Next Article in Journal
Isoform-Specific Role of GSK-3 in High Fat Diet Induced Obesity and Glucose Intolerance
Next Article in Special Issue
Challenges in Cell Fate Acquisition to Scid-Repopulating Activity from Hemogenic Endothelium of hiPSCs Derived from AML Patients Using Forced Transcription Factor Expression
Previous Article in Journal
Deubiquitinases in Neurodegeneration
Previous Article in Special Issue
Notch Signaling in HSC Emergence: When, Why and How
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 11
Issue 3
10.3390/cells11030557
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Hematopoietic Cells from Pluripotent Stem Cells: Hope and Promise for the Treatment of Inherited Blood Disorders

by
Ilaria Rao
1,2,†,
Laura Crisafulli
1,3,†,
Marianna Paulis
1,3,‡ and
Francesca Ficara
1,3,*,‡
1
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
2
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, Italy
3
UOS Milan Unit, Istituto di Ricerca Genetica e Biomedica (IRGB), CNR, 20138 Milan, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to the work.
‡
These authors contributed equally to the work.
Cells 2022, 11(3), 557; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11030557
Submission received: 6 January 2022 / Revised: 28 January 2022 / Accepted: 3 February 2022 / Published: 5 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Generation of Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells from Pluripotent Stem Cells for Cellular Therapy)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Inherited blood disorders comprise a large spectrum of diseases due to germline mutations in genes with key function in the hematopoietic system; they include immunodeficiencies, anemia or metabolic diseases. For most of them the only curative treatment is bone marrow transplantation, a procedure associated to severe complications; other therapies include red blood cell and platelet transfusions, which are dependent on donor availability. An alternative option is gene therapy, in which the wild-type form of the mutated gene is delivered into autologous hematopoietic stem cells using viral vectors. A more recent therapeutic perspective is gene correction through CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing, that overcomes safety concerns due to insertional mutagenesis and allows correction of base substitutions in large size genes difficult to incorporate into vectors. However, applying this technique to genomic disorders caused by large gene deletions is challenging. Chromosomal transplantation has been proposed as a solution, using a universal source of wild-type chromosomes as donor, and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) as acceptor. One of the obstacles to be addressed for translating PSC research into clinical practice is the still unsatisfactory differentiation into transplantable hematopoietic stem or mature cells. We provide an overview of the recent progresses in this field and discuss challenges and potential of iPSC-based therapies for the treatment of inherited blood disorders.

1. Introduction

Hereditary blood disorders comprise some 5000 distinct diseases; they are caused by alterations in more than 200 genes that modify the function and/or the number of different blood elements, namely red blood cells (RBCs), white blood cells, and platelets. Most inherited blood disorders are due to point mutations affecting hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) or their committed progeny, leading to hematopoiesis or cell lineage-specific defects. For example, more than 300 different mutations on the β-globin gene (HBB) are responsible for β-hemoglobinopathies [1,2], diseases due to defective RBCs. In other inherited disorders, more complex genomic alterations can cause a loss or a gain of a specific function. Chromosomal mutations, which include gross deletions, large insertions, duplications, complex rearrangements, and gene fusions, can have an impact of gene dosage resulting in reduced, increased, or ectopic gene expression [3].
Patients affected by hereditary blood disordered often need RBC or platelet transfusions, a procedure linked to the availability of compatible donors and that requires to be repeated. Allogeneic HSC transplantation is the only definitive cure for most blood genetic disorders. However, it is limited by the availability of HLA matching donors, and it can be associated with significant risks such as graft failure, graft versus host disease (GVHD), delayed immune reconstitution, and, in some case, risk of disease recurrence [4]. Therefore, to cure this type of disorders, there are currently many efforts towards developing safe and effective ex-vivo gene therapy (GT) approaches, such as autologous transplantation strategies based on genetically corrected HSCs [5].
Cellular and gene therapies for hematologic disorders can greatly benefit from the prompt availability of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) in the bone marrow (BM), in the cord blood and in mobilized peripheral blood (PB). Another promising option is the generation of HSCs or mature blood cells from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) or embryonic stem cells (ESCs) [6,7,8]. The advantage of iPSCs is that their cell source is easily accessible, that they can be produced at a relatively reasonable price, and that they represent a virtually unlimited source of HSPCs and mature blood cells. Moreover, iPSCs can be autologous, thus preventing rejection and rising fewer ethical issues regarding their collection when compared to ESCs.
With autologous cells, a further step of gene correction is required in patients with genetic mutations. Several different approaches have been considered to address the correction of the genetic defect. Over the past few years, the emergence of new genome editing technology such as clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/Cas9 has opened the opportunity to correct genetic mutation in an efficient and precise manner. The use of genome editing tools and iPSC technology for targeting monogenic blood diseases has been recently described [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Although CRISPR technology coupled to iPSCs represents one of the most promising approaches to gene correction and therapy at present, additional hurdles must be overcome. Among these, the mutation load of iPSCs, which undergo several stresses and long culture periods [20], and the possibility of “off target” effects must be taken into consideration [21]. These limits apply to essentially any genetic disease to be studied. However, some genetic defects, such as “genomic” or “chromosomal” disorders, present a further difficulty since they cannot be treated with conventional techniques. They consist in “structural” abnormalities, which include large deletions or inversions, copy number variations, aneuploidies and complex rearrangements. We proposed a novel approach called chromosomal transplantation (CT) as a solution, using a universal source of wild-type (WT) chromosomes as donor, and iPSCs as acceptor [22,23].
Possible approaches to overcome the correction step would be the generation of “universal” non-immunogenic iPSC lines, or the generation of iPSC biobanks, for HLA-matched allogeneic cell therapy [24,25].
Finally, the ability to recapitulate in vitro the normal pathways of differentiation from pluripotent to multipotent progenitors and mature cells is a prerequisite to obtain functional corrected cells in the desired lineage, including blood cells [7,26].
In this review, an overview of applications of iPSCs for hematological diseases, genome correction approaches, differentiation strategies and future perspectives will be discussed. Although only corrected HSCs will provide stable and definitive cure of inherited blood disorders, we will also discuss benefits from the generation of iPSC-derived mature hematopoietic cells for the treatment of these diseases.

2. Genetic and Genomic Hematologic Diseases

Mutations are conventionally classified in two classes, single gene mutations that involve single genes, and chromosomal mutations that involve chromosomal segments containing large portion of one gene, many genes, or whole chromosomes. When these kinds of mutations occur in germ-cell lineages, they cause an inherited disease, or pre-disposition to disease [27], including blood disorders. Moreover, a single disease entity may be the result of any one of several different alterations within the gene responsible for the disease. Few examples of hereditary blood disorders caused by both single gene mutations and chromosomal mutations are mentioned below.
Chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) is an inherited primary immunodeficiency characterized by severe, recurring infections due to absent or poor activity of phagocyte NADPH oxidase. The X-linked form of the disease is caused by mutations in the CYBB gene, which encodes the 91-kD glycoprotein component (gp91-phox) of the NADPH oxidase complex responsible for reactive oxygen species production in phagocytes. The type of mutations identified in patients are largely heterogeneous and include frameshift (20%), nonsense (20%), missense (20%), splice-region mutations (15–20%), but also large and small deletions (10%) and regulatory-region mutations (<5%) [28].
DiGeorge syndrome and velocardiofacial syndrome also known as 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11DS) is a common autosomic dominant genetic disease characterized by broad phenotypic variability. Most patients have a large deletion of 3 Mb in region 11 of the long arm of chromosome 22 (22q11.2del), leading to a haploinsufficiency of more than 100 genes, and comprising coding RNAs, noncoding RNAs, and pseudogenes [29]. Immunodeficiency and hematological alterations such as thrombocytopenia and large platelets observed in 22q11DS are associated to this disease [30].
Fanconi anemia (FA) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by chromosomal instability, variable congenital anomalies, progressive BM failure, and cancer susceptibility [31]. FA patients have progressive loss of HSCs in their BM [32], which clinically manifests as reduced mature cells. Mutations in at least 22 genes, all involved in DNA repair and genome stability, termed complementation groups FANCA-FANCW, have been associated to this disease [33]. All the genes are inherited in an autosomal recessive manner, except for FANCB that is localized on the X chromosome and causes X-linked FA. Molecular diagnosis of FA is complex, not only for the high number of genes associated with its development, but also for the heterogeneity of the mutations, which include large deletions or duplications [34,35].
X-linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA) is mainly caused by a mutation of the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) gene [36]. XLA patients are characterized by a reduction or lack of mature B lymphocytes, resulting in recurrent bacterial infections in affected males in the first two years of life. The BTK gene is located on the long arm of the X chromosome (Xq22.1) and contains 19 exons. Since the gene was discovered, a total of 1815 different BTK gene mutations were reported (https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/genes/BTK, accessed on 17 December 2021). They are uniformly distributed throughout the gene and include a huge variety of alterations ranging from point mutations, the most frequent, to large gene rearrangements. Moreover, 3–5% of individuals have a large deletion that extends through the closely linked Translocase of Inner Mitochondrial Membrane 8 (TIMM8A) gene [37], a translocase involved in the import and insertion of hydrophobic membrane proteins from the cytoplasm into the mitochondrial inner membrane. The extent of this genetic defect encompassing more than one gene may partially explain the heterogeneity and different severity typical of this hematological disorder. Several different approaches have been considered to address the correction of different genetic mutations.

3. Innovative Cell Therapy Approaches for Inherited Blood Disorders

The standard therapy for many patients with inherited blood diseases is HSC transplantation (HSCT), which replaces mutated blood cells and guarantees a definitive cure. The major challenge of HSCT is the availability of appropriate and sufficient donor cells for robust and durable hematopoietic repopulation. The cell source can be either from healthy donors, as in allogeneic HSCT, or patients’ own stem cells, as in autologous HSCT. Compared to allogeneic, autologous transplants present lower risk of complications such as GVHD, graft failure and infections. However, autologous HSCT requires gene modification prior to transplantation to correct gene-causing mutations. This can be achieved through classical GT or through CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing of autologous HSCs. Novel proposed strategies are instead based on iPSCs.
For hereditary blood disorders, the choice of ex-vivo GT vs. correction of autologous iPSCs followed by hematopoietic differentiation might be dictated by disease type, availability of patient’s own primary HSCs, and nature of the mutation. Compared to primary HSCs, a higher range of correction options are available for iPSCs, and the choice will be subordinated to the size of the gene defect (Figure 1).
Viral-mediated gene transfer or CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing might be ideal as GT platforms for small-size gene defects, while BAC-mediated or CT-mediated genome editing might be the best alternative for gross mutations and chromosomal disorders.

3.1. Pluripotent Stem Cells

Pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) can generate all body tissues. The prototypical PSCs are ESCs, obtained from pre-implantation embryos. PSCs that are derived from somatic cells are called induced PSCs (iPSCs); they are relatively more accessible than ESCs and present advantages such as the possibility to generate autologous cells belonging to the desired tissue. Discovery and development of iPSCs have been extensively reviewed elsewhere [38]. Briefly, in 2006 Yamanaka et al. described the possibility to reprogram differentiated murine embryonic fibroblasts into iPSCs in culture following viral-mediated transduction of a cocktail of four main transcriptor factors, namely Oct3/4, Sox2, c-Myc and Klf4 [39]. The following year the same team generated iPSCs from human somatic cells with the same technique [40]. Essentially, ectopic expression of these transcription factors silences the somatic gene expression and activate pluripotency regulatory networks. In the last 15 years, the original procedure for dedifferentiation of somatic cells into iPSCs was improved and many methods are now used to obtain iPSCs from different cell types belonging to different species. Methods for obtaining iPSCs vary in the cocktail of reprogramming factors, way of delivery them, type of somatic cell to be reprogrammed, culture conditions, to name a few, and greatly affect reprogramming efficiency and safety of the final product. In particular, different reprogramming methods have been employed to generate human iPSCs without genome-integrating DNA elements. These methods use, for example, episomal vectors, adenoviral vectors, Sendai viral vectors, plasmids, synthetic mRNA, miRNA, protein transduction and small molecules [41]. This allowed the achievement of a better safety profile by minimizing genomic instability and tumorigenic potential. Importantly, since iPSCs can be generated from adult tissues, each individual could in principle have their autologous iPSC line. Thanks to these features, iPSCs hold a huge potential and are a great promise for regenerative medicine.

3.2. Gene Therapy of Pluripotent Stem Cells

Early studies using patient-specific iPSCs as a potential source for autologous cell-based therapy relied on the use of low-efficiency homologous recombination or lentiviral GT [42,43]. A limit of the lentiviral GT system is random integration of the exogenous WT gene into the genome, which can result in undesired mutations. The first proof of principle of the use of iPSCs for GT purposes was provided with sickle cell anemia [44], followed by several other examples. For non-hematological diseases, iPSCs for autologous cell transplantation therapy is already successfully employed in clinical trials [45]. Before the CRISPR/Cas9 era, the rationale behind applying GT for the cure of inherited blood disorders by genetic modification of iPSCs was that only PSCs offered the possibility to perform homologous recombination, to avoid the risks of insertional mutagenesis associated with retroviral transduction. With homologous recombination it is possible to restore the integrity of the entire gene locus, and PSCs offer the opportunity to select, expand and differentiate the most appropriate clone. Our group demonstrated the potential of this approach using a murine model of autosomal recessive osteopetrosis (ARO) carrying a homozygous mutation in T cell immune regulator 1 (Tcirg1), the most frequently mutated gene in this disease, which encodes a subunit of the V-ATPase proton channel. We generated iPSCs from a Tcirg1−/− ARO mouse and performed BAC-mediated homologous recombination using the full-length WT gene, thus including all endogenous regulatory regions. Corrected iPSCs were then differentiated into early myelo-erythroid progenitors and finally into monocyte-derived funtional, bone resorbing osteoclasts [46]. A similar BAC-mediated homologous recombination approach was shown later to correct the mutated CYBB gene from a CGD patient [47]. Examples of site-specific correction of iPSCs followed by hematopoietic differentiation are TALEN-mediated gene editing of mutated IL-2Rγ gene from a SCID-X1 patient [12], or CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene targeting of JAK3 to model SCID due mutated JAK3 [48], while transgene CGD correction has been proposed through zinc finger nuclease (ZFN) mediated AAVS1 safe harbor minigene targeting [49]. A major advancement in the field might be the possibility of simultaneously editing and reprogramming autologous fibroblasts employing a CRISPR/Cas9 adenine base editor (ABE), as recently shown [50]. This method reduced cell culture time (human iPSC lines with the desired correction were obtained in 5 weeks) and improved safety since ABE does not induce DNA double-strand brakes and has inferior risk of off-target events.
With the CRISPR/Cas9 technology, the possibility to perform ex-vivo targeted gene correction in primary CD34+ cells became a reality [51,52], and many laboratories are actively working to improve efficiency and safety of this technique to bring it to the clinic [53]. Clinical trials for the treatment of sickle cell disease and β-thalassemia are indeed ongoing (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT03745287 and #NCT03655678). However, generation of HSCs from corrected autologous iPSCs might still be considered as the only alternative to allogeneic HSCT for the cure of hematological diseases in which patient’s own stem cells are either difficult to obtain in sufficient number, or for which classical GT approaches or gene editing are not feasible, such as in case of disorders due to deletion of large portions of the genome, as mentioned earlier. Examples of the first case are diseases characterized by BM aplasia, such as Fanconi anemia (FA), or fibrosis, as in osteopetrosis. FA is a rare X-linked genetic disease caused by germline mutations in any of several genes, including FANCA and FANCB, whose products are involved in DNA repair mechanisms [32]. In FA a progressive HSPC depletion due to cell cycle alterations and elevated cell death leads to BM failure with reduced blood cell formation and severe anemia, and collection of cells for GT purposes is challenging if not performed at very young age before HSC exhaustion [54]. FA fibroblasts and FA fibroblast-derived iPSCs have been recently corrected through the CRISPR/Cas9 technology [55,56]; corrected iPSCs were differentiated into cells with characteristics of definitive hematopoiesis, providing a proof of principle of the feasability of an iPSC-based GT approach for this disease. A further example is osteopetrosis; in ARO patients, BM harvest cannot be performed due to severe BM fibrosis, lack of BM cavity and susceptibility to bone fractures. Since most patients have high frequencies of circulating CD34+ cells, the use of HSPC ex vivo expansion protocols coupled to GT has been proposed to overcome these issues [57]. An alternative option might be generation of gene-targeted autologous iPSCs as an unlimited source for corrected HSC production.
A possible approach to treat hematological disorders due to chromosomal mutations could be chromosome transplantation (CT). CT, differently than chromosome transfer, which consists of adding a surplus chromosome, is based on the complete replacement of the defective chromosome with a normal donor one (Figure 1), obtaining the total restoration of a correct normal diploid karyotype (46, XY/XX). Pluripotent stem cells represent an adaptable platform for CT offering the possibility to differentiate into specific lineage of interest the corrected cells. We used this type of approach on human and murine pluripotent stem cells to address treatment of different type of diseases [20,21], including hematological disorders. In detail, we replaced the defective X chromosome in iPSCs derived from a murine model of CGD with a WT X chromosome obtained from a healthy donor [58]. The endogenous defective X chromosome was previously engineered through the CRISPR/Cas9 system to obtain Hprt inactivation, as a mean to discriminate the exogenous X chromosome from the endogenous defective one. In this study we replaced the X chromosome since CGD is a X-linked disorders, but theoretically it is possible to adapt this protocol for many more diseases based on different mutations in different chromosomes.
All genetic diseases with a wide spectrum of mutations in the same gene/chromosome will greatly benefit from a unique GT approach like the substitution of the entire chromosome instead of different GT approaches specific for each type of mutation.

3.3. iPSC Biobanks

The implementation of iPSC biobanks would represent a major step forward toward the success of iPSC-based regenerative therapies. “Universal” non-immunogenic iPSC lines can be generated by genetic inactivation of HLAs and overexpression of specific cell surface markers, such as CD47, to mask iPSC-derived cells from the immune system [22]. In addition, somatic cells from healthy donors with known HLA and genome characteristics have been already reprogrammed to initiate creation of iPSC collections. These biobanks are meant to include most HLA subtypes and would be useful to overcome part of the major concerns regarding the use of clinical-grade iPSCs and facilities variability [24,25]. More in general, to translate iPSC-derived HSCs into clinical applications, cells must be obtained following Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP)-grade procedures with increased production costs, which can be demanding for individual centers.

4. Strategies to Generate Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells from Pluripotent Stem Cells

For GT purposes, genetically corrected autologous iPSCs must be differentiated to hematopoietic cells. The goal is to generate transplantable HSCs able to engraft and reconstitute in vivo the entire hematopoietic system. Generation of terminally differentiated cells or committed, non-self-renewing progenitors, would only determine temporary benefits, if any, although here are some isolated exceptions to this general rule (see below, paragraph 5).
Protocols to generate HSCs from PSCs have been developed based on the knowledge of embryonic development. During embryonic development hematopoiesis occurs in temporally and spatially separated waves, named primitive and definitive. Primitive hematopoiesis mainly arises in yolk sac blood islands and in placenta to transiently generate nucleated RBCs, megakaryocytes (Mk) and monocyte-macrophages. Definitive hematopoiesis starts in the in the aorta-gonad-mesonephron area of the dorsal aorta of day 27–40 of human embryos [59] to generate multipotent, self-renewing HSCs from which the entire adult hematopoietic system will originate. In both cases, in vitro formation of mesoderm from PSCs, followed by induction of hemogenic endothelium (HE), is a prerequisite for subsequent hematopoietic specification (Figure 2a).
This occurs through an endothelial-to-hematopoietic transition that gives rise to CD45+ cells. In vitro establishment of primitive hematopoiesis has been demonstrated by different groups, with generation of RBCs mainly characterized by low enucleation potential, fetal globin expression and low expansion rate [60], and of macrophages resembling the embryonically-derived tissue-resident macrophages, rather that the BM monocyte-derived macrophages [61]. The activin-nodal pathway is required for primitive hematopoiesis specification, while specification of definitive hematopoiesis requires stage-specific activation of the canonical Wnt–β-catenin signaling, which in turn induces the expression of the caudal-related homeobox 4 (CDX4) transcription factor [62]. The expression of specific cell surface molecules and transcription factors at different stages during differentiation indicates the presence of mesoderm, HE and if primitive vs definitive hematopoiesis is being generated, with some differences in the choice of markers at each checkpoint from laboratory to laboratory. In addition to gene expression, the type of hematopoiesis is demonstrated through functional assays, for example, definitive but not primitive hematopoiesis gives rise to T cells in vitro. For regenerative medicine, the goal is to establish definitive hematopoiesis, with in vitro generation of HSCs able to give rise to all adult-type blood lineages (Table 1) including immunocompetent T and B lymphocytes for the treatment of immunodegenerative diseases. Generation of mature B and T cells in vitro from PSCs is particularly challenging. Differentiation of human iPSCs to immature B lymphocytes expressing surface IgM and undergoing VDJ recombination has been achieved [63]. However, even with improved protocols [64], at present it is possible to model in vitro only the earliest stages of human B lineage development occurring in utero. Immunocompetent B lymphopoiesis has been recently achieved in vivo in B-cell deficient mice after transplantation of ESCs transduced with three transcription factors (Lhx2, Hoxa9, and Runx1) essential to guide B-cell differentiation, hence upon further manipulation, likely without going through an in vitro PSC-derived HSC intermediate [65]. Likewise, engraftable human iPSC-derived hematopoietic progenitors with thymus-homing features and abundant TCRαβ repertoire was demonstrated upon transient expression of exogenous Runx1 and Hoxa9 in a specific time-window during in vitro differentiation [66], however mature T cells were generated only in vivo.
The gold-standard assay to demonstrate HSC functionality is the ability to repopulate long-term an irradiated or myeloablated murine host and to be serially transplanted. Generation of HSCs from human iPSCs fulfilling these criteria has been achieved successfully upon insertion of additional HSC-specific transcription factors [67], thus, adding further genetic manipulation of PSCs, not ideal for safety reasons and poor scalability. Moreover, although the quoted study certainly represents a fundamental milestone in the field, bona fide HSCs completed their development only in vivo in the xenograft model after intrabone rather than intravenous injection, indicating that the final phases of HSCs generation rely on in vivo niche factors, and that HSCs developing from PSCs might lack crucial homing signals. A reliable, efficient, fast, and clinically acceptable protocol for generating HSCs in vitro is still lacking, however considerable improvements have been achieved in recent years. For example, temporally controlled overexpression of critical regulators for mesodermal, endothelial, and/or hematopoietic specification (forward programming) has been proposed to overcome the difficulty in generating sufficient amounts of hemato-endothelial progenitors, often requiring purification from heterogeneous cell populations before hematopoietic specification [68]. We are confident that the continuous refinement and amelioration of current protocols will reach the goal of obtaining HSCs with long-term repopulating capacity. A brief overview of methods to generate HSPCs from PSCs is provided below; detailed protocols have been recently reviewed elsewhere [38,60,69,70]. Although developmental steps to generate primitive and definitive hematopoiesis are the same for mammals, timing and requirement of specific molecules and growth factors vary between mouse and human. Similarly, cell surface markers used to monitor each developmental step and to assess if definitive hematopoiesis is being obtained do not entirely overlap between mouse and human. We here mainly refer to methods for obtaining human hematopoiesis (Figure 2b).

4.1. Two-Dimensional (2D) In Vitro Differentiation

Primitive hematopoiesis can be generated from human PSCs via 2D monolayer systems in which sequential addition of specific cytokines direct mesoderm formation and subsequently differentiation to hematopoietic progenitor cells with erythroid, Mk and myeloid potential [71]. The necessary supportive stromal layer can either be iPSC-derived [71], or provided exogenously co-culturing differentiating iPSCs with OP9 cells or other cell lines, at early stages during mesoderm formation [72,73] or later to direct hematopoietic specification [74]. 2D systems can also be used to give rise to HSPCs more closely resembling definitive hematopoiesis, obtained for example after iPSC inducible forward programming [68], or by using scalable, clinically relevant commercial differentiation platforms, although not sufficient to generate engraftable HSCs [75]. As a further example, by seeding iPSC clumps or single cells in a vitronectin-coated surface, mesoderm induction occurs in two days in the presence of FGF2 and BMP4 [8]. This approach has been used with the purpose of generating adult-type Mk (Table 1), after patterning the definitive hematopoiesis program through the addition of Wnt signaling pathway agonists.

4.2. Three-Dimensional (3D) In Vitro Differentiation

Embryoid bodies (EBs) are 3D cell aggregates that recapitulate the spatial organization within the embryo and that allow the formation of endoderm, ectoderm, and mesoderm, the three germ layers. Addition of specific bone morphogenetic proteins and growth factors at the proper timing and concentration directs preferential formation of mesoderm over ectoderm or endoderm. To mimic primitive hematopoiesis, 3D-supported differentiation guarantees more efficient formation of mesoderm, commitment to hemogenic endothelium, generation of CD34+ hematopoietic cells, and colony-forming capacity compared to 2D [76], likely because the 3D EB system mimics the in vivo embryonic events. The EB system is used also for induction of definitive hematopoiesis, with proper stage-specific Activin inhibition, manipulation of the Wnt–β-catenin pathway, and correct choice of growth factors [77,78,79]. EBs can be generated in bulk cultures, in individual 96-well plate wells, with or without the hanging drop method. Composition of EB differentiation media, HE-inducing media, and of media for further hematopoietic differentiation into HSPC or mature cell type, as well as schedule of media exchanges and length of the different steps, vary from laboratory to laboratory and might result in different efficiencies if starting from established ESC lines or newly generated patient iPSCs; the time points at which the various cytokines are added might also need to be adjusted from line to line. In general, EB generation represents a delicate step and might be tricky if not carefully performed [79]. In addition, there is variability from donor to donor and even within each experiment using the same iPSC donor regarding the size and differentiation status of individual EBs, and often the operator discards suboptimal EBs before proceeding with the subsequent steps of differentiation. This represents a potential challenge for translation to a clinical-grade large-scale reproducible process.
An alternative 3D-culture HSPC differentiation method is based on favoring the emergence in vitro of sac-like structures, named ESC–derived sacs (ES-sacs), consisting in multiple cysts demarcated by cellular monolayers that concentrate hematopoietic progenitors. This method, initially used to demonstrate generation of functional platelets from ESCs [80], has been later adopted to generate HSPCs and RBCs from gene-edited human iPSCs [81]. However, similar to the EB method, reproducibility issues represent a challenge for future clinical application.

4.3. In Vivo Approaches

PSCs generate teratomas when transplanted in immunodeficient murine hosts. Teratomas recapitulate development of all body tissues and include a niche-like microenvironment permissive for HSC development [82]. Therefore, human iPSC-derived teratomas have been proposed as HSC source [83]. However, adaptation of teratoma-based protocols for large-scale HSC generation for clinical use is difficult to achieve.

5. Generation of Terminally Differentiated Hematopoietic Cells for Therapeutic Purposes

5.1. Platelets

In transfusion medicine a stable and controlled source for continuous production of platelets would be sufficient to treat thrombocytopenia due to inherited BM failure. Recent advances in differentiating Mk (from which platelets are released) from human PSCs and subsequent generation of platelets with improved output and safety paves the way for future clinical application [8]. The authors efficiently generated Mk from selected human iPSCs and ESCs through non-viral ectopic expression of specific transcription factors. They obtained large amounts of functional platelets using a scalable bioreactor system mirroring shear stress, and tailored lipid- and high glucose-supplemented culture media (Table 1).

5.2. Erythrocytes

An illimited source of universal donor RBCs would represent safer alternatives to conventional RBC units and solve issues related to scarce donor availability as has occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. A major step forward in this direction has been achieved recently with a protocol involving reprogramming of ex-vivo expanded primary erythroblasts from human PB, mesoderm induction, differentiation to HSPC with a 2D commercial system, maturation to the erythroid lineage by addition of human platelet lysate (hPL) or human serum, and finally by in vitro expansion [84]. Interestingly, while only a small proportion of enucleated mature RBCs were present in culture, this fraction increased in vivo after transfusion in NSG immunodeficient mice pre-treated with macrophages and complement depleting agents. The authors showed that infused cells homed to the BM where they completed their differentiation and egressed into the PB. This holds promise for future clinical applications, since it can be foreseen that iPSC-derived RBCs would similarly complete their terminal differentiation within the human BM, once infused in patients. However, safety concerns associated with injection of nucleated RBC in patients must be addressed before this strategy can be translated into clinical practice.
Generating RBCs from gene-edited iPSCs would allow to overcome the occurrence of erythrocyte alloimmunization by recipients of repeated transfusions such as sickle cell anaemia and thalassemia patients. Bi-allelic correction of homozygous sickle cell mutations in patient-derived iPSCs and subsequent differentiation into adult-type erythrocytes has indeed been demonstrated, indicating the potential of this approach [81]. Similarly, talen-mediated gene edited pyruvate kinase deficiency patient-specific iPSCs were shown to give rise to healthy erythroid cells [85]. On the other hand, the problem of finding and recruiting donors with the suitable RBC phenotype on a constant basis would be solved by creating illimited sources of RBC with desired rare antigenic profiles [86]. Nevertheless, improvement of culture systems and of scale-up methods is still required for obtaining from PSCs the vast numbers of RBCs required in each unit of transfused blood.

5.3. Osteoclasts

Osteoclasts (OCs) are terminally differentiated, multinucleated cells derived from myeloid precursors, whose function is bone resorbtion. Together with osteoblasts, OCs are responsible for bone remodelling, which takes place throughout life and is crucial particularly during infancy and childhood. Defects in OC resorbing activity, such as those caused by mutations in the TCIRG1 gene, lead to ARO, a rare disease characterized by high bone mineral density and that can be cured with HSC transplantation from HLA-matched siblings. PSC-derived OCs might overcome the donor availability issue. In the absence of suitable transplantable HSCs, osteopetrotic infants could benefit from repeated infusions of OCs or of their progenitors, as proposed [87]. Functional adult-type osteoclasts have been recently obtained from human ESCs [88]. Importantly, iPSCs have been generated from TCRG1-mutated ARO patients [89]; once transduced with WT TCRG1, iPSCs from ARO subjects could be differentiated in vitro into bone resorbing OCs [90,91]. The novel osteopetrotic xenograft model that we recently generated might be used in future studies aimed at testing the in vivo relevance of human iPSCs-derived OCs [92].

6. Conclusions

In this review, we provided an overview of potential applications of PSCs for hereditary blood diseases and summarized different genome correction approaches and differentiation strategies towards to hematopoietic lineage. Regenerative medicine can greatly benefit from the iPSC technology, and we are confident that current and future research will address and partially solve the existent obstacles for this new tool to enter the clinical practice.
As mentioned, crucial issues that remain to be solved are proper differentiation to true HSCs, and the inherent donor-to-donor variability in responding to differentiation cues that affects the efficiency and quality of hematopoietic generation and of subsequent expansion. For large-scale production of platelets, RBCs or, in prospect, of HSCs from HLA-matched universal donors, prior testing of the most suitable cell line for each purpose can be easily envisioned. However, opting for classical BM transplantation from healthy donors or for using iPSCs from cell banks might be the best choice over transplant of corrected autologous iPSC-derived HSCs when these are not obtained in vitro in sufficient number or quality from individual patients. Further research to understand factors responsible for this variability is highly warranted before autologous iPSC-derived HSC transplantation become a reality in clinical settings.

Author Contributions

I.R., L.C., M.P. and F.F.: original draft preparation; L.C.: figure preparation and visualization; F.F. and M.P.: manuscript review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

Ptpatient
Eryerythroid
PLplatelets lysate
Hematop.Hematopoietic
BFU-Eburst-forming unit-Ery
Diffdifferentiation
Pltplatelets
HChematopoietic cells
Progprogenitors

References

  1. Cavazzana, M.; Antoniani, C.; Miccio, A. Gene Therapy for β-Hemoglobinopathies. Mol. Ther. 2017, 25, 1142–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Amaya-Uribe, L.; Rojas, M.; Azizi, G.; Anaya, J.M.; Gershwin, M.E. Primary immunodeficiency and autoimmunity: A comprehensive review. J. Autoimmun. 2019, 99, 52–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Firth, H.V.; Richards, S.M.; Bevan, A.P.; Clayton, S.; Corpas, M.; Rajan, D.; Van Vooren, S.; Moreau, Y.; Pettett, R.M.; Carter, N.P. DECIPHER: Database of Chromosomal Imbalance and Phenotype in Humans Using Ensembl Resources. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2009, 84, 524–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Castagnoli, R.; Delmonte, O.M.; Calzoni, E.; Notarangelo, L.D. Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Front. Pediatr. 2019, 7, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Ferrari, G.; Thrasher, A.J.; Aiuti, A. Gene therapy using haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2021, 22, 216–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Demirci, S.; Leonard, A.; Tisdale, J.F. Hematopoietic stem cells from pluripotent stem cells: Clinical potential, challenges, and future perspectives. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2020, 9, 1549–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ebrahimi, M.; Forouzesh, M.; Raoufi, S.; Ramazii, M.; Ghaedrahmati, F.; Farzaneh, M. Differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells into erythroid cells. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2020, 11, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Evans, A.L.; Dalby, A.; Foster, H.R.; Howard, D.; Waller, A.K.; Taimoor, M.; Lawrence, M.; Mookerjee, S.; Lehmann, M.; Burton, A.; et al. Transfer to the clinic: Refining forward programming of hPSCs to megakaryocytes for platelet production in bioreactors. Blood Adv. 2021, 5, 1977–1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Chang, C.J.; Bouhassira, E.E. Zinc-finger nuclease-mediated correction of α-thalassemia in iPS cells. Blood 2012, 120, 3906–3914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Huang, X.; Wang, Y.; Yan, W.; Smith, C.; Ye, Z.; Wang, J.; Gao, Y.; Mendelsohn, L.; Cheng, L. Production of Gene-Corrected Adult Beta Globin Protein in Human Erythrocytes Differentiated from Patient iPSCs After Genome Editing of the Sickle Point Mutation. Stem Cells 2015, 33, 1470–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Ingrungruanglert, P.; Amarinthnukrowh, P.; Rungsiwiwut, R.; Maneesri-le Grand, S.; Sosothikul, D.; Suphapeetiporn, K.; Israsena, N.; Shotelersuk, V. Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome iPS cells produce megakaryocytes with defects in cytoskeletal rearrangement and proplatelet formation. Thromb. Haemost. 2015, 113, 792–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Menon, T.; Firth, A.L.; Scripture-Adams, D.D.; Galic, Z.; Qualls, S.J.; Gilmore, W.B.; Ke, E.; Singer, O.; Anderson, L.S.; Bornzin, A.R.; et al. Lymphoid regeneration from gene-corrected SCID-X1 subject-derived iPSCs. Cell Stem Cell 2015, 16, 367–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Park, C.Y.; Kim, D.H.; Son, J.S.; Sung, J.J.; Lee, J.; Bae, S.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, D.W.; Kim, J.S. Functional Correction of Large Factor VIII Gene Chromosomal Inversions in Hemophilia A Patient-Derived iPSCs Using CRISPR-Cas9. Cell Stem Cell 2015, 17, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Laskowski, T.J.; Van Caeneghem, Y.; Pourebrahim, R.; Ma, C.; Ni, Z.; Garate, Z.; Crane, A.M.; Li, X.S.; Liao, W.; Gonzalez-Garay, M.; et al. Gene Correction of iPSCs from a Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome Patient Normalizes the Lymphoid Developmental and Functional Defects. Stem Cell Rep. 2016, 7, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Wu, Y.; Hu, Z.; Li, Z.; Pang, J.; Feng, M.; Hu, X.; Wang, X.; Lin-Peng, S.; Liu, B.; Chen, F.; et al. In situ genetic correction of F8 intron 22 inversion in hemophilia A patient-specific iPSCs. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 18865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. He, Q.; Wang, H.H.; Cheng, T.; Yuan, W.P.; Ma, Y.P.; Jiang, Y.P.; Ren, Z.H. Genetic Correction and Hepatic Differentiation of Hemophilia B-specific Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Chin. Med. Sci. J. 2017, 32, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Lyu, C.; Shen, J.; Wang, R.; Gu, H.; Zhang, J.; Xue, F.; Liu, X.; Liu, W.; Fu, R.; Zhang, L.; et al. Targeted genome engineering in human induced pluripotent stem cells from patients with hemophilia B using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2018, 9, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Olgasi, C.; Talmon, M.; Merlin, S.; Cucci, A.; Richaud-Patin, Y.; Ranaldo, G.; Colangelo, D.; Di Scipio, F.; Berta, G.N.; Borsotti, C.; et al. Patient-Specific iPSC-Derived Endothelial Cells Provide Long-Term Phenotypic Correction of Hemophilia, A. Stem Cell Rep. 2018, 11, 1391–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Wattanapanitch, M.; Damkham, N.; Potirat, P.; Trakarnsanga, K.; Janan, M.; U-Pratya, Y.; Kheolamai, P.; Klincumhom, N.; Issaragrisil, S. One-step genetic correction of hemoglobin E/beta-thalassemia patient-derived iPSCs by the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2018, 9, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ma, H.; Morey, R.; O'Neil, R.C.; He, Y.; Daughtry, B.; Schultz, M.D.; Hariharan, M.; Nery, J.R.; Castanon, R.; Sabatini, K.; et al. Abnormalities in human pluripotent cells due to reprogramming mechanisms. Nature 2014, 511, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Tan, E.P.; Li, Y.; Velasco-Herrera, M.e.C.; Yusa, K.; Bradley, A. Off-target assessment of CRISPR-Cas9 guiding RNAs in human iPS and mouse ES cells. Genesis 2015, 53, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Paulis, M.; Castelli, A.; Susani, L.; Lizier, M.; Lagutina, I.; Focarelli, M.L.; Recordati, C.; Uva, P.; Faggioli, F.; Neri, T.; et al. Chromosome transplantation as a novel approach for correcting complex genomic disorders. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 35218–35230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Paulis, M.; Susani, L.; Castelli, A.; Suzuki, T.; Hara, T.; Straniero, L.; Duga, S.; Strina, D.; Mantero, S.; Caldana, E.; et al. Chromosome Transplantation: A Possible Approach to Treat Human X-linked Disorders. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 2020, 17, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Deuse, T.; Hu, X.; Gravina, A.; Wang, D.; Tediashvili, G.; De, C.; Thayer, W.O.; Wahl, A.; Garcia, J.V.; Reichenspurner, H.; et al. Hypoimmunogenic derivatives of induced pluripotent stem cells evade immune rejection in fully immunocompetent allogeneic recipients. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 252–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Huang, C.Y.; Liu, C.L.; Ting, C.Y.; Chiu, Y.T.; Cheng, Y.C.; Nicholson, M.W.; Hsieh, P.C.H. Human iPSC banking: Barriers and opportunities. J. Biomed. Sci. 2019, 26, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Tursky, M.L.; Loi, T.H.; Artuz, C.M.; Alateeq, S.; Wolvetang, E.J.; Tao, H.; Ma, D.D.; Molloy, T.J. Direct Comparison of Four Hematopoietic Differentiation Methods from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Stem Cell Rep. 2020, 15, 735–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jackson, M.; Marks, L.; May, G.H.W.; Wilson, J.B. The genetic basis of disease. Essays Biochem. 2018, 62, 643–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Rae, J.; Newburger, P.E.; Dinauer, M.C.; Noack, D.; Hopkins, P.J.; Kuruto, R.; Curnutte, J.T. X-Linked chronic granulomatous disease: Mutations in the CYBB gene encoding the gp91-phox component of respiratory-burst oxidase. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1998, 62, 1320–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Guna, A.; Butcher, N.J.; Bassett, A.S. Comparative mapping of the 22q11.2 deletion region and the potential of simple model organisms. J. Neurodev. Disord. 2015, 7, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Rosa, R.F.; Rosa, R.C.; Dos Santos, P.P.; Zen, P.R.; Paskulin, G.A. Hematological abnormalities and 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Rev. Bras. Hematol Hemoter. 2011, 33, 151–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Nalepa, G.; Clapp, D.W. Fanconi anaemia and cancer: An intricate relationship. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2018, 18, 168–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ceccaldi, R.; Sarangi, P.; D'Andrea, A.D. The Fanconi anaemia pathway: New players and new functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2016, 17, 337–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Moreno, O.M.; Paredes, A.C.; Suarez-Obando, F.; Rojas, A. An update on Fanconi anemia: Clinical, cytogenetic and molecular approaches (Review). Biomed. Rep. 2021, 15, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Morgan, N.V.; Tipping, A.J.; Joenje, H.; Mathew, C.G. High frequency of large intragenic deletions in the Fanconi anemia group A gene. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1999, 65, 1330–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. De Rocco, D.; Bottega, R.; Cappelli, E.; Cavani, S.; Criscuolo, M.; Nicchia, E.; Corsolini, F.; Greco, C.; Borriello, A.; Svahn, J.; et al. Molecular analysis of Fanconi anemia: The experience of the Bone Marrow Failure Study Group of the Italian Association of Pediatric Onco-Hematology. Haematologica 2014, 99, 1022–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Yeh, Y.H.; Hsieh, M.Y.; Lee, W.I.; Huang, J.L.; Chen, L.C.; Yeh, K.W.; Ou, L.S.; Yao, T.C.; Wu, C.Y.; Lin, S.J. Distinct Clinical Features and Novel Mutations in Taiwanese Patients With X-Linked Agammaglobulinemia. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sedivá, A.; Smith, C.I.; Asplund, A.C.; Hadac, J.; Janda, A.; Zeman, J.; Hansíková, H.; Dvoráková, L.; Mrázová, L.; Velbri, S.; et al. Contiguous X-chromosome deletion syndrome encompassing the BTK, TIMM8A, TAF7L, and DRP2 genes. J. Clin. Immunol. 2007, 27, 640–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Xiang, Y.; Sugimura, R. Single-Cell Approaches to Deconvolute the Development of HSCs. Cells 2021, 10, 2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Takahashi, K.; Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 2006, 126, 663–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Takahashi, K.; Tanabe, K.; Ohnuki, M.; Narita, M.; Ichisaka, T.; Tomoda, K.; Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 2007, 131, 861–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Liu, G.; David, B.T.; Trawczynski, M.; Fessler, R.G. Advances in Pluripotent Stem Cells: History, Mechanisms, Technologies, and Applications. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 2020, 16, 3–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Wang, Y.; Zheng, C.G.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Chen, J.; Yao, C.; Zhao, Q.; Liu, S.; Chen, K.; Du, J.; et al. Genetic correction of β-thalassemia patient-specific iPS cells and its use in improving hemoglobin production in irradiated SCID mice. Cell Res. 2012, 22, 637–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Tubsuwan, A.; Abed, S.; Deichmann, A.; Kardel, M.D.; Bartholomä, C.; Cheung, A.; Negre, O.; Kadri, Z.; Fucharoen, S.; von Kalle, C.; et al. Parallel assessment of globin lentiviral transfer in induced pluripotent stem cells and adult hematopoietic stem cells derived from the same transplanted β-thalassemia patient. Stem Cells 2013, 31, 1785–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hanna, J.; Wernig, M.; Markoulaki, S.; Sun, C.W.; Meissner, A.; Cassady, J.P.; Beard, C.; Brambrink, T.; Wu, L.C.; Townes, T.M.; et al. Treatment of sickle cell anemia mouse model with iPS cells generated from autologous skin. Science 2007, 318, 1920–1923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mandai, M.; Kurimoto, Y.; Takahashi, M. Autologous Induced Stem-Cell-Derived Retinal Cells for Macular Degeneration. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 792–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Neri, T.; Muggeo, S.; Paulis, M.; Caldana, M.E.; Crisafulli, L.; Strina, D.; Focarelli, M.L.; Faggioli, F.; Recordati, C.; Scaramuzza, S.; et al. Targeted Gene Correction in Osteopetrotic-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells for the Generation of Functional Osteoclasts. Stem Cell Rep. 2015, 5, 558–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Laugsch, M.; Rostovskaya, M.; Velychko, S.; Richter, C.; Zimmer, A.; Klink, B.; Schröck, E.; Haase, M.; Neumann, K.; Thieme, S.; et al. Functional Restoration of gp91phox-Oxidase Activity by BAC Transgenesis and Gene Targeting in X-linked Chronic Granulomatous Disease iPSCs. Mol. Ther. 2016, 24, 812–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Chang, C.W.; Lai, Y.S.; Westin, E.; Khodadadi-Jamayran, A.; Pawlik, K.M.; Lamb, L.S.; Goldman, F.D.; Townes, T.M. Modeling Human Severe Combined Immunodeficiency and Correction by CRISPR/Cas9-Enhanced Gene Targeting. Cell Rep. 2015, 12, 1668–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Merling, R.K.; Sweeney, C.L.; Chu, J.; Bodansky, A.; Choi, U.; Priel, D.L.; Kuhns, D.B.; Wang, H.; Vasilevsky, S.; De Ravin, S.S.; et al. An AAVS1-targeted minigene platform for correction of iPSCs from all five types of chronic granulomatous disease. Mol. Ther. 2015, 23, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Jalil, S.; Keskinen, T.; Maldonado, R.; Sokka, J.; Trokovic, R.; Otonkoski, T.; Wartiovaara, K. Simultaneous high-efficiency base editing and reprogramming of patient fibroblasts. Stem Cell Rep. 2021, 16, 3064–3075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dever, D.P.; Bak, R.O.; Reinisch, A.; Camarena, J.; Washington, G.; Nicolas, C.E.; Pavel-Dinu, M.; Saxena, N.; Wilkens, A.B.; Mantri, S.; et al. CRISPR/Cas9 β-globin gene targeting in human haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 2016, 539, 384–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Pavel-Dinu, M.; Wiebking, V.; Dejene, B.T.; Srifa, W.; Mantri, S.; Nicolas, C.E.; Lee, C.; Bao, G.; Kildebeck, E.J.; Punjya, N.; et al. Gene correction for SCID-X1 in long-term hematopoietic stem cells. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Salisbury-Ruf, C.T.; Larochelle, A. Advances and Obstacles in Homology-Mediated Gene Editing of Hematopoietic Stem Cells. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gentner, B.; Naldini, L. In Vivo Selection for Gene-Corrected HSPCs Advances Gene Therapy for a Rare Stem Cell Disease. Cell Stem Cell 2019, 25, 592–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Osborn, M.; Lonetree, C.L.; Webber, B.R.; Patel, D.; Dunmire, S.; McElroy, A.N.; DeFeo, A.P.; MacMillan, M.L.; Wagner, J.; Balzar, B.R.; et al. CRISPR/Cas9 Targeted Gene Editing and Cellular Engineering in Fanconi Anemia. Stem Cells Dev. 2016, 25, 1591–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Skvarova Kramarzova, K.; Osborn, M.J.; Webber, B.R.; DeFeo, A.P.; McElroy, A.N.; Kim, C.J.; Tolar, J. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Correction of the FANCD1 Gene in Primary Patient Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Capo, V.; Penna, S.; Merelli, I.; Barcella, M.; Scala, S.; Basso-Ricci, L.; Draghici, E.; Palagano, E.; Zonari, E.; Desantis, G.; et al. Expanded circulating hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells as novel cell source for the treatment of TCIRG1 osteopetrosis. Haematologica 2021, 106, 74–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Castelli, A.; Susani, L.; Menale, C.; Muggeo, S.; Caldana, E.; Strina, D.; Cassani, B.; Recordati, C.; Scanziani, E.; Ficara, F.; et al. Chromosome Transplantation: Correction of the Chronic Granulomatous Disease Defect in Mouse Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Stem Cells 2019, 37, 876–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Julien, E.; El Omar, R.; Tavian, M. Origin of the hematopoietic system in the human embryo. FEBS Lett. 2016, 590, 3987–4001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Hansen, M.; von Lindern, M.; van den Akker, E.; Varga, E. Human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived blood products: State of the art and future directions. FEBS Lett. 2019, 593, 3288–3303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Buchrieser, J.; James, W.; Moore, M.D. Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Macrophages Share Ontogeny with MYB-Independent Tissue-Resident Macrophages. Stem Cell Rep. 2017, 8, 334–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Creamer, J.P.; Dege, C.; Ren, Q.; Ho, J.T.K.; Valentine, M.C.; Druley, T.E.; Sturgeon, C.M. Human definitive hematopoietic specification from pluripotent stem cells is regulated by mesodermal expression of CDX4. Blood 2017, 129, 2988–2992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. French, A.; Yang, C.T.; Taylor, S.; Watt, S.M.; Carpenter, L. Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived B lymphocytes express sIgM and can be generated via a hemogenic endothelium intermediate. Stem Cells Dev. 2015, 24, 1082–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Böiers, C.; Richardson, S.E.; Laycock, E.; Zriwil, A.; Turati, V.A.; Brown, J.; Wray, J.P.; Wang, D.; James, C.; Herrero, J.; et al. A Human IPS Model Implicates Embryonic B-Myeloid Fate Restriction as Developmental Susceptibility to B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Associated ETV6-RUNX1. Dev. Cell. 2018, 44, 362–377.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Zhang, Q.; Wu, B.; Weng, Q.; Hu, F.; Lin, Y.; Xia, C.; Peng, H.; Wang, Y.; Liu 1, X.; Liu, L.; et al. Regeneration of immunocompetent B lymphopoiesis from pluripotent stem cells guided by transcription factors. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Guo, R.; Hu, F.; Weng, Q.; Lv, C.; Wu, H.; Liu, L.; Li, Z.; Zeng, Y.; Bai, Z.; Zhang, M.; et al. Guiding T lymphopoiesis from pluripotent stem cells by defined transcription factors. Cell Res. 2020, 30, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Sugimura, R.; Jha, D.K.; Han, A.; Soria-Valles, C.; da Rocha, E.L.; Lu, Y.F.; Goettel, J.A.; Serrao, E.; Rowe, R.G.; Malleshaiah, M.; et al. Haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Nature 2017, 545, 432–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Lange, L.; Hoffmann, D.; Schwarzer, A.; Ha, T.C.; Philipp, F.; Lenz, D.; Morgan, M.; Schambach, A. Inducible Forward Programming of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells to Hemato-endothelial Progenitor Cells with Hematopoietic Progenitor Potential. Stem Cell Rep. 2020, 15, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ackermann, M.; Liebhaber, S.; Klusmann, J.H.; Lachmann, N. Lost in translation: Pluripotent stem cell-derived hematopoiesis. EMBO Mol. Med. 2015, 7, 1388–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Wahlster, L.; Daley, G.Q. Progress towards generation of human haematopoietic stem cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2016, 18, 1111–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Mills, J.A.; Paluru, P.; Weiss, M.J.; Gadue, P.; French, D.L. Hematopoietic differentiation of pluripotent stem cells in culture. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014, 1185, 181–194. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  72. Vodyanik, M.A.; Thomson, J.A.; Slukvin, I.I. Leukosialin (CD43) defines hematopoietic progenitors in human embryonic stem cell differentiation cultures. Blood 2006, 108, 2095–2105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Ledran, M.H.; Krassowska, A.; Armstrong, L.; Dimmick, I.; Renström, J.; Lang, R.; Yung, S.; Santibanez-Coref, M.; Dzierzak, E.; Stojkovic, M.; et al. Efficient hematopoietic differentiation of human embryonic stem cells on stromal cells derived from hematopoietic niches. Cell Stem Cell 2008, 3, 85–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Kennedy, M.; Awong, G.; Sturgeon, C.M.; Ditadi, A.; LaMotte-Mohs, R.; Zúñiga-Pflücker, J.C.; Keller, G. T lymphocyte potential marks the emergence of definitive hematopoietic progenitors in human pluripotent stem cell differentiation cultures. Cell Rep. 2012, 2, 1722–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Ruiz, J.P.; Chen, G.; Haro Mora, J.J.; Keyvanfar, K.; Liu, C.; Zou, J.; Beers, J.; Bloomer, H.; Qanash, H.; Uchida, N.; et al. Robust generation of erythroid and multilineage hematopoietic progenitors from human iPSCs using a scalable monolayer culture system. Stem Cell Res. 2019, 41, 101600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Mora-Roldan, G.A.; Ramirez-Ramirez, D.; Pelayo, R.; Gazarian, K. Assessment of the Hematopoietic Differentiation Potential of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells in 2D and 3D Culture Systems. Cells 2021, 10, 2858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sturgeon, C.M.; Ditadi, A.; Awong, G.; Kennedy, M.; Keller, G. Wnt signaling controls the specification of definitive and primitive hematopoiesis from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 554–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Nafria, M.; Bonifer, C.; Stanley, E.G.; Ng, E.S.; Elefanty, A.G. Protocol for the Generation of Definitive Hematopoietic Progenitors from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells. STAR Protoc. 2020, 1, 100130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Garcia-Alegria, E.; Potts, B.; Menegatti, S.; Kouskoff, V. differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to hemogenic endothelium and blood progenitors via embryoid body formation. STAR Protoc. 2021, 2, 100367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Takayama, N.; Nishikii, H.; Usui, J.; Tsukui, H.; Sawaguchi, A.; Hiroyama, T.; Eto, K.; Nakauchi, H. Generation of functional platelets from human embryonic stem cells in vitro via ES-sacs, VEGF-promoted structures that concentrate hematopoietic progenitors. Blood 2008, 111, 5298–5306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Martin, R.M.; Ikeda, K.; Cromer, M.K.; Uchida, N.; Nishimura, T.; Romano, R.; Tong, A.J.; Lemgart, V.T.; Camarena, J.; Pavel-Dinu, M.; et al. Highly Efficient and Marker-free Genome Editing of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells by CRISPR-Cas9 RNP and AAV6 Donor-Mediated Homologous Recombination. Cell Stem Cell 2019, 24, 821–828.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. McDonald, D.; Wu, Y.; Dailamy, A.; Tat, J.; Parekh, U.; Zhao, D.; Hu, M.; Tipps, A.; Zhang, K.; Mali, P. Defining the Teratoma as a Model for Multi-lineage Human Development. Cell 2020, 183, 1402–1419.e18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Tsukada, M.; Ota, Y.; Wilkinson, A.C.; Becker, H.J.; Osato, M.; Nakauchi, H.; Yamazaki, S. In Vivo Generation of Engraftable Murine Hematopoietic Stem Cells by Gfi1b, c-Fos, and Gata2 Overexpression within Teratoma. Stem Cell Rep. 2017, 9, 1024–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Deng, J.; Lancelot, M.; Jajosky, R.; Deng, Q.; Deeb, K.; Saakadze, N.; Gao, Y.; Jaye, D.; Liu, S.; Stowell, R.S.; et al. Erythropoietic properties of human induced pluripotent stem cells-derived red blood cells in immunodeficient mice. Am. J. Hematol. 2021, 1, 194–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Garate, Z.; Quintana-Bustamante, O.; Crane, A.M.; Olivier, E.; Poirot, L.; Galetto, R.; Kosinski, P.; Hill, C.; Kung, C.; XAgirre, X.; et al. Generation of a High Number of Healthy Erythroid Cells from Gene-Edited Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency Patient-Specific Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Stem Cell Rep. 2015, 5, 1053–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Pandey, P.; Zhang, N.; Curtis, B.R.; Newman, P.J.; Denomme, G.A. Generation of ‘designer erythroblasts’ lacking one or more blood group systems from CRISPR/Cas9 gene-edited human-induced pluripotent stem cells. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2021, 25, 9340–9349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Cappariello, A.; Berardi, A.C.; Peruzzi, B.; Del Fattore, A.; Ugazio, A.; Bottazzo, G.F.; Teti, A. Committed osteoclast precursors colonize the bone and improve the phenotype of a mouse model of autosomal recessive osteopetrosis. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2010, 25, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Root, S.H.; Aguila, H.L. Novel population of human monocyte and osteoclast progenitors from pluripotent stem cells and peripheral blood. Blood Adv. 2021, 5, 4435–4446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Lanzi, G.; Ferraro, R.M.; Masneri, S.; Piovani, G.; Barisani, C.; Sobacchi, C.; Villa, A.; Vezzoni, P.; Giliani, S. Generation of 3 clones of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from a patient affected by Autosomal Recessive Osteopetrosis due to mutations in TCIRG1 gene. Stem Cell Res. 2020, 42, 101660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Chen, W.; Twaroski, K.; Eide, C.; Riddle, M.J.; Orchard, P.J.; Tolar, J. TCIRG1 Transgenic Rescue of Osteoclast Function Using Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Derived from Patients with Infantile Malignant Autosomal Recessive Osteopetrosis. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2019, 101, 1939–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Xian, X.; Moraghebi, R.; Löfvall, H.; Fasth, A.; Henriksen, K.; Richter, J.; Woods, N.B.; Moscatelli, I. Generation of gene-corrected functional osteoclasts from osteopetrotic induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2020, 11, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Palagano, E.; Muggeo, S.; Crisafulli, L.; Tourkova, I.L.; Strina, D.; Mantero, S.; Fontana, E.; Locatelli, S.L.; Monari, M.; Morenghi, E.; et al. Generation of an immunodeficient mouse model of tcirg1-deficient autosomal recessive osteopetrosis. Bone Rep. 2020, 12, 100242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cells 11 00557 g001 550
Figure 1. Gene/genome therapy options for the cure of hereditary blood disorders based on gene target size. With gene transfer WT form of the disease gene is added in the genome of the recipient cells; with gene editing the mutated gene is corrected; with BAC-mediated genome transfer the mutated gene including upstream regulatory sequences and intronic regions is substituted with homologous recombination; with chromosome transplantation the entire chromosome containing the altered gene(s) is replaced with a WT chromosome. MMCT, microcell-mediated chromosome transfer.
Figure 1. Gene/genome therapy options for the cure of hereditary blood disorders based on gene target size. With gene transfer WT form of the disease gene is added in the genome of the recipient cells; with gene editing the mutated gene is corrected; with BAC-mediated genome transfer the mutated gene including upstream regulatory sequences and intronic regions is substituted with homologous recombination; with chromosome transplantation the entire chromosome containing the altered gene(s) is replaced with a WT chromosome. MMCT, microcell-mediated chromosome transfer.
Cells 11 00557 g001
Cells 11 00557 g002 550
Figure 2. Hematopoietic differentiation from iPSCs. (a) Steps to generate blood cells from iPSCs. The HSC stage occurs during definitive hematopoiesis; (b) Strategies to generate blood cells from iPSCs. Symbols indicates absence (−), low (+/−), moderate (+), or strong (++) compliance with the highlighted features (protocol reproducibility, functional differentiation, efficacy, yield and clinical application).
Figure 2. Hematopoietic differentiation from iPSCs. (a) Steps to generate blood cells from iPSCs. The HSC stage occurs during definitive hematopoiesis; (b) Strategies to generate blood cells from iPSCs. Symbols indicates absence (−), low (+/−), moderate (+), or strong (++) compliance with the highlighted features (protocol reproducibility, functional differentiation, efficacy, yield and clinical application).
Cells 11 00557 g002
Table
Table 1. Examples of generation of human adult-type differentiated hematopoietic cells in vitro from PSCs.
Table 1. Examples of generation of human adult-type differentiated hematopoietic cells in vitro from PSCs.
Final Cell TypePSCsDifferentiation
Protocol Steps		ValidationRef.
RBCsiPSCs from
primary erythroblasts		1. STEMdiff to HSPCs
2. Ery expansion
3. hPL or plasma		FACS; transfusion in NSG mice pre-treated with CL and CVF[84]
MSC-iPS1 1. 3D mesoderm induction
2. Hematop. specification
3. Culture with OP9-DL1		BFU-E, analysis of globin gene expression[77]
OT1-11. 2D diff to HSPCs
2. Ery diff and expansion		FACS, morphology, enucleation[86]
iPSCs from
sickle cell anemia pt
dermal fibroblasts 		1. 3D (ES sacs)
2. CD34+ isolation
3. Ery diff		FACS[81]
PLTPSCs from cell
repositories		1. 2D mesoderm induction
2. Mk diff
3. Plt release in bioreactor 		FACS; in vitro thrombus formation, transfusion in NRG/J mice[8]
T and NK cellsMSC-iPS11. 3D mesoderm induction
2. 2D hematop specification
3. Culture with OP9-DL4		FACS[77]
OCsiPSCs from pt
skin fibroblasts		1. 2D OP9 co-culture to HC
2. Myelo-prog. expansion
3. OC prog. expansion
4. OC maturation medium		TRAP staining, morphology, bone resorption[90]
iPSCs from pt
skin fibroblasts		1. 3D mesoderm induction
2. monocyte diff medium
3. OC diff on bone slices		CTX-I release, TRAP staining, resorption[91]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rao, I.; Crisafulli, L.; Paulis, M.; Ficara, F. Hematopoietic Cells from Pluripotent Stem Cells: Hope and Promise for the Treatment of Inherited Blood Disorders. Cells 2022, 11, 557. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11030557

AMA Style

Rao I, Crisafulli L, Paulis M, Ficara F. Hematopoietic Cells from Pluripotent Stem Cells: Hope and Promise for the Treatment of Inherited Blood Disorders. Cells. 2022; 11(3):557. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11030557

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rao, Ilaria, Laura Crisafulli, Marianna Paulis, and Francesca Ficara. 2022. "Hematopoietic Cells from Pluripotent Stem Cells: Hope and Promise for the Treatment of Inherited Blood Disorders" Cells 11, no. 3: 557. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11030557

APA Style

Rao, I., Crisafulli, L., Paulis, M., & Ficara, F. (2022). Hematopoietic Cells from Pluripotent Stem Cells: Hope and Promise for the Treatment of Inherited Blood Disorders. Cells, 11(3), 557. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11030557

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop