Scholar]
  47. Bezuglova, O.S.; Polienko, E.A.; Gorovtsov, A.V.; Lyhman, V.A.; Pavlov, P.D. The effect of humic substances on winter wheat yield and fertility of ordinary chernozems. Ann. Agrar. Sci. 2017, 15, 239–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Vaughan, D.; Malcolm, R.E. Influence of humic substances on growth and physiological processes. In Soil Organic Matter and Biological Activity; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1985; pp. 37–75. [Google Scholar]
  49. Rose, M.T.; Patti, A.F.; Little, K.R.; Brown, A.L.; Jackson, W.R.; Cavagnaro, T.R. A meta-analysis and review of plant-growth response to humic substances: Practical implications for agriculture. In Advances in Agronomy; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; Volume 124, pp. 37–89. [Google Scholar]
  50. Krzemieniewski, S. Untersuchungen fiber Azotobacter chroococcum Beij. Bull. Acad. Sci. Gracovie 1908, 8, 929–1051. (In German) [Google Scholar]
  51. Remy, T.; Rosing, G. Uber die Biologische Reizwirkung natürlicher Humusstoffe. Zbl. Bakt. 1911, 2, 349–384. (In German) [Google Scholar]
  52. Prazmowski, A. Azotobacter Studien II. Physiologic und Biologic. Bull. Acad. Sci. Gracovie 1912, 7, 855–950. (In German) [Google Scholar]
  53. Iwasaki, K. Weitere Untersuchungen zur Fixation das Luftstickstoffs durch Azotobakter. Biochem. Z. 1930, 226, 32–46. (In German) [Google Scholar]
  54. Schnitzer, M.; Skinner, S.I.M. Organo-metallic interactions in soils: 1. Reactions between a number of metal ions and the organic matter of a podzol Bh horizon. Soil Sci. 1963, 96, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bhardwaj, K.K.R.; Gaur, A.C. Studies on the growth stimulating action of humic acid on bacteria. Zent Ralblatt fur Bakteriologie, Parasiten kunde Infektions krankheiten und Hygiene, Abt. 2. Naturwiss 1971, 126, 694–699. [Google Scholar]
  56. Andreyuk, E.I.; Gordienko, S.A.; Konoto, I.N.; Martynenko, V.A. Assimilation of humic acid nitrogen by microorganisms. Mikrobiol. Zhurnal 1973, 139–142. [Google Scholar]
  57. Filip, Z.; Claus, H.; Dippell, G. Abbau von Huminstoffen durch Bodenmikroorganismen-eine aersicht. Z. Pflanzenernähr. Bodenkd 1998, 161, 605–612. (In German) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Guminski, S.; Sulej, J. About the cause of the stimulative effect of humate in yeasts cultures. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 1979, 43, 279–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Valdrighi, M.M.; Pera, A.; Agnolucci, M.; Frassinetti, S.; Lunardi, D.; Vallini, G. Effects of compost-derived humic acids on vegetable biomass production and microbial growth within a plant (Cichorium intybus)-soil system: A comparative study. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 1996, 58, 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Vallini, G.; Pera, A.; Agnolucci, M.; Valdrighi, M. Humic Acids Stimulate Growth and Activity of in Vitro Tested Axenic Cultures of Soil Autotrophic Nitrifying Bacteria. Biol. Fertil. Soils 1997, 24, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Valdrighi, M.M.; Pera, A.; Scatena, S.; Agnolucci, M.; Vallini, G. Effects of humic acids extracted from mined lignite or composted vegetable residues on plant growth and soil microbial populations. Compost Sci. Util. 1995, 3, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Pradhan, A.; Geraldes, P.; Seena, S.; Pascoal, C.; Cássio, F. Humic acid can mitigate the toxicity of small copper oxide nanoparticles to microbial decomposers and leaf decomposition in streams. Freshw. Biol. 2016, 7, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Kudryasheva, N.S.; Tarasova, A.S. Pollutant toxicity and detoxification by humic substances: Mechanisms and quantitative assessment via luminescent biomonitoring. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 155–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Rozhko, T.; Bondareva, L.; Mogilnaya, O.; Vydryakova, G.; Bolsunovsky, A.; Stom, D.; Kudryasheva, N. Detoxification of AM-241 solutions by humic substances: Bioluminescent monitoring. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2011, 400, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Feifičová, D.; Šnajdr, J.; Siglová, M.; Čejková, A.; Masák, J.; Jirků, V. Influence of humic acids on the growth of the microorganisms utilizing toxic compounds (comparison between yeast and bacteria). Chim. Int. J. Chem. 2005, 59, 749–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Meredith, C.E.; Radosevich, M. Bacterial degradation of homo-and heterocyclic aromatic compounds in the presence of soluble/colloidal humic acid. J. Environ. Sci. Health 1998, 33, 17–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kulikova, N.A.; Perminova, I.V.; Badun, G.A.; Chernysheva, M.G.; Koroleva, O.V.; Tsvetkova, E.A. Estimation of uptake of humic substances from different sources by Escherichia coli cells under optimum and salt stress conditions by use of tritium-labeled humic materials. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 6223–6230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Puglisi, E.; Pascazio, S.; Suciu, N.; Cattani, I.; Fait, G.; Spaccini, R.; Crecchio, C.; Piccolo, A.; Trevisan, M. Rhizosphere microbial diversity as influenced by humic substance amendments and chemical composition of rhizodeposits. J. Geochem. Explor. 2013, 129, 82–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Gorovaya, A.I.; Orlov, D.S.; Shcherbenko, O.V. Humic Substances: Structure, Functions, Mechanism of Action, Protective Properties, Ecological Role; Publishing House Naukova Dumka: Kiev, Ukraine, 1995; p. 303. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  70. Kuhnert, M.; Bartels, K.P.; Kroll, S.; Lange, N. Veterinary pharmaceuticals containing humic-acid for therapy and prophylaxis for gastrointestinal-diseases of dog and cat. Mon. Vet. 1991, 46, 4–8. [Google Scholar]
  71. Klocking, R.; Helbig, B.; Steinbuchel, A. Biopolymers for Medical and Pharmaceutical Application; Steinbuchel, A., Marchessault, R.H., Eds.; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2005; Available online: https://application.wiley-vch.de/books/sample/3527311548_c01.pdf (accessed on 1 October 2021).
  72. Fuchs, V.; Golbs, S.; Kühnert, M.; Schopeck, W.; Stier, B. Studies into action of humic acids onselected trace elements in laboratory rats. Arch. Exper. Vet. Med. 1982, 36, 187–191. [Google Scholar]
  73. Seffner, W.; Schiller, F.; Heinze, R.; Breng, R. Subchronic application of humic acids and associated compounds provokes histological changes of goitre in the rat. Exp. Toxic. Pathol. 1995, 47, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Lange, N.; Kühnert, M.; Haase, A.; Höke, H.; Seubert, B. Studies concerning the resorption properties of a low molecular humic substance after single oral application to rats. Dtsch. Tierärztliche Wochenschr. 1996, 103, 134–135. [Google Scholar]
  75. Yasar, S.; Gokcimen, A.; Altunas, I.; Yonden, Z.; Petekkaya, E. Performance and ileal histomorphology of rats treated with humic acid preparations. J. Anim. Physi. Anim. Nutr. 2002, 86, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Hays, V.W. Effectiveness offeed additive usage of antibacterial agents in swine and poultry production. In The Hays Report; Report, 12476-01,5/; Rachelle Laboratories, Inc.: Long Beach, CA, USA, 1981; pp. 81–91. [Google Scholar]
  77. Schuhmacher, A.; Gropp, J.M. Effect of humic acids on health state and performance of weaners. Proc. Soc. Nutr. Physiol. 2000, 9, 77. [Google Scholar]
  78. Písaříková, B.; Zralý, Z.; Herzig, I. The Effect of Dietary Sodium Humate Supplementation on Nutrient Digestibility in Growing Pigs. Acta Vet. Brno 2010, 79, 349–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Varadyova, Z.; Kisidayova, S.; Jalc, D. Effect of humic acid on fermentation and ciliate protozoan population in rumen fluid of sheep invitro. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2009, 89, 1936–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Tunç, M.A.; Yörük, M.A. Humik asitlerin koyunlarda rumen ve kan parametreleri ile protozoon sayısı üzerine etkisi. Kafkas Üniversitesi Vet. Fakültesi Derg. 2012, 18, 55–60. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
  81. Kreutz, B.; Schlikekewey, W. Effects of Implantedbovine calcium hydroxyapatite with humate. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 1992, 111, 259–264. [Google Scholar]
  82. Livestock. Field Trials on Dairy Cattle 2003; Enviromate Inc.: Fort Worth, TX, USA; Available online: www.livestockrus.com/consignments/enviromate/enviromate.htmhttp://www.livestockrus.com/consignments/enviromate/enviromate.htm (accessed on 13 October 2021).
  83. Yüca, S.; Gul, M. Effect of Adding Humate to the Ration of Dairy Cows on Yield Performance. Res. Artic. 2020, 68, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Stepchenko, L.M.; Zhorina, L.V.; Kravtsova, L.V. The effect of sodium humate on metabolism andresistance in highly productive poultry. Nauchnye Dokl. Vyss. Shkoly. Biol. Nauk. Moscow Russia 1991, 10, 90–95. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  85. Bailey, C.A.; White, K.E.; Donke, S.L. Evaluation of Menefee Humate on the performance of TM broilers. Poult. Sci. 1996, 75, 84. [Google Scholar]
  86. Parks, C.W. The use of Menefee HumateTM in Typical and Low-Crude Protein Diets for Turkey Tomsand in the Bioremediation of Petroleum-Contaminated Soil Amended with Poultry Litter as Aco-Substrate and Nutrient Source. Master’s Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  87. Shermer, C.L.; Maciorowski, K.G.; Bailey, C.A.; Byers, F.M.; Ricke, S. Caecal metabolites and microbial populations in chickens consuming diets containing a mined humate compound. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1998, 77, 479–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kocabaglı, N.; Alp, M.; Acar, N.; Kahraman, R. The Effects of Dietary Humate Supplementation on Broiler Growth and Carcass Yield. Poult. Sci. 2002, 81, 227–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Şahin, T.; Aksu Elmalı, D.; Kaya, İ.; Sarı, M.; Kaya, Ö. The effect single and combined use of probiotic and humate in quail (Coturnix coturnix Japonica) diet on fattening performance and carcass parameters. Kafkas. Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg. 2011, 17, 141–146. [Google Scholar]
  90. Arif, M.; Alagawany, M.; Abd El-Hack, M.E.; Saeed, M.; Arain, M.A.; Elnesr, S.S. Humic acid as a feed additive in poultry diets: A review. Iran. J. Vet. Res. 2019, 20, 167–172. [Google Scholar]
  91. Steinberg, C.E.W.; Höss, S.; Kloas, W.; Lutz, I.; Meinelt, T.; Pflugmacher, S.; Wiegand, C. Hormone like effects of humic substances on fish, amphibians, and invertebrates. Environ. Toxicol. 2004, 70, 409–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Abdel-Wahab, A.M.; El-Refaee, A.M.E.; Ammar, A.A. Effects of humic acid as feed additive in improvement of nonspecific immune response and disease resistance in common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Egypt. J. Aquacult. 2012, 2, 83–90. [Google Scholar]
  93. Yilmaz, S.; Ergun, S.; Çelik, E.S.; Yigit, M. Effects of dietary humic acid on growth performance, haemato-immunological and physiological responses and resistance of Rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss to Yersinia ruckeri. Aquac. Res. 2018, 49, 3338–3349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Lieke, T.; Steinberg, C.E.W.; Pan, B.; Perminova, I.V.; Meinelt, T.; Knopf, K.; Kloas, W. Phenol-rich fulvic acid as a water additive enhances growth, reduces stress, and stimulates the immune system of fish in aquaculture. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. EMEA: Committee for Veterinary Medical Products. Humic Acids and Their Sodium Salts. Available online: http:/www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/vet/mrls/055499en.pdfs (accessed on 13 February 2021).
  96. EGTOP/1/2011. Final Report on Feed. The EGTOP Adopted This Technical Advice at Its 3rd Plenary Meeting on 29 and 30 June 2011. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/food-farming-fisheries/farming/documents/final_report_feed_1_en.pdf (accessed on 3 December 2021).
  97. European Commission. Health and Food Safety Directorate General sante.ddg2.g.5(2021)3756475. Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed Section Animal Nutrition. 19–21 April 2021. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/food/system/files/2021-06/reg-com_ani-nutrit_20210419_sum.pdf (accessed on 5 December 2021).
  98. Adil, S.; Tufail, B.; Gulam, A.B.; Masood, S.; Manzoor, R. Effect of dietary supplementation of organic acids on performance, intestinal histomorphology, and serum biochemistry of broiler chicken. Vet. Med. Int. 2010, 2010, 479485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Lückstädt, C. Effects of dietary potassium diformate on growth and gastrointestinal health in weaned piglets in Vietnam. In Proceedings of the Conference on International Research on Food Security, Natural Resource Management and Rural Development, Organized by the Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Prague, Czech Public, 17–19 September 2014. [Google Scholar]
  100. Khan, S.H.; Iqbal, J. Recent advances in the role of organic acids in poultry nutrition. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2016, 44, 359–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Hassan, S.M. Effect of Adding Dietary Humate on Productive Performance of Broiler Chicks. Asian J. Poult. Sci. 2014, 8, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Karaoglu, M.; Macit, M.; Esenbuga, N.; Durdag, H.; Turgut, L.; Bilgin, Ö.C. Effect of supplemental humate at different levels on the growth performance, slaughter and carcass traits of broilers. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2004, 3, 406–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Zralý, Z.; Písaříková, B.; Navrátilová, M. The effect of humic acid on mercury accumulation in chicken organs and muscle tissues. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 53, 472–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Arafat, R.Y.; Khan, S.H.; Saima. Evaluation of humic acid as an aflatoxin binder in broiler chickens. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2017, 17, 241–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Disetlhe, A.R.P.; Marume, U.; Mlambo, V.; Dinev, I. Humic acid and enzymes in canola-based broiler diets: Effects on bone development, intestinal histomorphology and immune development. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2017, 47, 914–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Jaďuttová, I.; Marcinčáková, D.; Bartkovský, M.; Semjon, B.; Harčárová, M.; Nagyová, A.; Váczi, P.; Marcincak, S. The effect of dietary humic substances on the fattening performance, carcass yield, blood biochemistry parameters and bone mineral profile of broiler chickens. Acta Vet. Brno 2019, 88, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Skalická, M.; Nad, P.; Bujňák, L.; Marcin, A. Impact of dietary humic substances supplementation on selected minerals in muscles of broiler chickens. Folia Vet. 2021, 65, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Visser, S.A. Physiological action of humic acids on living cells. In Proceedings of the 4th Int. Peat Congr., Finland, Ctaniemy, 25–30 June 1972; pp. 186–192. [Google Scholar]
  109. Stepchenko, L.M. The role of humic preparations in the management of metabolic processes in the formation of biological products of agricultural animals. In Collection of Papers “Achievements and Prospects for the Use of Humic Substances in Agriculture”; Publishing House of the Agricultural Institute: Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine, 2008; pp. 70–74. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  110. Stepchenko, L.M. Participation of humic preparations from peat in the control of metabolic processes in broiler chickens. In Proceedings of the Int. Conference, Minsk, Belarus, 29 May–2 June 2006; pp. 143–145. (In Russian). [Google Scholar]
  111. Naumova, G.V.; Thomson, A.E.; Ovchinnikova, T.F.; Zhmakova, N.A.; Makarova, N.L.; Dobruk, E.A.; Pestis, V.K. New biologically active drug “Gumosil” and the effectiveness of its use in the diets of dairy cows. In Proceedings of the International Conference “Humic Substances and Phytohormones in Agriculture”, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine, 16–18 February 2010; pp. 30–33. (In Russian). [Google Scholar]
  112. Hryban, V.H. The use of humic drugs to stimulate resistance and productivity of animals. In Proceedings of the International conference “Humic Substances and Phytohormones in Agriculture”, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine, 16–18 February 2010; pp. 171–173. (In Ukrainian). [Google Scholar]
  113. Topuria, L.Y.; Seitov, M.S.; Bibikova, D.R.; Topuria, G.M. The effectiveness of using guvitan-s in growing weaned pigs. Achiev. Sci. Technol. Agro-Ind. Complex 2014, 5, 45–46. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  114. Alexandrova, S.S.; Prokopiv, L.N.; Sadvokasova, A.A. The use of sodium humate "Rostok" in the diets of calves. Achiev. Sci. Technol. Agro-Ind. Complex 2015, 29, 83–85. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  115. El-Zaiat, H.M.; Morsy, A.S.; El-Wakeel, E.A.; Anwer, M.M.; Sallam, S.M. Impact of humic acid as an organic additive on ruminal fermentation constituents, blood parameters and milk production in goats and their kids growth rate. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2018, 27, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Chorna, V.I.; Stepchenko, L.M.; Lyanna, O.L. Peculiarities of influence of biologically active substances from peat on proteolysis of rat brain under conditions of model experiment. In Proceedings of the International Conference “Humic Substances and Phytohormones in Agriculture”, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine, 16–18 February 2010; pp. 174–175. (In Ukrainian). [Google Scholar]
  117. McGlone, J.; Ji, F.; Kim, S.W. Effects of dietary humic substances on pig growth performance, carcass characteristics and ammonia emission. J. Anim. Sci. 2006, 84, 2482–2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Wang, Q.; Chen, Y.J.; Yoo, J.S.; Kim, H.J.; Cho, J.H.; Kim, I.H. Effects of supplemental humic substances on growth performance, blood characteristics and meat quality in finishing pigs. Livest. Sci. 2008, 117, 270–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Reutov, V.A.; Repka, V.P.; Kravchenko, R.N.; Kuksin, E.M. Factory production technology of physiologically active ballastless preparation of sodium humates. In Humic Fertilizers. Theory and Practice of Their Application; Publishing House of the Agricultural Institute: Dnepropetrovsk, Russia, 1973; Volume 4, pp. 165–177. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  120. Peat in the National Economy; Sokolov, B.N. (Ed.) Publishing House Nedra: Moscow, Russia, 1988; p. 268. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  121. Sechin, V.A.; Topuria, G.M.; Semenov, S.V. The influence of Lignohumate-KD-A on the productivity of sows. Achiev. Sci. Technol. Agro-Ind. Complex 2014, 5, 45–47. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  122. Beskrovny, A.M. Biomoses: Their Properties and Aspects of Application in Medicine and Agriculture; Kharkov Medical Institute: Kharkov, Ukraine, 1990; p. 12. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  123. Demina, M.A.; Wulf, L.N. Experience in the use of physiologically active humic substances in poultry farming. In Humic Fertilizers. Theory and Practice of Their Application; Publishing House of the Agricultural Institute: Dnepropetrovsk, Russia, 1977; Volume 6, pp. 119–125. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  124. Kucukersan, S.; Kucukersan, K.; Colpan, I.; Goncuoglu, E.; Reisli, Z.; Yesilbag, D. The effects of humic acid on egg production and egg traits of laying hen. Vet. Med. Czech 2005, 50, 406–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Mikityuk, V.V.; Tsap, S.V.; Begma, N.A. The use of potassium humate in feeding productive animals. In Proceedings of the International Conference “Humic Substances and Phytohormones in Agriculture”, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine, 16–18 February 2010; pp. 176–177. (In Russian). [Google Scholar]
  126. Teregulov, A.N. Productive and Reproductive Qualities of Ducks Using Sodium Humate. Ph.D. Thesis, All-Russian Research and Technological Institute of Poultry, Moscow, Russia, April 2004. [Google Scholar]
  127. Trukhachev, P.I. Productive and Some Biological Features of Fine-Fleeced Rams Using Sodium Humate. Ph.D. Thesis, Stavropol State Agrarian Universitys, Stavropol, Russia, October 2000. [Google Scholar]
  128. Oginova, I.A.; Gorovaya, A.I. Influence of physiologically active humic substances on the functional state and fertility of eggs and the development of carp larva. In Humic Fertilizers. Theory and Practice of Their Application, V.9; Publishing House of the Agricultural Institute: Dnepropetrovsk, Russia, 1983; Volume 9, pp. 115–117. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  129. Taskin, D. Using humic acid in diets for dairy goats. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep. 2014, 32, 25–32. [Google Scholar]
  130. Fedoruk, R.S.; Tsap, O.F.; Kovalchuk, I.I.; Kropivka, S.Y.; Khomin, M.M.; Tsap, M.M. Immunobiological reactivity and productivity of cows under conditions of increased radiation exposure and feeding them corrective feed additives. In Proceedings of the International Conference “Humic Substances and Phytohormones in Agriculture”, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine, 16–18 February 2010; pp. 258–259. (In Ukrainian). [Google Scholar]
  131. Gerlach, H.; Gerlach, A.; Schrödl, W.; Schottdorf, B.; Haufe, S. Oral application of charcoal and humic acids to dairy cows influences clostridium botulinum blood serum antibody level and glyphosate excretion in urine. J. Clin. Toxicol. 2014, 4, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Sahin, A.; Iskender, H.; Terim Kapakin, K.A.; Ainkaynak, K.; Hayirli, A.; Gonultas, A.; Kaynar, O. The effect of humic acid substances on the thyroid function and structure in lead poisoning. Rev. Bras. De Ciência Avícola 2016, 18, 649–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Jusadi, D.; Aprilia, T.; Setiawati, M.; Suprayudi, M.A.; Ekasari, J. Dietary supplementation of fulvic acid for growth improvement and prevention of heavy metal accumulation in Nile tilapia fed with green mussel. Egypt. J. Aquat. Res. 2020, 46, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. McMurphy, C.P.; Duff, G.C.; Sanders, S.R.; Cuneo, S.P.; Chirase, N.K. Effects of supplementing humates on rumen fermentation in Holstein steers. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2011, 41, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Table
Table 1. Stimulatory action of humic substances (HS) on soil microorganisms.
Table 1. Stimulatory action of humic substances (HS) on soil microorganisms.
Causes of the Stimulatory Action of HS on MicroorganismsEffectReference Data
HAs stimulate the processes of respiration and nitrogen fixation in bacteriaEnhanced growth of the bacterial community, primarily azotobacter[50,51,52,53]
Capacity of humic acid (HA) to chelate trace nutrientsIncreased availability of trace nutrients[54,55,56]
HA is a source of carbon and energy in the humus mineralization processRelease of bound elements of mineral nutrition[55,57]
The effect of HA on the membranes of microorganisms (higher permeability)Slower plasmolysis and deplasmolysis in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast[58,59]
Improved conditions for the penetration of nutrients into the cell[60]
HAs sorb substances inhibiting the growth of nitrifying bacteria and trigger their switch to heterotrophic growthStimulation of the growth of nitrifying bacteria[61]
Sorption of HA on the cell walls of bacteria creates a protective layer contributing to withstanding higher concentrations of toxicants, the resistance of bacteria to toxicants improvescopper oxide nanoparticles[62]
heavy metal salts[63]
radionuclides[64]
phenolic compounds[65]
atrazine and quinoline[66]
Penetration of HA into bacterial cells is enhanced under stress caused by salinityReduction of the negative effects of stress[67]
HA, as well as malic and succinic acids, increase the content of sugars and organic acids in the rhizosphere of maizeGrowing population of soil microbial communities[68]
Table
Table 2. The effectiveness of the introduction of humates as a feed supplement in growing broiler chickens.
Table 2. The effectiveness of the introduction of humates as a feed supplement in growing broiler chickens.
Tested ChickensHA DosageHA EffectReference Data
Broiler chicks2.5 kg of Farmagulator DRYTM Humate /per ton of feedFeeding Humate during the grower period had the most beneficial effect in terms of growth and feed conversion on broiler performance.[88]
Broiler chicks (Ross-308) from 1 to 49 days of ageHumate, Farmavet International Inc., Turkey at a dose of 0.1–0.3% to basic dietHumate supplementation had no effect on performance, slaughter, and carcass characteristics, a slightly improvement was observed in FCR for H<sub>1<sub> group fed with diet containing 0.1% humate. In addition, no dead chicks were observed in the humate groups, while there was 1.8% mortality in the control group.[102]
Hybrid 9-weeks-old ISA BROWN chickens0.5 g per chicken/dayAfter concurrent treatment with HA and MeHg, Hg concentrations were lower by 20.6%, 23.8%, 23.0%, and 18.6% in liver, kidneys, brain, and muscle tissues.[103]
Broiler chicks from 1–28 days of age5.0 or 10.0 g humate kg−1 into feedAdding humate negatively affected the productive performance of broiler chicks in respect to feed conversion ratio and performance index.[101]
Broiler chicksOxygumate at a dose of 0.1–0.3% to feed contaminated with aflotoxinHA reduced the toxic effects of aflatoxin in growing broilers (liver damage and some hematological and biochemical changes in serum).[104]
Broiler chicks
Cobb 500, from 14 days of age		Sodium humate, 1.5% in the feed based on rapePositively affected the dynamics of digestion and uptake, which contributed to the improvement of bone development and immunity in broilers.[105]
Broiler chicks COBB 500, 1 day of age8 g and 10 g per kg of feed1% of humic substances had a positive effect on growth parameters (p > 0.05), breast and thigh meat yield, improved individual blood parameters, and increased calcium content in broiler bones (p < 0.05).[106]
One-day-old chickens of hybrid ROSS until 42 days.0.3–0.7% Humac Natur MycosorbHad a positive effect on the nutritional value of chicken meat, as it contributed to higher content of calcium and magnesium in the muscles of the breast and thigh.[107]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bezuglova, O.; Klimenko, A. Application of Humic Substances in Agricultural Industry. Agronomy 2022, 12, 584. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12030584

AMA Style

Bezuglova O, Klimenko A. Application of Humic Substances in Agricultural Industry. Agronomy. 2022; 12(3):584. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12030584

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bezuglova, Olga, and Aleksandr Klimenko. 2022. "Application of Humic Substances in Agricultural Industry" Agronomy 12, no. 3: 584. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12030584

APA Style

Bezuglova, O., & Klimenko, A. (2022). Application of Humic Substances in Agricultural Industry. Agronomy, 12(3), 584. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12030584

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop