Can the Adoption of ICT and Advisory Services Be Considered as a Tool of Competitive Advantage in Agricultural Holdings? A Literature Review
(This article belongs to the Section Farming Sustainability)
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Background
2.1. Voice Information Delivery Services
2.2. Radio-Dial up (Agricultural Information on Demand) and Regular Radio Broadcasts
2.3. IT Application for Traceability
2.4. Extension Services Based on Mobile Phone and Database Monitoring
2.5. Link with Agriculture 4.0 and Industry 4.0 Paradigms
2.6. E-Learning for Basic Skills, Farming Education, and the Video-Connectivity Approaches
3. Data and Methods
3.1. Methodology
3.1.1. Search Criterion
3.1.2. Eligibility Criteria
- -
- The inclusion criteria
- The literature should mostly report on European countries but also worldwide
- The articles should uphold a two-decade period since publication to date
- The articles should incorporate a transparent methodology and data processing steps
- The studies should be published in English
- Studies covering a direct subject matter as the study primary objective of study.
- -
- The exclusion criteria
- Outdated articles—older than two decades
- Studies concentrating mostly on other countries and territories other than Europe
- Studies lacking proper online naming system as well as incomplete names of all the authors.
3.2. Data Analysis
4. Results
- affordable and pervasive connectivity,
- flexible and more moderately priced tools,
- advances in sharing data and preservation,
- creative commercial arrangements and partnerships, and
- the liberation of data, including the open access movement using social media.
- (a)
- Affordable and pervasive connectivity: Connectivity’s widespread use—for portable devices, the internet, and other wireless devices—is facilitated by several factors, including slowing growth, more competitiveness, and infrastructural expansion for the final mile. Several tendencies are ICT equipment, and applications are becoming more affordable in parallel. Regarding methods that also increase slight producers’ access in terms of ICT use in agriculture, mobile phones are in the lead, with about six billion mobile phone subscribers recorded at the end of 2011. SIM cards, or more specifically, subscriber identification modules, were anticipated to be employed on a global scale. The involvement of mobile phones in developing nations is also a factor, with more than two memberships now accessible for every three persons, fueled by the growth of networks in Africa and Asia. The availability of inexpensive mobile phones has increased due to the upgrading of communications network. Most nations today have a cell service that reaches more than 90% of their population, including covering rural regions. Because favorable laws encourage competition in the communications industry and the considerable interest in subscriptions for mobile phones, broadband internet’s accessibility and cost-effectiveness are also drastically improving—though slightly and gradually in the process. The number of internet users in 2010 was approximately 2 billion, more than half of whom are now in developing nations. Global availability of the internet has increased dramatically after 2000, gaining more than 480 percent. The cost of bandwidth has grown. Additionally, the price of expanding connections to remote villages is still decreasing. Telecenters and other local amenities can offer access to the internet in areas where bandwidth is too costly for personal usage by people. Internet access is further predicted to rise because of the ongoing use of prominent and influential party (4G) mobile networks, which substantially increase data-holding capabilities.
- (b)
- Flexible and more moderately priced tools: The usefulness of ICT to smallholder agriculture has also expanded with the advent of adaptive and more reasonably priced technology and gadgets. Technology has steadily decreased the cost of buying phones, computers, and scientific equipment, and specific programs developed by agricultural innovation countries have improved its ability to meet the demands of emerging nations. Individuals with little academic education or technology experience can benefit from many technologies because of their intuitive design and ability to communicate information visually or vocally. Cellphone apps are becoming increasingly useful for isolated and underprivileged populations, especially with feature phones. Service providers can offer mobile banking, other transactional services (like selling inputs, for instance), and information services by utilizing straightforward, readily available technology such as SMS (market price alerts). Extension and advisory services, among other publicly and privately offered services, are provided through mobile devices, which are becoming not merely “Cellphones,” but are essentially multipurpose wireless devices. As mapping applications such as Microsoft Earth or Google Maps (picture 1.2) deliver geographic data material to non-specialist users, geospatial data is simpler to obtain and utilize. Through more accessibility, usable geographic information systems that are accessible on regular desktops and smartphones using web-based tools, scientists and development organizations have produced significant sets of georeferenced data on inhabitants, deprivation, shipping, and a variety of other standard utilities and factors. The clarity and richness of satellite photos and other pictorial elements have increased tremendously. Compared to earlier years, these instruments and monitoring devices use fewer resources and need fewer people’s interaction.
- (c)
- Advances in sharing data and preservation: A vastly increased capacity for data storage and the capability to remotely access data and simple data sharing have enhanced agriculture’s usage of ICT. The ability to network and develop the e-learning environment has allowed it to incorporate more partners in agricultural research. Information may now be shared and exchanged across departments and levels of government. Data sharing and storage advancements have fundamental causes. Hard disk capacity and processor performance have increased over time, as has the cost of storing data. Cloud computing provides access to the internet; several shared computer resources consist of services, tools, and intelligently connected information. These innovations deal with some of the agriculture industry information and communication restrictions from government agencies, cooperatives, and research institutions, and the formation of personality, which are advantages of improved data. The benefits of increased data capacity include specific targeting of agricultural development initiatives and improving the management of farm-level surpluses or deficits.
- (d)
- Creative commercial arrangements and partnerships: Many different forms of ICT were first developed and used in the public sector, but as their financial potential became evident, the private sector swiftly took over. The public sector continues to be very interested in ICT to improve public services with an impact on agriculture (for example, agricultural extension services, property registration, and forest management), as well as for interacting with residents and controlling internal matters. The role of the private sector in some of these initiatives has improved the availability, affordability, and flexibility of ICT for development. Development plans utilizing ICT have benefited from increased private sector engagement and public demand, in contrast with other strategic planning, which frequently has difficulty surviving or expanding since the public sector cannot pay them. Many different forms of ICT were first developed and used in the public sector, but as their financial potential became evident, the private sector swiftly took over. The public sector continues to be very interested in ICT to improve public services with an impact on agriculture (for example, agricultural extension services, property registration, and forest management), as well as for interacting with residents and controlling internal matters. The entrepreneurial aspect of ICT draws new business relationships and investment opportunities. Only a small portion of the potential is represented by mobile phone applications, software development, local language adaptation, and remote transaction services to support ongoing innovation. Private businesses that have made technology and software investments frequently want to collaborate with the public sector to offer their goods and services to smallholders. Cellular network operators can invest, for instance, by providing more extensive text products at a cheaper cost, gathering premiums, dispersing payments, or taking part in network expansion into remote regions. Commercial businesses, including processors, input providers, and exporters, are also encouraged to engage in ICT since it frequently results in greater productivity and earnings and furthermore extends to clientele groups like lone farmers [14]. There is the ability to layer geographical data that includes socioeconomic and climatic facts, in that there are multiple choices for analyzing biophysical trends (such as erosion or the movement of pathogens), forecasting (about the consequences of climate change or the proper place of wholesale markets in regards to transportation infrastructure), and picking specific populations to test new technologies or farming methods (for example, recognizing growers who are particularly likely to profit from using e-vouchers, to Buy fertilizer).
- (e)
- The democratization of data, including the open access movement using social media and related industry 4.0 technologies: ICT-enabled democratization of research and information is also advancing rural and agricultural development more widely. New technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT) and blockchain are expected to push this trend further, enabling farmers to actively participate in the governance of agrifood supply chain networks [55,56,57]. Through the open-access movement, enormous amounts of information held by people and organizations have become viewable, accessible, and maintainable. These deeds have enhanced accountability and visibility while also encouraging the public, private, and research sectors to take part in the solution of long-term economic challenges, including those involving agriculture. Additionally, the growth of freely accessible software and open source blockchain solutions makes it possible for local community organizations to share information. Social media, formerly just used for pleasure, now possesses enormous potential for usage in knowledge exchange and cooperation, even in farming, even though Facebook, the most widely used social network, was estimated in 2010 as only having 3 percent usage in Africa and over 4 percent in Asia against 10.3% (more than 500 million users) worldwide. Fundraising, which involves scientists, governments, and other development groups asking producers and consumers for input using tools such as cell devices, also supports the expansion of agriculture. Farmers may now share crucial local information on agriculture via SMS, such as insect incidences or agricultural production, which was formerly easier to collect with costly research surveys. Additionally, farmers in less developed countries can use innovative funding tools such as microloan crowdfunding platforms that use the internet and social media. Consumers may also inform companies about altering purchasing preferences and habits using technological tools.
5. Discussion
- Direct interactions with farmers, farm tours, lectures, and other informal educational activities highlight the special significance of advisors’ work.
- Educational centers for counseling and communication and information systems had to play a more central role.
- The significance and the value of agricultural advice in village life and the nation are emphasized.
- The farms that produce necessities, as well as family farms that may be seeking to develop more creative goods, should be able to receive guidance from the agricultural consulting company.
6. Conclusions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sachitra, V.; Choy Chong, S. Firm Level Competitive Advantage in the Agricultural Sector: A Research Agenda. J. Econ. Manag. Trade 2016, 12, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OECD. The Impact of Digitalization on Productivity: Firm-Level Evidence from The Netherlands. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=ECO/WKP(2021)31&docLanguage=En (accessed on 28 December 2022).
- Al Zubi, M.; Radovic, V. SDG11-Sustainable Cities and Communities-Towards Inclusive, Safe, and Resilient Settlements, 1st ed.; Emerald Publishing Limited: Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK, 2016; pp. 32–36. [Google Scholar]
- United Nations. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 7–32. [Google Scholar]
- Popescu, G.H.; Sima, V.; Nica, E.; Gheorghe, I.G. Measuring sustainable competitiveness in contemporary economies—Insights from European economy. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); The International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Status of Digital Agriculture in 18 Countries of Europe and Central Asia; FAO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- World Bank. Competitive Agricultural Project (SCAP). Report No. PAD 3446. Available online: http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/961711573843471628/pdf/Serbia-Competitive-Agriculture-Project.pdf (accessed on 14 December 2020).
- Đurić, K.; Cvijanović, D.; Prodanović, R.; Čavlin, M.; Kuzman, B.; Lukač Bulatović, M. Serbian Agriculture Policy: Economic Analysis Using the PSE Approach. Sustainability 2019, 11, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dimitrovski, D.; Leković, M.; Joukes, V. A bibliometric analysis of Crossref agritourism literature indexed in Web of Science. Hotel. Tour. Manag. 2019, 7, 25–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spasić, T.; Georgijevski, M. Application of modern information technologies in agricultural development. In Proceedings of the 18th International Scientific Conference “Regional Development and Demographic Flows of Southeast European Countries”, Niš, Serbia, 6–8 June 2013; pp. 759–771. [Google Scholar]
- Kountios, G. The role of agricultural consultants and precision agriculture in adopting good agricultural practices and sustainable water management. Int. J. Sustain. Agric. Manag. Inform. 2022, 8, 144–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simonović, Z. Development policy advisory public service in agriculture in Serbia. Ekonomika 2016, 62, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ammann, K. Reconciling traditional knowledge with modern agriculture: A guide for building bridges. In Intellectual Property Management in Health and Agricultural Innovation: A Handbook of Best Practices; Krattiger, A., Mahoney, R.T., Nelsen, L., Thomson, J.A., Bennett, A.B., Satyanarayana, K., Graff, G.D., Fernandez, C., Kowalski, S.P., Eds.; Centre for the Management of Intellectual Property in Health Research and Development (MIHR): Oxford, UK, 2007; Volume 1–2, pp. 1539–1559. [Google Scholar]
- Klerkx, L.; Jakku, E.; Labarthe, P. A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0: New contributions and a future research agenda. NJAS Wagening. J. Life Sci. 2019, 90–91, 100315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Latino, M.E.; Menegoli, M.; Corallo, A. Agriculture Digitalization: A Global Examination Based on Bibliometric Analysis. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2022, 1, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lezoche, M.; Hernandez, J.E.; del Mar Eva Alemany Díaz, M.; Panetto, H.; Kacprzyk, J. Agri-food 4.0: A survey of the supply chains and technologies for the future agriculture. Comput. Ind. 2020, 117, 103187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Latino, M.E.; Corallo, A.; Menegoli, M.; Nuzzo, B. Agriculture 4.0 as Enabler of Sustainable Agri-Food: A Proposed Taxonomy. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2022, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molina-Maturano, J.; Verhulst, N.; Tur-Cardona, J.; Güerena, D.T.; Gardeazábal-Monsalve, A.; Govaerts, B.; De Steur, H.; Speelman, S. How to Make a Smartphone-Based App for Agricultural Advice Attractive: Insights from a Choice Experiment in Mexico. Agronomy 2022, 12, 691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srinivasan, J.; Burrell, J. Revisiting the fishers of Kerala, India. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development: Full Papers—Volume 1 (ICTD ’13), Cape Town, South Africa, 7–10 December 2013; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 56–66. [Google Scholar]
- Islam, S.M.; Grönlund, Å.G. Factors influencing the adoption of mobile phones among the farmers in Bangladesh: Theories and practices. Int. J. Adv. ICT Emerg. Reg. 2012, 4, 4–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruiz-Garcia, L.; Lunadei, L.; Barreiro, P.; Robla, R. Review a review of wireless sensor technologies and applications in agriculture and food industry: State of the art and current trends. Sensors 2009, 9, 4728–4750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chapman, R.; Slaymaker, T. ICTs and Rural Development: Review of the Literature, Current Interventions and, Opportunities for Action; Working Paper; Overseas Development Institute (ODI): London, UK, 2002; pp. 30–34. [Google Scholar]
- Mitrović, D.; Škrbić, N.; Ogrizović, B. Review of the role and importance of the agricultural professional service from the point of view of mechanics. Poljopr. Teh. 2009, 25, 23–31. [Google Scholar]
- Filipović, J.; Stanković, S.; Beskorovajni, R.; Tolimir, N.; Popović, N.; Pešić, B.; Jovanović, V. Diary production in Pomoravlje region, Serbia. In Proceedings of the VIII International Scientific Agriculture Symposium “AGROSYM 2017”, Jahorina, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 5–8 October 2017; pp. 2575–2579. [Google Scholar]
- Janković, S.; Novković, N.; Vasiljević, Z. Agroeconomic knowledge in the function of agricultural extension in Serbia. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Scientific Agricultural Symposium AgroSym, Jahorina, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 15–18 October 2015; University of East Sarajevo: Jahorina, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2015; pp. 69–77. [Google Scholar]
- Labonne, J.; Chase, R. The Power of Information: The Impact of Mobile Phones on Farmers’ Welfare in the Philippines. Policy Research Working Paper No. 4996. Available online: athttp://econ.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64165259&theSitePK=478060&piPK=64165421&menuPK=64166093&etityID=000158349_20090716115612 (accessed on 22 December 2022).
- Antholt, C.H. Getting Ready for the Twenty-First Century: Technical Change and Institutional Modernization in Agriculture; World Bank Technical Paper 217; Asia Technical Department Series; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Radović, V.; Pejanović, R.; Marinčić, D. Extreme weather and climatic events on agriculture as a risk of sustainable development. Econ. Agric. 2015, 62, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pedersen, S.M.; Fountas, S.; Have, H.; Blackmore, B.S. Agricultural robots-system analysis and economic feasibility. Precis. Agric. 2006, 7, 295–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emerson, K.; Nabatchi, T. Collaborative Governance Regimes; Georgetown University Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2015; pp. 132–144. [Google Scholar]
- Seitanidi, M.; Koufopoulos, D.N.; Palmer, P. Partnership Formation for Change: Indicators for Transformative Potential in Cross Sector Social Partnerships. J. Bus. Ethics 2010, 94, 139–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mapiye, O.; Makombe, G.; Molotsi, A.; Dzama, K.; Mapiye, C. Information and communication technologies (ICTs): The potential for enhancing the dissemination of agricultural information and services to smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. Inf. Dev. 2021, 026666692110648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, F. An agri-food supply chain traceability system for China based on RFID & blockchain technology. In Proceedings of the 2016 13th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM), Kunming, China, 24–26 June 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prashar, D.; Jha, N.; Jha, S.; Lee, Y.; Joshi, G.P. Blockchain-Based Traceability and Visibility for Agricultural Products: A Decentralized Way of Ensuring Food Safety in India. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chryssochoidis, G.; Karagiannaki, A.; Pramatari, K.; Kehagia, O. A cost-benefit evaluation framework of an electronic-based traceability system. Br. Food J. 2009, 111, 565–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Latino, M.E.; Menegoli, M.; Lazoi, M.; Corallo, A. Voluntary traceability in food supply chain: A framework leading its implementation in Agriculture 4.0. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2022, 178, 121564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hughes, T.; Martin, C. Design traceability of complex systems. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Symposium on Human Interaction with Complex Systems, Dayton, OH, USA, 22–25 March 1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radogna, A.V.; Latino, M.E.; Menegoli, M.; Prontera, C.T.; Morgante, G.; Mongelli, D.; Giampetruzzi, L.; Corallo, A.; Bondavalli, A.; Francioso, L. A Monitoring Framework with Integrated Sensing Technologies for Enhanced Food Safety and Traceability. Sensors 2022, 22, 6509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rashmi, I.; Roy, T.; Kartika, K.S.; Pal, R.; Coumar, V.; Kala, S.; Shinoji, K.C. Organic and Inorganic Fertilizer Contaminants in Agriculture: Impact on Soil and Water Resources. In Contaminants in Agriculture; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 3–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajah, I.; Nweke, H. Big Data and Business Analytics: Trends, Platforms, Success Factors and Applications. Big Data Cogn. Comput. 2019, 3, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Javaid, M.; Haleem, A.; Singh, R.P.; Suman, R. Enhancing smart farming through the applications of Agriculture 4.0 technologies. Int. J. Intell. Netw. 2022, 3, 150–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garske, B.; Bau, A.; Ekardt, F. Digitalization and AI in European Agriculture: A Strategy for Achieving Climate and Biodiversity Targets? Sustainability 2021, 13, 4652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heyl, K.; Ekardt, F.; Sund, L.; Roos, P. Potentials and Limitations of Subsidies in Sustainability Governance: The Example of Agriculture. Sustainability 2022, 14, 15859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamid El Bilali, H.; Allahyari, M.S. Transition towards sustainability in agriculture and food systems: Role of information and communication technologies. Inf. Process. Agric. 2018, 5, 456–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OECD. Consumer Policy and the Smart Home. Available online: https://one.oecd.org/document/DSTI/CDEP/CISP/MADE(2017)1/en/pdf (accessed on 20 December 2022).
- Wolfert, S.; Cor Verdouw, L.; Bogaardt, M. Big data in smart farming—A review. Agric. Syst. 2017, 153, 69–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahoa, E.; Kassahun, A.; Tekinerdogan, B. Business processes and information systems in the Ghana cocoa supply chain: A survey study. NJAS-Wagening. J. Life Sci. 2020, 92, 100323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kassahun, H.T.; Jacobsen, J.B.; Nicholson, C.F. Revisiting money and labor for valuing environmental goods and services in developing countries. Ecol. Econ. 2020, 177, 106771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Köksal, Ö.; Tekinerdogan, B. Architecture design approach for IoT-based farm management information systems. Precis. Agric. 2019, 20, 926–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verdouw, C.; Sundmaeker, H.; Tekinerdogan, B.; Conzon, D.; Montanaro, T. Architecture framework of IoT-based food and farm systems: A multiple case study. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2019, 165, 104939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papadavid, G.; Kountios, G.; Michailidis, A. Monitoring and determination of irrigation demand in Cyprus. Glob. Nest J. 2013, 15, 93–101. [Google Scholar]
- Kountios, G.; Papadavid, G. The Adoption of Information and Communication Technologies in Farmers and the Emerging Need for an Integrated System of Agricultural Advisory and Training. In Proceedings of the CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Athens, Greece, 22–25 September 2022; Volume 3293. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, Y.-P.; Petway, J.R.; Anthony, J.; Mukhtar, H.; Liao, S.-W.; Chou, C.-F.; Ho, Y.-F. Blockchain: The Evolutionary Next Step for ICT E-Agriculture. Environments 2017, 4, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suprem, A.; Mahalik, N.; Kim, K. A review on application of technology systems, standards and interfaces for agriculture and food sector. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 2013, 35, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demestichas, K.; Peppes, N.; Alexakis, T.; Adamopoulou, E. Blockchain in agriculture traceability systems: A review. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 4113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serdaris, P.; Antoniadis, I.; Tomlekova, N. Supply chain management: A view of the distribution channel. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 2014, 20, 480–486. [Google Scholar]
- Anshari, M.; Almunawar, M.N.; Masri, M.; Hamdan, M. Digital marketplace and FinTech to support agriculture sustainability. Energy Procedia 2019, 156, 234–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stubenrauch, J.; Ekardt, F.; Heyl, K.; Garske, B.; Schott, V.L.; Ober, S. How to legally overcome the distinction between organic and conventional farming Governance approaches for sustainable farming on 100% of the land. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 28, 716–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weishaupt, A.; Ekardt, F.; Garske, B.; Stubenrauch, J.; Wieding, J. Land Use, Livestock, Quantity Governance, and Economic Instruments—Sustainability Beyond Big Livestock Herds and Fossil Fuels. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Verhoef, P.; Broekhuizen, T.; Bart, Y.; Bhattacharya, A.; Qi Dong, J.; Fabian, N.; Haenlein, M. Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 122, 889–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Article ID | Article Url/DOI | Results Analysis | |
---|---|---|---|
1. | [41] | 10.1016/j.ijin.2022.09.004 |
|
2. | [11] | 10.1504/ijsami.2022.124577 |
|
3. | [53] | 10.3390/environments4030050 |
|
4. | [32] | 10.1177/02666669211064847 |
|
5. | [34] | 10.3390/su12083497 |
|
6. | [39] | 10.1007/978-3-030-41552-5_1 |
|
7. | [54] | 10.1016/j.csi.2012.09.002 |
|
8. | [44] | 10.1016/j.inpa.2018.06.006 |
|
9. | [55] | 10.3390/app10124113 |
|
Publication Source | # |
---|---|
Progress in Development Studies | 1 |
Telecommunications Policy | 1 |
Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries | 6 |
Information Technology for Development | 3 |
Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension | 1 |
Journal of Enterprise Information Management | 1 |
Technological Forecasting & Social Change | 1 |
South African Journal of Information Management | 1 |
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture Information | 1 |
Processing in Agriculture | 1 |
African Journal of Agricultural Research | 1 |
International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability | 1 |
Journal of Rural Social Sciences | 1 |
Society and Business Review | 1 |
Journal of Agricultural & Food Information | 1 |
Journal of Agricultural Informatics | 1 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kountios, G.; Konstantinidis, C.; Antoniadis, I. Can the Adoption of ICT and Advisory Services Be Considered as a Tool of Competitive Advantage in Agricultural Holdings? A Literature Review. Agronomy 2023, 13, 530. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020530
Kountios G, Konstantinidis C, Antoniadis I. Can the Adoption of ICT and Advisory Services Be Considered as a Tool of Competitive Advantage in Agricultural Holdings? A Literature Review. Agronomy. 2023; 13(2):530. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020530
Chicago/Turabian StyleKountios, Georgios, Christos Konstantinidis, and Ioannis Antoniadis. 2023. "Can the Adoption of ICT and Advisory Services Be Considered as a Tool of Competitive Advantage in Agricultural Holdings? A Literature Review" Agronomy 13, no. 2: 530. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020530
APA StyleKountios, G., Konstantinidis, C., & Antoniadis, I. (2023). Can the Adoption of ICT and Advisory Services Be Considered as a Tool of Competitive Advantage in Agricultural Holdings? A Literature Review. Agronomy, 13(2), 530. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020530