Next Article in Journal
Testicular Germ Cell Tumor Tissue Biomarker Analysis: A Comparison of Human Protein Atlas and Individual Testicular Germ Cell Tumor Component Immunohistochemistry
Next Article in Special Issue
Contribution of Oligodendrocytes, Microglia, and Astrocytes to Myelin Debris Uptake in an Explant Model of Inflammatory Demyelination in Rats
Previous Article in Journal
Individual Contributions of Amido Acid Residues Tyr122, Ile168, and Asp173 to the Activity and Substrate Specificity of Human DNA Dioxygenase ABH2
Previous Article in Special Issue
Current Advancements in Spinal Cord Injury Research—Glial Scar Formation and Neural Regeneration
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 12
Issue 14
10.3390/cells12141842
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Understanding the Role of the Glial Scar through the Depletion of Glial Cells after Spinal Cord Injury

by
Lucila Perez-Gianmarco
1,2,* and
Maria Kukley
1,3
1
Achucarro Basque Center for Neuroscience, 48940 Leioa, PC, Spain
2
Department of Neurosciences, University of the Basque Country, 48940 Leioa, PC, Spain
3
IKERBASQUE Basque Foundation for Science, 48009 Bilbao, PC, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2023, 12(14), 1842; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12141842
Submission received: 22 May 2023 / Revised: 30 June 2023 / Accepted: 11 July 2023 / Published: 13 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Glial Scar: Formation and Regeneration)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a condition that affects between 8.8 and 246 people in a million and, unlike many other neurological disorders, it affects mostly young people, causing deficits in sensory, motor, and autonomic functions. Promoting the regrowth of axons is one of the most important goals for the neurological recovery of patients after SCI, but it is also one of the most challenging goals. A key event after SCI is the formation of a glial scar around the lesion core, mainly comprised of astrocytes, NG2+-glia, and microglia. Traditionally, the glial scar has been regarded as detrimental to recovery because it may act as a physical barrier to axon regrowth and release various inhibitory factors. However, more and more evidence now suggests that the glial scar is beneficial for the surrounding spared tissue after SCI. Here, we review experimental studies that used genetic and pharmacological approaches to ablate specific populations of glial cells in rodent models of SCI in order to understand their functional role. The studies showed that ablation of either astrocytes, NG2+-glia, or microglia might result in disorganization of the glial scar, increased inflammation, extended tissue degeneration, and impaired recovery after SCI. Hence, glial cells and glial scars appear as important beneficial players after SCI.

1. Glial Scar Formation and Composition

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a condition that affects between 8.8 and 246 people in a million, according to the World Health Organization. Unlike many other neurological disorders, SCI affects mostly young people, causing deficits in sensory, motor, and autonomic functions. Axonal atrophy following injury to the central nervous system (CNS) and the inability of central axons to regenerate has been described already by Ramón y Cajal in 1928 [1], but to this day, promoting regrowth of injured axons remains one of the main challenges to regain function. Various factors may affect axonal regeneration after SCI and one of them is the glial scar, which has been proposed by several studies as the main constraint for repair [2,3,4].
The glial scar is a compact mesh structure that surrounds the CNS lesions rapidly after the initial damage and is fully formed between two and three weeks post-injury (wpi) in rodents. This process is triggered by the breakdown of the blood-spinal cord barrier (BSCB) and the infiltration of non-neural cells into the CNS parenchyma [5]. Early on, this infiltrated parenchyma in the epicenter lesion presents edema, myelin debris, degenerating neurons and glia. As days go by, the edema is reduced, and a fibrotic scar begins to form, occupying the entire lesion epicenter by eight days post-injury (dpi) in rodents [6]. The fibrotic scar is composed of invading hematogenous cells: lymphocytes, macrophages, and leukocytes that infiltrate the spinal cord parenchyma; additionally, days after injury, fibroblasts from the damaged meninges invade the lesion core, where they proliferate and secrete molecules that change the extracellular matrix (ECM) [7]. Glial cells are rarely found within this fibrotic tissue, accumulating around it instead and separating the lesion epicenter from the spared nervous tissue by forming the glial scar (Figure 1).
This glial scar is mainly composed of astrocytes, NG2+-glia, and microglia, with newly proliferated astrocytes playing the leading role [7] (Figure 1). In human tissue, neurons, and oligodendrocytes are the vast majority of apoptotic cells, found between 3 h and 2 months post-injury [8]. At 1 dpi, microglia have already responded and changed their morphology, and they can remain at the site of injury for weeks to months [9]. It takes a few days for astrocytes near the lesion to undergo hypertrophy, reaching the maximum at 2–3 wpi and generates the glial scar [9]. This series of events is similar to the ones occurring in the animal models, although timing is the main difference. In rodents, astrocytes can be identified in the vicinity of the lesion epicenter by 2 dpi, where they progressively accumulate to form the dense structure that isolates the lesion epicenter from the spared tissue, with their processes extending towards the lesion [6]. During the first two weeks after SCI in rodents, astrocytes, NG2+-glia, and microglia undergo extensive proliferation, and their numbers remain elevated during the chronic phase [10]. Other than their accumulation and dense organization, these glial cells undergo diverse functional and morphological changes, affecting the composition of the extracellular matrix (ECM); this phenomenon is common to rodents and humans (Figure 1).
The ECM is an essential, non-cellular scaffold that varies for each tissue type but is always made up of collagens, fibronectin, laminin, hyaluronan, and elastin, added to different proteins, proteoglycans, and glycosaminoglycans [11]. The composition of the ECM can influence cell adhesion, migration, proliferation, and differentiation, and therefore, cellular and tissue function [12]. In the healthy adult CNS specifically, the ECM is looser than in other tissues because it is constituted primarily by hyaluronan, sulfated proteoglycans, and tenascin-R [13,14]. The molecules comprising the ECM play a role in axonal guidance and synaptogenesis that can vary between regions, ages, and animals [15,16]. For example, tenascin-R inhibits axon growth in mouse cerebellar neurites [17], but it promotes growth in embryonic mouse hippocampal neurons [18]. In the post-SCI, glial and blood-derived cells in the lesion overexpress matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) [19], resulting in the degradation of hyaluronan and other ECM components into low molecular weight fragments that can amplify inflammation [20]. Additionally, glial cells modify the ECM composition further by overexpressing sulfated proteoglycans, among them chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs) like NG2, brevican, neurocan and versican, both in rodents [21,22,23,24] and humans [25]. The possible consequences of sulfate proteoglycans overexpression include restriction of axon plasticity, migration of inflammatory cells, sequestering or presenting growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines (Reviewed in [19]). Dysregulation of these sulfated proteoglycans can have long-lasting effects on the structure and dynamics of the local tissue [19] and represents one of the major factors inhibiting axonal regeneration [26]. This is one of the main reasons why the glial scar has traditionally been viewed as detrimental to recovery after SCI. However, a growing number of experiments demonstrate that the glial scar plays a neuroprotective role as well [27,28]. In this context, the depletion of the glial scar, or the cells involved in its formation, represents interesting approaches to determine whether the glial scar promotes or inhibits axonal regeneration and functional recovery after SCI. Here, we review the studies that specifically ablated each glial cell population involved in the glial scar formation and describe how those manipulations affected recovery after SCI in animal models (Table 1).

2. Conditional Cell Ablation Strategies

2.1. Genetic Approaches for Ablation of Specific Glial Cell Populations

Several genetic strategies of conditional cell ablation have been described in the literature. Their major principle is the expression of a foreign protein, typically of bacterial or viral origin, whose transcription is regulated by a promoter specific to the targeted cell population. Such protein, be it an enzyme or a receptor, will grant that cell population the unique capacity to break down an administered prodrug into its active form, initiating the cell’s apoptotic death through one of several possible mechanisms.
One of these cell ablation strategies is the Tk/GCV system, where the Thymidine kinase (Tk) gene -of the Herpes Simplex Virus- is expressed under the control of a cell-specific promoter. Then, when the Ganciclovir (GCV) prodrug is applied systemically, the Tk (expressed exclusively in the cells of interest) phosphorylates it to its active form, inhibiting DNA synthesis and leading to apoptosis of the proliferative population of interest, and thus to its elimination (Figure 2). This system can be used in transgenic animals that express the Tk under the cell-specific promoter of interest, or, alternatively, it can be delivered through viral transfection. However, given its mechanism of action, the Tk/GCV system can only ablate proliferating cells.
Other similar systems that can target non-proliferating cells include (1) the NTR-CB1954, in which the E. coli enzyme nitroreductase (NTR) activates the CB1954 prodrug, inducing DNA interstrand cross-linking and cell death in the cells expressing NTR [35,36,37]; and (2) DTA/DTR, where a Diphtheria toxin receptor (DTR) is expressed under a cell-specific promoter and is harmless until the moment of ligand (Diphtheria toxin A, DTA) administration. When DTA binds to the DTR, the inhibition of protein synthesis is triggered in the targeted cells, leading to their apoptosis [38].
A common disadvantage to these cell ablation strategies is the necessity to obtain and maintain (or even generate new) transgenic mice that express the involved enzyme or receptor under a cell-specific promoter. This may be expensive and time-consuming. Additionally, there might be small populations within a determined cell type that escape depletion by expressing the wild-type allele and failing to express the Cre and reporter protein. Such a phenomenon has been recently described for microglia in the Cx3cr1CreER-Eyfp/wt mouse, where less than 1% of the population is Cx3cr1+ Cre− Eyfp−, thus failing to be targeted for ablation [39]. Although the same issue has not been reported for the other transgenic models addressed in this review, it should be considered a possibility when interpreting results. Alternatively, other available approaches for ablation of glial cells can be considered, e.g., pharmacological.

2.2. Pharmacological Approaches for Ablation of Specific Glial Cell Populations

Pharmacological approaches employ drugs or toxins that affect a specific cell type and can be applied to non-transgenic laboratory animals. However, the risk of using such toxins or drugs is the possible off-target effects. For example, in the case of microglia, it has been shown that these cells are the main source of Colony Stimulating Factor 1 Receptor (CSF-1R) expression in the CNS, and CSF-1R ablation or loss of function leads to microglia depletion [40]. Thus, it is reasonable to expect that inhibition of CSF-1R can lead to conditional microglial depletion. In fact, several specific kinase inhibitors have been developed and tested in vivo, some efficiently crossing the BBB and ablating microglia [41]. Among them, PLX3397 and PLX5622, which can be administered orally in the chow, appear to be the most potent and are widely used in microglia research [31,32,33,41,42,43]. Moreover, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved PLX3397 as a therapeutic agent for patients with Tenosynovial giant cell tumors, where blocking the CSF-1/CSF-1R pathway reduces the number of infiltrating monocytes and macrophages and minimizes tumor growth [44].
For specific ablation of astrocytes, the typical toxin is L-alpha-aminoadipate (L-AAA). L-AAA is a naturally occurring glutamate homolog that constitutes an intermediate in the lysine metabolism [45,46]. The L-AAA inhibits glutamate synthesis [47] and uptake [48] in astrocytes, rapidly ablating them without affecting the surrounding cell types, even if administered for extended periods; however, it is incapable of crossing the BBB in the adult CNS and must, therefore, be injected into the brain or spinal cord [48].
Even though there are pharmacological drugs that induce oligodendrocytes death, such as the Clostridium perfringens Epsilon toxin [49] and Cuprizone (effect and mechanism of action reviewed by Zirngibl et al. [50]), no drugs for specific ablation of NG2+ oligodendrocyte precursor cells have been reported so far.
Regardless of the chosen method to ablate glial populations, some considerations are always pertinent. Deletion of a group of cells might have an effect on its own -regardless of the targeted population- by causing inflammation and infiltration, possibly mediating some of the observed changes. In order to clarify the size of this effect, controls can be included in the experiments, such as sham-operated animals that undergo ablation and are, therefore, expected to represent the basal inflammation of the model. Additionally, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injections induce acute inflammation [51] and have been used to differentiate between the effects of inflammation and the proper effects of eliminating the glial cell type [29].
Moreover, Zhou et al. found a microglial population that persisted after conditional ablation with a genetic approach but also described that PLX3397 treatment for 21 days ablated approximately 70% of the total microglia [39]. In contrast, Fu et al. reported that PLX3397 treatment for seven days resulted in a 95% reduction in the Iba1+ population [33]. These variations in treatment efficiency might result from different experimental designs, age, and/or strain of the animals; hence, it is advisable to confirm the effect of the chosen treatment in the experimenter’s hands in order to conclude accordingly about the obtained data.

3. Glial Scar after SCI: What Have We Learned from Astrocytic Ablation Experiments?

Astrocytes are glial cells that have multiple functions in the adult CNS, including regulation of the BBB and CSF-brain barrier formation and function, regulation of blood supply, uptake of glucose, glutamate, and lactate supply to neurons, regulation of synaptic transmission and plasticity, pruning, and maintenance of synapses, removal of neurotransmitters from the extracellular space, extracellular ions homeostasis and pH control. Embryonic astrocytes also support axonal growth, but this function gets lost with age until the point when mature astrocytes inhibit axon growth [52,53].
In the intact adult spinal cord, astrocytes barely proliferate, but damage to the CNS triggers an astrocytic response known as astrogliosis. During this process, inflammatory cytokines promote the proliferation of adult astrocytes and ependymal cells, giving origin to reactive astrocytes [54,55]. In rodent models of SCI, first signs of astrogliosis appear as early as 2–7 dpi [10,29], but reactive astrocytes persist chronically after SCI. These newly proliferated reactive astrocytes -which acquire a different morphological structure with extended thick processes- are the ones that comprise the glial scar, where their cell density nearly doubles compared to astrocytes in uninjured tissue [56].
One of the main reasons why astrocytes (and the whole glial scar) are viewed as detrimental to axon regrowth is their overexpression of CSPGs after SCI [24,57], which is associated with inhibition of axonal regeneration [58,59]. However, other cell types in the scar also express CSPGs [22,60,61], and astrocyte ablation does not eradicate CSPGs in the lesion [21]. Most importantly, some of those CSPGs are axon-growth permissive; therefore, CSPG presence in the glial scar does not prevent axon regrowth in a stimulated environment [21]. The role of CSPGs in the glial scar after SCI is just one of the interesting findings resulting from astrocytic ablation experiments.
Astrocytic ablation was first described in forebrain stab injuries by means of the Tk/GCV system in adult transgenic mice [62]. Since then, several groups have made use of this system to ablate reactive proliferating astrocytes in mouse models of SCI, either by using transgenic GFAP-Tk mouse lines [21,29] or by lentivirus-mediated gene expression [30]. Both strategies proved effective at ablating this cell population, although the lentiviral approach did affect a small number of Olig2+ cells [30]. Ablation of scar-forming astrocytes resulted in extended tissue damage, failure to repair the BSCB and the consequent augmented infiltration of the spinal cord parenchyma by blood-borne cells, more extensive demyelination and oligodendrocyte death, decreased neuronal survival near the injury, and diminished locomotor function recovery [29,30]. These results were observed at different time points ranging from two to six weeks post-injury (wpi).
Anderson et al. used the same approach to ablate reactive proliferating astrocytes but focused their study on axonal regrowth in three fiber tracts: the descending corticospinal tract (CST), the ascending sensory tract (AST) and the descending serotonergic tract (5HT) [21]. They report that not only did astrocyte ablation not promote spontaneous axonal regrowth, but it increased the axonal dieback in the AST and CST. The 5HT axons in mice were less affected by the SCI and did not present augmented dieback after astrocytic ablation; still, they failed to spontaneously regrow in the lesion center at 8 wpi.
Seeing that astrocyte ablation in the acute phase of SCI in mice can be detrimental, Anderson et al. ablated the astrocytes during the chronic phase of SCI (i.e., 5 wpi), making use of a DTA/DTR system [21]. At 10 wpi, the authors observed failure of the axons to spontaneously regrow within all three fiber tracts studied. Interestingly, if neurotrophin-3 (NT3) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) (factors promoting axon growth) were administered locally after SCI, few AST axons were found to regrow into the lesion core [21]. However, administration of these same neurotrophic factors in combination with preconditioning lesions (a process in which the sciatic nerve is transected and ligated one week before SCI) [63,64,65] successfully promoted AST axon regrowth through the glial scar, despite CSPG presence [21]. Tk/GCV ablation of reactive astrocytes in this paradigm completely prevented axon regrowth, indicating that astrocytes are not detrimental to axon regeneration after SCI, but support it [21].
Overall, astrocytic ablation results in extended damage. Increased excitotoxicity seems an expected consequence, given their role in clearing molecules from the extracellular space. Additionally, their elimination enhances the extravasation of blood-borne cells, which are also known to inhibit regrowth. Consequently, axon regrowth was not enhanced, but dieback was extended. Under proper stimulation, axon regrowth occurred only in the presence of astrocytes. Taken together, astrocyte ablation experiments prove that reactive astrocytes mainly play a beneficial role after SCI and may be important for recovery at the cellular and functional levels, even at chronic stages of SCI. Hence, therapies to promote axonal regeneration should not aim at eliminating the astrocytic scar altogether but, possibly, at finding a way to reduce scarring by controlling the inflammation and infiltration of blood-borne cells.

4. Microglia Ablation after SCI: How Does It Affect Glial Scar Formation?

Even though for years -and to this day- microglial cells have been categorized as “resting” or “active”, they are, in fact, the most dynamic cells in the healthy CNS [66]. Even under normal conditions, microglia throughout the whole nervous tissue are always actively sensing their environment [67] and rapidly responding to its changes [68]. Among the key functions of microglia in the healthy adult nervous system are surveillance, phagocytosis of apoptotic neurons, pruning of synapses, neurotransmission regulation, and circuit reorganization (reviewed by Tremblay et al. [69]).
In response to focal CNS lesions in rodents, microglia can rapidly reorient their processes toward the lesion, and already after 30 min, they form a border that seals the lesion and prevents the spreading of the damage [67,70]. After SCI, microglial response is complex: cells retract their cytoplasmic processes and become more circular in shape [31], they proliferate [71], produce pro-inflammatory cytokines [72] and reactive nitrogen species [73], and enter a highly phagocytic state [31]. At 14 dpi in rodents, microglia accumulate in the lesion and can be found between the fibrotic and glial scars contacting astrocytes, where they persist at least until 35 dpi [31] (Figure 1).
In the last five years, a different microglial state has been described in models of pathologies such as Alzheimer’s disease [74,75], multiple sclerosis [76], demyelination [77] and, most recently, spinal cord injury [78]. Baseline microglia present transcriptional changes 0–2 h after injury, passing through an intermediate state that lasts up to one week before acquiring the “disease-associated microglia” transcriptional identity. This phenotype is maintained chronically after spinal cord injury and presents a similar transcriptional profile to embryonic and postnatal microglia in the developing CNS [78].
Microglial ablation in rodent SCI models has been carried out pharmacologically with either PLX5622 [31] or PLX3397 [32,33]. In all those experiments, microglia ablation resulted in a transient enlargement of the fibrotic scar area at 7 dpi that was no longer visible from 14 dpi onward. However, Bellver-Landete et al. found secondary satellite lesions filled with blood-derived myeloid cells and pericytes at 14 and 35 dpi [31]. Other early effects of microglial ablation were a reduction in astrocytic proliferation at 7 dpi [31,32] and decreased locomotor recovery from 7 dpi onward [31,32,33]. All these studies agree that after 14 dpi, the astrocytic scar of microglia-ablated mice is less compact, and astrocytes are not aligned but randomly positioned around the lesion center instead. This is accompanied by an exacerbated infiltration of blood-derived cells into the spinal cord parenchyma and a reduced number of neurons near the lesion. In addition to these effects, Bellver-Landete et al. observed a decrease in the Olig2+/CC1+ oligodendrocyte population around the lesion [31].
Zhou et al. quantified proteins after microglial ablation and found increased levels of three pro-inflammatory cytokines, i.e., TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β, which could be responsible for the augmented neuronal cell death after SCI [32]. Fu et al. analyzed the dieback of CST axons after SCI in mice with and without microglia ablation [33]. The authors injected biotinylated dextran amine (BDA)—a tracer that allows axon visualization—into the cortex of mice at 6 wpi. Two weeks later (8 wpi), they obtained sections from the injured spinal cords, stained them to see the BDA-labelled axons, and found that mice with microglia ablation presented more extended axonal dieback further away from the lesion site.
Additionally, Zhou et al. obtained transcriptomes from the lesion and adjacent spinal cord tissue at 7 dpi after SCI in mice treated or untreated with PLX3397, as well as from the sham-operated control animals [32]. They found upregulation of several groups of genes in the SCI group vs. sham-operated controls, specifically, genes involved in inflammation, fibrosis, extracellular matrix organization, cell adhesion, and immune response. The PLX3397 treatment reverted many of these changes after SCI, presenting a genetic expression more similar to uninjured mice; this indicates that microglial ablation prevents the inflammatory and immune responses initiated after SCI.
Given the negative effects of microglial depletion on SCI recovery, Bellver-Landete et al. used an additional interesting strategy to study the role of microglia after SCI [31]. The authors aimed to enhance microglial proliferation at the injury site by using a local injection of a bioresorbable hydrogel with incorporated macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF). The M-CSF is a cytokine that induces the proliferation and maturation of macrophages and microglia in rodents [79] and humans [80]. The proliferative effects of M-CSF are dose-dependent [79] and immediate on human cultured microglia [80]. Although the proportion of proliferative cells may vary, microglial division occurs consistently during treatment [80]. The hydrogel can sustain drug release for three to seven days, therefore, this system allows an increase in the proliferation of microglia during this time period. Stimulation of microglia proliferation resulted in reduced lesion area at 7 dpi and better locomotor recovery between 7 and 21 dpi, further supporting the idea that microglia exert a protective role after SCI.
Taken together, the extensive evidence gathered by several research groups unequivocally revealed microglia as a cell population whose implication after SCI is purely beneficial. Whether such a protective role is a unique property of disease-associated microglia or is common to all microglial states is an interesting unanswered question.
Finally, Han et al. have recently reviewed the existence of sexual dimorphism in rodent microglia, indicating that microglial response to SCI can differ between males and females [81]. Interestingly, of the articles reviewed in this section, both Fu et al. and Zhou et al. performed the experiments using females exclusively [32,33], while Bellver-Landete et al. pulled male and female mice [31]. Although they all report similar effects at the injury level, it would be interesting to figure out if there are differences in the response at a cellular level. Most cases of SCI occur in male patients, therefore, knowing if such dimorphism exists in humans and affects the response to this pathology in particular are important questions to address in the future.

5. NG2+-Glia Ablation after SCI: What We Learnt and What Remains Unknown

NG2+-glia constitutes the fourth most abundant glial cell type and the most widely distributed proliferating cell type in the normal adult CNS [82]. Differentiation of NG2+-glia cells into oligodendrocytes constitutes their canonical function, which is maintained throughout life [83]. These cells are capable of proliferating, migrating, and differentiating in response to external molecules, which they can rapidly sense with their motile processes [84,85]. One of the most remarkable features of NG2+-glia is their synaptic communication with neurons [86,87], which, together with their morphological complexity and persistence in the CNS throughout life, suggests that NG2+-glia may play other roles in the healthy CNS, independently of its capacity to generate oligodendrocytes [88].
NG2+-glia show a wide variety of responses to CNS injury, but the functional role of these responses is only partially understood and might vary with different factors, including the cause of injury, its location within the CNS, the age of the animals, etc. One type of NG2-glia response is injury-induced cell-fate plasticity, where they not only differentiate into oligodendrocytes to promote remyelination of axons [89] but can additionally differentiate into Schwann cells after focal demyelination [90], and into astrocytes after SCI [91]. Other types of NG2+-glia response to CNS injuries include their activation and participation in the glial scar formation after SCI [25] and promoting inflammation after injury to the brain white matter [92].
After SCI, NG2+-glial cells migrate towards the injury site [85] and undergo massive proliferation, representing 50% of all proliferating cells [93] and reaching their maximum at 7 dpi [34]. Even though their numbers are increased, NG2+-glia are incapable of populating the fibrotic tissue formed in the lesion epicenter but rather remain within the glial scar arising around the lesion [94,95,96]. Being a target of various factors which can influence their fate -such as bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs, growth factors) produced by reactive astrocytes [97] or overexpressed pro-inflammatory cytokines (reviewed by Levine [98])- NG2+-glial cells may differentiate into astrocytes after SCI [99,100]. At the same time, another part of the NG2+-glia population may differentiate into Schwann cells and oligodendrocytes [101]. The newly differentiated Schwann cells and oligodendrocytes play a key role in remyelination, as many oligodendrocytes originally present in the tissue die, while the spared ones are incapable of remyelinating the axons [102,103]. It should be noted that the relevance of remyelination after SCI in mice is still a matter of debate. Several studies have reported improved locomotor recovery after transplantation of neural precursor cells (NPCs) capable of myelination [104,105,106], suggesting that remyelination may be important for neuroregeneration after SCI. However, in addition to remyelination, transplanted NPCs may induce change by differentiating into astrocytes or by providing trophic support to axons; thus, it is possible that the observed recovery is mediated by a combination of these effects rather than by remyelination itself [107,108]. Furthermore, Duncan et al. analyzed the effect of knocking down the Myelin regulatory factor (Myrf) and found that, even though Myrf is essential to induce remyelination, its knockdown does not affect locomotor recovery [109]. These findings indicate that remyelination is not required for locomotor recovery after SCI in mice.
Another type of response of NG2+-glia after injury is CSPGs overexpression. Although evidence exists that CSPGs (and NG2 among them) are inhibitory for axon regrowth after SCI [110,111,112], several studies have observed that regenerating axons in the injured spinal cord appear more frequently in areas of the spinal cord showing NG2 labeling [24,113]. This suggests that the NG2 proteoglycan may actually provide a permissive environment for axons to grow. However, even if this is the case, NG2+-glia can still entrap the growing axons through the establishment of NG2+-glia-axon synapses, preventing their regrowth after SCI [114,115,116].
Given the several, and sometimes opposing, roles that the NG2+ glia play after SCI, ablating them in vivo seems a good approach to better define if their overall function is detrimental or beneficial in the post-SCI environment. In order to ablate proliferating NG2+ cells, Hesp et al. made use of a Tk/GCV system with transgenic NG2-Tk mice and GCV infusion starting immediately after SCI [34]; the animals were sacrificed, and the tissue was analyzed at 7, 11 and 21 dpi. The animals sacrificed at 7 and 11 dpi received GCV infusion for 7 and 11 days, respectively, while the animals sacrificed at 21 dpi received GCV infusion for 14 days and were kept for an extra week to study the NG2+ cells response after the ablation treatment was stopped [34]. Notably, NG2+ is expressed not only by oligodendroglial progenitors but also by pericytes, and the used approach eliminates both cell populations. However, after SCI, NG2+ pericytes occupy the fibrotic scar formed at the epicenter of the lesion, while NG2+ oligodendroglial progenitors occupy the glial scar around the lesion. Therefore, the effects of abolishing each cell type can be studied and distinguished in the respective area of interest. Additionally, the authors performed a time course study to determine the ratio of proliferating NG2+ glia and pericytes throughout the first 14 dpi by staining spinal cord sections with Ki67, NG2, and PDGFRb antibodies [34].
NG2+ ablation resulted in loss of tissue integrity, extended edema, and hemorrhage in the lesion site at 7 dpi. The effects were still visible -although less pronounced- at 11 dpi when lesion expansion was also observed. At 21 dpi, the swelling and the signs of edema were significantly reduced and were similar to sham-operated control mice [34]. Regarding the glial scar formation, NG2+ cell ablation resulted in a more discontinuous and less compact glial scar, with reduced astrocyte numbers and increased macrophage infiltration. Moreover, at 21 dpi (7 days after stopping GCV treatment) presence of NG2+ cells reached control levels, and axons were penetrating the lesion epicenter in the Tk/GCV treated mice; these axons were usually observed in contact with NG2+ cells, some even seemingly “traveling along NG2+ processes”. This suggests that acute ablation of NG2+ oligodendroglial progenitors and/or NG2+ pericytes results in a more permissive environment for axonal regrowth afterward. However, at the same time, NG2+ cell ablation negatively affected locomotion, impairing recovery of the forelimb step length in the Tk/GCV treated mice, as opposed to the complete recovery observed in control mice with SCI at 21 dpi [34]. It would certainly be interesting to extend the period of analysis after stopping GCV treatment in order to see whether the glial and fibrotic scars recover to their full density after a longer NG2+ repopulation period and what that may mean in terms of axon regrowth and locomotor recovery.
Taken together, although experiments with ablation of NG2-expressing cells brought interesting results, they did not allow us to fully understand the role of NG2+-glia in the glial scar formed after SCI. The beneficial effects of NG2+ cell ablation could be linked not only to NG2+-glia but also to the changes in the fibrotic scar after ablating the NG2+ pericytes. Therefore, finding a way to ablate the NG2+-glia exclusively, without affecting other cell types expressing NG2 could be a major breakthrough in identifying the function of the NG2+-glia in the SCI environment. One way to do this may be designing a Split-Cre system [117] under the control of two NG2+-glia specific promoters (such as NG2 and Olig2) that may enable the analysis of NG2+-glia functions without confounding effects.

6. Conclusions

The articles reviewed here have made remarkable advances to our knowledge regarding the role of the glial scar and each cell type comprising it. Moreover, they have proven that ablation of astrocytes, microglia, or NG2+-glia after SCI is not a beneficial approach to promote recovery. It is an established fact that glial cells produce inhibitory molecules at the site of the lesion, however, they also play a protective role that seems to outweigh said inhibition. Ablation of these populations all result in extended tissue damage, increased blood-borne infiltration, and reduced locomotor recovery, indicating that alternative paths should be explored for therapeutic purposes.
Among the inhibitory effects of the glial scar, the physical barrier has been pointed out as a main limitation for axon regrowth. However, Anderson et al. proved that, with the proper stimulation, axon regrowth can be achieved through and beyond the glial scar and, surprisingly, exclusively in the presence of astrocytes [21]. Moreover, for therapeutic strategies, it should be kept in mind that in human cases of SCI, the glial scar does not create such a thick wall of astrocytic processes [9], suggesting that if astrocytes inhibit neurite outgrowth in the injured human spinal cord, it is not mainly because of a physical barrier.
Alteration to the ECM composition is another grand inhibitory change after injury to the spinal cord. Glial cells have been shown to overexpress inhibitory CSPGs in the glial scar [21,22,23,24]. However, other cell types, such as pericytes and infiltrating macrophages, have been shown to also affect the ECM composition [23,118]. Therefore, it seems that reduction of the fibrotic scar might be a more beneficial approach to promote functional recovery after SCI. In fact, the inhibition of pericyte proliferation after SCI successfully reduced the fibrotic scar, resulting in improved motor and sensorimotor recovery [119].
The success of the approach by Dias et al. was based on an intermediate phenotype caused by an incomplete tamoxifen-induced recombination of the model mice [119]. They report a low number of highly recombinant mice, in which the fibrotic scar formation was completely blocked, resulting in failure to close the lesion and proving that these pericytes are essential for the generation of the fibrotic scar. In turn, the animals with an intermediate phenotype present reduced fibrotic scar density without losing tissue integrity. They also exhibit reduced inflammation, astrocyte reactivity, and density of the processes forming a wall. Curiously, reduced astrogliosis was associated with greater tissue damage in experiments eliminating microglia or NG2+-glia [32,34] but not in the experiment reducing pericyte proliferation [119]; possibly because the latter resulted in reduced fibrotic scarring, therefore limiting the damage extension.
Moreover, mice with a reduced fibrotic scar presented an increase in axon regrowth; CST axons growing through the glial scar do so in alignment with astrocyte processes, which might explain the astrocyte-dependent axon regrowth that was previously reported [21]. Finally, Dias et al. observed improved sensorimotor recovery after reducing the fibrotic scar [119]. These results could also help clarify the observed effects of eliminating NG2+-cells, which both enhanced axon regrowth and impaired locomotor recovery [34]. Considering the increase in axon regrowth after inhibition of pericyte proliferation, it is reasonable to think that this same effect after NG2+-cell ablation is mediated by NG2+-pericytes. At the same time, the opposite effects in locomotor recovery seem to indicate a protective role of NG2+-glia since inhibiting pericyte proliferation promotes locomotor recovery [119], but ablating NG2+-cells impairs it [34]. However, it would be interesting to design an approach that allows ablation of NG2+-glia exclusively in order to confirm its role in the glial scar without confounding effects on other cell populations.
Overall, the evidence presented here proves that modifying the glial scar by ablating cell populations is not a promising approach to promote functional recovery after injury to the spinal cord. Alternatively, a promising approach seems to be the reduction -but not elimination- of the fibrotic scar, reducing the production of ECM inhibitory components, inflammation, and astrogliosis, without preventing wound healing. It is possible that minimizing the fibrotic scar could alter the number and transcriptomic profile, not only of astrocytes but also of microglia and NG2+-glia. Further research on this topic could open up a new path for therapeutic strategies after spinal cord injury.

Author Contributions

L.P.-G. conceived the original idea for this manuscript, created the outline, collected the literature, and wrote the first draft. L.P.-G. and M.K. worked together on the intermediate versions of the manuscript. L.P.-G. created the final version of the manuscript and the table. L.P.-G. and M.K. worked on the final version of the figures. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Our work is supported by IKERBASQUE (Basque Foundation for Science), the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (grant PID2019-110195RB-I00), and the Basque Government PIBA Project (PIBA 2020_1_0030).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

References

  1. Cajal, S.R. Degeneration and Regeneration of the Nervous System; Oxford University Press: London, UK, 1928. [Google Scholar]
  2. Reier, P.J.; Stensaas, L.J.; Guth, L. The Astrocytic Scar as an Impediment to Regeneration in the Central Nervous System. In Spinal Cord Reconstructions; Raven Press: New York, NY, USA, 1983; pp. 163–195. [Google Scholar]
  3. Davies, S.J.A.; Goucher, D.R.; Doller, C.; Silver, J. Robust Regeneration of Adult Sensory Axons in Degenerating White Matter of the Adult Rat Spinal Cord. J. Neurosci. 1999, 19, 5810–5822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Asher, R.A.; Morgenstern, D.A.; Moon, L.D.; Fawcett, J.W. Chondroitin sulphate proteoglycans: Inhibitory components of the glial scar. Prog. Brain Res. 2001, 132, 611–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Preston, E.; Webster, J.; Small, D.; Kochanek, P.M.; Janesko, K.L.; Jenkins, L.W.; Yan, H.Q.; Kibbe, M.R.; Robichaud, P.; Wooditch, A.C.; et al. Characteristics of Sustained Blood-Brain Barrier Opening and Tissue Injury in a Model for Focal Trauma in the Rat. J. Neurotrauma 2001, 18, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Maxwell, W.L.; Follows, R.; Ashhurst, D.E.; Berry, M. The response of the cerebral hemisphere of the rat to injury. I. The mature rat. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1990, 328, 479–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kawano, H.; Kimura-Kuroda, J.; Komuta, Y.; Yoshioka, N.; Li, H.P.; Kawamura, K.; Li, Y.; Raisman, G. Role of the lesion scar in the response to damage and repair of the central nervous system. Cell Tissue Res. 2012, 349, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Emery, E.; Aldana, P.; Bunge, M.B.; Puckett, W.; Srinivasan, A.; Keane, R.W.; Bethea, J.; Levi, A.D.O. Apoptosis after traumatic human spinal cord injury. J. Neurosurg. 1998, 89, 911–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Norenberg, M.D.; Smith, J.; Marcillo, A.; Willebrords, J.; Yanguas, S.C.; Maes, M.; Decrock, E.; Wang, N.; Leybaert, L.; Kwak, B.R.; et al. The Pathology of Human Spinal Cord Injury: Defining the Problems. J. Neurotrauma 2004, 21, 429–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Zai, L.J.; Wrathall, J.R. Cell proliferation and replacement following contusive spinal cord injury. Glia 2005, 50, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Theocharis, A.D.; Skandalis, S.S.; Gialeli, C.; Karamanos, N.K. Extracellular matrix structure. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2016, 97, 4–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Krishnaswamy, V.R.; Benbenishty, A.; Blinder, P.; Sagi, I. Demystifying the extracellular matrix and its proteolytic remodeling in the brain: Structural and functional insights. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2019, 76, 3229–3248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lau, L.W.; Cua, R.; Keough, M.B.; Haylock-Jacobs, S.; Yong, V.W. Pathophysiology of the brain extracellular matrix: A new target for remyelination. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2013, 14, 722–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rauch, U. Brain matrix: Structure, turnover and necessity. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2007, 35, 656–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Haggerty, A.E.; Marlow, M.M.; Oudega, M. Extracellular matrix components as therapeutics for spinal cord injury. Neurosci. Lett. 2017, 652, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Becker, T.; Anliker, B.; Becker, C.; Taylor, J.; Schachner, M.; Meyer, R.L.; Bartsch, U. Tenascin-R inhibits regrowth of optic fibers in vitro and persists in the optic nerve of mice after injury. Glia 2000, 29, 330–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pesheva, P.; Gennarini, G.; Goridis, C.; Schachner, M. The F3/11 cell adhesion molecule mediates the repulsion of neurons by the extracellular matrix glycoprotein J1-160/180. Neuron 1993, 10, 69–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lochter, A.; Schachner, M. Tenascin and extracellular matrix glycoproteins: From promotion to polarization of neurite growth in vitro. J. Neurosci. 1993, 13, 3986–4000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Gaudet, A.D.; Popovich, P.G. Extracellular matrix regulation of inflammation in the healthy and injured spinal cord. Exp. Neurol. 2014, 258, 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Jiang, D.; Liang, J.; Noble, P.W. Hyaluronan in Tissue Injury and Repair. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2007, 23, 435–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Anderson, M.A.; Burda, J.E.; Ren, Y.; Ao, Y.; O’Shea, T.M.; Kawaguchi, R.; Coppola, G.; Khakh, B.S.; Deming, T.J.; Sofroniew, M.V. Astrocyte scar formation aids central nervous system axon regeneration. Nature 2016, 532, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Asher, R.A.; Morgenstern, D.A.; Shearer, M.C.; Adcock, K.H.; Pesheva, P.; Fawcett, J.W. Versican Is Upregulated in CNS Injury and Is a Product of Oligodendrocyte Lineage Cells. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22, 2225–2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Jones, L.L.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Stallcup, W.B.; Tuszynski, M.H. NG2 Is a Major Chondroitin Sulfate Proteoglycan Produced after Spinal Cord Injury and Is Expressed by Macrophages and Oligodendrocyte Progenitors. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22, 2792–2803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Jones, L.L.; Margolis, R.U.; Tuszynski, M.H. The chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans neurocan, brevican, phosphacan, and versican are differentially regulated following spinal cord injury. Exp. Neurol. 2003, 182, 399–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Buss, A.; Pech, K.; A Kakulas, B.; Martin, D.; Schoenen, J.; Noth, J.; A Brook, G. NG2 and phosphacan are present in the astroglial scar after human traumatic spinal cord injury. BMC Neurol. 2009, 9, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Bradbury, E.J.; Moon, L.D.F.; Popat, R.J.; King, V.R.; Bennett, G.S.; Patel, P.N.; Fawcett, J.W.; McMahon, S.B. Chondroitinase ABC promotes functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Nature 2002, 416, 636–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sofroniew, M.V. Reactive Astrocytes in Neural Repair and Protection. Neuroscientist 2005, 11, 400–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bradbury, E.J.; Burnside, E.R. Moving beyond the glial scar for spinal cord repair. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Faulkner, J.R.; Herrmann, J.E.; Woo, M.J.; Tansey, K.E.; Doan, N.B.; Sofroniew, M.V. Reactive Astrocytes Protect Tissue and Preserve Function after Spinal Cord Injury. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24, 2143–2155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Gu, Y.; Cheng, X.; Huang, X.; Yuan, Y.; Qin, S.; Tan, Z.; Wang, D.; Hu, X.; He, C.; Su, Z. Conditional ablation of reactive astrocytes to dissect their roles in spinal cord injury and repair. Brain Behav. Immun. 2019, 80, 394–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bellver-Landete, V.; Bretheau, F.; Mailhot, B.; Vallières, N.; Lessard, M.; Janelle, M.-E.; Vernoux, N.; Tremblay, M.; Fuehrmann, T.; Shoichet, M.S.; et al. Microglia are an essential component of the neuroprotective scar that forms after spinal cord injury. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Zhang, H.; Zhou, Z.-L.; Xie, H.; Tian, X.-B.; Xu, H.-L.; Li, W.; Yao, S. Microglial depletion impairs glial scar formation and aggravates inflammation partly by inhibiting STAT3 phosphorylation in astrocytes after spinal cord injury. Neural Regen. Res. 2023, 18, 1325–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Fu, H.; Zhao, Y.; Hu, D.; Wang, S.; Yu, T.; Zhang, L. Depletion of microglia exacerbates injury and impairs function recovery after spinal cord injury in mice. Cell Death Dis. 2020, 11, 528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hesp, Z.C.; Yoseph, R.Y.; Suzuki, R.; Jukkola, P.; Wilson, C.; Nishiyama, A.; McTigue, D.M. Proliferating NG2-Cell-Dependent Angiogenesis and Scar Formation Alter Axon Growth and Functional Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury in Mice. J. Neurosci. 2017, 38, 1366–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Knox, R.J.; Friedlos, F.; Boland, M.P. The bioactivation of CB 1954 and its use as a prodrug in antibody-directed enzyme prodrug therapy (ADEPT). Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1993, 12, 195–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Clark, A.; Iwobi, M.; Cui, W.; Crompton, M.; Harold, G.; Hobbs, S.; Kamalati, T.; Knox, R.; Neil, C.; Yull, F.; et al. Selective cell ablation in transgenic mice expressing E. coli nitroreductase. Gene Ther. 1997, 4, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Drabek, D.; Guy, J.; Craig, R.; Grosveld, F. The expression of bacterial nitroreductase in transgenic mice results in specific cell killing by the prodrug CB1954. Gene Ther. 1997, 4, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Saito, M.; Iwawaki, T.; Taya, C.; Yonekawa, H.; Noda, M.; Inui, Y.; Mekada, E.; Kimata, Y.; Tsuru, A.; Kohno, K. Diphtheria toxin receptor–mediated conditional and targeted cell ablation in transgenic mice. Nat. Biotechnol. 2001, 19, 746–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zhou, K.; Han, J.; Lund, H.; Boggavarapu, N.R.; Lauschke, V.M.; Goto, S.; Cheng, H.; Wang, Y.; Tachi, A.; Xie, C.; et al. An overlooked subset of Cx3cr1 wt/wt microglia in the Cx3cr1 CreER-Eyfp/wt mouse has a repopulation advantage over Cx3cr1 CreER-Eyfp/wt microglia following microglial depletion. J. Neuroinflamm. 2022, 19, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ginhoux, F.; Greter, M.; Leboeuf, M.; Nandi, S.; See, P.; Gokhan, S.; Mehler, M.F.; Conway, S.J.; Ng, L.G.; Stanley, E.R.; et al. Fate mapping analysis reveals that adult microglia derive from primitive macrophages. Science 2010, 330, 841–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Elmore, M.R.P.; Najafi, A.R.; Koike, M.A.; Dagher, N.N.; Spangenberg, E.E.; Rice, R.A.; Kitazawa, M.; Matusow, B.; Nguyen, H.; West, B.L.; et al. Colony-Stimulating Factor 1 Receptor Signaling Is Necessary for Microglia Viability, Unmasking a Microglia Progenitor Cell in the Adult Brain. Neuron 2014, 82, 380–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Spangenberg, E.; Severson, P.L.; Hohsfield, L.A.; Crapser, J.; Zhang, J.; Burton, E.A.; Zhang, Y.; Spevak, W.; Lin, J.; Phan, N.Y.; et al. Sustained microglial depletion with CSF1R inhibitor impairs parenchymal plaque development in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Green, K.N.; Crapser, J.D.; Hohsfield, L.A. To Kill a Microglia: A Case for CSF1R Inhibitors. Trends Immunol. 2020, 41, 771–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Benner, B.; Good, L.; Quiroga, D.; E Schultz, T.; Kassem, M.; E Carson, W.; A Cherian, M.; Sardesai, S.; Wesolowski, R. Pexidartinib, a Novel Small Molecule CSF-1R Inhibitor in Use for Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor: A Systematic Review of Pre-Clinical and Clinical Development. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2020, 14, 1693–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chang, Y.-F. Lysine Metabolism in the Rat Brain: The Pipecolic Acid-Forming Pathway. J. Neurochem. 1978, 30, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chang, Y.-F. Lysine metabolism in the human and the monkey: Demonstration of pipecolic acid formation in the brain and other organs. Neurochem. Res. 1982, 7, 577–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Tsai, M.J.; Chang, Y.F.; Schwarcz, R.; Brookes, N. Characterization of L-α-aminoadipic acid transport in cultured rat astrocytes. Brain Res. 1996, 741, 166–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Khurgel, M.; Koo, A.C.; Ivy, G.O. Selective ablation of astrocytes by intracerebral injections of α- aminoadipate. Glia 1996, 16, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Linden, J.R.; Ma, Y.; Zhao, B.; Harris, J.; Rumah, K.R.; Schaeren-Wiemers, N.; Vartanian, T. Clostridium perfringens Epsilon Toxin Causes Selective Death of Mature Oligodendrocytes and Central Nervous System Demyelination. mBio 2015, 6, e02513-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Zirngibl, M.; Assinck, P.; Sizov, A.; Caprariello, A.V.; Plemel, J.R. Oligodendrocyte death and myelin loss in the cuprizone model: An updated overview of the intrinsic and extrinsic causes of cuprizone demyelination. Mol. Neurodegener. 2022, 17, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Andersson, P.-B.; Perry, V.; Gordon, S. The acute inflammatory response to lipopolysaccharide in cns parenchyma differs from that in other body tissues. Neuroscience 1992, 48, 169–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Smith, G.M.; Miller, R.H.; Silver, J. Changing role of forebrain astrocytes during development, regenerative failure, and induced regeneration upon transplantation. J. Comp. Neurol. 1986, 251, 23–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bähr, M.; Przyrembel, C.; Bastmeyer, M. Astrocytes from adult rat optic nerves are nonpermissive for regenerating retinal ganglion cell axons. Exp. Neurol. 1995, 131, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Barnabé-Heider, F.; Göritz, C.; Sabelström, H.; Takebayashi, H.; Pfrieger, F.W.; Meletis, K.; Frisén, J. Origin of New Glial Cells in Intact and Injured Adult Spinal Cord. Cell Stem Cell 2010, 7, 470–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Magnus, T.; Carmen, J.; Deleon, J.; Xue, H.; Pardo, A.C.; Lepore, A.C.; Mattson, M.P.; Rao, M.S.; Maragakis, N.J. Adult glial precursor proliferation in mutant SOD1G93A mice. Glia 2007, 56, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wanner, I.B.; Anderson, M.A.; Song, B.; Levine, J.; Fernandez, A.; Gray-Thompson, Z.; Ao, Y.; Sofroniew, M.V. Glial Scar Borders Are Formed by Newly Proliferated, Elongated Astrocytes That Interact to Corral Inflammatory and Fibrotic Cells via STAT3-Dependent Mechanisms after Spinal Cord Injury. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33, 12870–12886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Hara, M.; Kobayakawa, K.; Ohkawa, Y.; Kumamaru, H.; Yokota, K.; Saito, T.; Kijima, K.; Yoshizaki, S.; Harimaya, K.; Nakashima, Y.; et al. Interaction of reactive astrocytes with type I collagen induces astrocytic scar formation through the integrin–N-cadherin pathway after spinal cord injury. Nat. Med. 2017, 23, 818–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. McKeon, R.; Schreiber, R.; Rudge, J.; Silver, J. Reduction of neurite outgrowth in a model of glial scarring following CNS injury is correlated with the expression of inhibitory molecules on reactive astrocytes. J. Neurosci. 1991, 11, 3398–3411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Mckeon, R.J.; Höke, A.; Silver, J. Injury-Induced Proteoglycans Inhibit the Potential for Laminin-Mediated Axon Growth on Astrocytic Scars. Exp. Neurol. 1995, 136, 32–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tan, A.M.; Zhang, W.; Levine, J.M. NG2: A component of the glial scar that inhibits axon growth. J. Anat. 2005, 207, 717–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Uhlin-Hansen, L.; Wik, T.; Kjellen, L.; Berg, E.; Forsdahl, F.; Kolset, S.O. Proteoglycan metabolism in normal and inflammatory human macrophages. Blood 1993, 82, 2880–2889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Bush, T.G.; Puvanachandra, N.; Horner, C.H.; Polito, A.; Ostenfeld, T.; Svendsen, C.N.; Mucke, L.; Johnson, M.H.; Sofroniew, M.V. Leukocyte Infiltration, Neuronal Degeneration, and Neurite Outgrowth after Ablation of Scar-Forming, Reactive Astrocytes in Adult Transgenic Mice. Neuron 1999, 23, 297–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Richardson, P.M.; Issa, V.M.K. Peripheral injury enhances central regeneration of primary sensory neurones. Nature 1984, 309, 791–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Neumann, S.; Woolf, C.J. Regeneration of Dorsal Column Fibers into and beyond the Lesion Site following Adult Spinal Cord Injury. Neuron 1999, 23, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Omura, T.; Omura, K.; Tedeschi, A.; Riva, P.; Painter, M.W.; Rojas, L.; Martin, J.; Lisi, V.; Huebner, E.A.; Latremoliere, A.; et al. Robust Axonal Regeneration Occurs in the Injured CAST/Ei Mouse CNS. Neuron 2016, 90, 662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Tremblay, M. The role of microglia at synapses in the healthy CNS: Novel insights from recent imaging studies. Neuron Glia Biol. 2011, 7, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Nimmerjahn, A.; Kirchhoff, F.; Helmchen, F. Neuroscience: Resting microglial cells are highly dynamic surveillants of brain parenchyma in vivo. Science 2005, 308, 1314–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Hanisch, U.-K.; Kettenmann, H. Microglia: Active sensor and versatile effector cells in the normal and pathologic brain. Nat. Neurosci. 2007, 10, 1387–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tremblay, M.-È.; Stevens, B.; Sierra, A.; Wake, H.; Bessis, A.; Nimmerjahn, A. The Role of Microglia in the Healthy Brain. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31, 16064–16069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Davalos, D.; Grutzendler, J.; Yang, G.; Kim, J.V.; Zuo, Y.; Jung, S.; Littman, D.R.; Dustin, M.L.; Gan, W.-B. ATP mediates rapid microglial response to local brain injury in vivo. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8, 752–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Schwab, J.M.; Frei, E.; Klusman, I.; Schnell, L.; E Schwab, M.; Schluesener, H.J. AIF-1 expression defines a proliferating and alert microglial/macrophage phenotype following spinal cord injury in rats. J. Neuroimmunol. 2001, 119, 214–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Pineau, I.; Lacroix, S. Proinflammatory cytokine synthesis in the injured mouse spinal cord: Multiphasic expression pattern and identification of the cell types involved. J. Comp. Neurol. 2006, 500, 267–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Xu, J.; Kim, G.-M.; Chen, S.; Yan, P.; Ahmed, S.H.; Ku, G.; Beckman, J.S.; Xu, X.M.; Hsu, C.Y. iNOS and Nitrotyrosine Expression After Spinal Cord Injury. J. Neurotrauma 2001, 18, 523–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Friedman, B.A.; Srinivasan, K.; Ayalon, G.; Meilandt, W.J.; Lin, H.; Huntley, M.A.; Cao, Y.; Lee, S.-H.; Haddick, P.C.; Ngu, H.; et al. Diverse Brain Myeloid Expression Profiles Reveal Distinct Microglial Activation States and Aspects of Alzheimer’s Disease Not Evident in Mouse Models. Cell Rep. 2018, 22, 832–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Keren-Shaul, H.; Spinrad, A.; Weiner, A.; Matcovitch-Natan, O.; Dvir-Szternfeld, R.; Ulland, T.K.; David, E.; Baruch, K.; Lara-Astaiso, D.; Toth, B.; et al. A Unique Microglia Type Associated with Restricting Development of Alzheimer’s Disease. Cell 2017, 169, 1276–1290.e17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Jordão, M.J.; Sankowski, R.; Brendecke, S.M.; Sagar; Locatelli, G.; Tai, Y.H.; Tay, T.L.; Schramm, E.; Armbruster, S.; Hagemeyer, N.; et al. Neuroimmunology: Single-cell profiling identifies myeloid cell subsets with distinct fates during neuroinflammation. Science 2019, 363, eaat7554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Masuda, T.; Sankowski, R.; Staszewski, O.; Böttcher, C.; Amann, L.; Sagar; Scheiwe, C.; Nessler, S.; Kunz, P.; Van Loo, G.; et al. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of mouse and human microglia at single-cell resolution. Nature 2019, 566, 388–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Hakim, R.; Zachariadis, V.; Sankavaram, S.R.; Han, J.; Harris, R.A.; Brundin, L.; Enge, M.; Svensson, M. Spinal Cord Injury Induces Permanent Reprogramming of Microglia into a Disease-Associated State Which Contributes to Functional Recovery. J. Neurosci. 2021, 41, 8441–8459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yamamoto, S.; Nakajima, K.; Kohsaka, S. Macrophage-colony stimulating factor as an inducer of microglial proliferation in axotomized rat facial nucleus. J. Neurochem. 2010, 115, 1057–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Smith, A.M.; Gibbons, H.M.; Oldfield, R.L.; Bergin, P.M.; Mee, E.W.; A Curtis, M.; Faull, R.L.M.; Dragunow, M. M-CSF increases proliferation and phagocytosis while modulating receptor and transcription factor expression in adult human microglia. J. Neuroinflamm. 2013, 10, 859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Han, J.; Fan, Y.; Zhou, K.; Blomgren, K.; Harris, R.A. Uncovering sex differences of rodent microglia. J. Neuroinflamm. 2021, 18, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Dawson, M.R.; Polito, A.; Levine, J.M.; Reynolds, R. NG2-expressing glial progenitor cells: An abundant and widespread population of cycling cells in the adult rat CNS. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2003, 24, 476–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hughes, E.G.; Orthmann-Murphy, J.L.; Langseth, A.J.; Bergles, D.E. Myelin remodeling through experience-dependent oligodendrogenesis in the adult somatosensory cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2018, 21, 696–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. A Hill, R.; Patel, K.D.; Goncalves, C.M.; Grutzendler, J.; Nishiyama, A. Modulation of oligodendrocyte generation during a critical temporal window after NG2 cell division. Nat. Neurosci. 2014, 17, 1518–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Hughes, E.G.; Kang, S.H.; Fukaya, M.; E Bergles, D. Oligodendrocyte progenitors balance growth with self-repulsion to achieve homeostasis in the adult brain. Nat. Neurosci. 2013, 16, 668–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Bergles, D.E.; Roberts, J.D.B.; Somogyi, P.; Jahr, C.E. Glutamatergic synapses on oligodendrocyte precursor cells in the hippocampus. Nature 2000, 405, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Kula, B.; Chen, T.J.; Kukley, M. Glutamatergic signaling between neurons and oligodendrocyte lineage cells: Is it synaptic or non-synaptic? Glia 2019, 67, 2071–2091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Butt, A.M.; Kiff, J.; Hubbard, P.; Berry, M. Synantocytes: New functions for novel NG2 expressing glia. J. Neurocytol. 2002, 31, 551–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Gensert, J.M.; E Goldman, J. Endogenous Progenitors Remyelinate Demyelinated Axons in the Adult CNS. Neuron 1997, 19, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Zawadzka, M.; Rivers, L.E.; Fancy, S.P.; Zhao, C.; Tripathi, R.; Jamen, F.; Young, K.; Goncharevich, A.; Pohl, H.; Rizzi, M.; et al. CNS-Resident Glial Progenitor/Stem Cells Produce Schwann Cells as well as Oligodendrocytes during Repair of CNS Demyelination. Cell Stem Cell 2010, 6, 578–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  91. Hackett, A.R.; Lee, D.-H.; Dawood, A.; Rodriguez, M.; Funk, L.; Tsoulfas, P.; Lee, J.K. STAT3 and SOCS3 regulate NG2 cell proliferation and differentiation after contusive spinal cord injury. Neurobiol. Dis. 2016, 89, 10–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Seo, J.H.; Miyamoto, N.; Hayakawa, K.; Pham, L.D.D.; Maki, T.; Ayata, C.; Kim, K.W.; Lo, E.H.; Arai, K. OPCs induce early blood-brain barrier opening. J. Clin. Investig. 2013, 123, 782–786. [Google Scholar]
  93. McTigue, D.M.; Wei, P.; Stokes, B.T. Proliferation of NG2-Positive Cells and Altered Oligodendrocyte Numbers in the Contused Rat Spinal Cord. J. Neurosci. 2001, 21, 3392–3400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Tripathi, R.; McTigue, D.M. Prominent oligodendrocyte genesis along the border of spinal contusion lesions. Glia 2007, 55, 698–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Hesp, Z.C.; Goldstein, E.A.; Miranda, C.J.; Kaspar, B.K.; McTigue, D.M. Chronic Oligodendrogenesis and Remyelination after Spinal Cord Injury in Mice and Rats. J. Neurosci. 2015, 35, 1274–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Hackett, A.R.; Lee, J.K. Understanding the NG2 Glial Scar after Spinal Cord Injury. Front. Neurol. 2016, 7, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Wang, Y.; Cheng, X.; He, Q.; Zheng, Y.; Kim, D.H.; Whittemore, S.R.; Cao, Q.L. Astrocytes from the Contused Spinal Cord Inhibit Oligodendrocyte Differentiation of Adult Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cells by Increasing the Expression of Bone Morphogenetic Proteins. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31, 6053–6058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Levine, J. The reactions and role of NG2 glia in spinal cord injury. Brain Res. 2016, 1638, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  99. Sellers, D.L.; Maris, D.O.; Horner, P.J. Postinjury Niches Induce Temporal Shifts in Progenitor Fates to Direct Lesion Repair after Spinal Cord Injury. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29, 6722–6733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Hackett, A.R.; Yahn, S.L.; Lyapichev, K.; Dajnoki, A.; Lee, D.-H.; Rodriguez, M.; Cammer, N.; Pak, J.; Mehta, S.T.; Bodamer, O.; et al. Injury type-dependent differentiation of NG2 glia into heterogeneous astrocytes. Exp. Neurol. 2018, 308, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Assinck, P.; Duncan, G.J.; Plemel, J.R.; Lee, M.; Stratton, J.A.; Manesh, S.B.; Liu, J.; Ramer, L.M.; Kang, S.H.; Bergles, D.E.; et al. Myelinogenic Plasticity of Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cells following Spinal Cord Contusion Injury. J. Neurosci. 2017, 37, 8635–8654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Crawford, A.H.; Tripathi, R.B.; Foerster, S.; McKenzie, I.; Kougioumtzidou, E.; Grist, M.; Richardson, W.D.; Franklin, R.J. Pre-Existing Mature Oligodendrocytes Do Not Contribute to Remyelination following Toxin-Induced Spinal Cord Demyelination. Am. J. Pathol. 2016, 186, 511–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Keirstead, H.S.; Levine, J.M.; Blakemore, W.F. Response of the oligodendrocyte progenitor cell population (Defined by NG2 labelling) to demyelination of the adult spinal cord. Glia 1998, 22, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Cao, Q.; Xu, X.-M.; DeVries, W.H.; Enzmann, G.U.; Ping, P.; Tsoulfas, P.; Wood, P.M.; Bunge, M.B.; Whittemore, S.R. Functional Recovery in Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury after Transplantation of Multineurotrophin-Expressing Glial-Restricted Precursor Cells. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25, 6947–6957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Yasuda, A.; Tsuji, O.; Shibata, S.; Nori, S.; Takano, M.; Kobayashi, Y.; Takahashi, Y.; Fujiyoshi, K.; Hara, C.M.; Miyawaki, A.; et al. Significance of Remyelination by Neural Stem/Progenitor Cells Transplanted into the Injured Spinal Cord. Stem Cells 2011, 29, 1983–1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Hawryluk, G.W.J.; Spano, S.; Chew, D.; Wang, S.; Erwin, M.; Chamankhah, M.; Forgione, N.; Fehlings, M.G. An Examination of the Mechanisms by which Neural Precursors Augment Recovery following Spinal Cord Injury: A Key Role for Remyelination. Cell Transplant. 2014, 23, 365–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Plemel, J.R.; Keough, M.B.; Duncan, G.J.; Sparling, J.S.; Yong, V.W.; Stys, P.K.; Tetzlaff, W. Remyelination after spinal cord injury: Is it a target for repair? Prog. Neurobiol. 2014, 117, 54–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Duncan, G.J.; Manesh, S.B.; Hilton, B.J.; Assinck, P.; Plemel, J.R.; Tetzlaff, W. The fate and function of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells after traumatic spinal cord injury. Glia 2019, 68, 227–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Duncan, G.J.; Manesh, S.B.; Hilton, B.J.; Assinck, P.; Liu, J.; Moulson, A.; Plemel, J.R.; Tetzlaff, W. Locomotor recovery following contusive spinal cord injury does not require oligodendrocyte remyelination. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Dou, C.; Levine, J. Inhibition of neurite growth by the NG2 chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan. J. Neurosci. 1994, 14, 7616–7628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  111. Tan, A.M.; Colletti, M.; Rorai, A.T.; Skene, J.H.P.; Levine, J.M. Antibodies against the NG2 Proteoglycan Promote the Regeneration of Sensory Axons within the Dorsal Columns of the Spinal Cord. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26, 4729–4739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Petrosyan, H.A.; Hunanyan, A.S.; Alessi, V.; Schnell, L.; Levine, J.; Arvanian, V.L. Neutralization of Inhibitory Molecule NG2 Improves Synaptic Transmission, Retrograde Transport, and Locomotor Function after Spinal Cord Injury in Adult Rats. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33, 4032–4043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. McTigue, D.M.; Tripathi, R.; Wei, P. NG2 Colocalizes with Axons and Is Expressed by a Mixed Cell Population in Spinal Cord Lesions. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2006, 65, 406–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Di Maio, A.; Skuba, A.; Himes, B.T.; Bhagat, S.L.; Hyun, J.K.; Tessler, A.; Bishop, D.; Son, Y.-J. In Vivo Imaging of Dorsal Root Regeneration: Rapid Immobilization and Presynaptic Differentiation at the CNS/PNS Border. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31, 4569–4582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Filous, A.R.; Tran, A.; Howell, C.J.; Busch, S.A.; Evans, T.A.; Stallcup, W.B.; Kang, S.H.; Bergles, D.E.; Lee, S.-I.; Levine, J.M.; et al. Entrapment via Synaptic-Like Connections between NG2 Proteoglycan+ Cells and Dystrophic Axons in the Lesion Plays a Role in Regeneration Failure after Spinal Cord Injury. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34, 16369–16384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Son, Y.J. Synapsing with NG2 cells (polydendrocytes), unappreciated barrier to axon regeneration? Neural Regen. Res. 2015, 10, 346–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Hirrlinger, J.; Scheller, A.; Hirrlinger, P.G.; Kellert, B.; Tang, W.; Wehr, M.C.; Goebbels, S.; Reichenbach, A.; Sprengel, R.; Rossner, M.J.; et al. Split-Cre Complementation Indicates Coincident Activity of Different Genes In Vivo. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e4286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Göritz, C.; Dias, D.O.; Tomilin, N.; Barbacid, M.; Shupliakov, O.; Frisén, J. A Pericyte Origin of Spinal Cord Scar Tissue. Science 2011, 333, 238–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Dias, D.O.; Kim, H.; Holl, D.; Solnestam, B.W.; Lundeberg, J.; Carlén, M.; Göritz, C.; Frisén, J. Reducing Pericyte-Derived Scarring Promotes Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury. Cell 2018, 173, 153–165.e22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Cells 12 01842 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the injury site, portraying the cellular composition of the glial scar and the infiltration of blood-borne cells into the spinal cord parenchyma in the epicenter of the lesion.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the injury site, portraying the cellular composition of the glial scar and the infiltration of blood-borne cells into the spinal cord parenchyma in the epicenter of the lesion.
Cells 12 01842 g001
Cells 12 01842 g002 550
Figure 2. Simplified scheme of the mechanism behind the Thymidine Kinase-Ganciclovir (Tk-GCV) system for cell ablation. Purple circles represent cells that do not express the Tk transgene; green circles represent cells that express the Tk transgene under the chosen cell-specific promoter. Only the cells expressing Tk undergo apoptosis by modification of the ganciclovir prodrug to its active form. Prom—promoter; Tk—Thymidine kinase; GCV—ganciclovir.
Figure 2. Simplified scheme of the mechanism behind the Thymidine Kinase-Ganciclovir (Tk-GCV) system for cell ablation. Purple circles represent cells that do not express the Tk transgene; green circles represent cells that express the Tk transgene under the chosen cell-specific promoter. Only the cells expressing Tk undergo apoptosis by modification of the ganciclovir prodrug to its active form. Prom—promoter; Tk—Thymidine kinase; GCV—ganciclovir.
Cells 12 01842 g002
Table
Table 1. Summary of the glial-cell ablation studies’ methodology and main results.
Table 1. Summary of the glial-cell ablation studies’ methodology and main results.
Ablated Cell TypeCell Ablation TechniqueSpecies/
Strain		Animal AgeTime-Point of Cell AblationTime-Point of Tissue CollectionConsequences of Cell AblationReference
AstrocytesGFAP-Tk mice. Tk-GCV systemTransgenic mice on C57BL/6J backgroundNot specifiedfrom 0 to 7 dpi14 dpiTissue degeneration. Increased infiltration of pro-inflammatory cells. Failed repair of the BBB. Reduced oligodendrocyte and neuronal survival. Increased demyelination. Impaired locomotor recovery.[29]
AstrocytesGFAP-Tk mice. Tk-GCV systemTransgenic mice on C57BL/6J background (females)8–16 weeksfrom 0 to 7 dpi14–56 dpiLesion expansion. Unchanged axonal regrowth and extended axonal dieback. Maintained CSPGs production. Ablation of astrocytes eliminates the beneficial effect of conditioning lesions and neurotrophic factors on axonal regrowth.[21]
loxP-DTR mice. DTA-DTR systemloxP-DTR mice on C57BL/6 background (females)8–16 weeksfrom 35 to 45 dpi70 dpiTissue degeneration and lesion expansion. Axon regrowth was not enhanced.
Astrocyteslentivirus-mediated Tk/GCV systemC57BL/6 mice (females)8–12 weeksfrom 1 to 8 dpi14, 28, and 42 dpiEnhanced infiltration of proinflammatory cells and tissue damage. Augmented neuronal death. Impaired locomotor recovery[30]
MicrogliaPLX5622 FeedingC57BL/6N mice8–10 weeksfrom 21 d before injury to 35 dpi; from 0 to 35 dpi; from 21 d before injury to 0 dpi1, 4, 7, 14 and 35 dpiDisorganization of the glial scar. Enhanced infiltration of immune cells. Reduced oligodendrocyte and neuronal survival. Impaired locomotor recovery[31]
MicrogliaPLX3397 IntragastricC57BL/6 mice (females)8–10 weeks14 days pre-injury until 7 or 14 dpi7 and 14 dpiDisorganization of the glial scar. Reduced astrocytic proliferation. Increased proinflammatory factors. Reduced neuronal survival. Impaired locomotor recovery.[32]
MicrogliaPLX3397 FeedingC57BL/6 mice (females)6 weeksfrom 7 days before injury to 28 dpi7, 14, 28, 30, and 56 dpiDisorganization of the glial scar. Acute expansion of the lesion. Increased axon dieback. Impaired locomotor recovery[33]
NG2 cellsNG2-Tk mice. Tk-GCV systemTransgenic mice on C57BL/6J background12 weeksfrom 0 dpi to 7 or 14 dpi7, 14, and 21 dpiEdema and swelling. Reduced intra-lesion laminin. Disorganization of astrocytes and the glial scar. Increased macrophage infiltration. Enhanced axon regrowth. Impaired locomotor recovery.[34]
Tk-GCV—thymidine kinase-ganciclovir; dpi—days post-injury; DTA-DTR—diphtheria toxin subunit A-diphtheria tox.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Perez-Gianmarco, L.; Kukley, M. Understanding the Role of the Glial Scar through the Depletion of Glial Cells after Spinal Cord Injury. Cells 2023, 12, 1842. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12141842

AMA Style

Perez-Gianmarco L, Kukley M. Understanding the Role of the Glial Scar through the Depletion of Glial Cells after Spinal Cord Injury. Cells. 2023; 12(14):1842. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12141842

Chicago/Turabian Style

Perez-Gianmarco, Lucila, and Maria Kukley. 2023. "Understanding the Role of the Glial Scar through the Depletion of Glial Cells after Spinal Cord Injury" Cells 12, no. 14: 1842. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12141842

APA Style

Perez-Gianmarco, L., & Kukley, M. (2023). Understanding the Role of the Glial Scar through the Depletion of Glial Cells after Spinal Cord Injury. Cells, 12(14), 1842. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12141842

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop