Next Article in Journal
IL-33 and MRGPRX2-Triggered Activation of Human Skin Mast Cells—Elimination of Receptor Expression on Chronic Exposure, but Reinforced Degranulation on Acute Priming
Next Article in Special Issue
Mitochondrial Flexibility of Breast Cancers: A Growth Advantage and a Therapeutic Opportunity
Previous Article in Journal
Histone Methylation and Memory of Environmental Stress
Previous Article in Special Issue
Microbiome—Microbial Metabolome—Cancer Cell Interactions in Breast Cancer—Familiar, but Unexplored
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 8
Issue 4
10.3390/cells8040340
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Assessing Therapeutic Efficacy in Real-time by Hyperpolarized Magnetic Resonance Metabolic Imaging

by
Prasanta Dutta
1,
Travis C. Salzillo
1,2,
Shivanand Pudakalakatti
1,
Seth T. Gammon
1,
Benny A. Kaipparettu
3,
Florencia McAllister
4,
Shawn Wagner
5,
Daniel E. Frigo
1,6,
Christopher J. Logothetis
6,7,
Niki M. Zacharias
1,8 and
Pratip K. Bhattacharya
1,*
1
Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
2
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UT Health Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
3
Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
4
Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
5
Biomedical Imaging Research Institute Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
6
Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
7
Department of Clinical Therapeutics, University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
8
Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2019, 8(4), 340; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8040340
Submission received: 1 March 2019 / Revised: 30 March 2019 / Accepted: 6 April 2019 / Published: 11 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mitochondrial Metabolic Reprogramming and Nuclear Crosstalk in Cancer)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Precisely measuring tumor-associated alterations in metabolism clinically will enable the efficient assessment of therapeutic responses. Advances in imaging technologies can exploit the differences in cancer-associated cell metabolism as compared to normal tissue metabolism, linking changes in target metabolism to therapeutic efficacy. Metabolic imaging by Positron Emission Tomography (PET) employing 2-fluoro-deoxy-glucose ([18F]FDG) has been used as a routine diagnostic tool in the clinic. Recently developed hyperpolarized Magnetic Resonance (HP-MR), which radically increases the sensitivity of conventional MRI, has created a renewed interest in functional and metabolic imaging. The successful translation of this technique to the clinic was achieved recently with measurements of 13C-pyruvate metabolism. Here, we review the potential clinical roles for metabolic imaging with hyperpolarized MRI as applied in assessing therapeutic intervention in different cancer systems.

1. Introduction

Aberrant metabolism is one of the hallmarks of cancer [1]. Cancer cells reprogram metabolism to sustain rapid proliferation and survival. The alteration of glucose metabolism in cancer is known as aerobic glycolysis or the Warburg Effect [2], which describes the ability of cancer cells to avidly metabolize glucose to lactate, even in the presence of oxygen. A schematic of glycolysis and Krebs cycle metabolic pathways is shown in Figure 1. A manifestation of the Warburg Effect is the increased 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose ([18F]FDG) uptake by many solid tumors as determined by positron emission tomographic (PET) scans. [18F]FDG-PET is the most widely used metabolic imaging technique in the clinic for tumor staging and assessment of treatment response to date [3]. This is the first approved imaging technology that integrates biologic and anatomic factors in clinical assessments. However, the [18F]FDG-PET imaging modality suffers from a lack of specificity, as increased glucose uptake also occurs in inflammation and normal brain tissue. Another drawback of PET is that only the radiotracer uptake can be assessed and downstream metabolites cannot be tracked dynamically.
There is a pressing need to develop noninvasive, nonradioactive imaging techniques for cancer diagnosis and monitoring tumor treatment response in the clinic for the appropriate selection of effective therapies. Hyperpolarized magnetic resonance (HP-MR) provides a >10,000-fold signal enhancement relative to conventional MR. HP-MR is capable of detecting endogenous metabolic substrates in real-time to monitor in vivo metabolic fluxes through the multiple key biochemical pathways including glycolysis and Krebs cycle [4]. In particular, conversion of hyperpolarized 13C-labeled pyruvate to lactate, catalyzed by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), has been shown to have a number of potential applications, such as diagnosis, staging tumor grade and monitoring therapy response [5,6,7,8,9]. [2-13C]-fructose has been hyperpolarized and tested in in vivo metabolic imaging that demonstrated a difference in uptake and metabolism in regions of tumor relative to surrounding tissue [10]. In this review, we briefly discuss the application of the state-of-the-art hyperpolarization technique to assess treatment response, current challenges, and future directions to make HP-MR a routine and viable diagnostic imaging modality in the clinic.

2. State-of-the-Art Hyperpolarization Techniques

Conventional MR always suffers from its poor signal sensitivity. Dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) is a solid-state technique that addresses this problem by significantly increasing the signal-to-noise ratio. Briefly, 13C or 15N labeled molecules, doped with small quantities of a stable radical, are cooled to approximately 1 K in a high magnetic field (3–5T); microwave irradiation transfers polarization from the fully polarized electron spins on the radical to the 13C or 15N nuclei (Figure 2A). Once the sample reaches the hyperpolarized state, it is then rapidly dissolved using a hot pressurized solution, which can be injected into an animal or human subjects in an imaging magnet. The increase in signal-to-noise ratio with DNP-MR is between 104 and 105, allowing the detection of not only the substrate and products but also of their spatial distribution using spectroscopic imaging [11]. The technique has been used to image 13C containing metabolites in tumors, cardiac tissue, and brain. The key advantage of DNP-MR is that both the injected substrate and its metabolic products can be detected, allowing real-time observation of multiple metabolites. In addition, multiple hyperpolarized molecules can be detected simultaneously, allowing several metabolic pathways to be probed as generated in real time [12]. In addition to DNP, Parahydrogen Induced Polarization (PHIP) is a liquid state hyperpolarization technique that has the potential for in vivo metabolic imaging applications [13]. In the PHIP method, nuclear polarization is increased through a chemical reaction involving a parahydrogen state where the hydrogen nuclei are oriented such that their net magnetization cancels each other (Figure 2B). The non-equilibrium spin order of the parahydrogen molecule is converted to nuclear polarization of the 13C nucleus in the substrate by hydrogenation [14]. The range of compounds hyperpolarized by PHIP with metabolic imaging potential is limited; nonetheless, the cost associated with PHIP is substantially lower than DNP and therefore this polarization technique could have great promise in specific applications [15,16,17]. Recently, the SABRE (Signal Amplification by Reversible Exchange) technique have also shown promise for in vivo imaging applications [18].

3. Assessment of Different Therapeutic Interventions

Clinical assessments of tumor responses to treatment are still based largely on observed changes in tumor size or uptake of [18F]FDG. However, this might not always be appropriate, particularly for the detection of early response or if the drug does not result in tumor shrinkage, as in the case of antiangiogenic drugs. Additionally, treatment assessment using metabolic [18F]FDG-PET imaging is difficult in some organs, e.g., prostate and brain, due to both low tumor uptake and increased background uptake, respectively. Evaluation of treatment response is likely to be the clinical scenario where hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate will have the greatest impact, as it could lead to immediate changes in clinical management, allowing the clinician to change a non-responding patient to a more effective drug at an early stage [19]. Early assessment of treatment response could also be used to accelerate the introduction of new drugs into the clinic indicating drug efficacy in early-stage clinical trials. In support of this concept, numerous studies have shown early decreases in the hyperpolarized 13C-labeled exchange between injected [1-13C]pyruvate and the endogenous lactate pool in a range of cancer models following treatment with chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiotherapy and recently, with immunotherapy. Each of these applications is systematically described in the following paragraphs. The early treatment response has been detected by measuring the rate of LDH-catalyzed lactate flux change in tumors after intravenously delivering HP-pyruvate [19]. It has been claimed that the transfer of this technique to the clinic may allow an oncologist to determine whether a cancer is responding to the treatment within hours of delivery. If the tumor is not responding, a more effective treatment regimen could then be initiated. This timely decision-making approach will have a significant impact on the drug development process and may enable a more personalized approach to therapy.

3.1. Metabolically Targeted Therapy

Several targeted therapies were evaluated by measuring the conversion of hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate to lactate [8,9,20,21,22,23]. LDH activity is highly dependent on the concentration and ratio of the reduced and oxidized form of the co-enzyme, Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH/NAD+) [24,25]. A representative example showing the application of hyperpolarized MRI and MRS in assessing response to therapy is shown in Figure 3. During the reduction of pyruvate to lactate, NADH is oxidized to NAD+. Any targeted therapy that reduces this ratio will reduce pyruvate to lactate conversion. This has been observed in prostate cancer cell lines treated with protein kinase B (AKT) [26] and a NAMPT [27] (an enzyme necessary for NAD synthesis) inhibitor. The clinical use of HP-MR to assess treatment response compared the maximum pyruvate-to-lactate flux metric and apparent rate constant, kPL, in a prostate adenocarcinoma before and six weeks after the administration of androgen deprivation therapy [28]. The post-treatment flux value was 3.5-fold less than the pre-treatment value though there was minimal reduction in tumor volume. A six-month follow-up exam revealed significant clinical response with undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in the patient’s serum.
We have recently reported in vivo differences in pyruvate to lactate conversion between specific human prostate cancer cell lines [29] and prostate patient-derived xenografts (PDX) [30]. Higher conversion of pyruvate to lactate was observed in the prostate cancer cell line PC3 versus its metastatic subline PC3M. This correlated with higher lactate concentrations in the PC3 tumor tissue by ex vivo metabolic profiling. The PC3M cell line was found to be more dependent on glutaminolysis than its parent line and to be sensitive to glutaminase (GLS) inhibitor CB-839 while its parent line was not. This work was furthered by determining if hyperpolarized 13C pyruvate conversion could discriminate prostate PDX animal models into glycolytic and non-glycolytic subtypes. Four PDX models of prostate cancer characterized as androgen receptor (AR) positive or negative were imaged. No significant difference in pyruvate to lactate conversion between PDX models individually was observed even though each model was biologically unique [31,32,33]. However, a significance was observed between the conversion values when the subtypes were sorted AR+ versus AR- [30]. These studies show the overall ability of hyperpolarized pyruvate to lactate conversion to subdivide prostate cancer into specific phenotypes, which could be used to guide targeted therapy choice. We also tested the effect the GLS inhibitor CB-839 had on pyruvate to lactate conversion in an acute myeloid leukemia (AML) animal model [34]. A reduction in pyruvate to lactate conversion was observed just four hours after oral gavage of the compound.
The inhibition of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K/Akt/mTOR) pathway with Everolimus was shown to correlate with a drop in hyperpolarized lactate levels in breast cancer and glioblastoma cells and xenografts [21]. The reduced appearance of lactate compared with pyruvate was attributed to a drop in LDH expression as a result of reduced levels of the transcription factor, hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) 1α, which regulates expression of the LDH gene. A similar decrease in lactate-to-pyruvate ratios was observed in GS-2 glioblastoma rat models following treatment with Everolimus after seven days [35]. HP-MR also predicts treatment response to mTOR inhibitor (rapamycin) in patient-derived ccRCC xenograft models [36].
Fermentative glycolysis was targeted in with dichloroacetate (DCA) in an A549 lung cancer mouse model [37]. By inhibiting pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (PDK), DCA activates pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) which shuttles pyruvate away from lactate production and into the Krebs cycle. This effect was observed through significantly reduced lactate production following the injection of hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate compared to untreated mice. The MCT1 inhibitor, α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamate (CHC) was administered to mice implanted with the mouse squamous cell carcinoma cell line, SCCVII [38]. Hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate was injected, and a significantly reduced lactate-to-pyruvate ratio was observed in the treated tumors compared to those that were untreated.
Pre-treatment scans with hyperpolarized pyruvate can be useful for predicting the efficacy of certain therapies. In mice implanted with the human prostate cancer cell lines DU145 and PC3, the DU145-implanted mice displayed significantly higher conversion of pyruvate to lactate [39] compared to PC3. After both cohorts of mice were treated with the LDH inhibitor FX-11, this conversion significantly decreased in the DU145-implanted mice, but not in PC3. This was correlated with a significant reduction in the tumor growth rate in the DU145-implanted mice, but not in PC3. Thus, pre-treatment scans predicted an increased dependence on LDH, while post-treatment scans verified the efficacy of targeting LDH. The effects of FX-11 were also tested in a patient-derived pancreatic cancer xenograft model where the drug responder versus non-responder were identified by HP-MR before actual tumor shrinkage [9]. Furthermore, in a lymphoma xenograft model, HP-MR using pyruvate evaluated the LDH-A and glutaminase (GLS) inhibition by small molecule drugs FX11 and BPTES [bis-2-(5-phenylacetamido-1,2,4-diathiazol-2-yl) ethyl sulfide] respectively [8]. In all these investigations, a lactate-to-pyruvate flux ratio was used as a means to measure treatment responses. An alternative to the lactate-pyruvate ratio, which is critically dependent on the timing of injection and subsequent data acquisition, is to measure the lactate and pyruvate signals over time and fit these to a kinetic model [19,21,40]. In addition, fast spectroscopic imaging techniques can provide spatially resolved dynamic data of hyperpolarized pyruvate metabolism and spatially variable uptake of pyruvate. Spatially resolved changes in uptake and the pyruvate-to-lactate flux were observed in transgenic prostate tumors which were directly correlated to tumor cellularity and necrosis [41]. These findings highlight the value of this technique as a method to confirm drug delivery and drug target modulation before, or in the absence of, apoptosis and a reduction in tumor size.
The measurement of hyperpolarized pyruvate to lactate conversion is sensitive to a combination of enzymatic and transporter changes and does not always decrease as a result of treatment. In a provocative study, MCF-7 breast cancer and PC3 prostate cell lines were treated with the MEK (mitogen-activated protein kinase enzymes) inhibitor U0126 [42]. LDH activity was significantly increased in both cell lines, but the monocarboxylate transporter, MCT1, decreased in only the MCF-7 cell line and not in the PC3. As a result, hyperpolarized lactate production was significantly decreased in the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line but significantly increased in PC3 prostate cancer cell line following MEK inhibition. In these contexts, [18F]FDG-PET imaging can be potentially paired with HP-MR in such situations to provide excellent opportunities to interrogate therapeutic efficacy with glucose uptake in a multimodal metabolic imaging platform.
In addition to pyruvate, several other hyperpolarized substrates have been used to test the treatment efficacy of targeted therapies as shown in Table 1 and references therein. Hyperpolarized fumarate was used for detecting treatment response in tumors because the production of labeled malate would seem to be an unequivocal indicator of cell death [43,44,45]. An increased malate-to-fumarate ratio was reported in a breast cancer xenograft model after treating with the FDA approved drug, Sorafenib, which is a multi-kinase inhibitor [46]. Dehydroascorbic acid (DHA), a marker of cellular redox state [19,20], also showed promise for in vivo applications [47,48]. A number of new substrates are being tested as hyperpolarized imaging agents as listed in Table 1 [49,50,51].
Two other hyperpolarized Krebs cycle imaging probes have been developed, 13C labeled succinic acid [52] and its hydrophobic analog diethyl succinate [53,54,55]. These compounds have been polarized using both the DNP [56] and PHIP [52] polarization methods. These compounds convert to fumarate in vivo and in some cases to aspartate and malate. We observed changes in the conversion of hyperpolarized diethyl succinate 20 min after inhibitor 3-nitropropionate (a suicide inhibitor of succinate dehydrogenase) was administered [52]. This illustrates the ability of hyperpolarized succinate and its hydrophobic analog to measure the direct inhibition of enzymes involved in the Krebs cycle. In addition, we observed variable intratumoral metabolism and uptake with these two hyperpolarized compounds in mice bearing subcutaneous tumors of the kidney (RENCA), breast (4T1) or lymphoma (A20) [53].

3.2. Chemotherapy

Hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate injections were used to evaluate the early response of rats orthotopically implanted with U-87 MG human glioblastoma cells following treatment with Temozolomide [57]. The ratio of lactate-to-pyruvate signals was significantly reduced at the one and two-day time-points when compared to untreated controls. The volume of treated tumors did not shrink until five days post-treatment.
The conversion of hyperpolarized [5-13C]glutamine to glutamate was measured before and after the administration of the natural anticancer drugs Resveratrol and Sulforaphane to DU145 and PC3 prostate cancer cells [58]. There was a significant reduction of glutamate production following treatment, which corresponded to a 50% reduction of cell count in each cell line. Hyperpolarized glutamine imaging was also exploited in IDH1 mutated murine GBM models [59,60]. Glutamine is a key metabolite in multiple metabolic pathways, and there is considerable interest in developing glutamine as a hyperpolarized imaging agent.
Tumors may respond to therapy by both apoptotic and non-apoptotic mechanisms including necrosis. Early detection of necrosis is of great interest in observing a tumor’s response to therapy. Hyperpolarized fumarate, a Krebs cycle metabolite, has been used to image necrosis in a murine EL-4 lymphoma model, with the formation of malate [43,45]. Following treatment with a chemotherapeutic drug Etoposide, there was a significant increase (2-3 fold) in malate production that correlated with tumor cell necrosis. The rate and amount of hyperpolarized malate production were significantly higher in the treated cells and tumors compared those that were untreated.

3.3. Radiation Therapy

In a C6 glioma rat model, conversion of hyperpolarized pyruvate to lactate in the tumors significantly decreased as soon as 72 h following radiotherapy, compared to pre-therapy values [61]. Interestingly, tumors continued to grow during this time, but long-term, these animals lived over threefold longer than untreated animals and gained weight while possessing rejuvenated activity and appetite. The efficacy of ionizing radiation in squamous cell carcinoma (SCCVII) and colon cancer (HT-29) was evaluated using hyperpolarized 13C-pyruvate MRI [62]. Thus, HP-MR could potentially be a useful tool to distinguish between true progression and pseudo-progression in tumors. Combined radiation therapy with conventional chemotherapy response on thyroid cancer was assessed by hyperpolarized pyruvate to lactate conversion [63]. The feasibility of using 13C metabolic imaging with [1-13C]pyruvate to detect early radiation treatment response in a breast cancer xenograft model was demonstrated in vivo and in vitro. Significant decreases in hyperpolarized [1-13C] lactate relative to [1-13C]pyruvate were observed in MDA-MB-231 tumors 96 h following a single dose of ionizing radiation [64].

3.4. Ablation Therapy

In transgenic adenocarcinoma of the mouse prostate (TRAMP) models, the prostate cancer was treated with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation and imaged at several time-points [65]. The hyperpolarized pyruvate to lactate conversion was significantly reduced from pre-treatment values by three to four hours in the fully- and partially-ablated zones. However, at the one and five-day time-points, conversion remained significantly decreased in the fully ablated zones, which corresponded to cell death but had recovered in the partially-ablated zones. Thus, HP-MRI can be useful for both short-term and long-term treatment assessment.

3.5. Immunotherapy

Early assessment of cancer immunotherapy is an emerging area in diagnostic imaging. Cancer immunotherapy is employed by blocking the multiple negative regulatory proteins of T-cell activation known as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA4), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and programmed death 1 (PD1) [66]. Immunotherapy is exceptionally successful in treating melanoma cancer patients; however, not all patients respond to this treatment. Therefore, being able to assess the immunotherapy response early would be beneficial in clinical care. Our laboratory has recently reported significantly different metabolic signature between immunotherapy resistant and sensitive murine melanoma tumors using in vivo 13C-MRS of hyperpolarized pyruvate and ex vivo 1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy [67].
B16 melanoma tumor-bearing C57BL/G RAG-1 knockout mice were treated with CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1 blockade immunotherapy. The melanoma cancer cells extracted from non-responsive mice tumors in the first generation (F1) were injected into the next generation (F2) of mice and treated with immunotherapy, and this serial passage transfer continued up to the fourth generation (F4) as depicted in Figure 4. The initial mouse model in the first generation (F1) was described as immunotherapy sensitive, and the ones that were completely resistant to immunotherapy after the fourth serial passage of tumor cells were termed as immunotherapy resistant mouse models. These two cohorts of mice were picked up for HP-MR metabolic imaging trials. Pyruvate metabolism in melanoma mouse models treated with immunotherapy was well captured in real-time, and hyperpolarized pyruvate was readily metabolized to lactate. The quantitative ratio of lactate-to-pyruvate was determined and used as a treatment response marker of sensitive and resistant tumors. The lactate-to-pyruvate ratios were significantly higher in resistant tumors compared to sensitive tumors (p < 0.01). The differences in these ratios among the tumors were observed much sooner than the tumor volume shrinkage. In NMR metabolomics study on ex vivo tissue samples, a high level of lactate concentration in immunotherapy resistant tumors was observed which validates the in vivo results. This study demonstrates that metabolic imaging with hyperpolarized pyruvate and NMR metabolomics can distinguish immunotherapy resistant and sensitive tumors at an early time point. These exciting results also suggest that checkpoint blockade immunotherapy resistant tumors acquired hypermetabolic states with upregulated glycolysis to evade the immune response [67].
A table summarizing the different hyperpolarized compounds and their converted metabolites interrogating different enzymatic pathways are shown below.

4. Current Challenges for HP-MR Imaging Modality

For in vivo applications of metabolic imaging to be a reality, several important features are critical. Since hyperpolarized compounds agents are administered intravenously as a concentrated bolus (mM range), toxicity may limit the dose delivered. Transport of the agent into the cellular compartment or organ of interest is an important consideration along with the rate of metabolic conversion of the agent after it is internalized. In addition, the metabolic products of the hyperpolarized compound must have long longitudinal relaxation times (T1) to be observed in the time-scale of most HP-experiments (1–2 min). The current challenges in hyperpolarization research lie in improving methods for fast imaging [68], analyzing real-time kinetic data of metabolic conversion [69], interpreting the underlying biochemical meaning of these parameters, understanding the linkage of measured metabolite fluxes to underlying fluxes, establishing meaningful parameters from a radiological point of view, and translating new substrates to the clinic [70,71].
Despite all these challenges, GE Healthcare’s SPINLab polarizer has been approved for clinical use of DNP and has been used in Phase I trials for the diagnosis of prostate, brain, breast cancer, as well as in cardiac applications [72]. The first clinical trial with hyperpolarized 13C pyruvate was performed in patients with prostate cancer [73]. The trial revealed that 13C pyruvate was well tolerated by patients at high doses and was able to detect biopsy-proven tumor lesions. To date, over seven sites have performed clinical hyperpolarization trials using the SPINlab polarizer, and more than 20 such polarizers have been installed around the world.

5. Conclusion and Future Directions

Improved imaging of metabolism with hyperpolarization may enable precise clinical monitoring of metabolism in patients on specific therapies. As part of the comprehensive characterization of patients, this will lead to an improved prognostication, prediction, efficient development, and deployment of targeted metabolic therapies. The first clinical trial established the feasibility of imaging human tumors with hyperpolarized pyruvate. The power of metabolic imaging with hyperpolarized substrates is that it gives information on dynamic processes in real time. However, its weakness is that there is no data on the concentrations of the labeled substrates and, therefore, no quantitative information on flux expressed as molar concentration. Although measurements of changes in this apparent first-order rate constant have been demonstrated to be sufficient to detect treatment response in laboratory-based studies, this will need to be scrutinized in clinical studies. In summary, hyperpolarized MR based metabolic imaging technique has the potential to transform patient care by precisely and non –invasively assessing candidate “metabolic targets” before, during, and following disruptive metabolic interventions.

Funding

This research was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (P50CA094056, U54CA151668, R21CA181994, 2R44CA206771 to S.W.M., R01CA184208 to D.F., R01CA234479, R03CA235113, R03CA212816 to B.A.K., R21CA185536 to P.B.), Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (16-65-BHAT to P.B. and F.M.), Institutional Research Grant (to P.B. and N.Z), CDMRP PC110065 (N.Z.), Colleen’s Dream Foundation (N.Z.), startup grants from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (to F.M., S.W.M., D.F. and P.B.), a grant from the Gulf Coast Consortium (to P.B.), G.E. In-kind Multi-investigator Imaging (MI2) Research Award (to S.W.M. and P.B.) and generous philanthropic contributions to Koch Foundation Genitourinary Medical Oncology Funds (to P.B. and C.L.) and the University of Texas MD Anderson Moon Shots Program (to D.F.). This work was also supported by a CPRIT Research Training Grant Award (RP170067 to T.C.S.) and a GCC/Keck Center CCBTP postdoctoral fellowship (CPRIT RP170593 to S.P.).

Acknowledgments

We thank Anna Romanowska-Pawliczek for assistance with the manuscript preparation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

HP-MRhyperpolarized magnetic resonance
MRIMagnetic resonance imaging
MRMagnetic resonance
MRSMagnetic resonance spectroscopy
NMRNuclear magnetic resonance
DNPDynamic nuclear polarization
PHIPParahydrogen induced polarization
SABRESignal amplification by reversible exchange
TRAMPTransgenic mouse prostate cancer model
PDXPatient derived xenograft
AMLAcute myeloid leukemia
LDHLactate dehydrogenase
NADHNicotinamide adenine dinucleotide
GLUT5Glucose transporter type-5
ALTAlanine transaminase
GLSGlutaminase
IDHIsocitrate dehydrogenases
BCATBranched-chain aminotransferases
PETPositron emission tomography
FDGFluoro-deoxy-glucose
BPTESBis-2-(5-phenylacetamido-1,2,4-diathiazol-2-yl) ethyl sulfide
DIDS4,4’-diisothiocyanostilbene-2,2’-disulfonic acid
HIFHypoxia-inducible factor
PSAProstate-specific antigen
HIFUHigh-intensity focused ultrasound
kPLApparent rate constant
lac/pyrLactate-to-Pyruvate ratio
CTLA4Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4
PD-L1Programmed death-ligand 1
PD1Programmed death 1

References

  1. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell 2011, 144, 646–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Warburg, O. On the origin of cancer cells. Science 1956, 123, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kelloff, G.J.; Hoffman, J.M.; Johnson, B.; Scher, H.I.; Siegel, B.A.; Cheng, E.Y.; Cheson, B.D.; O’shaughnessy, J.; Guyton, K.Z.; Mankoff, D.A.; et al. Progress and promise of FDG-PET imaging for cancer patient management and oncologic drug development. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005, 11, 2785–2808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bhattacharya, P.K.; Ross, B.D.; Bünger, R. Cardiovascular Applications of Hyperpolarized Contrast Media and Metabolic Tracers. Exp. Biol. Med. 2009, 234, 1395–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Golman, K.; Zandt, R.; Lerche, M.; Pehrson, R.; Ardenkjaer-Larsen, J.H. Metabolic imaging by hyperpolarized 13C magnetic resonance imaging for in vivo tumor diagnosis. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 10855–10860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Brindle, K.M. New approaches for imaging tumour responses to treatment. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2008, 8, 94–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kurhanewicz, J.; Vigneron, D.B.; Brindle, K.M.; Chekmenev, E.Y.; Comment, A.; Cunningham, C.H.; Deberardinis, R.; Green, G.G.; Leach, M.O.; Rajan, S.S.; et al. Analysis of cancer metabolism by imaging hyperpolarized nuclei: Prospects for translation to clinical research. Neoplasia 2011, 13, 81–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Dutta, P.; Le, A.; Vander Jagt, D.L.; Tsukamoto, T.; Martinez, G.V.; Dang, C.V.; Gillies, R.J. Evaluation of LDH-A and glutaminase inhibition in vivo by hyperpolarized 13C pyruvate magnetic resonance spectroscopy of tumors. Cancer Res. 2013, 73, 4190–4195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Rajeshkumar, N.V.; Dutta, P.; Yabuuchi, S.; de Wilde, R.F.; Martinez, G.V.; Le, A.; Kamphorst, J.J.; Rabinowitz, J.D.; Jain, S.K.; Hidalgo, M.; et al. Therapeutic targeting of the warburg effect in pancreatic cancer relies on an absence of p53 function. Cancer Res. 2015, 75, 3355–3364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Keshari, K.R.; Wilson, D.M.; Chen, A.P.; Bok, R.; Peder, E.Z. Hyperpolarized [2-13C]-Fructose: A Hemiketal DNP Substrate for In Vivo Metabolic Imaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 131, 17591–17596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ardenkjaer-Larsen, J.H.; Fridlund, B.; Gram, A.; Hansson, G.; Hansson, L.; Lerche, M.H.; Servin, R.; Thaning, M.; Golman, K. Increase in signal-to-noise ratio of >10,000 times in liquid-state NMR. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 10158–10163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lee, Y.; Zacharias, N.; Piwnica-Worms, D.; Bhattacharya, P.K. Chemical reaction-induced multi-molecular polarization (CRIMP). Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 13030–13033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hövener, J.-B.; Pravdivtsev, A.N.; Kidd, B.; Bowers, C.R.; Glöggler, S.; Kovtunov, K.V.; Plaumann, M.; Katz-Brull, R.; Buckenmaier, K.; Jerschow, A.; et al. Parahydrogen-based hyperpolarization for biomedicine. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 11140–11162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bowers, C.R.; Weitekamp, D.P. Parahydrogen and synthesis allow dramatically enhanced nuclear alignment. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 5541–5542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Reineri, F.; Boi, T.; Aime, S. Parahydrogen induced polarization of 13C carboxylate resonance in acetate and pyruvate. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 5858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Cavallari, E.; Carrera, C.; Aime, S.; Reineri, F. Metabolic studies of tumor cells using [1-(13)C] pyruvate hyperpolarized by means of phip-side arm hydrogenation. Chem. Phys. Chem. 2019, 20, 318–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Adams, R.W.; Aguilar, J.A.; Atkinson, K.D.; Cowley, M.J.; Elliott, P.I.P.; Duckett, S.B.; Green, G.G.R.; Khazal, I.G.; López-Serrano, J.; Williamson, D.C.; et al. Reversible interactions with para-hydrogen enhance NMR sensitivity by polarization transfer. Science 2009, 323, 1708–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Shchepin, R.V.; Truong, M.L.; Theis, T.; Coffey, A.M.; Shi, F.; Waddell, K.W.; Warren, W.S.; Goodson, B.M.; Chekmenev, E.Y. Hyperpolarization of “Neat” liquids by NMR signal amplification by reversible exchange. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 1961–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Day, S.E.; Kettunen, M.I.; Gallagher, F.A.; Hu, D.E.; Lerche, M.; Wolber, J.; Golman, K.; Ardenkjaer-Larsen, J.H.; Brindle, K.M. Detecting tumor response to treatment using hyperpolarized 13C magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 1382–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Benito, J.; Ramirez, M.S.; Millward, N.Z.; Velez, J.; Harutyunyan, K.G.; Lu, H.; Shi, Y.; Matre, P.; Jacamo, R.; Ma, H.; et al. Hypoxia-activated prodrug TH-302 targets hypoxic bone marrow niches in pre-clinical leukemia models. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015, 22, 1687–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ward, C.S.; Venkatesh, H.S.; Chaumeil, M.M.; Brandes, A.H.; Vancriekinge, M.; Dafni, H.; Sukumar, S.; Nelson, S.J.; Vigneron, D.B.; Kurhanewicz, J.; et al. Noninvasive detection of target modulation following phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibition using hyperpolarized 13C magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 1296–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sriram, R.; Criekingea, M.V.; Hansenb, A.; Wanga, Z.J.; Vigneron, D.B.; Wilson, D.M.; Keshari, K.R.; Kurhanewicz, J. Real-time measurement of hyperpolarized lactate production and efflux as a biomarker of tumor aggressiveness in an MR compatible 3D cell culture bioreactor. NMR Biomed. 2015, 28, 1141–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hu, S.; Balakrishnan, A.; Bok, R.A.; Anderton, B.; Larson, P.E.Z.; Nelson, S.J.; Kurhanewicz, J.; Vigneron, D.B.; Goga, A. 13C-Pyruvate imaging reveals alterations in glycolysis that precede c-Myc-induced tumor formation and regression. Cell Metab. 2011, 14, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Simpson, R.J.; Brindle, K.M.; Brown, F.F.; Campbell, I.D.; Foxall, D.L. Studies of lactate dehydrogenase in the purified state and in intact erythrocytes. Biochem. J. 1982, 202, 581–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Walker, C.M.; Merritt, M.; Wang, J.X.; Bankson, J.A. Use of a multi-compartment dynamic single enzyme phantom for studies of hyperpolarized magnetic resonance agents. J. Vis. Exp. 2016, 110, e53607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tee, S.S.; Suster, I.; Truong, S.; Jeong, S.; Eskandari, R.; DiGialleonardo, V.; Alvarez, J.A.; Aldeborgh, H.N.; Keshari, K.R. Targeted AKT inhibition in prostate cancer cells and spheroids reduces aerobic glycolysis and generation of hyperpolarized [1-13C] lactate. Mol. Cancer Res. 2018, 16, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Keshari, K.R.; Wilson, D.M.; Criekinge, M.V.; Sriram, R.; Bertram, L.; Koelsch, B.L.; Wang, Z.J.; VanBrocklin, H.F.; Peeh, D.M.; O’Brien, T.; et al. Metabolic response of prostate cancer to nicotinamide phophoribosyltransferase inhibition in a hyperpolarized MR/PET compatible bioreactor. Prostate 2015, 75, 1601–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Aggarwal, R.; Vigneron, D.B.; Kurhanewicz, J. Hyperpolarized [1-13C]-Pyruvate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Detects an Early Metabolic Response to Androgen Ablation Therapy in Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2017, 72, 1028–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zacharias, N.M.; McCullough, C.; Shanmugavelandy, S.; Lee, J.; Lee, Y.; Dutta, P.; McHenry, J.; Nguyen, L.; Norton, W.; Jones, L.W.; et al. Metabolic differences in glutamine utilization lead to metabolic vulnerabilities in prostate cancer. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zacharias, N.M.; Lee, J.; Ramachandran, S.; Shanmugavelandy, S.; McHenry, J.; Dutta, P.; Millward, S.; Gammon, S.; Efstathiou, E.; Troncoso, P.; et al. Androgen receptor signaling in castration-resistant prostate cancer tumor alters hyperpolarized pyruvate to lactate conversion and lactate levels in vivo. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2019, 21, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Aparicio, A.M.; Shen, L.; Tapia, E.L.; Lu, J.F.; Chen, H.C.; Zhang, J.; Wu, G.; Wang, X.; Troncoso, P.; Corn, P.; et al. Combined tumor suppressor defects characterize clinically defined aggressive variant prostate cancers. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 22, 1520–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Maity, S.N.; Titus, M.A.; Gyftaki, R.; Wu, G.; Lu, J.F.; Ramachandran, S.; Li-Ning-Tapia, E.M.; Logothetis, C.J.; Araujo, J.C. Efstathiou, E. Targeting of cyp17a1 lyase by vt-464 inhibits adrenal and intratumoral androgen biosynthesis and tumor growth of castration resistant prostate cancer. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tzelepi, V.; Zhang, J.; Lu, J.F.; Kleb, B.; Wu, G.; Wan, X.; Hoang, A.; Efstathiou, E.; Sircar, K.; Navone, N.M. Modeling a lethal prostate cancer variant with small-cell carcinoma features. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012, 18, 666–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zacharias, N.M.; Baran, N.; Shanmugavelandy, S.S.; Lee, J.; Lujan, J.V.; Dutta, P.; Millward, S.W.; Tianyu, C.; Wood, C.G.; Piwnica-Worms, D.; et al. Assessing Metabolic Intervention with a Glutaminase Inhibitor in Real-time by Hyperpolarized Magnetic Resonance in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2019. accepted. [Google Scholar]
  35. Chaumeil, M.M.; Ozawa, T.; Park, I.; Scott, K.; James, C.D.; Nelson, S.J.; Ronen, S.M. Hyperpolarized 13C MR spectroscopic imaging can be used to monitor Everolimus treatment in vivo in an orthotopic rodent model of glioblastoma. Neuroimage 2012, 59, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dong, Y.; Eskandari, R.; Ray, C.; Granlund, K.L.; Santos-Cunha, L.D.; Miloushev, V.Z.; Tee, S.S.; Jeong, S.; Aras, O.; Chen, Y.B.; et al. Hyperpolarized MRI visualizes warburg effects and predicts treatment response to mTOR inhibitors in patient-derived ccRCC xenograft models. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 242–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Seth, P.; Grant, A.; Tang, J.; Vinogradov, E.; Wang, X.; Lenkinski, R.; Sukhatme, V.P. On-target inhibition of tumor fermentative glycolysis as visualized by hyperpolarized pyruvate. Neoplasia 2011, 13, 60–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Matsumoto, S.; Saito, K.; Yasui, H.; Morris, H.D.; Munasinghe, J.P.; Lizak, M.; Merkle, H.; Ardenkjaer-Larsen, J.H.; Choudhuri, R.; Devasahayam, N.; et al. EPR oxygen imaging and hyperpolarized 13C MRI of pyruvate metabolism as noninvasive biomarkers of tumor treatment response to a glycolysis inhibitor 3-bromopyruvate. Magn. Reson. Med. 2013, 69, 1443–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Scroggins, B.T.; Matsuo, M.; White, A.O.; Saito, K.; Munasinghe, J.P.; Sourbier, C.; Yamamoto, K.; Diaz, V.; Takakusagi, Y.; Ichikawa, K.; et al. Hyperpolarized [1-13C]-Pyruvate Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging of Prostate Cancer In Vivo Predicts Efficacy of Targeting the Warburg Effect. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 24, 3137–3148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bankson, J.A.; Walker, C.M.; Ramirez, M.S.; Stefan, W.; Fuentes, D.; Merritt, M.E.; Lee, J.; Sandulache, V.C.; Chen, Y.; Phan, L.; et al. Kinetic modeling and constrained reconstruction of hyperpolarized 1-13C-pyruvate offers improved metabolic imaging of tumors. Cancer Res. 2015, 75, 4708–4717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Larson, P.E.; Bok, R.; Kerr, A.B.; Lustig, M.; Hu, S.; Chen, A.P.; Nelson, S.J.; Pauly, J.M.; Kurhanewicz, J.; Vigneron, D.B. Investigation of tumor hyperpolarized [1-13C]-pyruvate dynamics using time-resolved multiband RF excitation echo-planar MRSI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2010, 63, 582–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lodi, A.; Woods, S.M.; Ronen, S.M. Treatment with the MEK inhibitor U0126 induces decreased hyperpolarized pyruvate to lactate conversion in breast, but not prostate, cancer cells. NMR Biomed. 2013, 26, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gallagher, F.A.; Kettunen, M.I.; Hu, D.E.; Jensen, P.R.; Zandt, R.I.; Karlsson, M.; Gisselsson, A.; Nelson, S.K.; Witney, T.H.; Bohndiek, S.E.; et al. Production of hyperpolarized [1,4-13C2]malate from [1,4-13C2]fumarate is a marker of cell necrosis and treatment response in tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 19801–19806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Witney, T.H.; Kettunen, T.H.; Hu, D.-E.; Gallagher, F.A.; Bohndiek, S.E.; Napolitano, R.; Brindle, K.M. Detecting treatment response in a model of human breast adenocarcinoma using hyperpolarised [1-13C]pyruvate and [1,4-13C2]fumarate. Br. J. Cancer 2010, 103, 1400–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bohndiek, S.E.; Kettunen, M.I.; Hu, D.E.; Witney, T.H.; Kennedy, B.; Gallagher, F.A.; Brindle, K.M. Detection of Tumor Response to a Vascular Disrupting Agent by Hyperpolarized 13C Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2010, 9, 3278–3288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mignion, L.; Dutta, P.; Martinez, G.V.; Foroutan, P.; Gillies, R.J.; Jordan, B.F. Monitoring chemotherapeutic response by hyperpolarized 13C-fumarate MRS and diffusion MRI. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 686–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bohndiek, S.E.; Kettunen, M.I.; Hu, D.E.; Kennedy, B.W.; Boren, J.; Gallagher, F.A.; Brindle, K.M. Hyperpolarized [1-13C]-ascorbic and dehydroascorbic acid: Vitamin C as a probe for imaging redox status in vivo. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 11795–11801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Keshari, K.R.; Kurhanewicz, J.; Bok, R.; Larson, P.E.Z.; Vigneron, D.B.; Wilson, D.M. Hyperpolarized 13C dehydroascorbate as an endogenous redox sensor for in vivo metabolic imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 18606–18611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Najac, C.; Chaumeil, M.M.; Kohanbash, G.; Guglielmetti, C.; Gordon, J.W.; Okada, H.; Ronen, S.B. Detection of inflammatory cell function using 13C magnetic resonance spectroscopy of hyperpolarized [6-13C]-arginine. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 31397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Karlsson, M.; Jensen, P.R.; Zandt, R.; Gisselsson, A.; Hansson, G.; Duus, J.Ø.; Meier, S.; Lerche, M.H. Imaging of branched chain amino acid metabolism in tumors with hyperpolarized 13C ketoisocaproate. Int. J. Cancer 2010, 127, 729–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Billingsley, K.L.; Park, J.M.; Josan, S.; Hurd, R.; Mayer, D.; Spielman-Sun, E.; Nishimura, D.J.; Brooks, J.D.; Spielman, D. The feasibility of assessing branched-chain amino acid metabolism in cellular models of prostate cancer with hyperpolarized [1-13C]-ketoisocaproate. Magn. Reson. Imag. 2014, 32, 791–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Chekmenev, E.Y.; Hovener, J.; Norton, V.A.; Harris, K.; Batchelder, L.S.; Bhattacharya, P.; Ross, B.D.; Weitekamp, D.P. PASADENA hyperpolarization of succinic acid for MRI and NMR spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 4212–4213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zacharias, N.M.; Chan, H.R.; Sailasuta, N.; Ross, B.D.; Bhattacharya, P. Real-time molecular imaging of tricarboxylic acid cycle metabolism in vivo by hyperpolarized 1-(13)C diethyl succinate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 934–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zacharias, N.M.; McCullough, C.R.; Wagner, S.; Sailasuta, N.; Chan, H.R.; Lee, Y.; Hu, J.; Perman, W.H.; Henneberg, C.; Ross, B.D.; et al. Towards real-time metabolic profiling of cancer with hyperpolarized succinate. J. Mol. Imaging Dyn. 2016, 6, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jeong, G.; Lee, J.; Gong, G.; Ko, H.; Choi, I.; Seo, H.; Lee, Y.; Zacharias, N.M.; Bhattacharya, P.K. Bio-interfacial magnetic resonance imaging of hyperpolarized contrast agents for metabolic flux interrogation in vivo. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2016, 36, 224–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Billingsley, K.L.; Josan, S.; Park, J.M.; Tee, S.S.; Spielman-Sun, E.; Hurd, R.; Mayer, D.; Spielman, D. Hyperpolarized [1,4-(13)c]-diethylsuccinate: A potential DNP substrate for in vivo metabolic imaging. NMR Biomed. 2014, 27, 356–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Park, I.; Bok, R.; Ozawa, T.; Phillips, J.J.; James, C.D.; Vigneron, D.B.; Ronen, S.B.; Nelson, S.J. Detection of Early Response to Temozolomide Treatment in Brain Tumors Using Hyperpolarized 13C MR Metabolic Imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 2011, 33, 1284–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Canapè, C.; Catanzaro, G.; Terreno, E.; Karlsson, M.; Lerche, M.H.; Jensen, P.R. Probing treatment response of glutaminolytic prostate cancer cells to natural drugs with hyperpolarized [5-13C]glutamine. Magn. Reson. Med. 2015, 73, 2296–2305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chaumeil, M.M.; Larson, P.E.Z.; Yoshihara, H.A.I.; Danforth, O.M.; Vigneron, D.B.; Nelson, S.J.; Pieper, R.O.; Phillips, J.J.; Ronen, S.M. Non-invasive in vivo assessment of IDH1 mutational status in glioma. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cardona, L.S.; Shah, H.; Poot, A.J.; Correa, F.M.; Gialleonardo, V.D.; Lui, H.; Miloushev, V.Z.; Granlund, K.L.; Tee, S.S.; Cross, J.R.; Thompson, C.B.; et al. In vivo imaging of glutamine metabolism to the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate in IDH1/2 mutant tumors. Cell Metab. 2017, 26, 830–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Day, S.E.; Kettunen, M.I.; Cherukuri, M.K.; Mitchell, J.B.; Lizak, M.J.; Morris, H.D.; Koretsky, A.P.; Brindle, K.M. Detecting response of rat C6 glioma tumors to radiotherapy using hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate and 13C magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 2011, 65, 557–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Saito, K.; Matsumoto, S.; Takakusagi, Y.; Matsuo, M.; Morris, H.D.; Lizak, M.J.; Munasinghe, J.P.; Devasahayam, N.; Subramanian, S.; Mitchell, J.B.; et al. 13C-MR spectroscopic imaging with hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate detects early response to radiotherapy in SCC tumors and HT-29 tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015, 21, 5073–5081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sandulache, V.C.; Skinner, H.D.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Dodge, C.T. Glycolytic inhibition alters anaplastic thyroid carcinoma tumor metabolism and improves response to conventional chemotherapy and radiation. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2012, 11, 1373–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Chen, A.P.; Chu, W.; Gu, Y.P.; Cunnhingham, C.H. Probing early tumor response to radiation therapy using hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate in MDA-MB-231 xenografts. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e56551. [Google Scholar]
  65. Lee, J.E.; Diederich, C.J.; Bok, R.; Sriram, R.; Santos, R.D.; Noworolski, S.M.; Salgaonkar, V.A.; Adams, M.S.; Vigneron, D.B.; Kurhanewicz, J. Assessing high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment of prostate cancer with hyperpolarized 13C dual-agent imaging of metabolism and perfusion. NMR Biomed. 2018, e3962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Curran, M.A.; Montalvo, W.; Yagita, H.; Allison, J.P. PD-1 and CTLA-4 combination blockade expands infiltrating T cells and reduces regulatory T and myeloid cells within B16 melanoma tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 4275–4280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Jaiswal, A.R.; Liu, A.; Pudakalakatti, S.; Dutta, P.; Jayaprakash, P.; Bartkowiak, T.; Ager, C.R.; Wang, Z.Q.; Reuben, A.; Cooper, Z.A.; et al. Melanoma evolves complete immunotherapy resistance through acquisition of a hypermetabolic phenotype. Cancer Immuno. Res. 2019. accepted. [Google Scholar]
  68. Daniels, C.J.; McLean, M.A.; Schulte, R.F.; Robb, F.J.; Gill, A.B.; McGlashan, N.; Graves, M.J.; Schwaiger, M.; Lomas, D.J.; Brindle, K.M.; et al. A comparison of quantitative methods for clinical imaging with hyperpolarized 13C-pyruvate. NMR Biomed. 2016, 29, 387–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sun, C.; Walker, C.M.; Michel, K.A.; Venkatesan, A.M.; Lai, S.Y.; Bankson, J.A. Influence of parameter accuracy on pharmacokinetic analysis of hyperpolarized pyruvate. Magn. Reson. Med. 2018, 79, 3239–3248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Keshari, K.R.; Wilson, D.M. Chemistry and biochemistry of 13C hyperpolarized magnetic resonance using dynamic nuclear polarization. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 1627–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zacharias, N.M.; Ornelas, A.; Lee, J.; Hu, J.; Davis, J.S.; Uddin, N.; Pudakalakatti, S.; Menter, D.J.; Karam, J.A.; Wood, C.J.; et al. Real-Time Interrogation of Aspirin Reactivity, Biochemistry, and Biodistribution by Hyperpolarized Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 4179–4183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kurhanewicz, J.; Vigneron, D.B.; Ardenkjaer-Larsen, J.H.; Bankson, J.A.; Brindle, K.; Cunningham, C.H.; Gallagher, F.A.; Keshari, K.R.; Kjaer, A.; Laustsen, C.; et al. Hyperpolarized 13C MRI: Path to Clinical Translation in Oncology. Neoplasia 2019, 1, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Nelson, S.J.; Kurhanewicz, J.; Vigneron, D.B.; Larson, P.E.; Harzstark, A.L.; Ferrone, M.; Criekinge, M.V.; Chang, J.W.; Bok, R.; Park, I.; et al. Metabolic imaging of patients with prostate cancer using hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate. Sci. Transl. Med. 2013, 5, 198ra108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cells 08 00340 g001 550
Figure 1. A schematic of glycolysis and Krebs cycle metabolic pathways.
Figure 1. A schematic of glycolysis and Krebs cycle metabolic pathways.
Cells 08 00340 g001
Cells 08 00340 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of (A) DNP and (B) PHIP techniques.
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of (A) DNP and (B) PHIP techniques.
Cells 08 00340 g002
Cells 08 00340 g003 550
Figure 3. A representative example showing the application of hyperpolarized MRI and MRS in assessing response in liver tumor before and 72 h after MYC inhibition by Doxycycline (DOXY). A decrease in lactate is observed in the indicated voxel shown in red. Adapted from Reference [23] with permission.
Figure 3. A representative example showing the application of hyperpolarized MRI and MRS in assessing response in liver tumor before and 72 h after MYC inhibition by Doxycycline (DOXY). A decrease in lactate is observed in the indicated voxel shown in red. Adapted from Reference [23] with permission.
Cells 08 00340 g003
Cells 08 00340 g004 550
Figure 4. A schematic illustration of immunotherapy responding and non-responding tumors that are employed for hyperpolarized metabolic imaging trials and corresponding metabolic profiling.
Figure 4. A schematic illustration of immunotherapy responding and non-responding tumors that are employed for hyperpolarized metabolic imaging trials and corresponding metabolic profiling.
Cells 08 00340 g004
Table
Table 1. Hyperpolarized compounds and converted metabolites interrogating different enzymatic pathways.
Table 1. Hyperpolarized compounds and converted metabolites interrogating different enzymatic pathways.
Hyperpolarized CompoundsDownstream MetabolitesActive EnzymesSelective DrugsReferences
PyruvateLactate, AlanineLDH, ALTFX11, Etoposide, Temezolomide, α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamate, Everolimus, Rapamycin, DIDS, Immunotherapy (anti CTLA-4, PD-1)[8,9,19,22,35,36,38,57,67]
FumarateMalateFumaraseSorafenib, Etoposide[43,44,45,46]
GlutamineGlutamateGLSBPTES, CB-839, Resveratrol, Sulforaphane[8,34,58]
Diethyl succinateFumarateSDH3-nitropropionate[53]
KetoisocaproateLeucineBCAT [50,51]
ArginineUreaArginase [49]
Fructoseβ-fructofuranose-6-phosphate, β-fructofuranoseHexokinase, GLUT5 [10]
α-Ketoglutarate2-hydroxyglutarateIDH [59,60]
AcetateAcetyl-CoA, Acetyl- carnitineAcetyl-CoA, Carnitine [13,15]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dutta, P.; Salzillo, T.C.; Pudakalakatti, S.; Gammon, S.T.; Kaipparettu, B.A.; McAllister, F.; Wagner, S.; Frigo, D.E.; Logothetis, C.J.; Zacharias, N.M.; et al. Assessing Therapeutic Efficacy in Real-time by Hyperpolarized Magnetic Resonance Metabolic Imaging. Cells 2019, 8, 340. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8040340

AMA Style

Dutta P, Salzillo TC, Pudakalakatti S, Gammon ST, Kaipparettu BA, McAllister F, Wagner S, Frigo DE, Logothetis CJ, Zacharias NM, et al. Assessing Therapeutic Efficacy in Real-time by Hyperpolarized Magnetic Resonance Metabolic Imaging. Cells. 2019; 8(4):340. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8040340

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dutta, Prasanta, Travis C. Salzillo, Shivanand Pudakalakatti, Seth T. Gammon, Benny A. Kaipparettu, Florencia McAllister, Shawn Wagner, Daniel E. Frigo, Christopher J. Logothetis, Niki M. Zacharias, and et al. 2019. "Assessing Therapeutic Efficacy in Real-time by Hyperpolarized Magnetic Resonance Metabolic Imaging" Cells 8, no. 4: 340. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8040340

APA Style

Dutta, P., Salzillo, T. C., Pudakalakatti, S., Gammon, S. T., Kaipparettu, B. A., McAllister, F., Wagner, S., Frigo, D. E., Logothetis, C. J., Zacharias, N. M., & Bhattacharya, P. K. (2019). Assessing Therapeutic Efficacy in Real-time by Hyperpolarized Magnetic Resonance Metabolic Imaging. Cells, 8(4), 340. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8040340

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop