Next Article in Journal
Transcriptome Analysis of Banana (Musa acuminate L.) in Response to Low-Potassium Stress
Next Article in Special Issue
Tetraploid Wheats: Valuable Source of Phytosterols and Phytostanols
Previous Article in Journal
An Evaluation of Spelt Crosses for Breeding New Varieties of Spring Spelt
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phenolic Composition and Antioxidant Activities of Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) Plant during Growth Cycle
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of Distribution of Selected Bioactive Compounds in Camelina sativa from Seeds to Pomace and Oil

by
Danuta Kurasiak-Popowska
1,*,
Bernadetta Ryńska
1 and
Kinga Stuper-Szablewska
2
1
Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agronomy and Bioengineering, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Dojazd 11, 60-632 Poznań, Poland
2
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Wood Technology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 75, 60-625 Poznań, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2019, 9(4), 168; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9040168
Submission received: 19 February 2019 / Revised: 21 March 2019 / Accepted: 24 March 2019 / Published: 29 March 2019

Abstract

:
Camelina sativa is an oilseed plant that produces seed oil rich in vitamins, UFA (unsaturated fatty acids), phytosterols, and polyphenols. Most, but not all, bioactive compounds are soluble in oil. So far, studies have been based analyzing the profile of bioactive compounds only in oil. As part of this work, it was decided to examine the seeds, oil, and pomace of four genotypes of Camelina sativa (three spring genotypes and one winter cultivar). The transmission of bioactive compounds to oil and pomace was compared to their content in seeds. The quantitative profile of selected bioactive compounds was analyzed: eight flavonoid aglycons, 11 phenolic acids, three carotenoids, and 19 fatty acids. As a result of pressing more than 80% of flavonoids entered oil, whereas 20% remained in the pomace. When the content of phenolic acids in seeds and in oil was compared, it turned out that on average 50% of these compounds entered oil. Among all the phenolic acids under analysis the highest contents of chlorogenic, caffeic, and sinapic acids were found both in camelina seeds and oil. Similarly to the other bioactive compounds, more than 70% of fat-soluble carotenoids were extracted from camelina seeds with oil. Most of the genotypes had the fatty acid composition and the ω-6/ω-3 ratio characteristic of camelina oil. Camelina oil is characterized by properties that enable its extensive use in the food industry.

1. Introduction

In recent years the consumption of vegetable fats has been increasing systematically due to the promotion of a balanced diet, which includes functional food as an important element. These significant changes in the consumption of fats result not only from economic factors (changes in income and prices of food) and consumers’ new preferences, but also from the higher demand for oil and margarine in secondary processing (for the production of highly processed food and biofuels) [1].
At present, cold-pressed oils are the most popular vegetable fats consumed in Poland because of their health-promoting values. Rapeseed, sunflower, and linseed oils are traditionally produced and used in Poland. Recently consumers have been searching for a variety of tastes and health-promoting products. Consequently, there has been increasing interest in oils made from the seeds of other plants. One of which is camelina oil, a traditional product made from cold-pressed Camelina sativa seeds. Camelina sativa is an annual oilseed plant of the Brassicaceae family. It has been used for oil production for 3000 years. The increasing interest in camelina oil results from the fact that it contains large amounts of essential unsaturated fatty acids (UFA), i.e., ω-6 fatty acid (linoleic acid) and ω-3 fatty acid (linolenic acid) [2]. The composition of UFAs regulates lipid metabolism, reduces cholesterol and triacylglycerol levels in the blood, and is necessary for normal function of the nervous system, heart, and retina. UFA deficit inhibits growth, causes skin lesions, and increases the risk of infections [3]. At present, due to the fact that ω-6 and ω-3 fatty acids are consumed in inadequate proportions, in a large number of developed countries there is an increasing incidence of diet-dependent diseases of affluence, e.g., obesity, hypertension, atherosclerosis, cholesterolemia, and some cancers [4,5,6]. According to the data provided in reference publications, the optimal ratio between ω-6 and ω-3 fatty acids should range from 2:1 to 3:1 [6,7]. Using raw camelina, linseed, peanut, or rapeseed oils in a diet has beneficial effect on the lipid profile because it reduces the concentrations of LDL cholesterol and its fractions, but does not affect the concentration of HDL cholesterol.
Vegetable oils, including camelina oil, are important products in a well-balanced everyday diet not only because of their high content of energy, vitamins, UFAs, and phytosterols, but also because of the high content of bioactive antioxidants accompanying triacylglycerols. Apart from vitamins A and E, these are phenolic compounds (including phenolic acids and flavonoids), tocopherols, phytosterols, carotenoid pigments, and phospholipids. All these compounds protect unsaturated fatty acids in oil from oxidation. When these bioactive compounds contained in cold-pressed oils are consumed without being processed, they are beneficial to human health [8,9]. Polyphenols are important components of camelina oil as they have multidirectional functions. Furthermore, they affect taste and color, exhibit antioxidative activity, stabilize fats and other labile food ingredients. On the other hand, they act on the human organism as antioxidants. Apart from the aforementioned substances related to lipids, cold-pressed oil may also contain unfavorable components, e.g., antioxidation products, toxic trace elements, and pesticides [10].
In 2006 camelina oil was registered as a traditional product in Greater Poland Voivodeship, which is produced only by pressing at low temperatures, and can be consumed as unrefined oil. Currently, there is an increasing interest in Camelina sativa due to its tolerance to unfavorable soil and climatic conditions as well as its high resistance to diseases and pests [11,12]. Camelina maintains the same productivity level even at low rainfall and poor soil fertility [13]. Due to the low agronomic requirements of camelina scientists are becoming increasingly interested in using this plant for feeding people and animals. They also want to use camelina oil to produce bioenergy.
Research on the production of oil from other camelina cultivars than the ones which have been grown in Poland so far is justified by the fact that pilot experiments have found significant differences in the content of bioactive compounds between spring and winter cultivars and within these two types [14]. The aim of this study was to determine the qualitative and quantitative profiles of bioactive compounds in cold-pressed camelina oil and pomace, and to compare them with their content in seeds. The transmission of bioactive compounds to oil and pomace was tested in relation to their content in seeds. Three spring genotypes and one winter cultivar of camelina were analyzed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

Three spring genotypes and one winter cultivar of Camelina sativa were analyzed. In 2013, the Omega spring cultivar was registered in the National Plant Breeders’ Rights (PBR) in Poland. The Luna winter cultivar was registered in 2012. Both cultivars were bred at the Department of Plant Genetics and Breeding, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poland. The spring genotypes: Hoga and CSS-CAM 25 came from the US National Plant Germplasm System (NPGS). The Hoga genotype (PI 650150) was collected in Denmark. The CSS-CAM 25 genotype (PI 650154) was collected in the former Soviet Union. The NPGS received both genotypes in 1993.

2.2. Field Test

A field experiment on the genotypes was conducted in a randomized block design at the ARS Dłoń, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poland (51°41’23.835’’ N 17°4’1.414’’ E). There were three replications. The plot area was 15 m2. Camelina was seeded at a depth of 15 mm using a small plot drill. Winter Camelina cultivar was sown on 26 September 2016 while spring cultivars were sown 28 March 2017. All Camelina cultivars were sown at a rate 5 kg/ha. The field management followed standard agricultural practice. Diseases and pests were not combated. The plants were left standing in the field until they were completely ripe. All cultivars were combine-harvested (Hege 125) after reaching full maturity. Spring Camelina cultivars were harvested on 18 July 2017; winter cultivar—20 July 2017. The seed moisture was 9%.

2.3. Oil Pressing

The implementation of the project under EUREKA international scientific programme ‘E!4018 CAMELINA-BIOFUEL’ resulted in the construction of a set of machinery for effective pressing of oil from Camelina sativa seeds. The machinery was constructed at the Industrial Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Poznań, Poland. The set consisted of an expeller, crusher, and screw conveyor, which allowed continuous cold pressing of oil from seeds. After an initial start-up test, which was supposed to warm up the press so that it would operate at a steady temperature, the screw conveyor hopper was filled with a portion of seeds (5 kg). Their moisture was about 9%. The seeds were crushed in the 0.2 mm slot of the crusher. During the entire period of the experiment, the average capacity of the crusher was 60 kg∙h−1. The maximum capacity of the crusher was 75 kg∙h−1. The average efficiency of the process of pressing oil from whole seeds was 69%. The oil from all the samples subjected to analysis was pressed at the same time—about one month after the seeds had been harvested. Immediately after pressing the oil, seeds, and pomace were subjected to physicochemical analyses.

2.4. Content of Phenolic and Flavonoids Compounds

Samples weighing 10 g were collected for analyses of phenolic compounds. They were ground in a laboratory mill (WŻ-1). The samples subjected to analyses weighed 0.20 g. They were placed in sealed 17 mL culture test tubes and subjected to alkaline and acid hydrolyses. Distilled water (1 mL) and 4 mL of 2 M aqueous sodium hydroxide were added to the test tubes before alkaline hydrolysis. The test tubes were sealed tightly and heated in a water bath at 95 °C for 30 min. After cooling (approx. 20 min) the test tubes were neutralized with 2 mL of 6 M aqueous hydrochloric acid solution (pH = 2). Next, the samples were cooled in water with ice. Phenolic acids were extracted from the inorganic phase using diethyl ether (2 × 2 mL). The resulting ether extracts were transferred into 8 mL vials. Next, acid hydrolysis was carried out. For this purpose the aqueous phase was supplemented with 3 mL of 6 M aqueous hydrochloric acid solution. The test tubes were sealed tightly and heated in a water bath at 95 °C for 30 min. After being cooled in water with ice the samples were extracted with diethyl ether (2 × 2 mL). The resulting ether extracts were transferred into 8 mL vials. They were then evaporated to dryness in a stream of nitrogen. Before analyses the samples were dissolved in 1 mL of methanol. An Acquity H class UPLC system equipped with a Waters Acquity PDA detector (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) was used for the analyses. An Acquity UPLC® BEH C18 column (100 mm × 2.1 mm, particle size 1.7 μm) (Waters, Dublin, Ireland) was used for chromatographic separation. The composition of the mobile phase of the gradient elution was as follows: A, acetonitryl with 0.1% formic acid; and B, 1% aqueous formic acid mixture (pH = 2). The concentrations of phenolic compounds were measured using an internal standard at wavelengths of λ = 320 nm and 280 nm. Compounds were identified by comparing the peak retention time with the standard retention time and by adding a specific amount of the standard to the samples and repeating the analysis. The detection level was 1 μg/g. The retention times of assayed acids were as follows: kaempferol 6.11 min, gallic acid 8.85 min, vanillic acid 9.71 min, luteolin 11.89 min, protocatechuic acid 12.23 min, apigenin 16.43 min, catechin 18.09 min, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid 19.46 min, chlorogenic acid 21.56 min, caffeic acid 26.19 min, syringic acid 28.05 min, naringenin 31.22 min, vitexin 35.41 min, rutin 38.11 min, quercetin 39.58 min, p-coumaric acid 40.20 min, ferulic acid 46.20 min, sinapic acid 48.00 min, and t-cinnamic acid 52.40 min.

2.5. Content of Carotenoids

Carotenoids were isolated and their quantity in camelina seed samples was measured by means of Acquity ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (Waters, USA) without saponification. Carotenoid extracts were isolated from crushed camelina seeds (0.4 mg), which were ground with a mixture of acetone and petroleum ether (1:1). When the plant tissue was separated, the acetone and hydrophilic fraction were removed from the extract by washing with water. The procedure resulted in an ether extract with a mixture of carotenoid pigments. The extract was concentrated in a vacuum evaporator at 35 °C until the oily content was left. Next, it was dissolved in 2 mL of methanol (Merck Millipore, Poland) and subjected to chromatographic analysis. The content of lutein, zeaxanthin and β-carotene was measured by means of Acquity ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (Waters, USA) with a PDA 2998 detector (Waters, USA) with a 600E pump, 7725i rheodyne injector and RP-18 Atlantis T3 column, 3 μm, 4,6 × 150 mm. The following solvents were used for elution: A, HPLC methanol; B, water; and C, tert-butyl methyl ether (TBME). The gradient was applied at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. The column and samples were regulated using a thermostat. The column temperature was 30 °C, whereas the temperature of the samples was 10 °C. During the analysis the solutions were degassed in a degasser (Waters). The injection volume was 10 µl. The analysis was conducted at a wavelength of λ = 445 nm. The compounds were identified by their spectra ranging from 200 to 600 nm and by comparing their retention times with standards.

2.6. FAME (Fatty Acid Methyl Esters) Analysis

The fatty acid profile of the cultivars was determined to characterize the lipid fraction as a potential source of flavor/volatile compounds. Fatty acids were extracted with the method described by Young [15]. Samples containing 100 mg of ground seeds were placed in 17 mL culture tubes, suspended in 2 mL of methanol, treated with 0.5 mL of 2 M aqueous sodium hydroxide, and sealed tightly. The culture tubes were then placed in 250 mL plastic bottles, sealed tightly and placed inside a microwave oven (Model AVM 401/1WH; Whirlpool, Bromma, Sweden) operating at 2450 MHz and 900 W maximum output. The samples were irradiated (370 W) for 20 s. After about 5 min they were irradiated for another 20 s. After 15 min, the contents of the culture tubes were neutralized with 1 M aqueous hydrochloric acid. MeOH (2 mL) was added and extraction was carried out with pentane (3–4 mL) within the culture tubes. The combined pentane extracts were evaporated to dryness in a nitrogen stream. Next, the extracts were methylated with a mixture of anhydrous methanol and sulphuric acid (1:5, v/v). Methanol (0.5 mL) and then a 0.15 mL methanol/sulfuric acid mixture (1:5, v/v) were added to the extract containing lipids. The samples were heated at 70 °C for 15 min. After the solution had been cooled, 0.5 mL of n-hexane was added, followed by the addition of a sufficient amount of water to form two layers. The upper hexane layer was removed and analyzed with a gas chromatograph (Agilent 5890 II, Birmingham, UK) equipped with a flame ionization detector, fitted with a Supelcowax 10 column (30 m × 0.25 mm I.D., 0.25 mm film thickness). The injector and detector temperatures were 220 and 240 °C, respectively. The column temperature was programmed to increase from 60 to 240 °C at a rate of 110 °C/min. Peaks were identified by comparing the sample peak retention times with those of known methylated fatty acid compounds.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The results of the chemical analyses were analyzed statistically by means of the STATISTICA v 8.0 software. Tukey’s multiple comparison procedure was used to compare the contents of individual metabolites in the samples. Identical letters in rows or columns denote the lack of differences at a significance level α = 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

The seeds, oil, and pomace of four genotypes of Camelina sativa (three spring genotypes and one winter cultivar) were analyzed chemically. The quantitative profile of selected bioactive compounds was analyzed: eight flavonoid aglycons, 11 phenolic acids, and 19 fatty acids.
The contents of bioactive compounds were measured to check the distribution of individual groups of antioxidants in oil and pomace. Due to the different chemical properties, solubility, and polarity of the chemical compounds under analysis, we presume that some part of bioactive compounds cannot be co-extracted with oil. The water-soluble bioactive compounds mostly remained in the pomace. The results noted for the bioactive compounds in oil and pomace were compared with the content of bioactive compounds in the input material, i.e., seeds. Earlier investigations showed that the form of development (spring or winter) influenced the profile of bioactive compounds in seeds.
The analyses showed that in total, the seeds of the spring and winter genotypes did not differ significantly in the content of eight flavonoids (Table 1). As a result of pressing more than 80% of flavonoids entered oil, whereas 20% remained in the pomace (Figure 1). However, there were significant differences between the genotypes in the content of individual bioactive compounds. The statistical analysis showed that the biggest differences between the genotypes were noted in the content of apigenin and quercetin. The diversity in the content of these flavonoids may have been caused by internal factors affecting the genetic control of enzymes participating in synthesis and distribution, the degree of seed maturity and the cultivation method. The high content of these flavonoids in oil indicates that during the pressing process their hydrophilic glycoside forms, which can be found in plant tissues, become mostly degraded to aglycone forms, which dissolve in fats easily.
A similar tendency was observed for phenolic acids (Table 2). There were significantly more phenolic acids in the oil than in the pomace (Figure 1). However, these proportions were different than those observed for flavonoids. When the content of phenolic acids in seeds and oil was compared, it turned out that on average 50% of these compounds entered oil. The rest remained in the pomace. A similar outcome was caused by the chemical properties of phenolic acids, which dissolve in water more easily than in oil. However, phenolic acids in the form of glycoside esters dissolve in fats easily. This reaction of phenolic acids is caused by their low resistance to high temperature. Although the pressing procedure did not involve heating, the ester bonds of phenolic acids, which were less durable than glycoside forms, became broken. The results showed that camelina seeds contained more esters of phenolic acids than their glycoside forms.
Among all the phenolic acids under analysis, the highest contents of chlorogenic, caffeic, and sinapic acids were found both in camelina seeds and oil. There is also high content of sinapic acid in rapeseed oil (236 µg/100 g), but in soybean, sunflower, and grapeseed oils the content of this acid does not exceed 1.5 µg/100 g [16,17,18]. There was also syringic acid in camelina oil (52–71 mg/kg). Tuberoso et al. [19] studied nine different vegetable oils (cold-pressed oil from flax, grape seeds, maize, peanuts, pumpkins, rapeseeds, soybeans, sunflowers, and olives) and found syringic acid only in rapeseed oil (6.8 mg/kg). Most edible oils do not contain protocatechuic acid, but it can be found in camelina oil (48–66 mg/kg) and in pumpkin oil (3.1 µg/100 g) [17]. The presence of phenolic acids, whose quantitative and qualitative profile has not been tested in gold oil is very important for consumers. Raw oil influences the digestive system by preventing inflammation, relieving reflux, and lowering the acid level in the stomach. Phenolic acids have an anti-inflammatory effect.
Carotenoids were another group of bioactive compounds under analysis. Reference publications provide very scarce information on the content of carotenoids in camelina oil. So far, researchers have chiefly analyzed the total content of carotenoids or the content of β-carotene only. The results of our study showed that there was high content of β-carotene in camelina seeds and oil (Table 3). We also found lutein and zeaxanthin. As far as the latter is concerned, there was significantly higher content of this carotenoid in the Hoga genotype. The analyzed cultivars had similar levels of zeaxantin, except for the Hoga cultivar, which had 30 times higher content of this carotenoid. Similarly to the other bioactive compounds, more than 70% of fat-soluble carotenoids were extracted from camelina seeds with oil.
The carotenoids contained in the oil, such as lutein, are beta-carotene derivatives, hence their bioavailability is higher than that of beta-carotene.
The next very important stage of the research consisted in the identification of the fatty acid profile in camelina oil. There were no statistically significant differences in the oil content between the Camelina sativa genotypes under analysis, but the values in the results of our study were lower than in reference publications (Table 4). The oil content in camelina seeds differed according to the location, i.e., 35–43% in Canada [20,21,22], 35–40% in the US [23], and 37–41% in Germany [24].
Most genotypes had the fatty acid composition characteristic of camelina oil (Table 3), which is rich in oleic acid (18:1, 14–18%), linoleic acid, (18:2, 15–23%), linolenic acid (18:3, 28–40%), and eicosenoic acid (20:1, 12–17%) [5,25,26,27,28].
There were significant differences in the content of ∑MUFA and ∑PUFA in the CSS-CAM 25 (PI 650154) genotype, which had the lowest content of ∑MUFA and the highest content of ∑PUFA. The ω-6/ω-3 ratio in all the genotypes was about 1:2. This is characteristic of camelina oil [5], which is a good source of ω-3 acids (ALA). The camelina genotypes contained 35% (Hoga) to 46% (CSS-CAM 25) of α-linoleic acid. The content of α-linoleic acid amounted to less than 1% in olive and sunflower oils, about 8% in rapeseed and soybean oils, 10.4% in walnut oil, and up to 60% in linseed [23,29,30]. It is very important to enrich the diet with products containing large amounts of ω-3 acids, especially due to the fact that many vegetable oils (sunflower oil, saffron oil, cottonseed oil, soybean oil) contain large amounts of ω-6 acids [6].
As a result of metabolism, α-linolenic acid (ALA) can be converted into eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). However, the conversion of ALA into EPA and DHA depends on the ratio of ALA to LA in the food consumed [31]. High values of the ω-6/ω-3 ratio in the diet, e.g., from 10:1 to 20:1, reduce the synthesis of linolenic eicosanoids and may stimulate inflammations [32]. In highly developed countries people’s diets are usually rich in saturated acids and ω-6 acids. Therefore, using camelina oil as functional food may help to reduce the ω-6/ω-3 ratio in the diet.
Analyzing the quantitative profile of selected bioactive compounds in oil did not reveal any differences resulting from the form of cultivation of the camelina genotypes under study. However, there were differences between the genotypes. They were caused by their origin and genetic differences. The content of selected phenolic acids (syringic, vanillic, p-cumaric acids) was similar in both Polish cultivars. Apart from vanillic acid, the highest values of phenylcarboxylic acid were noted in the CSS-CAM cultivar, which came from the former Soviet Union. It was the only genotype where 4-hydroxybenzoic and gallic acids were not extracted with oil but most of them remained in pomace.
Camelina sativa is tolerant to unfavorable soil and climatic conditions. In addition, camelina has unique agronomic traits, which include a short vegetation period. Camelina’s adaptation to vast areas of the world, high oil content combined with its unique oil composition and properties makes it a suitable oil source for the production of biofuels, jet fuel, biobased-products, feed, and food. Camelina could become an important plant for obtaining oil rich in antioxidant bioactive compounds and a sustainable source of omega-3 acids.
The presented studies indicate a significant potential for using cold pressed oils and pomace. Oils, cold-pressed, rich in naturalized antioxidants, are used for raw consumption. They can thus be considered a functional food. Significant amounts of bioactive compounds in the pomace indicate the potential of using this waste material as a source of bioactive compounds.

4. Conclusions

On the basis of the conducted research, significant differences in the content of bioactive compounds between seeds, pomace and oil were found. The highest content of tested compounds was found in oil, lower in seeds and the lowest in pomace. The distribution of bioactive compounds in the tested samples varied. Camelina oil is characterized by properties that enable its extensive use in the food industry.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.K.-P. and K.S.-S.; methodology K.S.-S.; software, K.S.-S.; validation, K.S.-S. and B.R.; formal analysis, K.S.-S.; investigation, D.K.-P.; resources, D.K.-P.; data curation, B.R.; writing—original draft preparation, D.K.-P. and K.S.-S.; writing—review and editing, D.K-.P. and K.S.-S.; visualization, D. K.-P. and K.S.-S.; supervision, D.K.-P.; project administration, D.K.-P.; funding acquisition, D.K.-P.

Funding

This research was funded by Poznan University of Life Sciences, grant number 508.102.00 and “The APC was funded by Poznan University of Life Sciences”. This publication is being co-financed by the framework of Ministry of Science and Higher Education program as “Regional Initiative Excellence” in years 2019–2022, project no. 005/RID/2018/19.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rosiak, E. Spożycie tłuszczów w Polsce i Unii Europejskiej. Proble. World Agric. Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego 2016, 16, 279–288. [Google Scholar]
  2. Fan, L.; Eskin, N.A.M. Camelina oil: Chemistry, properties and utilization. Recent Res. Dev. Lipids 2013, 9, 125–137. [Google Scholar]
  3. Sikorski, Z.E. Interakcje składników żywności. W: Chemia żywności. T. III. Odżywcze i zdrowotne właściwości składników żywności. Red. Z.E. Sikorski; WN-T: Warszawa, Poland, 2007; pp. 204–222. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cosima, A.; Konkel, A.; Fischer, R.; Schunck, W.-H. Cytochrome P450–dependent metabolism of ω-6 and ω-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids. Pharmacol. Rep. 2010, 62, 536–547. [Google Scholar]
  5. Belayneh, H.D.; Wehling, R.L.; Cahoon, E.; Ciftci, O.N. Extraction of omega-3-rich oil from Camelina sativa seed using supercritical carbon dioxide. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2015, 104, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Simopoulos, A.P. An increase in the omega-6/omega-3 fatty acid ratio increases the risk for obesity. Nutrients 2016, 2, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Callaway, J.; Schwab, U.; Harvima, I.; Halonen, P.; Mykkänen, O.; Hyvönen, P.; Järvinen, T. Efficacy of dietary hempseed oil in patients with atopic dermatitis. J. Dermatol. Treat. 2005, 16, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Edge, R.; McGarvey, D.J.; Truscott, T.G. The carotenoids as anti-oxidants—A review. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 1997, 41, 189–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Palermo, N.E.; Holick, M.F. Vitamin D, bone health, and other health benefits in pediatric patients. J. Pediat. Rehabil. Med. 2014, 7, 179–192. [Google Scholar]
  10. Choo, W.S.; Birch, J.; Dufour, J.P. Physicochemical and quality characteristics of cold-pressed flaxseed oils. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2007, 20, 202–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sharma, G.; Kumar, V.D.; Haque, A.; Bhat, S.R.; Prakash, S.; Chopra, V.L. Brassica coenspecies: A rich reservoir for genetic resistance to leaf spot caused by Alternaria brassicae. Euphytica 2002, 125, 411–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Henderson, A.E.; Hallett, R.H.; Soroka, J.J. Prefeeding behaviour of the crucifer flea beetle, Phyllotreta cruciferae, on host and nonhost crucifers. J. Insect Behav. 2004, 17, 17–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lu, C.; Napier, J.A.; Clemente, T.E.; Cahoon, E.B. New frontiers in oilseed biotechnology: Meeting the global demand for vegetable oils for food, feed, biofuel, and industrial applications. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2011, 22, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kurasiak-Popowska, D.; Stuper-Szablewska, K.; Nawracała, J. Olej rydzowy jako naturalne źródło karotenoidów dla przemysłu kosmetycznego [Camelina oil as a natural source of carotenoids for the cosmetic industry]. Przem. Chem. 2017, 96, 2077–2080. [Google Scholar]
  15. Young, J.C. Microwave-assisted extraction of the fungal metabolite ergosterol and total fatty acids. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1995, 4311, 2904–2910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cai, R.; Arntfield, S.D. A rapid high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of sinapine and sinapic acid in canola seed and meal. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2001, 78, 903–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Siger, A.; Nogala-Kalucka, M.; Lampart-Szczapa, E. The content and antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds in cold-pressed plant oils. J. Food Lipids 2008, 15, 137–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Siger, A.; Nogala-Kalucka, M.; Lampart-Szczapa, E.; Hoffmann, A. Phenolic compound contents in new rape varieties. Rośliny Oleiste/Oilseed Crops 2004, 25, 263–274. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  19. Tuberoso, C.I.G.; Kowalczyk, A.; Sarritzu, E.; Cabras, P. Determination of antioxidant compounds and antioxidant activity in commercial oilseeds for food use. Food Chem. 2007, 103, 1494–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gugel, R.K.; Falk, K.C. Agronomic and seed quality evaluation of Camelina sativa in western Canada. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2006, 1047–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Urbaniak, S.D.; Caldwell, C.D.; Zheljazkov, V.D.; Lada, R.; Luan, L. The effect of cultivar and applied nitrogen on the performance of Camelina sativa L. In: The Maritime Provinces of Canada. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2008, 88, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Urbaniak, S.; Caldwell, C.; Zheljazkov, V.; Lada, R.; Luan, L. The effect of seeding rate: Seeding date and seeder type on the performance of Camelina sativa L. in the Maritime Provinces of Canada. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2008, 88, 501–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Budin, J.T.; Breene, W.M.; Putman, D.H. Some compositional properties of camelina (Camelina sativa L. Crantz) seeds and oils. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1995, 72, 309–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zubr, J.; Matthäus, B. Effects of growth conditions on fatty acids and tocopherols in Camelina sativa oil. Ind Crops Prod. 2002, 15, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zubr, J. Oil-seed crop: Camelina sativa. Ind. Crops Prod. 1997, 6, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Singh, B.K.; Bala, M.; Rai, P.K. Fatty acid composition and seed meal characteristics of Brassica and allied genera. Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett. 2014, 373, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Berti, M.; Gesch, R.; Eynck, C.; Anderson, J.; Cermak, S. Camelina uses, genetics, genomics, production, and management. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 94, 690–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Popa, A.L.; Jurcoane, Ș.; Dumitriu, B. Camelina sativa oil-a review. Sci. Bull. Ser. F Biotechnol. 2017, 21, 233–238. [Google Scholar]
  29. Nettleton, J.A. ω-3 Fatty acids: Comparison of plant and seafood sources in human nutrition. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1991, 91, 331–337. [Google Scholar]
  30. Hui, Y.H. Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, 5th ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1996; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gebauer, S.K.; Psota, T.L.; Harris, W.S.; Kris-Etherton, P.M. n-3 Fatty acid dietary recommendations and food sources to achieve essentiality and cardiovascular benefits. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2006, 83 (Suppl. 6), 1526–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tapiero, H.; Couvreur, G.N.; Ba, P.; Tew, K.D. Polyunsaturated fatty acids PUFA and eicosanoids in human health and pathologies. Biomed. Pharmacother. 1999, 56, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The flavonoid aglicons and phenolic acids composition (%) in spring and winter genotypes of Camelina sativa: 1—Apigenin; 2—Catechin; 3—Kaempherol; 4—Luteolin; 5—Naringenin; 6—Quercetin; 7—Rutin; 8—Vitexin; 9—4-hydroxybenzoic; 10—Caffeic; 11—Chlorogenic; 12—Ferulic; 13—Gallic; 14—p-Cumaric; 15—Protocatechuic; 16—Sinapic; and 17—Syringic; 18—t-Cinnamic; 19—Vanilic.
Figure 1. The flavonoid aglicons and phenolic acids composition (%) in spring and winter genotypes of Camelina sativa: 1—Apigenin; 2—Catechin; 3—Kaempherol; 4—Luteolin; 5—Naringenin; 6—Quercetin; 7—Rutin; 8—Vitexin; 9—4-hydroxybenzoic; 10—Caffeic; 11—Chlorogenic; 12—Ferulic; 13—Gallic; 14—p-Cumaric; 15—Protocatechuic; 16—Sinapic; and 17—Syringic; 18—t-Cinnamic; 19—Vanilic.
Agronomy 09 00168 g001
Table 1. The mean content of flavonoids in spring and winter genotypes of Camelina sativa.
Table 1. The mean content of flavonoids in spring and winter genotypes of Camelina sativa.
ApigeninCatechinKaempherolLuteolinNaringeninQuercetinRutinVitexin
seeds (mg/kg d.m.)
Omega97.78 b8.34 a51.35 c60.71 c63.88 c127.76 d19.84 a55.29 c
Hoga34.82 a51.72 d41.83 b67.25 c31.24 a34.27 a21.51 ab46.85 b
CSS-CAM 25117.56 b20.70 c24.18 a47.53 b46.12 b48.97 b25.07 b41.88 b
Luna125.46 b14.47 b45.99 b25.88 a48.74 b97.48 c16.76 a25.08 a
oil (mg/L)
Omega85.24 b7.26 a48.25 d55.25 c59.25 c119.25 d10.41 b50.41 d
Hoga21.25 a49.33 c35.57 b57.13 c25.26 a30.41 a4.53 a42.53 c
CSS-CAM 2589.37 b18.22 b15.25 a40.11 b41.22 b35.89 a7.86 b37.86 b
Luna102.23 c10.13 a40.12 c21.32 a40.12 b82.33 b9.25 b21.33 a
pomace (mg/kg d.m.)
Omega11.25 a1.13 a2.65 a3.52 a3.10 a6.55 b6.22 b3.27 a
Hoga12.65 a2.16 a4.67 b8.25 c4.11 a2.67 a15.45 a4.53 a
CSS-CAM 2525.45 b2.06 a5.37 b4.11 b3.45 a12.45 c17.07 c3.17 a
Luna21.24 b3.05 a4.07 b4.07 b5.45 a12.33 c5.25 b2.01 a
a, b, c, d—identical letters in a column denote the lack of statistically significant differences at α = 0.05.
Table 2. The mean content of phenylcarboxylic (A) and phenylacrylic (B) acids (mg/kg) in spring and winter genotypes of Camelina sativa.
Table 2. The mean content of phenylcarboxylic (A) and phenylacrylic (B) acids (mg/kg) in spring and winter genotypes of Camelina sativa.
A4-hydroxy-benzoicChlorogenicGallicProto-CatechuicSyringicVanillic
seeds (mg/kg d.m.)
Omega88.43 b222.08 a28.46 b77.24 b89.34 b63.54 c
Hoga98.08 a345.45 b30.20 b63.25 a72.15 a53.33 b
CSS-CAM 25144.96 c459.31 d38.66 c90.30 c113.70 c37.65 a
Luna121.93 b380.26 c22.38 a73.06 b88.00 b42.35 a
oil (mg/L)
Omega52.14 b165.33 a12.33 a65.33 b63.24 b59.37 c
Hoga31.27 a182.32 b10.25 a48.26 a25.53 a29.89 a
CSS-CAM 2547.13 b246.37 d8.99 a66.64 b71.23 b30.17 a
Luna62.13 c198.53 c8.97 a52.33 a52.33 b35.23 b
pomace (mg/kg d.m.)
Omega35.63 a50.25 a12.33 a9.33 a21.23 a1.25 a
Hoga65.33 b151.27 b16.57 b12.66 b40.13 b12.25 b
CSS-CAM 2590.52 c200.55 d20.26 c21.17 d41.25 b4.55 a
Luna58.25 b173.63 c10.45 a15.25 c29.56 a3.53 a
BCaffeicFerulicp-CumaricSinapict-Cinnamic
seeds (mg/kg d.m.)
Omega266.32 b139.93 b26.27 a1029.72 b195.18 a
Hoga261.67 b127.62 a31.94 b783.65 a267.85 b
CSS-CAM 25216.52 a194.86 c25.67 a716.25 a245.10 b
Luna239.58 a126.86 a25.33 a1013.64 b203.81 a
oil (mg/L)
Omega106.24 a46.37 b4.12 a265.32 b52.33 b
Hoga126.37 b43.27 b13.23 b103.24 a68.26 c
CSS-CAM 25110.85 a13.65 a10.05 b98.24 a76.86 c
Luna115.25 a26.55 a7.12 a123.33 b31.25 a
pomace (mg/kg d.m.)
Omega132.33 b82.33 b19.33 c652.33 c132.33 a
Hoga130.25 b65.33 a16.37 b524.27 a187.25 b
CSS-CAM 25100.56 a167.52 c10.45 a600.56 b156.37 a
Luna106.24 a87.25 b18.25 c712.25 d149.65 a
a, b, c, d—identical letters in a column denote the lack of statistically significant differences at α = 0.05.
Table 3. The content of β-carotene, zeaxanthin, and lutein in oil, pomace, and seeds of spring and winter genotypes of Camelina sativa (mg/kg).
Table 3. The content of β-carotene, zeaxanthin, and lutein in oil, pomace, and seeds of spring and winter genotypes of Camelina sativa (mg/kg).
LuteinZeaxanthinβ-Carotene
seeds (mg/kg d.m.)
Omega12.19 a0.25 a146.31 a
Hoga16.10 b7.09 b133.69 a
CSS-CAM 2517.15 b0.22 a140.64 a
Luna12.74 a0.25 a139.36 a
oil (mg/L)
Omega8.75 a0.21 a140.23 b
Hoga14.58 b6.54 b120.74 a
CSS-CAM 2515.98 b0.19 a131.58 a
Luna9.35 a0.18 a125.69 a
pomace (mg/kg d.m.)
Omega3.53 a0.05 a30.56 a
Hoga5.25 a1.72 b28.56 a
CSS-CAM 254.26 a0.07 a33.66 a
Luna4.22 a0.09 a25.15 a
a, b—identical letters in columns denote a lack of significant differences at a significance level of 0.05.
Table 4. The fatty acid composition (%) in spring and winter genotypes of Camelina sativa.
Table 4. The fatty acid composition (%) in spring and winter genotypes of Camelina sativa.
Fatty AcidOmegaHogaCSS-CAM 25Luna
Seed oil content21 a21 a24 a30 a
myristic acid0.251 b00.125 a0.125 a
pentadecanoic acid0000
pentadecenoic acid0000
palmitic acid (PA)3.513 a3.136 a6.022 b3.764 a
palmitoleic acid0.125 b01.004 b0
margaric acid0000
10-heptadecenoic acid000.1250
stearic acid2.384 b1.882 a2.785 b1.882 a
oleic acid14.427 b12.294 a16.058 c12.294 a
linoleic acid (LA)18.316 b14.051 a19.821 b14.803 a
γ-linolenic acid (GLA)000.2510
α-linolenic acid (ALA)36.883 a35.378 a46.041 c39.141 b
arachidic acid (ARA)0.627 a0.502 a1.756 b0.878 a
c-11-eicosenoic acid20.07 b25.96 c15.355 a23.45 b
c-11, 14-eicosadienoic acid0.878 a1.30 b0.502 a1.255 b
heneicosanoic acid0.125 a0.251 a00.251 a
erucic acid (EU)3.262 a3.889 a03.262 a
lignoceric acid0.125 a0.202 a00.125 a
nervonic acid0.376 a0.753 b00.753 b
∑SFA10.3 a9.9 a10.7 a10.3 a
∑MUFA35.0 b39.0 b32.5 a36.5 b
∑PUFA56.1 b50.8 a66.6 c55.2 b
EFA55.2 a49.4 a65.9 b53.9 a
PUFA ω-6/PUFA ω-31:2.01:2.51:2.31:2.6
SFA—saturated fatty acids, MUFA—monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA—polyenoic fatty acids; PUFA n-6—polyenoic fatty acids of n-6 family; PUFA n-3—polyenic fatty acids of n-3 family; and EFA—essential fatty acids. a, b—identical letters in columns denote a lack of significant differences at a significance level of 0.05.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kurasiak-Popowska, D.; Ryńska, B.; Stuper-Szablewska, K. Analysis of Distribution of Selected Bioactive Compounds in Camelina sativa from Seeds to Pomace and Oil. Agronomy 2019, 9, 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9040168

AMA Style

Kurasiak-Popowska D, Ryńska B, Stuper-Szablewska K. Analysis of Distribution of Selected Bioactive Compounds in Camelina sativa from Seeds to Pomace and Oil. Agronomy. 2019; 9(4):168. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9040168

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kurasiak-Popowska, Danuta, Bernadetta Ryńska, and Kinga Stuper-Szablewska. 2019. "Analysis of Distribution of Selected Bioactive Compounds in Camelina sativa from Seeds to Pomace and Oil" Agronomy 9, no. 4: 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9040168

APA Style

Kurasiak-Popowska, D., Ryńska, B., & Stuper-Szablewska, K. (2019). Analysis of Distribution of Selected Bioactive Compounds in Camelina sativa from Seeds to Pomace and Oil. Agronomy, 9(4), 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9040168

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop