Author Contributions
Conceptualization, X.L.; methodology, B.W.; software, B.W.; validation, Y.N.; formal analysis, B.W.; investigation, Y.P.; resources, X.L.; data curation, Y.N.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.N.; writing—review and editing, B.W.; visualization, Z.G.; supervision, J.L.; project administration, X.L.; funding acquisition, B.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Figure 1.
(a) Main structure of rice metering device. 1. seed box 2. outer cylinder 3. ventilation shell 4. seeding tubes 5. air delivery ports; (b) Schematic diagram of seeding process by vacuum centralized cylinder metering device.
Figure 1.
(a) Main structure of rice metering device. 1. seed box 2. outer cylinder 3. ventilation shell 4. seeding tubes 5. air delivery ports; (b) Schematic diagram of seeding process by vacuum centralized cylinder metering device.
Figure 2.
The practicality picture of hill-drop pneumatic central cylinder direct-seeding machine for hybrid rice.
Figure 2.
The practicality picture of hill-drop pneumatic central cylinder direct-seeding machine for hybrid rice.
Figure 3.
The cylinders and ventilation chamber shell. 1. Outer cylinder; 2. Outer suction holes; 3. Inner cylinder; 4. Inner suction holes; 5. Negative-pressure zone; 6. Positive-pressure zone; 7. Ventilation chamber shell.
Figure 3.
The cylinders and ventilation chamber shell. 1. Outer cylinder; 2. Outer suction holes; 3. Inner cylinder; 4. Inner suction holes; 5. Negative-pressure zone; 6. Positive-pressure zone; 7. Ventilation chamber shell.
Figure 4.
(a) The physical model and meshing of airflow in negative pressure zone. 1. Airflow field in negative pressure cavity; 2. Airflow field in big suction hole; 3. Airflow field in small suction hole; 4. Airflow field outside the suction hole; (b) The meshing of model.
Figure 4.
(a) The physical model and meshing of airflow in negative pressure zone. 1. Airflow field in negative pressure cavity; 2. Airflow field in big suction hole; 3. Airflow field in small suction hole; 4. Airflow field outside the suction hole; (b) The meshing of model.
Figure 5.
(a) The cloud chart of pressure distribution of 2 mm hole; (b) The cloud chart of velocity distribution of 2 mm hole; (c) The streamline diagram of velocity of 2 mm hole.
Figure 5.
(a) The cloud chart of pressure distribution of 2 mm hole; (b) The cloud chart of velocity distribution of 2 mm hole; (c) The streamline diagram of velocity of 2 mm hole.
Figure 6.
(a) The cloud charts of pressure distribution about a 2 mm wedge hole; (b) The cloud charts of velocity distribution about a 2 mm wedge hole; (c) The streamline diagram of velocity about a 2 mm wedge hole.
Figure 6.
(a) The cloud charts of pressure distribution about a 2 mm wedge hole; (b) The cloud charts of velocity distribution about a 2 mm wedge hole; (c) The streamline diagram of velocity about a 2 mm wedge hole.
Figure 7.
(a) The cloud chart of pressure distribution of 1.5 mm; (b) The cloud chart of velocity distribution of 1.5 mm hole; (c) The streamline diagram of velocity of 1.5 mm hole.
Figure 7.
(a) The cloud chart of pressure distribution of 1.5 mm; (b) The cloud chart of velocity distribution of 1.5 mm hole; (c) The streamline diagram of velocity of 1.5 mm hole.
Figure 8.
The negative pressure diagram of different hole types with different points.
Figure 8.
The negative pressure diagram of different hole types with different points.
Figure 9.
The positive pressure diagram of different hole types with different points.
Figure 9.
The positive pressure diagram of different hole types with different points.
Figure 10.
Different types of airflow distributor. (A) Linear type; (B) Box type; (C) Arc transition type.
Figure 10.
Different types of airflow distributor. (A) Linear type; (B) Box type; (C) Arc transition type.
Figure 11.
The velocity flow field distribution of different rice distributor CFD simulation with type A. (a) 8 m/s inlet velocity; (b) 16 m/s inlet velocity; (c) 24 m/s inlet velocity.
Figure 11.
The velocity flow field distribution of different rice distributor CFD simulation with type A. (a) 8 m/s inlet velocity; (b) 16 m/s inlet velocity; (c) 24 m/s inlet velocity.
Figure 12.
The velocity flow field distribution of different rice distributor CFD simulation with type B. (a) 8 m/s inlet velocity; (b) 16 m/s inlet velocity; (c) 24 m/s inlet velocity.
Figure 12.
The velocity flow field distribution of different rice distributor CFD simulation with type B. (a) 8 m/s inlet velocity; (b) 16 m/s inlet velocity; (c) 24 m/s inlet velocity.
Figure 13.
The velocity flow field distribution of different rice distributor CFD simulation with type C. (a) 8 m/s inlet velocity; (b) 16 m/s inlet velocity; (c) 24 m/s inlet velocity.
Figure 13.
The velocity flow field distribution of different rice distributor CFD simulation with type C. (a) 8 m/s inlet velocity; (b) 16 m/s inlet velocity; (c) 24 m/s inlet velocity.
Figure 14.
The installation drawing of type (C) arc transition air distributor.
Figure 14.
The installation drawing of type (C) arc transition air distributor.
Figure 15.
The schematic diagram of distributed seed-feeding tubes.
Figure 15.
The schematic diagram of distributed seed-feeding tubes.
Figure 16.
The high-speed photography of rice seed movement state with different tube angles. (a) Seed delivery experiment; (b) The division of collision zone.
Figure 16.
The high-speed photography of rice seed movement state with different tube angles. (a) Seed delivery experiment; (b) The division of collision zone.
Table 1.
The schedule of air distributor CFD experiment.
Table 1.
The schedule of air distributor CFD experiment.
Level | Inlet Velocity (m/s) | Distributor Type |
---|
1 | 8 | a |
2 | 16 | b |
3 | 24 | c |
Table 2.
The delivery airflow uniformity experiment of left five tubes. unit: m/s.
Table 2.
The delivery airflow uniformity experiment of left five tubes. unit: m/s.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
---|
a | 3.155 | 3.129 | 4.265 | 2.609 | 2.729 |
b | 3.548 | 3.607 | 4.673 | 3.208 | 3.361 |
c | 6.706 | 6.721 | 9.521 | 5.557 | 5.770 |
Table 3.
The variability uniformity experiment of left five tubes.
Table 3.
The variability uniformity experiment of left five tubes.
| Standard Deviation | Average Value | Coefficient of Variation |
---|
a | 0.654 | 3.177 | 0.206 |
b | 0.577 | 3.679 | 0.157 |
c | 1.582 | 6.855 | 0.231 |
Table 4.
The delivery airflow uniformity experiment of right five tubes. unit: m/s.
Table 4.
The delivery airflow uniformity experiment of right five tubes. unit: m/s.
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|
a | 2.094 | 1.903 | 2.327 | 1.876 | 1.874 |
b | 4.044 | 3.322 | 4.261 | 3.355 | 3.391 |
c | 7.413 | 6.443 | 8.080 | 6.423 | 5.985 |
Table 5.
The variability uniformity experiment of right five tubes.
Table 5.
The variability uniformity experiment of right five tubes.
| Standard Deviation | Average Value | Coefficient of Variation |
---|
a | 0.197 | 2.015 | 0.098 |
b | 0.444 | 3.675 | 0.121 |
c | 0.855 | 6.869 | 0.124 |
Table 6.
The delivery airflow uniformity experiment of ten different delivery tubes. unit: m/s.
Table 6.
The delivery airflow uniformity experiment of ten different delivery tubes. unit: m/s.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|
a | 1.572 | 1.644 | 2.212 | 1.486 | 1.464 | 1.826 | 1.623 | 1.995 | 1.639 | 1.415 |
b | 1.514 | 1.836 | 2.364 | 1.502 | 1.653 | 1.952 | 1.565 | 2.167 | 1.562 | 1.665 |
c | 3.185 | 3.276 | 4.469 | 2.997 | 2.818 | 3.625 | 3.031 | 4.021 | 3.018 | 3.000 |
Table 7.
The variability uniformity experiment of ten different feeding tubes.
Table 7.
The variability uniformity experiment of ten different feeding tubes.
| Standard Deviation | Average Value | Coefficient of Variation |
---|
a | 0.253 | 1.688 | 0.150 |
b | 0.297 | 1.778 | 0.167 |
c | 0.533 | 3.344 | 0.159 |
Table 8.
The coordinate point data of different seed-feeding tubes.
Table 8.
The coordinate point data of different seed-feeding tubes.
Tube C | Tube B |
---|
X (mm) | Y (mm) | X (mm) | Y (mm) |
---|
−100 | −200 | −50 | −200 |
−115 | −210 | −85 | −270 |
−135 | −250 | −110 | −300 |
−160 | −270 | −150 | −360 |
−185 | −310 | −180 | −400 |
−200 | −320 | −200 | −440 |
−220 | −350 | −250 | −565 |
−250 | −370 | | |
−270 | −380 | | |
−300 | −390 | | |
−350 | −400 | | |
−400 | −440 | | |
−450 | −450 | | |
−500 | −565 | | |
Table 9.
The schedule of air CFD experiment for seed feeding.
Table 9.
The schedule of air CFD experiment for seed feeding.
Level | Inlet Velocity (m/s) | Type of Seed Feeding Tubes |
---|
1 | 8 | C |
2 | 16 | B |
3 | 24 | |
4 | 32 | |
5 | 40 | |
Table 10.
The schedule of movement posture probability for seed delivery. unit: (%). (a) airflow velocity: 8 (m/s); (b) airflow velocity: 16 (m/s); (c) airflow velocity: 24 (m/s); (d) airflow velocity: 32 (m/s); (e) airflow velocity: 40 (m/s).
Table 10.
The schedule of movement posture probability for seed delivery. unit: (%). (a) airflow velocity: 8 (m/s); (b) airflow velocity: 16 (m/s); (c) airflow velocity: 24 (m/s); (d) airflow velocity: 32 (m/s); (e) airflow velocity: 40 (m/s).
Tube Type | a | b | c |
① | ② | ③ | ④ | ① | ② | ③ | ④ | ① | ② | ③ | ④ |
Tube C | 30.4 | 56.5 | 4.3 | 8.8 | 0 | 87.0 | 3.0 | 10 | 0 | 64.9 | 0 | 25.1 |
Tube B | 38.5 | 61.5 | 0 | 0 | 33.3 | 35.7 | 4.8 | 26.2 | 10.5 | 55.3 | 2.6 | 31.6 |
Tube Type | d | e | |
① | ② | ③ | ④ | ① | ② | ③ | ④ |
Tube C | 0 | 56.5 | 4.3 | 39.2 | 0 | 47.7 | 0 | 52.3 |
Tube B | 0 | 53.5 | 23.3 | 23.2 | 0 | 41.2 | 0 | 58.8 |